CRASH TEST Ford 2015 F150 vs. 2014 F150 - Compare REPAIR COSTS

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 1 сер 2015
  • / @youcartv Since the Ford F-150 is a unique vehicle with its aluminum body, the Institute also looked at repair costs for the 2015 model. Damage to aluminum body parts can be more complicated and pricier to repair than steel, analyses by the Highway Loss Data Institute have shown.
    The Institute ran crash tests at 10 mph with the new F-150 crew cab and its 2014 steel-bodied predecessor. Engineers crashed the front left corner of the aluminum pickup into the right rear corner of the steel pickup at a 15 percent overlap, and then flipped the test and ran the steel pickup into the back of the aluminum one.
    In both test scenarios, the aluminum F-150 had more extensive damage than the steel model. Total repair costs forthe front and rear damage combined were 26 percent higher for the aluminum F-150. Extra time to repair the aluminum body accounted for the higher price to fix frontal damage, while higher parts costs pushed up the repair bill for therear damage.
    The IIHS fender-bender tests show the potential implications for out-of-pocket costs as well as insurance premiums when consumers opt for vehicles built with more aluminum.
    ► These results are valid only for models sold in the USA
    Thanks for watching
    Comment, like, dislike, share! 🤟
    Don't miss next videos ► goo.gl/5i54Vg
    ✅ Source: IIHS
    Original content at iihs.org or UA-cam channel: / @iihs-hldi
    If you are interested to request to use the original content for any purpose, please contact legal@iihs.org. Join us to enjoy exclusive benefits:
    / @youcartv
  • Авто та транспорт

КОМЕНТАРІ • 1 тис.

  • @007Kellam
    @007Kellam 7 років тому +541

    That is a lot of damage for 10 miles an hour... I understand cars need to crumble to absorb the impact, but that seems quite excessive

    • @iiplaya
      @iiplaya 6 років тому +37

      jay jay YOURE SAFE IN ANY CAR AT A 10 MPH CRASH UNLESS IF YOU HAVE FUCKING TAKATA AIRBAGS.

    • @chaoszombie9995
      @chaoszombie9995 6 років тому +2

      007K the newer one was aluminium...

    • @andresosorio6330
      @andresosorio6330 6 років тому

      antuan XII from the 2000s *

    • @chaoszombie9995
      @chaoszombie9995 6 років тому +3

      antuan XII most cars have Takata airbags

    • @joshjlmgproductions3313
      @joshjlmgproductions3313 5 років тому +2

      @Chris B Our Ford was in a fire, pretty much the entire front end was melted. It was in the $20,000's to fix and still wasn't written off.

  • @Raprada
    @Raprada 7 років тому +1197

    Note : Don't crash into older F-150s

    • @itsyoboiivan3255
      @itsyoboiivan3255 5 років тому +13

      Lol you all know if you crash into a car covered with nokeas will obviously kill everyone

    • @EternalResonance
      @EternalResonance 5 років тому +9

      note. dont buy a Kmart ford.

    • @ec3886
      @ec3886 5 років тому +12

      Note: Aluminum has been shown to be cheaper than steel to repair.
      Additional Note: Steel transfers the energy whereas the Aluminum absorbs.
      I'll take the "Kmart" Ford over steel.

    • @rosssuperman7205
      @rosssuperman7205 5 років тому +5

      @@ec3886 that's why I don't wana buy a new car I wana get a 1995 back then they were made better

    • @chaoszombie9995
      @chaoszombie9995 5 років тому +1

      The newer steel body F150’s are like tanks though,

  • @helivesonforever
    @helivesonforever 9 років тому +30

    I love how the aluminum crushed about a foot back, while the 2014 would be easily repairable. Surprised the airbags didn't blow in the new one too.

  • @kuhndog52
    @kuhndog52 8 років тому +244

    shit my 67 f100 woulda been like...what was that noise?

    • @loogi_if
      @loogi_if 8 років тому +12

      cool story bro

    • @redlinemotorsportts
      @redlinemotorsportts 8 років тому +4

      +Andrew Kuhn (kuhndog52) i have a 71 f100.
      id probably cry if it happened.

    • @motorpickle6410
      @motorpickle6410 8 років тому +6

      +Andrew Kuhn (kuhndog52) My Dodge Dakota probably would have shattered into a million pieces. And I would be fine with it.

    • @christophermadden9210
      @christophermadden9210 8 років тому +3

      +Alex Curle actually i just had an incident with my durango ata similar speed to this and there was absolutely nothing wrong with my truck.

    • @motorpickle6410
      @motorpickle6410 8 років тому

      I was taking a jab at dodge......

  • @rangerdanger4.074
    @rangerdanger4.074 4 роки тому +208

    it’s amazing how the steel compares to the Aluminum

  • @tedschmitt178
    @tedschmitt178 7 років тому +314

    And where is the repair cost comparison?

    • @w00dchuck43
      @w00dchuck43 4 роки тому +16

      DESCRIPTION

    • @Tim.1113
      @Tim.1113 4 роки тому +5

      W00DCHUCK Thank you.

    • @canadadotca
      @canadadotca 4 роки тому +3

      You can see that in your own eyes dump.. You don't need an invoice lol

    • @rebelcowboy5.7l98
      @rebelcowboy5.7l98 4 роки тому

      The new one was beyond compare. Lol

    • @mrnoname7370
      @mrnoname7370 3 роки тому +1

      If you live in America it’s cheaper than the previous. Well the repair is more but you’ll be saving thousands from your hospital charges.

  • @lapamful
    @lapamful 9 років тому +142

    The drivers in both vehicles were like ''did you feel something?'' ;p

    • @Thomas___
      @Thomas___ 5 років тому +20

      Nah, just the 2014

    • @albq_
      @albq_ 3 роки тому +4

      Nope, the driver of the 2015 definitely was not

  • @IKIN_10
    @IKIN_10 9 років тому +831

    Looks like the 2014 is the better one

    • @kolby4078
      @kolby4078 8 років тому +25

      +AssassinGame00 steel isn't as soft as aluminum and this proves it

    • @FCFordLord
      @FCFordLord 8 років тому +43

      Not really. It's a large step forward in safety, for the occupants of both vehicles. The 2014 rear ending the 2015 was rather violent compaired to the 2015 rear ending the 2014.

    • @assaltmaster89
      @assaltmaster89 8 років тому +23

      +kolby4078 true ever one knew this anyway. the reason ford did this with the 2015 was to sofin up the blow. the more stiff the impact the more messed up you will be in a wreck. they made the cock pit super strong and it has already been tested and proven.

    • @kolby4078
      @kolby4078 8 років тому +9

      +josh b they did it so save weight, thus saving gas.
      safety improvements should always be there when making a new model, regardless of materials used

    • @AlejandroMendoza-re4ik
      @AlejandroMendoza-re4ik 8 років тому

      yeah bro you have all razon of the World

  • @cal920c
    @cal920c 8 років тому +6

    In both cases, you're looking at replacing the front headlight, and fender assemblies. The only difference is that in the 2016, you also have to get a plastic trim piece that goes around the headlight

  • @Hisham23633
    @Hisham23633 8 років тому +302

    clearly the steel one is the better contender at low speeds here

    • @GodlessMartyr666
      @GodlessMartyr666 8 років тому +9

      +Prince Broly Yep, less damage to the vehicle and the cost to repair any damage is ultimately about half the price compared to the cost of repairing aluminum.

    • @sly9263
      @sly9263 8 років тому +7

      The tools, skill, and time to repair aluminum is no different than steel. If you're letting them charge you more then you're a sucker.

    • @GodlessMartyr666
      @GodlessMartyr666 8 років тому +7

      Robert Kavanagh The tools used must be separate from any used to repair steel to avoid causing corrosion in the aluminum.. There are also tools specifically designed to repair aluminum vs steel because of the lack of 'memory' in the metal and it's thermodynamic properties vs steel.. Technicians without skill and experience in aluminum repair risk causing damage to the metal beyond repair. You can fuck around and do the job with the wrong tools if you want to wing it and/or have someone without proper training work on it but there are standards for a reason.
      That is aside from the fact that replacement parts cost on average 50% more than the same parts made of steel would cost.

    • @XFHgog
      @XFHgog 8 років тому +2

      +Robert Kavanagh You don't get to negotiate body repair costs. There is an industry standard that everyone uses.

    • @user-ex3ls3zq7o
      @user-ex3ls3zq7o 6 років тому +1

      ههههههههههه

  • @squangan
    @squangan 2 роки тому +4

    I was in an actual crash like this but was hit at a higher speed. A Dodge 1500 truck rear ended my 2010 F150 FX4 while I was at a stop light and that driver was texting, she didn’t even hit her brakes until just before the impact (50 kmh zone) and tried to swerve at the last second. Impact wise the driver seat protected me well and I wasn’t injured, the right side of my rear bumper, truck box and taillight had to be replaced. The body shop insurance claim came in around $10,000.

  • @Bobbybeb
    @Bobbybeb 9 років тому +234

    Steel all the way. Plus the repair cost are less for steel than aluminum.

    • @raekwonwillis102
      @raekwonwillis102 7 років тому +20

      KYDashcam same thing was said with fuel injection vs carburetors

    • @emmarobbieus9107
      @emmarobbieus9107 6 років тому +3

      Raekwon Willis what? Carburetors are still cheaper to fix. Not as reliable.

    • @safetydoge
      @safetydoge 5 років тому +6

      Smells like W H I P L A S H

    • @komodobricks
      @komodobricks 5 років тому +8

      The car crumples so your body doesn’t

    • @sevnlight6313
      @sevnlight6313 5 років тому +2

      @@komodobricks STEEL vehicles also have crumple zones....
      The ALUMINUM 2015 F150 supercab kills the driver in the small overlap. Then the frame structure was redesigned for 2016.

  • @inconspicuous7464
    @inconspicuous7464 7 років тому +4

    for those people saying "cars crumple to save your life" The steel version of the f150 has the crumple feature but the new F150 was almost totaled at 10 mph, nobody gets whiplash at that speed anyway

  • @88jxckson
    @88jxckson 9 років тому +373

    So basically the 2014 model is better....

    • @williams6550
      @williams6550 8 років тому +20

      +Dave Jackson How did you come to this conclusion?

    • @88jxckson
      @88jxckson 8 років тому +8

      +William S The 2014 model took less damage & it's made out of steel...Watch the video

    • @williams6550
      @williams6550 8 років тому +47

      ***** Yes, I watched the video...but your comment doesn't mean anything. You assume it's better based on what you have seen, but it doesn't really work like that. Appearances can be deceiving. The outer body panels are designed to crumple in a collision. Will it cost more to repair from a low speed collision such as this compared to a steel body? Yes, probably, for now anyways. But there are still advantages.. lighter weight being the biggest one. ...which equates to better fuel economy and higher payload.

    • @88jxckson
      @88jxckson 8 років тому +50

      +William S The video is about collision damage...not fuel economy or anything else you named which means your comment is just as irrelevant if not more...Its better when it comes to collisions...I'm more into Silverado trucks though so if you say so

    • @williams6550
      @williams6550 8 років тому +6

      ***** Oh, you're not even a Ford man? Good day to you Sir.

  • @HCFX2011
    @HCFX2011 8 років тому +116

    Everyone on here must be insurance appraisers or body shop workers. I worked at a body shop for 2 years and worked on high-end vehicles often built with aluminum or other composite material, so I can shed light on this.
    I don't see how the aluminum didn't hold up as well as the steel. Both trucks would need the same amount of new parts. In the front crashes, both trucks would need a new headlight, fender, hood, bumper and probably quite a few parts behind the bodywork. In the rear, both trucks would need a new taillight, bedside, tailgate and bumper. I really don't see how the repair costs could be 25% more with aluminum here, because panels on the aluminum body are riveted not welded so they are much easier to replace. Yes, in this video, the aluminum appears to have flexed more than the steel, but who gives a shit? The same amount of panels will need to be replaced on both trucks, so who cares how the panel reacted?
    The idea of the way the new aluminum F-150 is built is the ease of replacing panels. Yes, the parts are more expensive right now, but the labour required to replace the panel rather than trying to repair it should offset the cost of the part. That's the problem I have with Edmunds' test when they slammed a sledge into the side of their 2015. The body shop tried to repair the panel when it would've been easier and exponentially cheaper to replace the panel.
    Either way, I'm not really concerned. I upgraded from my 2013 F-150 to a 2015 F-150 and my insurance went down even though my new truck has a $10,000 higher sticker price than my 2013.

    • @ignacioalvarez1490
      @ignacioalvarez1490 6 років тому +5

      so youre saying that the steel one in this video could be fixed with just a new headlight? do you really think everything will fit just like it was before? you will have to replace panels on both

    • @fadingbeleifs
      @fadingbeleifs 6 років тому +5

      HCFX news flash, aluminum body panels ARE welded. You obviously don't know what the hell you're talking about.

    • @TwinShards
      @TwinShards 5 років тому +3

      As well has Aluminium will survive better against Snow and water. It will not rust.
      Over all, without any accident, your Aluminium Ford-150 will last way longer visually than the steel.

    • @ebeneezerslpooge9864
      @ebeneezerslpooge9864 5 років тому

      @@fadingbeleifs but how do you know?

    • @wva_trucks2336
      @wva_trucks2336 5 років тому +2

      Well aluminum parts are way more expensive even if you only need the same parts

  • @keyshawnrussell245
    @keyshawnrussell245 8 років тому +16

    They should really do more test like this

    • @petergilbert144
      @petergilbert144 8 років тому

      Not really. They should change ot and make a front hit a front and a back hit a back rather than comparing a front hitting a back.

    • @posinker
      @posinker 7 років тому

      +Peter Gilbert did you check the IIHS test site? They more than likely do perform such a test.

    • @CrazySteTV
      @CrazySteTV 7 років тому

      Keyshawn Russell All Cars must be tested... search on UA-cam:
      - NHTSA Oblique Crash
      or
      - IIHS Small Overlap
      they are the 2 Hardest Tests all Cars have to go through, the Small Overlap Crashes cars agaibst a wall at 40mph with 25% of the Nose, whereas the Oblique Crash Test, which is just being introduced, crashes a 5500lb Cart running at 56mph against the Nose of a Car parked at a 15 degrees Angle ... you'll be impressed to see what the results are

  • @mcgusto82
    @mcgusto82 7 років тому +7

    Just because the steel body f150 looks less damaged, it doesn't mean it'll be less costly to fix.
    A bent hood needs replacement as much as a balled up crumpled hood.

    • @floridianrailauto9032
      @floridianrailauto9032 4 роки тому

      Read the description, the steel F150 is LITERALLY better than the aluminum F150

  • @luken2o223
    @luken2o223 4 роки тому +12

    Steel is heavier and stronger so that there is less damage, sure. But aluminium is lighter and less resistant and crumples more to allow for a softer impact therefore making the occupants safer in case of a crash.

    • @vuurkoning
      @vuurkoning 4 роки тому

      So u want a drivable car or a safe ride?

    • @luken2o223
      @luken2o223 4 роки тому

      @@vuurkoning A safe ride... so an aluminium truck.

    • @vuurkoning
      @vuurkoning 4 роки тому +1

      @@luken2o223 in a big crash thatsnot a good choice but ok

    • @luken2o223
      @luken2o223 4 роки тому

      @@vuurkoning Neither is a steel body but ok

    • @vuurkoning
      @vuurkoning 4 роки тому

      @@luken2o223 a steel body is safer tho

  • @fake._
    @fake._ 6 років тому +1

    Reading the description helped explain more

  • @NikoBell12
    @NikoBell12 9 років тому +11

    LOL at all of the idiots here dissing aluminum. It doesn't have much to do with the material, it has everything to do with build quality. Numerous sturdy aluminum vehicles have been made in the past.

    • @nerdlydood
      @nerdlydood 9 років тому +2

      NikoBell12 I think a lot of the extra costs will go down too as aluminum becomes more mainstream.

  • @Mr.Looooong
    @Mr.Looooong 5 років тому +3

    People are missing the point. The aluminum body helps you not be affected by the hit, meanwhile the steel rocks the cab. You see how the cab barley moves on the 2015 but on the 2011-14 it shakes. It's all about safety.... and long lasting strength. Aluminum is strong, but not hard.

    • @saketnaik1
      @saketnaik1 3 роки тому

      Do you seriously thinking people care enough about their safety? I mean LESS MONEY=BETTER PRODUCT, they forget to add their hospital bills into the equation 😂

  • @gootywooty
    @gootywooty 8 років тому +47

    Safety wise, the 2015 version is more damaged due to the fact that it is hit in a crumple zone which is designed to reduce the impact of a crash. This will cost more but in fact is safer compared to the 2014 version has the occupants feel much more of the impact. If you want to keep repair costs down go with the 2014, if you want a lighter but safer pick-up, go with the 2015 version. The 2015 version also includes side airbags and ABS are standard with many other features available at request. So safety wise, the 2015 F-150 is better despite what the video above shows as it only takes in account the repair costs. - From an unbiased person living in the UK with no love for the F-150 ;) , just facts.

    • @AnthonyAwada
      @AnthonyAwada 8 років тому +3

      You are right. Don't forget that aluminum doesn't have to worry about rust issues.

    • @gootywooty
      @gootywooty 8 років тому +1

      +amanoncrack Yeah it didn't have ABS as standard, it was an optional feature.

    • @gootywooty
      @gootywooty 8 років тому +2

      +amanoncrack I'm from the UK so we don't really have Chevys here. Hardly any pickup trucks as well. We do have the Ford Transit though xD

    • @gootywooty
      @gootywooty 8 років тому +1

      +amanoncrack Yeah you're right about that, especially with those massive diesel/petrol V8s. I'd find it hard to inagine a Ford F-150 on the roads of London, it would probably be around the size of a single decker bus. Only people who buy pickups here in the UK would be builders or farmers. Its usually the Nissan Navara or Ford Ranger but they're tiny compared to a Silverado or any other American pickup truck. They must be really good for hauling stuff around and towing. I wouldn't mind one myself If I lived in the countryside.

    • @johnmoore1495
      @johnmoore1495 5 років тому +1

      ABS had been required on vehicles sold in America since 2000.

  • @Simulator51
    @Simulator51 5 років тому +3

    I just recently purchased a 2014 f150 fx4, and I knew it was a steel body. I thought the aluminum body was newer than 2015, though. Boy, did I luck out on that one. From everything I've read, the fuel economy increase is negligible as well.

    • @Enzo187
      @Enzo187 Рік тому

      You definitely didn't luck out but glad to know you're a moron.

  • @Twentythree33
    @Twentythree33 4 роки тому +1

    My family has a 2010 F150, and it kicks ass. It's got the 5.4 V8, which sounds insane!

    • @kyboy5
      @kyboy5 3 роки тому

      Shut the fuck up

  • @RetroWorkShop773
    @RetroWorkShop773 8 років тому +57

    Steel looks stronger bro......

    • @Wakelius
      @Wakelius 8 років тому +2

      +Nathan Oakes because it is

    • @calvins48
      @calvins48 8 років тому +5

      +Nathan Oakes Not in the event of a high speed crash

    • @RetroWorkShop773
      @RetroWorkShop773 8 років тому +10

      CalJack You mean a high speed crash where the steel frame underneath is doing most of the work of protecting you?

    • @XFHgog
      @XFHgog 8 років тому +5

      +geese Just about. Vehicles are getting closer to disposable. Pay $50K for a truck and send it to the junkyard because you bumped into something. No body repair is as good as new, so avoiding those types of repairs are ideal.

    • @ximenabarron21
      @ximenabarron21 7 років тому

      jclaunch00

  • @kyledavis436
    @kyledavis436 5 років тому +8

    “High strength aluminum alloy. Just as strong as steel but much lighter” My ass

    • @ec3886
      @ec3886 5 років тому +2

      Don't look at the impact zone as your irrefutable proof.. the newer F150's passengers are safe and didn't feel as much of the impact as compared to those in the steel body.

  • @rickjones871
    @rickjones871 3 роки тому +2

    A glancing blow at 15 miles an hour. Wow. At least now they know now to strengthen the Headlights. That was a very informative test. Repair cost probably cost more than the test. If you're going to test two trucks, do it right. Head on

  • @ExtraFrySauce
    @ExtraFrySauce 3 роки тому +2

    and welcome back 5 years later.
    UA-cam recommend shut up and let me enjoy this

  • @MrELIAN602
    @MrELIAN602 9 років тому +31

    Steel rules

  • @MouhamedKonte
    @MouhamedKonte 9 років тому +8

    The f-150 2014 is more than better that the 2015

  • @2koolchris291
    @2koolchris291 3 роки тому

    So glad my brother got a 2013 instead of something newer. I’d like if they would offer a steel variant on the ford trucks so that people who want to use them won’t worry as much about crashes.

  • @42luke93
    @42luke93 3 роки тому +2

    Even though the steel was not as damaged. It’s still damaged and the same parts need to be replaced it seems.

  • @StereoMike06
    @StereoMike06 8 років тому +5

    Kinda biased as the Aluminum versions bumper was just slightly lower placing all the force on the front panel and face. The steel version's bumper is a touch higher as you can see the initial contact deflect off the bumper first.

    • @blizzrd8153
      @blizzrd8153 5 років тому

      I didn't think anyone else caught that.. Good vision.

  • @s0meone1252
    @s0meone1252 3 роки тому +4

    The steel body :TIS BUT A SCRATCH
    The aluminum body: uwu plz don't hurt me

  • @Spherz
    @Spherz 3 роки тому

    My dad owned a 2014 Ford F-150 Lariat, and rolled it over at 60mph a few years back.. completely totaled it. Had it been a new one I’m not sure if I would still have him🙏

  • @thatotherguy186
    @thatotherguy186 2 роки тому +1

    Still rather have the higher damage. My deductible won’t change lol.
    Much rather have the vehicle crumble and absorb the impact, exactly as it’s designed to do. Steel cars at 10-15 can still cause some decent injuries. Notice it just pushed it out of the way instead of letting in go “through” it.

  • @skilashi21
    @skilashi21 9 років тому +60

    This is a video ford does not want you to see.

    • @williams6550
      @williams6550 8 років тому

      +skilashi21 What makes you say that?

    • @skilashi21
      @skilashi21 8 років тому +4

      +William S Are you blind? The aluminum F150 sustained more damage than the steel F150

    • @williams6550
      @williams6550 8 років тому +16

      skilashi21 What is your point? You know, all the flashy stuff on the outside is designed to absorb impacts... it's the cab/cabin that's important. Why don't you go cry about the fiberglass/plastic fenders on almost every dually, Saturn vehicles, Corvettes, etc. etc.?

    • @jonmario3440
      @jonmario3440 7 років тому +1

      just dont crash

    • @rickyprs
      @rickyprs 5 років тому +1

      And just don't buy f-150's

  • @justplanecrazy5575
    @justplanecrazy5575 4 роки тому +3

    I’d prefer to have the older F150

  • @LITTLE1994
    @LITTLE1994 3 роки тому

    The bumpers did not hit dead center. That's why both truck took considerable damage above.
    But steel bumpers, while rare now, those are the thicker metal 1980s and before large American cars had, so in minor collisions, repair costs are minimal.

  • @justinleonard8361
    @justinleonard8361 6 років тому

    What’s the speed of the vehicle at the point of impact?

  • @acrane2
    @acrane2 7 років тому +18

    Aluminum = Soda cans. Keep it that way.

    • @UnderR
      @UnderR 3 роки тому

      @Hazim Azam wtf

  • @nicocabrera7675
    @nicocabrera7675 5 років тому +6

    Looks like the F150 wins again

  • @CAMAROFAN45
    @CAMAROFAN45 8 років тому

    +youcar any way I could get my hands on both trucks

  • @iavagabond124
    @iavagabond124 7 років тому

    gotta remember 2015 was the beginning of the newest gen and there's always kinks. but they've been fixing it and making more durable we'll see how much better it is when the 18 f150 comes out. but my old 99 Taurus took a cement block to the mouth at 35 and only got a dent

  • @xkclearly666
    @xkclearly666 9 років тому +35

    just like an aluminum can.

    • @nonconsensualopinion
      @nonconsensualopinion 4 роки тому

      We should note the aluminum variant has a better crash rating and higher payload capacity.

    • @floridianrailauto9032
      @floridianrailauto9032 3 роки тому

      @@nonconsensualopinion And you also have to sell it for scrap if you get in a wreck at just 10 miles per hour

    • @floridianrailauto9032
      @floridianrailauto9032 3 роки тому +1

      @Hazim Azam Bro you need to understand no one is gonna pay 50 grand for a truck that gets totaled at just 5mph broooooooooooooo

    • @floridianrailauto9032
      @floridianrailauto9032 3 роки тому

      @Hazim Azam Your Urdu is also weak, work on it
      Also why don't you tell me whom you work for?

    • @floridianrailauto9032
      @floridianrailauto9032 3 роки тому +1

      @Hazim Azam Then use proper punctuation please.
      Why don't you give me my address Mr. Central Intelligence?
      Traduci questo dato che fai parte della CIA

  • @mexi9787
    @mexi9787 5 років тому +8

    Love my 2012 ECO-BOOST 💯‼️

  • @mike1536
    @mike1536 4 роки тому

    It was just a plastic parts that broke for the 2015. Also if you notice the bumper on the 2015 just came right down where the 2014 just stayed up which helped with the damage control

  •  6 років тому

    I got a 2014 Ford F-150 3.5l twin turbo and its been amazing, test drove the 2015 and still chose 2014.

  • @kylebullard4780
    @kylebullard4780 8 років тому +3

    I understand why automanufatures design vehicles to have crumple zones to absorb energy from a impact but what should be a fender bender in the parking lot shouldn't total or car or truck...

    • @hnoobsho
      @hnoobsho 8 років тому

      +Kyle Bullard even if the that saves one life its worth it, who cares about a totaled car.

    • @kleetus92
      @kleetus92 8 років тому

      +Kyle Bullard I would hardly call that totaled.

    • @inconspicuous7464
      @inconspicuous7464 7 років тому

      kleetus92 the front axle almost bent.

    • @inconspicuous7464
      @inconspicuous7464 7 років тому

      Chuck Norris I'm sure you would if you felt a slight bump from behind you and the rear axle was bent

  • @marcorenteria5245
    @marcorenteria5245 8 років тому +9

    military grade?

    • @Ford_Everest
      @Ford_Everest 8 років тому +7

      +Marco Renteria more of chinese made

    • @schon2395
      @schon2395 8 років тому

      Repair costs are going to go down in the next few years, and Chevy is going to go with aluminum in 4-5 years or so. (I'd bet they'd claim that they did it first.)

  • @salvadorpg2204
    @salvadorpg2204 5 років тому

    Is impresiont they difference in one and too

  • @MrRedFox13Photography
    @MrRedFox13Photography 8 років тому +1

    is there a way to petition ford for a steel body instead of aluminum

  • @scarumanga
    @scarumanga 8 років тому +3

    I have heard a couple stories of the new 2015's hitting moose in northern ontario. Apparently there is not very much left after that happens when compared to those who hit one with their steel bodied variants.

    • @serenan920
      @serenan920 2 роки тому

      New one is fragile. SAAB used to test with moose/elk. No way aluminium up to job..

    • @Enzo187
      @Enzo187 Рік тому

      Give me a break lmfao. No truck is going to be repairable after hitting a fucking moose.

  • @saeed5757
    @saeed5757 5 років тому +112

    اللي عربي لايك 😂❤️

  • @jjlegend3922
    @jjlegend3922 8 років тому

    Interesting the have new 14s laying around, but im pretty sure ive heard some of these crash facilities still have brand new 2002/2003 f150s to do the same thing with. Goes for other vehicles too... how do I get my hands on one? haha

  • @kevinalbogomezgomez4877
    @kevinalbogomezgomez4877 5 років тому

    Por lo que entendí es que la del 2014 fue más firme que la del 2015? fue eso o no

  • @robertmcdonald338
    @robertmcdonald338 7 років тому +9

    Well gm & chevy going to alum next couple yrs. dodge been using alum hoods on there pick ups.ford always been one step ahead for many yrs. others try to copy!!

    • @oma3111
      @oma3111 4 роки тому

      Hope so they don't. Fancy material .

  • @dyingangelo
    @dyingangelo 9 років тому +4

    10mph? is that a joke?

    • @Mat.Carvalho
      @Mat.Carvalho 9 років тому +2

      NeATaNDtURdy "REPAIR COSTS"

    • @eltaco1959
      @eltaco1959 9 років тому +1

      you're right they should have been at 35mph. that would have been real world crash test. I don't think they wanted to show what would happen to an aluminum ford at that scenario.

    • @dyingangelo
      @dyingangelo 9 років тому

      cars should be capable of surviving a crash based on their top speed not 10mph

    • @miguelrios45
      @miguelrios45 9 років тому +1

      +NeATaNDtURdy well so far that new f150 couldn't survive a 10mph hit. a 35mph would tear the truck up

  • @ZeZeBatata69
    @ZeZeBatata69 7 років тому

    So...? what's the results?

  • @acyr.vieira
    @acyr.vieira 7 років тому

    Dude! You hit my car!

  • @xnrs9334
    @xnrs9334 5 років тому +5

    2014 is better but 2015 weight is lower and it have lower fuel consuption

  • @f_-gy5jg
    @f_-gy5jg 5 років тому +10

    مافيه عربي

  • @is_dat_brock112
    @is_dat_brock112 5 років тому

    It’s funny because the commercials for the new fords are like “MADE OF HIGH GRADE ALUMINUM”

  • @alexandersegura21
    @alexandersegura21 4 роки тому +1

    Buen Video

  • @mohamedalsenafi9276
    @mohamedalsenafi9276 8 років тому +3

    GM truck the best 😻

  • @cstrng12
    @cstrng12 5 років тому +15

    I have an 04 steel body f150 i was tboned by a chick pulling out of a gas station, she was probly doing around 20 mph & she hit my drivers side door as i was going straight when she hit she completley bounced 180° in the other direction, my door was bent up pretty good but my window still goes down 🤣 tis but a scratch

  • @spaghetti9067
    @spaghetti9067 4 роки тому +1

    To me it looks like the aluminium one kept crumbling after it hit the steel one

  • @workct4102
    @workct4102 5 років тому

    That didnt show much....how about a side by side camparison afterwards?

  • @JDAlwaysWorkin
    @JDAlwaysWorkin 4 роки тому +3

    And people believe an aluminum airplane went through the pentagon.. pshh

  • @j.d.fgamer1516
    @j.d.fgamer1516 7 років тому +4

    mi abuelo me sigo que en sus tiempos habían camionetas más resisten y mujeres más calientes

  • @jamesreed9714
    @jamesreed9714 8 років тому

    I'm glad i watched this. I'm struggling eith a decision to buy a 2014 or a 15/16 f150. I like the 14 exterior but the 15/16 tech and interior. I'll have to go with quality though. I'm not paying top dollar for a truck to crumble like that aluminum body did. Wow! 2014 it is. I think ford will go back to steel soon. I work for a place that buys about 300 fords a year and administrators are not happy about the repair cost of the aluminum fords

  • @NewBrunswickRailfanner
    @NewBrunswickRailfanner 4 роки тому +1

    0:05 That was surprising .

  • @elvispresley3327
    @elvispresley3327 7 років тому +5

    ford is stupid for going aluminum why cut weight for effeicency when you can use steel for saftey to the buyers.
    .. ford is always lacks quality

    • @bladadah3105
      @bladadah3105 7 років тому +1

      Donald Trump you can always Put it as a no 5 star safety since your president

    • @JW-hf5is
      @JW-hf5is 7 років тому

      Donald Trump Because aluminium is safer than steel, genius.

    • @bladadah3105
      @bladadah3105 7 років тому

      J W do you want The Aluminum To crumble on your face, or have steel have dents on your face, And say this: Aluminum Is Much more expensive than the steel

  • @gagegarofalo123
    @gagegarofalo123 8 років тому +71

    It's a shame. The Newer F-150 had so much potential. Guess I'll be buying a Chevy.

    • @haydenmedgyesy5674
      @haydenmedgyesy5674 8 років тому +25

      Don't come crying to me to pull you home when you blow a gasket

    • @gagegarofalo123
      @gagegarofalo123 8 років тому +8

      +Hayden Medgyesy lol, I'm a Ford guy, but we get 2015-16 F-150's in the shop that have gotten in wrecks, and the way they are constructed now, you can't bang out the dents anymore, so we have to replace the whole quater panel which ends up costing the customer way more than it should to fix a dent. Any decent crash, and the new F-150 will total pretty easily. It's a truck, and I should be able to treat it as such. The F-150 is fragile now. It's like a coke can. It really is a shame. If it weren't for the aluminum I'd still be looking at Fords.

    • @CoffeeTechClub
      @CoffeeTechClub 8 років тому +14

      +Loose Goose the chevy is not near as safe and the ford got 5 star safety rating

    • @benpidgeon9386
      @benpidgeon9386 8 років тому +13

      it's safer than any other truck in its class...

    • @jamesthompson7116
      @jamesthompson7116 8 років тому +13

      Enjoy your Chevy and their ridiculously off-centered steering wheel issue... -.-

  • @Ali-ff5fh
    @Ali-ff5fh 6 років тому

    What the price of this model 😕 ?

  • @TheFrenchDark
    @TheFrenchDark 3 роки тому

    is that its maximum speed ?

  • @qjjl.
    @qjjl. 6 років тому +3

    قرطس

  • @xaviercavalier4822
    @xaviercavalier4822 8 років тому +23

    People saying "the car crumbles so you don't get hurt" get on my damn nerves. I would rather a TRUCK be able to take a low speed crash with little to no damage. My 80s steel suburban may not be safe for me if it hits another 80s steel truck, but if it hits a 2015 f150, you can bet your ass that pretty f150 will be undrivable... Ask me how I know lol the mans suspension gave in

    • @MyAlexVideos
      @MyAlexVideos 7 років тому +5

      the front and rear ends of the car are designed to crumple like that to take all the impact

    • @xaviercavalier4822
      @xaviercavalier4822 7 років тому +2

      I understand that, and that is precisely what I said I do not like!!

    • @MyAlexVideos
      @MyAlexVideos 7 років тому +2

      well if its designed to do that whay do you get mad? i dont understand lol

    • @xaviercavalier4822
      @xaviercavalier4822 7 років тому +1

      Because they didn't used to be!! You all can take your safe little plastic cars, but I'll keep driving my old steel ones, how bout that?

    • @MyAlexVideos
      @MyAlexVideos 7 років тому +5

      lol you dont understand

  • @oma3111
    @oma3111 4 роки тому +1

    So why new f150s cost so much now it seems that they are fancy . Reliable no more . Own a 2001 5.4 liter and still running like a beast.

  • @timrohrer3992
    @timrohrer3992 5 років тому

    How did the trucks drive themselves?

  • @matthebest018
    @matthebest018 8 років тому +6

    Wow thing peals open like a can....

    • @AlbanianSold13r
      @AlbanianSold13r 8 років тому +1

      yeah

    • @kingdaniel3519
      @kingdaniel3519 8 років тому

      +matthebest018 Cant wait to see how Chevy and Ram handle it when they switch to aluminum.

    • @AlbanianSold13r
      @AlbanianSold13r 8 років тому

      +Daniel Bell if they do

    • @kingdaniel3519
      @kingdaniel3519 8 років тому

      AlbanianSold13r They will. They announced last year they had already found suppliers.

    • @matthebest018
      @matthebest018 8 років тому

      Daniel Bell Nothing's confirmed, they simply said they were investing in there aluminum plants. GM just built an all aluminum ct6 doesn't meen it was for the Silverado. But anything is possible.

  • @swat260
    @swat260 9 років тому +39

    aluminum body like a chinse car.

  • @dragonheartedcs4061
    @dragonheartedcs4061 4 роки тому +1

    Just remember a very rigid vehicle (the older cor F150) Isnt as safe though i think its safer when some crashes into you or you want to kill someones car but if you hit someone or crash the passengers and driver will be more injured unlike the aliuminum where the Truck's panels or parts crumbles it absorbs the inpact much better and i believe the cabin is a stronger material than the outer area. Edit: Jeez so many people are either dumb or dont know much about cars

  • @onlyrock1
    @onlyrock1 5 років тому

    I'm confused??? You have the front, which is visually a weaker section on both- colliding into a virtually 90deg reinforced corner on the back (not designed for impact like the front corners). What kind of engineer thought this was a positive result??

  • @rapanuimotocrossenduro9193
    @rapanuimotocrossenduro9193 9 років тому +5

    built tough??? haha looks like soda can

  • @elcausaaa
    @elcausaaa 5 років тому +4

    JAJA:"(
    Yo queriendo una troca y estos vatos destrosandolas:'v

  • @amos-davidrogers3448
    @amos-davidrogers3448 6 років тому

    how did the air bags not deployed

  • @lincolnhunt9558
    @lincolnhunt9558 9 років тому +1

    Vehicles are designed with crumple zones to minimize impact to the driver and passengers, but they also should be able to withstand a stronger impact than that with minimal damage. That thing crushed like a soda can

    • @FCFordLord
      @FCFordLord 8 років тому +3

      It's a fairly hard, localized hit.
      The 2014 didn't absorb it at all, resulting in a very violent shock to both trucks.
      The 2015 absorbed it nicely.

  • @cstrng12
    @cstrng12 7 років тому +4

    why is that even an option 😂 steele all the way

  • @FaceyourGiants1
    @FaceyourGiants1 5 років тому

    I like how newer f150 had more softer impact. I would worry more about drivers/people inside it just smoothly impacted, everything else is insurance problem even if its 25% more repair. I noticed older had stiffer impact and the neck of that driver is now hurting

  • @user-er9bg2ic8o
    @user-er9bg2ic8o 8 років тому

    Lol i was watching this and just as the video ended, i hear a screech of tires and a loud crash... I look out the window and i see that two silver vans have crashed into each other and im like wow just as i watch a crash test video, a real accident happens lol

  • @paultwice2279
    @paultwice2279 9 років тому

    Not too bad considering the angle.

  • @thomaspotemciano
    @thomaspotemciano 8 років тому +2

    My question is what do they do with all the cars they wreck after testing them

    • @miker6052
      @miker6052 8 років тому +2

      +Eazydogg The vehicles are considered "junk" when they are built. Either by cosmetic defect or a random vehicle selected for testing. About 2% of the vehicles on the assembly line are chosen for "junk" status. They are sent to schools for training, crash testing and quality control testing. Most never leave the assembly plant.

    • @BadaBing.UCF30
      @BadaBing.UCF30 8 років тому

      +Eazydogg They go to M&M.
      mandmautosalvage.hollanderapps.com/asp/vehicles/

    • @yunocomehere6312
      @yunocomehere6312 8 років тому +3

      the vehicles are considered junk when they're built into fords xD

    • @TaigaXZ
      @TaigaXZ 8 років тому

      +dtrnsprtr OHHHH SAVAGE xD

  • @guardiasdemexicocgnrescate8888
    @guardiasdemexicocgnrescate8888 3 роки тому

    it's amazing keep it up it's great

  • @higamer2795
    @higamer2795 5 років тому

    the white truck is in the 2015 it's actually a 2017 I've been into a rear-end crash with it we rear end a motorhome and that's a platinum edition

  • @wsmcmc3864
    @wsmcmc3864 8 років тому

    A lot of comments to read through. But I didn't see anyone addressing any statistics on crash speeds most likely to occur nor at what speed would you have to be going in a single car accident and insurance would total your brand new $48k vehicle. Obviously these insurance factors get spread across all policy holders. Such as high speed crash survivors cost way more in medical bills than a dead person. The insurance companies are a casino. They don't care cause they don't loose over time. Every time you buy a new vehicle watch how your rates jack up.

  • @12skits63
    @12skits63 6 років тому +1

    The newer F-150 did just as good. Everyone saying it did poorly but it didn't. The 2014 F-150s hood is still impacted after the accident. And the fender and light still need to be replaced.

  • @reginamendez7414
    @reginamendez7414 7 років тому

    which is the 2014 and 2015 picks up trucks

  • @l4dyfett
    @l4dyfett 7 років тому +4

    Lot of hate for the F150.. This is the truck I have and I absolutely love it. Much safer than the other cars I've driven in the past.

  • @sunburntsilverado7665
    @sunburntsilverado7665 4 роки тому

    Been watching ford truck crash test because I’m looking to purchase one for my first ( purchased ) car.