It is SO AWESOME that the narrator told us in advance what Stefi's response was going to be. Really added to the quality of the product. Would not have gotten the joke otherwise.
I also think the commentator's tips are helpful, making it easier for viewers to understand the details and humor in the game. This way, you can enjoy the atmosphere of the game better!
This is why UA-cam is so stupid. The only people who know it was a gimmick for a commercial are the people who already know it. Everyone else is going to think that's real and before you know it, it's a fact. I miss journalism and newspapers and libraries and books. I was a child before the internet, and a teenager when it came into existence and I can tell you 100% the world was a better place without it. Maybe not as efficient or connected, but it was better.
@@MartyMcFly-n4lall of this rant for this tennis moment? Also, no the world probably wasn’t better without internet, you just have to learn how to use it well to not become a mess of a person. Like for example, if I find some information and it’s actually important (not like this tennis moment), I do investigate the source and everything. Internet allowed us many things we never thought possible, It powers education and economy. It supports our health and well-being. And it connects us to our neighbors and to those we love, basically it makes our life much easier, which means less stress, who doesn’t want that? As long as you don’t get addicted to the internet… You gotta see the bright things instead of the bad things y’ know?
The top one for me is where a couple in a house next to the court were sleeping with each other, and moaning like crazy. After a little while, when the whole arena is just embarrassed and laughing awkwardly at it, one of the players goes "Oh come on! It can't be that good!"
I’m at the beginning of the video hoping you’ll reveal by the end of it #15 was a TV commercial. Edit: you didn’t… 🤷🏻♂️ and Roddick impersonating Rafa was in an exhibition match, not offensive at all. Clueless lol
Last (bonus) video: Cuevas correctly got the point, because they were playing singles but the net posts are in the doubles' position. If the ball had hit the singles' sticks (the inside ones) in this instance or if the net posts were in the singles' position, then the point would have been good for Garin.
@@arkadiy8367 If a ball hits the net outside the singles stick, it is dead and the point is over. but if it hits the net in exactly the same spot, AND THERE IS NO SINGLES STICK IN POSITION, then it bounces on to the court, the ball is in play.
@cade2770 yes, but "permanent fixtures" is anything OUTSIDE the singles sticks. Article 2 in page 3 of ITF Rules of tennis 2024: www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&opi=89978449&url=www.itftennis.com/media/7221/2024-rules-of-tennis-english.pdf&ved=2ahUKEwic8bSf04uHAxUpYPEDHdy_DEAQFnoECCMQAQ&usg=AOvVaw0qGE2U6zuJbtOZMF2hUiX6
Imagine you get an outside seat to an incredible doubles match, only to end up with Serena Williams in your lap. We watched that man’s life peak on live TV
As a tennis umpire, i can tell you that you are wrong regarding the bonus moment.. The serve went in, the ball hit the net post and got in to cuevas' side. Hitting the net post is considered illegal because the net post is a permanent fixture according to the rules and the decision is correct giving cuevas the point. Know the rules :-)
No, the TOP of the net post in doubles (the wire and the pulley) is considered part of the net, except on a serve. Had this happened on a doubles point, it would have counted, but because there were singles sticks, the ball was out.
@@TennisSmash-bj2uw the one who hits the umpire is Shapovalov of Canada, and "pro tennis player" laughing with the racket broken is Paire. You need to research more, sorry
You never saw young Steffi in real life. She was drop dead gorgeous. Tall, long-legged, athletic, shapely, perfect posture, tan, blonde, with a nice smile.....she was like a new improved human.....just stunning.
im germanic celtic nordic and Graf had a bod from HADES as well as being a sexxxy attractive woman, yes. Isn't 'beauty' subjective anyway, pal? perhaps, 'god' watching you whack off makes reading this a bit 'less hard' , eh?!? oh wait, did i just permanently embed something err subjective as well?!? My guess is...DA/Oo/Si/Ya/Yes.
so what's the ruling when the ball gets embedded into the clay? Would it be an ace? But technically, it did not bounce yet (it did not touch the ground twice), so is is it still in play? (and the 2nd player would have to wait for eternity (or till the next earthquake) when it jumps off the ground and then he has to play it?
This would be a much better video if there was no commentary. Why does this announcer feel he has to give away everything before letting us watch it?? Very amateur.
OMG Everyone, including Roddick, admitted the serve in the clay was a hoax. WOW. you reported it as real. Honest mistake or "likes" bait. I'm unsubscribing!
Last bonus one: the empire made the right call. That part of the net the ball struck is not officially part of the singles court. On a true singles cour the ball would be out, hence it is false
cut the video too fast! should for the first example (and many other)s let the reaction of roddick and the other ! looks like you took too much speed dude! nice video anyway
This is a joke right? You have have a tennis channel and think the Roddick serve was real? You call John Isner JOSH Isner... and you pronounce his last name incorrectly? I'm only 3 highlights in. Get outta here. Downvoted and never subbed.
Come on Ivanišević has to Be on at least 2 places - when he broke all of his reckets during the Match so he did not have any reckets left so he Had to conceed THE Match :p
Why no Safin at the French Open pulling his shorts (but not boxers), down after a long, epic point he won, then had taken away for pulling his shorts down to his thighs… two ridiculous parts.
2:31 "During a double match": wouldn't it pay to know the slightest thing about tennis before scripting such a video? (Let alone confusing ads and charity events for actual competitive matches... sigh...)
In this case, he had every right to be annoyed. It was an over-rule that should never have been made on a big point. Even the wimbledon crowd cheered him. Everyone in the crowd knew he was right. The line callers were not pros back them. They would sometimes ask spectators to call the lines! They were playing for big money. Someone had to start complaining. Intimidating umpires became part fo the game.....
A lot of daft comments and many of the players' names pronounced incorrectly. Also, why do commentators feel the need to explain to you what you are about to see before you see it? It is patronising and pointless, but mostly annoying. A good reason not to subscribe, unfortunately.
I don’t remember that one with Roddick, wow! He showed me his iPhone back before Apple had even announced that they were going to make and sell them. I knew then that his little pocket-sized computer was going to completely change humanity if it ever reached the public’s hands. And it did!
@@natehubbard5062 Back in my corporate jet days I flew Andy Roddick and his brother in a corporate jet from Texas up to the Davis Cup. He left his iPhone aboard the aircraft. I grabbed it and chased him down in the FBO. Knowing that it was, at that time, an unusual looking cell phone, I joked with him that the only person I prank phone called from his phone list was John McEnroe. Apple hadn’t yet publicly announced that they were even going to make the iPhone, however, like many products, celebrities and athletes get this stuff long before the general public. I asked him about his unusual cell phone. He gave me a quick demo of all that it could do (which was completely unlike anything at the time). I knew that it was a “game changer” of a gadget. And indeed it was.
Did it count for a point for Roddick sunk the ball? Stefi became #1 after Szeles was stabbed in the back, maybe that's what she needed the money for? McEnroe's tantrum's were the best! Oh, the not so good old days!
If you love Tennis and want to earn some money: tennisworldmgmts@gmail.com
Number 9 wasn't. Dislike.
It is SO AWESOME that the narrator told us in advance what Stefi's response was going to be. Really added to the quality of the product. Would not have gotten the joke otherwise.
I also think the commentator's tips are helpful, making it easier for viewers to understand the details and humor in the game. This way, you can enjoy the atmosphere of the game better!
# 15 it's not real. It was a commercial for Powerade.
This is why UA-cam is so stupid. The only people who know it was a gimmick for a commercial are the people who already know it. Everyone else is going to think that's real and before you know it, it's a fact. I miss journalism and newspapers and libraries and books. I was a child before the internet, and a teenager when it came into existence and I can tell you 100% the world was a better place without it. Maybe not as efficient or connected, but it was better.
Yeah bad start
@@MartyMcFly-n4l this is actually a very decent hot take. I was born in 99' so I appreciate you sharing this pov, cheers.
@@MartyMcFly-n4lall of this rant for this tennis moment? Also, no the world probably wasn’t better without internet, you just have to learn how to use it well to not become a mess of a person. Like for example, if I find some information and it’s actually important (not like this tennis moment), I do investigate the source and everything. Internet allowed us many things we never thought possible, It powers education and economy. It supports our health and well-being. And it connects us to our neighbors and to those we love, basically it makes our life much easier, which means less stress, who doesn’t want that? As long as you don’t get addicted to the internet… You gotta see the bright things instead of the bad things y’ know?
@@victoralvino6618Bro was letting it all out 😂
4:40 I love how the ball boy just stands back up like nothing had happened.
Nick keegrios and josh isner with a long i made me laugh
That Andy Roddick clip was gold. His dedication to the bit, even after he won the point, was great.
Never seen Roddick hit so well
This video was painful. 5 mins of my life I'll never get back.
Just skip the next random video of your day and you will be fine.
2:02
"Against *Josh Aisner* ". Smh buddy, smh.
ill do better 🙁
The top one for me is where a couple in a house next to the court were sleeping with each other, and moaning like crazy. After a little while, when the whole arena is just embarrassed and laughing awkwardly at it, one of the players goes "Oh come on! It can't be that good!"
Josh Isner ... wasn't that the guy who played the longest match in history against Nicolas Yahoo?
No, that was Josh Eisner.
I’m at the beginning of the video hoping you’ll reveal by the end of it #15 was a TV commercial.
Edit: you didn’t… 🤷🏻♂️ and Roddick impersonating Rafa was in an exhibition match, not offensive at all. Clueless lol
2:12 the laugh 😂😂😂
"The rivalry between Federer and Nadal is known as the biggest rivalry of all time"??? 😂😂😂
I swear this is like watching a video made by AI
Last (bonus) video: Cuevas correctly got the point, because they were playing singles but the net posts are in the doubles' position. If the ball had hit the singles' sticks (the inside ones) in this instance or if the net posts were in the singles' position, then the point would have been good for Garin.
What if there were no singles sticks, but the posts were in the doubles position, as it is on most rec courts?
I think the posts then count as part of the net.@@joemarshall4226
@@joemarshall4226 then the rule stays - if the ball hits "doubles" sticks then it is a fault immediately (in a singles match).
@@arkadiy8367 If a ball hits the net outside the singles stick, it is dead and the point is over. but if it hits the net in exactly the same spot, AND THERE IS NO SINGLES STICK IN POSITION, then it bounces on to the court, the ball is in play.
@cade2770 yes, but "permanent fixtures" is anything OUTSIDE the singles sticks. Article 2 in page 3 of ITF Rules of tennis 2024:
www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&opi=89978449&url=www.itftennis.com/media/7221/2024-rules-of-tennis-english.pdf&ved=2ahUKEwic8bSf04uHAxUpYPEDHdy_DEAQFnoECCMQAQ&usg=AOvVaw0qGE2U6zuJbtOZMF2hUiX6
1995
- Would you merry my?
- How much money do you have?
2024
- Nothing has changed
Love this
3:10 How was that offensive? It was exhibition match afaik, and everyone, including Roger, had a lot of fun with it
Yeah I was confused by that. Everyone’s having a blast, what’s so offensive?
the very first clip was an ad, this kind of videos should be removed for misleading content.
Imagine you get an outside seat to an incredible doubles match, only to end up with Serena Williams in your lap. We watched that man’s life peak on live TV
0:32 Did they have to redo this serve? Or did the server get the point?
That's a clip from a commercial. It didn't actually happen 😅
As a tennis umpire, i can tell you that you are wrong regarding the bonus moment..
The serve went in, the ball hit the net post and got in to cuevas' side.
Hitting the net post is considered illegal because the net post is a permanent fixture according to the rules and the decision is correct giving cuevas the point.
Know the rules :-)
No, the TOP of the net post in doubles (the wire and the pulley) is considered part of the net, except on a serve. Had this happened on a doubles point, it would have counted, but because there were singles sticks, the ball was out.
@@joemarshall4226 correct. I only related to this scenario where it is a singles match. You related also to a doubles match.. 🤝👍🙂
"Steffi Graf known for her looks.." HAHAHAHA
She was. You never saw her in real life.
@@joemarshall4226 No woman with squinty eyes and a long nose has ever been considered a looker.
@@lwh7301 You never saw her in real life. TV exaggerates big facial features. I'm telling you, she was a knockout.
Many of the pro players are. They are so fit and healthy. But Steffi was in a class with few others.
@@joemarshall4226 Every picture of her is like that. Don't lie.
These random unrelated shots from 'the crowd' really annoy me...
The only thing ridiculous is the way your pronouncing some names bro
*you're, but agreed
ill do better next time
@@TennisSmash-bj2uw the one who hits the umpire is Shapovalov of Canada, and "pro tennis player" laughing with the racket broken is Paire. You need to research more, sorry
Josh isner???
The point goes to Cuevas, the referee decision is correct
Correct, cause outside single support is not part of the net. It is like the ball is hitting the umpires chair or anything else...
If there were no singles posts it would have gone against Cuevas, but as you say it is correct.
if these are the top moments.... this proves how awesome soccer and F1 are.
4:45 will someone tell me which actor that is? I think I know him from somewhere
How i met your mother
Steffi Graf was known for her looks??? Only an American could say that.
Wdym I think Americans have higher standards most European women are ugly and don’t shave their armpits
its also funny to know that this guy has some great name reading skills.somehow he reads john josh.and kyrgios kygrios.
Steffi was beautiful. What do you look like? 🙏✌️
You never saw young Steffi in real life. She was drop dead gorgeous. Tall, long-legged, athletic, shapely, perfect posture, tan, blonde, with a nice smile.....she was like a new improved human.....just stunning.
im germanic celtic nordic and Graf had a bod from HADES as well as being a sexxxy attractive woman, yes. Isn't 'beauty' subjective anyway, pal? perhaps, 'god' watching you whack off makes reading this a bit 'less hard' , eh?!? oh wait, did i just permanently embed something err subjective as well?!? My guess is...DA/Oo/Si/Ya/Yes.
so what's the ruling when the ball gets embedded into the clay?
Would it be an ace?
But technically, it did not bounce yet (it did not touch the ground twice), so is is it still in play? (and the 2nd player would have to wait for eternity (or till the next earthquake) when it jumps off the ground and then he has to play it?
its a t v commercial.
Well the david Beckham wasn't true lol
This would be a much better video if there was no commentary. Why does this announcer feel he has to give away everything before letting us watch it?? Very amateur.
IS there a version of this video without the commentary? Kinda spoils each clip before its shown....
click bait. half-stories, lacking info.
2:06 He was John Isner not Josh Eisner
2:02 : "Josh Isner"?? I know John Isner, but no Josh. And the pronunciation is "Eezner", not "eyes ner".
who is the guy @1:38 throwing everything
Kyrgios
Flung a chair, not flinged.
OMG Everyone, including Roddick, admitted the serve in the clay was a hoax. WOW. you reported it as real. Honest mistake or "likes" bait. I'm unsubscribing!
The most interesting one was left to few seconds at the end of the video
Who is Josh Isner? 😂 😂
Last bonus one: the empire made the right call. That part of the net the ball struck is not officially part of the singles court. On a true singles cour the ball would be out, hence it is false
5:00 At least it wasn't James Brown, I feel good.
Вся суть женщин: "Сколько денег ты имеешь?" 1:05
Потребляди.)
GRAF: LIKE FATHER LIKE DAUGHTER
Nadal federer isn’t the biggest tennis rivalry of all time. That’s Nadal Djokovic
15 😂 I remember it
cut the video too fast! should for the first example (and many other)s let the reaction of roddick and the other ! looks like you took too much speed dude! nice video anyway
Who's Josh Aesner? 🙂 2:02
This is a joke right? You have have a tennis channel and think the Roddick serve was real? You call John Isner JOSH Isner... and you pronounce his last name incorrectly? I'm only 3 highlights in. Get outta here. Downvoted and never subbed.
I don't know why I sat through it all.. but I can confirm it wasn't worth it 😂minimal effort video for sure
@@crazed3871 I was just about to writhe the same here after watching it. Clickbait
Come on Ivanišević has to Be on at least 2 places - when he broke all of his reckets during the Match so he did not have any reckets left so he Had to conceed THE Match :p
opened the video...saw the Andy Roddick commercial on nr 15 presented as an actual event...closed the video. not good
Why no Safin at the French Open pulling his shorts (but not boxers), down after a long, epic point he won, then had taken away for pulling his shorts down to his thighs… two ridiculous parts.
That ridiculous impersonation by Rodbigdick, about a much better player than him, Rafael Nadal, had no need to happen...
Roddick and that last one were commercials
Roddick serve was an ad not real
2:31 "During a double match": wouldn't it pay to know the slightest thing about tennis before scripting such a video? (Let alone confusing ads and charity events for actual competitive matches... sigh...)
Maybe research player's names and how to pronounce them first?
Nice clips but the over explaining of the narrator was a bit irritating.
Roddick is hilarious!
1:13 "Nick Keegreos" bruh
Those added scenes of for example Beckham looks really cringe
Bro said Josh Izener
it’s John IS-NER
Who the hell is Josh Isnor? 😂
So when Stefan Edberg accidentally killed a line guy by hitting him in the balls, did not qualify?
I liked number 7 😂😅
Number 15 is fake, my friends 😂😂😂
1:13 Nick kygrios?😭
Fact: this voicd from this guy isn't his voice. Its an ai voice
I am old enough to remember McEnroe. He was always pulling that shit. It was childish, really.
he was in the right though (at least in that particular instance).
@@panda4247 Perhaps, but considering it fit his pattern of behavior it just made the judge less likely to consider he was not wrong.
In this case, he had every right to be annoyed. It was an over-rule that should never have been made on a big point. Even the wimbledon crowd cheered him. Everyone in the crowd knew he was right. The line callers were not pros back them. They would sometimes ask spectators to call the lines! They were playing for big money. Someone had to start complaining. Intimidating umpires became part fo the game.....
How misleading; number 15 is froma commercial. Another channel to block!! Liars!!!
Did you say Nick "Kigrious" and.... Josh... Isner...
Do you watch tennis?
Ditto John Eyesner.
Josh Eisner 🤣
Lousy editing, too much explaining what is about to happen. I stopped after “Josh I-sner.” Wtf
his name is john isner not josh
Nick Kygrios and Josh Eisner
Clickbait with underwhelming content.
'flinged' 🙄
Nick Kee-gree-ohs? You gotta be kidding ne.
When someone who didn’t get any jail time at all after stabbing Monica Seles 😢
The first one was not real!! I really hope you knew this!!
Josh Aisner? Dude is probably desperate for comments...
1:14 Nick WHO?!
Nick "Kygrios" ??? Who is that ?
A guy
josh eyesner
A lot of daft comments and many of the players' names pronounced incorrectly. Also, why do commentators feel the need to explain to you what you are about to see before you see it? It is patronising and pointless, but mostly annoying. A good reason not to subscribe, unfortunately.
Josh isner?!?
Oh, please... 0:35 did not happen. It's a fake, a part of commercial or something.
good
I don’t remember that one with Roddick, wow! He showed me his iPhone back before Apple had even announced that they were going to make and sell them. I knew then that his little pocket-sized computer was going to completely change humanity if it ever reached the public’s hands. And it did!
what are you even saying
@@natehubbard5062 Back in my corporate jet days I flew Andy Roddick and his brother in a corporate jet from Texas up to the Davis Cup. He left his iPhone aboard the aircraft. I grabbed it and chased him down in the FBO. Knowing that it was, at that time, an unusual looking cell phone, I joked with him that the only person I prank phone called from his phone list was John McEnroe. Apple hadn’t yet publicly announced that they were even going to make the iPhone, however, like many products, celebrities and athletes get this stuff long before the general public. I asked him about his unusual cell phone. He gave me a quick demo of all that it could do (which was completely unlike anything at the time). I knew that it was a “game changer” of a gadget. And indeed it was.
Thanks for explain everything before it happens and keeping the original sound down. Makes it so much easier not to sub your channel.
Reasons not to watch the rest of the video or subscribe to the channel is #15. Don’t waste your time folks.
First one was a fake. How are we supposed to watch the rest without a dislike to the video, when you just tell lies? Terrible video.
Did it count for a point for Roddick sunk the ball? Stefi became #1 after Szeles was stabbed in the back, maybe that's what she needed the money for? McEnroe's tantrum's were the best! Oh, the not so good old days!
'Flinged' a chair?
“josh” isner?
'Josh aisner'?
you need to learn how to pronounce the players names correctly