Juror responds after Lori Vallow Daybell's attorneys ask for a new trial
Вставка
- Опубліковано 26 чер 2024
- #eastidahonews #daybell #trial
A man who served on the jury in Lori Vallow Daybell’s case is responding to a motion filed by her defense attorneys asking for a new trial.
Saul Hernandez, Juror No. 8, spoke with EastIdahoNews.com five days after he and 11 other jurors found Daybell guilty of murdering two of her children, Joshua “JJ” Vallow and Tylee Ryan. Daybell was also found guilty of conspiracy to commit the murder of Tammy Daybell, the former wife of Lori Daybell’s husband, Chad Daybell.
In the motion for new trial filed Friday, Jim Archibald and John Thomas, Daybell’s attorneys, claim Hernandez knew about evidence that wasn’t presented during the trial and that instructions given to the jurors were confusing.
The lawyers cite a portion of Hernandez’s interview with EastIdahoNews.com where he was asked about the efforts of law enforcement. Hernandez responded that police in Arizona had some “significant red flags” before and after Charles Vallow, Lori’s fourth husband, was shot and killed by her brother Alex Cox.
“We didn’t consider this during our deliberations because it was clear to us. The instructions were clear. Arizona evidence and testimony is only for demonstrative purposes,” Hernandez said.
During the trial, Archibald and Thomas repeatedly objected to having evidence and testimony from the Arizona cases brought into Daybell’s Idaho case. In their motion, they argue evidence regarding Arizona was not admitted for demonstrative purposes, as Hernandez said, but was evidence to show “some other reason other than bad character.”
“To confuse demonstrative evidence and character evidence is easy to do; hence, the defense objections should have been sustained,” the attorneys wrote.
They also argue that Hernandez referenced evidence in Arizona that was not part of the Idaho trial.
“We can only conclude that the juror relied on information not presented in court to reach his conclusion that Arizona dropped the ball and should have done more, even before Charles Vallow was shot and killed by Alex Cox,” the attorneys wrote in their motion.
In a follow-up interview Tuesday, Hernandez said he was not aware of the Arizona video and information until he watched “Dateline NBC” on May 14, two days after the trial ended. Our original interview with him was conducted in Boise on May 17.
“Once the verdict was final and we were released from court on Friday (May 12), as you can imagine, most people would have a bunch of questions in their mind,” Herandez says. “On Sunday, my wife said, ‘Do you want to watch a new episode (of ‘Dateline’)?’ and I said, ‘Cool. Let’s watch it.’ Obviously, I was intrigued, and that’s when I learned in Arizona there’s footage from an encounter with Charles where he is clearly telling the police that his wife has deemed him a zombie. To me, those were significant red flags about something that’s not normal.”
Jurors were prohibited from consuming news coverage of the case during the trial but were allowed to watch and read whatever they want once a verdict had been reached, and the judge dismissed them. Hernandez says he “absolutely” followed the court rules and was respectful of the jury instructions presented by District Judge Steven Boyce.
While Archibald and Thomas argue in their motion that those instructions were confusing, Hernandez says he and his fellow jurors understood them.
“I thought the judge gave us instructions through the trial, throughout the process, multiple times, and those instructions never changed even up until the very last day before the moment we were released to go and deliberate,” he says. “Those instructions were clear … and we used that set of instructions a number of times throughout the process of deliberation to go back and forth to make sure we understood exactly what the judge and the law and court allowed us to consider and what we were not allowed to consider.”
Hernandez says he was surprised his comments were mentioned in the defense’s motion, although he expected Daybell to appeal the verdict.
Read the rest of the story here: www.eastidahonews.com/2023/05...
► Subscribe to East Idaho News: ua-cam.com/users/Eastidahone...
► Download our free app: marketplace-redirect.doapps.co...
► Like us on Facebook: / eastidahonews
► Follow us on Twitter: / eastidnews
► Follow us on Instagram: / eastidahonews
► Get East Idaho News merch: www.eastidahonews.com/shop/
► Subscribe to our free newsletter: www.eastidahonews.com/newslet...
This is annoying frankly
She is guilty and I’m sick of hearing about her
Just saying.. don't tune in then..
@@KingsterLovey this person is just saying that she's guilty basically and we should spend our government's money on something else! We should move on and they should too! If you notice there are MANY people that feel this way by the many likes of this person's comment!
IKR! and I LOVE following Trials too!
Is it just me? Her face from even 2020 she looks evil not worn out not I dunno how to explain
I think what they mean is there don't HAVE to tune in its in our faces everywhere
Lori Vallows been abusing the legal system her whole adult life.
💯
Absolutely. The legal system and every man who's financed her lifestyle...minus Chad of course. Chad was going to give her access to 'power'. If it weren't for Larry and Kay, she would've continued getting their monthly benefits (I think those totaled somewhere between 4 - 6 thousand every month) and that million from Charles's life insurance. She's been locked up for 3? years, she sat through the entire trial (after being forced) and she saw what were surely sickening photos and after all that, she's still such an entitled lunatic she STILL hasn't learned a thing or has taken accountability for anything. I wonder how many millions of dollars have been spent so far on everything? Lori, nobody's interested in your games. We all just really want you to go away and never bother us again. You got your trial, you've been treated fairly and to even suggest ANOTHER trial just shows how selfish you truly are.
Abso-freakin-lutely. It's time she faces consequences for once.
Correct!
Well, she’s about to spend the second half of her life getting abused by the legal system, 😂 may she be cursed with a long long life.
Taxpayers have wasted enough money on Lori and Chad
Justice for all victims
And it is time to give the Childrens remains to Larry and Kay, so that they can have a Proper burial. Go to prison Lori! Another trial will have same verdict!
This Juror is OUTSTANDING!!! We are grateful for your service, Sir!!! ♥️❤️♥️
I second that
@@sherryhunt3995 I millionth that!!!
Yes!!! Thanks sir.
Spot on 💯🎯🙌🏻
Agree!!
The defense is grasping at straws…
They have nothing else to grasp. They know it.
Yes totally right. She's damned lucky she didn't get the possibility of the death sentence. Now the defense is trying so hard to try to "defend" when there is no defense. She's guilty. And that's the bottom line.
Yes because there was NO DEFENSE! how could they, they had nothing to work with and allegedly she wouldn’t let them say anything against Chad. Lori was really pissed off with his closing arguments 😂😂😂 it was a classic what he said of Chad. She’s a psycho IMO
The defense who never presented a defense....smh
@@shaz8486 Could they use any argument at all without her aproval🤨?
The attorney from LV is reaching. There isn’t going to be a new trial. That woman is delusional.
This trial verdict being thrown out has nothing to do with Lori at all! It has to do with evidence absent and allowed and the jury instructions that may have prejudiced this jury and not given Lori a total fair trial. These procedure errors are serious issues!
Her attorneys are doing their duty to their client.
Amen!
It STILL was allowed by Judge who sits there and passes things thru regardless
There is NO true justice in a court of law - regardless
@@carolwoodward6141Frankly, if I were Lori I would request that as well. (Not that I agree with anything she's done).
I respect this juror, and you, so much.
I agree with you 100%
When I saw she wanted a new trial and her resona, I said to my husband that man never said any of that they are reaching. I find this man to be very honest, unlike Lori.
I really like this juror ❤ He clearly took his job seriously as did his fellow jurors.
Absolutely 💯 % Agree 🎯 This juror did his job very seriously!
Hey, a NARCISSIST needs to keep being recognized!!!! Just sickening.
Yes I thought that immediately as well! The narcissist can't stand not being the centre of attention any more!
Who are you talking about?
@@jcny11 if you're serious, Lori Daybell, the murderer..
Well, she’ll be able to get more attention when she is tried in AZ.
Maybe, she’ll take the stand there, lol. She is a coward, and can’t stand that she didn’t bamboozle the jury. She has manipulated people for most of her life, and is throwing a tantrum.
A narcissist is really good at saying and doing things that make the head spin and people get fooled by it- they need enablers 🤭
I think we all knew the juror was referencing stuff he had watched post trial. The Defense are really grasping at straws.
Of course we did. Her lawyers are just trying to find a loophole and in the process made themselves look shady.
I concur
@@mickeykyker4837 That's what bothers me... Archibald has grounds for an appeal. That they allowed Charles Vallows murder into this case for one. That the instructions were 'unclear' for another. But instead of going into detail of what was wrong and how it could have affected the case he decides to drag this jurors character through the mud over nothing. It's unnecessary and it's nasty and mean.
Lori wants a new trial?
Charles and JJ and Tammy and Tylee want to be alive.
Thank you, Mr. Saul for the clarification! The defense is nuts!
Thank you for giving this juror an opportunity to clarify how vigilant he and the other jurors were during this process.
Lori is just feeling the gravity of her actions... "don't do the crime if you can't do the time" Nate as usual... another great clarifying interview. Can't see the judge using this to issue an appeal.
He never alluded to watching anything prior to the jury call... the defense is being petty and ridiculous.
He also wasn't confused. He clearly said that they clearly understood the rules and that The rules were clear. I don't know how the defense tendsomize he was confused or they were confused by that statement.
@@crystaldawn9255 Exactly. I know the defense has a job to do for their client, but shouldn't that job be true to the laws that bind them, thorough and and forthcoming for the taxpayers who have to pay for all of this??
What a well- spoken gentleman.
I really like Saul (sp?) If i were in trouble I would hope all my jurors would be this methodical
@@ginashemeth7708yes, he seems very honest and the perfect person to be on a jury.
Enough money has been spent on this case already. Her attorneys need to give it up already!!!
Easy money. Keep draining the taxpayers
Thank you for the clear up. Lori is not going anywhere. You do the crime, You do the time in Prison.
Nate you're a wonderful journalist. Thank you for putting this out and clarifying the facts so they can't be taken out of context.
Yes. Great interview Nate... now when that "bit. Ch" tries to turn his previous interview around. The prosecution can play this very interview . Great job. Thank you both for doing this interview...
Pure Desperation.
Definitely!
Saul Hernandez is an honest & standup guy who did his very best in participating as a juror
in the Lori Daybell trial.
Lori’s lawyers should sit down & shut the ef up as no one believes Lori is innocent.
You lost, Archibald & Thomas -
get over it !! She has two more trials to go, dudes...better get to work!🏃♂️🏃♂️
Unless they're licensed to practice in Arizona, I don't think they'll be representing her in the upcoming trials.
They won't be her attorneys. She gets new court appointed attorneys after this trial for appeals.
🙌🙌🙌
Metaphorically speaking, folks!!
Those two lawyers are attempting to get a new trial for Lori - so they do still work for her at this time.
Of course, every state has their own judiciary. Is it fun for you people to
bark at everyone all the time?
@@hipe4191 wow. "Bark?" You are the one using exclamation points. You are the one pretending to be right. Perhaps you should look up Idaho laws, then you can come back and "bark" some more ... 🤣
Thank you Nate. This juror is very clear, thank goodness.
Thank you for these clarifications. I had no concerns personally. LVD attorneys are grasping at anything. It is their duty.
I just wanted to thank Saul for his service as a juror and also for these interviews. He’s so well spoken and thoughtful. ♥️♥️♥️
Right. He was so thoughtful and careful about what he said in that first interview. I'm really disgusted at the smarmy way Mr. Archibald went about twisting his words to try to get a new trial. IMO, it was unnecessary and mean. He had other issues he could work with. SMH
Thank you for revisiting this. Lori’s attorneys are clearly reaching for excuses that are not there. Any confusion the jurors have now is based in the defense objections during trial…objections THEY raised and were granted. Once again Lori is blaming others for her poor choices and behavior.
Can only imagine what Lori demanded from her appointed attorneys after found guilty of all charges. After all she's a Goddess 🙄
They said they were confused and went into details! It’s serious. Can overturn a verdict!
@@Juke582 I listened to Mr Hernández' original interview on the 17th and again just now where Nick replayed it and it is VERY CLEAR his opinion came AFTER they were released of their jury duty and was told they were free to watch and read anything! As I am typing, Nick asks him, AGAIN!, to make sure it was clear to "YOU"!! Lori had a FAIR trial! Just because they/she/you, didn't like it, is TOO bad!!
Good grief!!
@@59Alaskan Exactly!!
That’s what objections are for - appellate record. That way the attorneys can say, “we objected to X and the judge allowed it.” But usually the defense makes a motion to vacate or overrule the jury’s verdict before sentencing. Saw it with Murdaugh.
I really feel for this juror! You can tell he took his duty to the court very seriously and followed all the instructions. His comments in the last interview have been twisted for her legal benefit and that is just appalling. Regardless, I feel confident the judge will see through this nonsense and the conviction will be upheld. Integrity and honesty always prevail!
It's clear that this is a last ditch try from the defense ! I'm impressed that you're addressing this issue quickly, Nate! Good job!!
I'm impressed with the thoughtful and articulate responses of this juror.
As a Narcissist, Lori will do anything to save face. Even if she loses, she will inflict maximum damage to those she sees as threats. She literally enjoys seeing Kay and Larry Woodcock suffer! She wants them and the people of Idaho and Arizona to pay both financially and emotionally.
Her lawyers are doing there job enough with the faux psychiatric assessments. It’s really not that deep and has little to do with Lori
Narcissists don't 'go away' without a fight.
Such a respectful honest clear juror thank you Nate for sharing and clarifying. When I heard the request for a new trial and why, I knew exactly what the juror just said was what had happened. Not rocket science they are grasping at straws to create doubt! Lori is guilty as charged and will be sentenced as such
agree with you - defense has to try - this juror was eloquent and respectful of the process. I am glad that it was clarified.
I thought the exact same thing and I'm glad Nate followed up and clarified this so it's on record. The State can attach both interviews with their motion to dismiss.
@@Retried77 Exactly THIS👆
read what you typed. Clarifying. And that is the problem. that there needed to be clarification of what was originally said.
So glad you did this. Thank you Saul and Nate.
Counsel and prosecutors are presented with the jury instructions for their approval. How can they later protest?
they have to do something to try for a new trial. They are clutching at straws. This juror was so impressive with his dedication to the process. Thank goodness for him and the others who had to sit through this and render a verdict.
Good point!
The Defense is reaching with this motion. But I doubt they think it'll go anywhere.
She is throwing a tantrum, they filed the motion to placate her.
Get use to it, Lori, play with your sock puppets.
@@dianealarcon8304 hahaha. Good one. Go call an inmate a zombie. Haha
As much as I hate the idea of her being granted a new trial because she is guilty and deserves the most strict punishment allowed by law, I have questions. Specifically 3:20. This is what the defense is referring to. My concern is that he seems pretty clear that they heard (or he heard) this info while the trial was going (or before), but now he is saying it was only after that verdict on Friday was when he heard this info. I worry that a valid argument can be made actually.
@@MissaPality It´s very easy to verify the dates of his searches. That shouldn´t have to happen if jurors waited until sentencing imo. This is what happens...Why givedefense any ammo at all?
@@MissaPality I feel like this juror is completely clear… he didn’t watch anything until after he was released by the judge!! Watch until the end… he makes it perfectly clear! The lawyers are trying to make the defense they didn’t have during the trial!
I believe this guy is honest and forthcoming. Lori is grasping at straws; who wouldn’t, facing life in prison without parole?
The jurors interviewed here and from Murdaugh have been so articulate. Great interview tonight
Going to find Dateline now LOL
@@ninacanadian The best synopsis imo was "The gravedigger´s wife". Evidence of Melaniece involvement on PART 5.
Defense is grasping at straws
They just want to keep getting paid by the state. Easy money
Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty
Jurors followed instructions, job well done. The juror was very clear in the interview, much respect to you and your fellow jurors.
Grasping at straws
Thank you Nate and Saul. Appeals are part of the process
They are grasping at straws and it’s pathetic. He did his job correctly! They are desperate!
I've said this before, the world needs more people like Nate and Saul.
Thanks again to everyone at East Idaho News for having the best coverage of this devastating family tragedy
Amazing juror! It is so important to watch what a juror says afterwards for exactly this reason: appeal. Great interview!
Nate, if you weren't famous before, you sure are now! And this is just what the defense has to do. I mean, they didnt bring in any witnesses. They have to show they did SOMETHING. And a new trial is a normal request, from what I understand. Of course the jurors found more info after they got home. Great job defending your interview!
This juror is very articulate and intelligent. Thank you for your service!
Saul seems like a very wise, thoughtful young man. We as citizens should be grateful for his service on this jury.
Id want Saul on the jury if i was ever accused of anything. He's a great juror!!! Thank you both for the interview. ❤
She can't even understand the basic of basics... DON'T KILL.....As far as I've heard none of the jurors had any trouble understanding the rules for deliberation
In that infamous video Charles was practically begging the cops for help, as he was some in the Cox family. Meanwhile those cops were gushing all over little Lori trying to be white knights. Simply disgusting, but not surprising insofar that men who experience some sort of domestic violence/threats are not treated seriously or equally.
And what was the that LEO commenting tylee's blue eyes? Weird and unprofessional.
He was meant to be juror in this trial. Very well spoken and intelligent! Hope he know how grateful we are! ❤
Archibald never spoke up during the trial but now he wants to speak.haha
Bahahaha hahajaja!!!😂
It was clear from early in the trial she was guilty!
What a slap in the face to these jurors
God bless all of the jurors ⚖️
Thanks to all the jurors! They got it right for sure 100 percent💖
Thanks Nate for always staying on top of the news and delivering it to us honestly. You’ve restored a bit of my faith in media. You are a true treasure!
Lori's attorneys are grasping at straws...desperate for anything to justify an appeal. Excellent interview as always Nate.
Thanks Nate, I’m glad you gave Saul a platform to clarify. Anyone who hears him talk knows his integrity is beyond reproach.
.I feel these jurors have done such a fabulous job and it’s a shame he even has to defend his own rights to or not to talk about the case.
His interview was clear and precise. His reference was not about the outcome of the verdict nor being confused about the instructions. After watching the dateline episode and AFTER the trial what he meant was had they looked into Charles report and then after his murder maybe the children and Tammy would still be alive. The defense is reaching…… ROT where you are Lori
Going to start calling Lori
" Desperado "
Thanks for clearing this up Nate!
This is so disgusting of them to do! They're REACHING for anything and everything to find a way to get a redo! This man shows NO display of dishonesty, moral corruption, or anything that would say he didnt do exactly as he was supposed to do! He knew and followed the judge's rules and directions as he was instructed in my opinion!
Leave the jurors alone. They provided a great and difficult service to our country and I, for one, am grateful.❤
Saul- God bless you and your family! Thank you for being the person you are and for having to go through what you did in that trial. Thanks for the information and interviews too!
She’s getting a “new” trial… In another state now . God bless all the families who’ve lost loved ones in this horrible tragedy.
This is such a wonderful example of what honor and dignity looks like between gentlemen. I appreciate and value jury duty more after listening to Saul. I apologize if I’m spelling your name wrong. I also appreciate Nate’s journalistic integrity and factual reporting. Nothing is more valuable than Truth. ✌️✍️👨⚖️🗞🙏🥂 Cheers!
Nate has his No BS face on. The defense isn’t going to mess with him or get a retrial! Go Nate!! 💪
Nate is a responsible local journalist. Support your local journalists!
The attorneys stated this request for a new trial is a normal process. They had a limited number of days to submit it, but I feel mentioning the interview was a dig at the juror.
They're grasping at straws to get the murdering mother off...sick.
She’s probably not safe outside of jail. Richard Ramirez was recognized in the streets of Los Angeles while he was wanted for the Night Stalker murders, and he was almost murdered by everyday citizens.
People really really hate Lori.
It's normal prosedure
The defense is nuts. This man was very clear in his first interview with you. This is kind of along the lines of the multiple times they claimed they didn’t get some documents. “Your honor, we didn’t receive that document from prosecution. Well, whatever.” The number of times he said that got me to laugh each time. I’m thinking, of course you didn’t. You probably lost it, whatever
This is why jurors shouldn’t be interviewed in the first place, but news channels are just too hungry for views
The defense and prosecution were presented with the jury instructions and had to agree to the final instructions. In my opinion the lawyer was setting up for appeal during the entire trial.
Great work Nate, thank you both.
Lori’s lawyers are ridiculous! They barely defend her and then pick on this well-spoken juror. When I heard his original interview, I thought I hope everyone is lucky enough to have such a fair, intelligent person deciding the case.
Why waste all the time and money on a new trial? She's guilty! Also, you'd have to be living under a rock to have not seen or heard anything about this trial. Good luck finding clueless jury members.
None of that matters!!! Everyone is guaranteed a fair trial and trial errors by a judge can overturn an entire trial verdict!!! No matter the defendant! It’s serious!
@@Juke582 you're correct, but not on this one..
Tell us you have some kind of thing relationship, with Lori, w/o saying you do....🎉
@@Juke582 He has every right to watch stuff he hadn't seen previously!
@SheJukster if her counsel was so concerned maybe they should have listened to what the man said and checked their dates BEFORE they made even bigger fools out of themselves!! There is/was NO trial error so wishful thinking on y'alls part yet again! Tell Ellie Mae she still has to face Charles's murder too, lest she may forget. Thanks a bunch
@@Juke582 Yes, that's true and I agree... but the trial errors have to do with bringing Charles Vallow case into this one and the supposedly 'unclear' instructions by the Court. Dragging this juror through the mud over nothing is just nasty and spiteful. Archibald should have just stuck with the facts and left the media out of it.
Great job Nate in defending your interview and clearing it up. The defense is just doing their normal last ditch effort and grasping at straws.
This Is why jurors don't like to talk to the media, the defense can spin it to their benefit, I feel bad his integrity came under question, he didnt do anything wrong.
The defense's spin isn't going anywhere. They are just doing the obligatory follow-up that they are paid to do. It's futile.
I agree, it just sucks this juror has to deal with it.
@@leannejordan4326 Yes, it infuriates me that this good decent person who did his duty, took his responsibilities seriously and was willing to talk about it was unfortunate enough to get T-boned by an Archibald. The thing is that Archibald has tipped his hand and the other jurors know what they might be in for and to mind what they say. I'm glad Saul and Nate are pushing back on this... it's also a clue to the other jurors on how to handle lawyers like that.
Thanks, Nate and the juror, for doing this interview to stress your first interview, which was very clear that all the jurors understood and follow the judge’s order before making their decision - very impressive!
The jury did an amazing job during a very difficult trial and they have my respect and thanks for a job well done. Thank you, Nate for being so good at your job!! 😊
Thank you for doing this clarification interview.
I just really like this guy. He seems to be honest and determined to do what is right. ⭐️
Juror #8 Saul and Nate Eaton … both of you are what we need in this world … thank you both … this new trial should have been expected… I’m sorry Saul got dragged into this effed up drama … it’s just how this crazy is being dragged out
They always reach in the appeals. Doesnt surprise me that they try using your interview, Nate was the thornin their side and even followed them to Hawaii, because he isgood at what he does!!!!! Way to go Nate, and East Idaho News!!! Of all media sources, you guys were the one that deserves even appellate attention, because you DID your job so well! 👏🏼👍🏼
Great point! Nate was surely on their dark scale!
And there we go, the reason the defense was so pitiful.
This young man is so insightful , interesting & intelligent. Exactly what we can only hope for in every trial.
If the defense team had a problem with the instructions then they should have brought that up while going over them with the judge before giving them to the jury! #Unbelievable!
Throughout the trial the defense objected to the AZ information. IMHO - the judge was correct in allowing it.
Please don't give her another trial
They will not get a new trial. You guys did exactly what you’re supposed to do. There was not one thing wrong at all. They are grasping at a whole bunch of stuff that’s not there.😂😂😂😂
UGH, I hate how this new trial motion is trying to twist words and split (nonexistent) hairs. With new trials or appeals, the key question is "Would this have actually affected the case outcome?" NO, obviously not. Why? Saul *clearly* said, even in the original interview, that the jury DID NOT CONSIDER Arizona information in their deliberations. Did the defense actually hear the jury's discussions? NO, obviously, not. (Hearsay!) Finally, let's just say it -- THIS IS INSULTING. There was no defense *during* the trial, but now let's talk smack about the jury after the fact? I feel like this motion actually deserves a reprimand from the judge.
Exactly. It's just a petty spiteful swipe at one of the jurors. Archibald should have just stuck to the facts and left this guy alone. Honestly it's a shame because it's helpful when a juror comes out and talk about the case and what they thought of the evidence.
Saul...You, Sir, are to be commended for doing your civic duty in such an upstanding, proud and honorable manner. It is boldly evident that you were fair, objective and that you adhered to the judge's instructions. I'm so proud of you, not only for your service as a juror, but for articulating your thoughts about the case so clearly for us. Your descriptions of Lori's expressions or demeanor, various courtroom events, juror de!iberations, etc. in these interviews with Nate really gave me an interesting and insider's perspective Thank you. Just awesome. ❤ Stellar interviews! Kudos to you both: Saul the Cool & Nate the Great 😊
I understand the reasoning but I wish all of these jurors would STOP doing interviews.
They would still have appealed..just w/o insulting the jurors
@@59Alaskan They also mentioned "other co-conspirators", a dig on prosecution for the deal with Zulema?
@@politicallyincorrect5802 true..
Makes sense
Unbelievable, she still has two more trials to go and she and her lawyers are looking for reasons to do a do over with this one, good luck with that!
I 100% agree that if pheonix had listened to Charles, then 4 people would still be alive. I guess we can always say what if...
Research Jason Mow former Phoenix police.... "alleged" CULT member
I was on a jury a year ago regarding a hit and run. We were asked if we’d heard anything about it on news outlets, true crime podcasts.
Of course I looked up the case after my job as a juror was complete!
But.....Would you give an interview about your experience BEFORE the SENTENCING while it´s still pending, waiting for the court report?
Sure, if the juror wants to speak.
The judge said so.
@@politicallyincorrect5802
Different jurisdiction, sentencing happened upon the verdict (judge ruled for the minimum sentence in the offense- 30 years)
But I still don’t see any issue with a juror doing an interview- his job was done, the jury doesn’t come back for sentencing
@@Sunset-chaser777 I don´t see any problem either, when all is said and done. What I don´t agree with, is to give defense an opportunity that wasn´t there and an excuse to contest the whole process. Imo this could be avoided just waiting until sentencing. What was the rush?
After I watched this jurors first interview, I asked in the comment section if this would mean a conflict and stated that Lori’s attorney would ask for a mistrial. People responded ugly towards me. Well…here we are.
It isn't a conflict but yes defense will always try to skew juror comments if they can. So yes it might be expected, but doesn't mean they will win or that there is anything wrong with a juror speaking out.
Thank you Nate, for asking the hard questions. I wondered the same thing after hearing your interview with him. I believe him. He is being honest.
It’s really sad they had to clear this up with another interview ❤
I believe this juror respects the process and would never risk the verdict by going outside the judges directions.
You were all amazing jurors! Thank you for what you did, and your respect, hard work, honesty and unimaginable traumas while doing this job.