Michael Behe and Michael Medved Explore Secrets of the Cell

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 1 гру 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 13

  • @roger-bp1nr
    @roger-bp1nr 23 дні тому +7

    Behe illustrates the importance of humility in the discipline of science.

  • @douglasmacdonald1052
    @douglasmacdonald1052 23 дні тому +7

    Unreal! The more I hear, the more I am slammed with the idea that God makes everything from the beginning perfectly! Wonderfully and fearfully made!

  • @concken1
    @concken1 12 днів тому

    Great to hear Michael Medved again - I miss him on the radio these days.

  • @refuse2bdcvd324
    @refuse2bdcvd324 23 дні тому +7

    God's word is true. Darwin's word is fable.

  • @cptrikester2671
    @cptrikester2671 23 дні тому +9

    The atheists will always ask 'Where is the evidence of God?"
    They will also refuse to look at all the information and examples of reason to point to His existence.
    They don't really want to know.

    • @refuse2bdcvd324
      @refuse2bdcvd324 23 дні тому +7

      You can lead an atheist to logic, but you can't make him think.

    • @cptrikester2671
      @cptrikester2671 23 дні тому +3

      @refuse2bdcvd324 no drinking from the fountain of knowledge, only gargle.

  • @johnglad5
    @johnglad5 21 день тому

    Grace

  • @robertbeniston
    @robertbeniston 21 день тому +2

    First evolution did not occur and second this clotting system was designed. Where is your reasoning ability or understanding if you believe it came about by random chemical changes over time? How would this be possible scientifically?
    Darwin was ignorant of the science of the cell but that did not stop him from being an expert on the subject. The man had a very good imagination, that’s true but his motivation was entirely a desire to reject Gods role in creation. He was an atheist.

  • @samuellowekey9271
    @samuellowekey9271 19 днів тому

    Congragulations Pennsylvania on voting for Trump and free speech.

  • @RubiDan1
    @RubiDan1 22 дні тому

    Michael Medvid sounds like he is still under the evolution ideology. If he would look at the evidence for intelligent design and the concept of irreducible complexity, he might have an epitome about living organisms and DNA.