Battletech Lore - Weapon Classes and Types Overview

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 21 вер 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 74

  • @Lightman0359
    @Lightman0359 3 роки тому +24

    For those curious, Autocannon 5 [of any variant] spit out 50 KG of ammo per trigger pull [20 Shots per ton], while AC/20s drop 200 kg of ammo. In the case of Ultras and standards, these are solid slug, for LB-X, these are shotgun style sub-munitions and for rotary, many chain-fed smaller rounds. a 440 lb shotgun shell is what an LB-20-X Autocannon fires, that's enough to invalidate 1 metric ton of solid steel armor and then some.
    Gauss Rifles fire a 125 kg lawn dart [8 shots per ton].
    Also when you hear "machine gun", don't think BAR. think Vulcan cannon. A clan MG weighs 250 KG and spits out 5kg of dakka in 1 trigger pull.

  • @juancholo7502
    @juancholo7502 5 років тому +46

    In the old Battletechnology Magazine from the 1980s, they had an article/articles explaining how & why the weapons worked. At that time it was said that BattleMech's (& Vehicle) special armor was excellent at stopping High Speed Kinetic Penetrators ie Tank Cannons, but would chip away & ablate off from fragments & slower blunt force attacks. Energy weapons would also ablate the armor. Auto-Cannons were descended from Anti-Aircraft guns firing fragmentation Flak Rounds. This is why you have big blocks of armor you have to scrub away & why Vehicles don't use Tank Guns anymore.

    • @GrimDarkNarrator
      @GrimDarkNarrator  5 років тому +11

      Interesting. Thanks for sharing!

    • @jamesricker3997
      @jamesricker3997 5 років тому +5

      Tank cannons still exist in lower tech forces. They have -3 damage against armor.

    • @HalIOfFamer
      @HalIOfFamer Рік тому

      Hey I know it's been 3 years but you got some sauce on why mechs are 10x as big as a tank yet somehow weight about the same or less? What part of them is so light that somehow can't be put on tanks instead to make them basically indestructible.

    • @juancholo7502
      @juancholo7502 Рік тому

      ​@@HalIOfFamer I don't have anything specific. In the early versions of the game (80s up to the mid-late 90s), Battlemechs were described as being usually around 30 ft tall, ie they can mostly hide behind usual 2-3 story buildings.
      While vehicles need hydraulics, suspensions, drive shafts, etc. for movement, a Battlemech only needs a basic framework articulated skeleton around which Myomer fibers are wrapped like muscles. Myomer fibers expand & contract when electricity is applied & they act like muscles. The Fusion Power Plant produces the energy for movement & to power any energy weapons. Technically since all that is required for the Myomers to function is electricity, that is why Mechs can be powered by I.C.E. engines. Note that I.C.E. mechs can't use energy weapons because the engines don't produce enough energy. Anyways, that is also why the majority of Mechs (at least originally) are humanoid in shape & more bug like ones were unusual or rare.
      As years went by & artists either didn't know, or the Rule of Cool took over, & Battlemechs have been drawn as being bigger & bigger & bigger. It also didn't help that the Battlemech miniatures & vehicles are out of scale with the hex maps & building chits that were included in the early game.
      The cockpits are also described as being "in the head" but if you look at the early Battlemechs, especially the Japanese anime inspired ones, 1/2 to 2/3s of the pilot was in the Center Torso with only 1/2 to 1/3 sticking up into the Head, but if the Head was destroyed half the pilot would be gone also.
      I hope this helps.

  • @KillerOrca
    @KillerOrca 4 роки тому +14

    "We're gonna be here till Nurgle takes a bath."
    Depends on the bath my man XD

  • @KageRyuu6
    @KageRyuu6 5 років тому +24

    The vehicle flamer is a petroleum based weapon not a fusion based weapon, hence why it has ammo.

  • @Sapper21b10
    @Sapper21b10 5 років тому +21

    We’re gonna be here till papa Nurgle takes a bath LOL. Love it. And not far from the truth!!

  • @UCSPanther20
    @UCSPanther20 4 роки тому +11

    I like the autocannons. There's just something about using a weapon with gunpowder and metal in a universe where lasers and particle beams are prevalent.

  • @alexandarvoncarsteinzarovi3723
    @alexandarvoncarsteinzarovi3723 3 роки тому +7

    The main advantage of the energy weapons usage is that they no longer need to carry much ammo or none at all, in the case of laser or PPC's you just need a strong power supply & cooling system, high power energy canons can shred even the strongest mechs, during the Golden Age of the Star League Aerospace Heavy Fighters were apt mech killers, capable of taking down even the mighty Atlas just like our world gunship/choppers or The Fairchild Republic A-10 Thunderbolt II taking out tanks,
    the Star League had also refined the usage of conventional ammo but in projectiles ignition, fuel and components, the fact remains that while energy weapons are more effective at taking out heavy or fast stuff, solid ammo is still a must have,

  • @cliffcampbell8827
    @cliffcampbell8827 2 роки тому +3

    I think battletech also has the railgun which falls under the ballistic category, subsection: really big gauss cannon. Used on and against capital ships.

  • @christopherkent2359
    @christopherkent2359 2 роки тому +2

    Much like Oliver would utter....."Please sir I'd like some more". Your videos are both entertaining and informative in the extreme! If you are conducive to the idea, and time permits please continue with your efforts:-)

  • @77Arcturus
    @77Arcturus 5 років тому +2

    Thank you GrimDark Narrator for the deliciously detailed weapon specs.
    Happy gaming :)

  • @Daimon-X
    @Daimon-X 5 років тому +2

    So much Dakka. This does put a smile on my face...

  • @hf117j
    @hf117j 2 роки тому +2

    I prefer the PPC's. Specifically the ER PPC's. No minimum range which means I can get up close and personal with a very painful punch to any unsuspecting light mech. I use that paired with an lbx type AC 10 to make double sure light mechs are just victims. And on top of that the PPC's short out ECM (Electronic countermeasures) for a few seconds. Which means if I know there's someone trying to be sneaky, I can hurt them while making sure my team knows too. And that's in my 55 ton Shadow Hawk. Jump capable as well. When I'm controlling it, it competes with lights in agility and mobility. Just lower top speed. It is specifically modified to kill off light mechs. And if you see my heavy class mech it is a 75 ton Marauder that has less weapons than normal. I stripped the medium lasers out for additional heat sinks, swapped the PPC's for ER PPC's. And that means the very hard hitting thing I mentioned before? Now it has two of them. And the autocannon I have mounted changes between the favored lbx 10 or the rotary 5. Now you might not think it but I selected my variant very carefully. It is jump capable and still very maneuverable. Still designed to wipe out light mechs by the lance and can still snipe with the ER PPC's. All of my mechs are vicious at range. But the closer you get, the more they hurt, and the more you realize they were built to be ready for anything

  • @eopatcjo
    @eopatcjo Рік тому +1

    He's doing The Blake's work.

  • @paulhuston9991
    @paulhuston9991 5 років тому +3

    Well done sir keep the battle tech coming! I do believe the Papa nurgal's bath is going to be nice and warm from all this dakka. Great way to hit the major weapon tech new players are guaranteed to run in to.

  • @Eulemunin
    @Eulemunin 5 років тому +9

    More PPC’s!

  • @billrich9722
    @billrich9722 3 роки тому +2

    I enjoy your content. I just wish the “without further ado,” part took place immediately. We all know why we’re here.

  • @benlaskowski357
    @benlaskowski357 4 роки тому +3

    I prefer Rotary ACs, personally: A fuckton of firepower in a mini size compared to similarly-powerful ACs. And beam lasers too: simple. The SRM4 is my mssl system: no frills and a small scatter pattern. Useful.

    • @venerablebrothergoriate5844
      @venerablebrothergoriate5844 3 роки тому

      OMG YEAH. RACS, SRMs and PPCs for me. I like to brawl with options for a constant stream of damage, and options for delivering a heavy blow with a single slick

  • @TrenMT
    @TrenMT 5 років тому +3

    Is that first picture an Argus? If so, incredible.

    • @GrimDarkNarrator
      @GrimDarkNarrator  5 років тому +1

      It might be a different setting altogether but it does looks a lot like an Argus.

  • @kishinasura1989
    @kishinasura1989 8 місяців тому +1

    Once in a game i took the customization a bit to far with my crusader i had 2 5 ultra atoucannons on each arm instead of missiles and lrm 10s in the shoulders needless to say i was dealdy at any range especially since i would grapple a mech the unload in it's joins or cockpit

  • @antytrend
    @antytrend 5 років тому +4

    Considering autocannons rapid fire is my least favorite thing.

  • @sreckocuvalo8110
    @sreckocuvalo8110 5 років тому +3

    Somebody seriously thought that waiting 200 years to use long-range missiles on the battlefield was by any stretch of imagination possible? we have this now and we are 5 years from flamers according to lore!

    • @GrimDarkNarrator
      @GrimDarkNarrator  5 років тому

      Remember this was conceived in the 80's. The future was way more funky back then.

    • @ghoulbuster1
      @ghoulbuster1 2 роки тому

      We are closer to this technology that expected, fusion engines are already being made.

  • @kapitan19969838
    @kapitan19969838 3 роки тому +1

    4:20 it's represented in the game! 😄

  • @scottoeltjendiers6007
    @scottoeltjendiers6007 5 років тому +1

    Great video more please

  • @unclesam1756
    @unclesam1756 3 роки тому +1

    More dakka!

  • @traviscochran6280
    @traviscochran6280 5 років тому +1

    I have to say, if I am playing a game with advanced tech, the LBX 10 is the way to go.

    • @venerablebrothergoriate5844
      @venerablebrothergoriate5844 3 роки тому

      CAR king Crab can pack 4 of them bad boys, 2 for each arm, if you’re okay with ditching the missiles up top

  • @monstergirllover2363
    @monstergirllover2363 5 років тому +7

    Waaaaaagggghhhh wait wrong game

  • @54032Zepol
    @54032Zepol 2 роки тому +1

    Imma firing my laser!! 🔫

  • @GorVala
    @GorVala 4 роки тому +1

    Awsome video

  • @sheilaolfieway1885
    @sheilaolfieway1885 5 років тому +1

    covering all the weapons and their subtypes in a video would take a day or two.....

    • @GrimDarkNarrator
      @GrimDarkNarrator  5 років тому

      That's true. It would also be as exciting as narrating the phone book :D

    • @sheilaolfieway1885
      @sheilaolfieway1885 5 років тому

      @@GrimDarkNarrator yeah not to mention civil war tech and jihad tech and solaris 7 tech..

  • @scambonehambone7655
    @scambonehambone7655 5 років тому +1

    Should be an option to vent excess heat as a close range attack. Weaponized mech farts.

  • @floridaman3823
    @floridaman3823 5 років тому +1

    BATHS FOR NURGLE! THAT THE PLAGUES MAY DIE AND RISE AGAIN!

  • @monstergirllover2363
    @monstergirllover2363 5 років тому +1

    "throws water on nurgle" lol

    • @GrimDarkNarrator
      @GrimDarkNarrator  5 років тому

      Water evaporates.

    • @monstergirllover2363
      @monstergirllover2363 5 років тому

      "unholy screeching of slaanesh" reeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee

    • @fabiocosta3830
      @fabiocosta3830 5 років тому

      @@GrimDarkNarrator more likely:
      "Water touch. Runs down Grandfather's skin. Water turns oily, then sludge, and finally takes the form and consistency of clay. Stinky, cancery, corrosive clay"

  • @phycosam2869
    @phycosam2869 5 років тому +1

    what is the name of the mech at 1:45 anyone

    • @GrimDarkNarrator
      @GrimDarkNarrator  5 років тому

      I think that's actually not a Battletech mech, but the closest thing would be an Argus.

    • @phycosam2869
      @phycosam2869 5 років тому

      @@GrimDarkNarrator thanks

  • @king0vitrial
    @king0vitrial 5 років тому

    Don't tempt fate, Nurgle could spite us by "bathing" in swamp backwash.

  • @Manglet762
    @Manglet762 5 років тому +1

    I'm not sure if you're pronouncing it right where you are from, but for Americans at least, Jaguar is pronounced Jag-ooh-are (last two syllables are pronounced almost at the same time. Not sire if that makes sense.)

    • @GrimDarkNarrator
      @GrimDarkNarrator  5 років тому

      I think I get what you mean. We pronounce it a bit different due to the accent, I guess.

  • @robertagren9360
    @robertagren9360 3 роки тому +1

    Idiotic designs. Two machineguns next to each other.

  • @charlesballiet7074
    @charlesballiet7074 3 роки тому

    man screw these 15 min format videos

  • @ShadowAxon
    @ShadowAxon 2 роки тому +1

    Very clear and concise. Thank you.