work done by the force field (KristaKingMath)

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 30 січ 2025

КОМЕНТАРІ • 20

  • @LarkinM
    @LarkinM 9 років тому +11

    Thanks for the help, you've been helping me since cal 1 and now my cal3 w/ differential equations final is tomorrow, thanks!!!!

    • @kristakingmath
      @kristakingmath  9 років тому

      +LadysLoveLarkin That's awesome! I'm so glad I've been able to help along the way. Thanks for letting me know!

  • @FireFoxDO
    @FireFoxDO 9 років тому +8

    Thank you this saved me a lot of time ! Damn tomorrow's calculus final tonight's going to be a rough one !

    • @kristakingmath
      @kristakingmath  9 років тому +2

      +FireFoxDO I'm so glad it helped! Study hard, but get some sleep too! And good luck tomorrow, I hope you do great!

  • @vrendus522
    @vrendus522 10 років тому

    Help for Krista;A generic force field motivator:Could be a laboratory grade Tesla Force Field Generator.This would be an item that is approximately seven inches by ten, with a transformer, plus heavy transistors and capacitors, with controls that accumulates an electrical charge. Then device converts this charge into an electromotive force, possibly a generated wave sent out as a burst of scalable energy along set vector lines.A rubber ball two thirds the size of a standard baseball is coated with the light level of powdered metal.This coating to ensure that EMF generated from Tesla screen projector, will move object from starting points of A to C.This device would operate off of standard wall socket current deliver in the 110 to 120 alternating voltage range from power supply in lab.A large nonconductive 4 by eight foot universal experimental lab top, one hundred percent leveled, could demonstrate point of departure of ball, to planned extent of end of travel.This path along projected by guess-ti-mation lines to desired outcome._"Just an idea Krista. As most people might have trouble envisioning what you mean by force field along with moving an object".

  • @ndawon1
    @ndawon1 9 років тому +2

    How is the function simply connected when Q is undefined for y

  • @brendanlydon5272
    @brendanlydon5272 4 роки тому

    The gradient function should be 2xy^3/2 + y + K because partial derivative with respect to y is equal to zero so must integrate to get g(y).. therefore 2xy^3/2 + y + k is function u want to plug P and Q into. Correct me if wrong

  • @Mary-du3by
    @Mary-du3by 4 роки тому

    How would we calculate it if they were to give the r vector of the trajectory (path) and two points and the force vector?

  • @Unidentifying
    @Unidentifying 10 років тому +1

    good and interesting video thanks alot

  • @ankitajain4302
    @ankitajain4302 4 роки тому

    Which writing platform it this? Thanks

  • @narinderkumar4708
    @narinderkumar4708 5 років тому

    Mam if force is along parabolic path?

  • @salami19-v4t
    @salami19-v4t 3 місяці тому

    life saver

  • @lobo53695
    @lobo53695 2 роки тому

    I still don't get it, but I appreciate your effforts...

  • @sunnykumar-nd8gp
    @sunnykumar-nd8gp 8 років тому +6

    u didn't integrate the equation and substituted the limits directly at the end .

    • @nellvincervantes6233
      @nellvincervantes6233 2 роки тому

      No need to integrate cause f is a scalar potential. F = grad(f). Then f = integral F.dr

  • @drjoephd
    @drjoephd 10 років тому +2

    Starting 10.0 minutes you didn't integrate the funciton. You plugged in (2,4) and (1,1) and subtracted without integrating as far as I can see. Am I missing simething? Is this a speial property of the integral for the curve?

    • @jaimemenapadilla
      @jaimemenapadilla 7 років тому

      drjoephd no she input the potential function f into the line integral effectively saying f=del(f) which is wrong its the fundamental theorem for line integrals so if ScF•dr=Sc(del(f))•dr=f(r(b))-f(r(a)) where r(b)= r(a)=

  • @lilmurp4171
    @lilmurp4171 Рік тому

    why is there so many steps wtf

  • @mansouralk
    @mansouralk 7 років тому +1

    the integral is wrong, why this video is still here?

    • @stevenm3914
      @stevenm3914 5 років тому +2

      Mansour Alkmim the integral is not wrong only thing wrong is he calls it the fundamental theory of calculus when in reality it’s the fundamental theory of line integral .