Five key areas Russian forces have adapted ahead of expected summer offensive in Ukraine
Вставка
- Опубліковано 17 тра 2024
- Russian forces in Ukraine are continuing to make small territorial gains along the eastern front as Kyiv waits for new supplies of US military aid.
On his Telegram account, Ukraine's commander-in-chief gave a sobering assessment, stating the situation had worsened and his forces were under attack across the frontline.
The Russian military remains tactically poor, but it is proving to be adaptable.
More: www.forces.net/russia/ukraine...
#forcesnews #news #russia #ukraine #military
Subscribe to Forces News: bit.ly/1OraazC
Check out our website: www.forces.net/
Facebook: / forcestv
Instagram: forcesnews...
X: / forcesnews
Calling Russia "tactically poor" is rich coming from people whose tactics never saw the battlefield. Unless you count the _NATO-trained🌟_ Ukies whose "best offensive ever" captured a village, two hovels and three potato patches over the span of four months at the low low cost of hundreds of vehicles and thousands of lives. All of which has been retaken by now...
Actually nato saw battle in Korea where a 4th rate militia force absolutely spanked them using nocturnal infiltration tactics. I'm embarrassed to be American.
Some nato members were actively participating in Iraq and Afghanistan. What are you on?
@@Reza1984_ Punching down at some flip-flop forces with near impunity hardly counts as a proper war.
'hundreds of vehicles'. Sure, buddy.
@@adamhall5298 Yes they lost hundreds of vehicles
"The Russian Military remains tactically poor" I'll just leave this here
I need to comment here just to come back to see if the Russians are tactically poor..dont mind me
They are 😂
@@cameronspence4977they're not man, underestimate the enemy with nonsense propaganda so we can sleep tight at night is not the key to win the war. Making yourself looks good in camera while loosing more and more city and settlement ain't a good sign.
@randompersononinternet2826 theyve lost a large town and a handful of villages in a year. Also, you just described what russia does, thats why theyre unable to beat a 100x weaker enemy
@@cameronspence49771. Ukraine is not 100x weaker
2. Ukraine is backed by NATO
Russian shovels are deadly
I just decided to stop using washing machines because these are mass destruction weapons!!
And washing machines😅
Imagine when Russia start using bullets.
commie
..and going rusty
How is the Russian army tactically poor when they are winning? What is the use of your tactical 'superiority' when you are losing? Is this not being delusional and believing your own hype?
It's just pro-NATO propaganda. They have to say something bad about Russia however vague or nonsensical it is.
Russia winning? In the whole year since bakhmut , theyve taken only a small town and a couple tiny villages for the cost of almost 100k casualties, meanwhile, ukraine a 100x weaker country with no defense production, long range strike, air force or navy is bombing russian cities, oil refineries, airfields and navy bases, 15.5k vehicles, 450k troops+ 250 aircraft lost, I wouldnt call that winning
Rus is tactically poor bc their actual tactics, troop conditions, use of forces techniques, low tech level warfare, inability to lead, bad officers,
bad supply lines, corruption and more are all stuck at WW1 level as evidenced by their failing to knock ukraine out of the war
bad supply lines, corruption and more
British propaganda on steroids
Not rule britanian rule the waves anymore
Britain's fall is inevitable. And nothing of value will be lost.
"They're tactically poor" but somehow they're doing well😂😂 Mainstream media is a joke.
If Russia are tactically poor indirectly fighting multiple NATO countries at once, and yet are still winning... then how would they describe Ukraine's NATO tactics? 😂
Well pushing hundereds of thousands of troops as cannon fodder and loosing them for an area as big as a football stadium isnt tactically a great idea either.
@@youjustreadthis897They are fighting multiple Nato countries? So Russia is using North Korean and Chinese weapons. So that means North Korea is fighting against Ukraine? What logic is that? If Nato enters full war then Putler's days are numbered.
@@kd5055 Hence the word "indirectly" in my unedited comment above. And you cannot compare the support of NK and China to Russia, to that of NATO to Ukraine. Ukraine has received hundreds of billions of dollars of support. It will be a trillion dollars soon and they will still be too stubborn to admit they made the wrong move against Russia
@@kd5055 You ought to study a map. Russia now controls almost a third of Ukraine. Has advanced slowly and built fortifications and trenches along the way, which has proven to be effective
Ukraine had 10 years to do the same and have failed miserably. Those on the outside who meddled with Ukraine surely knew in 2014 that this war was a possible scenario and should have made prepartions
Cheap propaganda
West has failed on Ukraine 🇺🇦 miserably
Ukraine shouldn’t have been so corrupt!
@@phucknuts.7065 in which way?
@@phucknuts.7065I guess they learned from russia 😂
too true
@phucknuts.7065 in comparison to Russia, ukriane is Honest
Embarrassing report “ poor tactics “ 😂😂
Sure, putin use meat waves like stalin.
This sounds like a Boris Johnson blog on steroids 😂
"War is when the government tells you who the bad guy is. Revolution is when you decide that for yourself." ~ Benjamin Franklin
bot
@@Vidz0022maybe you are a bot and you have not realized it yet...
@@Vidz0022It's obvious you have been "bot" by stupid propaganda that shows your remaining atom of brain is not working
@@Vidz0022Not everything that goes against your world view is a bot. Thankfully more and more people are opening their eyes and realising who truly is behind these wars
Agree
The easiest way for NATO to defeat Russia would have been to let it join the EU back when they asked for it.
NATO doesn't need to defeat Russia, and Russia has zero interest in invading NATO countries. All these countries can live side by side in peace.
It's a certain NATO member who since the 50's has been slowly paving other members towards and gearing up for wars like this one. They aim to destabilize regions around their enemies
Very true.
There is a saying: "if you can't defeated him, make him your friend "
They asked to join NATO too, as well as form a common ABM shield. This all underlines the truth that NATO is driving the war and wants Russia to remain an enemy.
@@AP-cc1uwThis is why I don't believe NATO is looking for peace. They are wolves in sheep's clothing.
Manufacturing 100 new tanks a month??
How long did it take to manufacture 100 Challengers?
Apparently we have forgotten the lessons of WWII.
100 ruzzian tanks, or 3 days scrap...But you count repaired / rehased tanks as new. The limit on time of building Challi 2 tanks is money not engineering facilities.
@@sumfatdude4824
Russian outproduce Ukraine in Drone department also lol
@@bikechainmic cope harder lmfao, Russia is currently winning and turns every ukrainian tank into a useless scrap to showcase on red square.
@@wallingnaga6563 No they don't. Russia is buying them.. Seriously you russian trolls don't even know what your own second rate country is doing!
They say Russian lost are horrible but on the frontline reports of Ukrainian soldiers says we are outnumbered 1-5 😆
POOR POOR BRITISH PROPAGANDA
Yes you are!
Amazing! A country where the national pastime is Chess and which put the first satellite and man into space can actually learn from its mistakes and adapt. We never would have guessed that by watching CNN, BBC, the Times or MSNBC.
Military grade copium.
"Tactically poor!" really but beating more than 36 countries.
No, only Ukraine. That 36 countries is only economically, not on the frontlines
Agree
Reality hurts for NATO
@@DNG12900lol they forfeit everything they got for ukraine, mate. Just ask the Dutch and the Spanish where their entire tank fleet went
@@10.huynhphathuy8 it's not like Russia is going to get to them so why not give their tanks? Plus that still doesn't really count unless Spain starts sending their soldiers or if Spain is bombed with missiles
Have you considered that Ukrainian reports on losses has nothing to do with reality? 70% of casualties on both sides is to arty. Russia has significant advantage in arty.
Russia is tactically poor but winning. The important part is winning
Whining? Lol. They’re making gains the last two weeks and acting like they’re on some massive run across the countryside. I’d be careful about bragging before it’s sure those gains will hold
@@chrissmith7669 The level of attrition is what matters, not the gains.
@@vladimirdosen6677 it seems when it comes to attrition it’s Ukraine being the more cautious and protective of manpower.
@@chrissmith7669 The amount of shelling begs to differ. Russians have to suffer casualties, they are the ones attacking, but they are also the ones dropping airstrikes, arty and who knows what whole day.
@@vladimirdosen6677 and the Russians are according to Ukrainian Reports still relying on mass Tracks which means they suffer huge losses. The Ukrainian commanders complained that there is no tactic to deal with just masses of people running at them.
Western numbers on Russian losses are questionable at best, while their numbers on Ukrainian losses are bordering on ridiculous.
The battlefield situation, repeated mobilizations and lack of manpower on the Ukrainian side is telling.
No one knows the true numbers, so wind your neck in buddy.
MOSAD leaked year ago that casualties were around 1 to 10 in RF favour. Which tracks considering that russians were in heavily fortified position and had massive arty, air and ECM superiority. Also 30k casualties by Zelenski are plain hilarious considering Ukraine had several dozens of mobilization waves.
@@luciussander8217 We do know bulls***t claims when we hear them so that should be easy enough for you to swallow as a statement.
@@user-bl3vr4zb8h true Zelensky and Zaluzhny said in May 2022 that there are 1 million serving in the Armed Forces of Ukraine, then for 2 years they took people from the street directly to the front, May 2024 they are again in the minority against 460 000 of the Russian Armed Forces
@@user-bl3vr4zb8hactually they didn’t. They were quoted as having leaked it by a questionable outlet and denied it.
They coulndt have lost 400k given their partial movilization is 300k plus 450k contract its impossible. They would not have an army and NATO would just enter to have a walk with that toll. But the oned banning consular services so their men comeback are others.
Just like throughout history, we underestimate the Russian ability to adapt and mass produce. The Russians can produce 25 tanks a week, that's 1300 tanks a year, which means they can mobilize for huge offensives, and with better tactics and encrypted communications, they will be unstoppable.
And yet they are failing to do so..Explain that!
@@okbutthenagain.9402 They aren't failing though, they keep taking more and more villages and towns, and as their old Soviet equipment is replaced by brand new equipment, they'll take even more ground.
So this tactically poor country and its tactically poor army is singlehandedly defeating 20+ countries. Also defeating literally the entire special forces spectrum the entire west has. Also defeating mercenaries which are pouring in their thousands from all over the world. Plus the Ukrainians mobilized their populace as well adding hundreds of thousands of soldiers which have also been mostly killed by Russia by now.
Plus Russia is learning and improving.
The west should be scared shitless by now.
If they can do all this while being tactically poor then they can win the whole world when they become tactically superior.
Meanwhile Rishi Sunak is thinking of looting entire britian and running away to Canada.
Did I miss anything?
Nope, that was pretty concise.
Perspective?
Yes they are tactically poor ofc😂 that isn’t even up for debate there initially invasion was atrociously planned resulting in the “second most military powerful country in the world” fail to take key objectives such as Kiev and in the counter offensive loosing Kherson and large parts of Donetsk and Kharkiv. Russia isn’t fighting against 20+ countries but reviving aid yes these are two very different things. Russia simple relies on numbers. The Russians have made minuscule gains over the past year so I don’t know why you keep on saying “ deafeated” as if it’s supposed to mean something 😂.
Russia has defeated the entire special forces spectrum of the west 😂 what does that even mean? Ukraine has mobilised its entire populace? No they haven’t Ukraine recently passed a bill through its parliament allowing it to sue people who evade mandatory conscription if that’s what you mean or the conscription age is for 25 year olds which was reduced from 27 years so doesn’t really constitutes it’s entire populace does it 😂
That's right, Russia alone against the whole world. Incredible!
lol. classic western media.
LOL classic Russian stupity
Let me give you the short version
1. The shifted from BTGs to Division style fighting focusing on slow gains instead of big arrow attacks which is why you see them take place by place town by town village by village.
2. Adapted to the use of drones. Cope cages, using drones to correct artillery, lancet drones, having their own fpv drones and strategic bomber drones (Shahed). With volunteers and massive industry the Russians are quickly becoming the most experienced drone army no defence or attack is done without drones
3. Quantity is a quality. Recruitment, Mobilization, use of old stocks, making new ones, buying new equipment. The Russians understand a war of attrition needs numerical advantage to grind down the enemy and win Avdiivka is a textbook example.
4. New methods of training. Trench warfare, drone warfare, artillery warfare, missiles and use of volunteer units. If you think the Russians are just going banzai to every attack they do by now the whole army would have collapsed. The meat wave attacks thing is just a myth for example i watch a 12 man team move from one tree lines to building in the cover of night split up in groups of four. Someone said that was a meat wave attack? Yet I've seen many Western units move the same way in training and even Ukraine used the same tactics last year in their failed offensive.
In short:
Russia is treating this like an actual war.
The west is not.
Firstly, great overview. Sincerely.👍Many open-source "NATO" researchers that are worth a damn agree with most of this. Tactics of Russia are improving.
The problem is Russia's strategic outlook. Russia is already economically all in & firing on all cylinders. There is no spare capacity, no "X-factors" that allow the potential for significant military production expansion.
1.) Russia is being hampered & slowly grinded down economically, quite effectively. It's a marathon; not a sprint.
Russia growing GDP only by military expenses, while other revenues consistently & significantly fall = burning money.
2.) When Soviet military "refurbishment stocks" run out, Russia's military production output is going to severely decrease. Russian war effort is headed for a long-term severe degradation.
Expect a visible on-field phase out of "the quality stuff" in the 9 months to 2,5 years timeframe, approx.. It will be most apparent in classic military hardware; arty barrels & SPG's, IFV's & tanks. In 2 years, artillery shells, that are now being refurbished from old Soviet stocks, will still be numerous, but new-production-limited. Not great.
As long as Ukraine stands & exists as a focal point of the sentiment " will not let Ukraine fall", the West will increasingly get more committed to the fight.
I'm talking about the increases in West's strategic education, strategic clarity, rising military production/ funding/ aid to Ukraine... there is A LOT of potential there.
3 biggest shifts to come:
1.) Allowing the Ukrainians to take the fight to Russia's soil; hitting military & strategic infrastructure/ industrial targets.
2.) Continuation of the steady ramping up of the military defence industrial production.
3.) Greater technological transfer & commitment of more advanced weapons to Ukraine - the West's combined R&D potential is ABSOLUTELY MASSIVE.
1. The main focus was the artillery in front of Donbas that had been shelling civilians for 8 years and where nato had been advising on deep dug in positions. The progress is slow because it is these deeply defended positions that Russia attacked and did so while taking 1 tenth the casualties of Ukraine.
Kiev and Kharkiv at the start were just a feint - they made the most noise at Gostomol airport which is actually West of Kiev - perfect to drag Ukrainian forces away from Donbas but of no other advantage to Russia at all.
@@elektrotehnik94 The west let Ukraine fall in 2022. What you mean is that the West will not let the media write of the fall till after the 2024 elections.
Fairs fair I suppose. Trump announced the withdrawal from Afghanistan in 2020. Only when Biden made the withdrawal did anyone dare admit US had lost 7 or 8 years earlier.
@@elektrotehnik94 How many ukrainians do you think exist? 100 thousand bizillion? All eager to be mobilized and combat ready? Ukraine can probably sustain one more year of intense fighting and then it is the end. Either capitulation, or some sort of freesing the conflict.
US will do its best to fight until the last ukrainian, but the ukrainians will not agree. They already know what a terrible mistake they made by refusing to negotiate with Russia. But are afraid to admit it. And unwilling to face the consrquences. Because the consequences are massive and all negative. And some politician/politicians will need to be scapegoated.
"Make attrition work". Only idiots would believe 87% of Russia prewar army is gone (700k of men), that is even larger than the entire Russia land army pre war because they counted the air force and navy too. You fighting ghost now? Even BBC can recount 80k casualties and they inflated it already. And the 100 tank/month was also downplaying it. It was the minimum. Defense Report/Reuters put it at 1500 tanks produced in 2023 (125 tanks/month) mostly modernized old stocks and with expected Soviet production lines reactivation would probaly make it 2100 tanks this year or 175 tank/month. All to armed the newly trained troops conscripted last year. This at a time when Zelensky himself said Ukr are lacking men, lacking tanks (Challenger 2 and Abrams withdrawed) and shells. The trend is clear.
Not conscripted. Contract soldiers.
Nice try at the Bullshti. Pity the facts don;t back your fantasy up!
Visit "Ukraine/NATO technique trophy expo"
01.04 - 31.04
Moscow. Poklonnaya hills victory park
(New vehicle added - light, medium, heavy
Special guest - M1 Abrams)
(New additions soon)
Visit Kiev and see the additions from the so called great russian army..Oh wait you can't see them as they have been obliterated on the battle field!
West weapon industry be like money money money.
You can sense a change of tone in Western media. Not much but very gradually letting everyone know that all is not well. I sense a real humiliation imminent for NATO.
Should have let the Ukrainians sign the Istanbul peace deal.
Crazy
Now russia has the most experimented and powerful army in the world. Ukranie has the second one. And USA have rainbo.. Diverse and wok.. Army lol.......
Just wait until the Russians use the wrong pronouns...
LOl No they don't. The whole world has seen that Russia is a paper army, second best to the boy scouts and totaly inept at combat!
@@okbutthenagain.9402 US military and CIA Analysts that disagree with you : Colonel Douglas MacGregor, Colonel Karen Kwiatkowski, Colonel Lawrence Wilkerson, Larry Johnson CIA analyst, Ray McGovern CIA analyst, Phil Giraldi CIA / US Army Intel, Marine Intelligence Officer Scott Ritter. All of these experts completely disagree with you.
"tactically poor" The Russian military is now the most battle-experienced and formidable ground force in the world, period. They have the best integrated ISR - strike anywhere, they have the only battle-tested consistent doctrine, and their equipment is geared towards near peer war, ie wars of attrition. The recent RUSI report suggesting what the US needs to do to modernize its ground forces is basically imitating what the Russians have done. No one wants to admit it, but the Russians have been extremely successful in Ukraine.
tactically poor russians r winning, tactically reach ukrainians+nato r loosing. hmmmmm
So you changed your mantra that Russia lost.
What about Western Weapons Exhibition organised by Putin in Moscow' Red Square? 😂 More British weapons will be exhibited next year! 🤣
It is not in Red Square. It is in Victory Park.
Yeah that was funny and the sign that welcomed all western officials to front of the queue free admission 😂
Correct analysis
I Just wanna know. Who say that Rússia Will make a summer offensive?
It's a matter of economy that's very important. Expensive western weapons versus cheaper but effective Russian weapons. And strategy of course. The Russians are the first to have introduced large scale drone warfare to the battlefield. And cheap and effective drones. They are the first to use relatively cheap but very effective so called glide bombs on a large scale on the battlefield and making them heavier and producing much more of them. For which Ukraine (and the west) has until now no proper defense. So Russia is innovating on the battlefield and the west tries to follow. We made an enemy for the foreseeable future that will be extremely difficult to beat if at all. Not a smart policy i would think.
We are not enemies of anyone, we are trying to be friends with others, unlike the United States, who are only interested in business interests.
General Patton "We fought the wrong side"
Thank Heavens they are tactically poor. Policies based on lies or untruths will not bode well.
Why do you say "Russia is adapting"? These have been Russian military tactics from the beginning except the use of drones. The obvious novelty is the Russian defense lines created in anticipation of Ukrainian last year offensive, the latter ended up in failure.
Russia is "tactically poor" but during entire military operation was outnumbered by Ukranians 3 to 1
There is an old saying... Russia is never as strong as it looks; Russia is never as weak as it looks.
biased reporting
Are they actually tactically poor?
Amazing what shovels can do.
How many Russian bots are lurking here?
@@snailerioooh, nice one. Man, the Russians really are just so good at coding, they can make bots rivaling gpt 10...
A lot @@snaileri lmao theyve been furious, raging and coping since 61b aid package got passed😂
@@snailerihalf the world stands by Russia, half stands by the west. Just the way the elites like it.
@@cameronspence4977 Why would they be furious? Everyone knows Russia is going to win regardless
Excellent report!
I think we in NATO countries need to stop with the arrogance and admit we would be in one hell of a scrap if we got into a rumble with Russia. They are adaptable and tough. Their missile, rocket and EMW capabilities (and now drone tech) are top notch and the equal, if not better in some cases, than NATO equivalents. The sheer war footing economy to churn out machines and manpower alone is worrying. A sober realistic assessment and plan is necessary as if we do get drawn into this war, we might be in for a rude awakening, even with US involvement. Russians are not stupid; their scientists and engineers in particular.
You're 100% right.
People say their chip-making facilities are old, and useless, and their tech is inferior. Look at their T-90M. Their Ka-52 helicopter. Their SU-57. Look at them and tell me that their outclassed...
@@m16-a2 They are outclassed by western equipment but the thing is their stuff aint as bad either.
And dragging this conflict out has pushed them to be very purposeful, they won't stop arming up because they think nato is going to attack them. I heard they're stockpiling tanks.
@@hamish1309 They are, and have been since the fall of the USSR. They have thousands of tanks, ranging from the T-62's to T54's, and even some rare IS-10's.
By not scrapping old tanks immediately once a newer one comes out, Russia has a 'reserve' of tanks incase reinforcements are needed.
These tanks are still deadly and useful. Once converted to fire modern ammunition, they can significantly boost Russia's a fighting capabilities.
@@scothf1273 I wouldn't say outclassed. On par? Yes.
We'll see in time
Why is the average Ukrainian soldiers age 40+?
Coz they want to preserve their youth.
lots of ex-civilians i guess
The government want to conserve the younger generation to rebuild the country after the war - IF there is anything to rebuild or if they win the war, that's remain to be seen.
@nemokat09 that's hilarious 😂
Same reason most Russians are...
Most of the younger soldiers are gone.
This is a horrifically brutal war with over half a million estimated dead.
One thing I love Russia is they are not battling with civilians they are not going to wipe out Ukraine But are going there to battle with fellow soldiers unlike some loosers who can't even fight a war with out involving the unarmed civilians
you're living in a fantasy world
Russia uses artillery bombardment to completely destroy villages/towns and cities as a central military doctrine
that is direct targeting of civilians and civilian infrastructure
Nonsense, they're shelling my in-laws' city non stop. Don't let the Russian propaganda fool you, they've flattened virtually every city they've taken.
MGM-140 ATACMS
MGM-140 ATACMS (Army Tactical Missile System)
Unit cost M39: $820,000 (FY1998) (or ~$1,476,000 FY2022) M57: ~$1,700,000 (FY2021)
No. built 3,700
Specifications ()
Mass 3,690 pounds (1,670 kg
ant news on the challenger 2 tanks ?
I think it has been decided that the Challenger 2 is now an old, obsolete tank. However, the Challenger 3 is a super world beater.
@@Hereford1642 just not seeing any of it in action in ukraine
They have been in action on numerous fronts. The Ukraine military are using them as scalpels against the Russian armour with great success.
The US wants Ukraine to go easy on attacking Russian oil refineries in order to keep fuel prices normal.
Not learning of past mistakes.. but streamlining processes and eliminating bureaucracy. They have never used Gillnets, purse seines and drift nets that are used in Fishing as a protective shield around the warships attacked and would stop Marine drones.
450000 casualty really! Do you think we are idiots or something.
Thermo baric iz not HE in the sence that HE is.. It has different operating specs and is a fuel air bonb .
US and allies taught Russia tHow to fight a war.
UKRAINE IS OVER 500K LOSSES . Russia at 50k
US has no shame for destroying so many countries
and Russia shoudl be be what - proud for waging war on its neighbour.
@@bbbf09Russia hasn't waged war, the OP is right. Russia should however be proud for standing against those who waged war. We need more countries like this, or else we will allow another 1000 foreign military bases to be built all over the globe by those that waged this war
@@youjustreadthis897 If you could listen to your nonsense with any sense of reality and honesty you'd ask for yourself to be sectioned.
Not half as many as the Soviet/Russians 🤨
@@Asparagus777-hw5ft The US and CIA have been interfering in other countries affairs for over 120 years. Deposing democratically elected governments and supporting nasty despots and dictators.
Russia has lost nowhere near 415, 000 troops
then why must they offer so much money for replacements? and why must they bring in more chechens? lol
Russian bloggers and war correspondents seem to think they have .... do you watch them for your info... or just make up your own mind ?
400k casualties, not deaths. Usually the death count is much lower than casualties.
@@12345krillinHigh casualties typically require mass mobilization, not higher monetary rewards.... This is because even with high pay outs, you have to wait for volunteers to come to you and that is quite an unreliable method when you are hemorrhaging men in the battlefield...
Yes they have, analysis by professionals and OSINT, and factord like bad quality of russia vehicles, russian human waves tactics, corruption, bad medical care, lack of care for troops and prison conscripts, and rear-line anto deserter units confirms this
Tactically poor but ukraine is losing😂😂 what a nice logic
ЗОЛОТОЙ, says GOLD. Funny doesn't look like it gold.😂 Looks more like GREEN.
Release the bots and arm-chair generals who don`t know the difference between the tactical and strategic level...
under estimates russia wasn’t a good idea
And now they are underestimating China
I would ague they have been over estimated 😂 they’re apparently the second best military in the world and are getting mauled by Ukraine. The ones who overestimate were the Russian when they thought they could take Ukraine in three days 😂
Wasn’t the special operations ment to be over in 3 weeks 🥴😂
Hey y'all in the comments. Should the U.S fund the Ukraine? Why or why not?
(Note: I'm just curious).
The problem with guys are you think Russians are poor in war , but tell when you Brits faught of you own ? You used Indians in both the world wars , now also you need Gorkhas .
Russia has lost a lot of gas to India. Will keep losing more and get well compensated for this loss.
Player operations in east
You're in a sports match. Soccer, football, basketball and your early in the start of the game. The score at that point in time is not really relevant to who wins the game. It's just a data point that needs to be addressed. It is and it will be.
And US made mighty Abraham tanks have reached Moscow... museum...😂😂
A lot more Russian thanks have reached Washington DC 🥴
This War could have been avoided
The West shouldn't have let its guard down around Russia.
How? Putin invaded a Ukraine and he wont stop.
@@luigiwoo4469 The West shouldn't have pushed Russia and respected it's red lines.
@@danielkrcmar5395 You sir are a Russian troll. You will be defeated, since good always defeats evil.
@@theincrement4898 Basic reality.
Why would anyone subscribe for more hubris?
So what your telling me Russia is winning.And winning considerably…😂
It took them 10 years to take avdiivka and only because the US cut off funding, what else have they taken in the last year? Nothing, a couple small villages for the cost of almost 100k casualties since then, meanwhile, ukraine a 100x weaker country with no defense production, long range strike, air force or navy is bombing russian cities, oil refineries, airfields and navy bases, I wouldnt call that winning
Oh weird Russia couldn’t take Kiev….lol
Winning exactly how they won ww2. By taking extremely high casualties.
@@jeremyj5932 They never tried to take Kiev by force. they were going to sign a peace treaty on March 2022, but Boris Johnson convinced Zelensky not to do it at the last minute.
@@mw9297 Except that Russian casualties have been comparatively lower than Ukraine... Having more artillery and actual air support do wonders in that regard.
Bravo RUSSIA
A team plays poorly but still wins !?!?
Politicians say they have a 61 billion dollar package. That's probably how much was paid to their friendship contracts and then the "what's left over" supplies minus shipping is on the way.
Truth is much worse than this. Ukraine has been in a desperate state since mid 2022. But US wants to fight to the last Ukrainian.
You don't know that any more than we do
Just because Russian channels tell you that it doesn't make it any more true than what western channels report.
The first casualty of war is always truth
Russian narrative is Russian.
ты не ври бои идут с равным успехом
Nice try but it’s obvious Ukrainians are the ones fighting and dying. And if you actually listen to them, they don’t want to live under Putin and don’t like Putin. You like Putin, great go live in Russia.
Yep theyve been "desperate" "about to lose" "falling apart" since 2022 yet magically somehow 2 years later not a single sign of russia winning against a 100x weaker ukraine, every week russian shills crow "ukraine is about to collapse in a week" or a month, yet they never do how odd!
didnt lose 415k people thats bull. its 50k
But the source is from the UK, so it must be true... 🧐
@@SewTubularI don't know why UK is so obsessed with helping Ukraine. It's really a Russian civil war and nothing to do with us. I object to them spending my taxes on this. Also they talk of reintroducing conscription and sending troops to Ukraine. If they won't stop the invasion in Dover nobody will be going to Ukraine to fight.
@@SewTubular Much more reliable a source than Russian state operated media.
Well will see if Russia can go on for 10 years like in Afghanistan. It may chip some land but it won’t make Russia winning the war.
How will Ukraine last 10 years when they are running out of men now ?
This seems like its a cope to face reality.
Go Russia!🇷🇺
Sounds like the sun‘s about to set on the Russian advantage
Unless the aid comes with additional troops... unlikely
@@johnpaul3099 Ukraine has enough troops. Russia has beat that drum for two years
Well looking at the comments we all can see where the trolls are !
Russia, in all its incarnations, has never worried about personnel losses. Attrition is their go-to strategy.
😂 nope
Are you an expert on Russian military tactics?
Or maybe they are not losing much and killing many more.
How come, Russia only mobilized once...while Ukraine is now mobilizing women (!) ?
Remind me, what was the strategy of the British for the entirety of WWI?
Why the distracting musak. Pointless
Jjjj Do you believe russia had lost 450m trops?😂😂
Russian bots going crazy in the comments
Because you don't have anything to answer to the truth that they are saying?
With the F-16 from Denmark to Ukr in June 2024 we will see an upper hand of Russian aviation engagement directly at the frontline nevertheless.
You are kidding right? The F-16 has effectively a great hoover under its nose for an air intake - it can only take off from prepared runways, and not off ordinary roads like Soviet planes. They will get wiped out within weeks unless they stay based 800km behind the frontlines.
(And we know the Ukrainian pilots are taking too long to learn to fly them)
@@antique-bs8bbthey will survive just like the other Ukrainian jets that will be sent to the air once the air raid is announced.
"Tactically poor?" 🧐🤔
Its just hate speech they just cant stomach how good Russia is better that all of them collectively
Russia is winning❤
Putin's high interest rates, Putin's high inflation, Putin crumbles, Bye Bye Putin!
Man i love seeing desperate people's coment 😂
@@randompersononinternet2826 Putin is desperate. Ivanov arrested. Central bank warning on interest rates. 500000 dead or injured soldiers, millions of bright young Russians emigrated. Soldiers on the front line earning 5x median wage creating labour shortages. Russian assets frozen. China wants Manchuria back. India and China invest heavily in solar reducing the need for oil
Go fight in Ukraine
@@InquisitorBoomBoom no need, ivanov arrested last week, the Kremlin destroys itself
Really. You still believe what you report...
Russia has always been the masters of attrition wars. They have the manpower and military industry to replace their losses in real-time. They also adapt quickly regarding strategy and equipment (technology).
This is why NATO cannot win, especially on Russia’s front door step. They will advance initially but after being worn down retreat like Hitler back to Western Europe.
Russia has already freed most of the Donbas and created the southern corridor to their brothers in Crimea. Cutting NATO off from the Azov Sea.
Nope. Neither the manpower or industry, already failing to replace vic losses and troops
NATO isnt even fighting so thats irrelevant, please tell how russia will beat NATO if they cant even take ukriane
NATO couldn’t beat the Taliban 😂 Russia has already taken the Russian speaking autonomous regions. Don’t get cheeky or they might decide to make their way to the Dniper river and take half of the country instead of 25%. That’s your tax for asking to join NATO 🤣
@@cameronspence4977 don’t underestimate Ukraines fighting ability or the NATO weapons handed to them. It’s helped Russia build a military museum. Can’t wait to see the F16 with the Western tanks 😉👍
@@cameronspence4977nato isn’t even fighting? Lmao just ask the Dutch and the Spanish where their entire tank fleets went. Or the poles where 2/3 of their hardwares went.
Such an incredible waste of lives just to appease the ego of one man
You're feeling sleepy aren't you
Biden?
@@blackcatdungeonmastersfami5311 Actually about 150 Biden Puppet masters.
NATO isn't one man
selensky?
Should be adapting almost 800 days into Putin's announced 4-6 day special operation.
32 nato countries vs 1 gas station, when has nato won a war? they started many of them
Vladimir Putin never once said this would take a few days. Never. Not once. Like so many other thick boomers, you fell for the media lie and now regurgitate it like a good little peon. I can't wait for you people to have to wake up when Ukraine finally has to sign the peace treaty accepting Russian rule of the Donbas and Crimea in perpetuity.
Except Putin never said it would only be 4-6 days. Just a baseless claim that pro western internet users like to throw around
Who in Russia said anything about how long the war should last
*V*
Great job 😂😅😂 ... 😂😅😂 ... you're the number one spreading British propaganda 👏👏👏
Hahaha your totally untruthful who is funding you ?
😂😂😂😂
Idemo Rusoja🇷🇺💪💪💪🇷🇺
🤮