Shimano 105 Di2 First Ride Impressions: Is it any good or not?

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 8 вер 2024
  • This video is sponsored by Pedalsure. Get a quote for cycling insurance from Pedalsure: bit.ly/Pedalsu...
    The wait is finally over, Shimano's 105 Di2 groupset is here but was the wait worth it? Here are my very first ride impressions, stay tuned for more analysis over the coming weeks
    Orro Bikes Venturi 105 Di2 bit.ly/3A3sst5
    Shimano Ultegra Di2 First Ride • Shimano Ultegra R8170 ...
    Shimano Dura-Ace Di2 Review • Shimano 12-speed Dura-...
    Supported by Saddleback
    Sidi shoes bit.ly/3tjQ8UP
    Sportful clothing bit.ly/2NLNw1t
    HJC helmet bit.ly/3sRiB2Z
    Follow me:
    Instagram: / davidjarthur
    Twitter: / davearthur
    Facebook: / justridebikesvideo

КОМЕНТАРІ • 279

  • @dogukantosun5547
    @dogukantosun5547 2 роки тому +22

    2:20 Canyon Aeroad cf sl 7 is more than 1 kilo lighter and comes with a pair of 60mm deep Reynolds wheels instead of stock Alu wheels for almost the same price. Why would I go for a heavy Fulcrum with bad wheels ?

  • @kantace5198
    @kantace5198 2 роки тому +20

    thanks for the review and the honest criticism of the front shifter. Most outlets said that it was the old one, but then they dodged the question wether it is noticeably worse. I guess , i have to save a bit more for ultegra then.

    • @Goriaas
      @Goriaas 2 роки тому

      ultegra has mechanical? I'll go wit Sora if it doesn't

    • @kayy-03
      @kayy-03 2 роки тому +1

      I personally don't shift the FD that much, so before spending the extra on Ultegra just because of that, I'd really ask myself if that is such an important point for you. But of course, Ultegra DI2 has lots of other advantages, so it might be worth it, but it's gonna depend on how manufacturers price their bikes

  • @chrisgravel7157
    @chrisgravel7157 2 роки тому +11

    As always great commentary and feedback David.
    I own a 7000 series 105 groupset. To my surprise 7K 105 is much better than my 6800 series Ultegra and as good as my 810 GRX - these are the best Mechanical groupsets I have owned. The weight is also 500g less than the new Di2 105 which is a big difference.
    Given weight, price and fact any experienced cyclist will thuroughly enough shimanos mechanical offerings the cost of this groupset is not a prudent expense. 100% your better off putting that money into wheels and or great kit.
    Given the shift in economy and record bike prices making most shoppers drop one or two tiers I think Shimano may have picked the WORST time to drop mechanical they could have ever chosen.

  • @Paddyhudson
    @Paddyhudson 2 роки тому +48

    This group is the reason why the Aliexpress brands are going to gain more market share in the next couple of years than ever before. Things are getting too fancy and too expensive; the great groupset reset needs to happen.

    • @ayowser01
      @ayowser01 Рік тому +1

      The whole cycling industry has gone mad with price hikes.

  • @ArteUltra1195
    @ArteUltra1195 2 роки тому +67

    At this price you don‘t expect smooth and reliable shifting anymore, that should be a given.
    The joke here is the weight and especially the fact that Shimano sets the new ‚normal‘ for midrange at 1700£

    • @indorock
      @indorock 2 роки тому +3

      he never said the shifting wasn't smooth or reliable, he said the opposite.

    • @ArteUltra1195
      @ArteUltra1195 2 роки тому

      @@indorock even better..
      Why bother, just get a last-gen Ultegra Di2, used or new

    • @indorock
      @indorock 2 роки тому +1

      @@ArteUltra1195 People people want 12 speeds and wireless shifters? There are a lot of reasons why.

    • @JuvoII
      @JuvoII 2 роки тому

      I'd take a Campy Chorus any day and save weight and money too. Or the Ultegra Di2 if I had to go electronic. This groupset is very much an also ran for me.

  • @SJD190990
    @SJD190990 2 роки тому +3

    I have a Cube litening which I bought in 2015. It has mechanical Dura ace 9000 and weighs just over 6.5kg. It cost £3,500 at the time. The increase in bike prices over recent years is pretty unbelievable.

    • @davidarthur
      @davidarthur  2 роки тому

      Sadly price rises are just happening in the bicycle world :(

    • @l.d.t.6327
      @l.d.t.6327 7 місяців тому

      I have a Giant TCR 2023 at 7.5kgs with discs and DI2 and it costs 3300 euro. So it's 700 euro cheaper, has aero wheels and frame, has DI2 and much better braking. Your complaints about bike prices is so 2020.

  • @madscycle4290
    @madscycle4290 2 роки тому +67

    3150 euros for a 9kg bike
    Big yikes 😬

    • @hansschotterradler3772
      @hansschotterradler3772 2 роки тому +14

      It's actually much more expensive since 3150£ ~ 3750€!
      It's getting insane, but nobody forces you to buy this nonsense.

    • @MilanSmore
      @MilanSmore 2 роки тому +12

      I prefer €600 for a second hand rim brake w/ 105 5800/7000

    • @PhiyackYuh
      @PhiyackYuh 2 роки тому

      Blame covid or the people who started covid. Without covid there will be no super inflation on any bikes.

    • @kool_thing
      @kool_thing 2 роки тому +4

      @@MilanSmore Absolutely. My brother bought a used rim-brake CAAD12 on Ultegra for 700$. Such an amazing bike and great value for the price.

  • @JayLato
    @JayLato 2 роки тому +5

    00:43 and proprietary batteries. Let’s not all forget mechanical to electronic is $1000 more.

  • @8paolo96
    @8paolo96 2 роки тому +147

    When he said 9kg without pedals I was on the verge of ragequitting the video. Come on! who will ever buy a 9+ kg of bike for 4000€??

    • @domestique3954
      @domestique3954 2 роки тому +16

      That’s absolutely ridiculous!
      My 23 year old titanium race bike is at ~ 8 kg WITH pedals!
      Would never change to carbon/disc brakes on a race bike

    • @glennoc8585
      @glennoc8585 2 роки тому +6

      Outrageous

    • @dh7314
      @dh7314 2 роки тому +5

      Isn’t the Venturi an aero bike though? So typically heavier anyway?

    • @steppings5645
      @steppings5645 2 роки тому +1

      The Emperor would to match his new suit!

    • @galenkehler
      @galenkehler 2 роки тому +7

      @@dh7314 not that heavy. I got an aero bike for about 7.5kg for about the same money.

  • @jackyharuhiko
    @jackyharuhiko 2 роки тому +7

    Thanks for the review. While the comment section never fails to give me some entertainment, here is the question I must ask: How does it compare with SRAM Rival eTAP AXS?

  • @tomrachellesfirstdance7843
    @tomrachellesfirstdance7843 2 роки тому +29

    9kg it's as heavy as my aluminium winter bike 🤣 My aero rim braked aircode with 105 is 7.5kg and that's with no lightweight parts at all, got vision 55mm wheels and alloy bars stem etc I don't worry about getting it lighter, and it was literally half the price too. Manufacturers are taking the Michael now.

    • @johnflynn4923
      @johnflynn4923 2 роки тому +3

      Michael is now heading up the marketing dept (he was a diversity hire) and scrambling desperately to justify the JCB/CAT like weight of these mid-higher end new bikes. Meanwhile I'll stick with my Trifox on Tiagra with Ican wheels coming in at 7.1kg incl pedals / cage / mount and leave Michael to his own devices 🙂

    • @1barnet1
      @1barnet1 2 роки тому +2

      We will see if italian bike brands start to gain popularity.
      Campagnolo has an brilliant affordable and lightweight 12 speed mechanical groupset with rimbrakes.
      The Campagnolo Chorus. (2.3kg rim 2.6 kg disc)
      105 DI2 is 3kg.
      Chorus is also roughly 600 euro's cheaper retail as an groupset.

    • @artoutlawphoto
      @artoutlawphoto 2 роки тому

      It's crazy, you can get a mtb hardtail with dropper, fork suspension and a massive cassette for 7,8kg, and it's also wireless.

    • @1barnet1
      @1barnet1 2 роки тому +1

      @@artoutlawphoto
      Well those hardtails do not come cheap. certainly not in the 3k-4k range the 105di2 roadbikes sit.
      That kind of weight can only be achieved by top spec forks wheels C68 frames and titanium groupsets. And even then 7.8 kg is pushing the limit.

    • @1barnet1
      @1barnet1 2 роки тому

      Example top of the line Canyon Exceed is 8.9 kg. and €6500

  • @johnossendorf9979
    @johnossendorf9979 2 роки тому +17

    Shimano is making a big mistake dropping mechanical 105 !

  • @marcuswong1797
    @marcuswong1797 2 роки тому +5

    Just like the Rival. Change the cassette and crankset and you will shave off a ton of grams without a ton of money. Most of the difference between top tier stuff that cost 3-4x as much is mostly in the cassette and crankset.

    • @1barnet1
      @1barnet1 2 роки тому +1

      The casette is an wear part. I'd rather save those grams in the frame and wheels where the money will last.

  • @jamesstirling1879
    @jamesstirling1879 2 роки тому +4

    Can't believe the weight of new bikes, my TCR with full 105 is 7.8kg! Everyone in the bike industry is keen to tell me that weight does not matter and aero is king - but I would rather not lug an extra couple of kg around the Peak District!

    • @KoreaRides
      @KoreaRides 2 роки тому +1

      TRUTH!

    • @Michaelsmith21588
      @Michaelsmith21588 2 роки тому

      Yeah some bikes with SRAM rival costing about 3-3500€ or more come in at about 9 kg.

  • @Nwrig004
    @Nwrig004 2 роки тому +5

    I never heard a complaint about weight. Weight and 105 aren’t even valid concerns, people arguing about group set weight are either trolls or bored.

  • @joshwilliams6849
    @joshwilliams6849 2 роки тому +7

    Really minor point but are you saying that the front shifting feels like R6870 Ultegra Di2 or R8070? The picture of the front mech you showed is 6870, but 'last gen' is technically now R8070?
    The reason I ask, is that if I recall, the front shifting performance was where Shimano put in the effort for the latest gen of Di2. Yes it went 12 speed and semi wireless (even though pros are using it fully wired) but Shimano were most proud of the ability to shift under any load particularly the front.
    So if this 105 gen doesn't have that tech but it feels as good as R8070 then I think calling it old and slow is probably a bit much - up until 2 months ago prior to the latest gens hitting the shops. That 'old and slow' was the benchmark of front shifting performance. Certainly better than anything from SRAM.
    (I totally appreciate that the new generations may have really moved the game on in this regard and now stepping back down to them might feel old and slow, but most people will step up to this shifting quality so it's all about perception)
    If it front shifts like 6870 Di2 from 2013 however, that is probably a different story and fair game to call out, given the cost etc.

  • @MrBlackPistol
    @MrBlackPistol 2 роки тому +1

    I‘m excited about the comparison between the Rival and the 105.

  • @danielwardAUS
    @danielwardAUS 2 роки тому +2

    Lucky you getting your hands on this! Thanks for the video. The weight difference between 105 R7000 Disc and 105 Di2 Disc would be interesting if you have it.

    • @sventice
      @sventice 2 роки тому +2

      I did a little research, and the 105 7000-series groupset with hydraulic disc brakes comes in at about 2.5 kg including cables. The rim brake version of r7000 comes in at about 2.2 kg. The new 12-speed, di2 105 is about 3kg. Especially given the very large price increase, this is very disappointing. Personally, I plan to stick to my current mechanical 105 groupset, which works brilliantly, until I get a new bike, at which point I'll probably opt for GRX or SRAM. I prefer road bikes, but I'm older, I'm not racing, and I like to do multi-day trips entirely on the bike, which involves carrying some weight and having a 30/46 chainring. I'm not at all certain that this new version of 105 would be very useful to me.

  • @spinnetti
    @spinnetti 2 роки тому +13

    The Canyon has deep dish carbon wheels. Level up the wheelset on the Orro, and its not such a great value, though I really do like the look of it. I don't need those massive mountain bike gears though, and would prefer a short cage and 12/25 for my riding conditions and lighter weight.

  • @jessemartinez6120
    @jessemartinez6120 2 роки тому +10

    These companies are really starting to take advantage of the consumer…They must think we are all stupid zombies!🤦🏽‍♂️

  • @razcohen5590
    @razcohen5590 2 роки тому +5

    Compare to Sram Rival etap as well please.

  • @Michaelsmith21588
    @Michaelsmith21588 2 роки тому +1

    2:37 Yes, but the Canyon Aeroad, apart from a shitty seat post, is equipped with Carbon deep section wheels retailing at over 1000€.

  • @donwinston
    @donwinston 2 роки тому +8

    I miss the short cage rear derailleur. That big long thing looks clunky. A 28 by 34 gear s a low enough for anything but very long mountain climbs.

    • @cyclingsfatsuma9808
      @cyclingsfatsuma9808 2 роки тому +2

      Because it's probably made for older, heavier and more solvent cyclists who want the glam of electronic shifting but not the Ultegra prices, not whippets who go up hills faster than I can on my ebike. Interest declaration: I have a 34:34 with a 105 hydro disc set up because I am the above and live on a hill. I need it. I'm also cheap so the electronic shifting is not going to happen for me so the bike I have will probably see me out.

    • @aygwm
      @aygwm 2 роки тому +1

      Compact cranks are not allowed

    • @donwinston
      @donwinston 2 роки тому

      @@aygwm You can't use a compact crank with a short cage derailleur? I don't see how that would matter.

  • @NathanBudd
    @NathanBudd 2 роки тому +2

    Nice hands on, but in all honesty I'm much more interested in how this compares with the SRAM Rival eTap AXS than the with the Ultegra/Dura Ace.
    I'm not pro, weight isn't really much of an issue to me, I'd rather just an enjoyable experience.

    • @davidarthur
      @davidarthur  2 роки тому +3

      Working on that comparison now Nathan - think the results will be really interesting

  • @KGrant88
    @KGrant88 2 роки тому +7

    Got my eyes out for a 1 or 2 year old mechanical dura ace rim groupset and then I'll be set for life and won't have to watch any groupset videos again. 😃😃

  • @hansschotterradler3772
    @hansschotterradler3772 2 роки тому +18

    Thorough review of electronic 105.
    Bikes are getting heavier every year. 9kg for a carbon road bike costing over 3000£ is a joke. My titanium gravel bike with 45c tires weighs 9.4 kg including bottle cages, spd pedals and wahoo mount.

    • @fennec13
      @fennec13 2 роки тому +2

      my Ti gravel bike is 7.9 kg - LOL with pedals. cages, etc
      idk what the point of these heavy bikes is. No thanks from me.

    • @hansschotterradler3772
      @hansschotterradler3772 2 роки тому

      @@fennec13 damn. How did you get it down to 7.9 kg?

    • @domestique3954
      @domestique3954 2 роки тому +1

      @@hansschotterradler3772 Leightweight parts and all the screws changed to titanium or aluminium

    • @indorock
      @indorock 2 роки тому

      And titanium gravel bikes where I'm from are ALL over 3000 euros. So I'm not sure what your point is.

    • @domestique3954
      @domestique3954 2 роки тому

      @@indorock because we talk about weight and Carbon is the lightest stuff,then comes aluminum and titanium is even“heavier“,although that depends on the thickness of the tubes.
      I still run my 1999 titanium frame and every other decade i put a new groupset on.
      After 23 years this frame looks (and feels!) brandnew although i rode about 100 000 km
      with it.
      Try that with a carbon frame...

  • @MrMentalmelon
    @MrMentalmelon 2 роки тому

    A lot of comments about the bike for this groupset review. I've got the 2019 Venturi (small) fitted out with r8020 and konax pro wheels, weighs in a pinch over 8 kg with alloy cockpit +Pedals. Rapid and comfortable bike. Even with winter tyres and helicopter tape it's only 8.4

    • @davidarthur
      @davidarthur  2 роки тому +3

      These wheels are nearly 2kg so I think 600g could be saved just in the wheelset choice alone - Orro does offer a £500 carbon wheelset upgrade option which could be worthwhile

    • @MrMentalmelon
      @MrMentalmelon 2 роки тому

      That would be it, alongside stem / handlebars and saddle swap, easily in the realm of 800g honestly though I'm still hesitant to switch to electronic shifting. Even with 105 tempting lower price points, I just love the feeling of clicking through an sti lever!

  • @jpnw3272
    @jpnw3272 2 роки тому +1

    I guess the last groupo to go to 12 speed will be GRX Di2? Mountain is 12 speed. Road is 12 speed. It would be nice to make a mullet with GRX with mountain groupo - just having the option like SRAM. Thanks for the first impression review!

    • @ricky7396
      @ricky7396 2 роки тому

      Yup got a giant revolt advanced 0 this year with top mechanical grx as I didn't want to splurge for 11spd di2. Will do that in couple of years once can justify newer bike. Should be soonish for it. Next year even.

  • @martinhudobivnik5895
    @martinhudobivnik5895 2 роки тому +10

    Front shifter being slow and front shifter taken from old Ultegra DI2. Sounds pretty fast and amazing to me. Unless you're buying 105 to ride TDF next year.

    • @martinhudobivnik5895
      @martinhudobivnik5895 2 роки тому +1

      At least with carbon they can talk about stiffness and compliance which' sounds' high tech.

  • @ricky7396
    @ricky7396 2 роки тому +1

    Those gear ratios to come would be great for a light gravel bike. That gets a bit of road use. Having the big 50x11 that would be nice. With a 36 big tooth on cassette too.

  • @TheChancerdog1
    @TheChancerdog1 2 роки тому +27

    Todays road bikes just don’t interest me at all. I don’t mind people going for this tech but who is going to make the bikes for those of us who loved the race like feel of lightweight bikes? You pretty much have to build your own or find an old bike on ebay at this point. Really saddens me

    • @Bpf1893
      @Bpf1893 2 роки тому +8

      Exactly. I’ll keep my 15lb rim brake mechanical bike. I have never once had a complaint about shifting or braking performance.

    • @TheChancerdog1
      @TheChancerdog1 2 роки тому +6

      @@Bpf1893 I’ve never not charged my cables or forgot them on the charger and my 105 shifts so flawlessly even after 6 years I don’t know why I would upset the Apple cart for heavier and more finicky systems 🤷‍♂️

    • @RobBlazoff
      @RobBlazoff 2 роки тому +1

      Aero vs. Light. What is faster?

    • @87togabito
      @87togabito 2 роки тому

      None. You guys are free to quit the sport. Don’t worry, no one misses you irrelevant folks.

    • @PhiyackYuh
      @PhiyackYuh 2 роки тому +1

      @@RobBlazoff riders weight slows everything down. Just collect all the data from weekend warriors weight. Thats your answer.

  • @urielp911
    @urielp911 2 роки тому +6

    12 Speed Ultegra has a rim brake option.Tthe ST-R8150 shifters are 12 speed Di2 rim brake shifters. Also 12 Speed Dura Ace has a rim brake option ST-R9250 shifters, so why do people think they won't produce a riim brake option on 105. I'm sure they will produce a mechanical and rim brake 105 option too. BYW my winter bike with mudguards is lighter than this bike. This bike is way too heavy and too expensive for what it is.

  • @zambufly1
    @zambufly1 2 роки тому +6

    I'll wait for the version with wireless hydraulic rim brakes...

    • @twatts4436
      @twatts4436 2 роки тому +5

      It's not going to happen.
      Unless that's the joke?
      Wireless braking would need to be normally clamped (braking), actively not braking with a continuous signal. Otherwise it would fail open in the event of flat batteries or loss of connection.
      With that being the case, the batteries are constantly draining. To maintain a good lifecycle they'd need to be pretty big.
      Then, if the battery did fail you'd have the brakes engaging 100% suddenly.
      None of this is safe.

  • @vinceasmith
    @vinceasmith 2 роки тому

    Interesting. Just to point out that all new Shimano Di2 shifters use CR1632 batteries not the CR2032 you have pictured at 10:56. Note that SRAM AXS shifters use the CR2032 batteries. You are correct in that 105 Di2 uses two CR1632 though. These are all commodity batteries. In my opinion, the CR2032 is much more common but that is a minor point.

  • @markwright8030
    @markwright8030 2 роки тому +4

    Great video on the new 105 group set . Bike looks good too👍👍👍🚴‍♂️🚴‍♂️

  • @steveco1800
    @steveco1800 2 роки тому +2

    Nice to see Orro featured. Got a 2019 Terra C GRX and 2018 Gold STC Ultegra and been very happy with them. Would recommend the brand. Not sure I could stomach over £3000 for a 9kg bike with entry level wheels (although better than the typical cheap rubbish wheels you get with Cannondale).

  • @marccarter1350
    @marccarter1350 2 роки тому +2

    I went Rohloff/steel frame a few years ago. Never looked back. My cycling is amazing again!

    • @casualguy393
      @casualguy393 2 роки тому

      Give a Cruzbike V20 a try. I am almost 6kph faster than my TT bike on it at a much lower power output. 2 hours max for me on the TT bike and I need a forklift to get me off it, and 8 hours for me on my V20. After I get off my V20 I can move around without my neck, back, ass or wrists hurting. It costs me about 210 watts for me to do 40kph on my V20 compared with 270 on my TT bike. Last month I raced a Japanese guy on his Cervelo P5/6. We both did 25km at 45.6kph with a slight tailwind. It cost me 211w to his 286w. He gave up at 25km, I continued on for another 18km. My TT bike has been hanging on the wall for 2 years except for 4 rides of about 50km each just to remind me how much I love my V20. With SRAM Force AXS I have only 2 brake wires hanging out in the breeze. For reference, my CdA on my V20 is about 0.200 and I can still get it down to 0.190 or maybe even 0.180 making it even more slippery.

    • @marccarter1350
      @marccarter1350 2 роки тому +2

      @@casualguy393 I stopped caring about speed. I no longer give a shit. I ride for fun without a bike computer. No cares given :-)

    • @casualguy393
      @casualguy393 2 роки тому +1

      @@marccarter1350 Fair enough and that is extremely important :) My TT bike is still an incredible bike. But I switched because I wanted longer saddle time. You can simply conserve energy for longer rides with the improved aerodynamics. Recumbents are still very comfortable as the seat contact patch is not only larger to distribute the body weight, but the reclined position takes more of your weight off your ass. V20 means a 20 degree seat angle, S40 means 40 degrees, but the S40 is a great touring bike. The legs being elevated means that your heart gets break because it doesn't need to lift the blood as it would on a diamond framed bike. Plus, the view is much better than looking at the front tire hahaha.
      It wouldn't hurt to try one. V20 owners in your area would be happy to let you give theirs a go.

    • @marccarter1350
      @marccarter1350 2 роки тому +1

      @@casualguy393 I have seen them. They look fun. Not sure i can afford another bike at present. We have a few vets here who have missing legs, or arms. I have seen them riding versions of these cycles here.

    • @casualguy393
      @casualguy393 2 роки тому +1

      @@marccarter1350 Sadly, bikes are getting so expensive these days so I understand what you mean. I have a couple of friends who use handcycles and it's great that they have the ability and desire to keep getting out. I let an amputee ride my V20 about 2 months ago, and he was in the same boat concerning bike prices.

  • @grantwilliams2912
    @grantwilliams2912 2 роки тому

    Thank you for the vid.. Looking fwd to the longer term 🙂👍

  • @PHHE1
    @PHHE1 2 роки тому +3

    "The aeroad is 100 money more", yeah, its also 10% lighter and has 60mm deep Aero wheels on in while this wheelet here makes the term Aero-Bike quite questionable.

    • @kimwarner6050
      @kimwarner6050 2 роки тому

      I was going to buy the aeroad, but It really isn't a light bike. The weight stated is xxsmall frame. Not to mention it already has the carbon seat post, handlebars, and wheels. So essentially you can't loose that much more weight. I also don't like that the small sizes come with 650b wheels. I decided to get a pinarello Paris with rival etap. Yes the bike is heavy, but you can get the weight down considerably. Also I just love the way the bike looks. I'm 4'11 and it is very difficult to find a bike that will fit me well.

    • @PHHE1
      @PHHE1 2 роки тому

      @@kimwarner6050 I don't know what you're doing. My SL8 with Ultegra di2 weighs 7.8 including bottle cage exactly as stated

  • @2906rick
    @2906rick 2 роки тому +3

    The shifters don’t feature the auxiliary hood button seen on the two higher-tier groupsets. They also lose out on the option to fit satellite shifters (or so-called ‘sprint shifters’).
    Unlike Dura-Ace and Ultegra, the brakes also don’t feature Servo Wave. Servo Wave makes the relationship between the brake lever and pad non-linear, improving modulation. Servo Wave is also seen on the brand’s GRX gravel groupset.
    Super expensive, no rim brake option and mechanical version. That is a big fail imo. I don't need disk brake . Only thing it does for me for my usage is making the bike heavier lol

  • @antonioduarte1964
    @antonioduarte1964 2 роки тому +4

    Please, review that bike as well!

  • @mlee6136
    @mlee6136 2 роки тому +1

    19lbs is heavier than my Ti Gravel bike like for like. One thing I noticed and confirmed is that disc brakes adds significant weight. All things considered.

    • @bonbonflippers4298
      @bonbonflippers4298 2 роки тому

      All my bikes are ti or steel and weight on those are irrelevant. But if I have a carbon bike it better be lighter that my lightest ti bike..which is 15lbs loaded....hard to beat but thats why you buy carbon...for stiffness and weight...
      9kg is like riding a steel bike...no way a carbon bike should be that heavy disc or not

  • @BikeLife154
    @BikeLife154 2 роки тому +1

    This bike is a BRICK! You can’t keep justifying these incredibly heavy machines as if the weight makes no difference.

  • @karlproctor7526
    @karlproctor7526 Рік тому +1

    Are you going to do a full review of the Orro?

  • @a1white
    @a1white 2 роки тому +2

    Pretty sad they’re saying you have to use the 11-34 cassette, with its bigger gaps. I’m sure many riders won’t need a 34 : 34 gear ratio. Why not give you a say a 11 or 12-30 cassette option, for example, without that ugly long-cage?

  • @17cream
    @17cream 2 роки тому +4

    £3500 for 105 !!!!!!!! I’m changing sport

  • @nigelperry9988
    @nigelperry9988 2 роки тому +1

    What do you think of the Orro Venturi frameset and wheels you are riding? I am seriously considering the Orro STC Gold STC Tailor Made with Ultegra DI2

  • @harrymitchell4033
    @harrymitchell4033 2 роки тому +3

    are you sure this is a road bike and not a gravel bike? 34 or 36 tooth on the back and 9kg without pedals, sounds a bit fishy if you ask me

  • @romanpramuka2703
    @romanpramuka2703 2 роки тому +31

    Yes, you need super easy gears, because these bikes are super heavy 😂

  • @turbosalsa
    @turbosalsa 2 роки тому +1

    Electronic for the people 🚴🏾‍♂️😎

  • @DynamiteDB
    @DynamiteDB 2 роки тому +8

    They’ve put climbing gears and chain rings on an aero bike? 🫤
    It’s so shit that you can’t use an 11-25, 11-28 or 11-30.

  • @kibbee890
    @kibbee890 2 роки тому +4

    They say you can't use it with 11-28, but I'd be interested in if it would work anyway. I had a deore bike that originally came with 11-32 and switched down to an 11-23 cassette and it shifted flawlessly. There's little reason why a rear derailleur would shift any differently with a smaller cassette than it was designed to handle.

    • @robtrotter7960
      @robtrotter7960 2 роки тому

      Chances are it would work just fine, it's just that they won't guarantee it. I've run a 32 when they said 30-max and it was faultless.

    • @MrChippinator
      @MrChippinator 2 роки тому

      I recently upgraded my groupset and bought a short cage rear mech. In my experience, 11-28 and 11-25 work with pretty much all long cage derailleurs. However, the shifting isn't as crisp and the setup is a bit more finicky.

  • @ohnoyoyo
    @ohnoyoyo 2 роки тому +1

    thanks for the quick review Dave but its a hard no from me! the last thing that my bikes need is sets of disposable batteries in the shifters.

  • @alastor2322
    @alastor2322 2 роки тому +2

    Cant for the life if me seeing this being bought. Makes a cheap ish bike expensive and we bought 105 to keep the price down on bikes. For me these days the industry is conning everybody to think that 4 and 5 grand is peanuts for a darn push bike

  • @jimeo2284
    @jimeo2284 2 роки тому +2

    incredible…,is this frame wight more than 2kg?so that the bike could be 9kg without pedals

  • @AlexssandroPhoto
    @AlexssandroPhoto Рік тому

    Hi, shimano 105 di2 working with Shimano Shimano Dura Ace Di2 Sw-r9150

  • @idpro83
    @idpro83 2 роки тому +1

    My bike I bought last year weighs a little less than 9 kg but it only cost me 270€. Don't get scammed people.

  • @David-wh7rm
    @David-wh7rm 2 роки тому +2

    Please do an in depth comparison to SRAM Rival eTap

  • @rangersmith4652
    @rangersmith4652 2 роки тому +6

    Claris, Sora, and Tiagra are the "people's" groupsets. Going higher in the Shimano range adds nothing but ego boost for the average casual or recreational rider and very little for fast club riders. Having 12 cogs means having a very narrow chain and very fussy indexing, something pro riders seldom worry about but the rest of us have to deal with every day. For me, electronically controlled shifting and 12 gears in the back are completely unnecessary, potentially problematic, and ultimately inferior compared to older and more bombproof 9 or 10-cog units. I have 11 mechanically-shifted cogs on my new-to-me Potenza-equipped bike, but that's my limit.

  • @indorock
    @indorock 2 роки тому +1

    It makes sense that a short cage RD cannot work with a larger cassette, but I've never heard of a longer cage not being compatible with a smaller cassette. What's the explanation behind that?

    • @AG-el6vt
      @AG-el6vt 2 роки тому +1

      Warranty claims. The fewer combinations they approve, the less testing they'll need to prove they're fine.

  • @LifeCycle1978
    @LifeCycle1978 2 роки тому +1

    I just came for the comments. Cyclist never let me down.

  • @chapmag6578
    @chapmag6578 2 роки тому +1

    Thanks, interesting review

  • @Veloscape
    @Veloscape 2 роки тому

    I don’t understand why people seem to be happy to pay more for inferior performance and weight. My CAAD12 (alu) is close to 7 kg with mechanical brakes and shifters. Rides like a dream. Of course I could have spent another £2000 to add a couple of kilos, maybe get it gold plated for that money

  • @r0sco_1
    @r0sco_1 2 роки тому +12

    Shimano has totally misjudged the market judging from the comments. If it sells as badly as it is being slated in the comments, then hopefully it will be a stark reminder that customer is still king.
    The cycling industry has been on a mission to sell bikes with components like disc brakes to consumers who do not want for the extra £$ for a heavier bike, given they could get a lighter bike a few years ago for far less just 5 years ago.

    • @davidarthur
      @davidarthur  2 роки тому +1

      Nobody builds a business or new product line based on comments ;)

    • @r0sco_1
      @r0sco_1 2 роки тому

      @@davidarthur I would call it a form of Market Research.
      Ultegra Di2 cost £1100 when it came out. Granted there is inflation but if Shimano want it to sell I would expect it to be roughly the same price. Instead we have a heavier and significantly more expensive product. I'd rather use an old Ultegra Di2. It would be a lot lighter and without and cheaper. Both things that their market research teams should have realised the consumer is interested in. I'd rather have a lighter and cheaper bike than a heavier more expensive bike. Obviously that would mean missing out on an extra gear or two, disc brakes and slightly quicker shifting.

    • @r0sco_1
      @r0sco_1 2 роки тому

      @@davidarthur Look at ANY 105 Di2 video and the comments are filled with people slating the price. This is a huge misstep from Shimano.
      You say nobody builds a business or product line based on comments but it's a Marketing team and product research teams job to understand their target audience. Given that viewers & commenters of Shimano 105 review videos are already interested in the topic, I would say it shows that their target audience is unimpressed at the price.
      It's a gross mistake to underestimate your target market. Many times companies have been burnt by this.
      If anything the price point might even hurt Shimano as consumers will now consider rival brands.

    • @davidarthur
      @davidarthur  2 роки тому

      Time will tell on this front, if Shimano has got it wrong and sales aren’t good they might have to react, so let’s see how the next year goes. We need to see more complete bike prices as that’s how the majority buy bikes, not the groupset on its own

    • @dcmkgo
      @dcmkgo 2 роки тому +2

      @@davidarthur agree, Shimano real market is OEM buying groupsets by the thousands not individuals. For them it is mostly the bike builders issue to create a “package” the mass market consumer will buy. If the builders said NO they might rethink but it would appear they did not.

  • @KoreaRides
    @KoreaRides 2 роки тому +10

    Way too heavy and overpriced! The Shimano 105 is too!

  • @ribbyramone
    @ribbyramone 2 роки тому +15

    What a joke, overpriced heavy junk. Get Chorus for half the price.

    • @goixiz
      @goixiz 2 роки тому

      how much is chorus ? is that electronic ?

    • @kerbodynamicx472
      @kerbodynamicx472 2 роки тому

      @@goixiz electronic is overrated imo. Until the day when electronic is less than 30% more costly than mechanical, I’m gonna stay with mechanical.

  • @SjaakSchulteis
    @SjaakSchulteis 2 роки тому

    Just checked the price... looks like this Shimano gear costs half the price of that bike... But so do other brands cost and even more. Why is it so expensive? The SRAM RED ETAP AXS 1X ELECTRONIC SHIFT KIT costs as much and there was another whole set that costs over 2000 $. Seems that Shimano is not the most expensive one. I'ld like electronic shifting, but that price tag is way too high. I stick with the old mechanical shifting, thank you very much.

  • @DjCringefest
    @DjCringefest 2 роки тому +2

    ok wheight is not everything but setting off on a ride with saddle bag and full bottles could mean almost 11 kg. and if not for improving performance then why and for who is this aero bike made? pricing might easely shoot up another 500 on other brands... the 105, in my mind at least, was like a solid marker in groupsetland. the first step in getting serious about road biking. it still looks pro tho.

  • @Flexo_l
    @Flexo_l 2 роки тому

    Cube and Canyon AXS bikes are 3k€. 105 DI2 should be under 3k then and it will be perfect for my next bike 😋

    • @Michaelsmith21588
      @Michaelsmith21588 2 роки тому

      Compared to the cost of the Rose Ultegra at 4600€ this could be a great option for me. I don't think they will make it under 3000€ tho.

  • @channel8048
    @channel8048 2 роки тому +3

    How much better is this over the existing mechanical 105 11 speed? Is it worth the upgrade?

    • @kayy-03
      @kayy-03 2 роки тому +2

      As you're gonna need to replace basically everything, I can almost guarantee, you that it's not worth it unless there is something wrong with your 105 and you need to change parts anyway, or just have money laying around, but not enough for Ultegra DI2. But Ultegra R8050 would probably be the smarter upgrade as it's cheaper and you can keep the same cassette and crank

    • @Paddyhudson
      @Paddyhudson 2 роки тому +3

      Absolutely NOT worth it.

    • @Vazter
      @Vazter 2 роки тому +1

      If you want to add more weight to your bike go ahead upgrade it lmao 🤣

  • @Kvs-vf9nt
    @Kvs-vf9nt 2 роки тому

    Not woth 1800euro for me. Then I rather buy for Ultegra again. But I keep my 105-R7000 it's good enough. I don't need a bike that makes me 5seconds faster. I don't race anymore since a long time.

  • @mokujinsan9946
    @mokujinsan9946 2 роки тому +21

    3 large for a 9kg plastic bike without pedals. 😂🤣😂🤣😂

  • @slantedorbit
    @slantedorbit 2 роки тому

    The primary goal appears to be further differentiating road and gravel/adventure groupsets. Next year’s Tiagra will straddle both.

  • @pj9375
    @pj9375 2 роки тому

    This groupset on a light frame like TCR would be the way to go.. 9kg seems a bit much, but how much of that is in the frame and how much is attributable to grp set?

  • @stevenfreeman7798
    @stevenfreeman7798 2 роки тому

    So much for fashion! You can buy a size 54 allez elite at the moment that weighs about 8.7kg for £1199 brand new from any decent bike shop surely weight still stands for something!. Yes this bike mirrors more expensive bikes it looks lovely but faced with bloody great mountains or hills you still have to pedal the bloody thing up there!!.

  • @teunluijbregts2533
    @teunluijbregts2533 2 роки тому +1

    So how is it compared to Campagnolo Record?
    I personally found Ultegra shifting much slower than Campa Ekar, and Ekar braking much more responsive.
    Wondering whether 105 and Record come closer?

    • @jimhize
      @jimhize 2 роки тому

      Given there isn’t a Record EPS (only super record) it probably compares favourably in terms of shifting speed at least, but it isn’t a like-for-like comparison.

    • @teunluijbregts2533
      @teunluijbregts2533 2 роки тому

      True you would be comparing different technical solutions to a similar business case, however the comparison would be very fair from a pricepoint perspective.
      Which is my question: what is the advantage of electronic? Is the £800 additional cost of the mechanical justified when all other components in the mechanical groupet are higher level? Or are those lower level components just as good and should we just accept the additional weight?

    • @1barnet1
      @1barnet1 2 роки тому +1

      @@teunluijbregts2533 The benefits of electronic shifting are easy.
      There is never a need to adjust tension on the cables. (every cable stretches and with ever increasing gears the tolerances become smaller.)
      The front derailleur can auto adjust for chain line. This also allows for an narrower front cage with results in quicker more decisive shifting.
      The downsides are easy to summerize in 1 word.
      complexity.
      complexity leads to higher prices and higher weight. Obviously the weight penalty can be circumvented by using more advanced materials and construction techniques.
      But this make the price penalty even worse and is not compatible with what 105 means for Shimano's customers.
      I think for the bikes that used to retail arround 1600-2500 with Shimano 105. Campagnolo Centaur and Chorus have become genuinely better options.
      Shimano just destroyed there own mid tier market. Tiagra 10 speed is just not good enough and 105 11speed seems discontinued.
      They'd better rebrand their old 105 to Tiagra or like with Deore (there is 6xxx 5xxx and 4xxx deore) and make a separate component tier for mechanical 105.
      or they will lose marketshare.

  • @glennoc8585
    @glennoc8585 2 роки тому

    Bikes have gone up yet there seems to lots of young riders on social media riding the latest expensive bikes. Must be able and willing to pay the big money

  • @nidge8703
    @nidge8703 2 роки тому

    Not sure about the long rear cage.

  • @Thetoad738
    @Thetoad738 2 роки тому

    I wonder why they kept the Dura-Ace and 105 names but dropped 600 for Ultegra.

  • @hollywoodundead72
    @hollywoodundead72 2 роки тому +1

    Honestly the last thing I need is a battery on my mechanical machine

  • @joeobrien9648
    @joeobrien9648 2 роки тому

    Overpriced for in essence a 3 kg groupset.Makes pairing with carbon wheels sensible or ...You decide

  • @EwanSWinston
    @EwanSWinston Рік тому

    How did you fine the bike? is it really aggressive or comfortable. I'm looking at the propel but at the price of the Orro i'm now thinking I like these

    • @jamiemitchell6265
      @jamiemitchell6265 Рік тому

      Any luck on finding out? I love the price of the bike but I’m worried it’s going to be too aggressive..

  • @horaciostjeward
    @horaciostjeward 2 роки тому +6

    This is the groupset the made me switch to Shensa. Bye bye Shimano

    • @Paddyhudson
      @Paddyhudson 2 роки тому +1

      Sensah, but agreed.

    • @mitjabokalic6472
      @mitjabokalic6472 2 роки тому

      @@JamesSmith-qs4hx Chinese groupset. I saw the test on yt... It was quite good an much cheaper

  • @robleigh14
    @robleigh14 Рік тому

    What does that bike compare to the Ribble areo di2

  • @harrymitchell4033
    @harrymitchell4033 2 роки тому +8

    9kg? not too bad? hahahahaha no thank you

  • @johndef5075
    @johndef5075 2 роки тому +1

    How do you put these modern carbon bikes in a repair stand without f' ing them up?

    • @Bpf1893
      @Bpf1893 2 роки тому +5

      Seat post

    • @RobBlazoff
      @RobBlazoff 2 роки тому

      Either a metal seatpost or an adapter, similar to what Silca makes

    • @Paddyhudson
      @Paddyhudson 2 роки тому +1

      @@Bpf1893 but what about if it has a proprietary aero seatpost??

    • @Bpf1893
      @Bpf1893 2 роки тому +1

      @@Paddyhudson I would still do it. It’s designed to be clamped. If anything using a bike stand puts less force on it then the clamp used to hold it into the frame.

  • @GS-pk9rd
    @GS-pk9rd 2 роки тому +1

    Very strange bike. Areo frame and compact cassette w/ 11-34t.. heavy as well, so maybe a gravel bike but presented as a road bike???

  • @kjwagoner
    @kjwagoner 2 роки тому +1

    That bike is gorgeous !

  • @RAG0407
    @RAG0407 2 роки тому

    You mentioned how the gearing of a 105 could better suit non power riders. While I get this is due to the fact that smaller gears. But maybe you could do a video on what rider would suit different gearing scenarios from the different brand. It might help me decide between 105 or rival.

  • @turbosalsa
    @turbosalsa 2 роки тому

    Shimano had to react to Sram rival. What about comparing the new 105 to sram rival Dave?

    • @davidarthur
      @davidarthur  2 роки тому

      That video is in the pipeline :)

  • @kibbee890
    @kibbee890 2 роки тому

    Did they just take the previous version of Ultegra Di2 and put a 105 badge on it? Not a bad idea, but I'm wondering how much of a this is a new groupset vs. just using an old groupset with new labels on it.

    • @1barnet1
      @1barnet1 2 роки тому

      No the previous Ultegra Di2 was lighter (2,5kg compared to 3kg of this 105) and 11 speed.
      They made a new groupset based on the new ultegra but with less advanced materials and production methods. Hence the increase in weight.

  • @sebart8028
    @sebart8028 2 роки тому

    Very exciting bike. 🚴🚴🚴🚵🚵🚳🐌😛

  • @Hintonbro.
    @Hintonbro. 2 роки тому

    Now we need GRX 105 level di2

  • @Mikekhoh
    @Mikekhoh 2 роки тому +2

    9kg no thanks

  • @michaelsingh843
    @michaelsingh843 2 роки тому +1

    Is it better or same than the ultegra di2 11 speed?

    • @davidarthur
      @davidarthur  2 роки тому

      12 is better than 11 no?

    • @MrLuigi-oi7gm
      @MrLuigi-oi7gm 2 роки тому

      @@davidarthur Hi David, I think he might be implying how does the performance of the 11 speed Ultegra Di2 (8000 series) compare to this 105 groupset independent of the fact that the 105 has one more gear. For example, you mentioned one thing in this video. 11 speed Ultegra Di2 has buttons on the hoods that can be programmed to do a variety of functions... Including control your cycling computer. The 12 speed 105 does not. Another example would be the weights of the 12 speed 105 vs. the 11 speed Ultegra. The Ultegra 11 speed is quite a bit lighter...especially the rim brake version. Which is another example. The 11 speed Ultegra is offered with rim brakes. The 12 speed 105 is disc only. For some people the extra gear of the 12 speed 105 may be a matter of life and death. For others, the 11 speed Ultegra's feature set, plus the fact that you can now get it at a lower price than 12 speed 105, may make it the the favored option. Sounds like a subject for a future video!!!!

  • @baltimorejae7397
    @baltimorejae7397 Рік тому

    What pedals are you using?

  • @Hippiehansie
    @Hippiehansie 2 роки тому +1

    In the bikeshops 2030

  • @notyourrealfather
    @notyourrealfather Рік тому

    I'm between a bike with this groupset and one with mechanical Ultegra, and I can't seem to find any resources saying which is better

    • @davidarthur
      @davidarthur  Рік тому

      Which is best comes down to personal preference really, one isn't specifically better than the other, they're different

  • @johnsalgir
    @johnsalgir 2 роки тому

    my 20 year old steel bike weighs less than this, I can't believe how heavy and expensive new bikes have become.

  • @Fixin-To
    @Fixin-To 2 роки тому +19

    Love the fact that 16t was mentioned and now everyone is suddenly a 16t connoisseur and would never touch a groupset without one. Sheep.