Yup. That crazy mf neighbour or that obnoxious coworker, the crazy church Karen? They vote. Want them to make the rules for you? If not, then better vote.
Stubb on kuin EU-federalistien ohjelmoima robotti, joka ei keinoja kaihda viedessään Suomea liittovaltioon. Se valehtelee, se vääntyilee, se kiertää. Me voimme yhdessä estää Cai-Göranin pääsyn presidentiksi => Nolla ääni on ääni Stubbille, pelleääni myös. Kokoomuksen kannattajat ovat aktiivisimmat äänestäjät, eli mitä alhaisempi äänestysprosentti hyväksyttyjen äänien suhteen, sitä suurempi kokoomuksen kannatus. Pekka Haavisto kehui Hitleriä, se vaatii munaa, hän saa ääneni toisella kierroksella. Ja ne, jotka pitävät homoutta konkreettisena ongelmana, ovat syvällä unessa. Ei käsitystä, miten suuria ja laajoja tämän maan ongelmat ovat. Huomautetaan myös, ettei Zelenskyikään ole suorittanut asepalvelusta. "PS:n Arto Luukkaselta kovia lausuntoja Pekka Haaviston Hitler-viittauksista - Haaviston mukaan siteerattiin väärin vaalikirjassa Perussuomalaisten puoluesihteeri Arto Luukkanen syyttää Pekka Haavistoa natsismista ja kirjoittaa Antti Lindtmanin ”natsiorgioista”. Arto Luukkanen on ollut aktiivinen blogissaan ja Twitterissä. Jenni Gästgivar / Iltalehti Tekijän kuva Sampo Lepistö torstai 20.7.2023 klo 17:39 Perussuomalaisten puoluesihteeri Arto Luukkanen pui blogissaan Adolf Hitleriin viittaavaa kohtaa kansanedustaja Pekka Haaviston (vihr) vuoden 2012 presidentinvaalikampanjasta kertovassa kirjassa. Lisäksi hän puhuu SDP:n puheenjohtajakisassa mukana olevan Antti Lindtmanin (sd) ”natsiorgioista”, joilla hän viittaa hiljattain julkisuudessa olleisiin Lindtmanin nuoruuskuviin. Luukkanen on myös syyttänyt blogiteksteissään mediaa valikoivuudesta ja ”Pjongjang-journalismista”. Luukkanen on kommentoinut viimeaikaisia perussuomalaisiin liittyneitä rasismikohuja yhteensä neljässä heinäkuussa julkaistussa blogitekstissään, jotka on julkaistu Uuden Suomen Puheenvuorot-blogialustalla. Uusi Suomi poisti sittemmin yhden Luukkasen teksteistä. Uuden Suomen päätoimittaja Jenni Tamminen kertoi Helsingin Sanomille, että teksti poistettiin sääntöjen vastaisena. Arto Luukkanen, mistä näissä teksteissä on kyse? - Kannattaa lukea ensin ne kirjoitukset. Siitähän se aika hyvin selviää, Luukkanen sanoo Iltalehdelle. Olen lukenut ne. - Ei siinä mitään, kannattaa lukea ne ja siinä se koko viesti on. En minä halua niitä nyt enempää kommentoida. Ihmiset lukevat ne, ja jos miellyttää, niin hyvä, mutta jos ei, niin ei se mitään. Se on sitä demokratiaa. Pekka Haaviston mukaan häntä siteerattiin väärin vaalikirjassa. Henri Kärkkäinen Kelan kynästä Luukkanen ottaa blogissaan esiin Haaviston kampanjasta kertovassa kirjassa olleen Adolf Hitleriä koskevan kohdan ja toivoo, että Haavisto ”astuisi esiin”. Kyse on vuonna 2012 julkaistusta kirjasta Sydänten presidentti. Kirjan ovat toimittaneet ja suurimmaksi osaksi kirjoittaneet Riikka Kämppi ja Jussi Lähde. Lisäksi mukana on monia vierailevia kirjoittajia, jotka ovat olleet mukana kampanjassa. Kyseessä oleva kohta ei ole suora lainaus Haavistolta, vaan osa hieman yli kolmen sivun mittaista osiota Tarinankertojan matkassa, jonka on kirjoittanut muusikko Anssi Kela. - Pekka pohtii idealismia yllättävästä kulmasta. Hän sanoo, että Hitler olisi loppujen lopuksi voinut olla Saksalle ihan kelpo johtaja, jos olisi vain hiukan tinkinyt näkemyksistään. Ei olisi edes tarvinnut muuttaa paljoa: olisi vain suhtautunut juutalaisiin hiukan lungimmin ja tyytynyt vähempään elintilaan. Pieniä asennemuutoksia yhden ihmisen päässä, ja koko ihmiskunnan historia olisi kirjoitettu toisella tavalla, Kela kirjoittaa kirjan sivulla 245. Osiossa, josta katkelma on peräisin, muistellaan Kelan ja Haaviston käymää keskustelua kampanjakiertueella, jonka aikana he pohtivat Haaviston edustaman ”idealismin” ja silloisen presidenttiehdokkaan, nykyisen tasavallan presidentin Sauli Niinistön, edustaman ”realismin” suhdetta. Lisäksi Kela kuvailee Haaviston tapaa rakentaa siltoja ja käydä keskustelua myös sellaisten ihmisten välillä, joiden ajatukset eroavat Haaviston omista. Kela viittaa tekstissä muun muassa Haaviston vierailuun europarlamentaarikko Teuvo Hakkaraisen (ps) luona sen jälkeen, kun Hakkarainen esitti, että ”kaikki homot pitäisi heivata Ahvenanmaalle”. Haavisto itse on homoseksuaali. ”Ehdoton ei” Luukkanen toteaa, että natsismille on oltava Suomessa ”ehdoton ei”. Hän ei halua kommentoida entisen elinkeinoministerin Vilhelm Junnilan (ps) tapausta. Junnila joutui eroamaan ministerin tehtävästä muun muassa esiin nousseiden natsiviittaustensa vuoksi. - Olen opettanut ja opiskellut Englannissa. Jos siellä tällainen tulisi, niin ei tällainen ihminen voisi enää olla politiikassa. Mutta Suomi on erilainen maa, Luukkanen toteaa viitaten Haavistoon. Millä tapaa erilainen? - Länsimaiset yhteiskunnat ovat vähän erilaisia, ja sitten Suomi on vähän erilainen, Luukkanen toteaa. Luukkanen kertoo Iltalehdelle, ettei vaadi Haaviston eroamista mistään, mutta toivoo hänen astuvan esille. Lisäksi hän toivoo medialta ”vähemmän selektiivisyyttä ja enemmän journalismia” sekä sanoo, että Haaviston ja Lindtmanin tapauksissa mediassa on vallinnut ”ihmeellinen hiljaisuus”. ”En tunnista omakseni” Pekka Haavisto kertoo sähköpostitse, ettei ole aiemmin lukenut Sydänten presidenttiä kokonaisuudessaan, eikä ole osallistunut sen tekoon muuten kuin antamalla haastattelun sen toiselle tekijälle. Kirjasta löytyvä ja Luukkasen esiin ottama katkelma on Haaviston mukaan virheellisesti siteerattu. - Yllätyksekseni kirjan sivulla 245 toisen henkilön tekstissä on minun ajatuskulukseni esitetty Saksaan liittyen villi tulkinta, jota en tunnista omakseni, Haavisto kertoo. Haaviston mukaan siteeraus liittyi keskusteluun siitä, minkälainen oppositiopolitiikka olisi ollut tehokkainta Hitlerin valtaannousua vastaan. Haaviston mukaan tätä keskustelua käytiin myös vuoden 2012 presidentinvaalien tilaisuuksissa. Haavisto lisää, että ”holokaustin järkyttävät rikokset eivät vanhene”. - Myös sen vuoksi on edelleen tärkeää reagoida voimakkaasti kaikkeen sellaiseen, jossa ymmärretään tai ihaillaan Adolf Hitleriä, kansallissosialismia tai natsismia. Euroopan on tärkeää oppia omasta historiastaan. Haavisto kertoo tutustuneensa Luukkasen blogitekstiin, jossa kirjan katkelmaa käsiteltiin."
I like how Sinimusta Liike (SML) is far left on the political compass because economically theyre quite left but socially... lets just say they wish it was 1940 again...
I believe that SML are more or less racist but something note worthy is that racism isn't right wing ideology maybe far nationalistic one but that is quality that most communists and national socialists also shared so definetly not right wing ideology if far left also advocates for it in many cases
Yeah, well it's on the left since the descriptions in the video have absolutely no basis in truth on how the different axis actually are. But this is clearly satirical video so you just shoud take that with a grain of salt and a laugh :D
@@juliasrouvali1924 Nyt tulee niin paljon hevonpaskaa sun suusta ku olla ja voi. Neuvostoliiton ja natsisaksan ideologiat olivat totalitarismia lukuunottamatta täysin vastapäisiä (tietenkin käytäntö on eri asia) toisistaan esim. Neuvostoliitossa naisten tuli olla tasavertaisia miesten kanssa kun taas Natsi-Saksassa naisen tuli olla miehen käskyn alla. Natsi-Saksa oli kapitalistinen kun taas Neuvostoliitto oli puoliksi valtio-omisteinen ja puoliksi sosialistinen. Natsi-Saksa oli ultranationalistinen ja eristäytyä autarkinen valtio kun taas Neuvostoliittolla oli Internationalistinen ote ulkopolitiikkaan (kuten Yhdysvalloilla) Natsismi on ääri-oikeistolainen ja RASISTINEN ideologia ja marxismi-leninismi oli ääri-vasemmistolainen anti-rasistinen ideologia joka oli ensimmäisiä rotuteoriaa kieltäviä aatteita. Ainoat yhdistävät piirteet oli totalitarismi ja jonkin tasonen nationalistisuus ja patrioottisuus.
I don't care if you're left or right when you restrict our freedom and force unnecessary regulations. Sadly I cannot vote, but go ahead, ruin the country if you really want to.
Whole Right/Left division falls apart when you take economic vs cultural left/right into account. Like National Coalition party is economically quite on the right, but culturally not so much. Still that does not make them centrists. If you pull this to its extreme, you could have some theoretical party that was completely fine with nationalizing all the wealth the nation has for the "common good"(Hence being economically extreme left), while still believing that Germany in the late 30s was really based when it came to its racial policies, thus they would be economically far left and culturally far right. Would such a party be centrists? Obviously not. My point being that this whole left/right axis kinda sucks.
@@wall4325 Afaik they don't have that much of an economic policy, but are more like an esoteric vague fascist party. Spiritualism, nationalism and the concept of race are celebrated, but when it comes to economics, they don't have much of an opinion. At least that is my very limited understanding of that micro party. At least none of their material i read put much emphasis on nationalizing all the means of production.
"If you pull this to its extreme, you could have some theoretical party that was completely fine with nationalizing all the wealth the nation has for common good (Hence being economically extreme left) while still believing that Germany in the late 30s was really based when it came to its racial policies" You managed to describe national socialism otherwise known as nazism perfectly. Nazis nationalized most if not all of the major companies in Germany in the 30s. They were more leftist than most modern leftist parties lol. Also Soviet Union in the later period of Stalin's rule started to persecute jewish people because of them being jewish.
@@Ho_Lii_Fuk Close, but not really. Nazi Germany did not nationalize everything. Companies were allowed to exist as long as they served the interests of the state. Hitler's Germany had companies separate from the state, but they were kept in tight leash. So Nazi Germany was not economically extreme left, or they would had been absorbed into the state altogether. In early 1940s Germany you could had ran a company with yourself as a CEO, as long as you didn't piss off the government too much. But for the same reason tankies calling this "capitalism" are also misguided. They certainly were not free. They were tolerated. Hitler's Germany was culturally far right, and economically mixed, leaning to the left.
People in general feel to be strictly talking about social policies when left vs right is brought up. Normies rarely care about economy other than if they lose money or have to pay more taxes.
I find it interesting in no left or right leaning manner, how the popularity of Perus has risen among young people despite them being the ones who need the most monetary support as they step into a working adult life.
The Finnsparty has done an excellent marketing campaing, speaking in simple terms and spreading their ideas in the internet by simple catchphrases and even memes.
I dont know the reason, but other parties dont have any good youtube videos or any videos at all. There are some videos of other parties, but most of material is from Perus. This is my anecdotal experience of youtube. I also hear that Perus has tiktok videos, we know that young people use more internet than older generations. Maybe thats why?
People don't necessarily vote based on their own interests, and can even vote against their own interests like for instance poor rural americans voting for trump and losing benefits granted to them.
Just a little while ago I was at a Studia fair and for some odd reason they had brought in some political parties to have their own booths. It was funny to see that almost there was almost no line at the kokoomus booth because they are literally cutting support from the students which the event is directed towards. Then you look right next to the kokoomus booth and see the SDP booth that has a solid 20 meter line, what made it even funnier is the fact that the christian and fennoswede booths, while being less popular, had longer lines than kokoomus.
@@PyhantaakkaThe near future has a lot of industry changes coming, which means a lot of people get fired. The social benefits help when you're in-between jobs. The union pay isn't enough for family or private healthcare
I was at the same studia fair and the PS booth was handing out condoms with halla-aho pic in fromnt of the condom box. And it also had text "Harjoitus tekee mestarin" / practice makes a master.
@SeMake Mitä äijä yrittää täälä valehdella. Ja sitä paitsi jos ne rahat ei meinaa riittää opiskellessa niin sitten tehdään töitä, kyllä aikuisen ihmisen pitää vähän ottaa vastuuta. Ei voi valtio aina tarjota kaikkea.
@@nightmare8292 kun niitä töitä vaan sais. En mä oo valehdellut mistään, valtion tuesta jää reilut 200 euroo puuttumaan elämisestä ja en voi hakea täysi aikaseen työhön opiskelun takia. Logiikka hei esille. Ei ole tarpeeksi työpaikkoja ja varsinkin sellaisia jotka ottavat vastaan opiskelijoita jotka pystyvät tekemään vain osa aika töitä. vaikka kuinka monelle pistää hakemuksia niin 90% ajasta ei tule vastausta ja 8% on "onni ei osunut tällä kertaa sinuun" sitten loput 2% on että joko työpaikka täyttyi tai "emme hae osa aikaisia työntekijöitä"
The taxation issue could be illustrated better. If you're poor, it would probably be nice if you could count on having good public healthcare. This means, getting to see a doctor on time. Doctors are among the highest paid employees in Finland. At a certain income level, they have a better time taking time off than working. In the private sector, doctors can form limited liability companies and take their income as dividend, taxed at 30% (versus 50-60%). So you're seeing more private healthcare pop up. It's hilarious that this mess was driven by supposed "socialists".
@kotikunnas1291 If you're poor you probably use public healthcare. So the poor should support the middle class by supporting tax breaks for the middle class.
Miten monta oikeistoagendaa hallituksella on? EU-ero? Markan palauttaminen? Mrna-piikkien kieltäminen? Rajat kiinni? Rangaistusten tuntuva korottaminen? Verojen tuntuva alentaminen? Kansallisomaisuuden kansallistaminen? Kehitysavun lakkauttaminen? Ihmisiä kiusaavan joutavan (fasistisen) lainsäädännön poistaminen? Ilmastovouhotuksen lopettaminen? Maaseudun puolustaminen? Virallisen tiedonannon poliittiseen karttaan uskovat ovat vaihtaneet aivonsa viralliseen tiedonantoon, eli eivät tykkää harrastaa ajattelua, elikä lampaat.
Left-wing government has sent you a message: "HELLO WE NOTICED THAT YOU MANAGED TO SAVE 50€ FROM YOUR PAYCHECK AND RECENTLY APPLIED FOR SOCIAL ASSISTANCE TO BUY A NEW WASHING MACHINE. HERE'S A BILL FOR 100€ WITH 11% INTEREST, IF YOU DON'T PAY WITHIN 2 WEEKS WE ARE FORECLOSING AND YOU WILL LOSE YOUR CREDIT RECORD AND WILL NO LONGER QUALIFY FOR HOUSING BENEFITS. WE LOVE YOU SO MUCH THANK YOU"
What these people don't get is that in order for people to go to work or employ themselves, there needs to be fruitful circumstance for them to do so. And that's when they aren't abandoned by their countrymen to their own mental problems because modern people made the system do the caring for others for them. That's the one perspective modern people seem to lack about the subject... the real betrayal. They couldn't bother to be there for them, they only cared enough to make sure that they suffer somewhere outside their sight.
Basically the income tax for poor people is going to go down a one third larger percentage than the income tax for richer people. However, since it's a percentage, people are concentrating on how much money someone's getting. Let's say that there's two people, other one gets 1000€ a month, and the other one gets 10000€a month. The one who makes 1k is going to get a 0,9% tax cut, and the guy who makes 10k is going to get 0,6% tax cut. 1k guy'll be taxed for 9€ less. 10k guy will be taxed for 60€ less. And people are going to frothe out of their mouth that the rixh are getting a 51€ more of an tax cut than the poor. :D
@@mandelin0 True. Nevertheless, at least I feel as though I can't trust whether the person saying stuff like the aforementioned is saying that due to lack of knowledge or due to wanting to exaggerate the point regardless of whether the point remains truthful. Thus I felt like the need to point out what I did. :D
That is cool. I worked for a university in Helsinki for a few years and many companies did not want to take our foreign master students for internships or summer jobs, as they would have had to speak Finnish. This even though the work of the company in question was international. So I think I am colored by this. My experience from Berlin is way different. But the Germans seem to be more "desperate" to find employers than Finland. They don't have any choice than to be more flexible, I guess
@@charlottep.4843 That's interesting, my impression of Germany is that it's much harder to get a job if you don't have a basic understanding of German. And maybe the few IT jobs I've landed just happen not to require Finnish.
Yes, I guess it is difficult to see the big picture out of personal experiences only. But basic German is also easier to reach than basic Finnish. Or well, if you know English/Dutch/Swedish/Norwegian/Danish at least
The only major difference between the right and left is that the other wants to cut services and social benefits, while the other sees taxation as the solution.
Yeah for the most part, but in the "leftist" parties (not very left while they're all capitalist) alternative budgets there are also things they'd cut from, like fossil fuel subsidies
@@ashcommittedarsonbutinasexyway The reason I support the greens: on social "issues" the right is idiotic, no one discusses economic issues from an educated perspective while also looking out for the people anyways, and the greens have a pretty alright track record on *NOT BURNING THE GODDAMN PLANET DOWN TO ASHES*
Unassimilable people doesnt integrate whatever you do, so reason to talk about negatively for us working groups is pretty much how to get them out. If you want see what happens if that grow, look any multicultural areas and see.
They do integrate, but only if they get enough support while adjusting to their new environment. Multicultural areas are known for having more innovation, more forward thinking people and a more friendly society. You are thinking of multicultural areas where there is a lot of racism and huge wealth and income inequality.
@@TheEsseboy They cost more to integrate than ever innovate. And multicultural areas are mostly known for crimes. Color of skin never innovate, multitude of ideas do, and multicultural is opposite of multitude ideas. Its forced idiotism.
@@TheEsseboy Only people who are able to integrate that way are those whose intelligence level is high enough that they can disassociate themselves from their cultural background. You are essentially trying to force something that is truly accessible to only the exceptional onto the entire society. A common case of academic foolishness that will ultimately see you burn bridges with everyone in the end, including those you think are benefitting from it. People like you are the prime reason why I want a decentralized government. Because at least then we'd be working on said communities instead of making decisions for everyone.
katoin tos youtubee ja huomasin että sauli niinistöst ei oo coverattu niin paljoo oisko joku history of sauli niinistö tai sen tyyppine video mahollist ku se on täs lähtemäs
Joskus videota suomalaisista tapahtumista? Kuten miten suomalaiset viettää kesää erilaisilla festareilla ja samaan videoon voisi sisällyttää kaljakellunnat ynnä muut kissan ristijäiset.
I find it amusing that Kokoomus lives in a bubble, where they think that no negative consequences arise from cutting welfare. For example: What do you think will happen when Ville Varaton loses a considerable portion of his benefits, leading to him to no longer be able to afford both food and rent? He has 3 options. 1. Find a job, which he will not do, since he doesn't want to do any other jobs than those he studied for. 2. Turn to petty crime. 3. Become a domestic terrorist.
Pretty sure Kokoomus are neo-liberals, so they aren't really concerned with the needs of the average citizen. Perhaps one should seek out where the trail of money leads in order to find out who really pulls their strings.
"Mutta miten Suomi nostetaan suosta?" ...jos vaikka lakattas, en tiiä, antamasta mahdollisia veromiljardeja huumekauppialle..? Kahvi koukuttaa pahemmin. Fakta.
Kohta ollaan uutta residenttiä äänestyttämässä. Saapi nähä tuleeko Haavisto vai Stuppi voittamaan. One way to gain popularity in the parliament is to declare that there is no poverty or famine among the Finnish folk. That will always work like a charm. Failing that, you could always try to argue how the monorails will upset the local flying squirrel economy. Or how the blind/deaf folk might accidentally run into them.
This video felt quite bias IMO. The "freedom to do whatever you like" remark about the left should have had "as long as you do and act the way they want" into it. I've only seen the clip from peaky blinders but I've come to the same conclusion "politics are a sircle" when you go enough to the left you see you've become an environmentalist and that is in its basic form conservatism of the mother earth. If you go down enough to the liberalism youl find anarchism and after that you'll find pure democratic anarchism. Then you'll want monarchism. When you far enough to the left and down you'll find yourself under totalitarian democratic leadership and propably and most hopefully find the Bible and hop to the top right corner of the political map becoming a totalitarian
My vote is governed by the legal status of one thing, and one thing only. Care to wager what that thing which is currently being persecuted without a single fact-based reason could possibly be? I'll give you a hint; Germany is the latest in a long and, heh, *growing* list of countries to have seen the lighter and will legalise it in 2024. Why are we finns so against it? No, seriously, we are being weird about it. Really weird. EDIT: Really, really weird and stupid and throwing our potential taxmoney literally at criminals, saying; TAKE IT! WE DO NOT *WANT* IT! YOU sell it, I don't WANNA!
Well, I am for legalizing it, but...there are bad sides to cannabis too. It is contrary to popular belief, it is addictive. It is also affecting your long term memory storage, your ability to concentrate, and brain development. The smoke from burning cannabis is also carcinogenic, and has the same issues with second hand smoking as tobacco. Hence with that backdrop of knowledge I would probably argue that only Alko can sell it, and with a very large added tax to deter people from using too much.
@@TheEsseboy All these have been debunked. Addictive? Sure, like candy is "addictive" as in you might want some, but your cells are fine without it, unlike heroin or nicotine ADDICTION for example. It's not your long term memory that's affected, some new information might not get recorded as easily, but that's the same as getting old. Concentration is actually much BETTER on cannabis (weed smoking gamers, hmm?), so that's that sorted, and tobacco smoke in itself is carcinogenic, cannabis smoke isn't, or is on par with eating smoked foods. And as to the Poison Shop having *yet* another monopoly on a substance which has ABSOLUTELY nothing to do with ALKOhol is just a horrible idea, I shudder to think. But be that as it may, all we really need to do is stop persecuting every fourth person in Finland for smoking whatever the hell they want. And mostly we need to stop fascist pigs coming into peaceful homes and taking grow-equipment worth THOUSANDS of euros even if absolutely no crime, real CRIME with a VICTIM has been committed. It saddens me that people are still spouting this 80s propaganda, no matter how much in favour of legalisation they are... :(
@@CrimSang420 Tell that to people who have smoked for a decade and are physically addicted. It is addictive, just that people have not used in on a scale large enough to messure it before. Concentration is not better on Cannabis, it is very hard to stay focused on a task while high. And yes, long term memory is affected and much more so than just getting old. Alcohol should also be faced out, I am all for that, but it takes many many decades to do so. Same with cigarettes etc. Cannabis smoke contains many of the exact same carcinogense as tobacco smoke...particulate matter, tar, formaldehyde, benzene etc. that is products of combustion and heating of organic matter...that is an inherent problem with taking drugs by burning them...
@@TheEsseboy You don't need to smoke it, you may bake it and eat it if you are that worried about carcinogens. I have been smoking it for more decades than (I assume) you have been alive, and I have zero difficulty being without it. Does life seem duller? Maybe a little, but to quote Half-Baked "I used to suck dick for crack. Have you ever sucked a dick to get marijuana?" I am not attacking you in any way, shape or form, but you do not seem to understand what addiction means; your very CELLS cannot function without the substance they've grown accustomed to. Cannabis does not do that. Even CAFFEINE does, exempli gratia; coffee headaches. And you were right about the brain development, I must've overlooked that bit; up to around 20-22 years of age, your brain IS developing and whilst smoking cannabis is much, much less detrimental to it than our beloved Legal Poison (I was killing myself with it, literally, in my not so distant past) it isn't something teenagers should (excessively) use. Also, also, actually, actually, I am not telling anyone to smoke weed; You don't like cannabis? Don't use cannabis! Just let adults make up their own damn mind about it. "I have never needed diabetes drugs! Why do we need to have diabetes drugs?!?" ...because a considerable amount of people need them to, literally, survive this Hellscape of Today. (I have ADHD and the solution of the half-my-age shrink was to put me on AMPHETAMINES, so no thank you.) I hope you'll have a great day, and perhaps a good think as well. :)
Unfortunately my preferred party of "I don't give a fuck what other people do as long as they leave me out of it" doesn't seem to exist on the spectrum.
Yes, that sounds like my kind of party. Socializing is a choice, not a necessity. You'd think that would have plenty of support here, but unfortunately not. @@TheEsseboy
@@TheEsseboy That's quite a stereotypical way to portray them, isn't it? Only thing their ideology really says about them is they put a lot of emphasis on autonomy over having middlemen. I can tell from experience that they tend to actually be quite social.
Since you invited us to light the beacons The bullshit about motivation is exactly that its bullshit "Im going to starve to death if I dont work" is not motivation its fear it turns out lots of people are motivated to work, and lots of people are not, and there is not some secret connection between having enough to live on and motivation to work the secret is that people are different, different things motivate them, and the world right now only cares about some things, so only some people are motivated to work in this world but having enough to eat and maybe enjoy yourself a little bit does not kill your motivation to work its that the work available and that needs doing isnt the kind of work a person is interested in is what kills their motivation and again being afraid that you will die because you will starve to death in the street is not motivation to work its fear and if you think its good to get people to work with fear you are a psychopath
antaa luonnon korjata jos ei ole motivaatiota elää. Suomalaiset on aina ollut yksi Euroopan rajuiten luonnonvoimien armoilla eläneistä kansoista. Luonnonpelko ja arvostus on ihan Suomalaisuuden ytimessä. Pelon voittamisesta kasvaa rohkeus.
@@dinocadet77 Ero heidän ja sinun välillä on että he eivät jättäneet omiaan heitteille, jotta he pystyisivät jahtaamaan omia unelmiaan. Se on suurin syntisi, *moderni ihminen.* Mutta olet oikeassa, luonto korjaa. Teidän lahoava yhteiskuntanne ellei jopa koko sivilisaatio eivät ole poikkeuksia siinä suhteessa.
I'm okay with anything except the extremes. The extremes are nuts and harmful. Always have been. Nothing left of SDP and nothing right of Kokoomus, thanks.
I notice I've been becoming more and more "extreme" when I've become more and more apolitical. Human rights are cool, no one should die, everyone should be happy and safe. Why the fuck are these things not being addressed enough? Surely when human rights organizations are directly opposed to some of your policies, those policies kinda suck.
@@AAAAAA-qs1bv If there were actual good options, I think policy would be easy, but the reality is usually that you have 2 or more bad options and different sides value the pros and cons of the bad options differently based on their world view, beliefs and personal values. Nobody makes policy choices that they regard as evil or worse than the alternative. Not even the extremes. But being on an extreme frequently means you're an outlier, you're part of a small group with niche views that are not supported by the vast majority of the population. Policy is like stat points during a game's character creation. You have a limited amount of points to place where you think they will do most good. And to add points to one stat, you have to remove them somewhere else. You can't have everything.
@@jm-holm And following the game analogy, there are meta character builds and minmaxing. We all have access to data and studies, why the fuck is discussing the policy we want to implement not done in the same format as scientific studies are done? Form a hypothesis, run tests, look at statistics, look at if the method that got stats was reliable and proper, generalize that knowledge (and following the assumption we're moral people) for the benefit of all.
@@AAAAAA-qs1bv You're not wrong, but this is assuming the world is static and unchanging like a game. It is not. It constantly changes and requires different "builds" to deal with different situations, therefore the "meta" doesn't really exist. Sure, if your goal is always human rights are #1 priority regardless of the situation and regardless of the price you have to pay, you can stick to a single policy and that's how you have a party. But other parties value different attributes higher.
@@moisuomi We need imigration because we white folks don't f*ck no more. Or we can pump up the child support finances. I used to be a leftist until they showed that they only accept people who have the same views. I will now vote for right out of spite for the leftist wokwism hypacracy. Even tho the current parliament is cutting from the students that are already f:ed if they are not from a financially stable household so they'll need to take the 6k a year student loan. And they are cutting from unemployment benefits which is (not) going to solve the fact that the jobless people will not get a job on the employers pure look at the jobless time in the CV. Also people rather be jobless and chase rats than do shit job like real-estate maintenance when they have higher degrees. I hope it helps the employers to look trough the fingers some stuff that they'll have better/lower standard of giving the boot to an employee. Best example I've heard is that an employer couldn't fire an employee even tho he stole gas into his own car with the businesses card.
Overton's Window is indeed a thing. Which is one of the main reasons why I tend to call most finnish political parties controlled opposition. Where's a guy like Milei to really shake things up?
@@avntgrds Totta tuo on. Esim. Suomen oikeisto on paljon lähempänä jenkkien vasemmistoa ku niiden oikeistoa. Ja jenkkien vasemmisto on lähempänä Suomen oikeistoa ku vasemmistoa. Meillä on oikeasti tosi hyvin asiat Suomessa ja suurin osa ei tajua miten sureempi polarisaatio politiikassa on monessa muussa maassa. Ei meillä edes ole mitään oikeeta äärioikeistoa.
Economically speaking the most far right parties are actually super left wing. But its the moral values that make them far right. PS is economically more right wing that KOK. But PS is bunch of cheating populists. True value right wing parties are bunch of crazy people like VKK and pals. Those are bunch of tinfoil crazies. But they want economic left wing policies.
This is why I hate politics so much. Antagonism and tribalism. Almost everyone wants a better world for all of us. So how about we sit down and discuss POLICIES instead of ripping out each others' throats over perceived slights against each other?
@@excancerpoikAh yes I too hate half the political spectrum over issues I barely understand. The only bad political party we have is PS their ideology is pure poison. It's just hatred of an out group and no actual solutions to modern issues. They can't even offer solutions to issues that exist, since their identification of the issue is not based on the core cause.
Putting RKP on the "right" is the biggest joke I've heard this year. Also, as a foreigner living in Finland, I can still see the heavy left-leaning bias.
They have traditionally been rightist, but most recently were in government with leftist parties. As a party they are flexible and able to fit into just about any government. Think about the previous and the current ones, for example. So don´t take the past couple of years as too representative of the party. They have history. Also, who runs the party has quite an impact on their direction.
Kekkonen oli paras presidentti mitä Suomella ikinä oli tai luultavasti tulee pitkään aikaan olemaan. Presidentin virkakauden rajoittaminen 12 vuoteen oli iso virhe, sillä jos joku osaa tehdä työnsä kunnolla niin miksi antaa potkut?
@@moustachio05 Jos hän olisi tehnyt työnsä huonosti hän ei olisi pysynyt vallassa, häntä äänestettiin ihan kun muitakin presidenttejä ja sen takia pysyi vallassa
@@AKL89 No ensinnäinkään en pidä Riikka Purrasta, esim. Hänen historiansa rasismin kanssa. Opintorahojen leikkaaminen on myös yksi syy, vaikkei se välttämättä pelkästään persujen vika ollut
Stubb ratsastaa uskonnolla, sekä isänmaallisuudella, vaikka ei usko kumpaakaan. Aika vtullaan täytyy olla aivot, kun noin toimii. ua-cam.com/video/PxNAULkQ5yM/v-deo.html ua-cam.com/users/shortsS7AmN9NRbyc
Vaikkei normaalin työssä käyvän verot pienenisi, mutta kunhan valtio ei kasvata velkaa samaan tahtiin ku Marinin hallituksen aikana. Suomessa tapana aina katsoa ensin omaa napaa ja sitten vasta mitä ympärillä pyörii. Suomi on joaika korkealla velka listalla.
@@mgntstr The left in Finland are democratic socialists, not Marxist Leninists that you probably confuse them with. The rightwing is actually more pro dictatorships than the left, as they want to dismantle the governments regulations on disinformation, Job security and social benefits, making us more and more dependent on greedy private corporations, which makes the society more feudalistic.
Noooooo🥺😱😭 What did you do? You criticized the politicians and you make comedy. Now the police will call you for questioning😮 Oh no. I will knit a nice pair of socks to send you in prison ❤
A common mistake to think that cutting benefits has no effect on job creation. One example: It does increase incentives to move from one place to another and therefore many entrepreneurs offer jobs they've otherwise wouldn't.
The fuck are YOU smoking?!? Where can I get some of THAT shit? Seems to make the world a pretty magical place where somebody with absolutely no money can just move to another place, without any money for moving or transport or food or temporary housing as they look for one of those magical job-things which you seem to hallucinate are just there for the taking... Damn that's some good shit you got, son!
The best reason as to why one should vote, is because other people can vote.
Based pfp
Yup. That crazy mf neighbour or that obnoxious coworker, the crazy church Karen? They vote. Want them to make the rules for you? If not, then better vote.
This should be a slogan or something to get people out to vote
@@meowiguess903 Probably has been used, I ofcourse didnt come up with that but I also dont remeber where I first heard it from.
Stubb on kuin EU-federalistien ohjelmoima robotti, joka ei keinoja kaihda viedessään Suomea liittovaltioon. Se valehtelee, se vääntyilee, se kiertää. Me voimme yhdessä estää Cai-Göranin pääsyn presidentiksi => Nolla ääni on ääni Stubbille, pelleääni myös. Kokoomuksen kannattajat ovat aktiivisimmat äänestäjät, eli mitä alhaisempi äänestysprosentti hyväksyttyjen äänien suhteen, sitä suurempi kokoomuksen kannatus. Pekka Haavisto kehui Hitleriä, se vaatii munaa, hän saa ääneni toisella kierroksella. Ja ne, jotka pitävät homoutta konkreettisena ongelmana, ovat syvällä unessa. Ei käsitystä, miten suuria ja laajoja tämän maan ongelmat ovat. Huomautetaan myös, ettei Zelenskyikään ole suorittanut asepalvelusta.
"PS:n Arto Luukkaselta kovia lausuntoja Pekka Haaviston Hitler-viittauksista - Haaviston mukaan siteerattiin väärin vaalikirjassa
Perussuomalaisten puoluesihteeri Arto Luukkanen syyttää Pekka Haavistoa natsismista ja kirjoittaa Antti Lindtmanin ”natsiorgioista”.
Arto Luukkanen on ollut aktiivinen blogissaan ja Twitterissä. Jenni Gästgivar / Iltalehti
Tekijän kuva
Sampo Lepistö
torstai 20.7.2023 klo 17:39
Perussuomalaisten puoluesihteeri Arto Luukkanen pui blogissaan Adolf Hitleriin viittaavaa kohtaa kansanedustaja Pekka Haaviston (vihr) vuoden 2012 presidentinvaalikampanjasta kertovassa kirjassa.
Lisäksi hän puhuu SDP:n puheenjohtajakisassa mukana olevan Antti Lindtmanin (sd) ”natsiorgioista”, joilla hän viittaa hiljattain julkisuudessa olleisiin Lindtmanin nuoruuskuviin.
Luukkanen on myös syyttänyt blogiteksteissään mediaa valikoivuudesta ja ”Pjongjang-journalismista”.
Luukkanen on kommentoinut viimeaikaisia perussuomalaisiin liittyneitä rasismikohuja yhteensä neljässä heinäkuussa julkaistussa blogitekstissään, jotka on julkaistu Uuden Suomen Puheenvuorot-blogialustalla.
Uusi Suomi poisti sittemmin yhden Luukkasen teksteistä. Uuden Suomen päätoimittaja Jenni Tamminen kertoi Helsingin Sanomille, että teksti poistettiin sääntöjen vastaisena.
Arto Luukkanen, mistä näissä teksteissä on kyse?
- Kannattaa lukea ensin ne kirjoitukset. Siitähän se aika hyvin selviää, Luukkanen sanoo Iltalehdelle.
Olen lukenut ne.
- Ei siinä mitään, kannattaa lukea ne ja siinä se koko viesti on. En minä halua niitä nyt enempää kommentoida. Ihmiset lukevat ne, ja jos miellyttää, niin hyvä, mutta jos ei, niin ei se mitään. Se on sitä demokratiaa.
Pekka Haaviston mukaan häntä siteerattiin väärin vaalikirjassa. Henri Kärkkäinen
Kelan kynästä
Luukkanen ottaa blogissaan esiin Haaviston kampanjasta kertovassa kirjassa olleen Adolf Hitleriä koskevan kohdan ja toivoo, että Haavisto ”astuisi esiin”.
Kyse on vuonna 2012 julkaistusta kirjasta Sydänten presidentti. Kirjan ovat toimittaneet ja suurimmaksi osaksi kirjoittaneet Riikka Kämppi ja Jussi Lähde. Lisäksi mukana on monia vierailevia kirjoittajia, jotka ovat olleet mukana kampanjassa.
Kyseessä oleva kohta ei ole suora lainaus Haavistolta, vaan osa hieman yli kolmen sivun mittaista osiota Tarinankertojan matkassa, jonka on kirjoittanut muusikko Anssi Kela.
- Pekka pohtii idealismia yllättävästä kulmasta. Hän sanoo, että Hitler olisi loppujen lopuksi voinut olla Saksalle ihan kelpo johtaja, jos olisi vain hiukan tinkinyt näkemyksistään. Ei olisi edes tarvinnut muuttaa paljoa: olisi vain suhtautunut juutalaisiin hiukan lungimmin ja tyytynyt vähempään elintilaan. Pieniä asennemuutoksia yhden ihmisen päässä, ja koko ihmiskunnan historia olisi kirjoitettu toisella tavalla, Kela kirjoittaa kirjan sivulla 245.
Osiossa, josta katkelma on peräisin, muistellaan Kelan ja Haaviston käymää keskustelua kampanjakiertueella, jonka aikana he pohtivat Haaviston edustaman ”idealismin” ja silloisen presidenttiehdokkaan, nykyisen tasavallan presidentin Sauli Niinistön, edustaman ”realismin” suhdetta.
Lisäksi Kela kuvailee Haaviston tapaa rakentaa siltoja ja käydä keskustelua myös sellaisten ihmisten välillä, joiden ajatukset eroavat Haaviston omista.
Kela viittaa tekstissä muun muassa Haaviston vierailuun europarlamentaarikko Teuvo Hakkaraisen (ps) luona sen jälkeen, kun Hakkarainen esitti, että ”kaikki homot pitäisi heivata Ahvenanmaalle”. Haavisto itse on homoseksuaali.
”Ehdoton ei”
Luukkanen toteaa, että natsismille on oltava Suomessa ”ehdoton ei”.
Hän ei halua kommentoida entisen elinkeinoministerin Vilhelm Junnilan (ps) tapausta. Junnila joutui eroamaan ministerin tehtävästä muun muassa esiin nousseiden natsiviittaustensa vuoksi.
- Olen opettanut ja opiskellut Englannissa. Jos siellä tällainen tulisi, niin ei tällainen ihminen voisi enää olla politiikassa. Mutta Suomi on erilainen maa, Luukkanen toteaa viitaten Haavistoon.
Millä tapaa erilainen?
- Länsimaiset yhteiskunnat ovat vähän erilaisia, ja sitten Suomi on vähän erilainen, Luukkanen toteaa.
Luukkanen kertoo Iltalehdelle, ettei vaadi Haaviston eroamista mistään, mutta toivoo hänen astuvan esille. Lisäksi hän toivoo medialta ”vähemmän selektiivisyyttä ja enemmän journalismia” sekä sanoo, että Haaviston ja Lindtmanin tapauksissa mediassa on vallinnut ”ihmeellinen hiljaisuus”.
”En tunnista omakseni”
Pekka Haavisto kertoo sähköpostitse, ettei ole aiemmin lukenut Sydänten presidenttiä kokonaisuudessaan, eikä ole osallistunut sen tekoon muuten kuin antamalla haastattelun sen toiselle tekijälle.
Kirjasta löytyvä ja Luukkasen esiin ottama katkelma on Haaviston mukaan virheellisesti siteerattu.
- Yllätyksekseni kirjan sivulla 245 toisen henkilön tekstissä on minun ajatuskulukseni esitetty Saksaan liittyen villi tulkinta, jota en tunnista omakseni, Haavisto kertoo.
Haaviston mukaan siteeraus liittyi keskusteluun siitä, minkälainen oppositiopolitiikka olisi ollut tehokkainta Hitlerin valtaannousua vastaan. Haaviston mukaan tätä keskustelua käytiin myös vuoden 2012 presidentinvaalien tilaisuuksissa.
Haavisto lisää, että ”holokaustin järkyttävät rikokset eivät vanhene”.
- Myös sen vuoksi on edelleen tärkeää reagoida voimakkaasti kaikkeen sellaiseen, jossa ymmärretään tai ihaillaan Adolf Hitleriä, kansallissosialismia tai natsismia. Euroopan on tärkeää oppia omasta historiastaan.
Haavisto kertoo tutustuneensa Luukkasen blogitekstiin, jossa kirjan katkelmaa käsiteltiin."
I just wish the stick wasn't growing faster than the carrot.
Funny how Mandelin's answer on why not talk about Keskusta is precisely what voters have been giving to Keskusta too in recent elections...
True 😄
Kepu pettää aina, jo vuodesta 1906!
I don't even know what Keskusta wants to even accomplish. What's their goal?
@@Mickelraven
Gain more power and make Finland into a country that it was in teh 1920's. IE. everyone lives in the rural areas.
@@Pikkabuu Yeah, that doesn't sound centrist at all. That's some real conservative shit.
I like how Sinimusta Liike (SML) is far left on the political compass because economically theyre quite left but socially... lets just say they wish it was 1940 again...
I believe that SML are more or less racist but something note worthy is that racism isn't right wing ideology maybe far nationalistic one but that is quality that most communists and national socialists also shared so definetly not right wing ideology if far left also advocates for it in many cases
Yeah, Fascism is economically quite close to social democracy, just without the "democracy" part
Yeah, well it's on the left since the descriptions in the video have absolutely no basis in truth on how the different axis actually are. But this is clearly satirical video so you just shoud take that with a grain of salt and a laugh :D
@@juliasrouvali1924 Nyt tulee niin paljon hevonpaskaa sun suusta ku olla ja voi. Neuvostoliiton ja natsisaksan ideologiat olivat totalitarismia lukuunottamatta täysin vastapäisiä (tietenkin käytäntö on eri asia) toisistaan esim. Neuvostoliitossa naisten tuli olla tasavertaisia miesten kanssa kun taas Natsi-Saksassa naisen tuli olla miehen käskyn alla. Natsi-Saksa oli kapitalistinen kun taas Neuvostoliitto oli puoliksi valtio-omisteinen ja puoliksi sosialistinen. Natsi-Saksa oli ultranationalistinen ja eristäytyä autarkinen valtio kun taas Neuvostoliittolla oli Internationalistinen ote ulkopolitiikkaan (kuten Yhdysvalloilla) Natsismi on ääri-oikeistolainen ja RASISTINEN ideologia ja marxismi-leninismi oli ääri-vasemmistolainen anti-rasistinen ideologia joka oli ensimmäisiä rotuteoriaa kieltäviä aatteita. Ainoat yhdistävät piirteet oli totalitarismi ja jonkin tasonen nationalistisuus ja patrioottisuus.
I don't care if you're left or right when you restrict our freedom and force unnecessary regulations. Sadly I cannot vote, but go ahead, ruin the country if you really want to.
muuten ihan hauska mutta kokoomus ei kauheasti kasvata tavallisen työssäkäyvän porkkanaa....potkii päähän siitäkin edestä.
No verotuksen kannalta keskituloiset ei juurikaan voita, varsinkin kun ottaa huomioon että muita etuja leikataan samaan aikaan
@@mandelin0 ainoa joka voittaa on korkiatuloiset ja sikariporras
gotta love Mandelin's videos
Lets just poistetaan demokratia and make Sauli ikuinen President
Paatunut Suomen tuhoaja.
Samaa mieltä. Ylijumala Sale!
@@Ylinasiantuntija Sauli hater spotted. Destroy. Destroy
@@LordValorum Pyydän anteeksi. Meillä ei saa olla muuta Jumalaa kuin Sauli.
@@Ylinasiantuntija That's oikein!
thank you for the video, i'm going to show this at christmas dinner as a conversation-starter!
Have fun!
Finland could really use an negative vöte system.
Some people don't know who they want to vote, but they know who they definetly don't want.
demokratia 👍
politiikka 👎
Kyllä
Kohta pääsee puoli suomea valittamaan väärästä presidentistä..
@@einienj3281
Mielummin puoli Suomea kuin koko Suomi.
@@einienj3281 no voiko yhtäkää niistä pitää sitten oikeana henkilönä siihe hommaan
@@BananaSlayer666 No ei nyt, kun Paavo ja Lauran sisko putos.
Whole Right/Left division falls apart when you take economic vs cultural left/right into account. Like National Coalition party is economically quite on the right, but culturally not so much. Still that does not make them centrists. If you pull this to its extreme, you could have some theoretical party that was completely fine with nationalizing all the wealth the nation has for the "common good"(Hence being economically extreme left), while still believing that Germany in the late 30s was really based when it came to its racial policies, thus they would be economically far left and culturally far right. Would such a party be centrists? Obviously not. My point being that this whole left/right axis kinda sucks.
There already is a party like that Sinimusta Liike (SML)
@@wall4325 Afaik they don't have that much of an economic policy, but are more like an esoteric vague fascist party. Spiritualism, nationalism and the concept of race are celebrated, but when it comes to economics, they don't have much of an opinion. At least that is my very limited understanding of that micro party. At least none of their material i read put much emphasis on nationalizing all the means of production.
"If you pull this to its extreme, you could have some theoretical party that was completely fine with nationalizing all the wealth the nation has for common good (Hence being economically extreme left) while still believing that Germany in the late 30s was really based when it came to its racial policies"
You managed to describe national socialism otherwise known as nazism perfectly. Nazis nationalized most if not all of the major companies in Germany in the 30s. They were more leftist than most modern leftist parties lol. Also Soviet Union in the later period of Stalin's rule started to persecute jewish people because of them being jewish.
@@Ho_Lii_Fuk Close, but not really. Nazi Germany did not nationalize everything. Companies were allowed to exist as long as they served the interests of the state.
Hitler's Germany had companies separate from the state, but they were kept in tight leash. So Nazi Germany was not economically extreme left, or they would had been absorbed into the state altogether. In early 1940s Germany you could had ran a company with yourself as a CEO, as long as you didn't piss off the government too much.
But for the same reason tankies calling this "capitalism" are also misguided. They certainly were not free. They were tolerated. Hitler's Germany was culturally far right, and economically mixed, leaning to the left.
People in general feel to be strictly talking about social policies when left vs right is brought up. Normies rarely care about economy other than if they lose money or have to pay more taxes.
I find it interesting in no left or right leaning manner, how the popularity of Perus has risen among young people despite them being the ones who need the most monetary support as they step into a working adult life.
The Finnsparty has done an excellent marketing campaing, speaking in simple terms and spreading their ideas in the internet by simple catchphrases and even memes.
I dont know the reason, but other parties dont have any good youtube videos or any videos at all. There are some videos of other parties, but most of material is from Perus. This is my anecdotal experience of youtube. I also hear that Perus has tiktok videos, we know that young people use more internet than older generations. Maybe thats why?
They are stupid. Education and intelligence is declining..
Maybe they vote based on something else than "Money for me? I'll vote!"
People don't necessarily vote based on their own interests, and can even vote against their own interests like for instance poor rural americans voting for trump and losing benefits granted to them.
Tästähän tulee ihan eräs satiirinen sarja mieleen: Itse Valtiaat (the Autocrats)
se on kova
Just a little while ago I was at a Studia fair and for some odd reason they had brought in some political parties to have their own booths.
It was funny to see that almost there was almost no line at the kokoomus booth because they are literally cutting support from the students which the event is directed towards.
Then you look right next to the kokoomus booth and see the SDP booth that has a solid 20 meter line, what made it even funnier is the fact that the christian and fennoswede booths, while being less popular, had longer lines than kokoomus.
Know that is comedy
@@PyhantaakkaThe near future has a lot of industry changes coming, which means a lot of people get fired. The social benefits help when you're in-between jobs. The union pay isn't enough for family or private healthcare
I was at the same studia fair and the PS booth was handing out condoms with halla-aho pic in fromnt of the condom box. And it also had text "Harjoitus tekee mestarin" / practice makes a master.
@SeMake Mitä äijä yrittää täälä valehdella. Ja sitä paitsi jos ne rahat ei meinaa riittää opiskellessa niin sitten tehdään töitä, kyllä aikuisen ihmisen pitää vähän ottaa vastuuta. Ei voi valtio aina tarjota kaikkea.
@@nightmare8292 kun niitä töitä vaan sais. En mä oo valehdellut mistään, valtion tuesta jää reilut 200 euroo puuttumaan elämisestä ja en voi hakea täysi aikaseen työhön opiskelun takia.
Logiikka hei esille. Ei ole tarpeeksi työpaikkoja ja varsinkin sellaisia jotka ottavat vastaan opiskelijoita jotka pystyvät tekemään vain osa aika töitä. vaikka kuinka monelle pistää hakemuksia niin 90% ajasta ei tule vastausta ja 8% on "onni ei osunut tällä kertaa sinuun" sitten loput 2% on että joko työpaikka täyttyi tai "emme hae osa aikaisia työntekijöitä"
Good video as always! Keep up the good work 👍
Thanks!
very useful to know all the crap there is to choose from
"growing the stick to beat your lazy ass and growing the carrot you can get as a reward" on ihan helvetin hyvä vertauskuva
They only grow the stick and remove the carrot..
The taxation issue could be illustrated better.
If you're poor, it would probably be nice if you could count on having good public healthcare. This means, getting to see a doctor on time.
Doctors are among the highest paid employees in Finland. At a certain income level, they have a better time taking time off than working.
In the private sector, doctors can form limited liability companies and take their income as dividend, taxed at 30% (versus 50-60%). So you're seeing more private healthcare pop up.
It's hilarious that this mess was driven by supposed "socialists".
@kotikunnas1291 If you're poor you probably use public healthcare. So the poor should support the middle class by supporting tax breaks for the middle class.
vihdoin joku auttaa äänestys hommissa xD
Mite äijällä on näin vähä tilaajia vaikka hiton hyviä videoita. Aina tulee virne suunpieleen ku näitä kattoo.
Kiitos! Juufin taisi joskus todeta, että kenelläkään ei ole ikinä ”oikeaa” määrää tilaajia. Aina on joko liian vähän, tai sitten liian paljon.
2:59 according to MMT (Modern Money Theory) there isn't such a thing as "balancing the budget".
_Right-wing government has sent you a message:_ *MEE TÖIHI!*
Miten monta oikeistoagendaa hallituksella on? EU-ero? Markan palauttaminen? Mrna-piikkien kieltäminen? Rajat kiinni? Rangaistusten tuntuva korottaminen? Verojen tuntuva alentaminen? Kansallisomaisuuden kansallistaminen? Kehitysavun lakkauttaminen? Ihmisiä kiusaavan joutavan (fasistisen) lainsäädännön poistaminen? Ilmastovouhotuksen lopettaminen? Maaseudun puolustaminen? Virallisen tiedonannon poliittiseen karttaan uskovat ovat vaihtaneet aivonsa viralliseen tiedonantoon, eli eivät tykkää harrastaa ajattelua, elikä lampaat.
Left-wing government has sent you a message: "HELLO WE NOTICED THAT YOU MANAGED TO SAVE 50€ FROM YOUR PAYCHECK AND RECENTLY APPLIED FOR SOCIAL ASSISTANCE TO BUY A NEW WASHING MACHINE. HERE'S A BILL FOR 100€ WITH 11% INTEREST, IF YOU DON'T PAY WITHIN 2 WEEKS WE ARE FORECLOSING AND YOU WILL LOSE YOUR CREDIT RECORD AND WILL NO LONGER QUALIFY FOR HOUSING BENEFITS. WE LOVE YOU SO MUCH THANK YOU"
”Mee itte saatana töihin” -Niilo22
What these people don't get is that in order for people to go to work or employ themselves, there needs to be fruitful circumstance for them to do so. And that's when they aren't abandoned by their countrymen to their own mental problems because modern people made the system do the caring for others for them.
That's the one perspective modern people seem to lack about the subject... the real betrayal. They couldn't bother to be there for them, they only cared enough to make sure that they suffer somewhere outside their sight.
3:24 is beautiful.
Basically the income tax for poor people is going to go down a one third larger percentage than the income tax for richer people. However, since it's a percentage, people are concentrating on how much money someone's getting. Let's say that there's two people, other one gets 1000€ a month, and the other one gets 10000€a month. The one who makes 1k is going to get a 0,9% tax cut, and the guy who makes 10k is going to get 0,6% tax cut.
1k guy'll be taxed for 9€ less.
10k guy will be taxed for 60€ less.
And people are going to frothe out of their mouth that the rixh are getting a 51€ more of an tax cut than the poor. :D
Well that is true, but unfortunately you can’t buy groceries with percentages
@@mandelin0 True. Nevertheless, at least I feel as though I can't trust whether the person saying stuff like the aforementioned is saying that due to lack of knowledge or due to wanting to exaggerate the point regardless of whether the point remains truthful. Thus I felt like the need to point out what I did. :D
If one could work in English, I think integration would be much easier and faster. I love being able to work in English here in Germany 🙃
Depends on the field. I know plenty of people who don't use Finnish in their jobs at all
Lern deutsch!
That is cool. I worked for a university in Helsinki for a few years and many companies did not want to take our foreign master students for internships or summer jobs, as they would have had to speak Finnish. This even though the work of the company in question was international. So I think I am colored by this. My experience from Berlin is way different. But the Germans seem to be more "desperate" to find employers than Finland. They don't have any choice than to be more flexible, I guess
@@charlottep.4843 That's interesting, my impression of Germany is that it's much harder to get a job if you don't have a basic understanding of German. And maybe the few IT jobs I've landed just happen not to require Finnish.
Yes, I guess it is difficult to see the big picture out of personal experiences only. But basic German is also easier to reach than basic Finnish. Or well, if you know English/Dutch/Swedish/Norwegian/Danish at least
7 minuuttia ja 25 sekuntia opetti enemmän kuin puoli vuotta yhteiskuntaopintunneilla
Let me start a new party. Also know as LKP (lobotomiset kusipäät).
authoritarian rule is the best, but that depends entirely on who rules ofcourse
Bongasin Ano Turtiaisen :D
The only major difference between the right and left is that the other wants to cut services and social benefits, while the other sees taxation as the solution.
Yeah for the most part, but in the "leftist" parties (not very left while they're all capitalist) alternative budgets there are also things they'd cut from, like fossil fuel subsidies
@@ashcommittedarsonbutinasexyway The reason I support the greens: on social "issues" the right is idiotic, no one discusses economic issues from an educated perspective while also looking out for the people anyways, and the greens have a pretty alright track record on *NOT BURNING THE GODDAMN PLANET DOWN TO ASHES*
@@ashcommittedarsonbutinasexyway Left alliance is a democratic socialist party
Jätän tän kommentin aivan vaan algoritmi boostiks🤌
I always try to vote for the smoll parties.
Koska persuja en ainakaa äänestä. Hyi saatana.
Used to vote for them but they turned out to be once again cheating assholes.
Unassimilable people doesnt integrate whatever you do, so reason to talk about negatively for us working groups is pretty much how to get them out. If you want see what happens if that grow, look any multicultural areas and see.
They do integrate, but only if they get enough support while adjusting to their new environment.
Multicultural areas are known for having more innovation, more forward thinking people and a more friendly society. You are thinking of multicultural areas where there is a lot of racism and huge wealth and income inequality.
@@TheEsseboy They cost more to integrate than ever innovate. And multicultural areas are mostly known for crimes. Color of skin never innovate, multitude of ideas do, and multicultural is opposite of multitude ideas. Its forced idiotism.
@@TheEsseboy Only people who are able to integrate that way are those whose intelligence level is high enough that they can disassociate themselves from their cultural background.
You are essentially trying to force something that is truly accessible to only the exceptional onto the entire society. A common case of academic foolishness that will ultimately see you burn bridges with everyone in the end, including those you think are benefitting from it.
People like you are the prime reason why I want a decentralized government. Because at least then we'd be working on said communities instead of making decisions for everyone.
katoin tos youtubee ja huomasin että sauli niinistöst ei oo coverattu niin paljoo oisko joku history of sauli niinistö tai sen tyyppine video mahollist ku se on täs lähtemäs
Henkilövideot ei oo oikein mun juttu, ja menee sen verran aikaa aina yhteen videoon et ei ehtisi valmiiksi nyt kun aihe on vielä ajankohtainen.
@@mandelin0 sori ku kesti vastaa nii kauan mut juu asia selvä 👍
good morning
I really love the approach of teaching about politics in Finland, from a position of not understanding politics at all! Very novel and appreciated.
Joskus videota suomalaisista tapahtumista? Kuten miten suomalaiset viettää kesää erilaisilla festareilla ja samaan videoon voisi sisällyttää kaljakellunnat ynnä muut kissan ristijäiset.
6:55 Dog whistle from the conservatives?
I came in 47 secs from publish (i know it’s not a competition and you don’t care but still)
I care, deeply. I am happy for you❤
Thats quite quick, I edged for the entirety of the video 😎
@@PartikleVT what is edging
...you came in 47 seconds? So... Not *even* a Minuteman, huh? Maybe think of baseball or something?
Ps almost perfect
Piraattipuolue!! saatana!
Perkele, just! Kato, ku on varma ettei Jumal auta...
I find it amusing that Kokoomus lives in a bubble, where they think that no negative consequences arise from cutting welfare.
For example:
What do you think will happen when Ville Varaton loses a considerable portion of his benefits, leading to him to no longer be able to afford both food and rent?
He has 3 options.
1. Find a job, which he will not do, since he doesn't want to do any other jobs than those he studied for.
2. Turn to petty crime.
3. Become a domestic terrorist.
Pretty sure Kokoomus are neo-liberals, so they aren't really concerned with the needs of the average citizen.
Perhaps one should seek out where the trail of money leads in order to find out who really pulls their strings.
"Mutta miten Suomi nostetaan suosta?" ...jos vaikka lakattas, en tiiä, antamasta mahdollisia veromiljardeja huumekauppialle..? Kahvi koukuttaa pahemmin. Fakta.
SFP/RKP and SDP >>>>
Kohta ollaan uutta residenttiä äänestyttämässä. Saapi nähä tuleeko Haavisto vai Stuppi voittamaan.
One way to gain popularity in the parliament is to declare that there is no poverty or famine among the Finnish folk. That will always work like a charm.
Failing that, you could always try to argue how the monorails will upset the local flying squirrel economy. Or how the blind/deaf folk might accidentally run into them.
hieno 👍 ㅤㅤ
Eikai mandelin vaan ole vassari
"Kaikki Hitleristä vasemmalla ovat vassarikommareita byhyyyy" 🤡
This video felt quite bias IMO. The "freedom to do whatever you like" remark about the left should have had "as long as you do and act the way they want" into it. I've only seen the clip from peaky blinders but I've come to the same conclusion "politics are a sircle" when you go enough to the left you see you've become an environmentalist and that is in its basic form conservatism of the mother earth. If you go down enough to the liberalism youl find anarchism and after that you'll find pure democratic anarchism. Then you'll want monarchism. When you far enough to the left and down you'll find yourself under totalitarian democratic leadership and propably and most hopefully find the Bible and hop to the top right corner of the political map becoming a totalitarian
My vote is governed by the legal status of one thing, and one thing only. Care to wager what that thing which is currently being persecuted without a single fact-based reason could possibly be? I'll give you a hint; Germany is the latest in a long and, heh, *growing* list of countries to have seen the lighter and will legalise it in 2024. Why are we finns so against it? No, seriously, we are being weird about it. Really weird. EDIT: Really, really weird and stupid and throwing our potential taxmoney literally at criminals, saying; TAKE IT! WE DO NOT *WANT* IT! YOU sell it, I don't WANNA!
Well, I am for legalizing it, but...there are bad sides to cannabis too. It is contrary to popular belief, it is addictive. It is also affecting your long term memory storage, your ability to concentrate, and brain development. The smoke from burning cannabis is also carcinogenic, and has the same issues with second hand smoking as tobacco.
Hence with that backdrop of knowledge I would probably argue that only Alko can sell it, and with a very large added tax to deter people from using too much.
@@TheEsseboy All these have been debunked. Addictive? Sure, like candy is "addictive" as in you might want some, but your cells are fine without it, unlike heroin or nicotine ADDICTION for example. It's not your long term memory that's affected, some new information might not get recorded as easily, but that's the same as getting old. Concentration is actually much BETTER on cannabis (weed smoking gamers, hmm?), so that's that sorted, and tobacco smoke in itself is carcinogenic, cannabis smoke isn't, or is on par with eating smoked foods. And as to the Poison Shop having *yet* another monopoly on a substance which has ABSOLUTELY nothing to do with ALKOhol is just a horrible idea, I shudder to think. But be that as it may, all we really need to do is stop persecuting every fourth person in Finland for smoking whatever the hell they want. And mostly we need to stop fascist pigs coming into peaceful homes and taking grow-equipment worth THOUSANDS of euros even if absolutely no crime, real CRIME with a VICTIM has been committed. It saddens me that people are still spouting this 80s propaganda, no matter how much in favour of legalisation they are... :(
@@CrimSang420 Tell that to people who have smoked for a decade and are physically addicted. It is addictive, just that people have not used in on a scale large enough to messure it before.
Concentration is not better on Cannabis, it is very hard to stay focused on a task while high. And yes, long term memory is affected and much more so than just getting old.
Alcohol should also be faced out, I am all for that, but it takes many many decades to do so. Same with cigarettes etc.
Cannabis smoke contains many of the exact same carcinogense as tobacco smoke...particulate matter, tar, formaldehyde, benzene etc. that is products of combustion and heating of organic matter...that is an inherent problem with taking drugs by burning them...
@@TheEsseboy You don't need to smoke it, you may bake it and eat it if you are that worried about carcinogens. I have been smoking it for more decades than (I assume) you have been alive, and I have zero difficulty being without it. Does life seem duller? Maybe a little, but to quote Half-Baked "I used to suck dick for crack. Have you ever sucked a dick to get marijuana?" I am not attacking you in any way, shape or form, but you do not seem to understand what addiction means; your very CELLS cannot function without the substance they've grown accustomed to. Cannabis does not do that. Even CAFFEINE does, exempli gratia; coffee headaches. And you were right about the brain development, I must've overlooked that bit; up to around 20-22 years of age, your brain IS developing and whilst smoking cannabis is much, much less detrimental to it than our beloved Legal Poison (I was killing myself with it, literally, in my not so distant past) it isn't something teenagers should (excessively) use. Also, also, actually, actually, I am not telling anyone to smoke weed; You don't like cannabis? Don't use cannabis! Just let adults make up their own damn mind about it. "I have never needed diabetes drugs! Why do we need to have diabetes drugs?!?" ...because a considerable amount of people need them to, literally, survive this Hellscape of Today. (I have ADHD and the solution of the half-my-age shrink was to put me on AMPHETAMINES, so no thank you.) I hope you'll have a great day, and perhaps a good think as well. :)
Yes there are enuf jobs there is free skool so u can get any job
Unfortunately my preferred party of "I don't give a fuck what other people do as long as they leave me out of it" doesn't seem to exist on the spectrum.
Oh, you mean an antisocial hyper-individualistic party? I think you mean a Libertarian party? Don't know if there is one in Finland but probably.
Yes, that sounds like my kind of party. Socializing is a choice, not a necessity. You'd think that would have plenty of support here, but unfortunately not. @@TheEsseboy
@@derre98 Without socializing there would be no society, it is needed.
One can make a choice which parts of life one wishes to include other people. Same applies to societies.@@TheEsseboy
@@TheEsseboy That's quite a stereotypical way to portray them, isn't it?
Only thing their ideology really says about them is they put a lot of emphasis on autonomy over having middlemen. I can tell from experience that they tend to actually be quite social.
Since you invited us to light the beacons
The bullshit about motivation is exactly that
its bullshit
"Im going to starve to death if I dont work" is not motivation
its fear
it turns out lots of people are motivated to work, and lots of people are not, and there is not some secret connection between having enough to live on and motivation to work
the secret is that people are different, different things motivate them, and the world right now only cares about some things, so only some people are motivated to work in this world
but having enough to eat and maybe enjoy yourself a little bit does not kill your motivation to work
its that the work available and that needs doing isnt the kind of work a person is interested in is what kills their motivation
and again
being afraid that you will die because you will starve to death in the street is not motivation to work
its fear
and if you think its good to get people to work with fear you are a psychopath
antaa luonnon korjata jos ei ole motivaatiota elää. Suomalaiset on aina ollut yksi Euroopan rajuiten luonnonvoimien armoilla eläneistä kansoista. Luonnonpelko ja arvostus on ihan Suomalaisuuden ytimessä. Pelon voittamisesta kasvaa rohkeus.
@@dinocadet77 Ero heidän ja sinun välillä on että he eivät jättäneet omiaan heitteille, jotta he pystyisivät jahtaamaan omia unelmiaan. Se on suurin syntisi, *moderni ihminen.*
Mutta olet oikeassa, luonto korjaa. Teidän lahoava yhteiskuntanne ellei jopa koko sivilisaatio eivät ole poikkeuksia siinä suhteessa.
Sanna Marine :DDD
nii oli hauska t. veeti 13v
politiikka on just jees ku se vituttaa jengii nii paljon😂😂😂
I'm okay with anything except the extremes. The extremes are nuts and harmful. Always have been. Nothing left of SDP and nothing right of Kokoomus, thanks.
Yes! The correct opinion.
I notice I've been becoming more and more "extreme" when I've become more and more apolitical. Human rights are cool, no one should die, everyone should be happy and safe. Why the fuck are these things not being addressed enough? Surely when human rights organizations are directly opposed to some of your policies, those policies kinda suck.
@@AAAAAA-qs1bv If there were actual good options, I think policy would be easy, but the reality is usually that you have 2 or more bad options and different sides value the pros and cons of the bad options differently based on their world view, beliefs and personal values. Nobody makes policy choices that they regard as evil or worse than the alternative.
Not even the extremes. But being on an extreme frequently means you're an outlier, you're part of a small group with niche views that are not supported by the vast majority of the population.
Policy is like stat points during a game's character creation. You have a limited amount of points to place where you think they will do most good. And to add points to one stat, you have to remove them somewhere else. You can't have everything.
@@jm-holm And following the game analogy, there are meta character builds and minmaxing.
We all have access to data and studies, why the fuck is discussing the policy we want to implement not done in the same format as scientific studies are done?
Form a hypothesis, run tests, look at statistics, look at if the method that got stats was reliable and proper, generalize that knowledge (and following the assumption we're moral people) for the benefit of all.
@@AAAAAA-qs1bv You're not wrong, but this is assuming the world is static and unchanging like a game.
It is not. It constantly changes and requires different "builds" to deal with different situations, therefore the "meta" doesn't really exist.
Sure, if your goal is always human rights are #1 priority regardless of the situation and regardless of the price you have to pay, you can stick to a single policy and that's how you have a party. But other parties value different attributes higher.
Always right!
LIVE LOVE LAUGH LEFT ❤
Left out of the Eduskunta
I don't give a 💩
😂😂
That is why basic finnish
Left is best ❤
Algorithm is cringe
Btw. The "far right" in Finland is equal to the common political compass center. Maybe even a bit to the left.
Economically speaking, absolutely. Otherwise they align with my cultural views such as being opposed to wokeism and immigration.
@@moisuomi We need imigration because we white folks don't f*ck no more. Or we can pump up the child support finances. I used to be a leftist until they showed that they only accept people who have the same views. I will now vote for right out of spite for the leftist wokwism hypacracy. Even tho the current parliament is cutting from the students that are already f:ed if they are not from a financially stable household so they'll need to take the 6k a year student loan. And they are cutting from unemployment benefits which is (not) going to solve the fact that the jobless people will not get a job on the employers pure look at the jobless time in the CV. Also people rather be jobless and chase rats than do shit job like real-estate maintenance when they have higher degrees. I hope it helps the employers to look trough the fingers some stuff that they'll have better/lower standard of giving the boot to an employee. Best example I've heard is that an employer couldn't fire an employee even tho he stole gas into his own car with the businesses card.
Overton's Window is indeed a thing. Which is one of the main reasons why I tend to call most finnish political parties controlled opposition.
Where's a guy like Milei to really shake things up?
@@avntgrds Totta tuo on. Esim. Suomen oikeisto on paljon lähempänä jenkkien vasemmistoa ku niiden oikeistoa. Ja jenkkien vasemmisto on lähempänä Suomen oikeistoa ku vasemmistoa. Meillä on oikeasti tosi hyvin asiat Suomessa ja suurin osa ei tajua miten sureempi polarisaatio politiikassa on monessa muussa maassa. Ei meillä edes ole mitään oikeeta äärioikeistoa.
Economically speaking the most far right parties are actually super left wing.
But its the moral values that make them far right.
PS is economically more right wing that KOK. But PS is bunch of cheating populists.
True value right wing parties are bunch of crazy people like VKK and pals. Those are bunch of tinfoil crazies. But they want economic left wing policies.
any vote that is not SDP is usually a good vote
Or greens or commiealliance
@@alksuboy9889 ok fair enough as long as its not any of those 3
This is why I hate politics so much. Antagonism and tribalism. Almost everyone wants a better world for all of us. So how about we sit down and discuss POLICIES instead of ripping out each others' throats over perceived slights against each other?
@@excancerpoikAh yes I too hate half the political spectrum over issues I barely understand. The only bad political party we have is PS their ideology is pure poison. It's just hatred of an out group and no actual solutions to modern issues. They can't even offer solutions to issues that exist, since their identification of the issue is not based on the core cause.
@@excancerpoik That's assuming the right-wing counterparts aren't just another uniparty, because if they are, you're 100% out of luck.
I choose none.
Putting RKP on the "right" is the biggest joke I've heard this year. Also, as a foreigner living in Finland, I can still see the heavy left-leaning bias.
They have traditionally been rightist, but most recently were in government with leftist parties. As a party they are flexible and able to fit into just about any government. Think about the previous and the current ones, for example. So don´t take the past couple of years as too representative of the party. They have history. Also, who runs the party has quite an impact on their direction.
RKP is a right wing party.
Look what they are doing in goverment atm.
Kekkonen oli paras presidentti mitä Suomella ikinä oli tai luultavasti tulee pitkään aikaan olemaan. Presidentin virkakauden rajoittaminen 12 vuoteen oli iso virhe, sillä jos joku osaa tehdä työnsä kunnolla niin miksi antaa potkut?
Kekkonen oli kuitenkin yksinvaltias mikä on vähän liian riskialttista mun mielestä. Ihan hyvä et on virkakauden rajoitus olemassa.
@@moustachio05 Jos hän olisi tehnyt työnsä huonosti hän ei olisi pysynyt vallassa, häntä äänestettiin ihan kun muitakin presidenttejä ja sen takia pysyi vallassa
persut on parhait
Jaa a
Olen eri mieltä, mutta en aio riidellä
@@identityv5843 Ei ole riittävän järkeviä argumentteja varmaankaan :DDD
@@AKL89 No ensinnäinkään en pidä Riikka Purrasta, esim. Hänen historiansa rasismin kanssa. Opintorahojen leikkaaminen on myös yksi syy, vaikkei se välttämättä pelkästään persujen vika ollut
@@AKL89 Ja taisin myös sanoa etten halunnut riidellä 🫣
I will always choose the exact opposite of Persus suomalaiset.. leftie for life! 😂
Yikes.
💀💀
Mielensä pahoittajat saapuivat.. 😆
@@Pyhantaakka I know what I don't want to be like.
@@Pyhantaakka Paraskin puhuja.
Stubb ratsastaa uskonnolla, sekä isänmaallisuudella, vaikka ei usko kumpaakaan. Aika vtullaan täytyy olla aivot, kun noin toimii. ua-cam.com/video/PxNAULkQ5yM/v-deo.html
ua-cam.com/users/shortsS7AmN9NRbyc
Köyhät ne vaan jaksaa valittaa
Stubb ei edes esiinny tällä videolla.
Voisit Arska jo lopettaa tuon lapsellisen pelleilyn.
@@pentti3715 6:14 Kokoomus ratsasti kodilla, uskonnolla ja isänmaalla myös. Lol.
@@Ylinasiantuntija Hienosti hoksattu.
@@Ylinasiantuntija En olisi yllättynyt, jos hän olisi WEF:n nuorten johtajien listalla.
Siksi PS
äänestämällä voit vaikuttaa!
...idiootilta
First
good job
tbh, politics is shit
Fuck the whole left political spectrum extreme right is also not good tho
the left are dictators, the right are anarchists... I don't see a whole lot of right leaning politics in this world.
lol you are some sort of pathetic nationalist
Vaikkei normaalin työssä käyvän verot pienenisi, mutta kunhan valtio ei kasvata velkaa samaan tahtiin ku Marinin hallituksen aikana. Suomessa tapana aina katsoa ensin omaa napaa ja sitten vasta mitä ympärillä pyörii. Suomi on joaika korkealla velka listalla.
@@mgntstr The left in Finland are democratic socialists, not Marxist Leninists that you probably confuse them with.
The rightwing is actually more pro dictatorships than the left, as they want to dismantle the governments regulations on disinformation, Job security and social benefits, making us more and more dependent on greedy private corporations, which makes the society more feudalistic.
Noooooo🥺😱😭 What did you do? You criticized the politicians and you make comedy. Now the police will call you for questioning😮 Oh no. I will knit a nice pair of socks to send you in prison ❤
Don't worry. Finland is a free country.
Not for long@@Kalzu85
Persut💙🤍
Mielenkiintoinen profiilikuva. 🤔
Natsi proffakuva
Of course the perussuomalainen also has a nazi profile pic. Grow up.
💀 Vähiten natsi persu:
1:48 Ano Turtiainen ei maininnut, että Suomi pitäisi liittää Venäjään ennen viime eduskuntavaaleja. Left cant meme.
left🤢🤢🤢🤢
Right 🤢🤢🤢🤢🤢
retu
@@avntgrds mitä se anime poika ulisee🤣🤣🤣 lasten tasolle jääny ku kattoo piirrettyjä
@@avntgrds Retu sitä Retu tätä. Jos joku on Retu niin sä lastenohjelma poika🤣😭🤣😭🤣😭🤣😭😭🤣😭😭
vuos sitte postattu kun oli vielä suosiossa XDDD vähän eri asia. halooo@@avntgrds
A common mistake to think that cutting benefits has no effect on job creation. One example: It does increase incentives to move from one place to another and therefore many entrepreneurs offer jobs they've otherwise wouldn't.
The fuck are YOU smoking?!? Where can I get some of THAT shit? Seems to make the world a pretty magical place where somebody with absolutely no money can just move to another place, without any money for moving or transport or food or temporary housing as they look for one of those magical job-things which you seem to hallucinate are just there for the taking... Damn that's some good shit you got, son!
Yes, I often move when my bank account is at zero and my debt is high. Don't you?