That’s cause it’s like 1st grade explanation No disrespect.. I’ve watched the advanced stuff over and over and took years to really grasp Keep watching Keep learning Kudos to you When it clicks It’s truly amazing 🤩 And it only gets better :)
@@Cynyc-pq2pc If more teachers/professors, specially Math ones, had Al-Khalili's ability to teach, from the most basic, much more students would really, really understand.
Spooky action at a distance, IMO means that information does not travel “through” space/time but rather bypasses space/time altogether. This also means that the entangled particles would act like two black holes joined by a wormhole thus making the travel of information between the two points instant.
Ever see Sightless? In the movie the girl is blinded and the world she sees in her head is the opposite of actual reality. Her kidnapper places her in a small room and tells her it's a lavish apartment so that's how it appears in her head, when he brings her a yellow bird she asks if it's blue and he says yes so the bird is blue in the movie, the kidnapper changes his voice and in her mind's eye she "sees" multiple people. In a way she can "see" the alternate waves of probability to change the way the world appears in her mind. Seeing the world makes it forced to be, so as long as the universe is observed we can't see the probabilities but a blind person can create any probability. We're in one beam of the separate slits and can only see the results of that beam but there are at least 5 alternate outcomes or realities, possibly multiverses as real as the one we perceive for every wave of light.
Kinda sounds like how the liberal media explains everything to us. No matter what the evidence says, they ignore it and creates an alternative reality they expect us to believe. Sad part is a lot of people believe them.
@@goofyFuNstupid I have a theory that some critters like flies might be able to see probabilities due to the fact they see time at a much slower rate then humans, they perceive and react faster than should be possible if they had the same perception of reality, but to them we're moving in slow-mo, they don't see the world the same way, it's as if they're speeding through time, to them they live a long life, as long as we see our own but only because time moves differently for them. On a Universal scale Time = Light Speed. What if the different probability waves are moving at slightly different speeds and that's what causes them to not be perceptible to us? They exist in a different time but still in the same space, to be able to see a different possibility we need to see it in a different time rate, we would have to literally adjust the universal rate of atomic decay to slow down and speed up time, or mind meld with a fly. The only problem with that is that we would not be able to tell if time slowed or sped up, being inside whichever beam/perceived reality makes everything relative, time would appear to be the same as always in whatever reality you perceive.
The quantum physics crisis makes me at once feel both unstable and full of potential. I don't like how reality is made of nothing, yet there's so much possibility there. It could drive one quite mad.
I could be wrong. I am actively looking for a reason to think I am. but I suspect it is not as complicated as they are making it out to be. if you are intrested in a simple explanation that appears to fit all observable fact I can find. I made a few vids. if you can find a flaw in the idea. please do.
@@brightphoebesays it's just na idea. I could be wrong. but nobody seems to be able to. give me a reason. getting alot of friction from the mods in hypothetical physics on redit. but no reason.
Yes, there is a link between the uncertainty principle and the bending of space-time in the context of quantum physics. The uncertainty principle, proposed by Werner Heisenberg, states that there is a fundamental limit to the precision with which certain pairs of physical properties, such as position and momentum, can be simultaneously known. In the case of particles like photons and electrons, their behavior is inherently probabilistic, and the uncertainty principle reflects this inherent fuzziness in their properties. When dealing with particles at the quantum level, particularly in the context of general relativity, which describes gravity as the bending of space-time, the uncertainty principle becomes relevant. The presence of particles with uncertain positions and momenta can contribute to fluctuations in the curvature of space-time, leading to phenomena like the bending of light around massive objects (gravitational lensing) or the behavior of electrons in an electromagnetic field. These connections highlight the deep interplay between quantum mechanics and general relativity in understanding the behavior of fundamental particles in the universe.
Beautiful video&great explaining, enjoyed it a lot! The quantum world might not be strange at all; it's just that our perception, conditioned by the human scale, tends to judge things in a quite linear way in general. See it more like this: Reality, at its foundation, must be universal in transcription. Furthermore, the quantum state could serve as a universal key for translation and description, implying that the principles governing quantum mechanics may offer the foundation for understanding reality across all levels.
Eliza's Uncertainty - Tangled up With You You can find it on UA-cam, Spotify etc. Written by Nick Goodwin. Singer: Eliza Shea, Bass: Misha Mullov-Abbado, Clarinet: Anthony Friend, Trombone: Vij Prakash, Guitar/Composition: Nick Goodwin.
What if the waves property belongs to 'Space'? The empty void space. And the light or electron are simply particles which are travelling through this wavy medium called Space? Maybe the wave ripples in space are caused by the slits? When the slits are placed in a space, they might have occupied some place in the space which moved the space fabric. And then each time a particle is released, it travels through one of the many waves that already exist in the space? Is it possible?
we can still measure that's there is no delay between the change. we've also sent England particles 10's of kms apart and done measurements. we're even sent pairs to two different satellites and measured
Entanglement's is a a cooperation of a invisible field, and since it is ca cooperation, one end is a end and the other is a end, which to share a exchange of the share energy, one is accepting the energy intact and the other other the tail let up, reminding the ends are mass points.
Donald Hoffamn theorizes that nothing exists, just like a computer renders what the player is looking at only and nothing is there outside the player's vision. So if nothing is there when it's not observed that means we have far more control over our bodies than we realize.
Hmm, i was just thinking about Bohr and Einsteins argument if the moon really exists if nobody looking at it. A long time ago i was using level of detail in my thesis project about virtual worlds. Radical thought to combine quantum physics and simulation theory.
When Einstein presented his paper on SR, 100 physicists of the day signed a document announcing why he was wrong. While getting a degree in physics this was never mentioned. There was a reason for this. Quantum Matrix Photon Theory explains this in detail.
Quantum physics is only strange and weird because we don't understand the mechanisms that make it work. We know what it does , we just don't know how it does it.
Logically it seems the photoelectric boost is just an an additional energy in the area, which the electron as a mass carrying particle would not support, but the ultraviolet light could, if it was a was or not.
Look at a atom as a mass is like a anchor of energy, but the energy field is not bound not to be able to drift, thus it could built (depending on the empty space medium) a wave a particle, or just a disturbing charge (field) that helps a electron become self sufficient and loss its bod to its anchoring.
If properly researching the word's meaning, quantum, finds it means it's focus point of observation is not a pinpoint, but just a very small generalized area (a resolution point), which as a area, it is a activity, not a single mass (atom, maybe) - considered a point.
34:20 that is because you claime that both entangled particles are "comunicating" in some way, and of course that can not be happenig more than speed of light, they are not comunicating, they are entangled, and that must be meaning another thing. antother domension. or maybe just its nature, and we are not entitled to learn more on that
did it ever occur to anybody that the electrons might be hitting and bouncing off the slit walls? What are the slits made of? do they repel or attract the electrons as they fly through? anybody?????
Hi I really appreciate your work. Thanks! What I am really mesmerized with every time is, why do the quantum world look strange to us. While my life is, as I found the hard way, totally unpredictable and govern with probabilities more then my predictions, people still lean to the deterministic way of thinking about their lives and be shattered when it doesn't work. Long way to go...😉
I even find that time if not because of entropy, doesn’t exist. Tthat if I pay close attention, the forward arrow of time is anything but straight and forward
"Life is but a veil, Its paths are dark and rough, Only because We do not know enough. When science Has discovered something more, We shall be happier Than we were before." Hilaire Belloc ( 1870 - 1953 )
When experimenting with single electron at a time around 27 minute, doesn't the result means that time means nothing at electrons levels and below-quantum level? Otherwise, how the interference pattern can be explained? Then if time is zero, hence by analogy distance is zero as well to solve the entanglement problem. Conclusion, both problems are solved and no more work for the physicists. Can somebody explain?
As an offshoot, a time-sensor property like minimum mass can be decided depending on this experiment. In other words, what is the minimum property of a particle to start sensing time? These sub-particles are the true God's particles where time means nothing. TISP time independent sub-particles. These remarks point to a new classification of matter where the time is the dividing domain. This throws question marks about the exact time of the big bang. Or it makes it only from our point of view. More importantly, it will be more logical to "understand" the size of the starting point of the big bang, it will be truly zero.
Quantum physics delves deep into the fundamental nature of reality, revealing a universe where particles can exist in multiple states simultaneously, only settling into a definite state when observed. This mind-bending reality challenges our traditional understanding of matter, energy, and causality. Meanwhile, quantum psychology takes these principles and explores how they might influence human consciousness, perception, and even the very nature of thought itself. Could quantum mechanics, with its probabilistic nature and concepts like superposition and entanglement, offer new insights into the complexities of the mind and consciousness? Quantum psychology proposes that the mind might function in a similar way to quantum systems, where thoughts and emotions are not static but exist in multiple potential states until we focus on or "observe" them, shaping our experiences and decisions. Furthermore, if consciousness is interconnected at a quantum level, as some theories suggest, could this explain phenomena like intuition, synchronicity, or even non-local interactions between minds? How might the probabilistic and non-deterministic nature of quantum states relate to our subjective experiences, mental processes, and even free will? As both fields evolve, can the marriage of quantum physics and psychology offer us a deeper understanding of human consciousness, going beyond the boundaries of classical neuroscience?
I enjoyed the video... Only we are now in the 21 century and Science has much advanced... What's with morden Science.. For example The Universes.. Connected to one another... And how..? 😂❤
So you don't think its a right thing to tell people this is none of your work here that you only uploaded video already existing on youtube? You think there were no aithors, no work input in these videos ?
It exists only when we measure it and we know it exists only when we measure it are two completely different propositions. Forgive my lack of the ability to connect two things without step by step reasoning, I can hardly see what the interchangeability of wave-particle has to do with the question of reality. More study is needed.
I have to agree with you. I have always seen this in my mind much like a wave on the ocean. We can learn alot by studying the wave , but certain things will be impossible to ascertain unless we pull a molecule of water from the wave and stop it so as to observe those additional properties. Doing so however does not make either any less real. A wave is a wave and a particle is a particle and yes....they are the same thing. But we cannot observe them as both. I guess we just gotta deal with it. So far it doesn't seem to be hurting anything other than some physicists mind.
I just absolutely love some of the scientific terms they come up with particularly when they still don’t understand but found something new ah ha! UV catastrophe!
The reason why 2 quantum objects can be in 2 places at the same time is because space and time does not exist at the quantum level, this was proven through experiments dealing with quantum entanglement.
You're close, coherent versus incoherent light, density-amp versus density de-amp, quantum fluid-flow & quantum particle-flows that are of the hydraulic instabilities that produces the force that pulls-straight inwardly into infinity versus the hydraulic instabilities that pushes & bends outwardly into infinity... Two-point and a three-point systemizing the Vorticity of an under-square, over-square, and the spherical vortex. The Schrodinger's cat paradox of the crystalline-past versus the non-crystalline future. All mass, no matter how large or how small that mass maybe is made up of orbiting-particle systems extending inwardly into infinity as well as extending outwardly into infinity. Even the synthetic diamond, as hard & pure as that diamond is... There is no part of that diamond that is not in the constant act of motion! Einstein's work was all about the force that pushes & bends outwardly, through angular accelerations that produce boundaries. Where as Newton's work was all about the force that pulls-straight inwardly into infinity, of which is a boundary remover. All of which is the simple difference between matter moving from an inertial frame of reference into annular accelerations, or angular accelerations moving back into a inertial frame of reference...
All these fifty years of conscious brooding have brought me no nearer to the answer to the question, 'What are light quanta (photons)?' Nowadays every rascal thinks he knows, but he is mistaken. 🕊️ EINSTEIN
People always talk about Schrodinger's cat when explaining Quantum physics, and for years.. I had no idea what it means. Your explanation using the two coins analogy is much much simpler.
The reason for the two therious won't line up is the dimensional differences and overlapping. Many dimensions coexist side by side. God sits at the highest ( infinite) dimension.
An either/or experiment is only valid if there are no other possibilities: solving a paradox requires verifying experimental results weren't caused by something you've overlooked. You demon experiment suggests to me that you';ve overlooked something - I'm not convinced by your argument.
I just want a correlation , which support technology but differs understanding. I have an analogy like triggering the event in LHC Higgs experiments where 90%of data is west . Statistics of targated events . You have make the event I.e this video to win Our attention and like. You have made us think is it a scientific truth. Is it nature or technology? Marvelous. AI Will do different than human's process of progress.
This video was obviously created before Alain Aspect,John Clauser and Anton Zeilinger won the Nobel prize in 2022 for proving that the universe isn't locally real
@@Sharperthanu1 We are teaching in undergraduate physics that reality is the totality of all irreversible energy exchanges. Nothing else matters. If you didn't get that, then you weren't paying enough attention in undergrad physics. Apect at al. were not. ;-)
My point? You've rigged the experiment to produce the result you wanted rather than test whether your hypothesis is appropriate - experimenter rigging his apparatus.
@@kathyorourke9273I mean the uploader of course, this video is uploaded just some day ago, so yes he/she would know 😂 I don't know how you could mean Jim the presenter, "He couldn't know you're watching me 10 years from now."😂😂😂
At first I didn't know if this guy was trying to fool the viewer or if he is fooled himself. Halfway through I figured it out. He is fooling the viewer. Light is a wave. The color of light is the wave length, the brightness of light is the frequency of the wave. Electrons have nothing to do with light. Video editing to show that cards and coins have no randomness...
After studying quantum physics for about a year with the assistance of AI, I propose this. My analogy of the universe starts like this, it behaves more like animal in its unpredictability. It has unpredictable behavior that is only modeled with the human fabrication of mathematics. You see, I see a universe where the models reduce to persistence, or the past battling with the coming change or the future. Now if I recount that math is the fabrication that introduces measurement and then time we can use this notion to eliminate time itself. It’s you fabrication of measure and math remember? The universe seems to reserve the right to do things at some point where the rules don’t really exist, to small. Here the universe expresses it self in the only way it can, it’s language is math remember? So the expression of mathematics enables probabilty to be the measure and it’s because of the rules of least action. What else is it to do. So the magic we think we see is all explainable as the process of expression unfolding, rather like a tardy child wanting to the least action needed, and your observation pushes the development of these systems, that’s all. As the universe tests and analyses things to decide what to do and why, it’s the same thing the scientist is doing creating test bed interference thus the additional confusion. When it does not make sense it does because this is where the freedom of exprssion of the universe begins because the rules stop there. Make sence? Where the sense stops its fundamental because the rules stop here. Then it makes sence. Penrose said, we study the rules so as to enable the violation of er something like that.
I have watched countless of documentaries about quantum physics and this one finally made sense to me.
That’s cause it’s like 1st grade explanation
No disrespect..
I’ve watched the advanced stuff over and over and took years to really grasp
Keep watching
Keep learning
Kudos to you
When it clicks
It’s truly amazing 🤩
And it only gets better :)
@@Cynyc-pq2pc If more teachers/professors, specially Math ones, had Al-Khalili's ability to teach, from the most basic, much more students would really, really understand.
best science docutainment show since Connections.
Jim Al-khalili has several docs on this topic and they are all amazing.
Love all of them!!
Is he egyptian? I have never seen a more egyptian looking man in my life.
@@cognitivedisability9864 Dr Al-Khalili is Iraqi-British
Spooky action at a distance, IMO means that information does not travel “through” space/time but rather bypasses space/time altogether. This also means that the entangled particles would act like two black holes joined by a wormhole thus making the travel of information between the two points instant.
Ever see Sightless? In the movie the girl is blinded and the world she sees in her head is the opposite of actual reality. Her kidnapper places her in a small room and tells her it's a lavish apartment so that's how it appears in her head, when he brings her a yellow bird she asks if it's blue and he says yes so the bird is blue in the movie, the kidnapper changes his voice and in her mind's eye she "sees" multiple people. In a way she can "see" the alternate waves of probability to change the way the world appears in her mind. Seeing the world makes it forced to be, so as long as the universe is observed we can't see the probabilities but a blind person can create any probability. We're in one beam of the separate slits and can only see the results of that beam but there are at least 5 alternate outcomes or realities, possibly multiverses as real as the one we perceive for every wave of light.
Very interesting. 1:26
Kinda sounds like how the liberal media explains everything to us. No matter what the evidence says, they ignore it and creates an alternative reality they expect us to believe. Sad part is a lot of people believe them.
@@goofyFuNstupid I have a theory that some critters like flies might be able to see probabilities due to the fact they see time at a much slower rate then humans, they perceive and react faster than should be possible if they had the same perception of reality, but to them we're moving in slow-mo, they don't see the world the same way, it's as if they're speeding through time, to them they live a long life, as long as we see our own but only because time moves differently for them. On a Universal scale Time = Light Speed. What if the different probability waves are moving at slightly different speeds and that's what causes them to not be perceptible to us? They exist in a different time but still in the same space, to be able to see a different possibility we need to see it in a different time rate, we would have to literally adjust the universal rate of atomic decay to slow down and speed up time, or mind meld with a fly. The only problem with that is that we would not be able to tell if time slowed or sped up, being inside whichever beam/perceived reality makes everything relative, time would appear to be the same as always in whatever reality you perceive.
This all very elaborate
Yes, indeed!
SpaceRip is having a marathon!!
Best educational video ever.
Why is Bell's formula presented at 46:45
The quantum physics crisis makes me at once feel both unstable and full of potential. I don't like how reality is made of nothing, yet there's so much possibility there. It could drive one quite mad.
I could be wrong. I am actively looking for a reason to think I am. but I suspect it is not as complicated as they are making it out to be. if you are intrested in a simple explanation that appears to fit all observable fact I can find. I made a few vids. if you can find a flaw in the idea. please do.
@@atticuswalker Thanks!
@@brightphoebesays it's just na idea. I could be wrong. but nobody seems to be able to. give me a reason.
getting alot of friction from the mods in hypothetical physics on redit. but no reason.
And the scientists use this as weapons to experiment and control people
This is by far the most amazing video I've seen on the subject.
Yes, there is a link between the uncertainty principle and the bending of space-time in the context of quantum physics. The uncertainty principle, proposed by Werner Heisenberg, states that there is a fundamental limit to the precision with which certain pairs of physical properties, such as position and momentum, can be simultaneously known. In the case of particles like photons and electrons, their behavior is inherently probabilistic, and the uncertainty principle reflects this inherent fuzziness in their properties.
When dealing with particles at the quantum level, particularly in the context of general relativity, which describes gravity as the bending of space-time, the uncertainty principle becomes relevant. The presence of particles with uncertain positions and momenta can contribute to fluctuations in the curvature of space-time, leading to phenomena like the bending of light around massive objects (gravitational lensing) or the behavior of electrons in an electromagnetic field. These connections highlight the deep interplay between quantum mechanics and general relativity in understanding the behavior of fundamental particles in the universe.
playing cards with the devil really blew m mind and it's conclusion. Jim Al Khalili videos are mesmerizing
4:20 - music name pls?
Darude - Sandstorm
Beautiful video&great explaining, enjoyed it a lot! The quantum world might not be strange at all; it's just that our perception, conditioned by the human scale, tends to judge things in a quite linear way in general.
See it more like this: Reality, at its foundation, must be universal in transcription.
Furthermore, the quantum state could serve as a universal key for translation and description, implying that the principles governing quantum mechanics may offer the foundation for understanding reality across all levels.
16:40 music please if anyone knows...
Eliza's Uncertainty - Tangled up With You
You can find it on UA-cam, Spotify etc.
Written by Nick Goodwin. Singer: Eliza Shea, Bass: Misha Mullov-Abbado, Clarinet: Anthony Friend, Trombone: Vij Prakash, Guitar/Composition: Nick Goodwin.
@@behappybevegan thank you very much
This reminds me of a movie I watched. ...There was a character that could become invisible BUT ONLY if nobody was looking at him !
What if the waves property belongs to 'Space'? The empty void space.
And the light or electron are simply particles which are travelling through this wavy medium called Space?
Maybe the wave ripples in space are caused by the slits? When the slits are placed in a space, they might have occupied some place in the space which moved the space fabric. And then each time a particle is released, it travels through one of the many waves that already exist in the space? Is it possible?
The videographer has done a fantastic job here.
This video has been around for a decade and spacerip is only good at ripping other people stuff.
The videographer as you call it is BBC!! 🙄
Can u send me the playlist pls love those kinda music
If entangled pair is observed on one desk, how is it proving the same will hapen instantly even when light years apart ?
we can still measure that's there is no delay between the change. we've also sent England particles 10's of kms apart and done measurements. we're even sent pairs to two different satellites and measured
Thank you. ❤
This gave me goose bumps! The Awe! Moment!
Entanglement's is a a cooperation of a invisible field, and since it is ca cooperation, one end is a end and the other is a end, which to share a exchange of the share energy, one is accepting the energy intact and the other other the tail let up, reminding the ends are mass points.
30:00 I find it more likely that the electrons are a wave till they finally interact with something.
Yep. That is also completely wrong. ;-)
Donald Hoffamn theorizes that nothing exists, just like a computer renders what the player is looking at only and nothing is there outside the player's vision. So if nothing is there when it's not observed that means we have far more control over our bodies than we realize.
Hmm, i was just thinking about Bohr and Einsteins argument if the moon really exists if nobody looking at it. A long time ago i was using level of detail in my thesis project about virtual worlds. Radical thought to combine quantum physics and simulation theory.
When Einstein presented his paper on SR, 100 physicists of the day signed a document announcing why he was wrong. While getting a degree in physics this was never mentioned. There was a reason for this. Quantum Matrix Photon Theory explains this in detail.
Quantum physics is only strange and weird because we don't understand the mechanisms that make it work.
We know what it does , we just don't know how it does it.
Phase pattern movement motion, lost. now?
still have no idea about Bell’s theorem. Went straight over my head.
Logically it seems the photoelectric boost is just an an additional energy in the area, which the electron as a mass carrying particle would not support, but the ultraviolet light could, if it was a was or not.
Look at a atom as a mass is like a anchor of energy, but the energy field is not bound not to be able to drift, thus it could built (depending on the empty space medium) a wave a particle, or just a disturbing charge (field) that helps a electron become self sufficient and loss its bod to its anchoring.
If properly researching the word's meaning, quantum, finds it means it's focus point of observation is not a pinpoint, but just a very small generalized area (a resolution point), which as a area, it is a activity, not a single mass (atom, maybe) - considered a point.
Recognition of patterns building the macro view.
Symmetry's logic - or a better math problem - being solved.
Proton/electron logic too.
34:20 that is because you claime that both entangled particles are "comunicating" in some way, and of course that can not be happenig more than speed of light, they are not comunicating, they are entangled, and that must be meaning another thing. antother domension. or maybe just its nature, and we are not entitled to learn more on that
did it ever occur to anybody that the electrons might be hitting and bouncing off the slit walls? What are the slits made of? do they repel or attract the electrons as they fly through? anybody?????
Great show
Why can't we say particles act like waves but not waves
Hi I really appreciate your work. Thanks! What I am really mesmerized with every time is, why do the quantum world look strange to us. While my life is, as I found the hard way, totally unpredictable and govern with probabilities more then my predictions, people still lean to the deterministic way of thinking about their lives and be shattered when it doesn't work. Long way to go...😉
I even find that time if not because of entropy, doesn’t exist. Tthat if I pay close attention, the forward arrow of time is anything but straight and forward
Whose work do you appreciate? The work of the plagiarist up-loader? I'm sure he appreciates your support. Wanna buy a bridge in Broklyn?
"Life is but a veil,
Its paths are dark and rough,
Only because
We do not know enough.
When science
Has discovered something more,
We shall be happier
Than we were before."
Hilaire Belloc ( 1870 - 1953 )
Banal and wrong. Science has given us terrible things such as nuclear weapons as well as good things. It's a double edged sword.
..when the soul transmigrates was it a leaping quantum..?
What soul? Silly.
There is a constant in all this. the universe, and the planets and stars. It is only consciousness that dissipates.
When experimenting with single electron at a time around 27 minute, doesn't the result means that time means nothing at electrons levels and below-quantum level? Otherwise, how the interference pattern can be explained?
Then if time is zero, hence by analogy distance is zero as well to solve the entanglement problem.
Conclusion, both problems are solved and no more work for the physicists.
Can somebody explain?
As an offshoot, a time-sensor property like minimum mass can be decided depending on this experiment. In other words, what is the minimum property of a particle to start sensing time?
These sub-particles are the true God's particles where time means nothing. TISP time independent sub-particles. These remarks point to a new classification of matter where the time is the dividing domain.
This throws question marks about the exact time of the big bang. Or it makes it only from our point of view.
More importantly, it will be more logical to "understand" the size of the starting point of the big bang, it will be truly zero.
Quantum physics delves deep into the fundamental nature of reality, revealing a universe where particles can exist in multiple states simultaneously, only settling into a definite state when observed. This mind-bending reality challenges our traditional understanding of matter, energy, and causality. Meanwhile, quantum psychology takes these principles and explores how they might influence human consciousness, perception, and even the very nature of thought itself. Could quantum mechanics, with its probabilistic nature and concepts like superposition and entanglement, offer new insights into the complexities of the mind and consciousness? Quantum psychology proposes that the mind might function in a similar way to quantum systems, where thoughts and emotions are not static but exist in multiple potential states until we focus on or "observe" them, shaping our experiences and decisions. Furthermore, if consciousness is interconnected at a quantum level, as some theories suggest, could this explain phenomena like intuition, synchronicity, or even non-local interactions between minds? How might the probabilistic and non-deterministic nature of quantum states relate to our subjective experiences, mental processes, and even free will? As both fields evolve, can the marriage of quantum physics and psychology offer us a deeper understanding of human consciousness, going beyond the boundaries of classical neuroscience?
Yep, that was complete bullshit. ;-)
Very well explained!
I enjoyed the video... Only we are now in the 21 century and Science has much advanced... What's with morden Science.. For example The Universes.. Connected to one another... And how..? 😂❤
Old video. Why not he is making new videos.
Never mind if the video is 10 years old. Its enjoyable reality for me right today(quantum physics)😊
No matter what im watching or listening to, when the commercials come on i leave.
Who's fault is it that you're a tight ar se. LOL
Thanks for sharing
8:24
"...really put the cat amongst the pigeons."
🤔
So you don't think its a right thing to tell people this is none of your work here that you only uploaded video already existing on youtube? You think there were no aithors, no work input in these videos ?
Quantum superposition is just saying you are witnessing a paradox because there is something you are overlooking which appears as a paradox.
55:00 DAMN! Imagining what he must have felt like...
why there are only few of us watching or why is it not on focus?
It exists only when we measure it and we know it exists only when we measure it are two completely different propositions. Forgive my lack of the ability to connect two things without step by step reasoning, I can hardly see what the interchangeability of wave-particle has to do with the question of reality. More study is needed.
I have to agree with you.
I have always seen this in my mind much like a wave on the ocean.
We can learn alot by studying the wave , but certain things will be impossible to ascertain unless we pull a molecule of water from the wave and stop it so as to observe those additional properties.
Doing so however does not make either any less real.
A wave is a wave and a particle is a particle and yes....they are the same thing. But we cannot observe them as both.
I guess we just gotta deal with it. So far it doesn't seem to be hurting anything other than some physicists mind.
What is the name of that song ???
Get closer look at that philament. Distance and size also matters.
I don't let this keep me up at night, but it is interesting. SF/
Why is it defiance, if it is something science has not yet been able to reach?
I just absolutely love some of the scientific terms they come up with particularly when they still don’t understand but found something new ah ha! UV catastrophe!
The reason why 2 quantum objects can be in 2 places at the same time is because space and time does not exist at the quantum level, this was proven through experiments dealing with quantum entanglement.
I'd be so much happier in life without this as a suggestion for something to watch for the 30th time. Find another target yeh? Thanks.
You're close, coherent versus incoherent light, density-amp versus density de-amp, quantum fluid-flow & quantum particle-flows that are of the hydraulic instabilities that produces the force that pulls-straight inwardly into infinity versus the hydraulic instabilities that pushes & bends outwardly into infinity... Two-point and a three-point systemizing the Vorticity of an under-square, over-square, and the spherical vortex. The Schrodinger's cat paradox of the crystalline-past versus the non-crystalline future. All mass, no matter how large or how small that mass maybe is made up of orbiting-particle systems extending inwardly into infinity as well as extending outwardly into infinity. Even the synthetic diamond, as hard & pure as that diamond is... There is no part of that diamond that is not in the constant act of motion! Einstein's work was all about the force that pushes & bends outwardly, through angular accelerations that produce boundaries. Where as Newton's work was all about the force that pulls-straight inwardly into infinity, of which is a boundary remover. All of which is the simple difference between matter moving from an inertial frame of reference into annular accelerations, or angular accelerations moving back into a inertial frame of reference...
every creation has a mind and soul
A fuzzy shadow is proof of nothing but the idea that the solar disk has a non-zero radius.
All these fifty years of conscious brooding have brought me no nearer to the answer to the question, 'What are light quanta (photons)?'
Nowadays every rascal thinks he knows, but he is mistaken.
🕊️
EINSTEIN
Hey this site is just reposting the videos that are year old. bologna
Watch it again
People always talk about Schrodinger's cat when explaining Quantum physics, and for years.. I had no idea what it means. Your explanation using the two coins analogy is much much simpler.
Too many ads
The reason for the two therious won't line up is the dimensional differences and overlapping. Many dimensions coexist side by side. God sits at the highest ( infinite) dimension.
BEHIND THE CURTAIN IS THE GLORY !!!! Love John !!!!
I've heard it speculated by another podcaster that the double slit experiment illustrates how instrument setup produces the result you desire.
Technically this documentary is like 70 years old.
Science tech from Brain power, no 💡?😂
An either/or experiment is only valid if there are no other possibilities: solving a paradox requires verifying experimental results weren't caused by something you've overlooked. You demon experiment suggests to me that you';ve overlooked something - I'm not convinced by your argument.
I just want a correlation , which support technology but differs understanding.
I have an analogy like triggering the event in LHC Higgs experiments where 90%of data is west .
Statistics of targated events .
You have make the event I.e this video to win
Our attention and like.
You have made us think is it a scientific truth.
Is it nature or technology?
Marvelous.
AI Will do different than human's process of progress.
my dad had goofy magnet things that i used to play with,...
Einstein said, if it can't be explained simply then you don't understand it-this video is conjecture at best ¿`_
I know what the curtain is, I have seen it on psychedelics
This video was obviously created before Alain Aspect,John Clauser and Anton Zeilinger won the Nobel prize in 2022 for proving that the universe isn't locally real
Sounds cool, except that that is irrelevant philosophical bullshit. ;-)
@@lepidoptera9337 Please explain and PROVE
@@Sharperthanu1 We are teaching in undergraduate physics that reality is the totality of all irreversible energy exchanges. Nothing else matters. If you didn't get that, then you weren't paying enough attention in undergrad physics. Apect at al. were not. ;-)
If all is one…
Its not that hard to grip,
I feel like my head is going to explode
just wrong analogy
I'm very interested in the Sciences...But I'm seeing thiz same info under 4/5 different titles...tho'
Pancho
It was NOT Einsteins idea. It was Newtons- Corpuscles
My point? You've rigged the experiment to produce the result you wanted rather than test whether your hypothesis is appropriate - experimenter rigging his apparatus.
Wow
Why doesn't that card game work for me?
16:08 was a good joke.
You are STEALING and reuploading videos !!!! Shame on you !
Copenhagen Interpretation #POW 2005 rammstein incirlik
There's nothing simple about creation.
The quantum world is many worlds.
Quantum mechanics is not fully understood
Scientist should study abdhidhamma in Buddhism, all this was explained and more 2500 years ago…
Quantum really sucks when you get way down into it!😂🙈✌️
Good doc, sad tho that you're not honest and tell us that this is almost 10 years old.
Thanks for you confirmation, I thought I got de ja vu :D
Doc you’re seeing now is totally honest. He couldn’t possibly know you were here 10 years later.
@@kathyorourke9273I mean the uploader of course, this video is uploaded just some day ago, so yes he/she would know 😂
I don't know how you could mean Jim the presenter, "He couldn't know you're watching me 10 years from now."😂😂😂
@@bennylloyd-willner9667I think this channel was sold. The content doesn’t match what it was earlier, just repost
The original videos are about that old. This is a channel belonging to someone who has pinched those vids and wants to make them their own
At first I didn't know if this guy was trying to fool the viewer or if he is fooled himself.
Halfway through I figured it out. He is fooling the viewer. Light is a wave. The color of light is the wave length, the brightness of light is the frequency of the wave. Electrons have nothing to do with light.
Video editing to show that cards and coins have no randomness...
So you weren't paying any more attention in science class than the folks who made this video. Cool. Also completely irrelevant. ;-)
ComputerOperatedDeviceEntry😮
Example: head you win, tail I lose.😂
Berkeley was right. Esse est percipi
This comment is both negative and positive.. you decide
After studying quantum physics for about a year with the assistance of AI, I propose this. My analogy of the universe starts like this, it behaves more like animal in its unpredictability. It has unpredictable behavior that is only modeled with the human fabrication of mathematics. You see, I see a universe where the models reduce to persistence, or the past battling with the coming change or the future. Now if I recount that math is the fabrication that introduces measurement and then time we can use this notion to eliminate time itself. It’s you fabrication of measure and math remember? The universe seems to reserve the right to do things at some point where the rules don’t really exist, to small. Here the universe expresses it self in the only way it can, it’s language is math remember? So the expression of mathematics enables probabilty to be the measure and it’s because of the rules of least action. What else is it to do. So the magic we think we see is all explainable as the process of expression unfolding, rather like a tardy child wanting to the least action needed, and your observation pushes the development of these systems, that’s all. As the universe tests and analyses things to decide what to do and why, it’s the same thing the scientist is doing creating test bed interference thus the additional confusion. When it does not make sense it does because this is where the freedom of exprssion of the universe begins because the rules stop there. Make sence? Where the sense stops its fundamental because the rules stop here. Then it makes sence. Penrose said, we study the rules so as to enable the violation of er something like that.
Stack the deck, against the Devil? Naughty Jimbo.
😂lol thanks for a decade old reupload LMAO...