@@hydra7427That's called collectivisation. Are you feeling communist? It has failed everytime it was tried. Will it be different because your leader will be in charge now?
@@Hardcore_Remixer You referencing to that one quote from a random Danish politician that was just giving her opinion at the WEF on what the world might become in 2030? The one where she also warned about increased government surveillance?
@@krashme997 Yes. And I refer to the fact that some people, as @hydra7427 can tell us, actually vote for that, and not only the world elites from the conspiracy theory.
There's a serious error here, Meloni was never about leaving EU. That was Salvini (and Di Maio). Meloni in fact always affirmed to want to change EU, leveraging Italy's role as one of the main founding states of the EU. Meloni always was against migration and valuing Christian european culture.
True, her group has become "soft euroskeptic," and committed to European membership, while resisting further EU integration (i.e., she likes EU more or less as it is, with a few "improvements").
Reducing bureaucracy is literally what every politician is saying should be done, yet nobody ever does so. Why? Because the bureaucrats are the politicians and their jobs depend on it! Nobody will make themselves redundant.
No, politicians are rarely drawn from the ranks of the bureaucracy. Professional civil servants make poor politicians. The BBC had a hilarious show based on the premise 50 years ago called "Yes, Minister."
@@danz1182 my point is that the bureaucrats are also part of the problem, they resist any reduction of complexity or efficiency improvements that might come from the politicians to the point when new elections take place and their bosses change. Result is the same, nothing happens which might jeopardise their positions.
Bureaucracy keeps me safe from dangerous working environments, contaminated food, bridges that collapse, planes that fall apart in midair, houses that are high flammable etc etc The red tape that keeps people safe costs business profit which is why they hate it They trick stupid people like you into thinking they hate it too despite it keeping them safe
Regarding the wish to leave the EU, even Orban doesn't want that as it would be very unpopular. In Hungary, most big projects are subsidised by the EU. That's also the case (in a smaller volume) for Italy and other southern countries.
Italy is a net contributor to the EU budget. Spain is net neutral. But yes, politics in these countries are trying for decades to make them with time less wealthy than northern Europe, by increasing their indebtment, taxation, and other deliberately sub-optimal policies. Why they are doing that I have no idea.
Its not just that a country is richer or poorer, the coesion funds are given to reagions and in Italy there are a lot of Southern reagions that definitly get money they otherwise would not be given, it was the case for the UK too, poorer regions of England and Wales lost a lot of Funds and despite Promises the Tory government has failed to make up for the losses in public investment, which is odd since they were net contributors after all, but I guess they had different priorities.
@@tomorrowneverdies567 Italy greatly benefits from the EU monetarily by having interest rates on government debt much lower than they would outside the EU
@@tomlxyz why would Italy have higher interest rates if it was not in the EU? In that logic, Germany also profits from having low borrowing interest rates.
EU is the most pro farmer part of the world. 80% of farmers income are from taxes and subsidies, they are the biggest whiners and pollute the climate more than many industries, yet they don't want to do their fair share. Their business is completly state funded yet they whine non-stop.
It’s a “damned if you do, damned if you don’t” situation. Farmers do indeed dislike heavy environmental regulations, and from their standpoint, it is understandable, and I do think that the current green policies in the EU don’t really seem to be working in the long run (Germany banning nuclear energy because of it being “bad for the environment” was a major beuh moment for everyone). Tax breaks for farmers and some concessions for them are definitely good ideas. However, being environmentally friendly is also very much needed, and this is why I hope that they will refocus their environmental policies instead of reducing them. Here in Hungary, there’s been a massive surge in building battery plants, and this has had many mixed results to say the least. It seems like the authorities here (which are pretty corrupt) don’t enforce many important environmental regulations, and because of this, there’s been massive pollution near these factories, to the point that it’s both really bad for the workers in the factories themselves and the towns where these are located. It’s interesting how these environmental regulations kind of screw over farmers, but the lack of regulation would screw over factory workers (especially because even if you are not working in that factory per se, most people living in the town are from the working class). There must be some sort of compromise. As for the rest, I am pretty sceptical about them, but there are indeed some solutions needed for stuff like immigration, which is shamefully ignored by the left and even centre, despite there being many problems arising from it. I must say that I am not a huge fan of the EU shifting right as I am not really big on neoliberal policies (albeit like I said, tax breaks and concessions can be a good idea). However, I am still younger, so this might change when I get older, as people seem to get more conservative, at least economically once they secure a well paying job (which hopefully will happen).
One would think that a pro lifer like Meloni would be in favor of environmental regulations given the smog problem in Northern Italy. Guess not. Shocker.
@@TheWeedIsland India, china and Africa emit less CO2 per capita than most european contries. Specially Africa where there's contries where one person on average lives with a quarter of the emissions of the best european contry. They have to make their share, of course, but the ones using oil for going to pee in the mall are not precisely africans.
3:48 It's time to stop thinking that Italy is strong in car manufacturing. Italy produces less cars than the Slovak republic. Fiat, after blocking or acquiring every other local car manufacturer, is no more, Stellantis has legal and fiscal headquarters outside Italy. The only thing that remains is the obsession of the average italian with car-centric culture, a landscape with little public transportation and even less cycling infrastructure.
@@markotrieste the point is that no one have any interest in "defending", whatever that could mean, a private corporation when it makes its wrongdoings. We Italians don't have such problem. We have always criticized FIAT for their actions.
Please dont bring Orban into anything. A bigger Moscow chil does not exist! Also, I'm not sure Italy of all countries should be complaining about EU bureaucracy when they themselfs are the worst country in Europe when it comes to it.
I mean I don't really see your point. If Italy's bureaucracy is shit then nothing should be done for EU bureaucracy? I'm sorry but this does not make any sense. Moreover Italian bureaucracy sucks because of different problems present with criminal organizations not because people are stupid and don't think about it. It is slow because there are huge numbers of checks to avoid Mafia collusion inside the institutions. In the past Italian bureaucracy had huge reforms to make it faster, the result? Mafia got deeper into the institutions.
Orban doesn't have a lot of votes anyway, if the left changes their view on immigration and multiculturalism they will win every election from now to 2100........ 🤷🏻♂️
We still have a moral obligation to save human lives. The point is that after saving them, those who have no will to remain in Italy should leave the country in either other European countries that are directly responsable for this tragedy or back to their native countries. But EU treaties deny us to do that. Moreover the new ESM that some European countries wants to make, plans to dump their migrants here in Italy. A criminal act if you ask me. If such plan come into effect, we should ask back all the trillions of Euro we wasted with the former ESM without getting anything back. As few knows, Europeans have kept our money without troubles of morality or legitimacy. Italy is always treated like a secondary power of Europe while we are the Third economy, we are still growing and all these supposedly "superior" or "great powers" of Europe instead are quickly falling apart, with their economies crumbling like rotten houses. I don't know how much would be convenient to ignore and mock Italy in this moment.
I mean you have to accept them on your land, to possibly then send them back if they arent refugees. You cant just refuse them and let them drown, unless of course you are a demon that likes human death, but surelly not?
I would love to have heard more of your analysis of Meloni's strongly pro-Ukrainian policies, particularly as they contrast with those of potential partner Fides. Unless I missed one recently, it's worth a whole nother video.
It is unlikely that Orban would join the ECR. Him and Meloni are increasingly at odds with each other. Orban is not a right wing conservative, he is an opportunist who will do anything to get more votes and more power. He has achieved that by being putins puppet inside the EU. Meloni is a real, run-of-the-mill conservative, who supports a free market economy, nato, and opposes russia.
Same. I'd love that too. I bet one thing is to try to change a few bits from inside eu but going against the US - atlantic agenda is a whole other matter. Plus yes, the fracture between russia and northern european countries seems to be slowing down the "frugal countries" so...
Honestly i don't understand the joke? Is it bureaucracy safeguarding a brand? Can i open a videogame store and sell a game i decide to call Super Mario?
@@idraotewhat's being stolen exactly when someone makes a wheel of Parmesan in Germany that tastes nearly identical to one made in Italy but at a fraction of the price?
Notwithstanding Meloni, Italy cannot afford to be eurosceptic ... we have an historical posture and we are founders of EU, thats is why Meloni is adapting to reality ...
Irrespective of whether you're left or right, I think we should be able to agree that Meloni should avoid courting Orban. The guy has basically made himself just a couple steps short of a dictator at this point.
Orban is a fascist and MEloni is a fascist too, they will always ally. His "dictator" ambitions is not something that Meloni is against, becuase she is anti-democracy as well due to her being on the extreme far right.
France, Germany, Hungary, Austria, the Netherlands, Sweden, Finland, Denmark and Portugal (not sure about Spain) have all moved in similar political directions to Italy in some key areas.
Spain too, the elections were an anomaly and the socialists hung on to power barely by ridiculing themselves for the separatists. Look at current polling.
Yup. And it causes me no end of anxiety to see it. I'm actively thinking of going to the US or Canada if the EU parliament becomes more right wing (this should be a joke but it isn't)
@@pedromoura1446 If you have marketable skills, Canada will welcome you with open arms. Canada has very high levels of extremely tightly controlled selective immigration which is easy given their relatively inaccessible geography.
If you're not absolutely support immigration and the globalist agenda you are immediately classified as "extremist", especially if you come from a European/western country
It's not that left-wingers deny the strong possibility that many European countries may become native-minority in the future. They either don't care or actively want that to happen because they hate themselves.
perhaps - however, one cannot ignore/overlook the extreme influx of illegal migration that’s been occurring - many of whom are undesirable and will never become model citizens. A large number of those single men have formed gangs … committing heinous crimes against woman. Those are not the kinds of people a country should invite in. And there should be limits on the numbers permitted in. Common sense is needed. Europe has a mess on its hands … too many instances of crimes perpetrated by migrants. Governments need to address it.
@@bzuidgeest Not true. Large and increasing majority recognise its a mistake. Brexit exposed a real divide between young and old, highly educated and less so
you must be living in a parallel reality, her goverment just passed yet another tax amnesty for evaders like all other right-wing goverments have done in the past 30 years. Where's the fiscal discipline in that?
Now from what I understood, the idea is to pay your back taxes as rated payments while ramping up enforcement. I’m not native Italian so sometimes have trouble with the more advanced language in the newspapers I read here. The UBI (reddito di cittadinanza) is also being phased out for nearly everyone.
Meloni will leave Italy in ruins. Said the same thing to the thick conservative voting monkeys in our country. Only now when they cannot afford proper food, heating or holidays do they acknowledge the disastrous mistakes they have made. They always cut taxes for the rich (their funders and handlers), it always damages the economy and lowers living standards for everyone else. It takes a special kind of moron who thinks giving all your country's money away to those with more than they can spend will leave the average man with more in the pocket. Of course it won't, it never has or will
@Devilm00n That's not true, tax reform is a very important thing, the tax amnesty you are talking about are bad debts under one thousand euros, these are small unpaid amounts from small fines that slowly rose. They are not paid because the tax authorities are very aggressive, and a good part of them are inaccurate like "you owe me 158 euro fine" "where did I get the fine?" In Milan" "but if I live in Rome and I've never been to Milan" "prove me wrong", you could appeal, but it costs more than the amount of the fine. The Reform would change this aggressive attitude as a kind of 'Friendly Taxation', more collaborative and coming to the citizen's aid according to his financial availability, with instalments and discounts.
@@askallois What the hell are you talking about? In her reform she made it so that if you have unpaid taxes and the state is not able to get the money back within 5 years the debt is simply cancelled - knowing the speed of italian bureaucracy how many tax evasors will be able to simply not pay anything because the state wasn't able to go after them within 5 years? And no we're not talking about debts that are small fines and rose, we're talking about people who have evaded taxes for hundreds of thousands of euros. We have 1.206,6 billion unpaid taxes here in Italy (that the state knows about, I'd expect the submerged economy would make that number balloon even more) and instead of doing everything in our power to put an end to this crap we keep cutting back on welfare and taxing honest employed workers who have no way to evade taxes. You need to wake the fuck up my dude, Italy is barrelling towards complete disfunction and destruction
Looser Structures and more national independence is demanded but at the same time more EU-Bonds? That perfectly illustrates how EU-Bonds only benefit the indebted European Counties. Hypocrisy at it’s finest…
If Italy could devalue like it did in the past.... And anyway think for yourself, Italy is at least growing unlike most of western Europe, the only thing Italy need is someone to keep interest rates low so we can reduce debt and not increase debt just to pay interests like we did in the last decades we're Italy was consistently running a primary budget surplus but still increased debt. 🤦♂️ And now economists have widely disproved what the EU did there is even a strong thesis that Italy would have a lower debt to gbp without austerity.
Only the benefits, but non of the obligations. Just a typical populist wanting everything, so when they dont get everything they can go to their voters and blame other people for them not getting anything done.
EU-bonds would benefit the entire Europe IF they will be used for European projects (eg. an European defence). It would be a mistake to use them to finance the member states instead (like they did with the NextGen EU).
You know what surprises me, I live in Croatia on the seaside, and every summer there are countless Italian tourists. I was thinking it's odd that they come for the beaches, but apparently I was told the Italian side of the Adriatic looks green and unclean
they don't mean the type of bureaucracy that requires you to do a lot of paperwork or something. What they mean is less power to the technocracts and more to the politicians.
As long as there's ongoing disarray amongst EU member states over the issue of irregular immigration, the problem will only get worse and ultimately drive even more EU member states to the Right. This issue was raised in the *New Internationalist* magazine in *September 1991;* the article is still available to read on line and is titled *'Fortress Europe'.*
My biggest worry here is the environment policies. If Europe doesn't set an example for other countries, no one else on this globe will. And that's how we'll get hell on earth in some 30 years. Genieten van.
If leftist win we would have no country anyway in the future.... 🤷🏻♂️ I don't care and won't fight for an economic area where I don't even feel at home anymore.
I'm afraid you're right. It seems right-wing parties don't realize the seriousness of climate change and since everyone is focused on immigration, right-wing gets more votes.
Oh please. The climate doomsday prophets masquerading as activists have been announcing the imminent end of life on Earth for 60 years, and yet not a single one of their bullshit predictions has come true. And every time we get to the date of the supposed armageddon and nothing happens, instead of admitting they were wrong and apologize, they just double down on the BS and move the date of the apocalypse to ten or twenty years in the future.
Using terms like "Hard right" reveal your prejudices. Please leave the right as right or refer to the left in the same way eg rampant communist left, or loopy left.
"a system of ideas and ideals, especially one which forms the basis of economic or political theory and policy. the science of ideas; the study of their origin and nature". (oxford language definition) Science bows to Ego, Economic and political pressures and needs. Everything humans believe is ideological. Nice try.
@@milescoleman3150 Of course every person has a political bias, but the reality is that climate change is a scientific fact based on empirical proof and it's agreed by basically every climatologist on Earth. If you understood how the scientifical model works you wouldn't be saying that.
@@milescoleman3150tell me that you don't understand how science works without telling me you don't know how science works. Nice try to make science a political debate.
Solar, wind and battery costs are plummeting. The green entry transition will happen sooner than people think. Same with EVs a batteries are the mist expensive part of the car. Cost curves just happen in free markets, it doesn't matter what the politicians or fossil fuels companies think. The beat thing that can be done to help the environment at this point is diet change. But most people are far too hypocritical for that.
@@alahacker8185 Yes, it's true, in the summer there was a real invasion on Lampedusa, every day around 1000/2000 people disembarked and this had a huge impact. We hope that in 2024 these numbers will decrease as in the first three months
Eurosceptic is a good term. A little underrated. To call her far right is a compliment to the far right. Everything she sees looks clear to me. Besides common sense people agreeing with her. Those lied to should see the light as well She's pretty down to earth making it easy enough to see her logic.
Believing that supportingTraditional European culture is extreme probably says a great deal about what is wrong with Europe's media today. It shouldn't be controversial to support and promote our cultural identity.
Judeo-Christianity, Greek and Roman civilisational heritage, monogamy, separation of church and state, national languages, diet and perhaps democracy. @@dalekrenegade2596
@@barryhill6507 I ask for specifics not a definition. Far too many really use "cultural Identity" as a Nazi dog whistle or just complaining that not enough white are giving birth(nobody wants to sleep with them).
What they call "bureaucracy" are safeguards against extreme policy and political takeover. Not only safeguards against extreme legislation but also protections against Lobbyism. The reason why you need hordes of lobbyists in Brussels is because it is so hard to influence so many different nations in so many languages.
tell me again how regulating how a Romanian grandmother raises a pig, in her own yard, for the own consumption, safeguards against extreme policy and political takeover. Because for sure it does not help, Romania at this point is the country in the EU where democracy faces the biggest threats.
@@clawy99 The way EU makes laws is quite eloborate and slow ... for a reason and leaves the implementation largly to the members. Undermining that would introduce the option to rule by minority. Something right-winger across are dreaming off using the EU as a centralized government to force their will across 27 countries. P.S. You can raise your pigs as you like, but when the possibility exists that you sell that meat to EU citizens you fall under regulations and laws like all other farmers in the EU. The laws exists so you cannot take shortcuts because it's cheaper. It ensures consumer protection and fair competition within in the EU.
@@AaronOkeanos Only the most extreme authoritarian right-wingers want to take control of the EU. Most want to let it burn to the ground as it is a fundamentally left-wing institution.
It’s immigration that is the most important, in all countries regardless left(Danish social democrats), right(well every right wing party) and center(Donald Tusk, Mitsotakis, Maja Kallas)Europeans want to protect their culture and history and parties that align win.
It's only "important" because of ignorant moguls and air breathers that convinced other idiots in the electorate than less than 1% of the European population is what's causing "issues", somehow.
Center parties are definitely not anti-immigration. Donald Tusk allowed more immigration once he got into power. Mitsotakis is a flip flopper but his only "hard" stance is to secure the borders with Turkey. His government doesn't deport anyone and they also save the migrants that come and sink their own boats in our seas. Maja Kallas is also not anti immigration. As for left wing parties, the only one that is anti immigration are the Danish social democrats. And they're soft on it too. They adopted that stance because a right wing party was dwarfing them a couple elections back.
I believe standing against wildlife and finding a better way to get cleaner energy is the wrong choice. True, it might harm agriculture, and I know some people don't want a wind turbine in their yard, but choosing to use non-renewable energy resources instead will damage the environment and agriculture more than opting to use green energy.
> Enviromentalism harms the fight against climate change more often than not > Wind turbines are least of my concerns when nuclear gets closed off, and my energy bills rise
@@Notsogoodguitarguy europe has already experienced african climates once before and plenty of crops struggled. failing to address or at least slow the change in growing conditions will severely affect agriculture across the block.
@@jonathanodude6660 people have also experienced tampering with farmers before. It has lead to famines every single time. What's your point? You think farms are the problem of climate change? Europe's committing a green suicide and isn't even reducing their CO2 usage. We're exporting our usage. We've reduced our emissions by a third I believe, which was already fairly low, while China, India and Africa are ramping up their emissions. The EU can go literally 0 carbon emissions tomorrow and it would change literally nothing. So, why go after farmers? Why not go after industries? Why not start investment funds and support projects for African countries? Why go after farmers?
She's the definition of populist politician who wants people to fear so she could exploit these fears. Absolute trojan horse for the European values and a reminder for how low has the Italian public fallen.
@@unraged6004 yeah the liberals and socialists are so much more rational when they claim "the right" is anti-science while believing there are more than 2 genders.
Destruction of European economy won't "save" the planet even if climate models are correct. Europe just has to protect it's external borders by force as it did in the past.
I cannot understand just how right-wing parties can want BOTH less green policies and less migration, when we don't pursue green policies, that will cause more people to migrate from areas becoming too hot to live or simply drowning. It's either one or the other, it can't be both.
It's not that middle-eastern areas are becoming too hot to live in, not yet. It's that is fairly easier to emigrate towards EU rather than change your own country for the best. Brain drain is the same thing for developed countries, people find easier to bail towards countries that pay better wages rather than get involved in the system and trying to change it from within. The difference is brain drain happens in accord to every country's law.
1:59 That is an interesting spelling of the word "bureaucracy;" I must say I have yet to be that inventive when it comes to a word describing something so decidedly un-creative.
Yeah... Temperature of waters in Florida reaching 101 degrees (body temperature is 98F btw.), eastern Europe record high temperatures IN OCTOBER, but the biggest problem we're facing is the green deal LMAO.
I assume you know how long you need to boil 1 liter of water on your stove? Now imagine heating all oceans of the planet how much energy you need for that. And you think so much extra energy is without serious consequences just because it is as warm as you (for now)?
@@AaronOkeanos Brooo... First of all: I do not use a stove to heat water, because it doesn't comply with the ecological, leftist and globalist agenda, issued during the §420-69's meeting of the European Cabal. And second, the problem isn't "water suddenly boiling in a cartoon-like fashion, hurting people bathing in it" (which shows that you don't even understand the problem) but instead, the problem is that waters reaching that temperature, is just an another SYMPTOM of what we're seeing all the time, which is: climate change is real, it's related to radiation being trapped between the earth and the atmosphere in an abnormal and elevated way, related to the increase of gas presence in the atmosphere (CO2 being one of them), and anyone who claims that's not the case (whether is you, or the Meloni) is just dumb, anti-scientific, anti-intellectual, coping, in-denial and most likely has undiagnosed schizophrenia.
@@AaronOkeanos First of all: I do not use stoves, since they were deemed as not efficient for purposes of water heating, by the decree 420-69 of the leftist & globalist agenda. And second: your understanding of the problem as “water boiling people” shows how much you don’t even understand the problem: waters displaying record high temperatures is one of the (many) SYMPTOMS, that not only confirm that climate change is real, but it confirms also that we’re done with looking at global warming as at a problem of the future, because “future” tends to become “now” once enough time passes, and thus we see the climate change having its first effects on us and our environment. Now, you do have two options: own the fact that you’re a denier, and offer us a different model that could (with scientific accuracy) explain and predict the changes that we already see, with a level of accuracy same or higher than the climate change model. Second alternative for you: accept the reality as it is, and accept the findings of scientists who (unlike you) spend their whole lives acquiring knowledge that can be SUCCESSFULLY used to explain and predict reality.
I'm very pro EU and believe most of the complaints the Right have about it are made up but she is right on both Immigration and Farming. As Michel Rocard once said, we cannot welcome all the misery of the world but we need to take our part, which we did and still do. On the farmer issues, the free market is messing people's life. How is it fair for a farmer in France not to be allowed to use a very efficient product (but ecologically bad) while the same farmer in Spain or Poland is allowed to use it, making their food way cheaper to produce? That's unfair competition. I'm a huge proponent of the free market but it needs to be regulated in a way that everyone competes on the same rules. If a product cannot be made illegal on the EU level, it shouldn't be made illegal on a country level, or those products shouldn't be sold outside their respective countries (which isn't possible as per the current laws). I don't trust Meloni one second but she surprised me on her foreign policies.
So, I understand Meloni's concerns about EU climate requirements impacting small businesses. These are the backbone of Italian industry, and it's true that they'll struggle to adapt. But why fight the new legislation instead of pushing for assistance and investment? I think it'd be better to turn this into an opportunity to revitalize Italy's stagnating economy than to drag everyone else down into stagnation and eventual climate disaster. I can't imagine that history will remember this kindly.
It's simple, it won't just affect small businesses. The "green transition" is going to affect every european business and increase their operating costs. This will severely limit the ability of european businesses to compete with those of rival markets like the developing asian economies that are also the biggest polluters by far e.g. India. It is already hard enough to compete with those markets given the labor regulations, or lack thereof, over there. I'm all for preserving the environment, but everyone needs to be playing by the same rules.
@@veckgames Your assertion isn't true. There's obviously a cost to transitioning to greener technologies, but greater efficiency actually LOWERS operating costs.
@@luke_fabis Greater efficiency would indeed lower operating costs, however we are not even remotely close to renewables being as efficient as fossil fuels currently. It is a gap that can only be bridged by technological advancement that will take both significant time and money.
@@luke_fabis The electric bill is almost the same doesn't matter if it comes from coal or the sun . If u have solar panel sure it's better but u still have entry level costs so what ? italy should go back to nuclear
@@jeckjeck3119 in 2011 Prime Minister Berlusconi had been framed in the same way their trying with Trump, then he was substituted (without any kind of election) by Monti, an EU "operative", followed by 10 years of puppets.
Meloni keeps looking over at the UK and see what would happen if Italy left the EU. Farmers are another reason why they can’t leave EU as subsidies are key to keeping that voting block happy. Immigration policy is what EU will bend on as it will be popular on left and right.
I want less immigration, asylum seekers must apply in their own country, one European army, less bureaucracy, choose either Brussels or Strasbourg, fewer representatives, direct representation (real European parties with an election theme instead of a collection of local parties), a economic policy that brings European countries together instead of playing them off against each other, infrastructure and waterways must be adjusted so that countries such as Turkey, China, Russia, etc. no longer play a significant role.
I heard a wonderful idea recently about changing our views that human society is separate from nature.... Countless animals and plants have adapted to thrive in human altered environments. If we started treating cities, farms, and ranches as human-influenced environments while making space for wildlife? We'd solve a lot of problems~ But we do still need to preserve what would places we have left as much as possible. Learning how to safely and healthily incorporate wildlife in our human environments? We could makes lives better for all living souls~
03:11 Interesting that she still sees it as an ideologic thing after what has been happening year after year in every Summer in Italy - specially after the crazy Summer of last year. It's quite obvious that climate change is a thing and anyone that denies its existance doesn't understand the difference between climate and weather.
climate has had many vast swings for millions of years and science proves it. before mankind invented cars or used coal, there were huge periodic climate swings/changes. You are too close to the trees to see the forest - so back up a bit.
In the end it is pretty simple. More power for every country means less power as an global political player. Because we always played against each others in our little european world. If we want to act together and bring geopolitical weight we have to give up some local tiny power . Another way would be to work together with full local power and form a geopolitical power. But this is more unlikly than riding on an unicorn in the clouds. European history shows it never happens before and it will become even more unlikely with more members. So the only practical way is to cut power of each country and give it to EU. Otherwise we will give up all geopolitical power to China and USA.
EU is controlled by Germany and France. So by cutting power of each country and giving it to EU you mean Germany and France. My country was controlled few times by Germany and last time it ended in genocide. So thank you very much for that advice, but I think that many countries will disagree. The whole dependence on Russia is widely Germany fault not to mention immigrant crisis.
@@violet_green4335 I fully agree. If it have to be a Union, it must be a Union where everyone have equal rights and opportunities. Otherwise it's just a soft version of tyranny.
Nope. The EU doesn't work this way. To give smaller countrys more vote power their vote weight is much bigger than people rich countrys. So in the end an maltese has much more vote power than a German or a French. Besides I guess you are more a russian troll . They are always bring the genocide card no matter which theme or it is whataboutism. So both ways your comment is not relevant in this context. So try harder.
>Because we always played against each others in our little european world. Yet we were far more relevant in the world scale than we are now. >If we want to act together and bring geopolitical weight we have to give up some local tiny power . That only works if EU wide policies are made by competent people. To me it doesn't look like that's the case or has been for a few years. Maybe it was in decades past, but nowadays all I see are incompetent, feckless policies that only keep European countries back. Like this obsession with regulating everything, even before it's come out, like Artificial Intelligence. While actually important countries like China or the United States are fostering AI because they know that'll give them an edge on the world scale, we're preventing people from using it and shooting ourselves in the foot. >Otherwise we will give up all geopolitical power to China and USA. You mean like the EU banning ICE cars, forcing people to go and buy electric cars that are mostly made outside the EU, in China and the US?
The eu needs to protect nature more instead of listening to countries like Italy because nature is in decline all around the world and Europe could become one of the most nature depleted continents in the world. Cars are one of the biggest producer of greenhouse gases anywhere in the world and they should be more regulated so that companies could get prosecuted if a car exceeds the greenhouse gas limit. How come the eu is allowing italy to send migrants to Albania when the uk gets blocked for trying to send them to Rwanda.
I'm not against EU reforms that looks at areas where the EU needs to give members more autonomy, a too heavy handed top down authority in Brussels could be disatrous. Also the bureacracy of the EU is too large we need less regulation for business to innovate
4:27 Translation: "We don't like the EU's strict proposals which mildly lower our lifestyle for the benefit of everyone and the planet. Instead, we want what the US has: A free market where nobody can be held accountable and we can blame poor people for everything." Italy is not a third world country, and what she does is just selfishly trying to maintain or improve her personal conditions at the cost of other people and the environment, when she could realise that her actions are only postponing the doom that arrives on Earth to the next generation rather than contributing to fixing the issues.
"Mildly" my ass. The EU's green house plan alone will force italians to spend tens of thousands of € in order to make their home "energy efficient" or risk having their property become unsellable and thus worthless. And that's just ONE of the "genius" ideas coming out of Bruxselles. Meanwhile China and India keep polluting the atmosphere without a care in the world, making all the EU's green plans useless.
@@xyeB - I see UA-cam keeps deleting my comments. But i'll repeat myself and see if this comment gets deleted too. There is no point in Europe going green when the rest of the world doesn't since we share one common atmosphere.
The difference between the so called EU-optimists and EU-sceptics is in their approach to EU policies, not their opinion on the EU in general. Both are heavily pro-EU.
@@sergiostudios She wants to lower immigration and isn't a fan of many climate policies. I'll go out on a limb and say those aren't even really right-wing (or left-wing) views. Right wing is all about supporting natural rights and individual responsibility while the left-wing believe in civil rights and equality. These are more economic and cultural issues and I could see her views being said by both socialists and conservatives.
Here's a way Meloni IS Reshaping Europe as well. U.K.- London- April 3rd, The Telegraph: Headline, "Italy's Meloni Is Doing What Basket-Case Britain Could Only Dream Of." Germany- Bonn- April 3rd DW (Deutsche Welle) "Italy Is Overtaking Germany As Europe's Economic Powerhouse." Straight from two major mainstream news publications in these two different countries. So "straight from the horses mouth" as they say, which makes it very hard to argue it's validity. Why would they Need to say this, and on the Same day, to boot? Now Germany has the 'stated' 3rd largest economy in the Entire world, Easily 2nd largest stated per capita GDP, and very possibly even 1st, really. So how could Germany, in particular, write a Headline like this, to their own citizenry even? Yet they surely Did. Well, I know, and 'they' know. Now the article itself doesn't say much, to me, and doesn't explain things very well at all actually. It doesn't give a lot of 'real facts.' But I am certain this is Intentional. But read what the headline says. That is the important "statement" here. How many of their own viewers and readers in Germany or around the world do you think would say this is true? Yet, that is their own "Headline." So ya, Giorgia Is reshaping some things in Europe, not just 'Trying.'
@GNMbg supporting autonomy for your country and stricter border controls is not far-right. Everything that the ignorant consider to be far-right was, only 20 years ago, considered common sense.
The thing is about popularise movements, what they actually want to push and what they can push is very limited to what the people want. We should remember after all that most of them got into power because of angry voters that are not happy with the established parties, they want change but they don't want the country to be turned upside down with radical policies, hence why they tone it down to appeal to more people, in other worlds, many of them become more moderate, the only exception to that rule is if the population becomes radical in high numbers, which is rare and if that did happen, then there are far more problems than it seems, as it is, it's mostly angry voters of how the established lot are dealing with things. With that said, reforms are clearly needed to the EU, but I think it's more in integration in key areas that's needed, maybe some areas could be loosened, but if we are going to improve our effectiveness and economy, which is probably what most people complain about, the economy, that we can achieve more together. The real question is, how to go about the reforms, what areas need more integration and if there are any areas that could be done better more at a local level, and I don't mean national level, I mean local region level. In any case, the world around us is going to force change on us in directions that some want and others don't, in a world of superpowers, it's likely going to put more pressure on us to integrate more into the EU just to stay competitive and to protect our interest, at an individual EU country level, we are too small compared to the big players, which allows the superpowers to divide and play us off each other, which they do all the time, in other words, we need to find solutions of having a cohesive voice among it's members and through the EU if we really want to protect our interest, the alternative is a slow decline, and in the end, the changes we do in the EU will likely drift in the direction of more integration in key areas because of the political and economic realities of the world, especially of a polarised US that's becoming less trustworthy, an aggressive Russia that's becoming more war like and an ambitions China, the changing world is likely going to push us to integrate more even if we don't want to do so.
People feel that the established parties have terrible policies which are leading their countries in exactly the wrong direction to what they want. More European integration will entrench these terrible established party policies. It will make it even harder to do the 180º turnaround they want, at the local or the European level. It will mean more terrible people like Thierry Breton trying to reduce EU citizens' freedom of speech to Chinese levels. That’s not the kind of “keeping up with China” they want. If European countries had more ability to diverge from each other, eventually one of them would flourish by doing the opposite of the current terrible consensus policies. There would then be a powerful practical counterexample which other countries could imitate.
@@georgesdelatour "It will mean more terrible people like Thierry Breton trying to reduce EU citizens' freedom of speech to Chinese levels. That’s not the kind of “keeping up with China” they want." - you clearly have no idea of what you're saying.
@@teaser6089 The European Union is a left-wing institution. Their entire ideology is based on a vision of complete equality and that can only be achieved with world government.
There does need to be reform, less centralization and more fiscal responsibility. It’s obvious by the rise of crime and extreme right wing parties that mass immigration was a mistake. At the same time leaving the EU is not the answer but Germany and France should not control the EU just because of their economy size
A huge yet common misunderstanding of political commentators is to confuse EU goals with the goals of the current left-of-center coalition governing the EU. Meloni doesn’t want to weaken or destroy the EU, as Brexiteers did. She wants a strong EU… with her party at the helm.
That's a dumb idea that will never happen though. She would be delusional to think it won't be some combination of Germany/France/Poland calling most of the shots.
@@paologat Fair, but I mean, the European Parliament is a farce. Even the Commission is arguably just subservient to France and Germany's interests. Poland is big enough it might muscle in on that pie in the future, but for now it's the big two that have final say on policy, they're the ones bankrolling it.
I like Giorgia Meloni very much. I think she is right on target and I like what she is doing and trying to do. I support her fully in what she is trying to do.
It's a change in rhetoric compared to the previously commonly held position of not openly stating that some people will simply not be allowed in. Despite that already and always having been the case in practice, that is a change in rhetoric.
@@Hardcore_Remixer thing is in case of people like Orban using it it doesn't mean the same, the selection of people is different. Besides that, he doesn't want immigrants going into Hungary because they mainly want to go through Hungary and not stay in it and if Hungarians see that they realize how bad of a job he does
@@tomlxyz So your argument is "It is different because Orban isn't one of our guys." I get it. When Merkel sais it it means real right wingers won't get that position and when Orban sais it it means only real right wingers will get that position. And you are basically telling me that the first is good and the second is bad because you don't like the idea of real right wingers getting a certain high position.
I feel an impending sense of doom when I see people elect politicians who don't take climate change seriously. Climate change is a huge issue and I think we all know it, but for some reason most people and politicians avoid it or put it in the back-burner. When everyone realizes their mistakes it will be too late.
Scientists started sounding the alarm about climate change in the 1970s. Some choices in the new race to finally address climate change don’t make sense.
We are at the end of a glacial era. Look at the future projections if you think now is allarming lol. You know the poles? They WILL melt. It is simply nature. Humans are too narcisistics to understand we can't control everything
Veneto ruled by the far right did everything necessary to prevent climatic issues and wasn't underwater Emilia ruled by the left did nothing and was underwater.... 🤡🤡🤡
Weather is savage nowadays. Theres a Yellow Alert right now over North Italy. That is not that bad. It's when it comes a Red Alert that you have to be really careful.
Thé EU as such does not have the means to protect the external borders of the EU. Italy and Greece are unable on their own to protect that border. If Northern Europeans realise that Merkel was wrong to open the doors to unlimited migration, they should be supporting the creation of an EU defence force to prevent the boats arriving from Africa and the Middle East and be deporting those who are not genuine asylum seekers or refugees or willing and capable of working.
Of course she changed her mind on leaving the EU... thanks Brexit!
The video says ''euro-zone'' not the EU.
She also wanted to leave the EU
If they had listened to all the people in Europe rather than fairies like you, we would never have left.
Well, her personal political agenda is not changed, but she can't do it since the State is involved and committed into EU and it's plans.
@@funghi2606 When?
The answer is not the brexit, but reforms for the eu.
Yes! Starting with abolition of private property and the confiscation of all wealth.
@@hydra7427That's called collectivisation. Are you feeling communist? It has failed everytime it was tried. Will it be different because your leader will be in charge now?
@@hydra7427"You will own nothing and be happy."
@@Hardcore_Remixer You referencing to that one quote from a random Danish politician that was just giving her opinion at the WEF on what the world might become in 2030? The one where she also warned about increased government surveillance?
@@krashme997 Yes. And I refer to the fact that some people, as @hydra7427 can tell us, actually vote for that, and not only the world elites from the conspiracy theory.
There's a serious error here, Meloni was never about leaving EU. That was Salvini (and Di Maio). Meloni in fact always affirmed to want to change EU, leveraging Italy's role as one of the main founding states of the EU. Meloni always was against migration and valuing Christian european culture.
Bravo Italie W Marine Vive la France
True, her group has become "soft euroskeptic," and committed to European membership, while resisting further EU integration (i.e., she likes EU more or less as it is, with a few "improvements").
Reducing bureaucracy is literally what every politician is saying should be done, yet nobody ever does so. Why? Because the bureaucrats are the politicians and their jobs depend on it! Nobody will make themselves redundant.
No, politicians are rarely drawn from the ranks of the bureaucracy. Professional civil servants make poor politicians. The BBC had a hilarious show based on the premise 50 years ago called "Yes, Minister."
@@danz1182 my point is that the bureaucrats are also part of the problem, they resist any reduction of complexity or efficiency improvements that might come from the politicians to the point when new elections take place and their bosses change. Result is the same, nothing happens which might jeopardise their positions.
Bureaucracy keeps me safe from dangerous working environments, contaminated food, bridges that collapse, planes that fall apart in midair, houses that are high flammable etc etc
The red tape that keeps people safe costs business profit which is why they hate it
They trick stupid people like you into thinking they hate it too despite it keeping them safe
Bureaucracy is good
Milei did it
Regarding the wish to leave the EU, even Orban doesn't want that as it would be very unpopular. In Hungary, most big projects are subsidised by the EU. That's also the case (in a smaller volume) for Italy and other southern countries.
The entire US south is subsidized by Democratic states, yet MTG still calls for secession. Reality doesn't matter to them.
Italy is a net contributor to the EU budget. Spain is net neutral. But yes, politics in these countries are trying for decades to make them with time less wealthy than northern Europe, by increasing their indebtment, taxation, and other deliberately sub-optimal policies. Why they are doing that I have no idea.
Its not just that a country is richer or poorer, the coesion funds are given to reagions and in Italy there are a lot of Southern reagions that definitly get money they otherwise would not be given, it was the case for the UK too, poorer regions of England and Wales lost a lot of Funds and despite Promises the Tory government has failed to make up for the losses in public investment, which is odd since they were net contributors after all, but I guess they had different priorities.
@@tomorrowneverdies567 Italy greatly benefits from the EU monetarily by having interest rates on government debt much lower than they would outside the EU
@@tomlxyz why would Italy have higher interest rates if it was not in the EU?
In that logic, Germany also profits from having low borrowing interest rates.
Meloni is just one reason why things are changing. Anti illegal immigration policy and pro farmer policies are raising all over Europe.
err honey, hyper capitalism and libertarian politics doesn´t help farmers, it helps big companies that disguise themselves as farmers.
the current policies are pro farmer lol
EU is the most pro farmer part of the world. 80% of farmers income are from taxes and subsidies, they are the biggest whiners and pollute the climate more than many industries, yet they don't want to do their fair share. Their business is completly state funded yet they whine non-stop.
@@sockosophie3132 You are confusing Meloni for Milei, Meloni is a protectionist at least she presents herself as such
🤔
It’s a “damned if you do, damned if you don’t” situation. Farmers do indeed dislike heavy environmental regulations, and from their standpoint, it is understandable, and I do think that the current green policies in the EU don’t really seem to be working in the long run (Germany banning nuclear energy because of it being “bad for the environment” was a major beuh moment for everyone). Tax breaks for farmers and some concessions for them are definitely good ideas.
However, being environmentally friendly is also very much needed, and this is why I hope that they will refocus their environmental policies instead of reducing them. Here in Hungary, there’s been a massive surge in building battery plants, and this has had many mixed results to say the least. It seems like the authorities here (which are pretty corrupt) don’t enforce many important environmental regulations, and because of this, there’s been massive pollution near these factories, to the point that it’s both really bad for the workers in the factories themselves and the towns where these are located. It’s interesting how these environmental regulations kind of screw over farmers, but the lack of regulation would screw over factory workers (especially because even if you are not working in that factory per se, most people living in the town are from the working class). There must be some sort of compromise.
As for the rest, I am pretty sceptical about them, but there are indeed some solutions needed for stuff like immigration, which is shamefully ignored by the left and even centre, despite there being many problems arising from it. I must say that I am not a huge fan of the EU shifting right as I am not really big on neoliberal policies (albeit like I said, tax breaks and concessions can be a good idea). However, I am still younger, so this might change when I get older, as people seem to get more conservative, at least economically once they secure a well paying job (which hopefully will happen).
Interesting points. Although, the pattern of young people becoming more conservative as they age has certainly been altered as of late.
One would think that a pro lifer like Meloni would be in favor of environmental regulations given the smog problem in Northern Italy. Guess not. Shocker.
Here's the best environmental policy: pressure India, China and Africa to do their fair share instead of trying to overcompensate for them
@@TheWeedIsland India, china and Africa emit less CO2 per capita than most european contries. Specially Africa where there's contries where one person on average lives with a quarter of the emissions of the best european contry. They have to make their share, of course, but the ones using oil for going to pee in the mall are not precisely africans.
@@BlueFrenzy "Per capita" makes sense as these territories have much greater inequality than Europe. OK?
3:48 It's time to stop thinking that Italy is strong in car manufacturing. Italy produces less cars than the Slovak republic. Fiat, after blocking or acquiring every other local car manufacturer, is no more, Stellantis has legal and fiscal headquarters outside Italy. The only thing that remains is the obsession of the average italian with car-centric culture, a landscape with little public transportation and even less cycling infrastructure.
It have zero relevance in this context. 🤔
@@danielefabbro822 truth hurts…
@@danielefabbro822 It is relevant indeed: to defend car manufacturing in Italy, nowadays, goes against the interests of the majority of italians.
@@markotrieste bs. Luxury italian brands make up a huge percentage of gdp. Most of these are on italian soil
@@markotrieste the point is that no one have any interest in "defending", whatever that could mean, a private corporation when it makes its wrongdoings.
We Italians don't have such problem. We have always criticized FIAT for their actions.
The young lady is an excellent host. Calm and clear. Thank you.
She is ours saver from evil from the Middle East and Africa
Please dont bring Orban into anything. A bigger Moscow chil does not exist! Also, I'm not sure Italy of all countries should be complaining about EU bureaucracy when they themselfs are the worst country in Europe when it comes to it.
Ireland: hold my brown envelope
I mean I don't really see your point. If Italy's bureaucracy is shit then nothing should be done for EU bureaucracy? I'm sorry but this does not make any sense. Moreover Italian bureaucracy sucks because of different problems present with criminal organizations not because people are stupid and don't think about it. It is slow because there are huge numbers of checks to avoid Mafia collusion inside the institutions. In the past Italian bureaucracy had huge reforms to make it faster, the result? Mafia got deeper into the institutions.
I'm pretty sure what you said is a logical fallacy but I don't remember the name.....
Orban doesn't have a lot of votes anyway, if the left changes their view on immigration and multiculturalism they will win every election from now to 2100........ 🤷🏻♂️
Are you out of your mind? That award goes to Germany hands down.
There is a difference between accepting legal immigrants and accepting anyone who shows up on the Italian coast
…. Accepting?
We still have a moral obligation to save human lives.
The point is that after saving them, those who have no will to remain in Italy should leave the country in either other European countries that are directly responsable for this tragedy or back to their native countries.
But EU treaties deny us to do that. Moreover the new ESM that some European countries wants to make, plans to dump their migrants here in Italy. A criminal act if you ask me.
If such plan come into effect, we should ask back all the trillions of Euro we wasted with the former ESM without getting anything back.
As few knows, Europeans have kept our money without troubles of morality or legitimacy.
Italy is always treated like a secondary power of Europe while we are the Third economy, we are still growing and all these supposedly "superior" or "great powers" of Europe instead are quickly falling apart, with their economies crumbling like rotten houses.
I don't know how much would be convenient to ignore and mock Italy in this moment.
@@Banter07 thanks
I mean you have to accept them on your land, to possibly then send them back if they arent refugees. You cant just refuse them and let them drown, unless of course you are a demon that likes human death, but surelly not?
Who is legal
I would love to have heard more of your analysis of Meloni's strongly pro-Ukrainian policies, particularly as they contrast with those of potential partner Fides. Unless I missed one recently, it's worth a whole nother video.
It is unlikely that Orban would join the ECR. Him and Meloni are increasingly at odds with each other. Orban is not a right wing conservative, he is an opportunist who will do anything to get more votes and more power. He has achieved that by being putins puppet inside the EU. Meloni is a real, run-of-the-mill conservative, who supports a free market economy, nato, and opposes russia.
Same. I'd love that too. I bet one thing is to try to change a few bits from inside eu but going against the US - atlantic agenda is a whole other matter. Plus yes, the fracture between russia and northern european countries seems to be slowing down the "frugal countries" so...
Simply, Meloni has no other choice than to follow the USA, so if the USA support Ukraine, then so does Italy.
@@stefanoruggeri9935
Balle!
Fides Orban è Fides Orban e Giorgia Meloni è Giorgia Meloni.
Sono diversi come diverse sono Italia e Ungheria.
Ci sono enormi inesattezze nel video.
Italy: “EU, I don’t like all your bureaucracy!”
Also Italy: “Help me EU, these jerks are copying our cheese!”
This made me laugh way harder than it should.
Made my day.
Not all Italians will agree with Melonai and cheese will be under protective status.
Italian cheese is worth big bucks that copycat are plain stealing.
What were you saying, exactly?
Honestly i don't understand the joke? Is it bureaucracy safeguarding a brand? Can i open a videogame store and sell a game i decide to call Super Mario?
@@idraotewhat's being stolen exactly when someone makes a wheel of Parmesan in Germany that tastes nearly identical to one made in Italy but at a fraction of the price?
Notwithstanding Meloni, Italy cannot afford to be eurosceptic ... we have an historical posture and we are founders of EU, thats is why Meloni is adapting to reality ...
So all politicians lie and bullishit their way to power
Italy can't afford to be destroyed beyond recognition by the EU
Guy it's not like the rest of Europe is doing so great now... And meloni is far from eurosceptic she even wants an EU army. 🤦♂️
@@ABC-rh7zc the EU is its member states. The EU itself has no power. Calm down, you live in lies.
meloni has just a tremendous fear of real work
Irrespective of whether you're left or right, I think we should be able to agree that Meloni should avoid courting Orban. The guy has basically made himself just a couple steps short of a dictator at this point.
You mean the lady that got her start in fascist youth movements should not idolize dictators? that might be a ship that has long sailed
Based
That's like asking lepen to not use mein kampf as her bedside light reading...
yeah i think we should be able to agree that Meloni should court macron or sunak instead
Orban is a fascist and MEloni is a fascist too, they will always ally. His "dictator" ambitions is not something that Meloni is against, becuase she is anti-democracy as well due to her being on the extreme far right.
Your objectivity is refreshing.
Georgina talking about Giorgia. BRILLIANT (the sponsor of this video)!
Great delivery and clarity. More of this presenter, please.
yes... more... 😶
France, Germany, Hungary, Austria, the Netherlands, Sweden, Finland, Denmark and Portugal (not sure about Spain) have all moved in similar political directions to Italy in some key areas.
Spain too, the elections were an anomaly and the socialists hung on to power barely by ridiculing themselves for the separatists. Look at current polling.
it was more than needed. And I said that as a voter for left parties myself.
and they will all swing to the left in the next five years when they notice that populism leads to nothing good.
Yup. And it causes me no end of anxiety to see it. I'm actively thinking of going to the US or Canada if the EU parliament becomes more right wing (this should be a joke but it isn't)
@@pedromoura1446 If you have marketable skills, Canada will welcome you with open arms. Canada has very high levels of extremely tightly controlled selective immigration which is easy given their relatively inaccessible geography.
2:15 "Meloni's views ...pretty extreme :
... dangers of ethic substitution and dilution of Europe's christian culture"
That is extremism? Seriously?
If you're not absolutely support immigration and the globalist agenda you are immediately classified as "extremist", especially if you come from a European/western country
yes
@@ciaoguys6218 And I am sure the marxist lunatics are pretty serious in their madness,
that is why this frenziness has to stop.
It's not that left-wingers deny the strong possibility that many European countries may become native-minority in the future. They either don't care or actively want that to happen because they hate themselves.
perhaps - however, one cannot ignore/overlook the extreme influx of illegal migration that’s been occurring - many of whom are undesirable and will never become model citizens. A large number of those single men have formed gangs … committing heinous crimes against woman. Those are not the kinds of people a country should invite in. And there should be limits on the numbers permitted in. Common sense is needed. Europe has a mess on its hands … too many instances of crimes perpetrated by migrants. Governments need to address it.
i think it's funny that this news outlet is from britain and they report better than any EU news outlet.
There are people in the UK that know how stupid Brexit is, just very few of them.
They are leftists thats why. This channel is very unpopular in the UK.
@@bzuidgeest- 37% of us .
They are quite good, young guys but am enjoying the channel
@@bzuidgeest Not true. Large and increasing majority recognise its a mistake. Brexit exposed a real divide between young and old, highly educated and less so
She taking real steps towards fiscal discipline and the economy is showing upticks. It’s not talked about much but it’s becoming noticeable
you must be living in a parallel reality, her goverment just passed yet another tax amnesty for evaders like all other right-wing goverments have done in the past 30 years. Where's the fiscal discipline in that?
Now from what I understood, the idea is to pay your back taxes as rated payments while ramping up enforcement. I’m not native Italian so sometimes have trouble with the more advanced language in the newspapers I read here. The UBI (reddito di cittadinanza) is also being phased out for nearly everyone.
Meloni will leave Italy in ruins. Said the same thing to the thick conservative voting monkeys in our country. Only now when they cannot afford proper food, heating or holidays do they acknowledge the disastrous mistakes they have made. They always cut taxes for the rich (their funders and handlers), it always damages the economy and lowers living standards for everyone else. It takes a special kind of moron who thinks giving all your country's money away to those with more than they can spend will leave the average man with more in the pocket. Of course it won't, it never has or will
@Devilm00n That's not true, tax reform is a very important thing, the tax amnesty you are talking about are bad debts under one thousand euros, these are small unpaid amounts from small fines that slowly rose. They are not paid because the tax authorities are very aggressive, and a good part of them are inaccurate like "you owe me 158 euro fine" "where did I get the fine?" In Milan" "but if I live in Rome and I've never been to Milan" "prove me wrong", you could appeal, but it costs more than the amount of the fine. The Reform would change this aggressive attitude as a kind of 'Friendly Taxation', more collaborative and coming to the citizen's aid according to his financial availability, with instalments and discounts.
@@askallois What the hell are you talking about? In her reform she made it so that if you have unpaid taxes and the state is not able to get the money back within 5 years the debt is simply cancelled - knowing the speed of italian bureaucracy how many tax evasors will be able to simply not pay anything because the state wasn't able to go after them within 5 years?
And no we're not talking about debts that are small fines and rose, we're talking about people who have evaded taxes for hundreds of thousands of euros.
We have 1.206,6 billion unpaid taxes here in Italy (that the state knows about, I'd expect the submerged economy would make that number balloon even more) and instead of doing everything in our power to put an end to this crap we keep cutting back on welfare and taxing honest employed workers who have no way to evade taxes.
You need to wake the fuck up my dude, Italy is barrelling towards complete disfunction and destruction
Looser Structures and more national independence is demanded but at the same time more EU-Bonds? That perfectly illustrates how EU-Bonds only benefit the indebted European Counties. Hypocrisy at it’s finest…
If Italy could devalue like it did in the past.... And anyway think for yourself, Italy is at least growing unlike most of western Europe, the only thing Italy need is someone to keep interest rates low so we can reduce debt and not increase debt just to pay interests like we did in the last decades we're Italy was consistently running a primary budget surplus but still increased debt. 🤦♂️ And now economists have widely disproved what the EU did there is even a strong thesis that Italy would have a lower debt to gbp without austerity.
Only the benefits, but non of the obligations. Just a typical populist wanting everything, so when they dont get everything they can go to their voters and blame other people for them not getting anything done.
EU-bonds would benefit the entire Europe IF they will be used for European projects (eg. an European defence). It would be a mistake to use them to finance the member states instead (like they did with the NextGen EU).
@@mpelle129 why use debt to finance the EU? let Southern Europe pay their fair share and there will be more than enough omney.
Italy is already the 3rd largest net contributor, should it be the 1st one? @nox5555
I live in milan and the environment here is garbage. Every other day the air is so bad you can't go outside.
Oh, that's pretty bad. A WHO study just found that air pollution is one of the top 3 best predictors of cognitive decline.
@@DrVictorVasconcelos that explain why meloni believe that climate change doesn't exist.
@@DrVictorVasconcelos 💯....AQI I'd rated as 'poor' currently
You know what surprises me, I live in Croatia on the seaside, and every summer there are countless Italian tourists. I was thinking it's odd that they come for the beaches, but apparently I was told the Italian side of the Adriatic looks green and unclean
what do you suggest should be done
I still don't understand which one of her views are "extreme".... seems that this channel is rather extreme in its bias....
Her political party is quite fascist oriented just compare their outfits on meetings and Mussolini goon squad
Bahaha Italy giving others lessons on bureaucracy is pretty funny
yeah, the irony is strong
@@GNMbg shut up british racists
Try Czechia, Italians are amateurs in this.
@@GNMbg racists
they don't mean the type of bureaucracy that requires you to do a lot of paperwork or something. What they mean is less power to the technocracts and more to the politicians.
As long as there's ongoing disarray amongst EU member states over the issue of irregular immigration, the problem will only get worse and ultimately drive even more EU member states to the Right. This issue was raised in the *New Internationalist* magazine in *September 1991;* the article is still available to read on line and is titled *'Fortress Europe'.*
Recently a new immigration law was passed
@@teaser6089 By who?
@@keyboarddancers7751
EU.
@@keyboarddancers7751 By EU parliament. Half measures and forced relocation which I don't support.
My biggest worry here is the environment policies. If Europe doesn't set an example for other countries, no one else on this globe will. And that's how we'll get hell on earth in some 30 years. Genieten van.
The interesting thing is, that the Global South care about climate change the least, but it will hit them the hardest.
If leftist win we would have no country anyway in the future.... 🤷🏻♂️
I don't care and won't fight for an economic area where I don't even feel at home anymore.
I'm afraid you're right. It seems right-wing parties don't realize the seriousness of climate change and since everyone is focused on immigration, right-wing gets more votes.
In 30 years we won't have a country anymore if the left win....
Oh please. The climate doomsday prophets masquerading as activists have been announcing the imminent end of life on Earth for 60 years, and yet not a single one of their bullshit predictions has come true. And every time we get to the date of the supposed armageddon and nothing happens, instead of admitting they were wrong and apologize, they just double down on the BS and move the date of the apocalypse to ten or twenty years in the future.
[chuckles] I’m in danger!
Yes, very dangerous when democratically elected ppl, voted in by their own constituency win! 🤦♂️
Using terms like "Hard right" reveal your prejudices. Please leave the right as right or refer to the left in the same way eg rampant communist left, or loopy left.
“Ideological issue” science is not ideological. It’s science.
"a system of ideas and ideals, especially one which forms the basis of economic or political theory and policy.
the science of ideas; the study of their origin and nature". (oxford language definition)
Science bows to Ego, Economic and political pressures and needs.
Everything humans believe is ideological.
Nice try.
@@milescoleman3150 Of course every person has a political bias, but the reality is that climate change is a scientific fact based on empirical proof and it's agreed by basically every climatologist on Earth. If you understood how the scientifical model works you wouldn't be saying that.
It is political when the "science" convinces Germany to shut down it's nuclear reactors and replace it with coal.
@@milescoleman3150tell me that you don't understand how science works without telling me you don't know how science works. Nice try to make science a political debate.
science is idelogical, it's like money it has power because people believe in it
Meloni is my hero !
better plan that just leaving the eu
The video says ''euro-zone'' not the EU.
I support Meloni! 👍👍
The earth is heading towards disaster, but won't anyone think of the oil industry and the richest?
Those poor, poor billionaires.
If the left win I won't have a country anyway 🤷🏻♂️
Solar, wind and battery costs are plummeting. The green entry transition will happen sooner than people think. Same with EVs a batteries are the mist expensive part of the car. Cost curves just happen in free markets, it doesn't matter what the politicians or fossil fuels companies think.
The beat thing that can be done to help the environment at this point is diet change. But most people are far too hypocritical for that.
@@jhunt5578the free market hasen't been a thing for decades, too many mega corpos manipulating the market.
Not the Earth. The planet is doing just fine.
WE humans are going towards our extinction.
Lookin good G's. Great delivery. ++
Have illegal immigration actually reduced ?
In Italy? Well yes actually, -64% in the first months of 2024
@@tiziotizios0956 wow , good for y'all .
@@tiziotizios0956compared to 2023 but almost 50% more arrivals by sea than in first quarter 2022.
@@tiziotizios0956any proof/data on that?
@@alahacker8185 Yes, it's true, in the summer there was a real invasion on Lampedusa, every day around 1000/2000 people disembarked and this had a huge impact. We hope that in 2024 these numbers will decrease as in the first three months
ThanksMuch for posting !
Trust, Meloni and friends can reshape caverns only
Eurosceptic is a good term. A little underrated. To call her far right is a compliment to the far right. Everything she sees looks clear to me. Besides common sense people agreeing with her. Those lied to should see the light as well She's pretty down to earth making it easy enough to see her logic.
I like this girl, can we have her narrate more things pls
me too... ;)
Support from The Netherlands 🌷🌷🌷🌷
Believing that supportingTraditional European culture is extreme probably says a great deal about what is wrong with Europe's media today.
It shouldn't be controversial to support and promote our cultural identity.
What is the "cultural identity"?
Judeo-Christianity, Greek and Roman civilisational heritage, monogamy, separation of church and state, national languages, diet and perhaps democracy. @@dalekrenegade2596
@@dalekrenegade2596 Cultural identity- Your shared European history and cultural experience, developed over hundreds or thousands of years.
@@barryhill6507 I ask for specifics not a definition. Far too many really use "cultural Identity" as a Nazi dog whistle or just complaining that not enough white are giving birth(nobody wants to sleep with them).
@@barryhill6507
I asked for specifics not a definition. Need to make sure you're not spewing dog whistles.
We need Italy and Hungary out of the EU ASAP
🎉
Geographically as well?
"If you can't beat 'em, join 'em"
What they call "bureaucracy" are safeguards against extreme policy and political takeover. Not only safeguards against extreme legislation but also protections against Lobbyism. The reason why you need hordes of lobbyists in Brussels is because it is so hard to influence so many different nations in so many languages.
tell me again how regulating how a Romanian grandmother raises a pig, in her own yard, for the own consumption, safeguards against extreme policy and political takeover.
Because for sure it does not help, Romania at this point is the country in the EU where democracy faces the biggest threats.
@@clawy99 The way EU makes laws is quite eloborate and slow ... for a reason and leaves the implementation largly to the members. Undermining that would introduce the option to rule by minority. Something right-winger across are dreaming off using the EU as a centralized government to force their will across 27 countries.
P.S. You can raise your pigs as you like, but when the possibility exists that you sell that meat to EU citizens you fall under regulations and laws like all other farmers in the EU. The laws exists so you cannot take shortcuts because it's cheaper. It ensures consumer protection and fair competition within in the EU.
@@AaronOkeanosyou can't be serious, the completion within EU will never be fair until we all have the same costs.
@@AaronOkeanos Only the most extreme authoritarian right-wingers want to take control of the EU. Most want to let it burn to the ground as it is a fundamentally left-wing institution.
It’s immigration that is the most important, in all countries regardless left(Danish social democrats), right(well every right wing party) and center(Donald Tusk, Mitsotakis, Maja Kallas)Europeans want to protect their culture and history and parties that align win.
Words of wisdom.
It's only "important" because of ignorant moguls and air breathers that convinced other idiots in the electorate than less than 1% of the European population is what's causing "issues", somehow.
If the left changes their view regarding migration they will win every election in the next 100 years..... 🤷🏻♂️
The US soft power are a bigger threat to European cultures than immigrants
Center parties are definitely not anti-immigration. Donald Tusk allowed more immigration once he got into power. Mitsotakis is a flip flopper but his only "hard" stance is to secure the borders with Turkey. His government doesn't deport anyone and they also save the migrants that come and sink their own boats in our seas. Maja Kallas is also not anti immigration.
As for left wing parties, the only one that is anti immigration are the Danish social democrats. And they're soft on it too. They adopted that stance because a right wing party was dwarfing them a couple elections back.
I believe standing against wildlife and finding a better way to get cleaner energy is the wrong choice. True, it might harm agriculture, and I know some people don't want a wind turbine in their yard, but choosing to use non-renewable energy resources instead will damage the environment and agriculture more than opting to use green energy.
nuclear
> Enviromentalism harms the fight against climate change more often than not > Wind turbines are least of my concerns when nuclear gets closed off, and my energy bills rise
"True, it might harm agriculture" - I see people haven't seen anything about history and have no idea what happens when you start going after farmers.
@@Notsogoodguitarguy europe has already experienced african climates once before and plenty of crops struggled. failing to address or at least slow the change in growing conditions will severely affect agriculture across the block.
@@jonathanodude6660 people have also experienced tampering with farmers before. It has lead to famines every single time. What's your point? You think farms are the problem of climate change? Europe's committing a green suicide and isn't even reducing their CO2 usage. We're exporting our usage. We've reduced our emissions by a third I believe, which was already fairly low, while China, India and Africa are ramping up their emissions. The EU can go literally 0 carbon emissions tomorrow and it would change literally nothing. So, why go after farmers? Why not go after industries? Why not start investment funds and support projects for African countries? Why go after farmers?
"Fidesz" is pronounced "FideSS"
Who cares.
@@tubinho79 those who dont care are dumb.
@@ldubt4494I don't care about ruZZian stooges.
Yeah and it stands for "Alliance of Young Democrats" which is hilarious if you look at the people who are actually in it 😂😂😂
@@tomblade in politics 50 year olds are adolescents 🤣
She's the definition of populist politician who wants people to fear so she could exploit these fears. Absolute trojan horse for the European values and a reminder for how low has the Italian public fallen.
"anti-immigration" "climate skepticism" 🤦 these two ideologies are completely conflicting as the climate crisis would INCREASE migration.
When have populists ever thought rationally?
@@unraged6004 yeah the liberals and socialists are so much more rational when they claim "the right" is anti-science while believing there are more than 2 genders.
Destruction of European economy won't "save" the planet even if climate models are correct.
Europe just has to protect it's external borders by force as it did in the past.
I cannot understand just how right-wing parties can want BOTH less green policies and less migration, when we don't pursue green policies, that will cause more people to migrate from areas becoming too hot to live or simply drowning. It's either one or the other, it can't be both.
Don't get it either. Some cu*t somewhere one day said green politics are left wing and the entire right is following.
I don't understand how you believe in things that aren't real.
It's not that middle-eastern areas are becoming too hot to live in, not yet. It's that is fairly easier to emigrate towards EU rather than change your own country for the best. Brain drain is the same thing for developed countries, people find easier to bail towards countries that pay better wages rather than get involved in the system and trying to change it from within. The difference is brain drain happens in accord to every country's law.
You think European green policies have serious effects on global warming?!?! Lol
Europe is a drop in the ocean...
@Procopius464 You have never read a primary source paper in your life, have you?
She's the girlfriend and love interest of Indian 🇮🇳 Prime Minister Narendra Modi, who's also a right-wing politician
1:59
That is an interesting spelling of the word "bureaucracy;" I must say I have yet to be that inventive when it comes to a word describing something so decidedly un-creative.
Use a spellchecker. “Beurocracy” (~1:59) is the worst misspelling of bureaucracy I have ever seen.
It’s a pun bEUROcracy
Yeah... Temperature of waters in Florida reaching 101 degrees (body temperature is 98F btw.), eastern Europe record high temperatures IN OCTOBER, but the biggest problem we're facing is the green deal LMAO.
What Green Deal? There is none. Give me the link or it doesn't exist.
I assume you know how long you need to boil 1 liter of water on your stove? Now imagine heating all oceans of the planet how much energy you need for that. And you think so much extra energy is without serious consequences just because it is as warm as you (for now)?
@@AaronOkeanos Brooo... First of all: I do not use a stove to heat water, because it doesn't comply with the ecological, leftist and globalist agenda, issued during the §420-69's meeting of the European Cabal.
And second, the problem isn't "water suddenly boiling in a cartoon-like fashion, hurting people bathing in it" (which shows that you don't even understand the problem) but instead, the problem is that waters reaching that temperature, is just an another SYMPTOM of what we're seeing all the time, which is: climate change is real, it's related to radiation being trapped between the earth and the atmosphere in an abnormal and elevated way, related to the increase of gas presence in the atmosphere (CO2 being one of them), and anyone who claims that's not the case (whether is you, or the Meloni) is just dumb, anti-scientific, anti-intellectual, coping, in-denial and most likely has undiagnosed schizophrenia.
@@AaronOkeanos First of all: I do not use stoves, since they were deemed as not efficient for purposes of water heating, by the decree 420-69 of the leftist & globalist agenda.
And second: your understanding of the problem as “water boiling people” shows how much you don’t even understand the problem: waters displaying record high temperatures is one of the (many) SYMPTOMS, that not only confirm that climate change is real, but it confirms also that we’re done with looking at global warming as at a problem of the future, because “future” tends to become “now” once enough time passes, and thus we see the climate change having its first effects on us and our environment.
Now, you do have two options: own the fact that you’re a denier, and offer us a different model that could (with scientific accuracy) explain and predict the changes that we already see, with a level of accuracy same or higher than the climate change model. Second alternative for you: accept the reality as it is, and accept the findings of scientists who (unlike you) spend their whole lives acquiring knowledge that can be SUCCESSFULLY used to explain and predict reality.
Florida waters are changing because the Gulf current is slowing down. Estimations tell us the current should stop in 2050 if i remember correctly
You lost me after the misspelling of "bureaucracy" on one of the intro cards. 😉😁
Yeah … unless they spell it differently in the UK
Quick Google … nope
I was going to say the same, but then realized it was a pun: bEUROcracy.
@Duodecimal12 Ah! Mea culpa. I hadn't thought of that angle. Thank you for enlightening me.
I'm very pro EU and believe most of the complaints the Right have about it are made up but she is right on both Immigration and Farming. As Michel Rocard once said, we cannot welcome all the misery of the world but we need to take our part, which we did and still do. On the farmer issues, the free market is messing people's life. How is it fair for a farmer in France not to be allowed to use a very efficient product (but ecologically bad) while the same farmer in Spain or Poland is allowed to use it, making their food way cheaper to produce? That's unfair competition. I'm a huge proponent of the free market but it needs to be regulated in a way that everyone competes on the same rules. If a product cannot be made illegal on the EU level, it shouldn't be made illegal on a country level, or those products shouldn't be sold outside their respective countries (which isn't possible as per the current laws). I don't trust Meloni one second but she surprised me on her foreign policies.
So, I understand Meloni's concerns about EU climate requirements impacting small businesses. These are the backbone of Italian industry, and it's true that they'll struggle to adapt.
But why fight the new legislation instead of pushing for assistance and investment? I think it'd be better to turn this into an opportunity to revitalize Italy's stagnating economy than to drag everyone else down into stagnation and eventual climate disaster. I can't imagine that history will remember this kindly.
It's simple, it won't just affect small businesses. The "green transition" is going to affect every european business and increase their operating costs. This will severely limit the ability of european businesses to compete with those of rival markets like the developing asian economies that are also the biggest polluters by far e.g. India. It is already hard enough to compete with those markets given the labor regulations, or lack thereof, over there.
I'm all for preserving the environment, but everyone needs to be playing by the same rules.
@@veckgames Your assertion isn't true. There's obviously a cost to transitioning to greener technologies, but greater efficiency actually LOWERS operating costs.
@@luke_fabis Greater efficiency would indeed lower operating costs, however we are not even remotely close to renewables being as efficient as fossil fuels currently. It is a gap that can only be bridged by technological advancement that will take both significant time and money.
@@luke_fabis The electric bill is almost the same doesn't matter if it comes from coal or the sun . If u have solar panel sure it's better but u still have entry level costs so what ? italy should go back to nuclear
@@luke_fabis the issue isnt that they dont want new, better machines. the issue is that the EU want to increase to paperwork for everything.
3:50 the most italian man in the world
Well well well, seems like its slowly dawning on Brussel that "democracy" does not mean "agree with us and do what we say, or else".
When was it ever like that?
@@jeckjeck3119 2015, when they tried to force member countries to take their "fair share" of illegal migrants?
@@jeckjeck3119 since 2011
@@giuliomicali7994
In what way?
@@jeckjeck3119 in 2011 Prime Minister Berlusconi had been framed in the same way their trying with Trump, then he was substituted (without any kind of election) by Monti, an EU "operative", followed by 10 years of puppets.
Meloni keeps looking over at the UK and see what would happen if Italy left the EU. Farmers are another reason why they can’t leave EU as subsidies are key to keeping that voting block happy. Immigration policy is what EU will bend on as it will be popular on left and right.
I want less immigration, asylum seekers must apply in their own country, one European army, less bureaucracy, choose either Brussels or Strasbourg, fewer representatives, direct representation (real European parties with an election theme instead of a collection of local parties), a economic policy that brings European countries together instead of playing them off against each other, infrastructure and waterways must be adjusted so that countries such as Turkey, China, Russia, etc. no longer play a significant role.
agreed. Brussels can be overbearing sometimes, and a more efficient bureaucracy would be good.
Asylum seekers applying in their own country? Are you fr
You clearly have no idea of what is happening in those countries, aren't you?
when you're the second largest economy in the world, in China's case, you are going to be playing a very significant role automatically.
Good but don't forget getting out of NATO we need our own defense system of only european countries no America or Turkey.
As it happens, with the support of the Greens, Ursula didn't need Meloni's support to be re-elected or to form a new gov't.
1:59 "beurocracy" TLDR still doesn't proofread
Lol
even if you proof read it's hard to see every detail. not like the internet where literally thousands read everything in a couple of minutes
I can spell bureaucracy either. I rely on autocorrect.
To be fair, no one knows how to spell it correctly. We just know when it looks wrong.
That's French for too much butter.
I heard a wonderful idea recently about changing our views that human society is separate from nature.... Countless animals and plants have adapted to thrive in human altered environments. If we started treating cities, farms, and ranches as human-influenced environments while making space for wildlife? We'd solve a lot of problems~ But we do still need to preserve what would places we have left as much as possible. Learning how to safely and healthily incorporate wildlife in our human environments? We could makes lives better for all living souls~
03:11 Interesting that she still sees it as an ideologic thing after what has been happening year after year in every Summer in Italy - specially after the crazy Summer of last year. It's quite obvious that climate change is a thing and anyone that denies its existance doesn't understand the difference between climate and weather.
climate has had many vast swings for millions of years and science proves it. before mankind invented cars or used coal, there were huge periodic climate swings/changes. You are too close to the trees to see the forest - so back up a bit.
great content!
7:19 seems to be missing a frame or something :)
In the end it is pretty simple. More power for every country means less power as an global political player. Because we always played against each others in our little european world.
If we want to act together and bring geopolitical weight we have to give up some local tiny power .
Another way would be to work together with full local power and form a geopolitical power. But this is more unlikly than riding on an unicorn in the clouds. European history shows it never happens before and it will become even more unlikely with more members.
So the only practical way is to cut power of each country and give it to EU. Otherwise we will give up all geopolitical power to China and USA.
EU is controlled by Germany and France. So by cutting power of each country and giving it to EU you mean Germany and France. My country was controlled few times by Germany and last time it ended in genocide. So thank you very much for that advice, but I think that many countries will disagree. The whole dependence on Russia is widely Germany fault not to mention immigrant crisis.
@@violet_green4335 I fully agree.
If it have to be a Union, it must be a Union where everyone have equal rights and opportunities.
Otherwise it's just a soft version of tyranny.
Nope. The EU doesn't work this way. To give smaller countrys more vote power their vote weight is much bigger than people rich countrys. So in the end an maltese has much more vote power than a German or a French. Besides I guess you are more a russian troll . They are always bring the genocide card no matter which theme or it is whataboutism. So both ways your comment is not relevant in this context. So try harder.
>Because we always played against each others in our little european world.
Yet we were far more relevant in the world scale than we are now.
>If we want to act together and bring geopolitical weight we have to give up some local tiny power .
That only works if EU wide policies are made by competent people. To me it doesn't look like that's the case or has been for a few years. Maybe it was in decades past, but nowadays all I see are incompetent, feckless policies that only keep European countries back. Like this obsession with regulating everything, even before it's come out, like Artificial Intelligence. While actually important countries like China or the United States are fostering AI because they know that'll give them an edge on the world scale, we're preventing people from using it and shooting ourselves in the foot.
>Otherwise we will give up all geopolitical power to China and USA.
You mean like the EU banning ICE cars, forcing people to go and buy electric cars that are mostly made outside the EU, in China and the US?
@@h.inusitatuswhat are ICE cars?
The eu needs to protect nature more instead of listening to countries like Italy because nature is in decline all around the world and Europe could become one of the most nature depleted continents in the world.
Cars are one of the biggest producer of greenhouse gases anywhere in the world and they should be more regulated so that companies could get prosecuted if a car exceeds the greenhouse gas limit.
How come the eu is allowing italy to send migrants to Albania when the uk gets blocked for trying to send them to Rwanda.
Based Meloni.
She wrote about "ethnic substitution" in her autobiography, which is a rebrand of the great replacement theory. Not far-right btw...
Not far right and not even a theory. It's actually happening.
@@SirAlric82 [source needed]
@@CartaplexUS Source needed? go for a walk in a city...
@@Lodovoh my god, I cringed so fucking hard
@@ashenminthe said nothing that wasn't correct. Europe needs a reset...
I'm not against EU reforms that looks at areas where the EU needs to give members more autonomy, a too heavy handed top down authority in Brussels could be disatrous. Also the bureacracy of the EU is too large we need less regulation for business to innovate
4:27 Translation: "We don't like the EU's strict proposals which mildly lower our lifestyle for the benefit of everyone and the planet. Instead, we want what the US has: A free market where nobody can be held accountable and we can blame poor people for everything." Italy is not a third world country, and what she does is just selfishly trying to maintain or improve her personal conditions at the cost of other people and the environment, when she could realise that her actions are only postponing the doom that arrives on Earth to the next generation rather than contributing to fixing the issues.
"Mildly" my ass. The EU's green house plan alone will force italians to spend tens of thousands of € in order to make their home "energy efficient" or risk having their property become unsellable and thus worthless. And that's just ONE of the "genius" ideas coming out of Bruxselles. Meanwhile China and India keep polluting the atmosphere without a care in the world, making all the EU's green plans useless.
@@SirAlric82EU green plans aren’t useless. Cope and seethe
That’s not how the USA works at all.
@@xyeB - I see UA-cam keeps deleting my comments. But i'll repeat myself and see if this comment gets deleted too. There is no point in Europe going green when the rest of the world doesn't since we share one common atmosphere.
@@SirAlric82 That's the same sort of excuse a child would make to not do their homework, since they found out that their sibling was slacking.
The difference between the so called EU-optimists and EU-sceptics is in their approach to EU policies, not their opinion on the EU in general. Both are heavily pro-EU.
Wasn't this channel calling her far right about a year ago? Perhaps you should stop branding people?
beacuse she is
@@sergiostudios She wants to lower immigration and isn't a fan of many climate policies. I'll go out on a limb and say those aren't even really right-wing (or left-wing) views. Right wing is all about supporting natural rights and individual responsibility while the left-wing believe in civil rights and equality. These are more economic and cultural issues and I could see her views being said by both socialists and conservatives.
Here's a way Meloni IS Reshaping Europe as well.
U.K.- London- April 3rd, The Telegraph: Headline, "Italy's Meloni Is Doing What Basket-Case Britain Could Only Dream Of."
Germany- Bonn- April 3rd DW (Deutsche Welle) "Italy Is Overtaking Germany As Europe's Economic Powerhouse."
Straight from two major mainstream news publications in these two different countries. So "straight from the horses mouth" as they say, which makes it very hard to argue it's validity. Why would they Need to say this, and on the Same day, to boot? Now Germany has the 'stated' 3rd largest economy in the Entire world, Easily 2nd largest stated per capita GDP, and very possibly even 1st, really. So how could Germany, in particular, write a Headline like this, to their own citizenry even? Yet they surely Did. Well, I know, and 'they' know. Now the article itself doesn't say much, to me, and doesn't explain things very well at all actually. It doesn't give a lot of 'real facts.' But I am certain this is Intentional. But read what the headline says. That is the important "statement" here. How many of their own viewers and readers in Germany or around the world do you think would say this is true? Yet, that is their own "Headline." So ya, Giorgia Is reshaping some things in Europe, not just 'Trying.'
"Everyone who disagrees with me is far-right." 🙄
Thank you Georgia for putting Italy first!
Like right wing everywhere it not for Italy people in control of rich and mafia,
no, the things you disagree with is what makes you far-right
@GNMbg supporting autonomy for your country and stricter border controls is not far-right. Everything that the ignorant consider to be far-right was, only 20 years ago, considered common sense.
@@mikesiciliano210 "Stricter border controls" - bro, Italy is in the Schengen area.
@@diogorodrigues747 and what does that have to do with immigration from North Africa and the Middle East?
Why the heck should we pay other countries to oblige our law???
The thing is about popularise movements, what they actually want to push and what they can push is very limited to what the people want.
We should remember after all that most of them got into power because of angry voters that are not happy with the established parties, they want change but they don't want the country to be turned upside down with radical policies, hence why they tone it down to appeal to more people, in other worlds, many of them become more moderate, the only exception to that rule is if the population becomes radical in high numbers, which is rare and if that did happen, then there are far more problems than it seems, as it is, it's mostly angry voters of how the established lot are dealing with things.
With that said, reforms are clearly needed to the EU, but I think it's more in integration in key areas that's needed, maybe some areas could be loosened, but if we are going to improve our effectiveness and economy, which is probably what most people complain about, the economy, that we can achieve more together.
The real question is, how to go about the reforms, what areas need more integration and if there are any areas that could be done better more at a local level, and I don't mean national level, I mean local region level.
In any case, the world around us is going to force change on us in directions that some want and others don't, in a world of superpowers, it's likely going to put more pressure on us to integrate more into the EU just to stay competitive and to protect our interest, at an individual EU country level, we are too small compared to the big players, which allows the superpowers to divide and play us off each other, which they do all the time, in other words, we need to find solutions of having a cohesive voice among it's members and through the EU if we really want to protect our interest, the alternative is a slow decline, and in the end, the changes we do in the EU will likely drift in the direction of more integration in key areas because of the political and economic realities of the world, especially of a polarised US that's becoming less trustworthy, an aggressive Russia that's becoming more war like and an ambitions China, the changing world is likely going to push us to integrate more even if we don't want to do so.
People feel that the established parties have terrible policies which are leading their countries in exactly the wrong direction to what they want. More European integration will entrench these terrible established party policies. It will make it even harder to do the 180º turnaround they want, at the local or the European level. It will mean more terrible people like Thierry Breton trying to reduce EU citizens' freedom of speech to Chinese levels. That’s not the kind of “keeping up with China” they want.
If European countries had more ability to diverge from each other, eventually one of them would flourish by doing the opposite of the current terrible consensus policies. There would then be a powerful practical counterexample which other countries could imitate.
@@georgesdelatour "It will mean more terrible people like Thierry Breton trying to reduce EU citizens' freedom of speech to Chinese levels. That’s not the kind of “keeping up with China” they want." - you clearly have no idea of what you're saying.
The EU needs to become more an economic bloc and less of a political institution
@@teaser6089 To cope with the current emerging new world order the EU must be even more united in things like foreign policy and defense.
@@teaser6089 The European Union is a left-wing institution. Their entire ideology is based on a vision of complete equality and that can only be achieved with world government.
There does need to be reform, less centralization and more fiscal responsibility. It’s obvious by the rise of crime and extreme right wing parties that mass immigration was a mistake. At the same time leaving the EU is not the answer but Germany and France should not control the EU just because of their economy size
A huge yet common misunderstanding of political commentators is to confuse EU goals with the goals of the current left-of-center coalition governing the EU.
Meloni doesn’t want to weaken or destroy the EU, as Brexiteers did. She wants a strong EU… with her party at the helm.
That's a dumb idea that will never happen though. She would be delusional to think it won't be some combination of Germany/France/Poland calling most of the shots.
@@Capt.Thunder “her party” in the European sense of the word, that is ECR.
France is not the same as Macron and Germany is not the same as Scholz.
@@paologat Fair, but I mean, the European Parliament is a farce. Even the Commission is arguably just subservient to France and Germany's interests. Poland is big enough it might muscle in on that pie in the future, but for now it's the big two that have final say on policy, they're the ones bankrolling it.
"Left-of-center"?! LOL
Neither Macron nor Tusk are "left", they're from the liberal right. Even Scholz isn't that leftist at all.
I like Giorgia Meloni very much. I think she is right on target and I like what she is doing and trying to do. I support her fully in what she is trying to do.
5:50 How is that tough language? That should be absolutely common language.
Imagine Viktor Orban saying the exact same thing with the exact same words. You'll figure it out.
It's a change in rhetoric compared to the previously commonly held position of not openly stating that some people will simply not be allowed in. Despite that already and always having been the case in practice, that is a change in rhetoric.
It should, but the Germans are strongly against it. So are leftists all over Europe.
@@Hardcore_Remixer thing is in case of people like Orban using it it doesn't mean the same, the selection of people is different. Besides that, he doesn't want immigrants going into Hungary because they mainly want to go through Hungary and not stay in it and if Hungarians see that they realize how bad of a job he does
@@tomlxyz So your argument is "It is different because Orban isn't one of our guys."
I get it. When Merkel sais it it means real right wingers won't get that position and when Orban sais it it means only real right wingers will get that position. And you are basically telling me that the first is good and the second is bad because you don't like the idea of real right wingers getting a certain high position.
Full support❤
I feel an impending sense of doom when I see people elect politicians who don't take climate change seriously. Climate change is a huge issue and I think we all know it, but for some reason most people and politicians avoid it or put it in the back-burner. When everyone realizes their mistakes it will be too late.
Scientists started sounding the alarm about climate change in the 1970s. Some choices in the new race to finally address climate change don’t make sense.
We are at the end of a glacial era. Look at the future projections if you think now is allarming lol. You know the poles? They WILL melt. It is simply nature. Humans are too narcisistics to understand we can't control everything
💚💚🤍🤍❤❤ Buongiorno ITALY 💚🤍❤Molte Grazie Prime Minister GEORGIA MELONi 💐 Ciao iTALY , Have a good day
I guess we will continue to see an increasing frequency of weather related rice crop failure in Italy if Meloni gets her way. Bravissimo signora! 😂
Veneto ruled by the far right did everything necessary to prevent climatic issues and wasn't underwater Emilia ruled by the left did nothing and was underwater.... 🤡🤡🤡
Weather is savage nowadays.
Theres a Yellow Alert right now over North Italy. That is not that bad.
It's when it comes a Red Alert that you have to be really careful.
Veneto ruled by the right did everything necessary to stop climate catastrophes Emilia ruled by the left didn't.... Guess who went underwater?
Veneto ruled by the right did everything necessary to stop climate catastrophes, Emilia Romagna ruled by the left didn't..... And went underwater...
Climate catasrophe happened in a left region btw where they chose not to invets in preventing flooding
Political leaders are like football team managers, you don't always get the best ones tio run a country. Fortunately, Italy have a good one this time👍
Great job Italy 🇮🇹. Support from Latvia 🇱🇻
This comment turned me into a Russia supporter. You achieved the impossible.
Ez Plan.....Make More Melons in Europe For The Soda Industry 🙃
British leader should take a leaf out of her book.
They have been as right wing as her for the past 30 years, look where that got em
Watching this makes me want to move to Italy
We dont need more integration. We need the EU to potect the external borders of the EU.
Thé EU as such does not have the means to protect the external borders of the EU. Italy and Greece are unable on their own to protect that border. If Northern Europeans realise that Merkel was wrong to open the doors to unlimited migration, they should be supporting the creation of an EU defence force to prevent the boats arriving from Africa and the Middle East and be deporting those who are not genuine asylum seekers or refugees or willing and capable of working.
Very good presentation
Remember everyone, just because she does her work right doesn't mean her ideologies are justified
But they are? Europeans are tired of the Islamist invasion. It’s time to stop it.
But one can admire her competence just as one can appreciate the tactics of war
'Fidesz' is to be read as 'FEE-dess', not 'fee-DESH': 'sz' is read as 'sh' in Polish but as 's' in Hungarian. Pretty confusing.
What's fidesh?
Hungarian conservative party.
@@Siranoxz For such well infomed news channel one would assume that they look up how to pronounce names.
You need to protect your culture & protect values .
Views that the majority of people agree with are not extreme; the nauseating self-righteousness of this channel is sometimes quite astonishing.
Boy if this is what you call "self-righteous..."
Majority of people in Italy before 1942 was not extreme, by your majoritarian bullshit logic.