Trinity World has a nasty habit of relying upon Scripture verses which have been corrupted by cherry picking the manuscript variant which suits their doctrinal fancies. Possibilities do not amount to factual evidence - especially unlikely possibilities.
Where did you get the idea that Stephen's words constitute a "prayer?" You have many more assumptions here than facts. Even further, did God not make Jesus into Stephen's Lord? Didn't God the Father entrust the risen man Jesus with everything? If you can't call upon your own Lord to receive something from you, what sense does that make?
The word epikaleo just means to call upon. Stephen was calling upon Jesus. I don't see where Stephen is "praying" to Jesus. He is not making a petition of request. This is imagined into the text without thinking about it.. Jesus is his Lord and he had already entrusted his life to his Lord and Savior and he is entrusting that life to him now. Likewise, Jesus wasn't "praying" for the Father to receive his spirit when he was dying (Luke 23:46). He was simply entrusting his spirit to God. I'm not sure why you are talking about more than one deity. God made the risen Jesus Lord of all heaven and earth just as He had made David Lord of Israel. Nobody said God made Jesus "God." It sounds like you are confused about the word "Lord."
You keep identifying what Stephen did as a prayer. WHY? Was Jesus praying at Luke 23:46? No, that's not a prayer. Jesus taught us to pray to the Father and that's why this is what you see throughout the New Testament. We have this access to the Father through Jesus. That's why we are taught to pray in the name of Jesus. It makes absolutely no sense to pray to Jesus in the name of Jesus. We pray to the Father in the name of Jesus his beloved son.
I never said we shouldn't call upon Jesus to receive our spirit. Why can you not understand what I am saying? You keep referring to Acts 7:59 as a prayer but you haven't explained why. Do you suppose that Luke 23:46 is a prayer too?
@@TheTrinityDelusionyes.. it seems a miracle, to me, that anyone comes to the full knowledge of the truth.. the Father has allowed so disinformation and lies to be spread about to confuse ppl. i wish finding the real truth was easier to do, but it really does take all our [my] attention and focus to not be sadly deceived.
@@lovealways2609 The truth IS incredibly easy and God DID make it absurdly easy. All people need is the Spirit of TRUTH. Done. Perfect unblemished truth.
1 Corinthians 27-28 " For God has subjected all things to him. (When we say that all things have been subjected to him, that of course does not include Him who subjected them to him.) But when all things have been subjected to him, then the Son himself will be subjected to Him who subjected all things to him, so that God may be all in all."
That is his role as the redeemer, he is not subjected at the end of the story , carry on and you see he occupies central throne of heaven hes priests sreving him and rules over all forever. thats not subjection thats ruling, you need to read all scripture not cherry pick.
@@SmalltimR There is still one throne and The lamb and father rule from it. The light emanates from this throne . This throne when we look at him who is seated upon it . We will see his face.
@@SmalltimR There is only one god , He who is on the throne. Only a King of all sits on a throne and rules over all for eternity. This God is is in all of us standing in front of the throne looking upon his face.
I was deceived into believing the Trinity doctrine but it never made sense. Who did Jesus pray to in the garden? Who did Jesus cry out to from the cross asking why he was being forsaken? “Forgive them Father, for they know not what they do” who was Jesus talking to? Himself? When Jesus was baptized and God said Jesus was His son and has pleased him greatly, the Holy Spirit that came upon Jesus when he was baptized. Did Jesus send the Holy Spirit upon himself? Trying to sort all this in your mind to make the trinity fit makes a person crazy. There is one God and His Holy Spirit. There is one Son who was sent by his Father to save humanity from themselves.
Sir , I really appreciate your scholarship. I'm Arian because I studied the Bible, not commentary or corrupted Theology. I am indignant that English Bibles have removed the name of God Yehova/ Jahova 6,510 times and replaced it with a generic expression "the Lord" . BLASPHEMY!
Very true. The divine name was actually in the original manuscripts of the bible particulary of the Old Testament where it appears some nearly 7,000 times!
A passage that has been added to is Matthew 28:19. Even though this passage reads the same even in the earliest manuscripts, it was added early back when they were really trying to promote the trinity doctrine. I just know Matt. 28:19 is not right. Jesus did NOT invoke the Trinity at the very end of this Book after not saying a word about it all through the Gospels. we have "Go ye therefore unto all nations...baptizing them in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Spirit". The part following the ellipsis is more than likely spurious and was added as early as the second century. It seems so out of place. The Hebrew Matthew reads: "Go, and teach them to carry out all things which I have commanded you forever" No Trinity mentioned.
I must admit, the baptism formula of Matt 28 is highly suspicious, though it remains that we do not have sufficient evidence to dismiss the words at this time. Though I don't think this in itself undermines God's nature, given the vast amount of supporting declarations and passages in the Bible.
Great job I was a trinitarian but for two years I have doubts concerning it and as I study Bible , it gets clear that it's a just man made doctrine. I don't know Greek nor have any knowledge of mss , but the last book in the Bible made me think over it and since then I have started studying Bible leaving all church doctrines aside . If you have printable material, please send me the link. Thank you
I am a muslim and what do you mean by made doctrine are you saying that the bible is not reliable or maybe i misunderstood what you said because the say's that the bible is reliable
@@follow_the_way No it clearly doesn't say that. Hence "the father is above all" This is just false but taught as being true. It's like every time you lose a tooth you say it's the tooth fairy that takes it away, anytime you mention God you just add trinity but it's true or real.
Amen, brother. I was a Lutheran among Lutherans, and concur, there are too many corruptions of the original manuscripts to know. Are you aware of the evidence for Matthew as a Hebrew original - and the work researching Hebrew copies by Miles Jones, Nehemia Gordon and George Howard? I recommend reading Gordon's "The Hebrew Yeshua vs. The Greek Jesus" for eye-opening answers regarding the difficult words spoken by The Messiah (THE Prophet Moses told us we MUST hear and obey). God Bless.
John 17:3, 1 Cor 8:6, Matthew 1:18 - read and think about the implications of just these 3 verses, and watch as the trinity doctrine falls apart in your mind. Yehovah is not a trinity, he's one person.
@@jamestomas7333 yes but @The Trinity Delusion was speaking about us. We have this tendency to think that we can have one foot in the world and one toe in the kingdom and be right with God. We don't value God enough to seek him with every fiber of our being and so we settle for whatever sounds most reasonable and find ourselves unwittingly deceived. Look at the Trinitarians and Unitarians. Look at the Oneness folks. Glean what you can from them and then in the Spirit of Holiness in commitment to God the Father seek the truth with all diligence. Test what they are saying for yourself. You may find what you thought was true was in fact not. Or you can be the like the majority of Christians. Watch a little bit of porn. Go check out the Katie Perry concert Wednesday night. Check out what happens on the next episode of Law and Order and then go see what the Pastor has to say about your salvation on Sunday.
@@ScriptureResearchCentre He can see what God gives him to see. And so it is with us all. I can only see what He gives me to see or understand. God, who is spirit, sees everything at all times. Only He.
Here is another verse that says Jesus doesn't know and he doesn't have the authority to grant somebody to sit on his right or left in his Kingdom? A Mother’s Request 20:20-28pp - Mk 10:35-45 20 Then the mother of Zebedee’s sons came to Jesus with her sons and, kneeling down, asked a favor of him. 21 “What is it you want?” he asked. She said, “Grant that one of these two sons of mine may sit at your right and the other at your left in your kingdom.” 22 “You don’t know what you are asking,” Jesus said to them. “Can you drink the cup I am going to drink?” “We can,” they answered. 23 Jesus said to them, “You will indeed drink from my cup, but to sit at my right or left is not for me to grant. These places belong to those for whom they have been prepared by my Father.” 24 When the ten heard about this, they were indignant with the two brothers. Matthew 20:20-24
You really think it was God who made you deny that Jesus is God manifested in the flesh as the salvation (Yeshua Jesus) of our God the father, huh? What’s the name of that god - Beelzebub?
@@ViralChristianityIt is ba'al/ashmodei/ashera/ishtar/isis/trivia/hecate the kingqueen of prince beelzebub, who has 3 heads brother. What of the 7 spirits of God, the candle lamps, are those another persons? What about the animal spirits, the donkey, the calf, the ox, the sheep, the dove? Are those not other persons? God is infinite and all powerful, should he have infinite persons?
Wonderful! One thing Trinitarians miss, however, is that "divine" does not only refer to God, but also to things OF God. Each one of us has the divine spark within us waiting to be awakened.
True Christians received warnings by a prophecy concerning the Man of Lawlessness “. . .Let no one lead you astray in any way, because it will not come unless the apostasy comes first and the *man of lawlessness* gets revealed, the son of destruction.” - 2Th 2:3 In a quick explanation, after the Apostles died, the Man of Lawlessness would corrupt the congregation. But that corruption would be revealed in the last day's.
CanadianLoveKnot Its possible Jesus is only called God once, in Heb1:8. Jesus is a god, not the one true God, the Father. Trinitarians just can't get it right. Apostasy.
TU on the video! The Bible context shows the Trinity is simply unscriptural. The formula of the Trinity is not even stated in scriptures. If you have to assume, twist and add to the scripture to get the Trinity then it’s obvious, you’re not viewing the scriptures in the same way as Jesus and his Apostles! Paul warning … “8 However, even if we or an angel out of heaven were to declare to you as good news something beyond the good news we (Jesus and his Apostles) declared to you, let him be accursed. 9 As we have said before, I now say again, Whoever is declaring to you as good news something beyond what you accepted, let him be accursed.” Ga 1:8, 9
Yes, me is God referring to the incarnation as Himself. The reason he changes to Him is because of the flesh. As God is in the flesh He often refers to Himself as He or Him. As Jesus refers to the Father as He. We must distinguish the natures of God (flesh and divine).
@@chriscarss8747 Adding to your thought, not to the others, but to you who may appreciate it: _ Malachi 3:6 and James 1:17 says Yahweh cannot change. Transforming himself into flesh is not possible (John 4:24). Also not possible is for part of the "one" God to be flesh in the spirit realm since eternity past. Flesh cannot see Yahweh (Exodus 33:20). If Jesus were God, then Yahweh lied to Moses. Also, how could the flesh "God" claim to have seen Yahweh (John 1:18)?
@@AnthonyAnderson. Trinity believers make God a lier and deciever by claiming jesus is god. As why would God claim to be someone else ie [jesus] when talking to abraham/moses/isaac and every other that God spoke to. God has always stated he is God almighty and nothing other than that throughout the scriptures, but trinity state 3 gods not one true and only God of all creation that scriptures state. Also Jesus states throughout scriptures that God is his father, so how can he be god and pray to himself.
Breathtaking Logic! At 27m 43s a wonderful list of *_solid critical thinking._* This shows the type of *_humility_* required (but too rarely delivered) by both scientists and Christians.
Brother, This video will help many to come out of the trinity doctrine. Because you were a trinitarian, and you had the desire to know the truth, which helped you to come out of the false doctrine. Many are dangerously religious that they blindly believe what their Bishop/ priest/ pastor say. And also if a trinitarian see this video, instead of the person proof checking by himself, he goes to his Bishop/ priest/ pastor and those people misguide them, Actually the Bible is so simple to understand, if a person really have the desire to learn, one will know the truth by the help of the holyspirit. People make it complicated and confusing and teaching false doctrine. Trinity is no where in the bible. Satan is making the majority christians blind. The bible quote in Matthew 7:13-14, the wide gate fits the trinitarians.
Matthew 24:36 is all the proof I need to know that the trinity is false doctrine, also the fact that Jesus sit's at the right hand of our Father is more proof if you need it
Interesting video you have here. I have a question for you which version/translation do you recommend as I see you find fault with several different in your video. Thanks
I have not done an examination of Trinity resistant Bibles, but I can tell you a good place to start is to use a Bible that contains the divine name, the Tetragrammaton, modernly expressed as YHWH, JHVH, Yahweh, or Jehovah. The Trinitarians often use the "Lord" = Jesus trick. With a Bible that gives God's name instead of "Lord" or "LORD," it foils many of the deceptions. Moreover, it gives you, as the reader, a better sense of just who is speaking. I have been using Bible Hub and Bible Gateway to do scripture look up. Both are online resources that you can use for free. I can't give you the links because UA-cam will not allow it, but you should find them in a search easy enough. The Bibles I have been using the most are Legacy Standard Bible (LSB) and World English Bible (WEB) that give Yahweh as the divine name. Also, I use the American Standard Version (ASV), Young's Literal Translation (YLT), and Darby Bible Translation (DBT) which use Jehovah for the divine name. Here is the list of Bibles containing the Divine name that I have verified: Bible Hub divine name translations ================================== Literal Standard Version World English Bible Young's Literal Translation ASV - American Standard Version DBT - Darby Bible Translation Smith's Literal Translation ARA - Peshitta Holy Bible Translated (Translations from Aramaic) Bible Gateway divine name translations ====================================== American Standard Version (ASV) Darby Translation (DARBY) Legacy Standard Bible (LSB) Lexham English Bible (LEB) Living Bible (TLB) Names of God Bible (NOG) World English Bible (WEB) Young's Literal Translation (YLT)
See the book by Jason BeDuhn, ‘Truth in Translation’, university press. It’s excellent detailed & thorough analysis of most popular translations. Spoiler alert for his conclusion; only TWO of the translations nab and nwt are deemed to be accurate, and both are produced by two of the biggest Christian denominations.
It says that faith is the only justification and faith the only condemnation which surprisingly is backed up by the very same writings. This implies that only those that follow their faith will find the ultimate truth of their destiny. Not someone elses faith but your own, now where or in what will you place yours?
👉🙏🏻✨🔆🙏🏻ALWAYS VERY HAPPY ✨😁👈🏼👉 TO LISTEN & LEARN 🤔🌹🤗 FROM Bro Kel!!!😁👈🏼🤔👉God 🙏🏻 Bless You 😊 For Your Time And Knowledge,You are SHARING With US ALL 🙏🏻✨🔆🙏🏻👈🏼💢❤️👈🏼
My point is that I am trying to find out the truth What is the truth about the holy bible? Is it reliable or not Can we trust it or not That's the point What is the truth? Not opinions but the truth... I need some clarification
@@cephasmwila7537 The Holy Bible is reliable. It has a basis in historical fact. It contains timeless and practical wisdom. It is honest in its historical accounts of people and the events surrounding them. Prophesies that have come true. There is historical and archaeological evidence for many of the people mentioned. It reveals the truth about God. It explain how and why we are here and what is the purpose of life. Compare the Bible to the Quran. The Quran is a made up book composed of myths and legends as well as badly narrated texts plagiarised from the Talmud and apocryphal writings. It is the invention of the self serving Muhammad. You need to do your own research and come to your own conclusions.
❤when i was baptized in the Holy Spirit and INSTANTLY delivered from cigarettes at the altar i KNEW IMMEDIATELY even though i was raised Catholic that the Father was the Spirit indwelling me from that point. I knew it was wrong to say the Father was NOT the Holy Spirit.
that is all that debatism is: trying to make a case and look good. This is why I sometimes question my urge to correct or debate christian brothers on anything anymore. Pretrib-er? Well you do you. Trinitarian? you do you. I draw the line where the law comes under attack or the sonship of Jesus is questioned but apart from that I already have very little motivation.
Second person of the Trinity hands over the Kingdom to the First person of the Trinity. [End your thinking process here]. They don't really think it through.
That's revelation of CHRIST or Our GOD The SON OF MAN fulfilling the rest of the prophesies from the Law and the prophets. So, that God may be all in all. The GOD of Israel has not and NEVER handed the control of heavens and the earth to somebody else. HE hold all things together. The Lord JESUS CHRIST is The GOD of Israel. 1 Cor. 15:24-28 does not mean there will be turn over of power from somebody else to GOD. Or that somebody else other than GOD is in control of Heavens and earth right now. Everything is under the control of GOD and forever GOD is in control.
When The SON OF MAN said: "All authority in heaven and on earth has been given to me." in Matthew 28:18 GOD has NOT given away the control of Heaven and earth to somebody else (like Michael the Archangel as the JW & SDA believe). So that 1 Cor. 15:24-28 there will be turn over of power from Michael the Archangel to GOD. But that was fulfillment of the many Prophecies from the law and the Prophets. Like what GOD promise to David that one of David's son will succeed David's throne FOREVER (1 Chronicles 17:11-14). By birth HE was born from David's bloodline as Mary comes from Nathan, David's Son. Note, the promise of GOD to David: 'I will set HIM over my house and my kingdom forever; HIS throne will be established forever.' CHRIST will NOT hand over anything to somebody else but HIS THRONE IS FOREVER. 1 Cor. 15:24-28 will be REVELATION to those who does not acknowledge and knows HIM as well as fulfillment of the rest of the Prophecies. There is no GOD but The Lord JESUS CHRIST.
@@PrintOfLife It was GIVEN to HIM ... means he did not have it tell it was given to him! In fact, everything Jesus has was given to him by his Father! Then you teach against what Jesus Apostles received by Holy Spirit saying, "CHRIST will NOT hand over anything ...". It appears you don't believe 2 Tim 3:16,17 putting yourself in direct opposition to God going against his words! That not very bright ...
Its of interest that the vast majority of 'text corruptions' of bible MSS's are aimed at suggesting the 'trinity' is true, rather than false! ( My Favourite one is what Count VonTishendorff discovered in 1844 when he examined the newly found 'Siniatic MSS of the NT in Greek. He looed at 1 Tim 3:16 and noted a FRESHER ink mark over the greek word for 'HE' that changed it to 'GOD' It should read; "He |(Christ) was manifest inthe flesh", Not 'God was! Ths all late & post 19th century NT's now translate it correctly!
23:42 -- There are no commas in the Greek manuscripts.. So why could 2 Peter not read OUR GOD, AND SAVIOR JESUS CHRIST instead of OUR GOD AND SAVIOR, JESUS CHRIST.
Yes that's right. I just made a slide last night for a coming video on 2 Peter 1:1 that mentions this. It depends if you pause after "our God" or if you pause after "Savior." Doing this at 2 Thess 1:12 is an interesting exercise (same Greek word structure). If you pause after "Lord," it just doesn't sound right. Try it.
Agreed. However when I was reading some of the church fathers, they had a multiplicity of ways of using terms like "god" and "lord", so even that might work.
The Trinity Delusion the same is with this.. depends where coma is placed the meaning changes instantly.. Luke 23:43 And Jesus said unto him, Verily I say unto thee, today shalt thou be with me in paradise." and now read this "And Jesus said unto him, Verily I say unto thee today, shalt thou be with me in paradise."
Interesting the *_meaning_* behind John 3.13. This was early in Christ's ministry, during his talk with Nicodemus. This implies a sequence which confounds even some Unitarians: Christ was the First to go up to Heaven, and afterward, he came down from Heaven to be born to Mary as the Son of God -- the "Son of man." This implies something which other parts of the New Testament also touche on: *_Reincarnation!_* The man born blind, the incessant questions of John the Baptist about whether or not he was one of the former prophets returned, Christ telling his disciples that Elijah (Elias) had indeed returned and they understood that he was speaking of John the Baptist. That Jesus was NOT God is clear. That he had been one of us, but blessed to be the First to graduate from this mortal realm, and through unconditional Love, returned to help all of us return with him to Heaven, only makes his story that much sweeter and meaningful. How can we who have sinned make it to Heaven? By following the one who had *_already done it!_*
How do you explain Isaiah 42:8 and Isaiah 48:11 where Yahweh says He will not give His glory to another, but we see in Revelation that God and the Lamb are receiving the same worship? Worshipping anyone but God is idolatry, so why is someone other than God being worshipped? What about Isaiah 41:4 where Yahweh says He is the First and the Last, and Jesus calls Himself this in Revelation 1:11,17 and 22:13. How about Hebrews 1:8-9 in which God is quoting Psalm 45:6-7 to the Son, and Hebrews 1:10-12 where God is quoting Psalm 102:25-27 to the Son? What about Genesis 19:24 where Yahweh rained brimstone and fire from Yahweh out of the heavens? What about Ezekiel’s conversation with Yahweh in 3:22 - 5:17? Yahweh tells Ezekiel that He will speak with him in the plain, and when Ezekiel gets to the plain, it is the Spirit is talking with him and telling Ezekiel all that he needs to know. Please explain this. How about Exodus ch.3 when the Angel of the LORD says in verse 6 that He is the God of Moses’ father, the God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob? Who does this Angel think He is? There’s only one God, but you have an Angel claiming to be God. Also, why is the Holy Spirit always referred to as a He? We also know that the Holy Spirit speaks to people in the New Testament such as Acts and Revelation and we also know that the Holy Spirit can be grieved. There are countless more examples of why the Father is God, Jesus is God, and the Holy Spirit is God. Somehow God is a compound being of 3 persons. No, the word Trinity is not in the Bible, but the word masturbation isn’t in the Bible either, but I guess it’s ok to do so since it’s not directly forbidden in the Bible. See why that’s a dumb argument? The doctrine and concept of the Trinity is found throughout the Old and New Testament.
I don’t think for example 8 the right term of “lord” is being implied by trinitarian either, the word used there for “ lord” actually translate to “Master” , not “theos” which is what trinitarian tend to attribute to Christ as Lord.
Got no facts, just simple questions. What am I and how many parts make up my identity? Am I flesh with an identifiable appearance, am I my mind, or my soul, or my spirit, or my emotions, or my thoughts, or my will, or am I merely a clump of cells brought together by chance? If the worlds most brilliant scientist dissect me, will they find my personality, my character traits, my breath, a spark of life, my conscience, subconscious, my morality, my beliefs, or the truth? Excluding the flesh, none of those things can be proven to exist by any standard known to man. And, yet, while I'm living, all of those things are uniquely my identity and my friends and family can recognize me, based on the closeness in our relationships, without me being in the room. Am I my voice? If I speak to a familiar person on the phone how will they know it's me? How is it that in my most familiar relationships we can finish each other's sentences? Am I not made in God's image? If we consider the Almighty and Eternal God in which all things have been made, can we put a limit on His power enough so that He cannot express Himself in a plurality of persons so that we might know Him through relationship? Just a clump of chewy questions that can not be understood by the minds of man.
My brother was struck in his head by a tree being sawed down, after his SPIRIT left his body he could see all going on around him the Doctor who was playing tennis 1000 feet away in city park whom was placed there by our Lord. My brother 10 years old at time was sucked through space at unbelievable amount of speed and then was on street of gold and started to hear singing looks around and seen angels, Then two huge hands looking up to see whose they belong finding Yeshua standing in between those hands. Yeshua was also standing in front of a gate. Jesus takes his hand touching his head and said not your time. And he was instantly back on earth over his ambulance taking him to Scottish rite hospital in Atlanta Ga. Where he stayed for 6mts.
I have always been a one God person. I still get excited when I see it again and again in scripture..there are multitudes of scripture to back this up. Actually the whole Bible declares God singularity
The kjv was perfect for me and woke me up just last year I read new first than old...but yes they shall look on me whom they pierced and they will morn for him My father whom they abandoned
Wow! Augustine (AD 354-430) didn't know about 1 John 5.7? I thought this was introduced into the Latin Vulgate (AD 382). Perhaps he did not learn from the Latin Vulgate, but from a different manuscript. Curious that he wouldn't know about this newer version by Jerome, et al.
I recently found an error in the KJV which obscures the connection between the 10 horns in the Roman empire, and the stars in the crown of Israel in Revelation 12. Daniel writing of the 10 horns writes 3 of the horns were plucked up by the roots. John, describing the dragon as the prince over the Roman empire, writes, a third of the stars were cast to the ground. Most people will read the English and think "a third" means one third. This would seem to be 4 of the stars, not 3. The ancient Greek counting system used 10 as their base number, whereas 1 is our base m=number. In the ancient Greek, everything less than 10 was less than the whole number. They counted as first, second, third. If this word was translated correctly into English, it should read 3, not a third. If three of the stars were thrown down to the ground, and three horns were plucked up by the roots by the Roman empire, then John is identifying the horns as stars in the crown of Israel. This would make it true that the 10 tribes migrated into Europe. Revelation is directed to the Hebrew people, and the message is "come out of her my people". Come out of the last kingdom, Rome, and her principality. The Trinitarian religion of lawlessness and the people of lawlessness. Though they (the 10 tribes) be as the sand of the sea, only a remnant will be saved. They are lost in the Roman Trinitarian religion and will be taken to a pit burning with Sulphur upon the return of Yeshua. Those who died in the Trinitarian religion will die a second death.
Paul is a ravenous wolf his writings and writings of him are very damning of him being a heretic. He was not a apostle and never met Christ. He claims that a visit from christ happened and he was the only one can hear, no two witnesses to confirm it so thats pretty shaky to be believing him.
How do you identify the Son and the Holy Spirit, either is God or creations. I wouldn't dare say they are created and not constitute One essence Godhead
The Bible provides us with the ability to identify lies from the truth. With that said the expression or term; _'one essence Godhead'_ is not written or found anywhere in scripture.
Thank you for your videos. 1st Corinthians 10:9 from The Cepher translation: Neither let us tempt Mashiach, as some of them also tempted Yahuah, and were destroyed of serpents. (Clearer distinction between the Son and Father).
_'Now I desire to remind you, though you already know this, that the Lord, having saved a people out of the land of Egypt, afterward destroyed those who didn’t believe'_ I don't see a problem here whatsoever, and as we conclude the Lord in question is YHWH
@@SmalltimR do you have an issue with reading comprehension? if you claim the Lord here is the Father, you also claim Jesus is the Father. Jude 4-5 (HCSB): turning the grace of our God into promiscuity and denying Jesus Christ, our only Master and Lord. Now I want to remind you, though you know all these things: The Lord first saved a people out of Egypt and later destroyed those who did not believe
@@JN-or1zr Your response comes-across as desperation, as though undertones ever lead to agreement - and in reflection of your desires, yours is childish banter over productive discourse. That said, the fact remains that we have no good reason to conclude the titles of Lords in verses 4 and 5, cannot be two different beings, and as we know Jesus was not the GOD of Israel throughout the OT, as no man had ever seen Him, let alone hear His voice - we find distinction over synonymity in such cases. Adding t5o this the obvious corruption and tampering of said texts, we now have every reason for skepticism, let alone a reliable means for to justify deviation from thousands of years of established doctrine and beliefs.
There is a lot of manuscript attestation for John 3:13 reading, "which is in heaven." It would be nice to see some documentation to back up the claim that "which is in heaven" is incorrect. I checked 1 Cor. 10:9 and found that Christ actually appears in the original Greek manuscripts. I do not see any evidence where any reputable manuscript evidence which ever uses "kurios" for "Lord" ever appears in any Greek manuscript. Jesus does not appear in the original Greek in Jude 1:5. Clement of Alexandria cited Acts 20:28 as "the Church of God which he has purchased with his own blood." Since Clement of Alexandria cited Acts 20:28 in the late second century (about 190-198) we know that the earliest scriptural evidence points to "the church of God" as being correct.
I didn't say John 3:13 is incorrect. You seem to suppose translators just made up the 'Lord' reading out of thin air for 1 Cor 10:9. Irenaeus cited "church of the Lord" for Acts 20:28 about 180 A.D.. Now what? The "church of the Lord" reading is correct? That would be very narrow minded thinking.
Under Acts 20:28, Ellicot's Commentary says, "Some of the best uncials and versions give "God;" others, of almost equal authority, give "Lord;" others, again, combine the two "Lord and God." The fact that elsewhere St. Paul invariably speaks of "the Church of God" (e.g., 1Corinthians 1:2; 2Corinthians 1:1; Galatians 1:13; 1Thessalonians 2:14, et al.), and never "the Church of the Lord," may be allowed, from one point of view, some weight as internal evidence in favour of the Received reading; while from another it may be urged that it might have tempted a transcriber to substitute a familiar for an unfamiliar phrase. Accepting that reading, the words not only confirm the great truths of the Church's creed, but give an implicit sanction to the language of theology or devotion, when it applies to the divine nature of our Lord predicates that belong strictly to the human nature which was associated with it. So Ignatius (Romans 6) spoke of "the passion of my God," and Tertullian (Ad Uxor, ii. 3) and Clement of Alexandria (Quis dives, c. 34) use the very phrase "the blood of God" which this passage suggests..." Under Acts 20:28, the Pulpit Commentary says, "There is, perhaps, no single passage in Scripture which has caused more controversy and evoked more difference of opinion than this. The T.R. has τοῦ Θεοῦ, but most uncials have τοῦ Κυρίου. Kuinoel asserts that the reading τοῦ Κυρίου rests on the authority, besides that of the oldest manuscripts, of the old versions, and of many el' the most ancient Fathers, and says that it is undoubtedly the true reading. Meyer, too, thinks that the external evidence for τοῦ Κυρίου is decisive, and that the internal evidence from the fact that ἐκκλησία τοῦ Κυρίου Occurs nowhere else in St. Paul's writings, is decisive also. But on the other hand, both the Codex Vaticanus (B) and the Codex Sinaitieus (א), the two oldest manuscripts, have Θεοῦ (Θυ). The Vulgate, too, and the Syriac have it; and such early Fathers as Ignatius (in his Epistle to the Ephesians) and Tertullian use the phrase, "the blood of God," which seems to have been derived from this passage. And Alford reasons powerfully in favor of Θεοῦ, dwelling upon the fact that the phrase ἐκκλησία τοῦ Θεοῦ occurs ten times in St. Paul's writings, that of ἐκκλησία τοῦ Κυρίου not once."
You entitled your video, "10 Trinity Proof Text CORRUPTIONS" so you are essentially saying "which is in heaven" is "corrupt" in John 3:13. I agree with you about John 1:18 reading "only begotten son" as many early Christian writers cited John 1:18 as "only begotten son" long before "only begotten God." We Oneness believers agree that the Father alone is the only true God and that there is no timelessly begotten God the Son person. Even if "He was manifested in the flesh" were correct, you still have a problem because the He who partook of flesh and blood (Heb. 2:14) and the He who was "manifested in the flesh" (1 Tim. 3:16) could not have been a non-existent He Person. Since John 8:58 proves that Jesus existed "before Abraham" as the great "I AM" we know that the He who was manifested in the flesh is the God of Exodus 3:14. For Luke 1:35 and Matthew 1:20 informs us that the Holy Spirit of God came down from heaven to reproduce the Christ child "out of the Holy Spirit" ("ek" = "out of" or "out from" in Matthew 1:20). When we compare Matthew 1:20 with Hebrews 1:3 we find that the Christ child was "reproduced" or "copied" (charakter) from the Substance of Being (hypostasis) of God the Father Himself. Therefore Jesus as the child born and son given is the Substance of God the Father's Being as the image of the invisible Father. 1 John 5:7 is an obvious Trinitarian interpolation. I cannot find any manuscript attestation for an alleged Trinitarian corruption in Zechariah 12:10. Even the Jewish Tanakh says, "And they shall look unto Me because they have thrust him through; And they shall mourn for him, as one mourns for his only son." Could non-Christian Jewish scholars have really supported an alleged Trinitarian corruption? I do not have manuscript info to back up 2 Peter 1:1 reading "our God and Savior, Jesus Christ." However, in the early second century church “It was the Christians’ habit on a fixed day to assemble before daylight and recite by turns a form of words to Christ as God,” (Pliny the Younger wrote in a letter to Emperor Trajan about Christians). 2 Clement opens his homily, “We must think about Christ as we think about God." Ignatius wrote to Polycarp, “I bid you farewell always in our God Jesus Christ." Therefore it is likely that the earliest church believed that "Jesus Christ" is "our God and Savior" just like most manuscripts of 2 Peter 1:1 affirm. Oneness theology affirms that Jesus Christ is not "God with us" as God the Father, he is Immanuel "God with us" as a true human son because the Spirit of God came down from heaven (Luke 1:35; John 6:38 - "I came down from heaven") to become a man with a human will and a fully complete human nature. Therefore only Oneness theology rightly divides the word of truth to show that God also became a true human son within the Hebrew virgin. In AD 125, Aristides of Athens wrote to the Emperor, "The Christians, then, trace the beginning of their religion from Jesus the Messiah; and he is named the Son of God Most High. And it is said that God came down from heaven, and from a Hebrew virgin assumed and clothed himself with flesh; and the Son of God lived in a daughter of man. This is taught in the gospel, as it is called, which a short time was preached among them; and you also if you will read therein, may perceive the power which belongs to it." Apology of Aristides II
GIM, You really don't get it do you? You don't get to cherry pick one or the other. Your personal best guesses do not amount to factual evidence. And the title of my video means that these ten verses have been corrupted. They have been corrupted. That's why the variants exist. Additionally, I happen to personally think the longer ending of John 3:13 might be the correct one so once again do you don't know what you are talking about. But my opinion doesn't make it factual evidence does it? Your so full of your own lying ways, you can't hear. John 8:43-47. Do yourself a favor and read up on Confirmation Bias. Then go look in the mirror.
Trinity Delusion: Wow, I'm surprised that you are so angry and mean spirited here. I am not "lying" about anything. I can just as easily say that you are using "Confirmation Bias" in this video. In the past you have always presented yourself as a kind gentleman. I am not saying that my comments and quotes are 100% accurate. I am just expressing alternative views here to show that all of your statements in this video are not 100% factual. No matter how much I am persecuted, I always endeavor to keep speaking what I see as the truth in a spirit of love and meekness in Christ Jesus. I suggest that you do the same. May the grace of our Lord Jesus Christ open our understanding in all things.
Research. You have to do your homework. Some of it is as easy as comparing several translations to find discrepancies. Some of it takes a very long time to research. Never make assumptions that you have valid information until you check it.
Keep up the good work my brother. U are doing a fantastic job. The Trinity idle needs to be exposed for what it is. A lie.. It's a gnostic lie. A fals god and a false Chris. It's anti christ.. You are doing a great service for the lord. And you are helping so many people. May the lord bless you and lead you as I know he does. You are a blessing to all who know the truth.
Since people are cannot avoid bias in translating the scripture, would it be safe to say that the scriptures ought to be translated based on principles taught in the tanak instead.
Grace And Peace, Kenos. Best is *God's Rules for studying ALL Scriptures!* And, then being *"Approved Unto God!!* Amen?: *BIBLE Study Rules!* Seven Excellent Rules for *Knowledgeable Bible* study! *"According To The Scriptures!":* (1) *“Let ALL things be done Decently and In Order!”* *(1 Corinthians 14 : 40!)* (2) Study *ALL Scripture Rightly Divided!:* *“Study to shew thyself approved unto God, a workman that* *needeth not to be ashamed, Rightly Dividing The Word Of Truth!”* *(2 Timothy 2 : 15!)* (3) *Never add to or take away From God’s Holy Word!* *(Deuteronomy 4 : 2, 12 : 32; Revelation 22 : 18,19!)* (4) *Be noble* students: *“These (in Berea) were more noble than those in Thessalonica, in* *that they received The Word with all readiness of mind, and* *searched The Scriptures daily, Whether Those Things Were So!”* *(Acts 17 : 11!)* (5) Build *Sound Doctrine, God’s Way!:* (5a) *“For precept must be upon precept, precept upon precept;* *line upon line, line upon line; here a little, and there a little!”* *(Isaiah 28 : 10!)* (5b) *Find ALL Related Scriptures* For A Specific doctrine!: *”ALL Scripture Is Given By Inspiration Of God, And Is* *Profitable For Doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for* *instruction in righteousness: that the man of God may* *be perfect, throughly furnished unto ALL good works!”* *(2 Timothy 3 : 16-17!)* (5c) *Compare ALL Related Scriptures* to learn and know a specific doctrine!: *“Which things also we speak, not in the words which man’s* *wisdom teacheth, but Which The Holy Ghost Teacheth;* *comparing spiritual things with spiritual!” (1 Corinthians 2 : 13!)* *{Comparing Scripture With Scripture!}* *“Simplicity” in CHRIST! (2 Corinthians 11:3)* Amen? *(6) The Best "Interpretive" Commentary On The Bible Is:* *The BIBLE Itself!* Never ever interpret *the Plain Scriptures* by the few difficult verses, but ALWAYS interpret the few obscure and difficult verses by *ALL* *Of The Many Plain and Clear Passages Of God’s Holy Word!* + *ONE Final Excellent Rule for Knowledgeable Bible study!:* (7) In order to *Honor The Father And The SON (John 5 : 22-23!),* *in Preparation For Judgment,* Always keep in mind: *”Whether therefore ye eat, or drink, or whatsoever ye do,* *do ALL to The Glory Of God!” (1 Corinthians 10 : 31!)* And then we can *ALL, in The Unity Of The Spirit Of CHRIST!... (Ephesians 4 : 3!):* *”...speak...the things which become Sound Doctrine!”* *(Titus 2 : 1 cp "SAME mind And judgment!" 1 Corinthians 1 : 10!)* Amen? ------------------------------------------------ Friend, do you believe you are *Approved Unto God?* *“Study to shew thyself approved unto God, a workman that* *needeth not to be ashamed, Rightly Dividing The Word Of Truth!”* *(2 Timothy 2 : 15!)*
Im searching for the truth I don't care what the truth is as long as I find it. You are giving the truth because you are going by the BIBLE. At least I can understand this. I told GOD I would find him and I will. I've always been told I didn't have to understand just believe. One thing that stopped me from believing was when satan told JESUS on the mountain if he would bow down to him he could have the whole world. If JESUS WAS GOD how could satan give him something that was already his. He couldnt. Please keep me in your prayers because when I find GOD I'm gonna post it and tell you. I have no church to go to or none that I will go to. I can walk alone as long as I have GOD. One question I've got for you...where and who started this? Was it Constantine? When it comes to my soul or finding GOD I dig to find the truth.. I don't want to waste my time on bowing down to baal. I will bow before One GOD of the BIBLE. Thank you for your video.
Serve only your Lord's God. Our Lord's God is his Father. Nobody knows for sure where or when this lie took root but we do know that it evolved over time until it was enforced by Imperial decree of Theodosius i 381 AD. It probably started with the Gnostics in the late first or 2nd century. See 1 John 4:2 for the most likely source.
The Trinity Delusion, Another thing about Zechariah that no one seems to understand is that, in the next chapter, the prophet goes on into speaking about some who would be pierced, which are false prophets. Because of the chapter divide, it's difficult to notice. Look at the parallels here: Zechariah 12:10 - "I will pour out a spirit of grace" "they will look to me about him they pierced" "they will mourn as for an only son" Zechariah 3:1-3 - "to cleanse sin and impurity" "then their parents will stab the one who prophesies" and their father or mother will do this to them So, is this their upright reaction to God saving them after there was the piercing, beginning to pierce instead the false prophets to cleanse the land; or was the cleansing the piercing, and they were looking to God about it, and mourning?
Also, consider the contextual reality of what's going on: someone from among the people is being killed for the mercy of God on the land, right? It is the same with Jesus, although he was not a sinner. So, it would be like the citation in Matthew about Isaiah 7 and 8, where God was going to save them, and the virgin birth is the sign that he would be God's Son; where it doesn't fit the original context except in the concept. You have the same kind of thing with David's speech in the author of Hebrews about how God forgives sin and what kind of sacrifice He wants in a person, and then applies it to Jesus who didn't sin, but who died for us instead. People miss these realities when they are hell-bent on trying to make Jesus to be God Himself.
Yes, I'm aware of this. They also have this problem - Then he will say, `Those with which I was wounded in the house of my friends.' Awake, O sword, against MY Shepherd, and against the man who stands next to me," declares YHWH of Hosts. "Strike the Shepherd that the sheep may be scattered; And I will turn My hand against the little ones.... They will call on My name, And I will answer them; I will say, `They are My people,' And they will say, 'YHWH is my God.' " See Matthew 26:31. This proves Jesus is not the speaker. The Shepherd (Jesus) is Yahweh's Shepherd (the speaker's shepherd). They are caught on all sides.
I am where you were in this video. What got me started thinking was, if there're 3 persons of the trinity, where is the Holy Sprit's Throne? Hebrews 1:13 God tells Jesus to sit at his right hand, zero mention of a 3rd throne. I have no problem seeing God the Father and Jesus the son. I am not seeing a third person the "Holy Spirt". My current position is, that the mention of the Holy Spirt is a manifestation of God.
In the bible sometimes it's the "messenger of the lord" sometimes the spirit of the lord and sometimes the "word of the lord". Why is it sometimes the word then other times the spirit and sometimes it's the "messenger of the lord". Definitely triune in nature in HIS communications with humans. Watch Michele Heiser " 2 powers in heaven" and "Jewish Trinity".
Job 32 verses 21 and 22 Anyone who is a person or one with a title will be lead away, which means executed. Now the word person comes from the Greek word kanah which is one with a title especially a surname. Big clue ? Why does it say that ? Well what is a person, I mean we all use that term when referring to someone. All person's are created by legalists not by God. God created Man, Woman or living souls he did not create Humans or person's as mentioned the devil's advocates did, which then perhaps that is why the bible warns us woe to you lawyers because you hide away the keys of knowledge. But what is a surname, what is a title ? Why would a loving creator want to destroy us if we have a title or a surname. Mathew 6 verse 24 says we CANNOT serve God and Mammon. Cannot means it is impossible right, and Mammon also means money or the god of money, money does not grow on trees and therefore it is not of nature and therefore it is not of God. Jesus says be no part of the world just as I am no part of the world, what is the world that we should be no part of? The world is defined in the King James Concordance as " the ornamental world of mankind". It is fake. And never underestimate the spell of Satan, he is in there he is the ruler of the world. So when Augustus Caesar declared himself saviour of the common people of Rome, he was talking about this in a legal sense, you will be my legal subjects under Satan, there power is derived from all those who reject the Messiah. But can this possibly be true To be a person or a human you have to have a surname, according to black's law dictionary 11th edition a surname is a name added to ones real name.So a surname is added to our God given Christian name and that makes a Human and a person , these are created by legalists so that we can operate in the Mammon. Let's look at Samuel Johnson's dictionary of 1755 which says under surname " A Gentilious name " and we then look in the same dictionary under Gentile " One of a uncovenanted nation one who knows not the true God" . Look under legal it says according to the law of the old compensation ( mmm we deny free grace). We look up the word secular and it says opposite to spiritual. Anyway in the legal we are debtors and the only way to accept free grace it to relinquish all legal title person surname, and we would need to be before kings and magistrates for his name's sake in order to do this. You see when looking up the term humanism it states it is the denying of the Messiah believing that mankind can reach perfection on their own.
The first document is right, but you should know that Jesus was equal with God but emptied Himself [Phillipians 2:6-7] and that He restricted Himself from divine privileges like divine knowledge
I’ve learned the truth about this “trinity” doctrine a few years ago. A minority of Adventist reject this teaching (trinity). Unfortunately even among “other Adventist (dissidents off-shoots)they erroneously want to claim they believe in the “Godhead” and not the “trinity” saying the “trinity” is Catholic but the “Godhead” is the biblical truth. When ask to explain the “Godhead” they end up explaining the trinity. Confused brothers!😕
william graves because it isn't found in the original Greek. its an interpolation. it was added later. No modern version has it. Our Greek text does not contain it.
1 John 5:7 kjv is in some early manuscripts if not all. It makes sense with rest of scripture. Baptize in One name of Father,Son,Spirit, the One true Eternal God..Worship the Son Worship the Spirit all through New Testament
Talking about "cherry picking" sir, you did a wonderful job of picking bible verses that helped you build your strawman case against the doctrine of the Trinity. In fact, none of the verses you use in your video are used by Trinitarians. There are stronger examples in the Bible that support the Trinitarian nature of God, like John 1:1-5, John 10:30, Genesis 1:26, Mathew 28:18-20, 2Corinthians 13:14, Hebrews 1:1-4, Revelation 22:13-15 and many others. It's rather ironic that you use none of these stronger examples in your argument. Peace.
"none of the verses you use in your video are used by Trinitarians." Have you been living under a rock? "It's rather ironic that you use none of these stronger examples in your argument. " The video is about MANUSCRIPT CORRUPTIONS.
@@TheTrinityDelusion I've been living under one of the rocks Jesus built His church with. What rock have you been living under? I do understand yor video is about manuscript corruptions, however, the examples bible verses you use for your arguments do not refute the doctrine of the Trinity. Hypocritically, you cherry picked inconsequential bible verses. May God bless you in the name of the Father, the Son and the Holy Spirit. Amen
I agree with most of your arguments. But only 1% of the manuscripts says “He who” (1 Tm 3:16), while 99% says “God”. Check Wilbur Pickering studies over greek manuscripts.
❤Jesus says all that the Father has is Mine. He was referring to the marriage custom of the Jews. Only the Father could tell the Son to go get His Bride.
I am not a trinitarian, and I do agree that the trinity is corrupt, however I believe that Jesus is God in the flesh. I use all translations as the basis of my belief. Was Jesus alive in the OT? Only because He is that Spirit that moved on the face of the deep in the beginning. Good video!
The Trinity Delusion Where does it say Lady Wisdom? This is gnostic terminology. Jesus is called the wisdom of God. All points in these verses are parallel to Jesus. www.gotquestions.org/wisdom-she-Proverbs.html
The Holy Quran emphatically declared there is only One God. That " dont say trinity". We Muslims continuously advised our Christian friends to desist from calling Jesus (Peace be Upon Him) to be a God and we were declared to be " Anti-Christ". God knows we are sincere and want the well-being of our Christian bretheren.
You are in contradiction - Islam does not want the well-being of Christians. The trinity concept and the allah concept is the same concept - they both deny the divine birth and nature of the Lord Jesus Christ. Only Jesus Christ is nature of GOD's own bosom. All other are brought by creation, not by birth. Jesus Christ is not created, but born by GOD - thus, He has GOD's divine nature, and inherited all things by the Father, making Him equal with the Father, and exalted to the place of the Father. Therefore, Jesus Christ is the Father because all that is of the Father is of Jesus Christ also by inheritance. And anyone that denies the Father and the Son, does not have the Father nor the Son in them. Allah is a name of the devil, and Muhammed is a prophet of the devil - as they both deny the Father and the Son; which is the devil's initial agenda. Serving Allah, is serving the devil. Serving Jesus Christ, is serving GOD - you cannot serve two masters, said Jesus, for you will end up hating one, and love the other, or be faithful to one and cheat on the other. You cheat on Jesus Christ, and thus, cheat on the Father, by following a religion that denies both the Son and the Father. Because remember, the quran says: Allah cannot have a Son. And this is true - because Allah is not GOD. Amen. But all the glory of GOD is to Jesus Christ, because He is the only true glory of the Father in heaven. Amen. There is no other name by which you can be saved. Allah doesn't save. Jesus saves. Allah gets you away from salvation. Repent and trust GOD - do not trust the devil. Amen.
@@rafeekshah4067 I speak the Word of GOD. You have ears planted by the devil - thus, you cannot understand. Because there is no love in you, because you do not know the Father, nor the Son. You speak the language of sarcasm and cynicism. I speak the language of truth - which you cannot understand, because you are not a child of the truth, Who is GOD and the Lord Jesus Christ, but you are son of the father of lies. Thus, your ears cannot understand Words of Truth - and Jesus Christ is the truth, the way, and the life. No one goes to the Father, but through Him. He is the full glory of the Father in heaven, and this glory remains unseen by the many, who walk the broad way of destruction. Only through repentance can you change ways, but your father, the devil, will not allow you to experience repentance from sin, and receive the cleansing blood of Jesus Christ through Whom all sins are forgiven, to those who repent and receive Him in heart and confess Him in mouth. Amen.
I think its really more of a translation issue since Hebrews 1:8 is quoting the LXX. (so Hebrews 1:8 will go in the future 10 Translation Corruptions video). A throne signifies Kingly authority. Hebrews chapter 1 is all about how Jesus became superior to the angels when he was exalted. ho thronos sou ho theos (the throne of you the god) is simply a way of saying the risen Jesus now has the authority of the throne of God just as Psalm 45:6 is saying the Davidic King (such as David or Solomon) had the authority of the throne of God over the Kingdom of God (see 1 Chronicles 28:5; 29:23). The Davidic King is given the right to execute God's authority whether it be David or Solomon or Jesus.
Trinis use HE, a single person pronoun to refer to the three persons. This being the case, the Trinitarian is no longer free to simply assert that the Father is one person, but absent a solid argument, the Father could be multiple persons. The Son could be more than one person, and also the Spirit.
Yes that's the thing. They are hypocritically inconsistent. Somehow they think they have reasons to believe the Holy Spirit is a single person but they deny those very same reasons would indicate the one God is a person and insist rather the one God is not a person but one being. That being the case, how do they know then whether the Holy Spirit is not in fact a being of 3 or 4 or 4000 persons? So how do they know? The truth is they just check their doctrine to see what will suit it. Sickness.
I was kind of knocking James White with that. He is full of telling others what they must do in debates. He dictates that a non-trini cannot assume Unitarianism (single-personism) but must prove it. But White himself assumes single-personism where it suits him. His dictate turns back on him. Because if YHWH is simultaneously a HE and a THEY, then the same can be true of the Father or the Son, and White cannot ASSUME the Father or the Son are single persons. He must PROVE it.
I've seen GOD. The Trinity is real. The Father is in The Son, so The Son can be called Father fulfilling Isaiah 9:6. The Lord JESUS CHRIST is The GREAT GOD of Israel.
Trinity World has a nasty habit of relying upon Scripture verses which have been corrupted by cherry picking the manuscript variant which suits their doctrinal fancies. Possibilities do not amount to factual evidence - especially unlikely possibilities.
What Scripture do you have in mind that prohibits praying to exalted men?
Where did you get the idea that Stephen's words constitute a "prayer?" You have many more assumptions here than facts. Even further, did God not make Jesus into Stephen's Lord? Didn't God the Father entrust the risen man Jesus with everything? If you can't call upon your own Lord to receive something from you, what sense does that make?
The word epikaleo just means to call upon. Stephen was calling upon Jesus. I don't see where Stephen is "praying" to Jesus. He is not making a petition of request. This is imagined into the text without thinking about it.. Jesus is his Lord and he had already entrusted his life to his Lord and Savior and he is entrusting that life to him now. Likewise, Jesus wasn't "praying" for the Father to receive his spirit when he was dying (Luke 23:46). He was simply entrusting his spirit to God. I'm not sure why you are talking about more than one deity. God made the risen Jesus Lord of all heaven and earth just as He had made David Lord of Israel. Nobody said God made Jesus "God." It sounds like you are confused about the word "Lord."
You keep identifying what Stephen did as a prayer. WHY? Was Jesus praying at Luke 23:46? No, that's not a prayer. Jesus taught us to pray to the Father and that's why this is what you see throughout the New Testament. We have this access to the Father through Jesus. That's why we are taught to pray in the name of Jesus. It makes absolutely no sense to pray to Jesus in the name of Jesus. We pray to the Father in the name of Jesus his beloved son.
I never said we shouldn't call upon Jesus to receive our spirit. Why can you not understand what I am saying? You keep referring to Acts 7:59 as a prayer but you haven't explained why. Do you suppose that Luke 23:46 is a prayer too?
I'm glad you are making these videos to expose the false trinity doctrine. So many people are learning this truth.
I hope they do come to see. It's a man-made idol.
@@TheTrinityDelusionyes.. it seems a miracle, to me, that anyone comes to the full knowledge of the truth..
the Father has allowed so disinformation and lies to be spread about to confuse ppl.
i wish finding the real truth was easier to do, but it really does take all our [my] attention and focus to not be sadly deceived.
@@lovealways2609 The truth IS incredibly easy and God DID make it absurdly easy. All people need is the Spirit of TRUTH. Done. Perfect unblemished truth.
This “truth” is referred to in the Bible as the doctrine of dem0ns.
@@TheTrinityDelusionNoahide,
Your “spirit of truth” is called the spirit of Antichrist that denies that Jesus is God manifested in the flesh.
1 Corinthians 27-28 " For God has subjected all things to him. (When we
say that all things have been subjected to him, that of course does not
include Him who subjected them to him.) But when all things have been
subjected to him, then the Son himself will be subjected to Him who
subjected all things to him, so that God may be all in all."
That is his role as the redeemer, he is not subjected at the end of the story , carry on and you see he occupies central throne of heaven hes priests sreving him and rules over all forever. thats not subjection thats ruling, you need to read all scripture not cherry pick.
@@LONGMAN772
What on earth are you talking about?
What God will be all in all?
@@SmalltimR There is still one throne and The lamb and father rule from it. The light emanates from this throne . This throne when we look at him who is seated upon it . We will see his face.
@@LONGMAN772
You didn't answer the question however;
What God will be all in all?
@@SmalltimR There is only one god , He who is on the throne. Only a King of all sits on a throne and rules over all for eternity. This God is is in all of us standing in front of the throne looking upon his face.
I was deceived into believing the Trinity doctrine but it never made sense. Who did Jesus pray to in the garden? Who did Jesus cry out to from the cross asking why he was being forsaken? “Forgive them Father, for they know not what they do” who was Jesus talking to? Himself? When Jesus was baptized and God said Jesus was His son and has pleased him greatly, the Holy Spirit that came upon Jesus when he was baptized. Did Jesus send the Holy Spirit upon himself? Trying to sort all this in your mind to make the trinity fit makes a person crazy.
There is one God and His Holy Spirit. There is one Son who was sent by his Father to save humanity from themselves.
Wow sir you are doing awesome works. After all these years it's helping people like me.
Jesus is the eternal true God according to the bible. Praise the triune God.
Sir , I really appreciate your scholarship. I'm Arian because I studied the Bible, not commentary or corrupted
Theology.
I am indignant that English Bibles have removed the name of God Yehova/ Jahova 6,510 times and replaced it with
a generic expression
"the Lord" . BLASPHEMY!
Many thumbs up, you may like the Youngs Literal Translation
Very true. The divine name was actually in the original manuscripts of the bible particulary of the Old Testament where it appears some nearly 7,000 times!
They have no excuse for covering up God's personal name other than to confuse millions of people of the distinction between God and his Son.
A passage that has been added to is Matthew 28:19. Even though this passage reads the same even in the earliest manuscripts, it was added early back when they were really trying to promote the trinity doctrine. I just know Matt. 28:19 is not right.
Jesus did NOT invoke the Trinity at the very end of this Book after not saying a word about it all through the Gospels.
we have "Go ye therefore unto all nations...baptizing them in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Spirit". The part following the ellipsis is more than likely spurious and was added as early as the second century. It seems so out of place.
The Hebrew Matthew reads:
"Go, and teach them to carry out all things which I have commanded you forever"
No Trinity mentioned.
I must admit, the baptism formula of Matt 28 is highly suspicious, though it remains that we do not have sufficient evidence to dismiss the words at this time.
Though I don't think this in itself undermines God's nature, given the vast amount of supporting declarations and passages in the Bible.
Great job
I was a trinitarian but for two years I have doubts concerning it and as I study Bible , it gets clear that it's a just man made doctrine.
I don't know Greek nor have any knowledge of mss , but the last book in the Bible made me think over it and since then I have started studying Bible leaving all church doctrines aside .
If you have printable material, please send me the link.
Thank you
I am a muslim and what do you mean by made doctrine are you saying that the bible is not reliable or maybe i misunderstood what you said because the say's that the bible is reliable
@@theguyver4934 he is saying the trinity doctrine is man made and implied.
@@ken440 - I pray that Yahweh bless christendom with thousands of people like sir isaac newton
Jesus is the eternal true God according to the bible. Praise the triune God.
Sad that you left the truth Eric.
@Chris Cuomo Sounds like you have not read you bible very well. 🤔
Your videos shakes the belly of all the beast that scheme.
Jesus is the eternal true God according to the bible. Praise the triune God.
@@follow_the_wayno Jesus isn't though. It's only according to you seeing the Bible that way
@@jamiesimms7084 No. The bible clearly says so. That's why.
@@follow_the_way No it clearly doesn't say that. Hence "the father is above all" This is just false but taught as being true. It's like every time you lose a tooth you say it's the tooth fairy that takes it away, anytime you mention God you just add trinity but it's true or real.
@jamiesimms7084 I'll show you. Which bible version do you believe is true?
Amen, brother. I was a Lutheran among Lutherans, and concur, there are too many corruptions of the original manuscripts to know. Are you aware of the evidence for Matthew as a Hebrew original - and the work researching Hebrew copies by Miles Jones, Nehemia Gordon and George Howard? I recommend reading Gordon's "The Hebrew Yeshua vs. The Greek Jesus" for eye-opening answers regarding the difficult words spoken by The Messiah (THE Prophet Moses told us we MUST hear and obey). God Bless.
I was once a Lutheran, and then I left that false church and became a real Christian. Then I was tightly baptized in the name of Jesus the Messiah.
Luther - one of the vehement anti-Semite in the history.
I love Nehemia's work. It's nice to have a scholar who is somewhat neutral regarding Christian variation of beliefs to look through the manuscripts.
To twist Scripture to prop up your doctrine is a very unwise path to go down.
God isn't fooled by anyone. He sees it all.
They often forget about this since they are too busy playing games with earthly men.
John 17:3, 1 Cor 8:6, Matthew 1:18 - read and think about the implications of just these 3 verses, and watch as the trinity doctrine falls apart in your mind. Yehovah is not a trinity, he's one person.
@@jamestomas7333 yes but @The Trinity Delusion was speaking about us. We have this tendency to think that we can have one foot in the world and one toe in the kingdom and be right with God. We don't value God enough to seek him with every fiber of our being and so we settle for whatever sounds most reasonable and find ourselves unwittingly deceived. Look at the Trinitarians and Unitarians. Look at the Oneness folks. Glean what you can from them and then in the Spirit of Holiness in commitment to God the Father seek the truth with all diligence. Test what they are saying for yourself. You may find what you thought was true was in fact not. Or you can be the like the majority of Christians. Watch a little bit of porn. Go check out the Katie Perry concert Wednesday night. Check out what happens on the next episode of Law and Order and then go see what the Pastor has to say about your salvation on Sunday.
God does see. But Jesus Christ doesn't. Because Jesus Christ can't see all and he is not God.
@@ScriptureResearchCentre He can see what God gives him to see. And so it is with us all. I can only see what He gives me to see or understand. God, who is spirit, sees everything at all times. Only He.
Here is another verse that says Jesus doesn't know and he doesn't have the authority to grant somebody to sit on his right or left in his Kingdom?
A Mother’s Request
20:20-28pp - Mk 10:35-45
20 Then the mother of Zebedee’s sons came to Jesus with her sons and, kneeling down, asked a favor of him.
21 “What is it you want?” he asked.
She said, “Grant that one of these two sons of mine may sit at your right and the other at your left in your kingdom.”
22 “You don’t know what you are asking,” Jesus said to them. “Can you drink the cup I am going to drink?”
“We can,” they answered.
23 Jesus said to them, “You will indeed drink from my cup, but to sit at my right or left is not for me to grant. These places belong to those for whom they have been prepared by my Father.”
24 When the ten heard about this, they were indignant with the two brothers.
Matthew 20:20-24
So Glad God brought me out of the Trinity doctrine.
Yeah, there’s going to be mass conversion to this Antichrist doctrine which is what the Bible refers to as a great falling away in the later days.
You really think it was God who made you deny that Jesus is God manifested in the flesh as the salvation (Yeshua Jesus) of our God the father, huh?
What’s the name of that god - Beelzebub?
@@ViralChristianity the antichrist draws an image of the beast to make people worship it. sound familiar?
@@ViralChristianityIt is ba'al/ashmodei/ashera/ishtar/isis/trivia/hecate the kingqueen of prince beelzebub, who has 3 heads brother.
What of the 7 spirits of God, the candle lamps, are those another persons? What about the animal spirits, the donkey, the calf, the ox, the sheep, the dove? Are those not other persons? God is infinite and all powerful, should he have infinite persons?
@@SoftBreadSoft Noahide,
The Bible is crystal clear that God is TRINITY - Yahweh, Eloheinu, Yahweh in one and Jesus is Yahweh God made flesh.
This is a well worthwhile video to go through as a touches on a couple different key issues that condemn be expanded on with further research
boy--youve rattled some snakes here Kel--well done bro
Wonderful! One thing Trinitarians miss, however, is that "divine" does not only refer to God, but also to things OF God. Each one of us has the divine spark within us waiting to be awakened.
This is a good video brother salaam from saudi
It's nice to see the reliability of the bible i am a muslim and i love the bible
Where there is smoke there is fire. Why are there so many forgeries and corruptions all relate to trying to support the Trinity.
Indeed.
True Christians received warnings by a prophecy concerning the Man of Lawlessness “. . .Let no one lead you astray in any way, because it will not come unless the apostasy comes first and the *man of lawlessness* gets revealed, the son of destruction.” - 2Th 2:3
In a quick explanation, after the Apostles died, the Man of Lawlessness would corrupt the congregation. But that corruption would be revealed in the last day's.
CanadianLoveKnot Its possible Jesus is only called God once, in Heb1:8. Jesus is a god, not the one true God, the Father. Trinitarians just can't get it right. Apostasy.
Its because the work of the Devil in corrupting the texts. The Devil is never idle and his intent is to deceive billions of people.
TU on the video!
The Bible context shows the Trinity is simply unscriptural. The formula of the Trinity is not even stated in scriptures. If you have to assume, twist and add to the scripture to get the Trinity then it’s obvious, you’re not viewing the scriptures in the same way as Jesus and his Apostles! Paul warning … “8 However, even if we or an angel out of heaven were to declare to you as good news something beyond the good news we (Jesus and his Apostles) declared to you, let him be accursed. 9 As we have said before, I now say again, Whoever is declaring to you as good news something beyond what you accepted, let him be accursed.” Ga 1:8, 9
Sir you are correct. Zechariah 12: 10 apparently doesn't really contain the word "me". It was probably added by trinitarians.
WickAndTallow
The LXX which is a translation of the old testament, was translated before Jesus, and it contains Me.
Yes, me is God referring to the incarnation as Himself. The reason he changes to Him is because of the flesh. As God is in the flesh He often refers to Himself as He or Him. As Jesus refers to the Father as He. We must distinguish the natures of God (flesh and divine).
@@MultiWorship777 God is not flesh???, where is it in scripture that states this???
@@chriscarss8747 Adding to your thought, not to the others, but to you who may appreciate it:
_
Malachi 3:6 and James 1:17 says Yahweh cannot change. Transforming himself into flesh is not possible (John 4:24). Also not possible is for part of the "one" God to be flesh in the spirit realm since eternity past. Flesh cannot see Yahweh (Exodus 33:20). If Jesus were God, then Yahweh lied to Moses. Also, how could the flesh "God" claim to have seen Yahweh (John 1:18)?
@@AnthonyAnderson. Trinity believers make God a lier and deciever by claiming jesus is god. As why would God claim to be someone else ie [jesus] when talking to abraham/moses/isaac and every other that God spoke to. God has always stated he is God almighty and nothing other than that throughout the scriptures, but trinity state 3 gods not one true and only God of all creation that scriptures state. Also Jesus states throughout scriptures that God is his father, so how can he be god and pray to himself.
You crack me up...but you taught me how to see the true in ALL the Bible...thanks
Jesus is the eternal true God according to the bible. Praise the triune God.
He cracks me up too brother.
Very good job sir I honor your job and videos.Keep up with the good work.
Jesus is the eternal true God according to the bible. Praise the triune God.
Breathtaking Logic! At 27m 43s a wonderful list of *_solid critical thinking._* This shows the type of *_humility_* required (but too rarely delivered) by both scientists and Christians.
Brother, This video will help many to come out of the trinity doctrine. Because you were a trinitarian, and you had the desire to know the truth, which helped you to come out of the false doctrine. Many are dangerously religious that they blindly believe what their Bishop/ priest/ pastor say. And also if a trinitarian see this video, instead of the person proof checking by himself, he goes to his Bishop/ priest/ pastor and those people misguide them, Actually the Bible is so simple to understand, if a person really have the desire to learn, one will know the truth by the help of the holyspirit. People make it complicated and confusing and teaching false doctrine. Trinity is no where in the bible. Satan is making the majority christians blind. The bible quote in Matthew 7:13-14, the wide gate fits the trinitarians.
Matthew 24:36 is all the proof I need to know that the trinity is false doctrine, also the fact that Jesus sit's at the right hand of our Father is more proof if you need it
There are lots of verses which prove it to be false. They just refuse to accept them honestly.
Interesting video you have here. I have a question for you which version/translation do you recommend as I see you find fault with several different in your video.
Thanks
I have not done an examination of Trinity resistant Bibles, but I can tell you a good place to start is to use a Bible that contains the divine name, the Tetragrammaton, modernly expressed as YHWH, JHVH, Yahweh, or Jehovah.
The Trinitarians often use the "Lord" = Jesus trick. With a Bible that gives God's name instead of "Lord" or "LORD," it foils many of the deceptions. Moreover, it gives you, as the reader, a better sense of just who is speaking.
I have been using Bible Hub and Bible Gateway to do scripture look up. Both are online resources that you can use for free. I can't give you the links because UA-cam will not allow it, but you should find them in a search easy enough.
The Bibles I have been using the most are Legacy Standard Bible (LSB) and World English Bible (WEB) that give Yahweh as the divine name. Also, I use the American Standard Version (ASV), Young's Literal Translation (YLT), and Darby Bible Translation (DBT) which use Jehovah for the divine name.
Here is the list of Bibles containing the Divine name that I have verified:
Bible Hub divine name translations
==================================
Literal Standard Version
World English Bible
Young's Literal Translation
ASV - American Standard Version
DBT - Darby Bible Translation
Smith's Literal Translation
ARA - Peshitta Holy Bible Translated (Translations from Aramaic)
Bible Gateway divine name translations
======================================
American Standard Version (ASV)
Darby Translation (DARBY)
Legacy Standard Bible (LSB)
Lexham English Bible (LEB)
Living Bible (TLB)
Names of God Bible (NOG)
World English Bible (WEB)
Young's Literal Translation (YLT)
See the book by Jason BeDuhn, ‘Truth in Translation’, university press. It’s excellent detailed & thorough analysis of most popular translations. Spoiler alert for his conclusion; only TWO of the translations nab and nwt are deemed to be accurate, and both are produced by two of the biggest Christian denominations.
good video with some great background as well 👍
10 out of 10 bro--be blessed
@corey santillo it's good to use multiple translations in discerning truth
Jesus is the eternal true God according to the bible. Praise the triune God.
@@follow_the_way lol
@@watchtoweralert1 I know right. Non Trinitarian = non Christian.
Do you claim to be a Christian?
If faith and belief is built-up on corrupt translations, then what does this say of the faith and belief?
It says that faith is the only justification and faith the only condemnation which surprisingly is backed up by the very same writings. This implies that only those that follow their faith will find the ultimate truth of their destiny. Not someone elses faith but your own, now where or in what will you place yours?
Hello, I was wondering if you had a list any scriptures that were corrupted in the Alexandria text that are correct in the KJV also?
👉🙏🏻✨🔆🙏🏻ALWAYS VERY HAPPY ✨😁👈🏼👉 TO LISTEN & LEARN 🤔🌹🤗 FROM Bro Kel!!!😁👈🏼🤔👉God 🙏🏻 Bless You 😊 For Your Time And Knowledge,You are SHARING With US ALL 🙏🏻✨🔆🙏🏻👈🏼💢❤️👈🏼
Sir......is Bart erhman Right about the New testament being unreliable? And can You make a video on it.....?
@OTTO OCTAVIOUS
Opinions can be lies or trues..
So what is it?
My point is that I am trying to find out the truth
What is the truth about the holy bible?
Is it reliable or not
Can we trust it or not
That's the point
What is the truth?
Not opinions but the truth...
I need some clarification
@@cephasmwila7537 The Holy Bible is reliable. It has a basis in historical fact. It contains timeless and practical wisdom. It is honest in its historical accounts of people and the events surrounding them. Prophesies that have come true. There is historical and archaeological evidence for many of the people mentioned. It reveals the truth about God. It explain how and why we are here and what is the purpose of life.
Compare the Bible to the Quran. The Quran is a made up book composed of myths and legends as well as badly narrated texts plagiarised from the Talmud and apocryphal writings. It is the invention of the self serving Muhammad.
You need to do your own research and come to your own conclusions.
❤when i was baptized in the Holy Spirit and INSTANTLY delivered from cigarettes at the altar i KNEW IMMEDIATELY even though i was raised Catholic that the Father was the Spirit indwelling me from that point. I knew it was wrong to say the Father was NOT the Holy Spirit.
I would say it like this....
The Holy Spirit is the Father's /
JAHOVA'S SPIRIT
that is all that debatism is: trying to make a case and look good.
This is why I sometimes question my urge to correct or debate christian brothers on anything anymore. Pretrib-er? Well you do you. Trinitarian? you do you.
I draw the line where the law comes under attack or the sonship of Jesus is questioned but apart from that I already have very little motivation.
I know it's a late reply but I really enjoyed your comment. I'm at that point myself. Bless you
How do trinitarians rationalize away 1 Cor. 15: 24-28?
Second person of the Trinity hands over the Kingdom to the First person of the Trinity. [End your thinking process here]. They don't really think it through.
That's revelation of CHRIST or Our GOD The SON OF MAN fulfilling the rest of the prophesies from the Law and the prophets. So, that God may be all in all. The GOD of Israel has not and NEVER handed the control of heavens and the earth to somebody else. HE hold all things together. The Lord JESUS CHRIST is The GOD of Israel. 1 Cor. 15:24-28 does not mean there will be turn over of power from somebody else to GOD. Or that somebody else other than GOD is in control of Heavens and earth right now. Everything is under the control of GOD and forever GOD is in control.
Son of man.
When The SON OF MAN said:
"All authority in heaven and on earth has been given to me." in Matthew 28:18
GOD has NOT given away the control of Heaven and earth to somebody else (like Michael the Archangel as the JW & SDA believe). So that 1 Cor. 15:24-28 there will be turn over of power from Michael the Archangel to GOD. But that was fulfillment of the many Prophecies from the law and the Prophets. Like what GOD promise to David that one of David's son will succeed David's throne FOREVER (1 Chronicles 17:11-14). By birth HE was born from David's bloodline as Mary comes from Nathan, David's Son. Note, the promise of GOD to David:
'I will set HIM over my house and my kingdom forever; HIS throne will be established forever.'
CHRIST will NOT hand over anything to somebody else but HIS THRONE IS FOREVER. 1 Cor. 15:24-28 will be REVELATION to those who does not acknowledge and knows HIM as well as fulfillment of the rest of the Prophecies. There is no GOD but The Lord JESUS CHRIST.
@@PrintOfLife It was GIVEN to HIM ... means he did not have it tell it was given to him! In fact, everything Jesus has was given to him by his Father! Then you teach against what Jesus Apostles received by Holy Spirit saying, "CHRIST will NOT hand over anything ...". It appears you don't believe 2 Tim 3:16,17 putting yourself in direct opposition to God going against his words! That not very bright ...
Its of interest that the vast majority of 'text corruptions' of bible MSS's are aimed at suggesting the 'trinity' is true, rather than false! ( My Favourite one is what Count VonTishendorff discovered in 1844 when he examined the newly found 'Siniatic MSS of the NT in Greek. He looed at 1 Tim 3:16 and noted a FRESHER ink mark over the greek word for 'HE' that changed it to 'GOD' It should read; "He |(Christ) was manifest inthe flesh", Not 'God was! Ths all late & post 19th century NT's now translate it correctly!
There are at least two dozen of these corruptions related to Trinity doctrine.
WHO'S HERE IN 2022?
Excellent work, thank you, God bless you to
Jesus is the eternal true God according to the bible. Praise the triune God.
Thank you 😊 what is your name sir
What about MARK 13:32??
The confusion when you remove Gods name .. no one can tell whos who! Its easier to fool someone than to convince them they've been fooled!
Excellent teaching on exposing these verses 👍👍👍👍👍😊
23:42 -- There are no commas in the Greek manuscripts.. So why could 2 Peter not read OUR GOD, AND SAVIOR JESUS CHRIST instead of OUR GOD AND SAVIOR, JESUS CHRIST.
Yes that's right. I just made a slide last night for a coming video on 2 Peter 1:1 that mentions this. It depends if you pause after "our God" or if you pause after "Savior." Doing this at 2 Thess 1:12 is an interesting exercise (same Greek word structure). If you pause after "Lord," it just doesn't sound right. Try it.
Agreed. However when I was reading some of the church fathers, they had a multiplicity of ways of using terms like "god" and "lord", so even that might work.
The Trinity Delusion the same is with this.. depends where coma is placed the meaning changes instantly.. Luke 23:43
And Jesus said unto him, Verily I say unto thee, today shalt thou be with me in paradise." and now read this "And Jesus said unto him, Verily I say unto thee today, shalt thou be with me in paradise."
Interesting the *_meaning_* behind John 3.13. This was early in Christ's ministry, during his talk with Nicodemus. This implies a sequence which confounds even some Unitarians:
Christ was the First to go up to Heaven, and afterward, he came down from Heaven to be born to Mary as the Son of God -- the "Son of man."
This implies something which other parts of the New Testament also touche on: *_Reincarnation!_* The man born blind, the incessant questions of John the Baptist about whether or not he was one of the former prophets returned, Christ telling his disciples that Elijah (Elias) had indeed returned and they understood that he was speaking of John the Baptist.
That Jesus was NOT God is clear. That he had been one of us, but blessed to be the First to graduate from this mortal realm, and through unconditional Love, returned to help all of us return with him to Heaven, only makes his story that much sweeter and meaningful. How can we who have sinned make it to Heaven? By following the one who had *_already done it!_*
How do you explain Isaiah 42:8 and Isaiah 48:11 where Yahweh says He will not give His glory to another, but we see in Revelation that God and the Lamb are receiving the same worship? Worshipping anyone but God is idolatry, so why is someone other than God being worshipped? What about Isaiah 41:4 where Yahweh says He is the First and the Last, and Jesus calls Himself this in Revelation 1:11,17 and 22:13. How about Hebrews 1:8-9 in which God is quoting Psalm 45:6-7 to the Son, and Hebrews 1:10-12 where God is quoting Psalm 102:25-27 to the Son? What about Genesis 19:24 where Yahweh rained brimstone and fire from Yahweh out of the heavens? What about Ezekiel’s conversation with Yahweh in 3:22 - 5:17? Yahweh tells Ezekiel that He will speak with him in the plain, and when Ezekiel gets to the plain, it is the Spirit is talking with him and telling Ezekiel all that he needs to know. Please explain this. How about Exodus ch.3 when the Angel of the LORD says in verse 6 that He is the God of Moses’ father, the God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob? Who does this Angel think He is? There’s only one God, but you have an Angel claiming to be God. Also, why is the Holy Spirit always referred to as a He? We also know that the Holy Spirit speaks to people in the New Testament such as Acts and Revelation and we also know that the Holy Spirit can be grieved. There are countless more examples of why the Father is God, Jesus is God, and the Holy Spirit is God. Somehow God is a compound being of 3 persons. No, the word Trinity is not in the Bible, but the word masturbation isn’t in the Bible either, but I guess it’s ok to do so since it’s not directly forbidden in the Bible. See why that’s a dumb argument? The doctrine and concept of the Trinity is found throughout the Old and New Testament.
Covered in other videos on this channel. Go watch them.
I don’t think for example 8 the right term of “lord” is being implied by trinitarian either, the word used there for “ lord” actually translate to “Master” , not “theos” which is what trinitarian tend to attribute to Christ as Lord.
I just realized how choppy my grammar sounded in this comment LOL
Got no facts, just simple questions. What am I and how many parts make up my identity? Am I flesh with an identifiable appearance, am I my mind, or my soul, or my spirit, or my emotions, or my thoughts, or my will, or am I merely a clump of cells brought together by chance? If the worlds most brilliant scientist dissect me, will they find my personality, my character traits, my breath, a spark of life, my conscience, subconscious, my morality, my beliefs, or the truth? Excluding the flesh, none of those things can be proven to exist by any standard known to man. And, yet, while I'm living, all of those things are uniquely my identity and my friends and family can recognize me, based on the closeness in our relationships, without me being in the room. Am I my voice? If I speak to a familiar person on the phone how will they know it's me? How is it that in my most familiar relationships we can finish each other's sentences? Am I not made in God's image? If we consider the Almighty and Eternal God in which all things have been made, can we put a limit on His power enough so that He cannot express Himself in a plurality of persons so that we might know Him through relationship? Just a clump of chewy questions that can not be understood by the minds of man.
Trinity is not mentioned in the Bible. Who created the trinity is against 10 commandment, the word of Almighty God.
My brother was struck in his head by a tree being sawed down, after his SPIRIT left his body he could see all going on around him the Doctor who was playing tennis 1000 feet away in city park whom was placed there by our Lord. My brother 10 years old at time was sucked through space at unbelievable amount of speed and then was on street of gold and started to hear singing looks around and seen angels, Then two huge hands looking up to see whose they belong finding Yeshua standing in between those hands. Yeshua was also standing in front of a gate. Jesus takes his hand touching his head and said not your time. And he was instantly back on earth over his ambulance taking him to Scottish rite hospital in Atlanta Ga. Where he stayed for 6mts.
Everything you said is a lie and you know it.
I have always been a one God person. I still get excited when I see it again and again in scripture..there are multitudes of scripture to back this up. Actually the whole Bible declares God singularity
Hello again I forgot to give you an other one ; Who is the third person? by SDA Pillars of truth excellent too
The kjv was perfect for me and woke me up just last year I read new first than old...but yes they shall look on me whom they pierced and they will morn for him My father whom they abandoned
Jesus is the eternal true God according to the bible. Praise the triune God.
@@michaelhaigh9182 What are you asking? Your text makes no sense.
oh, Big Babylon :( Someone can tell me is it Vatican?
The Nomina Sacra is a huge study in itself. Mother is also a NS, among others
Wow! Augustine (AD 354-430) didn't know about 1 John 5.7? I thought this was introduced into the Latin Vulgate (AD 382). Perhaps he did not learn from the Latin Vulgate, but from a different manuscript. Curious that he wouldn't know about this newer version by Jerome, et al.
I recently found an error in the KJV which obscures the connection between the 10 horns in the Roman empire, and the stars in the crown of Israel in Revelation 12. Daniel writing of the 10 horns writes 3 of the horns were plucked up by the roots. John, describing the dragon as the prince over the Roman empire, writes, a third of the stars were cast to the ground. Most people will read the English and think "a third" means one third. This would seem to be 4 of the stars, not 3. The ancient Greek counting system used 10 as their base number, whereas 1 is our base m=number. In the ancient Greek, everything less than 10 was less than the whole number. They counted as first, second, third. If this word was translated correctly into English, it should read 3, not a third. If three of the stars were thrown down to the ground, and three horns were plucked up by the roots by the Roman empire, then John is identifying the horns as stars in the crown of Israel. This would make it true that the 10 tribes migrated into Europe. Revelation is directed to the Hebrew people, and the message is "come out of her my people". Come out of the last kingdom, Rome, and her principality. The Trinitarian religion of lawlessness and the people of lawlessness. Though they (the 10 tribes) be as the sand of the sea, only a remnant will be saved. They are lost in the Roman Trinitarian religion and will be taken to a pit burning with Sulphur upon the return of Yeshua. Those who died in the Trinitarian religion will die a second death.
trinitarian time scale is way off--he was begotten once--resurrection--as Paul confirms
Paul is a ravenous wolf his writings and writings of him are very damning of him being a heretic. He was not a apostle and never met Christ. He claims that a visit from christ happened and he was the only one can hear, no two witnesses to confirm it so thats pretty shaky to be believing him.
And down the rabbit whole you go
How do you identify the Son and the Holy Spirit, either is God or creations. I wouldn't dare say they are created and not constitute One essence Godhead
The Bible provides us with the ability to identify lies from the truth.
With that said the expression or term; _'one essence Godhead'_ is not written or found anywhere in scripture.
Wait which scriptures are wrong in the video?
Thank you for your videos. 1st Corinthians 10:9 from The Cepher translation: Neither let us tempt Mashiach, as some of them also tempted Yahuah, and were destroyed of serpents. (Clearer distinction between the Son and Father).
HELLO i need your help, does john 21 vs 17 proves that Jesus is all knowing
The Spirit of Truth leads believers into all the truth. Are they "all knowing"?
jude 1:4-5 is troublesome, no matter which variation you choose for 1:5
Verses with known corruptions are not troublesome; they are to be ignored.
@@TheTrinityDelusion but there is no known corruption in 1:4. regardless what 1:5 says, it speaks about Jesus?
_'Now I desire to remind you, though you already know this, that the Lord, having saved a people out of the land of Egypt, afterward destroyed those who didn’t believe'_
I don't see a problem here whatsoever, and as we conclude the Lord in question is YHWH
@@SmalltimR do you have an issue with reading comprehension? if you claim the Lord here is the Father, you also claim Jesus is the Father.
Jude 4-5 (HCSB): turning the grace of our God into promiscuity and denying Jesus Christ, our only Master and Lord. Now I want to remind you, though you know all these things: The Lord first saved a people out of Egypt and later destroyed those who did not believe
@@JN-or1zr
Your response comes-across as desperation, as though undertones ever lead to agreement - and in reflection of your desires, yours is childish banter over productive discourse.
That said, the fact remains that we have no good reason to conclude the titles of Lords in verses 4 and 5, cannot be two different beings, and as we know Jesus was not the GOD of Israel throughout the OT, as no man had ever seen Him, let alone hear His voice - we find distinction over synonymity in such cases.
Adding t5o this the obvious corruption and tampering of said texts, we now have every reason for skepticism, let alone a reliable means for to justify deviation from thousands of years of established doctrine and beliefs.
There is a lot of manuscript attestation for John 3:13 reading, "which is in heaven." It would be nice to see some documentation to back up the claim that "which is in heaven" is incorrect.
I checked 1 Cor. 10:9 and found that Christ actually appears in the original Greek manuscripts. I do not see any evidence where any reputable manuscript evidence which ever uses "kurios" for "Lord" ever appears in any Greek manuscript.
Jesus does not appear in the original Greek in Jude 1:5.
Clement of Alexandria cited Acts 20:28 as "the Church of God which he has purchased with his own blood." Since Clement of Alexandria cited Acts 20:28 in the late second century (about 190-198) we know that the earliest scriptural evidence points to "the church of God" as being correct.
I didn't say John 3:13 is incorrect. You seem to suppose translators just made up the 'Lord' reading out of thin air for 1 Cor 10:9. Irenaeus cited "church of the Lord" for Acts 20:28 about 180 A.D.. Now what? The "church of the Lord" reading is correct? That would be very narrow minded thinking.
Under Acts 20:28, Ellicot's Commentary says, "Some of the best uncials and versions give "God;" others, of almost equal authority, give "Lord;" others, again, combine the two "Lord and God." The fact that elsewhere St. Paul invariably speaks of "the Church of God" (e.g., 1Corinthians 1:2; 2Corinthians 1:1; Galatians 1:13; 1Thessalonians 2:14, et al.), and never "the Church of the Lord," may be allowed, from one point of view, some weight as internal evidence in favour of the Received reading; while from another it may be urged that it might have tempted a transcriber to substitute a familiar for an unfamiliar phrase. Accepting that reading, the words not only confirm the great truths of the Church's creed, but give an implicit sanction to the language of theology or devotion, when it applies to the divine nature of our Lord predicates that belong strictly to the human nature which was associated with it. So Ignatius (Romans 6) spoke of "the passion of my God," and Tertullian (Ad Uxor, ii. 3) and Clement of Alexandria (Quis dives, c. 34) use the very phrase "the blood of God" which this passage suggests..."
Under Acts 20:28, the Pulpit Commentary says, "There is, perhaps, no single passage in Scripture which has caused more controversy and evoked more difference of opinion than this. The T.R. has τοῦ Θεοῦ, but most uncials have τοῦ Κυρίου. Kuinoel asserts that the reading τοῦ Κυρίου rests on the authority, besides that of the oldest manuscripts, of the old versions, and of many el' the most ancient Fathers, and says that it is undoubtedly the true reading. Meyer, too, thinks that the external evidence for τοῦ Κυρίου is decisive, and that the internal evidence from the fact that ἐκκλησία τοῦ Κυρίου Occurs nowhere else in St. Paul's writings, is decisive also. But on the other hand, both the Codex Vaticanus (B) and the Codex Sinaitieus (א), the two oldest manuscripts, have Θεοῦ (Θυ). The Vulgate, too, and the Syriac have it; and such early Fathers as Ignatius (in his Epistle to the Ephesians) and Tertullian use the phrase, "the blood of God," which seems to have been derived from this passage. And Alford reasons powerfully in favor of Θεοῦ, dwelling upon the fact that the phrase ἐκκλησία τοῦ Θεοῦ occurs ten times in St. Paul's writings, that of ἐκκλησία τοῦ Κυρίου not once."
You entitled your video, "10 Trinity Proof Text CORRUPTIONS" so you are essentially saying "which is in heaven" is "corrupt" in John 3:13.
I agree with you about John 1:18 reading "only begotten son" as many early Christian writers cited John 1:18 as "only begotten son" long before "only begotten God." We Oneness believers agree that the Father alone is the only true God and that there is no timelessly begotten God the Son person.
Even if "He was manifested in the flesh" were correct, you still have a problem because the He who partook of flesh and blood (Heb. 2:14) and the He who was "manifested in the flesh" (1 Tim. 3:16) could not have been a non-existent He Person. Since John 8:58 proves that Jesus existed "before Abraham" as the great "I AM" we know that the He who was manifested in the flesh is the God of Exodus 3:14. For Luke 1:35 and Matthew 1:20 informs us that the Holy Spirit of God came down from heaven to reproduce the Christ child "out of the Holy Spirit" ("ek" = "out of" or "out from" in Matthew 1:20). When we compare Matthew 1:20 with Hebrews 1:3 we find that the Christ child was "reproduced" or "copied" (charakter) from the Substance of Being (hypostasis) of God the Father Himself. Therefore Jesus as the child born and son given is the Substance of God the Father's Being as the image of the invisible Father.
1 John 5:7 is an obvious Trinitarian interpolation.
I cannot find any manuscript attestation for an alleged Trinitarian corruption in Zechariah 12:10. Even the Jewish Tanakh says, "And they shall look unto Me because they have thrust him through; And they shall mourn for him, as one mourns for his only son." Could non-Christian Jewish scholars have really supported an alleged Trinitarian corruption?
I do not have manuscript info to back up 2 Peter 1:1 reading "our God and Savior, Jesus Christ." However, in the early second century church “It was the Christians’ habit on a fixed day to assemble before daylight and recite by turns a form of words to Christ as God,” (Pliny the Younger wrote in a letter to Emperor Trajan about Christians).
2 Clement opens his homily, “We must think about Christ as we think about God."
Ignatius wrote to Polycarp, “I bid you farewell always in our God Jesus Christ."
Therefore it is likely that the earliest church believed that "Jesus Christ" is "our God and Savior" just like most manuscripts of 2 Peter 1:1 affirm.
Oneness theology affirms that Jesus Christ is not "God with us" as God the Father, he is Immanuel "God with us" as a true human son because the Spirit of God came down from heaven (Luke 1:35; John 6:38 - "I came down from heaven") to become a man with a human will and a fully complete human nature. Therefore only Oneness theology rightly divides the word of truth to show that God also became a true human son within the Hebrew virgin.
In AD 125, Aristides of Athens wrote to the Emperor, "The Christians, then, trace the beginning of their religion from Jesus the Messiah; and he is named the Son of God Most High. And it is said that God came down from heaven, and from a Hebrew virgin assumed and clothed himself with flesh; and the Son of God lived in a daughter of man. This is taught in the gospel, as it is called, which a short time was preached among them; and you also if you will read therein, may perceive the power which belongs to it." Apology of Aristides II
GIM, You really don't get it do you? You don't get to cherry pick one or the other. Your personal best guesses do not amount to factual evidence. And the title of my video means that these ten verses have been corrupted. They have been corrupted.
That's why the variants exist. Additionally, I happen to personally think the longer ending of John 3:13 might be the correct one so once again do you don't know what you are talking about. But my opinion doesn't make it factual evidence does it? Your so full of your own lying ways, you can't hear. John 8:43-47. Do yourself a favor and read up on Confirmation Bias. Then go look in the mirror.
Trinity Delusion: Wow, I'm surprised that you are so angry and mean spirited here. I am not "lying" about anything. I can just as easily say that you are using "Confirmation Bias" in this video. In the past you have always presented yourself as a kind gentleman. I am not saying that my comments and quotes are 100% accurate. I am just expressing alternative views here to show that all of your statements in this video are not 100% factual.
No matter how much I am persecuted, I always endeavor to keep speaking what I see as the truth in a spirit of love and meekness in Christ Jesus. I suggest that you do the same. May the grace of our Lord Jesus Christ open our understanding in all things.
How can we contact you???
How do you find these things out?
Research. You have to do your homework. Some of it is as easy as comparing several translations to find discrepancies. Some of it takes a very long time to research. Never make assumptions that you have valid information until you check it.
Keep up the good work my brother. U are doing a fantastic job. The Trinity idle needs to be exposed for what it is. A lie.. It's a gnostic lie. A fals god and a false Chris. It's anti christ.. You are doing a great service for the lord. And you are helping so many people. May the lord bless you and lead you as I know he does. You are a blessing to all who know the truth.
Since people are cannot avoid bias in translating the scripture, would it be safe to say that the scriptures ought to be translated based on principles taught in the tanak instead.
Grace And Peace, Kenos. Best is *God's Rules for studying ALL Scriptures!*
And, then being *"Approved Unto God!!* Amen?:
*BIBLE Study Rules!*
Seven Excellent Rules for *Knowledgeable Bible* study!
*"According To The Scriptures!":*
(1) *“Let ALL things be done Decently and In Order!”*
*(1 Corinthians 14 : 40!)*
(2) Study *ALL Scripture Rightly Divided!:*
*“Study to shew thyself approved unto God, a workman that*
*needeth not to be ashamed, Rightly Dividing The Word Of Truth!”*
*(2 Timothy 2 : 15!)*
(3) *Never add to or take away From God’s Holy Word!*
*(Deuteronomy 4 : 2, 12 : 32; Revelation 22 : 18,19!)*
(4) *Be noble* students:
*“These (in Berea) were more noble than those in Thessalonica, in*
*that they received The Word with all readiness of mind, and*
*searched The Scriptures daily, Whether Those Things Were So!”*
*(Acts 17 : 11!)*
(5) Build *Sound Doctrine, God’s Way!:*
(5a) *“For precept must be upon precept, precept upon precept;*
*line upon line, line upon line; here a little, and there a little!”*
*(Isaiah 28 : 10!)*
(5b) *Find ALL Related Scriptures* For A Specific doctrine!:
*”ALL Scripture Is Given By Inspiration Of God, And Is*
*Profitable For Doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for*
*instruction in righteousness: that the man of God may*
*be perfect, throughly furnished unto ALL good works!”*
*(2 Timothy 3 : 16-17!)*
(5c) *Compare ALL Related Scriptures* to learn and know a specific doctrine!:
*“Which things also we speak, not in the words which man’s*
*wisdom teacheth, but Which The Holy Ghost Teacheth;*
*comparing spiritual things with spiritual!” (1 Corinthians 2 : 13!)*
*{Comparing Scripture With Scripture!}*
*“Simplicity” in CHRIST! (2 Corinthians 11:3)* Amen?
*(6) The Best "Interpretive" Commentary On The Bible Is:*
*The BIBLE Itself!*
Never ever interpret *the Plain Scriptures* by the few difficult verses,
but ALWAYS interpret the few obscure and difficult verses by *ALL*
*Of The Many Plain and Clear Passages Of God’s Holy Word!*
+
*ONE Final Excellent Rule for Knowledgeable Bible study!:*
(7) In order to *Honor The Father And The SON (John 5 : 22-23!),*
*in Preparation For Judgment,* Always keep in mind:
*”Whether therefore ye eat, or drink, or whatsoever ye do,*
*do ALL to The Glory Of God!” (1 Corinthians 10 : 31!)*
And then we can *ALL, in The Unity Of The Spirit Of CHRIST!... (Ephesians 4 : 3!):*
*”...speak...the things which become Sound Doctrine!”*
*(Titus 2 : 1 cp "SAME mind And judgment!" 1 Corinthians 1 : 10!)* Amen?
------------------------------------------------
Friend, do you believe you are *Approved Unto God?*
*“Study to shew thyself approved unto God, a workman that*
*needeth not to be ashamed, Rightly Dividing The Word Of Truth!”*
*(2 Timothy 2 : 15!)*
Im searching for the truth I don't care what the truth is as long as I find it. You are giving the truth because you are going by the BIBLE. At least I can understand this. I told GOD I would find him and I will. I've always been told I didn't have to understand just believe. One thing that stopped me from believing was when satan told JESUS on the mountain if he would bow down to him he could have the whole world. If JESUS WAS GOD how could satan give him something that was already his. He couldnt. Please keep me in your prayers because when I find GOD I'm gonna post it and tell you. I have no church to go to or none that I will go to. I can walk alone as long as I have GOD. One question I've got for you...where and who started this? Was it Constantine? When it comes to my soul or finding GOD I dig to find the truth.. I don't want to waste my time on bowing down to baal. I will bow before One GOD of the BIBLE. Thank you for your video.
Serve only your Lord's God. Our Lord's God is his Father. Nobody knows for sure where or when this lie took root but we do know that it evolved over time until it was enforced by Imperial decree of Theodosius i 381 AD. It probably started with the Gnostics in the late first or 2nd century. See 1 John 4:2 for the most likely source.
Fellow truth seeker... Tartaria was the Millennial Reign..
The Trinity Delusion,
Another thing about Zechariah that no one seems to understand is that, in the next chapter, the prophet goes on into speaking about some who would be pierced, which are false prophets. Because of the chapter divide, it's difficult to notice.
Look at the parallels here:
Zechariah 12:10 - "I will pour out a spirit of grace" "they will look to me about him they pierced" "they will mourn as for an only son"
Zechariah 3:1-3 - "to cleanse sin and impurity" "then their parents will stab the one who prophesies" and their father or mother will do this to them
So, is this their upright reaction to God saving them after there was the piercing, beginning to pierce instead the false prophets to cleanse the land; or was the cleansing the piercing, and they were looking to God about it, and mourning?
Also, consider the contextual reality of what's going on: someone from among the people is being killed for the mercy of God on the land, right? It is the same with Jesus, although he was not a sinner. So, it would be like the citation in Matthew about Isaiah 7 and 8, where God was going to save them, and the virgin birth is the sign that he would be God's Son; where it doesn't fit the original context except in the concept. You have the same kind of thing with David's speech in the author of Hebrews about how God forgives sin and what kind of sacrifice He wants in a person, and then applies it to Jesus who didn't sin, but who died for us instead.
People miss these realities when they are hell-bent on trying to make Jesus to be God Himself.
Yes, I'm aware of this. They also have this problem - Then he will say, `Those with which I was wounded in the house of my friends.' Awake, O sword, against MY Shepherd, and against the man who stands next to me," declares YHWH of Hosts. "Strike the Shepherd that the sheep may be scattered; And I will turn My hand against the little ones.... They will call on My name, And I will answer them; I will say, `They are My people,' And they will say, 'YHWH is my God.' " See Matthew 26:31. This proves Jesus is not the speaker. The Shepherd (Jesus) is Yahweh's Shepherd (the speaker's shepherd). They are caught on all sides.
I am where you were in this video. What got me started thinking was, if there're 3 persons of the trinity, where is the Holy Sprit's Throne? Hebrews 1:13 God tells Jesus to sit at his right hand, zero mention of a 3rd throne. I have no problem seeing God the Father and Jesus the son. I am not seeing a third person the "Holy Spirt". My current position is, that the mention of the Holy Spirt is a manifestation of God.
In the bible sometimes it's the "messenger of the lord" sometimes the spirit of the lord and sometimes the "word of the lord".
Why is it sometimes the word then other times the spirit and sometimes it's the "messenger of the lord". Definitely triune in nature in HIS communications with humans.
Watch Michele Heiser " 2 powers in heaven" and "Jewish Trinity".
The trinity is as true as the sun goes around the earth.
The EARTH IS FLAT!
Research it.
Proof of flat earth?
Small timer Yes the scriptures do truly reveal God is Father, Son and Spirit. Don't call God a liar and turn to truth from your false cult.
Have you ever watched Nehemia Gordons video the Greek Jesus vs The Hebrew Yeshua?
I don't recall.
The Trinity Delusion ua-cam.com/video/tddCNY6U77Y/v-deo.html
I think you will find this enlightening
On second thought, I may have watched it a few years ago.
The Trinity Delusion ok. I enjoy your videos keep it up
Job 32 verses 21 and 22
Anyone who is a person or one with a title will be lead away, which means executed. Now the word person comes from the Greek word kanah which is one with a title especially a surname. Big clue ? Why does it say that ? Well what is a person, I mean we all use that term when referring to someone. All person's are created by legalists not by God. God created Man, Woman or living souls he did not create Humans or person's as mentioned the devil's advocates did, which then perhaps that is why the bible warns us woe to you lawyers because you hide away the keys of knowledge. But what is a surname, what is a title ? Why would a loving creator want to destroy us if we have a title or a surname. Mathew 6 verse 24 says we CANNOT serve God and Mammon. Cannot means it is impossible right, and Mammon also means money or the god of money, money does not grow on trees and therefore it is not of nature and therefore it is not of God. Jesus says be no part of the world just as I am no part of the world, what is the world that we should be no part of? The world is defined in the King James Concordance as " the ornamental world of mankind". It is fake. And never underestimate the spell of Satan, he is in there he is the ruler of the world. So when Augustus Caesar declared himself saviour of the common people of Rome, he was talking about this in a legal sense, you will be my legal subjects under Satan, there power is derived from all those who reject the Messiah.
But can this possibly be true
To be a person or a human you have to have a surname, according to black's law dictionary 11th edition a surname is a name added to ones real name.So a surname is added to our God given Christian name and that makes a Human and a person , these are created by legalists so that we can operate in the Mammon. Let's look at Samuel Johnson's dictionary of 1755 which says under surname " A Gentilious name " and we then look in the same dictionary under Gentile " One of a uncovenanted nation one who knows not the true God" . Look under legal it says according to the law of the old compensation ( mmm we deny free grace). We look up the word secular and it says opposite to spiritual. Anyway in the legal we are debtors and the only way to accept free grace it to relinquish all legal title person surname, and we would need to be before kings and magistrates for his name's sake in order to do this. You see when looking up the term humanism it states it is the denying of the Messiah believing that mankind can reach perfection on their own.
The first document is right, but you should know that Jesus was equal with God but emptied Himself [Phillipians 2:6-7] and that He restricted Himself from divine privileges like divine knowledge
Man-made myth. Paul said nothing of the sort.
kyriouser and kyriouser--said Alice
Unitarian Christian centerblog ✨.
Acts 20:28
It could still say his own blood and mean Jesus. My children are of my own blood. Thanks for these videos
Didn't even listen to your video...what is your testimony my good friend?
I’ve learned the truth about this “trinity” doctrine a few years ago.
A minority of Adventist reject this teaching (trinity).
Unfortunately even among “other Adventist (dissidents off-shoots)they erroneously want to claim they believe in the “Godhead” and not the “trinity” saying the “trinity” is Catholic but the “Godhead” is the biblical truth.
When ask to explain the “Godhead” they end up explaining the trinity.
Confused brothers!😕
Satan's grip on this world is very powerful indeed
Finally you will become an atheist
@Bersama Hikmah - He can be a unitarian christian as well p.s I'm a muslim
10 trinity it says the father son and holy Spirit are one why? I can't answer
Where?
william graves because it isn't found in the original Greek. its an interpolation. it was added later. No modern version has it. Our Greek text does not contain it.
How do the Greek and Hebrew langagues are similar or different ? E change left check Greek and Hebrew.
May you check two langagues a letter begins
I will study hebrew and Greek I have no time
1 John 5:7 kjv is in some early manuscripts if not all. It makes sense with rest of scripture. Baptize in One name of Father,Son,Spirit, the One true Eternal God..Worship the Son Worship the Spirit all through New Testament
My bibles say nor the son in Matt 24:36. The reason being is the father is the planner.
Are u just making assumptions or do u actually know that these are from inaccurate places, some of the scriptures?
We know these verses have been corrupted because we have variations in the manuscripts.
Talking about "cherry picking" sir, you did a wonderful job of picking bible verses that helped you build your strawman case against the doctrine of the Trinity. In fact, none of the verses you use in your video are used by Trinitarians. There are stronger examples in the Bible that support the Trinitarian nature of God, like John 1:1-5, John 10:30, Genesis 1:26, Mathew 28:18-20, 2Corinthians 13:14, Hebrews 1:1-4, Revelation 22:13-15 and many others. It's rather ironic that you use none of these stronger examples in your argument. Peace.
"none of the verses you use in your video are used by Trinitarians."
Have you been living under a rock?
"It's rather ironic that you use none of these stronger examples in your argument. "
The video is about MANUSCRIPT CORRUPTIONS.
@@TheTrinityDelusion I've been living under one of the rocks Jesus built His church with. What rock have you been living under?
I do understand yor video is about manuscript corruptions, however, the examples bible verses you use for your arguments do not refute the doctrine of the Trinity. Hypocritically, you cherry picked inconsequential bible verses. May God bless you in the name of the Father, the Son and the Holy Spirit. Amen
@@roccodivito9354 Feed yourself whatever lies you like.
Jude 1:5 in modern translation is not the word Jesus, it is actually Yahuah.
people be careful who you believe,Thomas called Jesus God and Jesus didn't correct him,and nobody has proof that bible is corrupted.
" nobody has proof that bible is corrupted."
Are you living under a rock?
I agree with most of your arguments. But only 1% of the manuscripts says “He who” (1 Tm 3:16), while 99% says “God”.
Check Wilbur Pickering studies over greek manuscripts.
The earliest and best manuscripts do not say "God." A big list of late manuscripts does not tell a relevant story.
Jesus is the eternal true God according to the bible. Praise the triune God.
❤Jesus says all that the Father has is Mine. He was referring to the marriage custom of the Jews. Only the Father could tell the Son to go get His Bride.
The Bible is inerrant word of GOD.
Stop confusing people.
He who does not help Jesus gather is scattering.
I am not a trinitarian, and I do agree that the trinity is corrupt, however I believe that Jesus is God in the flesh. I use all translations as the basis of my belief. Was Jesus alive in the OT? Only because He is that Spirit that moved on the face of the deep in the beginning. Good video!
Just asking a question to gain some understanding... So not only trinitarians believe that Jesus is God in the flesh ?
@@amandalynn3538 Not sure how a trinitarian views God in the flesh since they view God as three persons rather than One.
@@amandalynn3538 There are Oness Modalism and Binitarian who belives so too.
God bless you and May His truth be with you all!❤️💕
Who is Jesus' God?
Jesus says the scriptures testify of Him. What is your thought on Proverbs 8:22+? All these characteristics are the same in Jesus Christ.
Proverbs 8:22 is about Lady Wisdom not a son.
The Trinity Delusion
Where does it say Lady Wisdom? This is gnostic terminology.
Jesus is called the wisdom of God. All points in these verses are parallel to Jesus.
www.gotquestions.org/wisdom-she-Proverbs.html
Do you not understand what the word SHE means?
The Trinity Delusion
The terminology "lady chokmah, wisdom, sophia" is gnostic terminology. Wisdom is feminine in the text, but not a lady.
CHRISTIAN theologians refer to wisdom in Proverbs as Lady Wisdom because she is personified as a woman. So is Folly the Adulteress.
The Holy Quran emphatically declared there is only One God.
That " dont say trinity".
We Muslims continuously advised our Christian friends to desist from calling Jesus (Peace be Upon Him) to be a God and we were declared to be
" Anti-Christ".
God knows we are sincere and want the well-being of our Christian bretheren.
You are in contradiction - Islam does not want the well-being of Christians. The trinity concept and the allah concept is the same concept - they both deny the divine birth and nature of the Lord Jesus Christ. Only Jesus Christ is nature of GOD's own bosom. All other are brought by creation, not by birth. Jesus Christ is not created, but born by GOD - thus, He has GOD's divine nature, and inherited all things by the Father, making Him equal with the Father, and exalted to the place of the Father. Therefore, Jesus Christ is the Father because all that is of the Father is of Jesus Christ also by inheritance. And anyone that denies the Father and the Son, does not have the Father nor the Son in them. Allah is a name of the devil, and Muhammed is a prophet of the devil - as they both deny the Father and the Son; which is the devil's initial agenda. Serving Allah, is serving the devil. Serving Jesus Christ, is serving GOD - you cannot serve two masters, said Jesus, for you will end up hating one, and love the other, or be faithful to one and cheat on the other. You cheat on Jesus Christ, and thus, cheat on the Father, by following a religion that denies both the Son and the Father. Because remember, the quran says: Allah cannot have a Son. And this is true - because Allah is not GOD. Amen. But all the glory of GOD is to Jesus Christ, because He is the only true glory of the Father in heaven. Amen. There is no other name by which you can be saved. Allah doesn't save. Jesus saves. Allah gets you away from salvation. Repent and trust GOD - do not trust the devil. Amen.
@@dushkob1
Please speak English.
You are speaking in " tongues".
@@rafeekshah4067 I speak the Word of GOD. You have ears planted by the devil - thus, you cannot understand. Because there is no love in you, because you do not know the Father, nor the Son. You speak the language of sarcasm and cynicism. I speak the language of truth - which you cannot understand, because you are not a child of the truth, Who is GOD and the Lord Jesus Christ, but you are son of the father of lies. Thus, your ears cannot understand Words of Truth - and Jesus Christ is the truth, the way, and the life. No one goes to the Father, but through Him. He is the full glory of the Father in heaven, and this glory remains unseen by the many, who walk the broad way of destruction. Only through repentance can you change ways, but your father, the devil, will not allow you to experience repentance from sin, and receive the cleansing blood of Jesus Christ through Whom all sins are forgiven, to those who repent and receive Him in heart and confess Him in mouth. Amen.
A VERY important one to add to the list is Hebrews 1:8/Psalms 45:6
See RSV.
The MT and the LXX differ greatly.
How do they differ?
Anthony Buzzard was explaining it a little bit, he said it's VERY involved and confusing, he recommended looking at F.F. Bruce on the verse.
I think its really more of a translation issue since Hebrews 1:8 is quoting the LXX. (so Hebrews 1:8 will go in the future 10 Translation Corruptions video). A throne signifies Kingly authority. Hebrews chapter 1 is all about how Jesus became superior to the angels when he was exalted. ho thronos sou ho theos (the throne of you the god) is simply a way of saying the risen Jesus now has the authority of the throne of God just as Psalm 45:6 is saying the Davidic King (such as David or Solomon) had the authority of the throne of God over the Kingdom of God (see 1 Chronicles 28:5; 29:23). The Davidic King is given the right to execute God's authority whether it be David or Solomon or Jesus.
@@jamestomas7333 -
Did u read the verses in the RSV and the variant/ alternate reading?
Have u read Psalm 45?
Who is talking to who about whom?
Trinity did in fact exist in the Old Testament. The summary of trinity is in Deuteronomy 10:17.
Also in Numbers 11:25, one single verse where the concept of Trinity can be clearly found.
Trinis use HE, a single person pronoun to refer to the three persons. This being the case, the Trinitarian is no longer free to simply assert that the Father is one person, but absent a solid argument, the Father could be multiple persons. The Son could be more than one person, and also the Spirit.
Yes that's the thing. They are hypocritically inconsistent. Somehow they think they have reasons to believe the Holy Spirit is a single person but they deny those very same reasons would indicate the one God is a person and insist rather the one God is not a person but one being. That being the case, how do they know then whether the Holy Spirit is not in fact a being of 3 or 4 or 4000 persons? So how do they know? The truth is they just check their doctrine to see what will suit it. Sickness.
I was kind of knocking James White with that. He is full of telling others what they must do in debates. He dictates that a non-trini cannot assume Unitarianism (single-personism) but must prove it. But White himself assumes single-personism where it suits him. His dictate turns back on him. Because if YHWH is simultaneously a HE and a THEY, then the same can be true of the Father or the Son, and White cannot ASSUME the Father or the Son are single persons. He must PROVE it.
I've seen GOD. The Trinity is real. The Father is in The Son, so The Son can be called Father fulfilling Isaiah 9:6. The Lord JESUS CHRIST is The GREAT GOD of Israel.
@@PrintOfLife No. Jesus says his God is the God of Abraham... YHWH.
Zechariah 12:10 Who left Christ .?
Can you call people that corrupt the scriptures people of God or Satan because they deliberately corrupt God work they not trust worthy.
I started studying the jws. They cherry pick to fit their doctrines