How Tsar bomba works! Worlds biggest nuclear bomb ever detonated / learn from the base
Вставка
- Опубліковано 16 бер 2023
- #b3d #nuclear #bomb #military
The tsar bomb is an aerial hydrogen bomb known as a thermonuclear weapon
Nuclear Bomb breakdown
How Castle Bravo Bomb works! : • How Castle Bravo works...
HOW FAT MAN WORKS? | Nuclear Bomb ON Nagasaki: • HOW FAT MAN WORKS ? | ...
➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖
Music from @Argsound Background Music
Name of track: "Shadow"
Link: • (No Copyright) Tense C...
➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖
➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖
Song Credits
Quiet Desperation Part 2
JCar
Written By
Joshua Carter
Performed By
JCar
Produced By
JCar
➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖
Creator of the 3D model
Warkarma
sketchfab.com/3d-models/tsar-... - Наука та технологія
Compare news coverage from diverse sources around the world on a transparent platform driven by data. Try Ground News today and get 30% off your subscription: ground.news/learnfromthebase
i thought tsar bomb was denonated in the ocean?
How do you mispronounce "rod", even yt subtitles heard "road". 🤣
themmost terrifying thing you didnt mention was that this bomb was meant ot be what 80 or 100 megatons and they were scared it might ignite atmosphere so dialed it back to 50ish
You borked the edit by going from the cutaway of the bomb @2:43 into an ad and returning abruptly to "Kola peninsula" @3:43
....like, why cut it at styrofoam?
@@maj4530 You should not have thought that. Maybe you were confused by the one detonated by Usa at Bikini Atoll. It, of course, was not dropped by an aeroplane - it was the size of a large house.
fun fact : that was only 50% of what the actual bomb can do
yeah he just talked about a basic Teller-Ulam design - completely ignoring the fact that Tsar Bomba had _multiple_ secondaries.
@@chouseification
*Exactly.* Thank you for clarification of the _obvious._
@@ExplosivesLaboratory it's obvious to people in the know, but since this is supposedly an educational/informational video, hold your sarcasm... as that is not at all obvious to Joe Public.
They don't know how nukes work, so when they intentionally watch a video showing how this specific really big nuke worked, showing how it was very different than other very large nukes (by showing multiple secondaries) was actually a requirement here. Ooops.
Well not can
The bombs first design was 2x as powerful
But even the Soviets thought I was stupid
@@macieg_4179It wasnt stupid in the scale of destruction. It was stupid simply because it would crush half of Soviets and Finland completely if it were to go out like that. Besides the crews who drop those bombs would never made it out. Why do you think they designed the Tsar Bomb in the first place?
Nice to know that this was the SECOND Tsar Bomba. The first was twice as powerful but Krushcev decided that was OTT and ordered it be reduced by half
Imagine if they had detonated that one
@@muhacnt7988 the Poseidon submarine drone nuke is 200 megatons, 4 times the Tsar Bomb and twice the 1st nuke they wanted to test
@@muhacnt7988 it would be a kamikaze mission
They removed the fissile tamper
let the US remind all u dumbasses that size DOESNT matter…. its how u use it. u think they were getting a 27 ton bomb across the world without getting shot down… cant be fast. cant be maneuverable
The designer must be really proud of his work.
💪💪💪💪
the design was stolen from Americans thru some russian spies
@@scoashish who is he?
@@scoashishoh really 😂😂
@@jonathansimpson1106 Sakharov was designer of Russia's thermonuclear bomb, later in his life he paid dearly price while arguing for peace and disarmament. I guess he shared bit of same path as Oppenheimer.
This is both terrifying and amazing at the same time. . Feeling this bomb explode must be a once-in-a-lifetime experience..
yes, yes, yes... wait--
more like an end-of-lifetime experience 😂😂
@@JDurham4635
Depends on how far away you are as you're watching it
😂😂😂
they have one each for Germ many,Israhell,the filthy little island of the crown and anybody else that wants a few---north russia is loaded to the hilt with huge underground rockets with 16 warheads for all their ex-friends...plus russia has 20,000 tact nukes spread all over euro land for the rest of the dummies
As crazy as it is to say, that regardless of how destructive this bomb is, it’s truly genius
Genius? they STOLE the concept of nuclear weapons through spying on the US through british agent klaus fuchs they may have never been able to take a nuclear device without stealing the technology .. this is theft jarrod not genius
Only THE ANTICHRIST would use something like this ... the US was sick and
Should never have used them on JAPAN
Now Russia has to buy weapons from 3rd world North Korea and IRAN.
How the mighty has fallen .
yeah i cant wait to use it
In pooptin in power, he can use this bomb just to show ruski he won the war with Ukraine. But of course, that would be the end of russia as well. And pooptin will be united with his boss Stalin in hell.
Tsar Bomba actually designed as 100 MT bomb, using 3rd stage fusion by combining 2 fusion bombs and 1 fission bomb together, the reason why it cut into 50 MT (actual explosion is 55 MT) simply because TU-95 crew definitely will get killed if the bomb was designed as 100 MT, so the 3rd phase was removed and only have 2 phases (1 fission and 1 fusion).
And a destruction zone extending to Finland and populated Soviet territory.
@@johnbeckman492 true.
Soviet also doesn't have a place to drop the bomb, international law prohibit nuclear testing in international water.
It was a 3 stage bomb. The reflector-tamper was to be U238. Lead was used instead. Bringer the yield down to 58MT
UuuRrraaaa 🇷🇺🇷🇺
And they was worried it would break the ozone layer.
If my high school and college science classes had featured this type of explanation and graphics, I would have learned a lot more science.
With markets tumbling, inflation soaring, the Fed imposing large interest-rate hike, while treasury yields are rising rapidly-which means more red ink for portfolios this quarter. How can I profit from the current volatile market, I'm still at a crossroads deciding if to liquidate my $125k bond/stocck portfoli0
It’s precisely at times like these that investors need to be on guard against the next certainty. You don’t have to act on every forecast, hence i will suggest you get yourself a financial-advisor that can provide you with entry and exit points on the shares/ETF you focus on.
Right, I've been in constant touch with a fiinancial-analyst since covid . You know these days it's really easy to buy into trending stock`s, but the task is determining when to buy or sell . My advisorr decides entry and exit commands on my portfoliio, I've accrued over $300k from an initially stagnant reserve of $150K.
that's impressive!, I could really use the expertise of this advisors , my portfolio has been down bad....who’s the person guiding you.
credits to MARIE SLOPIEY DONNER, one of the best portfolio manager;s out there. she;s well known, you should look her up
Google her name.
he Czar bomb was originally designed as a 3-stage weapon with a 100 MT power. But the designer was horrified by how much power it would have, so the 3rd stage was replaced with lead. A bigger explosion would have made no sense, because the cloud would have already flown out into outer space. Even so, he broke the windows at a distance of 900 km, the rest of the data is there in the video. The shock wave bypassed the Earth several times.
Did they test 100 Mt one?
@@adhyanverma8954No.
@@toroashe oh ty for info
@@adhyanverma8954coming soon 😂
Tzar Bomba caused outrage around the world which triggered treaties with the Soviets not to make bigger weapons. The creator of it became a anti-nuclear advocate.
This video is a pretty accurate representation of my night after Taco Bell.
Fission doesn't work the way it's shown. Plutonium doesn't split into more plutonium, it splits into fission fragments of other elements like iodine, xenon, cesium, and cobalt to name a few.
Thank you
I'd never found anyone who explained the Tsar Bomba's inner working so clearly. Combined with the visual representations, you made it easy to fully understand how it works.
Shame it's inaccurate
Now we only need the materials… lol. Jk fbi.
@@forfun6273 And an accurate explanation of how they work, and the mathematical description of those phenomena.
@@forfun6273
😁😁😁💥
Am get so scared after watching this😮😮
Imagine paying for UA-cam Premium to have no ads and you still get ads
I didn’t get any ads
USE BRAVE BROWSER EVEN ON PHONES AND ITS FREE OVER A 300 MILLION USERS EZPZ
use adblockers its free
I didn't get any ads either
I wasnt paying to much attention to the video but he may be talking about when ppl say this video is brought to you by.... its annoying cause i paid for no types of ads
Wow thank you so much for this very informative detailed description of how the bomb works! I’ve never seen a video on UA-cam or anywhere else that explained the process this well?!
These kinds of illustrations are amazing
The yield estimate of the Fat Man has been more recently been revised to 24.8kt. The Tsar bomba yield was 56.8 Mt.
The primary was smaller than shown. The AF&F package did not lie between the stages. The pit was not pure plutonium, and would have been larger than 6 inches. The secondary tamper was lead, not uranium. It's deuteride, not deturide.
The sparkplug was probably boosted. The interstage material was not Styrofoam.
The weapon was mounted inside the bomb bay, only the doors had to be removed and it protruded outside the bay. It didn't use a 32 point initiation system. The chemical explosive did not produce a neutron burst. A separate device does that.
The feedback loop described as taking place in the secondary is inaccurate.
Maybe you're the one who should've made this video 😅
wow.. lol
@@WickedrWil Thought about making a video for years, but if I was going to do it, I'd do it properly. Multi-part, many hours in total, with all the maths to calculate the various parameters.
Thus far I've not had the time or energy to do that.
Also, is giving a detailed description of how to actually design a nuclear explosive to every rando on the Internet something I want to do? Dunno.
For now, I'll stick to correcting amateur videos and anything else I find spreading misinformation and mistakes about this topic.
@@Evan_Bell
Thanks for making this comment. It’s great when people like you who know what they are talking about clarify things in a more accurate manner.
Of course everyone is free to ask questions, I'll do my best to answer.
The Tsar Bomb was an impractical, psychological weapon. The interesting thing is that it accelerated the development of realistic missile delivery systems to take it to the West, but these systems ended up being used for space exploration instead.
What if Space Race was actually a distraction for USSR to focus on instead of making nukes. Ultimately bankrupting them
As always, unfortunate, real investments in since made to military researches.
It was practical in the mean that the URSS developed bigger and more powerfull warheads as a solution for their ICBM inferior precision. while US missiles could target bases and silos with aceptable precision the URSS couldnt..so their solution was use bigger warheads so even if the missile misses the target by a few miles it would still destroy it
Work smarter not harder
What an idiotic statement. What makes a nuclear weapon practical.
thanks for the tutorial, this is gonna rock my science fair!!!
Wait
xd
What a well orchestrated marriage of story and graphics that mesh in perfect harmony. I truly learned some interesting facts that were unknown to me at the time, and your video filled in some blank areas that I had questions about. This is sound doctrine and on point. Great work! This is one of those videos I tell my friends and family that I made it.😂
The actual yield of the Tsar-Bomb was 50MT at 97% fusion-yield and that was a derated version of a 100MT design (This was done to give the Tu-95 bomber-crew that dropped a chance to survive the blast - they nearly didn't). Also the test-device was a three-stage design not a two-stage design.
Predicted yield of 50Mt, actual yield of 56.8Mt.
But using a remotely controlled bomber would solve that problem as long as the operators where on the moon rip
"they nearly didn't"
*what does that mean (in this context)* ?
@@sungam69 The Tu-95 were almost killed by the bomb's blast.
@@nicholasmaude6906 What does almost mean in this context? Were they injured?
Great tutorial! This worked really well when I tried it myself. Instant sub.
Yeah great tutorial. wait what.
Agreed.
wait...
lol brb, heading to the workshop
What
This helped me make the beginning of my comic. Thanks a lot!
Who else came here for the tutorial? Building one right now
👍
Almost..
0:55 When your squad accidentally pulls and all-nighter, and someone mentions they can see the sun coming up through their window
This is both terrifying and amazing at the same time. 😯
This is one of the most informative video I've seen on thermost nukes
The truth is that there is no use to keep increasing nukes payload. As the energy is expanded in a sphere which is a 3 dimension shape, that means that in order to double a Nukes radius we need to increase the payload 8 times (2x2x2). So the most optimal way to increase the destruction is to just user more smaller nukes in a wider area. Tsar Bomba was just an exhibition and it is almost impossible to be successfully used in combat now days due to its size. Missiles with multiple warheads are the most dangerous weapon today
Why is it useless to use? Underwater drone "Poseidon" is just equipped with a charge of 100 megatons.
@@louisgivella5577 get a life kid 😅
@@mrDelight777 ok that doesnt mean shit when one icbm that costs literally less than the stupid ass tsar bomba can hit up to 12 different targets instead of just one
@@masterhacker7065 You said absolutely stupid. How did you measure the cost if this bomb was not produced? Of course, this bomb is ten times cheaper than an ICBM. The fact that the delivery method is outdated is a completely different question. But it has already been rightly noted above that strategic torpedoes have appeared, for which superpower is relevant again.
@@mrDelight777 Of course it is. The Russians said so.
And as we've seen for the last year when Russia says they have a wunderwaffe, and don't even show it we can totally believe them
Fun fact: 'Little Boy' and 'Fat Man' are the *only* nuclear weapons used in combat. No other nuclear weapon developed since 1945 has been used in combat. Let's hope things stay that way.
It won't.
It won't. Russia is fueling up their Europe-targeted birds as we speak...
In combat? Actually they were used in the massacre of hundreds of thousands of civilians. As the US has always done, in Hiroshima and Nagasaki, in Korea, Vietnam, Yugoslavia, Panama, Grenada, Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya, etc
@AltXodo RedNovember : Get over yourself, it was a world war after 3-4 years of Japanese atrocities and we knew how they treated our PoWs by that point.
@@altxodorednovember6920 There were no nukes dropped anywhere but in Japan. Don't lie.
Your talking speed is excellent in this video. Other similar channels could learn from yours. I don't know what it is with everyone wanting to speak so quickly these days and UA-cam doesn't allow you to fine tune the speed of the audio enough to get it just right.
Interesting fact: the uranium tamper was replaced by a lead one for Tsar Bomba in order to reduce radioactive fallout from the blast. This also reduced the bomb's yield from ~100 Mt to 58 Mt, because a large part of the explosive force of these "Teller-Ulam" type bombs comes from fission in the uranium tamper.
0:28 Sir, that's the T-pose Bomba.
That was quite fascinating….thanks for posting👍
Perfectly made. Thanks a lot
Thank you for give us professional knowledge ❤❤❤
I always thought it was facinating it takes a conventional bomb to set of a fission bomb to then set off a fusion bomb. Then if you look to the reactors you need the tritium byproduct of fission to power fusion reactors. Its just facinating.
"The weight of five elephants." - Thank god we all have pet elephants at home and have now a precise idea how heavy this bomb has been.
imagine going back in time with this video and making a paradox and creating an explosion that wipes the known universe
10/10 for the graphics, 6/10 for the scientific accuracy. The Soviet scientists never released any information on how the "Tsar Bomba" (which was the American nickname for it) was constructed and to this day we are left with guesses. The two best guesses are: two fission bombs with the fusion fuel between them leading to higher compression of the fusion stage and therefore more yield, or two fusion stages with the first igniting the second (again leading to more efficient use of the fusion fuel in the second fusion stage). Either way it was a highly impractical design!
The graphics are awful doesn’t even know the difference between circumference and diameter
Yeah I agree. I'm a 3D artist and there's all manor of bad animation and artifacting in the animations. Like the propellors of the planes.. how do you even make rotation of a propellor in 3D to look that poor! Along with all this other flickering and glitching
@@jamief.g This video looks like an advert for a free to play game and it fails to explain how the primary fission device works because it does not describe the neutron source at the centre of the sphere.
@@jamief.g How about: do it yourself?
@@Simboiss What would the reason to do it myself be? I would if you paid me
Not the tutorial we wanted, but the tutorial we needed
This ain't a tutorial☠
too bad the details are sloppy at best
Overused cringe comments
@@EvilForReal16 BRO TAKE A JOKE
@@thatcringyplaneguy There's no joke present. Dude's 100% right.
Dudes at the start was so humbled of the bomb that they stood in t-pose.
Great tutorial. Thanks a lot
The uranium compression cylinder in the description correctly described every thermonuclear bomb *_Except_* the actual Tsar Bomba that was dropped. Had the bomb been as described, its blast would have been 100 megatons TNT equivalent, and the bomber crew would not have survived. To cut that in half, lead was used instead of uranium, just as Ernest Jay wrote 7 days ago. I think that decision came from the bomb designers, one of whom was Andrei Sakharov. Presumably Khrushchev agreed.
i am wondering they had literally carried it and not loaded it inside of carrier , what happens if it somehow failed and gets dropped in route to that island , lol .there's no way stoppping it and world would have been something else by now then, lol .
Omg I've waited so long for this. Never actually expected you to make a vid about the tsar bomba. Amazing job!
Poor job.
Waiting for this.. Ofcourse 😊
Fascinating who knew just showing people what a nuke can do allowed them to study it and have other countries equip it and also learn how to make a nuke splitting atoms is pretty interesting
“We can build a weapon that mimics the furnace of our sun and the winds of Neptune but yet we cant predict the weather more than a few minutes ahead of it’s time”
-vsauce
Very worrisome to know that we have really further advanced beyond the ignorance of world control, we still face the dangers of nuclear war as we start to build up the stock worldwide! But with all that said, a really interesting video.
Male ego is the only reason these weapons exist.
Thanks for the tutorial btw. I just finished the fusion part.
No you didn't.
FBI on the way
Yall i finished it and im going to go test it in my yard. I will be back with yall soon :)
thx for the tutorial gotta try it
In theory, the bomb would have had a yield in excess of 100 Megatons (418 PJ) if it had included the uranium-238 fusion tamper which featured in the design, but was omitted in the test mainly due to reduce the radioactive fallout and to assure the survivability of the bomb crew.
i am wondering they had literally carried it and not loaded it inside of carrier , what happens if it somehow failed and gets dropped in route to that island , lol .there's no way stoppping it and world would have been something else by now then, lol .
The animation of fission reaction suggest that plutionium atoms multiply when split XD
I appreciate your detailed explanation,thank you.
When you realize that swapping lead acid batteries or alkaline batteries out for lithium, dopes the bomb up!
This channel feels like it's made by an AI.
Fascinating and terrifying at the same time it's a true Doomsday weapon.
Thank you for the very well done video
Cool thanks for the instructions, I'll get making one
You can learn anything on UA-cam, truly awesome time to be alive.
I'd be cool to see a timeline break out of the reactions I mean there is not much to explain but trying to imagine 600 billionth of a second is kind of hard, also how much of the material does actually react? 🤔
If you use the equation E=mc2 you can work it out. I know that 100% matter to energy is 25 MT per kg.
1:16 I like how it said Fat Man...
That’s the code name for the nuke dropped on Nagasaki
Stewie Griffin
What software do you use to make graphics and motion pictures, please let me know. Thank
What a terrifying weapon! 💣
The physics of AN602 described completely incorrectly.
At first, AN602 was a three-stage bomb. Unstead of a primary, the triggers were the two enormous thermonuclear two-stage secondaries, vaguely resembling these bombs described here. The tertiary was a giant block of 2 tons of lithium deuteride.
In addition, according to public sources, the Soviet H-bomb design never used a cylindrical secondary shape like a design pictured here. Instead, secondary capsules were spherical or ellipsoidal. This video describes a design of early Teller-Ulam hydrogen bombs.
According to public sources and photos, the AN602 tertiary was divided by six or eight ellipsoidal capsules, mounted symmetrically in the bomb case. These capsules are seen on footage of final bomb mounting as ellipsoids protruding from a big metal ring just about the case intersection.
Aliens: "That's cute"
Well put together and informative
Misinformative.
Good video. The only thing I have to disagree with is the role of styrofoam... The low-z (mostly transparent to x-ray radiation) foam mostly serves to keep the radiation channel open between the primary and the secondary. While plasma pressure does provide some compression to the secondary, most of the compression that causes the secondary to ignite comes from the ablative effect on the surface of the secondary, caused by x-rays from the primary detonation (staged radiation implosion). Without the foam present to produce a low-z plasma, the ablation of the surface of the secondary would plug the radiation channel and prevent radiation transport to the secondary, and the secondary would not ignite.
@@mozzjones6943 just an enthusiast that's been researching publicly available, declassified, and FOIA information about nuclear weapons for decades... good resources would be Sublette (Nuclear Weapons Archive), Hansen (Swords of Armageddon), and any number of declassified info available. Also... somewhere I read that this design possibly had two primaries compressing the secondary from either side. But I can't be sure on that. It seems like we have more info publically available about American weapons versus other countries' weapons...
You say that the foam is mostly transparent to x-ray. But just to be clear, I don't think the particular x-rays from a nuke go through solid styrofoam, they don't even travel more than a few inches or feet in room temperature air. Only once the foam heats up enough (perhaps to the point where it is plasma and no longer foam) then it is transparent to x-rays. But the same is true of air - which also becomes transparent to the x-rays.
So I can only guess why foam is specifically used. Even in Sublette's explanation the gap is called "empty, often filled with foam", which implies the foam isn't actually necessary.
@@sherry8444 thanks for the correction… the foam would definitely need to be ionized to become transparent. And yes some designs most definitely did not use foam. No idea about modern weapons. I’m glad that people are interested in this topic and can provide ideas. I’m with Sublette on almost anything. Definitely as much of an expert as they come on the subject.
@@sherry8444 I still think the foam helps keep the high-x material blowing off the inside of the radiation case and the surface of the secondary from blocking the radiation channel. But that’s just a guess (some others think so as well).
That, and many other errors in this video.
Very useful tutorial!
"Tsar" Bomba absolutely doesn't mean it's the bomb of the emperor. Tsar means "Great" in this sense.
This video shows a Teller-Ulam design with a single fusion stage. I don't think that could be scaled up to 58mt. The tsar bomba had 2 stages 1 fission charge and the 2 fusion charges that make up the second stage.
This project is a modification of Sakharov -Khariton...
Really I learned a lot buddy, thank you so much. ❤
Arguably the most beautiful thing mankind has ever produced.
You need to be my science teacher....😅
1:23 military t-pose universe
They are t-posing to assert nuclear dominance over the US
Cool, this is like a how to.....
I know what I'm doing this weekend!!🧑🔬🚀🌋
Weapon designer decided to reduce it by half because he had a conscious. Weapon designer later went on to go against all nuclear weapons.
how powerful are the payload in icbm relative to the tsar bomba?
its staggering how so many reactions can happen in such a tiny amount of time
"I do not know with what weapons WW 3 will be fought. But WW 4 will be fought with sticks and stones" - Albert Einstein
Welldone......very informative
50 million tons of TNT. And it was a 100 million ton TNT bomb they reduced 50%. Apparently they were afraid it might blow a hole through the atmosphere, ( or worse).
it's pretty cool from the Tsar Bomba that it didn't set the atmosphere on fire
Bro, what is this at 5:08? Plutonium doesn’t undergo mitosis. The fission products don’t undergo fission because they generally aren’t fissionable isotopes. The fissionable set lives within the actinide series. The animation is showing fission products as undergoing further fission, which is misleading.
It's worse than mitosis, one atom turned into three of itself
Who else is here after watching Oppenheimer?
Please stop
@@theschmedaparadox1018 big bada boom.
You might want to actually look at information on the subject. What you're describing is the Teller-Ulam design. The Soviets used many smaller secondary sections in their devices.
watching this video after oppenehiermer and the music playing in my head ,next level gossebumps
Insane how such a tinny thing can create such wide explosion
Watching this video makes you realize there are truly some extremely intelligent people out there to even be able too build something like this.. Crazy Scientest.
Absolutely brilliant minds, tasked with wholesale murder. All you really need to know about war.
Fallen angel technology bud. Just like the Bible is an extraterrestrial book per say. The author that moved the writers (the prophets, kings etc) is not of the earth, that's why most of the earth rejects the Bible even some so called Christians.
How thoughtful and compassionate that they should allow the plane to fly a safe distance away /s
The shockwave of this bomb circled the Earth 3 times.
Who ever invented this was damn smart
It helps that they had a spy (or was it spies?) in the actual manhattan project.
@@stripedpants1668 Don't blame spies for everything! This applies only to "ordinary" uranium bombs. But nuclear physics was very developed in the USSR, spies simply shortened the path. But the "father" of the hydrogen bomb is Academician Sakharov. And spies have nothing to do with it
@@stripedpants1668 Either way, thats some pretty solid maths.
Oppenheimer and his crew basically
I learned 2 things today
1. Tsar Bomba was '2 bombs'
2. Tsar Bomba was dangerous
Why is NK still testing bombs? If the conclusion was to show mankind how dangerous nuclear bombs are then no lessons were learnt.Countries like NK continue to spent billions making these bombs and testing them. If human beings are tired of their own life on this planet then maybe a couple of thousands of Tsar Bombas ought to be developed and dropped in each continent. Other forms of life will definitely sprout into existence in a couple of millions of years
All thermonuclear weapons are 2 bombs
@@thehusketeers4319 And all thermonuclear weapons are dangerous
@@vest2483 Not if you're 100 miles away
@@thehusketeers4319 Wait until they are.
Thank you for the tutorial
these animations are the light of my life
I am an Iranian military scientist, and this has been very helpful and progressive- thank you
I'm sure it is.......report to your ayatollah now eh???
:)
If it keeps making stuff to chainreact with, wouldnt it still be exploding to this day?
Thank you for making this video I love this video so much I really want you to make more of these videos
Great Video 👍👍
I love your other atomic bomb videos, glad to see this one covered
more nuclear videos to come soon
They could've made a 100 megaton bomb but the pilot wouldn't have been able to get away.
Crazy to know everything he said on how it senates happen in a millisecond is wild
You forgot to mention that the bomb was designed for 100 megatons but was wound back to 50 megatons, so the plane could escape in time.
I saw a display about Tsar Bomba last time I was in Russia plus an actual Tu-95. 👍
🙄when and where exactly
Museum in Russia they have a mock up Tsar Bomba and the Tupolev-95 modified plane that dropped it
@@blackmantis3130 I saw the Tu-95 at the MAKS airshow in 2017 and the display about the bomb in 2019 at the maritime museum in St. Petersburg