@@balin7889 Dude, I am still living. I made that recording about the time of my 21st birthday. I am now 81 years old and still playing (more or less!).
In the 1947 revised version, Stravinsky added the tempo marking of mm = 116. You may see the music here: sfiles.webservices.illinois.edu/2036/trumpet_audition_materials_spring_2013.pdf. I have shown the 1911 first edition because it is in the public domain, whereas the 1947 version is still under copyright protection. You may think 116 is too rushed, but Stravinsky did not.
@@kbreezy2025 Exactly! I have no problem if this is fast, but consistency is very important. Rushing (to me) doesn't mean playing it at a fast consistent tempo. Rushing (to me) means playing at a staring tempo, and (unintentionally) speeding up during a passage, or ending faster than you started.
The tempo of this recorded performance is exactly mm = 116, which is what Stravinsky specified in the revised edition (not shown here for copyright reasons). It is often played slower.
Well played - made it sound easy!
That was amazing
Watch the tempo/tone man, but overall, great playing.
Check the description
Smeeth I don't mean you are playing it too fast, its a great tempo, I mean you are rushing on those 16th runs.
@@hu954 dude the person who played it is probably dead, this was recorded in 1963. Pay attention for gods sake
@@balin7889 the dude that uploaded this made made the recording
@@balin7889 Dude, I am still living. I made that recording about the time of my 21st birthday. I am now 81 years old and still playing (more or less!).
Articulations are waaay to “fluffy” and tempo is fluctuating too much.
The guy recorded this is 1963 dawg check the description
@@the_good_fam7873 it doesn’t matter, incorrect rhythm is incorrect rhythm!
@@tromba1592 yea but I mean you saying this is not helping the guy. Either he’s had 60 years of improvement or he died
Pretty sloppy but in 63 you were a kid no?
Every decent conservatory player sounds like this. Its average. It's how you play it in an orchestra in a performance that counts.
Too rushed
In the 1947 revised version, Stravinsky added the tempo marking of mm = 116. You may see the music here: sfiles.webservices.illinois.edu/2036/trumpet_audition_materials_spring_2013.pdf. I have shown the 1911 first edition because it is in the public domain, whereas the 1947 version is still under copyright protection. You may think 116 is too rushed, but Stravinsky did not.
I meant 0:02
jwhill7 regardless of what it’s marked you didn’t stay that tempo (or whoever played this) which is what he was sayin
@@kbreezy2025 Exactly! I have no problem if this is fast, but consistency is very important. Rushing (to me) doesn't mean playing it at a fast consistent tempo. Rushing (to me) means playing at a staring tempo, and (unintentionally) speeding up during a passage, or ending faster than you started.
Tempo, for God's sake
The tempo of this recorded performance is exactly mm = 116, which is what Stravinsky specified in the revised edition (not shown here for copyright reasons). It is often played slower.
@@jwhill7 i think we (this person and myself) mean at certain points you tend to rush the passage.
@@micah_wong and myself