👍 But please think... _"what does STRICT monotheism actually mean?"_ The truth is simply that... it is either monotheism or not! _"The Sunnah-of-Allah"_ never change! What happened to the previous scriptures is happening to the present & final scripture... because humans will forever be humans! All religions, i.e. Judaism, Christianity, Sunnism, Shiitism, Sectarianism, Hinduism etc., are man-made! We make EVERYTHING about ourselves. The Sunni, Shiite & Sectarian version of Allah has a face, a shin, hands and everything a human possesses... even a house in the middle of the Arabian desert! Coming back to the issue of... it is either monotheism or NOT! All man-made religion believe is the One God... but here is where the similarity ends! This is when we start making EVERYTHING is about us humans! We make up stories that *"created one special human being to guide us to HIM"* and those who buy into our _miraculous fairy tales_ shall be "truly" guided! But the truth from the One True God is GUIDANCE and this guidance is in the form of SCRIPTURES. So... it is time we make EVERYTHING to be about the Quran... The Quran Alone! The God who sent down the Scriptures is a _"scientist"_ and NOT a magician who is sitting on a Throne up in Heaven waiting to perform miracles on humans who perform oral & physical rituals 5 times daily (among other rituals!) _peace_ *The Quran is proof that GOD exists.*
Very pleasant and clearly presented! The topic can be applied very closely to the Islamic majority! A parallel religion was created with added stories and interpretations, countless contradictions. You are only following assumptions and guessing. Then they hide behind so-called, well-paid scholars. Sad! But God will enforce the truth, even if the criminals don't like it! Peace!
Imagine your mother saying "Oh my God" when she sees you alive after you had an accident and she was worried and then people come and claim your mother believes you are God now... That's the level of decontextualization, even assuming John is a 100% legit gospel with no scribal additions nor stuff made up by the author for apologetic reasons...
I think this proof of parallel worlds, each gospel was written by the 4 beast John saw in Revelations. In the next lifetime, there will be 5 gospels of jesus, so we have 24 more to go
Where is the original Quran? Where is copy of the copy of the Quran? All we have are copies of Utman's Quran not his original nor one of his first four copies.
The Arabs did not write because they were good at memorization and learned without writing.. and this has its wisdom so that people do not say later that the Prophet wrote it himself and the companions and Muslims at that time were memorizers of it.. Stages of documenting the Holy Quran The first stage: Drawing the words of God Almighty (during the era of the Messenger of God, may God bless him and grant him peace) The second stage: Documenting the diacritics (during the era of Imam Ali, may God be pleased with him) The third stage: Documenting the dots (during the era of the Umayyad Caliph Abdul Malik bin Marwan) The modern stage: Documenting the intonation
@@matt291 Millions of Muslims have memorized the Quran, so if you ask someone who has memorized the Quran about any verse, he will easily answer you. The Holy Quran was written by the Companions from the Prophet, peace and blessings be upon him. Then, during the reign of Uthman, a four-person committee was formed, including Zaid bin Thabit, the scribe of the revelation. They compiled the Mushaf that we have in our hands now, and in one letter, so that people would not dispute. It was revealed in seven letters, so the Companions compiled it in the reign of Uthman in one letter, and it is what we have in our hands now, praise be to Allah. It was preserved from the Prophet, peace and blessings be upon him, through the Companions - may Allah be pleased with them and satisfy them - nothing was changed in it, and this is from the kindness of Allah. Because He, the Most High, said: “Indeed, it is We who sent down the Qur’an and indeed, We will be its guardian.” [Al-Hijr: 9] He is the One who sent down the Qur’an and He is the One who preserved it, which is the Qur’an. That is why He, the Most High, says: “Indeed, it is We who sent down the Qur’an and indeed, We will be its guardian.” [Al-Hijr: 9]. And Allah preserved it at the hands of His Messenger, peace and blessings be upon him, then at the hands of the Companions, then after that at the hands of the people of knowledge, century after century, preserving it in their hearts, receiving it from one another, and writing it in the Qur’an. All of that is from the kindness of Allah and His preservation of His great Book.
In brief, many of your opinions on The Gospel are not reflecting the facts. Most importantly, in terms of The Qur'an, Allah cites The Protoevangelion/Gospel of Mary/James and possibly Pseudo-Matthew. The former provides vital information on the genealogy of Yeshua, allowing Matthew 1 to be adjusted and reconciled with The Tanakh. Luke's genealogy is generally in harmony with The Tanakh and a prophesy which you are clearly unaware of. Matthew and John are quite explicit in terms of The Passion dates which you are unaware of. The canonical Gospels are sequenced according to the dates of publication. 2Luke (Acts) was obviously written during Paul's era, c. early 50s, it contains his account of the stoning of St. Stephen which is clearly written by Luke from an eyewitness. 1-2Luke form a chiasmus in terms of general events. Luke wrote the last of the synoptic Gospels. Lastly, Revelation was prophesied by Moses and reflects actual history post-Herodian Temple, as recognised by the early Protestant reformers. It also cites Isaiah 47, prophesy happening from our own 21st Century.
You are assuming the Qur'an is quoting the protoevangelion of Mary/James, forgetting that those texts often also reference older documents. For instance, Matthew and Luke take from Mark, so to claim "The Qur'an quotes Matthew" if it's actually quoting something Matthew took from Mark, then the claim is not based, and since we know there were many gospels we don't have direct acces to today, but our "gospels" today may take from, then it's not logical to assume to quickly where the text takes from. Of course we believe God quotes in the Qur'an what happened, so obviously God also knows what people wrote, correct or incorrect and he may quote that, but he will also have direct acces to the celestial records which are 100% exact unlike manmade documents which may record most of it but have some errors... When it gets ambiguous, in my opinion, i prefer to move on of more concrete matters. I know God is there and he is one, and the Qur'an confirms what i already knew, so yeah... But even in terms of harmony, the Qur'an isn't cheap at all, it has stuff of its own which proves it's not manmade, such as the mathematics of it, and while i may not agree with this channel or the takes of Dr Khalifa on certain points, some of it is undeniable and quite precise, definitely made on purpose, take that to mean what you see more logical...
@@Gabriel-ServantOfGod You; "...so to claim "The Qur'an quotes Matthew" if it's actually quoting something Matthew..." Answer: Try reading my comments next time. You: "...Matthew and Luke take from Mark..." Answer: Prove it with evidence instead of constructing an argument devoid of either facts or evidence, and ignoring the supporting evidence to the contrary. You: "...Of course we believe God quotes in the Qur'an what happened, so obviously God also knows what people wrote, correct or incorrect..." Answer: You heard wrong, try reading S61:5 which explicitly cites the extant Torah in its MODERN form dating from about 1k years ago although I realise that this matter is definitely above your pay grade and that few people have examined the published evidence on this matter.
@@Gabriel-ServantOfGod Surahs Amram/3, ayah/v.144, The Table/5, ayah/v.75: wa-mā muḥammadun ʾillā rasūlun qad khalat min qablihi (al)(r)-rusulu ʾa-fa-ʾin māta ʾaw qutila inqalabtum ʿalā ʾaʿqābikum wa-man yanqalib ʿalā ʿaqibayhi fa-lan yaḍurra allāha shayʾan wa-sa-yajzī allāhu (al)(sh)-shākirīna And Mohammad is not but a messenger, certainly the messengers from before him have died. What-then-if he-had-died or was slain, you turned-back on your heels? And whoever turns-back upon his heels then never is he harming Allah by-any-means. And Allah is rewarding the grateful-ones. .ומחמד אינו אלא שליח, וַדַאִי מתו מן לפניו השליחים ?מה אז-אם הוא מת או נהרג, הסתובבת על עקבים .ומי שמסתובב על עקביו אז יהי לעולם לא שׁוּם להזיק את אללה .ואללה מתגמל המודים mā al-masīḥu ub'nu maryama ʾillā rasūlun qad khalat min qablihi (al)(r)-rusulu wa-ʾummuhū ṣiddīqatun kānā yaʾkulāni (al)(ṭ)-ṭaʿāma unẓur kayfa nubayyinu lahumu al-ʾāyāti thumma unẓur ʾannā yuʾfakūna The Messiah son of Miriam is nothing but a messenger, certainly the messengers from before him have died, and his mother truthful. Both were the eaters of food, see how we make the signs clear to them, then see how they (become) (turned-aside). .המשיח בן מרים אינו אלא שליח, וַדַאִי מתו מן לפניו השליחים, ואמאו דוֹבֵר אֶמֶת שניהם היו אוכלי האוכל, ראה כיצד אנו מבהירים להם את האוֹתים, אז ראה איך הם .ללהֲפוך
@@nickmansfield1 Don't think i'm closed to this take. In fact i've examined it a bit and talked with people who take that stance, i'm definitely not wanting to say i believe in the Gospel and Torah and then not do so... But, the fact that minor corruption may happen and the text may still be "preserved" in a way cannot be avoided. Also, if a text quotes the Gospel, then that quote IS the Gospel, not necessarily the rest of the text. So if the Qur'an quotes a parabole which Mark and Matthew have, why assume Matthew did not quote this from Mark also? You asked me to provide evidence, legit, i am transparent, i heard this from Biblical scholars, they say Matthew and Luke take from Mark since both Matthew and Luke have identical stuff to Mark but they do erase and overwrit some of it... And they may have more arguments for that theory. As far as i'm concerned, that's the issue of Christians. I'm happy to have the Qur'an filter out the previous scripture, rejecting some ideas and confirming others. To me it makes sense, others may ask "who is this to tell what is right or wrong from our texts?" Well, take it with God. Consider if this is actually from God and you reject it, then what excuse would you have to keep wandering in ignorance after God cleaned the room so to speak?
@@Gabriel-ServantOfGod S27:76. Of course some Biblical and Gospel verses are corrupted, so is The Qur'an in S9, Allah shows you how quickly this can happen. To understand the former prophets your knowledge must be firmly grounded in The Qur'an. And Hebrew Matthew is 19, Thomas 6 x 19. Nonetheless Allah cites both versions of Matthew in S17.
0:40 It's funny that you criticize the gospel as not being 'verbatim Statement' when it was written 20 to 40 years after Jesus died. But you believe the quran, which is written over four hundred years after jesus died.Where's the consistency😂.
Do you believe in God? Do you believe God is all knowing? If both of the above are true, then you should also believe that a Book, which is verbatim the words of God, is more reliable than books written by humans. The Apostles never at any point claimed what they were writing was inspired by God.
@@nathanielmartins5930 1 Corinthians 2:13: "We speak, not in words taught us by human wisdom but in words taught by the Spirit." Thessalonians 2:13: "For this cause also thank we God without ceasing, because, when ye received the word of God which ye heard of us, ye received it not as the word of men, but as it is in truth, the word of God, which effectually worketh also in you that believe."
The Arabs did not write because they were good at memorization and learned without writing.. and this has its wisdom so that people do not say later that the Prophet wrote it himself and the companions and Muslims at that time were memorizers of it.. Stages of documenting the Holy Quran The first stage: Drawing the words of God Almighty (during the era of the Messenger of God, may God bless him and grant him peace) The second stage: Documenting the diacritics (during the era of Imam Ali, may God be pleased with him) The third stage: Documenting the dots (during the era of the Umayyad Caliph Abdul Malik bin Marwan) The modern stage: Documenting the intonation
@HanaAhmed-x7n So let me get this straight. The all-knowing God had a problem with his book being Contaminated; Moses wrote a book king, David wrote a book, etc. So his bright idea was to allow an illiterate to petition a bunch of random people to write a book in which he could not correct if there were any writing errors. Absolutely stupid.🤨.
@@theflaggedyoutuberii4311 The Quran was not written during the time of the Messenger... What is the number of verses that you do not understand? Contaminated!!!! Did you know that when the Holy Quran is read by a believer who believes in God and understands its meanings well, he cries out of fear of God?
@@HanaAhmed-x7n So not only wasn't it written by its recitator but it was written after he died. By again, some random people, we don't even know how many people even wrote it.
@@theflaggedyoutuberii4311 The Qur’an was revealed to the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) in parts, over a period of twenty-three years. Allaah the Most High said: {And a Qur’an which We have divided into parts that you may recite it to the people at intervals, and We have sent it down gradually.} [Surah al-Isra’: 106] As-Sa’di (may Allaah have mercy on him) said: That is: And We have sent down this Qur’an in parts, distinguishing between guidance and misguidance, truth and falsehood. {That you may recite it to the people at intervals} means: slowly, so that they may ponder it and reflect on its meanings, and extract its knowledge. {And We have sent it down gradually} means: little by little, in parts over twenty-three years. End quote. Tafsir as-Sa’di (p. 760). Second: Writing was rare among the Arabs, and Allah described them as such in His saying: (It is He who sent among the unlettered a Messenger from among themselves) Al-Jumu'ah / 2, so they memorized the Qur'an in their hearts, and a few of them used to write some verses or Surahs on skins and thin stones and the like. Third: The Prophet, may Allah's prayers and peace be upon him, forbade at first writing anything other than the Qur'an and forbade them from writing his words temporarily until the companions' determination to memorize and write the Qur'an was met and the words of the Prophet, may Allah's prayers and peace be upon him, would not be mixed with the words of Allah Almighty, so the Qur'an would remain preserved from additions or omissions. Fourth: The Prophet, may Allah's prayers and peace be upon him, appointed a group of trustworthy and knowledgeable companions to write down the revelation, and they were known in their biographies as the scribes of the revelation, such as the four caliphs, Abdullah bin Amr bin Al-'As, Mu'awiyah bin Abi Sufyan, Zaid bin Thabit and others, may Allah be pleased with them all. Fifth: The Qur’an was revealed in seven letters, as was authenticated from the Prophet, may God bless him and grant him peace, in the hadith of Umar ibn al-Khattab, may God be pleased with him. Narrated by al-Bukhari (2287) and Muslim (818). These are the languages of the Arabs, which are known for their eloquence. Sixth: The Qur’an remained preserved in the hearts of the Companions who had memorized it and on skins and other things until the time of the Caliph Abu Bakr al-Siddiq (may Allah be pleased with him). During the Ridda Wars, many of the Companions who had memorized the Qur’an were killed, so Abu Bakr (may Allah be pleased with him) feared that the Qur’an would be lost and forgotten in the hearts of the Companions. He consulted the senior Companions to collect the entire Qur’an in one book so that it would remain preserved from being lost. He entrusted the task to the mountain of memorization, Zayd ibn Thabit (may Allah be pleased with him). Al-Bukhari narrated in his “Sahih” (4986) on the authority of Zayd ibn Thabit (may Allah be pleased with him), who said: Abu Bakr sent for me when the people of al-Yamamah were killed, and when ‘Umar ibn al-Khattab was with him, Abu Bakr (may Allah be pleased with him) said: Umar came to me and said: The killing of the reciters of the Qur’an has intensified on the day of Yamamah, and I fear that the killing of the reciters will intensify in the battlefields and a large part of the Qur’an will be lost. I think that you should order the collection of the Qur’an. I said to Umar: How can you do something that the Messenger of Allah (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) did not do? Umar said: By Allah, this is good. Umar kept on urging me on until Allah opened my heart to it, and I saw in that what Umar saw. Zaid said: Abu Bakr said: You are a wise young man and we do not accuse you. You used to write down the revelation for the Messenger of Allah, may Allah bless him and grant him peace, so follow up on the Qur’an and collect it. Zaid said: By Allah, if they had ordered me to move a mountain, it would not have been heavier for me than what he ordered me to do of collecting the Qur’an. I said: How can you do something that the Messenger of Allah (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) did not do? He said: By Allah, it is better. Abu Bakr kept on urging me on until Allah opened my chest to that which He opened the chests of Abu Bakr and Umar (may Allah be pleased with them). So I searched the entire Qur’an, collecting it from palm leaves, palm fronds, and the chests of men, until I found the end of Surat At-Tawbah with Abu Khuzaymah Al-Ansari. I did not find it with anyone else except him: “There has certainly come to you a Messenger from among yourselves. Grievous to him is what you suffer…” until the end of Bara’ah. The scrolls were with Abu Bakr until Allah caused him to die, then with ‘Umar during his lifetime. Then with Hafsa bint Umar, may Allah be pleased with him. Usub: palm fronds, they used to scrape the fronds and write on the wide end. Lakhaf: thin stones. The companion Zaid bin Thabit, may Allah be pleased with him, had memorized the Qur’an, but he adopted a method of verification, so he would not accept to write a verse unless two of the companions testified that they had heard it from the Messenger of Allah, may Allah bless him and grant him peace. This Mushaf remained in the hands of the caliphs until the time of the Rightly-Guided Caliph Uthman bin Affan, may Allah be pleased with him. The companions, may Allah be pleased with them, had dispersed throughout the country and they used to recite the Qur’an according to what they had heard from the Messenger of Allah, may Allah bless him and grant him peace, from the seven letters, so their students would each recite according to what their sheikh had recited. If a student heard a reciter reciting differently from his own recitation, he would denounce him and his mistake, and so on until some of the Companions feared that a sedition would occur among the followers and those who came after them, so he decided to unite the people on one letter, which was the language of Quraysh, in which the Qur’an was first revealed, to remove the dispute and settle the matter. So he consulted Uthman, may God be pleased with him, and he agreed to this opinion.
You are not quoting a single verse clear,unambiguous,unequivocal saying former scriptures are corrupted. Instead there are over 30 verses in Quran which refer to the former scriptures,people of the book. Who are these people? Which book? Quran says it confirms the scriptures with them at the time. If gospels are corrupt then you would find the information about 4 persons mentioned in Quran totally different from Gospels If you as a Muslim. Is serious,find out about Zechariah John Mary Jesus What Quran says about them and compare with Luke narative. Islamic scholars had to find a way to make Muslims keep away from bible because there were places were Quran contradicts bible and Quran says if you doubt ask people of the reminder do they would be proved wrong. Follow step by step and the bible has more detailed information than Quran .How can Quran supervise it? Leave alone errors and contradictions s in Quran Then as one has laid. Out well those scenarios after death of Mohamed in SIN. Differences that were dealt away with by burning other copies meaning they were sufficiently different.
Please note that The Qur'an does not seriously contradict The Tanakh and Gospel and it deserves serious study beyond the superficial treatment by scholars of the modern age whom Mohammad warned us about.
Muhammad confirmed the gospels so if you say there is a contradiction youre saying allah and muhammad confirmed corrupted scriptures. And if you have a problem with the gospels written decades after Christ then how do you reconcile with the fact that Uthman burned arabic qurans including the qurans of Abdullah ibn Masud and Ubai bin Kab, 2 of the 4 people muhammad said to learn the quran from, and uthman standardized Zayeds quran who muhammad never mentioned. Theres a hadith where ibn Masud said he learned the quran fresh from muhammad the year he died when jibril recited it to muhammad twice and he memorised 70 suras before Zayed even knew what islam was. Another hadith where ibn masud said he doesnt accept Zayeds quran and if anyone knew more than him hed go learn from him and NONE of the companions of muhammad refuted him. And if ibn Masud and Ubai bin Kab leanred the quran from the same man how come Ibn Masud had 111 suras while Ubai bin Kab had 116 suras while the quran today only has 114. And if the quran is the same why did uthman force ibn Masud to give up his quran to the point he dragged him out of the mosque. broke 2 of his ribs and died of his injuries if the quran is the same. Thank Jesus that we never had an uthman who burned bibles and standardized 1 gospel. Isnt the quran the word of allah yet you have 40+ qiraat just from uthmans quran so how do you know you have the correct quran? We have nearly 30000 manuscripts of the gospels with over 10000 in latin, 5000 in greek and various other languages which even non christian scholars say is not corrupted. Let alone the fact that muhammad repeatedly confirms the torah and bible in the quran, you have no basis for this argument religiously or historically.
Don't confuse yourself, dear fellow! Let us take it one step at a time. You began with, _"Muhammad confirmed the gospels"_ ASSUMING... yes... let us assume that what you wrote is true... what is this _"gospel that Muhammad"_ confirmed? Is it the present-day Bible? Is the present-day Bible the very same *Injeel* mentioned in the Quran? What language is the word "Injeel?" Bible? At the very least, for the word "Torah" in the Quran, there is a scripture also called the Torah! _peace_
You are the one confused there was Hebrew and Aramaic then Greek. Has your quran said the language is a problem? The fact is in 7th century Mohamed in Quran says he confirms what is with them. Even says if you doubt ask reading the book before you. How can it tell him to ask those people if they don't have the book and they don't exist.? Be serious. Language is not mentioned.as an issue in former scriptures.ehy do you bring it up? Do you guys make things clear for Allah? Couldn't he tell us in Quran that The Torah and gospel even psalms they have are corrupt and the language used is not correct.. Why is that you Muslims explain for Allah this corruption of former scriptures,?them talk about language for Allah. You are like christians we ho explain trinity for God which is not there.
Then you speak like others don't know Injeel is not Arabic it's borrowed from llatin evengelion Torah is Hebrew for the law,teaching per say First five books attributed to Moses You even don't know history of the bible. When was it complied? When Quran says people of the book which book? Which people? Respond
Muslims you can never dodge the fact that the Quran confirms what was there at the time of Mohamed and that is the same Greek and Hebrew writings Errors may be there and contradictions especially on Narratives in Samuel Kings Chronicles And gospel narratives about details on crucifiction and death of Jesus. These don't in anyway deal with all fundamental teachings in the Jewish faith nor in the christian faith based on the bible. Do what are you saying,?
@@theflaggedyoutuberii4311 Verse proof? Here is a verse that proves literally the Father is GOD: 17 Jesus said, “Do not hold on to me, for I have not yet ascended to the Father. Go instead to my brothers and tell them, ‘I am ascending to my Father and your Father, to my God and your God.’”
Is Quran a complete book? Dose it have 133 chapters or what is now 114? Where are the 19 chapters? Because quran in based on code 19 and 7 if you devid 114 it comes 6 not 7. Where is chapter on salah? Where is the chapter on government? Where is the chapter on burial? Where is the chapter on circumcision? Chapter on Imamat khilafat ?When Allah said in Quran today I had completed the Deen of Islam quran was not compiled, hadith too not, successor was not appointed how it is possible, neither Allah is irresponsible nor Nabi s.a is.if say islam is perfect then why are so many differences. I think we had not recognise who are oolilamre, if you read the complete history of islam you will see specificully one family was kept away from the government and power they are the family of prophet. They had been killed, poison and jailed why? Because they are on Haq truth. We had also did what jews and Christian did. My conclusion read 39:18 al Quran.
When you began with the question, _"Is Quran a complete book?"_ it proved to me that you have either not read the Quran or that you are unable to understand the Quran. You do understand what the modern-day Arabic word _"Al-Kitab"_ means, right? Now... please take time to ponder on this verse: 2:2 This is Al-Kitab (The Scripture, The Divine Book, The Legitimate Bible, Allah’s Book), no raib (doubtful matter or interpolation) therein, guidance to those who are Al-Muttaqun. Okay... once you have understood that Al-Kitab is The Book, then please try understanding this verse: _5:3 You are forbidden to eat the meat of any animal that dies by itself (dead body), blood, the flesh of swine (pork) and that on which any name other than Allah's has been invoked; also that which is strangled to death , killed by a violent blow, killed by a headlong fall and of those beaten or gored to death; and that which has been partly eaten by a wild animal unless you are able to slaughter it before its death; also that which is sacrificed on altars or is divided by raffling of arrows. All these are sinful acts. Today the unbelievers have given up all their hope of vanquishing your religion. Have no fear of them, fear Me. Today I have perfected your religion for you, completed my favor upon you and approved Al-Islam as a Deen (way of life for you). Anyone who is compelled by hunger to eat what is forbidden, not intending to commit sin, will find Allah Forgiving, Merciful_ When the Quran says, *...Today I have perfected your religion for you, completed my favor upon you and approved Al-Islam as a Deen (way of life for you)...* Is there still any doubt in your heart that the Al-Kitab is indeed *a perfectly complete Book* during the lifetime of the prophet? But you are a Sunni? Or a Shiite? Or any of the Sectarians? Of course, you REJECT the Word of Allah and still maintain that the Quran is NOT a complete Book, right? So, you invented these questions to cast doubt... _"Dose it have 133 chapters or what is now 114? Where are the 19 chapters? Because quran in based on code 19 and 7 if you devid 114 it comes 6 not 7"_ Also, why must there be _"a chapter on Salah"_ when SALAH is simply RECITING THE VERSES OF THE QURAN TO THE PEOPLE/MANKIND? _peace_ *The Quran is the Word of Allah. But for the Sunnis, Shiites & Sectarians the Word of Allah is insufficient. They must have the Word of Bukhari, AbuMuslim, abuDawood & ibnMajah to complete the Word of Allah.*
Haha keep digging your hole. Your destination is hell. You have no evidence, no proof, you made an accusation and have nothing to substantiate it. You wasted your and your life.
I bear WITNESS THERE IS NO OTHER God but ONE GOD 🤲
I have been listening to your podcast for years…I didn’t know you had a youtube channel! Amazing!
This was so on point, brother. Alhamdulillah.
👍
But please think... _"what does STRICT monotheism actually mean?"_
The truth is simply that... it is either monotheism or not!
_"The Sunnah-of-Allah"_ never change!
What happened to the previous scriptures is happening to the present & final scripture... because humans will forever be humans!
All religions, i.e. Judaism, Christianity, Sunnism, Shiitism, Sectarianism, Hinduism etc., are man-made!
We make EVERYTHING about ourselves.
The Sunni, Shiite & Sectarian version of Allah has a face, a shin, hands and everything a human possesses... even a house in the middle of the Arabian desert!
Coming back to the issue of... it is either monotheism or NOT!
All man-made religion believe is the One God... but here is where the similarity ends!
This is when we start making EVERYTHING is about us humans!
We make up stories that *"created one special human being to guide us to HIM"* and those who buy into our _miraculous fairy tales_ shall be "truly" guided!
But the truth from the One True God is GUIDANCE and this guidance is in the form of SCRIPTURES.
So... it is time we make EVERYTHING to be about the Quran... The Quran Alone!
The God who sent down the Scriptures is a _"scientist"_ and NOT a magician who is sitting on a Throne up in Heaven waiting to perform miracles on humans who perform oral & physical rituals 5 times daily (among other rituals!)
_peace_
*The Quran is proof that GOD exists.*
Very pleasant and clearly presented!
The topic can be applied very closely to the Islamic majority!
A parallel religion was created with added stories and interpretations, countless contradictions. You are only following assumptions and guessing. Then they hide behind so-called, well-paid scholars. Sad! But God will enforce the truth, even if the criminals don't like it!
Peace!
Imagine your mother saying "Oh my God" when she sees you alive after you had an accident and she was worried and then people come and claim your mother believes you are God now...
That's the level of decontextualization, even assuming John is a 100% legit gospel with no scribal additions nor stuff made up by the author for apologetic reasons...
Can you refute a guy called testify?
I doubt it.
Nice information
I think this proof of parallel worlds, each gospel was written by the 4 beast John saw in Revelations. In the next lifetime, there will be 5 gospels of jesus, so we have 24 more to go
U drop the acid.
I was kinda hopeful with try is video, but you’ve just regurgitated long-ago refuted arguments
Where is the original Quran? Where is copy of the copy of the Quran? All we have are copies of Utman's Quran not his original nor one of his first four copies.
The Arabs did not write because they were good at memorization and learned without writing.. and this has its wisdom so that people do not say later that the Prophet wrote it himself and the companions and Muslims at that time were memorizers of it.. Stages of documenting the Holy Quran
The first stage: Drawing the words of God Almighty (during the era of the Messenger of God, may God bless him and grant him peace)
The second stage: Documenting the diacritics (during the era of Imam Ali, may God be pleased with him)
The third stage: Documenting the dots (during the era of the Umayyad Caliph Abdul Malik bin Marwan)
The modern stage: Documenting the intonation
@@HanaAhmed-x7n “The faintest ink is more powerful than the strongest memory”
@@matt291 Millions of Muslims have memorized the Quran, so if you ask someone who has memorized the Quran about any verse, he will easily answer you. The Holy Quran was written by the Companions from the Prophet, peace and blessings be upon him. Then, during the reign of Uthman, a four-person committee was formed, including Zaid bin Thabit, the scribe of the revelation. They compiled the Mushaf that we have in our hands now, and in one letter, so that people would not dispute. It was revealed in seven letters, so the Companions compiled it in the reign of Uthman in one letter, and it is what we have in our hands now, praise be to Allah. It was preserved from the Prophet, peace and blessings be upon him, through the Companions - may Allah be pleased with them and satisfy them - nothing was changed in it, and this is from the kindness of Allah. Because He, the Most High, said: “Indeed, it is We who sent down the Qur’an and indeed, We will be its guardian.” [Al-Hijr: 9] He is the One who sent down the Qur’an and He is the One who preserved it, which is the Qur’an. That is why He, the Most High, says: “Indeed, it is We who sent down the Qur’an and indeed, We will be its guardian.” [Al-Hijr: 9]. And Allah preserved it at the hands of His Messenger, peace and blessings be upon him, then at the hands of the Companions, then after that at the hands of the people of knowledge, century after century, preserving it in their hearts, receiving it from one another, and writing it in the Qur’an. All of that is from the kindness of Allah and His preservation of His great Book.
In brief, many of your opinions on The Gospel are not reflecting the facts. Most importantly, in terms of The Qur'an, Allah cites The Protoevangelion/Gospel of Mary/James and possibly Pseudo-Matthew. The former provides vital information on the genealogy of Yeshua, allowing Matthew 1 to be adjusted and reconciled with The Tanakh. Luke's genealogy is generally in harmony with The Tanakh and a prophesy which you are clearly unaware of.
Matthew and John are quite explicit in terms of The Passion dates which you are unaware of. The canonical Gospels are sequenced according to the dates of publication. 2Luke (Acts) was obviously written during Paul's era, c. early 50s, it contains his account of the stoning of St. Stephen which is clearly written by Luke from an eyewitness. 1-2Luke form a chiasmus in terms of general events. Luke wrote the last of the synoptic Gospels.
Lastly, Revelation was prophesied by Moses and reflects actual history post-Herodian Temple, as recognised by the early Protestant reformers. It also cites Isaiah 47, prophesy happening from our own 21st Century.
You are assuming the Qur'an is quoting the protoevangelion of Mary/James, forgetting that those texts often also reference older documents.
For instance, Matthew and Luke take from Mark, so to claim "The Qur'an quotes Matthew" if it's actually quoting something Matthew took from Mark, then the claim is not based, and since we know there were many gospels we don't have direct acces to today, but our "gospels" today may take from, then it's not logical to assume to quickly where the text takes from.
Of course we believe God quotes in the Qur'an what happened, so obviously God also knows what people wrote, correct or incorrect and he may quote that, but he will also have direct acces to the celestial records which are 100% exact unlike manmade documents which may record most of it but have some errors...
When it gets ambiguous, in my opinion, i prefer to move on of more concrete matters.
I know God is there and he is one, and the Qur'an confirms what i already knew, so yeah...
But even in terms of harmony, the Qur'an isn't cheap at all, it has stuff of its own which proves it's not manmade, such as the mathematics of it, and while i may not agree with this channel or the takes of Dr Khalifa on certain points, some of it is undeniable and quite precise, definitely made on purpose, take that to mean what you see more logical...
@@Gabriel-ServantOfGod You; "...so to claim "The Qur'an quotes Matthew" if it's actually quoting something Matthew..."
Answer: Try reading my comments next time.
You: "...Matthew and Luke take from Mark..."
Answer: Prove it with evidence instead of constructing an argument devoid of either facts or evidence, and ignoring the supporting evidence to the contrary.
You: "...Of course we believe God quotes in the Qur'an what happened, so obviously God also knows what people wrote, correct or incorrect..."
Answer: You heard wrong, try reading S61:5 which explicitly cites the extant Torah in its MODERN form dating from about 1k years ago although I realise that this matter is definitely above your pay grade and that few people have examined the published evidence on this matter.
@@Gabriel-ServantOfGod Surahs Amram/3, ayah/v.144, The Table/5, ayah/v.75:
wa-mā muḥammadun ʾillā rasūlun qad khalat min qablihi (al)(r)-rusulu ʾa-fa-ʾin māta ʾaw qutila inqalabtum ʿalā ʾaʿqābikum wa-man yanqalib ʿalā ʿaqibayhi fa-lan yaḍurra allāha shayʾan wa-sa-yajzī allāhu (al)(sh)-shākirīna
And Mohammad is not but a messenger, certainly the messengers from before him have died.
What-then-if he-had-died or was slain, you turned-back on your heels?
And whoever turns-back upon his heels then never is he harming Allah by-any-means.
And Allah is rewarding the grateful-ones.
.ומחמד אינו אלא שליח, וַדַאִי מתו מן לפניו השליחים
?מה אז-אם הוא מת או נהרג, הסתובבת על עקבים
.ומי שמסתובב על עקביו אז יהי לעולם לא שׁוּם להזיק את אללה
.ואללה מתגמל המודים
mā al-masīḥu ub'nu maryama ʾillā rasūlun qad khalat min qablihi (al)(r)-rusulu wa-ʾummuhū ṣiddīqatun kānā yaʾkulāni (al)(ṭ)-ṭaʿāma unẓur kayfa nubayyinu lahumu al-ʾāyāti thumma unẓur ʾannā yuʾfakūna
The Messiah son of Miriam is nothing but a messenger, certainly the messengers from before him have died, and his mother truthful.
Both were the eaters of food, see how we make the signs clear to them, then see how they (become) (turned-aside).
.המשיח בן מרים אינו אלא שליח, וַדַאִי מתו מן לפניו השליחים, ואמאו דוֹבֵר אֶמֶת
שניהם היו אוכלי האוכל, ראה כיצד אנו מבהירים להם את האוֹתים, אז ראה איך הם
.ללהֲפוך
@@nickmansfield1 Don't think i'm closed to this take.
In fact i've examined it a bit and talked with people who take that stance, i'm definitely not wanting to say i believe in the Gospel and Torah and then not do so...
But, the fact that minor corruption may happen and the text may still be "preserved" in a way cannot be avoided.
Also, if a text quotes the Gospel, then that quote IS the Gospel, not necessarily the rest of the text.
So if the Qur'an quotes a parabole which Mark and Matthew have, why assume Matthew did not quote this from Mark also?
You asked me to provide evidence, legit, i am transparent, i heard this from Biblical scholars, they say Matthew and Luke take from Mark since both Matthew and Luke have identical stuff to Mark but they do erase and overwrit some of it...
And they may have more arguments for that theory.
As far as i'm concerned, that's the issue of Christians.
I'm happy to have the Qur'an filter out the previous scripture, rejecting some ideas and confirming others.
To me it makes sense, others may ask "who is this to tell what is right or wrong from our texts?"
Well, take it with God.
Consider if this is actually from God and you reject it, then what excuse would you have to keep wandering in ignorance after God cleaned the room so to speak?
@@Gabriel-ServantOfGod S27:76.
Of course some Biblical and Gospel verses are corrupted, so is The Qur'an in S9, Allah shows you how quickly this can happen. To understand the former prophets your knowledge must be firmly grounded in The Qur'an. And Hebrew Matthew is 19, Thomas 6 x 19. Nonetheless Allah cites both versions of Matthew in S17.
The pashitta bible avoids these so called “contradictions”
Cope
Quran 19:34
That is Jesus, son of Mary. ˹And this is˺ a word of truth, about which they dispute.
@@aob7808 yeah, cry
@@aob7808 I don’t care
@@aob7808 I don’t give a f what it says
0:40 It's funny that you criticize the gospel as not being 'verbatim Statement' when it was written 20 to 40 years after Jesus died. But you believe the quran, which is written over four hundred years after jesus died.Where's the consistency😂.
Do you believe in God? Do you believe God is all knowing?
If both of the above are true, then you should also believe that a Book, which is verbatim the words of God, is more reliable than books written by humans.
The Apostles never at any point claimed what they were writing was inspired by God.
@@nathanielmartins5930
1 Corinthians 2:13: "We speak, not in words taught us by human wisdom but in words taught by the Spirit."
Thessalonians 2:13: "For this cause also thank we God without ceasing, because, when ye received the word of God which ye heard of us, ye received it not as the word of men, but as it is in truth, the word of God, which effectually worketh also in you that believe."
@@theflaggedyoutuberii4311
You just referred me to the letters of Paul, which Paul never considered to be divine revelation, nor part of the Bible.
@nathanielmartins5930 So are you ignorant to the fact that paul letters are part of the bible.😅. In fact, which bibles do not include paul's letters?
@theflaggedyoutuberii4311
Paul never intended his letters to become Liturgical Canon.
❤
2:40 What is the official manuscript of the quran?A book written by an illiterate?😂.
The Arabs did not write because they were good at memorization and learned without writing.. and this has its wisdom so that people do not say later that the Prophet wrote it himself and the companions and Muslims at that time were memorizers of it.. Stages of documenting the Holy Quran
The first stage: Drawing the words of God Almighty (during the era of the Messenger of God, may God bless him and grant him peace)
The second stage: Documenting the diacritics (during the era of Imam Ali, may God be pleased with him)
The third stage: Documenting the dots (during the era of the Umayyad Caliph Abdul Malik bin Marwan)
The modern stage: Documenting the intonation
@HanaAhmed-x7n So let me get this straight. The all-knowing God had a problem with his book being Contaminated; Moses wrote a book king, David wrote a book, etc. So his bright idea was to allow an illiterate to petition a bunch of random people to write a book in which he could not correct if there were any writing errors. Absolutely stupid.🤨.
@@theflaggedyoutuberii4311 The Quran was not written during the time of the Messenger... What is the number of verses that you do not understand? Contaminated!!!! Did you know that when the Holy Quran is read by a believer who believes in God and understands its meanings well, he cries out of fear of God?
@@HanaAhmed-x7n So not only wasn't it written by its recitator but it was written after he died. By again, some random people, we don't even know how many people even wrote it.
@@theflaggedyoutuberii4311 The Qur’an was revealed to the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) in parts, over a period of twenty-three years. Allaah the Most High said: {And a Qur’an which We have divided into parts that you may recite it to the people at intervals, and We have sent it down gradually.} [Surah al-Isra’: 106]
As-Sa’di (may Allaah have mercy on him) said:
That is: And We have sent down this Qur’an in parts, distinguishing between guidance and misguidance, truth and falsehood.
{That you may recite it to the people at intervals} means: slowly, so that they may ponder it and reflect on its meanings, and extract its knowledge.
{And We have sent it down gradually} means: little by little, in parts over twenty-three years. End quote.
Tafsir as-Sa’di (p. 760).
Second:
Writing was rare among the Arabs, and Allah described them as such in His saying: (It is He who sent among the unlettered a Messenger from among themselves) Al-Jumu'ah / 2, so they memorized the Qur'an in their hearts, and a few of them used to write some verses or Surahs on skins and thin stones and the like.
Third:
The Prophet, may Allah's prayers and peace be upon him, forbade at first writing anything other than the Qur'an and forbade them from writing his words temporarily until the companions' determination to memorize and write the Qur'an was met and the words of the Prophet, may Allah's prayers and peace be upon him, would not be mixed with the words of Allah Almighty, so the Qur'an would remain preserved from additions or omissions.
Fourth:
The Prophet, may Allah's prayers and peace be upon him, appointed a group of trustworthy and knowledgeable companions to write down the revelation, and they were known in their biographies as the scribes of the revelation, such as the four caliphs, Abdullah bin Amr bin Al-'As, Mu'awiyah bin Abi Sufyan, Zaid bin Thabit and others, may Allah be pleased with them all.
Fifth:
The Qur’an was revealed in seven letters, as was authenticated from the Prophet, may God bless him and grant him peace, in the hadith of Umar ibn al-Khattab, may God be pleased with him. Narrated by al-Bukhari (2287) and Muslim (818). These are the languages of the Arabs, which are known for their eloquence.
Sixth:
The Qur’an remained preserved in the hearts of the Companions who had memorized it and on skins and other things until the time of the Caliph Abu Bakr al-Siddiq (may Allah be pleased with him). During the Ridda Wars, many of the Companions who had memorized the Qur’an were killed, so Abu Bakr (may Allah be pleased with him) feared that the Qur’an would be lost and forgotten in the hearts of the Companions. He consulted the senior Companions to collect the entire Qur’an in one book so that it would remain preserved from being lost. He entrusted the task to the mountain of memorization, Zayd ibn Thabit (may Allah be pleased with him). Al-Bukhari narrated in his “Sahih” (4986) on the authority of Zayd ibn Thabit (may Allah be pleased with him), who said: Abu Bakr sent for me when the people of al-Yamamah were killed, and when ‘Umar ibn al-Khattab was with him, Abu Bakr (may Allah be pleased with him) said: Umar came to me and said: The killing of the reciters of the Qur’an has intensified on the day of Yamamah, and I fear that the killing of the reciters will intensify in the battlefields and a large part of the Qur’an will be lost. I think that you should order the collection of the Qur’an. I said to Umar: How can you do something that the Messenger of Allah (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) did not do? Umar said: By Allah, this is good. Umar kept on urging me on until Allah opened my heart to it, and I saw in that what Umar saw. Zaid said: Abu Bakr said: You are a wise young man and we do not accuse you. You used to write down the revelation for the Messenger of Allah, may Allah bless him and grant him peace, so follow up on the Qur’an and collect it. Zaid said: By Allah, if they had ordered me to move a mountain, it would not have been heavier for me than what he ordered me to do of collecting the Qur’an. I said: How can you do something that the Messenger of Allah (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) did not do? He said: By Allah, it is better. Abu Bakr kept on urging me on until Allah opened my chest to that which He opened the chests of Abu Bakr and Umar (may Allah be pleased with them). So I searched the entire Qur’an, collecting it from palm leaves, palm fronds, and the chests of men, until I found the end of Surat At-Tawbah with Abu Khuzaymah Al-Ansari. I did not find it with anyone else except him: “There has certainly come to you a Messenger from among yourselves. Grievous to him is what you suffer…” until the end of Bara’ah. The scrolls were with Abu Bakr until Allah caused him to die, then with ‘Umar during his lifetime. Then with Hafsa bint Umar, may Allah be pleased with him.
Usub: palm fronds, they used to scrape the fronds and write on the wide end.
Lakhaf: thin stones.
The companion Zaid bin Thabit, may Allah be pleased with him, had memorized the Qur’an, but he adopted a method of verification, so he would not accept to write a verse unless two of the companions testified that they had heard it from the Messenger of Allah, may Allah bless him and grant him peace.
This Mushaf remained in the hands of the caliphs until the time of the Rightly-Guided Caliph Uthman bin Affan, may Allah be pleased with him. The companions, may Allah be pleased with them, had dispersed throughout the country and they used to recite the Qur’an according to what they had heard from the Messenger of Allah, may Allah bless him and grant him peace, from the seven letters, so their students would each recite according to what their sheikh had recited.
If a student heard a reciter reciting differently from his own recitation, he would denounce him and his mistake, and so on until some of the Companions feared that a sedition would occur among the followers and those who came after them, so he decided to unite the people on one letter, which was the language of Quraysh, in which the Qur’an was first revealed, to remove the dispute and settle the matter. So he consulted Uthman, may God be pleased with him, and he agreed to this opinion.
You are not quoting a single verse clear,unambiguous,unequivocal saying former scriptures are corrupted.
Instead there are over 30 verses in Quran which refer to the former scriptures,people of the book.
Who are these people?
Which book?
Quran says it confirms the scriptures with them at the time.
If gospels are corrupt then you would find the information about 4 persons mentioned in Quran totally different from Gospels
If you as a Muslim. Is serious,find out about
Zechariah
John
Mary
Jesus
What Quran says about them and compare with Luke narative.
Islamic scholars had to find a way to make Muslims keep away from bible because there were places were Quran contradicts bible and Quran says if you doubt ask people of the reminder do they would be proved wrong.
Follow step by step and the bible has more detailed information than Quran .How can Quran supervise it?
Leave alone errors and contradictions s in Quran
Then as one has laid. Out well those scenarios after death of Mohamed in SIN.
Differences that were dealt away with by burning other copies meaning they were sufficiently different.
Please note that The Qur'an does not seriously contradict The Tanakh and Gospel and it deserves serious study beyond the superficial treatment by scholars of the modern age whom Mohammad warned us about.
Muhammad confirmed the gospels so if you say there is a contradiction youre saying allah and muhammad confirmed corrupted scriptures. And if you have a problem with the gospels written decades after Christ then how do you reconcile with the fact that Uthman burned arabic qurans including the qurans of Abdullah ibn Masud and Ubai bin Kab, 2 of the 4 people muhammad said to learn the quran from, and uthman standardized Zayeds quran who muhammad never mentioned. Theres a hadith where ibn Masud said he learned the quran fresh from muhammad the year he died when jibril recited it to muhammad twice and he memorised 70 suras before Zayed even knew what islam was. Another hadith where ibn masud said he doesnt accept Zayeds quran and if anyone knew more than him hed go learn from him and NONE of the companions of muhammad refuted him. And if ibn Masud and Ubai bin Kab leanred the quran from the same man how come Ibn Masud had 111 suras while Ubai bin Kab had 116 suras while the quran today only has 114. And if the quran is the same why did uthman force ibn Masud to give up his quran to the point he dragged him out of the mosque. broke 2 of his ribs and died of his injuries if the quran is the same. Thank Jesus that we never had an uthman who burned bibles and standardized 1 gospel. Isnt the quran the word of allah yet you have 40+ qiraat just from uthmans quran so how do you know you have the correct quran? We have nearly 30000 manuscripts of the gospels with over 10000 in latin, 5000 in greek and various other languages which even non christian scholars say is not corrupted. Let alone the fact that muhammad repeatedly confirms the torah and bible in the quran, you have no basis for this argument religiously or historically.
media.tenor.com/5Yk4elB-yfsAAAAM/no-way-dude-no.gif
Don't confuse yourself, dear fellow!
Let us take it one step at a time.
You began with, _"Muhammad confirmed the gospels"_
ASSUMING... yes... let us assume that what you wrote is true... what is this _"gospel that Muhammad"_ confirmed?
Is it the present-day Bible?
Is the present-day Bible the very same *Injeel* mentioned in the Quran?
What language is the word "Injeel?" Bible?
At the very least, for the word "Torah" in the Quran, there is a scripture also called the Torah!
_peace_
You are the one confused there was Hebrew and Aramaic then Greek.
Has your quran said the language is a problem?
The fact is in 7th century Mohamed in Quran says he confirms what is with them.
Even says if you doubt ask reading the book before you.
How can it tell him to ask those people if they don't have the book and they don't exist.?
Be serious.
Language is not mentioned.as an issue in former scriptures.ehy do you bring it up?
Do you guys make things clear for Allah?
Couldn't he tell us in Quran that
The Torah and gospel even psalms they have are corrupt and the language used is not correct..
Why is that you Muslims explain for Allah this corruption of former scriptures,?them talk about language for Allah.
You are like christians we ho explain trinity for God which is not there.
Then you speak like others don't know
Injeel is not Arabic it's borrowed from llatin evengelion
Torah is Hebrew for the law,teaching per say
First five books attributed to Moses
You even don't know history of the bible.
When was it complied?
When Quran says people of the book which book?
Which people?
Respond
Muslims you can never dodge the fact that the Quran confirms what was there at the time of Mohamed and that is the same Greek and Hebrew writings
Errors may be there and contradictions especially on
Narratives in
Samuel
Kings
Chronicles
And gospel narratives about details on crucifiction and death of Jesus.
These don't in anyway deal with all fundamental teachings in the Jewish faith nor in the christian faith based on the bible.
Do what are you saying,?
Jesus explicitly calls himself God when he doesn't refute Saint Thomas, who said: "My lord, my god,"😂. [John 20:28.]
John 20 17
@@aob7808 John 10:30.
@@theflaggedyoutuberii4311 Father + Son = 1. Trinity debunked. Because the Holy Spirit is not one with the two.
@aob7808 The Holy Spirit dwells in jesus, so he is.
@@theflaggedyoutuberii4311 Verse proof?
Here is a verse that proves literally the Father is GOD:
17 Jesus said, “Do not hold on to me, for I have not yet ascended to the Father. Go instead to my brothers and tell them, ‘I am ascending to my Father and your Father, to my God and your God.’”
Is Quran a complete book? Dose it have 133 chapters or what is now 114? Where are the 19 chapters? Because quran in based on code 19 and 7 if you devid 114 it comes 6 not 7. Where is chapter on salah? Where is the chapter on government? Where is the chapter on burial? Where is the chapter on circumcision? Chapter on Imamat khilafat ?When Allah said in Quran today I had completed the Deen of Islam quran was not compiled, hadith too not, successor was not appointed how it is possible, neither Allah is irresponsible nor Nabi s.a is.if say islam is perfect then why are so many differences. I think we had not recognise who are oolilamre, if you read the complete history of islam you will see specificully one family was kept away from the government and power they are the family of prophet. They had been killed, poison and jailed why? Because they are on Haq truth. We had also did what jews and Christian did. My conclusion read 39:18 al Quran.
Silence jahil shia. Not even the topic of this video, plus it's too difficult to read your yap because you lack basic grammar.
What is your proof for a conspiracy of the missing chapters? Any historical references? Or writings there of?
When you began with the question, _"Is Quran a complete book?"_ it proved to me that you have either not read the Quran or that you are unable to understand the Quran.
You do understand what the modern-day Arabic word _"Al-Kitab"_ means, right?
Now... please take time to ponder on this verse:
2:2 This is Al-Kitab (The Scripture, The Divine Book, The Legitimate Bible, Allah’s Book), no raib (doubtful matter or interpolation) therein, guidance to those who are Al-Muttaqun.
Okay... once you have understood that Al-Kitab is The Book, then please try understanding this verse:
_5:3 You are forbidden to eat the meat of any animal that dies by itself (dead body), blood, the flesh of swine (pork) and that on which any name other than Allah's has been invoked; also that which is strangled to death , killed by a violent blow, killed by a headlong fall and of those beaten or gored to death; and that which has been partly eaten by a wild animal unless you are able to slaughter it before its death; also that which is sacrificed on altars or is divided by raffling of arrows. All these are sinful acts. Today the unbelievers have given up all their hope of vanquishing your religion. Have no fear of them, fear Me. Today I have perfected your religion for you, completed my favor upon you and approved Al-Islam as a Deen (way of life for you). Anyone who is compelled by hunger to eat what is forbidden, not intending to commit sin, will find Allah Forgiving, Merciful_
When the Quran says, *...Today I have perfected your religion for you, completed my favor upon you and approved Al-Islam as a Deen (way of life for you)...*
Is there still any doubt in your heart that the Al-Kitab is indeed *a perfectly complete Book* during the lifetime of the prophet?
But you are a Sunni? Or a Shiite? Or any of the Sectarians?
Of course, you REJECT the Word of Allah and still maintain that the Quran is NOT a complete Book, right?
So, you invented these questions to cast doubt... _"Dose it have 133 chapters or what is now 114? Where are the 19 chapters? Because quran in based on code 19 and 7 if you devid 114 it comes 6 not 7"_
Also, why must there be _"a chapter on Salah"_ when SALAH is simply RECITING THE VERSES OF THE QURAN TO THE PEOPLE/MANKIND?
_peace_
*The Quran is the Word of Allah. But for the Sunnis, Shiites & Sectarians the Word of Allah is insufficient. They must have the Word of Bukhari, AbuMuslim, abuDawood & ibnMajah to complete the Word of Allah.*
Haha keep digging your hole. Your destination is hell. You have no evidence, no proof, you made an accusation and have nothing to substantiate it. You wasted your and your life.
@@Dr.SohailA.K do you know why there mustn't be a chapter of Salah? If you believe in Allah and his prophets and you are truthful