Carl Jung - Face to Face (1959) - Special Edition with Newspaper replies and Jung's Letters

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 27 вер 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 253

  • @JoJaDaRu
    @JoJaDaRu Рік тому +39

    Great job, this is very well done. Informative and well spoken with great research.

    • @edgeofthought
      @edgeofthought  Рік тому

      Thank you, Jacob. Also, I hope I can do a video again soon with your music. ❤🎶

    • @edgeofthought
      @edgeofthought  Рік тому +1

      You know, I wonder how many and which languages Jung knew. German, Greek, English, Latin, at the very basic least.

    • @integodoo
      @integodoo 6 місяців тому +1

      @@edgeofthought and also he helped Herman Hesse to finish his famous book Sidharta

    • @edgeofthought
      @edgeofthought  6 місяців тому +2

      @@integodoo how interesting, thank you for mentioning that. When I read your message, a thought came back to mind, at the end of Letters Volume 1, there is a bit of additional letters included out-of-sequence, in Addenda. One is to Herman Hesse but on the topic of H's book "Demian". I just had to go check in on that letter this moment when replying to your comment, so I could be sure what the book was. Did you read Siddhartha?

  • @mrsdee1656
    @mrsdee1656 4 місяці тому +31

    There's just something so magnetic about Jung. There's no going back, once you're into his teachings, you're in for life. 🥰💫

    • @laurelsoderholm9480
      @laurelsoderholm9480 4 місяці тому

      He makes you think backwards

    • @pebystroll
      @pebystroll Місяць тому

      It's probably not a great way to think about psychology but I understand what you mean

  • @rekanagy4609
    @rekanagy4609 6 місяців тому +43

    HUGE Respect to Jung not speaking about Freud’s dreams ❤

    • @Me_ThatsWho
      @Me_ThatsWho 6 місяців тому +2

      exactly

    • @AndreaPetrut
      @AndreaPetrut 5 місяців тому +1

      💖I'm glad you noticed and commented. Hige respect to him for respecting privacy and confidentiality. Lots of wisdom and lessons in this interview...

    • @tiya3715
      @tiya3715 4 місяці тому

      I also thought that was very tasteful and professional.

  • @branandubh
    @branandubh 6 місяців тому +64

    Amazing how sharp mentally he was in his 80s, not even in his first language.

    • @graphguy
      @graphguy 6 місяців тому +2

      That’s an ageist comment.
      I know as many 80 year olds who are sharp as I do 45 year olds.

    • @AdamBechtol
      @AdamBechtol 4 місяці тому +2

      As I know many who are not sharp. So now what?

    • @avipinckney
      @avipinckney 4 місяці тому +1

      ⁠@@graphguyit’s not ageist. It’s a fact that your mental faculties decline with age……..

    • @NullScar
      @NullScar 4 місяці тому +1

      Are people really getting triggered by this comment?

    • @edgeofthought
      @edgeofthought  4 місяці тому +1

      @@NullScar not really. more people in comments are triggered by Jung himself... Freudians, typically (as with Maurice Richardson as in the newspaper letters, and the one I didn't include in the video)

  • @Davorduke
    @Davorduke 6 місяців тому +55

    This is so wonderful and beautiful that it's worth noting and people are not even aware of it. One of the greatest minds in history, presented in this film as a person practically communicating with us, gives the impression of simplicity and some kind of accessibility to all of us. However, behind this lies much more than meets the eye. He communicates with us both verbally and non-verbally. We hear words, can relate to his fate, to some elements of thinking, and yet, on the other hand, his thoughts are at the peaks of human contemplation and creation, so far-reaching and untouchable. This is a great honor, as if we were listening to Plato, Shakespeare, or another giant, but since it's so close to us through this screen, we are not aware of the gift we have listening to Jung. Thank you!

    • @edgeofthought
      @edgeofthought  6 місяців тому +4

      You hit the nail on the head, perfectly. Can you imagine what Hugh Burnett felt having achieved the interview, then the invitation for second but the interviewer was not John Freeman... Burnett must have been scrambling, but had a busy schedule. Since Jung passed about a year later, but possibly there was more planning that went on.
      There is more detail also in Jung’s Man and His Symbols, because it was a project also collaborated with Freeman. One might wonder why Burnett and Freeman couldn’t get a plan complete for Professor Jung to have the follow-up interview with themselves.
      On your mention of Plato, in case you are interested, besides reading Jung’s alchemy books, I have a few Plato projects in the works for the channel, and thoughts about Babylonian and ancient far-east works.

    • @DonnaCsuti-ji2dd
      @DonnaCsuti-ji2dd 5 місяців тому +1

      Yes agreed so glad I saw this and listened to it . Time well spent thanks for sharing this

    • @StephenCrowley-dx1ej
      @StephenCrowley-dx1ej 5 місяців тому

      That goes for me in real life

    • @liammaxwell5427
      @liammaxwell5427 4 місяці тому +1

      Yes! Yes! That is the profundity of it! I love becoming aware of a person who conceives of the absolute blessing it is to witness such a moment in history, of one of the greatest minds to have ever come before us, speaking on film! It fills me with gratitude, though leads me into a sense of befuddlement so as to why more people are not interested or inclined to inquire into such recordings... Most people in modern society are happy to accept the field of psychology as being a concrete, definite domain of educational truth, yet do not seem to feel the need to understand its origins? Are willing simply to accept its validity because everyone else does so? Human culture is characterised by an overabundance of conformists and and submissive, suggestible types (those led to blindly accept religious beliefs and dogmatism without question), and the exceedingly rare individuals among us who actually seem to require proof or factual evidence in order to be convinced of what others happily and unquestioningly accept like sheep following each other endlessly around a paddock which seem indistinct from unconscious automatons!

    • @laurelsoderholm9480
      @laurelsoderholm9480 4 місяці тому

      He speak close to God. The creator is chessing with him

  • @FrancoisMouton-iu7jt
    @FrancoisMouton-iu7jt 7 місяців тому +40

    What an extraordinary and beautifull soul.

  • @jasonshapiro9469
    @jasonshapiro9469 6 місяців тому +19

    How fortunate we are to have men like him on film..to know for sure exactly what he said..think of all the historical figures we are forced only to know through writings possibly corrupted by translations and time

  • @kiel4
    @kiel4 6 місяців тому +20

    This is like the third time I have listened to this discussion with Jung, what wonderful insights about understanding our nature. “The greatest danger to Man is himself” wow

  • @jamesnicol3831
    @jamesnicol3831 6 місяців тому +13

    one of the best uses of you tube

  • @GeorgePierce-r3v
    @GeorgePierce-r3v 6 місяців тому +11

    So wonderful to see this interview. Jung's book, memories, dreams and reflections was instrumental for me in providing a framework with which I could make sense of experiences I was having at the age of 14-15. Ultimately becoming a catalyst for a dive into occult knowledge ... meaning hidden. Carl Jung remains as one of the giants in my life. Thank you for sharing this upload.❤

    • @marykinsella417
      @marykinsella417 5 місяців тому

      Thank you ,such an interesting intellectual person ,I look forward to more podcasts❤😂

  • @cheri238
    @cheri238 6 місяців тому +12

    This was an opening of mind-blowing conversations.
    What an enormous contribution you have given with these letters. It was as if the voice of Jung was walking alongside me.
    "Do you remember of your consciousness of your own individual self?"
    "That was in my 11th year, I was own my way to school, I stepped out of a mist, it was as if I had been in a mist walking in a mist, and I stepped out of it and I knew, I am, I am. What am I? And then I thought I was that happened in the mist, not knowing to defferriate myself from the things I was that happened in the midst not knowing to defferiate myself from things was just one among many things."
    🙏❤️🌎🌿🕊🎵🎶🎵

    • @DiannMelodyDunkley-sx2jr
      @DiannMelodyDunkley-sx2jr 6 місяців тому +1

      Highly logical and understandable. Did you know that Jung was a Gnostic Christian ?

  • @praktijksensus7554
    @praktijksensus7554 8 місяців тому +17

    Beautiful interview, even now after many years. Wisdom combined with science is growth in a beautiful way. Science without wisdom is poor, narrow minded and deeply ignorant missing and excluding important faculties of mankind and therefore even dangerous

  • @JodiTraver
    @JodiTraver 6 місяців тому +9

    Thank you so much for posting this video. I didn't expect that today I would be confronted with such thought-provoking information. What a joy!

  • @integodoo
    @integodoo 7 місяців тому +109

    " I don't need to believe in God , I Know" ❤

    • @edgeofthought
      @edgeofthought  7 місяців тому +4

      It's a famous quote :) When I made this Face to Face special edition in May 2023, this video was part 2, of a pair. Part 1 is called "Carl Jung's words & writings - I am not what Happened to me - I Don't Believe, I Know" (see here ua-cam.com/video/j_ZD5O-Wgh8/v-deo.html )
      In that part 1, I analyze some other of his writing, that people love to quote (and accidentally misquote). Some of this part 2 special edition video includes material from part 1.

    • @rishabhksharma
      @rishabhksharma 7 місяців тому +6

      I have a scientific proof of God

    • @lynnhall9957
      @lynnhall9957 7 місяців тому +3

      Listening ​@@rishabhksharma

    • @lynnhall9957
      @lynnhall9957 7 місяців тому +7

      Man cannot stand a meaningless life. ❤

    • @lynnhall9957
      @lynnhall9957 7 місяців тому +3

      The psyche living outside space and time and the historic mind influences sound similar to ideas of Whitehead and now Rupert Sheldrake's theory of Morphic Resonance which he based on his scientific studies and discoveries studying plants as a Biologist.

  • @tjtampa214
    @tjtampa214 6 місяців тому +3

    At 1:06:40 I stopped the video & enlarged my tablet screen to read page 524 of the book you are reading with letters or notes from C.G. Jung. This one dated 5 December 1959 states that Jung considers himself a Christian. A few moments ago I was stating that it is important to have dates next to the comments of people because often we or they may have an opinion at one age and date and may have an opposite opinion later in life. Or they may have the same opinion but in just a more mature and complex way. So thank you for that. Also wanted to say I appreciate what you put on the screen and how your second screen of you on the side in a smaller size ... and your reading... is very enjoyable. I also appreciate the cadence that you use and the clarity of speech. It is rare that I find a channel that can come close to this. Thank you very much! This is my first video and I did sub of your channel.

  • @PeterShieldsukcatstripey
    @PeterShieldsukcatstripey 6 місяців тому +3

    Such an honest bloke. Happy to have a yarn.

  • @jujumulligan43
    @jujumulligan43 6 місяців тому +1

    Jung opened a door on the human psyche that was not revealed prior in the study of psychology. I believe he was very ahead of his time. Even today, his work is often sited and many books have been written by other great thinkers referencing his work. Thank you so much for presenting this video. You have made my quiet, raining morning a thought provoking one. With gratitude.❤

  • @mystryfine3481
    @mystryfine3481 6 місяців тому +2

    I have seen this interview before, but I watched it again because of the addendum of letter reading and as it turned out, I was well rewarded, both by the visual presentation, the selection of letters, (without distracting commentary) as well as the podcast like nature of the reading, followed by the readers show of enthusiasm for Jung’s work. Thank you

  • @autumnleaves2766
    @autumnleaves2766 6 місяців тому +9

    I read "Memories, Dreams, Reflections" recently and have always been interested in Jung's ideas. I hope to read more of his books. It was a joy to see this 1959 interview with Jung, just two years before he died. A remarkable man. One thing that led Jung to depart from Freud was when the latter confided in Jung that he was troubled by a dream he'd had. Jung offered to help Freud and interpret the dream, but Freud said that he could not risk losing his authority. Jung realised then that Freud was more concerned with his reputation than seeking the truth. In the mid 1940s Jung was taken ill with a heart attack and had an amazing out of body experience in which he was flying so high above the Earth that he could see the outlines of the coastlines far below. A mythological figure flew close to him and he realised that it was the doctor treating him, Dr H. Jung understood immediately that the dream meant that if he were to live, then Dr H would have to die. Jung tried to warn Dr H, who couldn't really grasp what Jung meant. The day Jung felt much better and began to get out of bed and wonder around, Dr H fell ill and died a few days later. He was a great thinker, and a kind, humane man. I'm not sure if you can still buy his collected works in a complete set, I think I'll probably have to buy just the books which interest me the most eg Psychological Types, case histories from his career as a psychiatrist, Synchronicity, his writings on the collective unconscious etc. Not sure if I'd be up to reading the more difficult works about alchemy.

    • @frederickanderson1860
      @frederickanderson1860 5 місяців тому

      You have to be aware of jesus teaching, " you have to be born again ( from above).

  • @HendrikMentz
    @HendrikMentz Місяць тому

    Appreciate your research into the reception Jung's interview elicited. Thank you.

  • @Vahe345
    @Vahe345 2 місяці тому +1

    Wow what an awesome video. I never knew that Jung was so pissed off about the lack of knowledge of the 1957 interviewer. I am glad he did these interviews because I've learned so much watching them many times as I read his books I learn more from his words and expressions.

    • @edgeofthought
      @edgeofthought  2 місяці тому +1

      Hey thanks! I'm so glad you commented and perceived the point about the other interviews.
      There is a huge world of controversy and stories behind this interview. One other youtube guy just stole my video recently, and instantly got thousands of subscribers and stripped the extra material about jung.
      But even what I put in here, for "special extended" material to share with everyone, is just the tip of the iceberg. I've just bought four books recently that talk about everything that happened. I am trying to get an interview with a few others about late-life Jung stories related to this.

    • @Vahe345
      @Vahe345 2 місяці тому +1

      @@edgeofthought cool I look forward to your next video on that. You got a subscriber out of me.

  • @gavinsmith28
    @gavinsmith28 6 місяців тому +17

    What a wonderful, humble and unashamedly spiritual man Jung is!

    • @edgeofthought
      @edgeofthought  6 місяців тому +2

      There is a good quote in the beginning of Red Book Liber Novus that in his own words would nod to what you wrote. A period of deep questioning and writing notes, in his late 30s early 40s. And the quote talks about how the numinous/spiritual beginning lead to more stuff than can be figured out in one life, and much of his life's career from 1920s-1960s was a mere scientific elaboration, for others. His work in alchemy is partly why I've been going in that direction on my channel. :)

  • @bg-se7rq
    @bg-se7rq 6 місяців тому +3

    Ty for sharing this. Well put together

  • @JonHallstrom
    @JonHallstrom 6 місяців тому +3

    Thank you for the work.

    • @edgeofthought
      @edgeofthought  6 місяців тому

      My pleasure, friend, a group learning. I plan to develop more, if you plan to stick around :)

  • @elizabethk3238
    @elizabethk3238 7 місяців тому +3

    Amazing content. Jung was not as eloquent a writer as Freud, which made his books more difficult to get through...but so worth the effort.

  • @jquinterov
    @jquinterov 5 місяців тому +1

    Man, the comment section in 1959 was no joke 🔥

  • @PromoMIAR
    @PromoMIAR 7 місяців тому +4

    🙏♥ 1 of the smartest Men to have lived.

  • @mhchun
    @mhchun 6 місяців тому +3

    thanks for making it !

  • @xiaoqingling1500
    @xiaoqingling1500 4 місяці тому

    Thanks for sharing this amazing interviewed ❤❤❤

  • @erikafurman6891
    @erikafurman6891 6 місяців тому +2

    Great job, loved it!!

  • @onepainfulangel1111
    @onepainfulangel1111 7 місяців тому +3

    Thanks for this

  • @jeromedenis100
    @jeromedenis100 8 місяців тому +3

    Thanks for posting this

    • @edgeofthought
      @edgeofthought  8 місяців тому

      You’re very welcome. I have a few more angles on Jung that no one ever looks at. In the process over the past two years of getting into I accidentally found multiple but hard-to-find references to his dog. So I’m going to make a vid about his dog 😆
      Also, alchemy, but that is a well-known aspect, but what fewer people know is Jung’s personal alchemy library has been scanned and put online.

    • @jeromedenis100
      @jeromedenis100 8 місяців тому +1

      It's ways interesting to hear new angles on Jung and his work!

  • @ThePsychicMindofHart
    @ThePsychicMindofHart 6 місяців тому +2

    Hugh was my best friend. He died aged 87 in his lovely home on Richmond Green.

    • @edgeofthought
      @edgeofthought  6 місяців тому +1

      Wow! Do you have any stories? He must have had a lot of interesting experiences in his career. During the work on this video, I tried to connect with someone who had a picture of Mr Burnett, but without success.

  • @josephdorocak1955
    @josephdorocak1955 6 місяців тому +2

    Thanks for the great video. After viewing it, I thought that Dr. Jung's concept of Archetype might somehow relate to an AI aToken.

  • @mosaab9102
    @mosaab9102 6 місяців тому +4

    A great man with great mind may God accept him in paradise because not like most psychiatrists he believes in God … he knows . wow ❤

  • @suraya1224
    @suraya1224 4 місяці тому +2

    In a letter to Freud, dated 1/30/1910, Jung wrote, "The prerequisite for a good marriage, it seems to me, is the license to be unfaithful." I was surprised to learn that Jung had affairs w/ at least 2 of his patients (Sabina & Toni), & during his marriage, but his wife Emma decided that she "could live with it." They were married on Valentine's Day. She died abt 5 yrs before he did.

  • @vangroover1903
    @vangroover1903 6 місяців тому +2

    I remember him from the old UK TV comedy series, The Jung Ones. They made a lot of Freudian Slips .

  • @IdoSha
    @IdoSha 4 місяці тому +1

    Superb

  • @melanie.l6282
    @melanie.l6282 5 місяців тому

    what an interesting man Thanks for the subtitles❤

  • @bluesky-rb8fn
    @bluesky-rb8fn 6 місяців тому +1

    I could say soooo much about Mr. Jung, I would like to say he is also very handsome!!!

  • @thecuriousquest
    @thecuriousquest 5 місяців тому

    Butting heads with your teachers. First sign of a legend!

  • @magdalenachadrys9437
    @magdalenachadrys9437 6 місяців тому +1

    Thank You❤️

  • @peerfaizanbashir8546
    @peerfaizanbashir8546 6 місяців тому +1

    Great, bro.

  • @oliverjamito9902
    @oliverjamito9902 6 місяців тому +1

    Beloved the Sea of Glass came to pass! Walking upon the SEA OF GLASS. For such time as this. Able to see my pop having sincere conversations. For life is conversations! Pop having sincere conversations with his shared "i" AM. For many looking for signs! Many will wonder!

  • @oliverjamito9902
    @oliverjamito9902 6 місяців тому +1

    With patience, mercy, and grace! Judgment and Justice knows the True Owner.

  • @leematthews6812
    @leematthews6812 11 місяців тому +5

    I can't see eye to eye with the Guardian's criticism. Just a cursory exploration of Jung's complex ideas would last for way longer than the 40 minutes allotted to the interview. John Freeman's introduction to Man and His Symbols indicates that this programme was, to an extent, an exploration, to gauge at what level he should pitch that book.

    • @edgeofthought
      @edgeofthought  8 місяців тому +1

      That is interesting. It sounds vaguely familiar, I may have skimmed Freeman's intro of MaHS later, but not in depth. Perhaps we might find it interesting to see if John Freeman referenced Jung or his ideas in any other future works. More digging, ha! It was a fun exercise for this video.
      There is some small niche for making new unique researched videos about Jung. :) The newspaper research yielded many more articles written about Jung, but out of context for this video itself. If memory serves, there were numerous ones on his trips to Africa, I think because he was sponsored and taking-along a wealthy patron. Also a lot about Jung's passing in 1961. I have done back research on the modern antagonist Richard Noll.

  • @ursulaschlapbach311
    @ursulaschlapbach311 6 місяців тому +2

    I like him

  • @danerose575
    @danerose575 6 місяців тому +7

    Let's be clear: Healthy masculine aggression, now a forbidden taboo, is accepted and integrated by Jung, the founder of much of current therapy.

    • @gaxter12
      @gaxter12 5 місяців тому

      They would expel him from the psychologist association today and smear him in the media and discard and mock his work if he was here today

    • @DubyaW111
      @DubyaW111 4 місяці тому

      ​@@gaxter12YUP. and thats crazy.. Very knowledgeable man indeed 🙌🙏🏻🥰🕉️🔱💖

  • @RafaelToscano
    @RafaelToscano 6 місяців тому +3

    30:20 - perfect!

  • @ursulaschlapbach311
    @ursulaschlapbach311 6 місяців тому +1

    I like him alot

  • @mariamassey5468
    @mariamassey5468 5 місяців тому

    A FASCINATING MAN X A SPELLBINDING SPEAKER❤❤❤

  • @andreahoulihan8453
    @andreahoulihan8453 6 місяців тому +2

    What a mind.

  • @graphguy
    @graphguy 6 місяців тому +2

    I was first exposed to Carl Jung when I was in 9th grade and he took me on a journey that I still sail.

    • @RJ-cs9gz
      @RJ-cs9gz 5 місяців тому +2

      Me too!

  • @pavanatanaya
    @pavanatanaya 3 місяці тому

    "Objective Reality" ,What a Concept

  • @JessyP-u6q
    @JessyP-u6q 5 місяців тому +1

    We dont copy talented people to make our live better or bitter !

  • @almodawara
    @almodawara 7 місяців тому +2

    Wowww 😮

  • @paulleydet9479
    @paulleydet9479 6 місяців тому +1

    You only need to look into a dead man’s eyes to believe in the spirit

  • @bernardofitzpatrick5403
    @bernardofitzpatrick5403 6 місяців тому +2

    Atman is Brahman . Sam Altman . Open A.I. No birth and therefore death. Loved to have heard Jung’s reaction, had he been alive, to A.I. And its connection to the collective unconscious and archetypes. Is A.I cognizant , will it ever be, of synchronicity and the like?

  • @inambuneri3989
    @inambuneri3989 6 місяців тому +1

    ❤ Peshawar Afghanistan

  • @brianparks2039
    @brianparks2039 5 місяців тому

    I had a professor do the same thing to me in a English composition class, had a term paper on the themes of Edgar Allen Poe, the asshole teacher thought I plagiarized from various sources, almost got kicked out of Edmonds Community College because of it.

  • @Daniela.Mccaffrey
    @Daniela.Mccaffrey 6 місяців тому +3

  • @eunicestone6532
    @eunicestone6532 6 місяців тому +3

    He contributed a lot to the treatment of addiction and alcholism. Hes mentioned several times in the Big Book of ALCOHOLICS ANONYMOUS & NARCOTIS ANONYMOUS.

  • @ursulaschlapbach311
    @ursulaschlapbach311 6 місяців тому +1

    Me too .I know what Love is. 99.9 people dont know it .

  • @cm1642
    @cm1642 6 місяців тому +2

    What is the accent of the interviewer?

    • @edgeofthought
      @edgeofthought  6 місяців тому +2

      John Freeman was from Regent's Park, London UK. I could say a British accent, but I think there are a bunch english accents, right? He was also the British Ambassador to the United States, from 1969-71. Had a good productive life. Also more involved in another Jung project.

    • @cm1642
      @cm1642 6 місяців тому +1

      @@edgeofthought thank you for the information!

  • @leegalen8383
    @leegalen8383 8 місяців тому +4

    This would be even better with closed captioning.

    • @edgeofthought
      @edgeofthought  8 місяців тому +1

      Hey good point, thanks. I checked and they appear turned on but "unavailable". I changed the language from UK english to no-region general English, so ... who knows, maybe that will enable/re-enable. Cross fingers.

    • @leegalen8383
      @leegalen8383 8 місяців тому +1

      @edgeofthought Thanks so much!!

    • @edgeofthought
      @edgeofthought  8 місяців тому +3

      @@leegalen8383 just came back now and found that UA-cam has fixed it up, so thank you again for your suggestion :)

  • @eunicestone6532
    @eunicestone6532 6 місяців тому +1

    He once treated King Charles3.

  • @leroyjones6170
    @leroyjones6170 7 місяців тому +1

    Was there a physical repulsion when discussing briefly Freud’s dreams?

  • @mercster
    @mercster 7 місяців тому +2

    Hey "Television Critic" with the Guardian... that interview, as short as it was, was infused with the fundamentals of his life's work. The ins and outs and details are far too complex and particular to cover in some sort of "lecture" of that length; one could try, but one would also lose the wisdom and charm of this old man, speaking to us in the comfort of his own home. Go read a book. (I realize I'm berating someone who is probably long dead, so be it. Perhaps his consciousness will read my words.) 😏

  • @GH3K3
    @GH3K3 6 місяців тому +1

    i.e. (id est) does not mean "for example" (that would be e.g., or exempli gratia). It means "that is."

    • @edgeofthought
      @edgeofthought  6 місяців тому

      Ha! Thanks. I appreciate the insight. Do you have any thoughts on hoc est? It is in enough latin that I read, and in my head, and with studying on hīc/hoc/haec and such, hoc est treads the meaning of "that is". I don't think of i.e. as latin, but rather english "in example".
      You may find in other videos, multiple times I've pronounced "etcetera" as "et ketera" and then correct myself for the audience to english pronunciation.

    • @GH3K3
      @GH3K3 6 місяців тому +1

      Id est Definition & Meaning - Merriam-Webster
      4 days ago Id est is a Latin phrase that means that is.@@edgeofthought
      Not "pedantic" to know the elements of style; Strunk and White, 3rd ed.

    • @GH3K3
      @GH3K3 6 місяців тому

      "Brevity is the soul of vigor."

  • @markstemmett5296
    @markstemmett5296 6 місяців тому +1

    Smoking at 84 how wonderful

    • @edgeofthought
      @edgeofthought  6 місяців тому +1

      hahaha, it's true. but could be like those 90-somethings and centenarians that swear by having alcohol every day, as their key to longevity. I don't think Jung died from throat or mouth cancer. I know your point, only just saying it's what it is for him, plus at that time, 9 out of 10 doctors in America chose Camels cigarettes. :)

  • @oliverjamito9902
    @oliverjamito9902 6 місяців тому

    Creation itself knows? Can't exist in front without...shared "i" AM come forth!

  • @Skunkhunt_42
    @Skunkhunt_42 5 місяців тому

    Is that a smoke alarm chirping on low battery ? 😂

  • @robertcoll7297
    @robertcoll7297 6 місяців тому

    God sees all God is all

  • @nigellee9824
    @nigellee9824 4 місяці тому

    Archaeology...thank God he didn't go down that road....

  • @AbdullahIsWatchingU
    @AbdullahIsWatchingU 5 місяців тому

    Проблема в том, что в молодости, что бы мы не делали, мы можем скрыть свои палубный привычки, но в старости трудно скрыть, процесс идет в замедленной форме, т. егасилбник уже насильничеь открыто, а вор открыто ворует, что быэтого не было надо в молодости бороться со своими привычками.

  • @Lyndanet
    @Lyndanet 6 місяців тому +3

    The difference between Jung and Freud one liked children the other didn’t..😂

    • @GH3K3
      @GH3K3 6 місяців тому

      one was a Jew and one wasn't; that's the biggest difference. Freud was an addict, too (cocaine, tobacco), and Jung wasn't. Jung was well-read in philosophy, Freud wasn't.

    • @Lyndanet
      @Lyndanet 6 місяців тому

      @@GH3K3 I have a different opinion on the matter but maybe someone will research your theory one day.

    • @GH3K3
      @GH3K3 6 місяців тому +2

      Not a 'theory', just a few random observations from knowledge of the subject. As far as psychoanalytic theory, Freud couldn't buy into Jung's archetypes and collective unconscious hypotheses because it undercut the "overweening emphasis on sexuality" as Jung phrased it in Freudian theory.

    • @Lyndanet
      @Lyndanet 4 місяці тому

      @@GH3K3 he “explored “ his theories with his own daughter his race and creed had nil to do with such he was just a jerk

  • @user-yo9pv1ni6t
    @user-yo9pv1ni6t 3 місяці тому

    what Jung could do which few in the scrience humanities could not do, was to read and correctly interpret what ever he read. Jung's works are in DIRE DESPERATE need of a critical study,, Now as to his freligios/bible ideas, we can allow those to pass off as weakness, JUng always said my ideas must have further confirmation and development,, This is what I am trying to do, bring Jung's ideas into the 21st century, as the Jungianists have droped the ball. I really find not much interest in any Jungian material, Other than Von Franz and a few others who were close/worked w Jung. Jung's ideas await a new voice, new meanings. This is my goal, to bring awareness to the need, I am too old to brinmg forth a new synthesis of Jung.

  • @guyfoucher4805
    @guyfoucher4805 5 місяців тому

    Jung is 10 times more intresting than Freud

  • @ilikemusic8632
    @ilikemusic8632 5 місяців тому

    Im ten minutes in and the interviewer is like an interrogator not particularly nice, maybe he is in a rush?

  • @WilhelminaBruno-f6n
    @WilhelminaBruno-f6n 14 днів тому

    Hall Scott Clark Betty Rodriguez Laura

  • @SpenderDebby-x6n
    @SpenderDebby-x6n 9 днів тому

    Lopez Sharon Hall Frank Young Michael

  • @Nodualidaddr
    @Nodualidaddr 5 місяців тому

    Is not that God does not exist, is that you do not exist 😃

  • @stuckinlodi100
    @stuckinlodi100 6 місяців тому +1

    I suspect Jung went over the edge of thought like many mildly infatuated sociopaths. There are dim contradictions likely related to old age..or just as likely not related to it. Sociopathy is most often a complicated condition if not very serious.

  • @GregoryBoyd-s1n
    @GregoryBoyd-s1n 14 днів тому

    Wilson Gary Hall Deborah Brown Scott

  • @cipriani9607
    @cipriani9607 5 місяців тому

    On that time this simple human being was considered inteligent...now days ..the more you cheat,stole have expensive cars and no morals you are considered "clever".I enjoyed watching this considerably treasure video but I thin the gentleman doing the interview didn't resonate like he should be...was superficial in my opinion !!!!

  • @kirkstable
    @kirkstable 6 місяців тому

    I thought it was really boring for the first nine minutes..

  • @JesusIsGod-l2h
    @JesusIsGod-l2h 6 місяців тому

    What is Carl Jung? Carl Jung is just another lost man as far as I can tell from his interview.

  • @forestdweller2661
    @forestdweller2661 6 місяців тому

    Worst interviewer ever,,,,,if one had the chance to talk to this man and waste it asking nothing about his ideas and understanding…so British of his time.

  • @nerdvana101
    @nerdvana101 7 місяців тому

    Founder of the borg

  • @eottestcontent3288
    @eottestcontent3288 3 місяці тому +1

    DustyArchiver stole the work in this video and claimed as its own. Especially arguing and blocking anyone who brings evidence about it. ua-cam.com/users/shortsxlS0trrNRAE

  • @marthashepherd341
    @marthashepherd341 7 місяців тому +14

    When one remembers this was recorded in the 1950s, this is still so current. What a Bright and Gentleman 🙏♥️🙏

  • @maximelagace
    @maximelagace Рік тому +40

    What a beautiful video you have put out there!
    Love this part on Freud, "When he has thought something then it was settled, while I was doubting all along the line."
    Make me think to this quote by Bertrand Russell: "The fundamental cause of the trouble is that in the modern world the stupid are cocksure while the intelligent are full of doubt."

    • @Lyndanet
      @Lyndanet 6 місяців тому +3

      I like (d) your comment 🦾

    • @karlschmied6218
      @karlschmied6218 6 місяців тому

      Well, but Jung is cocksure about “God” and the independence of the psyche from the body and that it survives physical death, for which there is no convincing evidence, but rather the opposite becomes increasingly clear when you look at the evidences brain research produces.

    • @maureenelliott4986
      @maureenelliott4986 5 місяців тому +1

      Cocksure or not, Freud was a brilliant man.

    • @Lyndanet
      @Lyndanet 5 місяців тому +2

      @@maureenelliott4986 what did he do that was so brilliant?

    • @edgeofthought
      @edgeofthought  4 місяці тому

      @@Lyndanet Jung wrote of his admiration for Freud, wrote details on Freud’s accomplishments, within the opening to Psychology of Dementia Praecox, which is contained in CW3 the Psychogenesis of Mental Disease. The attack-natured partisans for Freud or Jung are sad to me. One benefits from awareness of all peoples accomplishments. Freud and Adler are mentioned early in this F2F episode, Jung wanted to do Justice to them by bringing a missing key.

  • @zhaochen2487
    @zhaochen2487 7 місяців тому +13

    This is such a lovely compilation of some historical moments. I almost feel I was the one talking to Jung, touching and understanding his thoughts. Would be great he is still available to us today to chat more in depth on many things that he probably didn't want to talk fearing to stir up the crowd.

  • @mattpiepenburg8769
    @mattpiepenburg8769 6 місяців тому +7

    Miles and miles and miles beyond Freud. Only wish William James was alive today to add his insights to this :)

  • @rickpandolfi7860
    @rickpandolfi7860 6 місяців тому +11

    You have done a very good, possibly a great thing through your presentation and curation of this content. Herr Professor Jung, in my modest judgment is the most consequential thinker of the 20th century. Anything that brings him more fully into our lives is manna.

    • @edgeofthought
      @edgeofthought  6 місяців тому +2

      Thank you for your commendation, Rick. Truly, the work of Jung is inspiring, and I would like to hear more about your own experiences with Jung's work, if ever you want to share them. Knowing what people think about their own takes on Jung's work, has made this video so valuable to me; as this video is just my own "little" project, to contribute into the global conversation and awareness, historically.
      I am very serious about the work of Jung, and his historical influences (i.e. his parents, wife, his wife's grandfather, Paracelsus, alchemists...). Also some focuses: Sonu Shamdasani's work, i.e. "Jung Stripped Bare By His Biographers, Even", The Red Book Liber Novus, and his other recent articles; plus I want to contribute to awareness of the translation projects from Philemon Foundation.
      Some other of my own little projects: I re-started recording Ashmole’s Theatrum Chemicum Britannicum, using a scan from the book owned by CG Jung, in his alchemy library. There is another project I want to do on Jung, based on his letters to certain of his friends and collaborators (i.e. Richard Wilhelm, Hans Schmid).

  • @jenniferwells9032
    @jenniferwells9032 7 місяців тому +12

    Another great soul ❤️

    • @edgeofthought
      @edgeofthought  6 місяців тому +1

      It's so friendly to read comments on the videos, I must ask are you any fan of Jung's writing, anything in particular? I want to see about peoples' individual interests.

  • @fpalisse
    @fpalisse Рік тому +15

    This is amazing

    • @edgeofthought
      @edgeofthought  Рік тому +2

      Hey you have a hand in restoring my faith and interest in working and developing this channel. 😍 your UA-cam poems also come to mind when I re-listen to my Village Blacksmith poem read.

  • @FoggyTimes98
    @FoggyTimes98 6 місяців тому +3

    "We are the origin of all coming evil" love this!

  • @brucevanbeek3133
    @brucevanbeek3133 4 місяці тому +2

    I wonder if William Donahue 350 keys to the Kingdom or if you ever listen to William Donahue. He spoke highly of Carl Jung .
    I just found William Donahue, I'm really surprised that it has not gotten much attention on his explanations of thinking !
    Anyway, here to the new understanding of consciousness! My friends 🧡

  • @SivaVgt
    @SivaVgt 6 місяців тому +4

    That was sincerely amazing. Thank you for sharing.

    • @edgeofthought
      @edgeofthought  6 місяців тому

      Much thanks and gratitude, SivaVgt. I truly am moved for the friendly words you and others have shared. Honestly, this is early March, and before 2 months ago, it was 6 months old on. UA-cam, and only had around 200 views, and a handful of comments. If you stick around, I will be producing more stuff, as I'm extremely deeply invested in this.