@@AerynSBtime to seek therapy to help with your uncontrollable impulse to be obnoxious and rude to total strangers without being provoked. Prayers for your healing love ❤
Or, he was hoping she would look foolish on national television. He paid $5k. She looks greedy. I'd say that's a reasonable amount for the dividends he's getting in her performance.
@@msbaboolal ~ How did she look greedy? She didn't, imho. He showed the world how dumb he is, however ~ which was really stupid, given he sells insurance. Would you buy a policy from this clown after seeing this video?
So for the folks who think the Plaintiff is ripping off the defendant… … these life insurance policies with a cash value are basically savings accounts with guaranteed growth margins. If she paid into the policy, she is absolutely entitled to funds when the policy is cashed out, just like if they had a joint bank account that she was making regular deposits on and he decided to close it.
I agree too. It seems to me that many commenters here - and even Judge Judy! - are quite biased against the plaintiff simply because they dislike her. Granted she didn't sell herself well, but that should not impact on any assessment of the case.
@@Lex-ri8ki That was irrelevant to the case. The basis for the case started at the point when he made a written contract with her. Everything was based on that.
Wow! I didn’t see that coming. “ she wanted more money than I was willing to give her” what?! Dude, you put it in the contract. Don’t buy insurance from this man. He doesn’t know what he’s doing.
It's easy to call this woman greedy, and maybe she is a little bit... what a lot of people aren't understanding is that she did put money into this policy for several years. It seems like she saw an opportunity to recoup that money back, when she previously assumed it was just lost. Remember that by cashing it out, he's getting money back too. Why shouldn't she get something for the money she put into it? Either way, a contract is a contract and he owes her what they agreed to.
Consider that when she started paying for 3 years, she was also joining into the benefit of the 3 years he paid solo. She should have gotten what she paid in and not a cent more especially since she couldn’t afford to continue. She only gained 5-6K more based on a mistake her contribution time period and she knows that
Why shouldn't she get something for the money she put into it? Because she threw it away and gave up her interest. But her ex let her back in so then it morphed into another agreement which in the end is what was adhered to.
I thought they both were a little snippy. My mom was screwed over by my step father's kids after he died. He put my mom in a house that she couldn't afford to keep living in and she sold her home to pay him half for the new home but after he died his kids came calling for all of his possessions and his share in this new home. Thank god my Mom had been very tight with her money her whole life and had saved money for she was able to sell some things and was able to pay his kids off. Mom is now in an assisted living place and is going on 100 years old with no regrets because she is still able to pay her way and is owing to no one, especially not the State or the Government.
Why do people always make the woman out to be the bad guy? HE made that contract and ask her to sign it. She even stated she told him HE should make her an offer.. he felt 18,500 was a fair price so how is she the bad person? she held up her side of the agreement and he stabbed her in the back. I’m glad she won!
Oh she was the bad guy alright.... since they had a verbal agreement (contract) to which they both admitted too, that she turned over the policy to him and he agreed to take it... but she secretly did not give him the policy at all, by way of her withheld signature and then forced him to change the terms of the original contract to give her all that money.
Wow, that didn't go as expected. I think this guy is starting to slip mentally. Maybe a little dementia setting in. If I were her, I would have taken the 12K. She wasn't entitled to anything, until he sent her the contract. She's greedy, and he's foolish.
If she was really greedy, she would have tried to sell the policy in 2015 (and the signature dispute would heve been the other way around). She just wanted her share of 12 year payments. Can understand that.
She is greedy. If she could sell the policy in 2015 she obviously would have, but she couldn't she couldn't because they were divorced and she knew he wouldn't sign to sell his own policy to benefit her.
@@Naturefan354 "She knew he wouldn't sign to sell his own policy to benefit her" Right.. if she had tried to sell it, the rose would have been reversed.. she would have needed his signature and he would have wanted a portion of the policy for his signature just like she does. She's not anymore greedy than he is cashing it out at this point in time, wanting all the money to himself that they BOTH put into it. 🙄
The 11 yrs paid jointly were monies not split between them if they hadn’t bought the policy. She paid alone for 3 yrs. She’s entitled to the share of the cash value of the policy. He agreed to pay $18,500, he has to pay $18,500. The ones who “lose” out are his kids and wife, who don’t receive benefits from a substantial life insurance policy when the defendant dies. “Lose” is in quotes because there was no guarantee they would be receiving the money.
In the last minute, the woman comes out finally with the contract!!! if JJ would’ve had that at the beginning, the show would’ve been two minutes, barely!!
I don't like the plaintiff any more than the judge, but she didn't do anything illegal. She played the smart card; the defendant wrote the contract, the plaintiff agreed to it and signed it. A deal is a deal. This is yet another reason why it is so important to read and re-read a contract before you conjure one up, or sign it. I see far too many people generate or sign contracts in such a quick manner before they really take the time to read what is written, and that's why things go south afterwards.
"Be careful when you sign off YOUR RIGHTS to things"? Wasn't it HIS life insurance policy? Didn't she already discard it? What about any of this is her rights?
@@BarbaraHulsizer I don't think you understand what I was asking. Let's say you buy a used vehicle and pay for all the maintenance and needs for the vehicle. One day you decide that it's too expensive to drive or maintain the vehicle so you junk it. Someone comes along and puts money into it and makes it reliable and beautiful again. Restored it to what it was and wants to sell it, but he can't because the title is still in your name. Where in this scenario would you be signing your rights away if you were to transfer the title of the car you junked? That's what I'm asking where are her RIGHTS as an individual being signed away?
Your used car isn’t a good analogy. When you “junk a car” you surrender the title at the same time. At that point you signed away your rights. Where this man failed was that when he agreed to take it over, he should have gotten her to sign over any rights. He made a deal with her. He can’t go back on it regardless of what he later decides is fair.
@@Wallflower28 JJ knows the law and she applied it. The man should not have agreed to give her the money if he didn't want to pay it. He signed on the dotted line.
@@seashellesbelles7232Do you know how many times a person had a "contract" with another person,which can be verbal or written, and JJ either chose to uphold it or not uphold it? She picks and chooses what contracts she wants to enforce. Many cases where a person agreed aka a contract, but JJ didn't enforce it.
Women in the audience sat behind the plaintiff with the gold necklace oh my god she gorgeous. She knew what was going on. As for the plaintiff she is just pure greedy and who knows had the policy in her name she could have caused an "accident". Pure evil intentions you got $12,500 shut up and move on. What a waste of court proceedings
It's not totally unfair, she did pay into the policy by herself for three years...in truth, whole life is basically a scam, get a term policy if you have dependents, stay away from whole life or anything with a cash surrender value
Ikr?? These people want to litigate their relationship and all the ways they were wronged that have nothing to do with the matter at hand. It drives me crazy.
You are confusing opinion with fact. He couldn’t sell without her signature. He had a couple of choices. Let it lapse or make her an offer. He offered $18,500. He decided he didn’t like it and tried to stiff her on the agreed amount.
@@momsterzz what is going to happen is that the insurance company will send him a 1099 for his capital gains. He will have to pay taxes on that. It will be difficult for him to make her pay on her settlement with him.
He is so foolish!! He sells insurance he should have figured what she paid into the policy first before making a contract with her! She has every right to get the total amount!
that was fair, she paid into it for many years with him and apart from him, he got money back and so did she, he was the one who was trying to go back on a contract, there was nothing wrong with what the woman in this case did
Wasn't at all fair, she was set to let it lapse and he picked it up, she had no Rights until he offered her money, he could have sued her before he did that. You'd have no Rights, no matter how long you paid on a policy if you went 3 years without paying it.
@@sojubean6386That’s outside speculation that has nothing to do with the case. What he paid for everything during the marriage but she cleaned and mama’s everything? See where I’m going? He signed a contract. He made the deal. He was married to her for 11yrs. He knew what he had to say and do In order to get her signature. We can judge her but can we blame her? No.
He is the sneaky one. I’d like to hear what his first ex wife has to say about him, but this ex-wife is not the issue. I don’t agree with JJ feeling the way she does. He tried to sneakily get her to sign those docs. I’m glad she got the money.
The defendant was bound by the contract. However seems he tried to explain that when he agreed to that figure in the contract they had had a conversation prior and seems he may have been misled on how she paid the premiums i.e. whether she in fact paid them from her own monies or from a joint account in both their names. This why defendant said yes Judge was fair (accepted being bound by contract) but also that he lost money. Anyway good luck to him, he seems a lovely gentleman.
She's still digging that gold ten years after the divorce. He is right, she is wrong, but that contract to pay her is not going anywhere. Big mistake he made when offering her that money.
No, she's entitled to it. He CHOSE to sell it. That made it an unrealized asset at that point. If he had just continued it as life insurance, she didn't have a hand in that, but selling the policy made it a different ball of wax.
Hes annoying asf. Always making dum facial expressions, looking for attn and commenting on these vids. And then there's Ms Excessively Smiley nxt to him. CRINGE!
Being a Homeless Veteran for 10yrs if any of you think it's easy it's not. Nobody cares about our situation Now i make 22k weekly. have a home, a wife, a lovely daughter... A child of God. HALLELUJAH
After I raised up to 325k trading with her I bought a new House and a car here in the states 🇺🇸🇺🇸 also paid for my son's surgery (Oscar). Glory to God.shalom.
He didn't legally owe her anything so what are you even talking Abu?In fact JJ didn't even have to uphold the contract but she usually does whenever a woman is getting money from a man
There have been many times that people had signed contracts and JJ still wouldn't enforce it because it wasn't legally binding. She is greedy and doesn't deserve anything
Birds of a feather flock together. I get bad vibes from both of those litigants, they both seem like snakes and I wouldn't do business with either one of them. She extorted him for money and he entered into a contract knowing full well he wasn't going to honor it
He had to agree to the contract so he could sell the policy and collect on it. He needed her signature. It's a little tit-for-tat but she paid into it as well. I wonder though, if there is a conflict of interest because my understanding here is she was the agent for the life insurance. It is a good thing he did not let it lapse because neither of them would have received a dime if that happened.
"She wanted more money than I was willimg to give her." No she wanted the money you were contracted to give her. This is why there is a difference in acquiring assets within and outside of a marriage. They were married, and acquired the policy during their marriage. She had rights to the policy as long as he didn't die, regardless of who paid the premiums, and regardless of their marital status. (this is why he needed her signature.) Had he died the policy would have gone soley to his beneficiaries. Notice his previous ex wife was also a beneficiary on the policy, along with their kids. That tells me he married this ex wife while his kids were still minors, and that they were married for a significant amount of time. Life Insurance policies, like bank accounts are property of the marriage. She only relinquished her rights as the beneifiary, not as an owner on the account. Meanwhile the first exwife and the kids get ZERO, unless he has another policy.
Having worked in insurance NYL) I've seen some million-dollar policies (Whole life). Listen, these things can accrue so much money that an owner can borrow from. Dividends are where it's at. So this lil he gave her was nothing trust! Get the policies when they are babies and by the time they are college age.. you could pay for it using some funds from the policy.. I used to print process the check to be sent out.
She asked him TO MAKE HER AN OFFER (a figure $ amount) in order to have her signature to sell the policy. But she acted like she did request for a figure, he just offered her a figure himself.
I hate that he didn’t do the math before signing the contract. But at the same time, he lost a little sympathy for having his new wife pay into a policy that would partially benefit his ex wife. Neither of them seem particularly unreasonable though the plaintiff comes off as a bit unsympathetic. I wonder why they broke up 🤔
I don't understand why the plaintiff didn't provide the WRITTEN offer, her signed ACCEPTANCE, and the proof he shorted her when paying the CONSIDERATION. She had her case , right there, and instead spent the entire part two of this talking about irrelevancies. The defendant made a bad bargain. That's on him. She didn't name the figure, he did. Unfortunately, I"ve known insurance salesmen to lie about their policies to make a sale as a standard tactic. Maybe he thought he could get away with pulling it on his ex-wife. If he did, it backfired. At least he doesn't have to live that with broad anymore.
Yep, this sounds like an insurance policy. You buy one, you need to make a claim and then the agent says “Sorry, that’s not covered, yess I know it says it in the contract but we are adding depreciation value so, you are getting less than what you thought.” You have to take them to court to make the insurance pay you for what they said they would cover cause nowhere in the policy does it say minus depreciation. This guy is all about declining policies and she knows it. She knows to make him pay based on the contract.
All she had to do was to give JJ the contract from the get go 🙄
You know they always want to say their story
JJ had much more patience with the plaintiff than she should have done. Listening to that woman was akin to watching paint dry.
Exactly what I said! The program would’ve been one minute! 😊😂😂😂😂
I hate how they (P or D) don't listen to JJ's question and get to the point.
They want to lay out their "story" that nobody asked about 🙄
@@jenn_x. No, you are wrong. Watching paint dry is boring. This woman is not boring, she is annoying.
If she had shown the contract right away, the case would have been settled in 60 seconds. 😁
$18,500 became hers when he foolishly made a contract with her. Then he tried to stiff her. Too Bad - So Sad for him. He screwed up.
We all saw the video. We all have common sense to break it down for ourselves. Your comment is rhetoric.
@@AerynSB You're unnecessarily rude.
@@AerynSBtime to seek therapy to help with your uncontrollable impulse to be obnoxious and rude to total strangers without being provoked. Prayers for your healing love ❤
@@AerynSB
From the content of your first two sentences,
"... your comment is RHETORICAL"
Is a more appropriate third 🤣😊
@@desokie257 And you have a big mouth.
"If you want to disagree with anything I said, you have 30 seconds." 😂 Yupp, that's getting added to my vernacular!
😂😂
The contract doomed him. However, as an insurance agent, he had to know that going in. Maybe he just wanted the show to pay it.
Or, he was hoping she would look foolish on national television.
He paid $5k. She looks greedy.
I'd say that's a reasonable amount for the dividends he's getting in her performance.
@@msbaboolal ~ How did she look greedy? She didn't, imho. He showed the world how dumb he is, however ~ which was really stupid, given he sells insurance. Would you buy a policy from this clown after seeing this video?
He didn’t know they would end up on JJ. The show looks up cases and picks the ones that look like they would be interesting
@@ronica2623 ~ Not sure, but I believe seeing JJ on the bench would give anyone a clue they might end up on the show. 🙃
I just love homegirl in the background just smiling the whole time Thinking about JJ like "Wow she's really good! She's amazing!" 😂
@chadrickrhule4477 - Did you see her eyeroll at 0:26? LOL
@@katesweeney9101 yes lol thats how she started making me focus on her
When she rolled her eyes I LOL
Meanwhile, the guy in the white shirt and suspenders is looking irritated at everyone.
Home girl?
So for the folks who think the Plaintiff is ripping off the defendant…
… these life insurance policies with a cash value are basically savings accounts with guaranteed growth margins. If she paid into the policy, she is absolutely entitled to funds when the policy is cashed out, just like if they had a joint bank account that she was making regular deposits on and he decided to close it.
I agree.
I agree too. It seems to me that many commenters here - and even Judge Judy! - are quite biased against the plaintiff simply because they dislike her. Granted she didn't sell herself well, but that should not impact on any assessment of the case.
Problem is that she agreed to the relinquish her rights. He was a dummy for making this new contract.
But once she decided to throw the policy away, don’t those rights go out the window too?
@@Lex-ri8ki That was irrelevant to the case. The basis for the case started at the point when he made a written contract with her. Everything was based on that.
I actually don't know why this man didn't understand that that was an enforceable contract and that he was obligated to pay.
Email is a rather lose contract, what if he did not get any money or not has much. Kinda like slavery "BUT WE HAVE A CONTRACT"
He didn't think she'd sue.
He wanted to meet JJ.
Yeah and he’s supposedly an insurance agent.
He gets to show her for what she is.
lmfao the woman in the gallery to the left of the plaintiff is sending me with her facial gymnastics 😂😂😂😂😂
I agree. Loved the eye roll at 0:27.🤣😂🤣😂🤣
Wow! I didn’t see that coming. “ she wanted more money than I was willing to give her” what?! Dude, you put it in the contract. Don’t buy insurance from this man. He doesn’t know what he’s doing.
I suspect he's retired or simply managing an agency now.
He wrote the contract. He can’t be mad about it.
So nobody peeped the black lady in the back 😂😂😂😂
She has me weakkk😂😂
Yes!!! She was clocking everything!!! 😂
THE BLACK LADY IN THE BACK STANDS OUT WITH HER GOLD JEWELRY. SHES ENJOYING HER SELF ❤
@@katleigh5434Right I noticed her right away I always find someone who is engaged in the case. 😂
She was hilarious, but I feel she REALLY wanted to be noticed🤣
It's easy to call this woman greedy, and maybe she is a little bit... what a lot of people aren't understanding is that she did put money into this policy for several years. It seems like she saw an opportunity to recoup that money back, when she previously assumed it was just lost. Remember that by cashing it out, he's getting money back too. Why shouldn't she get something for the money she put into it? Either way, a contract is a contract and he owes her what they agreed to.
Consider that when she started paying for 3 years, she was also joining into the benefit of the 3 years he paid solo. She should have gotten what she paid in and not a cent more especially since she couldn’t afford to continue. She only gained 5-6K more based on a mistake her contribution time period and she knows that
Why shouldn't she get something for the money she put into it? Because she threw it away and gave up her interest. But her ex let her back in so then it morphed into another agreement which in the end is what was adhered to.
I don’t know why he sold it, in the first place. Something just doesn’t smell right.
3 parts to get to the fact she had a written contract the whole time! Good Lord! Pay the woman and be done with her for good. Geesh!
Rules of acquisition number 17, A contract is a contract is a contract… but only between Ferengi.
A Star Trek fan. Me too.
@@Messier45_Pleiades Most of the Rules of Acquisition came out in Deep Space 9...)
Haaaaaa!!! Those sneaky Ferengi!!!
Started to read that and was saying Ferengi!!!. Keep your friends close, your family closer!!..
A contract is a contract that's a contract!!!
Judge Judy would be an excellent captain
Gotta love the eye roll at 0:27 from the lady to the left of the plaintiff.🤣😂🤣😂
After listening to her, he definately came out the winner.
She only cares about herself
I thought they both were a little snippy. My mom was screwed over by my step father's kids after he died. He put my mom in a house that she couldn't afford to keep living in and she sold her home to pay him half for the new home but after he died his kids came calling for all of his possessions and his share in this new home.
Thank god my Mom had been very tight with her money her whole life and had saved money for she was able to sell some things and was able to pay his kids off. Mom is now in an assisted living place and is going on 100 years old with no regrets because she is still able to pay her way and is owing to no one, especially not the State or the Government.
My brain hurts.
How he's on deaths door money should go to.his children
He looked dumber than she looked selfish. He wrote the K, she signed it. Done deal. Be a man and pay her.
Once she presented that contract case was over. No way out unless he had another contract in writing made after that one
Why do people always make the woman out to be the bad guy? HE made that contract and ask her to sign it. She even stated she told him HE should make her an offer.. he felt 18,500 was a fair price so how is she the bad person? she held up her side of the agreement and he stabbed her in the back. I’m glad she won!
Oh she was the bad guy alright.... since they had a verbal agreement (contract) to which they both admitted too, that she turned over the policy to him and he agreed to take it... but she secretly did not give him the policy at all, by way of her withheld signature and then forced him to change the terms of the original contract to give her all that money.
@@mystikmind2005 he’s stupid and that’s not Her fault. She didn’t hold a gun to his head to force him to sign, furthermore he offered that amount.
A contract is a contract.
Wow, that didn't go as expected.
I think this guy is starting to slip mentally. Maybe a little dementia setting in.
If I were her, I would have taken the 12K. She wasn't entitled to anything, until he sent her the contract. She's greedy, and he's foolish.
He married her, OF COURSE he's slipping a bit!!!
Just greedy and bitter
Yeah but a deal's a deal.
Yeah I feel bad for the guy. Life’s sad!! At least he’s not with that greedy woman anymore
Could have been the way of their relationship
If she was really greedy, she would have tried to sell the policy in 2015 (and the signature dispute would heve been the other way around). She just wanted her share of 12 year payments. Can understand that.
Exactly
Exactly. Even judge Judy said it was reasonable (not nice) but understandable.
The case was fair.
She is greedy. If she could sell the policy in 2015 she obviously would have, but she couldn't she couldn't because they were divorced and she knew he wouldn't sign to sell his own policy to benefit her.
@@Naturefan354
"She knew he wouldn't sign to sell his own policy to benefit her"
Right.. if she had tried to sell it, the rose would have been reversed.. she would have needed his signature and he would have wanted a portion of the policy for his signature just like she does. She's not anymore greedy than he is cashing it out at this point in time, wanting all the money to himself that they BOTH put into it. 🙄
Boy he must’ve been a really bad insurance agent 😅made a mistake…lol😂
rule 17 of the Ferengi Rules of Acquisition. "A CONTRACT IS A CONTRACT IS A CONTRACT" lol
😂100%
But only between Ferengi
Good for her, she’s a smart cookie. Don’t tell JJ wouldn’t have done something similar in that situation.
The 11 yrs paid jointly were monies not split between them if they hadn’t bought the policy. She paid alone for 3 yrs. She’s entitled to the share of the cash value of the policy. He agreed to pay $18,500, he has to pay $18,500. The ones who “lose” out are his kids and wife, who don’t receive benefits from a substantial life insurance policy when the defendant dies. “Lose” is in quotes because there was no guarantee they would be receiving the money.
In the last minute, the woman comes out finally with the contract!!! if JJ would’ve had that at the beginning, the show would’ve been two minutes, barely!!
I don't like the plaintiff any more than the judge, but she didn't do anything illegal. She played the smart card; the defendant wrote the contract, the plaintiff agreed to it and signed it. A deal is a deal.
This is yet another reason why it is so important to read and re-read a contract before you conjure one up, or sign it. I see far too many people generate or sign contracts in such a quick manner before they really take the time to read what is written, and that's why things go south afterwards.
All is fair in love & war 😅
That smug grin on her face is triggering me 😑🖐🏾
Your not alone...
I'm calling Doctor Phil now 😂
@@JohnDoe-xm9qlYou’re not the only one !
Stay indoors then, she taking back what was rightfully hers that she had paid her share of.
😂❤
One of these days Alice, bannngggg zoooommm
"Be careful when you sign off YOUR RIGHTS to things"? Wasn't it HIS life insurance policy? Didn't she already discard it? What about any of this is her rights?
She paid half the money into it. He's lucky she didn't leave a banana skin on the stairs.
He said he’d give her $18,500 for her signature. The rest of your comment are opinions about fairness. He owes her $6,500.
@@BarbaraHulsizer I don't think you understand what I was asking.
Let's say you buy a used vehicle and pay for all the maintenance and needs for the vehicle. One day you decide that it's too expensive to drive or maintain the vehicle so you junk it. Someone comes along and puts money into it and makes it reliable and beautiful again. Restored it to what it was and wants to sell it, but he can't because the title is still in your name.
Where in this scenario would you be signing your rights away if you were to transfer the title of the car you junked?
That's what I'm asking where are her RIGHTS as an individual being signed away?
Your used car isn’t a good analogy. When you “junk a car” you surrender the title at the same time. At that point you signed away your rights. Where this man failed was that when he agreed to take it over, he should have gotten her to sign over any rights. He made a deal with her. He can’t go back on it regardless of what he later decides is fair.
@@Wallflower28 JJ knows the law and she applied it. The man should not have agreed to give her the money if he didn't want to pay it. He signed on the dotted line.
He should've had her sign off her rights to when they got divorced.
Absolutely but he gave her the policy. I'm sure she couldn't believe they had built up that much cash
IMHO it's disgusting that this woman got any money whatsoever. Even the $12,000 is too much.
At the end of the day they both paid into the policy over many years and he agreed to the amount.
@@nilnil7325she extorted the amount. She was going to let it all be for nothing so instead he took it over. It’s his policy.
Shes a witch.
@@nilnil7325So? She washed her hands of it later and stopped paying. If it was a man suing a woman in this case then he would have lost 🙄
@@Naturefan354That’s absurd. It’s basic contract law. It has nothing to do whether it’s a man or a woman suing.
@@seashellesbelles7232Do you know how many times a person had a "contract" with another person,which can be verbal or written, and JJ either chose to uphold it or not uphold it? She picks and chooses what contracts she wants to enforce. Many cases where a person agreed aka a contract, but JJ didn't enforce it.
Advice to self: stay single
good
Advice*
People are not all alike, so good advice for some and bad advice for others.
@@purrple.shadows the advice is for me not for anyone else
I'm gonna go ahead and heed your advice to yourself for myself! @@Sam-gv6lo
Doesn’t know if he’s “On foot or horseback” is crazy JJ love her sayings
Excellent person-to-person advice at the end.
OK, I came here to watch the plaintiff get torn to pieces. I feel like we all got stiffed! I want to see the contract we have with JJ!
Many women don't change. Gold digger before marriage, Gold digger after marriage. Gold digger will always be a Gold digger.
Women in the audience sat behind the plaintiff with the gold necklace oh my god she gorgeous. She knew what was going on. As for the plaintiff she is just pure greedy and who knows had the policy in her name she could have caused an "accident". Pure evil intentions you got $12,500 shut up and move on. What a waste of court proceedings
God*
And yes ,she is gorgeous 😊
It's not totally unfair, she did pay into the policy by herself for three years...in truth, whole life is basically a scam, get a term policy if you have dependents, stay away from whole life or anything with a cash surrender value
Some of these litigants act like they have never seen an episode of JJ before😂 get to the point people!
Ikr?? These people want to litigate their relationship and all the ways they were wronged that have nothing to do with the matter at hand. It drives me crazy.
The clever ones know when to be quiet and either not p1ss off Judy, or when it's obvious that she's going to find for them.
Old people. Just how they are.
She wanted to start off with "well, the day we first met was......."
@@kimm6589 it’s not just old people. Young people do this also.
She would not be entitled to any more than what she had paid but for his miscalculation. I hope it puts her into a higher tax bracket.
You are confusing opinion with fact. He couldn’t sell without her signature. He had a couple of choices. Let it lapse or make her an offer. He offered $18,500. He decided he didn’t like it and tried to stiff her on the agreed amount.
@@BarbaraHulsizer He could have kept it. That would have eliminated having to deal with her.
I doubt she declares it on her taxes
@@momsterzz what is going to happen is that the insurance company will send him a 1099 for his capital gains. He will have to pay taxes on that. It will be difficult for him to make her pay on her settlement with him.
Why do you hope it puts her into a higher tax bracket? If it did, it would probably have minimal impact.
an opportunity for her to make money...ransom!
I can’t believe this guy thinks he can get out a contract case
He is so foolish!! He sells insurance he should have figured what she paid into the policy first before making a contract with her! She has every right to get the total amount!
That audience member's eyeroll at 0:26 🤣
Smart woman. Of course she is smiling.
that was fair, she paid into it for many years with him and apart from him, he got money back and so did she, he was the one who was trying to go back on a contract, there was nothing wrong with what the woman in this case did
Wasn't at all fair, she was set to let it lapse and he picked it up, she had no Rights until he offered her money, he could have sued her before he did that. You'd have no Rights, no matter how long you paid on a policy if you went 3 years without paying it.
Wow, if my ex gave me $12,000, unexpectedly, i would be happy, no way would I sue for another 5, even if I knew i could. Lady is terrible
I mean she did pay for the policy too.
@@helenaBeauRight smh!! He wouldn’t have a insurance policy if it wasn’t for her.. smh!!! 🤣😂🤣Momma wasn’t playing ✌️ she kept him alive that long
@sojubean6386 So what? They were married when she did and there was obviously things he paid for that kept her alive while married
@@sojubean6386That’s outside speculation that has nothing to do with the case. What he paid for everything during the marriage but she cleaned and mama’s everything? See where I’m going? He signed a contract. He made the deal. He was married to her for 11yrs. He knew what he had to say and do In order to get her signature. We can judge her but can we blame her? No.
You’d understand if you were a money, grubbing paper shuffler, who never had to lift a finger or break a sweat in your life…🤔
She is one smart cookie 👏👏👏👏
He is the sneaky one. I’d like to hear what his first ex wife has to say about him, but this ex-wife is not the issue. I don’t agree with JJ feeling the way she does. He tried to sneakily get her to sign those docs. I’m glad she got the money.
Spoiler alert
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
Greedy woman won.
Thanks for the “spoiler alert”.
Some ppl just comment based on the decision and ruin it for the rest of us.
Disgusting!!!! I can't stand her.
@@onetimes1Yes. It has happened to me a few times, but I guess is my fault for reading the comments as the episode plays ..🤷♂️😂
She wasn't greedy. HE made the contract, she signed the contract. He has to honor the contract.
I ain’t sayin she a gold digger… but she ain’t messin with no broke 😂
She paid into the policy just as much as he did. What's so hard to understand about that? He made the offer! He chose the amount! He's the idiot!
@@sarahlynn7894lol! She did not pay into the policy as much as he did. Were you not watching the show? She is shiesty. 😂
That greedy woman fleeced him
He let himself be fleeced. He even admitted it.
The defendant was bound by the contract. However seems he tried to explain that when he agreed to that figure in the contract they had had a conversation prior and seems he may have been misled on how she paid the premiums i.e. whether she in fact paid them from her own monies or from a joint account in both their names. This why defendant said yes Judge was fair (accepted being bound by contract) but also that he lost money. Anyway good luck to him, he seems a lovely gentleman.
That eye roll from the lady with the necklace...
This man is smart. He knew he would lose and got the TV show to pay his debt.
She's still digging that gold ten years after the divorce. He is right, she is wrong, but that contract to pay her is not going anywhere. Big mistake he made when offering her that money.
No, she's entitled to it. He CHOSE to sell it. That made it an unrealized asset at that point. If he had just continued it as life insurance, she didn't have a hand in that, but selling the policy made it a different ball of wax.
That plaintiff's character shows in her smile... I wouldn't want to know her!
At the beginning of the video the guy to the left is REALLY interested in what she’s saying 😂😂😂
Hes annoying asf. Always making dum facial expressions, looking for attn and commenting on these vids.
And then there's Ms Excessively Smiley nxt to him. CRINGE!
He wanted someone to be on his side so bad 😂😂 dude
Being a Homeless Veteran for 10yrs if any of you think it's easy it's not. Nobody cares about our situation Now i make 22k weekly. have a home, a wife, a lovely daughter... A child of God. HALLELUJAH
How did you do it? Do explain please 😯
My family have been into series of sufferings lately
All thanks to Renee Marie Harrison
After I raised up to 325k trading with her I bought a new House and a car here in the states 🇺🇸🇺🇸 also paid for my son's surgery (Oscar). Glory to God.shalom.
There is her line!!!! look down under this comment!!!! 🆗
+1🇺🇸
Simple:
Contract law
Deal with it
That gotcha moment when you realize you’re busted.
😂😂GOT HIM!!! Smart Woman!
Let's deal with her JJ 😂
I would have said " I will sign if you pay me for the three years I paid for it. "
And then when you found out he got $40k, you’d be kicking yourself for your stupidity
That plaintiff is one angry scorned woman
He’s well rid of her! Hopefully, she pays dearly for what she just did. Karma is intense.
He's shady. As an agent he has the responsibility to disclose everything. Creep.
Yes!!!!
He didn't legally owe her anything so what are you even talking Abu?In fact JJ didn't even have to uphold the contract but she usually does whenever a woman is getting money from a man
That lady was a smart cookie. And he knows that if there's a signed contract, he owes her that money. I'm glad she prevailed in court.
There have been many times that people had signed contracts and JJ still wouldn't enforce it because it wasn't legally binding. She is greedy and doesn't deserve anything
Why is everyone hating on her. They made a contract and both agreed to it. He should have just paid the whole amount and kick himself later.
Birds of a feather flock together. I get bad vibes from both of those litigants, they both seem like snakes and I wouldn't do business with either one of them. She extorted him for money and he entered into a contract knowing full well he wasn't going to honor it
The lady greedy
What a fun couple!
If she’s in a relationship, hope that person is watching
This one never should've gone to litigation. He had to know he didn't have a snowball's chance of winning. 🤔🤐
He scammed her. She didn't understand the value that was in the policy until he went to cash it out.
0:15 JJ was definitely looking at the gorgeous black lady in the audience
How do you know where JJ eyes are looking??? God
He had to agree to the contract so he could sell the policy and collect on it. He needed her signature. It's a little tit-for-tat but she paid into it as well. I wonder though, if there is a conflict of interest because my understanding here is she was the agent for the life insurance. It is a good thing he did not let it lapse because neither of them would have received a dime if that happened.
Good for her! Women so often don't stand up for themselves and don't negotiate.
"She wanted more money than I was willimg to give her." No she wanted the money you were contracted to give her. This is why there is a difference in acquiring assets within and outside of a marriage. They were married, and acquired the policy during their marriage. She had rights to the policy as long as he didn't die, regardless of who paid the premiums, and regardless of their marital status. (this is why he needed her signature.) Had he died the policy would have gone soley to his beneficiaries. Notice his previous ex wife was also a beneficiary on the policy, along with their kids. That tells me he married this ex wife while his kids were still minors, and that they were married for a significant amount of time. Life Insurance policies, like bank accounts are property of the marriage. She only relinquished her rights as the beneifiary, not as an owner on the account. Meanwhile the first exwife and the kids get ZERO, unless he has another policy.
KARMA WILL COME BACK ON HER 👌🏼
Oh I sooooo hope so.
Having worked in insurance NYL) I've seen some million-dollar policies (Whole life). Listen, these things can accrue so much money that an owner can borrow from. Dividends are where it's at. So this lil he gave her was nothing trust! Get the policies when they are babies and by the time they are college age.. you could pay for it using some funds from the policy.. I used to print process the check to be sent out.
Beautiful woman. Awesome smile
Her saying thats right after jj said if he didjt say 18,500 then she woukdnt have a leg to stand on like she knew that exsctly lol
At the very end, the woman says, "Be careful.....". Yeah, lady, be very careful of people like YOU!
Dang,intelligent peoples,both of them....
He offered the money in the contract. Just pay it and move on.
It sorta begs the question. Why didn't SHE sell it off? Did He refuse to sign off for her? Somethings not kosher
She asked him TO MAKE HER AN OFFER (a figure $ amount) in order to have her signature to sell the policy.
But she acted like she did request for a figure, he just offered her a figure himself.
I hate that he didn’t do the math before signing the contract. But at the same time, he lost a little sympathy for having his new wife pay into a policy that would partially benefit his ex wife. Neither of them seem particularly unreasonable though the plaintiff comes off as a bit unsympathetic. I wonder why they broke up 🤔
I’d love to know the face value of this policy
She musta been big mad at him to do this!
I don't understand why the plaintiff didn't provide the WRITTEN offer, her signed ACCEPTANCE, and the proof he shorted her when paying the CONSIDERATION. She had her case , right there, and instead spent the entire part two of this talking about irrelevancies.
The defendant made a bad bargain. That's on him. She didn't name the figure, he did. Unfortunately, I"ve known insurance salesmen to lie about their policies to make a sale as a standard tactic. Maybe he thought he could get away with pulling it on his ex-wife. If he did, it backfired.
At least he doesn't have to live that with broad anymore.
You can only present the evidence AS JJ asks for it. JJ knew she had the contract.
@@mindimartian9821 She should have presented it in part 2, instead of going off into tangents.
I don’t understand how a person can sell an insurance policy on their life to someone else.
Yep, this sounds like an insurance policy.
You buy one, you need to make a claim and then the agent says “Sorry, that’s not covered, yess I know it says it in the contract but we are adding depreciation value so, you are getting less than what you thought.”
You have to take them to court to make the insurance pay you for what they said they would cover cause nowhere in the policy does it say minus depreciation.
This guy is all about declining policies and she knows it. She knows to make him pay based on the contract.
You can tell Judge Judy hated siding with that money grabber woman. She even stated that she hated to do it. But a contract is a contract.
This case seems like a no-brainer. Except I didn't know life-insurance was a commodity.
Insurance policies, mortgages are supported by a whole bunch of guarantees and bonds from banks and governments that can be traded.
She signed a contract for 18000, not 12500. He breached the contract by not paying her the rest.
In all fairness that was the agreement 🤝
Let's go JJ!
Hooray for being first! Your prize is a snazzy set of suspenders, as modeled by the audience member behind the plaintiff!