In With the New,,, Year, Saw, Well Mostly Anyway..
Вставка
- Опубліковано 3 січ 2023
- Filmed in January, 2021. Middle of that month. So, just under two years ago.
Through the saw building process, I've made a few great friends. One of whom works at a shop. I was entrusted to use this "mo-chine" in various "gnawing" activities. This was the first instance in a tree. Literally the first outing to the point of I started it for the 1st time that day.
This is the same "strip" where I was using my 2100, a stock 500i & the Franken 500i - seen here testing the 2nd gen 500i MaxFlow® cover assembly in prototype white, a 572 with a 38" bar, my 181/281 hybrid with a 42"er, my 481 Torque Monster, etc.
I had properly "did" Mr. "outinthewood" s 500i ~ 8 months prior. I had a fair amount of time to saw test it at varying elevations (800 to 4300 feet). It can be seen in a number of the 500i videos on this channel. I ran it with stock filtering. I used it to test the early version Max-Flow® system and provide feedback to Mr. Max-Flow for some of the minor tweaks.
There is some dialog in this session. I talk about the way this Husky runs. At that juncture, the nomenclature (number designation) was unknown. There was a lot of speculation, read rumor mill, going on all over the internet. I knew the bore size from the cylinder notation. I knew it was the replacement for the 395. I had worked backward with the calculator to get a reasonable stroke to arrive ~ the 91 (38mm) to 94cc (40mm) displacement.
Anyhoo, since this was a prototype I was hopeful that is was on the longer side stroke wise. Turns out, it has a 39mm stroke.
I will stand by my thoughts mentioned. For a purely stock saw that was the best running one I've had meathooks on.
At the time of your viewing this, I may, or may not, be immediately available for custom saw modifications. I am booked out several months regularly. If you are interested in having a saw zipped, please shoot me an email. That is the best, first point of contact.
danger_cat@rocketmail.com
Thanks for watching. - Розваги
Belated, sorry. Best wishes to all for the 2023 experience. Let us hope & pray for more since and sensibility in the coming year. Less fervor and therefore, by default, sanity...
Blessing to all and thanks for watching.
Supplemental:
IMPORTANT - there seems to be some confusion revolving around this saw & the associated timeline. I thought it is fairly well qualified in the description. Seems as though few read that area. To bad...
Hope u had a good Christmas an newyear!!! Best wishes for 2023
Those 592s modified pull like freight trains from what I’ve seen, and for stockers they aren’t exactly struggling. Huskies are known for being heavy but they have a lot of torque and cut speed. Lol on getting the tape stuck, I thought I was the only one that could do things like that. 😆
Reading over the comments here as well as elsewhere, your perspectives are highly sought after. Your intro/outro and opinions on certain subjects are also quoted often, myself included... Imitation being the highest form of flattery...timber on the ground by an "R&D" prototype test pilot...very nice Mr Jack.
That's amazing to hear Jack say he's impressed with a stock saw 😂 I can't wait to get one
Can’t wait to see some 592 vs 395 vs 585 vs 661 etc crime on crime very interested in some of those videos in the future for sure thanks for sharing jack
I’ve been waiting for this. Can’t wait for the bench talk.
Happy New Year, Jack, and it's always good to see you post a new video! Yeah, that looks like the 592 and it is a ripper for sure! Cheers for a happy, healthy, and productive 2023!
Can't wait to see it on the table top
No replacement…for displacement. 😊
I like my 592 xp . I will go back and fourth between the 500i and 592xp.
Different applications.
Big wood & a long bar it's the 592.
Medium wood and a mid length bar and it is the 5ooi.
Well, from a busheler's perspective anyway.
Thanks for watching.
Here's wishing you & yours the very best, and the heavenly father continues to watches over you. Thank you for what you provide for me and others, and to help me become a better Stewart of this earth.
The 592 is a animal after I got 3 tanks in on my 592 a 36 inch bar is not enough it wants more I’m very impressed with the performance but I wish it would weigh about 15 pounds not 20 . It’s a great saw it definitely replaced the 395 . Thanks for the video happy New Years
I believe that is the 592, Bjarne Butler has one and he really likes it.
Yes he does, he said it out cuts his 390xp which it is a little bigger.
@@scottw.2450 the 592 ported that I have out cuts a 3120 by a small margin I love it when the saw bounces off the rev limiter and digs in it pulls a 42-in bar and a 52 inch bar full skip nicely on a mill
@@michaelmcbride5077 Nice, how good does it oil with a long bar?
@Scott White haven't had any issues keep the chain sharp and she flys 👍
390s are less than 88cc. The 592s are over 92cc. 87.9 & 92.7 rounding. The 395 & 592 are the comparable saws.
The 585 is the 390s replacement and will out cut them.
I've said for years, 3cc in today's piston ported saw engines is a huge differential.
Thanks for watching.
Great job sir hope all is well.
Nice Work, Happy and safe New Year.
Cheers from w wash. thanks and happy new year to you bud! Hope all is well.
Happy New Year Jack. Thanks again for your video’s. I like that saw myself
Look like a sweet saw
Happy new years to you and yours sir. I’m thinking I need one if your available and can’t wait to see what you conger up but either way I’m sure it will pull like a dozer lol.
Happy New Year Pardner!
Nice clean and dry work site sir. We’ve been socked with mud here in the northeast for weeks.
The description area has the particulars.
Thanks for watching.
Отличная робота 👍
Почему спасибо
👍👍👍
Happy new year to you and yours Jack. Maybe we will see a 585 on your operating table?
Likewise.
At some point I imagine.
Thanks for watching.
I would’ve died if you would’ve zipped that saw and told em…”wasn’t bad when you gave it to me…but this is how they should come from you”
Yah, that would have been a good laugh...
Maybe even better,,, don't say a word and let them figure it out for themselves, lol.
Probably the best way to get kicked off the A-Team for the next round of prototype testing duty!
I had been in on testings of "before available" saws before through my old shop. I had given my word not to be checking/taking apart/altering those saws as well. Just part of the process I guess.
I'm just thankful I was given the opportunity to be a small part of testing program here and there over the years - God has been smiling on me for sure.
Thanks for watching.
@@hotsaws101 not saying a word would’ve been funny as well…. And I get it that you have to agree to not mess with em other then bar and chain swaps and probably air filters n spark plugs…. If it wasn’t for the epa maybe you could get a hotsaws101 performance package option lollll
Happy New Year, a little root pull on the off side?
A little wood pull out the middle too, lol.
Thanks for watching.
Hi Jack, I look forward to hearing more on your testing of this saw. Especially what you find to be the ideal bar to balance this saw. I see you are running one of your Oregon light bars on this saw, did Husqvarna send this one with a 24" x-tough light bar or a longer one and were you able to run your choice of fuel/mix in this test saw?
The Stihl LW 34.5" bar. Read 36", but it technically doesn't measure 3 feet. That's the 119 driver .375 bar.
The description explains what is going on with this saw.
Powerhead only.
I used my own mix while running it.
Thanks for watching.
@@hotsaws101 Thank you! The test saw I had I had to run Husqvarna pre-mix in it only. The other guys I know that had them also could run their own mix. Unfortunately the saw I had never ran like the one you had. I can only hope all the adjustments made to it helped make the production saws better. It certainly is benifitial to have someone whom cuts timber and works on saws put time on them and provide feedback. I would like to see the saw manufacturers make the best possible product they can. More attention to quality control would be beneficial at this time from both Stihl and Husqvarna.
@@230e4 The engineering staff was getting time on the prototypes and comparing the Husky mix oil to some others is my presumption. I did talk to a factory boy about the lackluster performance that either version of the Husqvarna oil yields.
It only takes a few hours of run time with the "new & improved" synthetic oil to have the piston gummed up. The piston will slide in the bore but it is encumbered from the buildup of residue. It can even be felt while cranking the saw over without the sparkplug.
I post one of two videos showing new saw with VERY low hours run on the new Husky oil ~ 6 years ago.
It's CRAPP,,, THROW IT OUT...
Truth be told, the HP from the Germans is not that much better.
Thanks for watching
Due to the ergonomics of the 592 it seems lighter than saws of comparable engine size. Does that make sense?
It makes perfect sense, too bad the same can't be said for the 562.
@@brettblack7049 actually don't have one of those got a 550 Mark II feels like carrying a brick. If that's what you mean
@@austindenotter19 I meant the 562 is heavy feeling also. Yes, the 550 mk2 is a tank compared to the mk1, or the 261. Even the 572 is on the fat side, but they do have a nice low end power for a 70 and they have a wide power band, which makes them forgiving in the cut.
I am a huge fan of the husky flippy caps, and some of the other time savers like the gas level site, the return to run master switch, and the captive bar nuts.
It does. When they increased the diameter of the handle bars on the x-torq 372s in '10 it was the same thing.
Thanks for watching.
I'm floored! You know it's a helluva machine when ol HOTSAWS raves! It does look pretty chunky though...thems the breaks I guess
Have to give credit where credit is due.
I (also) wish that engineering would have shed another pound on (off of, lol) the 585/592s.
FORMIDABLE at that point.
Thanks for watching.
@@hotsaws101 that's why us saw breakers have saw builders like you, to squeeze the appropriate power out of lighter saws!
Better late than never! What is your thoughts on the 592 and 585
This was filmed 2 years ago. I'm actually early.
I just don't always run to the computer immediately...
They run great for stock saws.
Better be using TOP TIER mix oil in those saws. It's not Husky or Stihl oil eirher.
Thanks for watching.
5120 xp maybe ?
No that's not a new saw that's a 592 XP anyone that has a 592 XP knows that sound very unlikely that Husqvarna would came out with another new saw when they can't even get the 592 to the people that were waiting for them why make another saw for a prototype. I wish that the dogs came out like that on the 592 XP but the metal was a very lightweight and it wasn't strong enough to hold up
Actually, this was a new saw. Again, check the description for the particulars.
Thanks for watching.
@@hotsaws101 well you got me stumped here saying that it's a new saw maybe in 2021 we are in 2023 for the new year and posting the video for 2023 for the start of the new year with a brand new saw to start off 2023 when you clearly said 2021 that's how I know this is an old video?? Or did they come out with a new saw for you to test drive
Is that a 592xp
Yep it sure is as I was watching this video he said January of 2021 the 592 XPS have been out in the states since 2022 I got mine in February of 2022 the saw is actually a 2021 that I have I was one of the fortunate ones to get one on the Eastern side of the of the US they only had five from what I was told and I managed to get one it was a long wait but definitely worth it
@@michaelmcbride5077 Saws & cars are on a similar production cycle. It takes months before they reach the dealers and are available to the public.
I imagine that this saw was from 2020. It could have been from 2019 also. But, there was no placard qualifying that part. So we will never know.
This was filmed in 2021, literally 2 years ago.
The description spells it out.
That's a 592 XP I can tell just by the sound of it anyone that owns one knows that sound you start that saw up in the woods people know you got a big saw
585xp tuning holes in the side cover
@@rockhopperdockhopper5261 there's no holes in the side cover 592 XP top cover is gray 585 is all orange
@@rockhopperdockhopper5261 that meaning where the Husky symbol is the 592 XP is gray for that part of the top cover the 585 is all orange
I stand corrected I mistook the purge bulb hole for the tuning holes at 0.40 in the video👍
@@rockhopperdockhopper5261 the only issues that people need to know about these saws is that upon purchasing them they need to check and make sure that the fuel line is not kinked on the priming bulb other than that I ran the hell out of this saw it almost runs the hell out of me you can make short work of a tree with this saw
585
That saw was a 592. The description spells out why there is speculation at this juncture.
Thanks for watching.
@hotsaws101 okay so that answers the question I was right that was a 592 and you posted a video for 2023 made me think that there was a brand new saw out and it was an old video from 2021 👍