SIYI MK15 Digital Long Range System - Hands On Overview

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 15 лип 2024
  • ► SIYI MK15: s.click.aliexpress.com/e/_AmH6um
    📖 User Manual: drive.google.com/file/d/1dnkI...
    🎵 Music: bit.ly/AUDIIO
    ╔════╡My Gear╞═════════════════════╡
    ║ ► Goggles - FatShark HDO2 - bit.ly/HDO-2
    ║ ► RX Module - bit.ly/rapidFIRE
    ║ ► Radio Controller - Radiomaster TX16S: bit.ly/TX16S-MAX
    ║ ► Battery Charger - Hobbymate D6 Duo Pro: bit.ly/D6-Duo
    ║ ►Lipo Batteries: bit.ly/CNHL-BG
    ╚════════════════════════════════╡
    ╔═╦╗╔╦╗╔═╦═╦╦╦╦╗╔═╗
    ║╚╣║║║╚╣╚╣╔╣╔╣║╚╣═╣ → bit.ly/subscribeToMyUA-cam
    ╠╗║╚╝║║╠╗║╚╣║║║║║═╣ I Really Appreciate Your Support!
    ╚═╩══╩═╩═╩═╩╝╚╩═╩═╝
    ●▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬●
    Find Me On Facebook:
    ► / kremerfpv
    Instagram:
    ► / kremerfpv
    Please consider supporting my channel by using my affiliated links:
    * Banggood: bit.ly/BG-Kremer-FPV
    * HobbyCool: bit.ly/hobbycool
    * Gearbest: bit.ly/GB-Affiliate
    * RDQ: www.racedayquads.com?aff=26
    * Rotor Riot: store.rotorriot.com?aff=10
    It doesn't add any extra cost to you and will help me to grow my channel and bring you high quality updated content.
    Thanks in advance!
    Description:
    15KM 1080P SIYI MK15 Mini Handheld Radio System Transmitter Remote Control 5.5-Inch HB Screen FPV Android OS 2G RAM 16G ROM
    Max Transmission Distance: 15 km
    (unobstructed, free of interference)
    AG Control Range 3.5 km (flying at 3-meter height)
    Channels: 13
    Datalink Supported FC PIX, APM
    Video link: Supported
    GCS (Standard RTSP video
    stream)
    QGroundControl
    MissionPlanner
    Monitor: 5.5-inch High Definition and High Brightness LCD Touchscreen
    #SIYI #MK15 #DigitalLongRangeFPV
  • Наука та технологія

КОМЕНТАРІ • 67

  • @KremerFPV
    @KremerFPV  3 роки тому +1

    ► SIYI MK15: bit.ly/SIYI-MK15
    * IP Rating is 53 and not 58.

  • @johnk8825
    @johnk8825 3 роки тому +5

    Quite interesting Gal. No matter what the current performance specifications are, it's always good to see another HD entry appear. Additional competitors can only be good for us in the long run.

    • @KremerFPV
      @KremerFPV  3 роки тому

      Thanks John. It's a pretty interesting system and I hope to test it soon.

  • @MCsCreations
    @MCsCreations 3 роки тому +1

    Pretty interesting system indeed, Gal! Great review! 😃
    For quadcopters it wouldn't be useful... But for a slow rc truck, like a crawler? Probably! Who knows. 😊
    Anyway, stay safe there with your family! 🖖😊

    • @KremerFPV
      @KremerFPV  3 роки тому +1

      Thanks a lot Mario, you too :-)

  • @ChristopherF_1971
    @ChristopherF_1971 3 роки тому +1

    Got one on preorder. It will be going into one on my Mini Talon planes. This could be useful on our farm for crop surveying 200+acres.
    I'm currently using the DJI FPV system on a Mini Talon which works well enough but definitely could use higher definition and range plus DJI isn't really setup for mapping data and live feed telemetry like this has.
    This uses same encoder as DJI H.264 encode hardware so this COULD be interesting. My biggest attraction to this is its ability to run a sim so we can use the 4G network..

    • @KremerFPV
      @KremerFPV  3 роки тому

      That's very interesting. I am going to release a couple of videos about this system soon.
      Which flight controller are you going to use?

  • @ANDYCOSER
    @ANDYCOSER 3 роки тому

    Interesting, I think that this kind of system may be suitable for heavy drones. For example cinema drones or agricultural drones. Would be interesting to understand the flight controller features in ter of automatic operations like photogrammetry or something else.

  • @dronie574
    @dronie574 2 роки тому +1

    Hi! Very useful video. But can you tell me if the radiator part of the Receiver (including the fan) is open directly to the electronics inside or it is solid on that side ? (at 3:25). Im trying to make a water resistant cover for the Receiver.

  • @lleston8927
    @lleston8927 3 роки тому +4

    It will be nice if SIYI can shorten the size of the air unit so we can put it in a 5” quad for freestyling

    • @MatthewTaylor3
      @MatthewTaylor3 3 роки тому +1

      The latency alone will cause you to crash your quad

    • @SIYITech
      @SIYITech 3 роки тому

      Thanks for your suggestion, Mr Leston. This system should not be made for racing drones. Welcome to keep an eye on our future products!

    • @KremerFPV
      @KremerFPV  3 роки тому +1

      Yes, as I mentioned it's not for racing drones, but maybe SIYI will come up with another system in the future which will be compatible with our hobby.

  • @anthonystownsend
    @anthonystownsend 3 роки тому +1

    This is perfect for a ground vehicle, FPV tracked rover perhaps?

    • @KremerFPV
      @KremerFPV  3 роки тому

      Yep you can use it for that purpose as well.

  • @mrelashvili
    @mrelashvili Рік тому

    can you increase single camera resolution OR range, by not having the second camera?

    • @KremerFPV
      @KremerFPV  Рік тому

      As far as I can remember it should increase the picture quality.

  • @MrSiciro
    @MrSiciro Рік тому

    does the 2 slider buttons have a push function as well?

  • @jtsheedy
    @jtsheedy Рік тому

    Are you able to do channel mixing with this controller?

  • @EnglishTurbines
    @EnglishTurbines 3 роки тому +3

    Won't be installing that on a Whoop then...Niche Market...🤔🙄🇬🇧

  • @user-pc1mm5ph7b
    @user-pc1mm5ph7b 5 місяців тому +2

    Si丫i,mK15,拿來

  • @aviphysics
    @aviphysics 3 роки тому

    Interesting kind of. Just seems like it would need a really big plane to make the best use of it. Also, that lag looks pretty terrible.

    • @KremerFPV
      @KremerFPV  3 роки тому +1

      I will try to measure the latency on one of the next tests. You should also note that using two cameras together increases the latency.

    • @ChristopherF_1971
      @ChristopherF_1971 3 роки тому

      That's actually around same lag youd get with a DJI Mavic ect.. This is geared more towards large UAV'S either multiRototored or Fixedwing.. OpenHD latency is worse then this and I found it unreliable personally. Although it wouldn't suprise me if that's what this systems based off of. Hmmm

  • @RubyS.1
    @RubyS.1 3 роки тому

    Even at 180ms latency if it's consistent it's a pretty decent and clean setup. Be curious to see what you do with it.

    • @KremerFPV
      @KremerFPV  3 роки тому

      More tests will be up soon :-)

  • @shashank.m.rdronepiolet4712
    @shashank.m.rdronepiolet4712 3 роки тому

    Please give this full review of clear range in vedio quality?

  • @yannickg6904
    @yannickg6904 3 роки тому +1

    When I purchased my V2 goggles YESTERDAY, DJI was still the only HD option, lol.

    • @thirtythreeeyes8624
      @thirtythreeeyes8624 3 роки тому +1

      There was SharkByte too

    • @yannickg6904
      @yannickg6904 3 роки тому

      @@thirtythreeeyes8624 You're right, I almost forgot. Now comes the wait, I don't have anything to pair the goggles to yet.

    • @Hughjanus720
      @Hughjanus720 3 роки тому

      Aomway, fatshark, insight, OPENHD,herelink You clearly didn't research that well lol

    • @yannickg6904
      @yannickg6904 3 роки тому

      @@Hughjanus720 TBH, my decision was already made, lol. But I welcome more options.

    • @mingchenzhang3113
      @mingchenzhang3113 3 роки тому

      @@Hughjanus720 There is also the old DJI ocusync hd system before DJI fpv system.

  • @shashank.m.rdronepiolet4712
    @shashank.m.rdronepiolet4712 3 роки тому

    Can u make range test and vedio and data range exactly??

    • @KremerFPV
      @KremerFPV  3 роки тому

      Yes, more videos will be out soon.

  • @mironuw6917
    @mironuw6917 3 роки тому +1

    HDMI adapter doesn't work with Canon R5 and Canon 5dmk3

    • @mironuw6917
      @mironuw6917 3 роки тому

      More precise it doesn't work when camera is in PAL you have to change to NTSC system to get video from Canon cameras

    • @KremerFPV
      @KremerFPV  3 роки тому

      Thanks!

    • @mironbogacki7295
      @mironbogacki7295 2 роки тому

      @@mironuw6917 So If you are in Europe you can't use MK15. HDMI adapter is faulty !!!

    • @VillainState
      @VillainState 2 роки тому

      @Miron UW did you like the MK15? I’ve had a VD32 & having heaps of trouble with it so I’m upgrading to MK15 & hope it’s trouble free

  • @andreasl5077
    @andreasl5077 2 роки тому

    Did you also tried to implement a 3rd party IP Camera > We wonna implement a IR Camera (with an Rasp.)

  • @jorgeromero4680
    @jorgeromero4680 3 роки тому

    OMG from where did it came this?! Is this a competitor of dji? That's completely unexpected i was expecting news from fatcat and news came from an unknown (?) company

    • @KremerFPV
      @KremerFPV  3 роки тому

      SIYI is not a new company and they actually have a vast experience making radio systems.

    • @ChristopherF_1971
      @ChristopherF_1971 3 роки тому

      I'd guess this is more based off of OpenHd ecosystem. Definitely not near what DJI digital is. Although this imo could be a better choice for surveying crops. I've built and used Openhd not to long ago and found it was way to unreliable and laggy. This imo is a refined version of Openhd ecosystem.
      That's what a lot of these companies do. They let the Open source devs do all the work then swoop in and build a refined version and try to make cheese. JS.

  • @michaellivingston7732
    @michaellivingston7732 Рік тому

    How long does it take to ship out to usa

    • @KremerFPV
      @KremerFPV  Рік тому

      I am not sure, please reach out to SIYI and ask them.

  • @pritambasumatary6503
    @pritambasumatary6503 2 роки тому

    does it work with 4s lipo

  • @user-pc1mm5ph7b
    @user-pc1mm5ph7b 7 місяців тому +1

    二郎神李金雄

  • @mariofpv
    @mariofpv 3 роки тому +2

    180ms? That’s a lie. At 6:28 I can clearly see that the latency is near 500ms (0,5 second)! I have OpenHD system and I can tell that this video system has 4x the latency of OpenHD which is 125ms.

    • @SIYITech
      @SIYITech 3 роки тому

      Of course, there are many good image transmission systems. But, could it be a little arbitray to leave a such a judgement by "eye test"? The 180 ms latency declared by SIYI is an average latency counted by repeated timer tests. In an ideal condition, it reaches to lower than 150 ms. And, please pay attention that it is the latency from camera to the Android application. Not to mention that Gal was doing a dual video stream test at 6:28. If there are people who thinks that OpenHD and SIYI system are direct competitors, welcome to do some solid and fair tests on all specs, resolution, frame rate, latency, range, etc.

    • @KremerFPV
      @KremerFPV  3 роки тому +1

      I will perform a latency test soon. There is no need to call it a lie as judging from a few frames in a video is not a very scientific way of testing it out :-)
      As mentioned in the video, more tests and videos will be up soon.

    • @mariofpv
      @mariofpv 3 роки тому

      @@KremerFPV please perform a flight latency test before suggesting what a company is claiming.
      I’m not calling you a lier, you’re a honest person and I have been following you for years. It’s just companies tend to lie just to sell their product. Look at the new Runcam MIPI camera for example. They were saying that it supports Raspberry Pi until we emailed them. Then they removed from the specs their claim.😊
      My point is that as reviewers we should first do our own tests and then publish data to the public that they trust us.

    • @mariofpv
      @mariofpv 3 роки тому +1

      @@SIYITech I’m sorry but I can’t trust you as you clearly want to sell your product.
      All I know is that OpenHD can go 40km distance and still has HD video. Judging by facts, video proofs.
      But we would be more than happy to see an OpenHD solution made by your company.😊🍻

    • @KremerFPV
      @KremerFPV  3 роки тому +1

      @@mariofpv Point taken Mario. Thanks again for your continuous support.

  • @SPotter1973
    @SPotter1973 3 роки тому +2

    A little bit cheaper than herelink.

    • @KremerFPV
      @KremerFPV  3 роки тому

      Yes its price is very competitive.

  • @icu-drone3442
    @icu-drone3442 3 роки тому +1

    Air unit is too heavy. For me it's a no go :(

    • @KremerFPV
      @KremerFPV  3 роки тому

      Well this product is not for everyone.