Just captured in my S23 ultra. It's crazy insane! The fact that it is 1344 light years away and 12 light years in radius and we are able to capture it in our mobile is spectacular!
amazing, finally someone using the 10x camera for an astrophrography, and if you had used calibration frames (darks, flats, bias, etc) the result would have been even more professional and unbelievable, great job
Thank you! I normally use calibration frames and it really helps with the noise ratio and vignetting, but I didn't want to confuse people with too much information :D Maybe next time I can show that part too!
Hey, I just uploaded a video showing some results from Samsung Galaxy Ultra's 10x camera with calibration frames. Here is the video:ua-cam.com/video/IV79lIQ5CPw/v-deo.html
@@JosephConroy Hey, I just uploaded a video showing some results from Samsung Galaxy Ultra's 10x camera with calibration frames. Here is the video:ua-cam.com/video/IV79lIQ5CPw/v-deo.html
Amazing results! I have a 23 ultra and have a LOT to learn. I'm no pro and I've only taken basic night sky photos like the Big Dipper, Orion and other constellations.
Absolutely amazing result, congrats! Just my concern is, at the beginning of the recording how are you able to have a proper and accurate polar alignment? I'm a telescope user and know how important it is. Even more if you would like to track any object with tight angle (10x zoom for e.g), and even if you have this lightweight Skywathcer (?) tool. Sorry, if I'm answering stupid question just I assume the proper tracking depends on the accurate polar alignment. Maybe I am wrong and this tool ensures somehow the right traccking (i mean rotating the camera). Thanks in advance!
Thank you! These are great questions, and I am more than happy to answer. I didn't explain the polar allignment part to not confuse people with lots of technical information bc my channel is for beginners/starters mostly. Sky Watcher Mini has a polar scope it goes thru the rotating engine, and the sky watcher app has a polar allignment guide. The guide on the app knows your location, and your altitude shows the precise polar allignment point in your scope. I manually find the polaris looking at the north and also sometimes using planetarium apps (Stellarium). I allign my tracker's polar scope to the Polaris similar to what the app shows me, and that's it. I turn the star tracker on, and I can put my dslr or my phone on it and track the stars. Sometimes, if there is too much light pollution, it is hard to find the polaris from the polarscope, so I use the red illuminator light attachment it comes with the tracker, it helps to locate the polar star. As you mentioned, for 10X Zoom, I definitely need precise polar allignment. For wide angle lenses, rough polar alligment can be enough. I hope this answers your questions!!
@@kitchenraw thanks a lot for clarification, I appreciate it. It is clear now, I was just wondering if there is any new method (unknown for me) which makes you able to track precisely without polar alignment. Fair comment, that this video is not about right polar alignment, just could be important for beginners (who want to make similar recordings) it is not enough to go out under the clear sky and start photoshooting immediately :-) Got it, thanks again!
@rolandszalai367 Most regular star trackers require manual polar allignment. Also, there are really expensive pro level trackers it can find the polaris automaically. But tech is improving so fast now we have "To Go Telescopes." You basically type the name of the target it does everything for you. There is also new tech that just came last year portable small smart telescopes, "Seestar or Dwarf" they don't require polar allignment. I tested Seestar Smart telescope before, but it was so effortless and easy to use, I got bored eventually :) I think I enjoy the proccess of hard work (polar allignment, finding targets) to achieve results. There is also another interesting camera that has a built-in star tracker made by Pentax. It has an incredible technology using a sensor reduction system to move the sensor inside the camera to track the stars without a polar allignment. I will leave a video link here bc I reviewed that Pentax a few months ago:ua-cam.com/video/YAS6KMl7LjE/v-deo.htmlsi=8DKhZaIlzfAr9bkc
I forgot to mention, Sky Watcher Mini which I used in the video has 3.5 kilos loading capacity and can be too small for carrying a telescope. It is designed for dslr and telezoom lenses. Sky Watcher' pro series have higher loading limit mostly designed for telescopes and better tracking than the mini version
@@kitchenraw thanks for further info :) indeed, using even more developed technology tools makes observation and recording easier, and it's amazing, more people can use them and therefore science is between us. It is great I think...
Amazing video! Thanks for posting this mate! Btw, I clicked the amazon link u posted for star tracker and it is showing 2 options. One is 200+ usd and other one is 300+ usd. Which one are you using? Thanks again :)
Thank you!! Yes, there are 2 options. They are the same device, but $300+ Pro Pack one comes with an extra equatorial base, a declination bracket, which helps you a lot to make fine adjustments when you are finding targets. I am using the pro pack, and I definitely suggest getting that one. Cheaper one is the star tracker device by itself.
@RAWKITCHEN, why dont you do an update video? the s23 ultra has a new expert raw update that makes the capturing of nebula much easier, please look into it and update us?
I tried last week while I was camping in Big Bend National Park. I used 10 mins option with Expert Raw. The result I got wasn't even close to the quality, what I got by doing the stacking manually. I can send you the example image I tried with expert raw and just compare it by yourself ;) I can send you the example. Just send me an empty email at: askrawkitchen@gmail.com 👋
Your video is simply wonderful! I have been an astrophotographer for more than 4 years, I want to buy a C24 ultra and shoot nebulae with it using an astro tracker. I’m sure that at 10x zoom everything will be great with the tracker! Your content is wonderful! Tell me, please, can I do the usual gifts and biases? Do you just cover your phone with something for dark purposes? Thanks for the work
Thank you so much! When I am capturing with my smartphone camera, I just need to make sure I am in a non-light polluted area and shooting raw images. Just like how I do astrophotography with my dslr. Sometimes, weather temperature changes drastically, and it might mess up with focus, so I stop intervelometer every 30 minutes to check if my focus is still good. Other than that, it's pretty straightforward.
Also, I made this video to show how calibration frames benefitting the image if you are interested: ua-cam.com/video/IV79lIQ5CPw/v-deo.htmlsi=P7Jq_FtFYaKvGAB0 And yes, for my calibration frames, I basically put my phone on the table cameras facing down in the dark after capturing. And I use my Ipad or laptop screen to get flat calibration frames
@Ahmad Hasil You need to be away from the city. At least bortle 5 or lower. Check the lightpollutionmap.info Also, you need a star tracker mount to be able to long exposure like I mentioned in the begining of the video
There is no difference between s21, s22 and s23 Ultra's 10x cameras. They use the same 10x optical periscope with the exact same sensor and aperture. Results will be same. 23 Ultra has maybe better ai processing for regular photo mode but for astrophotography I have to use raw dng unedited files which will be the same for all ultra models.
Why not do it all automatically with the built in 10 minute multi exposure expert raw app from Samsung, with the nebula shown overlayed on the camera view to help find it?
Expert raw is not giving you the untouched raw image. It applies auto sharpening and noise reduction. For astrophotography and stacking, we only use raw, unedited pictures to stack even with the professional astro cameras. Expert raw is good for daylight and low light, but it is not designed for deep sky astrophotography.
@RAW KITCHEN not designed for it? It's explicitly designed for it. It does all the stacking work and has a star map in the app. Even the "sharpening" is there to save most people the time of doing it themselves. Have you compared the results and showed that doing it manually even comes out better? You could be right, but I'd want to know that before I went to all that work!
@Dorian Lust For milkyway or star trails yes, but deep sky astrophotography no. I tried 10x camera with expert raw for 10min multiple times on orion nebula you can't get anywhere close to manual stacking. I would love to see if you can send me some examples of deep sky astrophotography made with expert raw.
people investigating on reddit found out that Samsung’s so called “Expert RAW” is really just a jpg repackaged in a DNG file format. It was very easy to tell from sample images because,“Expert RAW” images have excessive sharpening as well as jpeg compression artifacts, and don’t have the noise patterns typical of true RAW files, nor do they respond well to basic edits like raising shadows or lowering highlights. I was extremely disappointed in Samsung when I discovered this. Samsung literally already offers true RAW images in the Pro mode, and “Expert RAW” could have been a serious step up by applying HDR and stacking multiple exposures at the RAW level, yet the reality is disappointing: their dedicated “Expert RAW” app is just a jpeg with the file extension changed. I will give samsung a tiny benefit of the doubt that they may change this in a software update, but I don’t expect anything from them anymore. They were caught cheating benchmark scores last year with “Game Optimizing Service” scandal. And this year they got caught faking their moon shots with “AI enhancements” aka cheat code that inserts moon details into photos. Now they also fake their “Expert RAW” mode, and just repackage a jpeg instead of truly applying computational photography at the RAW level like how iPhone can. They keep chasing gimmicks like 108MP, 200MP, 8K video recording, but won’t make the meaningful improvements at either the hardware or software level like increasing sensor size, switching to glass optics, or improving the image pipeline. sorry for the rant, these are incredible astrophotography shots, I’m just so annoyed with Samsung right now
@@Felipe-ld4qsThank you! Yes it works with s22+ s23+ s24+ Only difference is plus models' maximum zoom range is 3x, they don't have the 10x camera but still works
@@Felipe-ld4qs I actually made a tutorial video a few weeks ago. All you need to do is watch this video and try this in a rural area away from city light pollution, and avoid Moonlight pollution. ua-cam.com/video/74YXR3qvQLw/v-deo.htmlsi=399Ms5e74PUQjJvz
Unfortunately, you can't get this much detail bc s21 doesn't have optical Zoom cameras. You can get more wide angle shots like Milkyway like this one: ua-cam.com/video/A_Oi3wxwICM/v-deo.htmlsi=Fny7tTDq2D-EYDXP
Yes, you can! You can do it with most of the phones that have full manual control. Your Huawei allows you to change your "Shutter Speed, ISO and Manual Focus," right?
Can you explain how to get all the calibration photos with the phone because i have a hard time understanding it. Like what settings, how many or how to set them up in general with your phone?
1-Dark Frames:Cover your camera lens or telescope after taking your main photos. Use the same settings (exposure time, ISO) as your main photos and take 10-20 pictures. 2-Bias Frames:Cover the lens and set your camera to the fastest shutter speed (shortest exposure time).Take 10-20 pictures. 3-Flat Frames:Point your camera at a bright, even surface, I use Ipad screen opening a white page and put a white cloth between camera and screen. Keep the same focus as your main photos and take 10-20 pictures.
Do I have a chance to capture this on a basic mobile phone that costs 200 euros? (Realme 8 model). The night sky really amazes me and I would like to start taking pictures, but I don't have such good equipment.
@@PyroPavlikecc Hey, I am not so sure what your phone's capabilites but there are multiple different ways to capture the dark sky. I think your phone can capture long exposure(15sec to 30sec shutter) shots in pro mode. That's all you need. Key for astrophotography is actually finding a dark site without city light pollution. And choosing a day with no Moon (Moon creates light pollution too) Check the vide below it might help: ua-cam.com/video/A_Oi3wxwICM/v-deo.htmlsi=rBDdphLGaTxys3Dh
@@PyroPavlikecc Additionally. Check your area's light pollution with lightpollutionmap.info (find an area to capture at least class 4 and below) and download Stellarium App to plan what's in the sky also avoiding Moon. Good luck
@@kitchenraw Thanks, I live quite far from cities in a village so lighting won't be a problem. Just wondering when is the best time to photograph the Orion Nebula? I have read that the best time to observe is around December to February, but I would like to capture it in the near future, around November, will it be possible to observe it in clear weather without light smog?
@@PyroPavlikecc This week is good to be able to see Orion after 10pm when you look towards East. But I am not sure where you live it might depend on your location. The best way to learn is downloading the free Stellarium App and it works with your phone's gps. You can search on the app "Orion" and it will show you where, when depending on your location. In general, Orion is a good target for fall and winter if you live in the Northern Hampshire.
@@kitchenraw I live in the Czech Republic, in the northern hemisphere. So if it is now observable after 10 pm, does that mean that in December it will already be high on the horizon around 8 pm?
Hopefully you see this comment but I did an hour session taking photos of m31 using my s24 Ultra and tried to stacking the raw files but for some reason it doesn't allow me... I tried DeepSkyStacker and Sequator. I believe it's to do with the file since they both say something about the file being invalid. I looked at my settings in expert raw and saw the option for Lossless Raw which is turned on but i'm not sure if it could be that causing the problem
@@Tilza78 Hey, now worries, I try to answer all the questions in the comments section as much as possible. Can you send me an email with a few raw files you captured to askrawkitchen@gmail.com so I can look at it what is causing the problem. Fyi, Deep Sky Stacker or Sequator sometimes fails for no reason (so annoying) even with the captures I get with my professional equipment.
Thanks!! I know Siril is much more efficient but it costs money :D I am mostly showing the basic process for beginners and they can get 30 days free trial of Photoshop which is not a deal breaker for people who wants to try and start astrophotography.
@robj144 Oh jeezz, this is amazing! I am downloading now! I don't know why, but last time I tried to download it to my Mac, it was $39. Maybe I remember it wrong, or it was another stacking app. I am actually curious how user-friendly Siril is. Is it easy to learn for beginners? My followers are mostly beginners.
Sorry for so many questions, but I have one more question. In PRO mode, I can take photos in RAW format, but unfortunately I cannot zoom in on photos in this format, it only works with JPEG format so I'm afraid that the resulting photo won't be able to be edited that much and won't be as nice.
@@PyroPavlikecc Yes, raw images are the untouched images your camera sensor gets. When you are in jpeg it digitally crops the image not an actual zoom. To be able to take zoomed raw images your phone needs to have dedicated optical zoom cameras such as 3x 5x 10x cameras.
That's very cool but also try this: (Only works at high light pollution) Duplicate the layer Select the top one and blur it with Gaussian blur at max. After that select in layer merge mod: subtract or extract and merge the layers. After that stretch and the nebulosity will double.
@@kitchenraw Actually i learned it from a tutorial video of a guy but the video itself it's out of this point. It is simple so you will not need a tutorial. I will make a video and i will upload it in an open cloud storage so you can see it safely
i am using the gimp but the same is for the photoshop too but you might get worse results. For some reason as hard as i could try the gimp tabs in the recording werent visible but i left a history tab open.
Just captured in my S23 ultra. It's crazy insane! The fact that it is 1344 light years away and 12 light years in radius and we are able to capture it in our mobile is spectacular!
That is great!
amazing, finally someone using the 10x camera for an astrophrography, and if you had used calibration frames (darks, flats, bias, etc) the result would have been even more professional and unbelievable, great job
Thank you! I normally use calibration frames and it really helps with the noise ratio and vignetting, but I didn't want to confuse people with too much information :D Maybe next time I can show that part too!
@@kitchenraw Great video! Yes please update the video with the use of calibration frames! AMAZING!!
@@JosephConroy Thank you, I will do that soon.
Hey, I just uploaded a video showing some results from Samsung Galaxy Ultra's 10x camera with calibration frames.
Here is the video:ua-cam.com/video/IV79lIQ5CPw/v-deo.html
@@JosephConroy Hey, I just uploaded a video showing some results from Samsung Galaxy Ultra's 10x camera with calibration frames.
Here is the video:ua-cam.com/video/IV79lIQ5CPw/v-deo.html
Amazing results! I have a 23 ultra and have a LOT to learn. I'm no pro and I've only taken basic night sky photos like the Big Dipper, Orion and other constellations.
Thank you. When you go outside of the light polluted cities, these phones perform amazing in the dark.
Channels like this deserve more exposure for collective good of humanity, algo must bless these instead of brain rot videos.
Amazing Job. I can't wait for andromeda :)
Tesekkurler!!
Increíble trabajo amigo, necesitaba algún tutorial de este tipo, muchas gracias continúa haciendo tu excelente contenido 😁😁😁😁
Muchas gracias 🙏
This is amazing, I wish I could do this on my note 20 ultra. I am really impressed and might need to upgrade
Thanks! Actually, you can do this with Note 20 Ultra, too.
@@kitchenraw what!!! Fantastic then, I shall follow your steps and see the results :)
Absolutely amazing result, congrats!
Just my concern is, at the beginning of the recording how are you able to have a proper and accurate polar alignment? I'm a telescope user and know how important it is. Even more if you would like to track any object with tight angle (10x zoom for e.g), and even if you have this lightweight Skywathcer (?) tool.
Sorry, if I'm answering stupid question just I assume the proper tracking depends on the accurate polar alignment. Maybe I am wrong and this tool ensures somehow the right traccking (i mean rotating the camera).
Thanks in advance!
Thank you! These are great questions, and I am more than happy to answer. I didn't explain the polar allignment part to not confuse people with lots of technical information bc my channel is for beginners/starters mostly. Sky Watcher Mini has a polar scope it goes thru the rotating engine, and the sky watcher app has a polar allignment guide. The guide on the app knows your location, and your altitude shows the precise polar allignment point in your scope. I manually find the polaris looking at the north and also sometimes using planetarium apps (Stellarium). I allign my tracker's polar scope to the Polaris similar to what the app shows me, and that's it. I turn the star tracker on, and I can put my dslr or my phone on it and track the stars. Sometimes, if there is too much light pollution, it is hard to find the polaris from the polarscope, so I use the red illuminator light attachment it comes with the tracker, it helps to locate the polar star. As you mentioned, for 10X Zoom, I definitely need precise polar allignment. For wide angle lenses, rough polar alligment can be enough. I hope this answers your questions!!
@@kitchenraw thanks a lot for clarification, I appreciate it.
It is clear now, I was just wondering if there is any new method (unknown for me) which makes you able to track precisely without polar alignment.
Fair comment, that this video is not about right polar alignment, just could be important for beginners (who want to make similar recordings) it is not enough to go out under the clear sky and start photoshooting immediately :-)
Got it, thanks again!
@rolandszalai367 Most regular star trackers require manual polar allignment. Also, there are really expensive pro level trackers it can find the polaris automaically. But tech is improving so fast now we have "To Go Telescopes." You basically type the name of the target it does everything for you. There is also new tech that just came last year portable small smart telescopes, "Seestar or Dwarf" they don't require polar allignment. I tested Seestar Smart telescope before, but it was so effortless and easy to use, I got bored eventually :) I think I enjoy the proccess of hard work (polar allignment, finding targets) to achieve results. There is also another interesting camera that has a built-in star tracker made by Pentax. It has an incredible technology using a sensor reduction system to move the sensor inside the camera to track the stars without a polar allignment. I will leave a video link here bc I reviewed that Pentax a few months ago:ua-cam.com/video/YAS6KMl7LjE/v-deo.htmlsi=8DKhZaIlzfAr9bkc
I forgot to mention, Sky Watcher Mini which I used in the video has 3.5 kilos loading capacity and can be too small for carrying a telescope. It is designed for dslr and telezoom lenses. Sky Watcher' pro series have higher loading limit mostly designed for telescopes and better tracking than the mini version
@@kitchenraw thanks for further info :) indeed, using even more developed technology tools makes observation and recording easier, and it's amazing, more people can use them and therefore science is between us. It is great I think...
Amazing video! Thanks for posting this mate! Btw, I clicked the amazon link u posted for star tracker and it is showing 2 options. One is 200+ usd and other one is 300+ usd. Which one are you using? Thanks again :)
Thank you!! Yes, there are 2 options. They are the same device, but $300+ Pro Pack one comes with an extra equatorial base, a declination bracket, which helps you a lot to make fine adjustments when you are finding targets. I am using the pro pack, and I definitely suggest getting that one. Cheaper one is the star tracker device by itself.
@kitchenraw Got it. Again, thank you so much sir!
@RAWKITCHEN, why dont you do an update video? the s23 ultra has a new expert raw update that makes the capturing of nebula much easier, please look into it and update us?
I tried last week while I was camping in Big Bend National Park. I used 10 mins option with Expert Raw. The result I got wasn't even close to the quality, what I got by doing the stacking manually. I can send you the example image I tried with expert raw and just compare it by yourself ;) I can send you the example. Just send me an empty email at: askrawkitchen@gmail.com 👋
The image it produces is not really raw
Really amazing for us as a begineer
Any stacking photo app idea?
Deepskycamera looks like what you are looking for
Those single shots look cool tho
Thank you
Subscribed.. thanks for full tutorial..
Thanks 👋
JUST WOW 🤐
Thank you!
Bro Samsung s22 shoot 1080p slow motion at 240fps or not
It does!
Your video is simply wonderful! I have been an astrophotographer for more than 4 years, I want to buy a C24 ultra and shoot nebulae with it using an astro tracker. I’m sure that at 10x zoom everything will be great with the tracker! Your content is wonderful!
Tell me, please, can I do the usual gifts and biases? Do you just cover your phone with something for dark purposes? Thanks for the work
Thank you so much! When I am capturing with my smartphone camera, I just need to make sure I am in a non-light polluted area and shooting raw images. Just like how I do astrophotography with my dslr. Sometimes, weather temperature changes drastically, and it might mess up with focus, so I stop intervelometer every 30 minutes to check if my focus is still good. Other than that, it's pretty straightforward.
Also, I made this video to show how calibration frames benefitting the image if you are interested: ua-cam.com/video/IV79lIQ5CPw/v-deo.htmlsi=P7Jq_FtFYaKvGAB0
And yes, for my calibration frames, I basically put my phone on the table cameras facing down in the dark after capturing. And I use my Ipad or laptop screen to get flat calibration frames
Hey bro.
You using star tracker?😢
Yes. Without a star tracker, I could only capture 2 to 3 seconds. I use this one, which is around $240 amzn.to/3Ey31S0
Amazing!..is this result just by the 10× telephoto cam or did you use lens?
Yes! It is from the 10x camera. No additional lens used.
@@kitchenraw that's really impressive, do i have to take the picture in dark sky? Or i can take it from the city?
@Ahmad Hasil You need to be away from the city. At least bortle 5 or lower. Check the lightpollutionmap.info Also, you need a star tracker mount to be able to long exposure like I mentioned in the begining of the video
@@kitchenraw i don't have a tracker so i will try the other way you said in the video, i hope it works
amzn.to/430bDe7 This is the star tracker I used
Amazing work🙌
Thank you 🙌
Insane, andromeda will be also good target
Thanks, my next project is actually Andromeda, but I will have to wait for the summer bc Andromeda is not visible from my location these days.
Totally amazing!
Thank you❤
this was recorded with s21 ultra? So we can hope we get even better results with s23 ultra, comparasion between would be also interesting
There is no difference between s21, s22 and s23 Ultra's 10x cameras. They use the same 10x optical periscope with the exact same sensor and aperture. Results will be same. 23 Ultra has maybe better ai processing for regular photo mode but for astrophotography I have to use raw dng unedited files which will be the same for all ultra models.
Btw, yes it is recorded with s21 Ultra
Why not do it all automatically with the built in 10 minute multi exposure expert raw app from Samsung, with the nebula shown overlayed on the camera view to help find it?
Expert raw is not giving you the untouched raw image. It applies auto sharpening and noise reduction. For astrophotography and stacking, we only use raw, unedited pictures to stack even with the professional astro cameras. Expert raw is good for daylight and low light, but it is not designed for deep sky astrophotography.
@RAW KITCHEN not designed for it? It's explicitly designed for it. It does all the stacking work and has a star map in the app. Even the "sharpening" is there to save most people the time of doing it themselves. Have you compared the results and showed that doing it manually even comes out better? You could be right, but I'd want to know that before I went to all that work!
@Dorian Lust For milkyway or star trails yes, but deep sky astrophotography no. I tried 10x camera with expert raw for 10min multiple times on orion nebula you can't get anywhere close to manual stacking. I would love to see if you can send me some examples of deep sky astrophotography made with expert raw.
@RAW KITCHEN ok, good to know. You should make a video comparison, people would watch that.
people investigating on reddit found out that Samsung’s so called “Expert RAW” is really just a jpg repackaged in a DNG file format. It was very easy to tell from sample images because,“Expert RAW” images have excessive sharpening as well as jpeg compression artifacts, and don’t have the noise patterns typical of true RAW files, nor do they respond well to basic edits like raising shadows or lowering highlights. I was extremely disappointed in Samsung when I discovered this.
Samsung literally already offers true RAW images in the Pro mode, and “Expert RAW” could have been a serious step up by applying HDR and stacking multiple exposures at the RAW level, yet the reality is disappointing: their dedicated “Expert RAW” app is just a jpeg with the file extension changed.
I will give samsung a tiny benefit of the doubt that they may change this in a software update, but I don’t expect anything from them anymore. They were caught cheating benchmark scores last year with “Game Optimizing Service” scandal. And this year they got caught faking their moon shots with “AI enhancements” aka cheat code that inserts moon details into photos. Now they also fake their “Expert RAW” mode, and just repackage a jpeg instead of truly applying computational photography at the RAW level like how iPhone can. They keep chasing gimmicks like 108MP, 200MP, 8K video recording, but won’t make the meaningful improvements at either the hardware or software level like increasing sensor size, switching to glass optics, or improving the image pipeline.
sorry for the rant, these are incredible astrophotography shots, I’m just so annoyed with Samsung right now
Sana yemin edebilirim ki aksandan acaba Türk mü diye içimden geçirdim😂
Yemin etme çarpilirsin 😆
@@kitchenraw 😅😅
Güzel video, ellerine sağlık.
this mode works with PLUS model?? Greate video and greate photo... i love it..
@@Felipe-ld4qsThank you! Yes it works with s22+ s23+ s24+ Only difference is plus models' maximum zoom range is 3x, they don't have the 10x camera but still works
@@Felipe-ld4qs I actually made a tutorial video a few weeks ago. All you need to do is watch this video and try this in a rural area away from city light pollution, and avoid Moonlight pollution.
ua-cam.com/video/74YXR3qvQLw/v-deo.htmlsi=399Ms5e74PUQjJvz
how about my s 21 5g????
Unfortunately, you can't get this much detail bc s21 doesn't have optical Zoom cameras. You can get more wide angle shots like Milkyway like this one: ua-cam.com/video/A_Oi3wxwICM/v-deo.htmlsi=Fny7tTDq2D-EYDXP
Wow! Cool
Thank you❤
PLEASE CAN I DO THIS WITH HUAWEI P30??
Yes, you can! You can do it with most of the phones that have full manual control. Your Huawei allows you to change your "Shutter Speed, ISO and Manual Focus," right?
YES BUT I HAVE ONLY 6X ZOOM , THANK YOU @@kitchenraw
@kujojotaro9629 6X is more than enough. You can even use 3x. It will work.
@@kujojotaro9629 This one is captured with 3x on a fixed tripod: ua-cam.com/video/y-5cuUojcps/v-deo.htmlsi=6TDkp41XicuN0TkI
Great video ❤❤
Thanks!!
Can you explain how to get all the calibration photos with the phone because i have a hard time understanding it. Like what settings, how many or how to set them up in general with your phone?
Hey calibration frames are not necessary but it will improve the noise reduction and vignetting. It only works in manual (pro) mode.
1-Dark Frames:Cover your camera lens or telescope after taking your main photos. Use the same settings (exposure time, ISO) as your main photos and take 10-20 pictures.
2-Bias Frames:Cover the lens and set your camera to the fastest shutter speed (shortest exposure time).Take 10-20 pictures.
3-Flat Frames:Point your camera at a bright, even surface, I use Ipad screen opening a white page and put a white cloth between camera and screen. Keep the same focus as your main photos and take 10-20 pictures.
Do I have a chance to capture this on a basic mobile phone that costs 200 euros? (Realme 8 model). The night sky really amazes me and I would like to start taking pictures, but I don't have such good equipment.
@@PyroPavlikecc Hey, I am not so sure what your phone's capabilites but there are multiple different ways to capture the dark sky. I think your phone can capture long exposure(15sec to 30sec shutter) shots in pro mode. That's all you need. Key for astrophotography is actually finding a dark site without city light pollution. And choosing a day with no Moon (Moon creates light pollution too) Check the vide below it might help: ua-cam.com/video/A_Oi3wxwICM/v-deo.htmlsi=rBDdphLGaTxys3Dh
@@PyroPavlikecc Additionally. Check your area's light pollution with lightpollutionmap.info (find an area to capture at least class 4 and below) and download Stellarium App to plan what's in the sky also avoiding Moon. Good luck
@@kitchenraw Thanks, I live quite far from cities in a village so lighting won't be a problem. Just wondering when is the best time to photograph the Orion Nebula? I have read that the best time to observe is around December to February, but I would like to capture it in the near future, around November, will it be possible to observe it in clear weather without light smog?
@@PyroPavlikecc This week is good to be able to see Orion after 10pm when you look towards East. But I am not sure where you live it might depend on your location. The best way to learn is downloading the free Stellarium App and it works with your phone's gps. You can search on the app "Orion" and it will show you where, when depending on your location. In general, Orion is a good target for fall and winter if you live in the Northern Hampshire.
@@kitchenraw I live in the Czech Republic, in the northern hemisphere. So if it is now observable after 10 pm, does that mean that in December it will already be high on the horizon around 8 pm?
You could have used timelapse mode of motioncam..
Could be a good trick, but motioncam doesn't support the super telephoto lens.
@@kitchenraw ua-cam.com/video/chvkekvRz3M/v-deo.html
someone tested 230mm lens on motioncam with s23u.
Probably you didn't enabled hidden Id option
@Kino No Tabi That’s so cool. I will definitely check mine too.
@@kitchenraw Good luck, waiting for your next video
Hopefully you see this comment but I did an hour session taking photos of m31 using my s24 Ultra and tried to stacking the raw files but for some reason it doesn't allow me... I tried DeepSkyStacker and Sequator. I believe it's to do with the file since they both say something about the file being invalid. I looked at my settings in expert raw and saw the option for Lossless Raw which is turned on but i'm not sure if it could be that causing the problem
@@Tilza78 Hey, now worries, I try to answer all the questions in the comments section as much as possible. Can you send me an email with a few raw files you captured to askrawkitchen@gmail.com so I can look at it what is causing the problem. Fyi, Deep Sky Stacker or Sequator sometimes fails for no reason (so annoying) even with the captures I get with my professional equipment.
@@kitchenraw Thank you so much for helping!! I sent you an email regarding it.
You should use Siril next time for stacking and stretching. That's painful to watch in PS. :)
Cool video though.
Thanks!! I know Siril is much more efficient but it costs money :D I am mostly showing the basic process for beginners and they can get 30 days free trial of Photoshop which is not a deal breaker for people who wants to try and start astrophotography.
@@kitchenraw Siril is free...
@robj144 Oh jeezz, this is amazing! I am downloading now! I don't know why, but last time I tried to download it to my Mac, it was $39. Maybe I remember it wrong, or it was another stacking app. I am actually curious how user-friendly Siril is. Is it easy to learn for beginners? My followers are mostly beginners.
@kitchenraw It's easy enough with a couple short tutorials.
Subbed, bro. I will try your method!
Thank you
Sorry for so many questions, but I have one more question. In PRO mode, I can take photos in RAW format, but unfortunately I cannot zoom in on photos in this format, it only works with JPEG format so I'm afraid that the resulting photo won't be able to be edited that much and won't be as nice.
@@PyroPavlikecc Yes, raw images are the untouched images your camera sensor gets. When you are in jpeg it digitally crops the image not an actual zoom. To be able to take zoomed raw images your phone needs to have dedicated optical zoom cameras such as 3x 5x 10x cameras.
@@kitchenraw Ah, so my phone unfortunately does not have this function. Will it be a problem if I take pictures in JPEG format?
That's very cool but also try this:
(Only works at high light pollution)
Duplicate the layer
Select the top one and blur it with Gaussian blur at max.
After that select in layer merge mod: subtract or extract and merge the layers. After that stretch and the nebulosity will double.
@@astrorama-ath Wow that's interesting! Never heard of that, I have to try this. Do you think I can find a tutorial on somewhere about this technique?
@@kitchenraw Actually i learned it from a tutorial video of a guy but the video itself it's out of this point. It is simple so you will not need a tutorial. I will make a video and i will upload it in an open cloud storage so you can see it safely
@@astrorama-ath 🙏 That would be great!
i am using the gimp but the same is for the photoshop too but you might get worse results. For some reason as hard as i could try the gimp tabs in the recording werent visible but i left a history tab open.
@@astrorama-ath i am the same user but i try to comment from diffrent accounts but my comments with link too keep deleting
+
Thank you❤