SUCH A CONCLUDING AND ELEGANT LECTURE. The asking for confirmation in the middle and explaining his own Arabic proficiency in the end just adds more INTEGRITY AND BEAUTY to the lecture. Mashallah! May Allah belss you
Whenever someone quotes Ibn Taymiyyah, or Albani, or anyone, they're not quoting or 'referring to the Qur’an and Sunnah' as they claim. They're referring to Ibn Taymiyyah or Albani, etc. They're following a madhab. Just not one of the four accepted ones. So say you follow the Qur’an and Sunnah all you like. All of these ulamah of the past followed the Qur'an and Sunnah and put them in a format we can understand. We're all following madhabs. And you're definitely not following the Qur’an and Sunnah directly if you can't even understand Arabic.
Great lecture Ma shaa Allah. Even though it sounds really catchy that we should follow Quran and Hadith, but it is so clear that there is no substance in such a claim.
I believe everyone must read the Quran and Sunah first hand by them selves to truly value what work has been done and where the Truth lies I. Light of those works … following others without paying attention to the Real gas greater chances of going wrong . But the “True Scholars are as eyes to mankind “ and ignoring them is “ blinding ourselves “ .
Wow. So we wl never know the quran bec we are not arabic grammarist. Its th ulamma same as th pharises --that makes th simple monotheist islam like a integral calculus.
Because the Wahhabi minhaj (tawheed) is not in accordance with the minhaj (Islam Iman and Ihsan) of the ahlu Sunnah wal jamaah. There going to get it twisted every time
Imam Ali (ra) was asked, “Why was abu bakr chosen for the caliphate?” He (ra) replied, “We saw that Abu bakr was the most suitable for this affair amongst the people. He was the companion of the Prophet (sws) in the cave and was the second person ever praised by Allah (swt); and the Prophet made him imam while he (sws) was alive.” Sharah e Nihjal Balagha, Labin Abi Al-Hadid, 1/332 Ahqaqul Haq, Shustri, volume 1, page 116
Muslims are obligated to learn and follow the Quran and ahadeeth from the well known Scholars of Hadeeth and Sunnah...Those who call to the way of the Sahabah and their Aqeedah and methodology. We are not to blind follow any Scholar, but the Scholar is to provide the evidence on an issue. We are to keep away from innovations, any worship which has no evidence
If u want to keep away from innovation then don't read quran which gets proven from your logic.. Because nowhere in the quran is written that people comprise a book of the revelation that is being sent to prophet muhammad pbuh.. or never our prophet ever said that.. so why are u reading quran.. Even sahabas were in doubt that should they do it or will it also be called an INNOVATION.. but they did as reasoning was also a thing.. and still it is, but the followers of ibn taimiyan without reading his books claim such thing.. Do u even know about bidah.. every innovation is not bad.. and everything is permissible except what quran and sunnah directly opposes or scholars gives their views of them.. like smoking or say chewing tobacco.. these type of things dont have clear answer so people have to go to early scholars and their understanding.. even there are good bidah's, once one sahaba said when watching a group of people praying taraweeh prayer in congregation so then he said what a good bidah it is.. Without creating your own view try to learn more and more and get perspectives.. dont be fickle minded..
Was Imam Malik a well known scholar of Hadith and Sunnah? I’d think so, and I’d have no doubt that him being closer to the ones who inherited the religion from the most knowledgeable I’d think there isn’t anyone alive today who could compare
Did you not listen to the lecture? He just explained very good how imam malik for example would come to a fatwa and wich critera he would have. He learnt from people who learnt from sahaba and met alot of these tabiin. Meanwhile we sit here and read one naration that some scholar said is sound. But we dont know when it was said and in wich context it was said etc etc.
Jesus Christ foretold his death several times. Matthew 12:38-40) Then certain of the scribes and of the Pharisees answered, saying, Master, we would see a sign from thee. But he answered and said unto them, An evil and adulterous generation seeketh after a sign; and there shall no sign be given to it, but the sign of the prophet Jonas: For as Jonas was three days and three nights in the whale's belly; so shall the Son of man be three days and three nights in the heart of the earth. Matthew 16:4) A wicked and adulterous generation seeketh after a sign; and there shall no sign be given unto it, but the sign of the prophet Jonas. And he left them, and departed. Matthew 20:17-19) And Jesus going up to Jerusalem took the twelve disciples apart in the way, and said unto them, Behold, we go up to Jerusalem; and the Son of man shall be betrayed unto the chief priests and unto the scribes, and they shall condemn him to death, And shall deliver him to the Gentiles to mock, and to scourge, and to crucify him: and the third day he shall rise again. Mark 8:31) And he began to teach them, that the Son of man must suffer many things, and be rejected of the elders, and of the chief priests, and scribes, and be killed, and after three days rise again. Mark 9:30-32) And they departed thence, and passed through Galilee; and he would not that any man should know it. For he taught his disciples, and said unto them, The Son of man is delivered into the hands of men, and they shall kill him; and after that he is killed, he shall rise the third day. But they understood not that saying, and were afraid to ask him. Mark 10:32-34) And they were in the way going up to Jerusalem; and Jesus went before them: and they were amazed; and as they followed, they were afraid. And he took again the twelve, and began to tell them what things should happen unto him, Saying, Behold, we go up to Jerusalem; and the Son of man shall be delivered unto the chief priests, and unto the scribes; and they shall condemn him to death, and shall deliver him to the Gentiles: And they shall mock him, and shall scourge him, and shall spit upon him, and shall kill him: and the third day he shall rise again. Luke 18:31-33) Then he took unto him the twelve, and said unto them, Behold, we go up to Jerusalem, and all things that are written by the prophets concerning the Son of man shall be accomplished. For he shall be delivered unto the Gentiles, and shall be mocked, and spitefully entreated, and spitted on: And they shall scourge him, and put him to death: and the third day he shall rise again. Luke 24:45-48) Then opened he their understanding, that they might understand the scriptures, And said unto them, Thus it is written, and thus it behooved Christ to suffer, and to rise from the dead the third day: And that repentance and remission of sins should be preached in his name among all nations, beginning at Jerusalem. And ye are witnesses of these things. John 2:18-21) Then answered the Jews and said unto him, What sign shewest thou unto us, seeing that thou doest these things? Jesus answered and said unto them, Destroy this temple, and in three days I will raise it up. Then said the Jews, Forty and six years was this temple in building, and wilt thou rear it up in three days? But he spake of the temple of his body. When therefore he was risen from the dead, his disciples remembered that he had said this unto them; and they believed the scripture, and the word which Jesus had said. It was not so much about Jesus of Nazareth being divine, but Jesus of Nazareth being a man obedient to God. He was to be that SERVANT of THE LORD that would pay the price for sin and for sins to save God's people. God defeated the enemy by a MAN - A man that was A PROPHET (foretold by Moses in Deu 18); A man as the Messiah (as foretold by Isaiah in chp 61); A man as The Good Shepherd (as foretold by Ezekiel in chp 34); and as SERVANT of THE LORD as by Isaiah 53. Isaiah 53:10-12) Yet it pleased the Lord to bruise him; he hath put him to grief: when thou shalt make his soul an offering for sin, he shall see his seed, he shall prolong his days, and the pleasure of the Lord shall prosper in his hand. He shall see of the travail of his soul, and shall be satisfied: by his knowledge shall my righteous servant justify many; for he shall bear their iniquities. Therefore will I divide him a portion with the great, and he shall divide the spoil with the strong; because he hath poured out his soul unto death: and he was numbered with the transgressors; and he bare the sin of many, and made intercession for the transgressors. [Believe in God's Word - it is Truth. During his ministry, he told Israel that he came not to destroy, but to FULFIL... He fulfilled many of the prophecies - and there are more that he will still fulfil.] May The God of Israel open many, many, many more eyes and inward parts soon and very soon!
There was no madhab in times of sahaba as they themselves saw prophet muhammad pbuh.. so no need of madhab they 1st hand learned and emulated the prophet pbuh.. But it is not a certainty to follow madhab but its for our betterment.. to give clarity.. bcoz not every issue u will find in mutawatir hadees and interpretation matters.. But if peoples believe that whatever ibn taimiyan said and wrote and afterwards abdul wahab najdi rejecting all others scholars.. then clearly those people has very less wisdom..
Every person follows a madhab whether or not they know it. Salafis don't go direct to the Qur’an and Sunnah. They follow the madhab of Ibn Taymiyyah and any other scholar they follow.
@BigJohn Hansome yes true.. but they portray to the peoples that they only follow the quran and sunnah and peoples other than them are innovators.. illiteracy and lies in so called nowadays salafis
One of the flaws here is the notion that if you haven’t memorized things then you are ignorant. You don’t have to memorize everything as long you know enough to look it up. If you learn/know حتى has seventeen meanings and you have access to the information when needed, that is sufficient. I mean the notion that ijtihād is about having memorized a bunch of stuff. Ijtihād is about having establishing the right principle and then knowing where/how to access the secondary information. Most importantly it is a strong grasp of the Quran way before a bunch of hadith (which is the problem I see most.)
MUSLIMS : Do ISLAM as given to us by the PROPHET MUHAMMAD Do not be a FOLLOWER OF ANYONE AFTER TE PROPHET Do not get into INVENTIONS AFTER THE PROPHET….Shia SUFI Etc Etc Etc TABLIGI WAHABI BERELVI DEOBANDI and So on and on and on
you are not capable of the understanding you do not have the grammatical capabilities to even understand a sentence those people studied Arabic for birth to 20 years old and further before they touched hadith in the means of interpreting
The issue isn’t necessarily madhabs. The issue is with the grass roots of each madhabs indirectly or directly teaching division. If one follows the Sahih Hadith and prophetic sunnah like Ahlul Hadith for example, you cannot go wrong. All they teach in my masjid is avoid innovation and prophetic tradition according to Sahih Hadith and there’s nothing wrong with that despite what is claimed by interpretation. We get hung up on interpretation of every Hadith then we’re going nowhere as an ummah and we’ll remain at loggerheads until the last day. Grass roots indoctrination of them and us is the issue, address that.
Somebody still has to pick hadiths for you. You cannot get around taqleed. Each of the four schools of thought rely on imams to pick the hadiths for them. "Shafi said this" "Malik said this" "Hanbal said this" "Abu Hanifa" The salafis came around and said " wa law qaala maalik, wa law qaala shafi, wa law qaala ahmed, wa law qaala Abu hanifa "Qur'an and Sunnah- qaala allah qaala rasool" The imams would say: I say this because of this hadith. Imam Bukhari in his book: starts hadiths with "qaala rasoolollah" Rasoolullah said, so salafis say rasoolullah said, not mentioning that BUKHARI is the one who is relaying the hadith. So they are making taqleed of bukhari. Except its worse, rejecting the imams opinions in the four school of thought doesn't make you a kafir. Rejecting a single hadith which is narrated by bukhari can make you kafir according to salafis and ahlul hadeeth. Point is thats HADITH NOT SUNNAH. This ummah has gone down the drain and we are paying the price.
@@imranb4985 I see you deleted your previous comment I still have a record of it in my email. Refute what I wrote, you cannot. You don't even read or understand arabic I bet and making attacks on other people. And worse than that you are part of ahlul hadith which means you are part of a sect which is a sect which makes you guilty of shirk.
@@imranb4985 who defines what a Sahih hadith. you? Those Imams gave the definition of Sahih hadith and here you are rejecting them. you're not following Sunnah. you're just picking and throwing whatever you like.
@@Kay-sd1fw these are major accusations you make and need to be corrected you are accusing the hanbali heritage of attributing lies to imam Ahmed bin hanbali and this is way higher than you can vocalize in English without going into a tangent
Madhabs & hadiths destroyed Islam by the Quran Alone. The divided the Brotherhood of One Ummah & confused the innocent people. Masha'allah! Allahu'akbar!
Masha Allah. Fantastic lecture.
SUCH A CONCLUDING AND ELEGANT LECTURE.
The asking for confirmation in the middle and explaining his own Arabic proficiency in the end just adds more INTEGRITY AND BEAUTY to the lecture.
Mashallah!
May Allah belss you
Whenever someone quotes Ibn Taymiyyah, or Albani, or anyone, they're not quoting or 'referring to the Qur’an and Sunnah' as they claim. They're referring to Ibn Taymiyyah or Albani, etc. They're following a madhab. Just not one of the four accepted ones. So say you follow the Qur’an and Sunnah all you like. All of these ulamah of the past followed the Qur'an and Sunnah and put them in a format we can understand. We're all following madhabs. And you're definitely not following the Qur’an and Sunnah directly if you can't even understand Arabic.
Great lecture Ma shaa Allah. Even though it sounds really catchy that we should follow Quran and Hadith, but it is so clear that there is no substance in such a claim.
Best lecture I have ever listened on the social media platforms. Thank you very much for your clarification
By Allah, I love this man. May Allah forgive his shortcomings and change them into good for him. Aameen Ya Rabb al 3aalameen
Fantastic reasoning
I believe everyone must read the Quran and Sunah first hand by them selves to truly value what work has been done and where the Truth lies I. Light of those works … following others without paying attention to the Real gas greater chances of going wrong .
But the “True Scholars are as eyes to mankind “ and ignoring them is “ blinding ourselves “ .
sunnah books are a scam. if you want to learn islam , then you must follow the quran only.
In sha Allah am calling my future sons Shaykh Hamza Yusuf, Dr Abdullah Umar Farook and Shaykh Yasir Abu Ammar Qadhi
Masha Allah, lot of knowledge
Mashaallah ❤
Subhan Allah this is a blessing lecture.
Masha Allah
Can you provide this original videos please
Mustafa Husain
My man
We love you we stand for you
JazakAllah khair
Amazing.. Sensible. I want to learn from you a lot!! Masha Allaah
Good lecture
Wow. So we wl never know the quran bec we are not arabic grammarist. Its th ulamma same as th pharises --that makes th simple monotheist islam like a integral calculus.
Because the Wahhabi minhaj (tawheed) is not in accordance with the minhaj (Islam Iman and Ihsan) of the ahlu Sunnah wal jamaah. There going to get it twisted every time
Define wahabi minhaj?
There is no such thing as wahabi manhaj. By you saying as such has educated everyone on your knowledge of Islam.
Sufism is an innovated sect
Wahhabi isn't even a sect
Imam Ali (ra) was asked, “Why was abu bakr chosen for the caliphate?” He (ra) replied, “We saw that Abu bakr was the most suitable for this affair amongst the people. He was the companion of the Prophet (sws) in the cave and was the second person ever praised by Allah (swt); and the Prophet made him imam while he (sws) was alive.”
Sharah e Nihjal Balagha, Labin Abi Al-Hadid, 1/332
Ahqaqul Haq, Shustri, volume 1, page 116
@@thereligionofabraham Muhammad ibn Abdul Wahhab
Muslims are obligated to learn and follow the Quran and ahadeeth from the well known Scholars of Hadeeth and Sunnah...Those who call to the way of the Sahabah and their Aqeedah and methodology. We are not to blind follow any Scholar, but the Scholar is to provide the evidence on an issue. We are to keep away from innovations, any worship which has no evidence
this hamza Yusuf has no status in islamic scolarship, even if his followers believe so
If u want to keep away from innovation then don't read quran which gets proven from your logic..
Because nowhere in the quran is written that people comprise a book of the revelation that is being sent to prophet muhammad pbuh.. or never our prophet ever said that.. so why are u reading quran..
Even sahabas were in doubt that should they do it or will it also be called an INNOVATION.. but they did as reasoning was also a thing.. and still it is, but the followers of ibn taimiyan without reading his books claim such thing..
Do u even know about bidah.. every innovation is not bad.. and everything is permissible except what quran and sunnah directly opposes or scholars gives their views of them.. like smoking or say chewing tobacco.. these type of things dont have clear answer so people have to go to early scholars and their understanding.. even there are good bidah's, once one sahaba said when watching a group of people praying taraweeh prayer in congregation so then he said what a good bidah it is..
Without creating your own view try to learn more and more and get perspectives.. dont be fickle minded..
@@manuelcardinali1287 what status do u hold?
Was Imam Malik a well known scholar of Hadith and Sunnah? I’d think so, and I’d have no doubt that him being closer to the ones who inherited the religion from the most knowledgeable I’d think there isn’t anyone alive today who could compare
Did you not listen to the lecture? He just explained very good how imam malik for example would come to a fatwa and wich critera he would have. He learnt from people who learnt from sahaba and met alot of these tabiin. Meanwhile we sit here and read one naration that some scholar said is sound. But we dont know when it was said and in wich context it was said etc etc.
Jesus Christ foretold his death several times.
Matthew 12:38-40)
Then certain of the scribes and of the Pharisees answered, saying, Master, we would see a sign
from thee. But he answered and said unto them, An evil and adulterous generation seeketh after a sign;
and there shall no sign be given to it, but the sign of the prophet Jonas: For as Jonas was three days
and three nights in the whale's belly; so shall the Son of man be three days and three nights in
the heart of the earth.
Matthew 16:4)
A wicked and adulterous generation seeketh after a sign; and there shall no sign be given unto it,
but the sign of the prophet Jonas. And he left them, and departed.
Matthew 20:17-19)
And Jesus going up to Jerusalem took the twelve disciples apart in the way, and said unto them, Behold,
we go up to Jerusalem; and the Son of man shall be betrayed unto the chief priests and unto the scribes,
and they shall condemn him to death, And shall deliver him to the Gentiles to mock, and to scourge,
and to crucify him: and the third day he shall rise again.
Mark 8:31)
And he began to teach them, that the Son of man must suffer many things, and be rejected of the elders,
and of the chief priests, and scribes, and be killed, and after three days rise again.
Mark 9:30-32)
And they departed thence, and passed through Galilee; and he would not that any man should know it. For
he taught his disciples, and said unto them, The Son of man is delivered into the hands of men, and
they shall kill him; and after that he is killed, he shall rise the third day. But they understood not
that saying, and were afraid to ask him.
Mark 10:32-34)
And they were in the way going up to Jerusalem; and Jesus went before them: and they were amazed; and as
they followed, they were afraid. And he took again the twelve, and began to tell them what things should
happen unto him, Saying, Behold, we go up to Jerusalem; and the Son of man shall be delivered unto the
chief priests, and unto the scribes; and they shall condemn him to death, and shall deliver him to the
Gentiles: And they shall mock him, and shall scourge him, and shall spit upon him, and shall kill him:
and the third day he shall rise again.
Luke 18:31-33)
Then he took unto him the twelve, and said unto them, Behold, we go up to Jerusalem, and all things that
are written by the prophets concerning the Son of man shall be accomplished. For he shall be delivered
unto the Gentiles, and shall be mocked, and spitefully entreated, and spitted on: And they shall scourge
him, and put him to death: and the third day he shall rise again.
Luke 24:45-48)
Then opened he their understanding, that they might understand the scriptures, And said unto them,
Thus it is written, and thus it behooved Christ to suffer, and to rise from the dead the third day: And
that repentance and remission of sins should be preached in his name among all nations, beginning at
Jerusalem. And ye are witnesses of these things.
John 2:18-21)
Then answered the Jews and said unto him, What sign shewest thou unto us, seeing that thou doest these
things? Jesus answered and said unto them, Destroy this temple, and in three days I will raise it up.
Then said the Jews, Forty and six years was this temple in building, and wilt thou rear it up in three days?
But he spake of the temple of his body. When therefore he was risen from the dead, his disciples
remembered that he had said this unto them; and they believed the scripture, and
the word which Jesus had said.
It was not so much about Jesus of Nazareth being divine, but Jesus of Nazareth being a man obedient
to God. He was to be that SERVANT of THE LORD that would pay the price for sin and for sins to
save God's people.
God defeated the enemy by a MAN - A man that was A PROPHET (foretold by Moses in Deu 18);
A man as the Messiah (as foretold by Isaiah in chp 61); A man as The Good Shepherd (as foretold
by Ezekiel in chp 34); and as SERVANT of THE LORD as by Isaiah 53.
Isaiah 53:10-12)
Yet it pleased the Lord to bruise him; he hath put him to grief: when thou shalt make his soul
an offering for sin, he shall see his seed, he shall prolong his days,
and the pleasure of the Lord shall prosper in his hand.
He shall see of the travail of his soul, and shall be satisfied: by his knowledge shall my righteous servant
justify many; for he shall bear their iniquities.
Therefore will I divide him a portion with the great, and he shall divide the spoil with the strong;
because he hath poured out his soul unto death: and he was numbered with the transgressors;
and he bare the sin of many, and made intercession for the transgressors.
[Believe in God's Word - it is Truth. During his ministry, he told Israel that he came not to destroy,
but to FULFIL... He fulfilled many of the prophecies - and there are more that he will still fulfil.]
May The God of Israel open many, many, many more eyes and inward parts soon and very soon!
hi
Did the Sahaba follow a madhab.
Alghamdulillah all praise and worship to Our Rab!
There was no madhab in times of sahaba as they themselves saw prophet muhammad pbuh.. so no need of madhab they 1st hand learned and emulated the prophet pbuh..
But it is not a certainty to follow madhab but its for our betterment.. to give clarity.. bcoz not every issue u will find in mutawatir hadees and interpretation matters..
But if peoples believe that whatever ibn taimiyan said and wrote and afterwards abdul wahab najdi rejecting all others scholars.. then clearly those people has very less wisdom..
Every person follows a madhab whether or not they know it. Salafis don't go direct to the Qur’an and Sunnah. They follow the madhab of Ibn Taymiyyah and any other scholar they follow.
@BigJohn Hansome yes true.. but they portray to the peoples that they only follow the quran and sunnah and peoples other than them are innovators.. illiteracy and lies in so called nowadays salafis
Isn't it bid'at to follow 4 individuals who were born 1 century after the Holy Prophet . They would talk about Malik but ignore totally his TEACHER!
One of the flaws here is the notion that if you haven’t memorized things then you are ignorant. You don’t have to memorize everything as long you know enough to look it up. If you learn/know حتى has seventeen meanings and you have access to the information when needed, that is sufficient. I mean the notion that ijtihād is about having memorized a bunch of stuff. Ijtihād is about having establishing the right principle and then knowing where/how to access the secondary information. Most importantly it is a strong grasp of the Quran way before a bunch of hadith (which is the problem I see most.)
Értüdèsz Cármēglïône
MUSLIMS :
Do ISLAM as given to us by the PROPHET MUHAMMAD
Do not be a FOLLOWER OF ANYONE AFTER TE PROPHET
Do not get into INVENTIONS AFTER THE PROPHET….Shia SUFI
Etc Etc Etc TABLIGI WAHABI BERELVI DEOBANDI
and So on and on and on
Do not create doubt
You are drowned in doubt
Cartamagiano
love from george bush and 10 million dead for such a elequent lecture
on point
following a madhab over what Allah revealed is the same mistake the jews made by following rabis over the scripture
you are not capable of the understanding you do not have the grammatical capabilities to even understand a sentence those people studied Arabic for birth to 20 years old and further before they touched hadith in the means of interpreting
You clearly do not understand what a madhhab is.
@@masudtv which madhab do you follow
Following your own understanding of Quran and Hadeeth without knowledge and guidance
brings you ISIS,and thier supporters.
....JIHAALAT....
@@m4fital2 hanafi in fiqh, maturidy in aqeedah and maybe later i join a tareeqa...note that joining a tareeqa is not an obligation
Their is one thing being educated and another being musguided. This man over thinks. Deviants use qiyas for every whims and desires they conjure up
Another fellow Dhahiri.
The issue isn’t necessarily madhabs. The issue is with the grass roots of each madhabs indirectly or directly teaching division. If one follows the Sahih Hadith and prophetic sunnah like Ahlul Hadith for example, you cannot go wrong. All they teach in my masjid is avoid innovation and prophetic tradition according to Sahih Hadith and there’s nothing wrong with that despite what is claimed by interpretation. We get hung up on interpretation of every Hadith then we’re going nowhere as an ummah and we’ll remain at loggerheads until the last day. Grass roots indoctrination of them and us is the issue, address that.
Somebody still has to pick hadiths for you. You cannot get around taqleed.
Each of the four schools of thought rely on imams to pick the hadiths for them.
"Shafi said this"
"Malik said this"
"Hanbal said this"
"Abu Hanifa"
The salafis came around and said " wa law qaala maalik, wa law qaala shafi, wa law qaala ahmed, wa law qaala Abu hanifa
"Qur'an and Sunnah- qaala allah qaala rasool"
The imams would say: I say this because of this hadith.
Imam Bukhari in his book: starts hadiths with "qaala rasoolollah"
Rasoolullah said, so salafis say rasoolullah said, not mentioning that BUKHARI is the one who is relaying the hadith. So they are making taqleed of bukhari.
Except its worse, rejecting the imams opinions in the four school of thought doesn't make you a kafir. Rejecting a single hadith which is narrated by bukhari can make you kafir according to salafis and ahlul hadeeth.
Point is thats HADITH NOT SUNNAH.
This ummah has gone down the drain and we are paying the price.
@@elroheater6880 Not true. Our belief is based upon Sahih hadith, Quran and Sunnah. Non of what you have said applies when it comes to Ahlul hadith.
@@imranb4985 I see you deleted your previous comment I still have a record of it in my email.
Refute what I wrote, you cannot. You don't even read or understand arabic I bet and making attacks on other people.
And worse than that you are part of ahlul hadith which means you are part of a sect which is a sect which makes you guilty of shirk.
Hopefully each everyone of us go to paradise, by Allah rahmah whatever madhab no madhab whatsoever. Forgive and accept our brotherhood period.
@@imranb4985 who defines what a Sahih hadith. you? Those Imams gave the definition of Sahih hadith and here you are rejecting them. you're not following Sunnah. you're just picking and throwing whatever you like.
That’s lies about imam Ahmad ibn hanbal, he rejected any weak Hadith and he was the strictest out of the 4 madhahib. Hamza yusuf speaks with no proof
Your wrong not all Hadith that are weak are fabricated the Sanad just has 3/5 requirements to be sahih
@@malikitijani where did I say weak means fabricated ??!?
@@Kay-sd1fw because the hanabilah accept the use of weak Hadiths that aren’t fabricated over qiyas
@@malikitijani maybe the students from hanibillah not Ahmad ibn hanbal though
@@Kay-sd1fw these are major accusations you make and need to be corrected you are accusing the hanbali heritage of attributing lies to imam Ahmed bin hanbali and this is way higher than you can vocalize in English without going into a tangent
Beware of the Sufi
Read history
Exactly
And his secularism
Madhabs & hadiths destroyed Islam by the Quran Alone. The divided the Brotherhood of One Ummah & confused the innocent people. Masha'allah! Allahu'akbar!
Quraniyoon at it again, audhubillah
What did you mean by madhabs and hadith destroyed Islam by the Quran alone? That doesn't make sense
You are die hard followers of Albania
ISIS is the product of self teaching.
To reject the hadiths is to reject the entire sunnah of our beloved muhammed ﷺ
Lecture by a sufi 🤦♂️
meaningless question, meaningless answer, meaningless speech
Do you know what the question was?
@@nomnom207 It's written in the title, it's a fake dicotomy, incomplete and deceiving, like usual for this deceiving liar
Meaningless comment
Meaningless comment
May Allah guide Hamza Yusuf or crush his backbone
What a bunch of meaningless speech.
meaningless speech is his speciality, he can talk four hours without saying anything
Fantastic reasoning
Fantastic reasoning