Curious how you vote. 30 years ago it would not have affected how I would have replied (with sympathy). Today, my reply is based on whether you voted FOR this to happen to you, or against it. And recently changing your mind is totally valid to me, I am a former loyal Democrat who will never vote blue again.
@@mikeg3439 What does voting have to do with it? You are aware this has been allowed to happen because this country refuses to acknowledge they have a problem with Mexican drug traffickers
They want a way to be distracted from their reality, same as most Americans that use pills or injections do...especially the Americans that have insurance to pay for those pills or injections. In the absence of any REAL help from the state or federal government, you bet the unhoused want drugs of some kind.
I was homeless for 3 years and I can tell you they don't go to a shelter cause you can't get high and tweak in there most of the mental problems comes from the constant drug use the day I went to rehab was the last day I was homeless I'm all in favor of them making them get help by any means possible no one deserves to be forgotten and left to live that way
The people in San Francisco have the wrong type of “compassion”. San Francisco’s “compassion” is equal to enabling self destructive behavior for vulnerable people with severe addiction.
Deserve. Very Telling Choice of words. I get up. Go to work. I SERVE the public. I don't think of what I DESERVE. Perhaps entitlement is where these people are wrong. Went wrong.
There’s a difference between people that want to change and people that don’t. I’ve been homeless saw all the resources offered an got out. Of course it doesn’t happen overnight. They embrace the life and refuse help. Heck when I was homeless you couldn’t even tell I was homeless. I didn’t look homeless. I also volunteer a lot so I’ve seen plenty resources people are offered . There’s no reason to be out there like this, there’s plenty of resources offered.
Its really difficult to have empathy for people who don't have any interest in changing their situation. Give them two choices; pay an occupancy fee for their sidewalk space or move to a shelter for free.
A useful use of public money would be to expand treatment. If they don't want treatment, prison is the other option. Do not give them a choice. Stop letting the homeless run the city.
A really stupid idea was that distributing free needles to these junkies. What did the city council think when they passed that? Our city is a real joke thanks to these people.
Stop ALL homeless benefits if they won't change their ways. We've paid for their support long enough for them to improve their lives! Stop wasting money on those preying on our better nature.
I do agree that the help should be available for those that want it and bus tickets for those that don’t. Most of the addicts are from other areas of the country taking an advantage San Francisco.
SF city budget is about 16bn, they spend a little over 1bn on homeless people. Over 6% of their budget is being spent on 1% of their population. It's closer to 10% of the budget once you account for police etc calls related to homelessness. It just doesn't make sense to me.
It would be far cheaper to build/re-open asylums. Once we get the people who are incompetent indoors, the resources can go to people who actually can be helped.
@@Cucumberflavoredmustard California can lead in this effort, if they don't let the super compassionate minority frighten them. I was wondering whether it would be cheaper than the complex systems for dealing with this crisis already is. How much would it be to repurpose the abandoned buildings into asylums and have staff there 24/7, providing counseling, food, shelter all in one place? It would probably cut the waste, since charity would consolidate around these healthcare systems. The only thing is that these people would have to be detained without consent like they are criminals. There are no laws against what they do. If there were, I'm sure there would be people that were complaining that giving cops the right to determine incompetence is not correct. I believe this is what the country needs though.
@@tysupply8408 That would be a good thing. I do think there would be a revolving door of incompetent individuals who enter the asylums, so the funding would still be there but more focused. Even charities could contribute.
Oh it's worse than that and it's going to get far far worse as they major tax generators leave. But this is as intended not just by the politicians, but most of the voters know this is happening and are happy with it. They want SF to become one body odor reeking drum circle, and they will cry out "bummer man, where is the free pizza delivery? F__king capitalists, hurry up."
God’s kingdom is the only solution. The experiment in self-rule has proven what we see today. Soon. Daniel 2: 44. It will remove homeless problems. All will have a home and a garden soon. But not all behavior will be allowed. Isaiah 65: 21,22
@@XM2X901 Not true. Cancer cures are most successful if applied early. Homelessness in Calif has been growing for a long time, and officials have delayed dealing with it. We're in a Stage 4 homeless crisis now. Time to find a real cure(s).
California has spent $23 BILLION in the last 5 years, spends $140K plus each year in SF on every homeless person. The problem is corruption, not homelessness.
I sadly have to agree with this. What percent of these homeless services do you think are corrupt? 80%? Or more? I read an article in the Chronicle about six nonprofits that have been outed for fraud. Not just little start ups, but large ones including Recology, the company that deals with SF’s waste. And this is all recent. It would be interesting to see how much of those billions went to people’s salary and benefits versus money and services to actual people that need help.
Yes, there is CORRUPTION all around us. The worse CORRUPTION is the one WE don't see!!! The POLITICIANS put taxpayers money out on the streets and only a small percentage actually gets there, the rest goes in the pockets of POLITICIANS. PEOPLE... "ENOUGH IS ENOUGH" please remember in NOVEMBER!!
we've given certain people years of time to be homeless and figure things out on their own. being homeless for years only makes their circumstances worse, and the community's circumstances worse. we have to try a different approach than what we've been doing.
They don't want to be in the structured environment like shelters because it would be difficult for them to do drug and commit crime. Can't let these people loose on the street regardless.
While I agree your comment has merit to it, don’t forget. There are people that don’t want to go into those conditions because they don’t want their belongings getting stolen.
People need to be conserved. They refuse to go to the shelters because they don't want to follow the rules of not doing drugs and carrying their hoarding trash items. If they refuse to go to a shelter and continue to be on the street, they need to lose their rights.
not always true. They aren't allowed to bring in anything bigger than a large purse which means they lose all of their belongings. 2nd: Shelter staff often don't catch weapons like knives on people. Shelters can be more deadly inside than on the street. 3rd: they are only allowed 1 week at a time and half to jump through hoops by trying to get signed up each week by going to a library and use the computers. There is also a lot of mistreatment by staff. Many staff members were previously unhoused and mistreat those they knew on the streets. I have spoken to many housing and counseling volunteers. Reporters need to start asking the true darker reasons as to why people aren't going to shelters. It is illogical to think that 90% of those on the streets are all mentally ill. Statistically, that is unfounded.
WHATEVER LOL. You are not streetwise. PERIOD. If you want to know the truth go there and ask them. I don't care about people like you who have no idea what it means to live on the street. Even the reporter walking around for one hour doesn't mean shit. In any case, I don't expect people like you to care or understand what they are going through. You're muted but you can respond which I am sure you do. You like the sound of your own voice. Have a nice day.
This is a big warning. The word of God is the bible. Our Lord Jesus Christ is God and not human. Those religions saying he is a human was a total devastation to yall. Do not add or deduct his word in the holy scriptures. Powerful wrath from heavens worldwide.
A lot of people living on the street have some form of mental disorder shelter wont work they need to be under medical supervision half probably dont know if they're coming or going
Most of them from constantly boiling their brains with drugs and alcohol. It's self inflicted. I've skirted both issues three times myself, each time forced myself to get clean (age 17 quit drugs, over my life got into alcohol too much twice, been clean and doing great for a very long time now, but not once did I stop working, paying my bills, taking care of business).
Why is it that homeless people probably have mental issues or drug problems?? Just maybe, are just TIRED of all BS of trying to live the AMERICAN DREAM!!! Just like any other situation, adjusting is the hardest!!! Once that is done, problems aren't as bad!!! It's hard to believe, but some of the HOMELESS aren't as bad off as someone leads us to believe!!!😮😮
@@punkagrrlzero those aren't' the ones that anyone is taking issue with. And elderly, disabled and working poor families with children are the first to get into assisted housing. All the "Unhoused" you see in the tenderloin aren't part of that group. And the ones that are disabled already have housing but choose to be on the street for quick access to the Hondo dealers or are selling drugs themselves on Turk and Golden Gate, Hyde and Turk, Ellis and Jones, Leavenworth and Turk, Market and 6th, 6th and Mission and who knows how many other corners of the city they've taken over.
@@bpapaoif I had the place for them I would as long as they went out not recovery first . Or maybe how about you not be a bigot towards people who are homeless?
We can build a sophisticated telescope for $10 billion , put it up a million miles from Earth, to explore the early period of our universe (13 billion years ago) , but we can't find a way to prevent the homeless from camping on the streets of San Francisco.
Require 3 things: 1) Force into rehab 2) force into shelter. 3) Force into mental health centers. It is clear that these hard drugs everywhere are the root cause of this. SF was the dumping ground of these people.
It’s not “an impossible problem to solve.” Build a tiered system of hotels/nice jails: Level 1 involuntary short term general homeless hotel with social workers, therapists, and police. Level 2 involuntary medium term drug rehabilitation hotel. Level 3 involuntary long term mental health support hotel. Level 4 jail. Each one probably needs 1000 units in the city. Take over old run down hotels/buildings for this, reinvest to bring them up to code. Then enforce the city’s no camping laws! No tents, no shopping carts, no trash, no loitering, no sleeping gear. Move everyone inside! Reclaim the city! SF doesn’t have to be a mecca for addicts from across the nation. Will it cost money? Yes. Would residents be willing to pay? Definitely. I think everyone recognizes that there are people in society who can’t take care of themselves, and we all need to pitch in to get them off the streets. What we can’t do is let the homeless call the shots. They clearly aren’t capable of making good decisions or they wouldn’t be there in the first place.
He may have gone nuts since then, but I was living in NYC when Rudy Giuliani became mayor. In the early '90s, Manhattan was like SF with all the homeless and druggies on the streets. Giuliani said the homeless had three choices - go to a shelter, leave town, or go to jail. It worked. The city was drastically improved within a year.
Oh? You realize that the majority of unhoused are elderly, disabled, and working poor families with kids right? Most of us did contribute until we couldn't any longer.
@@punkagrrlzero Please don't try to blow smoke up my ass. I live here and I see exactly who they are with my own two eyes. They are not victims. We are their victims.
it is cheaper to build a jail to keep these homeless people who refused to go to shelter or receive assistance! Jail and forced labor don't sound too bad for those people
When I moved BACK to California around 25 years ago.. a friend and I decided to make the trip and start a new life in California.. he wanted to go to San Francisco.. I have never been so agreed.. we went got to downtown San Fran and looked for a HOSTEL. One was in the TENDERLOIN.. next day we need to find some sort of work.. we go to a couple of places for resources, a Church was the first stop..a line for 3 blocks going into this Church.. for food and clothing, bus passes, drug Paraphernalia.. 99% of the people in this line were SMOKING CRACK PIPES OR METH PIPES.. out in the OPEN on the sidewalk in front of this Church that is supposed to HELP...? MOST of these GROUP shelters are SCAMS for Government and the organizers to get PAID.. very SAD but shelters are DANGEROUS and most are just CRUEL
An amazing achievement for Gavin and his voters 👍. Glad that the taxpayers don’t mind paying more in taxes to clean up after their homeless residents… time and time again 👏👏👏
I was just in the union square/ tenderloin adjacent area tonight, its a freaking disaster. SF really needs to get its act together. Its unacceptable how disgusting the streets are and how much open drug dealing and using was going on. Crack, fentanyl/ heroin, you name it. What a mess.
Forbidding tents was huge. The mental illness of collecting crap is dangerous. Having people collect and hold things is what brings bugs and disease. Breaking that cycle is a big first.
If they don’t want help, move out of SF! Give them a ticket then put in jail. Get their families to take them home. When accidents happens all of a sudden the homeless’ family member speaks out. Such BS. When they are homeless their family member needs to help them. If they don’t don’t sue anyone when there is an accident!
You're an Autocrat huh!!! Authoritarian who doesn't care much about people's rights. Well, even in RED STATES, ( your dream state) it is illegal to do that. Family members aren't their family members keepers lol. If they were, then I would hope your family shuts you down and takes away your rights to UA-cam.
It's kinda like daily maid service for the "unhoused". Not a bad deal - I'd prob keep doing too if there were no consequences - just minor inconveniences.
They want to stay outside so they have better access to the Hondos that give them drugs. Apparently there is no dealing or use allowed in the shelters.
i was helping soup kitchen for years before covid, i know many of them in the mission area, shelters are well known to them, there are plenty, but they only go there when really necessary and they don't want to be there for long to avoid fights, and their survival daily routine cant be done in the shelter, and it feels in prison to just be there after living in the open air for long. they also have friends outside to protect them and to talk. SF offering help is rubbish, they cannot help. They can inject them or talk to them, they don't improve their lives. Some of those homelesses i knew who went out of street, usually borrow suit, bath and find low paying jobs. Many of them want to work simple jobs. I knew one doing hardware recycling to get skills too. Psychological help for homeless? You are just wasting everyone's money, they are not homeless, they don't know the issue being a homeless
I would hope that these "journalists" at least MENTION that SF spends over $700 MILLION - ANNUALLY - on the homeless. And then maybe even dig into where all that money is actually going!
It maybe slow in the TL but it works on the outter area. Bernal Heights park once plaqued with homeless in tents and motorhomes are now clear! Zoo Rd, Vidal, and Winston are also cleared too. Report this
Now what is that guy with the cart going to do with that lane divider? Never understood the value in picking up a damaged car bumper and dragging it around..
Give them a place to stay that’s not just for a few days at a time and can still have their pets if they have any and turn the build into something like a community housing all in one center for them so they don’t have to leave for the ones without transportation and provide them guidance counseling and human resource team. Then provide them transportation to their jobs to earn their income restoring the city, then they can start helping others get off the streets too. Because they respond better with those who’s been in their shoes.
You have a solution to the problem of the homelessness, and it's a very good idea. They should try to do it if they very want to help the homeless people, and not just complain about them.
You also clearly haven’t walked around the Tenderloin recently. Drug addicts aren’t interested in finding a way off the streets, being a part of a community, or helping society - they’re interested in drugs, by any means necessary. If it means crime, they’ll do it. If it means destroying their body and everything and everyone around them, they’ll do it. Your solution would work great if homeless people had your mentality - you’re projecting yourself onto them - but there is a reason you aren’t homeless. Sorry if that sounds harsh
@@kennethprola5136 I am homeless technically, been homeless since my grandma passed from cancer and graduated high school in 2012 im 30 now but I moved up from sleeping in a car to a tent and now I have a travel trailer and I work in resort parks and camp grounds but I still consider myself homeless.
But your right I haven’t walked around the Tenderlion, a lot of the drug addicts won’t just jump straight into the idea I have but the ones who aren’t that far gone yet who don’t want to live on the streets by choice will have a chance and the others who absolutely won’t go off the streets can be incarcerated until they’ve been clean long enough to get into a program.
It depends on the shelter in how much immediate time they are given. If they are a night pass there not going to go for long. If they get a coveted 90 day pass renewable they may try until they realize they are back on the street. I know it better than I should. Blacked out at night 250 guys in bunks 2ftX3ft is a hell zone. 50+ year old still climbing up metal bunks at night in limited light.. Phone charger, keys, purse, backpack especially wallet gone.
😂 Let's come down to Cesar Chavez and Indiana St. These homeless build their bunkers with ply woods. They open the water hydrant for their own use to take showers and home made electrical outlets to the public light pole for electricity. They basically get FREE water and electricity while all the tax payers and residents of SF are paying their bills. What a joke!!! This city is hopeless and cannot move forward with this issue going on and on...
Are they from Pacheco Ca? I think I see them on Bayshore Blvd after they tackled the tin barb wire from surrounding area fencing and have puncture wounds old and now..They look like raspberry blackberry burnt Pop tart cigarette flavored.
Who is feeding these homeless people? Is it the food shelter at St. Anthony’s? Why can’t the city cut off the food supply that is helping feed these homeless people?
Sure , take away what people need to survive and watch what happens. The rest of us shouldn’t have to deal with chaos because people want revenge against people who are homeless with mental illness.
Billions spent on these initiatives for only dozens of homeless people to take advantage of them, but when that audit rolls around the funds mysteriously go missing. It doesn’t take a genius to realize where that money is going.
In 1978, HUD’s budget was over $83 billion. In 1983, HUD’s budget was only $18 billion. In 1983, general public emergency shelters began opening in cities nationwide. In 1987, Congress passed the Stewart B. McKinney Act, providing $880 million in homeless assistance funding (2004 constant dollars). Since 1987, annual McKinney homeless assistance has never been more than $1.4 billion.5 Our perspective is that the overwhelming omission of the systemic and broad structural causes of homelessness in public discussions and policy responses is nothing short of a collective deception that has only led to increased homelessness. Federal responses to homelessness have failed and will continue to fail unless and until they include a serious and sizable federal recommitment to funding affordable housing. Homeless ends whit a home.
....so cleaning up the trash is a total waste of time and money. When will we live by normal standards and not let these addicts dictate how our cities are?
I think the state needs to implement a conservatorship approach where mental and/or drug addicted homeless people are forced into rehab or institutions.
Who could have imagined? If you live in big cities, you have to expect to homelessness. Don't move to a large city and then complain about homelessness. Homelessness has always occurred in big cities.
SF is too far gone. You just have to leave. Unless you're wealthy and live above the streets, taking a robotaxi from point A to point B and Doordashing all the time
It's like taking care of animals. Every once in a while pick up the trash and poop, at taxpayer expense, then repeat over and over with NO change, not slow change as the reporter alleges
They want dope. Not help.....I work in the tenderloin.
Facts. Waste of money.
But you want to protect the drug traffickers who sell the fentanyl these people are addicted to. People like you never mention the drug peddlers.Why?
Curious how you vote. 30 years ago it would not have affected how I would have replied (with sympathy). Today, my reply is based on whether you voted FOR this to happen to you, or against it. And recently changing your mind is totally valid to me, I am a former loyal Democrat who will never vote blue again.
@@mikeg3439 What does voting have to do with it? You are aware this has been allowed to happen because this country refuses to acknowledge they have a problem with Mexican drug traffickers
They want a way to be distracted from their reality, same as most Americans that use pills or injections do...especially the Americans that have insurance to pay for those pills or injections.
In the absence of any REAL help from the state or federal government, you bet the unhoused want drugs of some kind.
I was homeless for 3 years and I can tell you they don't go to a shelter cause you can't get high and tweak in there most of the mental problems comes from the constant drug use the day I went to rehab was the last day I was homeless I'm all in favor of them making them get help by any means possible no one deserves to be forgotten and left to live that way
^^ THIS.
It’s sickening when id see all the dealers in the TL and the homeless just camp out right there next to them .
Time to bus them to Ohio! ❤ deport migrants
The people in San Francisco have the wrong type of “compassion”. San Francisco’s “compassion” is equal to enabling self destructive behavior for vulnerable people with severe addiction.
Deserve. Very Telling Choice of words. I get up. Go to work. I SERVE the public. I don't think of what I DESERVE. Perhaps entitlement is where these people are wrong. Went wrong.
Street cleaning should not depend on coöperation from people who can get up and walk.
Won't get up and walk. There's a difference, won't get a job ! Won't leave the source of their drugs.
@@danasmith858 It's pretty hard to get a job when you are homeless.
And it's hard to get off hard drugs when there are not enough rehab beds.
@@milascave2 Why wait till you are homeless to get a job? They never wanted a job
There’s a difference between people that want to change and people that don’t. I’ve been homeless saw all the resources offered an got out. Of course it doesn’t happen overnight. They embrace the life and refuse help. Heck when I was homeless you couldn’t even tell I was homeless. I didn’t look homeless. I also volunteer a lot so I’ve seen plenty resources people are offered . There’s no reason to be out there like this, there’s plenty of resources offered.
Jail time.
They don't want help. They want to be homeless! When is SF going to learn.
Its really difficult to have empathy for people who don't have any interest in changing their situation. Give them two choices; pay an occupancy fee for their sidewalk space or move to a shelter for free.
A useful use of public money would be to expand treatment. If they don't want treatment, prison is the other option. Do not give them a choice. Stop letting the homeless run the city.
Exactly.
So being a homeless makes you a criminal.
got it
A really stupid idea was that distributing free needles to these junkies. What did the city council think when they passed that? Our city is a real joke thanks to these people.
@@minhdo1728 You prefer people to die from easily preventable diseases??
Hold the drug dealers accountable too
So glad we're paying all these property taxes for city workers to sit by a tent for an hour.
Can y’all move these bums to fort baker in Marin county, because there’s millions of acres for them to live like a caveman
Decades and decades of democrat high taxes to solve the homeless problem and not one single thing has been done. Billions wasted
You can ALWAYS leave...
You can always leave homie 🚞
@@amirthephotographerwhen we “leave”, you’ll start sobbing about “food deserts” like you always do.
Stop ALL homeless benefits if they won't change their ways. We've paid for their support long enough for them to improve their lives! Stop wasting money on those preying on our better nature.
I do agree that the help should be available for those that want it and bus tickets for those that don’t. Most of the addicts are from other areas of the country taking an advantage San Francisco.
@@Ellieempress This! I have worked with many homeless in the Bay area and so many are from other states. It makes no sense. Go back home!
you don't have a 'better nature'
Still looks the same to me. I’ve been here 25 yrs and not one thing has changed.
Yup, just wasting $$$ and making it more difficult for people to get back on their feet.
They just come back
I agree
You must have voted for it
@@wickedleeloopy2115 I’m a registered republican.
If the city was run as a company, all the management would have be fired years ago. The failure from corruption and neglect starts at the top.
Voter failure
SF city budget is about 16bn, they spend a little over 1bn on homeless people. Over 6% of their budget is being spent on 1% of their population. It's closer to 10% of the budget once you account for police etc calls related to homelessness. It just doesn't make sense to me.
It would be far cheaper to build/re-open asylums. Once we get the people who are incompetent indoors, the resources can go to people who actually can be helped.
@@Cucumberflavoredmustardi feel like if they fixed the problem they would probably get less funding
@@Cucumberflavoredmustard California can lead in this effort, if they don't let the super compassionate minority frighten them. I was wondering whether it would be cheaper than the complex systems for dealing with this crisis already is. How much would it be to repurpose the abandoned buildings into asylums and have staff there 24/7, providing counseling, food, shelter all in one place? It would probably cut the waste, since charity would consolidate around these healthcare systems. The only thing is that these people would have to be detained without consent like they are criminals. There are no laws against what they do. If there were, I'm sure there would be people that were complaining that giving cops the right to determine incompetence is not correct. I believe this is what the country needs though.
@@tysupply8408 That would be a good thing. I do think there would be a revolving door of incompetent individuals who enter the asylums, so the funding would still be there but more focused. Even charities could contribute.
Oh it's worse than that and it's going to get far far worse as they major tax generators leave. But this is as intended not just by the politicians, but most of the voters know this is happening and are happy with it. They want SF to become one body odor reeking drum circle, and they will cry out "bummer man, where is the free pizza delivery? F__king capitalists, hurry up."
So, these "sweeps" are about as effective as treating skin cancer with a Band-aid. What's the real solution going to be??
There’s no cure for cancer… Duh!!!
Telling the NIMBYS to get bent and build affordable housing.
God’s kingdom is the only solution. The experiment in self-rule has proven what we see today.
Soon. Daniel 2: 44. It will remove homeless problems. All will have a home and a garden soon. But not all behavior will be allowed.
Isaiah 65: 21,22
@@XM2X901 Not true. Cancer cures are most successful if applied early. Homelessness in Calif has been growing for a long time, and officials have delayed dealing with it. We're in a Stage 4 homeless crisis now. Time to find a real cure(s).
You get rid of poor people. Duh
California has spent $23 BILLION in the last 5 years, spends $140K plus each year in SF on every homeless person. The problem is corruption, not homelessness.
Keep in mind it's not just those homeless right now but over a period of time and those that almost fell into homelessness
I sadly have to agree with this. What percent of these homeless services do you think are corrupt? 80%? Or more? I read an article in the Chronicle about six nonprofits that have been outed for fraud. Not just little start ups, but large ones including Recology, the company that deals with SF’s waste. And this is all recent. It would be interesting to see how much of those billions went to people’s salary and benefits versus money and services to actual people that need help.
It’s a good business to NOT solve problems. There’s a lot of money people are making off the back of homeless people.
Yes, there is CORRUPTION all around us. The worse CORRUPTION is the one WE don't see!!! The POLITICIANS put taxpayers money out on the streets and only a small percentage actually gets there, the rest goes in the pockets of POLITICIANS. PEOPLE...
"ENOUGH IS ENOUGH" please remember in NOVEMBER!!
Homelessness is a big business.
uh sure yeah
Bingo
Everyone is overthinking things, force them to relocate to a shelter. If they refuse help, bus them to treasure island. Problem solved
How about Alcatraz?
we've given certain people years of time to be homeless and figure things out on their own. being homeless for years only makes their circumstances worse, and the community's circumstances worse. we have to try a different approach than what we've been doing.
They don't want to be in the structured environment like shelters because it would be difficult for them to do drug and commit crime. Can't let these people loose on the street regardless.
While I agree your comment has merit to it, don’t forget. There are people that don’t want to go into those conditions because they don’t want their belongings getting stolen.
@@MarkKaehleryeah whatever... Their belongings that they probably stole in the first place! 😂
@@MarkKaehler As if they won't get stolen living on the street?
@@CrzyD-cv8xzyet you don’t know that for sure , because not all homeless people are on drugs.
@@billmM3605many other things happen in shelters that people are trying to avoid .
IMPEACH BREED
Show the streets at night... it's a disaster
you thought that looked good?
start putting people in jail if they refuse to stop setting up tents and encampments on the sidewalks and streets
At the rate of rent going up and wage not going up, you're going to have whole generation of people in prison.
People need to be conserved. They refuse to go to the shelters because they don't want to follow the rules of not doing drugs and carrying their hoarding trash items. If they refuse to go to a shelter and continue to be on the street, they need to lose their rights.
not always true. They aren't allowed to bring in anything bigger than a large purse which means they lose all of their belongings. 2nd: Shelter staff often don't catch weapons like knives on people. Shelters can be more deadly inside than on the street. 3rd: they are only allowed 1 week at a time and half to jump through hoops by trying to get signed up each week by going to a library and use the computers. There is also a lot of mistreatment by staff. Many staff members were previously unhoused and mistreat those they knew on the streets. I have spoken to many housing and counseling volunteers. Reporters need to start asking the true darker reasons as to why people aren't going to shelters. It is illogical to think that 90% of those on the streets are all mentally ill. Statistically, that is unfounded.
Enough help.
WHATEVER LOL. You are not streetwise. PERIOD. If you want to know the truth go there and ask them. I don't care about people like you who have no idea what it means to live on the street. Even the reporter walking around for one hour doesn't mean shit. In any case, I don't expect people like you to care or understand what they are going through. You're muted but you can respond which I am sure you do. You like the sound of your own voice. Have a nice day.
They refuse to go hard on drug dealers and public drug use.
This is a big warning. The word of God is the bible. Our Lord Jesus Christ is God and not human. Those religions saying he is a human was a total devastation to yall. Do not add or deduct his word in the holy scriptures. Powerful wrath from heavens worldwide.
A lot of people living on the street have some form of mental disorder shelter wont work they need to be under medical supervision half probably dont know if they're coming or going
Most of them from constantly boiling their brains with drugs and alcohol. It's self inflicted. I've skirted both issues three times myself, each time forced myself to get clean (age 17 quit drugs, over my life got into alcohol too much twice, been clean and doing great for a very long time now, but not once did I stop working, paying my bills, taking care of business).
Why is it that homeless people probably have mental issues or drug problems?? Just maybe, are just TIRED of all BS of trying to live the AMERICAN DREAM!!! Just like any other situation, adjusting is the hardest!!! Once that is done, problems aren't as bad!!! It's hard to believe, but some of the HOMELESS aren't as bad off as someone leads us to believe!!!😮😮
That's because of the drugs. Idgaf how they remove them as long as it's done. No more of these cooperation B.S. regardless of mental status
Jail or institutions period
As long as the drugs are available. The people will stay on the street. …
STOP SAYING UNHOUSED 😤
they don't want to be housed.... they want to be free as a bird....
NO. You don't understand who the unhoused actually are. Elderly, disabled, and working poor FAMILIES WITH CHILDREN!!!
@@punkagrrlzero those aren't' the ones that anyone is taking issue with. And elderly, disabled and working poor families with children are the first to get into assisted housing. All the "Unhoused" you see in the tenderloin aren't part of that group. And the ones that are disabled already have housing but choose to be on the street for quick access to the Hondo dealers or are selling drugs themselves on Turk and Golden Gate, Hyde and Turk, Ellis and Jones, Leavenworth and Turk, Market and 6th, 6th and Mission and who knows how many other corners of the city they've taken over.
@@punkagrrlzero Stop spamming lies. Stop YELLING IN CAPS. Stop degrading comments sections.
@@dixonpinfold2582 but caps ARE FUN!
They need to be in jail.
Can’t a cop ticket or arrest them for trespassing
Why ?
You want elderly, disabled, and children in jail just because they're homeless? That's disgusting.
@@Ellieempress You take em home then
@@bpapaoif I had the place for them I would as long as they went out not recovery first . Or maybe how about you not be a bigot towards people who are homeless?
You can’t smoke and inject meth/fentanyl in the shelter.
We can build a sophisticated telescope for $10 billion , put it up a million miles from Earth, to explore the early period of our universe (13 billion years ago) , but we can't find a way to prevent the homeless from camping on the streets of San Francisco.
Require 3 things: 1) Force into rehab 2) force into shelter. 3) Force into mental health centers. It is clear that these hard drugs everywhere are the root cause of this. SF was the dumping ground of these people.
They don't want help, what a joke.
what a BIG difference from 1980s to 2024 in SF
it's SAD today!!!!!
MAKE THEM MOVE. THIS IS A RIDICULOUS WASTE OF EVERYONE'S TIME AND MONEY.
Okay, okay geez all caps guy! Anybody see where I dropped my magic wand??
@@trainwreck9567 the magic wand is called “law enforcement” because…. it’s job is to enforce the laws.
It’s not “an impossible problem to solve.” Build a tiered system of hotels/nice jails: Level 1 involuntary short term general homeless hotel with social workers, therapists, and police. Level 2 involuntary medium term drug rehabilitation hotel. Level 3 involuntary long term mental health support hotel. Level 4 jail. Each one probably needs 1000 units in the city. Take over old run down hotels/buildings for this, reinvest to bring them up to code.
Then enforce the city’s no camping laws! No tents, no shopping carts, no trash, no loitering, no sleeping gear. Move everyone inside! Reclaim the city! SF doesn’t have to be a mecca for addicts from across the nation.
Will it cost money? Yes. Would residents be willing to pay? Definitely. I think everyone recognizes that there are people in society who can’t take care of themselves, and we all need to pitch in to get them off the streets. What we can’t do is let the homeless call the shots. They clearly aren’t capable of making good decisions or they wouldn’t be there in the first place.
He may have gone nuts since then, but I was living in NYC when Rudy Giuliani became mayor. In the early '90s, Manhattan was like SF with all the homeless and druggies on the streets. Giuliani said the homeless had three choices - go to a shelter, leave town, or go to jail. It worked. The city was drastically improved within a year.
It’s a shame Giluliani accomplishments are overseen
homeless, not un housed. Most drug addicts need confinement to sober up and make better choices. Why not put them in detoxes for a time to help them.
Noncontributing members of society.
I believe a lot of them could do much better if the city does what a city should do in the past 30 years.
Oh? You realize that the majority of unhoused are elderly, disabled, and working poor families with kids right? Most of us did contribute until we couldn't any longer.
@@punkagrrlzero Please don't try to blow smoke up my ass. I live here and I see exactly who they are with my own two eyes. They are not victims. We are their victims.
@@HanginInSF you weak asf
Leeches
what the problem is SF is trying to solve a problem of homelessness when the problem is drug addiction and homelessness caused by drug addiction
Not all homeless situations are the same, they differ as much as the people do .
No it isn't. It's caused by POVERTY
In 2023 there were almost an equal number of unoccupied subsidized housing as there are unhoused people in America. Seems like a fixable issue.
High rents is the problem and the real estate profiteers who expect people to pay those high rents.
it is cheaper to build a jail to keep these homeless people who refused to go to shelter or receive assistance! Jail and forced labor don't sound too bad for those people
What about getting rid of the source and jail the Honduran narcotics traffickers selling the fentanyl?
@@williamryan9195 Both arrest users and arrest sellers. New prisons and treatment centers should be our new investment.
You nailed it! Common sense solution.
Take the shelter/mental health program/sobriety program or take jail. Simple as that
100%! Jail will stop them from using drugs immediately!
" ain't nothing tender, about that loin ! "
When I moved BACK to California around 25 years ago.. a friend and I decided to make the trip and start a new life in California.. he wanted to go to San Francisco.. I have never been so agreed.. we went got to downtown San Fran and looked for a HOSTEL. One was in the TENDERLOIN.. next day we need to find some sort of work.. we go to a couple of places for resources, a Church was the first stop..a line for 3 blocks going into this Church.. for food and clothing, bus passes, drug Paraphernalia.. 99% of the people in this line were SMOKING CRACK PIPES OR METH PIPES.. out in the OPEN on the sidewalk in front of this Church that is supposed to HELP...? MOST of these GROUP shelters are SCAMS for Government and the organizers to get PAID.. very SAD but shelters are DANGEROUS and most are just CRUEL
An amazing achievement for Gavin and his voters 👍. Glad that the taxpayers don’t mind paying more in taxes to clean up after their homeless residents… time and time again 👏👏👏
It gives people jobs, you have a problem with people having jobs?
Not “unhoused”: homeless, hobos.
I was just in the union square/ tenderloin adjacent area tonight, its a freaking disaster. SF really needs to get its act together. Its unacceptable how disgusting the streets are and how much open drug dealing and using was going on. Crack, fentanyl/ heroin, you name it. What a mess.
Literally none of that happens in union square. Stop lying. One of that happens outside the tenderloin at all…….
Forbidding tents was huge. The mental illness of collecting crap is dangerous. Having people collect and hold things is what brings bugs and disease. Breaking that cycle is a big first.
If they don’t want help, move out of SF! Give them a ticket then put in jail. Get their families to take them home. When accidents happens all of a sudden the homeless’ family member speaks out. Such BS. When they are homeless their family member needs to help them. If they don’t don’t sue anyone when there is an accident!
You're an Autocrat huh!!! Authoritarian who doesn't care much about people's rights. Well, even in RED STATES, ( your dream state) it is illegal to do that. Family members aren't their family members keepers lol. If they were, then I would hope your family shuts you down and takes away your rights to UA-cam.
This is working as local voters intended.
Putting them in jail means you will be paying much more for their room and board. Edit that part obviously.
you simply dont know what you're talking about, which is why none of your 'solutions' can work. that shit was all tried 50 years ago
I like how the anchorwoman says homeless and the voice over says unhoused.
It's kinda like daily maid service for the "unhoused". Not a bad deal - I'd prob keep doing too if there were no consequences - just minor inconveniences.
They want to stay outside so they have better access to the Hondos that give them drugs. Apparently there is no dealing or use allowed in the shelters.
i was helping soup kitchen for years before covid, i know many of them in the mission area, shelters are well known to them, there are plenty, but they only go there when really necessary and they don't want to be there for long to avoid fights, and their survival daily routine cant be done in the shelter, and it feels in prison to just be there after living in the open air for long. they also have friends outside to protect them and to talk. SF offering help is rubbish, they cannot help. They can inject them or talk to them, they don't improve their lives. Some of those homelesses i knew who went out of street, usually borrow suit, bath and find low paying jobs. Many of them want to work simple jobs. I knew one doing hardware recycling to get skills too. Psychological help for homeless? You are just wasting everyone's money, they are not homeless, they don't know the issue being a homeless
ABC7 News Bay Area, nice video keep it up
So all that poop goes into the storm drains, thats NOT the sewer system my friends.
You think people pick up those poops by hands?
Sewer and street drains are the same pipe to treatment.
It’s a combined sewer and storm drain in San Francisco, for what it’s worth
@@purplepeoplesparty2368that’s not true at all…..storm drain drain straight to the bay.
the only permanent housing for homeless is prison. food and a bed are provided not to mention medical attention.
No, we need to undo what Reagan did and open up compassionate medical facilities.
You belong in prison.
@Ellieempress um no fucking way! You want all autistic kids chained to walls again? DISGUSTING
And showers…
@@sandrasmith4546 bingo
Do a deep dive on what these homeless shelters are like.
Every 4 years
How about putting them in prison like we used to do?
I would hope that these "journalists" at least MENTION that SF spends over $700 MILLION - ANNUALLY - on the homeless. And then maybe even dig into where all that money is actually going!
Looks like rotten tenderloin to me
The way these democrats let the homeless run their city
Recorded horizontally:(
CITY must-have the law no camping no sleeping sidewalk and doing drugs on the treet 😢 terrible for public peoples walking walking on the streets 😢
It’s almost as if having affordable housing could help? Idk
I agree.
You clearly haven’t gone for a walk in the TL recently
It maybe slow in the TL but it works on the outter area. Bernal Heights park once plaqued with homeless in tents and motorhomes are now clear! Zoo Rd, Vidal, and Winston are also cleared too. Report this
2:52 Don't do drugs.
That lady was high as a kite, My God! This is absoutely ridiculous.
That's good way to take money from taxpayers 😮
So just wasting tax payers money on useless OT 🤮
Now what is that guy with the cart going to do with that lane divider? Never understood the value in picking up a damaged car bumper and dragging it around..
🎵I left my trash in San Francisco...🎵
Give them a place to stay that’s not just for a few days at a time and can still have their pets if they have any and turn the build into something like a community housing all in one center for them so they don’t have to leave for the ones without transportation and provide them guidance counseling and human resource team. Then provide them transportation to their jobs to earn their income restoring the city, then they can start helping others get off the streets too. Because they respond better with those who’s been in their shoes.
You have a solution to the problem of the homelessness, and it's a very good idea. They should try to do it if they very want to help the homeless people, and not just complain about them.
@@ong9998 thank you.
You also clearly haven’t walked around the Tenderloin recently. Drug addicts aren’t interested in finding a way off the streets, being a part of a community, or helping society - they’re interested in drugs, by any means necessary. If it means crime, they’ll do it. If it means destroying their body and everything and everyone around them, they’ll do it. Your solution would work great if homeless people had your mentality - you’re projecting yourself onto them - but there is a reason you aren’t homeless. Sorry if that sounds harsh
@@kennethprola5136 I am homeless technically, been homeless since my grandma passed from cancer and graduated high school in 2012 im 30 now but I moved up from sleeping in a car to a tent and now I have a travel trailer and I work in resort parks and camp grounds but I still consider myself homeless.
But your right I haven’t walked around the Tenderlion, a lot of the drug addicts won’t just jump straight into the idea I have but the ones who aren’t that far gone yet who don’t want to live on the streets by choice will have a chance and the others who absolutely won’t go off the streets can be incarcerated until they’ve been clean long enough to get into a program.
Allowed? Nah, they were FORCED to clean up the streets.
We offered them the carrot. Now they get the stick.
Buh bye.
It depends on the shelter in how much immediate time they are given. If they are a night pass there not going to go for long. If they get a coveted 90 day pass renewable they may try until they realize they are back on the street. I know it better than I should. Blacked out at night 250 guys in bunks 2ftX3ft is a hell zone. 50+ year old still climbing up metal bunks at night in limited light.. Phone charger, keys, purse, backpack especially wallet gone.
😂 Let's come down to Cesar Chavez and Indiana St. These homeless build their bunkers with ply woods. They open the water hydrant for their own use to take showers and home made electrical outlets to the public light pole for electricity. They basically get FREE water and electricity while all the tax payers and residents of SF are paying their bills. What a joke!!! This city is hopeless and cannot move forward with this issue going on and on...
Are they from Pacheco Ca? I think I see them on Bayshore Blvd after they tackled the tin barb wire from surrounding area fencing and have puncture wounds old and now..They look like raspberry blackberry burnt Pop tart cigarette flavored.
Who is feeding these homeless people? Is it the food shelter at St. Anthony’s? Why can’t the city cut off the food supply that is helping feed these homeless people?
Sure , take away what people need to survive and watch what happens. The rest of us shouldn’t have to deal with chaos because people want revenge against people who are homeless with mental illness.
@@Ellieempress mental illness? These homeless people, ultimately, chose to live in the streets.
@@no40says the lowlife 🤡
It’s important that they keep sweeping these people away and not let up. It’s not a right to be out there when they make a mess like they’re making.
Billions spent on these initiatives for only dozens of homeless people to take advantage of them, but when that audit rolls around the funds mysteriously go missing. It doesn’t take a genius to realize where that money is going.
They need to be locked up in jail until they get sober.
Quit spending money on the homeless and start spending it on security for people and companies who pay their taxes!
In 1978, HUD’s budget was over $83 billion.
In 1983, HUD’s budget was only $18 billion.
In 1983, general public emergency shelters began opening in cities nationwide.
In 1987, Congress passed the Stewart B. McKinney Act, providing $880 million in homeless
assistance funding (2004 constant dollars).
Since 1987, annual McKinney homeless assistance has never been more than $1.4 billion.5
Our perspective is that the overwhelming omission of the systemic and broad structural
causes of homelessness in public discussions and policy responses is nothing short of a
collective deception that has only led to increased homelessness. Federal responses to
homelessness have failed and will continue to fail unless and until they include a serious
and sizable federal recommitment to funding affordable housing. Homeless ends whit a home.
Insanity is doing the SAME thing again and again and hoping for different results.
_Our West Coast cities are perfect examples of this_
We need to start having serious discussions about drug legalization.
Great reporting ❤
....so cleaning up the trash is a total waste of time and money. When will we live by normal standards and not let these addicts dictate how our cities are?
I think the state needs to implement a conservatorship approach where mental and/or drug addicted homeless people are forced into rehab or institutions.
Shelters kick u out like 8 am…
Why do we even pay taxes
why would people take a bus ticket when youre in the easiest city to be homeless in
ABC keep doing this once a month series and we will see that nothing will change even after a year
Who could have imagined? If you live in big cities, you have to expect to homelessness. Don't move to a large city and then complain about homelessness. Homelessness has always occurred in big cities.
It was good for one week but back to shit
Newsome could have saved a ton of Dems in this election if this would have passed a year ago.
SF is too far gone. You just have to leave. Unless you're wealthy and live above the streets, taking a robotaxi from point A to point B and Doordashing all the time
A shelter is not a home.
Greatcher 🤮
Here's a new plan :
A hard winter is coming....
Once the people leave for
indoor shelters, wooden
planters blocking access
to laying down. 🤔
Why are you seeking "cooperation" from lawless criminals? How about act on behalf of taxpaying businesses and residents. ENOUGH!!!!!
Being homeless isn’t being a lawless criminal.
It's like taking care of animals. Every once in a while pick up the trash and poop, at taxpayer expense, then repeat over and over with NO change, not slow change as the reporter alleges