Modern Horizons SUCCEEDS where other sets FAIL

Apologies for getting this one out so late. I was out of town this past weekend and got stuck in a procrastination/anxiety loop. 😔 I finally downloaded an editing program and will slowly start to learn and improve, so bear with me. 🙏
Ooh! Also, I will start to post community polls 📊 this week, which should be fun.

[@cv4126]

Modern Horizons sets are some of my favorites, and all three have great commander staples, but MH3 really feels like Commander Horizons over being a modern set. The first two were clearly more focused on other formats or at least just made cards that are good in all eternal fomats, but the vibe of MH3 is for sure commander. Wizards should learn to balance the design of cards in Modern Horizons sets between being playable in Edh, Modern, and Legacy.

[@Unknown-qj9sm]

I really don’t like the price, and I think the sets need to be powerful pushes the game in some really toxic directions see the incarnation cycle or the flare cycle. However, if we were to cut the bloating fat off these sets we’d have a really cool thing. I love that we can push the direction of modern sideways, we get new decks that could be more or less fun than the old one of the same power level, I just wish they pushed up less I guess.

[@BlobThoughtsMTG]

Yeah, I agree that the MH price point is a bit high.
I should have mentioned in the video, but I'm glad that they learned with the free spell cycle this time. Double pips + a real cost makes them more fair for Commander. As for Modern, I'll defer to the experts on that 😅

[@chillinon3263]

I know it was a small part of the video, but the funny thing about your reaction to MH1 commanders is that Sisay is actually THE best commander in the entirety of cedh going by tournament data, whereas Urza is considered unviable these days

[@kwagmeijer26]

I kinda don't like too many "staples" being printed. I love cards to be more situational and less overpowering.