I agree with Finn Roberts. He saw it coming from the boundary and watched it onto his bat. Also it should’ve been only five runs because, as in the law book, he hadn’t finished the run before the obstruction was performed meaning it should’ve been a single and a four.
@@lpbrodie3502 But the law says 'if the batsmen had crossed at the "instance of the throw *or act* ". So I'd argue that the "act" in this case was it hitting Stokes' bat, not the throw itself, in which case the 6 runs awarded was quite correct.
So say for example, a ball is being fielded back towards the wicket, and a batsman has an angle on the ball suitable to hit it away. If it is reasonably likely to have hit the stumps, this would not be obstruction, but a legit defense? Even if it leads to an additional run?
@@avgictfan there's no way this is the first time it's come up in a major match, right? It seems like it would be happening all the time if the batsmen could get away with it
fun fact : 2019 world cup won by england because batsman something like this happened 1:49 , runners bat was accidently hit the ball while ball was getting to the wicket keeper to out the runner but runners bat hit the ball and ball goes for boundry and england get 4 more run and they won the world cup . name of batsman was ben stocks . serch this "Ball Hits Ben Stokes For Accidental 'Six'! | ICC Cricket World Cup 2019" for actual video
People saying Ben Stokes are idiots. No way was the Ben Stokes incident a deliberate attempt to obstruct the field, he didn't change direction and he was attempting to make his ground.
@TheSmithersy Hitting the ball twice with the bat is legal if you are defending your wicket. So Ho Thi's question is a very good one. The relevant law is 33.2.2.2 which says a fair catch includes situations when "a fielder catches the ball after it has been lawfully struck more than once by the striker, but only if it has not been grounded since it was first struck." So the answer to Ho's question is that yes, you could be caught and given out, as long as the ball hadn't hit the floor between the first and second hit.
How can a batsman having wilfully hit the ball a second time to stop it from landing on his wickets not be classified as out hitting the ball twice? When he does this it is certainly not accidental. It's no different to reaching down and wilfully touching the ball with your hands to defend your wickets, and both of these are supposed to be out.
You are specifically allowed to hit the ball twice with the bat (or any part of your body except your hand) if you are doing it to defend your wicket. See law 34 which contains the phrase "except for the sole purpose of guarding his/her wicket."
Why is this animation better than don bradman games
Inzamam Ul Haq
Obstracting the crowd
He obstructed the field with his bat
I was about to mention him
🤣🤣🤣
Mohd hafeez
Ben Stokes DID NOT obstruct the ball deliberately.
It was Umpire's fault to give 6 runs instead of 5 and ICC rules mistake to make it legal
@BullseyeBullsclaw it's umpire's fault and ICC rules fault. The players have to follow the rules that are set before the match
Ben stokes in the final
Finn Roberts did not!
I agree with Finn Roberts. He saw it coming from the boundary and watched it onto his bat. Also it should’ve been only five runs because, as in the law book, he hadn’t finished the run before the obstruction was performed meaning it should’ve been a single and a four.
Yes
Lol
@@lpbrodie3502 But the law says 'if the batsmen had crossed at the "instance of the throw *or act* ". So I'd argue that the "act" in this case was it hitting Stokes' bat, not the throw itself, in which case the 6 runs awarded was quite correct.
Alex Ross was given out obstructing the field in a Big Bash League match against the Hobart Hurricanes @ the Gabba on the 10th of January 2018.
Ben Stokes
So say for example, a ball is being fielded back towards the wicket, and a batsman has an angle on the ball suitable to hit it away. If it is reasonably likely to have hit the stumps, this would not be obstruction, but a legit defense? Even if it leads to an additional run?
CSLFiero If he deliberately hits it, then ball becomes dead. But if it is by accident, the ball is still in play, even if it leads to additional runs.
Ben stokes won the 2019 final with this😂
Bro you fu*king predicted the final instance of wc 2019 final 💀
@@avgictfan there's no way this is the first time it's come up in a major match, right? It seems like it would be happening all the time if the batsmen could get away with it
fun fact : 2019 world cup won by england because batsman something like this happened 1:49 , runners bat was accidently hit the ball while ball was getting to the wicket keeper to out the runner but runners bat hit the ball and ball goes for boundry and england get 4 more run and they won the world cup . name of batsman was ben stocks . serch this "Ball Hits Ben Stokes For Accidental 'Six'! | ICC Cricket World Cup 2019" for actual video
People saying Ben Stokes are idiots. No way was the Ben Stokes incident a deliberate attempt to obstruct the field, he didn't change direction and he was attempting to make his ground.
He did obstruct the field in a one day series against Australia in 2017 (correct me if I'm wrong on the date)
Please explain me the law , declaration between the inning at the last hour of play
Who else love Tommy 😘😍
Himanshu Binduasara lol, samw
Maa chod do tommy ki
@@Time_Kad_K wtf
@@sagnik3556 teri bhi
Nice Animation
If you deflect the ball when the bat after already striking it with the bat - could you caught and given out?
@TheSmithersy Hitting the ball twice with the bat is legal if you are defending your wicket. So Ho Thi's question is a very good one. The relevant law is 33.2.2.2 which says a fair catch includes situations when "a fielder catches the ball after it has been lawfully struck more than once by the striker, but only if it has not been grounded since it was first struck." So the answer to Ho's question is that yes, you could be caught and given out, as long as the ball hadn't hit the floor between the first and second hit.
@00:50 Rahul Dravid vs west indies
Pushing the BALL when it gone near the stumps by the batsman is
UNFAIR
But it mostly gets covered by handling the ball, obstruction of field or lbw. And there's nothing unfair in doing that with the bat.
Muhammad Hafeez was given out against South Africa for obstructing the field.
Inzamam UL haq........😂😂😂😂😂😂
Who came here to know how ravindra jadeja given out
Me
If only Stephen Fry was at the final.....
Tommy is so cute 😆 😆
This rule implies date?
Steve Waugh was given out against India for obstructing ball
At the time however it was out handling the ball
Ben stokes
I was thinking about if you use your hand to strike the ball instead of bat is it still called handling the ball?
Prior to 2017 yes
Amit mishra in ipl
Pollard vs Gunathilaka
Ben stroke
Amit Mishra 2019 ipl
pollard and gunathilaka
How can a batsman having wilfully hit the ball a second time to stop it from landing on his wickets not be classified as out hitting the ball twice? When he does this it is certainly not accidental. It's no different to reaching down and wilfully touching the ball with your hands to defend your wickets, and both of these are supposed to be out.
You are specifically allowed to hit the ball twice with the bat (or any part of your body except your hand) if you are doing it to defend your wicket. See law 34 which contains the phrase "except for the sole purpose of guarding his/her wicket."
@@matthewharris3131 but if you stop the ball from hitting the stumps with the ball and has a chance of caught out by a wk then?
@@RkSaha-gh5jv fair game. There’s a very specific scenario I can see this happening in so it’s highly unlikely it’ll happen.
GO TOMMY
Ben stokes ki maaki