Appreciate the video. If you're up for some unsolicited advice read on, otherwise this was a simple thank you comment. Perhaps the next time you do this you could instead use a replay so we can see like for like comparisions. Also as someone else mentioned 1080p with youtube's terrible compression really doesn't cut it for any kind of graphical quality. Even if you record at 1080p, simply uploading it rendered at 1440p will force youtube to use much more bandwidth. 4k is even better - even with a 1080p source.
Think the comparisons would have been better had they all been from the same start and finish and not on random places on the track. Hard to do proper comparisons that way when the lightning and all is different.
@@martin-hall-northern-soul thanks very much. I haven’t seen most of the negative comments, lol. Between family and work I don’t have time to read many comments.
Hi Mike appreciate the video. I personally use LCS with purelinear as the filter. It looks so much more natural to my eyes. That is the thing with comparison videos people should just go with what looks good to them as we all have different views.
Maybe I'm missing something, but besides the nice skies, Gamma looks a lot better with the lighting. Especially in the darker settings like dusk and nighttime. Seems like LCS just gives you nice skies. But again, maybe I am not seeing something? And thank you for making a video like this! I never really knew the differences between the two. Even when I play it can be hard to tell when I swap back and forth.
i would agree, however LCS is much better at ambient lighting and sun rays. i do like the aspect, but with the current csp and any ppfiltwr i can find, the lighting on the cars themselves is pitiful compared to gamma, it doesn't show paint finishes correctly, and is all around less great on overall quality. hopefully they can dial this in because the skies and ambient lighting has definitely improved a lot with LCS
Hey Mike, if it's not too much to ask, can you please add the track names, too? You feature some cool map mods I haven't seen before. Great job as always. Hope you are enjoying the new studio. Peace.
I don't know what specific track mods/skins he is using for each track, but I'm pretty sure these are the tracks: 1. Knockhill 2. Daytona 3. Silverstone 4. Road America 5. Le Mans 6. Nurburgring 7. Skip Barber Motorsports Park 8. Mugello 9. Magione
why dont u upload in higher resolution for a graphics comparison? The youtube compression is way to high when u upload in 1080p WQHD is minimum for a nice looking video
Ah Mike, I wanted your opinion at the end of this. I liked the video which us interesting but you give us your opinions on dars/tracks/sims so what do you think here?
See the night driving (c.. 9mins on gamma etc)…. I cannot unsee the block shadows above the cars!! Looks very odd. See it in my own pc too. Like Black cowls… What is that? Dynamic shadows? Looks too much! Is there a CSP setting to reduce or remove?
Hi. As we have similar PC specs i d like to ask if you keep your GPU on quality or performance. I keep it on quality and i can manage only SOL but just on very high settings (no ultra)
Great Video! I Just installed pure 2.0 Yesterday but somehow ITS way too dark and when im make it brighter, the shadows will stay at Most parts of the car and are completely so Theres No Detail at all. Do you know how tobfix that? ( I Changed pp Filters already )
@@yxkusa thanks for watching. I’m not sure what would cause what you’re describing, but I’d suggest joining the Pure Patreon and asking the folks there. They tend to be very helpful and are far more knowledgeable than I am.
Hey mike, or anyone else...do you keep 'use extended physics for all cars and tracks' on under cm settings/general patch settings/ Physics Experiments?
There are ways to find it online without paying, although it's only a dollar. I happily paid, was actually going to sub for more before I realized that they're making half a million a year off these mods. Kudos though, they've done a great job. I should get into modding evo...
@@dracula5487 sure I can.. but in a world where everything becomes subscription based, I'll eventually have to afford 1000 times $1.. I'm saying NO to that kind of thing. I'm only paying subscription fees for stuff where it makes sense, not products that should be a one-time payment.
Appreciate the video.
If you're up for some unsolicited advice read on, otherwise this was a simple thank you comment.
Perhaps the next time you do this you could instead use a replay so we can see like for like comparisions. Also as someone else mentioned 1080p with youtube's terrible compression really doesn't cut it for any kind of graphical quality. Even if you record at 1080p, simply uploading it rendered at 1440p will force youtube to use much more bandwidth. 4k is even better - even with a 1080p source.
@@tabs1913 understood. Thanks for the tip!
@@tabs1913 this is solid advice!
Think the comparisons would have been better had they all been from the same start and finish and not on random places on the track. Hard to do proper comparisons that way when the lightning and all is different.
Blimey, seems to be a demanding crowd who watch these comparison videos. I thought it was great personally.
@@martin-hall-northern-soul thanks very much. I haven’t seen most of the negative comments, lol. Between family and work I don’t have time to read many comments.
@@SimRacing604 Probably for the best not to see them sometimes I guess, lol. They probably forget that a lot of channels are doing it as a hobby :)
Hi Mike appreciate the video. I personally use LCS with purelinear as the filter. It looks so much more natural to my eyes. That is the thing with comparison videos people should just go with what looks good to them as we all have different views.
Maybe I'm missing something, but besides the nice skies, Gamma looks a lot better with the lighting. Especially in the darker settings like dusk and nighttime. Seems like LCS just gives you nice skies. But again, maybe I am not seeing something? And thank you for making a video like this! I never really knew the differences between the two. Even when I play it can be hard to tell when I swap back and forth.
i would agree, however LCS is much better at ambient lighting and sun rays. i do like the aspect, but with the current csp and any ppfiltwr i can find, the lighting on the cars themselves is pitiful compared to gamma, it doesn't show paint finishes correctly, and is all around less great on overall quality. hopefully they can dial this in because the skies and ambient lighting has definitely improved a lot with LCS
Glad it's not just me; I've stuck to Gamma for now for the same reason.
Hey Mike, if it's not too much to ask, can you please add the track names, too? You feature some cool map mods I haven't seen before.
Great job as always. Hope you are enjoying the new studio. Peace.
@@michaelo6259 I’ll see what I can do when I get home. I’ll try and add notes to the description
I don't know what specific track mods/skins he is using for each track, but I'm pretty sure these are the tracks:
1. Knockhill
2. Daytona
3. Silverstone
4. Road America
5. Le Mans
6. Nurburgring
7. Skip Barber Motorsports Park
8. Mugello
9. Magione
Assetto Corse Evo may not ever compete with the mod friendly AC1, but hope Evo delivers in the graphics department!
mods are overated, i prefer quality over quantity and most mods brings quantity but not quality
@@dante316a Agreed, playing a lot of AMS2 lately and it looks better than modded AC while performing better
I finally got my hands on the C13 AEGIS PPF, i'm going to give LCS a try tonight. Thanks for the video Mike! I'm stoked to try it out.
Dusk into night have been my new favorite times to drive
I was also in this race, I started P7 and arrived P11 because I forgot to change the race tires, and I had to do the whole race saving tires
why dont u upload in higher resolution for a graphics comparison?
The youtube compression is way to high when u upload in 1080p
WQHD is minimum for a nice looking video
AC + CM = Fine Wine
LCS is much easier on my eyes. Besides the prettier skies, the hue seems to always be warmer
List of cars you drove in this video?
This is confusing. LCS with the Pure PP filter and then Gamma with the Pure Linear PP filter?
Could just be a mistake in the captions. Doesn't make sense otherwise.
Ah Mike, I wanted your opinion at the end of this.
I liked the video which us interesting but you give us your opinions on dars/tracks/sims so what do you think here?
Man I want to drive that first track. Anyone have a link to the mod?
I hate the suspension squeak sound that is in the beginning. Is there any way to turn it off? Ruins the 787b for me.
Where do you get the pure app from? Is it in the pure install folders (I’m not by my pc now) as I couldn’t see it there either?
@@tdhitchins it’s called Pure Config, and it should be accessible in game once you drag-and-drop Pure into your Assetto Corsa folder
@@SimRacing604 ah ok, thanks. I’ll give it a try again :)
Gamma is still better when it come the reflections on the cars, sun glare and rain (especially on the windscreen).
See the night driving (c.. 9mins on gamma etc)…. I cannot unsee the block shadows above the cars!! Looks very odd. See it in my own pc too. Like Black cowls…
What is that? Dynamic shadows? Looks too much!
Is there a CSP setting to reduce or remove?
Hi. As we have similar PC specs i d like to ask if you keep your GPU on quality or performance.
I keep it on quality and i can manage only SOL but just on very high settings (no ultra)
@@MarvinButterfly sorry, I need to update my PC specs. I’m now running a 4070 ti. No overclock. And I usually favour performance in the settings.
@@SimRacing604 Cheers buddy🙏
Great Video! I Just installed pure 2.0 Yesterday but somehow ITS way too dark and when im make it brighter, the shadows will stay at Most parts of the car and are completely so Theres No Detail at all. Do you know how tobfix that? ( I Changed pp Filters already )
@@yxkusa thanks for watching. I’m not sure what would cause what you’re describing, but I’d suggest joining the Pure Patreon and asking the folks there. They tend to be very helpful and are far more knowledgeable than I am.
Hey mike, or anyone else...do you keep 'use extended physics for all cars and tracks' on under cm settings/general patch settings/ Physics Experiments?
No.
I was told not to. Apparently it's an old feature.
Bottom line, you get higher frame rate with LCS. Use LCS.
Mine dropped
what Caterham is that? 420R from Overtake?
@@jianh1989 yup. Exactly right
@@SimRacing604 Thanks. and what is the first circuit on this video, where the Caterham runs on?
@@jianh1989 Knockhill 2015. Also on Overtake. Happy racing!
@@SimRacing604 Cheers!
I think gamma is better at low light, while LCS is better with high light.
similar experience, LCS is really nice with a bright a vibrant scenery, looks so natural, Gamma makes it too dim sometimes
LCS looks like it's need for speed. Gamma looks realistic.
What circuit is the first section of the video?
@@brentwhite7246 Knockhill 2015. Excellent mod.
@@SimRacing604 What car version was it Mike? Looks so great compared to AMS2 version.
@@SimRacing604 thank you sir!
Man, I wish I could buy Pure, but afaik it's subscription only :( not gonna do that..
You can't afford $1.00?
There are ways to find it online without paying, although it's only a dollar. I happily paid, was actually going to sub for more before I realized that they're making half a million a year off these mods. Kudos though, they've done a great job. I should get into modding evo...
Pay once then unsubscribe ;)
If you don't think it's worth $1/month then you probably don't deserve it.
@@dracula5487 sure I can.. but in a world where everything becomes subscription based, I'll eventually have to afford 1000 times $1..
I'm saying NO to that kind of thing. I'm only paying subscription fees for stuff where it makes sense, not products that should be a one-time payment.
New updates fixes a lot of things.
gamma miles better
LCS next Gen Orgasm
Either the video quality is poor or this games graphic quality is poor. This does not look good at all.
Should have gone to Specsavers...................😜
Uploaded at 1080p. Nastiness courtesy of YT compression.