thank you for this soldier. idk why literally no one else does 1080 and 1440 low benchmarks when 90% of players on multi are going to be playing at these settings. also curious to why you arent running your mem @ 6000 cl28 or something close to that as im almost certain you would get better fps ? maybe im wrong?
@@Milkykt I used to run the memory that low but the performance on X3D chips went from negligible to sometimes worse and I just went for the more relaxed voltages and higher frequency with tighten secondaries and tertiaries route
Good stuff, if you're buying from Amazon I have affliate links in the description that cost you nothing extra but add some sheckles into my pockets lol
Great work. Thank you. Hopefully, you can do some testing in the new resurgence map, Area 99. My frames dropped significantly on the map tonight compared to the mp maps, so it'll be interesting to see how your rig will do (I have 4090 and I'm upgrading to 9800x3d tomorrow)
@@FIVESTRZoh man that's unlucky haha but it's a pretty decent map even if you choose to do a solo match for the sake of making another great benchmark video for your loyal subscribers like myself haha
@@FIVESTRZ interesting. With my 12900k + 4090, I was consistently dipping in the 150-180 area in 1440p! I was streaming for some of my buddies in discord but it was in 720p. Maybe that was putting pressure. I get 250+ in multiplayer in 1440p. Can't wait to try my 9800x3d and see for myself.
@ yea so what I noticed with the 12900K is that when you went with the 13900K the performance gain in COD was huge. Went from pushing 200-220 with 3090 Ti to 275-310 depending on areas and the spots that were 180 were then 240-260. Craziest improvement ever 😂
That 1440p performance is pretty good, if the 4090 wasn't too expensive at ny local Micro Center, I will definitely get one with the 9800x3d and forget about RTX 50 series for maybe 2-3 years depending how good or how horrible is the optimization in newer games. But for now I still prefer to wait for the RTX 50 series and see how good it will be.
Today, I would wait. You don't already have one and its so late into the life cycle for the same money in a few months or sooner potentially you could get the newer cards. If you found a good deal on one used that would be the play because you can flip for a few dollars less OR just keep it if the 5000 series doesn't make sense to buy
@FIVESTRZ I was considering getting a used one, if not then a 7900 xtx considering that my local Micro Center have plenty of them for less than $1000 (some models) plus they are offering me a GPU trade in for my 3090 ti, but that's something that I was thinking about. But like I said before, I'll wait for the RTX 50 series and see how good it will be (only if it doesn't cost more than the 4090)
@@FIVESTRZ Honestly, I'm not very desperate to have a faster PC, but at the same time I like having a PC that keeps the same fps as my monitor can show considering that I really like smooth gaming performance, and the worst part is that some developers thinks that everyone have a very powerful PC considering that newer games are getting more demanding (Warzone with Black Ops 6 is a good example) Little bit dissapointing 😅
3090 Ti from EVGA is my all time favorite card bar none. I would definitely rock that to this day if I didn't upgrade or didn't have a tech addiction lol. Plus I grabbed it for $1199 when the market crashed but I remember they launched at $1999 and collected dust
@@FIVESTRZ It's the one that I'm still rocking, considering that for me the 3090 ti was the worst price to performance ratio, but I still like how it performs in older games such as Modern Warfare 2019 and other older games as well
@@FIVESTRZ I just recently bought an Endgame Gear OP1 8K wired mouse and it’s working flawlessly in CoD. Polling rate 8000Hz I meant to say. I have an Intel 10900KF and Asus mobo and no problems so far. I still need to test it with lots of older games. I was just wondering how a high polling rate mouse would work with an AMD system. I have the Logitech G502 X wired and it’s a great mouse for single player games.
@@SpideyDiG I have the op1 8k and no issues with 9800x3d at 8k hz. literally 0 frame drops. for reference i play about 1h aim trainers per day i would most likely notice it if there was any issue.
@@BoomerShooterFPS try checking out some hits from this video. 100-120 seems really low unless you’re at 4K. I also made a video a few weeks ago in all my game files tweaks. Troubleshooting Low FPS - Hardware, Software, and COD Config Files Checklist ua-cam.com/video/GNiQKtYzCaA/v-deo.html
@ wow I got 13900ks 4090 and can’t get these numbers without DLSS I think it’s time to switch to 9800x3D unbelievable performance. Thanks for the content
@@FIVESTRZI’m confused. I have a 13900k, I have 2 friends with 14900k, and one with 12900k. We have ddr5 6400 and not a single one of us comes close to this performance. From the beta to launch I lost like 40-50fps with the exact same drivers. Heaps is off for all of us. We also all play 1440p mostly low settings and all have 4090s
Can you post a video about the in game settings for b06. I have a 9800x3d and 4080 super. If I change any setting or vram target my game starts to lag and it’s terrible. Or do you do optimization sessions
so im not the only one whos gpu load almost never reaches 99 (1440p low settings). i had no problem reaching 99 at launch but now it almost never goes past 98 idk if an update changed something
@@FIVESTRZ I thought it would be fixed when I upgrade from my 7800X3D to the 9800X3D tomorrow but I guess that’s just how it is currently…definitely saved me for going crazy tomorrow haha
Is it worth to get the 9800x3d or take the 14900k? I have a Rtx 4090 and a 13900k, what is better for fps avarage 1%low and 0,1% low and At 1440p, I want to take the Rtx 5090 (I have 480hz monitor) thank you !
Depends on what RAM you’re putting together with the 14900K and I’d go with the 9800X3d because the platform isn’t dead so when a faster CPU drops you can just buy that and drop it into your board. 9800X3D is the fastest hands down now and we will see how the 5090 handles games when they launch it
@ I never ran that low. 7200C34 and before that I ran DDR4 on 13900K for a bit 4000C15/3733C14/4166C16. Now I’m 8200C38 and it’s been pretty solid with some light tuning. X3D is still faster than all the intel chips now but there are some scenarios where Intel has more consistent lows. Like I said dead platform versus newer
Is there a chance to get a cs2 benchmark map result with the 4090 and the 9800x3d ? Really curious. All low and 1280x960 resolution. Can’t find anyone with the exact specs other than you that I’m looking for. Thx a lot in advance !
thinking about getting the same pc but with 4080s instead of 4090 cuz the price gap is really high, also gonna play on 240hz 1080p i don't think there would be a really big diff right
Good video bro, can you tell me maybe test if there is a difference between 7600 1:2 1t gdm (i think u use this) and 6000 or 6400 (depends on silicon lottery) 1:1 gdm off. It would be great thank you
If I spend any time tuning RAM it would be to see if the 9800X3D and hit 8000MT with the current subtimings I have but I don't have the same time I did to spend 4-5 hours clearing CMOS after PC fails to boot during testing and dialing in the timings
Nah, it was the native performance. I also hit the same performance on the 14900KS but the video was broken and did the shadowplay gitch where it starts then immediately stops the recording so I have 1 sec clips
Hey but you’re at 4K. That 6800 XT was a 1440P animal. I remember getting the ASRock PG model and slaying God of War. Also feel like those cards just had better color reproduction compared to Nvidia and still
@@FIVESTRZ I run it normally at 1440P, I just slapped it up to 4k to see where it's at compared to todays best, conclusion - old but still good enough for my 1440P setup upgrades not required lol
120FPS seems so specific like it's gotta be a frame cap or a program capping the FPS. I did have a defective 13900K on launch day which was hitting about that but also could not use DIMM 1 or 2 on any boards for RAM so essentially forced into single channel configuration. Warzone was like 120 FPS and as soon as I got a new chip from Newegg, 308 FPS
@FIVESTRZ just a quick build update 😆 my be quiet 1600w titanium psu and my crucial t705 4tb ssd arrives later on today all I need now is copy of windows and cpu and gpu lol build is almost completed
How many people play with rtx 4090? I have 12600k and rtx 4070 and I play 2k with 180 fps. Fps above 150 is irrelevant. All reviews are set up only for selling cpu and gpu and motherboards.
I think the key difference is how many frames do you need to play without a negative experience versus how fast and smooth you want that same good experience to be improved by. Everything in life has a ladder nowadays from cars, phones, homes, and PC parts are just in that mix. Just buy a console and hook up a keyboard to it if that is the point you are pushing lol. 120 FPS and $450. Also refresh rates over 240Hz are noticeable so if you're capable of pushing 240-360 FPS and your monitor can refresh that high, then your money isn't wasted.
yo try 6400 1:1 with timings tune because 7600mt is weird with ryzen either push for 8000mt+ or stay with 1:1 mode the best is 6400 with timings tune thats will give you great results test that
I've been on this since the bios update last year but didnt see much difference from 6200C28 that I was running prior with 7950X3D - ua-cam.com/video/-Hvq7WFcWpI/v-deo.htmlsi=PgzigYOCfIXMbLzm
@FIVESTRZ yeah 7600mt is same speed as 6200 1:1 but the best you can get with 1:1 is 6600mt but I doubt it will work unless if you had golden cpu or you can use 6400 its faster than 7600 , but if manage to get 8000 that's just faster than anything else lol its easier on the cpu but its harder on the board if you got good board it might run 8000 it will be perfect setup for ryzen cpu , also check buildzoid video it will explain ram on ryzen better than this
@ I typically just test myself in 1-2 games and see if my chances made a difference. I could get XMP working which was 8000C38 but yea the voltages required to run 1:1 is much higher and sometimes past 1.5V which I’m not trying to do
@@FIVESTRZ I see did you ever test tuned 8000 with your current setup ? , it should give nice boost in games especially the 1%lows also keep fclk at 2000 because with 8000mt it will be synced and basically will give the lowest latency possible thats great for gaming
You should, I am going to try this out with 8000C36 tonight, my board would let me do XMP 8000C38 but with the 7800X3D I couldn't go any further down without lower frequency
![Ultimate Ryzen 9800X3D & RTX 4090 Gaming PC Build! 🙌 [The New FASTEST Gaming CPU?]](/img/n.gif)
So 4k 240 competitive is real now
@@itsolitz very much so yes.
@ Is heaps on or off?
@ off, found it performed better on my 4090 off and better on with the XTX
to bad the human eye cant see past 30fps and 360p
@ 😂 nah man. 180P and 24FPS cap on vision
thank you for this soldier. idk why literally no one else does 1080 and 1440 low benchmarks when 90% of players on multi are going to be playing at these settings. also curious to why you arent running your mem @ 6000 cl28 or something close to that as im almost certain you would get better fps ? maybe im wrong?
@@Milkykt I used to run the memory that low but the performance on X3D chips went from negligible to sometimes worse and I just went for the more relaxed voltages and higher frequency with tighten secondaries and tertiaries route
I am going to wait for the 5090 and fully upgrade my rig so I can play 4k 240hz.
Spend the money once
Great vid! Sick fps :) do you got a 4070 ti super too? would love to see 9800x3d paired with it and with low settings
Sold it a few weeks ago since I am scaling down the channel
thank you so much for this video, it made my next purchase feel much easier
Good stuff, if you're buying from Amazon I have affliate links in the description that cost you nothing extra but add some sheckles into my pockets lol
Great work. Thank you. Hopefully, you can do some testing in the new resurgence map, Area 99. My frames dropped significantly on the map tonight compared to the mp maps, so it'll be interesting to see how your rig will do (I have 4090 and I'm upgrading to 9800x3d tomorrow)
I had dropped for a few seconds and our buddy who asked us to play it quit so we dropped right out lol
@@FIVESTRZoh man that's unlucky haha but it's a pretty decent map even if you choose to do a solo match for the sake of making another great benchmark video for your loyal subscribers like myself haha
@@rollnrollnroll so far on the 14900KS/4080 I’m over 250 FPS most parts
@@FIVESTRZ interesting. With my 12900k + 4090, I was consistently dipping in the 150-180 area in 1440p! I was streaming for some of my buddies in discord but it was in 720p. Maybe that was putting pressure. I get 250+ in multiplayer in 1440p. Can't wait to try my 9800x3d and see for myself.
@ yea so what I noticed with the 12900K is that when you went with the 13900K the performance gain in COD was huge. Went from pushing 200-220 with 3090 Ti to 275-310 depending on areas and the spots that were 180 were then 240-260. Craziest improvement ever 😂
That 1440p performance is pretty good, if the 4090 wasn't too expensive at ny local Micro Center, I will definitely get one with the 9800x3d and forget about RTX 50 series for maybe 2-3 years depending how good or how horrible is the optimization in newer games. But for now I still prefer to wait for the RTX 50 series and see how good it will be.
Today, I would wait. You don't already have one and its so late into the life cycle for the same money in a few months or sooner potentially you could get the newer cards. If you found a good deal on one used that would be the play because you can flip for a few dollars less OR just keep it if the 5000 series doesn't make sense to buy
@FIVESTRZ I was considering getting a used one, if not then a 7900 xtx considering that my local Micro Center have plenty of them for less than $1000 (some models) plus they are offering me a GPU trade in for my 3090 ti, but that's something that I was thinking about. But like I said before, I'll wait for the RTX 50 series and see how good it will be (only if it doesn't cost more than the 4090)
@@FIVESTRZ Honestly, I'm not very desperate to have a faster PC, but at the same time I like having a PC that keeps the same fps as my monitor can show considering that I really like smooth gaming performance, and the worst part is that some developers thinks that everyone have a very powerful PC considering that newer games are getting more demanding (Warzone with Black Ops 6 is a good example) Little bit dissapointing 😅
3090 Ti from EVGA is my all time favorite card bar none. I would definitely rock that to this day if I didn't upgrade or didn't have a tech addiction lol. Plus I grabbed it for $1199 when the market crashed but I remember they launched at $1999 and collected dust
@@FIVESTRZ It's the one that I'm still rocking, considering that for me the 3090 ti was the worst price to performance ratio, but I still like how it performs in older games such as Modern Warfare 2019 and other older games as well
Just wondering if you have a 8K mouse to tryout to see how it works with the 9800X3D?
25K sensor 🤷🏿♂️I use the G502X Plus works well, are you seeing issues online about jitter?
@@FIVESTRZ I just recently bought an Endgame Gear OP1 8K wired mouse and it’s working flawlessly in CoD. Polling rate 8000Hz I meant to say. I have an Intel 10900KF and Asus mobo and no problems so far. I still need to test it with lots of older games.
I was just wondering how a high polling rate mouse would work with an AMD system.
I have the Logitech G502 X wired and it’s a great mouse for single player games.
@@SpideyDiG I have the op1 8k and no issues with 9800x3d at 8k hz. literally 0 frame drops. for reference i play about 1h aim trainers per day i would most likely notice it if there was any issue.
Is this Battlenet, Steam or Game Pass version? I’m on PC Game pass and I feel like my 4080 is not being fully utilized
@@Jaykurosakiiwhat CPU do you have and RAM. I uploaded the 14900KS/4080 version of this the other day
I’m using a 5800x3d with a 4090 and getting 100-120 fps. Anything you would suggest changing settings wise to get more frames?
@@BoomerShooterFPS try checking out some hits from this video. 100-120 seems really low unless you’re at 4K. I also made a video a few weeks ago in all my game files tweaks.
Troubleshooting Low FPS - Hardware, Software, and COD Config Files Checklist
ua-cam.com/video/GNiQKtYzCaA/v-deo.html
Did you use DLSS or this is a raw benchmark with low presets?
No upscaling on this one
@ wow I got 13900ks 4090 and can’t get these numbers without DLSS I think it’s time to switch to 9800x3D unbelievable performance. Thanks for the content
@ohmyTalal play around with heaps in your game files, I was getting similar performance with this same GPU and the 14900KS with better lows
@@FIVESTRZI’m confused. I have a 13900k, I have 2 friends with 14900k, and one with 12900k. We have ddr5 6400 and not a single one of us comes close to this performance. From the beta to launch I lost like 40-50fps with the exact same drivers.
Heaps is off for all of us.
We also all play 1440p mostly low settings and all have 4090s
@@muffin0608 I was running 14900KS and 8200C38 memory so that is almost 2GHz faster RAM with likely similar CL
any special bios settings for the 9800X3D?
Nothing really, just +200MHz on core and -15 PBO
Can you post a video about the in game settings for b06. I have a 9800x3d and 4080 super. If I change any setting or vram target my game starts to lag and it’s terrible. Or do you do optimization sessions
@@scottrobeson7513 nah no optimization sessions from your boy. Video is already up on the channel by the way. About 2 weeks ago
ive got the rtx 4090 with the i9 13900k and im playing with 140-190 fps what are youre settings?
@@dreamking8129 ua-cam.com/video/D-VuD0ZFTQg/v-deo.htmlsi=nN-r7T4OVosMZSSO
so im not the only one whos gpu load almost never reaches 99 (1440p low settings). i had no problem reaching 99 at launch but now it almost never goes past 98 idk if an update changed something
@@IBaknam the Nvidia drivers will occasionally cap you from being able to reach max unless your pushing the GPU really hard
makes sense cause it’s maxed out when I run a 3DMark test
@@IBaknam yea for the longest it was 97% for me but these newer chips have pushed me to 99% on certain games now.
@@FIVESTRZ I thought it would be fixed when I upgrade from my 7800X3D to the 9800X3D tomorrow but I guess that’s just how it is currently…definitely saved me for going crazy tomorrow haha
Lol nah, you're not CPU bottlenecked and it was mainly because the driver implementing this cap to keep latency down
can you post your overlay item file? Looks nice!
@@prfrag MSI Afterburner and the bottom half is HWiNFO64. Search UA-cam Wolfgang MSI Afterburner tutorial for a nice breakdown
Is it worth to get the 9800x3d or take the 14900k? I have a Rtx 4090 and a 13900k, what is better for fps avarage 1%low and 0,1% low and At 1440p, I want to take the Rtx 5090 (I have 480hz monitor) thank you !
Depends on what RAM you’re putting together with the 14900K and I’d go with the 9800X3d because the platform isn’t dead so when a faster CPU drops you can just buy that and drop it into your board. 9800X3D is the fastest hands down now and we will see how the 5090 handles games when they launch it
@ im with 6400 cl32
Is it worth to change in my case ?
@ I never ran that low. 7200C34 and before that I ran DDR4 on 13900K for a bit 4000C15/3733C14/4166C16. Now I’m 8200C38 and it’s been pretty solid with some light tuning. X3D is still faster than all the intel chips now but there are some scenarios where Intel has more consistent lows. Like I said dead platform versus newer
just got mine 2 days ago and it is absolutely glorius. i can never drop below acceptable frames without using frame gen since im on a 480hz monitor
What does that even mean
I’m working through mine, crazy that 480Hz monitors dropped lol I thought I was flexing with my lil 360Hz OLED but nah. Back seat now 🤣
Is there a chance to get a cs2 benchmark map result with the 4090 and the 9800x3d ? Really curious. All low and 1280x960 resolution. Can’t find anyone with the exact specs other than you that I’m looking for. Thx a lot in advance !
I think I had done the 7800X3D and 4090 or 4080 with those types of settings. Parking lot for down time video
@ I can’t seem to find that test + I wanna see it with the 9800x3d so I can roughly know what I can achieve ich I get that processor
I feel ya, If I remember AND have down time I can try to throw one on.
@ I would really appreciate that !
thinking about getting the same pc but with 4080s instead of 4090 cuz the price gap is really high, also gonna play on 240hz 1080p i don't think there would be a really big diff right
Might end up putting my 4080 in this because it's way too tight in the O11D Evo.
Good video bro, can you tell me maybe test if there is a difference between 7600 1:2 1t gdm (i think u use this) and 6000 or 6400 (depends on silicon lottery) 1:1 gdm off. It would be great thank you
@@ThomasVonbretzt beefy Tech made that video last year. It was faster at times 7800 I think he used
@FIVESTRZ ye i know this video but new cod engine new cpu maybe you can test it on battle royale would be great.
If I spend any time tuning RAM it would be to see if the 9800X3D and hit 8000MT with the current subtimings I have but I don't have the same time I did to spend 4-5 hours clearing CMOS after PC fails to boot during testing and dialing in the timings
frame generation was on right?
No it was not on.
@ dude how i get less fps on my 4090
@ I’m not sure, what CPU are you rocking?
@@FIVESTRZ i9-13900K 5600mhz ram
@ you’re RAM is probably the biggest bottleneck right off the bat there.
What overlay are you using to get 1 percent lows
MSI Afterburner still
Would it be much different with a 4080 super?
@@zurga3777 probably not but it would most likely be pinned to its max utilization
This has to be with dlss/frame gen on right?
Nah, it was the native performance. I also hit the same performance on the 14900KS but the video was broken and did the shadowplay gitch where it starts then immediately stops the recording so I have 1 sec clips
Hows the performance on 4K with Quality DLSS? Should be roughly similar to 1440p I guess, but would be awesome to see :D
@@KalmerVT I don’t think it would be like 1440P but I haven’t tried it. 4K hits performance hard
I don't understand how you're hitting 60c. I changed -25curve with 200mhz plus and I get 80-85 degrees. I have an AIO.
Your thermal paste application is messed up or you left something on the copper block on the aio. I get 60c on my hotspot while gaming.
Yea if everything was new the common things are the plastic on the AIO being left on.
@@FIVESTRZ it's not the plastic before this i had the 7800x3d. i was getting around 60c while gaming
Do you turn on variable rate sharing AND OR rebar
@@Cat-x4v3z VRR yes Rebar yes with NV Inspector and heaps off
my 6800xt gets 82 fps with 72 fps 1% lows in 4k, this setup you run more than doubles holy shit
Hey but you’re at 4K. That 6800 XT was a 1440P animal. I remember getting the ASRock PG model and slaying God of War. Also feel like those cards just had better color reproduction compared to Nvidia and still
@@FIVESTRZ I run it normally at 1440P, I just slapped it up to 4k to see where it's at compared to todays best, conclusion - old but still good enough for my 1440P setup upgrades not required lol
bruh im getting 120 fps on 13900k 4090 on 2k low settings howww
thats weird i get with 13900ks and 4090 around 300-350
@ whats your ram?
120FPS seems so specific like it's gotta be a frame cap or a program capping the FPS. I did have a defective 13900K on launch day which was hitting about that but also could not use DIMM 1 or 2 on any boards for RAM so essentially forced into single channel configuration. Warzone was like 120 FPS and as soon as I got a new chip from Newegg, 308 FPS
Maybe he overclocked his cpu
how do you get uncapped fps in cod?
First settings screen select unlimited instead of custom frame rate
@ appreciate you
@ you got it man!
Gameplay too smooth
Wish the recording software was working properly when I did the 14900K version
@FIVESTRZ just a quick build update 😆 my be quiet 1600w titanium psu and my crucial t705 4tb ssd arrives later on today all I need now is copy of windows and cpu and gpu lol build is almost completed
That's exciting man, almost there
@@FIVESTRZ indeed💯
@@GamingwitD5I bought a 1200w platinum psu in prep for the 9800X3D/5090. Should be more than enough, right?
why you can get so high gpu usage in this map?I got low fps and low gpu usage in this shit map
Have you turned heaps on and off in the game files to see which one works best for you?
do a test on warzone
Just in case you hadn't seen it the warzone runs are live
How many people play with rtx 4090? I have 12600k and rtx 4070 and I play 2k with 180 fps. Fps above 150 is irrelevant. All reviews are set up only for selling cpu and gpu and motherboards.
I think the key difference is how many frames do you need to play without a negative experience versus how fast and smooth you want that same good experience to be improved by. Everything in life has a ladder nowadays from cars, phones, homes, and PC parts are just in that mix. Just buy a console and hook up a keyboard to it if that is the point you are pushing lol. 120 FPS and $450. Also refresh rates over 240Hz are noticeable so if you're capable of pushing 240-360 FPS and your monitor can refresh that high, then your money isn't wasted.
yo try 6400 1:1 with timings tune because 7600mt is weird with ryzen either push for 8000mt+ or stay with 1:1 mode the best is 6400 with timings tune thats will give you great results test that
I've been on this since the bios update last year but didnt see much difference from 6200C28 that I was running prior with 7950X3D - ua-cam.com/video/-Hvq7WFcWpI/v-deo.htmlsi=PgzigYOCfIXMbLzm
@FIVESTRZ yeah 7600mt is same speed as 6200 1:1 but the best you can get with 1:1 is 6600mt but I doubt it will work unless if you had golden cpu or you can use 6400 its faster than 7600 , but if manage to get 8000 that's just faster than anything else lol its easier on the cpu but its harder on the board if you got good board it might run 8000 it will be perfect setup for ryzen cpu , also check buildzoid video it will explain ram on ryzen better than this
@ I typically just test myself in 1-2 games and see if my chances made a difference. I could get XMP working which was 8000C38 but yea the voltages required to run 1:1 is much higher and sometimes past 1.5V which I’m not trying to do
@@FIVESTRZ I see did you ever test tuned 8000 with your current setup ? , it should give nice boost in games especially the 1%lows also keep fclk at 2000 because with 8000mt it will be synced and basically will give the lowest latency possible thats great for gaming
@ no because the sub timing that are stable aren’t working
5090 wen
Depends only on price
Rip all the money to get owned by Controller players.
@@AugustoV8Cesar haha OR, join them
I use ps edge controller on PC
Wow, 0.1% lows are destroyed, i think i will stay with 14900k and 8000mhz cl36
You should, I am going to try this out with 8000C36 tonight, my board would let me do XMP 8000C38 but with the 7800X3D I couldn't go any further down without lower frequency