Bill Thornton - Intro to Common Law You can get his dvd videos that are well worth it from Dennis Whipple 1215.org/seminar/denniswhipple.htm nationalliberty... www.1215.org
The 'Nitty Gritty Law School'? This sounds like some sort of 'tinfoil hat', 'Freeman-on-the-land' scam institution, about as legitimate as the 'Trump University'! I would, moreover, hazard a guess that the speaker is not a 'lawyer' or an academic, as he might claim, but a fantasist and a crank. . . . . and to think that people believe and follow these wingnuts. Such credulity! We have so-called 'Common Law Lawyers' in my country and none of them is qualified in Jurisprudence; few of them have any academic qualifications whatever. They have read up from nutcase websites and books. Stephen Macclesfield, UK
@@stephenhardy312 so what? This is education and you’re projecting your insecurity onto it. Sure, there’s endless amounts of idiots like you point out, but you apparently can’t recognize the philosophical level of truth and the rigor of the language he uses because you let your emotions rule you. One does not need to use his knowledge in order to recognize the value of it; this is the kind of knowledge people should not act on, but instead recognize that it points out very real things in the world which ought to make us pause and reflect, ought to make us question the foundations of what we call civilization.
*The Language Every Philosopher, Legal Professional and Linguist Should Know* 1) Slang (learned before school) 2) Formal English (learned in school... hopefully) 3) Legal English (not learned in school and with varying proficiencies in law itself!) Did you know that Civics was transitioned out of the curriculum of the school system during the years 1850 to 1950? It was replaced by 'American Government' (or something similar). Why is that important for philosophers, legal professionals and linguists? That is what this thread is about. I will be adding to this thread over time as my understanding of this language grows. #Knowlege #Wisdom #Understanding #Insight #Learning #Sovereignty #CommonLaw #Liberty #Freedom #Law #Judicial
Police are policy enforcers. Corporations use policies and nations use laws. The United States is a federal corporation defined under US code 3002 section 15. States are subsidiaries of the United States and municipalities are subsidiaries of the states. The 14 Amendment infers that citizens are subject to the United States. Birth Certificates and Social Security are forms of incorporating a person into the United States. Social Security is a pension and employee identification number. America is a land mass owned by the United States which is headquartered in Washington DC which was established as a sovereign municipal corporation through the 1871 District of Columbia Organic Act. The royal chartered Virginia Company is the basis for the United States.
I’m glad almost 200k views on this. He may be “incorrect” on “ALOT of things,” as a nearby hater puts it, but the ideas are very real and very interesting to think about.
Oh crap! I didn’t have my glasses on and as soon as the opening scene appeared, I thought the podium read, the Grandpa Forum! HAHAHA! Ok, I will watch the rest now but wanted to share the little laugh I had. 😆
Bill makes a great, revelatory statement in this presentation at the 23:36 or so, '...you have to develop an ability, if you're gonig to be effective in the common law, is the ability to say '2 plus 3 equals ...what? ...maybe you've never seen a five before? ' This is the Platonic approach, as he says, ' ..a reasoning process.' You have to be assume that NOTHING IN THE PROCEDINGS IS MEANINGLESS, AND ARBITRARY! As he says, '..every word has a meaning.' Applying this methodology shows why Mr. Thornton is so knowledgeable on the subject.
isn't it interesting how at the top of the discussion scroll there always seems to be a negative paid troll response somehow toggled right to the top that could be used by the thoughtless "citizen" to dismiss this highly powerful information that threatens the establishment
eh they're not paid.. this kind of thing is generally regarded by those who really like law as pseudo-law.. by that group i mean people who study in traditional law schools which go back a couple hundred years or so.. first one ever is actually here in Litchfield CT. anyway yeah that's probably it, i doubt they're paid..
Of coarse you can, however it will be much more effective and forth coming when the common law grand jury is used. In other words, not one of the people, but 25 of the people come together and bring suit.. that's an indictment. look at National Liberty Alliance www.nationallibertyalliance.org and get evolved in your county!
Oarqvs Rodte People do, people have. Biill is one, I am another, ones at National Liberty Alliance are taking the Common Law Grand Jury Route. LOOK INTO IT!
Oarqvs Rodte I will comment on this again. when you claim common law they are aware you are not aware of what you are speaking about. when you speak common law, in their language you are speaking the ucc code.
If common law is unwritten, than why do you have to file paperwork that you’re the plaintiff if you’re not part of the legal society.. and what if you don’t know how to read or write? Wasn’t common law designed for people who can’t read or right?
My whole life I've subscribed the idea that this was the most boring and pedantic subject imaginable. Boy, was I wrong!... about it being boring, anyway. Now that I find out that I don't have to be completely impotent in a courtroom, I want to learn as much as I can. Now I just need to find someone to explain Napoleonic Code to me since I live in Louisiana. I'm in my 20's and I just serve on a jury for the first time not too long ago, and I found the whole process very interesting. Now that I'm aware of the default legal status called "the citizen" that most people are duped into accepting, apparently by their own ignorance no less than the exclusivity of the legal system, my interest is thouroghly piqued.
Decentralized law is where freedom actually has a chance. Common law is still a practice of centralized law, which has failed us for the last 10,000 years. However, common law would become a new animal with some shared traits, though common law as it is now is without principle and dependant on precedent and public opinion.
So "they" snuck in the 14th amendment? It is more accurate to say that we fought a war over it and hundreds of thousands of people died in the path to The 14th Amendment.
I thought sovereigns don't have to even go to a courtroom? (great and brilliant speaker by the way) You sir are a GENIUS. I don't profess to understand it all yet- I'm just beginning to learn this but WOW. What a memory- what a genius!
The CD was just a duplication of his website at the time. 1215.org .. I believe he has a link to a zip file of every thing o.k. the website that is current. Check there..
Thank you so much! After I heard a few lectures on Admirly Law, and the way the entire structure of the US is subverted, I knew I had to get as much knowledge about Common Law as I could!
well, I would suggest that firstly, understand why you want to be, and are currently not.. I know understanding is a big part of that.. so keep up the research and due diligence and ask questions!
Well God asked me to find you and to give you this message. That on August 5 2014 10:00 am I will be arresting a judge and a defence attoreny for P.C 550 (b) (3) P.C 118 and C.I.C 1871.4. I have engouh evidence and I feel that my Flesh freedom will be taken from me. My God has groomed me in HIS word back in 99-01. Little did I understand as to why? Until now. I am a peaceful Son of Man. I need a grand jury and this is where you come in let's not chase the wind!
TaxTheFed 1st-He got Contempt of court for sounding like a crazy man and representing himself in court. After they beat the shit out of him behind the scenes, he pleaded mental insanity and took a plea deal. No judges, defense attorney or anyone of that nature were arrested.
Hey, Bill was in southern California general region, I think, a few to five years ago... I am not positive as Life happens and its fast, so he could be anywhere by now.
at approx 1.12.30 on your youtube you're explaining how they get you to agree in order that they have authority over you- but you don't say how to get out of that...what to say when given those 3 options of "Do you agree to this, this or this?" Could you tell me what you should answer to that because those are trick questions. Thanks
The LostBoys i treat fitness as a small hobby,not a death sentence like most people,thats all it is. the common law part i simply want to step out of the constant bs of the government...to deny them consent and even bill them if they wish to pursue the fraud,.. so id like to learn how to inform my gov to step back and not intrude in my life.
Common Law is the term used to recognize a set of values and honor when dealing with others with regard to a dispute. The Concepts apply to every being who is cognizant and aware enough, to be able to resolve a dispute honorably. Kings/Queens Have no higher power, and if another King/Queen is some how harmed by the direct or indirect actions of another King/Queen, how is a resolution to be found when both feel they are in the right? Just because a Land, does not write in its codes/statutes/laws that it recognizes common law, does not mean that it does not exist.. !!! However I digress, If you watch the seminars, there is a from of GOVERNMENT that is completely Common Law.. This form of government is called a REPUBLIC.. Republican form of government - www.1215.org/lawnotes/lawnotes/repvsdem.htm
David Bradley the physical us constitution part i take with a grain of salt, claiming the us constitution will never work unless there is no precedent will work in any court within the British commonwealth (including nz, oz, canada...)
If it is in there as 1207 it is a typo' or a misnomer.. UCC section 1-207 is not just NY.. It is hard to find that UCC with the full parts.. I remember trying to track it down and could not because all the editions had been shortened.. Imagine that..
Volume is too low for this computer. Got to get speakers, and much of the print is blurry to make notes. Feel I am missing out on much but thank you and plan to watch this and the next one. Too much to learn and too little time. Got some dishonest maneuvering going on and want to file a tort agaisnt the person making the complaint and the State for putting their name as Plaintiff, since it belongs in Municipal court where there are ordinances that are not listed in the State complaint. Besides I was never served and did not even learn about the case until five months or more later. They sent a certified letter when the complainant lives behind me. He threatened me he would teach me a less for telling his 7 dogs for being out of control and barking at me when I am tending to my property. On and on. Court is being abused with help of authorities in small town who seem to want to get rid of the witness to the village thief, having been a victim as well. Protecting the thieves, profitable. Would make a good book. Thank you for sharing your knowledge.
well what if your case is denied by all judges!? in all available courts!? can one then form one's own court and force them to enter in a trial!? so that you may be able to litigate at all!
you're not under 'common law' in australia.. look up systems of law on wikipedia, the world map showing them. it's jus tasystem of law which is really broad and they can't be (common laws so to speak) all bound in one book.. at least that's my legal opinion.
Re: at 2:00 (ish) he is asked if there is a Federal Common Law. He says there is no such thing. I'm confused because in Black's (4th edition) it defines Federal Common Law as: "a body of decisional law developed by the federal courts untrammeled by state court decisions." How is there not a thing, that is defined?
The reason there is no federal common law is because Erie Railroad vs. thompkins. That decision from the supreme court is why. Poor Mr. Thompkins got only a headache and nothing else,
S Zee. I have never heard that and don´t know what it would even mean for Magna Carta to not be "valid". Are you saying Magna Carta was never signed by King John in 1215? While I believe it´s true that the "king" signed under duress, which might put into question whether it could be enforced between the barons and the "King", it has been ratified by millions of people since then. They ratified it by using it, and it´s still used today, just as we use other founding documents in America. Even the fake corporate "courts" of Anglo-American countries recognize it as authority (when forced to do so).
@@oclv110sl ok but English common law is not American common law. The Magna Carta of 1215 is not the law of the land. He’ll it’s not even the law of the uk anymore
That is correct. :David-Wynn: Miller, grammatically disqualified the Magna Carta, the Declaration of Independence, and the US Constitution in 1999, which led to one of the strangest events ever witnessed. ALL the above documents, and others of such ilk were sold at Christies Auctions as 'Historical Documents of No Importance'.
"COMMON LAW. That which derives its force and authority from the universal consent and immemorial practice of the people." Of the people, not one person. Therefore, a group of people (usually the entire populous) agree to the concept. If you complain, tough luck. Just saying common law is what you think it is will not effect the law to grant you rights you think you deserve. If you don't want to accept having to have a driver's license, then walk.
For some this is not new and has been expected. So TO STOP THE CORRUPT POWER AND CONTROL YOU NEED TO KNOW WHAT IS GOING ON and you know someone else that needs to know too, YES YOU DO!!...
Halito!!! ADASSLIGI UTSATI GVGEYU!!!!!!!!Grand RAISING my Beautiful original melenated copper tone American indigenous Aborigine Gods and Goddesses kings and queens brothers and sisters of TURTLE ISLAND aka the Americas! peace honor and love tribe! One love! Keep vibing High! Positive vibrations! Shout out from SouthEast Washington D.C.
Juanita gamboa I heard him talk about his cameraman selling dvds, but I can't remember what video that was. sorry Why do you need his dvds though? Most of his work is online. He allows people to copy his work (no copyright) This channel has a lot of his clips uploaded.
google is right in your hand chrome even or yt with 1000 different explanations from various channels. put ut in this search and watch em as they roll up
This is the real reason the War For Southern Independence was fought. All the states lost their sovereignty after the war. Central Bankers forced the Federal Government to Incorporate and the 14th amendment was enacted not ratified or signed into law by Andrew Johnson, Stewart signed it as Secretary of State. This created a US and State Citizenship until that time we were state citizens only. The Federal Reserve Act of 1913 was enacted while half of Congress was on Christmas Vacation giving bankers control of our currency, and Our Income Tax. Income tax is paid to the Federal Reserve, its stockholders make billions and give the Treasury Half. The Privately Owned Federal Reserve also makes 6% on every dollar for printing the funny money.
marie smith Which flag flies over State Capitols? The Federal Flag, this represents Marshall Law. We were a Union of States, not a Nation or a Country. We didn't Nationalize, we Federalized. "I have no purpose directly or indirectly to interfere with the institution of slavery in the state where it now exists. I believe I have no lawful right to do so, and I have no inclination to do so ... My paramount objective is to save the Union and it is not either to save or destroy slavery. If I could save the Union without freeing any slave, I would do it." Abe
A State is actualy just a 'condition'.. or set of current conditions.. we need to get our semantics down via etymonline and other etymology websites.. learn what words mean but please don't listen to Jordan Maxwell lmao
When I started to research common law, I reach the same conclusion on why there was a civil war. The civil war, taught in government education, was about slave, but there was one more fact which was not taught in government education. The southern state was fighting for sovereignty.
I agree with what you said, but the people didn't lose their sovereignty, just the states. The "U.S. Citizen" term is what made most people believe they too had lost their sovereignty. Word play by the elite is the majority of the problem.
The Fourth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution provides, "[t]he right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly ...
'corporation,' 'government' these are just terms people use to avoid personal responsibility. They are DBAs. Just people 'doing business as' some 3rd party entity. A 'corporation' has to be incorporated by the 'government.' A corporation can not exist without the might of the 'government.' It is only individuals doing business and hiding their personal responsibility behind the violent force of the individuals who call themselves 'government.' They are simply words created by psychopaths to obfuscate their true violent nature.
Dustyn Charles Look up the definition of a corporation in Blacks Law Dictionary, if you are confused as to what it means. A legal dictionary is something everyone should utilize as without it you'll have no way to translate the legal terms spoken by the government. If they are speaking to you in a language you do not understand, then do not agree with anything they said until they have defined what they are saying to you in a manner which you do understand.
36:27 The statutory law is the law of the special interests. The common law is the law of the people 1:07:50 the constitution does not grant any rights. It recognizes the rights. 1:42:30 republic leads to freedom, a democracy leads to dictatorship.
+Too Crunk perhaps you are confusing what I was meaning with the knowledge and understanding of how the forms and processes are currently handled in relation to how it was originally intended for a republic in common law. That paper does go into alot of those ideas it appears. nothing about the BAR existed in the beginnings of our systems of jurisprudence. well, the concept of People and Slaves ( now citizen ). . i admit, there is alot of information I do not know about.. The concept of people and their relationship to the government and state, and the functions of the state with regards to the decree of the people, and really understanding that relationship, has been my focus. As well and using that new understanding to motion the common law court for remedy.. The trickery and word games of attorneys, the BAR and other judicial corrupted methodologies, within the statutory system, do not apply to common law.. That does not STOP them from trying to apply it though.. i have researched 90% of bill thornton, and have talked with Judges and Common law professors about the information.. Personal Perception of what it is supposed to mean, is always an issue.. Understanding it used to be common Sense.. The simplicity of it has been bastardized, in my opinion.. My goal is always to promote the truth and free will of true freedom and liberty.. . There are those with cases that bring up the "UNION DUES CARD" debate with regards to the DA, judge with great results.. John darash with National Liberty Alliance uses that info ALWAYS in his cases.
Go away +RetSquid TROLL!. there are plenty of cases and decisions.. If you are not paid by the establishment to dis-inform, then you must be freely to choosing the state as the represented or "CLIPPED" Sovereignty and Parens patriae for your governance. Tis your choice.. Wonderful thing about a true Republic is the UNLIMITED right to contract, even if it is to contract away your Sovereignty and Liberty.
+Eldonthian McAllister using obscure legal codes as a way to fabricate your own story of how the legal system works is nonsensical, why have none of these strategies ever worked in court, and we only see loons like yourself end up in jail for not paying their speeding ticket, ect... Where is the legal precedent for any of the things you claim?
+Meta Tron there is proof that it works, and proof that it does not work.. pull your head out... there are laws that make stealing illegal and unlawful... stealing is wrong before any laws were decreed to make it so... is there proof that it works? is there proof that it doesn't work? ( people still get robbed every day ) just because the law is ignored, not enforced or utilized, does not mean that it it not real, good or applicable. this law and info is good and accurate. is is true and correct, however, just like the law against stealing does not guarantee no one is going to steal from you. these laws of the/our republic does not guarantee or magicaloy keep our people free... too much fear to stand up and be a king. because of the threat of local practice, and coercion. .. .
This man, Bill Thornton is the owner and operator of www.1215.org You can contact him there. I am also available to answer questions. You can also get involved at NationalLibertyAlliance.org
If King John pledged his heirs and successors (Clinton/Trumpf) to pope for ever plus one day ... And, if John gave England to pope in 1213, and Magna Carta came two years later, is the common law of England the common law of pope? Or is it the common law of "we the persons" of England starting at 1215? Since all "presidents" of the 13 Colonies were King John's relations, thus an inference of bias on the part of the judiciary/government in general, how is it your case laws and jurist quotes are all valid. That is to say, are we dealing with the rule OF law or the rule BY law or lawfare
You must ponder on the idea of perspective with relation to where the law was decreed.. for example.. there is a natural law ( generally agreed, decreed by god ) of gravity.. the law of gravity applies to all things.. So your real questions might be how does any man made law truly apply to any other man.. Again, looking back at the perspective of where that law came from. The genius of a republic, is that we are all kings.. With no subjects and none to Govern but ourselves. your laws truly only apply to only you when you decree a law of your own, or apply to others that are in your kingdom. This kingdom of North America has been confiscated by the Corporation the United States of America and entrusted to this trust to ensure the prosperity of the people.(the preamble to the constitution FOR the United states of America). You can choose to be subject, and consent to the laws.. i.e. I choose to stop at that stop sign or stop light, because I recognize its place to help ensure the safety of our fellow man.. It Originally really only becomes enforceable when someone else got hurt from your actions.. you run the stop sign, and kill some one.. now you did wrong.. However, out of ignorance and coercion, we are imprisoned/enslaved to follow Codes(of Conduct)/Statutes out of the ignorance of the public officials and officers.. Its all a big scam and we are born into it. The LAW truly comes from the consensus of everyone in a republic (indirectly through representation or of a True Jury of 25 or more of your PEERS/Kings/Sovereigns; or directly via you a king moving your court to seek remedy for being wronged in some way.)
mustaffa1611 That is because, what the dead people did is outline and come up with concepts and ideas, Philosophies.. The concepts do only apply if there are those who still support it.. In this case, the supreme court justices, the body of people, grand juries.. etc. ( www.nationallibertyalliance.org ) There are those who are trying to kill the concepts and ideas, however, it does require people to keep them alive. Every State is Required to be a republic. It is the understanding of what a republic is, and how to apply it to your liberty, that is important.
Somebody left this quote on a video of mine. what do you think of it: All governments are exactly the same. It doesn't matter what label you put on them. It doesn't matter if you call it a "republic" or a "monarchy" or a "democracy." Its all the same. Governments are only people providing services on a violent compulsory basis. That's it. Its just people who are incapable of dealing with others on a peaceful voluntary basis in the marketplace like everyone else.
mustaffa1611 It does seem that the government bodies we know of today, do all seem to be nothing but coercion, and violence.. however, not all "Governement" is based on such concepts.. It does always come down to the kinds of people staffing the government. All the issues boil down to the people behind that staff the agencies, and the enlightenment, rather the lack thereof, that results in such tyrannical governance! In My opinion. This is why education and discolsure of truth should be the goal, for the benefit of all concerned!
This man, Bill Thornton is the owner and operator of www.1215.org You can contact him there. I am also available to answer questions. You can also get involved at NationalLibertyAlliance.org
Why is everyone talking about common law all the time. Common law is the constitutions federal and state. When he talks about all of this stuff he’s actually talking about natural law. He’s not wrong but he’s also not right. Common law federally is the process afforded to you statutorily or constitutionally. The constitution says common law because the enlightenment brought natural law to everyone and it was so popular in the interests of liberty that everyone followed common law to express the natural law
Man... God bless this old man! There should be more like him to educate the "people" not the public. See how I just learned? 😁
The 'Nitty Gritty Law School'? This sounds like some sort of 'tinfoil hat', 'Freeman-on-the-land' scam institution, about as legitimate as the 'Trump University'! I would, moreover, hazard a guess that the speaker is not a 'lawyer' or an academic, as he might claim, but a fantasist and a crank. . . . . and to think that people believe and follow these wingnuts. Such credulity! We have so-called 'Common Law Lawyers' in my country and none of them is qualified in Jurisprudence; few of them have any academic qualifications whatever. They have read up from nutcase websites and books.
Stephen
Macclesfield, UK
@@stephenhardy312 so what? This is education and you’re projecting your insecurity onto it. Sure, there’s endless amounts of idiots like you point out, but you apparently can’t recognize the philosophical level of truth and the rigor of the language he uses because you let your emotions rule you. One does not need to use his knowledge in order to recognize the value of it; this is the kind of knowledge people should not act on, but instead recognize that it points out very real things in the world which ought to make us pause and reflect, ought to make us question the foundations of what we call civilization.
The reminder for us to be "a nice person" is absolutely invaluable - thank you kindly
*The Language Every Philosopher, Legal Professional and Linguist Should Know*
1) Slang (learned before school)
2) Formal English (learned in school... hopefully)
3) Legal English (not learned in school and with varying proficiencies in law itself!)
Did you know that Civics was transitioned out of the curriculum of the school system during the years 1850 to 1950? It was replaced by 'American Government' (or something similar). Why is that important for philosophers, legal professionals and linguists?
That is what this thread is about. I will be adding to this thread over time as my understanding of this language grows.
#Knowlege #Wisdom #Understanding #Insight #Learning #Sovereignty #CommonLaw #Liberty #Freedom #Law #Judicial
Police are policy enforcers. Corporations use policies and nations use laws. The United States is a federal corporation defined under US code 3002 section 15. States are subsidiaries of the United States and municipalities are subsidiaries of the states. The 14 Amendment infers that citizens are subject to the United States. Birth Certificates and Social Security are forms of incorporating a person into the United States. Social Security is a pension and employee identification number. America is a land mass owned by the United States which is headquartered in Washington DC which was established as a sovereign municipal corporation through the 1871 District of Columbia Organic Act. The royal chartered Virginia Company is the basis for the United States.
Stop regurgitating Sovrun/Freetard made up nonsense.
@@golden-63 How is it nonsense?
please explain.
@@oluas85 The statements made above are demonstrably false. They have no basis in the truth.
@@golden-63 I get it.
In relation to what you say that the information claimed above is false, then what is the truth?
I’m glad almost 200k views on this. He may be “incorrect” on “ALOT of things,” as a nearby hater puts it, but the ideas are very real and very interesting to think about.
Natural orders lives forever.
I'am thankful have listened to the video
This is GOLD!!! THANK YOU!
This is the best of the best common law introduction, and I have seen so many and he is the best of the best
This video grows over a period of time to become delightfuly something that I can stand under. Totally understandable Bill Thornton is...
I cannot stop staring at his beard! Pure awesomeness. Likewise, the content of the video is priceless.
Very revealing! You shall know the truth and the truth shall set you free.
Oh crap! I didn’t have my glasses on and as soon as the opening scene appeared, I thought the podium read, the Grandpa Forum! HAHAHA! Ok, I will watch the rest now but wanted to share the little laugh I had. 😆
Thank you, I absolutely appreciate your work.... 🙌
Bill makes a great, revelatory statement in this presentation at the 23:36 or so, '...you have to develop an ability, if you're gonig to be effective in the common law, is the ability to say '2 plus 3 equals ...what? ...maybe you've never seen a five before? '
This is the Platonic approach, as he says, ' ..a reasoning process.' You have to be assume that NOTHING IN THE PROCEDINGS IS MEANINGLESS, AND ARBITRARY! As he says, '..every word has a meaning.' Applying this methodology shows why Mr. Thornton is so knowledgeable on the subject.
ua-cam.com/video/GOTMeSDmuYg/v-deo.html
A judges job is to make sure your rights are not violated, period
Only if you assert the rights otherwise you are operating as a subject to the contract of the governed
I have to sleep now this is exhausting but exciting at the same time :)
isn't it interesting how at the top of the discussion scroll there always seems to be a negative paid troll response somehow toggled right to the top that could be used by the thoughtless "citizen" to dismiss this highly powerful information that threatens the establishment
dukegreened very true
☝☝☝☝☝☝☝☝☝☝☝ (Watch Our YT Site!)
One step forward into our earth evolution: live the benefits regarding a solution already existing in law to redeem oneself from the current debt matrix system!
🛡️ 🛡️ 🛡️ 🛡️ 🛡️ 🛡️ 🛡️ LAFRAMBOISE-SECURITY-COVENANT 🛡️ 🛡️ 🛡️ 🛡️ 🛡️ 🛡️ 🛡️
🛡️ 🛡️ 🛡️ 🛡️ 🛡️ 🛡️ 🛡️ WEBSITE ➤ the-covenant.usa(DOT)cc/8NwXXRkpYEI 🛡️ 🛡️ 🛡️ 🛡️ 🛡️ 🛡️ 🛡️
eh they're not paid.. this kind of thing is generally regarded by those who really like law as pseudo-law.. by that group i mean people who study in traditional law schools which go back a couple hundred years or so.. first one ever is actually here in Litchfield CT. anyway yeah that's probably it, i doubt they're paid..
" TO SIN BY SILENCE MAKES COWARDS OUT OF MEN AND WOMEN " freedom of speech is power to the people on the streets .
I've been seeing that everywhere and I have yielded to saying (or commenting) to remain in the positive and without presumptions.
THANKS FOR SHARING!
A man's home is his castle, his land is his kingdom, and that makes him King!
can we take the district of Columbia to common law court and make them pay for breaching their oath of office as trustee of our freedoms?
Of coarse you can, however it will be much more effective and forth coming when the common law grand jury is used. In other words, not one of the people, but 25 of the people come together and bring suit.. that's an indictment. look at National Liberty Alliance www.nationallibertyalliance.org and get evolved in your county!
Eldonthian McAllister Why has nobody done this?!
Oarqvs Rodte People do, people have. Biill is one, I am another, ones at National Liberty Alliance are taking the Common Law Grand Jury Route. LOOK INTO IT!
Oarqvs Rodte I will comment on this again. when you claim common law they are aware you are not aware of what you are speaking about. when you speak common law, in their language you are speaking the ucc code.
Doesn't matter which faculty, there's always a sensei.
Wonderful, I am going to study this here in Idaho.... Great love any tips.
Wonder how I we the people can use this to stop the chemtrails!!!
this dude is aweeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeesomeeeeee
Just learning all this and it is fascinating.
That joke IS cute. It put a big smile on my face. Thank you.
I'm looking for a group to practice mock courtroom cases and defending and experimenting with the constitution
if you are in NYC, lets sit with people that have open cases
Please reach out to me as well.
@@DivergentPatriot around two thousand hours of legal study since I wrote this response. You sir are the first person to respond.
Great lesson of life.
27:12 sovereign citizen, oxymoron
If common law is unwritten, than why do you have to file paperwork that you’re the plaintiff if you’re not part of the legal society.. and what if you don’t know how to read or write? Wasn’t common law designed for people who can’t read or right?
No it’s designed for men.
My whole life I've subscribed the idea that this was the most boring and pedantic subject imaginable. Boy, was I wrong!... about it being boring, anyway. Now that I find out that I don't have to be completely impotent in a courtroom, I want to learn as much as I can. Now I just need to find someone to explain Napoleonic Code to me since I live in Louisiana. I'm in my 20's and I just serve on a jury for the first time not too long ago, and I found the whole process very interesting. Now that I'm aware of the default legal status called "the citizen" that most people are duped into accepting, apparently by their own ignorance no less than the exclusivity of the legal system, my interest is thouroghly piqued.
More
Decentralized law is where freedom actually has a chance. Common law is still a practice of centralized law, which has failed us for the last 10,000 years. However, common law would become a new animal with some shared traits, though common law as it is now is without principle and dependant on precedent and public opinion.
So "they" snuck in the 14th amendment? It is more accurate to say that we fought a war over it and hundreds of thousands of people died in the path to The 14th Amendment.
Kevin V. Davis no they didn’t. The 14th amendment was put in place after the war during reconstruction to keep democrats from acting like dicks.
@@dennisbergstrom846spoken with eloquence. Makes you wonder if bill spoke like you. Then we probably wouldnt listen
I thought sovereigns don't have to even go to a courtroom? (great and brilliant speaker by the way) You sir are a GENIUS. I don't profess to understand it all yet- I'm just beginning to learn this but WOW. What a memory- what a genius!
A genius? Impressed you.
UA-cam = Know your Constitution - Carl Miller 1/3
Take notes and look this stuff up your court house...
Morality = Freedom
how do we get the cd? i need it asap
Sev Dot, I can get you the CD and all of around 40 DVDs of Bill Thornton for only $70. Email me: denniswhipple@yahoo.com or Call/Text: 562-667-6600
can anyone inform me on any links thank can show me the process of filing a lien on a public servant bond?
Christopher Hauser on UA-cam
Good Ol Billy Bob Thornton
Is the content of the “CD” available for download?
The CD was just a duplication of his website at the time. 1215.org .. I believe he has a link to a zip file of every thing o.k. the website that is current. Check there..
Thank you so much! After I heard a few lectures on Admirly Law, and the way the entire structure of the US is subverted, I knew I had to get as much knowledge about Common Law as I could!
This is why I love Missouri.
preamble? as though it may be changed? Our declaration was formed for a reason, mostly against tyranny.
Look into the 10th amendment very important probably should be the 1st
These days they know they breaking the law and do so anyways. Most are deserving of conditional acceptance with lien
Searched for the website I found nothing.
Can anyone give me the link to the website please? Thank you.
I want to be the 3%. Now how do I do this?
well, I would suggest that firstly, understand why you want to be, and are currently not.. I know understanding is a big part of that.. so keep up the research and due diligence and ask questions!
Well God asked me to find you and to give you this message. That on August 5 2014 10:00 am I will be arresting a judge and a defence attoreny for P.C 550 (b) (3) P.C 118 and C.I.C 1871.4. I have engouh evidence and I feel that my Flesh freedom will be taken from me. My God has groomed me in HIS word back in 99-01. Little did I understand as to why? Until now. I am a peaceful Son of Man. I need a grand jury and this is where you come in let's not chase the wind!
SOM Chasing The Wind So, what happened?
TaxTheFed 1st-He got Contempt of court for sounding like a crazy man and representing himself in court.
After they beat the shit out of him behind the scenes, he pleaded mental insanity and took a plea deal.
No judges, defense attorney or anyone of that nature were arrested.
stanley yelnats Was he crazy or just railroaded? Did he know his stuff?
GREAT!
Where is Bill Thornton today>
Hey, Bill was in southern California general region, I think, a few to five years ago... I am not positive as Life happens and its fast, so he could be anywhere by now.
Bill is in Southern California. Email him at: x@1215.org
can i use a government code of Califonia and use it in CANADA ?
You have to research Canada code's and case's if it is in violation of charter rights and Constitution absolutely
If you set up your own court, you can use any code you wish.
Are you one of the people, the sovereign decrees the law in his court of record
Sign your drivers license, and ALL documents with - U.D. 1-207 W.P.
Any references to court cases where this holds? I'm not denying, just want to do my homework
at approx 1.12.30 on your youtube you're explaining how they get you to agree in order that they have authority over you- but you don't say how to get out of that...what to say when given those 3 options of "Do you agree to this, this or this?" Could you tell me what you should answer to that because those are trick questions. Thanks
awesome lecture
does three witness equal a notary?
im still learning..well begining too...
where is common law valid, only in the usa.. or world wide?.
The LostBoys
i treat fitness as a small hobby,not a death sentence like most people,thats all it is.
the common law part i simply want to step out of the constant bs of the government...to deny them consent and even bill them if they wish to pursue the fraud,.. so id like to learn how to inform my gov to step back and not intrude in my life.
The LostBoys
New Zealand.
Common Law is the term used to recognize a set of values and honor when dealing with others with regard to a dispute. The Concepts apply to every being who is cognizant and aware enough, to be able to resolve a dispute honorably. Kings/Queens Have no higher power, and if another King/Queen is some how harmed by the direct or indirect actions of another King/Queen, how is a resolution to be found when both feel they are in the right? Just because a Land, does not write in its codes/statutes/laws that it recognizes common law, does not mean that it does not exist.. !!! However I digress, If you watch the seminars, there is a from of GOVERNMENT that is completely Common Law.. This form of government is called a REPUBLIC.. Republican form of government - www.1215.org/lawnotes/lawnotes/repvsdem.htm
David Bradley the physical us constitution part i take with a grain of salt, claiming the us constitution will never work unless there is no precedent will work in any court within the British commonwealth (including nz, oz, canada...)
Common law is simply judge-made law. Nothing else. It is prevalent in the British world and its former colonies. Everything else is balderdash.
I thought it was backwards US is the corporation and the USA is from the constitutional Republic? 🧐😅
The term Citizen of the United States is written in the Constitution for the United States of America, more than once.
The constitution was rewritten, according to the people who claim it’s a corporation.
The without prejudice code for NY is UCC 1-207 , not 1207 like in this vid from Cali
If it is in there as 1207 it is a typo' or a misnomer.. UCC section 1-207 is not just NY.. It is hard to find that UCC with the full parts.. I remember trying to track it down and could not because all the editions had been shortened.. Imagine that..
Volume is too low for this computer. Got to get speakers, and much of the print is blurry to make notes. Feel I am missing out on much but thank you and plan to watch this and the next one. Too much to learn and too little time. Got some dishonest maneuvering going on and want to file a tort agaisnt the person making the complaint and the State for putting their name as Plaintiff, since it belongs in Municipal court where there are ordinances that are not listed in the State complaint. Besides I was never served and did not even learn about the case until five months or more later. They sent a certified letter when the complainant lives behind me. He threatened me he would teach me a less for telling his 7 dogs for being out of control and barking at me when I am tending to my property. On and on. Court is being abused with help of authorities in small town who seem to want to get rid of the witness to the village thief, having been a victim as well. Protecting the thieves, profitable. Would make a good book. Thank you for sharing your knowledge.
well what if your case is denied by all judges!? in all available courts!? can one then form one's own court and force them to enter in a trial!? so that you may be able to litigate at all!
Research President James Timothy Turner
Does this apply in Australia?
you're not under 'common law' in australia.. look up systems of law on wikipedia, the world map showing them. it's jus tasystem of law which is really broad and they can't be (common laws so to speak) all bound in one book.. at least that's my legal opinion.
Thank you for this video it was very informative.
You are welcome.. be sure to watch the others on sovereignty and common law, to get the fullness.. the is just the introduction!
Re: at 2:00 (ish) he is asked if there is a Federal Common Law. He says there is no such thing. I'm confused because in Black's (4th edition) it defines Federal Common Law as: "a body of decisional law developed by the federal courts untrammeled by state court decisions." How is there not a thing, that is defined?
The reason there is no federal common law is because Erie Railroad vs. thompkins. That decision from the supreme court is why. Poor Mr. Thompkins got only a headache and nothing else,
It's because"common law" has many meanings. Federal common law is the judicial gloss on federal statutes.
How to Make an Order / Decree 115:50 Min. As a Tribunal in Common Law. Judicial notice Cognizance Requirement
Does anyone here live a Nomadic lifestyle?
I do
Someone said the Magna Carta has been proven to NOT be valid. Is that true?
S Zee. I have never heard that and don´t know what it would even mean for Magna Carta to not be "valid". Are you saying Magna Carta was never signed by King John in 1215? While I believe it´s true that the "king" signed under duress, which might put into question whether it could be enforced between the barons and the "King", it has been ratified by millions of people since then. They ratified it by using it, and it´s still used today, just as we use other founding documents in America. Even the fake corporate "courts" of Anglo-American countries recognize it as authority (when forced to do so).
The Magna Carta is not American law.
Common Law doesn't need a piece of paper to hold validity. It only requires collective awareness and conscience. Thats the problem.
@@oclv110sl ok but English common law is not American common law. The Magna Carta of 1215 is not the law of the land. He’ll it’s not even the law of the uk anymore
That is correct.
:David-Wynn: Miller, grammatically disqualified the Magna Carta, the Declaration of Independence, and the US Constitution in 1999, which led to one of the strangest events ever witnessed.
ALL the above documents, and others of such ilk were sold at Christies Auctions as 'Historical Documents of No Importance'.
I need some help wish i could ask for a ?
"COMMON LAW. That which derives its force and authority from the universal consent and immemorial practice of the people." Of the people, not one person. Therefore, a group of people (usually the entire populous) agree to the concept. If you complain, tough luck. Just saying common law is what you think it is will not effect the law to grant you rights you think you deserve. If you don't want to accept having to have a driver's license, then walk.
For some this is not new and has been expected. So TO STOP THE CORRUPT POWER AND CONTROL YOU NEED TO KNOW WHAT IS GOING ON and you know someone else that needs to know too, YES YOU DO!!...
How do I even get in contact with Bill Thorton
Halito!!! ADASSLIGI UTSATI GVGEYU!!!!!!!!Grand RAISING my Beautiful original melenated copper tone American indigenous Aborigine Gods and Goddesses kings and queens brothers and sisters of TURTLE ISLAND aka the Americas! peace honor and love tribe! One love! Keep vibing High! Positive vibrations! Shout out from SouthEast Washington D.C.
What website can I go to buy his dvds??
Juanita gamboa I heard him talk about his cameraman selling dvds, but I can't remember what video that was. sorry
Why do you need his dvds though? Most of his work is online. He allows people to copy his work (no copyright)
This channel has a lot of his clips uploaded.
i need your help
i have back ground on this
I wish an explanation on jurisdiction was a bit more explained.
Its granted by our consent. They don't have jurisdiction but assume it . U must set the court of records straight
You can always pick up a legal dictionary or two. I have more than a couple 😂
google is right in your hand chrome even or yt with 1000 different explanations from various channels. put ut in this search and watch em as they roll up
1:22:00
If I want to move to TEXAS am I immergrating to TEXAS or to the United States of America?
+oh no its That guy again
No one can answer you. It appears you've made up a new word: immergrating
Buzzards Bass LOL guess I did at that. I recall as a child my mother referring to immigrants as immergrants. Her Nova Scotia accent.
Can you file a counter claim once a judgement has been entered?
Might possibly if you vacate the judgement..
This is the real reason the War For Southern Independence was fought. All the states lost their sovereignty after the war. Central Bankers forced the Federal Government to Incorporate and the 14th amendment was enacted not ratified or signed into law by Andrew Johnson, Stewart signed it as Secretary of State. This created a US and State Citizenship until that time we were state citizens only. The Federal Reserve Act of 1913 was enacted while half of Congress was on Christmas Vacation giving bankers control of our currency, and Our Income Tax. Income tax is paid to the Federal Reserve, its stockholders make billions and give the Treasury Half. The Privately Owned Federal Reserve also makes 6% on every dollar for printing the funny money.
brainerdrebel States have NEVER lost their sovereignty. US SUPREME COURT BACKS THAT. YOU CANNOT LOSE IT. DUH.
marie smith Which flag flies over State Capitols? The Federal Flag, this represents Marshall Law. We were a Union of States, not a Nation or a Country. We didn't Nationalize, we Federalized.
"I have no purpose directly or indirectly to interfere with the institution of slavery in the state where it now exists. I believe I have no lawful right to do so, and I have no inclination to do so ... My paramount objective is to save the Union and it is not either to save or destroy slavery. If I could save the Union without freeing any slave, I would do it." Abe
A State is actualy just a 'condition'.. or set of current conditions.. we need to get our semantics down via etymonline and other etymology websites.. learn what words mean but please don't listen to Jordan Maxwell lmao
When I started to research common law, I reach the same conclusion on why there was a civil war. The civil war, taught in government education, was about slave, but there was one more fact which was not taught in government education. The southern state was fighting for sovereignty.
I agree with what you said, but the people didn't lose their sovereignty, just the states. The "U.S. Citizen" term is what made most people believe they too had lost their sovereignty. Word play by the elite is the majority of the problem.
Should be mentioned that THIS CLIP....Seems to be from 2005 !!!
As per closing of meeting at, or around 2h39m40s !!! :-)))
The Fourth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution provides, "[t]he right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly ...
allen poe
If you're a PERSON then you have zero rights based on freedom, not liberty. PERSON is fictional.
Common law certainly can be difficult.
The video wont play past 1:32, ??????
I just tested and was able to play no problem.. sorry for you troubles
You're lucky.
Yea can't get complacent
Where can I obtain the DVD?
Would be nice to see common law being practiced. Not a fan of these acts…
so the united estates is a corporation?
I understand that they make a hug e difference on personal employment, but is your argument sound?
'corporation,' 'government' these are just terms people use to avoid personal responsibility. They are DBAs. Just people 'doing business as' some 3rd party entity. A 'corporation' has to be incorporated by the 'government.' A corporation can not exist without the might of the 'government.' It is only individuals doing business and hiding their personal responsibility behind the violent force of the individuals who call themselves 'government.'
They are simply words created by psychopaths to obfuscate their true violent nature.
Dustyn Charles Look up the definition of a corporation in Blacks Law Dictionary, if you are confused as to what it means. A legal dictionary is something everyone should utilize as without it you'll have no way to translate the legal terms spoken by the government. If they are speaking to you in a language you do not understand, then do not agree with anything they said until they have defined what they are saying to you in a manner which you do understand.
What if the natural man is not fluent in Englsih - can they get help from their English speaking child?
36:27 The statutory law is the law of the special interests. The common law is the law of the people
1:07:50 the constitution does not grant any rights. It recognizes the rights.
1:42:30 republic leads to freedom, a democracy leads to dictatorship.
Can you please help me.
Their are many ways about it
+Too Crunk perhaps you are confusing what I was meaning with the knowledge and understanding of how the forms and processes are currently handled in relation to how it was originally intended for a republic in common law. That paper does go into alot of those ideas it appears. nothing about the BAR existed in the beginnings of our systems of jurisprudence. well, the concept of People and Slaves ( now citizen ). . i admit, there is alot of information I do not know about.. The concept of people and their relationship to the government and state, and the functions of the state with regards to the decree of the people, and really understanding that relationship, has been my focus. As well and using that new understanding to motion the common law court for remedy.. The trickery and word games of attorneys, the BAR and other judicial corrupted methodologies, within the statutory system, do not apply to common law.. That does not STOP them from trying to apply it though.. i have researched 90% of bill thornton, and have talked with Judges and Common law professors about the information.. Personal Perception of what it is supposed to mean, is always an issue.. Understanding it used to be common Sense.. The simplicity of it has been bastardized, in my opinion.. My goal is always to promote the truth and free will of true freedom and liberty.. . There are those with cases that bring up the "UNION DUES CARD" debate with regards to the DA, judge with great results.. John darash with National Liberty Alliance uses that info ALWAYS in his cases.
+Eldonthian McAllister hello please contact me at email icanifucant02@gmail.com
Banks Jonathan you should msg me privately.
Go away +RetSquid TROLL!. there are plenty of cases and decisions.. If you are not paid by the establishment to dis-inform, then you must be freely to choosing the state as the represented or "CLIPPED" Sovereignty and Parens patriae for your governance. Tis your choice.. Wonderful thing about a true Republic is the UNLIMITED right to contract, even if it is to contract away your Sovereignty and Liberty.
+Eldonthian McAllister using obscure legal codes as a way to fabricate your own story of how the legal system works is nonsensical, why have none of these strategies ever worked in court, and we only see loons like yourself end up in jail for not paying their speeding ticket, ect... Where is the legal precedent for any of the things you claim?
+Meta Tron there is proof that it works, and proof that it does not work.. pull your head out... there are laws that make stealing illegal and unlawful... stealing is wrong before any laws were decreed to make it so... is there proof that it works? is there proof that it doesn't work? ( people still get robbed every day ) just because the law is ignored, not enforced or utilized, does not mean that it it not real, good or applicable. this law and info is good and accurate. is is true and correct, however, just like the law against stealing does not guarantee no one is going to steal from you. these laws of the/our republic does not guarantee or magicaloy keep our people free... too much fear to stand up and be a king. because of the threat of local practice, and coercion. .. .
Civics is taught in Ontario secondary schools
Ruben Borges its called civics but it isn't the same as what it used to be. its more about gov not personal rights.
How can I contact this guy
This man, Bill Thornton is the owner and operator of www.1215.org
You can contact him there. I am also available to answer questions. You can also get involved at NationalLibertyAlliance.org
25:05 00 How the 1215 A.D. Magna Carta is Common Law Explanation Confirmatio Cartarum 1297-1789 A.D. 25:08 00 And the Constitution
Common law is your god given rights that no one can take from you we a fooled in to giving them up
No it's a bit different but I agree to some extent friend
Not even close to being true.
If King John pledged his heirs and successors (Clinton/Trumpf) to pope for ever plus one day ...
And, if John gave England to pope in 1213, and Magna Carta came two years later, is the common law of England the common law of pope? Or is it the common law of "we the persons" of England starting at 1215?
Since all "presidents" of the 13 Colonies were King John's relations, thus an inference of bias on the part of the judiciary/government in general, how is it your case laws and jurist quotes are all valid. That is to say, are we dealing with the rule OF law or the rule BY law or lawfare
What happened to Bill Thornton?
I always wondered where is Bill? This video was posted 11 years ago. My assumption is he likely died some time ago.
1:32:49 😯 as if I wasn’t already paying attention!!
💜💚🇺🇸🥊💪🧠
how is any 'law,' whether its 'common' or something else applicable to anyone?
You must ponder on the idea of perspective with relation to where the law was decreed.. for example.. there is a natural law ( generally agreed, decreed by god ) of gravity.. the law of gravity applies to all things.. So your real questions might be how does any man made law truly apply to any other man.. Again, looking back at the perspective of where that law came from. The genius of a republic, is that we are all kings.. With no subjects and none to Govern but ourselves. your laws truly only apply to only you when you decree a law of your own, or apply to others that are in your kingdom. This kingdom of North America has been confiscated by the Corporation the United States of America and entrusted to this trust to ensure the prosperity of the people.(the preamble to the constitution FOR the United states of America). You can choose to be subject, and consent to the laws.. i.e. I choose to stop at that stop sign or stop light, because I recognize its place to help ensure the safety of our fellow man.. It Originally really only becomes enforceable when someone else got hurt from your actions.. you run the stop sign, and kill some one.. now you did wrong.. However, out of ignorance and coercion, we are imprisoned/enslaved to follow Codes(of Conduct)/Statutes out of the ignorance of the public officials and officers.. Its all a big scam and we are born into it. The LAW truly comes from the consensus of everyone in a republic (indirectly through representation or of a True Jury of 25 or more of your PEERS/Kings/Sovereigns; or directly via you a king moving your court to seek remedy for being wronged in some way.)
The people who made up this 'common law' have been dead for hundreds of years. How can anything some dead people wrote apply to anyone living today?
mustaffa1611
That is because, what the dead people did is outline and come up with concepts and ideas, Philosophies.. The concepts do only apply if there are those who still support it.. In this case, the supreme court justices, the body of people, grand juries.. etc. ( www.nationallibertyalliance.org ) There are those who are trying to kill the concepts and ideas, however, it does require people to keep them alive. Every State is Required to be a republic. It is the understanding of what a republic is, and how to apply it to your liberty, that is important.
Somebody left this quote on a video of mine. what do you think of it:
All governments are exactly the same. It doesn't matter what label you put on them. It doesn't matter if you call it a "republic" or a "monarchy" or a "democracy." Its all the same.
Governments are only people providing services on a violent compulsory basis. That's it. Its just people who are incapable of dealing with others on a peaceful voluntary basis in the marketplace like everyone else.
mustaffa1611
It does seem that the government bodies we know of today, do all seem to be nothing but coercion, and violence.. however, not all "Governement" is based on such concepts.. It does always come down to the kinds of people staffing the government. All the issues boil down to the people behind that staff the agencies, and the enlightenment, rather the lack thereof, that results in such tyrannical governance! In My opinion. This is why education and discolsure of truth should be the goal, for the benefit of all concerned!
I concur and ask the same
This man, Bill Thornton is the owner and operator of www.1215.org
You can contact him there. I am also available to answer questions. You can also get involved at NationalLibertyAlliance.org
Thank u, saved !
Why is everyone talking about common law all the time. Common law is the constitutions federal and state. When he talks about all of this stuff he’s actually talking about natural law. He’s not wrong but he’s also not right. Common law federally is the process afforded to you statutorily or constitutionally. The constitution says common law because the enlightenment brought natural law to everyone and it was so popular in the interests of liberty that everyone followed common law to express the natural law
dennis bergstrom So what was the law before the colonies became a nation?