@Jman3000 Hello friend. Circle reasoning is used to age the rocks. The sediments containing the fossil record were produced by Noah's flood 4400 years ago.
@micah1116 No you're right, to surround a large body fossil such as a whale or tree with sediment would happen rapidly over a period of weeks or months or even less due to a turbidity current. It's the rock formation that takes the time and that's what she's referring to. I don't know the term polystrate but I guess it means through many strata, again it is reasonable to expect that in areas of rapid deposition such as volcanic areas you would get these without resorting to religious nonsense
@johnthreesixteen316 Yes some sediments - such as turbidity currents form fairly rapidly but rock formation normally takes longer. I've never poured a driveway or sidewalk but I get your point
@johnthreesixteen316 The process still at work? Sedimentation. Turbidity currents at the edge of continental shelves for example or maybe rivers - you must have heard of them.
How does she know that it is 235 million years old? I'm not doubting it, I am just trying to understand the logic behind determining the age of rock layers.
I'd like to know which processes still at work today produced sediment layers as much as 18 miles thick? What modern day processes are producing any fossils? None. Whales are found fossilized through 'millions' of years of layers.
I know that this thread happened a long time ago...but johnthreesixteen316, I would like to request that you produce a list of references of scientific journal articles that support your claims. These exist by the hundreds of thousands supporting what Ian is saying. If anything you said is actually supported by science, it would have been published and debated by the scientific community, and the process best supported by the evidence would be the one we currently teach. Ian's.
The same processes that created the rock can be seen on Earth today. It takes a long time to create sedimentary rock. Radio metric dating is used to date the rock, a long established an accurate technique. Those of you who want to ignore science or make pathetic attempt to debunk it never have to justify their position - for example, if your flood led to the aquatic fossils in the high Andes and Himalayas then where did the water go because there isn't enough on the planet now to reach.
@johnthreesixteen316 You obviously don't understand how evolution works. It is not driven. It works on the survival of individual genes and groups of genes. For evolution a dragonfly is just as highly evolved as a human or for that matter any other organism alive on the planet today as they have survived or (more accurately) the niche in which they live has survived. Find out what evolution is first, then comment
Do not call me friend because I don't know you and to be quite honest I don't want to. Yes the earth is flat and the the Himalayas are only 4400 years old, there are fairies at the bottom of the garden and santa will bring you something nice for Christmas. Fool, the Himalayas are 20 M years old, uplifted from the remains of the Tethys ocean
@johnthreesixteen316 Rubbish - the dating of rocks and fossils is not done by assumption. It is only reasonable to predict that rock and fossil in the same strata formed at the same time - but both can be radio metrically dated. I wonder why your flood killed the many marine organisms which disappeared 65 million years ago eg ammonites
@Jman3000 Hello friend. Here is the truth regarding these 'scientists'......."Knowing this first, that there shall come IN THE LAST DAYS SCOFFERS, walking after their own lusts.......for this they WILLING ARE IGNORANT OF, that by the word of God the heavens were of old, and the earth standing out of the water and in the water: By which the world that then was, being OVERFLOWED WITH WATER, perished." 2 Peter 3 (emphasis is mine)
![ПОЛНАЯ ИСТОРИЯ ЭКЗОРЦИЗМА [Топ Сикрет]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/qBySr6Bt0B8/mqdefault.jpg)
Lol "like the walls of my cave" i laughed at that during science :)
Nice rocks
The sedimentary rock formation due to water explains the reason why in pokemon game franchises rock type pokemon is weak to water type moves.
this is the best comment section ive ever seen
good one
@Jman3000 Hello friend. Circle reasoning is used to age the rocks. The sediments containing the fossil record were produced by Noah's flood 4400 years ago.
@micah1116 No you're right, to surround a large body fossil such as a whale or tree with sediment would happen rapidly over a period of weeks or months or even less due to a turbidity current. It's the rock formation that takes the time and that's what she's referring to. I don't know the term polystrate but I guess it means through many strata, again it is reasonable to expect that in areas of rapid deposition such as volcanic areas you would get these without resorting to religious nonsense
@johnthreesixteen316 Yes some sediments - such as turbidity currents form fairly rapidly but rock formation normally takes longer. I've never poured a driveway or sidewalk but I get your point
What series is this? I wish to find more videos to help my son with his failing science grades. Thank you.
Helped me on my science project. Thanks
*sigh* i wish my life was like sandstone
thanks this really helped me .cool video!!!!!!!
@johnthreesixteen316 The process still at work? Sedimentation. Turbidity currents at the edge of continental shelves for example or maybe rivers - you must have heard of them.
Very interesting vid
How does she know that it is 235 million years old? I'm not doubting it, I am just trying to understand the logic behind determining the age of rock layers.
Hello friend. What does the flood have to do with religion? Nothing. So I'm not sure why you would mention it.
@johnthreesixteen316 Not circle reasoning - radio metric dating
How did i get here
@johnthreesixteen316 You just make it up as you go along - What happened to all the extinct marine organisms.
I'd like to know which processes still at work today produced sediment layers as much as 18 miles thick? What modern day processes are producing any fossils? None. Whales are found fossilized through 'millions' of years of layers.
yeet swag squad fam
:)
@micah1116 what century are you in
@Jman3 Radio metric dating
@johnthreesixteen316 I think that myself. I'm trying to understand things.
I know that this thread happened a long time ago...but johnthreesixteen316, I would like to request that you produce a list of references of scientific journal articles that support your claims. These exist by the hundreds of thousands supporting what Ian is saying. If anything you said is actually supported by science, it would have been published and debated by the scientific community, and the process best supported by the evidence would be the one we currently teach. Ian's.
The same processes that created the rock can be seen on Earth today. It takes a long time to create sedimentary rock. Radio metric dating is used to date the rock, a long established an accurate technique. Those of you who want to ignore science or make pathetic attempt to debunk it never have to justify their position - for example, if your flood led to the aquatic fossils in the high Andes and Himalayas then where did the water go because there isn't enough on the planet now to reach.
very thick
very very thick
thick
thick
thick
thick
thick
thick
thick
thicker than your mum
claudia is a snack
4 stars
@johnthreesixteen316 You obviously don't understand how evolution works. It is not driven. It works on the survival of individual genes and groups of genes. For evolution a dragonfly is just as highly evolved as a human or for that matter any other organism alive on the planet today as they have survived or (more accurately) the niche in which they live has survived. Find out what evolution is first, then comment
thikkkk
thickkkkk
thickkkkkkk
thickkkkkkkk
@johnthreesixteen316 You have got to be having a laugh
@johnthreesixteen316 I wasn't clear. I believe what you say about Noah's flood. I'm just trying to understand things like how people date rocks.
I thought the geology lady was very nice. I love you geology lady
Do not call me friend because I don't know you and to be quite honest I don't want to. Yes the earth is flat and the the Himalayas are only 4400 years old, there are fairies at the bottom of the garden and santa will bring you something nice for Christmas. Fool, the Himalayas are 20 M years old, uplifted from the remains of the Tethys ocean
"friend" is a slang that someone says when they respect you enough to the point where they're treating you like a friend.
@johnthreesixteen316 Rubbish - the dating of rocks and fossils is not done by assumption. It is only reasonable to predict that rock and fossil in the same strata formed at the same time - but both can be radio metrically dated. I wonder why your flood killed the many marine organisms which disappeared 65 million years ago eg ammonites
dafuq did i just read
Lmaoo this is so old
lol she lives in a cave
lol
hi
ua-cam.com/video/I3ksyC78RI8/v-deo.html
@@Noa_888 i cried
@@AGwest1 it gets better😕😕😔😣😭🍔
@@Noa_888 i don’t know if she’ll survive 😔✊
@@AGwest1 she didn’t buckle up..🤺
@Jman3000 Hello friend. Here is the truth regarding these 'scientists'......."Knowing this first, that there shall come IN THE LAST DAYS SCOFFERS, walking after their own lusts.......for this they WILLING ARE IGNORANT OF, that by the word of God the heavens were of old, and the earth standing out of the water and in the water: By which the world that then was, being OVERFLOWED WITH WATER, perished." 2 Peter 3 (emphasis is mine)
potato
Go and preach your nonsense somewhere else - this is a not the place for it