@@RealCoolstriker64 facebook and twitter (and tumblr) are full of negative (toxic) people. Warp drive needs negative energy spacex buys facebook to harvest the negative energy from its uses to power a warp drive.
Aliens: "Oh, so you did receive and translate our instructional material. Did you manage to peacefully unite and achieve technological utopia too?" Humans: "Yeah, about that..."
If you are not afraid to learn beyond what mainstream offers, read this book "Secrets of Antigravity Propulsion by Paul A. LaViolette". Subquantum Kinetics theory of Warp Drive.
*We must take it on faith as mathematical proof doesn't exist.* *N.A.S.A. on speed:* *The Earth's orbital speed around the sun is 67,000 m.p.h.* *The sun's orbital speed around the galaxy is 450,000 m.p.h.* *The speed of the ground beneath your feet, as a result of the Earth's* *rotation is* *600 m.p.h. at the latitude of Sheffield (53 degrees);* *1,000 m.p.h. at the equator.* *The Earth travels 584 million miles per year (one trip around the sun); that's* *1,600,000 miles per day; 66,667 miles traveled each hour* *“The distance across St. George's Channel, between Holyhead and Kingstown Harbour, near Dublin, is at least 60 statute miles. It is not an uncommon thing for passengers to notice, when in, and for a considerable distance beyond the centre of the Channel, the Light on Holyhead Pier, and the Poolbeg Light in Dublin Bay. The Lighthouse on Holyhead Pier shows a red light at an elevation of 44 feet above high water; and the Poolbeg Lighthouse exhibits two bright lights at an altitude of 68 feet; so that a vessel in the middle of the Channel would be 30 miles from each light; and allowing the observer to be on deck, and 24 feet above the water, the horizon on a globe would be 6 miles away. Deducting 6 miles from 30, the distance from the horizon to Holyhead, on the one hand, and to Dublin Bay on the other, would be 24 miles. The square of 24, multiplied by 8 inches, shows a declination of 384 feet. The altitude of the lights in Poolbeg Lighthouse is 68 feet; and of the red light on Holyhead Pier, 44 feet. Hence, if the earth were a globe, the former would always be 316 feet and the latter 340 feet below the horizon!” -- Dr. Samuel Rowbotham,* ~ *_Earth Not a Globe!_* *“The lights which are exhibited in lighthouses are seen by navigators at distances at which, according to the scale of the supposed ‘curvature’ given by astronomers, they ought to be many hundreds of feet, in some cases, down below the line of sight! For instance: the light at Cape Hatteras is seen at such a distance (40 miles) that, according to theory, it ought to be nine-hundred feet higher above the level of the sea than it absolutely is, in order to be visible! This is a conclusive proof that there is no ‘curvature,’ on the surface of the sea - ‘the level of the sea,’- ridiculous though it is to be under the necessity of proving it at all: but it is, nevertheless, a conclusive proof that the Earth is not a globe.” -- William Carpenter,* *_100 Proofs the Earth is Not a Globe_* Surveyors, engineers and architects are never required to factor the supposed curvature of the Earth into their projects. Canals and railways, for example, are always cut and laid horizontally, often over hundreds of miles, without any allowance for curvature. (self.conspiracy) The London and Northwestern Railway forms a straight line 180 miles long between London and Liverpool. The railroad's highest point, midway at Birmingham station, is only 240 feet above sea-level. If the world were actually a globe, however, curving 8 inches per mile squared, the 180 mile stretch of rail would form an arc with the center point at Birmingham raising a full 5,400 feet above London and Liverpool. Adding the station's actual height (240 feet) to its theoretical inclination (5,400 feet) gives 5,640 feet as the rail's necessary height on a globe Earth, more than a thousand feet taller than Ben Nevis, the tallest mountain in Great Britain. *The Suez Canal which connects the Mediterranean Sea with the Gulf of Suez on the Red Sea is a clear proof of the Earth's and water's non-convexity. The canal is 100 miles long and without any locks so the water within is an uninterrupted continuation of the Mediterranean Sea to the Red Sea. When it was constructed, the Earth's supposed curvature was not taken into account, it was dug along a horizontal datum line 26 feet below sea-level, passing through several lakes from one sea to the other, with the datum line and the water's surface running perfectly parallel over the 100 miles. The average level of the Mediterranean is 6 inches above the Red Sea, while the flood tides in the Red Sea rise 4 feet above the highest and drop 3 feet below the lowest in the Mediterranean, making the half-tide level of the Red Sea, the surface of the Mediterranean Sea, and the 100 miles of water in the canal, all a clear continuation of the same horizontal line! Were they instead the supposed curved line of globe-Earthers, the water in the center of the canal would be 1,666 feet (502 x 8 inches = 1,666 feet 8 inches) above the respective Seas on either side!*
I wanted to comment this but found you already did:) if only those stubborn scientists take clues from ufology and test them out out of mere curiosity!
It’s crazy that if you listen to UFO reports, the disc will often go up on end, flat to the direction of travel, before it darts off at impossible accelerations.
@@TheShootist Even if there is a multiverse and infinite time (and as far as we know, there isn't), some things are just impossible. Two plus Two will never equal five in any universe.
I tried reading Einstein's original paper on special relativity. Night after night for 6 months I tried to understand it. I tried everything. I looked through previous publications to understand the knowledge at the time. I tried to work through some problems and I thought about the theories in novel ways to try to get an intuitive grasp or even any at all. It probably didn't help much that I didn't have the appropriate background in math. I tried learning the math, I even tried talking to experts. Still, nothing made sense. It just wouldn't click in my head. I toiled over this complex theory, wasting many notebooks of scrap paper trying to make sense of it. Many long nights later, I came to an amazing epiphany; I can't read German.
That was a good one. I have already allotted myself ten years to get through Einstein's Field Equations. The only thing I need to do now is get started.
Try to get it this way: Einstein's equations describe the relations between different masses in a way that give each pair of masses in the universe an individual relation that can be perceived as space multiplied by time. In other words: there is no space beyond that relation. Independent space does not exist.
I decided to completely work out the most difficult example given in my engineering calculus textbook and discovered there was a mistake in the example. I brought this up to my professor, he just blew me off and wasn't in the least, interested.
thats the main difference between academics, some enter to study how reality works and this understanding its both aesthetically & useful and others are nerds that really wants fantasy to somehow works leading to no progress except for novels written in fancy mathematical language and call it "understanding" both "aesthetically" & "useful"... lets philosophers do that crappy work of doing garbage ideology like it were "academia"
@@janpahl6015 I was actually referring to myself. I've lost the ability to comprehend equations but not the interest in the science . Sabine, in real sense have been a great teacher to communicate those deep insights of equations.
This might be something Picard would say, but he never did, because that is a quote from Nelson Mandela from by 2001. Unless it's from the new series. I didn't watch that.
@Ryan Dawson Actually, if you're trying to find who came up with the idea, you'd have to search back into ancient history... impossiblehq.com/25-impossible-quotes/
In a world full of til tok fools, be an intelligent human, not a twit-ter. And if someone tells you your idea is stupid, tell em that's what they said to Tesla, Bell, and hundreds of other visionaries. I'm studying star formation and star birth, needless to say, the more I'm studying the more questions I end up with.
Exactly what I was thinking looking at starship test flights. For a normal boy in his bedroom to be able to see the cutting edge of human knowledge and progress. Boom!! Amazing
@@snikrepak well its just a decently big group of kids who use tiktok, no need to worry about everybody becoming dumb or humanity being doomed because of one group
"Next step: learn how to generate my own space warp." Actually if you adopt your wife's frame of reference, you will quickly see that your own frame is already warped.
@@SovereignStatesman You'd like "Guitarzan" by Ray Stevens. (Ray's a homie. I'm on the Album "I Have Returned".) I prefer "Marching to Mars" by Sammy Hagar. Fair winds and following seas.
@SuperNova Gaming _"let's see here... synthehol, alcohol, time crystals, inaprovaline, cannabis, Klingon nerve toxin, snakeleaf, cordrazine, ketracel-white, and just a wee pinch of LDS... there. _*_Cap'n!_*_ The Christmas punch is ready, and she's got a lovely kick!"_ Merry Christmas, my fellow Trekkies 😁 🖖 💚❤️💚❤️💚❤️💚 🖖
She is rambling on about nonsense. Theories based on theories which are based on yet even more theories, and none of them have ever been tested in any way. You are listening to someone preaching a religion because her beliefs are entirely based on faith that what she has been taught is true. But none of it has ever been proven.
@@EoWKen Wrong. the vast majority of physics is what we have gleaned from empirically evidenced results of experiment. To say that the theoretical stuff that tries to extend that with rigorous mathematical models is anywhere close to having faith and making up complete nonsense like with religion, is to completely misunderstand what we know and how theoretical physics is done. Indeed, Sabine rails against those theories that seem not to be supported but are popular, like those that rely on an idea of "symmetry" just for the sake of it. If you think someone like her and some religious nut are somehow equal, I'd invite you to go take medical advice from the latter and see how you end up.
@@EoWKen Sure, relativity is so "unproven" that the clocks of satelites we use for GPS and other things need to be adjusted for the time altering effects of it. You might not be aware of the proof, but that says nothing about whether it is proven or not. Reality is not dependent on your personal knowledge. You are probably unaware that is is possible to prove that the root of 2 is irrational, but for people who are studying maths or physics it is a first semester thing. You are trying to disprove things using your own ignorance, which is about as stupid and pathetic as it gets.
@Bliss Okpu If petitionary prayer worked, things would be different. For example, hospitals that organized prayer for patients would have better results than hospitals that don't. They would advertise this service and we would have statistics about how well it works. Many people have difficulty confronting these issues because they have been taught that they will go to Hell if they get the answer that their church doesn't like. If you are in that category, I don't blame you. Cult exit phobias are not going to be repaired by UA-cam posts.
@Bliss Okpu You asked God to make this video age well. That isn't adding to the direct word of God? Whatever. Getting your beliefs to make sense isn't my problem. In any case, either prayer moves things in the direction you ask for on the average, or it doesn't. Presenting a wall of text can't change that. I agree with you that millions of people claim to have been helped by God. The claim that prayer helps is a statistical claim so it wants statistical evidence. The people who believe it don't think very well about statistics. I also agree with you that people who have been Christian for a long time are able to make their thoughts conform without much explicit thought about Hell. For example, my statement about hospitals didn't get much response from you. It is called thought stopping, and like other skills people get better at it with practice. If you want to see thought stopping in action, try to read and understand the following two sentences: There are known techniques that could have caused reliable transmission of the Gospels without starting with four discordant versions and then having everyone do their own edits for hundreds of years. A loving and omniscient God would have used them. (Edit: You probably have lots of friends who share your beliefs, and you may not be able to afford being in conflict with them. I can't provide you with new friends via a UA-cam comment, nor can I change their beliefs en masse with a UA-cam comment that you will see and they won't. So it probably makes perfect sense for you to ignore me or deflect what I say. I'm speaking mostly for the benefit of other people who come by this thread. I expect you to be a lost cause for the next few years at least.)
I read this too many years ago, & am not sure how to find it again. But I have read about studies that do show prayer has statistically significant benefits. You (the atheist) said God will have nothing to do with it. My own view is that God has everything to do with everything, inseparable from their own creation.
@@polychoron Citations for astonishing claims have multiple uses. In this case a citation would make it possible to find other people who did similar studies or had something to say about this one. But this a dog-ate-my-homework excuse. "I found evidence that proves the existence of God, I misplaced the pointer to it, and I can't be bothered to rediscover it despite it being the most important thing in the world. You really should believe bald assertions about religion from a random UA-camr." Sorry, that is bullshit. You can do better, if you want to.
@@raybeeze5522 Sci-Fi (pseudo science): static.wikia.nocookie.net/doctorwhotorchwood/images/c/c6/USS_Enterprise_NCC-1701-D.jpg/revision/latest?cb=20160816071915&path-prefix=de Semi-Realistic: s.hdnux.com/photos/44/40/15/9569100/3/1200x0.jpg How the FTL drive in Star Wars works is explained and completely different to warp drive. They jump to a different "dimension" (hyperspace) where distances are smaller and then drop out of it again. It's BS pseudo science, like most sci-fi (doesn't stop it to be fun). Star Trek actually does the moving a bubble of space thing, but in a complete BS sci-fi way, of course. They call it warp drive, it might be that the name "warp drive" is actually from Star Trek?
Time warp, mind warp, warped sense of humor, warped sense of reality, warp speed now, warp is not the answer, the fog of warp, Fisherman's warp, Lieutenant warp. Sweet potatoes taste better at 0.5 c. If my clock runs slower I ask "Slower than what?" My previous clock or your clock? The slower my clock runs due to increasing gravity, the faster (I perceive) your clock is running. If clock speed and speed of light are as connected as relativity dictates, then as I cross over into faster than light velocity, I might be at exactly the speed of light for just a microsecond and it is during that microsecond that the clocks for the rest of the universe (outside of my little bubble) will elapse time at an infinitely fast rate. In short, all of eternity will happen in a second and there won't be anyone left to appreciate my warped accomplishment. Elton John once said "It's lonely out in space." He wasn't kidding.
Love the propper pronounciation of Einstein :) plus the "there are equations for each combination of directions in spacetime" might just be my new favourite super simple explanation of underlying tensor algebra ever ...
There was a young lady named Bright Who traveled much faster than light She left us one day In a relative way And arrived on the previous night from Oxford or Cambridge
How do you call these kinds of poems where you have this exact "rhythm" or "schema" in it? I heard a similar one from Spongebob with the exact same rhyme schema, see watch?v=k2HqgjI35eo.
So what this is basically saying is that the shape of flying saucers makes perfect sense if they move and hover by bending space-time? Aliens confirmed.
No one knows how they hover, move around and by what means they travel between star systems, besides, the classic flying saucer shape is not the only shape they operate, there are some 20 other very common shapes reported, such as cylinder, triangle, boomerang, spherical, pyramid...
@@PurpleVidaar "some" is more than one, so what about a single quanta of space time, anything less in the real world cant exist by definition, and so must have a fractal dimension of 1
At least i understand relativity and don't take fictional bullshit for scientific papers. Your attempt at appeal to authority failed epicly. Better luck next time!
*"1 1/4 light years per minute? That is theoretically impossible."* _"Their drives may be based on different theories than ours."_ My favorite Dialog from Larry Nivens _Ringworld_
"Not being afraid to learn more" is really synonymous with "don't become a slave to ideas". A professor of mine once said in passing "don't marry your ideas". It immediately resonated and stuck.
Obviously this must be taken in moderation. We should still be afraid to engage in unethical research. In that regard, there is a limit to how much we should know.
@@TheSuperRatt Ideas should not be conflated with research. I would argue that we should regularly engage with questions of what ideas we regard as ethical or unethical.
I think we truly need to be actively seeking to challenge our ideas and learn more as to grow in our understanding. Ideas are beautiful, and it's important that we are constantly trying to improve them by looking for new evidence and thinking open-mindedly, impersonally.
basically look at R on left and T on right....R is now curved space time is and T is mass and energy density,,,,,,,,,,,,,,basically as we all know Mass and energy bend space time..............so with this equation ,once we measure the energy density, T (mass and energy) we can calculate how much it will bend the space time, R ...we can use this info to calculate how orbits work etc i guess.......................however we can do the opposite too.....we can say i want space time to be bent in this way, thus defining R.....then using the same equation we can calculate what is the exact mass and energy density (T) needed to achieve that space time curvee (R) .........................andd when we input the curve we need for superluminal travel and solve the equation , we see it requires negative energy density to achive that curve
Simple does not mean that it is easy to understand, especially if you don't have the knowledge. This is a basic concept of logic called Occam's Razor, which is that the explanation of something should require the fewest new assumptions in one's logic should be preferred over one that requires more if both chains of logic reach the same conclusion. Thus, the simplicity. Again, just because something is simple to explain doesn't mean that it is easy to understand, only that the logical steps and the assumptions behind them, especially new assumptions, required to reach the answer are, relatively, few. The new paper basically further refined Alcubierre's paper by explaining how the shape of the warp bubble impacts the amount of energy needed.
Being as Dr. Alcubierre is Mexican, I think it's pronounced (al-coo-be-air-ray). Kind of. The double R is a single letter in Spanish and is spoken as a rolling R. It is difficult to write phonetically.
I know we're supposed to be lofty minded people here, but, can anyone else see the baby Chihuahua in the stars to the right side of Sabine's head? How cute is that? :-)
Chances are that those domains are connected. If we need exotic matters for warp drive, we need a way to discover and produce exotic matters. And if it can't be done in a particle accelerator...
These videos are brutal at times. Sabine you give no quarter to weak thinking or 'populist' interpretation. Thats precisely why this channel is now the go-to for scientific review. For those of us who wish we knew more, who wish we could think and analyse like you, its frustrating at times. For now at least, I will have to rely on you Sabine to help. Subscribing and donating.
How do we know she’s right? I was very suspicious of a lot of what she said in the video about traveling faster than the speed of light. Pretty much every other scientist says causality will be violated.
@@gilgamesh310 When i first encountered this chanel i had the same suspicions, just like you i noticed the appearently unconventional opinions of her (and it only got wierder when i found out about her music videos). But I've come to respect her as a rational person after i watched some of her interviews. You can at least trust her to understand these fiels, judging from the fact she has a wikipedia article detaling her credentials.
You could go through her papers and look at the credibility of the publisher, check reviewer comments and her rebuttal if possible, or see who has cited and used her work. Its published and available.scholar.google.com/citations?user=NaQZcyYAAAAJ&hl=en publons.com/researcher/324810/sabine-hossenfelder/
I remember reading a book a long time ago called "The Physics of Star Trek" or something like that. In it they said the least realistic thing was the teleporter, not the warp drive. I can't totally remember why now, but I think it was the energy cost.
It would actually make sense for them to move differently on planetary surfaces, since air resistance would be the most important factor, and you generally wouldn't want to travel anywhere near the speed of light in the vicinity of a planet. Not only would you get vaporized by the friction, but if you happened to hit anything in your path, well you would also be vaporized.
Saucers don't move, they fall at desired direction. Because saucers are always stationary inside the bubble of spacetime, more accurately the vortex ring of ether. The shape of saucer is likely because it is an important shape to create a controlled vortex ring of ether/spacetime curvature around the saucer with powerful electromagnetic force and not necessarily due to friction reason.
A saucer in space is not in a danger of being destroyed as long as its vortex ring of ether/spacetime curvature field/bubble is up and running. Everything whether it be an asteroid, rarefied gas or even light, it will go around the saucer instead of colliding head on, same with friction problem. It is better not to compare a saucer flying from point A to point B with an airplane flying. They are not flying in conventional fashion.
@@Xeno_Bardock I would imagine that in such warped spacetime as the boundary region there would probably still be exotic effects on any such material is it is deflected as the high curvature is in GR terms going to result in an apparent acceleration of course that material is generally so rarified that it wouldn't be readily observable but I would expect it to still have some form of feedback on the warp drive likely relating to loss of energy/stability of the warp field so it likely still would be a bad idea to do warp driving near matter or other concentrations of energy
@Jack Rabbit The whole point of the video, if I understood it correctly, is that most of these caveats can be resolved if you restrict yourself to *sub* luminal speeds, i.e. slower than light.
Problem is energy, divide force interaction of electromagnetic force by gravity and you get an idea of the energy scale you are dealing with, then you need extra energy to manipulate it so it matches the tensor diagrams. You need to convert minimum approx 90 billion kg of matter into energy at 100% efficiency to move one kg. The rest is a piece of cake.
What I still don't understand is how, when looking at the "bubble" from the outside, the propagation of spacetime information about the bubble itself can happen faster than light. I mean, gravitational waves travel at the speed of light, and my understanding was that all propagation of spacetime does the same, when looking at it on a zoomed-out scale.
@@FriedrichHerschel metric, no short or long kg, this is energy consumption just to maintain field, not to mention impossible task of thermal management of passangers, they would experience thermal output of a sun and burnt into a crisp within nano seconds
This is very exciting! It’s true though, whenever I’ve heard discussions about the Alcubierre warp drive, it was always with the assumption that we were trying to attain faster than light travel. It never even occurred to me that we could use such propulsion for subliminal speeds. All this time, as far as this concept goes, we’ve been trying to hit the Home run instead of just settling for a two run bass hit. LOL, we can accomplish a lot with just that to run bass hit. granted, yes, it would be nice to have faster than light travel, but still, it certainly would be nice to be able to quickly zip around the solar system. And getting to nearby star systems in a reasonable timewould certainly be doable even without super luminal speeds.
"reasonable time"... the next closest star system is over 4 light years away. Even moving at near light speed, 4 years is not exactly a reasonable amount of time. If we want to go beyond that, the journey will start to take a substantial portion of a human lifespan.
@@neurofiedyamato8763 You're forgetting time dilation - at near light speed, this trip takes >4 years each way in an external frame of reference, but it's *much* shorter for the astronaut herself. In the light speed limit, it's instantaneous for the astronaut.
Best video ever. No bashing of particle physicists, self-revealing revelations, fascinating open ended vista’s. An optimistic outlook from Dr. Sabine. Addictive!
I feel like Sabine is a breath of fresh air. Especially when she is breaking balls. Not that I always agree with her, but I always agree with her passion
I'm sure, like most of us, Hossenfelder is a multifaceted individual, neither all harsh cynicism nor all boundless optimism. In any case, she always brings a valuable perspective to consider. Paul Sutter is another 'cranky physicist' who likes to play the foil to the more romantic types - and I think this thankless job is needed. ;)
"The only way of making progress is not to be afraid of learning more" That's brilliant! I'd only like add that sometimes I find it impossible to not be afraid, and would change the "not being afraid of" bit for overcoming the fear.
January 2021 Update patch log: - FIXED: Found bug that allows some humans to travel faster than light by exploiting a vulnerability in the physics engine.
Even at sub-luminal speeds, the travel time within solar system bodies would be much shorter. Imagine going from Earth to Saturn in a few weeks rather than decades.
@@twistedyogert Problem is, from what I understand the authors suggest that the warp field configuration still has to be accelerated to the proper speed by conventional means like a rocket. So then really what's the point of the warp drive if all it does is wrap you in a bubble of "static" spacetime?
Absolutely. The joy of negative energy repulsion balancing out contraction is you have inherently inertial cancelation between the 2 effects at work. Even at sublight, this would be vastly superior to any convention means of travel.
The problem isn't breaking the barrier, but simply moving our speeds forward. Even decimal increments toward light speed will improve our current technological ability. I'm glad to see that people are actually working toward this goal. When I see how far we have come in just my lifetime, it gives me hope for the future.
@@jimmorrison2657 So basically you just became biased and ignorant that fast. You would be mind blown if you had actually checked it out. Then again I'm wasting my time typing here to an ignorant person.
@@jimmorrison2657 The problem I've discovered is figuring out what needs unlearning. Science, History, Politics, Law, Art... everything I know is corrupt :/ Here's some unsolicited free advice: "Don't take unsolicited free advice".
@@antonijaume8498 Nope. It sounds like an oxymoron. How does that work? I hope you're not referring to the distribution of temperatures around 0 K... At 0 K (a temperature that has never been reached - and cannot be reached - experimentally), you have in fact a distribution of atoms or molecules, some of which being exactly at 0, very close to having zero momentum. So, what can possibly be negative absolute temperatures? Thanks
@@raminagrobis6112 no, it is a result in statistical mechanics, in a sense it is somewhat flakey. Still it fits the equations, and works to predict real world situations. So it is possible that with better understanding of both theory and the real world. For one thing we know that general relativity is incomplete, nor do we know what are dark matter and dark energy.
@@antonijaume8498 I think we wers both saying the same thing when I mentioned that the behavior of atoms near 0 K is accounted by the measurement of their distribution around that T. Tomato. tomato. You said statistical mechanics, I went with "distribution' ,:). So a negative T is a result predicted by a probabilistic description of elementary particles in the vicinity of 0. But I honestly wonder about the realistic prospect of exploiting a hypothetical result of a purely mathematical construction that has little, if any bearing in reality, notwithstanding my admission that there is no consistent model incorporating both a relativistic description of the real world and its quantum mechanical counterpart...
Q: How do we reach warp speed? A: Just assume you have. Thanks scientists. Really knocked it out the park with that one. Have a break from scienceing, you've earned it.
Sabine, you will never know how much we, the unwashed, enjoy your talks. You have given us access to things we could never have discovered in our work-a-day world. Our thanks to you.
Dilithium won't help here as i) it regulate positive energy production and ii) doesn't create warp fields that and iii) ST ftl travel is way more different than what is theorised. But you are right about needing something as exotic like those.
@@DarkShroom I mean that they approached it with the intent of building realizable metrics. Many of the geometries they studied could be created with good old positive energy.
they really didn't, not that you read their paper both alcubierre and them put a basic ammount of human decency in their paper, alcubierre is just your typical university student regurgitating his classes, and his paper was just him deciding to have fun with his homework after watching a few episodes of star trek but he is an actually moral person who was careful never to claim things that were false, at least as far as his understanding went The new paper was the same, but both were just toying around with maths that don't match reality, an engineer wouldn't look at either for more than a second, this is garbage not the fault of alcubierre or alexi and gianni, just the fault of the people who were their teachers
@@thetim6764 yeah and incredible ignorant towards those who can only afford vehicles with hyper drive as opposed to the warp drives of the intergalactic bourgeois
If it's possible to avoid causality paradoxes I think that augers heavily in favor of superluminal travel being possible. But my suspicion in the end is that the solution to interstellar travel times isn't going to be FTL drives, it's going to be living longer and being more patient. Either way though, yeah, I'd be delighted with just a reactionless drive even if it's slower than light.
I heard there's whiskey in some nebula out there in space. Although I'm a functioning teetotaler, it would be so cash to take a few sips from God's whiskey cellar before I give up the ghost.
"There was a young woman named Bright, whose speed was much faster than light. She departed one day, in a relative way, and returned on the previous night."
Hi Sabine, I still don't know if warp drive will be possible in the near future. It doesn't seem so, though it's absolutely worth studying. There is however an ion drive, on my channel, that lifts its power supply against Earth's gravity. It might also be able to utilize relativistic electrons as propellant someday as well. Even though that upgrade is still theoretical, there is some mathematical support for it.
I almost got obsessed with the Alcubierre drive when I learnt of it. I saw a picture of the IXS Enterprise, read that it was based on the Alcubierre drive and so began my journey into general relativity. 😁
I'm a molecular biologist and I just discovered your channel! Thanks for the easier-to-digest physics content. I'm fond of astro- and particle physics whenever I'm off my work and I've been so far limited to the public engagements of Brian Cox, Sara Seager, and Tara Shears (and the likes)!
Even subluminal warp travel would have loads of advantages, to include moving debris out of the way I believe. Even if we can't go faster than light, we're gonna at least get close to C and things hurt when they hit ya that fast.
The fastest man has ever travelled in space so far is 0.00004*c, a record established during the Apollo program. A nearly 50-yr old record!. We thus have a long way to go. For many technical reasons, it has been predicted that the fastest speed achievable using the same overall vehicle design and with the best theoretically & practically useful propulsion energy source (e.g. controlled fusion), with the exclusion of fantasy solutions such as matter/antimatter, would be about 0.4*c in the BEST scenario, but more conservatively, more probably smtg in the vicinity of 0.2*c, which would already be a massive advance (a 5000-fold increase in speed is nothing to be ashamed of). Over that value, relativistic problems start getting "seriously" in the way and the energy required to increase momentum becomes exponentially more critical. Warp speed engine-based design would improve that limit for sure. And we haven't yet considered the impact of hitting debris, small meteorites, etc., which will certainly become a major factor in establishing a safe limit to the maximal velocity any vehicle will reach in practice.
The fastest man made object is the Parker Solar Probe (by Applied Physics Laboratory - probably not the same Applied Physics from the new paper) that, using a Sol gravity assist, has reached speeds around 0.0006c which is close to 3 times the speed of the previous record holder - the Helios B solar probe (apparently, the sun is pretty good at accelerating things - who would've thought 😜)
@@guss77 Thanks for the precision, but I specified for a manned vehicle... Of course faster projectiles have been and will be tested before we go faster with pilots on board!
Bob Lazar is such a paradox. Time continues to strengthen and weaken his claims. As both a believer in fundamental science and someone whose willing to go tinfoil hat occasionally. I honestly have no idea what to believe. Could it be possible that some genius thought of warp drive technology in secrecy and now governments hide it behind aliens? Who knows. I’ll let time and science continue to flesh things out.
He said nothing of the sort. Lazar made no claim that this position of the ship was beneficial for the warp bubble, and obviously didn't understand why it would be. His hypothetical warp bubble was not as flat as the one shown in this video, but a three dimensional heart shape with the bulges of the heart behind the ship, and the point going forward; a shape that would be impractical and energy intensive for the reasons explained in this video, as it would have a greater length going forward than up and down, the exact opposite of what this theory recommends. The only reason he would have claimed such a thing is so that the ship's artificial gravity could be provided by the gravity well underneath the ship. Consistently, Lazar shows no knowledge of the actual math and theories behind warp drives, and depends entirely on science fiction like Star Trek for the information in his theories, but still proposes a warp drive less believable than that in Star Trek.
I think that quote is as stupid as it is meaningless. Just a figment of the imagination of people who aren't interested in evidence of reality and it's limitations. Certain groups come to mind. EDIT: Of course it depends on your definition of 'science fiction' and the only one that works is 'anything actually possible' which we have no way of knowing and this it's meaningless.
@@nommy8599 Jules verne an author in the 1800s wrote From The Earth to the Moon describing rocketships very similar to the Rockets eventually used in the Space Race during the 1960-70s Star Trek had the Warp Drive engines and NASA says it's doable in the next few years Rail Guns were Science Fiction now the Navy is heavily invested in them Laser weapons made for riot control Material for Vehicles and Uniforms that can allow soldiers to hide from optics like night vision and thermal vision George lucas and his star wars Legends books have this thing called a protoSaber and some guy and his friends built one in his garage Ancient Greeks invented steam engines for automatic doors and gates The Roman Empires Coliseum held Naval battles as a form of entertainment My point is Technology even imagined in some book in the past is slowly becoming real
Apparently, one problem with the Alcubierre "drive" is that any matter in front of the warp bubble becomes massively charged and, when you reach your destination, it all blows up, possibly destroying your ship and destination. I don't know if this newer maths overcomes that problem. If it does then even if one can't get the bubble to travel at superluminal speeds, it might be that it makes fast travel between stars safer, as it would avoid the collision with small particles at relativistic speeds.
If we managed to get warp drive done in reality, would that also implicitely mean that we manage to get some kind of anti-gravity-device done in reality?
Possibly. If we can figure out how to manipulate spacetime to travel at superluminal speeds then it shouldn't be too big of a step to manipulate spacetime to create artificial gravity for the crew or to create an anti-gravity field to lift a half a million ton spaceship off the ground. But first we need to figure out how to manipulate spacetime in general.
FINALLY! A UA-cam video that explains current warp theory in an honest, straightforward manner. This video SHOCKS (!!) clickbait garbage channels like Future Unity.
once you understand that light speed will make you wait 4 years to get to the nearest star, imagine how longer to the next one after that, 8 years going back and fort at the speed of light, and we can't reach at best 10% of that if one wants to visit the entire galaxy or other galaxies, you need alot more than light speed
@@angrymurloc7626 Very true light speed is very very slow. 500 years from now it’ll be an every day occurrence if we hope to travel just in our own Galaxy.
I would love if you would revisit this subject in light of the new 2021 paper of Erik W Lentz. You made me understand how an Alcubierre drive would really work and now I would like to hear your thoughts on this paper that aparantely makes the Warp drive possible with normal, positive energy. Albeit a whole lot of it. At least for now.
10:25 What if sterotypical sci fi extraterestial UFO's (Flying saucers) fly trough space with the flat/(top) towards the destination and uses this tecnique to warp at lower energy consumption. The shape of Flying Saucers makes more sense now.
It's called , "Regenerative Propulsion" inspired by NASA's ignorant 40 years of non Regenerative Propulsion. Navy would like this . . . Helps maintain healthy planets. . .
I've known about the Alcubierre Drive since Miguel Alcubierre published his paper in 1994. A physicist ex-friend of mine from a local UFO group told me about his proposed warp drive idea.
@@fearsomefoursome4 Not sure what Bob Lazar specifically saw. I DO believe his accounts of what HE worked on, however. But, from interviews, it sounds like he got only passing glimpses of an alien and/or other spacecraft from the one he worked on, and barely remembers them in detail himself.
Maybe if you have negative time. Feynman suggested to regard anti-matter as ordinary matter travelling back in time to read his diagrams. That means anti-matter would have to have negative mass. I only considered the possible application in anti-gravity, and never considered its possible applications in warp drives and temporal engineering. But to the best of my knowledge there is no evidence that anti-matter has negative mass.
@@davidwuhrer6704 Yeah antimatter doesn't seem likely to have negative mass though if it did it would have interesting implications there are experiments looking to test this on antihydrogen at the LHC which will be interesting to see how they turn out
Make it so!
Ha Ha 😊
Hi
Helm, engage.
Master Shake?
This is the way.
So say we all.
10:16 Oh, so the hypothetical spaceship has to be shaped like a disk, or a saucer, if you will.
What a minute...
See my reply to Vytautus Danielius.
It all comes full circle
I had the same thought.
I want to believe...
Would love to see Bob Lazars reaction
Today on the news: "Warp drives require infinite quantities of negative energy"
Tomorrow on the news: "SpaceX acquires Facebook"
😆
I think twitter is a better source.
Underrated comment.
Yeah... that’s a woosh from me. Can someone explain?
@@RealCoolstriker64 facebook and twitter (and tumblr) are full of negative (toxic) people. Warp drive needs negative energy spacex buys facebook to harvest the negative energy from its uses to power a warp drive.
Aliens: So, how did you become warp capable?
Humans: We watched Star Trek and were hooked.
Aliens: "Oh, so you did receive and translate our instructional material. Did you manage to peacefully unite and achieve technological utopia too?"
Humans: "Yeah, about that..."
"We assumed we will"
Terrans: **Aggressively arm phasers**
Please check for my comments under the pinned comment near the top, and check them out from top to bottom in that order.
You will be mind blown!!!!
Space force emblem .....
Futurama weren't kidding when they said the engines move the universe around the ship!
Futurama was pretty spot on with most of its science-injections.
That's how they got the idea in the story.
Now we just need to find a small weird duck-like creature to produce the mystical fuel for the drive and we're set!
Did you ever doubt? 😉
some of Futurama´s creators have some PHDs as well ^^
"The only way to make progress is to not be afraid of learning more."
- I love you for this.
also not to think you already know the truth so there's no need to consider new data
Please check for my comments under the pinned comment near the top, and check them out from top to bottom in that order.
You will be mind blown!!!!
Failure is the key to success ~
If you are not afraid to learn beyond what mainstream offers, read this book "Secrets of Antigravity Propulsion by Paul A. LaViolette". Subquantum Kinetics theory of Warp Drive.
*We must take it on faith as mathematical proof doesn't exist.*
*N.A.S.A. on speed:*
*The Earth's orbital speed around the sun is 67,000 m.p.h.*
*The sun's orbital speed around the galaxy is 450,000 m.p.h.*
*The speed of the ground beneath your feet, as a result of the Earth's* *rotation is*
*600 m.p.h. at the latitude of Sheffield (53 degrees);*
*1,000 m.p.h. at the equator.*
*The Earth travels 584 million miles per year (one trip around the sun); that's*
*1,600,000 miles per day; 66,667 miles traveled each hour*
*“The distance across St. George's Channel, between Holyhead and Kingstown Harbour, near Dublin, is at least 60 statute miles. It is not an uncommon thing for passengers to notice, when in, and for a considerable distance beyond the centre of the Channel, the Light on Holyhead Pier, and the Poolbeg Light in Dublin Bay. The Lighthouse on Holyhead Pier shows a red light at an elevation of 44 feet above high water; and the Poolbeg Lighthouse exhibits two bright lights at an altitude of 68 feet; so that a vessel in the middle of the Channel would be 30 miles from each light; and allowing the observer to be on deck, and 24 feet above the water, the horizon on a globe would be 6 miles away. Deducting 6 miles from 30, the distance from the horizon to Holyhead, on the one hand, and to Dublin Bay on the other, would be 24 miles. The square of 24, multiplied by 8 inches, shows a declination of 384 feet. The altitude of the lights in Poolbeg Lighthouse is 68 feet; and of the red light on Holyhead Pier, 44 feet. Hence, if the earth were a globe, the former would always be 316 feet and the latter 340 feet below the horizon!” -- Dr. Samuel Rowbotham,* ~ *_Earth Not a Globe!_*
*“The lights which are exhibited in lighthouses are seen by navigators at distances at which, according to the scale of the supposed ‘curvature’ given by astronomers, they ought to be many hundreds of feet, in some cases, down below the line of sight! For instance: the light at Cape Hatteras is seen at such a distance (40 miles) that, according to theory, it ought to be nine-hundred feet higher above the level of the sea than it absolutely is, in order to be visible! This is a conclusive proof that there is no ‘curvature,’ on the surface of the sea - ‘the level of the sea,’- ridiculous though it is to be under the necessity of proving it at all: but it is, nevertheless, a conclusive proof that the Earth is not a globe.” -- William Carpenter,*
*_100 Proofs the Earth is Not a Globe_*
Surveyors, engineers and architects are never required to factor the supposed curvature of the Earth into their projects. Canals and railways, for example, are always cut and laid horizontally, often over hundreds of miles, without any allowance for curvature. (self.conspiracy)
The London and Northwestern Railway forms a straight line 180 miles long between London and Liverpool. The railroad's highest point, midway at Birmingham station, is only 240 feet above sea-level. If the world were actually a globe, however, curving 8 inches per mile squared, the 180 mile stretch of rail would form an arc with the center point at Birmingham raising a full 5,400 feet above London and Liverpool. Adding the station's actual height (240 feet) to its theoretical inclination (5,400 feet) gives 5,640 feet as the rail's necessary height on a globe Earth, more than a thousand feet taller than Ben Nevis, the tallest mountain in Great Britain.
*The Suez Canal which connects the Mediterranean Sea with the Gulf of Suez on the Red Sea is a clear proof of the Earth's and water's non-convexity. The canal is 100 miles long and without any locks so the water within is an uninterrupted continuation of the Mediterranean Sea to the Red Sea. When it was constructed, the Earth's supposed curvature was not taken into account, it was dug along a horizontal datum line 26 feet below sea-level, passing through several lakes from one sea to the other, with the datum line and the water's surface running perfectly parallel over the 100 miles. The average level of the Mediterranean is 6 inches above the Red Sea, while the flood tides in the Red Sea rise 4 feet above the highest and drop 3 feet below the lowest in the Mediterranean, making the half-tide level of the Red Sea, the surface of the Mediterranean Sea, and the 100 miles of water in the canal, all a clear continuation of the same horizontal line! Were they instead the supposed curved line of globe-Earthers, the water in the center of the canal would be 1,666 feet (502 x 8 inches = 1,666 feet 8 inches) above the respective Seas on either side!*
A flat space ship requires less energy to make a warp bubble. So we need to make a saucer shaped spaceship? :)
Why does that sound so familiar? ;)
🛸
I wanted to comment this but found you already did:) if only those stubborn scientists take clues from ufology and test them out out of mere curiosity!
It’s crazy that if you listen to UFO reports, the disc will often go up on end, flat to the direction of travel, before it darts off at impossible accelerations.
It all makes sense now xD
No such thing as reading “too much” science fiction 🤓
But there's plenty wrong with reading so much of it that you think that 'fiction' means 'fact'.
@@michaelsommers2356 not a problem if, in your suspension of disbelief, you keep in mind the 190th rule of acquisition.
@@michaelsommers2356 given the multiverse and infinite time, it's all possible/happening somewhenwhere
@@TheShootist So that means that there is a parallel universe in which your statement is true?
@@TheShootist Even if there is a multiverse and infinite time (and as far as we know, there isn't), some things are just impossible. Two plus Two will never equal five in any universe.
So the flying saucers make sense, they warp-drive flat-side forward, and are round to create a shapely bubble.
I wonder if Mulder has seen this clip.
I tried reading Einstein's original paper on special relativity.
Night after night for 6 months I tried to understand it. I tried everything. I looked through previous publications to understand the knowledge at the time. I tried to work through some problems and I thought about the theories in novel ways to try to get an intuitive grasp or even any at all. It probably didn't help much that I didn't have the appropriate background in math. I tried learning the math, I even tried talking to experts. Still, nothing made sense. It just wouldn't click in my head. I toiled over this complex theory, wasting many notebooks of scrap paper trying to make sense of it. Many long nights later, I came to an amazing epiphany;
I can't read German.
That's funny!
That was a good one. I have already allotted myself ten years to get through Einstein's Field Equations. The only thing I need to do now is get started.
Try to get it this way: Einstein's equations describe the relations between different masses in a way that give each pair of masses in the universe an individual relation that can be perceived as space multiplied by time. In other words: there is no space beyond that relation. Independent space does not exist.
@@hans-joachimbierwirth4727 Like it
I decided to completely work out the most difficult example given in my engineering calculus textbook and discovered there was a mistake in the example. I brought this up to my professor, he just blew me off and wasn't in the least, interested.
When sabine says "seriously", I put down everything at warp speed and watch it immediately.
Genuinely this was me
lol same I clicked watch later then I saw "seriously" and immediately clicked the video
science without goobly goo, for those who can't pass academic exams to understand on there own.
thats the main difference between academics, some enter to study how reality works and this understanding its both aesthetically & useful and others are nerds that really wants fantasy to somehow works leading to no progress except for novels written in fancy mathematical language and call it "understanding" both "aesthetically" & "useful"... lets philosophers do that crappy work of doing garbage ideology like it were "academia"
@@janpahl6015 I was actually referring to myself. I've lost the ability to comprehend equations but not the interest in the science . Sabine, in real sense have been a great teacher to communicate those deep insights of equations.
If you do happen to warp time and space. Make sure you have a first mate called Dr Spock and a doctor named Bones
'Things are only impossible until they are not.' - Jean-Luc Picard
This might be something Picard would say, but he never did, because that is a quote from Nelson Mandela from by 2001. Unless it's from the new series. I didn't watch that.
@@Alkis05 ua-cam.com/video/7-Q9CxKtZUA/v-deo.html
@@MrBillTroop73 I... stand corrected. Maybe Mandela was a Trekkie 🤣
no shit
@Ryan Dawson Actually, if you're trying to find who came up with the idea, you'd have to search back into ancient history...
impossiblehq.com/25-impossible-quotes/
What a privilege to be able to acces this kind of information. Unthinkable for common ppl outside universities only a decade ago. This is progress.
In a world full of til tok fools, be an intelligent human, not a twit-ter. And if someone tells you your idea is stupid, tell em that's what they said to Tesla, Bell, and hundreds of other visionaries. I'm studying star formation and star birth, needless to say, the more I'm studying the more questions I end up with.
YES David well said
Progress towards the abyss...
Exactly what I was thinking looking at starship test flights. For a normal boy in his bedroom to be able to see the cutting edge of human knowledge and progress. Boom!! Amazing
@@snikrepak well its just a decently big group of kids who use tiktok, no need to worry about everybody becoming dumb or humanity being doomed because of one group
I already knew all this stuff. I am building a warp drive engine in my basement. What I have so far, is a 4 x 4 sheet of plywood as the base.
I put a flux capacitor in a Morris minor. Still can't get it to work.
Knoble start.
Same. Even managed to collect a sliver of negative energy but my glass caught fire and it vanished😓
We all have to start somewhere.
I think you can do this by putting a CD in the microwave.
I think it's wonderful that it's becoming viable in research to release a paper that says "we don't know" or "here's why this idea is inconclusive".
If you need infinite quantities of negative energy I can introduce you to my ex-wife, she is already warped, and belongs in space.
Good one - made me laugh
very funny ha ha ha...
Dad ?
The Democratic Party in the USA also has infinite quantities of negative energy.
@@KabukeeJo you need some help... and the other side? without sins?
No such thing as negative energy! Clearly you've never met my wife.
🤐🤐🤐🤐🤐🤐
negative energy exists on small quantum scales but not on the macroscopic scales needed at least not yet.
No such thing as negative energy! Clearly you've never met my wife.
Rodney dangerfield over here
@Michael Bishop Casimir???
3:40 When I get grumpy, my wife tells me I have "negative energy."
Next step: learn how to generate my own space warp.
Ad astra per malevolum!
Too damn funny! :)
well, that called out of body experience during deep meditation process. Then u bend all space around ya, trust me ))
"Next step: learn how to generate my own space warp." Actually if you adopt your wife's frame of reference, you will quickly see that your own frame is already warped.
Translation: To the stars by being a twat!
Why can't come up with such delightful morsels?!
I was an avid science fiction reader in my early years. I miss sailing the canals on Mars.
Fair winds and following seas to all.
I liked Tarzan, myself.
@@SovereignStatesman You'd like "Guitarzan" by Ray Stevens. (Ray's a homie. I'm on the Album "I Have Returned".) I prefer "Marching to Mars" by Sammy Hagar.
Fair winds and following seas.
There's no such thing as negative energy? Let me introduce you to YT comment sections! LOL
"The worst are full of passionate intensity..." Oh yeah.
So it's just a form of bad news drive Douglas Adams wrote about.
@Like Bot, several years ago I invented the concept of negative IQ to account for the dimwits in sales where I worked. :-)
@@bgbthabun627 - Careful, you might hurt some feelings with that.
@@alexandernorman5337 too bad that they never listened to me, before I was fired for speaking truth to power.
If Star Trek has taught me anything, the most important element of inventing warp drive will be functional alcoholism.
LOL
“THIS, Deena..
“DE-ANNA!”
“.....is the good stuff!”
Like all good things in life!
@SuperNova Gaming _"let's see here... synthehol, alcohol, time crystals, inaprovaline, cannabis, Klingon nerve toxin, snakeleaf, cordrazine, ketracel-white, and just a wee pinch of LDS... there. _*_Cap'n!_*_ The Christmas punch is ready, and she's got a lovely kick!"_
Merry Christmas, my fellow Trekkies 😁
🖖 💚❤️💚❤️💚❤️💚 🖖
...and a love for classic rock.
Zefram Cochrane RIP?
This woman makes me feel very short because almost every word goes above my head.
see them as punches of a heavyweight and you are going to feel lucky right away ;)
She is rambling on about nonsense. Theories based on theories which are based on yet even more theories, and none of them have ever been tested in any way. You are listening to someone preaching a religion because her beliefs are entirely based on faith that what she has been taught is true. But none of it has ever been proven.
@@EoWKen Wrong. the vast majority of physics is what we have gleaned from empirically evidenced results of experiment. To say that the theoretical stuff that tries to extend that with rigorous mathematical models is anywhere close to having faith and making up complete nonsense like with religion, is to completely misunderstand what we know and how theoretical physics is done. Indeed, Sabine rails against those theories that seem not to be supported but are popular, like those that rely on an idea of "symmetry" just for the sake of it. If you think someone like her and some religious nut are somehow equal, I'd invite you to go take medical advice from the latter and see how you end up.
@@PinataOblongata well said about religion lol
@@EoWKen Sure, relativity is so "unproven" that the clocks of satelites we use for GPS and other things need to be adjusted for the time altering effects of it.
You might not be aware of the proof, but that says nothing about whether it is proven or not. Reality is not dependent on your personal knowledge. You are probably unaware that is is possible to prove that the root of 2 is irrational, but for people who are studying maths or physics it is a first semester thing.
You are trying to disprove things using your own ignorance, which is about as stupid and pathetic as it gets.
There was a lot of negative energy on my last workplace, I just never understood it could be of any use...
Videos like this are going to age VERY well! MORE OF THIS PLEASE SABINE!!!
@Bliss Okpu and god wouldn’t have anything to do with it.
@Bliss Okpu If petitionary prayer worked, things would be different. For example, hospitals that organized prayer for patients would have better results than hospitals that don't. They would advertise this service and we would have statistics about how well it works.
Many people have difficulty confronting these issues because they have been taught that they will go to Hell if they get the answer that their church doesn't like. If you are in that category, I don't blame you. Cult exit phobias are not going to be repaired by UA-cam posts.
@Bliss Okpu You asked God to make this video age well. That isn't adding to the direct word of God? Whatever. Getting your beliefs to make sense isn't my problem.
In any case, either prayer moves things in the direction you ask for on the average, or it doesn't. Presenting a wall of text can't change that.
I agree with you that millions of people claim to have been helped by God. The claim that prayer helps is a statistical claim so it wants statistical evidence. The people who believe it don't think very well about statistics.
I also agree with you that people who have been Christian for a long time are able to make their thoughts conform without much explicit thought about Hell. For example, my statement about hospitals didn't get much response from you. It is called thought stopping, and like other skills people get better at it with practice. If you want to see thought stopping in action, try to read and understand the following two sentences: There are known techniques that could have caused reliable transmission of the Gospels without starting with four discordant versions and then having everyone do their own edits for hundreds of years. A loving and omniscient God would have used them.
(Edit: You probably have lots of friends who share your beliefs, and you may not be able to afford being in conflict with them. I can't provide you with new friends via a UA-cam comment, nor can I change their beliefs en masse with a UA-cam comment that you will see and they won't. So it probably makes perfect sense for you to ignore me or deflect what I say. I'm speaking mostly for the benefit of other people who come by this thread. I expect you to be a lost cause for the next few years at least.)
I read this too many years ago, & am not sure how to find it again. But I have read about studies that do show prayer has statistically significant benefits.
You (the atheist) said God will have nothing to do with it. My own view is that God has everything to do with everything, inseparable from their own creation.
@@polychoron Citations for astonishing claims have multiple uses. In this case a citation would make it possible to find other people who did similar studies or had something to say about this one.
But this a dog-ate-my-homework excuse. "I found evidence that proves the existence of God, I misplaced the pointer to it, and I can't be bothered to rediscover it despite it being the most important thing in the world. You really should believe bald assertions about religion from a random UA-camr." Sorry, that is bullshit. You can do better, if you want to.
"Warp drive" and shows a picture of a space ship with a hyperdrive. 😄
please upload a picture of a wrap drive vehicle
@@raybeeze5522 Sci-Fi (pseudo science): static.wikia.nocookie.net/doctorwhotorchwood/images/c/c6/USS_Enterprise_NCC-1701-D.jpg/revision/latest?cb=20160816071915&path-prefix=de
Semi-Realistic: s.hdnux.com/photos/44/40/15/9569100/3/1200x0.jpg
How the FTL drive in Star Wars works is explained and completely different to warp drive. They jump to a different "dimension" (hyperspace) where distances are smaller and then drop out of it again. It's BS pseudo science, like most sci-fi (doesn't stop it to be fun). Star Trek actually does the moving a bubble of space thing, but in a complete BS sci-fi way, of course. They call it warp drive, it might be that the name "warp drive" is actually from Star Trek?
Blakes 7, Andromeda ,Babylon 5 and stargate open up a window into hyperspace, Star Trek use Warp drive.
@@dogwalker666 thank you. that cleared things up nicely
Trolling the Star Trek fans... 😜
At the moment we can't even go to the pub yet alone the stars. 🍺🥂🍻
Just drink at home.
@@MH-up1xe not the same atmosphere
Time warp, mind warp, warped sense of humor, warped sense of reality, warp speed now, warp is not the answer, the fog of warp, Fisherman's warp, Lieutenant warp. Sweet potatoes taste better at 0.5 c. If my clock runs slower I ask "Slower than what?" My previous clock or your clock? The slower my clock runs due to increasing gravity, the faster (I perceive) your clock is running. If clock speed and speed of light are as connected as relativity dictates, then as I cross over into faster than light velocity, I might be at exactly the speed of light for just a microsecond and it is during that microsecond that the clocks for the rest of the universe (outside of my little bubble) will elapse time at an infinitely fast rate. In short, all of eternity will happen in a second and there won't be anyone left to appreciate my warped accomplishment. Elton John once said "It's lonely out in space." He wasn't kidding.
@@MH-up1xe can we drink at your place? I'll buy you a 6 pack.
There's no covid in space...just saying.
Love the propper pronounciation of Einstein :) plus the "there are equations for each combination of directions in spacetime" might just be my new favourite super simple explanation of underlying tensor algebra ever ...
Her pronunciation of sword in English was surprising though.
“Use the force Harry” - Gandalf
Man, I love The chronicles of Narnia.
"Use the force harry, we need to get to mordoor" - Jean Luc Picard
@@FavioredValkyrie Best part of the Pirates of the Caribbean. Best musical ever.
yeah thats what i thought with the xwing on the cover ^^
I mean....the image is a little baiting - but okay (like putting Marie Currie next to a picture of the Nobel Prize for Literature) 🤦
There was a young lady named Bright
Who traveled much faster than light
She left us one day
In a relative way
And arrived on the previous night
from Oxford or Cambridge
How do you call these kinds of poems where you have this exact "rhythm" or "schema" in it? I heard a similar one from Spongebob with the exact same rhyme schema, see watch?v=k2HqgjI35eo.
@@_cytosine That's a Limerick, I think
@@_cytosine It's called a limerick.
@@paulkarch3318 awesome, thanks!
"from Oxford or Cambridge"
- No, from the University of Manitoba, written by a mycologist called A.H. Reginald Buller in 1923.
So what this is basically saying is that the shape of flying saucers makes perfect sense if they move and hover by bending space-time? Aliens confirmed.
exactly my thought 😂
holy sh!t
No one knows how they hover, move around and by what means they travel between star systems, besides, the classic flying saucer shape is not the only shape they operate, there are some 20 other very common shapes reported, such as cylinder, triangle, boomerang, spherical, pyramid...
I think Bob Lazar (the guy that worked on ufos ) said the same long ago!
My thought was tangential: finally an explanation for the USS Enterprise's saucer.
I missed the part about how it doesn't necessary violate casuality
She has a whole previous video that she provided a link to on the topic during this one.
How to trigger trekkis and star wars fanboys 101: mention warp speed and show a star wars spaceship. 😉
Well played Sabine, well played! 😌
toldya ...
Indeed
Oh, the nerd rage!
Everyone knows the best Star Trek is Star Wars.
Did it to me.
If you need "negative energy", just stop by my workplace.
Sabine, there is no “too much” science fiction. 😉
Good luck with _that..._
Finally a good explanation why UFO's are saucer shaped.
"...just put in any space time..." - um, yeah. Right. I have a box of space-times in here somewhere....
Any box contains some spacetime in it
This box contains our own universe!
She means you can solve the equations for any region that you have measurements for. The substance or mass and it's properties.
Why is the cat dead in my box? I always get the dead one.
@@PurpleVidaar "some" is more than one, so what about a single quanta of space time, anything less in the real world cant exist by definition, and so must have a fractal dimension of 1
"Now it all makes sense".
Um, I'll take your word for it.
As a German i deeply apologize for Hossenfelder's bullshit. We're not all that stupid.
@@hans-joachimbierwirth4727 What was the main issue?
@@chrissonofpear1384 Stupidity. The main issue is always stupidity.
@@hans-joachimbierwirth4727 and why do you call her (a PHD) stupid? Are you more qualified?
At least i understand relativity and don't take fictional bullshit for scientific papers. Your attempt at appeal to authority failed epicly. Better luck next time!
*"1 1/4 light years per minute? That is theoretically impossible."*
_"Their drives may be based on different theories than ours."_
My favorite Dialog from Larry Nivens _Ringworld_
Ringworld, best SciFi novel ever
@@benheideveld4617 I checked it out on Audible recently. About half way through it, I realised, "This is one of the best *novels* I've ever read."
@Robin Hack Did the best that he was able...
@@alanbarnett718 Check out Hyperion on Audible next, the performance in that book is almost as fantastic as the book itself.
Louie Woo where are you?
I am so glad I found your channel, Sabine. I love your explanations. Thank you!
"Not being afraid to learn more" is really synonymous with "don't become a slave to ideas". A professor of mine once said in passing "don't marry your ideas". It immediately resonated and stuck.
Obviously this must be taken in moderation. We should still be afraid to engage in unethical research. In that regard, there is a limit to how much we should know.
@@TheSuperRatt Ideas should not be conflated with research. I would argue that we should regularly engage with questions of what ideas we regard as ethical or unethical.
I think we truly need to be actively seeking to challenge our ideas and learn more as to grow in our understanding. Ideas are beautiful, and it's important that we are constantly trying to improve them by looking for new evidence and thinking open-mindedly, impersonally.
4:07 "Looks intimidating, but it's actually simple"
*proceeds to completely lose me*
Oh, well. Thanks for trying.
It *IS* simple. The problem is we are much simpler.
its a bit hard for low iq ppl like me but i played it 3 times n i think i understand
basically look at R on left and T on right....R is now curved space time is and T is mass and energy density,,,,,,,,,,,,,,basically as we all know Mass and energy bend space time..............so with this equation ,once we measure the energy density, T (mass and energy) we can calculate how much it will bend the space time, R ...we can use this info to calculate how orbits work etc i guess.......................however we can do the opposite too.....we can say i want space time to be bent in this way, thus defining R.....then using the same equation we can calculate what is the exact mass and energy density (T) needed to achieve that space time curvee (R) .........................andd when we input the curve we need for superluminal travel and solve the equation , we see it requires negative energy density to achive that curve
dont mind me btw just trying to make sure i understood lol
Simple does not mean that it is easy to understand, especially if you don't have the knowledge. This is a basic concept of logic called Occam's Razor, which is that the explanation of something should require the fewest new assumptions in one's logic should be preferred over one that requires more if both chains of logic reach the same conclusion. Thus, the simplicity.
Again, just because something is simple to explain doesn't mean that it is easy to understand, only that the logical steps and the assumptions behind them, especially new assumptions, required to reach the answer are, relatively, few.
The new paper basically further refined Alcubierre's paper by explaining how the shape of the warp bubble impacts the amount of energy needed.
I like that the name really works. "Alcubierre Drive" _sounds_ like a good SF warp drive name.
It's a very nice name.
Perfect in its random, non-Anglosaxon worldliness.
Being as Dr. Alcubierre is Mexican, I think it's pronounced (al-coo-be-air-ray). Kind of. The double R is a single letter in Spanish and is spoken as a rolling R. It is difficult to write phonetically.
Negative
It's an absurdium drive™
forged at the dumbfoundery™
@ImaginarilyInc
Nah, the
echo beer drive(CC on, 3:55)
it's lots cooler!
@@rylian21 Maybe he just has a French dad lol
I know we're supposed to be lofty minded people here, but, can anyone else see the baby Chihuahua in the stars to the right side of Sabine's head? How cute is that? :-)
Iol
Science fiction is such a beautiful, mind expanding exercise. Thank you for acknowledging that.
Sabine clearly favors more funding for warp drive research and less for particle accelerators. I agree!
Good one. You have my warp coil. ;-)
And my Jeffries tubes, or something
Chances are that those domains are connected. If we need exotic matters for warp drive, we need a way to discover and produce exotic matters. And if it can't be done in a particle accelerator...
@@mecha-sheep7674 You beat me to it :)
how about practical stuff?
These videos are brutal at times. Sabine you give no quarter to weak thinking or 'populist' interpretation. Thats precisely why this channel is now the go-to for scientific review. For those of us who wish we knew more, who wish we could think and analyse like you, its frustrating at times. For now at least, I will have to rely on you Sabine to help. Subscribing and donating.
How do we know she’s right? I was very suspicious of a lot of what she said in the video about traveling faster than the speed of light. Pretty much every other scientist says causality will be violated.
@@gilgamesh310
When i first encountered this chanel i had the same suspicions, just like you i noticed the appearently unconventional opinions of her (and it only got wierder when i found out about her music videos).
But I've come to respect her as a rational person after i watched some of her interviews.
You can at least trust her to understand these fiels, judging from the fact she has a wikipedia article detaling her credentials.
You could go through her papers and look at the credibility of the publisher, check reviewer comments and her rebuttal if possible, or see who has cited and used her work. Its published and available.scholar.google.com/citations?user=NaQZcyYAAAAJ&hl=en
publons.com/researcher/324810/sabine-hossenfelder/
Just... learn it. Take the time, create an order of learning math, physics, and get started before it’s too late.
Hello, I recommend you to go to the source:
backreaction.blogspot.com
Tons of good stuff here!
I remember reading a book a long time ago called "The Physics of Star Trek" or something like that. In it they said the least realistic thing was the teleporter, not the warp drive. I can't totally remember why now, but I think it was the energy cost.
This Einstein guys name keeps coming up. I'll have to check him out.
lol
hahahaha
Channels like this are the reason I love science...
Keep it up Sabine :)
Love from Australia ☄️☄️🪐
Ahh so this explains the shape of saucers, now science fiction movies will have to change the way they make them move!
It would actually make sense for them to move differently on planetary surfaces, since air resistance would be the most important factor, and you generally wouldn't want to travel anywhere near the speed of light in the vicinity of a planet. Not only would you get vaporized by the friction, but if you happened to hit anything in your path, well you would also be vaporized.
Saucers don't move, they fall at desired direction. Because saucers are always stationary inside the bubble of spacetime, more accurately the vortex ring of ether. The shape of saucer is likely because it is an important shape to create a controlled vortex ring of ether/spacetime curvature around the saucer with powerful electromagnetic force and not necessarily due to friction reason.
A saucer in space is not in a danger of being destroyed as long as its vortex ring of ether/spacetime curvature field/bubble is up and running. Everything whether it be an asteroid, rarefied gas or even light, it will go around the saucer instead of colliding head on, same with friction problem. It is better not to compare a saucer flying from point A to point B with an airplane flying. They are not flying in conventional fashion.
@@Xeno_Bardock I would imagine that in such warped spacetime as the boundary region there would probably still be exotic effects on any such material is it is deflected as the high curvature is in GR terms going to result in an apparent acceleration of course that material is generally so rarified that it wouldn't be readily observable but I would expect it to still have some form of feedback on the warp drive likely relating to loss of energy/stability of the warp field so it likely still would be a bad idea to do warp driving near matter or other concentrations of energy
For the confused 10:15 and you beat me to it.
I think Einstein would be very excited about this news, especially if the theory leads to practical
Probably not, he liked theories that actually could be verified..
So subluminal warpdrives could be perfectly viable? That's still pretty exciting news.
@Jack Rabbit The whole point of the video, if I understood it correctly, is that most of these caveats can be resolved if you restrict yourself to *sub* luminal speeds, i.e. slower than light.
Problem is energy, divide force interaction of electromagnetic force by gravity and you get an idea of the energy scale you are dealing with, then you need extra energy to manipulate it so it matches the tensor diagrams. You need to convert minimum approx 90 billion kg of matter into energy at 100% efficiency to move one kg. The rest is a piece of cake.
@@plexiglasscorn Long or short billion?
What I still don't understand is how, when looking at the "bubble" from the outside, the propagation of spacetime information about the bubble itself can happen faster than light. I mean, gravitational waves travel at the speed of light, and my understanding was that all propagation of spacetime does the same, when looking at it on a zoomed-out scale.
@@FriedrichHerschel metric, no short or long kg, this is energy consumption just to maintain field, not to mention impossible task of thermal management of passangers, they would experience thermal output of a sun and burnt into a crisp within nano seconds
This is very exciting! It’s true though, whenever I’ve heard discussions about the Alcubierre warp drive, it was always with the assumption that we were trying to attain faster than light travel. It never even occurred to me that we could use such propulsion for subliminal speeds. All this time, as far as this concept goes, we’ve been trying to hit the Home run instead of just settling for a two run bass hit. LOL, we can accomplish a lot with just that to run bass hit. granted, yes, it would be nice to have faster than light travel, but still, it certainly would be nice to be able to quickly zip around the solar system. And getting to nearby star systems in a reasonable timewould certainly be doable even without super luminal speeds.
"reasonable time"... the next closest star system is over 4 light years away. Even moving at near light speed, 4 years is not exactly a reasonable amount of time. If we want to go beyond that, the journey will start to take a substantial portion of a human lifespan.
@@neurofiedyamato8763 You're forgetting time dilation - at near light speed, this trip takes >4 years each way in an external frame of reference, but it's *much* shorter for the astronaut herself. In the light speed limit, it's instantaneous for the astronaut.
Subliminal speeds, you say? Traveling in a region of space that is not consciously recognized?
Best video ever. No bashing of particle physicists, self-revealing revelations, fascinating open ended vista’s. An optimistic outlook from Dr. Sabine. Addictive!
I think it's to do with what motivates her.
This video was very interesting and full of possibilities.
I feel like Sabine is a breath of fresh air. Especially when she is breaking balls. Not that I always agree with her, but I always agree with her passion
I'm sure, like most of us, Hossenfelder is a multifaceted individual, neither all harsh cynicism nor all boundless optimism. In any case, she always brings a valuable perspective to consider. Paul Sutter is another 'cranky physicist' who likes to play the foil to the more romantic types - and I think this thankless job is needed. ;)
"The only way of making progress is not to be afraid of learning more" That's brilliant! I'd only like add that sometimes I find it impossible to not be afraid, and would change the "not being afraid of" bit for overcoming the fear.
I just love how she pronounces Einstein's name right. It's refreshing haha
Sounds like Einßtein
In Germany that's how you saying it ..später :)
Sean Connery also pronounces it like this.
@@richpickings2845 Yeah, but only by luck lol. If he pronounces all his Ss as Sh, then he's going to be correct in some language.
Might be because she's German 🤔
January 2021 Update patch log:
- FIXED: Found bug that allows some humans to travel faster than light by exploiting a vulnerability in the physics engine.
Me: *moves around at sub light speed using a warp drive*
Sabine: "that's pretty cool"
Even at sub-luminal speeds, the travel time within solar system bodies would be much shorter. Imagine going from Earth to Saturn in a few weeks rather than decades.
Or goşng to near by stars which will take only decades.
@@twistedyogert Problem is, from what I understand the authors suggest that the warp field configuration still has to be accelerated to the proper speed by conventional means like a rocket. So then really what's the point of the warp drive if all it does is wrap you in a bubble of "static" spacetime?
@@twistedyogert bro imaging leaving the Oort Cloud
Absolutely. The joy of negative energy repulsion balancing out contraction is you have inherently inertial cancelation between the 2 effects at work. Even at sublight, this would be vastly superior to any convention means of travel.
The problem isn't breaking the barrier, but simply moving our speeds forward. Even decimal increments toward light speed will improve our current technological ability. I'm glad to see that people are actually working toward this goal. When I see how far we have come in just my lifetime, it gives me hope for the future.
If there was a race to reach light speed with a camera, would anybody watch it?
"The only way to make progress is to not be afraid of learning more."
And unlearning what you were wrong about.
Wise words!
Please check for my comments under the pinned comment near the top, and check them out from top to bottom in that order.
You will be mind blown!!!!
@@gameresearch9535 It seems to me that you have just spammed that thread with links to your channel.
I didn't get mind blown.
@@jimmorrison2657
So basically you just became biased and ignorant that fast.
You would be mind blown if you had actually checked it out.
Then again I'm wasting my time typing here to an ignorant person.
@@jimmorrison2657 The problem I've discovered is figuring out what needs unlearning. Science, History, Politics, Law, Art... everything I know is corrupt :/
Here's some unsolicited free advice: "Don't take unsolicited free advice".
An impossibly high amount of an unavailable form of energy.... Hmmm.. Sounds like we have a winner here :).
Feodoric, have you heard of negative absolute temperature?
Print more money...that will solve it.
@@antonijaume8498 Nope. It sounds like an oxymoron. How does that work? I hope you're not referring to the distribution of temperatures around 0 K... At 0 K (a temperature that has never been reached - and cannot be reached - experimentally), you have in fact a distribution of atoms or molecules, some of which being exactly at 0, very close to having zero momentum.
So, what can possibly be negative absolute temperatures? Thanks
@@raminagrobis6112 no, it is a result in statistical mechanics, in a sense it is somewhat flakey. Still it fits the equations, and works to predict real world situations. So it is possible that with better understanding of both theory and the real world. For one thing we know that general relativity is incomplete, nor do we know what are dark matter and dark energy.
@@antonijaume8498 I think we wers both saying the same thing when I mentioned that the behavior of atoms near 0 K is accounted by the measurement of their distribution around that T. Tomato. tomato. You said statistical mechanics, I went with "distribution' ,:). So a negative T is a result predicted by a probabilistic description of elementary particles in the vicinity of 0. But I honestly wonder about the realistic prospect of exploiting a hypothetical result of a purely mathematical construction that has little, if any bearing in reality, notwithstanding my admission that there is no consistent model incorporating both a relativistic description of the real world and its quantum mechanical counterpart...
Q: How do we reach warp speed?
A: Just assume you have.
Thanks scientists. Really knocked it out the park with that one. Have a break from scienceing, you've earned it.
It got me thinking of the infinite improbability drive from hitchhiker's guide to the galaxy.
@@soulextracter Lol, when they become sofa's in the film after the drive failed.
Look earth is not flat. It’s inverted oval ball. Yes your balls are a good example
I assumed, i had a lot of mony, i looked in my deposit - sadly it did'nd work.
@@soulextracter That's exactly what it called to my mind. Perhaps what we need is "Tea, Earl Grey, REALLY hot."
Sabine, you will never know how much we, the unwashed, enjoy your talks. You have given us access to things we could never have discovered in our work-a-day world. Our thanks to you.
Pathetic.
I guess we need "The Spice Melange" or dilithium crystals.
Dilithium won't help here as i) it regulate positive energy production and ii) doesn't create warp fields that and iii) ST ftl travel is way more different than what is theorised.
But you are right about needing something as exotic like those.
melange only allows to foresee safe superluminar pathways - the Holzmann drive is what pushes ships in the Imperium
Antimatter! :D
Or a "flux capacitor"
Forget dilithium crystals, they’re prone to get unstable and ignite from Kelpian scream.....;)
Miguel Alcubierre approached warp drive as a theoretical physicist. These two authors approached warp drive as engineers.
Thus proved engineers + physicists = 🔥🔥🔥, like the Manhattan project
not really, this is theoretical physics
there's no proposed engines or mechanisms, as said they don't even know if negative energy can exist
@@DarkShroom I mean that they approached it with the intent of building realizable metrics. Many of the geometries they studied could be created with good old positive energy.
@@DarkShroom Casimir effect...
they really didn't, not that you read their paper
both alcubierre and them put a basic ammount of human decency in their paper, alcubierre is just your typical university student regurgitating his classes, and his paper was just him deciding to have fun with his homework after watching a few episodes of star trek
but he is an actually moral person who was careful never to claim things that were false, at least as far as his understanding went
The new paper was the same, but both were just toying around with maths that don't match reality, an engineer wouldn't look at either for more than a second, this is garbage
not the fault of alcubierre or alexi and gianni, just the fault of the people who were their teachers
"...there's no such thing as negative energy"
Government of my country proves you wrong
😂😂😂
Well, america might reach such extremes prettt soon
@@theancientgamer6760 may the force be with you
Every country has different system of doing things.
It would be nice if all the Same fundamental believe in governments and in our Society
Needing lots of Congress to go along with the Progress, with lots of negative energy from the former.
I'm so glad this channel has a 1/4 million subscribers, quality information, hope she finds many more in future
The title is about warp drive and there is a picture of an X-Wing which clearly uses hyperdrive! Yeesh!!! Sorry had to! lol
Literally unwatchable!
@@thetim6764 yeah and incredible ignorant towards those who can only afford vehicles with hyper drive as opposed to the warp drives of the intergalactic bourgeois
"Would it help if I got out and pushed?"
"...Yeah, it might.."
Voyager :)
It's not my fault
Star Wars! If voyager used it they were paying homage to Han and Leia
@@CaptainVideo1960 That's true! I forgot. Yeah, that line is there in Voyager too, which is why I remembered that since I just watched it :)
Sometimes you just want them to go out the airlock.
4:07 "I know these look somewhat intimidating..."
* Standard model has entered the chat *
If it's possible to avoid causality paradoxes I think that augers heavily in favor of superluminal travel being possible.
But my suspicion in the end is that the solution to interstellar travel times isn't going to be FTL drives, it's going to be living longer and being more patient.
Either way though, yeah, I'd be delighted with just a reactionless drive even if it's slower than light.
But even when GR is wrong, warp drives could be impossible.
Potentially, but not definitely.
Yeah, probably.
3:55 Closed captioning calls it the "Echo Beer Drive".
Now with mezcal
Comes from FTL travel... you get the same beer again.
Win-win.
Maybe that's the solution 🤔
Humanity would be the species to create FTL travel to go on a beer run to the next solar system 😂
I heard there's whiskey in some nebula out there in space. Although I'm a functioning teetotaler, it would be so cash to take a few sips from God's whiskey cellar before I give up the ghost.
Can u warp space without warping time?
Wouldn't you risk getting there before u left?
Woa.
That's one of the reasons you can't travel faster than the speed of light, if it were possible, you could get back before you left
So in the future, we will order pizza delivery AFTER we eat it?
"There was a young woman named Bright, whose speed was much faster than light. She departed one day, in a relative way, and returned on the previous night."
Hi Sabine, I still don't know if warp drive will be possible in the near future. It doesn't seem so, though it's absolutely worth studying. There is however an ion drive, on my channel, that lifts its power supply against Earth's gravity. It might also be able to utilize relativistic electrons as propellant someday as well. Even though that upgrade is still theoretical, there is some mathematical support for it.
I almost got obsessed with the Alcubierre drive when I learnt of it. I saw a picture of the IXS Enterprise, read that it was based on the Alcubierre drive and so began my journey into general relativity. 😁
I'm a molecular biologist and I just discovered your channel! Thanks for the easier-to-digest physics content. I'm fond of astro- and particle physics whenever I'm off my work and I've been so far limited to the public engagements of Brian Cox, Sara Seager, and Tara Shears (and the likes)!
Even subluminal warp travel would have loads of advantages, to include moving debris out of the way I believe. Even if we can't go faster than light, we're gonna at least get close to C and things hurt when they hit ya that fast.
The fastest man has ever travelled in space so far is 0.00004*c, a record established during the Apollo program. A nearly 50-yr old record!.
We thus have a long way to go. For many technical reasons, it has been predicted that the fastest speed achievable using the same overall vehicle design and with the best theoretically & practically useful propulsion energy source (e.g. controlled fusion), with the exclusion of fantasy solutions such as matter/antimatter, would be about 0.4*c in the BEST scenario, but more conservatively, more probably smtg in the vicinity of 0.2*c, which would already be a massive advance (a 5000-fold increase in speed is nothing to be ashamed of). Over that value, relativistic problems start getting "seriously" in the way and the energy required to increase momentum becomes exponentially more critical. Warp speed engine-based design would improve that limit for sure. And we haven't yet considered the impact of hitting debris, small meteorites, etc., which will certainly become a major factor in establishing a safe limit to the maximal velocity any vehicle will reach in practice.
The fastest man made object is the Parker Solar Probe (by Applied Physics Laboratory - probably not the same Applied Physics from the new paper) that, using a Sol gravity assist, has reached speeds around 0.0006c which is close to 3 times the speed of the previous record holder - the Helios B solar probe (apparently, the sun is pretty good at accelerating things - who would've thought 😜)
@@guss77 Thanks for the precision, but I specified for a manned vehicle... Of course faster projectiles have been and will be tested before we go faster with pilots on board!
so... flying saucers are more scientifically accurate than the enterprise... interesting.
This is exactly how Bob Lazar described the propulsion system of UFO's.
Only for this particular solution, she said.
Warp drive, but you put a Star Wars X-wing in the thumbnail :(
it would have been great if she put a picture of Picard or Kirk instead
@@alosumo87 Nah, it's about the ship's drive system, so still only good for a ship.
Sorry, only spaceship I know how to draw!
Sorry, my initial comment was primarily sarcasm, and then we started having more fun. It was a great video!
@@SabineHossenfelder I figured you were just trolling the nerds a little bit.
Hey, didn’t Bob Lazar say the UFO he worked on tilted and flew flat bottom toward direction of motion? Making a flat bubble :)
Bob Lazar is such a paradox.
Time continues to strengthen and weaken his claims. As both a believer in fundamental science and someone whose willing to go tinfoil hat occasionally. I honestly have no idea what to believe.
Could it be possible that some genius thought of warp drive technology in secrecy and now governments hide it behind aliens? Who knows. I’ll let time and science continue to flesh things out.
Yeah it's the same!
He said nothing of the sort.
Lazar made no claim that this position of the ship was beneficial for the warp bubble, and obviously didn't understand why it would be. His hypothetical warp bubble was not as flat as the one shown in this video, but a three dimensional heart shape with the bulges of the heart behind the ship, and the point going forward; a shape that would be impractical and energy intensive for the reasons explained in this video, as it would have a greater length going forward than up and down, the exact opposite of what this theory recommends.
The only reason he would have claimed such a thing is so that the ship's artificial gravity could be provided by the gravity well underneath the ship.
Consistently, Lazar shows no knowledge of the actual math and theories behind warp drives, and depends entirely on science fiction like Star Trek for the information in his theories, but still proposes a warp drive less believable than that in Star Trek.
UFOs are never aliens.
"There's no such thing as science fiction, only science eventuality" -
I think some technologies are too improbable for us, the human race.
Please check for my comments under the pinned comment near the top, and check them out from top to bottom in that order.
You will be mind blown!!!!
@@mainstreetsaint36
You do know in most Sci-Fi we befriend aliens right?
I think that quote is as stupid as it is meaningless. Just a figment of the imagination of people who aren't interested in evidence of reality and it's limitations. Certain groups come to mind.
EDIT: Of course it depends on your definition of 'science fiction' and the only one that works is 'anything actually possible' which we have no way of knowing and this it's meaningless.
@@nommy8599
Jules verne an author in the 1800s wrote From The Earth to the Moon describing rocketships very similar to the Rockets eventually used in the Space Race during the 1960-70s
Star Trek had the Warp Drive engines and NASA says it's doable in the next few years
Rail Guns were Science Fiction now the Navy is heavily invested in them
Laser weapons made for riot control
Material for Vehicles and Uniforms that can allow soldiers to hide from optics like night vision and thermal vision
George lucas and his star wars Legends books have this thing called a protoSaber and some guy and his friends built one in his garage
Ancient Greeks invented steam engines for automatic doors and gates
The Roman Empires Coliseum held Naval battles as a form of entertainment
My point is Technology even imagined in some book in the past is slowly becoming real
Apparently, one problem with the Alcubierre "drive" is that any matter in front of the warp bubble becomes massively charged and, when you reach your destination, it all blows up, possibly destroying your ship and destination.
I don't know if this newer maths overcomes that problem. If it does then even if one can't get the bubble to travel at superluminal speeds, it might be that it makes fast travel between stars safer, as it would avoid the collision with small particles at relativistic speeds.
If we managed to get warp drive done in reality, would that also implicitely mean that we manage to get some kind of anti-gravity-device done in reality?
Possibly, considering gravity is "just" space-time curvature to begin with.
Exactly: not having one means not having the other as well. Both ruled out equally.
Possibly. If we can figure out how to manipulate spacetime to travel at superluminal speeds then it shouldn't be too big of a step to manipulate spacetime to create artificial gravity for the crew or to create an anti-gravity field to lift a half a million ton spaceship off the ground. But first we need to figure out how to manipulate spacetime in general.
Sabine I'd love to see John Michael Godier on your show! The ASMR value alone....
Bad-joke-time: Who is this General Relativity who is always forbidding something?! (So, sorry).
And even further: who made Relativity a General?
That bad joke of yours made me chuckle for a full ten seconds, so you must be doing SOMETHING right!
Thanks, I needed that. :)
A good bad one.
That was a great joke
Shaft
FINALLY! A UA-cam video that explains current warp theory in an honest, straightforward manner. This video SHOCKS (!!) clickbait garbage channels like Future Unity.
0:21
That's a _good_ bit of why I'm become an engineer!
Imagine if the ideal shape of the bubble is a doughnut-shape spheroid, ala classic flying saucer *puts tinfoil hat on*
And now imagine it's not... *puts a second tinfoil hat on*
I find it telling that many saucer UFO films show the craft tilt poles towards direction of fast acceleration.
Enterprise
@@MyStarPeopleExperiences What's it telling you?
Humans are difficult to satisfy. "Hey, light speed is really fast! Lets do that." "No no, we want faster than light."
Cosmically, the speed of light is abysmally slow. It only comfortably solves travel within the solar system
Yeah I'd rather be able to travel to other solar systems in hours or days or weeks instead of years
once you understand that light speed will make you wait 4 years to get to the nearest star, imagine how longer to the next one after that, 8 years going back and fort at the speed of light, and we can't reach at best 10% of that
if one wants to visit the entire galaxy or other galaxies, you need alot more than light speed
@@angrymurloc7626
Very true light speed is very very slow.
500 years from now it’ll be an every day occurrence if we hope to travel just in our own Galaxy.
I would love if you would revisit this subject in light of the new 2021 paper of Erik W Lentz. You made me understand how an Alcubierre drive would really work and now I would like to hear your thoughts on this paper that aparantely makes the Warp drive possible with normal, positive energy. Albeit a whole lot of it. At least for now.
10:25 What if sterotypical sci fi extraterestial UFO's (Flying saucers) fly trough space with the flat/(top) towards the destination and uses this tecnique to warp at lower energy consumption. The shape of Flying Saucers makes more sense now.
That is what Bob Lazar claims the ships he was working on do. Of course he may be full of crap as a Christmas turkey.
I won't make a Star Trek joke.
I won't make a Star Trek joke.
I won't...
Sabine! Don't go into the teletransporter with that shirt!!
Damnn...
Ensign redshirt!
Do you ever get a bit of Ms. Frizzle vibe from her wardrobe?
wowe now this is epic xDDDDD
We know her name so she'll be fine.
Warp drives are infinitely improbable.
42!
Got the hot cuppa tea right here! 👍
@@svenmorgenstern9506 We are all part of the big computer.
… I'm sorry, what was the question?
@@davidwuhrer6704 now that you mention it, I can't remember. ;-)
It's called , "Regenerative Propulsion" inspired by NASA's ignorant 40 years of non Regenerative Propulsion. Navy would like this . . . Helps maintain healthy planets. . .
I've known about the Alcubierre Drive since Miguel Alcubierre published his paper in 1994.
A physicist ex-friend of mine from a local UFO group told me about his proposed warp drive idea.
dude does that "warp shield" not look like the heart shaped gravity field bob lazar talks about?
@@fearsomefoursome4 I think it looks more like the detachable saucer section of a Galaxy-class starship ...
@@fearsomefoursome4 Not sure what Bob Lazar specifically saw. I DO believe his accounts of what HE worked on, however. But, from interviews, it sounds like he got only passing glimpses of an alien and/or other spacecraft from the one he worked on, and barely remembers them in detail himself.
Let’s do this! Where do we find the dilithium?
Easy. Amazon
@@jessemontano762 Now minty fresh! www.amazon.com/Unemployed-Philosophers-Guild-Dilithium-Crystal/dp/B074WGJ763/
Look in the unobtanium aisle at your local Walmart - over by the paint. 😉
It's called stable version of ununpentium. Element 115
Just put 2 lithium atoms next to each other.
Sounds alot like the "heart shaped" warp event bob lazar talks about
"This is bad - because there is no such thing as negative energy..." :-D
Isn’t matter basically negative energy?
@@thalamay no
Maybe if you have negative time.
Feynman suggested to regard anti-matter as ordinary matter travelling back in time to read his diagrams.
That means anti-matter would have to have negative mass.
I only considered the possible application in anti-gravity, and never considered its possible applications in warp drives and temporal engineering.
But to the best of my knowledge there is no evidence that anti-matter has negative mass.
Isn't negative energy high around trump?
@@davidwuhrer6704 Yeah antimatter doesn't seem likely to have negative mass though if it did it would have interesting implications there are experiments looking to test this on antihydrogen at the LHC which will be interesting to see how they turn out