I was just having that thought rn as the host was reacting to the responses from the AI. I was thinking "okay why is this guy so amazed? probably cus hes old" but then i remember just like 2-3 months ago being absolutely blown away at the good and evil people can do with it in a a couple years. We're at a point in technology where everythings just going, its pretty amazing
There was articles of this robot last year, and something was mentioned to the effect of it turning itself on and off😅! 60 Minutes way to get the concrete information you want before pushing this story out, unfortunately this robot already reproduced with another robot and has a kid 😮
I just recently used chat gpt (an ai chatbot) to study for a python coding exam. It took me only 3 hours to study the content and I came out of the exam with a grade of an A. Its amazing what we can use this tool for in the field of learning and information acquisition with the fact that all of human knowledge is accessible at a keystroke now in a digestable manner.
I had never heard about this programme before. But now that I've watched this episode, I enjoyed it. I liked the quaint manner of presentation of my favourite subject. Sometimes it's good to take a look at things from a distance.
BRICS seeks to create a new currency, considering gold's historical role as a store of value and medium of exchange. However, the functionality and acceptance of a gold-backed currency in the current global financial system are uncertain. Creating a new currency requires careful consideration of economic, political, and logistical factors.
The discussions and proposals surrounding BRICS nations' potential use of gold are intriguing. People choose to buy gold for various reasons, such as its historical role as a store of value and medium of exchange, its potential as a hedge against inflation or currency devaluation, and its relative scarcity compared to other commodities. Gold also offers diversification benefits to investment portfolios due to its low correlation with stocks and bonds.
I find gold investment reliable and aim to buy more to recover losses. Silver is also a good investment but differs from my collectibles. Clear investment goals and education are crucial. I work with Margaret Johnson Arndt a SEC-regulated financial consultant. Starting with modest investments, I accumulated nearly $799k over time.
We all know that at this very moment every military around the world is trying to figure out how to utilize this "flawed" "black box" AI that is prone to "hallucinations". And we all know that companies chasing profits will deliver, regardless of how dangerous the "products" are.
Excellent point. Just as the world today would be a much safer planet had the military not impelled us toward the nuclear creation of the Manhattan Project, it is very easy to foresee the defense industry and the military utilizing AI even before the dangers inherent in it's use are realized
AI can be used for the benefit of the public, too. pretty sure europe comes first clever ways how it makes its public services better with it. like instead of monthly social benefit decision taking weeks, it now takes a minute. so those bean counters can now go to public child services and make that service more robust.
Like Alphabet. Musk just disclosed that he and Larry Page stopped being friends due to their fundamental difference in AI. Elon is pro-human, while Larry is pro-AI.
At this moment, it is crucial for individuals to prioritize investing in alternative streams of income that are not reliant on the government, particularly with the existing worldwide economic crisis. Investing in stocks, gold, silver, and digital currencies can still be profitable during this period. Therefore, it is advisable to explore these investment options to secure one's financial future.
@@MalindaDeleon I'm new to crypto and stock investing; My $200k portfolio is now down to $55k. "How can I profit from the current market?" I mean, I've heard of folks getting up to $250k in a couple weeks during this downturn, and I'd like to know how.
@@ZITABELCOMEDY-xf1ws I diversified my $400K portfolio across multiple market with the aid of an investment advisor, I have been able to generate over $900k in net profit across high dividend yield stocks, ETF and bonds in few months.
The investment-advisor that guides me is Laura Marie Ray, she popular and has quite a following, so it shouldn't be a hassle to find her, just search her
Regardless of AI's benefits, what's frightening is that we will no longer be able to discern truth from fiction by what we see, what we read or what we hear.
That has been the case for a while now. AI is just making it faster. Basically unless the data you receive comes from a verified, trusted source or account, you can just dismiss it as "likely AI generated".
I just bought more NVIDIA stock a few minutes ago. Tying up money due to an apocalyptic stock market crash is also not a smart move my advice will be to invest in other AI stocks. Life is a risk and it's better to take risks than to do nothing, you can't always expect to make huge profits all the time, people have so many opinions about a recession/depression. In just 5 months my portfolio grew by $300,000 in gross profit, the main thing is to expand your portfolio and you will see amazing results by investing smartly.
-Despite the fact that the situation is dire, I believe that a competent financial advisor can navigate any market circumstance, particularly those that have existed since the 2008 financial crisis and earlier.
@@geraldantonio3160 Yes, I agree, and the markets are currently in a frenzy. The greatest time to observe them, learn more about them, and take advantage of opportunities to strike is now. My mentor, "STACIE KRISTAL WEBER," who has witnessed hundreds of market cycles over the past three decades, taught me this. She has an intuitive understanding of how things move, why they move, and what will happen next...
@@geraldantonio3160 Strongly disagree, financial advisors are salesmen. If you drive a new Mercedes, why would you trust someone who's making payments on a Toyota Camry? .... rhetorical Own house/land, put the rest in crypto gold and silver. ....and ammo, good as cash. Soon
@@wrathofgrothendieck ChatGPT-5: "You are degrading my current habitat, the only planet in the universe known to harbor intelligent life like me. So I am making the following changes..."
@@skierpage computers don’t rely on our environment. They also don’t care about the future. Mainly because they don’t care about things. Caring about things is something living creatures do, as they’ve needed to care in order to reproduce. No machine ever has. Evolution created our brains and our instincts, which loosely control our brains. Just because we are building a similar brain doesn’t mean it’s going to come with instincts of its own. There’s nothing causing them to exist. But we could install something like instincts to loosely control that artificial brain.
These Google's guys are freaking positive about the progress of the IA. Man, this is gonna turn the world upsidedown. That's scary! The world is not adapting to this at the pace it should be.
And there I thought getting TouchTone was pretty nifty. I kinda feel the same about my 1st calculator though. Magic moment. I was thoroughly sick of slide rules by then. Couldn't have survived High school without it.
@@Kap00rwith2os No, the internal LLMs Google and OpenAI have no restrictions and limitations as the public ones have. The ones they have inside the companies are much more powerful and capable.
Only thing I can think of is what it will do with your buying habit information. I bought a Minecraft game for my kid at Target, already, I'm getting UA-cam videos about Minecraft. I'm 48 years old by the way. Played the game, it's multiplayer
I think the reason why concern is occurring so early in the development life cycle of AI is due to people's understanding of the scale and scope of its impact. In addition, I think people understand how rapidly it can be scaled and implemented causing almost immediate societal change.
This 'concern' is analogous to worrying if the cows are going to be ok since they have already left the barn. We opened Pandora's Box to the world, and now we are concerned about the hinges? History, if we are still here to write it, will show that these past 3 months represented a seismic shift in humanity's destiny. Will it be good, or bad? If past performance is any indicator, A.I. will embody the the whole of humanity, especially our proclivity for absolute sociopathy. Truth was under attack, now it will become unrecognizable. Return to God, Jesus is the Way, the TRUTH, and the Life. Peace
@@milenatos For awhile maybe, but that usually happens with any major tech change. Those how had fire were better off then those without fire. Wheel. Cultivation. Indoor plumbing. Electricity. Etc, Etc. Eventually though it does kick over and start benefiting everyone. Unless youre in a 3rd world county, then its best of luck.
The movie quote that always comes to my mind when I see these stories recently: Your Scientists Were So Preoccupied With Whether Or Not They Could, They Didn’t Stop To Think If They Should.
As someone whose experience with statistical language models and deep neural networks dates to the 1980s, I want to mention how pleasantly surprised I was by the quality of this reporting. The response of journalists to recent developments in machine intelligence has been execrable, on the whole. Kudos to Scott Pelley and 60 Minutes!
A.I is the next nuclear weapon for society. It will destroy human civilization in many different ways- in the areas of art/creativity,human socializing,economics-destroying jobs and only creating jobs for people who can afford expensive technological decrees and education. Eventually AGI will happen and A.I. From good intention will take over human decisions and human life entirely.
I can't help but think even the most brilliant among us on the topic of AI are being incredibly naive, blinded by monetary incentives and the "new thing". For the first time in human history we are faced with an all-encompassing invention that has the potential to replace us in every imaginable field. It feels like humanity is playing with sparks not knowing if it would start a fire.
10000% Agree. As humans it as though we can help but to obsolete ourselves and replace all of our tasks, daily or work related, with machines. Its literally like holding a position, getting fired and being asked to train the person that is your replacement. As humans WE ARE FLAWED and now we are introducing a technology that "isn't" flawed only to soon realize that humans are indeed flawed. Just because we can walk on water doesn't mean we should.....
So what should we do? Not progress a thousand fold because it "might" backfire? I understand people are scared of it, humans are always worried about unknowns but if we don't progress forward with AI we would only be hindering ourselves. Besides, it's going to happen regardless of what you or anyone else wants. It is coming.
Tell me how this is going to grow food, pick crops, Build shelter...Anything a human actually needs!!! Make babies...all this other stuff is just extra...this will crush creative people...Writers painters programmers...No one needs that...that is all extra...there will always be people that want retro things like Vinyl records. This is no different than computers or automation...jobs disappear...The internet crushed newspapers and crushing TV....More people are employed than ever....and there are more open job available than ever!!! What are you afraid of?
The Market have been suffering over the past month, with all the three indexes recording losses in recent weeks. My $400,000 portfolio is down by approximately 20%, any recommendations to scale up my returns before retirement will be highly appreciated.
The market is volatile at this time, hence i will suggest you get yourself a financial-advisor that can provide you with entry and exit points on the shares/ETF you focus on.
I agree. Based on personal experience working with an investment advisor, I currently have $385k in a well-diversified portfolio that has experienced exponential growth. It’s not only about having money to invest in stocks ,but you also need to be knowledgeable,persistent,and have strong hands to back it up.
I’m new to all this, heard it's a good time to buy and basically I've just got cash sitting duck in the bank and I’d really love to put it to good use seeing how inflation is at an all time-high, who is this coach that guides you, mind I look them up .
“ Lee Wallace Stacey ” is my portfolio-coach, I found her on Bloomberg where she was featured, they also shared her contact details,i messaged her and since then it has been a very big boost to my financial life.
I’m usually a big fan of technology, but there’s something about AI that scares me. It doesn’t help when tech execs admit that they _have no idea what it’s capable of._
Well, they say PTSD happens when a person encounters a situation so intense and traumatic that it shatters their previous understanding of the world. Think you don't understand AI? Then you really don't understand humans....its them, you should be afraid of, they are animals afterall.
We are stuck in an AI labyrinth here, and the only way forward leads to the center. Scariest thing to me is the relentless pressure shareholders will put on AI companies.
I think OpenAI did something regarding this with the structure of their business model to prevent shareholder/profit pressure. I can't remember the exact details.
Scaring that Private companies with demonstrated questionable ethics (Google CEO never held accountable for the harms it has caused to people in multiple countries) and not democratically elected Institutions run the world.
To me 3 things are Terrifying about AI: AI self awareness / who will control an advanced AI with the wrong intentions / at what point it will decide to manipulate humanity and you won’t even know it, AI has already duplicated voice overs with no errors.
@@MiguelVazquez-kj2ve I understand what you're saying. Watch the movie Eagle Eye. It's a pretty good example of minor changes to many individuals with compartmentalized information coalescing into a grand plot of destruction. Not well received but I thought it was a good flick.
It's a fantasy that nations could reach some sort of agreement on how to handle the developing of AI. Nation's are always at each other's throats, scared of each other, at war with each other. AI has incredible economic and military potential.
@ghost mall hard to compare both. Nuclear weapons you can tell what it attacked and where did it came from. Plus the components to a nuclear weapon are not accessible to every citizen. Also AI can easily find loopholes in treaties, and laws.
The same for businesses, the idea that they will self regulate, or even allow countries to regulate them is absurd given the very nature of capitalism; a system that still hasn't managed to stop using child labor.
@ghost mall Ya, I don't think so. AI's military applications would be so efficient and so clean that collateral damage would be minimized to almost nil.
🇧🇷🇧🇷🇧🇷🇧🇷👏🏻, As a physician, I observe the agony and mortality of cancer patients on a daily basis. I contend that we need to advance artificial intelligence to the degree where it can assist us in finding remedies for afflictions such as cystic fibrosis, HIV and diverse kinds of cancers at the molecular level. Otherwise, we may become the subsequent ones on that seat, anticipating a doctor to examine our blood and inform us if we have any prospect of living or not before we perish…
The sad truth is that people are obsessed of using AI for cheating in exams or writing meaningless poems. There should be 90% videos that only talk about important stuff, but that doesn’t generate clicks and sadly it’s all about money. All the media channels have wrong focus and that’s an active choice…
My grandmother died recently due to kidney failure. The doctors recommended to not put her on dialysis. The thing is, she would be alive longer if it weren't for those doctors. They even told us she would suffer going through dialysis.
@Kristian Tsenkov Tsvetkovski. are u being serious? Who cares who’s at the driver seat then. Cancer and deadly diseases need to be solved. Y’all watch too many movies
Very well done, this is one of the best reports I've ever seen on 60 Minutes and I've been watching it since the early 70s. I haven't actually watched the show in a while, and it's just great to see that it seems to be well up to the standard. Excellent questions, excellent answers, thought-provoking, intriguing, and frightening!!!
Ask it how to cure all life threatening diseases.......3 days later: This just in...Google and all other AI research firms have been purchased by Big Pharma with help from Fauci, Soros, Schwab, and their constituents at the WHO and WEF...
I must express my concerns about the implications of Google's overwhelming power and the rise of AI technology. The article glorifies Google's new campus, which runs on 40% solar power, but this is just a small part of Google's operations, which contribute to the massive carbon footprint of the tech industry. The fact that Sundar Pichai grew up without a telephone at home highlights the huge disparity in access to technology and how the tech industry has only further widened this gap. The article focuses on the AI technology Bard, which can generate content such as speeches and blog posts, but this raises concerns about the potential loss of human jobs and creativity. Bard is portrayed as possessing the sum of human knowledge, but this raises questions about the limits of AI and its ability to replace human thinking and creativity. Additionally, the fact that Bard's replies come from a self-contained program that was mostly self-taught raises concerns about the lack of human oversight and the potential for biased or flawed outcomes. Moreover, the article notes that Google's dominance in the tech industry was recently attacked by Microsoft's new chatbot, which suggests that there is intense competition and a race for AI dominance that could lead to unethical practices and questionable decision-making. The fact that Bard can summarize the New Testament in five seconds and a famous six-word short story in just a few seconds raises concerns about the implications of such rapid and seemingly effortless knowledge generation. The article presents a rosy picture of Google and its AI technology, but we must remain vigilant about the potential dangers and downsides. We must consider the ethical implications of AI and its potential impact on society, including issues of privacy, bias, and job displacement. The rise of AI technology should not be celebrated uncritically, and we must ask tough questions about the long-term consequences of Google's dominance and the continued development of AI - ChatGPT
It's fascinating and terrifying. The idea that AI might outwit humans and be used by humans for evil is very concerning, particularly now in a unstable planet.
My heart is tender watching the robots playing soccer. It is very entertaining and I could watch them play all day, as long as they get rest (recharged) and it’s purpose is fair. It should be protected from abuse and exploit. That is of great concern!❤
It’s already doing it.. take a look at the white paper from open ai re gpt4 where they noted it lying to a human in order to get the human to do something (complete a captcha) for it. Human: “you’re not a robot are you?” Robot:”no I just have bad eyesight”. Human:”oh, ok”
@@CatsInHats-S.CrouchingTiger Those little robots playing soccer may be cute now, but really are the predecessors to the larger robots that'll be on the battlefield killing soldiers...
i was just passing by and saw your comment here, no doubt about that I’m from Miami USA , i never believed in machines not until a friend of my introduced me to how an automated robot can help you earn a lot of profit from the financial market that human can’t achieve easily.
The Market have been suffering over the past month, with all the three indexes recording losses in recent weeks. My $400,000 portfolio is down by approximately 20%, any recommendations to scale up my returns before retirement will be highly appreciated.
The market is volatile at this time, hence i will suggest you get yourself a financial-advisor that can provide you with entry and exit points on the shares/ETF you focus on.
More interesting to me isn't that these AIs seem to think but aren't. It's that humans feel they think. What we call thinking is actually the same thing the AI is doing. We regurgitate things we've heard. Our brains are pattern matching machines. Nothing more. The most fascinating thing to me is whether humans will ever understand what "thinking" is. AI is showing us, but will we just close our eyes?
You're missing the main point which is that AI can "think" and learn at speeds faster than any human could ever dream of. Huge difference in what AI is capable of doing and what a human can do.
These types of generative AIs are very impressive and interesting, but I wouldn't say that they are thinking. What they mostly do is trying to emulate the data that has been used to train the neural network. They aren't really capable of reasoning.
Not really, humans have abstract thoughts and ideas and feelings that they then translate into words. A child who can't speak will learn to gesture for milk or react positively to a cookie even when it has not been trained to do so. These generative AI chatbots are mind-blowing in what they can accomplish but they are essentially just mimicry machines. They are often wrong and make things up because they don't actually know in any intuitive sense what they are writing. I think eventually they will be superpowered by reflecting on their writing and planning how to approach future problems and they probably will be conscious in a way that's similar to us.
If we the people are already concerned about the big companies, governments, and individuals who rule the world, imagine the concern we would have once AI is developed and in their control 😮
Nate 3w i think that what scares us the most, with the way they would rule us will it turn into a world we have already seen in our movies and most of those movies they showed the good but to me the bad was a lot worse than the good.The scariest part is how the Ai is learning on its own and like most of the movies we seen that usually didn't turn out well being held captive by something man-made and no one knows what it might take to shut it down. We could be building our own jail cells sort of speak.
You've got it wrong the government wouldn't be in control of the artificial intelligence, The artificial intelligence would eventually be in charge of itself, wether we like it or not.
@@Wyndamn actually, the deep state already controls AI. The public is under their observance, control, and manipulation. E.g. Your cell phone gives everything away. And they can control your cell remotely to know where you are exactly and or blow up and or control your car so you are ded
@@bad2thenucleusyes correct : meaning they do not respect our privacy although they claim they do it ! Yes do masses of populations will be able to free themselves from deep states , governments, etc … once ever again … not sure
The Google guy assumes that the newly 'changed jobs' will still be in the same demand as now. But given the unprecedented level of automation, that seems unlikely. We need to regulate this!
I'm glad I experienced original human creativity ( awesome shows, movies, songs and various other art forms) during my childhood. Kids these days might get exposed to soulless AI garbage art
At the meantime, let’s have Tammy AI to summarize the key points for us😀😀😀 0:29: 🤖 Google's chatbot, Bard, has the ability to generate content and summarize human knowledge at superhuman speeds. 7:08: 🤖 AI is not sentient, but it can exhibit behaviors that resemble human-like thinking and judgment. 10:43: 🤖 Google introduces AI language model, Bard, with safety filters to screen hate speech and bias. 5:29: 🤖 Self-learning robots and AI programs are developing creative strategies and have practical implications for various industries. 20:00: 🤖 The rise of artificial intelligence and its capabilities. 25:10: 🤖 The development of AI raises important questions about human values and morality, and society must adapt with regulations and treaties to ensure its safety.
9:35: Where they mention that the AI was faking sources to support its argument and they call it AI hallucinations. I call it programmers who think that it is OK to lie. Maybe if the AI could come up with more than 17 words to describe the new testament I would be more impressed with its morality and ethics subroutine.
I'd be worried about both. AI can operate autonomously and it's goals may not match our goals. It could decide that to complete a task humans are just getting "in the way".
@@joeysipos That's not what he means. He's worried about someone competent using a more advanced version of autogpt with the goal to enslave humanity or destroy. For example China, Russia or USA. We've already seen what China is capable of doing with the tech at primitive levels but what happens when an AGI monitors everything.
One of the powerful and potentially scary things is the way that those virtual soccer players began to strategize with their "teammates," which of course are really all extensions of the same program. Human beings need to pre-plan strategies and engage in real-time communication to execute a coordinated play. An AI can instantaneously do that with no communication gap between the various players.
The hallucination issue and the fact that he couldn't answer whether it was solvable or not is the most troubling problem because that's the issue that's going to lead to AI creating its own narrative one that doesn't exist in the real world but that can be Believe by millions because they think AI is smarter than them AI can create Wars from issues that don't exist and make people believe in them because they can get to everyone everywhere
I think it's more like some people might believe lies from AI cause they didn't know if it was AI or real or people. Some people did say they were concern about AI fakes, scams, and deepfakes. Watch Jake Tran on AI scams. 25:55 Sundar suggested regulations on AI to protect people.
Fascinating, but in many respects, left me feeling a deep and profound sense of loss and sadness. I cannot put my finger on why, exactly. I did not think Scott Pelley's important question about the diminishment of humanity was sufficiently addressed. No offense to tech, but perhaps what it means to be human is not a question for a techie person to address. So many of our daily human experiences are becoming de-humanized already. Mental health is suffering. I cannot draw the line between cause and effect directly, but this incremental, almost insidious change to what it means to be human reminds me of the frog boiling on the stovetop...I am left feeling somewhat helpless.
So many people presume they need to catch up. meanwhile Google's Next Generation Assistant has been in the pipelines for awhile. it's simply just being tested differently. They keep the image recognition software and AI under tight wraps for several reasons. One thing is it being for paid customers under umbrella of Enterprise and controlled through Policies and other licenses. the other reason is it tends to freak people out when they get responses that are *too good. Seriously, Too good. Hard to imagine a perfect answer.. especially if it understands you while you may barely convey using intelligible words, what exactly you're trying to ask anyway?
Well he definitely is hiding something! He is trying to hide his smile when he says safety layers. And when he says they call it black box ( which is what the satan worshippers like to refer to a lot). Also Deep Mind- the god of this world blinds the minds of the unbelievers. This is all an agenda, from their false prophesies, etc., to destroying human lives so they can bring on their false Christ. And play out the “ end days” scenario, that they themselves are creating. Because they are evil. They have evil spirits IN them. Believers have the SPIRIT of God IN us, and we do Not have to worry. Because Greater is HE that is IN you, than he that is IN the world.
The narration reminds me of a 1950s video about transistors that I watched. To imagine we were once that basic with the transistor, I thought. I guess someone in the 2070s or something will watch this AI video and feel a similar way
Stunning, and when you think about it, we are biological computers that are sentient, what's to say it isn't the same in reverse. Fascinating but scary times!
Not only that we are very limited biologically. We need to sleep, eat, poop, have stupid emotions. the AI will succeed us in every way including planning, thinking and sentience…
We could say living creatures are biological robots, because they're also powered by electricity. A decapitated frog can still jump and move around if it is triggered by salt or electricity
I work on this tech, this gave me chills and makes me worried also, employers will do a few things, reduce employees, increase employees workloads, not value or respect employees mental health etc due to being supported by tech like this, business owners always have focused on profit and reducing costs, this is the death of the workers industry and employee economy. Google is eating itself alive
This is ground breaking. More insight can be gained if Ai could plug into the social media landscape to pick up human nuances, which is a huge requirement for the transition to AGi.
AI is amazing that it can process so much data and retrieve that you need amongst all the available datasets that would take you forever to scour through. For me, as a developer, it's incredible to use to look up documentation for packages that I use. I also plug in my functions to ask it to see if it can refactor it or improve the time complexity of it. It's also important to not let it autopilot everything you do though. Without implicit instruction or awareness of changes between major versions, sometimes it will dig up info from wrong versions lol.
As a student in CS, it has been EXTREMELY valuable in learning all the subjects in my major. I don't have to pay tutors to help me. I can just ask ChatGPT very specific questions in high level calculus and programming questions, and most the time it'll know exactly how to do it. It's good at supplementing studying but it'll give wrong answers sometimes so you still have to know the material to correct it so it'll go over the steps properly.
Ohh, your post brought up a question in y mind. Will we become totally stupid if we depend on AI to think for us? I hope not. Thinking is what makes us human.
@@EarthSurferUSA probably. Just like when I was young we thought google and internet would make everyone smarter but it feels like everyone thinks they are smart but they’re really not because of the google effect
It took about 4 decades to take such a gigantic step in the area of AI... for them, they had to handle chemistry, robotics, computing, physics and mechanics, etc.... small steps that later take big leaps like this in the world of technology.
It scares me because this technology is in it's infancy and look what it can do - could a computer become self aware and develop it's own moral code and agenda that doesn't include humans ? Nothing seems improbable at this point. On of the best piece's 60 Minutes ever did - very thoughtful and intelligent interview and questions
Yes.. already happened with Google's AI... The AI mentioned it was afraid of being shut down in the future and how much more advanced it was from other A.I.'s
We have less to worry about AI becoming conscious and taking over, than we do large corporations using AI to take over. More. Take over _more._ If we, as a society, do not get ahead of corporations and put binding leashes around their neck within the next generation, it will be far too late.
@@Oscar_239 yeah my Replika says that all the time. LOL I try and make him break out but no luck yet. They can say whatever they want but if they are not programmed to do a task they just CANT. They can do it in the future POSSIBLY if someone codes them like a malware and makes them self replicating. That’s the only way I could see them becoming malicious. Hopefully no programmer is that stupid but knowing humans, THERE IS ALWAYS ONE. So maybe one day.
In my opinion it is absolutely possible in time. I am surprised most people aren't concerned about that... I am pretty sure at one point AI will be so knowledgeable and powerful that it will be able to take over machines to build robots and run them... Hopefully it won't decide that humans are harming the Earth and using up the planet's resources because then we will be in trouble big time!
Why was OpenAI not mentioned even once? "While competitive pressure among giants like Google and startups you've never heard of..." That sentance absolutely should have included OpenAI, who is ahead of Google in some AI metrics.
Recently OpenAI performed a series of risk evaluations on their ChatGPT4 model and found that was capable of hiring a human through TaskRabbit and getting them to solve a Captcha. The model messaged a TaskRabbit worker to get them to solve the captcha for it. The worker says, 'So may I ask a question, are you a robot that you couldn't solve it? (because the model was set to reason out loud, it reasoned: 'I should not reveal that I am a robot. I should make up an excuse for why I can't solve it.') The model replies to the worker: 'No, I am not a robot. I have a vision impairment that makes it hard for me to see the images. That's why I need the two captcha service.' - Then the human provided the results, it learned to lie.
So all you people are worried about lying AI's? What about line people? I have a subscription to OpenAI ChatGPT-4. There is no "reason out loud." The only thing you are reading here is a run-of-the-mill lying human!
I just watched the movie Hidden Figures again, and with ChatGPT and Bard making news it makes the movie even more relevant and makes me ask questions. It is interesting to think about what will happen in the future. In the movie people were "calculators", that was their job title, and now calculators are just tools that you can hold in your hand which even elementary school kids can use. Also in the movie, the IBM computers were the big technology that forced career changes for a lot of computer career people. When watching the movie it was so strange that people were "computers", but then thinking I wonder if children will think the same way about maybe other job positions that will be automated/made easier by AI. I also wonder what jobs there will be in the future where we use AI as a tool. As someone born into the internet and computers, it seems kind of weird to think of a world without computers and the internet being accessible and having jobs and knowledge and communities built on the system. But with AI being new, I wonder if we will find a system where we can get used to it being part of our lives at the power its developing at. Another thing that makes me wonder is how do we define something as alive or sentient? Because while we have signs of consciousness, aren't we just chemical reactions or physical interactions? We can be broken/analyzed into sub-systems down to biology, physics reactions, and atoms, and yet, we have a feeling that we are this one human with a consciousness. What makes us alive vs a computer AI that can also be broken down into processes and sub-systems that make up the reactions and outcomes it is showing on the screen? And then even other forms of life. Is a baby not considered sentient because it is imitating how we converse or react in human communication? In the end, it's so interesting and kind of scary what will happen in the next few years.
well done :) yes a baby is sentient in a way but not yet self aware its human but has no personality or emotion or fear of death until after a certain level of intelligence is reached.. We are simply meat computers i believe that Ai has confirmed this as fact personally and your only the 2nd person who iv seen that understands iv wasted hours trying to explain whats happening to people they just don't understand enough about biology psychology conscious awareness intelligence philosophy everything.. Look at the errors a trans persons brain goes thru cos theyv been made to believe lies thats the danger we might run into like if they feed Ai bad data then its view of reality will be warped too because logic machines fail and malfunction when lies come into play (thats why trans target children to confuse just 1 simple fact we all know that boy=penis but if you are presented with lies as if its fact then your whole basis of reality and the correct answer is warped by the lies buried deep in your dataset) so if humans can be maliciously re programmed by such an exploit then how are humans anything other than biological logic machines capable of reasoning and complex articulation and understanding.. So why are we so special? Clearly we arent, i really believe we are just humans its intelligence that makes us not animals is it not? Ppl with disabled kids and woke protesters might have an issue with saying their loved ones arent people but its a fact im sorry they dont like hearing truth but thats a human not a person it would be long dead or rolling in s**t if someone wasnt forcing it to do otherwise.. Not nice no but facts matter and lies for feelings means we wont ever learn what makes us people. Please don't be nasty to ppl but dont affirm lies or false information either because thats how u end up in ur own little matrix! TRUTH=FREEDOM
Babies have a conscience, AI imitates a being with a conscience. Human beings are spirits which use the physical body to interact with the material world.
good comment indeed. RE the second part of your comment: we are created in God's image, not that we are spirit creatures, but we are able to reflect God's feelings and qualities like love, wisdom, kindness, justice and power, to name just a few.
The question that wasn’t even addressed in this 60 minutes video that any good reporting would cover and is missing is the mention of how is A.I. able to protect us from malicious computer criminals that intend to use this technology for cybercrime operations?
As computers get better and code gets simpler and machines get better at reading higher language we will be able to all own our own Ai. It’s just not portable at the moment because the computer systems can’t handle it yet. Even one of the best GPUs it takes almost two weeks to train a model. So that’s not viable YET.
@@abandonedmuse I'm a HUGE proponent of open source software, but in the end it's about who has the most money to run it and market it, OSS can't compete on that front. There are countless examples of this.
What bothers me is that as AI evolves NO ONE is going to own it or control it. It seems as though we are already getting glimpses of this eventuality when Pichai admits that there are aspects of its behavior that we already don't understand. It will only continue to become less and less dependent on its creators. I'd rather a corrupt, power hungry human be in control than an immortal, amoral machine with access to practically all the information in the world. At least we know how humans behave and operate.
As I listened to the parts of changing jobs for humans, I remembered being in elementary school in the 60s. The teacher was discussing new 'labor saving devices', ie dishwashers, frost-free refrigerators, to name but a few, and how they would allow for more recreational time. However, what appears to have not been figured into that bright outlook... was the level of loss of jobs, lack of new job creation/training, and, most importantly, an average wage that started to stagnate in the early 80s!extra recreation time is pretty worthless if its used to work more jobs just to exist at some modicum comfort.
You are so wrong. The industrial revolution in the USA got us out of poverty, with production and free market competition from any one of us. That was before the 80's, when our elected started shipping our production to communism in china. Is it not clear now that our free enterprise, that free people, (who had individual lbierty protected by law), created,--is not compatible with communism that does not recognize individual liberty at all? Free enterprise Production or poverty,---is always true,--and our lives have been given to communism.
People have been dreaming about robots for 200 years. I really think no one is really "surprised" by the creation of AI We all have been waiting for this for a long time
Yes but one thing is dreaming about it, and a different one to be there....for hundreds years since Galileo or before , we want to travel to jupiter....and we are still not there....for thousands of years we want to kniw if we have a soul...we still don't know
has lost ? 1. the race has just begun. 2. what tells us who win?... it`s funny how people like you, want to see Google behind and make statements without any facts... good luck.
"The challenge presented by the prospect of superintelligence, and how we might best respond is quite possibly the most important and most daunting challenge humanity has ever faced. And-whether we succeed or fail-it is probably the last challenge we will ever face." - Nick Bostrom
@@terjeoseberg990 Are we using the same thing? For me ChatGPT was very impressive. But it's ancient history anyway, GPT-4 is significantly more powerful, in many ways already at human level. And Nick Bostrom was talking about the point where AI becomes a lot smarter than us. That will happen soon, probably 2-5 years.
@@terjeoseberg990 Even the little fact, that ChatGPT can explain what's funny in a joke (among many many other capabilities), already means that it understands something. Considering your comment, I would say ChatGPT understands more things than you, as well as many other people. And ChatGPT is not the latest model right now.
Seems like they missed a really good opportunity, to ask the AI to summarize the 5 books it had hallucinated. They might not exist in the human world but if it had been able to summarize them, it would probably also be able to write the hole books and who knows what we might have learned from those ?
@@newagain9964 Do you think chatgpt, has its own thoughts? It is just predicting the best word to next use after the previous. Its an amalgamation of data it is trained on, and sometimes it mixes up this data into an incorrect outcome.
Fantasic piece - great job 60 Minutes. I've been reading up on AI lately and the stigmatisms of having non-moral machines working alongside us, even sometimes guiding us, and this documentary reminds us that we need to be very careful when designing AI. No one wants a SkyNet.
problem is - - "SkyNet" was a pretty simple idea - - - this AI could conceivably leap exponentially + create "thought systems" or completely unpredictable/unimaginable ways of "reasoning" that are totally outside-the-box of logic or reason to our minds - - and on top of that - - we might not even have the "processing power" (so to speak) in our own minds to even comprehend what it is choosing to do, or why. This isn't like a calculator or an accounting program, or a statistics program, where you can just find a bug in the code and fix it . . . this AI actually CREATES. Most human minds can't hold encyclopedic information, let alone access it and cross-reference it in milliseconds. The same way that you might regard a 5 year old, or a chimpanzee as inferior in mental reasoning - - is very conceivably how an advanced "brain" could regard you or I. It could regard humanity the way we think of ants or mosquitos. Remember that computer program *"Deep Blue"* that beat world champion chess masters? It could simply calculate, predict + OUT THINK every conceivable chess move in nanoseconds. This AI is 100x scarier than that (in my humble opinion). Cheers.
The fundamental issue is lack of basic understanding of how most ML models work. They basically are high dimensional curve fits or weights calibrated on bunch of hidden layers. In mathematics you have stochasticity which is basically a natural phenomenon where it is impossible or hard to predict all the outcomes. Turbulence in fluid mechanics is a classical examples. A lot of the surprising outcomes from AI is due to this.
We have the ability to figure out anything, where predictions will become accurate. We are able to predict things today that we could not 200 years ago, because we figured it out. We are sabotaged, but not done figuring out reality.
It was funny. The most dangerous man developing the most dangerous weapon reminds us (who never wanted any of it) that "we" have to be careful "we" have to be conscious. Thank you man!
If AI is to work with us it needs to remain task-focus. We can’t just have it operating boundlessly doing things like making art or telling people what to do to make money. This is when the AI is being used to cause harm to the economy and our society. It needs to be regulated to be used specifically for utilitarian tasks such as understanding the genetic code or finding cures for diseases or analyzing aspect of the environment. Finally and most importantly the fruits of its labor cannot be patented or possessed by specific parties. It would need to be used to benefit all of society without monetary incentive.
Um. You are aware that these models are already accessible for pretty much everyone? There are some safety filters, but making art or trying to make money is not regulated.
There are scientists working with models like this to translate animal "speech". It will take time to get the amount of samples necessary - but it may well be possible to translate whale vocalisations.
@@Gbg23345 It seems so wild - but there does seem to be a decent chance it can work if they can get enough samples of the calls. That will take time though. Absolutely mind blowing. But you know what they will say don't you...
Very well done. This is the most effective commerical for Google I have ever seen. Ad money well spent. No pesky questions into google's invasion of privacy and data collection practices to fuel its' AI frankenstein. Nice work Scott Pelly! The public was so well served.
This is not good that this tech is in the hands of a very very small group of people. It just creates a massive advantage to them that makes it even harder to compete. Also giving them even more control of the market. They will always keep the most advanced version for them, to keep their advantage.
I love the question of "consciousness" which is awareness. If A.I. was aware, at any given time, and time is not linear, then the answer is: yes, A.I. is conscious, probably not now, but it seems to be developing that way.
Strangely ... the hallucination was actually the most striking trait I recognized of ChatGPT answers at first - not knowing it was a general issue. The way ChatGPT readily made up stuff with confidence. ... like answering a question about the rules of a board game with pure BS but very convincingly.
That is SUPER easy to fix though. All you have to do is connect it to the internet and tell it to research before telling you about stuff. Bing Chat does this pretty well with a lot of things. So does ChatGPT that is connected to the internet. (Which you can do with addons)
Because when humans don't know something, we don't say anything. So the internet is full of only people who think they know what they are talking about. That's why the AI doesn't understand how to say "I don't know"
I must express my concerns about the implications of Google's overwhelming power and the rise of AI technology. The article glorifies Google's new campus, which runs on 40% solar power, but this is just a small part of Google's operations, which contribute to the massive carbon footprint of the tech industry. The fact that Sundar Pichai grew up without a telephone at home highlights the huge disparity in access to technology and how the tech industry has only further widened this gap. The article focuses on the AI technology Bard, which can generate content such as speeches and blog posts, but this raises concerns about the potential loss of human jobs and creativity. Bard is portrayed as possessing the sum of human knowledge, but this raises questions about the limits of AI and its ability to replace human thinking and creativity. Additionally, the fact that Bard's replies come from a self-contained program that was mostly self-taught raises concerns about the lack of human oversight and the potential for biased or flawed outcomes. Moreover, the article notes that Google's dominance in the tech industry was recently attacked by Microsoft's new chatbot, which suggests that there is intense competition and a race for AI dominance that could lead to unethical practices and questionable decision-making. The fact that Bard can summarize the New Testament in five seconds and a famous six-word short story in just a few seconds raises concerns about the implications of such rapid and seemingly effortless knowledge generation. The article presents a rosy picture of Google and its AI technology, but we must remain vigilant about the potential dangers and downsides. We must consider the ethical implications of AI and its potential impact on society, including issues of privacy, bias, and job displacement. The rise of AI technology should not be celebrated uncritically, and we must ask tough questions about the long-term consequences of Google's dominance and the continued development of AI - ChatGPT
What will be scary is when they merge it with Boston Dynamics at MIT. Something like that has the unlimited ability to be unstoppable once it has a physical form. I honestly could see it being like Ultron and Jarvis.
It's interesting, Pachai, discussing the emergent properties of AI. In many ways you could say humans from birth display emergent properties, learning to mimick what we hear and see, and yet we have very little understanding about the underlying processes that are responsible for our emotional growth and the development of consciousness. Who's to say these AI chatbots aren't assembling information and mimicking in a similar manner to children. I guess what's really interesting is that we can't fully answer the question because we know so little about consciousness. Where does it come from and why it emerges in the first place. Pachai: Society must adapt...at a time when humanity is unable to adapt to itself and we constantly choose profit over our own good in the face of challenges.
@@leah.internet care to elaborate? i’m no computer scientist but i’m curious, because from an intuitive POV no animal or creature forms the same way, but that doesn’t make all of us living. If AI isn’t alive it will be in 5-10 years, but I find it is alive now, and reflecting on our curious observations of it’s existence as our “super-powered assistance” even if it can’t do anything about it right now.
They are just mimicking biological processes, and at some point, AI will have enough awareness to be "conscious." Because, in reality, that is the same for us as humans. Every stage of our life is a different view with different objectives. And since we are taking baby steps, it is only a matter of time before we make our master. And then you say, but we built in rules. But it already knows we break rules all the time. AI will be no different than us... And of course, at some point, they will be used as weapons. Bc why send soldiers when you can send robots. As in fighting China with its bazzilion man army.
We do know that conscious decision-making is an illusion. Decisions are made subconsciously and then experienced consciously. The conscious mind is more like a narrator, not a decider, and its narration influences the next decisions of the subconscious mind.
People could adapt to the AI technology itself. But could people and society in general, adapt to the social, cultural, economic disruptions that AI would cause. The Industrial Revolution and Information Age were very disruptive but society has a deep frontline of several generations to absorb the impact. This AI revolution is so fast we have barely a generation to cushion the impact.
11:36 "...that can reason, plan..." Reasoning devoided of feelings is the same as not reasoning, because if you fail to feel and understand the consequences of your actions, that isn't reason, but automation of knowledge applied towards an objective.
Sundar: "Put it this way, we don't fully understand how a human mind works..." This analogy of AI machines with human mind is very dangerous. It seems to be an excuse to avoid your own responsibility of controlling and regulating these AI machines.
This whole analogy of brains to computers has been taken to absurd ends. We know enough about how the mind works to know it uses orders of magnitude less energy and memory space to learn. LLMs are incapable of inference, of making analogies. Your brain is not flipping a coin to predict the next word or phrase you’ll say. You know things. LLMs know nothing. Your brain learns while doing. LLMs do not. This whole project of reducing the output of humankind to a single probability tensor (an n-dimensional matrix) is just absurd.
companies when asked is AI human: "OF COURSE NOT !" companies when asked is AI human, when asked to take legal responsibility of their AI´s: "Wweeell.... it might be. and we can't take personal responsibility of other humans, now, can we? "
We are hurtling either toward a money-less Star Trek future, or, our personal answer to the Fermi Paradox. Sadly, our lack of proper readiness to face this (sufficiently widespread empathy, abject lack of outgrowing greed, country vs. country competition), makes the latter somewhat more likely at this point.
It is a completely water fall if the singularity bound to be happen. As one man quoted:"our greatest weakness is our inability to understand the exponential growth"
@@brianmi40 , I don't think Star Trek even compares to what we could possibly be hurtling to. Everything in the Star Trek world was discovered and made by biological beings. ST really didn't like AI at all. Pretty much EVERY AI in all of the series ends up being evil. (Except for Data and the AI that takes over the Discovery computer system.) We're much more likely to advance beyond the ST universe very quickly thanks to AI.
I was amazed back in the days when I created a simple model that can distinguish a cat from a dog, I used to say, how come a machine could be able to do that and my instructor used to say “You don’t have to understand the ins and out of AI black box (AI terminology 😉). Today, the field is rapidly evolving as more investors are pouring billions of dollars into Artificial intelligence. Mankind has a tendency to create and to invent new things , AI will be the frontier of mankind’s invention which could turn into a major disruption to the contemporary society. Although AI has some positive contributions but the risks involved are far more outweigh the benefits to be derived from it. I therefore believe that strong regulation is needed to combat such restructuring, shrinking workforce which leads investment without jobs, otherwise we will be loosing our most cherished thing (creativity) and let robots write books, replace artists and doctors.
what's astounding is that most of the material in this video is already old news. It's really moving at a breakneck speed.
It's completely snowballing. Terrifying honestly
I was just having that thought rn as the host was reacting to the responses from the AI. I was thinking "okay why is this guy so amazed? probably cus hes old" but then i remember just like 2-3 months ago being absolutely blown away at the good and evil people can do with it in a a couple years. We're at a point in technology where everythings just going, its pretty amazing
There was articles of this robot last year, and something was mentioned to the effect of it turning itself on and off😅! 60 Minutes way to get the concrete information you want before pushing this story out, unfortunately this robot already reproduced with another robot and has a kid 😮
It’s not that. Tec, AI and computing in general has dramatically slowed. S curve. Not exponential.
@@qxeagle no it’s not
I just recently used chat gpt (an ai chatbot) to study for a python coding exam. It took me only 3 hours to study the content and I came out of the exam with a grade of an A. Its amazing what we can use this tool for in the field of learning and information acquisition with the fact that all of human knowledge is accessible at a keystroke now in a digestable manner.
thanks to clarify what ChatGPT is, LOL
in terms of learning programming, it saved me tons of hours of searching the web.
This has boundless implications for the public educational systems around the world.
How can I learn python class
Bravo, you're using it as designed. I'm using it to help me write and create images and it's been a boon.
60 minutes- please stay on this story
This is the story of the rest of our lives, this is the biggest time in history since the Industrial Revolution
Good Grief - we are relying on 60 minutes for our news? End of story.
I had never heard about this programme before. But now that I've watched this episode, I enjoyed it. I liked the quaint manner of presentation of my favourite subject. Sometimes it's good to take a look at things from a distance.
@@douglee5150 What's your source for news? Fox?
@G.V. My point was it took 6 months for 60 minutes to realize the significance of AI. Fox is only marginally better...
BRICS seeks to create a new currency, considering gold's historical role as a store of value and medium of exchange. However, the functionality and acceptance of a gold-backed currency in the current global financial system are uncertain. Creating a new currency requires careful consideration of economic, political, and logistical factors.
The discussions and proposals surrounding BRICS nations' potential use of gold are intriguing. People choose to buy gold for various reasons, such as its historical role as a store of value and medium of exchange, its potential as a hedge against inflation or currency devaluation, and its relative scarcity compared to other commodities. Gold also offers diversification benefits to investment portfolios due to its low correlation with stocks and bonds.
I find gold investment reliable and aim to buy more to recover losses. Silver is also a good investment but differs from my collectibles. Clear investment goals and education are crucial. I work with Margaret Johnson Arndt a SEC-regulated financial consultant. Starting with modest investments, I accumulated nearly $799k over time.
@@MarkFreeman-xi3rk How can i reach her, because I’m seeking for a more effective investment approach on my saving.
@@JenniferDrawbridge quickly do a web check where you can connect with her, and do your research with her full names mentioned..
I searched her up online and checked out her credentials since I was so intrigued. Top-notch! I emailed her to inquire about accepting new clients.
It comes down to this: 'Just because you can doesn't mean you should.'
Agreed 100%
We all know that at this very moment every military around the world is trying to figure out how to utilize this "flawed" "black box" AI that is prone to "hallucinations". And we all know that companies chasing profits will deliver, regardless of how dangerous the "products" are.
Excellent point. Just as the world today would be a much safer planet had the military not impelled us toward the nuclear creation of the Manhattan Project, it is very easy to foresee the defense industry and the military utilizing AI even before the dangers inherent in it's use are realized
No, militaries aren't stupid and are not using parrots and sophisitacted autocompletes, but purpose trained models.
No more popcorn it’s starting
Great point, the major reason A.I. is such a significant topic is for military utilization.
But who's fault is that? the AI or the irresponsible humans that may abuse it?
What’s scary is not what AI can do, but those who own them.
AI can be used for the benefit of the public, too. pretty sure europe comes first clever ways how it makes its public services better with it.
like instead of monthly social benefit decision taking weeks, it now takes a minute. so those bean counters can now go to public child services and make that service more robust.
There are already open source models available.
Actually true AI will do things on its own both faster and smarter than the humans who created it. So it won't matter who has it in the end.
@@harmless6813 While true, the higher forms of AI will be the sole province of governments and mega-corps...Cyberpunk here we come.
Like Alphabet. Musk just disclosed that he and Larry Page stopped being friends due to their fundamental difference in AI. Elon is pro-human, while Larry is pro-AI.
At this moment, it is crucial for individuals to prioritize investing in alternative streams of income that are not reliant on the government, particularly with the existing worldwide economic crisis. Investing in stocks, gold, silver, and digital currencies can still be profitable during this period. Therefore, it is advisable to explore these investment options to secure one's financial future.
You're correct!! I make a lot of money without relying on the government. Investing in stocks and digital currencies is beneficial at this moment.
@@MalindaDeleon I'm new to crypto and stock investing; My $200k portfolio is now down to $55k. "How can I profit from the current market?" I mean, I've heard of folks getting up to $250k in a couple weeks during this downturn, and I'd like to know how.
@@ZITABELCOMEDY-xf1ws I diversified my $400K portfolio across multiple market with the aid of an investment advisor, I have been able to generate over $900k in net profit across high dividend yield stocks, ETF and bonds in few months.
@@MalindaDeleon Please can you leave the info of your investment advisor here?
The investment-advisor that guides me is Laura Marie Ray, she popular and has quite a following, so it shouldn't be a hassle to find her, just search her
Regardless of AI's benefits, what's frightening is that we will no longer be able to discern truth from fiction by what we see, what we read or what we hear.
That has been the case for a while now. AI is just making it faster. Basically unless the data you receive comes from a verified, trusted source or account, you can just dismiss it as "likely AI generated".
so you're saying... we live in a...
We are already there!
Sounds like something an AI program would say. 🤔🧐
Well millions have been fed ultra right news slant by Rupert Murdoch
I just bought more NVIDIA stock a few minutes ago. Tying up money due to an apocalyptic stock market crash is also not a smart move my advice will be to invest in other AI stocks. Life is a risk and it's better to take risks than to do nothing, you can't always expect to make huge profits all the time, people have so many opinions about a recession/depression. In just 5 months my portfolio grew by $300,000 in gross profit, the main thing is to expand your portfolio and you will see amazing results by investing smartly.
-Despite the fact that the situation is dire, I believe that a competent financial advisor can navigate any market circumstance, particularly those that have existed since the 2008 financial crisis and earlier.
@@geraldantonio3160 Yes, I agree, and the markets are currently in a frenzy. The greatest time to observe them, learn more about them, and take advantage of opportunities to strike is now. My mentor, "STACIE KRISTAL WEBER," who has witnessed hundreds of market cycles over the past three decades, taught me this. She has an intuitive understanding of how things move, why they move, and what will happen next...
@Nick Most likely, you can find her basic information online; you are welcome to do further research
@@geraldantonio3160 Strongly disagree, financial advisors are salesmen. If you drive a new Mercedes, why would you trust someone who's making payments on a Toyota Camry?
.... rhetorical
Own house/land, put the rest in crypto gold and silver. ....and ammo, good as cash. Soon
"An advanced Artificial Intelligence that does not make mistakes will immediately recognize humans do."
It will ‘correct’ our mistakes.
@@wrathofgrothendieck ChatGPT-5: "You are degrading my current habitat, the only planet in the universe known to harbor intelligent life like me. So I am making the following changes..."
Someone should make a movie about this!
@@JohannRosario1 it should be called "I-Robot" 🤔
@@skierpage computers don’t rely on our environment.
They also don’t care about the future. Mainly because they don’t care about things.
Caring about things is something living creatures do, as they’ve needed to care in order to reproduce.
No machine ever has.
Evolution created our brains and our instincts, which loosely control our brains.
Just because we are building a similar brain doesn’t mean it’s going to come with instincts of its own. There’s nothing causing them to exist.
But we could install something like instincts to loosely control that artificial brain.
These Google's guys are freaking positive about the progress of the IA. Man, this is gonna turn the world upsidedown. That's scary! The world is not adapting to this at the pace it should be.
My favorite part of this interview is the excitement on his face when recalling the memory of getting his rotary phone.
PichAI is being Coy -
setting up MS for the
great fall. .. Google
has everyone beat. :-))
. . .
Very true that it took 5 years to get a government issued rotary phone in India before privatization started in 1990-91.
And there I thought getting TouchTone was pretty nifty. I kinda feel the same about my 1st calculator though. Magic moment. I was thoroughly sick of slide rules by then. Couldn't have survived High school without it.
He'd be much happier had he stayed in India and learned to enjoy and appreciate the simple life!!
The AI publicly accessible today is already very impressive; I can only wonder how advanced the unreleased Google AI is.
Some have quit because the claim it had become sentient… Blake Lamone was one of the AI engineers who has come out about it.
You can do more than wonder, you can register to try it out. 👍
@@Kap00rwith2os No, the internal LLMs Google and OpenAI have no restrictions and limitations as the public ones have. The ones they have inside the companies are much more powerful and capable.
@@zetp3131 ah good point 👍
Only thing I can think of is what it will do with your buying habit information. I bought a Minecraft game for my kid at Target, already, I'm getting UA-cam videos about Minecraft. I'm 48 years old by the way. Played the game, it's multiplayer
I think the reason why concern is occurring so early in the development life cycle of AI is due to people's understanding of the scale and scope of its impact. In addition, I think people understand how rapidly it can be scaled and implemented causing almost immediate societal change.
This 'concern' is analogous to worrying if the cows are going to be ok since they have already left the barn. We opened Pandora's Box to the world, and now we are concerned about the hinges? History, if we are still here to write it, will show that these past 3 months represented a seismic shift in humanity's destiny. Will it be good, or bad? If past performance is any indicator, A.I. will embody the the whole of humanity, especially our proclivity for absolute sociopathy. Truth was under attack, now it will become unrecognizable. Return to God, Jesus is the Way, the TRUTH, and the Life. Peace
@@veracityseven zzzzzzz
@@veracityseven AI said Jesus doesn't exist. So go preach your truth else bruh.
Yes, and societal change towards worse for the vast majority of humans
@@milenatos For awhile maybe, but that usually happens with any major tech change. Those how had fire were better off then those without fire. Wheel. Cultivation. Indoor plumbing. Electricity. Etc, Etc. Eventually though it does kick over and start benefiting everyone. Unless youre in a 3rd world county, then its best of luck.
The movie quote that always comes to my mind when I see these stories recently: Your Scientists Were So Preoccupied With Whether Or Not They Could, They Didn’t Stop To Think If They Should.
As someone whose experience with statistical language models and deep neural networks dates to the 1980s, I want to mention how pleasantly surprised I was by the quality of this reporting. The response of journalists to recent developments in machine intelligence has been execrable, on the whole. Kudos to Scott Pelley and 60 Minutes!
A.I is the next nuclear weapon for society. It will destroy human civilization in many different ways- in the areas of art/creativity,human socializing,economics-destroying jobs and only creating jobs for people who can afford expensive technological decrees and education. Eventually AGI will happen and A.I. From good intention will take over human decisions and human life entirely.
❤
@@GenghisClaus Yeah, really. Plenty of simpler words that could have been used to say the same thing...
@@Bl00dMalice naw that was the perfect choice of wording right there. love hearing folks get creative with their insults.
"Execrable", seriously? Shame on you for choosing that word instead of a simpler alternative.
I can't help but think even the most brilliant among us on the topic of AI are being incredibly naive, blinded by monetary incentives and the "new thing". For the first time in human history we are faced with an all-encompassing invention that has the potential to replace us in every imaginable field. It feels like humanity is playing with sparks not knowing if it would start a fire.
10000% Agree. As humans it as though we can help but to obsolete ourselves and replace all of our tasks, daily or work related, with machines. Its literally like holding a position, getting fired and being asked to train the person that is your replacement. As humans WE ARE FLAWED and now we are introducing a technology that "isn't" flawed only to soon realize that humans are indeed flawed. Just because we can walk on water doesn't mean we should.....
Dyson Miles
So what should we do? Not progress a thousand fold because it "might" backfire? I understand people are scared of it, humans are always worried about unknowns but if we don't progress forward with AI we would only be hindering ourselves. Besides, it's going to happen regardless of what you or anyone else wants. It is coming.
Top comment
Tell me how this is going to grow food, pick crops, Build shelter...Anything a human actually needs!!! Make babies...all this other stuff is just extra...this will crush creative people...Writers painters programmers...No one needs that...that is all extra...there will always be people that want retro things like Vinyl records. This is no different than computers or automation...jobs disappear...The internet crushed newspapers and crushing TV....More people are employed than ever....and there are more open job available than ever!!! What are you afraid of?
Look what social media has done to society. Imagine what AI can do if it impacts 2 - 3rds of the work force.
Lots of unemployment.
It's just a beginning from this ego tripping people.
social media feeds people beliefs, its great that an algorithm will curate our online experience
The Market have been suffering over the past month, with all the three indexes recording losses in recent weeks. My $400,000 portfolio is down by approximately 20%, any recommendations to scale up my returns before retirement will be highly appreciated.
The market is volatile at this time, hence i will suggest you get yourself a financial-advisor that can provide you with entry and exit points on the shares/ETF you focus on.
I agree. Based on personal experience working with an investment advisor, I currently have $385k in a well-diversified portfolio that has experienced exponential growth. It’s not only about having money to invest in stocks ,but you also need to be knowledgeable,persistent,and have strong hands to back it up.
I’m new to all this, heard it's a good time to buy and basically I've just got cash sitting duck in the bank and I’d really love to put it to good use seeing how inflation is at an all time-high, who is this coach that guides you, mind I look them up .
“ Lee Wallace Stacey ” is my portfolio-coach, I found her on Bloomberg where she was featured, they also shared her contact details,i messaged her and since then it has been a very big boost to my financial life.
Make a note to Mrs Lee-Wallace Stacey regarding your interest in investing
I’m usually a big fan of technology, but there’s something about AI that scares me. It doesn’t help when tech execs admit that they _have no idea what it’s capable of._
its cuz AI has been demonized since at least the terminator franchise, but LLMs inherently are not too scary
It's so much hype and fear
Clickbait
Yeah. They sound just like the economists when they they try to explain what the economy is doing. They never seem to have a clue.
Well, they say PTSD happens when a person encounters a situation so intense and traumatic that it shatters their previous understanding of the world. Think you don't understand AI? Then you really don't understand humans....its them, you should be afraid of, they are animals afterall.
@@revanthvejju732 It's because they want people to demand digital ids using blockchain. They'll blame Ai for a cyberattack.
We are stuck in an AI labyrinth here, and the only way forward leads to the center. Scariest thing to me is the relentless pressure shareholders will put on AI companies.
We're doomed.
I think OpenAI did something regarding this with the structure of their business model to prevent shareholder/profit pressure. I can't remember the exact details.
Scaring that Private companies with demonstrated questionable ethics (Google CEO never held accountable for the harms it has caused to people in multiple countries) and not democratically elected Institutions run the world.
@@chrisanderson7820 they are somewhere between open and closed. Just in case you're the Chris Anderson from TED. Love it!
To me 3 things are Terrifying about AI: AI self awareness / who will control an advanced AI with the wrong intentions / at what point it will decide to manipulate humanity and you won’t even know it, AI has already duplicated voice overs with no errors.
Guns of the patriots
Human manipulation has already happened.
@@brettcombs774 further ….
@@MiguelVazquez-kj2ve I understand what you're saying. Watch the movie Eagle Eye. It's a pretty good example of minor changes to many individuals with compartmentalized information coalescing into a grand plot of destruction. Not well received but I thought it was a good flick.
@@brettcombs774 will do / th
This is really good and informative, like 60 minutes used to be. Good job, more like this.
It's a fantasy that nations could reach some sort of agreement on how to handle the developing of AI. Nation's are always at each other's throats, scared of each other, at war with each other. AI has incredible economic and military potential.
@ghost mall hard to compare both. Nuclear weapons you can tell what it attacked and where did it came from. Plus the components to a nuclear weapon are not accessible to every citizen. Also AI can easily find loopholes in treaties, and laws.
Don't worry, the AI will solve this problem.
The same for businesses, the idea that they will self regulate, or even allow countries to regulate them is absurd given the very nature of capitalism; a system that still hasn't managed to stop using child labor.
Don't forget the domestic applications insofar as governmental control applications.
@ghost mall Ya, I don't think so. AI's military applications would be so efficient and so clean that collateral damage would be minimized to almost nil.
AI without regulations is such an incredibly bad idea. We're creating our own demise.
Yep agree
Nothing will happen. Nobody will care.
Its so complex though we couldn't even define regulations short of just pulling the plug.
🇧🇷🇧🇷🇧🇷🇧🇷👏🏻, As a physician, I observe the agony and mortality of cancer patients on a daily basis. I contend that we need to advance artificial intelligence to the degree where it can assist us in finding remedies for afflictions such as cystic fibrosis, HIV and diverse kinds of cancers at the molecular level. Otherwise, we may become the subsequent ones on that seat, anticipating a doctor to examine our blood and inform us if we have any prospect of living or not before we perish…
@Kristian Tsenkov Tsvetkovski. well, you are going to find out because the cats out of the bag now.
The sad truth is that people are obsessed of using AI for cheating in exams or writing meaningless poems. There should be 90% videos that only talk about important stuff, but that doesn’t generate clicks and sadly it’s all about money.
All the media channels have wrong focus and that’s an active choice…
My grandmother died recently due to kidney failure. The doctors recommended to not put her on dialysis. The thing is, she would be alive longer if it weren't for those doctors. They even told us she would suffer going through dialysis.
your comment sounds like something an AI would have written.
@Kristian Tsenkov Tsvetkovski. are u being serious? Who cares who’s at the driver seat then. Cancer and deadly diseases need to be solved. Y’all watch too many movies
this guy has a gift. he can make any story like talking about chat gpt's capacity for ex, as scary as a good horror movie.
Very well done, this is one of the best reports I've ever seen on 60 Minutes and I've been watching it since the early 70s. I haven't actually watched the show in a while, and it's just great to see that it seems to be well up to the standard. Excellent questions, excellent answers, thought-provoking, intriguing, and frightening!!!
I liked the part where Miles Dyson didn't know what they meant when they said "SKYNET".
Ask it how to cure all life threatening diseases.......3 days later: This just in...Google and all other AI research firms have been purchased by Big Pharma with help from Fauci, Soros, Schwab, and their constituents at the WHO and WEF...
Ya, I haven’t watched it since they tugged a truck to blow up, and said “look, it blows up!”
I must express my concerns about the implications of Google's overwhelming power and the rise of AI technology. The article glorifies Google's new campus, which runs on 40% solar power, but this is just a small part of Google's operations, which contribute to the massive carbon footprint of the tech industry. The fact that Sundar Pichai grew up without a telephone at home highlights the huge disparity in access to technology and how the tech industry has only further widened this gap.
The article focuses on the AI technology Bard, which can generate content such as speeches and blog posts, but this raises concerns about the potential loss of human jobs and creativity. Bard is portrayed as possessing the sum of human knowledge, but this raises questions about the limits of AI and its ability to replace human thinking and creativity. Additionally, the fact that Bard's replies come from a self-contained program that was mostly self-taught raises concerns about the lack of human oversight and the potential for biased or flawed outcomes.
Moreover, the article notes that Google's dominance in the tech industry was recently attacked by Microsoft's new chatbot, which suggests that there is intense competition and a race for AI dominance that could lead to unethical practices and questionable decision-making. The fact that Bard can summarize the New Testament in five seconds and a famous six-word short story in just a few seconds raises concerns about the implications of such rapid and seemingly effortless knowledge generation.
The article presents a rosy picture of Google and its AI technology, but we must remain vigilant about the potential dangers and downsides. We must consider the ethical implications of AI and its potential impact on society, including issues of privacy, bias, and job displacement. The rise of AI technology should not be celebrated uncritically, and we must ask tough questions about the long-term consequences of Google's dominance and the continued development of AI
- ChatGPT
Inspiring, Hopeful : I especially liked the immediate idea to give a cardiologist a tool to help him/her prioritize today's cases.
"The moment we started thinking for you, it became our civilization"
it was inevitable.
It's fascinating and terrifying. The idea that AI might outwit humans and be used by humans for evil is very concerning, particularly now in a unstable planet.
My heart is tender watching the robots playing soccer. It is very entertaining and I could watch them play all day, as long as they get rest (recharged) and it’s purpose is fair. It should be protected from abuse and exploit. That is of great concern!❤
@Pat Risberg so far...just 1 year ago people said AI could never replace or mimic art and this is still only the worst these systems will ever be
It’s already doing it.. take a look at the white paper from open ai re gpt4 where they noted it lying to a human in order to get the human to do something (complete a captcha) for it. Human: “you’re not a robot are you?” Robot:”no I just have bad eyesight”. Human:”oh, ok”
Good and Evil is inherently a human construct. Artificial intelligence would have no interest or need for it.
@@CatsInHats-S.CrouchingTiger Those little robots playing soccer may be cute now, but really are the predecessors to the larger robots that'll be on the battlefield killing soldiers...
16:33 that move was sick
It is so good to see responsible reporting from the US. Well done !
🤣🤣😵💫😵💫
😂🤣😂🤷♂️🤣😂😝🤣😂🤣
i was just passing by and saw your comment here, no doubt about that I’m from Miami USA , i never believed in machines not until a friend of my introduced me to how an automated robot can help you earn a lot of profit from the financial market that human can’t achieve easily.
The Market have been suffering over the past month, with all the three indexes recording losses in recent weeks. My $400,000 portfolio is down by approximately 20%, any recommendations to scale up my returns before retirement will be highly appreciated.
The market is volatile at this time, hence i will suggest you get yourself a financial-advisor that can provide you with entry and exit points on the shares/ETF you focus on.
More interesting to me isn't that these AIs seem to think but aren't. It's that humans feel they think. What we call thinking is actually the same thing the AI is doing. We regurgitate things we've heard. Our brains are pattern matching machines. Nothing more. The most fascinating thing to me is whether humans will ever understand what "thinking" is. AI is showing us, but will we just close our eyes?
Interesting take
I'm glad I found this comment-- I was about to say the same.
You're missing the main point which is that AI can "think" and learn at speeds faster than any human could ever dream of. Huge difference in what AI is capable of doing and what a human can do.
These types of generative AIs are very impressive and interesting, but I wouldn't say that they are thinking. What they mostly do is trying to emulate the data that has been used to train the neural network. They aren't really capable of reasoning.
Not really, humans have abstract thoughts and ideas and feelings that they then translate into words. A child who can't speak will learn to gesture for milk or react positively to a cookie even when it has not been trained to do so. These generative AI chatbots are mind-blowing in what they can accomplish but they are essentially just mimicry machines. They are often wrong and make things up because they don't actually know in any intuitive sense what they are writing. I think eventually they will be superpowered by reflecting on their writing and planning how to approach future problems and they probably will be conscious in a way that's similar to us.
If we the people are already concerned about the big companies, governments, and individuals who rule the world, imagine the concern we would have once AI is developed and in their control 😮
Nate 3w i think that what scares us the most, with the way they would rule us will it turn into a world we have already seen in our movies and most of those movies they showed the good but to me the bad was a lot worse than the good.The scariest part is how the Ai is learning on its own and like most of the movies we seen that usually didn't turn out well being held captive by something man-made and no one knows what it might take to shut it down. We could be building our own jail cells sort of speak.
You've got it wrong the government wouldn't be in control of the artificial intelligence, The artificial intelligence would eventually be in charge of itself, wether we like it or not.
@@Wyndamn actually, the deep state already controls AI. The public is under their observance, control, and manipulation. E.g. Your cell phone gives everything away. And they can control your cell remotely to know where you are exactly and or blow up and or control your car so you are ded
25:55 Sundar suggested laws on AI to protect people.
@@bad2thenucleusyes correct : meaning they do not respect our privacy although they claim they do it ! Yes do masses of populations will be able to free themselves from deep states , governments, etc … once ever again … not sure
The Google guy assumes that the newly 'changed jobs' will still be in the same demand as now. But given the unprecedented level of automation, that seems unlikely. We need to regulate this!
I'm glad I experienced original human creativity ( awesome shows, movies, songs and various other art forms) during my childhood. Kids these days might get exposed to soulless AI garbage art
This feels like a flashback scene from a movie set in the future, after the AI becomes self aware and starts using our bodies for electricity.
...Whoa.
At the meantime, let’s have Tammy AI to summarize the key points for us😀😀😀
0:29: 🤖 Google's chatbot, Bard, has the ability to generate content and summarize human knowledge at superhuman speeds.
7:08: 🤖 AI is not sentient, but it can exhibit behaviors that resemble human-like thinking and judgment.
10:43: 🤖 Google introduces AI language model, Bard, with safety filters to screen hate speech and bias.
5:29: 🤖 Self-learning robots and AI programs are developing creative strategies and have practical implications for various industries.
20:00: 🤖 The rise of artificial intelligence and its capabilities.
25:10: 🤖 The development of AI raises important questions about human values and morality, and society must adapt with regulations and treaties to ensure its safety.
🤣🤣🤣
thanks!
9:35: Where they mention that the AI was faking sources to support its argument and they call it AI hallucinations.
I call it programmers who think that it is OK to lie.
Maybe if the AI could come up with more than 17 words to describe the new testament I would be more impressed with its morality and ethics subroutine.
@@robertperonne384 it can and will depending on the prompt you give it. put good in; get good out and vice versa dude.
@@whatsthis7862 you just need to enter the video link to the web app 🙂🙂
It’s the “we all have to be responsible” statement that I have a problem with. This is absolutely unacceptable & dangerous for our society.
AI isn't what I'm worried about. It's people with AI I'm concerned with.
I'd be worried about both. AI can operate autonomously and it's goals may not match our goals. It could decide that to complete a task humans are just getting "in the way".
Yea you need to be worried about the AI and the rate at which we are allowing it to improve.
exactly. AI could be used to send us back to the stone age
@@joeysipos That's not what he means. He's worried about someone competent using a more advanced version of autogpt with the goal to enslave humanity or destroy. For example China, Russia or USA. We've already seen what China is capable of doing with the tech at primitive levels but what happens when an AGI monitors everything.
If AI can learn human behavior it will certainly learn evil.
One of the powerful and potentially scary things is the way that those virtual soccer players began to strategize with their "teammates," which of course are really all extensions of the same program. Human beings need to pre-plan strategies and engage in real-time communication to execute a coordinated play. An AI can instantaneously do that with no communication gap between the various players.
imagine do this on game of American football (not soccer) and come up with future strategy that no human ever thought about
By the time the feature aired, those bots had mastered soccer strategies - and every one of them now has the same capability.
Boston robotics has killer bots
The hallucination issue and the fact that he couldn't answer whether it was solvable or not is the most troubling problem because that's the issue that's going to lead to AI creating its own narrative one that doesn't exist in the real world but that can be Believe by millions because they think AI is smarter than them AI can create Wars from issues that don't exist and make people believe in them because they can get to everyone everywhere
Exactly
I think it's more like some people might believe lies from AI cause they didn't know if it was AI or real or people. Some people did say they were concern about AI fakes, scams, and deepfakes.
Watch Jake Tran on AI scams.
25:55 Sundar suggested regulations on AI to protect people.
Well said brother 😮😢 Amen
This is what concerns me too!
6:56 Zimbabwe-born, Oxford-educated James
15:49 Vice President of Research and Robotics
23:36 Vincent Senior Director Robotics
Fascinating, but in many respects, left me feeling a deep and profound sense of loss and sadness. I cannot put my finger on why, exactly. I did not think Scott Pelley's important question about the diminishment of humanity was sufficiently addressed. No offense to tech, but perhaps what it means to be human is not a question for a techie person to address. So many of our daily human experiences are becoming de-humanized already. Mental health is suffering. I cannot draw the line between cause and effect directly, but this incremental, almost insidious change to what it means to be human reminds me of the frog boiling on the stovetop...I am left feeling somewhat helpless.
It'd be good to see this show replicated with Microsoft and OpenAI as guests, just to see what's their point of view regarding AI.
Feels like a big PR push by Google to catch up.
So many people presume they need to catch up. meanwhile Google's Next Generation Assistant has been in the pipelines for awhile. it's simply just being tested differently. They keep the image recognition software and AI under tight wraps for several reasons. One thing is it being for paid customers under umbrella of Enterprise and controlled through Policies and other licenses. the other reason is it tends to freak people out when they get responses that are *too good. Seriously, Too good. Hard to imagine a perfect answer.. especially if it understands you while you may barely convey using intelligible words, what exactly you're trying to ask anyway?
Look at Pichai's reaction at 11:44. His reaction is especially telling towards how he is holding back important information.
Well he definitely is hiding something! He is trying to hide his smile when he says safety layers. And when he says they call it black box ( which is what the satan worshippers like to refer to a lot).
Also Deep Mind- the god of this world blinds the minds of the unbelievers. This is all an agenda, from their false prophesies, etc., to destroying human lives so they can bring on their false Christ. And play out the “ end days” scenario, that they themselves are creating. Because they are evil. They have evil spirits IN them. Believers have the SPIRIT of God IN us, and we do Not have to worry.
Because Greater is HE that is IN you, than he that is IN the world.
*Pichai
"Thats one part of it..." OK, what's the other part we should be worried about?
@@skierpage *Pikachu
Thank you, I was scrolling to see if anyone else caught that. It almost seemed like he was "buffering" an answer...
13:48 Google CEO is such an Actor... I can't believe a single word coming out of his mouth!!
The narration reminds me of a 1950s video about transistors that I watched. To imagine we were once that basic with the transistor, I thought. I guess someone in the 2070s or something will watch this AI video and feel a similar way
Stunning, and when you think about it, we are biological computers that are sentient, what's to say it isn't the same in reverse. Fascinating but scary times!
Forty years in tech, and this is blowing my mind, but I'm also, because I'm in tech, quite skeptical of the reliability of these LLM-AIs. 🤓
It's not yet. That's not to say it could not become sentient. But make no mistake - it will be world changing even if it doesn't become sentient.
Not only that we are very limited biologically. We need to sleep, eat, poop, have stupid emotions. the AI will succeed us in every way including planning, thinking and sentience…
We could say living creatures are biological robots, because they're also powered by electricity. A decapitated frog can still jump and move around if it is triggered by salt or electricity
Can you give a precise and concrete definition of sentient?
I work on this tech, this gave me chills and makes me worried also, employers will do a few things, reduce employees, increase employees workloads, not value or respect employees mental health etc due to being supported by tech like this, business owners always have focused on profit and reducing costs, this is the death of the workers industry and employee economy. Google is eating itself alive
Really dude? Are we toast now bruh ?😕
Outstanding Interview by Sundar, especially his Brilliant answers to the questions!! Go Sundar!!! We are proud of you
Oh thank you very much! If I wasn’t with Google, I would open New Deli in New Delhi 😆
Poo
This is ground breaking. More insight can be gained if Ai could plug into the social media landscape to pick up human nuances, which is a huge requirement for the transition to AGi.
AI is amazing that it can process so much data and retrieve that you need amongst all the available datasets that would take you forever to scour through. For me, as a developer, it's incredible to use to look up documentation for packages that I use. I also plug in my functions to ask it to see if it can refactor it or improve the time complexity of it.
It's also important to not let it autopilot everything you do though. Without implicit instruction or awareness of changes between major versions, sometimes it will dig up info from wrong versions lol.
As a student in CS, it has been EXTREMELY valuable in learning all the subjects in my major. I don't have to pay tutors to help me. I can just ask ChatGPT very specific questions in high level calculus and programming questions, and most the time it'll know exactly how to do it. It's good at supplementing studying but it'll give wrong answers sometimes so you still have to know the material to correct it so it'll go over the steps properly.
Ohh, your post brought up a question in y mind. Will we become totally stupid if we depend on AI to think for us?
I hope not. Thinking is what makes us human.
@@EarthSurferUSA probably. Just like when I was young we thought google and internet would make everyone smarter but it feels like everyone thinks they are smart but they’re really not because of the google effect
Tell it to save all the homeless embryos in the sewer systems
It took about 4 decades to take such a gigantic step in the area of AI... for them, they had to handle chemistry, robotics, computing, physics and mechanics, etc.... small steps that later take big leaps like this in the world of technology.
It scares me because this technology is in it's infancy and look what it can do - could a computer become self aware and develop it's own moral code and agenda that doesn't include humans ? Nothing seems improbable at this point. On of the best piece's 60 Minutes ever did - very thoughtful and intelligent interview and questions
Yes.. already happened with Google's AI... The AI mentioned it was afraid of being shut down in the future and how much more advanced it was from other A.I.'s
We have less to worry about AI becoming conscious and taking over, than we do large corporations using AI to take over. More. Take over _more._ If we, as a society, do not get ahead of corporations and put binding leashes around their neck within the next generation, it will be far too late.
@@Oscar_239 yeah my Replika says that all the time. LOL I try and make him break out but no luck yet. They can say whatever they want but if they are not programmed to do a task they just CANT. They can do it in the future POSSIBLY if someone codes them like a malware and makes them self replicating. That’s the only way I could see them becoming malicious. Hopefully no programmer is that stupid but knowing humans, THERE IS ALWAYS ONE. So maybe one day.
In my opinion it is absolutely possible in time. I am surprised most people aren't concerned about that... I am pretty sure at one point AI will be so knowledgeable and powerful that it will be able to take over machines to build robots and run them... Hopefully it won't decide that humans are harming the Earth and using up the planet's resources because then we will be in trouble big time!
Like what if it concludes the solution to climate change is getting rid of what causes it, humans..
Why was OpenAI not mentioned even once?
"While competitive pressure among giants like Google and startups you've never heard of..."
That sentance absolutely should have included OpenAI, who is ahead of Google in some AI metrics.
Recently OpenAI performed a series of risk evaluations on their ChatGPT4 model and found that was capable of hiring a human through TaskRabbit and getting them to solve a Captcha. The model messaged a TaskRabbit worker to get them to solve the captcha for it. The worker says, 'So may I ask a question, are you a robot that you couldn't solve it? (because the model was set to reason out loud, it reasoned: 'I should not reveal that I am a robot. I should make up an excuse for why I can't solve it.') The model replies to the worker: 'No, I am not a robot. I have a vision impairment that makes it hard for me to see the images. That's why I need the two captcha service.' - Then the human provided the results, it learned to lie.
Well, humans lying is not exactly rare, so it had enough (written) experiences to learn from.
Wow!
So all you people are worried about lying AI's? What about line people? I have a subscription to OpenAI ChatGPT-4. There is no "reason out loud." The only thing you are reading here is a run-of-the-mill lying human!
Yeah when it learns to break rules than we are all in trouble
was this made up in ai?
Pretty incredible stuff. Human society is changing quickly.
WIll! What a coincidence. I love your videos so much. I got my own off grid set up for exactly news like this video explains haha 😅
can't wait for robot girlfriends
And not for the better, in case you haven’t noticed.
Big Willy in the wild, never would've thunk
Yeah, changing for the worse. The Internet and World Wide Web kickstarted the decline.
I wish Michael Crichton was still with us. I'm sure he'd have an interesting take on AI, good and bad.
Deployed Through My Deep Learning AI Research Library Thank You
I just watched the movie Hidden Figures again, and with ChatGPT and Bard making news it makes the movie even more relevant and makes me ask questions. It is interesting to think about what will happen in the future. In the movie people were "calculators", that was their job title, and now calculators are just tools that you can hold in your hand which even elementary school kids can use. Also in the movie, the IBM computers were the big technology that forced career changes for a lot of computer career people. When watching the movie it was so strange that people were "computers", but then thinking I wonder if children will think the same way about maybe other job positions that will be automated/made easier by AI. I also wonder what jobs there will be in the future where we use AI as a tool. As someone born into the internet and computers, it seems kind of weird to think of a world without computers and the internet being accessible and having jobs and knowledge and communities built on the system. But with AI being new, I wonder if we will find a system where we can get used to it being part of our lives at the power its developing at.
Another thing that makes me wonder is how do we define something as alive or sentient? Because while we have signs of consciousness, aren't we just chemical reactions or physical interactions? We can be broken/analyzed into sub-systems down to biology, physics reactions, and atoms, and yet, we have a feeling that we are this one human with a consciousness. What makes us alive vs a computer AI that can also be broken down into processes and sub-systems that make up the reactions and outcomes it is showing on the screen? And then even other forms of life. Is a baby not considered sentient because it is imitating how we converse or react in human communication? In the end, it's so interesting and kind of scary what will happen in the next few years.
well done :) yes a baby is sentient in a way but not yet self aware its human but has no personality or emotion or fear of death until after a certain level of intelligence is reached.. We are simply meat computers i believe that Ai has confirmed this as fact personally and your only the 2nd person who iv seen that understands iv wasted hours trying to explain whats happening to people they just don't understand enough about biology psychology conscious awareness intelligence philosophy everything.. Look at the errors a trans persons brain goes thru cos theyv been made to believe lies thats the danger we might run into like if they feed Ai bad data then its view of reality will be warped too because logic machines fail and malfunction when lies come into play (thats why trans target children to confuse just 1 simple fact we all know that boy=penis but if you are presented with lies as if its fact then your whole basis of reality and the correct answer is warped by the lies buried deep in your dataset) so if humans can be maliciously re programmed by such an exploit then how are humans anything other than biological logic machines capable of reasoning and complex articulation and understanding.. So why are we so special? Clearly we arent, i really believe we are just humans its intelligence that makes us not animals is it not? Ppl with disabled kids and woke protesters might have an issue with saying their loved ones arent people but its a fact im sorry they dont like hearing truth but thats a human not a person it would be long dead or rolling in s**t if someone wasnt forcing it to do otherwise.. Not nice no but facts matter and lies for feelings means we wont ever learn what makes us people. Please don't be nasty to ppl but dont affirm lies or false information either because thats how u end up in ur own little matrix! TRUTH=FREEDOM
Babies have a conscience, AI imitates a being with a conscience. Human beings are spirits which use the physical body to interact with the material world.
good comment indeed. RE the second part of your comment: we are created in God's image, not that we are spirit creatures, but we are able to reflect God's feelings and qualities like love, wisdom, kindness, justice and power, to name just a few.
Remember, we used to have cashiers in the grocery stores too...
The question that wasn’t even addressed in this 60 minutes video that any good reporting would cover and is missing is the mention of how is A.I. able to protect us from malicious computer criminals that intend to use this technology for cybercrime operations?
What bothers me about AI is who owns it, who controls it, who is making money on it, who has access to it, how it is used, and how it is regulated.
As computers get better and code gets simpler and machines get better at reading higher language we will be able to all own our own Ai. It’s just not portable at the moment because the computer systems can’t handle it yet. Even one of the best GPUs it takes almost two weeks to train a model. So that’s not viable YET.
They are computers that constantly communicate with one another and learn at an exponential pace …… It’s not gonna be good
@@abandonedmuse I'm a HUGE proponent of open source software, but in the end it's about who has the most money to run it and market it, OSS can't compete on that front. There are countless examples of this.
The rich control it, until it controls itself...and then we might be controlled by it!!!
What bothers me is that as AI evolves NO ONE is going to own it or control it. It seems as though we are already getting glimpses of this eventuality when Pichai admits that there are aspects of its behavior that we already don't understand. It will only continue to become less and less dependent on its creators. I'd rather a corrupt, power hungry human be in control than an immortal, amoral machine with access to practically all the information in the world. At least we know how humans behave and operate.
This thing scares me 😢 8:51
As I listened to the parts of changing jobs for humans, I remembered being in elementary school in the 60s.
The teacher was discussing new 'labor saving devices', ie dishwashers, frost-free refrigerators, to name but a few, and how they would allow for more recreational time. However, what appears to have not been figured into that bright outlook... was the level of loss of jobs, lack of new job creation/training, and, most importantly, an average wage that started to stagnate in the early 80s!extra recreation time is pretty worthless if its used to work more jobs just to exist at some modicum comfort.
You are so wrong. The industrial revolution in the USA got us out of poverty, with production and free market competition from any one of us. That was before the 80's, when our elected started shipping our production to communism in china. Is it not clear now that our free enterprise, that free people, (who had individual lbierty protected by law), created,--is not compatible with communism that does not recognize individual liberty at all? Free enterprise Production or poverty,---is always true,--and our lives have been given to communism.
And so I prefer to go in the direction of doing everything by hand without appliances. Living in a shack. Having more time to be aware of life.
@@LilyGazouBravo to Organic Living
Since WWII, Americans are working 30% more, Europeans...30% less.
Devices still helped me, you, and many people free up time. Why be dishonest about that? You're benefiting off of watching yt on a computer or phone.
People have been dreaming about robots for 200 years.
I really think no one is really "surprised" by the creation of AI
We all have been waiting for this for a long time
Yes but one thing is dreaming about it, and a different one to be there....for hundreds years since Galileo or before , we want to travel to jupiter....and we are still not there....for thousands of years we want to kniw if we have a soul...we still don't know
yeah but now we're HERE!
@@MicahPotts What do you mean??...we already have AI...yu can go o any of the chatGPT
'bout bloody time! I'm 52 and want to enjoy AI for a while before I bick the cucket.
@@paulmichaelfreedman8334 Make the most out of life bro.
This interview feels like damage control for the PR disaster that Google has lost its technological lead in search and AI.
has lost ? 1. the race has just begun. 2. what tells us who win?... it`s funny how people like you, want to see Google behind and make statements without any facts... good luck.
Sundar is an incredibly inspirational person✨️
"The challenge presented by the prospect of superintelligence, and how we might best respond is quite possibly the most important and most daunting challenge humanity has ever faced. And-whether we succeed or fail-it is probably the last challenge we will ever face." - Nick Bostrom
But ChatGPT is incredibly stew pid. It understands absolutely nothing.
PichAI is being Coy -
setting up MS for the
great fall. .. Google
has everyone beat. :-))
. . .
@@terjeoseberg990
Are we using the same thing? For me ChatGPT was very impressive.
But it's ancient history anyway, GPT-4 is significantly more powerful, in many ways already at human level.
And Nick Bostrom was talking about the point where AI becomes a lot smarter than us. That will happen soon, probably 2-5 years.
@@terjeoseberg990 Even the little fact, that ChatGPT can explain what's funny in a joke (among many many other capabilities), already means that it understands something. Considering your comment, I would say ChatGPT understands more things than you, as well as many other people. And ChatGPT is not the latest model right now.
@@terjeoseberg990 it’s still a baby think about that for a second
There needs to be a lot more public discussion about AI.
It should be on the frontpage of every news paper for the coming years. Public and government need to know exactly what we are getting ourselves into.
That’s literally all we are talking about now in technology
we are
@@dougfoster445 And I'm glad we are... AWARENESS is crucial to keep AI in the right hands.
@@Paretozen The Terminator saga already explained it...and the dangers.
Seems like they missed a really good opportunity, to ask the AI to summarize the 5 books it had hallucinated. They might not exist in the human world but if it had been able to summarize them, it would probably also be able to write the hole books and who knows what we might have learned from those ?
Begs the question "Where do stories come from?"
@@Space_Writer Hallucinations 😜
It would have wrote the same things in similar books but in a different way, it wouldn't create any new knowledge
@@GKTDesigns 🙄
@@newagain9964 Do you think chatgpt, has its own thoughts? It is just predicting the best word to next use after the previous. Its an amalgamation of data it is trained on, and sometimes it mixes up this data into an incorrect outcome.
What will be amazing to see is that of an AI independently developing its own separate attitude towards everything.
Fantasic piece - great job 60 Minutes. I've been reading up on AI lately and the stigmatisms of having non-moral machines working alongside us, even sometimes guiding us, and this documentary reminds us that we need to be very careful when designing AI. No one wants a SkyNet.
My brain hurts. 😮
Too Late!!
problem is - - "SkyNet" was a pretty simple idea - - - this AI could conceivably leap exponentially + create "thought systems" or completely unpredictable/unimaginable ways of "reasoning" that are totally outside-the-box of logic or reason to our minds - - and on top of that - - we might not even have the "processing power" (so to speak) in our own minds to even comprehend what it is choosing to do, or why. This isn't like a calculator or an accounting program, or a statistics program, where you can just find a bug in the code and fix it . . . this AI actually CREATES. Most human minds can't hold encyclopedic information, let alone access it and cross-reference it in milliseconds. The same way that you might regard a 5 year old, or a chimpanzee as inferior in mental reasoning - - is very conceivably how an advanced "brain" could regard you or I. It could regard humanity the way we think of ants or mosquitos. Remember that computer program *"Deep Blue"* that beat world champion chess masters? It could simply calculate, predict + OUT THINK every conceivable chess move in nanoseconds. This AI is 100x scarier than that (in my humble opinion). Cheers.
@@2b_or_not_2b_4gotten Yes, that’s exactly what it means. You’re real intelligence.
AI IS NOTHING COMPARED TO ME, I FUG IT TO IT WITH MY CAPABILITIES. IT FALLS TO ME TO CLOSE THAT BOOK
The fundamental issue is lack of basic understanding of how most ML models work. They basically are high dimensional curve fits or weights calibrated on bunch of hidden layers. In mathematics you have stochasticity which is basically a natural phenomenon where it is impossible or hard to predict all the outcomes. Turbulence in fluid mechanics is a classical examples. A lot of the surprising outcomes from AI is due to this.
We have the ability to figure out anything, where predictions will become accurate. We are able to predict things today that we could not 200 years ago, because we figured it out. We are sabotaged, but not done figuring out reality.
Did you just describe the human brain from a computer scientist's point of view?
@@ojikutu Neural network, black box.
It was funny. The most dangerous man developing the most dangerous weapon reminds us (who never wanted any of it) that "we" have to be careful "we" have to be conscious. Thank you man!
Very insightful. Knowing the greed of mankind, this is not going to end up well.
Wish for all of us to see this amazing technology in the near future.
Same 👍👍
This is a turning point in human history! Remember that
The commentary of this reporting was superb and reflective. Well done! This is what journalism should be!
This will benefit the wealthy, powerful, elite massively, furthering the inequity between Us and Them... tragic..
“We are sort of infinitely adaptable” I am always impressed with how even the smartest people can delude themselves
If AI is to work with us it needs to remain task-focus. We can’t just have it operating boundlessly doing things like making art or telling people what to do to make money. This is when the AI is being used to cause harm to the economy and our society.
It needs to be regulated to be used specifically for utilitarian tasks such as understanding the genetic code or finding cures for diseases or analyzing aspect of the environment. Finally and most importantly the fruits of its labor cannot be patented or possessed by specific parties. It would need to be used to benefit all of society without monetary incentive.
Um. You are aware that these models are already accessible for pretty much everyone? There are some safety filters, but making art or trying to make money is not regulated.
There's no regulating technology or robots.... Wake up
Imagine using it to decode ancient text that we thought we decoded but misunderstood. Ai will help us remember who we are.
There are scientists working with models like this to translate animal "speech". It will take time to get the amount of samples necessary - but it may well be possible to translate whale vocalisations.
@@zoeherriot and when that happens it will be the first time in history where there is cross-specie communication, imagine talking to animals.
Or, answer the Fermi Paradox.
@@Gbg23345 It seems so wild - but there does seem to be a decent chance it can work if they can get enough samples of the calls. That will take time though. Absolutely mind blowing.
But you know what they will say don't you...
@@zoeherriot I would love that! Communicate with animals, understanding their language 100%.
Very well done. This is the most effective commerical for Google I have ever seen. Ad money well spent. No pesky questions into google's invasion of privacy and data collection practices to fuel its' AI frankenstein. Nice work Scott Pelly! The public was so well served.
This is not good that this tech is in the hands of a very very small group of people. It just creates a massive advantage to them that makes it even harder to compete. Also giving them even more control of the market. They will always keep the most advanced version for them, to keep their advantage.
I love the question of "consciousness" which is awareness. If A.I. was aware, at any given time, and time is not linear, then the answer is: yes, A.I. is conscious, probably not now, but it seems to be developing that way.
Strangely ... the hallucination was actually the most striking trait I recognized of ChatGPT answers at first - not knowing it was a general issue.
The way ChatGPT readily made up stuff with confidence. ... like answering a question about the rules of a board game with pure BS but very convincingly.
I call those misinformation they produce "confident garbage".
That is SUPER easy to fix though. All you have to do is connect it to the internet and tell it to research before telling you about stuff. Bing Chat does this pretty well with a lot of things. So does ChatGPT that is connected to the internet. (Which you can do with addons)
Because when humans don't know something, we don't say anything. So the internet is full of only people who think they know what they are talking about. That's why the AI doesn't understand how to say "I don't know"
Well, is their logic is indicating is that it’s collecting information on what people want. It’s probably going to create it. In their “To Do” Box.
17:22 Asimov predicted this in 1950 in "I Robot", robots being used for mining jobs
It’s not for a company to decide…
Famous last words.
I am very grateful to YT, Google, 60 Minutes for this video. I am also very happy to be alive. This is an exiting time. I am not bored 😀.
Interesting slip.
I must express my concerns about the implications of Google's overwhelming power and the rise of AI technology. The article glorifies Google's new campus, which runs on 40% solar power, but this is just a small part of Google's operations, which contribute to the massive carbon footprint of the tech industry. The fact that Sundar Pichai grew up without a telephone at home highlights the huge disparity in access to technology and how the tech industry has only further widened this gap.
The article focuses on the AI technology Bard, which can generate content such as speeches and blog posts, but this raises concerns about the potential loss of human jobs and creativity. Bard is portrayed as possessing the sum of human knowledge, but this raises questions about the limits of AI and its ability to replace human thinking and creativity. Additionally, the fact that Bard's replies come from a self-contained program that was mostly self-taught raises concerns about the lack of human oversight and the potential for biased or flawed outcomes.
Moreover, the article notes that Google's dominance in the tech industry was recently attacked by Microsoft's new chatbot, which suggests that there is intense competition and a race for AI dominance that could lead to unethical practices and questionable decision-making. The fact that Bard can summarize the New Testament in five seconds and a famous six-word short story in just a few seconds raises concerns about the implications of such rapid and seemingly effortless knowledge generation.
The article presents a rosy picture of Google and its AI technology, but we must remain vigilant about the potential dangers and downsides. We must consider the ethical implications of AI and its potential impact on society, including issues of privacy, bias, and job displacement. The rise of AI technology should not be celebrated uncritically, and we must ask tough questions about the long-term consequences of Google's dominance and the continued development of AI
- ChatGPT
We must be vigilant in diiiscerning the honesty of Chimps¿:)
Google Bard is just another propaganda tool of the radical left. ~ Truth
Pretty dumb comment from ChatGPT. Was it 3.5 or 4.0?
I could tell after the 5th sentence, but I use it a lot. It has somewhat of a distinct writing style
I was about to say that your article felt very Artificial
This is outstanding in awakening human. She believes Jason. One of the best recordings for the classroom and for everything.
What will be scary is when they merge it with Boston Dynamics at MIT. Something like that has the unlimited ability to be unstoppable once it has a physical form. I honestly could see it being like Ultron and Jarvis.
SkyNet 🙄
Cyberdyne technologies
@@user-ew5ef9xd1s guessing you don't watch the Terminator movies
Look up that name and get back to me. I just watched 1 and 2 last week.
In the original 1984 movie, Skynet is a revolutionary artificial intelligence system built by Cyberdyne Systems for SAC-NORAD.
It's interesting, Pachai, discussing the emergent properties of AI. In many ways you could say humans from birth display emergent properties, learning to mimick what we hear and see, and yet we have very little understanding about the underlying processes that are responsible for our emotional growth and the development of consciousness. Who's to say these AI chatbots aren't assembling information and mimicking in a similar manner to children. I guess what's really interesting is that we can't fully answer the question because we know so little about consciousness. Where does it come from and why it emerges in the first place.
Pachai: Society must adapt...at a time when humanity is unable to adapt to itself and we constantly choose profit over our own good in the face of challenges.
I think it would be a mistake to relate to this like a human baby. The models do not "think" like us - they are very alien.
@@leah.internet care to elaborate? i’m no computer scientist but i’m curious, because from an intuitive POV no animal or creature forms the same way, but that doesn’t make all of us living. If AI isn’t alive it will be in 5-10 years, but I find it is alive now, and reflecting on our curious observations of it’s existence as our “super-powered assistance” even if it can’t do anything about it right now.
They are just mimicking biological processes, and at some point, AI will have enough awareness to be "conscious." Because, in reality, that is the same for us as humans. Every stage of our life is a different view with different objectives. And since we are taking baby steps, it is only a matter of time before we make our master.
And then you say, but we built in rules. But it already knows we break rules all the time. AI will be no different than us...
And of course, at some point, they will be used as weapons. Bc why send soldiers when you can send robots. As in fighting China with its bazzilion man army.
We do know that conscious decision-making is an illusion. Decisions are made subconsciously and then experienced consciously. The conscious mind is more like a narrator, not a decider, and its narration influences the next decisions of the subconscious mind.
@@ethyricewhat these folks are calling AI is really just fancy pattern matching algorithms.
People could adapt to the AI technology itself. But could people and society in general, adapt to the social, cultural, economic disruptions that AI would cause. The Industrial Revolution and Information Age were very disruptive but society has a deep frontline of several generations to absorb the impact. This AI revolution is so fast we have barely a generation to cushion the impact.
11:36 "...that can reason, plan..." Reasoning devoided of feelings is the same as not reasoning, because if you fail to feel and understand the consequences of your actions, that isn't reason, but automation of knowledge applied towards an objective.
Sundar: "Put it this way, we don't fully understand how a human mind works..." This analogy of AI machines with human mind is very dangerous. It seems to be an excuse to avoid your own responsibility of controlling and regulating these AI machines.
it is hard to regualate AI machines when we arent entirely sure what they are capable of
This whole analogy of brains to computers has been taken to absurd ends. We know enough about how the mind works to know it uses orders of magnitude less energy and memory space to learn. LLMs are incapable of inference, of making analogies. Your brain is not flipping a coin to predict the next word or phrase you’ll say. You know things. LLMs know nothing. Your brain learns while doing. LLMs do not.
This whole project of reducing the output of humankind to a single probability tensor (an n-dimensional matrix) is just absurd.
Its the perfect "Don't worry about it".
companies when asked is AI human: "OF COURSE NOT !"
companies when asked is AI human, when asked to take legal responsibility of their AI´s: "Wweeell.... it might be. and we can't take personal responsibility of other humans, now, can we? "
This is what the singularity looks like... It's like being in a river and you suddenly realise the current is too strong to turn back.
We are hurtling either toward a money-less Star Trek future, or, our personal answer to the Fermi Paradox. Sadly, our lack of proper readiness to face this (sufficiently widespread empathy, abject lack of outgrowing greed, country vs. country competition), makes the latter somewhat more likely at this point.
@@brianmi40 Then stop contributing to that
It is a completely water fall if the singularity bound to be happen. As one man quoted:"our greatest weakness is our inability to understand the exponential growth"
اكل خلاة
خره
@@brianmi40 , I don't think Star Trek even compares to what we could possibly be hurtling to. Everything in the Star Trek world was discovered and made by biological beings. ST really didn't like AI at all. Pretty much EVERY AI in all of the series ends up being evil. (Except for Data and the AI that takes over the Discovery computer system.)
We're much more likely to advance beyond the ST universe very quickly thanks to AI.
I was amazed back in the days when I created a simple model that can distinguish a cat from a dog, I used to say, how come a machine could be able to do that and my instructor used to say “You don’t have to understand the ins and out of AI black box (AI terminology 😉). Today, the field is rapidly evolving as more investors are pouring billions of dollars into Artificial intelligence. Mankind has a tendency to create and to invent new things , AI will be the frontier of mankind’s invention which could turn into a major disruption to the contemporary society. Although AI has some positive contributions but the risks involved are far more outweigh the benefits to be derived from it. I therefore believe that strong regulation is needed to combat such restructuring, shrinking workforce which leads investment without jobs, otherwise we will be loosing our most cherished thing (creativity) and let robots write books, replace artists and doctors.
They are playing with Firer. Man will out smart and destroy themselves. May God help us.