Why is Lancet 3 Successful Against Leopard 2A6
Вставка
- Опубліковано 20 чер 2023
- In a recent news, it has been reported that Russia's advanced Lancet-3 system has achieved its first successful encounter against a German-made Leopard 2 tank. This report was based on a video footage shared by Russian Ministry of Defense showcasing the precise and impactful strike delivered by the Lancet loitering munition. So, what factors contribute to the effectiveness of Lancet-3 against the Leo 2A6?
Subscribe Now :
/ @military-tv - Наука та технологія
The Orlan-10 has not failed - it's purely a reconnaissance drone. It's purpose is to gather information. It's not an armed drone.
YES EXACTLY, it reports back accurate GPS coordinates of tanks and Howitzers etc, so the Russian Artillery can be pin point accurate every single time. Very- very efficient system. The Ukranians have lost 10,000s of military hardware items due to this, and indeed tens of thousands of men.
@@graemes52 It's the reason why the M777 is essentially useless and hasn't achieved anything.
Orlan 10 is now Orlan 30
@@derbigpr500 Yes and NATO tanks & Crabs and Ceasers,. Drones have greater range and total accuracy. They are game changers in the real sense of the term
Radically agree
Ursula you lied to me,their shovels can fly 😂
Everyone knows that Shovels don't fly.....but washing machine do
With their tails shot clean off 🐊
EU lies every time just for the US masters
Не только летать, но и пиз-ть
Brilliant 😂
The picture of the Leopard is from a training in Poland where one Leopard ran into the other knocking the turret of.
Yeah, and that other picture is one reused to death by now. Shitty cick bait vid btw, not a reason was given as to why the lancet is successful against leo's
And its a 2A4...
Там на картинке даже следы траков видно где коллега заехал танком.
Картинка замануха
Весь видео ряд подбитых танков НАТО это не работа Ланцета, а работа российских танков, арты и птр комплексов. Ну с другой стороны, а где ему картинки взять для канала?
they just need a bumb for a flying turret lol
The costs of each armament:
Bradley: 4.35 million dollars
Leopard 2A6: 8.42 million dollars
Lancet: 0.02 - 0.04 million dollars
rxtxrds still don't realize it's money spent possibly 20-40 years ago, and that most of the equipment the US sends is nearing expiration date and waiting to be scrapped or to go a tank graveyard
А сколько надо американским генералам заплатить и корпорациям которые оружие изготовляют, все входит в цену оружия на продажу.
Эффект дежавю, а на самом же деле -
Не Курская это, совсем не дуга. 🚩
Но, как в 43-ем мы видим в прицеле
Кресты, как мишени, на танках врага.
Немецкие "кошки" опять в перекрестье,
И гладит их, русский солдат, против шерсти,
Да так, что ложится в десятку снаряд.
И те, как и в ту, мировую, горят!
16.06.2023г
so you win wars...)
Yeah and a 1000$ artillery shell can take out a 10 million dollar tank so what?
Here's the thing....tanks (Leopard2s/T-90s etc.) are not obsolete in any way. However, tanks---no matter how modern---can only succeed if they are a component of a properly balanced combined arms team which is intelligently employed against realistically achievable tactical and strategic objectives. There is no high-tech "wunderwaffe" that can win by itself when employed incorrectly. Even if a technology has a decisive edge, history shows us that such an advantage is only short-term as counter-technologies and/or techniques are soon developed.
True but at the beginning of the war the west make it out to be like their tanks wouldn't be destroyed
Oh look, we have a progress. T-90s are not obsolete in any way. And apparently there is no high-tech "wunderwaffe". That took you long enough. You know what's next? People will realize that active protection is not usable against such adversary. Look at them in the comments. It's already happening.
Tanks may not be obsolete yet but they will soon be.They are going the way of the battleship. In my opinion, in any scenarion where the adversary has modern artillery, guided misiles, Kornets and soon-to-be AI-powered loitering drones, tanks are little more than expensive metal coffins... hence why the Ukrainians are leaving their tanks whenever possible.
Probably also so why the Russians aren't even bothering to try to bring the T 14s to full production anymore.
You give me your tank's $10 million budget and the ocst of fuel, crew, maintenance, and transport and I'll buy about 500 Lancets for every tank, let's see if your tanks make it within 20 miles of my position... I don't like your chances.
Price Lancet 3 = 10.000 €
Price Leopard = 11.000.000 €
There is NOTHING to say against your comment...
However, I can still remember very well that the German taxpayer (and I think also the taxpayers in the other western "democracies") were promised that the western tanks will quickly end this war in UKRAINE... (to avoid the to justify
costs for these deliveries)...
However, we have not been told how this war will end...
Burning LEOPARD tanks are neither evidence of a "game changer" nor an image boost for the German armaments industry.
When the Russian army suffered devastating casualties early in this war, the western world scoffed at the Russian
tanks being no good...
I must say, the German "super tanks" on the battlefields in UKRAINE don't burn much worse either...
Did anyone ever get the message from the German Army from WW2 that said without air cover tanks are a sitting target.
BUt gHoST oF kEiVv
Kinda makes you wonder if this shit is fake 🤔🤷♂️
@@stephenmyers7076 no it's real
@@milsimmaniac711 I think most is fake. Some is real but Russia is the land of lies. They have done nothing but lie about their capabilities since the end of WWII 🤷♂️
С-400 ..500km
Orlan-10 is a true recon drone. It flies very high, has long duration and better sensors.
Lancet is not only for recon. Its for suicide.
@@Hansiwansi it's not a su/ cide if there's no pilot on board.
Orlan 10, is that the drone with a nikon and a petbottle for a fueltank?
@@stefanth8596 they got you with the propaganda vid
@@stefanth8596 yes and lancet has a shovel where the warhead should be. How will the west ever recover when our tanks get btfo-d by a flying shovel.
What helps Lancet-3 defeat Leo-2A6 is the fact that Lancet-3 DIVES onto the ROOF of the tank. Shaped charge into the roof will penetrate any tank that exists in the world currently. Both sides also use typical quadcopters for tank hunting: they strap an RPG grenade to them, look for a tank and dive onto its roof or motor-transmission cover, where penetration is more likely. It's all about targeting the weak spots.
Roof cage can sometimes protect the tank from Lancet. Also wire mesh is used to protect artillery from Lancets, sometimes it works too
Я же писал вам тут когда то , что ваша военная техника очень дорогая , но гореть будет не хуже самого дешевого танка . Почему меня никто не слушал? Пойми одну простую вещь - хорошее оружие для войны это такое оружие которое просто в эксплуатации и дешево в производстве . Это же элементарные вещи . Так всегда было , есть и будет. Любую технику которую подарит Украине НАТО все равно сожгут, взорвут и сломают. Подчеркиваю красным - любую технику.
i did see some videos of the lancets hitting the leo, if i remember correctly they hit the sides
You wrote a garbage.
In this video you see a leopard hit directly under the turret or side of the tank.
@@nimenea yes and those are weakspots
Just like AK-47 this is another masterpiece from Kalashnikov. A legend already.
👍🏻
Russia the best 🇷🇺❤️🇷🇺❤️🇷🇺❤️
556 rifles no dam good in mud. Seen the trenches. Kalishnikov knew what he was doing when he designed it.
Cheap, fast to manufacture, less confusing build, but deadly, so yeah this is another Flying AK
70-90% of the avionics and options on Rus hi-tech weapons are American, German, French, Canadian, Japanese, some Chinese, Korean and Taiwanese. and even from the Baltic states. Of course, it's all in accordance the sanctions, but Russia pays x3 and x5 for them, so the sellers still earn a lot of money.
And people die, and the war continues.
Why not blockade all electronics and optic goods going to Russia 100%??!
Ah, the famous X-Wing Shovel.
Another outstanding piece made by reading the lancet 3 sales brochure interspersed with some borrowed lancet 3 manufacturer video.
The lancet 3 is effective against the leopard 2A6 for exactly the same reason it is effective against any other armored vehicle: because it's a well designed modern anti-armor munition.
You can only see that Leo2 got hit by Lancet but not that they were severely damaged or destroyed. Come again!
The Lancet only disable the tank, but this is enough.
Actually the CEO and creator of the Lancet drones recently said in a video that at closer range, they prefer to use the Lancet-1's. The Lancet-3 actually looks different from when it was debuted which the front wings are longer than the X shape.
There is also a new, and third Lancet variant that has a increased range (200km), and a new launch system, and other features.
Do you have a link to the details of the new version? Sounds interesting.
@@andyspoo2 Сейчас Ланцеты обладают камерой ночного видения и ИИ системой которая самостоятельно ищет и уничтожает цели. Теперь даже под РЭБом, он способен продолжить преследовать цель. Всего за время СВО задокументированы(!) т.е. есть видео-подтверждения 1000 пусков Ланцетов (буквально вчера был юбилей) А реально их применяют еще больше. Правда и от старого Ланцета в нем пожалуй только название и осталось...
it will do the same against Challengers , Abrams or Merkava. The tank in the open is an inviting and rather easy target, If the mines, AT infantry Kornets, KA-52 Ataka AT missiles, laser guided arty shells don't get you, there's the Lancet.
the British have told Ukrainians only to use Challengers in defensive positions behind the offensive in fear that if the destroyed tanks are seen on photos like the leopard 2s, it will be hard to sell the war narratives to their public.
in modern drone warefare tanks are garbage
They are going the way of the battleship. In my opinion, in any scenarion where the adversary has modern artillery, guided misiles, Kornets and soon-to-be AI-powered loitering drones, tanks are little more than expensive metal coffins... hence why the Ukrainians are leaving their tanks whenever possible.
Probably also so why the Russians aren't even bothering to try to bring the T 14s to full production anymore.
You give me your tank's $10 million budget and the ocst of fuel, crew, maintenance, and transport and I'll buy about 500 Lancets for every tank, let's see if your tanks make it within 20 miles of my position... I don't like your chances.
@@likemostthings Not when you have counter drone systems...Active tank protection, Electronic walfare, air defense systems..etc..They can shoot over half the drones then tankers can deal with the rest
@@denisrichu5697 tanks are to expensive they should been left in ww2, like seriously damn things cost millions of dollars they weight tons plus they are always crewed, to much to lose in a warfare don't you think.
Нужно собрать танковый кулак из 200-250 Леопардов и Абрамсов для прорыва , а за ними Бредли и БМП 300-350 машин с пехотой 5-6 тысяч человек . И к ипеням погибнуть через полчаса .
отличное соотношение цены Ланцета и Леопарда
А также в сравнении сколько времени надо на производство танка и ланцета несопоставимо просто. А сколько этот бедный танк ехал до места своей гиьели, а хлопнули его за минуту.
@@user-u6rty2op не в тему, дроны для борьбы с танками не годятся или тебе лишь бы покритиковать?
@@user-u6rty2op
There are 25 million people left in Ukraine, in 1991 there were 50. Literally twice as many. Does the price match in this case?
The Orlan 10 is literally taking a lot of the videos we see of the lancet strikes
The Orlan 10 is an artillery recon drone. And yes, it's very successful in its role. Cheap and easy to produce in grate numbers, therefore can sustain a very high attrition in the hottest areas. It also used as a laser designator for guided shells like the Krasnopol.
Lancets are usually used in pair with Zala recon drone. The same manufacturer as the Lancet.
It is also guidance drone since it points laser to the target which guides laser guided artillery and lancet
It doesn't carry a laser designator. Orlan-30 does
Those Bradleys and leopards that you showed a video clip of were victims of a minefield, not a drone attack
All tanks are vulnerable to top down missiles.
Hard kill counter measures could help, but if it can get near the hull from the top it can destroy it.
leopard 2 has 38 mm side armor. basically tinfoil. can be even penetrated by close hit by artillery. but western people somehow think that their tanks are superior to t90 with 80mm side armor and double layers of reactive armor.😄
@@MultiNonpoint LOL you have no idea what armor the 2A6 has.
вропейцы. не россияне виноваты. А русские "люди". Избавьтесь от своей толерантности по отношению с русским людоедам. Сказанное вовсе не нацизм. Русский - это не этнос. Когда вы производите селекцию растений, вы же не говорите, что данный кактус обладает качествами фашиста? Русский - худшее что могло произойти с человеком. И произошло это за ваши денги. За западные деньги. Это селекция рабов за ваш счет. Селекция дотационных тварей, сидящих на шее у банды отморозков. Все кто не были иждивенцами были истреблены. Гены свободолюбивых людей не успели оказать влияние на популяцию. Если вы это не признаете, то откажитесь от генетики, назовите генетику лженаукой, а эволюцию назовите мракобесием. Руские 1000 лет не имели прав собственности, не имели права на бизнес, были расходным материалом и только приспособленцы за лояльность к власти имели значительные преференции. Потомство успевали дать исключительно предатели и доносчики.....
Полезные признаки социальных приспособленцев, рабов с культом государства в крови и доносчиков и приобрела русская популяция. И теперь через русскую культуру они пытаются распространять по миру свою рабскую ментальность. В этом нет ничего удивительного. Изучите мат часть.
Вы скажете что немцы тоже были фашистами. Да, для немцев фашизм - это не естественное состояние, это болезнь. Для русских фашизм - это их естественное состояние!
ПЕРЕВЕДИ И ДОНЕСИ ДО ЕВРОПЕЙСКИХ ТРУСЛИВЫХ ПОЛИТИКОВ..
@@MultiNonpoint That is why it is easy t see Russia SCARED to use the T-90 and more scared to deploy the "ARMATA TOY/TONKA MBT" ??
@@steffenjespersen247 Neither DO YOU!
Great sales pitch for the Lancet 3 by Russia. Counter-measures against drones should be a top priority for everyone. The way of war has changed drastically overnight since the first Azerbaijan-Armenia conflict in which drone were wildly successful by Azerbaijan, that should have been a huge wake up call for the entire Military/Defense complex across the World. Methods of operation are changing daily with the war in Ukraine on every aspect of warfare.
no pitch its record speaks for itself
The Azerbaijan- Armenia war was definitely an eye opener!!!
The Turkish drone played a big part but was useless during the SMO.
Fighting against Russia with excellent air defense, drones are less affective.
Turkish drones were mercilessly destroyed by Russian now there is no sign of that bayraktar drone
Effective against Armenia, the Turkish Bayrakhtars failed in the war against Russia.
Things happen.
This might be a bit overstated. Drones are effective but have received disproportionate coverage due to their ability to record target hits and in turn receive propaganda value from the public. Experts in the military likely already understand the value of/use of drone warfare. This stuff is only getting to the public recently due to youtube.
The extraordinary thing about the Lancet is its price, in fact according to various experts, its price varies between $10k and $20k which makes it an exceptional weapon. with $20k the Russians are making a massacre of NATO material. A Leo 2A6 costs $4 million.
В этом и вся прелесть дронов, продать дешёвку очень дорого это победа.
You saw 1 leopard2 burning and thats a masacre….. try watching russian t80s t72 t90 getting hit and you will see alot more… arrogant russians… cant tolerate morons.
what makes the Lancet-3 and the KUB-BLA drones extremely exceptional is that they have autonomous capabilities, you can jam the video feed, but drone is coming regardless. when lunched in a given area, drone will find targets on its own and engage them without operator.
In your dream, you watch 2 leopard filmed in 100 angles and you think a hundred have been destroyed. LOL
That's why usa dint send the fat abrums
Countermeasures against drones would be an interesting topic. High-value decoy targets that are deployed with active units, more sophisticated radar to detect along with aircraft to intercept, use of warning system based on audio detection of drone engine/propeller characteristics, and defensive anti-drones constantly in the air over the battlefield, etc.
Most common countermeasure against drone in militaries is ground-based EW system. Also both Russians and Ukrainians are getting more and more "anti-drone guns" that fire an EMP at it and drop it. Also depending on the drone itself, a basic SPAAGM would easily kill a medium-sized drone. As Pantsir has done repeatedly. Shit, the darn thing takes out HIMARS rockets, so drones aren't a problem.
@@Max_Da_G Multimission drones have multiple layers of protection. For example, if they lose the command link they are preprogrammed to return home. In contrast, I would think that even single-use drones would have multiple layers of target acquisition (image, infrared, emissions, and GPS) however there are tradeoffs with weight, distance, and power. Recent wars have integrated the use of drones and exposed their usage and countermeasures to the public.
Bro its shovels, its flying shovels 😂😂
Perhaps in the distant future tank mounted lazers could be deployed, but making a lazer powerful and small enough to be placed on a tank would be a challenge!
Миллионы ложных целей которые не оставляют следов? Это прошлый век.
There's footage of it hitting a disabled leo2 A6 to prevent it being recovered, not seen a single Leo2 taken out directly by a Lancet (not that it isn't possible). A lot of the clips in this video are pretty misleading as they are from AT-mine damaged/destroyed vehicles, KA52 strikes etc., not Lancet strikes.
Bull.
What nonsense. Maybe there were a couple of shots where the Lancet hits armored vehicles abandoned by the crew, but even in this case, this armored vehicle is a legitimate target for destruction. You're talking here as if you yourself had been inside all this armored vehicles before the Lancet hit it. I don't like talkers.
вропейцы. не россияне виноваты. А русские "люди". Избавьтесь от своей толерантности по отношению с русским людоедам. Сказанное вовсе не нацизм. Русский - это не этнос. Когда вы производите селекцию растений, вы же не говорите, что данный кактус обладает качествами фашиста? Русский - худшее что могло произойти с человеком. И произошло это за ваши денги. За западные деньги. Это селекция рабов за ваш счет. Селекция дотационных тварей, сидящих на шее у банды отморозков. Все кто не были иждивенцами были истреблены. Гены свободолюбивых людей не успели оказать влияние на популяцию. Если вы это не признаете, то откажитесь от генетики, назовите генетику лженаукой, а эволюцию назовите мракобесием. Руские 1000 лет не имели прав собственности, не имели права на бизнес, были расходным материалом и только приспособленцы за лояльность к власти имели значительные преференции. Потомство успевали дать исключительно предатели и доносчики.....
Полезные признаки социальных приспособленцев, рабов с культом государства в крови и доносчиков и приобрела русская популяция. И теперь через русскую культуру они пытаются распространять по миру свою рабскую ментальность. В этом нет ничего удивительного. Изучите мат часть.
Вы скажете что немцы тоже были фашистами. Да, для немцев фашизм - это не естественное состояние, это болезнь. Для русских фашизм - это их естественное состояние!
ПЕРЕВЕДИ И ДОНЕСИ ДО ЕВРОПЕЙСКИХ ТРУСЛИВЫХ ПОЛИТИКОВ..!!
Alot of lancets strikes are used to disable the tanks, then again alot probably used to actively destroy it
The Lancet is a game changer for the Russian forces. DEADLY!!
Unlike the useless switchblade drone touted to be the game changer. No more news about those switchblade drones? Russia has more of these and much cheaper too.
@@parrotbrand2782 fantasies
HOPEFULLY THEY WILL DESTROY ALL THE UKRAINIAN MILITARY !
@@parrotbrand2782 yep the priceless cost of a corrupt mic
Same as your Geran/shahed drones don't tout them much now most if not all totally useless plus lancets can't get through netting 😂
they said russian weapons are inferior to the west hehe
They told that Russia is fighting with shovels.
They always say that. Looking at the mud and conditions in the field especially in the trenches with the muck the only rifle I would have is the AK variant the 556 is to narrow a gas exchange more IAs and stoppages. That’s just the rifle. No Russian kit is excellent. What Russia needs are uniforms clothing with one cammo pattern and stay with it. The one they had in the Soviet times was great I have a smock I use for hunting
And the mRNA vaccines are super effective.
@@brianmurray1395russia just got a now variant of ratnik
Wkpo 2.0, 3.0 and 4.0.. the new kit is pretty much looking like spec ops stuff, but it is for everyone
The pattern that was chosen is multicam, as a stock holder until russia invents a really effective own camo
So moch ( atack fg) and emr will slowly fade
Ha, ha, ha...let them repeat it again. Mainstream western media is being exposed for their lies yet again and all the time. They're disgusting and a disgrace to journalism.
Seen a short of a T90m hitting a land mine then be hit with RPGs and anti tank missles and was still able to take the damage and retreat from the battlefield was very impressive!
Круговая броня.
У натовских танков броня только лобовая
о каком видео речь, можно ссылку?
@@gilman2056 He dreamed something🤣
@@stefanbatory3866 are you fink is it fake?
And that was on one ruZZian propaganda channel...there's also one Ukrainian tank that you see two RPGs hiting and he just keeps going...and it's not t90...but a land mine and he escaped...very very doubtful, at least the tracks would go...if his anti-tank land mine...
Да ... Забыл сказать : присылайте еще , Леопардов , Абрамсов и даже Меркаву !
Мы - всеядные !
Ну судя по тем видео, как йеменцы Абраш жгли, хлам тот ещё, зажигалки жестянные. Меркавы крепче намного, но палестинцы один таки пробили, значит Вихрь его легко прошьёт.
@@user-qf6dc1vu6h Главное вывести из строя . Хотя бы остановить .
If you look at the body, motor, prop it looks like something your average R.C. hobbyist could put together, which is what makes it cheap and quick to assemble. All the clever stuff is in the head. And how such a tiny explosive warhead causes so much damage is quite remarkable (to me at least).
It is basically a mini missile that can be launched by a soldier.
It's much more than that. It is a LOITERING missile that can me launched by soldiers. Over 30 minutes minutes worth of searching for targets to engage.
It's a recon drone and strike drone at the same time.
quote "It is basically a mini missile that can be launched by a soldier." Is actually more like an RPG-7 rocket grenade mounted in a drone but this is the anti armor version. They also have 3 other warheads for softer targets
@@technoartfest8708L appears to gather Intel by photo and video.
Except that it is not a missile. It doesn’t have a missile engine.let me repeat, NOT a missile.
The Leopard2A6, T90, Abrams or whatever tank needs something like a Gepard + air-support to operate the way they should... I wouldn't go out in ANY tank without decent AA or air-support... It's suicide.
And its cost a lot of money.
Sooooooooo many Germany Leopards were blown up by Russian "Krasnopol" Munitions - Rockets/Drones/Lancet's and some sank into Mud - they are NOT the NATO Wonder Weapon they said - it was all a Big Hype and on the Battlefield they are Useless - same with the Bradleys and French AMX-10 Tanks ! And some People really believed The Western Propaganda - ha-ha-ha-ha ! Bravo Russia Bravo and Glory to Mother Russia !!!!
Only superpowers does that, Ukraine and the rest of the world doesn't
@@agungprasetyo2665Okay, forget about air support. To have a Gepard accompanying a Leopard and the Bradleys would have prevented these losses... The Gepard would have been the cheapest of all the vehicles destroyed... This was a tactical failure on Ukrainians part. They played into Russia's hand. The Gepard's radar would have seen the drones coming miles away. Would you spend $ 3.00 to save/insure $ 200.00 in a war situation? I definitely would.
@@user-ib1if9fg6g My bra... Ek kan nie daai k@k lees nie... Wat sê jy? Kom ons bly by engels dan kan almal verstaan hoe fok dom jy is.
The Lacet Drones are very reliable. The have flown mission for Gazprom Pipeline network for years at least 7+ and the X-wing design is easier and mor stable as Quad copter ones. The electro Motor is very silent and not to compare to Go-card motors in the Turkish Drone.
Determined by flight time and radar capture; almost all data links are able to be disabled by high-powered/directed microwave emissions using IR directed scattered arrays led by Radar/Frequency Range Finders and High Speed Frequency Hop processors. The problems aren't just the tanks and the munitions, the problems are are also not utilizing appropriately deployed forward Defense Tactical-Interceptor Communtions Systems.
They would literally fall right out of the sky
I hear they're using them against the Himarrs and j-damms.
вропейцы. не россияне виноваты. А русские "люди". Избавьтесь от своей толерантности по отношению с русским людоедам. Сказанное вовсе не нацизм. Русский - это не этнос. Когда вы производите селекцию растений, вы же не говорите, что данный кактус обладает качествами фашиста? Русский - худшее что могло произойти с человеком. И произошло это за ваши денги. За западные деньги. Это селекция рабов за ваш счет. Селекция дотационных тварей, сидящих на шее у банды отморозков. Все кто не были иждивенцами были истреблены. Гены свободолюбивых людей не успели оказать влияние на популяцию. Если вы это не признаете, то откажитесь от генетики, назовите генетику лженаукой, а эволюцию назовите мракобесием. Руские 1000 лет не имели прав собственности, не имели права на бизнес, были расходным материалом и только приспособленцы за лояльность к власти имели значительные преференции. Потомство успевали дать исключительно предатели и доносчики.....
Полезные признаки социальных приспособленцев, рабов с культом государства в крови и доносчиков и приобрела русская популяция. И теперь через русскую культуру они пытаются распространять по миру свою рабскую ментальность. В этом нет ничего удивительного. Изучите мат часть.
Вы скажете что немцы тоже были фашистами. Да, для немцев фашизм - это не естественное состояние, это болезнь. Для русских фашизм - это их естественное состояние!
ПЕРЕВЕДИ И ДОНЕСИ ДО ЕВРОПЕЙСКИХ ТРУСЛИВЫХ ПОЛИТИКОВ..
4:41 this extra speed has *ridiculously small* impact on the effect of its cumulative charge (the only one with serious piercing effect on a modern tank). *Such a cumulative charge would pierce the tank anyway, even at zero relative speed.* So talking about the "impact" of speed on armor is quite out of the point. This is even less than some paintballs, and less than falcon birds attacking pigeons. This diving speed is definitely *not what damages an armor.* The military charge does.
The only significant advantage of such final approach speed is to make the Lancet *more difficult to intercept.* Otherwise it changes nothing to its effects and only make the targeting more difficult for the operator.
The benefit is that when targeting artillery, the enemy crew has less time to run and suffers more casualties. They typically spot Lancet few seconds before impact.
Training of operators is handled by simulators. After watching hundreds of Lancet impact videos, I believe operators are fairly competent.
Other than this, good points.
Lol no
yeah the tank could use some Avengers AA Units like in C&C General to simply shoot down the slow slow drone...
I think it is still better to speed up to minimise chances of interception.
^yeah its about the interception
Эта гонка вооружений уносит многие тысячи жизней
It is a top attack missile that's the thinnest armour on a tank and the warhead is behind the guidance unit to give better stand off for the heat warhead.
Lancet,the penicillin for Leopold!
😂
Except that it didn‘t destroy any Leopards so far apart from russian propaganda
@@pInGu-kl2ffвам это по телевизору сказали?
@@pInGu-kl2ff присылайте больше своего натовского хлама,все сгорит.
@@pInGu-kl2ff Coping is hard, eh?
this precision is saving a lot of lives, on or off the battlefield for both countries.
Если бы украинских солдат не заставили убивать оперативников рф и ранее почти десять лет назад своих на тот момент граждан.
@@JIUNnF "forced".
Well the entry requirement to build these types of things are becoming ever lower.
Lots of control systems for drones out there. FPV drone control with whatever design, with payload of whatever available munitions, network link, and maybe download map data and some image recognition to make it autonomous if network link is lost and it will loiter, identify and strike after launched. And so many hobbyists out there building drones, we will see many many variants of these things in war now.
Begun, the drone wars has.
MISLEADING THUMBNAIL: The Leopard in the thumbnail has rolled over during an exercise in Poland and has not been hit by a drone or projectile.
As an American…I believe the West underestimated Russia’s capabilities.
The West lies permanently to their peoples. The USA lies to the people is that they are the gratest. They are the best and must rule the world. Don't forget that russians were the first to put a human (Yuri Gagarin) in the space and the landing of man on the moon was a lie so as not to lose face in confrontation with the Russians. You Americans are permanently deceived by your politicians. For example, West beat the Nazis, but the Soviets beat them and arrived first in Berlin. And much more to tell you about lies of your warmongers.
Exactly...
Has from the start
especially in economic abilities, technology capacities also is very underestimated. But it's historical thing. Western countries are very good to sale it self and opposite: russia is very bad salesman for itself. It makes russia looks worse that it is (for western countries).
@@kiromaples Russia is horrible at PR. In the West everyone keeps talking about "Russian propaganda" but in reality, Russia propaganda is so obvious that majority of people see through it and seek other sources of information. Whereas in the West the propaganda is so sophisticated that it even works on Russian liberals.
So the new future Leo version must have an early warning drone attack and suicide explode auto switch.
When they detect drones coming, they'll explode themself. So they can boast in advertising that their tank has never been destroyed by a drone.
🎉😂
Bullshit is never helpful
A big hidden objective in NATO's heavy weapon deliveries for Ukraine was to battle test these expensive ripe-for-museum pieces, so that NATO's military industry could identify and fix their weaknesses, which are a result of decades of peace, complacency and corruption. The fact they are using Ukrainian men as guinea pigs is why this objective is so hush hush at the moment. It won't last long. They will start showing off improvements before the last Ukrainian defender is laid to his grave. Because they can't afford losing certain clients to Russia's military industry.
@@graemes52 That's the whole point. No one what to help the NAFO agressors
Not only that but that Leopard photo was taken at a ballistic shock test site.
What info do you have to back this up? I’m not aware they have Lancet3 and never have?
Why do the APU lose so many people and equipment during attacks on the "Surovikin line": analysis of the Military Chronicle
The Ukrainian offensive has slowed down so much that after a while it may turn into positional battles. Why is this happening?
Have the APU reached the "Surovikin line" or not yet?
The defensive structures of the "Surovikin line" along the entire length are built along the dominant heights and ridges. The defense is installed at a depth of 25-30 kilometers. Several separate protective zones have been erected between the defensive lines. In zone No. 1, closer to the front, there is an advanced line of defense consisting of several dozen platoon and company strongpoints. Those Ukrainian units that managed to break through the minefields came across these areas with a huge number of ATGMs and surveillance equipment. Between the advanced fortified area and the main line of defense there are about 25 kilometers of minefields, anti-tank ditches and other structures, it is almost impossible to break through them.
The only achievement of the APU offensive at the moment is the advance in the "gray zone" - an area that does not affect the combat capability of Russian troops.
At the same time, artillery and aircraft from the depths of the "Surovikin line" strike the advancing Ukrainian troops long before the main forces of the Armed Forces of Ukraine approach not only to the front line of protection, but also to minefields.
What is wrong with the advance of the APU to the "Surovikin line"?
Despite the transfer of German Leopard-2 tanks and hundreds of Soviet-type tanks to the offensive area, Ukrainian formations interact poorly with each other. Often they engage in battle in an unfamiliar area, without coordinating actions with neighboring units, without up-to-date intelligence information and without fire support, as well as without centralized management.
In a number of cases, instead of units prepared for the assault, mechanized brigades that had already lost parts of heavy equipment were thrown to break through to the front line of the guard. The main task of such units is to occupy captured positions and hold them, as well as to clean up pockets of resistance, and not to storm positions controlled by the enemy.
Such cases are not uncommon due to the shortage of experienced commanders who die during strikes on command posts of battalions and brigades. Due to misunderstanding of the situation and incorrect orders, elite units, such as the 137th and 88th battalions of the 35th Marine Brigade, as well as units of the 37th Infantry Brigade of the AFU, are suffering particularly heavy losses. These formations advanced to the assault of the advanced guard lines exclusively on light vehicles - Oshkosh M-ATV and HTSV Wolfhound armored vehicles, as well as French AMX-10RC - equipment not suitable for breaking through echeloned defense.
The scheme with the creation of local, seemingly safe paths, but essentially representing a fire bag has already been used by the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation both during the battles in the Sukhoi Stavka area in the Kherson region, as well as in the "Bakhmut meat grinder", a hand in the creation of which was also applied by General Surovikin.
What losses did the APU have in the offensive and what reserves remained?
During the 17 days of the offensive, the losses of the AFU amounted to approximately 17-20 battalions killed and wounded, which is equivalent to 16 thousand people or five brigades of 3,500 people each. In total, about 5 brigades out of 9 trained and equipped according to NATO standards were allegedly involved in the APU offensive, which means that more than half of the reserves prepared for the strike have already been destroyed.
In fact, the "Surovikin line" is gradually becoming a "second Bakhmut" for the Ukrainian army - more and more troops are needed for combat operations in this area, which, in addition to sending reserves, have to be removed from the front in Limansk, Kupyansk and other directions.
Any sources??or are u making this up as u go?
@@sreckobrzin8534 source - military journalist straight from the battlefield. Btw, ukraininans still got no any significant results
@@Ivan-wp1ne1 Sure!The vord of a ruSS kie "journalist"!!
The ABSOLUTE truth!😆🤥🤪
While looking at these photos my first question is “why are the Ukrainian’s luster Ed so close together, spread out!
They've probably been drafted less than 4 hours ago, go easy on them 😂
They are being trained by countries that have never seen war and only play call of duty
when you forcefully pick people off the streets and give them less training and you only have a few combat trained soldiers amang them, they will move like that.
because they havn't a clue
minefields + all answers above 😅
It's great that it can hit moving targets too
Literally any FPV drone can do this
The Lancet it's working thanks from the chips and electronic components of the west washer machine and dish washer machine as well.
And secret toilet technology
Tank are Battleship on land, supposedly tanking damage and bring short range bombardment to the enemy. If tank requires combined arms team to execute, so does BB. But unlike tanks, BB has no countermeasures to stop her munition, not even a bunker
VERY WELL EXPLAINED, including accurate success rates included. BUT: just FYI to some viewers, some footages are of Ka-52 launching ATGM (Anti-Tank Guided Missiles) such as their latest example: VIHR / VIKHR which has a very strong Anti-Tank RHA penetration (first used in March 2022 iirc).
What is the price of one piece of lancet 3 compared to one piece of leopard 2??
Probably around $20k for one lancet and a leopard 2A6 probably close $10 million.
But also time and resources needed to produce. vastly easier and quicker than a multi million dollar tank.
Leopards are free to the Ukraine.
@@demsrchildabusers7959 free for Ukraine doesn’t mean it was built for free. Some nation is bearing the cost
Price difference ratio is 1:604
Танки для Украины без денег, под залог Украинской земли и промышленности.
The destroyed/damaged leopard 2 tanks from this video did get hit by mines and not by drones... There are many videos about this leopard graveyard.
Hype without facts! The Leopard tanks referred to as “destroyed by Lancet” at 5:06 were stopped by minefields then later finished by a combination of artillery, lancets and FPV drones. I’m not aware of a documented instance on Oryx of a Lancet destroying a mobile and undamaged Leopard tank.
The tank on the thumbnail is actually the first leopard tank destroyed during this conflict, and it's not even destroyed by russians, it's destroyed by Ukrainians with another leopard 😄.It was during their training in Poland. The other leopard was reversing and it's crew didn't see the tank behind them , so it crushed into the leopard behind, popping it's turret out by hitting the main gun from underneath with it's rear side.
I remember the pic; this had been this little accident which had happened in Poland when the tanks had been on their way to Ukraine. I doubt much that a lancet drone is able to destroy a leopard 2; this drone had already problems with a gepard tank.
nice cope 🤣🤣🤣 so butthurt western weapons are trash and its actually the lancet russian drone thats the wonder weapon in ukraine
Who told you this story ? Google ?
What is your excuse for a Bradley!?
I thought the other Leopard ran it over because they were practising sharp turns or something along those lines but yeah, the thumbnail picture is from training that took place months ago. When I saw the picture, I had to do a double-take because I assumed the video was from one of those dumb propaganda channels...
Happily, the tank was swiftly repaired and I'm sure everybody involved probably had a good laugh. Even if it was a nervous laugh.
Lancet is much deadly than the american switch blade 600. Its all over tg the video of lancet while 300 and 600 are really few
They haven’t gotten the 600 yet and they only were given like 200 of the 300 version. With everything else they have that can easily take out Russian armor, I don’t think they even need the switch blades.
Lancet didn’t destroy the tanks, just damaged. The lighter APVs, it can/did destroy some of those. The switchblade 600 can destroy tanks. There are videos of the 600 destroying tanks, but the US hasn’t sent more than 10 or 15 so don’t expect many videos.
Lol both comments looks confusing 😂🤣😂
Honestly lancet has a big warhead comparing to does switchblades it like does Israeli suicide drones that devestated nogoro karabak war of armenia.
Lancet is cheaper to build so it is more successful if that make sense
@@deidresable check your sources, switchblade(less than $10k) costs less than a lancet. Lancet costs less than $50k.
6:00 isnt Lancet, it is a guided missile "Vikhr" launched from ka-52
Lancets and leopards are made for each other😂
Я думаю это не последняя конфигурация, схема с Х образным опереним, так и напрашивается крылья сделать покороче, а движатель установить ракетный а на системе управления слегка подправить прошивку.
При движении с большой скоростью оператору будет сложно управлять летательным аппаратом.
@@ladakalina408 оператору это и не нужно делать ему достаточно определить цель.
it's all about price.... there is no statistics how many drones get shot down ...
с ракетным двигателем она будит светиться на радар ПВО
Я думаю это не последняя конфигурация? Зайчик думать это не твое.
2% ВВП против 40% ВВП помощи стран поддержки Украины. Можно движатель установить ракетный а на системе управления слегка подправить прошивку .Можно все но как это поможет? Единственное что может помочь так это в системе управления страной слегка подправить прошивку.
Cumulative is the russian word for heat rounds. I don't think it explodes from a standoff distance. Heat rounds are like a javelin or rpg it has to hit the target physically. The source I read says the standoff explosion one is the fragmentation one, that is so that the fragments shower the troops and equipment, like they used on that radar truck for iris t system
Ngl, from all the Lancet footage I've seen, it seems like they do explode just before colliding
The explosion is likely throwing a high velocity molten metal mass created by it to penetrate the armor.
they may have tandem charge, first exploding at a distance, second on contact.
6:02 I really don't understand why the Lancet-3 video contains footage from Ka-52 strikes utilizing Vikhr ATGM 🤷♂
It's just some random guy making videos of him reading from a manufacturer's brochure while showing us some random footage. Don't be mean to him. 😅
If the Kalashnikov concern is responsible for production , hundreds of thousands of them will be released in the near future
It's a drone and the target is a tank it's bloody obvious
The lancet is efficient because it costs a fraction of the price of one round that the Leo can fire with its 120mm.
No matter if you need 4 lancet to destroy a tank, it is efficient...
Even the best protected tank can be destroyed by a bottle of beer filled with ignited oil and gazoline. the molotov cocktail.
The Leo has a terrible weak point on front of the turret that IS NOT PROTECTED AT ALL: the gunner's primary sight... The A6 is improved on this point (the device has been deported higher to get a next to complete frontal mantlet), but the issue still exists.
Google expert🤣🤣
Molotov, the one that is effective is a gasoline or a diesel mixed with sulfuric acid. Ignited by Kalium perchlorate soaked cloth. What YOU are talking about is a simple fire bottle that has almost no effect on vehicles because it burns and evaporates fast, doesnt stick enough and cant reach into tight spaces. ;)
The Lancet is mostly effective because no tank has heavy armor on its top.
Just hit one of the tracks of any modern tank and it's a sitting duck for artillery.
@@williamdrijver4141REALLY??? 😮. Wow nobody ever told us that before 😱🙄
The leopard in the thumbnail had its turret dislodged during a military exercise when a second leopard ran into it at speed and climbed over it. Nothing to do with drones of any kind, lancet included. Notice there was no blackening of the hull from an explosion or fire!
Fascinating video, incidentally, i wonder who thought painting that radar system white was a good idea ?
I saw Abrams M1 tanks taken out at close range in the towns in Iraq, with rpg7's
Now imagine that in the place of RPG 7, the opposite side has ATGMs that shoot at 2.5-3 km and punch a meter of homogeneous steel, there are helicopters with ATGMs with a range of 10 km, there is artillery firing ammunition with laser population, and remote mining systems, I'm not talking about vampire-type RPGs, with tandem a cumulative grenade. What are Abrams' chances?
Range is moot for a RPG. Except that if they´re fired too close, the warhead doesn´t detonate. Furthermore, you probably saw disabled M1 tanks(shot in the tracks) by RPG 7 and then blown up either by insurgents or the US military to avoid capture.
@@Gearparadummies да говно ваш абрамс может против пастухов и фермеров он и оказывал эффект вау на реальном поле боя против нормальной армии использование Абрамсов и любой другой заподной техники не рентабельна и не практична, ещё лет 50 все конфликты на планете будут проходить с автоматом калашникова на танках т 72 ваша техника выглядит хорошо и эффективно только в голивуде
@@Gearparadummiesearn how to read. There is nothing written about blowing up. It says "taken out" which means they are in their state not usable for combat(damaged) or their crew is dead. But right, that includes tracks
@@-Lazy The Bradleys and Leopards in the video have been confirmed by the Russians to have their engines still running. As they're shown, they look like they're in a repairable state. There are even reports that some of them may have been recovered by Ukraine(those are unconfirned). T-72B3s used by Russia blow to smithereens when hit. At least, when in Western vehicles, the crew lives to fight another day. This has happened also not only in Iraq and Afghanistan: Even when a poorly trained military like the Saudi have lost Abrams tanks against Kornet missiles, their crew survived. Furthermore, on close inspection, those Bradleys date all the way to the 1991 Gulf War. I can assure you that most of the Leopards sent to Ukraine are 30+ year old A4s with a few being A6s. The sorry state of some I can attest to personally. The reality of this is: Ukraine is beating back Russia albeit slowly and painfully, using Western military surplus. One of the poorest countries in Europe against the allegedly 3rd most powerful military in the world. No amount of "LeOpArDs ArE nOt InVinCibLe" pro-Russian propaganda is going to change that.
Good promotion for KA-52 and Lancet in this war.
Well…no. Many, many KA-52 lost, especially cosiddering the russian air superiority at the frontline.
@@pInGu-kl2ff how many?
@@pavlosemenoff1415 35 visually confirmed. Probably more. Given the 100 they had before the war the number is huge
@@pInGu-kl2ff not bad for 1.5 year of war. And not all of them is equipped by nu system even for now
@@pInGu-kl2fftanks and vehicles destroyed by ka52 cannot be even counted.
i dont know where are thos ewestern advanced active protective things like Iron Fist? or they are ineffective?
Beautiful.
This will be a lesson for NATO for their future tank designs.
NATO are used to fighting less equipped and less capable militaries, and their results makes them think they are the best, but know they have learned that all this while their equipment was simply designed to take out militaries in the middle east and Africa, they never thought about Russian terrain or confrontation since the Soviet Union fail.
Não arranjar briga com a Rússia.
@@ludiogoncalves1030, no one is picking a fight with Russia.
Send elephant, Tiger, lion tanks to Ukraine. It helps🤣😂🤣😂🤣
@@themouas Rússia não está só, BRICS+.
Lancet 4 is coming soon...it will have better warhead, bigger flight duration, and lock target accuracy
and stealth, so invisinle
They gonna need Paladin Tank like in C&C General Zero Hour
oh my god !!!
The scary thing is the Lancet is a problem because the NATO forces havent got far enough to face all the other Russian Anti-Armour systems.
NATO forces do not fight in Ukraine, if they did then the last Russian would be pushed out of Ukraine by September
The helicopters have been raking in kills during this Zaporizhia offensive too.
There are NO NATO forces in Ukraine.
@@alexandernorman5337 i hurd 6 where downed by Ukraine yesterday and 1 was on video looked like the one behind it was also hit but flyable
Really 6 choppers anything comes out of ukrain is a lie and propaganda backed up with know photos, grow a brain mate.
So far we habe 1 Video of Lancet vs Leopard where it set off the smoke launchers.
The close grouping of all those Bradley IFV’s along with the Leopard 2 suggests they were caught by standard artillery. The leopard itself appears abandoned rather than destroyed.
I didn't know the leopard was meant to fight aerospace targets?
All the film, or "footage," I EVER see coming from anywhere, and from anyone, in Ukraine is so cut and spliced its hard to know for sure whats really happening anyway. I wish we were able to have a higher confidence in what we are actually seeing... Except for stuff that is geolocated by a second or third entity I'd be very suspect of any 'footage' we see.
lol its adorable seeing western sheep desperately coping when reality goes counter to the fake western narratives theyve been gobbling up from cnn and other western propaganda outlets, it was clear from the start to anyone with 2 brain cells, ukraine never had a chance against russia 😂😂😂
add to that Ukraine using the same kind of tank early game, claim whose tank is lost by simply drawing symbols on the then destroyed tank. But now that western tanks are coming, no more claims, the loss is distinctive
Большинство потерь ВСУ от мин. И от своих хозяев на западе, что их гонят в бессмысленное наступление.
Фашисткие символы по всей Украине тоже почему то не кто не верит.
That's not true. There are many footage after the drone hits the target from another recon drone.
"In the first two weeks of Ukraine’s grueling counteroffensive, as much as 20 percent of the weaponry it sent to the battlefield was damaged or destroyed, according to American and European officials" - The New York Times
Nice the Leo is burning that’s Beautiful
It is amazing how this cheap russian drone can take down sophisticated military equipment worth tens of millions of dollars. The west needs to learn a lot from Russia specifically in this regard,
everything from Russia either don't work as intended or is broken and is inferior to western equipment. that's the western narrative, how do you expect them to learn, yet 2 months ago they shipped t-90M tank captured by Ukraine to Florida USA for studies, and they keep telling everyone that Russia's equipment is nothing lol...
We learn something; not letting a lunatic clown like Putler run the show.
Russia lost way more equipment to drones than Ukraine… .
And what is the cost benefit analysis? What is the cost of an average target vs cost of the Lancet 3, factoring in accuracy. Are any Lancet 3's getting shot down, or missing their targets?
Havent seen a video of lancet missing but I know that one lancet is approximately 20-30 000 US dollars and you can do the math when one destroys equipment costing millions!
😂🥳
@@GarrusVA A KF51 takes them down all
@@proislam1447 In the same imagine universe where KF51 are
This war saw a major shift in cheap striking power in the form of disposable drones being more available to a lot more countries, even countries as isolated and hit by sanctions as Iran ... this is changing warfare in a major way, almost as significantly as the arrival of gunpowder did. The wars of today and tomorrow are going to be ever more wars of drones.
The music that you have use on this video is very nice.... can tell me the name of the music?
It could also attack in bad weather to increase it's chance of survival if enemy is using lasers to shoot it down. Lasers don't work well in heavy rain or fog.
lasers don't work in shooting things down period. Nobody has created a working laser that shoots down things. Lasers are used for marking targets, not for killing anything
@@wilgoos63 Tell that to the DoD. They seem to be convinced otherwise, at least shooting down drones anyway.
@@onetruekeeper Could you link me to the system you are referring to, because as far as I am aware not a single laser system that can actually shoot something down is in active service. Test models? yes, but nothing that is actually working.
genau Tschetschenen , schaut euch in der Ukraine an was Russen mit Brüdern machen wenn sie nicht spuren
@@onetruekeeper part of the DoD's job is to fund research into weapons procurement, just because they research something doesn't mean it will see the light of day. There are about 3 more levels of testing and rigorous trials it needs to pass before even a prototype is ever built. On top of that, laser weapons are designed to be complimentary to other systems, not a replacement. The laser works as backup targeting system when in bad weather. It can gather data on speed, location, size, etc with more accuracy than RADAR.
The Leopards drove on mines, it wasnt destroyed by lancet. The lancet hit the leopard after it drove on mine but it wasnt really destroyed, it only showed white smoke.
But disabled equipment is not involved
The result of the battle is important - the equipment is out of order.
@@shadow-wy3gd yes but the title says Lancet 3 is successfull against leopard 2 but so far i havent seen a video. The video i saw was disabled leopards because they drove on tank mines. Then a lancet drone hit the leopard but you did not see the damage.
@@danbarb9728 What difference does it make what weapon is disabled, it is no longer a combat unit and does not participate.
@@shadow-wy3gdIt makes a giant difference when the video is all about how Lancet kills Leopards since it is pure propaganda and a lie
What is the timestamp in video where the Lancet hit the Leopard 2A6?
No tank should roll without its Gepard.
Unless a way can be created to eliminate drone's ability to function within a battle space, not only are tanks obsolete, but all forms of mechanized warfare are obsolete.
Drones are slow and easy targets and soon obsolet.
Yes make them faster, ouch, there are missiles already.
@@proislam1447 Easy targets for what? Do you think you are going to be able to shoot one down with a rifle?
@@proislam1447they are never going to be obsolete just like ATGMs
Does active protection even work? Seems anti-tank munitions and big payload drones are still knocking them out of the fight. Is there any footage of them even working? Not stock footage, but in the field in a combat situation?
Well maybe about times. Example active protection system of trophy from israel. Its made to counteract an rpg! But im not sure if it works for atgm? Comments please...
I mean : whether trophy is working to counteract a suicide drone?
@@boti_depokit failed against kornet, as shown in 2006
does leopard 2a6 have active protection?
all tanks are vulnerable when struck from the top, consequences of Morden warfare, no thick amor on the turret, due to design limitations that can make the turret not traverse properly.
“Hey, you can't park there"
Man, those shovels and refrigerators are striking hard. The world is a jungle and europe my little garden, Joseph Burro el
Orlan is a great drone, and still being used with great success
"BOOM"
The real gamechanger/wunderwaffe of this war, so far😁👍
but Russia will still lose. Because Ukraine is fighting for its independence
@@elias-ue9yx Independence LOL - they are hopelessly dependent on the West now.
I wouldn’t be surprised if it had a triple EFP charge to punch through anything
That video of a gaggle of disabled / destroyed armor seems to include tracks missing from every one. That's mines, not a drone.
This is a picture of a tank that lost its turret during a training accident 🙄
The creators doesn't care about facts when spreading propaganda.
Holy crap. At 2:46, look at all those DESTROYED vehicles... Looks like a total disaster is going on over there.
Yes it is a total disaster, you should see the video of the Leopards and Bradleys being taken out one by one by a KA-52 attack helicopter
@@victortakunda5443give us a link for that footage
@@victortakunda5443have you learned spelling "JOHN DEERE AGRICULTURAL MACHINERY"..? 😂😂
@@victortakunda5443i watched it to...
Russians did a good job... Leopard couldnt survive for 5mins
@@victortakunda5443 oh the Leopard 2 which the Ukrainians cleverly disguised as a harvester in a field? Can't trick those amazing KA52 pilots, can you? 😂
Now these so-called Western play station generals have to make excuses why a Russian Drone is burning up billions of dollars in Western weapons. Top 4 excuses
1. Tank ran out of fuel
2. It was a land mine
3. It's the same photo of one tank
4. The crews did not have enough training time
#1 would be an assumption, #2 might explain why the tank wasn't moving, #3 more footage would dispel that one, #4 is also an assumption, so the playstation generals might have a point.
the new excuse is that Ukrainian soldiers an sabotaging western tanks so as to avoid being on the battlefield in them, a bounty of 1,000,000 rubles is out for any one on Russia's side to take out western amor.
All this with so much Russian scrap metal all over the battle fields.😂😂
@@sidsod1616 You do know that half of it is actually Ukrainian? It's Ukraine begging for tanks, not Russia. Ever wondered why there are NATO MBTs in Ukraine to begin with? Or do you think that every tank they claim to be Russian, is indeed Russian? There are well over hundreds of cases when they purposely claimed their losses as Russia's. It's very convenient because the tech is all same. I wouldn't trust any numbers at all. Not until the war is over.
Russians shovels can fly and hit the targets , it's called smart shovels build from washing machines semiconductors . Wow.😂😂😂
Tanks need an automatic turret cannon that would target and shoot everything that's incoming from top half-sphere to survive. Like those turrets that are installed on war ships.
Дело в том,что немецкая техника генетически на русской земле обречена на смерть. Стоит немцам это не забывать каждых 70-80 лет.❤
Только не забывай, что это не русская земля.
@@ixk4943Киев - мать городов русских 😊
@@ixk4943 не русская говоришь? Может это хохлы еще черное море выкопали?
@@user-nr2sc4rq4x еслиб Киев знал тоб зделал оборт
@@Adolf-RPжаль твоя мать не сделала это
Would be curious about how US' Switchblade loitering munition is doing in Ukraine. I have not heard of it too much.
seen just a handful of uses so far, seen hundreds of lancet feeds so far.
The only conclusion is that switchblades are not effective against a modern army, not shepherds with ak47s
They're not effective, also Russia has jamming equipment making ukrainian drones almost useless In some regions
@@bombarderoazulThe propaganda could tell you everything I guess 😂
there is enough videos about them ... but they don't try to use them against tanks ... there is enough targets
Der Turm vom Leo fliegt zwar nicht so hoch, aber er fliegt😂
i have a question
i have been told that the lancet warhead is not powerful enough to damage seriously a tank
is this true?