Enjoyed the review, well done👍 however, you must stop saying $80k, this figure is irrelevant and misleading as we cannot buy it for $80k, it’s more like $97k, yes, you may say that it varies between states and dealers..but an approximate drive away cost is $97k would be very helpful.
Great review I had a 2017 GT 6 speed for 7 years that I absolutely loved, and just moved on to a 2024 GT 10 speed with Magnaride It’s an evolution vs revolution but for me it just ticks so many boxes in so many aspects, my 2017 as much as I loved it was a poor 1st cousin that I still love, but would prefer to drive this one every time I love it!
I previously owned a 2019 mustang gt before starting a family and trading it in. Always planned to get anther but with these price increases after a few options and lct your hivering 100k. For that price I would rather get BMW M340i
$90k plus car, no front parking sensor, no 360 camera, no powered tailgate, no HUD, they didn't even reverse the centre console so the hand brake and cup holders are on the wrong side (similar to the S550), I get V8, but at that price point I'd expect a little more...
@@elmin2323 A 2 door coupe wider than a Ford Everest, nearly as long, with a bulging hood that slopes away from you so it's even harder to judge distance (plus no front sensors), but sure, the answer is I should go buy a Tesla because I want the convenience of being able to park it easier.
I have a 2019 Last gen GT and whilst I’ve seen and sat in the new GT & Dark Horse for 30k extra than what I paid for mine and less torque I just don’t think it offers enough to justify that big of a price jump. I still love it but at such a large price jump it just isn’t worth upgrading. I hope they sell a tonne of them though long live the V8.
Price aside nice upgrades and very glad we can buy it here from Ford. This will be much cheaper and easier to maintain than German coupes for longer term ownership.
Thanks for the review. I’ve noticed that most American reviews have criticized the lack of steering feel over the previous model, but nothing was mentioned to support that here… did they do an AU tune for that here? Also, would be good to hear about how the 6-Speed manual is to drive. Thanks
That's because some of the reviewers didn't know much about the car, they just get a press car & review it for likes and subscribers. On the actual steering wheel, there is a button with an image of a steering wheel. Press that & you get 3 different option settings for your steering feel. Just need to see which one you like & for the purpose you are driving for. I hope this helps.
I had one on order from the second they were announced and ended up cancelling. At 13l/100km and 90k without magnaride it's just too much. Good car, but not great and now no longer great value, just good
Obviously everyone's different, but I have no idea why you would find the fuel consumption to be an issue when purchasing a $90k muscle car? I mean, you don't buy a Fiat 500 and mark it down for the lack of rear seat room :)
@@jeremybean-hodges6397 well thats the entire point. the Mustang was a $66k muscle car in 2016, then $75k until 22 at the end of the S550 range and then jumped to $93k drive away for auto with magnaride with mainly infotainment update. The issue is, the cars value performance index is an indication on a prospective buyer. ie. there are 2 cars. both have 500 horse power, both look great, one sounds slightly better than the other but one cost $60k and the other $110k. The $110k uses 9.3l/100km and the $60k one uses 13.5l/100km. You obviously go for the $60k as the value to performance index is insane. Now, i mean... i love the mustang. im still looking at the new ones as it is a beautiful car. but at near 100k, ill probably just go proper engineering and buy a 2 year old M2 comp. lol... and it is actually 35% better efficiency and is still quicker. I dont think i had to explain this. i mean its a muscle car, but you still have to run the damn thing. lol... its not like its free. its literally $200 a week with moderate mileage.
@@jeremybean-hodges6397 regarding the fiat analogy, if your criteria is small affordable run around with back seats, yes you mark it down. If your criteria is small car and who cares about the back seats you dont mark it down. my personal, and many peoples criteria is affordable sports or muscle cars. otherwise i''d not bother with the damn mustang and get a GT2RS LOL
At around one hundred thousand on road in Australia in automatic guise the Mustang is overrated. With the centre console still not correct after the conversion and no tremec manual as standard fitment on the GT. I think Australia is still an afterthought by Ford. I also see no Maverick Hybrid trucks on the Horizon for Australia. 😎🇦🇺
Great review, great car...just one suggestion...though! A minute of sounds from the V8 would've been PERFECT! Start-up, inside and outside exhaust of this Beasty car would've made me jizz! It's all about the V8 SOUNDS CUZ!👍
Car pictured is definitely not a Magneride car, doesn't have red callipers - as you said, it's not possible to order here with the apperance pack, for some rubbish reason.
The black calipers would indicate this is a non-Magnaride car (with magnaride cars having red calipers), so why was it tested as having them? I drove a magnaride car at a local dealer and compared it to a non-magnaride car, and I can say it preferred the handling without! My thoughts only.
Ain't no way that car cost that much. Mine is fully loaded with not a single unchecked box. It only came up to $74,000 out the door and that's with every warranty as well. I'm in the United States
As mentioned you could get a supercharged HSV for 80k however that was 80k back in 2017 roll on 2024, 7 years later and if the HSV would all around 100k or over now if they were still around. I dont think it was a great comparison to make
Yep, inflation confuses a lot of people. $88,990 in 2017 is worth $108,276.50 today. And you get a lot more car than a HSV for that price. Slap a supercharger on and you won't be much more expensive than that adjusted for inflation and with a far superior car.
Great looking car but I don’t understand why in America the produce this car on the line with 486 hp stock And here in Australia you telling me there is producing 465 hp. Why is that is the same car please? Somebody can tell me why.😮
From an article on the carsguide website: "It comes down to a combination of factors, says Ford, with different extractor configuration for right-hand drive car and emissions standards both affecting power." I have to say, the Coyote's output is still massive compared to any of the other four performance cars I drove from 1988 through 2013. Just how much do you need? :D
Such as where? I agree that $100k is a lot of money but everything is expensive now. Have you seen the price of a crappy medium sized SUV from a mid-range brand?
I didn't know GM was still building the Camaro. I thought it was done... That's funny. well I guess I was mistaken. Wait, why does that Camaro have a horse emblem? ugly as hell. remember the good old Mustang II in 1974? it's not looking so bad anymore compared to this...
Enjoyed the review, well done👍 however, you must stop saying $80k, this figure is irrelevant and misleading as we cannot buy it for $80k, it’s more like $97k, yes, you may say that it varies between states and dealers..but an approximate drive away cost is $97k would be very helpful.
Great review
I had a 2017 GT 6 speed for 7 years that I absolutely loved, and just moved on to a 2024 GT 10 speed with Magnaride
It’s an evolution vs revolution but for me it just ticks so many boxes in so many aspects, my 2017 as much as I loved it was a poor 1st cousin that I still love, but would prefer to drive this one every time
I love it!
I previously owned a 2019 mustang gt before starting a family and trading it in. Always planned to get anther but with these price increases after a few options and lct your hivering 100k. For that price I would rather get BMW M340i
just got my Dark Horse LOVE IT''''
$90k plus car, no front parking sensor, no 360 camera, no powered tailgate, no HUD, they didn't even reverse the centre console so the hand brake and cup holders are on the wrong side (similar to the S550), I get V8, but at that price point I'd expect a little more...
Also with bottles in the cup holders, it would get in the way of shifting in a manual. At least for right hand drive models.
You know what, I've got a 2022 GT S550 and when you have one, none of that stuff matters one little bit.
The price point is cheap for what the car is.
Go buy a Tesla lol who needs 360 cam in a 2 door coupe 🤣
@@elmin2323 A 2 door coupe wider than a Ford Everest, nearly as long, with a bulging hood that slopes away from you so it's even harder to judge distance (plus no front sensors), but sure, the answer is I should go buy a Tesla because I want the convenience of being able to park it easier.
I bought the 2018 Bullitt, which will see me out. I just can’t take the LCD screens & or the so called new look headlights. Each to their own.
I have a 2018 gt premium, I'LL STICK WITH THAT ALSO.
Im sorry, but I had the previous model to this. I think my car is just better looking. Interior especially. The new model just looks bawdy.
I have a 2019 Last gen GT and whilst I’ve seen and sat in the new GT & Dark Horse for 30k extra than what I paid for mine and less torque I just don’t think it offers enough to justify that big of a price jump. I still love it but at such a large price jump it just isn’t worth upgrading. I hope they sell a tonne of them though long live the V8.
Price aside nice upgrades and very glad we can buy it here from Ford. This will be much cheaper and easier to maintain than German coupes for longer term ownership.
Great review
Thanks
Thanks for the review. I’ve noticed that most American reviews have criticized the lack of steering feel over the previous model, but nothing was mentioned to support that here… did they do an AU tune for that here? Also, would be good to hear about how the 6-Speed manual is to drive. Thanks
That's because some of the reviewers didn't know much about the car, they just get a press car & review it for likes and subscribers. On the actual steering wheel, there is a button with an image of a steering wheel. Press that & you get 3 different option settings for your steering feel. Just need to see which one you like & for the purpose you are driving for. I hope this helps.
An almost 20% increase in price is kinda a kick in the teeth tbh..
So glad I bought my FGX supercharged V8 for $60K.
Greetings from Wellington, Utah USA.
So many people would have no idea how good we had it. But still not bad for a two door V8 I think in this day and age
It ain’t $80k !! It’s $99k on the road
I had one on order from the second they were announced and ended up cancelling. At 13l/100km and 90k without magnaride it's just too much. Good car, but not great and now no longer great value, just good
Obviously everyone's different, but I have no idea why you would find the fuel consumption to be an issue when purchasing a $90k muscle car?
I mean, you don't buy a Fiat 500 and mark it down for the lack of rear seat room :)
@@jeremybean-hodges6397 well thats the entire point. the Mustang was a $66k muscle car in 2016, then $75k until 22 at the end of the S550 range and then jumped to $93k drive away for auto with magnaride with mainly infotainment update.
The issue is, the cars value performance index is an indication on a prospective buyer.
ie. there are 2 cars. both have 500 horse power, both look great, one sounds slightly better than the other but one cost $60k and the other $110k.
The $110k uses 9.3l/100km and the $60k one uses 13.5l/100km. You obviously go for the $60k as the value to performance index is insane.
Now, i mean... i love the mustang. im still looking at the new ones as it is a beautiful car. but at near 100k, ill probably just go proper engineering and buy a 2 year old M2 comp. lol... and it is actually 35% better efficiency and is still quicker.
I dont think i had to explain this. i mean its a muscle car, but you still have to run the damn thing. lol... its not like its free.
its literally $200 a week with moderate mileage.
@@jeremybean-hodges6397 regarding the fiat analogy, if your criteria is small affordable run around with back seats, yes you mark it down.
If your criteria is small car and who cares about the back seats you dont mark it down.
my personal, and many peoples criteria is affordable sports or muscle cars.
otherwise i''d not bother with the damn mustang and get a GT2RS LOL
At around one hundred thousand on road in Australia in automatic guise the Mustang is overrated. With the centre console still not correct after the conversion and no tremec manual as standard fitment on the GT. I think Australia is still an afterthought by Ford.
I also see no Maverick Hybrid trucks on the Horizon for Australia.
😎🇦🇺
$88,990 in 2017 is worth $108,276.50 today.
Inflation catches at lot of people out and this reviewer made some unfortunate comparisons as a result.
Great review, great car...just one suggestion...though!
A minute of sounds from the V8 would've been PERFECT!
Start-up, inside and outside exhaust of this Beasty car would've made me jizz!
It's all about the V8 SOUNDS CUZ!👍
Where is he driving in the hills. It looks so nice
How did you get the appearance pack with the magneride suspension?
Yes, I've been reading you can get one or the other but not both.
Car pictured is definitely not a Magneride car, doesn't have red callipers - as you said, it's not possible to order here with the apperance pack, for some rubbish reason.
@@niceflicks wasn't talking about the car pictured. He said that that's what he was driving.
The black calipers would indicate this is a non-Magnaride car (with magnaride cars having red calipers), so why was it tested as having them? I drove a magnaride car at a local dealer and compared it to a non-magnaride car, and I can say it preferred the handling without! My thoughts only.
That’s how much my brothers Shelby cost not new but low miles mint condition
Ain't no way that car cost that much. Mine is fully loaded with not a single unchecked box. It only came up to $74,000 out the door and that's with every warranty as well. I'm in the United States
That’s still to my you could’ve bought a Shelby
@@gabrielregalado7087 I am not spinning between 100 and 159,000 for a 2024 Shelby Mustang. That's ridiculous
As mentioned you could get a supercharged HSV for 80k however that was 80k back in 2017 roll on 2024, 7 years later and if the HSV would all around 100k or over now if they were still around. I dont think it was a great comparison to make
Yep, inflation confuses a lot of people.
$88,990 in 2017 is worth $108,276.50 today.
And you get a lot more car than a HSV for that price. Slap a supercharger on and you won't be much more expensive than that adjusted for inflation and with a far superior car.
Base model with supercharger would be good sleeper option...
Auto start/stop button on a V8, what are you thinking Ford
This looks more grown up than previous generations.
YEAH , it looks grown up alright. With a GROWN UP PRRRRICE.😢
Great looking car but I don’t understand why in America the produce this car on the line with 486 hp stock
And here in Australia you telling me there is producing 465 hp. Why is that is the same car please? Somebody can tell me why.😮
i believe it has to do with our stricter EPA regulations. You can always mod it for more horse power.
From an article on the carsguide website: "It comes down to a combination of factors, says Ford, with different extractor configuration for right-hand drive car and emissions standards both affecting power." I have to say, the Coyote's output is still massive compared to any of the other four performance cars I drove from 1988 through 2013. Just how much do you need? :D
Too much for a mustang. For close to 100k I'd be looking elsewhere.
There is no other V8 coupe available this side of $180,000.
@@BingoDingo8394I'd buy second hand, this is madness
@@drnicktellis madness? A 1995 Ford LTD in today's money would be over $100,000.
Such as where? I agree that $100k is a lot of money but everything is expensive now. Have you seen the price of a crappy medium sized SUV from a mid-range brand?
There's nothing even remotely similar. This is cheap.
does it have the Euro Petrol particulate Filters?
No they do not. It has regular catalytic converters. And they sound amazing. Louder and deeper than previous generation.
Release this year 2024: Dark Horse, Fast back, GTD
What a hollow lip service review that was.
dear universe:
*i want this car i don't care how much it costs somehow someway grant me the ability to buy this car outright from shopfloor*
Would rather a used stinger
A V8 car finally. Too pricey. I'd prefer the retro round headlights.
Exterior won't win any beauty contests and interior looks very grey and bleak. So is the engine worth $100k? Guess it depends.
Great reviewer, not so good camera work.
It's starting to look less and less like a mustang and more like a generic 2 door coupe. $100k is ridiculous.
Its about the price of a 70 series LandCruiser... bargain!
I didn't know GM was still building the Camaro. I thought it was done... That's funny. well I guess I was mistaken. Wait, why does that Camaro have a horse emblem?
ugly as hell. remember the good old Mustang II in 1974? it's not looking so bad anymore compared to this...
Way overpriced! Just buy an M2, C8, or Supra. A lot better cars in almost every way.
That screen 😩💩👎
To much for v8 rather buy a Ferrari 😂
And it gets smoked by an M340i...............
Go buy that then… because if your in the market for a 3 series bmw your not the person who would be looking at a mustang
That costs $30,000 more, dude. You could supercharge your Mustang for that price difference (and some).
Shazi ???