Exactly that's besides the fact that she was rapping for almost 40% to 50% of this album/era so it was a shock to those that were specially enthusiastic over her vocals. I will say that I think that all her belts on the album whether they were mid or upper ones sound much more resonant then they did during any of her other era's including 4.
which I don't understand lol. Beyoncé is not just any old high belter, she's quite a versatile vocalist. I love 4 but the self-titled era is probably her most vocally creative, which is saying a lot because her vocals have always been her main musical/creative imprint since a young age.
TayTay BeyNippy Mmm.. I think B'day had the most resonant belts above Eb5, Sasha Fierce C5-E5 only love, and SelF-Titled lower G4-C5 midbelts trump all.
The F2 is everything Airy/weak but still great for a mezzo And i can hear it And the D6 was so operatic and beautiful 18:04 wtf , was she holding these notes for 22 seconds 😵😵
Beyoncé is my favorite, Self-titled albums are typically the best! But umm Lemonade is a snatch from all ENDS!!! so many great vocal moments there. I actually made a gorgeous visual but YT blocked it 💀 I’m surprised others are up
MICO Lemonade was artistically undeniable but it definitely had so many missed opportunities for better vocal inflections. There were so many songs that could've stood allot more then that narrative type of singing that she used especially on songs like Love Drought, Pray You Catch Me, and even Daddy Lessons but she made up for that song with the remix which I enjoyed greatly. But I wasn't a fan at all of many of her choices vocally during that album she just seemed so restrained for an Era were her voice was beyond capable of doing more.
OMG!!!! Amazing voice and showcase!!!! I love all the songs that you chose in this showcase video. I love her Head Voice so much.💚l was literally mesmerised by the whole video and by her voice. ILYSM Beyonce!!!😍😍😍💖💖💖 What does the flashing numbers mean on the screen? I see them in every video with other videos. Please make more Beyonce videos!!!💙 l love your videos so much!💚
The flashing numbers indicated the notes she is hitting relative to a grand piano. And thanks allot my whole channel is dedicated to Beyonce vocal videos you can check them out and I hope you enjoy 😊😊
TayTay BeyNippy oh okay, thank you for explaining it to me.💚 I've seen all your other videos of Beyonce before, but l'll defiantly rewatch them all again.💚💚
she could sing a resonant F1, she's still a fucking soprano in every damn register... or a light, bright, easy, airy, high, skyhigh, very lyric sopranoish coloratura mezzo-soprano.... lol, I just can't.
I don't think so because in order for that to be correct the D3s in the song would have to C#3s and that is impossible because the live version also has D3s and F#3s all over it.
OMG you're right this version I used is a semi-tone higher the Ds are C#s the F#s are Fs and the As are G#s. But that's so weird because the live version has D5's in it??
That is from a "Freakum Dress" Intro that she did during the Mrs Carter World Tour. I can't believe no one paid attention to it "Me included". Oh and btw was I right about the Eb6 peak? I checked it a hundred times and I still was going back and forth between an Eb peak or an E peak I wasn't sure especially since the intro is full of Es and no Ebs at all...
TayTay BeyNippy Theres nothing educational here. Just Fanaticism. For something to be of educational value it needs to be put in context with other subjects and somewhat unbiased. Anyone can use fancy vocabulary, but how does it relate in a context of theory?
Your cognitive dissonance seems challenged trying to comprehend the very simple context of the video which isn't explaining the entire theory of vocal pedagogy. Because if you're uneducated in that aspect then merely blaming a video that requires you to have at the very least an at most simplistic understanding of a scale is dense in the gloomiest manner. There is absolutely no bias in trying to discern the amount of notes a singer is able to hit relative to the range set within a grand piano and more often then not it's the most objective thing any instrument player can do regardless of being a pedagogue or not. No where in the title does it suggest that the video presents a full analysis of her voice or an in depth analogy between the notes and those attempted in a more accurate comportment. But rather a showcase of a very simple aspect of it which is her "capacity" hence the word range in the title. And last but certainly not least your timidity in apprehending simple vocabulary is in no shape, form, or manner the standard measurement of what a Sesquipedalian, multi-syllabic or in your description "a person using fancy vocabulary" is. Either read a book to understand or ask a question prior to trying to critique a subject in which it's aim might not even include educating to begin with.
@@taytaybeynippy486 Ok. Fine. I just feel that anyone who is either a true fan or a study of music does not and should not need to know what pitch Beyonce is singing to discern she is gifted and able vocalist. That should be obvious. Knowing what tones shes singing is not germaine (Or Michael) in reaching that conclusion. For example, do you ever see a video of Jimi Hendrix playing guitar with every note hes playing at the exact time? No...unless its an instructional video and that would be displayed using Tabs or musical notation. It is of no value for myself to know what pitch a singer is sounding unless im attempting to learn a tune. Considering 98% of the Earths Populatuon could not posess the talent talent that Mrs. Knowles does thats unlikely to have any value to them either.
Well this comment would've been a much better replacement for the the main one which was in all honesty condescending, and was of no value or beneficial substance to anyone. And my response to your point is it might not be of any use discerning a vocalist's notes when the objective is finding which manner does a certain passage relate to a certain musical theory "because in that case keys, harmonies and layers must be taken into accountability". As for not finding any analysis for the likes of Jimi Hendrix. Well that would be attributed to the fact that while playing an instrument takes an astounding level of comprehension and hard work it's not particularly uncanny when compared to some being able to replicate that into their own vocal structure hence why "in my personal opinion" it's less impressive to discern the amount of notes a guitar player or a piano player can play. But to those with the objective to know what are the depths an heights a vocalist was willing to reach in a certain song and how far was the capacity of their voice allowing them to challenge their tessitura while still maintaining neutral gloats, great breath support, a steady vibrato and an etiquette tonal quality and so on so forth. It can come in handy especially since those are components used in evaluating the level of mastery a vocalist can possess relative to their superiors or peers may they be in the classical realm or the contemporary realm. Beyonce is indeed unbearably virtuous when it comes to being a vocalist but there are areas where she fails in that others don't and areas she exceeds where others fail and this video and the likes while only being a meek fraction of her knowledge and talent is a decent subject to use in an analogy.
Yeah I know I included every song she released between the years of 2013 to early 2015 "that I know of". Because that was the era of the album. I did that with every vocal range video I've done to this point.
Well I didn't like this musically, and I think it's far from over looked, it's actually widely overrated. The only track I really love is "Superpower" and that alone says I'm not looking for belting all over a record (and I love such songs as "I Miss You", "Satellites", "Disappear"..). I don't even like the way she sings, this is when she started to push to mimic a determined sound or trendy vocal style on certain songs. 4 is a MUCH better record, both musically and vocally.
workitout80 I agree that 4 was widely diverse in the vocal department and way more then this album could dream of reaching. But I do find a few of the belts on this album much more relaxed and the resonance is quite evident while in 4 she sort of had a gritty sound that was beautiful but also tended to make her sound a bit thinner to me especially on C#5s and Eb5s in comparison to this album but even that was rare. I'm still chosing 4 over this album any day of the week. But I can see now that this is full of great vocal moment which is why I said that it was overlooked ot as full body of work but vocally that is.
workitout80 I love the lows and head voice here infinitely better than 4. But vocally 4 is undeniable, I care and Love on Top alone destroy. Also she sounded much more determined on 4 than here, so I don't know what you're saying.
![Kelly Rowland's Vocal Range: [Bb2-Bb5-G#6] (2015 - 2017)](/img/n.gif)
The lows in this album >>>>>>
I think the head voice on this album is >>>>>>>>
I love it all. Every register's quality is equal here.
18:05 she did that for 23 seconds. WIG
SimsBGCTV song plz 💔
saud al-harbhy it’s pretty hurt
She absolutely shined through every register. All this years of technique work and voice maturation came down to this.
Highly underrated vocally!
OMG THAT D6!!!!
18:25 considering how it sounds at the end makes me think it’s Sia but idk
Yeah I'm also conflicted over the strain on that B4.
Shadeee😂
It definitely wasn’t sia that’s Bey timbre….and stems have been posted online sia did harmonizingnin the back
@@taytaybeynippy486 no that wasn’t sia bye
What song was that?
16:51 that transition was INSANE
I think people didnt like a lot this album vocally because she wasnt basically breathing upper belts like 4
Exactly that's besides the fact that she was rapping for almost 40% to 50% of this album/era so it was a shock to those that were specially enthusiastic over her vocals. I will say that I think that all her belts on the album whether they were mid or upper ones sound much more resonant then they did during any of her other era's including 4.
which I don't understand lol. Beyoncé is not just any old high belter, she's quite a versatile vocalist. I love 4 but the self-titled era is probably her most vocally creative, which is saying a lot because her vocals have always been her main musical/creative imprint since a young age.
TayTay BeyNippy Mmm.. I think B'day had the most resonant belts above Eb5, Sasha Fierce C5-E5 only love, and SelF-Titled lower G4-C5 midbelts trump all.
@@Gameworks1407 no they didn’t
Now Lemonade did what it had to do, but...
BEYONCÉ >>>>> Lemonade
I 👏🏾SAID 👏🏾WHAT 👏🏾I 👏🏾SAID!!
I think artistically Lemonade was her best work period but vocal it doesn't rank near BEYONCÉ.
You have lost your mind
Mad man you are
The F2 is everything
Airy/weak but still great for a mezzo
And i can hear it
And the D6 was so operatic and beautiful
18:04 wtf , was she holding these notes for 22 seconds 😵😵
That I been on D6 is f*cking LIFE 🔥🔥🔥🔥 Bitch was feeling some type of way.
what song?
This video is sooo underrated
Beyoncé is my favorite, Self-titled albums are typically the best! But umm Lemonade is a snatch from all ENDS!!! so many great vocal moments there. I actually made a gorgeous visual but YT blocked it 💀 I’m surprised others are up
MICO Lemonade was artistically undeniable but it definitely had so many missed opportunities for better vocal inflections. There were so many songs that could've stood allot more then that narrative type of singing that she used especially on songs like Love Drought, Pray You Catch Me, and even Daddy Lessons but she made up for that song with the remix which I enjoyed greatly. But I wasn't a fan at all of many of her choices vocally during that album she just seemed so restrained for an Era were her voice was beyond capable of doing more.
TayTay BeyNippy pray you catch me is her best intro of this decade. Those G#’s are amazing
Hi! Tay I'm Yonce & Mimi and this is my new channel. Great Video!
Amazing video!❤❤😍
27:21 I think it’s mixed voice
yeah or masked
@@kay_kay0710 I think it's too poweful to be head voice
@@everton7361 yeah it has a chesty sound to it
OMG!!!! Amazing voice and showcase!!!! I love all the songs that you chose in this showcase video. I love her Head Voice so much.💚l was literally mesmerised by the whole video and by her voice. ILYSM Beyonce!!!😍😍😍💖💖💖
What does the flashing numbers mean on the screen? I see them in every video with other videos.
Please make more Beyonce videos!!!💙 l love your videos so much!💚
The flashing numbers indicated the notes she is hitting relative to a grand piano. And thanks allot my whole channel is dedicated to Beyonce vocal videos you can check them out and I hope you enjoy 😊😊
TayTay BeyNippy oh okay, thank you for explaining it to me.💚 I've seen all your other videos of Beyonce before, but l'll defiantly rewatch them all again.💚💚
0:08 where, I can't find it in the song
Where is the very last song from
Wait at 18:04 bey really held that notes for like 22-23 seconds that’s crazy
Beyoncé is The Queen. Amazing video but she can hit F6 and I saw when she hit C7!
But it's a video of the album range
Is it me or the Crazy In Love clips had a different pitch?
Daniel Fernandez It was a remix
Beyoncé has good vocal flexibility and legato. I don't have such qualities. I sing like a clumsy bear.
she could sing a resonant F1, she's still a fucking soprano in every damn register... or a light, bright, easy, airy, high, skyhigh, very lyric sopranoish coloratura mezzo-soprano.... lol, I just can't.
She’s a mezzo
@@hiddenvaultz right..what was his point 💀
@@Jai-gx7pn 😭😭
beyoncé is a ‘dramatic coloratura mezzo-soprano’
the clip that you used for crazy in love is pitched. i think it should be an F5 instead of F#5.
I don't think so because in order for that to be correct the D3s in the song would have to C#3s and that is impossible because the live version also has D3s and F#3s all over it.
here is a link from the song. ua-cam.com/video/bfQ7ucGQdOM/v-deo.html i don't think that it's D3's and F#5s
OMG you're right this version I used is a semi-tone higher the Ds are C#s the F#s are Fs and the As are G#s. But that's so weird because the live version has D5's in it??
what live version? can you give me the link for that one? 😱
where is the F3 from @6:50 ?
Can you list all the songs that weren't on the album, but were here?
You Changed
Nuclear
Dream
Crazy In Love Remix
God Made You Beautiful
Rise Up
And "Freakum Dress Intro From the Mrs Carter World Tour"
27:05 wait where the fuck is that from :O
That is from a "Freakum Dress" Intro that she did during the Mrs Carter World Tour. I can't believe no one paid attention to it "Me included". Oh and btw was I right about the Eb6 peak? I checked it a hundred times and I still was going back and forth between an Eb peak or an E peak I wasn't sure especially since the intro is full of Es and no Ebs at all...
TayTay BeyNippy I would just say it’s a D6 honestly but idk
@@love2lovebrit497 it’s not
@@taytaybeynippy486 is it a slowed down version of i been on or a different vocal?
22:09
20:37 Song ???
God makes u beautiful
What is the F2 song??
No angel
Whos listening in 202......😳......AHHHH HELP WANNABE INTERNET VOCAL COACHES....AAHHHH....(equips garlic and cross and makes a hasty retreat)
You do know the term is wannabe vocal pedagogue and not vocal coach right. Because those two extremely different things.
TayTay BeyNippy Theres nothing educational here. Just Fanaticism. For something to be of educational value it needs to be put in context with other subjects and somewhat unbiased. Anyone can use fancy vocabulary, but how does it relate in a context of theory?
Your cognitive dissonance seems challenged trying to comprehend the very simple context of the video which isn't explaining the entire theory of vocal pedagogy. Because if you're uneducated in that aspect then merely blaming a video that requires you to have at the very least an at most simplistic understanding of a scale is dense in the gloomiest manner. There is absolutely no bias in trying to discern the amount of notes a singer is able to hit relative to the range set within a grand piano and more often then not it's the most objective thing any instrument player can do regardless of being a pedagogue or not. No where in the title does it suggest that the video presents a full analysis of her voice or an in depth analogy between the notes and those attempted in a more accurate comportment. But rather a showcase of a very simple aspect of it which is her "capacity" hence the word range in the title. And last but certainly not least your timidity in apprehending simple vocabulary is in no shape, form, or manner the standard measurement of what a Sesquipedalian, multi-syllabic or in your description "a person using fancy vocabulary" is. Either read a book to understand or ask a question prior to trying to critique a subject in which it's aim might not even include educating to begin with.
@@taytaybeynippy486 Ok. Fine. I just feel that anyone who is either a true fan or a study of music does not and should not need to know what pitch Beyonce is singing to discern she is gifted and able vocalist. That should be obvious. Knowing what tones shes singing is not germaine (Or Michael) in reaching that conclusion. For example, do you ever see a video of Jimi Hendrix playing guitar with every note hes playing at the exact time? No...unless its an instructional video and that would be displayed using Tabs or musical notation. It is of no value for myself to know what pitch a singer is sounding unless im attempting to learn a tune. Considering 98% of the Earths Populatuon could not posess the talent talent that Mrs. Knowles does thats unlikely to have any value to them either.
Well this comment would've been a much better replacement for the the main one which was in all honesty condescending, and was of no value or beneficial substance to anyone. And my response to your point is it might not be of any use discerning a vocalist's notes when the objective is finding which manner does a certain passage relate to a certain musical theory "because in that case keys, harmonies and layers must be taken into accountability". As for not finding any analysis for the likes of Jimi Hendrix. Well that would be attributed to the fact that while playing an instrument takes an astounding level of comprehension and hard work it's not particularly uncanny when compared to some being able to replicate that into their own vocal structure hence why "in my personal opinion" it's less impressive to discern the amount of notes a guitar player or a piano player can play. But to those with the objective to know what are the depths an heights a vocalist was willing to reach in a certain song and how far was the capacity of their voice allowing them to challenge their tessitura while still maintaining neutral gloats, great breath support, a steady vibrato and an etiquette tonal quality and so on so forth. It can come in handy especially since those are components used in evaluating the level of mastery a vocalist can possess relative to their superiors or peers may they be in the classical realm or the contemporary realm. Beyonce is indeed unbearably virtuous when it comes to being a vocalist but there are areas where she fails in that others don't and areas she exceeds where others fail and this video and the likes while only being a meek fraction of her knowledge and talent is a decent subject to use in an analogy.
Quite a few of these songs aren’t even on the album 🙄
Yeah I know I included every song she released between the years of 2013 to early 2015 "that I know of". Because that was the era of the album. I did that with every vocal range video I've done to this point.
Well I didn't like this musically, and I think it's far from over looked, it's actually widely overrated. The only track I really love is "Superpower" and that alone says I'm not looking for belting all over a record (and I love such songs as "I Miss You", "Satellites", "Disappear"..). I don't even like the way she sings, this is when she started to push to mimic a determined sound or trendy vocal style on certain songs. 4 is a MUCH better record, both musically and vocally.
workitout80 I agree that 4 was widely diverse in the vocal department and way more then this album could dream of reaching. But I do find a few of the belts on this album much more relaxed and the resonance is quite evident while in 4 she sort of had a gritty sound that was beautiful but also tended to make her sound a bit thinner to me especially on C#5s and Eb5s in comparison to this album but even that was rare. I'm still chosing 4 over this album any day of the week. But I can see now that this is full of great vocal moment which is why I said that it was overlooked ot as full body of work but vocally that is.
workitout80 I love the lows and head voice here infinitely better than 4. But vocally 4 is undeniable, I care and Love on Top alone destroy. Also she sounded much more determined on 4 than here, so I don't know what you're saying.