10 Weapons Worse Than Nuclear Bombs
Вставка
- Опубліковано 7 чер 2024
- 10 Weapons Worse Than Nuclear Bombs
Subscribe for more Top 10 videos: bit.ly/Top10z
- More Top 10 Trends Videos -
Trending Now! ► goo.gl/6iOjv4
UA-camr Top 10s ► goo.gl/K1CSy3
Gaming Top 10s ► goo.gl/x5wC6g
10 Things You Won't Believe Exist! ► goo.gl/9W00nj
Top 10 Trends is a Top 10 channel that produces informative, fascinating, and engaging educational entertainment list videos. Watch our viral, trending, creepy, crazy, funny, hilarious, and mysterious list videos. Top 10 Trends covers everything including Top 10s on Pop Culture, Celebrity, Movies, Music, TV, Film, Video Games, Politics, News, Comics, Superheroes, Sports, Money and more. Your #1 facts source for Top 5 / Top 10 content!
Follow us on Twitter!
/ top10trendz
Voiceover by: / sonofamitchshow - Наука та технологія
1. My mom when she calls me by my full name.
I can totally relate to this comment 🤣
@@Blamejames78 You have no need to use an emoji.
😬👎 glass 🥶💎 big boy diamonds
@@ER-bc6fs u have no need to reply
@@Maluee be quiet
A lego inside a shoe that you can never take off
Lol
You’d get used to it. Not that bad as Hiroshima, let’s be honest, you don’t died.
Soviet Boi Welcome to Mother Russia! r/whoosh
Xanax time Satan Jr...
Let me guess, somebody stole your sweetroll.
I just love that there's elevator music in the background.
Yeah lol why no one notices it
Reminds me of The Plaza on Roblox
A pencil is the most dangerous weapon when John wick hold it
Beast Sw or heath ledger joker
I haven't heard anything more true
Lol
Imagine John Wick having a nuke.
@@aiosquadron john nuke
10 weapons worse than a nuclear bomb...
_Adds a nuclear weapon to the list..._
Seems legit.
Does the 1st example even EXIST IRL? I didn't think we were in the year 2040 yet, and Project Starwars was canned before it was even built IIRC (unless Nixon carried on his work through DARPA and NASA in secret). I thought we were going to seeing REAL weapons that exist, not theoretical, hypothetical or proposed ideas for weapons!
ncshuriken he said the first example is hypothetical
@Enraged Toaster: He should've titled the video more appropriately then. It makes it seem like the video will be about weapons that actually exist.
In terms of most to least realistic:-
Could and would / have been used: 9, 6, also 4 (at least on mosquitos).
Available but too scary so haven't been used yet: 8, 7.
Could conceivably be used in the future: 10, 5, 1.
Not like in the movies or stories but could act like mega toxins instead: 2.
Least realistic: 3.
@@ncshuriken COD: Ghosts
It's hilarious to me that we're fine killing each other, but we have rules as to how to do it.
We ain't exactly a sharp species. We kill each other over arguments about what happens when we die, failing to see the fucking irony in that.
My thoughts exactly
@@yattaguru I better get my 72 virgin's lol
@@JT_8283 You'll have to tell us how that goes 😏
@@yattaguru alot of that talk is an excuse To Kill if most people dont want to fight. you have To get them To somehow. it works. PLUS smart people dont want overpopulation They use it To get people on board.
Thermobaric weapon worst than nuclear? Um, nooo.
And how is it worse exactly?
@@suprlite read the comment above my good man
@@suprlite Lets say you were in a cave and a thermobaric device went off, the oxygen that previously existed in that cave is now gone and will not be returning for some time. You would suffocate almost instantly.
@@DarkSynthon Uhm, yes. So what? A nuclear bomb would tear the mountain the cave was in apart.
@Vadim VeeVoit well, its not. The pressure and temperatures created by even the smallest nuclear bombs far exceeds that of even the largest thermobaric weapons.
I love how the narrator gets both faster and more hysterical as the weapons get more extreme. He sounds like a desperate auctioneer by the end
Hot Pockets straight from the microwave...VERY DANGEROUS
I FUCK HOT POCKETS try again sir
Reheat a boiled egg, get the timing right and BOOM just when you bite it.
Haven't heard that name in a long long time.
Apple pie from Maccy D's, its like lava if you dig straight into those things lol. The scars are only mental though so its alright.
A hot Pocket that's been sitting in back seat of car for a week or so still tasty but will mess u up bad
NOW THAT'S ALOTTA DAMAGE!
oh fuck off hahahah
I can die now as this was all I needed in life
Damn Daniel
Flextape XD fuck. XD
Flextape XD true
For some reason I now feel the need to purchase a handy kitchen gadget that slices, dices, chops, grinds and makes julienne potatoes, especially if it (For a limited time) comes with a FREE set of stainless steel mixing bowls...
Or run out and buy that oxiclean as seen on TV lol
Only for 3 easy payments of $19.99! That's right! Only $19.99!
You forgot our gift if you buy it you get a new skyscraper yea a skyscraper only for 19.99
@Prowler Cam you had me laughing at "But Wait"
But wait there's more. If your one of the first 50 commenters he'll throw in an extra WMD free.
The voice of this guy seems to me a very dangerous, psychological headache weapon. It might fit well in the list.
Destructions 100.
true
Forgetting the wife’s birthday beats most of these
Nick are you speaking from experience? For your sake I hope not.
Im not married anymore so Im cleared of that doomsday device.
Yep!!
Oh, Hey scientists!!! Keep unfreezing these Mammoths or Core-Drilling in Antarctica and eventually you'll release a Super-Virus that'll eat your Wee-Wee.
It's not just the wife's birthday but your anniversary. Lol
Just a glance from the ex-wife,is worse than all of these!
you know what is more worse than those weapon?
my dad belt
😂
RedCube Gamer at least u have dad
@@BELAC43
It's better to not have a dad than to have a dad like that.
@@socratesxaidi2128 shut up fuckhead you dont know what you are saying
Game Byte I agree with him, my biological dad was an abusive asshole and my stepdad can be useless at times. So he can be right when a dad likes to pull a wip it’s probably better to not receive pain.
I was waiting for him to say: "Batteries not included"
S Or “We are not responsible for etc...”
Underrated comment.
“For only two simple payments of 19.99!!!”
Why did this all turn into THEORETICAL worse than nuclear weapons, 🤦♂️
Gives us an idea of what to look forward to?🤷🏽♂️
Because in reality, no weapons are worse than nuclear.
@@whtbobwntsbobget antimatter
@@therealkingz9506 I said in reality
Number 1: A women holding a child with a birth certificate that has your signature on it.
Fixedguitar this comment is underrated
Alejandro Ramos - Thank you for your understanding
If and when you love her and she loves you,then every day you not believing, the kid is the fruit of it!
Eduardo Galdino - Oh you don’t get it. A women can destroy a man and sleep just fine.
*Woman
With the way you speak, i can only imagine the amount of saliva on the mic.
I'm thinking speed dealers are making fistfulls of money off this guy.
I think the 'voice-over' is number 11 of "10 Weapons Worse Than Nuclear Bombs"!!!
Yes the way he speaks is very very annoying. I hate it when people speak too fast because their thing during a time frame. Don't get me wrong I'm able to comprehend and understand when a person speaks fast but it depends on how they speak it. I don't know it's very hard to explain. I guess it could be worse the voice of the Android!
It looks like a dog toy at this point.
ThatOneUglyKid 😂 damn
So basically we create things that could destroy the whole earth to feel safer?
Yes.
I thought i was watching a war game app ad. I was expecting a “download for free” at the end.
Years ago, I asked my husband if he had a choice how would he like to die. He replied, "..during sex". As a response we both laughed and laughed, I then responded," be careful what you wish for". Well, guess what...I am a widow.
*I'm calling the police*
It took the EMS and hospital staff two hours to convince me that it wasn't my fault...
@@deezimmo4814 Recently two well known sex addicts died that way.
could i be next please. lol
Wash your ass and you wouldn't have that problem.
Gotta watch out for the terminator
If you snort a line of coke this video makes sense.
oh yeah your right
"10 Weapons Worse Than Nuclear Bombs"
Puts cobalt bomb on the list.
Bruh...
The Cobalt Bomb can destroy all of humanity
@@comicalnakakapagpabagabag8734 It's a nuclear weapon though so it shouldn't count as a weapon worse than nuclear weapons.
Title 10 weapons *Worse than nuclear weapons*
3 minutes and 41 seconds hes talking about nuclear weapons
3:41*
Yeah you was a little bit later on the time stamp
Grey goo? Isn’t that a Nano toilet cleaner that ate earth. Twice. And then ate ALOT of turtles.
The Youngs tasty planet op
Yeah, but it just kept recreating the Earth instead of itself.
My favorite line “Good bye animal! Oops it mutated! Good bye everyone else!”
Bro you need to stop the dope take a breather put the pipe down and slow down switch to decaf holyshit anybody else understand half of what he said
Pretty easy to understand
Lol😂
Why are you shouting?
He's actually the head of Aperture Science
and speaking super duper fast this guy definitely sniffed one too many line of coke before that video
@@harrisonbalduf3290 underrated
Probably inspired by north american television. Bitch please, this is UA-cam, we got attention- spans here.
He did not sniff cocaine. He¨s excited about the "facts" he is talking about. I mean, would you not be excited, if you had to talk about such terrible things?
*saves to Favorites playlist*
this will be useful for when i become an evil scientist
Is That You Andrew?
Fbi watchlist
Joseph Fox I swear it said Fortnite
you forgot MWAHAHAHAHA !!!!
Can I help lol
I never heard someone talking about the deadliest weapons being that enthusiasm😂
There's nothing worse than a Nuke.....my grandfather saw five nukes explode on Christmas Island he told me the fifth explosion was equally as scary as the first
a nokia phone on a slingshot is the deadliest weapon ever made by human
Or a slingshot filled with the 30mm Nokia smart Tide pods!
Actually threw a Nokia at an electric company worker that accidentally tried turning my electric off when it was the neighbor he was after. He's lucky it hit the corner post of the porch cause that would have left a mark. Guess Nokies are good for something! Idiot repelant! :)
Anonymous Anonymous No. No it wouldn't. Not from orbital velocities. Not nearly enough mass. Not even close.
Whoopee. Still not enough mass or velocity. Not even close.
Here's a website for you if you're interested in what it would actually take: impact.ese.ic.ac.uk/ImpactEarth/ImpactEffects/
Kenetic weapons have been around for a long time . During WWII, they had a bomb that contained lots of flachets. These were hardened steel darts with fins. Used mostly to destroy factories in Germany and Japan they were in dropped from a high altitude. These darts would go through the factories equipment rendering them useless without a high risk of fire. Course if a person was in the way, it did not do them any good.
Still you left the ultimate weapon off the list. Man's capacity to think. That is how you got everything that was on your list to begin with.
That sounds like something I heard about in a TV documentary that was about how faithful Platoon was (I think it was Platoon) to the real life Vietnam war. Apparently there was a weapon called something like the "buzzing bee" or "beehive" and it was a tank fired shell IIRC, but it actually shot out 100's of flechettes, shredding people apart, and nobody wanted to use it because it was far too easy to take out your own people with it in some classic American friendly fire. Sounds really crazy.
If you don’t think the us military has ALL these capabilities, you’d be wrong. Even the antimatter one. They say it’s hard to contain. Well tell me how tractor trailer trucks transport liquid helium, nitrogen, ALL those cryogenic substances. If those materials were just in a tube trailer, the FIRST bump would shatter it....so how do they do it? Magnetic fields, so the liquid doesn’t even touch the metal of the trailer.... same principle applies for anti matter
Actually its not. There were some times during the Vietnam war that canister rounds were used to break the enemy's charge on a fire base. Canister turns your gun tube into a very big shotgun at very close range. You definitely do not want to be in front of it when it goes off.
There is something we Vietnamese called: “bom bi”. It’s basically a hand grenade contains hundreds of metals balls. When the NVC set it off, it would literally melts the whole “squad” in secs.
And do you know what the sad part is? There is still thousands of them left around in Vietnam’s jungle, awaiting for it next victims.
@@scottytoohotty8510 i think you take a bit more pride in our government then anyone else, how about we keep facts and throw away the opinions/theories, yes?
You earned my sub when you said "And because its diamond it's hard as fu**" 😂 had me dying
ejstras I don't know what to say very well straight to the tiny sharp point
2:49 *"OR BUILDINGS"* nice editing lmao
A nokia is the biggest most dangerous weapon of mass destruction
People still dabbing is a doomsday weapon
A dog fetching' a NUCLEAR Bomb! Would be DANGEROUS too! Back to it's owner...
KA-BOOM! MIND BLOWN!! 🐶+💣=💥💥💥💥💥🌍🌎🌏
Fresh feet nah my dude
Galaxy Note 7
You are fucking wrong
It's the Samsung note 7
My farts can be pretty bad
Brilliant ... :P
Too late
I've cleared a house and multiple vehicles(I'm not joking either)
Hahaaaa
I once blew this big ass fart in a Big Lots I used to work at and the shelves literally vibrated. Fart blast wave. XD
Plenty of metal gear references sprinkled in, I love it
Play at x0.75 speed, you'll thank me
Play 1.5x condition apply
Wow, welcome back to your comment from 2 years ago, i brought you back here to tell you to your advice led me on an adventure of wonder and amusement, go fuck yourself
Number 1: A infinity gauntlet with all infinity stones
🤣🤣
So true
Funny, I have one of those but all I can do with it is punch someone.
"Mr. Stark, I don't feel so good..."
Drake Caudill have you tried to snap?
10 Weapons Worse than a nuclear bomb Worse as it's Not as good as a nuclear bomb
Super Soaker, Nerf Guns, Slingshot, Fist, Legos, Paper Airplane, My Dick, Boomerang, Note 7, and Toothpick
Bob Johnson No he is actually reasonable. And correct.
I agree, but I would substitute effective for good. I am by no means a SJW snowflake, but I am sure there are only a few people who can describe a nuke as good outside of N. Korea, or just maybe China.
While it is effective it is also frowned upon by the whole world.
Ratko Mladic maybe like the first 2 but not the rest, the damage a nuclear can cause is greatly dwarfed when compared
“It’s diamond so it’s hard as fu$&!” 😂
10. Kinetic weapons? The satellite that carries them would be a target.
9. Thermobaric weapons? They are not more powerful than a nuclear bomb.
8. Cobalt bomb? You're right on that one. It is worse than an ordinary nuclear bomb but does not accurately state why it was worse. The video states that fallout extends but fallout is normal for any nuclear bomb. The reason a cobalt salted bomb is worse is because it's fallout renders an area uninhabitable for at least a hundred years instead of a few weeks like an ordinary nuke.
7. Biological weapons? It is impossible to spread any lethal amount of microorganism throughout a large area like an entire nation. Destroying an entire nation is something that nukes can do.
6. Chemical weapons suffer the same issues as do biological weapons. Both may be used on a limited area but not throughout an entire nation let alone the world. The video cited 200,000 civilian casualties and over a million troops but it does not state if those were deaths or injuries. The latter is likely to have been the case.
5. Diamond meteorites??? It is not practical to divert the orbit of a small asteroid even with a nuclear bomb. The asteroid/meteorite would simply fragment into a thousand pieces. And why the hell are they referred to as diamonds? Meteorites do not contain diamonds.
4. Gene drive? It is simply not practical to use such a thing against a population instead of an individual for the same reasons as biological weapons.
3. Antimatter weapons? The video did a good job of explaining why it is unrealistic. Containment of the antimatter would be impossible especially in small devices like hand grenades.
2. Gray goo? That's about the only weapon mentioned that might have some potential in the future but only if you want to target the entire planet.
1. Artificial intelligence? Maybe.
Overall, this video is BS.
You forgot that if Squidward dabbed the world would blow up
Carrie Floyd your gay for that dabbing is last year’s trend
@@FlossyBadgeYT your gay for being triggerd
But he already did 🤔
Glad he's only done it once and not twice
YFG T O x I c You’re like two years old. Learn how to use proper English.
I like how you're talking about weapons of mass destruction and in the background theres happy music xD
Thermobaric weapons are powerful but a wind exceeding 20 KPH will disperse the fuel and severely lower its impact.
Honestly shocked that Cobalt Bomb isn’t higher on the list!
The two really dangerous actual weapons in this video, are the cobalt bomb and biological weapons. The cobalt bomb IS a nuclear weapon that woulds make large areas uninhabitable for decades. Biological weapons are indiscriminate and can spread far from the original point of insertion.
the two weapons you mentioned were actually the only weapons on that failure of a list this abomination of a channel uploaded, that are worse than a conventional nuke. And you're absolutely right in saying that one of those essentially is a nuke.
Chuck Norris can take on all of these
And Justice For All 🤣🤣🤣
I didn't understand a bit what he is saying look like a bomb chasing him on the field and he is reading his last script
Kinetic tungsten rods: Why hello there.
Me: *COD Ghosts flashbacks*
There is one more... it's more powerful than the number one weapon on this list... TikTok
Underrated
A blackhole made in a lab.
Time itself?
Yeah, control time, and you def. got the better weapon
Time
jake paulers banding together screaming their pre pubescent voices, thus deafening everyone and then slowly kicking and punches someone to death very very slowly with their tiny fists, and last but not least dabbing on you. it is truly terrifying.
Laggy_ I bet it's worse than living in South Sudan
Laggy_ I know right? My ears bled just from being around one
Dumbass
Announcer: you ain’t selling oxyclean! Tone it down a bit buddy. 🤦🏼♀️
Was that Bill Burr waiting in line to get a shot?
Social media and the news is the worst weapon!...
Absolutely, propaganda is single handily brought more countries to war then any other device on earth to date and will continue to be used for the foreseeable future
Religion is the deadliest weapon ever. People have been slaughtered for centuries just because they didn't believe in the same imaginary person as someone else.
heeell yees 👁
White peoples fault
Depends on what you mean by worse, there is no man-made weapon more destructive than a nuclear warhead but there are of course much more brutal weapons than a nuke which would likely vapourise a person instantly. The cobalt bomb is still a nuclear bomb, although it could also be categorised as a dirty bomb.
“It’s got its own thing goin’”
Fuckin’ hilarious!
Play back at .5 for a good laugh, sounds like a Drunken Sailor.
Bald Gamer dude you’re the best hahaha
At 6:49 .5 speed is a really good part for this
@@mydude3254 Nowwww hear me outtt lol.
.25X funnier as well. Sounds like sleepy drunk. 2X makes him sound like a chipmunk
>worse weapons than nuclear bombs
>shows rock in thumbnail
Regular rock like the Cherblynsk object, nuke level airburst. Use metal object or rock wrapped in carbon fiber or graphene and it's an impactor.
I would just like to point out that you said a tungsten rod weighing the same would do "about the same amount of damage" (as an atomic bomb) equal to 11 tons of tnt, this is an entirely untrue! Fatman, one of the two atomic bombs detonated over japan, was equivalent to 21,000 tons of tnt. Tsar Bomba, the most powerful hydrogen bomb ever tested, was equivalent to 50,000,000 tons.
Learn the diffrence between the bombs you dumbass.
positive side of tungsten rods bomb is that is bloody expensive and the common trend is go for the cheapest.
@@kwando472 If that was aimed at me I was pretty clear in my explanation.
@@AnotherDred Lifting a tungsten rod into space is much more expensive than an atomic device and far less damaging
@@spider0804 Still learn the diffrence between an atomic bomb and the tsar bomba.
1. My mom when I talk back
"Take that Australia "
Australians be like "wtf we do?"
I've had a "Rod from God"!
I miss Father Davis...
Wait...
John O'Neill gay
😂
Haha priest joke
John O'Neill - Said the Virgin Mary
At 10:00 the pods in the moon where our real bodies or minds are contained, i woke up there on an lsd trip 2 weeks ago. They realized i had awoke and they put me back in the simulation. It was real af.
No way. Are you serious?! I’ve been there too after doing DMT for hours and hours. it was the realest thing I’ve ever experienced and I was so afraid and in so much shock that I could hardly breath, talk, or move. They came to me and simply put me back. I couldn’t fight back or anything, my mind was just in too much shock and mind fucked. I haven’t been the same since. I’ve tried counseling, I’ve tried support groups but I can’t stop feeling this impending doom in the pit of my stomach yet at the same time every thing seems so fake now.
A weapon more dangerous than nukes? Influencers!
Social media Influencers. 😂
25 kills you get grandpas fart instantly ends match
Agree with Artificial Intelligence its dangerously risky not to give computers life
Meteorites do not strike the earth. A meteorite is what it is called after it hits the earth. So, unless you have people picking them up and throwing them they have no trajectory. The suffix ite is used to describe an ore that is found in the ground. Meteors on the other hand do strike the earth.
True story
Your wrong they become metroite after entering Earth's atmosphere metors when missing entering ea
Sam Rowe, According to both dictionary and encyclopedic references they become meteorites after they hit the ground. Go argue it with the dictionary;
www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/meteorite
Tell them why they are wrong. I have studied English for many years. I suggest you spend a bit more time with it before telling someone else they are wrong. I even broke the word down for you so you would understand why. I could teach English. Can you?
john underwood we strike them?! lmao
@@jhonfamo8412 Why not? First strike works sometimes.
11:36 when you try to order a pizza but your phone is on 1%
"Nanomachines, son."
Oh my god I fucking love you...
Couple pounds of anti matter
I want some, i has plans....
Oh my goodness
🤗
I like cheese 🧀 cake 🍰
PLATANO POWER i love cheetos
Wait, I like cheese and I like cake. Sooo...
The announcer lives on a steady diet of red bull and espresso
I thought we where going to hear real weapons but we hear about 100ft diamond meteors and terminators
MIKE Cardinal Even then the diamond meteors and rods of God are functionally the same
You really undersold AI there. Number 1 spot is correct, but you could have explained the why of it a bit better.
Presented as light hearted joke........ Just for a second ask yourself a couple of serious questions.........1. Who actually believes the government either doesn't have or is not trying to get most or all of these weapons? 2. Would they use it on us the ordinary people? 3. Are all battle grounds really that far away from our homes? 4. How much are you personally willing to bet you are for 1 second immune from this happening to YOU?
Please please just for a second think about it, remember when we are dead it's too late. Pay attention and be safe.........peace
The US has built a laser in orbit with the X37-B over the past several years capable of outputting several megawatts of power in the form of a laser.
In 1998 Lt. Col. William H. Possel of the U.S. Air Force wrote a report on laser weapons in space, Laser Weapons in Space: A Critical Assessment. They basically say by 2020 the US will have a laser in space. These lasers have been in the works since the mid 70's. There have been some claims of them using the laser already. Can you prove it? No. But history tells us that when they talk about it, when the public knows about the plans, it's already been made.
@@TheLogicalLowdown it is no wonder people never take these things seriously until it's too late, it annoys the shit out of me. I agree totally with your comment, thank you for posting it.....peace
Presented with this light hearted joke I would take it seriously and start saving money to buy anti matter so I can make lasers to shot from space, which is intirely legal for some unknown reason.
Aye. There's a reason I'm trying to get a large piece of property. I'm building a very nice bunker when the opportunity arises. It will be used for a living place and as a training zone for some of those who feel the same as myself
if it can be weaponized it will be.
I know what's worser than a nuclear bomb, it's a natural weapon it's a Supervolcano!
ive never had to turn my volume so low...
While Kinetic Bombardment could most definitely be dangerous, the physics of a simple metal rod being launched from orbit and having the equivalent energy release of a nuclear warhead just doesn’t add up. This idea was recently popularized in the G.I. Joe movie but the destructive force was completely misrepresented.
@@4johnybravo when you’re in earths orbit and drop an object from outer space (tungsten which is an extremely dense metal) weighing tons, the impact will be extremely violent and just from the Kinetic energy alone it’ll displace dirt that can create an impact that is equivalent to the damage of an atomic bomb just without the nuclear fallout.
3th grader:ligma
Other 3th grader:what ligma
3th grader:ligma balls
Other 3th graders: *DEAD*
4th grader: Theres a cure for ligma called rideon
Other 4th grader: rideon?
4th grader: ride on ma dick
Other 4th graders: *DEAD*
Thirth grader?
Seems like your all in kindergarden
@@user-xk4gf9jz8c while you're in nursery
You are correct, Jason M. It's my "all in kindergarden". I am in possession.
Isnt the first one from gi.joe?🤣..the one with the tungsten rod😂
If you're dropping a projectile from space, wouldn't the force of the impact be equivalent to the fuel required to get it up into space? Since we're really just dealing with potential energy. Actually, it would take more fuel, right? Since you also have the mass of the shuttle to take it up there.
Diamond meteorite would not ne dangerous at all, diamond is métastable carbon, it Burns pretty easily
I was looking for someone that realized this. It's not just something that'll burn up, but it also has very little mass. Our atmosphere eats stuff like that for breakfast.
AI will never take over because battery technology will always be shit.
If AI takes over, people will notice it by how rapidly things improve.
Stanford University student accidentally found a way to make batteries last forever. That was about 4 years ago... haven't heard anything about it since.
jdlech Do you actually believe that story?
Unless you're the battery
@@jdlech it's just battery health, not charge. Still you have to consider the law of conservation of energy.
I watched at .75 speed. Made it more normal speaking at least.
LOL It works, he sounds drunk, but it's also hilarious!
So true lol
For me, the coolest way to die would to be locked in my room and forced to forever watch Barney Miller reruns!! What a show!!
AI: Potentially more dangerous than nukes and antimatter weapons. You know, I can actually believe that... scary.
Do you know what is bigger and badder then a pitbull with aids? The s.o.b. that gave it to him.. just sayn
Nahhhh you can get a pit bull to release its lock jaw by simply putting your thumb up it’s butt. Artificial intelligence is legit scary because the only potential known is that within itself. We’ll never know the true potential until it’s too late.
That's a lot of damage!!
@7:39 take that Australian 😂
Chemical weapons?
Smells like fresh cut gra...
Tear gas and Chlorine? Salted bombs and anthrax?
How are these "worse" than nukes?
I think its because of the suffering you'd go through unlike a nuke which vaporizes you or gives you radiation posining which kills in a couple years where as people live for many years after chlorine gas attack.
Beacause they are about the same amount of explosives that spread radioative fall out like urainium 235, plutoniom, radium,and the artificial urainium 239 made spliting atoms of urainum 238,234 ps i am only twelve
Despite how powerful nuclear weapons are portrayed in media, a lot nuclear warheads are needed for large areas of land. Yes you could use 1 to hit each metropolitan area, but after about 2 months the area is now "survivable" (barring the use of long decay isotope salts like Cobalt)
1 nuclear warhead cannot end life on our planet. There is a maximum yield in a nuclear weapons that depends on the critical mass of the fuel. All of the weapons listed, save for 2 (the rod of God and the thermobaric warhead) are almost unlimited in their destructive ability. A Cobalt salted warhead could spread long lived deadly radiation across regions a single nuke couldn't touch except with fallout. It could potentially radiate an entire ocean with dangerous particles and make fish life until fit for consumption.
A chemical bomb can permanently sterilize the entire planet with a chemical that prevents plant growth or contaminates animal life.
Biological threats replicate themselves, Nanobots as well, same with AI. Meteors let alone made of diamond are of course world ending.
The only thing on this l think my be a bit ridiculous is antimatter. The antimatter-matter annihilation reaction is rather well studied at this point and not exactly ideal for weapons. All other weapons have to be armed or triggered or etc, but antimatter-matter doesn't have that. Once it is created it does not go away until it is annihilated with it's pair particle. The rest of the world is made of it's pair so everything is a trigger. Nukes don't just go off Willy nilly to the slightest shock or what have you, they are very delicate pieces of engineering and are required to go off correctly to be anything more than a "simple" dirty bomb.
@@draykegoddard8484 no one cares that your 12, anyone with a mental capacity can quickly learn the basic fundamentals to nuclear fission and fusion concepts. BTW tear gas and chlorine don't explode or spread radiation "Beacause they are about the same amount of explosives that spread radioative fall out like urainium 235 "
@@rsmabby7985 Nukes cause huge amounts of suffering through burns and although this is less then salted bombs cancer.
I would prefer god rods than nuclear bombs because nuclear bombs make its entire destruction radius uninhabitable for thousands of years, so I vote space harpoon
Thats not true. Hiroshima is still fine today. Population of 1.2 M
@@PumpMcStump well I guess I was wrong
@@PumpMcStump true I guess lingering radiation from nuclear bomb blasts last like 5 years, but that doesn't change the devastation it causes to human and animal life in the blast radius, imagine your skin being pulled off your bones, simply by the heat caused by an explosion meters away
@@PDXraw Ya dude. War sucks.
My scary weapons : My fart after I eat beans and hot peppers at the same time .
Thermobaric bombs are definitely the most interesting. They are technically not as destructive as nukes, because they don't cause permanent pollution, but you can't really hide from them.
I too watched G.I. Joe 2
Me too lol. What's next...God's eye?
speak 20% faster so i could understand nothing finaly
Wow, who is chasing you sir? 😂😂😂
At least you got a great humor man make it sound hilarious and cool funny LOL