WHY THESE MASTS ARE POPPING UP EVERYWHERE...
Вставка
- Опубліковано 28 лют 2024
- We all want a good internet speed, but how fast do we really need and at what cost?
These 5G mobile phone masts seem to be popping up everywhere.
BUY MESHTASTIC DEVICES HERE
(These are affiliate links for which I may be compensated.
As an eBay Partner, I may be compensated if you make a purchase)
HELTEC DEVICES ARE AVAILABLE FROM UK EBAY SELLER (TRUSTED) HERE:
eBay UK SELLER --- ebay.us/fCuA9H
eBay UK SELLER --- ebay.us/Dh4aFT
Heltec on Amazon (sold out more soon) --- amzn.to/4b5Upkv
Heltec Cases --- amzn.to/3HCwbkt
Batteries (not plug and play)
amzn.to/3Omnv5t
amzn.to/3SEufhr
BENDER ENCLOSURE FOR HELTEC V3
ikb3d.co.uk/bendtastic
SMA PIGTAILS FOR CONNECTING BETTER ANTENNAS TO HELTEC NODES
amzn.to/48WlRQj
PARADAR ANTENNA
amzn.to/3w5eKGp
PARADAR YAGI
amzn.to/3umBj95
THOSE FUNKY MINI HELTEC ANTENNAS
www.experimental-engineering....
XRAY MARKS MCGILL MICROWAVE ANTENNA DEAL!!!
www.mcgillmicrowave.com/produ...
email: contact@mcgilllmicrowave.com if you want the deal, tell them Mark sent you
FIND OUT MORE ABOUT MESHTASTIC
• EMERGENCY DEVICE THAT ...
GET STARTED
• JOIN THIS EXCITING OFF...
MESHTASTIC OFFICIAL WEBSITE
meshtastic.org/
MESHTASTIC TIPS AND TRICKS
• IS THIS CB RADIO 2.0!!!
Discord
/ discord
EBIKE STORE
www.kirbebike.com
Business Enquiries
andy@cloudsto.com - Наука та технологія
Bars for the digital prison. Social credit score next.
*What a cheerful non-analysis of a potential disaster for everybody, especially if you have one at the bottom of your garden.*
biggest story you're going to find, im pasting his yt title everywhere, tax is all criminal, many thx
part 1 FORMER POLICE OFFICER GARY WATERMAN
Yep👍....glad to be on the way out rather than comining into this catastrophic world😢 really sad for the young but they dont seem to care🤷♀️
Nothing a plant pot full of thermite would cure
What frequency does 0² resonate at?
the elephant in the room is the pulsed ,targeted frequencies used to connect to the smart meter networks that seem to broadcast more in the early hours of the morning from these towers
Are you talking about the local network from the smart meter to your house terminal and nearby smart meters, or the ones which talk back to base using the cellphone network? The latter mostly use 2G.
It's part of the money worshippers mind control infrastructure
@@paulsengupta971 exactly 2G is fine for dumb meters and 2G has a longer range than 5G - so less masts needed.
Yeah 2g dont make us all like 5g does. Im feeling the difference since 2019/2020 when they went up all over Denmark
the censorship is rife - they deleted my comment about what its really used for... Says all you need to know haha
Secretly put them up in the dark so no one notices. Our digital prison will have no walls.
Secretly pull them down in the dark so no one notices!
Nothing a bit of thermite can't fix..
Nobody will care when their internet and phones go dead?
Many went up in lockdown
@@DenisKz No need to be too dramatic. 5th generation microwave devices are lethal weapons & use a great deal of electrical energy controlled by the unit at the base of the mast. Depriving the source of the device of ventilation would be the more expedient way. Emeritus Professor Martin Pall believes that this technology will lead to the abolition of mankind.
a petrol cutter with a diamond steel blade
No, it isn't one of those. This is a radio mast.
@@paulsengupta971- are you sure? If you squint in the dark while listening to a hard rock band on headphones after taking several tabs of LSD it looks very similar to a cutting tool. Food for thought, amiright?
@@portlyoldman Not sure about food for thought, but it's lunchtime now, and I'm more interested in food for my stomach. Yes, I know, time is an illusion, lunchtime doubly so. I prefer LED to LSD.
i hear they hold a pound of platinum and loads of copper
Tell the scrappers 😅@@cunnyfunt3923
Check to see if planning approval has been granted I think you’ll be shocked !
They come under permitted development. They can stick them up anywhere. As far as I'm aware. We we're going to have a 70 foot radio mast put in the village. Just a notification on a telegraph pole telling us they were doing it. We got it thrown out by destroying their survey mostly. That was going to be WiFi by AirBand.
I think i read the same, planning permission not required, they just let councils know as a courtesy
Amazing how the very same Country that first adopted the Natural Law Jurisprudence in their unwritten Constitution as the basis of the Common Law that spread through the Western World now allow themselves so passively to be subjected to exposure which adversely uses their bodies which absorb these emissions under the skin 24/7.
You are being microwaved on slow cook. 5G technology was developed as a WAR WEAPON in WW2 where the eyeballs of people were cooked like hard boiled eggs.
"My opinion". . . .you are misleading people and you haven't even checked into the patents. You know nothing worth knowing about "radio stuff". Your own Parents are being microwaved and there you are - no problem here. UNFATHOMALBE.
They haven't spent £billions installing 5g towers so you can download a film in 30seconds.
They have spent 2.4 Trillion installing them accross the world my friend. This was mentioned by my boss as we are involved in the industry
Blade runners your skope has widened.
You the people are the product
He getting microwaved on defrost Lol
He doesn’t see a problem with it apparently?! Sausage imo 👊🤡
When they increase the frequency you will fry or slowly die ,they got you if you not behave they can roost you how scary.
While you were tracking their emissions, they were tracking yours.
Looks like a weapon
Cannon with high tech Muzzle 😯
It is. And can see through walls
There's room for a cheeky Meshtastic node up there ;-)
Lol I came here looking for the sneaky meshtastic comment.
I was thinking these towers are just gown up’s Meshtastic
An informative video with no b.s. talk and also with a device that can check what these towers are putting out, even if its not a high end professional device that can read the power of these towers. Well done to keep the public informed !
I'm glad I'm not the only one. I use a drone to drop off--and occasionally pick up to service--my meshtastic nodes. I use skyscrapers, TV station masts, you name it. Where I live there's no enforced drone laws yet, so I can go anywhere and do anything - and a lot of the time from home! :)
The earth isn't flat guys...
Am in Gateshead, and there are loads of them being put up right outside people's houses
Sold to us as fast downloads, but in reality they are part of the Internet of things. Cars and people need to be tracked for commerce and control reasons, as well as the fridge door maybe. If they want to charge motorists by the mile, they need to track them from the minute they leave home, so antennas need to be on the street with no trees around, hence the amount of trees that have been cut down in the last three years.
No, the trees have been cut down because of Ash die-back.
@@paulsengupta971 Trees can be a significant source of path loss, and there are a number of variables involved, such as the specific type of tree, whether it is wet or dry, and in the case of deciduous trees, whether the leaves are present or not. Some possibly have been cut down so the council doesn't have to look after them.
Ash die back has mainly happened in the South East.
@@spex357 Trees aren't generally a concern to the mobile operators, they plan around them. The only times it becomes an issue is if a tree grows into an existing microwave transmission link. If that happens, either the link is moved or the tree is trimmed. And yes, it can be noticed if there's a difference between summer and winter.
Lol in Alabama (united states) a 200ft tower disappeared without a trace 😂
Haven't they found that yet? Such a mad story 😂
@TOMinPDX not yet and my money is on it never being found. Mad and sad 😂 apparently the people of the station don't listen or they'd known when it stopped transmission
Aliens
There's a lot of evidence that the whole story was a hoax...
ua-cam.com/video/78PvlGCqM84/v-deo.html
@@undernature2799Because it was gone long before they said it was gone. Owners are a fraud.
The crazy part - there was never any research into effect of these masts on human health.
Yes. Its quite dangerous to crash into one
well there was, but its so bad they will never give you the truth !
They already say normal mobile phones kill bees as they lose the nack to find their way home, I wonder if this is what has happened to whales that our technology has made them lose their primitive sonar ability.
Yes there was, in the 1970's. Technology that you are aware of is way behind what is really available and they aren't going to tell you about it. See Direct Energy Weapons, which were here 120 years ago.
@@brianjones4026 ICNERP
That first monopole tower is an N77 / N78 3-sector tower operating at just a couple of watts per sector, which with the typical antenna gain will be around 12-24dBm EIRP because of how close they are to end users. You will note the conical GPS antenna in the center of the top truss (for frame synchronization), the three almost-square RRUs (remote radio units) at the top that drive the antennas, and the three taller 120-degree sector antennas below it. Depending on whether these particular towers are before or after Hutchison / Three won that extra 80MHz of spectrum in the top end of N77, they may be pushing upwards of 100MHz per sector out of that tower, which won't go very far, but can move a considerable amount of bandwidth given it's at 3.4-3.8GHz and the proximity to end users.
The last tower you looked at, looks to have just a single modern antenna element (note the lack of weathering) servicing band n77/n78, which would align with the sporadic / not fully saturated output you're seeing on the waterfall diagram. These are often used to "fill in" coverage in more rural areas, such as along a motorway or from the hill overlooking a town, while the smaller "urban monopoles" you saw earlier do most of the heavy lifting.
Thank you. Reality check from an RF engineer who knows what he's talking about instead of speculation from YT warriors.
@@chrisquirk4754He didn't say it was safe tho did he?
@@TheTubejunky Even 24dBm is about 0.25Watts which is very small compared with other transmitters around you that you wouldn't even know were there.
5G is not meant to go very far and as he says, "because of how close they are to end users."
The power could be even be less than the leakage from your cheap microwave oven.
@@chrisquirk4754 You know in the 60s that had a foot measurement device to buy shoes in many stores said to be safe. They operated on RADIOLOGY and killed most of those humans. It would be VERY naive to believe random humans on the internet. Good luck out there.
Propagated not radiated... 🤔
The problem is not just the power of the radiation, but also that it is pulsed.
We don't know what effect high frequency pulsed radiation has on the body.
Pulsed? What are you talking about? Do you know anything about Quadrature Amplitude Modulation?
@@paulsengupta971 Admit it - you made that term up!
@@londonerwalksHah, if I did, I'd probably be rich! 🙂
The handset transmits pulsed but the base station is continuous.
@@londonerwalks Some people are too stupid to even Google a technical phrase to see if it is really a thing.
We appear to now have an awful lot of total emf exposure than ever before …. Would not like any of these or electricity pylons near me thank you ….
Talking emf, the wind turbines! Nothing but weather modification systems. There are always heavy rain clouds around these things where I live.
@@SuperBC10 😂😂😂😂😂😂
Not one scientist, professor who I've watched can prove 100% that any of these frequencies aren't harmful to human cells. Even going back to WiFi for example, one ex military professor who worked on microwave technology for a weapon said that it certainly shouldn't be in schools for a start.
I'd recommend that you don't look into UV radiation, you might get quite a fright
@@Sam-rx8wd From the sun right? Yes, even the natural world is harmful to us I know.
Not one scientist, professor who I've watched can prove 100% that any of these masts are harmful to human cells.
Your parents seem very sweet. Love your videos, Andy.
Are you only young? I'm 50 and have no parents. My dad died when I was 24. My mum last year.
Notice the 3 sticker on the box of tricks . The mobile company 3 went out of business in 2015 though masts are being erected in the name of 3 .... Check out Richard Vobes channel . Will you be covering the ELF transmitters that went up around here in 2012 ? Located around council houses , students accomodations , the hospital , the university and outside fire stations . ELF is sub 30 Hz and used for behavior modification . Professor Anthony Sutton - Psycotronic Weapons . Research the Woodpecker in the 1960s , Sir . Four inch square white boxes ELF transmitters , not so high . Plus directional cone high power transmitter used at Ormskirk hospital points at Edge Hill University a few hundred yards to the West . 😮
18 v grinder with a sliting disc will sort any health issues
Andy Very interesting video. Does anyone know what the these towers could be capable of in terms of RF power output. Power is low now but what could it do.
The mobile tower is transmitting in the sub 4 gigahertz range and the signal will drop in power sharply as you move away the transmitter. So one way to test how dangerous it is, would be to put a glass of water next to your Wifi which does transmit in the 5 gigahertz range and check the if temperature goes up and how much it goes up by. Make sure to control the variables so don’t do it near warm windows or radiators and have a second glass with the same amount of water in it that isn’t near the transmitter to compare the temperature with. If the temp goes up by a noticeable amount compared to the control and the ambient temperature, then you may have a problem.
The operators do not want the towers to transmit very far. They only have a limited supply of frequencies, so want to reuse them as much as possible to have the maximum capacity on their networks. This is why they are moving away from rooftop and tower sites to the street furniture that you see in this video.
Andy, you're only checking RF-levels as a measure for tissue heat-up.
It's the type of modulation that may cause trouble.
I'm a HAM, doing stuff down from 500kHz up to 6GHz, no problems here,
still I'm carefull with certain 'digital' modes, especialy on tissue penetrating frequenties.
Here in NL you can find a report on a goverment website that clearly states the dangerous nature of some techniques.... At least it does if you can read the report.
They are also looking at using mm waves of 27 & 60GHz. Short range, high bandwidth. Nice on paper, but some serious health concerns for those _resonances_ they could cause
As a Ham myself (2e0gyo), I only noticed anything strange when using 1.3Ghz for ATV, only when I used the 50W AMP! after about 30mins I would get light-headed and would stop the TX, the antenna was a WIMO something or other all those years ago and about 10ft away from my shack in the house, no problems on other frequencies though. And, indeed, low power in the right conditions.. 10mW on 144MHz 1064KL to Germany in Dec 2004, and on my mobile phone at south stack Anglesey, one fine evening with no reception in 2013, I get a text message welcoming me to an Irish service! I took a 15min exposure (yes at night) on a Canon 600D and you can actually see Ireland's lights and TV masts!
@@sr3d-microphones Ohhh sure i remember a weekend where the conditions where such That i could talk from Maastricht (NL) to Poland with a handy talker on 2M.
that weekend we worked Poland on 23cm and the UK on 10368MHz !
@@pascalcoole2725 That's great!
G3SMU Brian (silent key) told me twice a story about them working on 10Ghz and were getting ready for a sked, and all of a sudden they spotted a signal (ATV) of a cricket match that was live, after a while they realised it was a match in Australia! Brian was in the UK at the time, but I can't remember his QTH was of the time they received it, I am positive he was pulling my leg, but he was deadly serious! I loved his little stories, it's those special magical moments in radio that make working radio so much fun, I'd like to believe his little story as I'm sure if conditions were in fact in favour, it would have happened! RIP Brian.
Been doing HAM radio since I was 16 and I'm now a grandfather of two teenagers and I'm normal, normal, eh normal. Did develop cataracts when I was in my 40's, no big deal, they did an operation and now I have like bionic distance vision. While the masts are in some cases ugly, in my opinion they are not dangerous. People want to have cell service including fast internet everywhere, but they don't want those ugly antenna towers in their back yard. I would welcome one in mine, if they would let me have an antenna or two, ok three on it.
I rather see your angel grinder than your signal meter
Why are you grinding angels?
what I always say to people who ask, is the signal radiating into your body when holding a mobile phone - especially if held to ear - is much stronger than one of those masts will ever be due to the relative distance
Reminds me of the Gavin & Stacey episode where Stacey's mum joins a protest group to stop a new mobile being put in a field and then complains she can't get a signal on her mobile phone 😂 does look a bit over styled to look like something from the 1927 Metropolis film by Fritz Lang so it looks like the future. I expect none of those elements do anything the actual aerial is hidden inside a plastic housing. We have the same here
There are many antennas in one enclosure that directs the radio signal towards where it is needed, and away from where it isn't.
... here being...?
We never had towers like this and the signal is worse than ever , my old Nokia 5110 worked better back in 2001 , no joke
she can't get a signal because they turned off the 3G signal....
Over styled is not right. Those shapes are purely functional.
The last mast isn't N78 5G (But maybe DSS B1 5G). Most likely you were picking up the microwave links.
What do models mean?
I'm in Eastern Europe and here all 5G antennas are like the last one, shown in the video. I guess it has something with the fact, that a lot of the housing buildings here are massive concrete with a lot of steel inside, creating interferences, thus the need for a bit more powerful emitters.
I was in care in Hoddesdon in 93, their St Bernard died just before I arrived, they had a kitchen full of feral cats aswell lol. Happy times.
More masts, less distance between, less range required, should mean lower transmitter power.
Considering the inverse square law, should mean MUCH less transmitter power.
So less RF exposure to those nearby. But of course more people nearby.
All very much like the wi-fi in your house, perhaps on your bedside table in some households.
There is a lot more going on with these newer masts or monopoles, the older 4G ones had maybe 1 or 2 equipment cabinet at the base, whereas these new ones always have as many as 5 or 6 large cabinets around the base.
@@RichieReportsUK Your point?
@@RichieReportsUKexcept they don't
@@EddieTheHweapons mate , u may laugh, look up Spanish flu and what was actually making them sick ,, signals !
higher frequency is less range and they are coking us slow
I live in the state of Michigan in the U.S. Right across from my house is a VFW Post, (Veterans of Foreign Wars). They have a flag pole that went up a few years back that is also a cell tower. Last year, they added some outer panels to the top 20ft or so. These panels seem to protect what's inside. This pole is bigger than the ones near you and we're pretty sure they're for 5G. It looks a bit menacing because of its size and with the American flag flying from it, the flag can't properly wave in the wind. It just doesn't look right. Some have called it a tampon, because that is what it looks like. Or a one sided Q-tip.
I adore this visual so much
I wanna build a tiny replica
I believe the tampon ones which we have here in London England are actually air quality monitors not mobile masts
I have previously tried the apps you mentioned to sort out which cell I was connected too. However I encountered a problem, cell towers are regarded as essential for communication in times of distress, I storms, or war and (at least some) will give false readings to protect their exact location. Examples - I live in Estonia, to search out my local Tele2 tower I was directed to the edge of a forest, I know what lies beyond this point in every direction, there is nothing that could remotely be a cell tower. The actual tower I was using was about a kilometre from my apartment in a different direction. Inquiries led me to discover some cell towers can be deemed an essential neccesary security for rapid communication of the public and are protected against apps that betray their location.
Yes, in some countries (perhaps all of them in the West?) masts are not noted on maps of cell towers which are available to the public, for reasons of national security. It's certainly that way in Sweden.
The Russian drones targeting Kiev have a GSM unit in their nose. Speculation was that they could target individual phones.
I personally suspect they are using masts and mast ID's as waypoints for guidance. Masts don't move, and are precicely located.
Maybe this is why exact locations are now being restricted in NATO countrys; targeting an individual phone is NOT easy, no power.
@@rafbarkway5280 Uke mobile networks, broadcasting nets and those across Europe have been hacked.
It is always impressive watching you brits drive at the wrong side of the road.
❤❤❤
I've heard they can switch up the power. 5g transmission is VERY weather dependent. Hates the rain.
How can you talk to someone apparently on the moon decades ago but you can't talk to anyone in a valley or up a mountain?
You don't understand how radio works. Communication with the moon is handled at this end by huge parabolic dishes such as those at Goonhilly. Those are direct line of sight. The dish has to be able to see the device on the moon with which it is communicating.
Plus no one has been there….
You can. Easily. It depends on how you want to talk to them.
Probably because they were talking from a film set up the road from mission control
@@user-fc2dc7po6iNah, that was too difficult to set up, so they filmed it on location.
Looks gorgeous, wish we had one
😂 yes, they do have quite a sparkle to them…
How high does that newer spectrum analyzer really go? I have the previous version, but being able to get up into gigahertz ranges would be much better.
what frequency range does your device detect? most of the affordable ones i've seen only go up to around 3.5Ghz, i'd be interested to see up to 100GHz
Have you got any information about saftety testing of these 5G signals? Are they running at full power? What is the peak power they can output? Who really needs the "faster internet" that you refer to?
Will enable the up and coming CBDC
Yes plenty near me, several within 10 meters of private houses. They have a 25 Kilowatt power supply next to them. This amount of high power for each tower is surely going to radiate mega Gigahertz of energy to people within those properties. The big question is whether this represents a serious health hazard. Any feedback on this?
The council should have an environmental impact assessment report but they don't . There is a period of time after installation to object but it is not encouraged. I don't understand why the authorities don't address the concerns of the public and provide the safety and research data .
@@mickyates9154 I believe people did object and apparently told the towers were illegal and must come down. Nothing has happened though, the masts have now been fitted with 'heads' which I assume to be the RF radiator section. Sounds like a bit of sneaky continuum??
Hi,
I think you have been misinformed about the size of the power supply.
Generally they are between 5 and 100 watts at the near field RF power, meaning they have no requirement for such high current.
For a mast to be 10 meters from a property is highly unlikely.
But here is a basic power density calculation for 10mtrs at 100W.
100*20/(4*π*10³)= 0.159mW/cm² which even at that "In my opinion too close" distance, it falls a magnitude below the 2mW/cm² ICNIRP guidelines for public exposure which is a safety factor of 5 from occupational max exposure and a factor of 10 for maximum near field exposure.
Hope this helps.
@@arthurbrotleibe1528 thanks interesting stuff , I'm no EMF expert but could you recommend a search suggestion for exposure aspects eg 2 mW/ cm2 , length of time at various output levels ?
@@mickyates9154 If you just Google ICNIRP guidelines for RF exposure it will return quite a large knowledge base.
Be mindful about people outside of this science, after all it is Quantum particle physics, as they like to misinterpret units of measurement.
Generally EMF meter manufacturers, and hardcore conspiracy theorist like to use μW or mW but also like to omit the decimal places 🤥
Happy reading.
Oh if my memory serves me correct, ICNIRP have a basic grid style logarithm that's already mapped out for like 200Mhz - 300Ghz, but don't quote me on that?
Lower power readings may also be due to MIMO ant, current sector loading and any beamforming in that sector. Nicely balanced video 👍
Hi, any chance you could show a Video on step by step you did on the Nano VNA to show the Spectrum Meter etc. The setup etc? Thanks
It isn't a NanoVNA - he's holding a TinySA Ultra.
It would be cool for you to test also EMF at different distances because as you say, 3500 and on tend to need more masts which potentially means higher EMF exposure than what was previously deemed as normal. Even then we have to think about the modulations, ie just look at how harmful 1.7Ghz can be (yes we don't use that, thankfully) but it makes for good thought food.
One big difference between the 5G mast and the radio you keyed is the overall exposure. You only get exposure from the handheld radio when you transmit rather than 24/7/365 from the 5G.
The other thing is that the newer technologies use beam steering so the power is constantly varying to concentrate it on active users both in distance and direction.
Great video, what's the app called andy that tells you what mast your receiving signal from?
Google app store Ookla, LLC speed test
Interesting video. It's not the RF energy power that is in question when it comes to the negative health effects on humans (and other organisms) but rather the nature of the particular frequencies that are used. Last time I checked there were over 6,000 scientific studies on the negative impact of man made microwave frequencies of various types of the health of living organisms. It's very unfortunate what has been happening the last decade or two with these masts and what people are exposed to on a daily basis and it's only getting worse.
Near the Ricoh Arena in Coventry they had a big mast that's camouflage as a tree lol it looks very fake but did the job. I don't think it's there anymore
Replaced by the Coventry building society arena
More 5g = less bee's. 😢
How do you work that one out?
@andy, can you help with a video for a MeshTastic car unit.... So a unit that is in the car and an antenna outside.... What do you recommend?
Nice work, interesting. Worth noting that the tiny SA spectrum analyser is a superb piece of kit. This thing only costs about 100 quid but it’s worth 10 times that.
Which ones are used for smart meters? Gas and electric ones. I swear i heard that somewhere.
They use 2G in the UK, original GSM effectively. That's why 3G is being turned off but 2G carries on for now.
For a cell site it is a very low mast. At least in the northeastern USA. Most of our cell sites are 100 ish feet tall. We have towers that are painted and decorated to look like trees. They don't really look like trees. They are better than a big white thing you've got.
We have some of the fake tree ones here in the uk too .
Mmwave 5g is pretty low in the us though....
Conspiracy theorists will say these low 5g antennas have a correlation between certain vaccines and certain types of blood clots.
Start looking on the sides of tall buildings and water towers as well… they are all over the place in the US now. If you figure out what most of the 5G antennas look like, rather than a whole tower, you will start seeing them all over. They are also inside large buildings as well. You will see them inside airports all over this country.
@@Isaacmantx I know that is true other areas. I happen to live in a part of the USA (northern New England) where there are a lot of trees and rolling hills with few tall buildings. In bigger cities I do spot lots of cell sites on buildings.
@@maskedviperus Ah yes Bill Gate's chips. Funny they ignore Elon has killed 60% of the primates he's put real chips in. I guess there is no figuring out what ignorance falls for.
The force is strong with you Luke
Aloha, here in Honolulu, they have mounted these 5G antennas on top of the street lights on every other street or block but they are about 1/4 the size of the ones they are putting up on your street.
One quick question: Don’t you worry about crashing into other cars when you drive on the wrong side of road? 😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂
We switch sides every other week.
You get used to it.
Mark Steele, is an expert in these 5g masts, he has a channel on telegram, and he can explain what they do, and they are not telecommunications, they are a weapons system. His local council took him to court, to try and put a gagging order on him, as he was making the local community aware of the dangers of these masts. The judge agreed with Mark, and said the public have a right to debate over this, and the council couldn't just go ahead, and install them. He backed up all his evidence in court with the documents that he had.
The judge said the public have a right to object to 5G. He didn't say that the thug who shot a teenage girl in the head was correct about anything much he claimed about the "dangers" of 5G.
I've read their frequency will activate elements of certain forced jabs, if you know what I mean.
@@SilverSunPublishing I've read that it's an utter bollocks theory put about by a thug grifter who just wants people to subscribe to his "political party".
I heard this about 5G being a weapons system about 2/3 years ago, from a former Marconi employee. I am still wondering why this is being sold to us for the next generation of mobile phones.
@@colinbaynard9067 And yet no one comes up with creditable proof of any of this bollocks. Chem trails, flat earth, 5G, Jadehelm. It's all bollocks, but hey, easier to remove comments, even demonstrably true comments than argue a legit case.
It really amazes me all the people complaining like women collecting children from school. They are all on the phone and texting and are the first to complain about poor signal. They could go and put 10p in one of those big red toilet boxes with windows in. I think not.
And the lower the signal the more power uses the phone to transmit because the signal loss is the same both ways
When I am in East Fife on the coast my mobile signal often comes over the sea from places like Dunbar or North Berwick. It's affected by the tides, surprisingly. I use Network Cell Info Lite to move around and try to connect to a more local cell. Even if it's weaker it's more consistent than the ones over the water.
I'm surprised you got much of a reading indoors. Those signals do not penetrate buildings vary well. Expected if it is for internet, homes would have an antenna they could put in the window for better reception.
Can you recommend what test equipment can actually measure 5G tower RF signal with some accuracy?
Cheers from Oz.
A modern Android mobile phone coupled with software like CellMapper will likely do a rather good job.
I have replied twice to your comment but it has been removed both times , strange to be censored over this topic.
The beam forming 5ge technology is discussed in depth by Dr Barrie Trower & Mark Steele.
I’m not a fan of long (24/7) duration exposure to low power signals in that frequency realm which is what seems to be the case here.
You mean completely harmless signals in this configuration? Cause that’s what they are…
@@RingwayManchesterYes, all non-ionising and subject to ICNIRP power density limits.
But it's the case everywhere. You only have a tune around on a radio or TV to know that you're surrounded by low power signals day in, day out.
I'd say you covered this subject in a good manner.
How does emmisions from my old Huawei P30 compare?
These 5G towers are required to run the mandatory smart meters that you'll have installed in every residency for AGENDA 2030-50 . This is not optional !
It is always optional.
There's always options take control back
@@theone-rp2gq EXACTLY! 💪
take that RF analyser up to Barkway and check out the two huge masts there.
Also GB3PI repeater is there as well
Does GB3PI irradiate people? Certainly some of the users are a bit strange, could RF be the answer?
@@qwerty-cg7hv not at the height its bolted onto the huge tower.
@@BillyNoMates1974 So not the cause of the PIs users being strange then! That's good to know.
@@qwerty-cg7hv no im just a strange person anyways. lol
Reminds me of the beehives in the the Black Mirror episode Hated in the Nation.
Now that’s strange to find someone looking at the same things. Have subscribed. From what I know is that as street furniture no need for planning.
BTW, also consider the 'Inverse Cosecant Squared' antenna pattern, almost certainly in use. The gain pattern would put much more power on the horizon (to serve those further away) and less power at lower angles (because they're nearby). This antenna pattern is clever, and intended to balance the inverse square law, assuming flat terrain.
A very wise man once noted: "If RF was purple, then it wouldn't be so mysterious."
Harmonics are what makes it dangerous..........
@@TruthAndFreedom.Please explain your claim because it is total tosh!
UHF/VHF radio repeaters have at least a 30km range - usually more....
@@daomingjin What is the relevance of your comment please?
@@125brat it's all tosh! There's no such thing as "the 'Inverse Cosecant Squared' antenna pattern" either. Most modern cellular antennas used phased array technology to make gain, not unlike how an FM radio transmitter antenna has multiple bays. Or like line array loudspeakers for large events. It's not magic, but people into woo-woo pseudoscience love to say all kinds of nonsense. One thing that you can take to the bank is anyone with "Truth" in their name is a liar.
Hey Andy, what's the weakest power signal you could bounce a signal off the ionosphere (HF) ? Would make an interesting experiment 😊
HARRP
its not the random bounce its the ability to steer it
@@TheTubejunky that's ultra high power not low power
500mw (1\2w) when the bands are open
@@nickmullen1666 yeah, try buying some attenuators you will be surprised how much lower you can go esp on CW
Really interesting & thank you for sharing Andy , I also really like the music on the end credits , really cool.
Signal strength? They are only being used for phones AT THE MOMENT
They totally scammed the public planning consultation process before erecting one near mine… No letters, and they stuck an A5 public notice with size 8 font, on a telegraph post, facing the road, 7 feet high.
If you request a copy of the safety certification the company gave the planning department of the local council, you’ll find they’ve used the name of a dissolved company and any other company names on the paperwork have small changes to their name…just enough for it to be classed as ‘different’ from the real company…also the addresses are usually fake! There’s no one to put a claim against for harm caused by them….and they’ve used that legal back door to protect the real companies…however, it’s classed as serious fraud. Apparently it’s a Chinese company committing the fraud…they’ve covered their backs for a reason!
Don’t forget too…NONE OF THESE ARE INSURED! They can’t get insurance to protect public health because they know the harms do exist! The Richard Vobes channel had a researcher on recently about this. 🙂👍🏻
Most of these sites are covered under blanket planning permission, there is no requirement to consult the public.
the key is to not let them get installed in the first place@@trappedinroom1014
@@BrianMorrison you have some of the government's sh*t on the end of your nose
@@BrianMorrison The ones I have seen do not have a blanket on them, is this to keep the electrons warm? PS Whatever you do NEVER consult the public, 99% of them don't know what they are talking about and those that do won't talk about it! :-)
Gonna need some faraday cage bedrooms for some respite :D
Aluminum foil hats work.
@@albing1397 Good idea, I'll have to buy one of them. Where can I get one from?
Bacofoil. Free hat in every box.
would love to see a video on the TinySA
looks like it could be very useful for WiFi surveys as well as what you've shown already :)
Being so close at measurement at the last mast, it could be signal flare from the little (3.5 GHz) point-to-point radio antenna and not a 5G signal from the base station's (local signal) sectored antenna.
It’s under the guise of self driving vehicles but is actually to track everything, the RFID chip. They are all MOD and previous mast were painted in army or navy colours. The company they hide behind is 3. And they can be used like LRAD.
I am a witness and am being electronically harassed 24/7
Frequency below human hearing levels are being blasted at me at over a hundred decibels. So it singles out certain people. Sadists love it.
I already have a microchip inserted into my spine against my will. Am seriously considering writing to my MP
I just died because I turned on my WiFi and it BLASTED me with RADIATION and my brain just got cooked. I'll wear my tinfoil hat next time
@@TallPoehuman hearing is anything above, 20 hz below that is infrasound which can affect certain types.
Don’t be fooled by that question when oposing 5G, don’t you want a better phone single? Your phone signal is way down the list of what 5G is for. If you have wifi and you have devices conected to the net all those things can be controled remotely, including your EV. Got the picture yet?
I have one at the end of my road about 300 meters away but does give me over 700 megs down and over 100 up. I can see the top from my window like that one but its much taller
When are they planning on improving the 4g signal coverage?
Have you seen the public discussion on 5G and its dangers, especially since other countries are halting deployments ... right, no public discussion, nothing ... suddenly 5G masts everywhere !
This isn't acceptable.
These need to come down.
They can probably do phone tracking and location services ie start of the digital prison
I think you get it spot on.
What's the point of erecting these masts for High speed 5G connections to download films faster according to Kevin Bacon? All the while there is a national rollout for installing fibre optic infrastructure throughout the UK for fast internet access, including my rural location and I've seen it happen everywhere. Doesn't make sense to me. It just blotts the landscapes the same as wind farms do. Ridiculous!
Next they will be chopping trees down for line of 5G sight!
Some people want a phone signal outside their house, such as on a bus or train, or even in the back of a car or walking!
So it's true, there are places in the UK with a mobile phone signal. I have heard about this and seen adverts. Unfortunately, my phone is redundant most of the time.
This is a bit worrying as my landline has just been digitalized and if we have a power cut we lose the landline so no way to contact anybody. As an emergency backup, I've got a book of stamps (2nd class) for my fallback comms. I suppose this makes me a prepper?
some 5G masts have a set power output of 20w, i was involved with an up grade on a tower similar to one you show and its only 20w
I wish they would get some 5G towers up around here. Starting to wonder if the 5G actually works in my phone for all I've seen of it. 😂👍
Where is 'here'? England, Detroit, Madagascar, Antarctica?
I think HERE is not there but maybe somewhere
It's really frustrating where I am. 3 want to install a 5G mast here, but the council rejected the.application because it would impinge on the street scene.... And within 100m or so if where they want to put it is a frigging great mast on the edge of the South Downs National Park...
@@Joe-by8jh Arh.. I see. That must be why they keep cutting down the trees everywhere!
@@Joe-by8jhbasically only open field events. I mean it's a good use but unfortunately so many things obstruct them in urban areas.
They are seriously dangerous. Don't think it's safe ! What do you use microwave radiation for cooking food !
I bought o e of those cheap EMP/ microwave detectors with the led read out& from the entrance of our street & down the road about 500 feet to where the new 5G mast is the divice was reading at 50% of the dial, maybe it was underground electric cables, not 100% sure but its my guess.
In the States we have Suspicious Trees. Usually giant robot evergreens, but I've seen a Suspicious Palm in the desert, too.
Long term effect of constant exposure to 5G are a legitimate a concern. If you are interested in the subject I would recommend reading EMF*D by Dr. Joseph Mercola.
Im with you. They say its not an issue due to low power. But how does that low power affect our cells being exposed day in and day out non stop.
@@FalconWing1813It's non-ionising radiation, the energy of these photons is too low to break chemical bonds and is not hazardous to biological processes.
@@BrianMorrison My understanding of biological effects is that it's more subtle & to do with things like the mobility of calcium ions through cell membranes. I think there's a lot we don't understand about this but we'll find out eventually though it's a given any adverse research will be suppressed as very inconvenient!
@@alanjewell9550 I think that this suggestion has been about for a long time, the difficulty is to demonstrate it in vivo as opposed to in vitro.
@@BrianMorrison Well! Photon torpedo's can be dangerous, just ask any Klingon and they will tell you....
People complain about poor mobile signal on their latest expensive smart phone and then complain when a mast goes up to boost their signal.......
Do they, Im happy with 4G
I think everyone was happy with 3G , these are weapons !! They don’t boost any signal on phone when near lol , WiFi in ur home , it’s all bad waves and effects us negatively
put one in your bed
i never had problems with signal ever since 3G ... 1MBit/sec. is good enough unless you;re trying to download 5 or more 4K HD video streams, and live stream at the same time. For regular internet use - it's not needed. Unless of course if you're trying to build a network infrastructure that allows you to keep tabs on every citizen 24/7.... which we know is their end goal
If they cannot get good 4g reception they have zero chance of getting 5g right.
Does that thing support the Lorah / Lowfi network?
2:47 Love the hype music for the cell tower montage
These far king monstrosities are springing up everywhere with no notice given to people.
Why would people need notice?
@@tracyrreed Because people don't want their green spaces and locality made ugly.
@@manicminer4573 they are a weapon
@@manicminer4573 These aren't ugly though!
Infrastructure for 15 minute city dystopia?
Yes, it's so some people can work from home.
Look at frequency of military microwave crowd control.then look how much more 5g can be turned up.dystopias coming!!!
Thanks for the reassurance that they're not as dangerous to our health as you think. This affects all of us, whether we're interested in technology or not, so is good to know.
They can turn the power up as the cables and power supplies are hefty when you see inside. Maybe no harm being done as you show RF output is reasonable on the metering.
And with the proper equipment close enough to the mobile tower, you can harness the radiation and turn it into usable electric power to light up a low power LED. heh BigClive on his YT channel showed that it can be done.
We stopped one going up in our neighbourhood, the council put a small paper on the nearest lamp post, luckily my wife saw it and we put leaflets through every door in the street, we got everyone to complain, the council will take no notice if you go down the route of it affecting your health, you have to complain that there is nothing else at that height in the area and it would look right out of place, we stopped it going up, there is plenty of info out there regarding these towers, make your own mind up, if you want these things near you.
And now all the people complain they can't get decent speeds on their phones!
@@paulsengupta971 no problem with the phone signal in southeast London.
Hmm. World domination conspiricy thwarted by aestetic planning objections. Sounds perfectly legit.
@@electrogrim we had over 100 people sign the complaint form, we also had a planning officer that told us the only way we could win is to not mention health but to go with the fact nothing else is that height in the area, we won and the planning was withdrawn.
We brought a EMF radiation detector a few years back because of everything going *smart* and checked where the kids slept. We actually had to move one of the beds around.
Personally I think that mild cough narritive with chemical taste on recovery was in fact five gee.
But the financial elites want their smart cities & internet of things so they can't have the truth come out.
Thanks Andy, love your beats, keep up what you're doing 👍
What sort of meter was that? How much did you pay for it?
We could do with a few of them over here as my handheld without a antenna gets out further than the cell towers in this rural location haha
It may be relatively low level RMF, but it's there 24/7, pretty much wherever you go now, especially in cities. And there is often multiple types of mast in one area (does the power multiply at different frequencies from different masts?). Does anybody really know all that backround RMF is safe or is it just a case of lets try it and if it's really bad we'll soon know about it?
Some conspiracy loons are going to be very disappointed when they watch this
Exactly the same Nikola Tesla fan boys who think that powering a city via a transmitter was suppressed genius.
10,000 5G masts in Wuhan 2019? Just a coincidence 😉
Don’t be silly
Sahara dust rained down on the UK a few years back and we had a water shortage that year and wild fires. Coincidence?
Yes. That’s how coincidences and selective reasoning works.
They must have good signal. Coincidence?
Booster time for the chat 😅😂
I had a cup of coffee this morning after returning from Sarajevo yesterday, and have just watched this video. Coincidence?
They're retro-fitting second towers very close to those originally erected near me, often just across the road. Looks awfully like a checkpoint. Anyone else seeing this happening?
Different companies probably.
I'm less than 100 yards from a 5G mast. They added a second cabinet to it when they changed the mast. The main difference was the height.
And that one you have is way shorter