It doesn’t surprise me. Because even a lot of police don’t know the laws. I think people get overly outraged about these things.I don’t know anybody who knew about the laws until auditing video started to come out..
I don't think 'Ellen' would be pleased with that. After all he has a scribbly tattoo with her name on his arm. He's her hero! Unfortunately.@@georgesmith610
And boast about people who they know, who have BROKEN DRONE LAW by messing with chips that were put into the drones to keep them legal, How two faced is that ?.
@@Thai.FarangNo its honestly something people believe now on mass in the UK, they didn't used to, and I want to know why they believe filming them is illegal. Is it some bad training going on somewhere that filtered through to the public? How did this belief come about? It'd be an interesting story if we ever got to the bottom of it. It used to be people loved or hated the camera, but nobody told you it was illegal.
@@Thai.FarangI don’t think many people know the laws to be fair. They are doing what any of us would do in their position. Until awareness is spread regarding the laws then you can’t expect people to know about such things. Did you know all the laws before you started watching auditing videos ? No.
@@kierangrennan236 If he did/does get a warning for positive reaction and giving the company a good name, let's hope the others get fired for their reaction, lack of knowledge and giving the company are bad name.
These people are so pathetic it’s embarrassing to all the mediant friend and families members .In about two years time this protection of the company will back fire on then their replacement will come from others and you will become obsolete to requirements never mind the rest of the British people will-look😢😢😢😢😢😢😢 after. You And the unusual as you say will become the norm you’ll see and then you will kick off
@@ramalama9650 that’s very dramatic. The fact is most people are not aware of the laws regarding photography. I bet you weren’t aware until you started watching auditing videos right? The main problem I see is how they approach the photographers not that they don’t know the law because most people don’t, and that includes the police who you would think would definitely know the law and yet often they don’t.
I was aware of it but I would never do it. The aim is to goad someone into reacting. I think it's rude to be honest but that's how these videos work. If I was the owner of the property I would want to confront the person but I know that would be the worst thing to do, I'd be playing into their hands. I go back to my original comment, the bosses in these places like to tell people what to do and give orders. They are confused by it when their orders fall on deaf hears and someone speaks back to them. Their authority ends at the gates. In their minds it doesn't. Notice how they don't want to hear the rules for drones and photos? You see it in many videos. They expect you to just do as your told. Now, if someone was within their gates and on their property then that's a totally different story. Inside their rules apply, outside they don't. @@christopherwhittaker2620
"dunning-kruger effect" People who don't know how little they actually know and people who actually know are as confident that they know the topic well and are correct. So why would you google a topic you already know? When someone challenges you on your knowledge it comes clear if you actually know or just think you know 😁 Security can easily show how much they actually know: Step 1. See that there is a person. Step 2. Go introduce yourself to them. Step 3. Politely ask what they are doing? "If you don't mind me asking...." Step 4. Listen what they are saying. Step 5. When they say "Drone" ask them how much it weighs. Step 6. When they say "249" you conclude that then there is nothing else to do. Step 7. As long they have not indicated wanting to be left alone you can keep chatting. Perhaps answer few of their questions which you can. You could also prep yourself asking from your company if you are allowed to show people the grounds but that probably is a no. Step 8. Wish them good day and perhaps reminds them to stay in public places and not enter restricted areas. What else is there to? Be polite and have a normal chat.
@@DJAUDITS Marti being Marti he took the skid like a boss...as others said. Can we have a MiRider Auditors race like the Duck Race idea. Reggie, Marti yourselves and any others?😎
That aggressive pace forward when Knuckles said he would phone the police! If I had any authority in that company I would re-designate Knuckles to be the toilet cleaner, well away from the public.
Calling him knuckles is childish. I understand what you mean, but let’s just go up a second first of all there’s hardly anyone in the country that is fully aware of the laws regarding public photography don’t you think it would be more strange if people in these companies were never suspicious or whenever trying to defend their buildings surely that would be strange. The man you can’t knuckles in his own way was just trying to protect his company. His people skills are lacking. I grant you that but that’s all he’s trying to do at the end of the day. It’ll be more weird if someone from a security company saw someone outside filming and didn’t approach them that would be strange wouldn’t it? I think your outrage is a little bit weird in the context of even the police often don’t know the laws you certainly wouldn’t of known the last until you started watching audit and videos so put yourself in their position. That’s just human nature to react in the way they do a lot of the time.
@@christopherwhittaker2620 totally disagree, knuckles is the perfect name for a fella trying to look intimidating but a bit of a pansy if it kicks off,,, he came out and wanted to show authority.. he does not have any authority whatsoever over anyone in the public,, best thing he should do is stay back inside the fence where he works and not venture onto public land during his working hours.. it has nothing at all to do with him what the public are doing......... if a van pukll up outside and 6 fellas jumped out of it with disc cutters, bolt croppers and tools to break intothe company he still has no authority to challenge them.. he silly job finishes at the fence, not on it or over it, inside it. and was there a real SIA badge on display ?. anyway pansy knuckles did not get his own way, he will now be sulking and telling his mates what he was going to do until his boss came out. he is probably the hardest bloke in his bedroom..
DJ's interaction skills are beyond impressive. Other auditors should really study his technique, approach and personality. In my opinion it's the gold standard
He is by far the best we have in the UK. DJ is very good also. Another is AB,but in a different way. They all have different strengths. Oh btw, FP has the part 2 of his last video this evening Friday 19th January. Should be good. @@MrRoyum
I would say that FP is more a street / public photographer than an auditor, it's just that he's so damn good at it and dealing with any security or police it makes him far better than most auditors. DJ and PJ are polite, seem actually interested in most of the places they go to (not my thing but hey some people go train spotting). AB is mostly comedy nowadays, I don't think that he'd mind my saying that.
These places seem to have an abundance of directors, directing managers, estate managers etc. who are armed with a lack of knowledge about social media trends and will no doubt later wonder why they are getting unnecessary bad reviews etc.
Did you know about the laws until you started watching auditing videos? The police themselves often don’t know the law regarding public photography. It’s not something that there is much awareness about as he’s proven in these videos so I’m always confused that people in the comments don’t understand that it’s not something that is common knowledge it’s human nature to want to protect their property that is natural. It would be more weird if they were blasé and didn’t care. One of the reason auditing videos has become popular to watch is because of the drama that happens regarding people not knowing the laws. Imagine if every place where DJ when they knew the laws, there would be no confrontation ever, which would make for mostly boring viewing. Let’s be honest a lot of the time it is the confrontation that keeps coming back to watch these videos if you’re being honest about it
@@christopherwhittaker2620 I've been filming buildings for almost 50 years. There is no law and never has been. It's the same as reading or looking at things .
It’s so odd to me, do these people ever think about the tourists who visit the UK taking pictures and filming anything and everything - landmarks especially in big cities be they private or public. It’s actively encouraged in most locations - people taking pictures of Ozzy the bull in Birmingham New St station. And that’s without mentioning the people who queue up for hours to take a picture of the Royals (Sandringham on Christmas Day for example) or film stars on red carpets at film premieres or paparazzi in general. The permission thing is a bizarre mindset. I know what DJ does is not quite the same but photography in and from a public place remains lawful in the UK.
@@neilmc120 I think you’re being a bit dramatic. Did you know the laws before you started watching auditing videos? No you didn’t do most people in Britain know the laws of their own country regarding photography. No they don’t do all the police who are supposed to uphold laws know all the laws regarding photography and flying drones? No no, they don’t. It’s human nature to be defensive regarding one’s own property or one’s own business. If they knew the laws, I’m sure they wouldn’t come out in the way they do . The fact is most people don’t know the laws regarding photography and drones. And let’s be honest, if everyone didn’t know the last these videos would become boring, pretty quick because there’s been no confrontation, no drama, et cetera et cetera. The reason most people come back to watch these videos isn’t for the interesting scenery, or what’s going on in the industrial estate. It is for the drama and the confrontation end of story. that includes you
@@rogerbroadbelt3424 Google does that because they can't be bothered fighting it. They don't necessarily _have_ to, they just do because they don't care about it. Just because Google does one thing, that doesn't mean everybody else has to do the same thing. There is no expectation of privacy in public. You can't stop anybody filming you in public, and if they publish that video, there's nothing you can do about it.
@@rogerbroadbelt3424 like I said, because they don't care about fighting it. What Google does has no impact on what other people do. Google doesn't do it because they have to, they do it because it's easier than having to educate every single member of society of privacy laws. Just because Google does it, doesn't mean everybody has to do it.
What a surprise, a security related company that doesn't know the law even if it's int he field they work in. Shame on them. Praise to the man that came back to talk and actually was very much aware of the law.
To be fair, their field of work is installing security cameras and equipment. I agree to some extent that it is a little unusual. They don’t know the laws regarding public photography and regarding people taking photographs of their premises. However, even the police often don’t know the laws regarding public photography, especially photography or business premises and they are “ the law “ so to speak. I find it funny at all the outrage I see in the comments were people act like they are experts on the law regarding photography and the use of drones to make videos when the truth is nobody knew much about any of this stuff until all the videos started to turn up on UA-cam. Period.
I get as a security company they would be concerned , but all that can be seen from the car park is a building and parked cars and you can see all that on Google Earth . I dont know why they get so upset .
@@scooby1992 someone else who doesn’t understand something so obvious. They own a business and industrial estate. You need to put yourself in their position. Until the last few years when auditing has grown so to speak, it would be and in some cases as we see still is very unusual for a business I industrial estate to see a random person stood outside the premises. Taking pictures. Me you and others who regularly watch videos by DJ and other auditors have become very used to seeing people taking photographs on industrial estates and outside business is wherever they may be, We are used to it. But business owners and their staff and security guards are not used to it clearly. They were used to it are they knew about the laws they wouldn’t come out would they. And when they are looking out of the window and see someone filming into the back of their premises, maybe to them it looks like they are making a reconnaissance video in order to carry out nefarious activities later on or even if that far doesn’t enter their head it’s just unusual to see someone on industrial estate at the back of the business are at the front of the business buying a camera at their premises. It’s not something that they are used to seeing. it’s a simple as that really. And just because we’re used to seeing it, and we now know the laws because of auditors does it mean everyone else does not even security companies and in many cases, not even the police who you would expect knew all the laws, but even the police don’t know a lot of the time so in 3 to 5 years we will be seeing a lot less drama and confrontation because they’ll be a lot more awareness and the Wordle of gone round the auditors now are likely to come and photograph your business & they are allowed to it’s a lot of activity. But guess what when that happens auditors won’t be making videos as much because most of us come back to watch these videos for the drama and father confrontation if we’re being honest about it, we’re not coming back to find out what DJ can see in the back of skips in the back of premises on industrial estate are we? The amount of outrage in the comment section makes me laugh.
@@christopherwhittaker2620 in the US audits have been a thing since our constitution and isn't really different from your "acts" as they are almost the same as our rights and you yapping about your people knowing the law as if they shouldn't is slow and is retarded to say "act as experts" as if you are one from what I can tell you don't know jack goofy, crying about people knowing the law just cause most know it more than an "law enforcement" officer so to speak, I find it funny at all the outrage I see in the comments were people act like others should not know the law regarding photography and isn't true that this has been a thing since ww2 and other states and countries from around the planet started adopting laws from the US in a way as they are built around for the people and in your case acts that are fought for through a legislature to enact such things sherlock and is your fault you are this slow behind. 👍👍
To be fair, the police themselves often don’t know the laws regarding public photography, so I don’t see why a security company who just install security would necessarily need to know about the laws of their own business being photographed. And let’s be honest we’re all here for the drama and confrontation. Very few of us are here to see what’s in the recycle bins.
Exactly, and the truth is most people in the country don’t have a clue about photography laws are the laws surrounding drones. Why would they even the police often don’t know the laws regarding public photography and flying drones and they are supposed to know the Lord is better than anyone. He is perfectly normal the business owners come out and are a little defensive and want to protect their business et cetera. It’s completely normal in my book and let’s be honest most of us won’t be watching the videos if there wasn’t some kind of drama and confrontation .
Threatening to phone the police because someone won't do as they're told could be classed as perverting the course of justice if the aim is to inconvenience and potentially have an innocent person arrested.
One maybe two times out of ten you get positive ones. Theres fun in those, its always satisfying to educate idiots and those fresh off the boats who have no idea of the law
Love how 'Zammo' leans forward when he thinks calling the police will help him. But why on earth do some many people think private business means its private? It's not. It's visible publicly.
They main stars were rather pleasant in their beliefs that you couldn't film from public, just because they are a private company/ building. 3 of them all with phones, could of just had a quick check if it was unlawful, maybe would take 30 seconds. Seemed to be star number 1 was wanting to escalate things, the other 2 were just curious more than anything. That was my take on the 3 main stars of this interaction. Number 4 was fine in every way.
I'm soo bad in confrontational scenarios, let alone the ones DJ faces daily. Even if I could "know my place" as well he does, I would crumble like a biscuit as soon as I had to stick up for myself. Kudos. A great life skill
By that logic the thousands of tourists who take photographs/video of Buckingham Palace or the Houses of Parliament first need to obtain permission from the Crown Estate.
They might as well come out and ask members of the public if they’ve looked at the building, and if so not to as they haven’t given them permission to look in that direction 😂
That’s ridiculous. Did you know the laws regarding public photography before he started watching auditing videos? Did you know you didn’t do the police always know the laws regarding auditing and public photography no they don’t and they are the laws are they are supposed to be appalled in-laws and they often don’t know so I think a lot of the manufactured outrage I see in the comments. He’s literally that you’re getting outraged at the outrage which is kind of ironic to say the least
@@christopherwhittaker2620 learn t owrite a sentance mate,,, the whole point is the company has no right to ask you anything at all when your not on their proerty. they have zero rights of anything you do on public land................ now please explain what this menas ...Did you know you didnt. and .... " He’s literally that you’re getting outraged at the outrage which is kind of ironic to say the least.... now calm down and go and edit that gobbledegook..... the outrage is the public do not need to answer to anyone aboutwhat they are doing if not ona firms property,, it is very simple,, but then again i might be talking to cheese.
"You can't carry on continuing!" I'm gonna carry on continuing... and I'll continue carrying on continuing until my continuing has been carried out : ) This whole conversation is a complete bamboozeler for them, I love it : )))))
2009 street view around the other side of the building, guy stood outside the door with hand on his chin with a perturbed look as the cam car recorded the building. Gentleman at the end was great! Used SCADA systems in prior pipeline work in US. Great video ⭐⭐⭐👍 Initially part of Broomco and changed to Remco (Deeside) in 1998 and registered address changed to Deeside. They own the freehold and appears they fulfilled mortgage obligations in 2012.
Years ago they used to do computer systems. They fitted out the computer system for turning out fire appliances in the brigade I worked in. It crashed more often than the Post Office Horizon system! 😂
Big lad was angry, probably because he missed his second breakfast. The management seemed decent. They took the time to listen calmly and try and understand with good humor.
Thought I saw you today at Portishead marina near Avon-mouth. Chased after some bloke on a MI bike same as yours and with similar build hoping for a keyring. He was very confused and had no idea what I was talking about.
Google is a company who have a mission to put all information in the public domain. These companies who say its private property dont have a clue about what is right and wrong. DJ you know what is right and whats is not. Its plainly obvious that a lot has got to be taught to these individuals. nice one DJ CRACK ON
Crazy seeing this 8 months later. I recently starting watching DJ Audits and thought he may have been to deeside industrial park as I worked there for 3 years at a different company. Remsdaq were a client of the company I worked for so I visited them and have actually met the IT manager who has now retired.
7:26 Crow arrives on building on the left - 7:48 comes closer for a better look. 8:01 2nd Crow arrives on roof. Both interested in what's going on, Crows are avid people watchers and spend a lot of time studying humans. They also love a bit of aggro so were probably hoping a fight breaks out 😆
@@DJAUDITS They also love trolling camera's by shouting during a take. I read that before a certain year when sound editing came out; Every single movie ever made, where there are indigenous Crows, has a Crow shouting sound in it 😄 Something to listen out for if you watch old movies or TV shows 👌
Another avenue you could persue it the fact that most companies employ CCTV and there's instance that you as a member of the public are deliberately captured and these companies don't ask premision to photograph you. I know under GDPR you can request the footage. 👍😁I just posted this when you made the request under GDPR for the footage from the gentleman.
That bypass for the data controller information, straight to the sign... Which HAD the data controller information... Shows that DJ is the absolute gold standard of this kind of stuff! This was auditing 101! Chefs kiss! Absolutely brilliant and actually made me laugh out loud with my headphones on whilst eating pub grub. 🤣🤣🤣🤣
Excellent control once again of the narrative. Surprised a security company wasn't more au fait with the drone laws but still think you should invoice them and they use the interaction as a training video.
SCADA is a control system of hardware and software elements used to control and monitor industrial processes, infrastructure, and facilities. SCADA systems are commonly employed in industries such as manufacturing, energy, water treatment, transportation, and other critical infrastructure sectors. Fun fact when Iran's nuclear program was hacked (Stuxnet), suspected US government (one of the most advanced viruses ever created) the exploit they found was in SCADA.
D.J. you saw them all off , they tried all angles to stop you but you knew more than they did , the first guy was an angry sort of chap and the other older guys were not too bad really but you had all the answers for them in your extra smooth answering ways , great vid and content, another one so well done !........
They fell a bit short of intelligent. The other dude talking about "chipped" drones was quite interesting though. regarding products, you can often find schematics by looking up the FCC ID.
I really think what you doing is nessary plus i admire the way you explain everything you do even though they don't deserve any of the information from you i think you are great keep it up.
Why was the muppet being so awkward? 😂 the irony went right over they muppets head. Ignorance of the law is no defense. It is ok to politely ask but demanding answers making unlawful requests and accosting a member of the public going about their lawful business is grounds for a written warning. It is perfectly legal and lawful to photograph anything from a public place. The company security issues are not the concern of members of public. Being suspicious, or different or doing unusual activities, or not giving personal details is not a crime.
Hey DJ, excellent video as usual! The engagement was top-notch. Regarding the comment about not grasping the desire to lift the height restriction (120m), let me clarify for those who may not be aware. Consider this quick example: if I'm standing halfway up a mountain, I can fly 120m above my current position. However, if the peak I want to capture in a photo or film is an additional 200m above, I'm out of luck with the current height limit.
The charade of another client wasn't required in my view, as previous videos it's just as entertaining and informative to be transparent in stating you're a UA-camr, basically they're just being inquisitive which is understandable. Another great vid DJ.
I really don’t understand why he has started doing that….. pretending to be a photographer for a client… why not just state you’re a UA-camr, it’s as if he’s trying to get a reaction rather than just exercising his right to film in public! I much prefer Northern Audit’s style… much more honest with the companies which, for me makes the video more pleasant to watch.
Agree with this sentiment. Great video but the bit where dj could not provide his client details due to gdpr undermined his position. If DJ is bound by gdpr in respect of client details then surely he would also be bound by gdpr in respect of the imges he is taking. I know it's all a farce but I think it does weaken DJ's position on gdpr a bit.
All the brains came out with no idea but supposed laws And low and behold a lovely chap comes along with all the answers It’s becoming a worrying trend how is it nobody in charge seems to know anything Anymore
Protect from what? Did you not notice the big wide open gates, which I presume are closed to provide at minimum protection? Are cameras now deemed as dangerous and anyone or anything that might captured in shot would need some sore of protection?
Love the fact that their entrance sign has directions to the "Visitor's Car Park." Singular. As in: we can only accept one visitor at a time! So that could be you, DJ.
Humans are so untrusting, and just not innocently curious enough. :-( Sadly, most of these negative interactions could go either way, but largely depends on the initial person and how they approach. Thx for sharing, watching from Vancouver, Canada. Regards Jules
Tubby man is about as scary as my nan. And poor old Cliff............. Am I the only one who wondered where the Hell did this weirdo looking bloke appear from? Almost made me jump.
Well they are all having a quiet sensible convesation, but they are having a really hard time understanding that what somebody does in public is none of their business.
Tell me something, did you know any of the laws regarding public photography and flying drones to make videos over businesses before you started watching auditors ? I would say that’s a no. Do the police always know the laws regarding public photography and flying drones over businesses and they are the law, do they always know ? no they don’t. If you owned a business and you never seen any hard in videos, and you saw A random person pointing the camera through your fence of your business, taking photographs or making a video are flying a drone over your business. Would you be sat there thinking no problem? Or would you be likely to go out to find out what they are doing? I reckon like most people would go out to find out what they are doing. Here’s the thing. Most of us watch the videos for the drama and the confrontation, if we’re being honest. One of the good things about auditors, who do it the right way is there slowly, but surely educating people regarding the rights of people to take photographs so at some point there will be a lot less confrontation and drama when auditors turn up to take photographs, I’ll make videos. And I guarantee at that point, the numbers of viewers will drop dramatically because looking at industrial estate and what’s in recycle bins isn’t really that interesting is it if you’re being honest. Too many people in the comment section, have this outrage and like to moan about how people behave regarding How they don’t understand the laws et cetera when the truth is most people in the country, don’t have a clue about the laws regarding photography why would day that includes the police.
@@christopherwhittaker2620Yes I did. I have been a photographer for over 40 years, and I have been challenged in public many years ago, so I learnt the laws. I am also a pilot so I know a fair bit about the laws concerning things flying around and its in my own interest to do so especially given the rise in drones. I have seen the damage a pigeon can do to a light aircraft, let alone a hard plastic drone. My problem is the way that people come out and are basically rude, aggressive and so entitled to demand to know what somebody is doing on the public foot path. They could could come out and say hello, how are you, and start a reasonable conversation. But no, they come out making laws up left right and center, they have no fucking idea what the laws are, they just feel they are entitled to interrogate people without cause. As far as trained (sic) security personnel are concerned, then yes, they bloody well shold know the laws concerning interacting with the members of the public, its thier bloody job to know.
@@turdwarbler sure and I can agree with most of what you’re saying here. Especially regarding how people approach auditors. Too often, they come out guns blazing with a cocky attitude or as you say, rude or aggressive etc. And I agree That it’s about time that security personnel were trained properly regarding the laws. It seems like The people and companies that train people to become SIA registered are taking peoples money and not training them properly. All SIA Security should have good knowledge of things like photography, drone laws.etc etc. I think with you being a photographer and a pilot automatically, makes you very likely to be aware of the laws regarding photography and drones. But my only point I’ve been trying to make is most people aren’t photographers are pilots, so they don’t know these laws through no real fault of their own. And as I’ve said often police don’t even know the laws which kind of says it all really. And that is why I sometimes laugh at the amount of outrage in the comment section. Most of the people who watch these videos will have had absolutely no idea about the laws around photography or drones, until they started watching auditing videos. And as I’ve said, most of us are here, because of the drama, all the confrontation captured in videos, maybe not your good self, but most people. Anyway, I appreciate your reply. Take care mate
@christopherwhittaker2620 You are replying with almost the same comment on here. To a certain degree, in regards to drones not a lot of people would know, I would agree with. However, not knowing and automatically saying it's not allowed or it's illegal are the usual go to stance. What makes them think it's not allowed or illegal? When they get told it's not, they then double down and say well it's the law. If you don't know something then best not to speak as an authority on a subject you know nothing about. Yes these drone videos have opened eyes, especially for the ones that watch them My next point is the normal everyday use of a camera, be that a phone or other type. Virtually every person has one of some description. I can guarantee the vast majority have at some point taken pictures or videos in public. Be that in town, in a park, on holiday, any tourist attractions etc. You don't need to know any laws about taking said pictures or video in public. There is no way in this world that they thought to ask permission, they just done it without a care in the world. That's all they needed to know, that they were doing it end of. So to that end why would these people in these premises think differently? That is the question. They have done exactly what DJ and others are doing, but for some reason they think their buildings are sacred. Audits like this mainly came about, for the majority who do it, were sick to the back teeth of getting stopped by police, strangers etc, wanting to know what they were doing. So in the main, the use of video was to try and show the general public who watch, or in this case, a business, that filming in public is a normal activity.
@@stuartb4525 no sorry I disagree. There’s a huge difference between people taking photographs and selfies of each other in their houses in pubs and restaurants on holiday et cetera et cetera. Surely you understand that businesses are a different kettle of fish and you seem to be missing my point. I will repeat my point if that’s what I need to do. Until auditing started to happen fairly recently, you would not of seen people turning up randomly on industrial estates pointing cameras at their premises. Don’t try and pretend you would, so if you put yourself in the position of business owners, security, guards, and even the police to some extent, surely you can see it is quite unusual to see a random person turn up at your business on an industrial estate taking photographs? There is a massive difference between taking photographs of yourself in the street in the pub at home and taking photographs of premises on industrial estates. Now just because you have got used to the idea of seeing it because you watch videos of auditors doesn’t mean that business owners and security guards are aware that this happens as frequently as it is happening, so to them it is highly unusual. This is why we get the drama, what don’t you understand about that? We wouldn’t see the drama if everyone was used to seeing people taking photographs on industrial estates would we ? surely you can see that ? obviously you can’t. And you’re actually making my point for me by pretending that business owners should automatically understand it’s normal for random people to be taking photographs of their premises just because people take selfies and people now have phones with cameras on them. it’s almost like you’re saying that the business owners know that the photographers have the right to do what they’re doing and I just coming out just for the confrontation which isn’t true. Business, owners, staff from businesses, security guards, and even the police are often confused as to why someone is taking pictures of business premises. And that’s because it’s quite a new thing relatively speaking. It’s only going to become normal once the world goes round and once there is awareness raised about the rights of photographers, you pretending that people should automatically know the rights of photographers who own businesses is hilarious because if that was the case we wouldn’t see the drama that we do on a regular basis. I can’t believe you’re being so stubborn regarding this. You’ve got to ask yourself, why do we see so much drama if people genuinely new photographers rights, it makes no sense.
The amount of info people just give up without knowing... if this was something like a RED team exercise at the recon phase you'd have loads of stuff to play with ;)
That totally amazes me that a security company doesn’t know the laws about public property. I don’t think I would be using their business
Being insecure whillst advertising secure isn't a great win for the company imo.
Indeed, I say, shut those clowns down immediately!!!
It doesn’t surprise me. Because even a lot of police don’t know the laws. I think people get overly outraged about these things.I don’t know anybody who knew about the laws until auditing video started to come out..
Think public photography laws should be learns before sia badge issued or any security
I don't think 'Ellen' would be pleased with that. After all he has a scribbly tattoo with her name on his arm. He's her hero! Unfortunately.@@georgesmith610
How Bizarre . People that make Tech to Monitor Everyone Don't want to be Monitored themselves 😀 One of your Best visits I think !
Never ceases to amaze me that people are so sure of laws that don't exist
They just make it up as they go along, and expects everyone else to indulge them in their little pantomime.
And boast about people who they know, who have BROKEN DRONE LAW by messing with chips that were
put into the drones to keep them legal, How two faced is that ?.
They could actually be doing something illegal and trying to hide something.
@@Thai.FarangNo its honestly something people believe now on mass in the UK, they didn't used to, and I want to know why they believe filming them is illegal. Is it some bad training going on somewhere that filtered through to the public? How did this belief come about? It'd be an interesting story if we ever got to the bottom of it. It used to be people loved or hated the camera, but nobody told you it was illegal.
@@Thai.FarangI don’t think many people know the laws to be fair. They are doing what any of us would do in their position. Until awareness is spread regarding the laws then you can’t expect people to know about such things. Did you know all the laws before you started watching auditing videos ? No.
Cool older guy at the end showed a proper interest and conversation without invasive questions . Company needs more like him 👍
Probably in the office getting a warning now though 😮
@@kierangrennan236 If he did/does get a warning for positive reaction and giving the company a good name, let's hope the others get fired for their reaction, lack of knowledge and giving the company are bad name.
Your authority ends at the boundary of your property.
You have no authority to accost a member of the public in public
These people are so pathetic it’s embarrassing to all the mediant friend and families members .In about two years time this protection of the company will back fire on then their replacement will come from others and you will become obsolete to requirements never mind the rest of the British people will-look😢😢😢😢😢😢😢 after. You And the unusual as you say will become the norm you’ll see and then you will kick off
That's a very big problem. Inside they are God (or think they are). Outside they are NOTHING!
They can't come to terms with that.
twat of the week, who the hell does he think HE is,then joined by, dumb dumb of the month,
@@ramalama9650 that’s very dramatic. The fact is most people are not aware of the laws regarding photography. I bet you weren’t aware until you started watching auditing videos right? The main problem I see is how they approach the photographers not that they don’t know the law because most people don’t, and that includes the police who you would think would definitely know the law and yet often they don’t.
I was aware of it but I would never do it. The aim is to goad someone into reacting. I think it's rude to be honest but that's how these videos work.
If I was the owner of the property I would want to confront the person but I know that would be the worst thing to do, I'd be playing into their hands.
I go back to my original comment, the bosses in these places like to tell people what to do and give orders. They are confused by it when their orders fall on deaf hears and someone speaks back to them. Their authority ends at the gates. In their minds it doesn't. Notice how they don't want to hear the rules for drones and photos? You see it in many videos. They expect you to just do as your told.
Now, if someone was within their gates and on their property then that's a totally different story. Inside their rules apply, outside they don't.
@@christopherwhittaker2620
"We're a security company..."
A security company that doesn't know how the laws of privacy work. Crazy.
Like saying the Director of a firm that makes,say, hospital beds doesn't know about kidney transplanting.
@@catabaticanabatic3800no it’s like saying a maker of hospital beds who doesn’t know about the laws, policies and procedures around hospital beds.
"dunning-kruger effect"
People who don't know how little they actually know and people who actually know are as confident that they know the topic well and are correct. So why would you google a topic you already know? When someone challenges you on your knowledge it comes clear if you actually know or just think you know 😁
Security can easily show how much they actually know:
Step 1. See that there is a person.
Step 2. Go introduce yourself to them.
Step 3. Politely ask what they are doing? "If you don't mind me asking...."
Step 4. Listen what they are saying.
Step 5. When they say "Drone" ask them how much it weighs.
Step 6. When they say "249" you conclude that then there is nothing else to do.
Step 7. As long they have not indicated wanting to be left alone you can keep chatting. Perhaps answer few of their questions which you can. You could also prep yourself asking from your company if you are allowed to show people the grounds but that probably is a no.
Step 8. Wish them good day and perhaps reminds them to stay in public places and not enter restricted areas.
What else is there to? Be polite and have a normal chat.
@catabaticanabatic3800 how did you become so dumb? Genuine question
The “I’m saying that I’m going to carry on”.
“I’m saying I’m gonna phone the police” exchange (with the step forward) was funny 😂
I have no idea why they say such stupid things like they can actually follow through with what they are saying 🤣🤣
@@DJAUDITS DJ, Marti could do with some stabalisers for his present....or a course on a skid pan😂😂😂😎
@@sapankhurst2015 or some solid tyres which are puncture proof 🤣🤣 He’s loving his bike which is awesome to see 💚
Like a game of poker. "I'll see your carry on and I'll raise you THE POLICE! "🤪
@@DJAUDITS Marti being Marti he took the skid like a boss...as others said. Can we have a MiRider Auditors race like the Duck Race idea. Reggie, Marti yourselves and any others?😎
That aggressive pace forward when Knuckles said he would phone the police! If I had any authority in that company I would re-designate Knuckles to be the toilet cleaner, well away from the public.
I saw that and was gonna say see how he moved forward 😂
Calling him knuckles is childish. I understand what you mean, but let’s just go up a second first of all there’s hardly anyone in the country that is fully aware of the laws regarding public photography don’t you think it would be more strange if people in these companies were never suspicious or whenever trying to defend their buildings surely that would be strange. The man you can’t knuckles in his own way was just trying to protect his company. His people skills are lacking. I grant you that but that’s all he’s trying to do at the end of the day. It’ll be more weird if someone from a security company saw someone outside filming and didn’t approach them that would be strange wouldn’t it? I think your outrage is a little bit weird in the context of even the police often don’t know the laws you certainly wouldn’t of known the last until you started watching audit and videos so put yourself in their position. That’s just human nature to react in the way they do a lot of the time.
I think he might be due on his period you know.
@@christopherwhittaker2620 totally disagree, knuckles is the perfect name for a fella trying to look intimidating but a bit of a pansy if it kicks off,,, he came out and wanted to show authority.. he does not have any authority whatsoever over anyone in the public,, best thing he should do is stay back inside the fence where he works and not venture onto public land during his working hours.. it has nothing at all to do with him what the public are doing......... if a van pukll up outside and 6 fellas jumped out of it with disc cutters, bolt croppers and tools to break intothe company he still has no authority to challenge them.. he silly job finishes at the fence, not on it or over it, inside it. and was there a real SIA badge on display ?. anyway pansy knuckles did not get his own way, he will now be sulking and telling his mates what he was going to do until his boss came out. he is probably the hardest bloke in his bedroom..
His wife was shagging one of his mates whilst Knuckles was 'at work'. @@philldownes8685
DJ's interaction skills are beyond impressive. Other auditors should really study his technique, approach and personality. In my opinion it's the gold standard
Focus Pocus is the gold standard, rather than DJ.
He is by far the best we have in the UK. DJ is very good also. Another is AB,but in a different way. They all have different strengths. Oh btw, FP has the part 2 of his last video this evening Friday 19th January. Should be good. @@MrRoyum
UKMTT has a better approach
@@MrRoyum 100% focus pocus makes all the others look like school children doing this 😂
I would say that FP is more a street / public photographer than an auditor, it's just that he's so damn good at it and dealing with any security or police it makes him far better than most auditors.
DJ and PJ are polite, seem actually interested in most of the places they go to (not my thing but hey some people go train spotting). AB is mostly comedy nowadays, I don't think that he'd mind my saying that.
These places seem to have an abundance of directors, directing managers, estate managers etc. who are armed with a lack of knowledge about social media trends and will no doubt later wonder why they are getting unnecessary bad reviews etc.
Did you know about the laws until you started watching auditing videos? The police themselves often don’t know the law regarding public photography. It’s not something that there is much awareness about as he’s proven in these videos so I’m always confused that people in the comments don’t understand that it’s not something that is common knowledge it’s human nature to want to protect their property that is natural. It would be more weird if they were blasé and didn’t care. One of the reason auditing videos has become popular to watch is because of the drama that happens regarding people not knowing the laws. Imagine if every place where DJ when they knew the laws, there would be no confrontation ever, which would make for mostly boring viewing. Let’s be honest a lot of the time it is the confrontation that keeps coming back to watch these videos if you’re being honest about it
A few commas and a little tidying up wouldn't have gone amiss in your post. Otherwise, it was a fair point.@@christopherwhittaker2620
@@christopherwhittaker2620 I've been filming buildings for almost 50 years. There is no law and never has been. It's the same as reading or looking at things .
It’s so odd to me, do these people ever think about the tourists who visit the UK taking pictures and filming anything and everything - landmarks especially in big cities be they private or public. It’s actively encouraged in most locations - people taking pictures of Ozzy the bull in Birmingham New St station. And that’s without mentioning the people who queue up for hours to take a picture of the Royals (Sandringham on Christmas Day for example) or film stars on red carpets at film premieres or paparazzi in general. The permission thing is a bizarre mindset.
I know what DJ does is not quite the same but photography in and from a public place remains lawful in the UK.
@@neilmc120 I think you’re being a bit dramatic. Did you know the laws before you started watching auditing videos? No you didn’t do most people in Britain know the laws of their own country regarding photography. No they don’t do all the police who are supposed to uphold laws know all the laws regarding photography and flying drones? No no, they don’t. It’s human nature to be defensive regarding one’s own property or one’s own business. If they knew the laws, I’m sure they wouldn’t come out in the way they do . The fact is most people don’t know the laws regarding photography and drones. And let’s be honest, if everyone didn’t know the last these videos would become boring, pretty quick because there’s been no confrontation, no drama, et cetera et cetera. The reason most people come back to watch these videos isn’t for the interesting scenery, or what’s going on in the industrial estate. It is for the drama and the confrontation end of story. that includes you
The attitude of the goon at 16:00 sums up the company attitude, where he stubbornly refused to give the Data Handler details. Overpaid and underclued.
"May" be subject.
You need to go into the law a lot deeper than an exchange of comments on YT
@@rogerbroadbelt3424 Google does that because they can't be bothered fighting it. They don't necessarily _have_ to, they just do because they don't care about it. Just because Google does one thing, that doesn't mean everybody else has to do the same thing. There is no expectation of privacy in public. You can't stop anybody filming you in public, and if they publish that video, there's nothing you can do about it.
@@rogerbroadbelt3424 like I said, because they don't care about fighting it. What Google does has no impact on what other people do. Google doesn't do it because they have to, they do it because it's easier than having to educate every single member of society of privacy laws. Just because Google does it, doesn't mean everybody has to do it.
What a surprise, a security related company that doesn't know the law even if it's int he field they work in.
Shame on them.
Praise to the man that came back to talk and actually was very much aware of the law.
To be fair, their field of work is installing security cameras and equipment. I agree to some extent that it is a little unusual. They don’t know the laws regarding public photography and regarding people taking photographs of their premises. However, even the police often don’t know the laws regarding public photography, especially photography or business premises and they are “ the law “ so to speak. I find it funny at all the outrage I see in the comments were people act like they are experts on the law regarding photography and the use of drones to make videos when the truth is nobody knew much about any of this stuff until all the videos started to turn up on UA-cam. Period.
@mind5403 👍👍
I get as a security company they would be concerned , but all that can be seen from the car park is a building and parked cars and you can see all that on Google Earth . I dont know why they get so upset .
@@scooby1992 someone else who doesn’t understand something so obvious. They own a business and industrial estate. You need to put yourself in their position. Until the last few years when auditing has grown so to speak, it would be and in some cases as we see still is very unusual for a business I industrial estate to see a random person stood outside the premises. Taking pictures. Me you and others who regularly watch videos by DJ and other auditors have become very used to seeing people taking photographs on industrial estates and outside business is wherever they may be, We are used to it. But business owners and their staff and security guards are not used to it clearly. They were used to it are they knew about the laws they wouldn’t come out would they. And when they are looking out of the window and see someone filming into the back of their premises, maybe to them it looks like they are making a reconnaissance video in order to carry out nefarious activities later on or even if that far doesn’t enter their head it’s just unusual to see someone on industrial estate at the back of the business are at the front of the business buying a camera at their premises. It’s not something that they are used to seeing. it’s a simple as that really. And just because we’re used to seeing it, and we now know the laws because of auditors does it mean everyone else does not even security companies and in many cases, not even the police who you would expect knew all the laws, but even the police don’t know a lot of the time so in 3 to 5 years we will be seeing a lot less drama and confrontation because they’ll be a lot more awareness and the Wordle of gone round the auditors now are likely to come and photograph your business & they are allowed to it’s a lot of activity.
But guess what when that happens auditors won’t be making videos as much because most of us come back to watch these videos for the drama and father confrontation if we’re being honest about it, we’re not coming back to find out what DJ can see in the back of skips in the back of premises on industrial estate are we? The amount of outrage in the comment section makes me laugh.
@@christopherwhittaker2620 in the US audits have been a thing since our constitution and isn't really different from your "acts" as they are almost the same as our rights and you yapping about your people knowing the law as if they shouldn't is slow and is retarded to say "act as experts" as if you are one from what I can tell you don't know jack goofy, crying about people knowing the law just cause most know it more than an "law enforcement" officer so to speak, I find it funny at all the outrage I see in the comments were people act like others should not know the law regarding photography and isn't true that this has been a thing since ww2 and other states and countries from around the planet started adopting laws from the US in a way as they are built around for the people and in your case acts that are fought for through a legislature to enact such things sherlock and is your fault you are this slow behind. 👍👍
There is nothing about a security having a right to challenge anyone outside the business. They aren't that special. No company can challenge anyone.
“We are a security company…..”…….and we haven’t got a clue about photography laws 😂
To be fair, the police themselves often don’t know the laws regarding public photography, so I don’t see why a security company who just install security would necessarily need to know about the laws of their own business being photographed. And let’s be honest we’re all here for the drama and confrontation. Very few of us are here to see what’s in the recycle bins.
The older guys interacted very politely, as they schooled themselves in the moment compared to many
Exactly, and the truth is most people in the country don’t have a clue about photography laws are the laws surrounding drones. Why would they even the police often don’t know the laws regarding public photography and flying drones and they are supposed to know the Lord is better than anyone. He is perfectly normal the business owners come out and are a little defensive and want to protect their business et cetera. It’s completely normal in my book and let’s be honest most of us won’t be watching the videos if there wasn’t some kind of drama and confrontation .
I miss when DJ would say when they'd say "It's our property." he'd respond quickly with "I'm not TAKING it."
Threatening to phone the police because someone won't do as they're told could be classed as perverting the course of justice if the aim is to inconvenience and potentially have an innocent person arrested.
Are you a barrister? Thought not.
You do have such a smooth way of setting people straight.
Oh, I see why they're so paranoid, they've clearly got a problem with moles!
The irony of their objections when their gear is probably doing the same?
👍😇👍😳😳😁😁🤭🤭
One maybe two times out of ten you get positive ones. Theres fun in those, its always satisfying to educate idiots and those fresh off the boats who have no idea of the law
A problem with moles...? Perhaps if they didn't have the grassland, the problem would cease to be...!!! 😁😜👍
Love how 'Zammo' leans forward when he thinks calling the police will help him. But why on earth do some many people think private business means its private? It's not. It's visible publicly.
"Zammo" 😂😂😂
Zammo 😂 that's an insult to Zammo..😂
Seeing them struggle to justify google is always fun. 😂
They main stars were rather pleasant in their beliefs that you couldn't film from public, just because they are a private company/ building. 3 of them all with phones, could of just had a quick check if it was unlawful, maybe would take 30 seconds. Seemed to be star number 1 was wanting to escalate things, the other 2 were just curious more than anything. That was my take on the 3 main stars of this interaction. Number 4 was fine in every way.
I'm soo bad in confrontational scenarios, let alone the ones DJ faces daily.
Even if I could "know my place" as well he does, I would crumble like a biscuit as soon as I had to stick up for myself.
Kudos. A great life skill
He knows how to conduct a difficult conversation with someone in any situation. Learned a lot from listening to him.
Don’t put yourself down.☺️ It’s just practice and knowing you’re in the right to guarantee your success at anything.
By that logic the thousands of tourists who take photographs/video of Buckingham Palace or the Houses of Parliament first need to obtain permission from the Crown Estate.
Be consistent, don't lie about clients. I usually enjoy your videos
My favourite dj video,they should thank you for educating them..
“We are a security company” he claims as an old van zooms straight into their yard! 😂😂
yep nothing at all secure about that place.
Maybe the old van is someone who is known to work there I don’t see what point you’re trying to make here and it doesn’t seem you thought this through
It was an under cover Aston Martin.
The subject access request segment was golden. Lured them into taking the photo before timing that request perfectly.
You’d think by now SIA would have put training in place regarding photography from outside 😂 and they are a … security company 😂
I'm glad they don't though else I wouldn't watch these videos. I'm here for the drama 😅😂
The IT manager was nice enough to be fair
They might as well come out and ask members of the public if they’ve looked at the building, and if so not to as they haven’t given them permission to look in that direction 😂
Stop looking in our general direction 😂
I can't stop you looking but you need permission to remember what you just looked at.
That’s ridiculous. Did you know the laws regarding public photography before he started watching auditing videos? Did you know you didn’t do the police always know the laws regarding auditing and public photography no they don’t and they are the laws are they are supposed to be appalled in-laws and they often don’t know so I think a lot of the manufactured outrage I see in the comments. He’s literally that you’re getting outraged at the outrage which is kind of ironic to say the least
@@christopherwhittaker2620 learn t owrite a sentance mate,,, the whole point is the company has no right to ask you anything at all when your not on their proerty. they have zero rights of anything you do on public land................ now please explain what this menas ...Did you know you didnt. and .... " He’s literally that you’re getting outraged at the outrage which is kind of ironic to say the least.... now calm down and go and edit that gobbledegook..... the outrage is the public do not need to answer to anyone aboutwhat they are doing if not ona firms property,, it is very simple,, but then again i might be talking to cheese.
@@philldownes8685 😆🤣😆
"You can't carry on continuing!"
I'm gonna carry on continuing... and I'll continue carrying on continuing until my continuing has been carried out : )
This whole conversation is a complete bamboozeler for them, I love it : )))))
2009 street view around the other side of the building, guy stood outside the door with hand on his chin with a perturbed look as the cam car recorded the building. Gentleman at the end was great! Used SCADA systems in prior pipeline work in US.
Great video ⭐⭐⭐👍
Initially part of Broomco and changed to Remco (Deeside) in 1998 and registered address changed to Deeside. They own the freehold and appears they fulfilled mortgage obligations in 2012.
I appreciate you patience in educating again and again.
REMSDAQ should try paying their outstanding debts instead of dissolving the company then launching themselves under a slightly different name?
Years ago they used to do computer systems. They fitted out the computer system for turning out fire appliances in the brigade I worked in. It crashed more often than the Post Office Horizon system! 😂
🤣🤣
Big lad was angry, probably because he missed his second breakfast. The management seemed decent. They took the time to listen calmly and try and understand with good humor.
Thought I saw you today at Portishead marina near Avon-mouth. Chased after some bloke on a MI bike same as yours and with similar build hoping for a keyring. He was very confused and had no idea what I was talking about.
I love your videos and the way you are also calm under such adversity!
Never gets old 🤣👍🏻
Keyring finder might want to give it a rinse off, probably have some dog piss on it later 👍🏻
don't worry i've washed it
You'd make the best teacher, you have such a kind way of educating these guys and it's lovely when the penny finally drops
Keep up the great work DJ, slowly but surely educating the country on their rights and the law.
"My god he's filming our pallets!"
Mr Angry Mr Tech Mr Bewildered and Mr Nice guy a good mix of characters there!
lol
Loved that conversation with the directors. Great stuff DJ.
DJ you are simply delightful in how you communicate with people like that.
I missed the "Get back to work." That always cracks me up.
Google is a company who have a mission to put all information in the public domain. These companies who say its private property dont have a clue about what is right and wrong. DJ you know what is right and whats is not. Its plainly obvious that a lot has got to be taught to these individuals. nice one DJ CRACK ON
Crazy seeing this 8 months later. I recently starting watching DJ Audits and thought he may have been to deeside industrial park as I worked there for 3 years at a different company.
Remsdaq were a client of the company I worked for so I visited them and have actually met the IT manager who has now retired.
I know I say it alot DJ, but thankyou for what you do, I look forward to coming home after work to a DJ Audits video! Keep up the good work ❤️💙
Hi DJ and everyone watching from and supporting from Portugal 🇵🇹
hello Portugal fans from UK fans 🙂
I bet you guys in Portugal feel cold when you see our weather!
Complete joke of a Security Company that don't know the law,great video as always D.J😂
DJ you are simply delightful in how you communicate with people like that. They were out like a gang
Love this chanel!! Well done DJ keep it up brother 👌
I love that your polite at all times and you have a good sense of humour
7:26 Crow arrives on building on the left - 7:48 comes closer for a better look. 8:01 2nd Crow arrives on roof. Both interested in what's going on, Crows are avid people watchers and spend a lot of time studying humans. They also love a bit of aggro so were probably hoping a fight breaks out 😆
🤣💚💚💚
@@DJAUDITS They also love trolling camera's by shouting during a take. I read that before a certain year when sound editing came out; Every single movie ever made, where there are indigenous Crows, has a Crow shouting sound in it 😄 Something to listen out for if you watch old movies or TV shows 👌
@@Crow_FriendI always thought that sound was put in for effect.
Love you DJ , your reasoning is so calm and logical, yet they do no understand what a pity, keep up the good work.
They do understand. They just don't like the logical conclusion that they can't stop him and preveracate
I am sure I could hear the gears grinding in the the Numpties heads Haha
Final chap was spot on.
I do love a good confrontation,my wife thinks im mad but i love these videos,keep up the good work DJ
When security is given imaginary powers above their paygrade and the law.
Another avenue you could persue it the fact that most companies employ CCTV and there's instance that you as a member of the public are deliberately captured and these companies don't ask premision to photograph you. I know under GDPR you can request the footage. 👍😁I just posted this when you made the request under GDPR for the footage from the gentleman.
That’s masterpiece 😂🎉
That chap was very happy to come and talk with you about drones.
That bypass for the data controller information, straight to the sign... Which HAD the data controller information... Shows that DJ is the absolute gold standard of this kind of stuff! This was auditing 101! Chefs kiss! Absolutely brilliant and actually made me laugh out loud with my headphones on whilst eating pub grub. 🤣🤣🤣🤣
🤣🤣🤣💚💚
The drone friendly bloke completely undermined security and the directors of the company 😊
Excellent control once again of the narrative. Surprised a security company wasn't more au fait with the drone laws but still think you should invoice them and they use the interaction as a training video.
🤣🤣🤣
DJ
SCARDA system is a remote connection software to operate equipment.
Example, remote switching on High Voltage system from a control room.
SCADA is a control system of hardware and software elements used to control and monitor industrial processes, infrastructure, and facilities. SCADA systems are commonly employed in industries such as manufacturing, energy, water treatment, transportation, and other critical infrastructure sectors.
Fun fact when Iran's nuclear program was hacked (Stuxnet), suspected US government (one of the most advanced viruses ever created) the exploit they found was in SCADA.
D.J. you saw them all off , they tried all angles to stop you but you knew more than they did , the first guy was an angry sort of chap and the other older guys were not too bad really but you had all the answers for them in your extra smooth answering ways , great vid and content, another one so well done !........
When google go around they never ask permission off anyone .
DJ, you should carry on continuing to continue carrying on. I think.
I love dj audits 😂 so funny has great witty response to people 😂
So much going on at that site…… great views…. Really enjoyed it
You go bro you put them straight .
This is the best approach rather than misleading like the medical trials one. Great vid sir and I’m saying hahahaha so good
Listened more commented early. I don’t think saying it’s for a client is necessary
They fell a bit short of intelligent. The other dude talking about "chipped" drones was quite interesting though. regarding products, you can often find schematics by looking up the FCC ID.
The product of their collective IQ’s would still be a single digit
This is like a Merry go Round. It is nothing to do with them what you are doing. As long as you are not breaking the law, carry on.
You can hear that guys knuckles dragging on the floor. The way he stepped forward and said ‘police’ is hilarious.
If you think there is a crime you know who to call. " the ghost busters"
Straight away in my head aswell don't worry
I really think what you doing is nessary plus i admire the way you explain everything you do even though they don't deserve any of the information from you i think you are great keep it up.
Why was the muppet being so awkward? 😂 the irony went right over they muppets head.
Ignorance of the law is no defense.
It is ok to politely ask but demanding answers making unlawful requests and accosting a member of the public going about their lawful business is grounds for a written warning.
It is perfectly legal and lawful to photograph anything from a public place. The company security issues are not the concern of members of public.
Being suspicious, or different or doing unusual activities,
or not giving personal details is not a crime.
Watching now and it tickles me how much people don't know. Wish you'd come to West Yorkshire!
Hello DJ from Scotland 🏴👍👍
Hey DJ, excellent video as usual! The engagement was top-notch. Regarding the comment about not grasping the desire to lift the height restriction (120m), let me clarify for those who may not be aware. Consider this quick example: if I'm standing halfway up a mountain, I can fly 120m above my current position. However, if the peak I want to capture in a photo or film is an additional 200m above, I'm out of luck with the current height limit.
The charade of another client wasn't required in my view, as previous videos it's just as entertaining and informative to be transparent in stating you're a UA-camr, basically they're just being inquisitive which is understandable. Another great vid DJ.
I really don’t understand why he has started doing that….. pretending to be a photographer for a client… why not just state you’re a UA-camr, it’s as if he’s trying to get a reaction rather than just exercising his right to film in public!
I much prefer Northern Audit’s style… much more honest with the companies which, for me makes the video more pleasant to watch.
Agree with this sentiment. Great video but the bit where dj could not provide his client details due to gdpr undermined his position. If DJ is bound by gdpr in respect of client details then surely he would also be bound by gdpr in respect of the imges he is taking. I know it's all a farce but I think it does weaken DJ's position on gdpr a bit.
DJ is on fire on this one .
Most of these companies could lose 90% of their staff with no material difference to them.
The gift that just keeps giving
All the brains came out with no idea but supposed laws
And low and behold a lovely chap comes along with all the answers
It’s becoming a worrying trend how is it nobody in charge seems to know anything
Anymore
10:30 "casing the joint" lol love it
I like this security guy. He’s wrong however he’s trying to protect his colleagues and his place of work. Good for him.
Rubbish he's talking crap.
Protect from what? Did you not notice the big wide open gates, which I presume are closed to provide at minimum protection? Are cameras now deemed as dangerous and anyone or anything that might captured in shot would need some sore of protection?
Very well explained the laws in photography and very professional audit video, but they fell into the audit trap, adding extra interest to the video.
Love the fact that their entrance sign has directions to the "Visitor's Car Park." Singular. As in: we can only accept one visitor at a time! So that could be you, DJ.
Humans are so untrusting, and just not innocently curious enough. :-( Sadly, most of these negative interactions could go either way, but largely depends on the initial person and how they approach. Thx for sharing, watching from Vancouver, Canada. Regards Jules
What a lovely employee at the end! Directors take note. That’s how to approach the public
“ you’re not carrying on continuing!” Greatest statement ever😂😂
Tubby man is about as scary as my nan. And poor old Cliff............. Am I the only one who wondered where the Hell did this weirdo looking bloke appear from? Almost made me jump.
Im a Nan to, be scared 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
Calmly baffled. I enjoyed the interaction.
And I’m saying this is the greatest DJ Audits opening ever.
The company is out of their designated area to be right. Great DJ 👍.
Well they are all having a quiet sensible convesation, but they are having a really hard time understanding that what somebody does in public is none of their business.
Tell me something, did you know any of the laws regarding public photography and flying drones to make videos over businesses before you started watching auditors ? I would say that’s a no. Do the police always know the laws regarding public photography and flying drones over businesses and they are the law, do they always know ? no they don’t. If you owned a business and you never seen any hard in videos, and you saw A random person pointing the camera through your fence of your business, taking photographs or making a video are flying a drone over your business. Would you be sat there thinking no problem? Or would you be likely to go out to find out what they are doing? I reckon like most people would go out to find out what they are doing. Here’s the thing. Most of us watch the videos for the drama and the confrontation, if we’re being honest. One of the good things about auditors, who do it the right way is there slowly, but surely educating people regarding the rights of people to take photographs so at some point there will be a lot less confrontation and drama when auditors turn up to take photographs, I’ll make videos. And I guarantee at that point, the numbers of viewers will drop dramatically because looking at industrial estate and what’s in recycle bins isn’t really that interesting is it if you’re being honest. Too many people in the comment section, have this outrage and like to moan about how people behave regarding How they don’t understand the laws et cetera when the truth is most people in the country, don’t have a clue about the laws regarding photography why would day that includes the police.
@@christopherwhittaker2620Yes I did. I have been a photographer for over 40 years, and I have been challenged in public many years ago, so I learnt the laws. I am also a pilot so I know a fair bit about the laws concerning things flying around and its in my own interest to do so especially given the rise in drones. I have seen the damage a pigeon can do to a light aircraft, let alone a hard plastic drone.
My problem is the way that people come out and are basically rude, aggressive and so entitled to demand to know what somebody is doing on the public foot path. They could could come out and say hello, how are you, and start a reasonable conversation. But no, they come out making laws up left right and center, they have no fucking idea what the laws are, they just feel they are entitled to interrogate people without cause.
As far as trained (sic) security personnel are concerned, then yes, they bloody well shold know the laws concerning interacting with the members of the public, its thier bloody job to know.
@@turdwarbler sure and I can agree with most of what you’re saying here. Especially regarding how people approach auditors.
Too often, they come out guns blazing with a cocky attitude or as you say, rude or aggressive etc. And I agree That it’s about time that security personnel were trained properly regarding the laws.
It seems like The people and companies that train people to become SIA registered are taking peoples money and not training them properly. All SIA Security should have good knowledge of things like photography, drone laws.etc etc. I think with you being a photographer and a pilot automatically, makes you very likely to be aware of the laws regarding photography and drones. But my only point I’ve been trying to make is most people aren’t photographers are pilots, so they don’t know these laws through no real fault of their own.
And as I’ve said often police don’t even know the laws which kind of says it all really. And that is why I sometimes laugh at the amount of outrage in the comment section.
Most of the people who watch these videos will have had absolutely no idea about the laws around photography or drones, until they started watching auditing videos. And as I’ve said, most of us are here, because of the drama, all the confrontation captured in videos, maybe not your good self, but most people. Anyway, I appreciate your reply. Take care mate
@christopherwhittaker2620 You are replying with almost the same comment on here. To a certain degree, in regards to drones not a lot of people would know, I would agree with. However, not knowing and automatically saying it's not allowed or it's illegal are the usual go to stance. What makes them think it's not allowed or illegal? When they get told it's not, they then double down and say well it's the law. If you don't know something then best not to speak as an authority on a subject you know nothing about. Yes these drone videos have opened eyes, especially for the ones that watch them
My next point is the normal everyday use of a camera, be that a phone or other type. Virtually every person has one of some description. I can guarantee the vast majority have at some point taken pictures or videos in public. Be that in town, in a park, on holiday, any tourist attractions etc. You don't need to know any laws about taking said pictures or video in public. There is no way in this world that they thought to ask permission, they just done it without a care in the world. That's all they needed to know, that they were doing it end of. So to that end why would these people in these premises think differently? That is the question. They have done exactly what DJ and others are doing, but for some reason they think their buildings are sacred.
Audits like this mainly came about, for the majority who do it, were sick to the back teeth of getting stopped by police, strangers etc, wanting to know what they were doing. So in the main, the use of video was to try and show the general public who watch, or in this case, a business, that filming in public is a normal activity.
@@stuartb4525 no sorry I disagree. There’s a huge difference between people taking photographs and selfies of each other in their houses in pubs and restaurants on holiday et cetera et cetera. Surely you understand that businesses are a different kettle of fish and you seem to be missing my point. I will repeat my point if that’s what I need to do.
Until auditing started to happen fairly recently, you would not of seen people turning up randomly on industrial estates pointing cameras at their premises. Don’t try and pretend you would, so if you put yourself in the position of business owners, security, guards, and even the police to some extent, surely you can see it is quite unusual to see a random person turn up at your business on an industrial estate taking photographs? There is a massive difference between taking photographs of yourself in the street in the pub at home and taking photographs of premises on industrial estates.
Now just because you have got used to the idea of seeing it because you watch videos of auditors doesn’t mean that business owners and security guards are aware that this happens as frequently as it is happening, so to them it is highly unusual. This is why we get the drama, what don’t you understand about that? We wouldn’t see the drama if everyone was used to seeing people taking photographs on industrial estates would we ? surely you can see that ? obviously you can’t. And you’re actually making my point for me by pretending that business owners should automatically understand it’s normal for random people to be taking photographs of their premises just because people take selfies and people now have phones with cameras on them. it’s almost like you’re saying that the business owners know that the photographers have the right to do what they’re doing and I just coming out just for the confrontation which isn’t true.
Business, owners, staff from businesses, security guards, and even the police are often confused as to why someone is taking pictures of business premises. And that’s because it’s quite a new thing relatively speaking.
It’s only going to become normal once the world goes round and once there is awareness raised about the rights of photographers, you pretending that people should automatically know the rights of photographers who own businesses is hilarious because if that was the case we wouldn’t see the drama that we do on a regular basis. I can’t believe you’re being so stubborn regarding this.
You’ve got to ask yourself, why do we see so much drama if people genuinely new photographers rights, it makes no sense.
The amount of info people just give up without knowing... if this was something like a RED team exercise at the recon phase you'd have loads of stuff to play with ;)