5 Freightliners VS 5 Volvos - Millage, Fuel Efficiency, Downtime Test (What do Fleets Prefer?)
Вставка
- Опубліковано 25 сер 2022
- Which truck will reign supreme in having better fuel efficiency, Downtime and Repairs and Maintenance. Freightliners VS Volvos?
In this video, Ronen wants to show you guys which truck truly is more fuel efficient. So he compiled a whole years worth of data on 5 Freightliners and 5 Volvos from ET's yard and how they performed.
How much millage was driven, The cost of Fuel annually, and how much of a differance is the Volvos VS Freightliners. is there a diffeance in downtime, Rapirs and maintenance?
Which truck has better fuel efficiency? How much does the difference equate to in money? Watch the video to find out!!
Subscribe to our channel for entertaining and informational content on trucking, and hit the 🔔 icon to get notified when we release a new video!
🚛 Buying a new truck? We've negotiated with 4 different lenders to compete for your financing!
⬇️ Fill out this form and make them compete for your business!!! ⬇️
www.ettransport.ca/commercial...
#Freightliner #Volvo #Trucking
For all sponsorship inquiries:
Sponsorship@ettransport.ca - Авто та транспорт
Cascadia is a fuel champ. I'm driving a 2020, 12spd/2.64/455hp. For the month of August, I logged 9,115 miles with averages of 26k lb loads, 800 mile trips, 63 mph cruise speed, for an average MPG of 9.3
lolololol
26 000 lbs is just about half a full commercial load.
@@shelbynamels973 averages my guy.....but even at 44k I haven't been below 8.4mpg
63mph??? I'm the end of the year annually you losing out on more loads and eating your drive time for driving so slow to save on fuel..... do the math in the end of a 12 month period you'll lose more then you'll save on fuel... unless you do short runs then it might balance out or if the rate per miles pay well to
@@78043jimenez I've done 60, 63, 70.....you know how many miles I get? The same.....only difference is the amount of fuel burned. I've learned that the world of trucking isn't perfect......meaning, all I'm doing when I go 70 is getting to my destination faster only to wait.....hurry up and wait! Why burn more fuel, just to wait and end up with the same amount of miles at the end of the week? Doesn't make sense. If I have shippers and receivers robbing me of time all week long, which I don't get paid for.....I'm sure as shit not going to burn up more fuel for them
The Volvo has a smaller engine, but 200 pounds more torque wich makes a big difference when pulling hills,but you burn more fuel ofcourse 😁That 505 hp in the Cascadia maybe gives better acceleration, but the torque setting gives the better fuel mileage. But if they do only big hills with heavy loads ,the Volvo I think would get better fuel economy
Thank you for sharing such valuable data. Very generous of you!
This Chanel is so amazing. I just love your videos.
Great video. I’ve always been curious about this topic.Keepum comin. Thanks
Great video. Thanks. Numbers don't lie. I like both trucks but, numbers don't lie and maintenance is an even bigger distinction.
You always provide the best information do you guys do comparison between Freightliner and Kenworth?
Love the video Ronen thank you
Excellent video thanks for sharing.
I've been waiting for that video to come out for a while.
We are averaging 8.5 mpg with very little idle time pulling around 22k. This includes mountain driving in CO and interstate driving. This is over 6k miles in a 2023 Volvo VNL 740 without skirts and running open lug 11R 24.5 tires. We average around 70 mph on the interstate, typically cruising 67 mph but faster in MT where speed limit is 80. Our truck is equipped with 12 speed auto, 500hp DD13, 2.64 rears. I was initially disappointed in mileage but not after seeing this. I expected a little better with such a light load. We do hand calculations too and compare them to the computer. It’s typically pretty close, less than .5 mpg difference. The Volvo is more comfortable by far. I do run Amsoil diesel treatment.
OMG 77 MPH, you are a potensional killer on the road.
@@Volkpilot That should have been 67mph not 77mph.
Great review lots of good tarmac homework. Thanks.
thx for the cut and dried comparison !
Thank you very much very helpful video
Great info thank you .
Great Video..just finding your channel...I'm a new subscriber as welll...keep up the awesome work
i own a freightliner 2022 cascadia and the truck has 350,000 miles. i had zero problems. let me say that again I HAD ZERO PROBLEMS. this truck is amazing. also my average mpg is about 9mpg but thats because i always run 65 mph
Superb..great use of your super powers
Love these videos, thanks foe the information
Glad you like them!
One obvious reason for the difference is the Volvo has higher torque. Higher the torque lower the mpg you will have. Also on the freightliner you have the smart cruise. It goes into coast mode using gps on locations of hills. Volvo doesn’t have that. You should of included the speeds your trucks are governed. That plays a big part as does idle time. Our Volvos run in the 9mpg range but ours is the VNL 860 with the crawler gear technology. But ours is governed at 65mph.
I am a Freightliner fan. Now, more then ever! Information Video
Great video
Brilliant channel
I use only PACCAR trucks. Peterbilt and Kenworth. They cost more but are worth it.
Lol, five 2022 auto Peterbilt and five trucks down for two week in the first 3 months absolute junk
Paccar is trash had nothing but bad luck and my buddy had a 200k miles one and already wants to get rid of it due to no parts.
I have 2016 Volvo with 776K on it. I bought it used with 720K, had all new injectors, seats, etc etc cost me a small fortune but I feel I have an almost new truck. I'm a more senior driver, drive the speed limit or less, and I'm getting 8.4 or if I have a very heavy load and I'm driving through the mountains of PA or Virginia, I'll get mid 7's. The truck is very comfortable for OTR, so that's my 10 cents on that, You have some great videos, very informative, thank you. Andy.
Drive the speed limit? Lol 🤡
@@youtubesurfer1022 probably a company driver that doesn't realize the fuel savings. lmao i would be mad too if i got paid .50 cents a mile.
@@aj-sv6bb 2019 389 2ws glider food grade tank, fuck your speed limit bullshit and I’m still laughing all the way to the bank and waving blowing your doors off while you’re doing 62. Know you’re worth and you wouldn’t have to drive that slow, or just stop being a dock jockey and you wouldn’t make shit money
@@aj-sv6bb Since i don't pay for fuel taking longer just costs me home time or money if i could have done something worth more with the extra time. Fuel efficiency only concerns me if it means i won't make the destination or waste more time getting a little extra fuel between depots. If i was paid per hour then i would go slower. The boss chose to pay trip rates not hourly. Why do you expect company drivers to cost themselves?
You need the t680 and pete 579 too
He's already done those and they get 5.5 to 6.2 miles per gallon
I agree. I drive a 2020 579 Pete and I have averaged 8.2 mpg over the last 2 years. Automatic governed at either 65 / 67 mph depending on my Fuel efficiency.
I have before owner operator spec t680 2020 paccar 510 hp no restrictions I'm pulling reefer spread axle . The most I see in that time is in the summer 7.5 in the winter 6.2 , 6.5 by ifta running most the time 68
Better w900
Agreed and with X15 efficiency series
Seeing ET trucks here in Bangor Maine. Very cool. By the way- I'm a company driver and I drive a 2021 VNL760- You are spot on about the Volvos. I get about 7.5 when I'm lucky.
Great comparison, great video. I would like to see a Cummins x15 in there somewhere I know maybe your fleet doesn't have any Cummins but would love to see how it compares to your Volvo and Cascadia... Great job on the video
Thinking of buying one 2024 Freightliner with x15 Cummins
Could you help me buddy ??
I heard both good and bad things for Cummins and Detroit in Freightliner
@@sashasandeepverma5835 I am without a doubt a Cummins guy all the way. They could burn a bit more fuel than maybe the Detroit, but not by much to make a big difference for me. I do like Volvo engines as well. The reality is there are really no bad engines out there for new trucks, some are just better than others. For me, it is just a comfort to know that more mechanics would work on a Cummins before a Detroit. Open the hood and see a beautiful Red Cummins is all I need. So if you're going to get the Cascadia, I would go with the X15 before I would get a Detroit. 🙂
This was very informative. Do you have videos for cascadia Vs Mack ?
So I've watched alot of your videos and I always,always like them! I come back and most of the time the like is GONE! I've noticed it with this,I watched yesterday.
Absolutely love my mans Freightliner
Volvo all the way. So comfortable.
But short on adequate legroom for taller drivers.
I’m owner operator. I will never go Volvo.less sale in USA less money for upgrades .at 2018 they both had a new looking model. But Volvo only changed engine hood.😂😂😂😂13 litres engine using more fuel than 15 litres dd15 😂😂😂 now 2025 Volvo copying Freightliner common rail engine ，gear shifter . Even folding bed😂😂😂😂if it s really good why Walmart don’t has even 1 of them 😂😂😂😂😂
did you not watch the video? The Freightliners are way better in every way. maybe slightly more comfort but this is a business not a vacation.
I’m getting 8.8 miles per gallon at the speed of 70 miles with Volvo 860
Thanks for sharing!
Thanks for this video...👍 I agree about not having payments etc...my 20 year old Pete 379 has a 1.8 million mile CAT C15 single turbo specd at 475hp, 3.36 gears and a 13 speed...i average about 5 to 5.25 mpgs, and i run pretty flat interstate 75% of the of the time...cruise at 70-72 mph at 1450 rpms...but no emissions issues and no payments...shes very reliable for 1.8 million and one in frame overhaul...i can park it when ever i want and make a monthly insurance payment only...in todays market its probably very stressful to make expensive new truck payments and stay afloat...I do spend a little in repairs and maintenance but I like to stay away from tow bills even though I have towing in my insurance...and i try to do shop time with planned home time etc
Glad to see other fleets are consistently getting 8+ out of New Cascadias, especially without going for a max efficiency spec. My '19 was getting 9+ but I had super singles, more aero bits on the cab & trailers, and the truck was only set for about 400hp. Not sure on the rear axles, it was an integrated powertrain so I believe the effective rear end ratio was 2.64 same as yours but I'm not 100% on that. Sadly the fleet I was with moved away from that max aero spec from drivers damaging all the little rubber bits that push those numbers up fractions of a percentage point each, since replacing them often cost more than they saved in fuel. Even still, with the powertrain set up for efficiency averaging 8.5 to 8.7 is totally doable in the modern Cascadia even without the extra aero bits.
I can get at least 7 mpg in a w900 it’s doable but as the old adage goes drive slow that’s the only way, but if your in hills it’s very tough
The 2020 Cascadia I had was very easy to get 8mpg, easily saw 10mpg if I slowed down and drove slow. It's frustrating, but slowing down is the single most effective way to increase mpg. It had a 10 speed, I bet a 13 speed would have gotten another .5mpg easily.
Yea as a fleet mechanic i mostly remove aero stuff after it gets damaged case the drivers tend to break em and it cost more than they save especially that lower lip on the new cascadia
@@totemnihil6099 It's so frustrating to watch fleet drivers trash them or the back of cab fairings without a care while I would give my left kidney to have a max efficiency spec like that right now.
@@totemnihil6099 My father was a fleet mechanic for 40 years!!! Thank You for your hard work!!
Please compare Freightliner cascadia vs T680 next generation next
For many truckers now i mean 5k is 5k but now with the long haul going the way it is and the pay they would rather see which truck has the better interior that they will be living in… which seems to be the draw to the volvo from what ive seen.
Sleepers; VNL860 is far superior interior size and amenities compared to the Tiny Freightliner Sleeper with no options for anything bigger.
Another great video could be : A comparison between purchasing the trucks/ leasing or renting from company's like penske and Ryder. Company's go both routes from what I have seen would be nice to see the numbers and what's worth more in what scenario for a brand new company.
I agree. I'd love to see a "Pros Vs Cons" lease Vs purchase.
Penske/Ryder , Can u do owner operator by renting out those trucks?
@@Jaspreetkhokhar yes I believe so, penske does state on their website be ir 1 truck or more they have the options for it. You'll have to contact and try asking, I will be doing the same when I'm.looking to get my own equipment.
@@saqibsiddiqi6684 yes , same plan. good experiment before investing on s New Truck.
Customers are a lot happier when their stuff is delivered on time. If you aren't able to re power a load during a breakdown, the 3 day versus 14 day repair time gets huge for time sensitive ( just in time) customers.
Fascinating statistics
Ronen, Thank you buddy. Invaluable info.
Good Video
Thanks for watching!
This was fantastic. This was a good "bean counter" analysis. Now I would like to hear which the drivers prefer. Which has the better sleeper, best ride, best features etc. I'm a Cascadia fan but even I can't deny by the number you see on the road something attracts companies to Volvo. If it's not the operating costs what is it?
Volvo is a nicer looking truck in and out has a better higher class interior. More options has a smoother ride. It's a driver comfort issue
Volvo rides, handles, and shifts so so smooth
this is an old video by the time I found it. why I believe the cascadia will will the fuel mileage debate, to get the real cost to compare, the empty miles vs loaded miles combined with total weight for loads. I do like the video.
Freightliner is an underrated truck from my experience they are much better than International
Both trucks are nice I’m partial to Volvo but due my
Own truck peterbilt 389 with a Cummins X15
I think you have to look at some of the intangibles
Such as safety - Volvo is the only truck to have an air bag
The amount of crash testing that Volvo does contributes to there design such items like their engine is designed to go under the frame rails instead of sliding into the drivers compartment in the case of a frontal collision
Volvos cab is also significantly less noisy and transmits less vibration therefore the driver has less fatigue by the end of the day
Fleet companies don't care about drivers comfort or safety. All they care about is how much money can they save.
I love the both truck s
Been watching alot of videos of guys showing load board rates/miles. Some even back to 2019 and those were some eye popping videos. Sub $2 per mile was the norm.
Where i work they are switching from Freightliner to Volvos . Comparing apples to apples on the same decaded run I do ever week the Volvo demo truck got 8.3 miles per gallon running 70 mph. The Cascade i have been runing with a Cummins 450 and 10 speed automation had been getting around 7.9 mpg.The company I work for only 8 drivers. The main reason for the change is waiting time as long as 2 weeks to fix problems with the computer on the transmission and other warranty problems causing too much downtime. I would be nice to see a review on the percentage of warranty problems on each truck.
Freightliners are not THAT reliable, they are just easy to fix because of parts availability. Volvos are far more reliable but parts availability is much lower and they are much more expensive.
Ur a good guy ronen
1 important detail you missed, because of the 0.5mpg you will keep volvos for the double amount of years than cascadias !
Will you?
@NorthAmerican-Trucking-News current volvo 1.9 milion ! No rebuild
Good thing I own a Freightliner! 😊
One crucial determining factor left out here is average speed. Obviously if you’re averaging 70mph you’ll burn more fuel than averaging 60mph
Average doesn't mean anythhing. You can run 8 hours on 75 and then stuck on start stop traffic on 10-20 mph for 2 hours. You will average more than somebody doing 60 for 11 hours.
@@chrishar110 u misssed the point buddy
You missed the meaning of word average. You should explain better what you want to say.
no. I made my point. You will burn more fuel averaging 70 than you will 60. I made it point and it stands. Idc about your extra what ifs. I run otr in all 48 states a strategically route around major cities and/or cities known for traffic. 9 times out of 10 if im sitting in traffic it’s bc of an accident or construction So you’re “scenario” of sitting in traffic burns more fuel is something that happens a couple times a week at most. when the weeks over your truck isn’t averaging 10-20mph is it?
Have you ever tried a Cascadia with a DD13-505 for comparison to the DD15?
Thanks for explaining but please mention the reatio of the cascadia S well I like freightliner always
What is the governor in those truck or how fast you guys go? And how heavy the load are?
If possible, plz make a video about International trucks as well
Freightliner got the freight shaker for a reason, fuel efficiency is on weight of loads too plus you get a lot more torque in Volvo. Freightliner only has a advantage to when it comes to parts. I prefer Volvo overall in quality, power, design & silence inside of the cab. Great video btw from your fleet!
Thanks for sharing
Did you mention the cost to buy the trucks?
Which one is less and by how much?
I'd like to know which one does better on the heavier loads. I haul bulk commodities. Your average freight is 26k mine is closer to 54k. And do your trucks have apu's?
as an o/o that savings in fuel would cover my california reg ($2800) hvut ($550) and a years worth of my cell phone ($90/mo) and id still have $1200 left over….so it makes a difference. thanks for sharing that information!
does ET run single wide tires w/self inflation? what about aero kits?
Agree with Brian's October 25, 2021 video, 1850 ft.lb is a silly high spec. for the Volvo.
Do you have any freightliner's with the DD13 engine for comparison? I actually prefer those to the DD15. Great video.
dd15 is much better on fuel than a dd13.
I’ll take that Volvo over the Freightliner, but my favorite truck is the Kenworth T680. Never been a fan of Freightliners.
Great analysis, though not exactly fair as you specified your Volvos with the version of the D13 which is tuned to the max with 1850 ft.lb torque for some reason and you should have specified version which are more closely tuned to the 1650 ft.lb that your DD-15s are tuned to because you seem happy with that. Those more economy oriented tunings of D13 obviously exist. Even so, would have only closed the gap and there still issues of parts and service availability so the conclusion is still reasonable, not the sweetest ride on the market but Freightliner is the market leader due to fuel economy and service availability.
It seems that the 5 volvos you picked had a large variance in mileage for those 12 months. Was there a more even set of 5 volvos in mileage driven in those 12 months?
absolutely
On empty no. Hills I get over 8 pmg on my Pete 579 13 speed. Loaded now with hills 5. 5 to about 7
What’s the rear end ratio of that truck? Engine?
I was wondering how you measured the mpg. Was it off the ECM or was it calculated miles/gallon off fill ups?
What is the upfront cost difference on the Freightliners vs the Volvo's? I know long term the fuel costs and repair costs are a bigger concern, but it would be nice to look at it as more of a "life of the truck" thing. What is the residual value difference on the trucks (I know tough to do on 2020 trucks).
Volvo is a significantly cheaper brand whether it's new or used. I'm currently leasing a Western Star DD13.
Blatantly wrong lol it's not significantly cheaper. They both hover in the same market demographic. Traditionally a cascadia is cheaper
Can u plzz do 2021 and 2022 cascadia mpg analysis in ET
I'd like to see a comparison of accident rates. I've noticed it's always the Freightliners that run off the road in snowstorms, often with Punjab drivers who have never seen snow.
Are you sure those are Gen 5 engines in the Cascadias?
Being 2020 models, they were most likely built in 2019 and the Gen 5 wasn’t available until the beginning of 2021.
What size tires?
DT12- OD or direct?
Volvos- TC or VGT?
Details are important.
Accurate
Are the trucks running the exact same tires? Make and model?
Comment below Ronin do comparisons on t680 and pete 579
What platform do you use to track fuel consumption and revenue?
I preferred Freightliner, of course much better 😅
Excellent video very informative I have a question can I buy a Volvo with DD15 engine or a cummins engine Will it help with the fuel consumption I drove a Volvo and I drove a freightliner Volvos are super comfortable
Detroit DD15s are Daimler exclusive (Freightliner/Western Star). You might do a little better with a Cummins X15 Efficiency but I doubt it, and you'll be adding a good chunk of weight for no real gain in anything other than power and better parts availability. Conversely if you step down to the Volvo D11 you might gain a little MPG but you'll sacrifice your performance on hills. Not bad if you're only running fairly local with no major grades but you'll have a hard time selling it to anyone that isn't similarly specialized. D13/iShift is going to generally be your best efficiency powertrain for an OTR Volvo truck.
What tire size you use?
Have you tried the Prostar from International?
Hi Ronen, Would you be able to do a video on Western Star 49X.
Thanks.
I wouldn't expect Ronen's company to run any of those by their own choice. For OTR use, they're basically a more expensive but less aerodynamic Cascadia. Same powertrain and sleeper, but a square hood, vertical exhausts, and no skirts. They're better for certain more severe applications like logging and construction where ground clearance & engine cooling matters more than aerodynamics, but for pulling vans from warehouse to warehouse you're just paying a premium to have a more old-school look.
ET Transport are you Volvos equip with the D13TC engine?
Were these volvos with the D13 TC or the old VGT? The TC crushes DD15. What about idle time? Were the vovllvos equipped with idle fee HVAC? Your RAR is also mid for both brands. You could do a lot lower. Also, parts availability is poor for both these days... Just try to find a one box for Freightliner.
AGREED!! The TC is way ahead of the old VGT motors
Agreed. The D13 is inferior to the DD15, but the new D13TC is unbeatable!
Max gross weight, 62mph, 9.0-10.0mpg all day.
Having driven both I prefer the Volvo as it is more comfortable and has a smoother ride and the turning radius seems better. COMFORT as a company driver is the highest issue with me. Every other concern you mentioned is NOT my problem. As a company driver I want the best driving environment possible, and Volvo delivers.
Try running the Cummins ISX 15 in the Volvo's. they get better fuel mileage when coupled with an Eaton Fuller 18 speed manual As far as down time I have see Cascadia drivers waiting up to 2 weeks to get parts especially if it's the Control Module. BTW did any of the Volvo's have an APU? My APU of choice is #GreenAPU.
How would you feel if you geared the trucks to 2.15 gear ratio for better mpg
It all depends on each drivers foot
I just acquired a 2023 Cascadia that is an automatic Detroit. Getting 6.5 currently and was hoping for a lot better. Will it improve drastically as it gets broken in? Hope so...
That entirely depends on how you spec’d the truck. What’s the differential ratio on your truck? What’s the engine under the hood? Do you have an overdrive or a direct drive transmission?
I have a 2014 Cascadia with DD13(450hp, 1650 torque) and a 10 speed manual transmission with overdrive
Thank you Konan Barbarian! Amazing video!!!
Which one is the better freight liner engine DD13 or DD15
On Prarie runs the cascades get around 29 l/100 km and my volvo gets around 33 l/100 km pulling 40,000 lbs. However in the rockies the cascades get 44 l/100 km and volvo get 42 l/100 km. I suspect the slightly higher torque is a factor hear. I am spect differently then your volvos. I run 500 hp 1850 ft-ibs of torque. Most of the loads I pull are heavier at 55 to 60000 lbs. The new style volvos have bad electronics, this is 90percent of my downtime. I didn't find the freightliner to be any better. Locally I prefer the volvo dealers over freightliner, better service. I think for higher torque jobs, volvo is the better choice. BTW are freightliner have 1550 ft-lbs of torque and I have scene these trucks as low as 22 l/100 km. I can't come close to that with the volvo. I would have to go to a d11 and the dd15 will circles around that engine.
I may have missed it but what are they governed down at
Theres so many variables
Victor the Volvo VNL 860, Frank the Freightliner Cascadia, William the Western Star 57X, Peter the Peterbilt 579, Mack Anderson the Mack Anthem and Ken Wilkinson the Kenworth T680.
Were all the trucks governed? If so, Are they governed at the same speed?
1850Tq compared to 1650bis a BIG difference.
It also wasn't stated if this was the D13-TC motor or the old spec 455...? The TC motor is Huge difference in Fuel Efficiency and eliminates the Variable Vane turbo for a stronger and more reliable ball bearing Forged compressor traditional turbo.
both of thoose are rookie numbers the volvo FH 16 750 makes 2618 ft lbs
ARE YOU ABLE TO DIFFERENTIATE WHAT FUEL ECONOMY WOULD BE RUNNING LIGHT LOADS? WOULD THAT HAVE A DRASTIC DIFFERENTIAL IN FUEL ECONOMY/?
Did both trucks have APUs in them?
So the Freightliner is all around a better financial investment. First of all, they cost a lot less than a Volvo. The maintenance is easier and less expensive. They get better fuel mileage. So this tells me the only reason someone would have a Volvo is because it's more luxurious, nicer more appropriated interior better fit and finish and a smoother ride personally, I think I'd rather save more money than just have a nicer looking truck