Instead of paying 235 Million to COP, to countries like China and India we should spend the money back home. This money paid overseas to countries that account for 86% of all new planned Coal and Gas power stations - countries that are Nos 86 and 93 on the world corruption list... money well spent? Post 2026, this amount will exceed $500 million going overseas to the same corrupt countries while our power bills will go up due to a lack of investment in LOCAL INFRASTRUCTURE. Spend at home, achieve more globally and achieve our climate targets.
Do you think we can just tell these globalist technocrats no? This is like a mafia where you either play ball or sleep with the fishes. Look at the countries who aren't signed up to this stuff. They're under constant subversion and attack.
Underestimating our forests capacities to sequester carbon isnt logical. Many new zealand native tress can live more than 1000 years. Planting trees is key and wetalnd rehabilitation is critical as wetlands in NZ support the highest concentrations of biodiversity out of terrestrial ecosystems
We have a lot of emissions from things like concrete, if the way concrete was manufactured changed nationally we could cut emissions by 20%. We are 0.01% of the worlds emissions we are now a poor country. We need to get our perspective right, get the country with a proper infrastructure then we can look at luxuries like our tiny emissions. Keep in mind the emissions people are the same one that said the hole in the ozone would never close and it's closing. We as a country were heavily effected by the hole we never received any compensation we didn't make the hole were too small as a country. So sorry emissions can wait.
The hole in the ozone closing was the result of strong collective international action to phase out the harmful chemicals that caused its creation. If anything its an argument in favour of action on climate change.
@red2seata they agree it is a luxury the changes in practices or added costs around farming for cow farts is ridiculous. Cost of food will only increase, more farmers will decide it's not worth it and less food will be produced pushing food costs up further. Then foreign investment for buying farms will happen and NZ won't own the food we produce. Again context we make 0.01% of the worlds emissions if NZ sank into the ocean we wouldn't make any difference to climate so yes a luxury.
Listening to Jack doing this interview, asking a question, letting the guy talk and compare this to the Luxon, asking a question, interupt within 2 words..
"what I would say to you is" Rod answers the question and so jack doesn't need to keep reminding him of the question... its also comparing apples with grapes, politicians are masterclass (most of them, our hairless leader is not one of them) at deflecting to their talking points to skew perception - Rod is on here to answer straight, therefore jack doesn't need to. there is no ambiguity or hidden agendas!
I only use a tiny % of the national road network so why should I pay anything towards it, right? If our govts thought like you there’d be no way of stopping climate change.
If a relativity rich county that already has..... a large percentage of renewable electricity and an abundance of potential renewables, can't do anything, what hope is there for any other country? Especially considering how beholden we are to other distant (and often dodgy) countries, for their fossil fuels.
@@neil3488 "If every country has this belief, then nothing will happen. It is a matter of justice for future generations." If I could give you a dozen thumbs up for this comment, I would.
GLORY!!!'m favoured, $140K every 3weeks! And am retired i can now give back to the locals in my community and also support God's work and the church. God bless America 🇺🇸 ❤️
Hello, how do you achieve such biweekly returns? As a single parent i haven't been able to get my own house due to financial struggles, but my faith in God remains strong.
YES!!! That's exactly her name (Elizabeth Ann Larson) so many people have recommended highly about her and am just starting with her 😊 from Brisbane Australia🇦🇺
Okay so go plant trees in the desert. there is no point in planting trees on farm land, we need trees where there are no trees, where we can teroform the planet and strip these gases from the atmoshere BUT AGAIN! They say nothing about the ozone, or areas on the map with huge endothermic reactions over ozone holes like the arctic circle and antarctic. Your trying to move a desert, but focusing on a single grain on sand.
Climate patterns are influenced by natural factors like volcanic activity, water vapor, and solar cycles, not just human CO₂ emissions from us is very little compared to nature itself. CO₂, essential for plant life, has driven a greener Earth and boosted agricultural productivity over the past 50 years. CO₂ makes up less than 0.04% of the atmosphere, and its classification as a pollutant remains scientifically debatable. Scaling wind and solar energy faces environmental challenges, including extensive land use and resource-heavy lithium mining.
@@neil3488 On point yeah Rod has a lot of misinformation; The reality is that convection and conduction, not radiation from greenhouse gases, are the primary ways heat moves through the atmosphere. Historically, this was well understood, but today CO2 is wrongly emphasized. The concept of a "global average temperature" also oversimplifies Earth's diverse climate system, which has always undergone natural changes. The focus on CO2 ignores other significant factors like natural cycles, solar activity, and volcanic eruptions. The singular focus on CO2 creates an illusion of control over Earth's complex climate.
@@SuperHone12 Climate scientists have accounted for everything you mention and still conclude that human activity (agriculture, industrialisation, burning fossil fuels, etc.) is the cause for the trend in global warming. The evidence is overwhelming.
It won't make a dent in a reduction to the planet! But It will make your children poorer like it's doing now! Expect energy prices just doubling over and over into the next century! Great times! 🤣
What are the technologies that could eliminate or mitigate 80% of emissions if deployed at pace and scale? I think it was solar, wind, geothermal + biomass?
The ALLAM CYCLE has been perfected by a Texan company called "8 Rivers" - it is 100% carbon neutral. They were going to build a pilot plant in Taranaki but stopped due to the last governments anti-fossil fuel development bill. Instead there is now a 3GW power station producing, carbon free, electricity in Britain. ua-cam.com/video/vnmsHFpLt1I/v-deo.html&ab_channel=LowEmissionTechnologyAustralia
@@WamSUBNZ Construction Phase Heavy Machinery: 5,000 gallons of diesel fuel Materials (Steel, Concrete, etc.): Approximately 795,000 gallons (converted from 18,857 barrels) Implementation and Maintenance (Over 20 years) Gear Oil: 800 gallons/year × 20 years = 16,000 gallons Transformer Oil: 1,200 gallons/year × 20 years = 24,000 gallons Lubrication Oil: 80 gallons/year × 20 years = 1,600 gallons Total Estimated Oil Consumption Over 20 Years Construction: 800,000 gallons (5,000 + 795,000) Maintenance and Operation: 41,600 gallons (16,000 + 24,000 + 1,600) Overall Estimate: 841,600 gallons So, the total estimated oil consumption for the construction, implementation, maintenance, and operation of a wind turbine over a 20-year period would be approximately 841,600 gallons.
@@WamSUBNZ Wind turbines offset their carbon cost in six months to two years; they have a lifespan of fifteen years. In comparison, how much carbon is produced by the construction of a gas power plant, and how much is produced by its operation over its entire lifespan?
Having alternative energy sources is good. But scale is an issue. And renewables require replacement in 20 years or so. Growth is our fundamental issue. We can’t or shouldn’t grow.
Great content, as always! A bit off-topic, but I wanted to ask: My OKX wallet holds some USDT, and I have the seed phrase. (alarm fetch churn bridge exercise tape speak race clerk couch crater letter). Could you explain how to move them to Binance?
Job 38:3 Now prepare yourself like a man; I will question you, and you shall answer Me. Job 38:4 “Where were you when I laid the foundations of the earth? Tell Me, if you have understanding. Job 38:8 “Or who shut in the sea with doors, When it burst forth and issued from the womb; Job 38:10 When I fixed My limit for it, And set bars and doors; Job 38:25 “Who has divided a channel for the overflowing water, Or a path for the thunderbolt, Job 40:2 “Shall the one who contends with the Almighty correct Him? He who rebukes God, let him answer it.” John 3:16 For God so loved the world that He gave His only begotten Son, that whoever believes in Him should not perish but have everlasting life.
While China is building 100’s of coal powered power stations, NZ’s impact is negligible and the link between CO2 and any heating effects are weak. CO2 is an essential airborne fertiliser that all life requires.
anytime you are indoors, you are breathing in about 10-50 times the normal atmospheric CO2 levels which are only 4 parts per 10,000. CO2 is not toxic.
@@ynotbegreat The issue isn't CO@'s toxicity but its ability to trap atmospheric heat. Our planet is essentially cooking as a result of anthropogenic gaseous emissions.
Probably due to the concise answers that Rod gave, his wide knowledge of the subject in question and the logic of his approach to the issue. All of which were sadly lacking for Luxon.
It wasn't a New Zealand commitment tho, it was made by John Key, as one of his last acts in office, inwhich he had already lost popular support. NEW ZEALAND DIDNT SIGN ANY COMMITMENT! it was signed by a man who had no public support and was on his way out. We should leave that agreement, because clinging to it will not help the world, more so as NZ is a world leader in renewables.
Bit like Helen Clark and the Free Trade Deal with China... as one of the last acts in office, they sign HIGHLY UNPOPULAR agreements and expect the country to stick to them. Not going to happen....
The is a bias fool like Tame. Tame asked Carr about one thing that would make a real difference. His answer was ban gas to private homes. I think the alarmism is wrong but say I am wrong then the thing that would make the biggest difference would be nuclear power as will happen in Oz if there is a change of government there.
This guy is incredible. I wish our politicians held the same degree of expertise in their respective portfolios. When are we going to move away from electing based on popularity. Sure politics requires a certain skill set of its own but it blows my mind that we can have a ceo of a company come in and just be prime minister of a country. I think you should be a proven expert in a field before entering politics then hold senior positions in government or oppositions for at least two terms of parliament before even being considered as a prime minister. The issues are so vast and nuanced, surely you need experience to understand how all the issues gel together and how you can make balanced decisions that addresses all the competing priorities.
Brilliant interview. Here's a radical idea for Labour/Greens: Wealth tax to fund green energy infrastructure. Wealthy people like Bruce Plested of Mainfreight have publicly stated that they will pay a wealth tax if they felt the Government wouldn't waste the money. Placing the tax revenue collected from a wealth tax into a green energy fund may well be a winning policy.
All a wealth tax will achieve is to have wealth and employment generators leave and take their wealth with them. Idiotic suggestion and Chippy is only pushing it so he can buy an election and be PM regardless of the cost to the population.
TVNZ Q & A are very generous about allowing comments on any video about climate change policy - given the 118 utterly unhinged and unreal comments below at the time of writing! Have a nice day all you 118 nutters! 😄
Have you been getting informed by the science and climate experts? Sorry, the Science and experts that only gets funding if it follows the narrative... There's lots of experts and scientists out there that disagree with the favored narrative, but they get silenced, deplatformed or have their characters attacked and defamed, why is that and is that right to you?. Isn't it healthier to have debate over these things by experts from both sides, so the right decisions can be made?
@@ZaneLike Thank you for proving my point with that perfect example of an irrelevant comment. That's just the old debunked nonsense point "there is no consensus amongst climate scientists". That's straight out of the USA tobacco lobby playbook of the 1950s. It's completely wrong. There is in fact a consensus of scientists that global warming way above pre industrial concentrations is human-caused. Have a nice day!
Yeah, a while ago climate scientists said the world was going into an ice age. Was on the cover of Time magazine. Then switched to “global warming”…now because winters were getting colder and with more snow, its now called “Climate change”. Whats next?. BTW the earth has been through many extreme changes and still going…
Disgraceful. Why does he and Jack still drive cars? Maybe they don’t. Why are they using iPhone? Took a lot of carbon and slavery to create that device….. honestly, a funny interview
Then why are power generators, reducing their generation capacity to store energy while at the same time doubling their investment in a product that will fail within 10 years. Likewise this push towards EVs, importing EVs in crippling the economy, and you just need to look at the extreme lengths America goes to in an attempt to isolate the car market to locally made. He wants to talk about chemistry of gases, but not the chemistry of energy, despite a requirement to discuss energy. There are so many holes in his argument, just a parrot with a title we are suppose to respect. One thing i think he highlights is how the likes of the Human Rights Commission allowed pretty much every single right to be eradicated during Covid19, if not for the last decade as woman have been pathwayed into public leadership. I was hoping for some insightful understanding as to the challenge, but its just a script, a parrot the same old talking points with nothing new, nothing abstract, and ultimately paying very close attention to what hes saying. Which goes to show an attempt to hide something from the public.
@@AnnSmith-u9c The dairy industry in its present form is under risk of becoming redundant due to emissions related trade barriers and precision fermentation production methods of its base products. Organically produced dairy products compete strongly against both these threats but most of NZ's dairy production is far from Organic, and still has to be transported to distant markets with food miles implications.
Instead of paying 235 Million to COP, to countries like China and India we should spend the money back home. This money paid overseas to countries that account for 86% of all new planned Coal and Gas power stations - countries that are Nos 86 and 93 on the world corruption list... money well spent? Post 2026, this amount will exceed $500 million going overseas to the same corrupt countries while our power bills will go up due to a lack of investment in LOCAL INFRASTRUCTURE. Spend at home, achieve more globally and achieve our climate targets.
Do you think we can just tell these globalist technocrats no? This is like a mafia where you either play ball or sleep with the fishes. Look at the countries who aren't signed up to this stuff. They're under constant subversion and attack.
He is incredibly well spoken
Underestimating our forests capacities to sequester carbon isnt logical. Many new zealand native tress can live more than 1000 years. Planting trees is key and wetalnd rehabilitation is critical as wetlands in NZ support the highest concentrations of biodiversity out of terrestrial ecosystems
Here's a thought Hemp plants give more air and also filter the bs build fields so this is carbon tax goes away
Why is any change so slow to be taken up in NZ? NZ media outlets (Govt especially) are very poor at simple, clear mass communication.
Activist advising.
Climate change commission apparently soes not favor labor or the greens.
This commemt section is an indictment on NZs education system and a great example of why we're screwed
Good informed conversation about an on-going dilemma thats needs to be addressed.
We have a lot of emissions from things like concrete, if the way concrete was manufactured changed nationally we could cut emissions by 20%. We are 0.01% of the worlds emissions we are now a poor country. We need to get our perspective right, get the country with a proper infrastructure then we can look at luxuries like our tiny emissions. Keep in mind the emissions people are the same one that said the hole in the ozone would never close and it's closing. We as a country were heavily effected by the hole we never received any compensation we didn't make the hole were too small as a country. So sorry emissions can wait.
The hole in the ozone closing was the result of strong collective international action to phase out the harmful chemicals that caused its creation. If anything its an argument in favour of action on climate change.
A stable climate is a luxury? Tell farmers that.
@red2seata they agree it is a luxury the changes in practices or added costs around farming for cow farts is ridiculous. Cost of food will only increase, more farmers will decide it's not worth it and less food will be produced pushing food costs up further. Then foreign investment for buying farms will happen and NZ won't own the food we produce. Again context we make 0.01% of the worlds emissions if NZ sank into the ocean we wouldn't make any difference to climate so yes a luxury.
NZ should take a principled position. If all countries act as you suggest, future generations will live in a mad max hellscape.
Did they actually say the ozone hole was never going to close, or did they say it's never going to close unless we stop using CFCs?
Listening to Jack doing this interview, asking a question, letting the guy talk and compare this to the Luxon, asking a question, interupt within 2 words..
Because Rod was answering concisely unlike Luxon's usually word salads and self promotion deflecting away from actually answering.
"what I would say to you is" Rod answers the question and so jack doesn't need to keep reminding him of the question... its also comparing apples with grapes, politicians are masterclass (most of them, our hairless leader is not one of them) at deflecting to their talking points to skew perception - Rod is on here to answer straight, therefore jack doesn't need to. there is no ambiguity or hidden agendas!
@@HarmLessSolutionsNZone is science and the other is political so…
@@matty_mccarthy So, one lives in the real world whereas the other lives under a different coloured sky to the rest of us.
It's completely irrelevant what NZ a country of 5 million people out of 8 billion humans does .
and equally what one human can do amongst 8 billion, great idea mate, do nothing. 🙄
I only use a tiny % of the national road network so why should I pay anything towards it, right? If our govts thought like you there’d be no way of stopping climate change.
If every country has this belief, then nothing will happen. It is a matter of justice for future generations.
If a relativity rich county that already has..... a large percentage of renewable electricity and an abundance of potential renewables, can't do anything, what hope is there for any other country? Especially considering how beholden we are to other distant (and often dodgy) countries, for their fossil fuels.
@@neil3488 "If every country has this belief, then nothing will happen. It is a matter of justice for future generations."
If I could give you a dozen thumbs up for this comment, I would.
GLORY!!!'m favoured, $140K every 3weeks! And am retired i can now give back to the locals in my community and also support God's work and the church. God bless America 🇺🇸 ❤️
Hello, how do you achieve such biweekly returns? As a single parent i haven't been able to get my own house due to financial struggles, but my faith in God remains strong.
Excuse me for real?,how is that
possible I have struggling
financially, how was that possible?
Thanks to my co-worker whom God used to give a great opportunity of crossing paths with 'Mrs ELIZABETH ANN LARSON'.
YES!!! That's exactly her name (Elizabeth Ann Larson) so many people have recommended highly about her and am just starting with her 😊 from Brisbane Australia🇦🇺
I have heard a lot of wonderful things about Elizabeth Ann on the news but didn't believe it until now. I'm definitely trying her out
So what are the methane levels from 1990 dropped to in 2017 if that will be your base number in 2050?
Okay so go plant trees in the desert. there is no point in planting trees on farm land, we need trees where there are no trees, where we can teroform the planet and strip these gases from the atmoshere BUT AGAIN!
They say nothing about the ozone, or areas on the map with huge endothermic reactions over ozone holes like the arctic circle and antarctic.
Your trying to move a desert, but focusing on a single grain on sand.
Scam, im burning as much as i can now
Climate patterns are influenced by natural factors like volcanic activity, water vapor, and solar cycles, not just human CO₂ emissions from us is very little compared to nature itself.
CO₂, essential for plant life, has driven a greener Earth and boosted agricultural productivity over the past 50 years.
CO₂ makes up less than 0.04% of the atmosphere, and its classification as a pollutant remains scientifically debatable.
Scaling wind and solar energy faces environmental challenges, including extensive land use and resource-heavy lithium mining.
Misinformation, I'm afraid. Read the science.
@@neil3488 On point yeah Rod has a lot of misinformation; The reality is that convection and conduction, not radiation from greenhouse gases, are the primary ways heat moves through the atmosphere. Historically, this was well understood, but today CO2 is wrongly emphasized.
The concept of a "global average temperature" also oversimplifies Earth's diverse climate system, which has always undergone natural changes. The focus on CO2 ignores other significant factors like natural cycles, solar activity, and volcanic eruptions. The singular focus on CO2 creates an illusion of control over Earth's complex climate.
@@SuperHone12 Climate scientists have accounted for everything you mention and still conclude that human activity (agriculture, industrialisation, burning fossil fuels, etc.) is the cause for the trend in global warming. The evidence is overwhelming.
It won't make a dent in a reduction to the planet! But It will make your children poorer like it's doing now! Expect energy prices just doubling over and over into the next century! Great times! 🤣
As Dr Carr said, there are solutions available which are low-cost. Solar and wind have dramatically decreased in cost, for instance.
Thanks moron on UA-cam. Renewables are all cheaper
That's so true 👍
What are the technologies that could eliminate or mitigate 80% of emissions if deployed at pace and scale? I think it was solar, wind, geothermal + biomass?
The ALLAM CYCLE has been perfected by a Texan company called "8 Rivers" - it is 100% carbon neutral. They were going to build a pilot plant in Taranaki but stopped due to the last governments anti-fossil fuel development bill. Instead there is now a 3GW power station producing, carbon free, electricity in Britain. ua-cam.com/video/vnmsHFpLt1I/v-deo.html&ab_channel=LowEmissionTechnologyAustralia
You should look up how much oil is needed on a turbine
And what is needed for a solar panel and where it comes from
@@WamSUBNZ Construction Phase
Heavy Machinery: 5,000 gallons of diesel fuel
Materials (Steel, Concrete, etc.): Approximately 795,000 gallons (converted from 18,857 barrels)
Implementation and Maintenance (Over 20 years)
Gear Oil: 800 gallons/year × 20 years = 16,000 gallons
Transformer Oil: 1,200 gallons/year × 20 years = 24,000 gallons
Lubrication Oil: 80 gallons/year × 20 years = 1,600 gallons
Total Estimated Oil Consumption Over 20 Years
Construction: 800,000 gallons (5,000 + 795,000)
Maintenance and Operation: 41,600 gallons (16,000 + 24,000 + 1,600)
Overall Estimate: 841,600 gallons
So, the total estimated oil consumption for the construction, implementation, maintenance, and operation of a wind turbine over a 20-year period would be approximately 841,600 gallons.
@@WamSUBNZ Wind turbines offset their carbon cost in six months to two years; they have a lifespan of fifteen years. In comparison, how much carbon is produced by the construction of a gas power plant, and how much is produced by its operation over its entire lifespan?
Having alternative energy sources is good. But scale is an issue. And renewables require replacement in 20 years or so. Growth is our fundamental issue. We can’t or shouldn’t grow.
Great content, as always! A bit off-topic, but I wanted to ask: My OKX wallet holds some USDT, and I have the seed phrase. (alarm fetch churn bridge exercise tape speak race clerk couch crater letter). Could you explain how to move them to Binance?
The amount NZ wastes on this fanciful rubbish is a disgrace.
Job 38:3 Now prepare yourself like a man;
I will question you, and you shall answer Me.
Job 38:4 “Where were you when I laid the foundations of the earth?
Tell Me, if you have understanding.
Job 38:8 “Or who shut in the sea with doors,
When it burst forth and issued from the womb;
Job 38:10 When I fixed My limit for it,
And set bars and doors;
Job 38:25 “Who has divided a channel for the overflowing water,
Or a path for the thunderbolt,
Job 40:2 “Shall the one who contends with the Almighty correct Him?
He who rebukes God, let him answer it.”
John 3:16 For God so loved the world that He gave His only begotten Son, that whoever believes in Him should not perish but have everlasting life.
Jack wets himself on this issue..
"Climate Change is real" 🤣 The Ice Age was Climate change, Did we do that has well?
Even oil companies do not deny human-caused climate change.
Hi Jack
While China is building 100’s of coal powered power stations, NZ’s impact is negligible and the link between CO2 and any heating effects are weak.
CO2 is an essential airborne fertiliser that all life requires.
"CO2 is an essential airborne fertiliser that all life requires."
Too much of anything will kill you.
anytime you are indoors, you are breathing in about 10-50 times the normal atmospheric CO2 levels which are only 4 parts per 10,000. CO2 is not toxic.
@@ynotbegreat The issue isn't CO@'s toxicity but its ability to trap atmospheric heat. Our planet is essentially cooking as a result of anthropogenic gaseous emissions.
@@ynotbegreatI think it's less about how toxic it is, but how it heats the planet.
Didnt Al gore say we would all be dead by now....im not dead but he still took the billion dollars
We don’t need any emission reductions.
Oh so you were paid well for this interview...
Pushing the usual climate scam Jack
Such a softball interview compared to the interview with Luxon.
Probably due to the concise answers that Rod gave, his wide knowledge of the subject in question and the logic of his approach to the issue. All of which were sadly lacking for Luxon.
It wasn't a New Zealand commitment tho, it was made by John Key, as one of his last acts in office, inwhich he had already lost popular support.
NEW ZEALAND DIDNT SIGN ANY COMMITMENT! it was signed by a man who had no public support and was on his way out.
We should leave that agreement, because clinging to it will not help the world, more so as NZ is a world leader in renewables.
Bit like Helen Clark and the Free Trade Deal with China... as one of the last acts in office, they sign HIGHLY UNPOPULAR agreements and expect the country to stick to them. Not going to happen....
Where stuck in the bug spectrum
No one will ever convince me that cows are causing the earth to heat.
It’s just a rort
Labour hate the landed gentry . Just away of getting at them .
Science doesn't care what you think.
Good to hear you have an open mind 😉
@ I have common sense
The number of cattle in the world has tripled over the last 100 year. This obviously has an environmental impact. Basic science.
The is a bias fool like Tame. Tame asked Carr about one thing that would make a real difference. His answer was ban gas to private homes. I think the alarmism is wrong but say I am wrong then the thing that would make the biggest difference would be nuclear power as will happen in Oz if there is a change of government there.
You didnt ask him what he thinks abouts the incoming us presidents policy….”drill baby drill”……😏
The majority of this comment section is so depressing. I thought Rod spoke well. It's a shame that no one is listening.
This guy is incredible. I wish our politicians held the same degree of expertise in their respective portfolios. When are we going to move away from electing based on popularity. Sure politics requires a certain skill set of its own but it blows my mind that we can have a ceo of a company come in and just be prime minister of a country. I think you should be a proven expert in a field before entering politics then hold senior positions in government or oppositions for at least two terms of parliament before even being considered as a prime minister. The issues are so vast and nuanced, surely you need experience to understand how all the issues gel together and how you can make balanced decisions that addresses all the competing priorities.
My view 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
Brilliant interview. Here's a radical idea for Labour/Greens: Wealth tax to fund green energy infrastructure. Wealthy people like Bruce Plested of Mainfreight have publicly stated that they will pay a wealth tax if they felt the Government wouldn't waste the money. Placing the tax revenue collected from a wealth tax into a green energy fund may well be a winning policy.
Delusion.
@@mrwilly1441 Very insightful comment 🤣
@@sussanfitzgerald514 What does hard core money and power mean? Cryptic comment.
@@sussanfitzgerald514 The main difference in the suggestion is a specific tax for a specific purpose. This hasn't been tried.
All a wealth tax will achieve is to have wealth and employment generators leave and take their wealth with them. Idiotic suggestion and Chippy is only pushing it so he can buy an election and be PM regardless of the cost to the population.
TVNZ Q & A are very generous about allowing comments on any video about climate change policy - given the 118 utterly unhinged and unreal comments below at the time of writing! Have a nice day all you 118 nutters! 😄
Have you been getting informed by the science and climate experts? Sorry, the Science and experts that only gets funding if it follows the narrative... There's lots of experts and scientists out there that disagree with the favored narrative, but they get silenced, deplatformed or have their characters attacked and defamed, why is that and is that right to you?. Isn't it healthier to have debate over these things by experts from both sides, so the right decisions can be made?
Ughhh the disinformation cult 😒
@@ZaneLike Thank you for proving my point with that perfect example of an irrelevant comment. That's just the old debunked nonsense point "there is no consensus amongst climate scientists". That's straight out of the USA tobacco lobby playbook of the 1950s. It's completely wrong. There is in fact a consensus of scientists that global warming way above pre industrial concentrations is human-caused. Have a nice day!
Yeah, a while ago climate scientists said the world was going into an ice age. Was on the cover of Time magazine. Then switched to “global warming”…now because winters were getting colder and with more snow, its now called “Climate change”. Whats next?. BTW the earth has been through many extreme changes and still going…
Disgraceful. Why does he and Jack still drive cars? Maybe they don’t. Why are they using iPhone? Took a lot of carbon and slavery to create that device….. honestly, a funny interview
It doesn't apply to them . Read the book " Animal Farm " . It's all there in black and white .
The feudal landlord murdered by the peasants using pitchforks that he owned probably saw the irony too.
Where are their options, tho...?
@@r.1599 options for what?
@@odrumcmydna Alternatives.
Wow. Really informative interview ❤
Then why are power generators, reducing their generation capacity to store energy while at the same time doubling their investment in a product that will fail within 10 years.
Likewise this push towards EVs, importing EVs in crippling the economy, and you just need to look at the extreme lengths America goes to in an attempt to isolate the car market to locally made.
He wants to talk about chemistry of gases, but not the chemistry of energy, despite a requirement to discuss energy.
There are so many holes in his argument, just a parrot with a title we are suppose to respect.
One thing i think he highlights is how the likes of the Human Rights Commission allowed pretty much every single right to be eradicated during Covid19, if not for the last decade as woman have been pathwayed into public leadership.
I was hoping for some insightful understanding as to the challenge, but its just a script, a parrot the same old talking points with nothing new, nothing abstract, and ultimately paying very close attention to what hes saying. Which goes to show an attempt to hide something from the public.
Q&A why don’t you start reporting what the people on the ground think or maybe you don’t make any money off us 🤦🏻♀️
Thank you for your service, Rod Carr.
It's a load of crap who cares
His career depends on it .
You may be able to survive it but your kids and their kids are going to be dealing with a climatic horror show.
Until the Government stops giving the dairy industry a free pass, the rest of us pay the price.
Lol your a woke joke
Oh stop this nonsense. You greenies are nuts 🥜
The dairy industry makes our economy stronger, so what’s going to fill the gap?
The dairy industry is the only thing keeping the NZ economy above water .
@@AnnSmith-u9c The dairy industry in its present form is under risk of becoming redundant due to emissions related trade barriers and precision fermentation production methods of its base products. Organically produced dairy products compete strongly against both these threats but most of NZ's dairy production is far from Organic, and still has to be transported to distant markets with food miles implications.
NZ cant change anything.
Wow looks terribly hot outside with that backdrop last I checked it was overcast and raining but mild, im confused?
Doesn't suit their doomsday narrative .
Especially pushing out some Woke looking Santa ,virtue signaling to the rest of the nation who possess a fair amount of common sense than that halfwit
rubbish again jack! The planet is not warming, it has been cooling. Total Propaganda!!
Who cares humanity is completely doomed already
Unfortunately, I think you're right 😭 but, we can grow food, reduce our dependence on outside influences and love more ♥️
@markkunath8440 I used to think that way but it's jus not going to happen