Deep Sea Encounters with Cryptids

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 6 лип 2022
  • Cryptid Iceberg
    • The DEEPEST Cryptid Ic...
    Cryptid Playlist
    • Cryptid Videos
    Patreon:
    www.patreon.com/Truthisscarier
    Twitter:
    TruthScarier
    Instagram
    truthisscarier
  • Розваги

КОМЕНТАРІ • 248

  • @chrisgaming9567
    @chrisgaming9567 Рік тому +40

    First like/comment!

  • @mimonikeda5768
    @mimonikeda5768 Рік тому +253

    I've always considered the Deepstar 4000 fish to be the most concrete cryptid sighting. There is not a doubt in my mind that it's a real fish. Great video, you gained a new sub!

    • @Truthisscarierthanfiction
      @Truthisscarierthanfiction  Рік тому +76

      It's an extremely good sighting. One of the benefits of making a video on deep sea cryptozoology is that most of the people who are in the deep sea have great qualifications in marine biology, so the sightings are pretty high quality
      Thank you! I appreciate it

    • @CivilizedAnimal2022
      @CivilizedAnimal2022 Місяць тому +1

      Megamouth shark?

    • @GladDestronger
      @GladDestronger Місяць тому +8

      It might've been an unknown armored fish... a descendant from the early Devonian era. Plenty of 'em back then. A few of might've survived extinction by living in deep water.

    • @FeedMeSalt
      @FeedMeSalt Місяць тому +6

      I absolutely believe that one. Especially considering how many fossils have later been found still living, or at least so similar they are essentially the same species.
      Like deep see isopods. Always wanted to eat one tbh

    • @cMARVEL360
      @cMARVEL360 27 днів тому

      Be realistic. Even if such a thing we're to exist, what are the chances they they stumble on to it on some Random Dive.
      The size of the oceans, in relation to the random Excursion. I mean just look at the odds man!

  • @crunchyhippo8957
    @crunchyhippo8957 10 місяців тому +62

    The first fish that's sketched is much larger than 25-ft. long. More like 50-ft. long.

  • @thetainowarrior9902
    @thetainowarrior9902 2 місяці тому +17

    The DSV Alvin sighting isn't the deepest cryptid encounter ever reported, the Mariana Trench flatfish sighting is.

  • @mattatk92
    @mattatk92 Рік тому +71

    Deep Star 4000 story is new to me. Awesome video. Subscribed.

  • @jon952
    @jon952 Місяць тому +9

    Corkscrew creature sure seems like it could be a siphonophore, though the head and eyes pose a problem.

  • @johhnymoney9512
    @johhnymoney9512 Рік тому +42

    I love Cryptozoology

  • @1megaalakazam100
    @1megaalakazam100 Рік тому +37

    The ocean has so many secrets and strange creatures... is always fascinating.
    You always make a nice video bro. Very nice.

    • @Truthisscarierthanfiction
      @Truthisscarierthanfiction  Рік тому +6

      Thank you bro, appreciate your support as always

    • @robbylebotha
      @robbylebotha 22 дні тому

      Wouldn’t call them secrets, we just don’t have the capability to find out. They aren’t hiding, they just live where we can’t go. It’s like saying volcanos hold secrets.

  • @robin8137
    @robin8137 Рік тому +29

    Great video. I'm glad you cover a lot of stuff that is more obscure.

  • @dareka9425
    @dareka9425 Місяць тому +53

    Explorer: I just saw a plesiosaur with my own eyes!
    Expert Critics: Nah. We didn't see it ourselves so it's probably just a seal.

    • @jakewolf079
      @jakewolf079 Місяць тому +5

      the "snake like head" description proves that it is definitely not a seal

    • @thoughtfuldevil6069
      @thoughtfuldevil6069 Місяць тому +8

      Could be an unknown species of seal. Or fish. Or Amphibian. There's no particular reason to jump to "Post-Cretaceous Elasmosaur."

    • @RootVegetabIe
      @RootVegetabIe Місяць тому +3

      If you yourself describe the person as an "expert" then maybe you should listen to them.

    • @adriel88_
      @adriel88_ Місяць тому +1

      I believe the explorers and I believe plesiosaur is still out there with Megalodon and it scares the shit outta me

    • @krollmond7544
      @krollmond7544 26 днів тому +1

      Yeah like i never heard of a long necked seal, can someone elaborate on that?

  • @jakewolf079
    @jakewolf079 Місяць тому +3

    I'm convinced what they saw in Alvin (the last one) is a real Plesiosaur, especially with the ''snake like head'' description.

  • @kcurran9913
    @kcurran9913 Рік тому +22

    I feel like this channel is about to blow up.

  • @FeedMeSalt
    @FeedMeSalt Місяць тому +6

    Oh hey the algorithm auto play brought me somewhere juicy.
    Good content I'm subbing.
    Fingers crossed maybe the algorithm Is coming back around for this one. I think it deserves more attention for sure.
    Especially considering I watch this type of stuff often, and haven't heard of half of these.

    • @Truthisscarierthanfiction
      @Truthisscarierthanfiction  Місяць тому +3

      Lately the algorithm has been pretty kind, lot of old videos blowing up. I appreciate it!

  • @Croatz
    @Croatz Місяць тому +20

    I love how everyones explanation for what people see is: "Maybe your just stupid"

    • @trumancremers6337
      @trumancremers6337 Місяць тому +3

      I mean its kinda true misidentification of things is common

    • @davidtrainor2115
      @davidtrainor2115 29 днів тому

      Tbf it’s been demonstrated countless times that eyewitness accounts are unreliable; especially when there’s fame to be had from spotting a ‚sea monster‘

    • @07foxmulder
      @07foxmulder 27 днів тому +4

      Almost fitting that you don’t know the difference between your and you’re.

    • @ltahoe9257
      @ltahoe9257 27 днів тому +1

      @@07foxmulder maybe they're not a native English speaker?

    • @creatureTHEcritter
      @creatureTHEcritter 23 дні тому

      @@07foxmulder it might not be an accidental spelling error. A lot of the time i don't type the' cause I just feel like it. Some people may not care, I mean it's a UA-cam comment not an essay lol.

  • @hippothehippo
    @hippothehippo Місяць тому +76

    Sadly because of our polluting and deep sea fishing, mining, and dredging activities, it’s possible we could wipe out entire species without even getting to see or know their miraculous forms.

    • @XoxotoMemes
      @XoxotoMemes Місяць тому +14

      Mostly because of China

    • @luigiconder6113
      @luigiconder6113 Місяць тому +4

      I don't tend to cry much about things. But in a weirdly intimate way, this shocking conclusion forced me to cry even if only for a moment at such a tragic contemplation

    • @silassilver8583
      @silassilver8583 Місяць тому +4

      ​@@XoxotoMemesThank god we have an excuse for everything now. It is China or Russia.

    • @XoxotoMemes
      @XoxotoMemes Місяць тому +13

      @@silassilver8583 it is a known fact. Cope

    • @silassilver8583
      @silassilver8583 Місяць тому +4

      @@XoxotoMemes If the were as many americans than chinese our world already had collapsed.

  • @ninjaswordtothehead
    @ninjaswordtothehead Місяць тому +4

    Considering the ocean is so vast that it has been estimated, in any given second, multiple sperm whales are each having an epic battle with a giant squid; it doesn't seem much of a stretch to think that a giant fish exists we just haven't found yet.

  • @Lily_of_the_Forest
    @Lily_of_the_Forest Рік тому +68

    I wish experts would look at past animals and compare them to modern cryptids. Maybe the cryptids are unknown adaptations of extinct creatures? Also, since humans can have gigantism / acromegaly, why not sea animals? Since gigantism is not a species trait, that could explain the few sightings since it is just 1 or 2 members of the population.

    • @Error_404_Account_Deleted
      @Error_404_Account_Deleted Рік тому +1

      Well said. And to back your point there is plenty of accepted evidence of deep sea gigantism. IE giant isopods, etc 👍🏻

    • @thing_under_the_stairs
      @thing_under_the_stairs 2 місяці тому +1

      Deep sea gigantism is a known phenomenon, too. Just look at the giant squid! Until the early 00's, there was no hard evidence in human possession that they even existed, and they'd never been filmed! Now there are two species of giant squid that have been identified... so far. If some curious marine biologists applied the same effort from the search for the giant squid to looking for other deep sea giants, who knows what they'd find?

    • @comrade-princesscelestia4907
      @comrade-princesscelestia4907 Місяць тому

      Well I get your meaning, but also literally all animals alive today are adaptations of extinct species so by definition any unknown animal is an unknown adaptation of an extinct animal

  • @EmperorZeech
    @EmperorZeech Рік тому +6

    Great work!

  • @nicholaslienandjaja1815
    @nicholaslienandjaja1815 7 місяців тому +12

    I think Beebe's deep sea fish and the Deepstar 4000 fish could be real, undiscovered species of animals. After all, who knows what kind of creatures live in the unknown depths.
    Anyone remember the James Cameron documentary Aliens of the Deep?

  • @qrfarchaeology9391
    @qrfarchaeology9391 7 місяців тому +22

    The concept of plesiosaurs being deep sea divers is interesting. I grew up reading stories that relate them to lake monsters nothing was really conclusive. I did read one case that sounded credible wear a creature with a long neck had was almost mistaken for an upright floating log because it was camoflauged. If that bioluminescent one is really a plesiosaur, what does that mean for other alleged cases?

    • @Truthisscarierthanfiction
      @Truthisscarierthanfiction  7 місяців тому +2

      Do you remember where you read about the camouflaged case?

    • @qrfarchaeology9391
      @qrfarchaeology9391 7 місяців тому +2

      @@Truthisscarierthanfiction I'll try to remember. I'm doing geophysics homework at the moment (which is not structured well) but I will look for it while taking a break.

    • @nicholaslienandjaja1815
      @nicholaslienandjaja1815 7 місяців тому +4

      Also, nobody currently knows how deep can a plesiosaur, a pliosaur, or a mosasaur dives (I'm pretty sure some of them could have dove into great depths just like today's sperm whales, but unfortunately, fossil evidence does not show depths in diving for animals currently thought to be extinct, especially those that were thought to be wiped out by the Chicxulub asteroid).

    • @qrfarchaeology9391
      @qrfarchaeology9391 7 місяців тому +4

      @@Truthisscarierthanfiction I thought I had replied later that day but it was the "Lake Leelanau monster" in Michigan. I read about it online about 20 years ago and the blogpost or whatever it was. If I remember right, the post's author was also relating it to a case where someone was attacked by a sea monster with a turtle like head as he was swimming near a bouy.
      Sorry for the late reply. My earlier one was much more well thought out and written.

    • @qrfarchaeology9391
      @qrfarchaeology9391 6 місяців тому +5

      @@Truthisscarierthanfiction Came across a video that talk about the "buoy" sighting. Turns out it was the Pensacola story. I knew my memory was fuzzy. Not really related to the "Lake Leelanau monster" but the article I had read years ago was discussing the morpholgy of necks sticking out of the water, hence the 2 stories were discussed.

  • @KevinFreist
    @KevinFreist Місяць тому +4

    sitting in the 300 sea ray ,in the thumbnail, one nite andall of the suddenthe whole vessel lifted up atleast a couple feet and with force. i was moored at my dock in the Hillsborough river Tampa. just one movement no waves or boats. itwas about 3 am and quiet as a church at midnite. i jumped out of the cabin to see wtf was goin on andsaw nothing. i can't explain it. been in that boat in all kinds of water. never experienced that before. it had to be a large big giant hydrodynamic shape as it left no wake or splash. just the small radiating waves of my 30 ft 9 thousand pound boat bobbing from whatever lifted it. there was 3ft between my keel and bottom there so it was the whole body of water that went up. no scraping sound . in fact no damn sound at all. it scared the hell out of me .and i was moored! if that happened in the bay i would have really freaked out. river is about 300 to 350ft across and 30 ft deep in the center. all the boats in themarina were bobbing like toys in a tub when i first popped out to see. just never could figure out what did that. im sure it wasn't a sub. had to be a critter.

  • @ro4eva
    @ro4eva Місяць тому +2

    Best wishes to you and your channel =-)

  • @jimwebb3392
    @jimwebb3392 Рік тому +28

    Deepstar fish doesn't seem to resemble a shark at all

    • @jimiesoteric2417
      @jimiesoteric2417 Рік тому +8

      some sharks don't fit the common look of most others. just sayin.

    • @ChrisVillagomez
      @ChrisVillagomez 3 місяці тому +2

      ​@@jimiesoteric2417 Like Frilled Sharks or Cookiecutter Sharks, some of them are really elongated or tube-shaped (granted Cookiecutters are very small but they fit the tube-shape so they were the first name to come to mind)

    • @knightbane3752
      @knightbane3752 2 місяці тому

      It actually reminded me of the Le Serric sea monster photo

    • @connorbosley4431
      @connorbosley4431 2 місяці тому +1

      Sleeper sharks don't seem like sharks either

  • @TylerRakstis
    @TylerRakstis Рік тому +11

    Though you forgot that the 3rd cryptid you've talked about does have a name, it's either Colossal Claude or Marvin the Monster.

    • @Truthisscarierthanfiction
      @Truthisscarierthanfiction  Рік тому +6

      I think most people call it Marvin, there's actually another water cryptid called Colossal Claude/Marvin in the Oregon River

    • @TylerRakstis
      @TylerRakstis Рік тому +4

      @@Truthisscarierthanfiction I see then. Maybe a bit of a mix-up.

  • @1922BluePhoenix
    @1922BluePhoenix Місяць тому +2

    thank you very interesting video

  • @Enshohma
    @Enshohma 5 місяців тому +3

    Not a bad video! Adding it to my Mythological Giant Monsters playlist right now!

  • @alejandror2571
    @alejandror2571 Рік тому +19

    Random question for you, based on the amount of knowledge you have, which cryptid do you think has the most potential to be discovered?

    • @Truthisscarierthanfiction
      @Truthisscarierthanfiction  Рік тому +21

      I think the most likely one to be discovered right now would be the Orang Pendek of Indonesia, especially with recent discoveries of ape species in the region. I think there are other Cryptids that are more likely to exist/have exist, but they're either likely extinct now or live in areas that are hard to search for. Thanks for asking!

    • @alejandror2571
      @alejandror2571 Рік тому +11

      @@Truthisscarierthanfiction Do you think the Orang Pendek is just a undiscovered sub species of an Orangutan or some sort of primitive human. Would you consider doing a cryptic story video, Where your subscribers tell there encounters?

    • @Truthisscarierthanfiction
      @Truthisscarierthanfiction  Рік тому +13

      @@alejandror2571 1. Sub species of Orangutan. I do think that there are humans that have been mistaken for Cryptids though
      2. Yes I would

  • @stonedmoon6056
    @stonedmoon6056 Рік тому +6

    great video! my only complaint is the audio mixing. it felt like you were yelling in my ear the whole time, even though you're clearly not talking very loud.

    • @Truthisscarierthanfiction
      @Truthisscarierthanfiction  Рік тому +1

      Sorry about that, I'll see if I can fix it

    • @stonedmoon6056
      @stonedmoon6056 Рік тому +3

      @@Truthisscarierthanfiction absolutely not a huge issue! a lot of YT channels have the same problem lol

    • @Truthisscarierthanfiction
      @Truthisscarierthanfiction  Рік тому +2

      @@stonedmoon6056 Haven't really worked with my microphone after I got it last January, I'll see what I can do

  • @mikewachumpski6152
    @mikewachumpski6152 Рік тому +3

    Good vid dude.

  • @Darkmatter105
    @Darkmatter105 11 місяців тому +8

    To bad the titan sub wasn't just a big ball.

  • @1TakoyakiStore
    @1TakoyakiStore Місяць тому +2

    Those gar/needlefish like fish actually sound like something called a snipe eel, just colored differently.

    • @jon952
      @jon952 Місяць тому

      I was gonna say, they look very much like snipe eels.

  • @federicomerlin4312
    @federicomerlin4312 2 місяці тому +3

    Deep sea is fascinating and the mysteries that it hides are a big incentive to study it and protect it.

  • @coryfice1881
    @coryfice1881 11 місяців тому +8

    I imagine these fish if it was real is still swimming out there. Blissfully unaware of the world above it.

    • @randomautobotprime360
      @randomautobotprime360 2 місяці тому +2

      Nah they tryna deal with political discourse. Fish politics is important!

  • @gmmr04
    @gmmr04 Рік тому +6

    Wow! This was a great video! I'm an avid fan of crypitds, I read a lot of books, listen to podcasts and watch videos. However, I never heard of any of these! GREAT STUFF!! Subscribed

    • @Truthisscarierthanfiction
      @Truthisscarierthanfiction  Рік тому +2

      Thank you! I try to find stories and cryptids people haven't heard about before so that's good to hear

  • @Matthew-oe8tb
    @Matthew-oe8tb 21 день тому

    I love how people like to tell them what they saw.

  • @PopPunkNerd
    @PopPunkNerd Місяць тому +1

    It’s crazy I live in San Diego my whole life and barely finding out about this

  • @incineroar9933
    @incineroar9933 6 місяців тому +8

    Could the angler with 3 lures have been deformed or had a badly injured, torn up lure?

    • @Truthisscarierthanfiction
      @Truthisscarierthanfiction  6 місяців тому +6

      That's interesting, I'm unsure of the mechanics of a lure and if they would still light up if it was torn

    • @jon952
      @jon952 Місяць тому +2

      There's a few species of anglers that have multiple or branching lures, like species in the genus Linophryne. So it's totally plausible!

  • @las10plagas
    @las10plagas 2 місяці тому +12

    it's soooo annoying how people always conclude people had hallucinacions, when they saw something out of the ordinary.
    now, I'm not talking about the sub, but it's soooo rare for someone to hallucinate without a reason (like psycho-active drugs [weed doesn't give you hallucinations btw that's BS]),
    or to have shared delusions. I sometimes wonder, if people who claim this, always hallucinate themselves, since they think it's so so common.
    people become so agitated or downright agressive, when something disturbs their tiny, little world they live in >.<
    it's a wonder people didn't claim these sea criptids were barn owls or weather baloons...

    • @enlightenedone7141
      @enlightenedone7141 2 місяці тому

      I totally agree. Its also very annoying to me that the vast majority of people believe these pathetic, wilfully ignorant cynics. Its basically human arrogance, and doesnt fit with their own views and beliefs, so they cannot be real so therefore they aren't, case closed!! Tossers

    • @randomautobotprime360
      @randomautobotprime360 2 місяці тому +2

      I mean giant fish are definitely less out there than a giant ape living in North American forests. We don’t know much about the ocean so these fish fellas being around seem a bit less out there then other cryptids

    • @las10plagas
      @las10plagas 2 місяці тому +1

      @@randomautobotprime360 oh yeah definitely

    • @ErichZornerzfun
      @ErichZornerzfun Місяць тому +2

      Hallucinations are actually quite common in healthy people and certainly don't require drugs to cause.
      More likely, though, for cases like these, poor visibility can make it easy for people to misjudge or misidentify what they are looking at.

  • @cloudnein8114
    @cloudnein8114 Рік тому +4

    Awesome!

  • @Kink_Shaman
    @Kink_Shaman 16 днів тому

    That Kik Stream footage tells me one thing. The dude has crashed several times before, and he’s always run away from the accident.

  • @FozzyZ28
    @FozzyZ28 28 днів тому +1

    Sleeper sharks don't have scales, only fish.... so what the hell did he encounter??!

    • @katkit4281
      @katkit4281 27 днів тому

      Lol sharks are fish. And they also have scales.

  • @daniellambert1928
    @daniellambert1928 Рік тому +6

    I wish i could remember the name of the Doco ? the Shell Oil Company Mobot footage was shown Complete ! I remember my brother & i freaking out watching it back in the late 70's , it was So Cool to watch it swim like a corkscrew & Super Creepy too

    • @Truthisscarierthanfiction
      @Truthisscarierthanfiction  Рік тому +1

      Let me know if you remember any details!

    • @daniellambert1928
      @daniellambert1928 Рік тому +2

      @@Truthisscarierthanfiction
      Shows about paranormal things & criptids were very common in the 70's & I've watched everyone I can find from the period but still no Marvin > it's definitely out there somewhere > if I find it I will contact you 1st Danny

  • @jimiesoteric2417
    @jimiesoteric2417 Рік тому +5

    I think the "fish" shown before the angler fish was actually the jellyfish because he wouldn't have seen anything but the lights most likely and just guessed at what the rest of it was which is why it looks so much like almost every other surface level fish which as we all know now the deeper you go the more bizarre the fish look

    • @lcjester16
      @lcjester16 Місяць тому

      Looks like a spot on Oarfish

  • @Freshie207
    @Freshie207 Рік тому +14

    Limbs aren't that uncommon in "Fish", plenty of Ray Finned Fish have "Limbs"
    Frogfish, Mudskippers, Sea Robins, and Bichir have functional limbs, in addition to the Lobe Finned Fish you listed.

  • @hildanmaruf
    @hildanmaruf Місяць тому +2

    loved that you included the metric calculations, as an asians it helps us a lot! I saw negative comments below about the metric system, just ignore it I already gave him a thumbs down lol! this is my first time seeing your content, thank you for the video anyway you did a great job

  • @paulforder591
    @paulforder591 20 днів тому

    There may be many more undiscovered deep sea species not yet classified by science, not necessarily resembling the ones shown in this mini-documentary. Still, this is a great intro to underwater cryptids. Glad you shared this! 🤓🐠🐟🐡🐋

  • @dantanskymonsterhunter
    @dantanskymonsterhunter 11 днів тому +1

    I love how all the "experts" sitting in ivery towns know what people are seeing.
    Rouge waves were a joke. A sailor's fantasy for centuries until one was caught on camera.

  • @qaundaledingle9201
    @qaundaledingle9201 Рік тому +4

    Hey bro I found a video on UA-cam of a lady that worked for a robotics department or something in British Columbia and her name is Kendra, the video was uploaded 7 years ago and she makes a call to John Bergeron and his family I’ll write another comment for the UA-cam channel

  • @906087
    @906087 19 днів тому +1

    Given these are just supposed to be slightly different fish in an environment we've barely explored where any number of dead bodies may never reach the surface I would believe they all could be real

  • @GaidenDS10
    @GaidenDS10 3 місяці тому +1

    That Deepstar 4000 fish could have been just a sub -species maybe even an extinct kind of armored fish, and that thing might be dead for now since it's last sighting.

  • @neutrongarbage
    @neutrongarbage Місяць тому +3

    I like your research and thoughtful presentation, however your audio levels are peaking and distorting in your voice over. Try speaking further from the microphone, and instead of increasing the gain levels of the audio input, boosting the volume once you've recorded the audio track at a lower gain level.

  • @user-is1eg1ix6u
    @user-is1eg1ix6u 2 місяці тому +4

    i feel like they shou;d send another deepstar 4000 into the ocean and see if they can see that thing again

  • @Steven-se4gd
    @Steven-se4gd 16 днів тому

    OH MY GOD YOUR MIC QUALITY

  • @jessehutchings
    @jessehutchings Місяць тому

    Holy crap that voice volume is crazy
    Successful jump scare

  • @brattyprincesses2286
    @brattyprincesses2286 16 днів тому

    The deep sea is still unexplored.

  • @Cheesefiddlehorn
    @Cheesefiddlehorn 6 місяців тому +3

    What was the one by Japan named or did it have a name?

  • @gregoryl.levitre9759
    @gregoryl.levitre9759 8 місяців тому +7

    It seems like the view through that small window in the Bathysphere was warped and altered the look of the creatures.

  • @kirknichols178
    @kirknichols178 Місяць тому +1

    Any theories on why evidence of new organisms would be scrubbed or conveniently lost?

    • @Truthisscarierthanfiction
      @Truthisscarierthanfiction  Місяць тому

      Honestly, stuff just tends to get lost a lot and I don't think it's neccesarily conspiracy. Museums often have a ton of uncataloged stuff that they just don't have the manpower to sort through, its very possible cryptids are sitting in a museum drawer right now waiting to be discovered. Look up Delcourt's gecko for an example

  • @johnlopez9014
    @johnlopez9014 Місяць тому +1

    Yes, there’s plenty of creatures that haven’t been discovered yet at deep depths but people are going to be very disappointed. People expect to find a Megladon type or a giant dinosaur n they will never find one that deep. For multiple reasons: first, pressure is a lot stronger. Sperm whales do go deep but they have biological adaptations that no giant shark or dinosaur has. Plus eventually the whale needs to go back up. It can’t live in deep waters. Second, oxygen levels. Third, and animal like a megladon or aquatic dinosaur requires a high caloric intake in order to maintain that large body and not die.

  • @jimjim2789
    @jimjim2789 Рік тому +4

    I'd really like to see those rainbow gar

  • @donkeykong6426
    @donkeykong6426 11 місяців тому +3

    7:39 people believe that is colossal claude

  • @LordRain1031
    @LordRain1031 25 днів тому

    Well, considering we've ONLY explored, what? 5% or less of the ocean? We're BOUND to find unidentified life in the ocean. 🤷‍♂️

  • @Tom_Samad
    @Tom_Samad Місяць тому +1

    Impressively, the Alvin is still in use after all these decades. A testament to its brilliant design.

  • @shanewilson9814
    @shanewilson9814 2 місяці тому

    The ocean is speculated to be the most fluid ecosystem on the planet.

  • @thomasolympia3731
    @thomasolympia3731 Місяць тому

    There really is always a bigger fish huh ?

  • @truth1805
    @truth1805 Рік тому +3

    Second like/comment!

  • @lukaurshibara5837
    @lukaurshibara5837 21 день тому +2

    7:14 About the corkscrew-like creature, I remember a similar creature being shown once in a deep-sea documentary back in the 80s; it was about the same size and moved by just like a corkscrew outside the window of the submarine.
    Maybe it was the same?

  • @tonybarde2572
    @tonybarde2572 Рік тому +2

    They are still alive

  • @blobbertmcblob4888
    @blobbertmcblob4888 2 місяці тому +3

    I love how someone goes into the deep ass ocean and claims to see something and people are like "Whhhhaaaaat? No that's not possible" like bruh, we literally have NO clue what's down there. New species are spotted basically every time NOA goes down there.

  • @chrisgaming9567
    @chrisgaming9567 Рік тому +3

    Over 2000 views yooooo

  • @user-dd4fv6qj8g
    @user-dd4fv6qj8g 4 місяці тому +3

    I love how people after the fact are like "Oh, we know better than the people who were fucking there. Nevermind that we discover something new nearly every other dive. We've definitely found everything."
    If someone tells me they saw something 3,000 meters down, I tend to believe them.

  • @user-pe8rz4ch5u
    @user-pe8rz4ch5u 3 місяці тому

    Nice new subber here bud

  • @phatman3573
    @phatman3573 20 днів тому

    If you e heard of the story from sonar operators you will know they encounter very odd things...from large objects moving at hundreds of knots at ridiculous depths no man can go to sightings of objects coming and going freely from sea to air seamlessly we know that this isn’t us or our tech...we need to look down rather than up for answers....

  • @busterthe2
    @busterthe2 Місяць тому

    6:55 First time i ever heard someone say carbon deoxide. Lol

  • @frenzyviz6296
    @frenzyviz6296 Місяць тому

    If the plesiosaur like creature was in fact a long necked seal, why would the report be removed from the record? That, in itself, makes me suspicious. I would also question why people who did not witness the sightings always assume the person who did see it as mistaken or exaggerating, or worse? It sounds like a cover up, as so many of these things do.

    • @RootVegetabIe
      @RootVegetabIe Місяць тому

      Why would somebody cover it up. What would a person gain by doing so?

    • @frenzyviz6296
      @frenzyviz6296 Місяць тому +1

      @@RootVegetabIe because it would disprove evolutionary theory & lend more credence to the truth of the bible. That’s why.

    • @katkit4281
      @katkit4281 27 днів тому

      Can you explain how it disproves evolution? You clearly heard this but didn't actually think about it. There are many phylum, families, orders, etc going back hundreds of millions of years that still are around today like sharks and crocadilians. So please explain. ​@@frenzyviz6296

  • @johnowens4205
    @johnowens4205 24 дні тому

    The narrators voice kept putting me to sleep 😴😴

  • @ogrelogre8429
    @ogrelogre8429 2 місяці тому +1

    There are certainly cryptids in the oceans. There is more unknown down there than known. They just discovered, what, five new species? Another great video.

  • @scatterbug
    @scatterbug Рік тому +4

    I enjoyed this video, even if I had heard some of the stories/sightings before. BUT! I have to say that unidentified creatures do not equal cryptids.

    • @Truthisscarierthanfiction
      @Truthisscarierthanfiction  Рік тому +1

      Interesting, what makes you say that?

    • @scatterbug
      @scatterbug Рік тому +1

      @@Truthisscarierthanfiction Cryptid implies something known (either ethnoknown or through stories/folklore/etc) but not known to science. A new animal discovery that was previously completely unknown is just that, a new discovery. Even, maybe especially, if it was one unverified (by science) sighting. When a new animal is discovered in the Amazon for instance, reports do not say "Cryptid discovered!" because there were no stories hinting at its existence beforehand. It's just a new animal.

    • @Truthisscarierthanfiction
      @Truthisscarierthanfiction  Рік тому +1

      @@scatterbug I agree! However, when so much time has passed since the sighting and the animal is still unrecognized, I think it counts as a Cryptid. You are right though, we discover how many species a week in the Amazons and they aren't Cryptids

    • @scatterbug
      @scatterbug Рік тому

      @@Truthisscarierthanfiction I suppose you could think of it that way. I just think it takes (or should take) more than a single sighting before labeling something as a cryptid. That is of course only my opinion. 🙂

  • @thunderbear82
    @thunderbear82 26 днів тому

    The last one is obviously fake, an animal like that would have to surface for air and would be commonly sighted.

  • @fullaregrets5015
    @fullaregrets5015 15 днів тому

    Nice volume control, buddy. Nearly broke my speakers at half volume.

  • @michaelbruns449
    @michaelbruns449 2 місяці тому +4

    Armchair skeptics (who tell you what you did and didnt see even though they werent there) all need to find a far away island to go live together on and doubt eachothers reality.

    • @enlightenedone7141
      @enlightenedone7141 2 місяці тому +3

      Great idea!!! I call em cynics though, I heard a great quote, 'no evidence is ever enough to persuade an idiot'. Which these cretins indeed are!!!

  • @qaundaledingle9201
    @qaundaledingle9201 Рік тому +2

    The video is uploaded by a UA-cam channel called goddessofthehobbos

  • @ramazonspikes2322
    @ramazonspikes2322 Рік тому +2

    K

  • @wonderingweirdo7476
    @wonderingweirdo7476 2 місяці тому +1

    The problem with experts trying to debrief/debunk is that the reasoning they always compare it to, is already verified species and will say it was "mis identification" f a proven species. This is simply not true all the time

  • @NicTheGreek1979
    @NicTheGreek1979 21 день тому

    Stop eating your mic lol.

  • @flintsky7706
    @flintsky7706 Місяць тому

    I swear to god if you say “draygon fish” one more time…

  • @scottmeredith64
    @scottmeredith64 4 дні тому

    Too bad for you that you called an unidentified animal a cryptid.

  • @Muddybagclean
    @Muddybagclean 2 місяці тому +2

    Jesus Loves You All

    • @shanewilson9814
      @shanewilson9814 2 місяці тому

      Not me... keep your faith to yourself. That one little sentence exactly encapsulates why people absolutely despise Christians.

  • @kurules3072
    @kurules3072 21 день тому

    No video equals it didn’t happen 👎

  • @stephengallagher2209
    @stephengallagher2209 Місяць тому

    Have you considered having a less ridiculous accent at all?

  • @battlecatsoof2485
    @battlecatsoof2485 Рік тому +3

    ur discord?

  • @arkhorn146
    @arkhorn146 Місяць тому

    OH, PLEEEASE! IF plesiosaurids still existed, they would NOT be found that deep in the ocean! What CRAP!

  • @bigj2518
    @bigj2518 20 днів тому

    Gotta love Cousteau not naming his sub using the crummy metric system!