What 6 'Jurassic Park' Movies Looked Like Behind the Scenes | Movies Insider | Insider
Вставка
- Опубліковано 6 лип 2022
- We trace the evolution of dinosaur effects in the "Jurassic" movies, from the Tyrannosaurus rex in the paddock scene from "Jurassic Park" (1993) to the feathered dinosaurs and Giganotosaurus introduced in "Jurassic World: Dominion" (2022).
We spoke to legends like Dennis Muren, who was in charge of Industrial Light & Magic's full-motion CG dinosaurs for "Jurassic Park" and "The Lost World: Jurassic Park" (1997), and Phil Tippett, the pioneering stop-motion artist behind Tippett Studios and dinosaur supervisor on "Jurassic Park."
Jean Bolte, a texture artist at ILM, shares what it was like to witness the initial CG T. rex tests, which were so groundbreaking they convinced Steven Spielberg to go the digital route for his dinosaurs. Matt Winston, cofounder of Stan Winston School and a puppeteer on the original "Jurassic Park," breaks down the revolutionary mold-making process and hydraulic technology used on the T. rex animatronic in that film and explains why his father, Stan Winston, favored a variety of practical and digital techniques to convince audiences the "Jurassic" dinosaurs were real.
Howie Weed, a digital effects artist on "The Lost World: Jurassic Park," and Jon Alexander, the compositing supervisor on that film, discuss the techniques used to bring the chicken-sized Compys to life.
"Jurassic Park III" (2001) director Joe Johnston explains how his team engineered the climactic battle between the Spinosaurus and T. rex, while Matt sheds light on the process of sculpting and assembling the Spinosaurus puppet for that film, the largest animatronic ever made for a movie.
Finally, Neal Scanlan, the creature effects supervisor on "Jurassic World: Fallen Kingdom" (2018), and David Vickery, the VFX supervisor on "Fallen Kingdom" and "Dominion," tell us how they brought the franchise's creatures into the modern day with innovative techniques in both the physical and digital worlds. Neal describes how "Fallen Kingdom" expanded the role of practical creature effects, including the variety of partial animatronics his team created for the Indoraptor, a new fictional species introduced in the film. And David, coming off "Jurassic World: Dominion," shares the 'digital archaeology' process that his team used to restore the model of the T. rex from earlier films, the Quill software ILM's engineers built in order to give the dinosaurs feathers, and how the VFX team worked with John Nolan's animatronics team to give birth to complex creatures like the Giganotosaurus.
"Jurassic World: Dominion" is now playing in theaters.
www.jurassicworld.com/
For more from ILM:
/ ilmvfx
/ ilmvfx
/ ilmvfx
/ ilmvfx
For more from Stan Winston:
www.stanwinstonschool.com
/ stanwinstonschool
/ stanwinstonschool
/ stanwinstonschool
For more from Neal Scanlan:
www.nealscanlan.com/
MORE MOVIES INSIDER VIDEOS:
How Superhero Costumes Evolved From 'Adventures Of Superman' To 'The Batman' | Movies Insider
• How Marvel and DC Supe...
How Disney's Animated Hair Became So Realistic, From 'Tangled' To 'Encanto' | Movies Insider
• How Disney's Animated ...
How Realistic Animatronics Are Made For Movies & TV | Movies Insider
• How Realistic Animatro...
------------------------------------------------------
#JurassicPark #MoviesInsider #Insider
Insider is great journalism about what passionate people actually want to know. That’s everything from news to food, celebrity to science, politics to sports and all the rest. It’s smart. It’s fearless. It’s fun. We push the boundaries of digital storytelling. Our mission is to inform and inspire.
Subscribe to our channel and visit us at: www.insider.com
Insider on Facebook: / insider
Insider on Instagram: / insider
Insider on Twitter: / thisisinsider
Insider on Snapchat: / 4020934530
Movies Insider on Snapchat: / 9616609930
Insider on TikTok: / insider
What 6 'Jurassic Park' Movies Looked Like Behind the Scenes | Movies Insider | Insider - Розваги
What is the most impressive thing is that the original still holds up.
Everything aside from the cg shots from far enough back, like the brachiosaurus shot at the very beginning and the herd and t-rex eating the herd. Those shots need updated with better lighting and textures (those textures were matched or surpassed in real time in xbox 360 games a decade ago, again in real time). Everything else is still top notch.
@@Parker-- exactly, it holds up.
💯
Holds up bc it’s not CGI.
@@Cavemankind_ no way! It's almost as if the video mentions that...
That rainy scene in JP 1 is truly so dam realistic and to this day no other Jurassic movie has come close to matching that terror and realism. Some indo and spino scenes come close but just dont match
But where did the ground go the T-Rex was standing on behind the fence when the Jeep went over the wall and fell, what looked like 3 stores?
@@TracksideViews yea, yea, just a little detail, doesn't mean it's still not good.
I have a feeling the dinosaurs of the Jurassic World look a lot more fake than the previous Jurassic Park trilogy
@@TracksideViews omg ur so right!
@@TracksideViews there’s an answer to that
That last scene with the Rex saving the day in Jurassic Park was totally unexpected when I first saw it. I'm glad Spielberg added that scene.
The first move had some things that didn't make sense but it's still the best movie out of all the others.
That scene really doesn’t make sense at all lol. How did it even squeeze through the doors and how did Grant not see it towering over the raptor? It’s one of the best scenes in movie history but it’s also one of the most nonsensical. Jurassic Park is legitimately a top 15 movie of all time if not top 10 and I don’t understand how anyone could disagree with that.
@@Parker-- Yeah, it doesn't make sense from the perspective of the heroes. Just because it's off screen doesn't mean THEY can't see it. But it is a bit of artistic licence. It's not that great of an offender when it comes to plot holes. The plot holes of the rest of the films, starting even with JP2 are much more ludicrous. For example, that film doesn't even try to explain how a T-Rex killed all the boat crew and then got back in its room and locked itself in. There's a missing scene showing raptors escaping from the boat, but since they cut it from the final film, it leaves a huge plot hole.
@@Parker--The T.rex came through an unfinished wall in the Visitor Center. How the humans and raptors didn't see it is beyond me though.
The scene in Jurassic Park where the T Rex attacks is so iconic, it could have not been better with the technology they used back then
It still looks 10 quintillion times better than the new movies. The new ones look like cartoons and aren't scary AT ALL
And it STILL HOLDS UP! The T-Rex paddock scene stands up against anything Marvel or Star Wars have done even in the past half decade.
Yup
@@legitbeans9078 that’s hilarious. Good joke
@@darkshat3077 you’re saying JW is more scary and more realistic than the OG Jurassic Park? Who actually had these dinosaurs act like animals than monsters?
As groundbreaking as the CGI was in the early films, I glad this video also focused on the heroic work by Stan Winston and his team.
Great video!
Don't forget Dennis merrin and Phil tippit...their collaborative effort is what lay the groundwork for special effects as we know today.
The first Jurassic Park, nailed it so much, and it’s aged so well!!
It aged really well
I will always find a sense of satisfaction in watching footage of how a movie's special effects was brought to life 😊
Gshdhduhrjrjeh3juehehkshdtt
I will never forget the first time I saw the original Jurassic Park movie when it first came out and having my mind blown at the practical dinosaurs that were made for the movie. Even to this day I’m still in awe, those dinosaurs were truly a work of art 😍
OG Jurassic Park still reigns supreme!
Amen
Palaeontology fact for those wondering, Spinosaurus and T Rex never would have fought as they are from different eras but if somehow they ever did the Spinosaurus wouldn't have much of a chance. It didn't have enough strength to snap the T Rex's neck like it did in Jurassic Park 3. The Spinosaurus also would not have been this height as it actually has much shorter limbs but only recent discoveries have proven all this as it was relatively unknown back when this movie was filmed. Also, T Rex as we know so far had one of if not the biggest bite force of all land Carnivorous dinosaurs so the scene where he bites the Spinosaurus on the neck it would have completely crushed it in one go! In the movie the Spinosaurus carries on but it wouldn't be able to. One last fact: The Spinosaurus is now proven as more of a semi aquatic dino so it would not have spent much time on land! Very entertaining fight for the movie though :)
There is extreme debate over whether Spinosaurus was aquatic or semi-aquatic. Regardless, it couldn't have beat a Rex.
@@vishaansingh1019 Well recent studies have given the opinion of it being aquatic. I can share links if you like. There was a very interesting Spinosaurus fossil found about 4-5 weeks ago with further proof of them having webbing between their fingers. Do you have a cool interest in paleontology? I like when I find others that love dinosaurs it's fun :p
@@vishaansingh1019 Yes it wouldn't have beat a T Rex at all :)
@@MaxxadTV Oh, I love dinosaurs. However, I will ask you to hold off on citing Spino links, because they find out something new about the damn thing once a month. I'm honestly tired of trying to keep up with Spino news.
@@vishaansingh1019 Haha very true. Its probably gonna be another 10-15 years until there's an absolute definitive image and idea of the spino
Stan Winston would've been proud to be credited for working on his projects like the animation or design of creatures or robots in every movie like Terminator and Jurassic Park.
We miss you Stan Winston.
I've loved these movies since I was a kid and I still do. They kicked off my obsession with dinosaurs. I'm so grateful for the work they put into this.
I just love the idea that they cared so much about us the Jurassic park fans the Dino fans that they made sure to get it right and to go thru all that trouble makes it worth loving this series even more
But they didn't get it right. They got so much, so very, objectively wrong. Maybe you mean something else than what I'm thinking of though.
All these special effects and green screen CGI etc nowadays and the original JP in 93 still is the best the director and story telling make the movie
Phil Tippett was actually the Dinosaur "Supervisor" for the first Jurassic Park creating the MEME
You had one job Phil, ONE JOB!!!
The texture of the skin is sooooooo incredible!
Ever since I was a young boy I loved Dinosaurs 🦕 💙. When this franchise came out I was in fascinated. Thank you for this post, greatly appreciated 🙏 ❤.
The Jurassic World dinosaurs would've looked better if they animated them with some weight. Almost all the dinosaurs moved like they're filled with helium.
They look like hot garbage in the new movies.
Ya the animatronic ones felt more realistic because animatronics are heavy, like a dinosaur. Helium balloons are not heavy like a dinosaur, makes no sense to use.
@@chrisrichfield8906 many dinosaurs especially the carnivores had hollow air filled bones . makes more sense then you think
ngl the jp1 raptors look way more realistic and believeable than jw's cgi. jurassic park special effects are evolving backwards
Wow.
It's really amazing and cool to see what goes on behind the makings of Jurassic park and how much efforts have been pulled into this series
A big thank you to everyone involved in the project. You guys are really amazing
As an aspiring entertainer and movie director / producer this inspires me so much. Grew up loving Jurassic Park and just watch Jurassic World Dominion last night.
Equally.. the theme music also adds thrill to the larger than life feel!! It suits even after three decades.
Great video! It would have been great to see the Giganotosaurus instead of the Indominous Rex at 15:10 and 15:33 though.
Idk why but when she said "raptor boots" I started dying laughing lmao sounds highly fashionable 😂😂😂
Its sad that the movie industry is moving away from using animatronics, and relaying more on CGI to save money and time.
The human brain cant connect very good with unusual things, as the over overusage of CGI. But connect a lot better with the use of animatronics, because its "real". Even a combination with animatronics and CGI can work perfectly together, if used correctly.
I don’t really mind, honestly. But I’m glad they still used tons of animatronics even in Dominion.
@@CervusLavandula yes that was a pleasant surprise! wasn't expecting it after the reduced animatronics in JW
Saying that CGI is only used "to save money and time" is like saying any building that was built using anything other than hammers and nails, was done to save time and money. Yes, you can use modern building materials and techniques to cut corners and erect some soulless building. However, modern building building materials and techniques and can also be used to create works of art that would be physically impossible to build if you were only using "traditional" materials and techniques.
Animatronics have their weaknesses and limits. For God's sake, re-watch _Robocop,_ ED-209 moves with zero inertia or weight and jitters all over the place, it looks incredibly fake and really takes you out of the movie. And that movie was made when animatronics were at their peak! It's not a coincidence that movies where animatronic characters had a major role were INCREDIBLY rare in the pre-CGI era. Where as today, we have the likes of Gollum from Lord of the Rings and Caesar from the Planet of the Apes reboot trilogy. It's difficult to get an animatronic character to give a convincing, emotive performance when they're incapable of forming proper phonemes shapes with their mouth, their facial expressions are jerky and robotic and their eyes are dead and staring off into nothing.
CGI and practical effects are just two different tools in the director's toolbox. One is not "better" than the other, nor should one be used to do everything. A skilled director knows which tool is right for the job at hand and makes a decision based on that. Not because they're hoping to impress wannabe film buffs by not using CGI.
The OG Jurassic Park are still phenomenal in terms of effects. The first one, everyone crazies about, same with me, but I rarely hear anyone craze about Jurassic Park 3’s effects. It’s hella good, both VFX and animatronic wise! Just thought I’d also bring that in the spotlight. May not be the best, but it has its moments I’ve gotta say.
Especially when the Raptor said Alan! Nah I’m kidding…😂
The first movie is just pure art.. I watched it when I was 7 or so and that T-Rex scene absolutely mesmerised me and it still looks spot on now 30 years later!
THE EFFECTS HAVE EVOLVED!
Special effects in 93: “let’s use a combination of practical, CG, good camera work, good lighting, imagination, and good pyrotechnics to create something great
Special effects today: jUsT cGi iT
What's wrong with CGI?
@@robinator678 nothing if it’s used well, but in general well thought out practical effects are far more immersive. It causes filmmakers to be lazy and instead of trying to do things for real they just say “eh do it in cg” which is to the detriment of most films
@@robinator678 literally everything. Thanks for playing.
@@anthonydpearson And name one movie in the last 10 years where CGI was used well.
@@vikinghammer87 very few. That’s my point lol
It’s incredible to see the realism behind the Dinos fall behind as we go more cg
I love soothing videos like this. An escape from all the scary things in the world, just a video about crafts basically
The original trilogy had amazing effects and I think the cgi looked the best in the 3rd. That t rex spinosaurus fight looks so much better than the indominos and the rex fight in jw. It just looks like its overdone like its just layered in cgi
THE EFFECTS LOOK COOL!
This was so freaking awesome! I need more
This movie and that scene is a miracle of movie history. at that time... it still holds up in 2022 and i bet it will in 2122.
If it's evolved then how come the effects in the original Jurassic Park look better?
No CGI will ever top the first movie.
Excellent video! Thanks!
The time an effort is unbelievable., so clever
Next do a video about how the writing, plot etc. devolved.
Great movie. I really love it💟💟💟💟💟💟
Does anybody wonder where they put the animatronics after the movie? It would be awesome if the sold them to universal studios! Just imagine seeing THE GIGA animatronic, and all the other ones! Like put it at the entrance of the Jurassic world of make some changes to the rides and put the new animatronics in. They will make some bank..
I'm pretty sure they schedule them to destroy them later on
Yeah only a few pieces are kept if any
Sigh, they could make some money selling the little things.
Probably scrapped sadly
I saw some of the dinosaur animatronics used for the second film on a field trip to Sally Robotics 2 years before the film came out.
They should make a Museum full of amazing Movie Props so ordinary people like us can go there and appreciate the hard work they did just to make a great movie.
Like the Academy of Motion Pictures?
It’s simple “Dino DNA” 🧬
Loving this
Great video!
16:21 Animal Logic also has an internal feather tool called Quill.
Phenomenal 🔥💖
I want one of those dinosaur costume for Halloween 🎃 lol
I don't know why but the dinosaurs in jp dominion looks more cartoonish and unreal than the 1993 movie.
HOW?
True. I guess the dinosaur’s customs in some way look more realistic then the actual CGI. I mean, it’s obvious why.
@@waspanimations7037 it is what it is. Check the 1st part than this one dinos won't scare you anymore in latest part because they look unreal
@@zantekgaming5523Agreed. The dinos in JP1 look more real because they are real in some shots. Idk why they couldn't use suits and animatronics for things like the raptors, especially when they're standing still.
@@Bagelgeuse jp1 is legendary
Super cool
12:20 omg look for that video!!! need to see it
The effects haven’t evolved in my opinion. Yes, technology is impressive, but creativity is more important.
Ew, you are that kind of person
w comment
The "new dinosaurs"
Are alot slower dumber and less aggressive
@Kn rz which ones? The ones from Prehistoric Planet? Hmm i wonder why.. they act more like animals- oh wait
What are you talking about
They've actually went down hill in terms of effects. The Big One is more believable than a ninja acrobatic blue raptor.
Jurassic Park forever.
Absolutely. The first scene of the raptors in jurassic world is so fake. At no point were they ever believable. They felt like they were placed on top of the ground and they constantly floated and bobbed because the mocap people were constantly swaying around. They were Stevie Wonder-ing the entire time and it was extremely unrealistic.
Agreed. The new raptors look terrible.
There's nothing wrong with the JW raptors, get over it.
@@robinator678 They're as believable as the orcs in the Hobbit movies.
@@robinator678 they look fake
Very cool 😃
WOW IT'S A PUPPET!
One thing that hasn’t evolved is the writing and story telling skills.
It has evolved.... Backwards
I do miss Stan Winston bro
there used to be a museum near me that had one of the T-rex animatronic legs
Though technology has evolved so much original triology is still the best imo.
I am digital sculptor myself, but those old times puppet and machine works are priceless. They worked not for money, but because they loved their job. It is not just to shot movie or earn money. Making an entire robotic system for single puppet is beyond of any explanation. These guys are the motivation and biggest inspiration for upcoming artists. Really love what they did. It is great that they are still being used. Anyways, shout out to all their amazing work! I think right now Hollywood is kind of fall asleep, and making mostly too low level, or remake and redo works. It almost stopped being an art that makes world a better place, instead it became source of degrading and moral killing machine.
I don’t get why people are saying the cgi got worse in the newer movies. The cgi is objectively better than it was in the older movies. It makes more sense to say that the dinosaurs feel more like monsters. The cgi in the newer movies is undeniably better done but it’s probably less convincing because the dinosaurs look like they pose for the camera when they roar and they do things that an animal couldn’t or wouldn’t do. It’s not the cgi that’s worse, it’s how they act.
That's usually director/studio choices, because they think everyone wants a spectacle based on the popularity of super hero movies. Those films tend to break physics and performance the most.
The Giant Dildosauricus Wearheadicus in it's natural environment. Truly awe-inspiring.
Yes, the technology evolved, however human creativity remains the same over time.
Yes, the technology used to produce dinosaurs onscreen has reached incredible heights. Unfortunately, the ability to employ that technology to sell the scene to the audience has atrophied. Lighting, camera work, and the blending of both practical and real effects matter just as much. As the guy from JP1 said: "Keep them guessing." Nowadays, we're seeing way too much of the dinos in the open, in broad daylight, up close. Spielberg was limited by the technology of the time and so he was forced to be conscious of what he could and couldn't get away with. This informed the decision making on whether to use practical or CGI effects. That line continues to be blurred more and more these days, and not just in the Jurassic franchise. As a result, it has become far too easy to just slap some CGI on the screen, to the point to where entire shots look like green screen now. They're alternating less and less between puppets and CGI. It's like they spent so much time wondering if they could, that they never stopped to ask if they should.
I completely agree!
the bizarre thing is that because of this, the early pioneering CG effects of the 1993 film look far more convincing than 90% of the ones in any of the new state of the art modern CG used in the Jurassic World films...
I think your both partially wrong.
@@cryptodino3roberts712 I recently did a marathon re-watch of all the Jurassic movies and I still honestly don't think we are wrong... I still think the effects in the original look better than the overused CG in the Jurassic World films for the most part
@@atomicvinylreviews3420I agree. Fallen Kingdom IMO had the best blend of animatronics and CGI in a Jurassic World film, Jurassic World has the best CGI and a decent animatronic (an Apatosaurus head), and Dominion's affects range from great (the feathered dinosaurs look nice, even though they aren't practical) to weirdly fake (the Dilophosaurus and Microceratus animatronics are so stiff and lifeless). Blue often doesn't look real at all.
All of them are inferior to the JP trilogy's practical affects though.
As they were talking about the Giganotosaurus, that was Indominus Rex they were showing footage of, not Giganotosaurus
Cgi has come a long way!
Dominion wasn’t that crash hot! Appreciated the animatronics that were used, and seeing the old gang back…but other then that, meh.
I think it’s fair to say that Prehistoric Planet has outdone the Jurassic franchise in terms of how dinosaurs are portrayed. Hollywood only cares about monsters, & they have only gotten worse at portraying dinosaurs.
Because they only care about their money.
Well tbf the whole point of Jurassic park was to make a monster movie based around dinosaurs and what happens when science goes too far. The newer movies have really leaned into the whole “monster” thing though.
@@thatfishguy4991 correct
Yeah plus Prehistoric Planet is a Documentary XD
It's because prehistoric planet is a documentary about real life dinosaurs while the Jurassic movies are fictional stories set in a fictional universe, it's not meant to be accurate or realistic, the Jurassic park movies have already made it clear that the dinosaurs are not pure because they're genetically engineered to look cool and scary as possible, to further elaborate Dr. Henry Wu the scientist responsible for creating most of the dinosaurs have said that nothing in Jurassic world is natural, what John Hammond and InGen did at Jurassic Park is create genetically engineered theme park monsters, nothing more and nothing less, stated by Dr Grant.
Good.
15:10 Factual error: That was the Indominus Rex in JW1 not the Giganotosaurus in JW Dominion
Yes, I think that's because the JW Dominion movie was still in cinemas so they have not got any clips of it yet...
@@marcellotenarta5233 There are plenty of Giganotosaurus clips they could use from the trailers and prologue. Anyway was just pointing out that showing the clips of the Indominus Rex while narrating about Giga could be misleading since both are very different creatures.
@@ylihao Yes
Thanks
If anything the latest jw movies are actually less realistic looking than the original jp1.
Wrong
"It's just a guy wearing a raptor glove and reaching around"... NO WAY! 😂
13:04 this is why the early 2000’s and back were way fkn better😂
15:33 that’s the indominus Rex from jurassic world (2015) and not the latest Giganotosaurus .
•
•
The best CGI of the franchise is still the Rex and the I-Rex
I disagree that the CGI in Jurassic World is a step up. I can't put my finger on it but the CGI looks odd and removes you from the story.
The movements look slightly cartoon like
TBH the dinosaurs looked better 30 years ago... they were actual animatronic props and not CGI cartoons
Lmao you're hilarious
The newer movie had more animatronics that the first
@@pie112098 why is that hilarious?
The effects evolved? Ha, could have had me fooled. The tech evolved but not the effects. Heck most of the effects done in JP1 are better than most in the rest of the franchise. There are scenes in the worlds that look so bad that its painful and borderline insulating. There will never be another T-rex breakout scene where practical and CGI (which holds up better than a lot of things done today.) blend so well together. I love the franchise but World's GCI is to soft and uncanny making everything kinda meh.
Right , doesn’t help that most of the dinosaurs in Jurassic world don’t rlly act like animals and just act like movie monsters.
@@tobreezzyproductions While I agree I feel like they lost the animal feel by jp3.
@@tobreezzyproductions disagreed. They act the most like animals in Dominion
@@darkshat3077 maybe the bigger dinosaurs, but the raptors nope, plus Chris Pratt doing the hand thing is still incredibly stupid and silly.
@@tobreezzyproductions that’s the whole point. They did it so much in the movie intentionally. He does it to confuse the dinosaurs. The raptors in the movie were literally created to kill, so they wouldn’t exactly be considered “animals”. Blue acts like an animal.
cool
I have a feeling the dinosaurs of the Jurassic World look a lot more fake than the previous Jurassic Park trilogy 😬
Yes broo i totally agree with you i am also not impressed by the new movie dinos they look cartoonish and fake
How
12:10 just like if a dinosaur was stabbed and started bleeding but it's a puppet lol
It must be scary when you your stored them and walking in the morning 😂
Love JP 🦖
Wow they redid the T-Rex model.
“People love T-Rex, so we needed something that could kill T-Rex” -> The epitome of fixing something that isn’t broken…
JP is the best and always be
JW and Dominion still good
Jurassic park is becoming fast and furious these days.
Haha "reaching around." lol Glad that's still a thing...🤣
Correction: stan Winston effects legend
Now we can have a King Kong/Godzilla epic with hair raising realism.
👍👍👍
15:10 Ah yes the giganogisaurus.
I thought the original franchise looked more realistic and better overall in most shots.
Ross Geller will be impressed 😂😂
cg has made the dinosaurs much less believable in in theses new movies in my opinion. They look more like movie monsters than dinosaurs regardless of the scientific inaccuracies . The trex and raptors are so much better the the original than the newer movies it’s not even close . I’ve never believed blue was real she’s always look cg
The title should hace been how they unevolved. Lol
It looked way better when it was puppets and dudes in suits. It's instantly obvious when they showed the dude in the suit, which looked amazing, to the two raptors in the kitchen.
The goal of the effect is that you should not be able to tell instantly wether it is cgi or practical. So is it really good
@@cryptodino3roberts712 for sure, but somehow it's more acceptable when it's practical. Or combine the two that might be better. Like the Batman trilogy did
@@Subfightr i mean they talk about doing that on this video with dominion. The gigas head and neck were practical its body was cgi. They have also combined cgi and practical with the first to jw films and. Battle at big rock. On big rock it looks best because its impossible to tell when the animatronic allosaurus is used
Animatronics will always look better on screen than CGI for some reason older CGI always looks better than modern CGIZ