The Real Reason why the US Bought Alaska from Russia

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 22 тра 2024
  • The purchase of Alaska is surrounded by one of the most persistent historical myths of our time. It was dubbed "Seward's Folly," after then Secretary of State William H. Seward, and was supposedly widely opposed by the public. But that... isn't true.
    In this video, we're taking you through the events surrounding the Purchase of Alaska.
    FULL TRANSCRIPT + SOURCES:
    docs.google.com/document/d/10...
    MAIN SOURCES:
    There Are Two Versions of the Story of How the U.S. Purchased Alaska From Russia (Smithsonian):
    www.smithsonianmag.com/histor...
    Purchase of Alaska, 1867 (Office of the Historian):
    history.state.gov/milestones/...
    Seward's Bargain: The Alaska Purchase from Russia (National Archives):
    www.archives.gov/publications...
    Timeline of Important Laws and Events Impacting Tribal Governments in Alaska (University of Alaska Fairbanks):
    public.courts.alaska.gov/web/...
    The Alaska Purchase (Library of Congress):
    www.loc.gov/collections/meeti...
    #PurchaseOfAlaska #USHistory

КОМЕНТАРІ • 789

  • @nickwaah2702
    @nickwaah2702 3 місяці тому +28

    I appreciate how you didn’t kill us with “like & subscribe” crap but asked us to consider watching more videos. I thank you for the work done on this informative video.

  • @LibertyMonk
    @LibertyMonk 4 місяці тому +16

    To be fair, $7 million was like a 20% of the annual revenue of the government at the time. It's a big number.

    • @freebird7284
      @freebird7284 3 місяці тому +2

      we could print that before lunch in 2024, thanks biden

    • @sport7553
      @sport7553 12 днів тому

      if you compare usa gdp growth as a whole vs alaskas from 1867-2024 then alaskas gdp should today be about 4,7 trillions for it to have been a good purchase... so either alaskans are beeing severly exploited and that gdp is going somewhere else or it was a really bad purchase considering it's current gdp of 63 billions... alaska should currently be contributing 18% to usas current gdp for it to have been a good purchase

  • @Buster3752
    @Buster3752 8 місяців тому +259

    The reason why it’s not Canadian is because back then Canada was the British colony and the Russians didn’t want the Brits to get stronger

    • @mirielle6258
      @mirielle6258 8 місяців тому +2

      until now, it's a Commonwealth

    • @joseph-sj7do
      @joseph-sj7do 5 місяців тому

      It was said that the Sun did not set on the British Empire cos it was World Wide but it is also because God did not trust Brits in the Dark and they might attempt to seize Heaven

    • @cristianJoker2512
      @cristianJoker2512 5 місяців тому +10

      dude usa it's also British colony 😂

    • @TooMuchJack-BrawlStars
      @TooMuchJack-BrawlStars 5 місяців тому +17

      @@cristianJoker2512 but at the time it wasn’t

    • @MrMajsterixx
      @MrMajsterixx 5 місяців тому +7

      @@cristianJoker2512 not true, these days its more like the other way around

  • @Skywatch3ryt
    @Skywatch3ryt 8 місяців тому +74

    This is not underrated this is educational and my favorite second channel to watch history and geography... Keep the good work man love your vids

    • @HindsightYT
      @HindsightYT  8 місяців тому +6

      That means a lot, thank you!!

    • @tylerdurden7869
      @tylerdurden7869 4 місяці тому +1

      Surely you mean “ is underrated”

    • @Breezeinyoutube
      @Breezeinyoutube 3 місяці тому

      What happened to Skywatche3ryt after this

  • @michaelsadams524
    @michaelsadams524 8 місяців тому +105

    This is absolutely amazing! I knew before watching this that "Sewards FollIy" was not accurate but that most of our ancestors were for the purchase of Alaska. But that was just scratching the surface. In these 23 minutes, I have learned more about Russia and America and this purchase than I had ever learned before! Hindsight, I am hooked!

    • @murrismiller2312
      @murrismiller2312 3 місяці тому

      this video is a bit stupid.... the trees/ forests were the natural resources MOST desired.

    • @KevinKickChannel
      @KevinKickChannel 3 місяці тому

      I never knew that Russia was the only major European power to support the Unionists in the American Civil War. And then also selling Alaska to them for a bargain. I think historically overall, Russia has given more to America than the other way around. Think about relations with Russia in recent times what you want, I feel this video covers events and topics that aren't thought enough in American schools.

  • @rosskardon7195
    @rosskardon7195 8 місяців тому +66

    Just imagine what the Cold War in the 1950's and 1960's would have been like if the 1867 purchase of Alaska was rejected and then Alaska was part of the Soviet Union in the 20th Century!

    • @loonowolf2160
      @loonowolf2160 8 місяців тому +21

      no ty i don't wanna imagine a sh*t scenario like that.

    • @depthcharger3607
      @depthcharger3607 6 місяців тому +12

      I acctually see Alaska as the remnants of the Russian Empire

    • @Oregon123
      @Oregon123 6 місяців тому +4

      Its pretty cool seeing all those old orthodox churches scattered all over Alaska.

    • @reneblom2160
      @reneblom2160 5 місяців тому

      Since Tsar Nikolai II was in desperate need of money, he would probably just have found another buyer, in case the 1867 purchase was rejected. I believe that he actually offered Alaska to Liechtenstein, first. It's really funny hearing Russian propagandists trying very hard to push the narrative, that Russia didn't sell Alaska to the US and that it somehow still belongs to Russia. 🤣

    • @heatran4109
      @heatran4109 5 місяців тому

      Definitely would be a very interesting scenario.
      There’s always a chance that Alaska would break away from Russia during the civil war and become an independent state (likely under American and British protection). However, if the Soviets were able to take it then it’d likely become it’s own SSR like Ukraine or Belarus. Now obviously, the Soviets would place nuclear bombs here which might seem like a really significant event, but I don’t think it would be, essentially becoming a lessened down Cuban Missile Crisis. As for Cuba, the Americans would likely be fine with having nukes placed there as the threat of Alaska would’ve existed for over 15 years by that point. The Soviets would almost definitely still lose the Cold War, resulting in the modern world having an independent Alaska (likely speaking Russian), however it would almost definitely become a western democracy due to the close influence of the USA and Canada. Looking at it from that point of view, the only major world difference in the modern day would be a slight decrease in the overall power of the USA (now only 49 states), however I do believe that Alaska would become a major non NATO US ally, possibly even joining the alliance itself.

  • @Real_Amphy
    @Real_Amphy 6 місяців тому +8

    9:00 that is some very chipper music for the subject being discussed and it's funny as hell because of it.

  • @mindexplorer6929
    @mindexplorer6929 5 місяців тому +10

    Congratulations! This is a exceptionally well done documentation!

  • @ianmatthews7385
    @ianmatthews7385 5 місяців тому +2

    Thanks for vid, really high quality! Subscribed 🙂

  • @dirklutz7292
    @dirklutz7292 3 місяці тому +2

    An amazing documentary. Your team’s passion for history comes through.

  • @augiegirl1
    @augiegirl1 5 місяців тому +20

    The first line from Scott O’Dell’s children's novel “Island of the Blue Dolphins” speaks of hunters from the Aleutian Islands arriving, & the setting of that book is the real-life island of San Nicholas, just off the coast of California from Los Angeles. The fact that the Aleutians could travel this 2500-mile distance speaks to how skilled they were as seaman.

    • @swoondrones
      @swoondrones 4 місяці тому

      As always, people take advantage of natives and usurp them as forced labour. Such as the nature of usury economics.

  • @NiX_aKi
    @NiX_aKi 8 місяців тому +83

    Alaska is big & rich enough to be a country on its own

    • @baneofbanes
      @baneofbanes 8 місяців тому +18

      Big sure, but rich enough? No. And certainly not enough people.

    • @SuperCatacata
      @SuperCatacata 8 місяців тому +16

      @@baneofbanes Yeah, it ranks nearly dead last out of the 50 states in GDP... It's huge, but it's certainly not populated enough nor rich enough to be it's own country by modern western standards.

    • @bolshoibooze8010
      @bolshoibooze8010 6 місяців тому +3

      @@SuperCatacata When you're so low the only way out is up 📈📈📈

    • @trapjohnson
      @trapjohnson 5 місяців тому

      @@baneofbanes Well, the Feds stand athwart nearly all development of their abundant Natural Resources, so I am not surprised.

    • @thomashenebry8269
      @thomashenebry8269 5 місяців тому +1

      Not happening.

  • @mora103
    @mora103 8 місяців тому +72

    7.2 million dollars for a state bigger than a lot of countries sounds like a pretty good reason 😅

    • @Dave05J
      @Dave05J 6 місяців тому +4

      Not in today's Dollar! It's a l'or more than that today

    • @mora103
      @mora103 6 місяців тому +4

      @@Dave05J even then...its still cheap for a state 🤔 I got a friend who paid 2.5 million for a two hundred and fifty acres 😅

    • @mycocorleone4771
      @mycocorleone4771 6 місяців тому +13

      ​@@Dave05J 117 million is still a good deal

    • @stevedunn5546
      @stevedunn5546 5 місяців тому +1

      100%

    • @hydrolito
      @hydrolito 5 місяців тому

      7.2 million would have been worth what is billions now due to inflation, some books were called penny dreadful because sold for a cent.

  • @rokadaprliinnysystemyaczno4761
    @rokadaprliinnysystemyaczno4761 21 день тому

    Excellent film. Learnt a lot. Thanks for making it

  • @Kudarat08
    @Kudarat08 8 місяців тому +10

    I like your voice and explanations, subscribed

  • @MechanicalMeltdowns
    @MechanicalMeltdowns 8 місяців тому +16

    Only 17k subs?? Well you’ve got mine. Great video. Thank you man.

  • @yeetvtdtr5905
    @yeetvtdtr5905 8 місяців тому +7

    Underrated channel

  • @NathanDayspring-re4ok
    @NathanDayspring-re4ok 4 місяці тому +1

    Excellent presentation.

  • @curtiscoureau
    @curtiscoureau 8 місяців тому +2

    Amazing video

  • @user-cv5hn1jf3f
    @user-cv5hn1jf3f 4 місяці тому +1

    Awesome video

  • @lakshmankarunaratne3541
    @lakshmankarunaratne3541 6 місяців тому

    Thank you TOI for this information.

  • @SeigeGoat
    @SeigeGoat 8 місяців тому +21

    Mark my words this guy will get a million views and subscribers in future

  • @user-wr2cd1wy3b
    @user-wr2cd1wy3b 6 місяців тому +4

    This was a very well done documentary!

    • @thomashenebry8269
      @thomashenebry8269 5 місяців тому

      What of it? That's their job.

    • @user-wr2cd1wy3b
      @user-wr2cd1wy3b 5 місяців тому

      @@thomashenebry8269 Not their job, their choice, in hopes to make money, a choice made up of many creative choices, many of which I thought was well done. If not one recognizes what goes behind it, it can feel unappreciated.

  • @draculastraphouse7863
    @draculastraphouse7863 8 місяців тому +33

    Russia is feeling really stupid right now for giving up Alaska lmaoooo

    • @NoVisionGuy
      @NoVisionGuy 8 місяців тому +1

      They didn't want Britain to one day takeover Alaska back then, so they sold it to USA.

    • @sigwinfelicia2164
      @sigwinfelicia2164 8 місяців тому +4

      I tink Those people are dead

    • @KennyNGA
      @KennyNGA 8 місяців тому +2

      Really the tsar from back then is still alive? Thought they got nearly all Romanovs

    • @reneblom2160
      @reneblom2160 5 місяців тому

      That's probably also why they have fabricated a story, that Russia only leased Alaska the the USA for 90 years. 😆 Nice try, Ivan. But all sales are final. No returns.

    • @KevinKickChannel
      @KevinKickChannel 3 місяці тому

      @@sigwinfelicia2164 Yea I don't think 150 year old skeletons have the ability to feel stupid lol

  • @travisdeppe9172
    @travisdeppe9172 6 місяців тому +11

    I've never heard the myth that Alaska was thought to be a bad purchase at some point. Everything I was taught in school during the 90s said the opposite.

    • @aymonfoxc1442
      @aymonfoxc1442 5 місяців тому +3

      Some politicians and newspapers were against the purchase of Alaska (believing it to be a waste of public funds that went beyond the responsibilities of government as imposed by the Constitution) but Seward paid newspapers in major population centres to display pro-purchase adverts and write positive stories in support of the purchase. In the US, politicians buying favourable news coverage was commonplace and even somewhat expected in that era).

    • @cshepard09
      @cshepard09 5 місяців тому +1

      same.. my history teachers always made it out that we fleeced the russians for an amazing piece of land. dont know where the creator is getting that idea from

    • @pwdrjnky
      @pwdrjnky 4 місяці тому

      That is evidence of an extremely poor education system, you must have grown up in the US, The most common way to be completely wrong yet absolutely certain that you’re right.

    • @kenwalker687
      @kenwalker687 Місяць тому

      Actually, I grew up in the US educational system and I think it was pretty fair but that was a long time ago. They have purged a lot out to make room.@@pwdrjnky

  • @evoluna3056
    @evoluna3056 4 місяці тому

    I didn't know this, thank you. Impressing.

  • @Preaplanes
    @Preaplanes 5 місяців тому +4

    Keep in mind that the mercator distorts the size. Alaska is only about 1/6 of the USA, but that’s still a lot of land.

  • @kellensanna
    @kellensanna 4 місяці тому +10

    Great video. I think something people overlook when they talk about the purchase price of Alaska is with Russian America only having 800~ settlers the control they had on the area was still nebulous. The Russians basically converted a paper claim to cash in a time of need. People often think of modern strictly controlled border but the situation back then was much more flexible.

  • @thany3
    @thany3 4 місяці тому +2

    Aha! So this is why in Japan there is the Okhotsk Limited Express rail service (limited express means stopping at fewer stations than regular express) that goes all the way to the northernmost tip of the mainland. Beautiful region btw. I also just assumed that name was borrowed from the Sea of Okhotsk, but never realised where that bit of sea got its name. Now I know 😀

  • @virtualizeeverything
    @virtualizeeverything 5 місяців тому +1

    dont let the be forgotten I love your work keep it up

  • @cresenciashamsoddin2942
    @cresenciashamsoddin2942 3 місяці тому +3

    Thanks telling the Story of Alaskan History

  • @DaS-jp6wn
    @DaS-jp6wn 6 місяців тому +19

    Russia first asked the leader of one of the smallest countries in the world if he wants to buy Alaska. Lichtenstein (between Swiss and Austria) but he said no. If not alaska would be german speaking and would belong one of the smallest countries in the world. Imagine how rich that 30.000 inhabiant Country Lichtenstein now would be. And imagine how the cold war would have been when russia would not have sold alaska. russian tanks in north amerika

    • @043muitoa
      @043muitoa 5 місяців тому +1

      And nuclear missiles

    • @thomashenebry8269
      @thomashenebry8269 5 місяців тому +1

      Better stop reading this through beer goggles.

    • @shanechostetler9997
      @shanechostetler9997 5 місяців тому

      They would have had it stolen from them, or sold it to the US.

    • @rmp7400
      @rmp7400 3 місяці тому

      Russia has always been our ally.
      Marxism came from the Rothschilds, (Karl Marx was a Rothschild as much as Klaus Schwab is)
      & together with Wall Street It was the Rothschilds who financed the Khazarian Revolution of Russia (and slaughter of nearly 200 million Russian, Ukrainian & Polish Christians)
      So if you hate what the Rothschilds did to Russia...better look at our USA politicians.
      At least Russia recovered from those who attacked her....the USA is just becoming even more Bolshevik...!sadly!

    • @kenwalker687
      @kenwalker687 Місяць тому

      Is this true? Why on earth would Lictenstein want to buy Alaska? They could not hold it in the 19th century. I do not believe this post.

  • @YeahYeahb-tch
    @YeahYeahb-tch 4 місяці тому +2

    Seward was obviously a man ahead of time. People criticize because they don’t know better. Leave the diplomacy and tactics to your “Betters”

  • @kenwalker687
    @kenwalker687 Місяць тому

    I remember being taught in junior High school about the Alaska purchase from Russia & being called Seward's Folly and that it turned out not o be a folly at all. We were not taught about possible plans for purchase into British Columbia and nothing about the native peoples. Movies portrayed the lawlessness. My dad and his cousin, with his his Methodist uncle/father pastor moved to Ketchekan before WW2. They had to have navel passports. When Japan attacked Pearl Harbor, his mom had him move to Catalina with his praternal grandparents. As he already had a naval passport, he was allowed to do so. He enlisted in the USN and was assigned to China Lake, CA for the duration. His maternal grand-parents had economic ties to Japan & the Manchuco emporer before Dec 7th. His mother worked in a US defense industry and became an engineer for combat airplanes.

  • @VVayVVard
    @VVayVVard 4 місяці тому +3

    12:31 Minor note, but around this time, the four southern islands in the Kuril Island chain were still part of Japan. Russians first entered them in 1945, after Japan surrendered to the US.

    • @kenwalker687
      @kenwalker687 Місяць тому

      Yes, that probably encouraged Japan to surrender, in addition to the A-Bomb. How does Japan get Russians out of Japanesse territory once siezed? Are not the Russians still there?

  • @proveritate9312
    @proveritate9312 5 місяців тому +5

    An absolutely great video with a happy outcome for the Natives of Alaska, and all the other Alaskan people ! What a good positive beautiful historical narrative ! Thank you so much !

  • @hydrolito
    @hydrolito 5 місяців тому +3

    Russians likely worried about British Empire taking it anyway and French likely sold Louisiana because worried couldn't hold it anyway either.

  • @leealangrothe5552
    @leealangrothe5552 4 місяці тому +4

    I checked the Deed from Russia to the United States. The legal description on the Deed describes about 1676 acres. Meets and bounds description. Check it out. That is the reason the United States could not get permitting for the Alaska Pipeline before Ted Stevens and Don Young Created the ALASKA NATIONAL INTEREST LANDS CONSERVATION ACT (ANILCA) which changed sovereign native villages into C corporations requiring an attorney to represent them. Hence Alaska was purchased from Russia when Russia did not have title to the land.

  • @idontneedfriendsbutmyselfd3076
    @idontneedfriendsbutmyselfd3076 8 місяців тому +296

    If only Russians knew how valuable Alaska is today.

    • @liamhashmi7750
      @liamhashmi7750 8 місяців тому +29

      they do

    • @Tony-qx8dm
      @Tony-qx8dm 8 місяців тому +43

      Russia should give all Russian territory to the USA for the cost of Ukraine war

    • @palabert
      @palabert 8 місяців тому

      ​@@Tony-qx8dmlol

    • @G-Man-half-life
      @G-Man-half-life 8 місяців тому +31

      ⁠@@saccount-z3Ukraine is an American 🇺🇸 Allie and friend and has been since 1991… Ukraine 🇺🇦 will continue to receive tanks, planes, guns, bullets, bombs, and much much more in their fight for freedom and democracy.

    • @TheCaptainSplatter
      @TheCaptainSplatter 8 місяців тому +12

      They want it back which ain't happening

  • @gregorylyon1004
    @gregorylyon1004 4 місяці тому +1

    When then Secretary of State William Seward put forth the recommendation to buy Alaska, it was utterly useless land in the forbidden North. Nobody really knew if it was worth a dime or not. Back then, I would have considered it a really bad purchase. But with the discovery of oil, it ended up a deal for America.

    • @Manikanta-hh7wp
      @Manikanta-hh7wp Місяць тому

      Fur, Fisheries, Strategic location in Pacific ocean itself is the good deal

  • @Tbone1492
    @Tbone1492 8 місяців тому +13

    Very Good breakdown. Alaskans trace there ancestry back to Mongolia. Maybe you can consider that Native!

    • @hydrolito
      @hydrolito 5 місяців тому +2

      Alaskans Innuits related to people of Finland, Northern Russia, Northern Canada and Greenland also.

    • @kenwalker687
      @kenwalker687 Місяць тому

      Interesting suggestion: Do you have anything to support your statement, other than a pre-historic land bridge that Siberians probably crossed in pre-history?

  • @shaundevrisky349
    @shaundevrisky349 4 місяці тому +6

    Two of my favorite subjects have always been United States history and Russian history. (I was so infatuated with Russian history in school that my junior-high teacher took my Dutch last name De Vries and changed it to Mr. Devrisky for his own amusement 😁). You have taken these two subjects and merged them into twenty-three minutes of enjoyment. Thank-you!

  • @Dinteen949
    @Dinteen949 8 місяців тому +16

    9:10
    "She passed a law, that declared all natives in Russian America to be *subjects* of Russia ... *forced into labor.* "
    "Russia ruled the natives with an *iron fist.* "
    "They took the *children* of the natives' leaders *hostage* , and they frequently resorted to *extreme force.* "
    *(CHEERY, UPLIFTING MUSIC PLAYING IN THE BACKGROUND)*

    • @reneblom2160
      @reneblom2160 5 місяців тому +3

      That's what 'Russkiy Mir' is really about. This Russian concept hasn't changed much, for the past three centuries.

    • @aeniechka
      @aeniechka 5 місяців тому

      @@reneblom2160the US literally did genocide of almost all native Americans on their land… like Spain, like the UK. That was “ok” for countries of the time. And huh, actually Russia didn’t treated the natives so badly. Most of these words are just a bad translation or tries of manipulation, Russian bureaucratic machine usually just taxed all natives by furs, like the Empire did in Siberia. Alaskan case was pretty much the same, huh. Almost all local tribes are fighting each other -> the Empire proposes protection for the weakest and taxes them -> the Empire conquers the strongest tribe and taxes them by force -> the entire region is under Russian control. Pretty liberal strategy, comparatively to strategies of other countries of that time 😅

    • @Habik87_29
      @Habik87_29 4 місяці тому +5

      @@reneblom2160 What about the American Mir in which 90% of the Indians were exterminated?

    • @reneblom2160
      @reneblom2160 4 місяці тому

      @@Habik87_29 I have no interest in russian whataboutism, since it's a tool that is being used to divert the attention away from the topic at hand.

    • @Dariusz_1.618
      @Dariusz_1.618 16 днів тому

      @@Habik87_29
      There are more Indians in USA than ever in history and prehistory.
      If you talk about deaths, majority was due infectious diseases.
      They spread faster than people from Europe set foot.
      Are you trying to ban sailing by ship and reaching the shore ?
      Especially since we are talking about the past centuries, not the present ones.

  • @AGrace-tw6ku
    @AGrace-tw6ku 5 місяців тому +12

    The fact that we get free videos from Hindsight on UA-cam is priceless; keeping the education and knowledge alive. 👍👍👍
    By the way, may I also remind you the fact that our Native American population in our motherland, the Continent of America before the European Colonizers arrived, was around 15 millions, while the European population in their motherland, the Continent of Europe was around 25 millions.
    Today, Native American population is 15 million, while the European population, in the Continents of America + Europe, is a staggering TWO BILLION! A shocking sad truth. 😔
    In my humble opinion, it's about time to decolonize the Colonized lands, and return it to rightful owners Native American people.
    Notorious global cardinal crimes the Christian West has committed, and benefited a great deals, such as Slavery & Colonialism had long been over, why on earth is notorious Colonization still lingering on, may I ask? 😔

    • @oldfellaoldfella8535
      @oldfellaoldfella8535 5 місяців тому +7

      It's a gift.

    • @Sobabe-el5ke
      @Sobabe-el5ke 5 місяців тому +6

      Priceless!

    • @mamajune3864
      @mamajune3864 5 місяців тому +7

      If it's free, then you are a product.

    • @misterjorge2581
      @misterjorge2581 5 місяців тому +3

      It's very knowledgeable.

    • @mamajune3864
      @mamajune3864 4 місяці тому +3

      My jaw dropped as I learnt Native American population in their motherland, the Continent of America before the European Colonizers arrived, was around 15 millions, while the European population in their motherland, the Continent of Europe was around 25 millions.
      Today, Native American population is 15 million, while the European population, in the Continents of America + Europe, is a staggering TWO BILLION. It is a shockingly sad truth 😔

  • @StephenLatimerWoody
    @StephenLatimerWoody 5 місяців тому +6

    The possibility of the British Columbia mainland and the separate colony of Vancouver and Quadra Islands joining the United States was real, and there was interest by some people and politicians in the US to retain the entire west coast north of Mexico for the United States.

  • @KonglomeratYT
    @KonglomeratYT 5 місяців тому

    It doesn't take long for history to be misremembered. The Paris Peace Accords were completely forgotten by the 90s.

  • @michaelwalsh1278
    @michaelwalsh1278 3 місяці тому +1

    We purchased Alaska from the Russian Czar because the Czar asked us to do so. The Czar was concerned about Great Britton and France taking Alaska. He would have been unable to respond as he was in Saint Petersburg and would have had to send people all the way around the South American continent whereas Great Britton owned what is now Canada. Holding the land from Great Britton would have been impossible.

    • @kenwalker687
      @kenwalker687 Місяць тому

      Don't forget the uniting of Siberia with western Russia was not started until 1891 with the trans-Siberian Railroad. That is a hell of a long-distance to travel in the early 19th century on horse, wagons, foot or ship.. Sell Alaska! Before the Brits...

  • @kenwalker687
    @kenwalker687 Місяць тому

    As mentioned in the podcast, Russia was afraid that Britain might take Alaska from them and Russia were not friends with Britain at that time .

  • @Weberbros1
    @Weberbros1 5 місяців тому +1

    Frankly, I believe that I could count the efforts of historians to prove that it was indeed a popular decision at the time.

    • @kenwalker687
      @kenwalker687 Місяць тому

      This is too vauge. Can you explain?

    • @Weberbros1
      @Weberbros1 Місяць тому

      @@kenwalker687 22:33 he said it was countless. I just don't agree.

  • @jacksnyder7318
    @jacksnyder7318 5 місяців тому

    My question is why was the Press discouraging the purchase ?
    The benefits for the price had to be obvious.

    • @kenwalker687
      @kenwalker687 Місяць тому

      Too far away and cold much of the time. Nothing is up there and cost too much money. The Russians are afraid that the Brits will steal it from them. Why should the USA care?

  • @godbodyheru
    @godbodyheru 8 місяців тому +5

    Excellent information, now maybe you can do a video in the Indeginous who were there before the natives

  • @Sevastopol91
    @Sevastopol91 5 місяців тому +6

    At the time, Russia had no physical or economical means to hold on to or defend Alaska, and therefore made the only right decision at the time: to sell it rather than just lose it "for free."
    My only question is whether they could've/should've negotiated a better price.

    • @cshepard09
      @cshepard09 5 місяців тому +1

      the only problem is everyone else also saw it is a liability, only after the vast natural resources were discovered did it become such a steal

    • @andrewharrison44
      @andrewharrison44 4 місяці тому +2

      They did sell it for a better price. The tsar authorised the sale for $5Mn and the US paid $7.2Mn - a premium of almost 50%. At that time there were only 800 Russian settlers so the price/man was enormous - about $9000/head

    • @xxjoshuaxx23
      @xxjoshuaxx23 4 місяці тому

      2 cents per acre is not a good price even back then....this is huge land with so much resources that russia could of used later@@andrewharrison44

    • @user-ts4yf3fe9u
      @user-ts4yf3fe9u 3 місяці тому +1

      Good thing Russian sell Alaska to the US when it did, if they don't Japan would have annexed it after the Russo-Japanese war. Of course it would lost Alaska to the British during the Crimea War earlier then that. So many way for Russia to lose Alaska to a foreign powers...

  • @kentchamberlain5720
    @kentchamberlain5720 3 місяці тому

    FOUR ads in a row at 17:04 what the hell

  • @Koolarrow1987
    @Koolarrow1987 3 місяці тому

    If picture of my grandmother Guadalupe Gonzales family now resting near calveras lake in Bejar de San Antonio Tejas. Unidios caballeros de Americas.

  • @bjbolander620
    @bjbolander620 4 місяці тому

    That's a whole different beast of it's own

  • @menalgharbwalsharq648
    @menalgharbwalsharq648 5 місяців тому +1

    Funny to think that owning territories in the north may become a question of survival in the future

  • @k7y
    @k7y 4 місяці тому +1

    $7.2 million is about $150 million Today. Alaska Actual worth today is half trillion dollars. Which would be about 25 billion in 1867

    • @brianzybura8633
      @brianzybura8633 4 місяці тому

      So where did the USA find this 7.2 million dollars back in 1867?

    • @franciscopagan3255
      @franciscopagan3255 3 місяці тому +1

      7.2$ millions are aprox 18.1 $ billions today!😮

    • @brianzybura8633
      @brianzybura8633 3 місяці тому

      @@franciscopagan3255 Well, okay, but you FAILED to read my question?! I ASKED where did the U.S. government find that kind of money back in the day to pay the Russians that kind of money for Alaska? Kindly pay attention to what you are reading--PLEASE!

  • @ge2623
    @ge2623 4 місяці тому +4

    My great, great, great grandfather was the realtor who had the contract to sell Alaska. He told our family that it was the curb appeal, the good school district and the open floorplan that really made the U.S. buy it. It also had a 7 million car attached garage.

  • @amemes4957
    @amemes4957 8 місяців тому +1

    The return on investment is astronomical we say say that this is the best real state deal it gave US 1000 times the return of what they gave 🎉

  • @Nobudd0
    @Nobudd0 8 місяців тому +7

    Isn't 7.2 million very cheap...? Like, sometimes you pay 7.2 million for a house or a penthouse..

    • @Black-And_White
      @Black-And_White 8 місяців тому +1

      Russian Empire was poor that year

    • @laocarlos9406
      @laocarlos9406 8 місяців тому +3

      7.2 millions dollars in 1867 is equivalent about 151 millions dollars in 2022.

    • @RHDRich206
      @RHDRich206 8 місяців тому

      @@laocarlos9406still pretty cheap if you think about it lol

    • @Nobudd0
      @Nobudd0 7 місяців тому +1

      Still cheap for an entire state, sometimes you pay 151 million for 5 houses

    • @hybrid6ix885
      @hybrid6ix885 6 місяців тому

      @@laocarlos9406much much more than that.

  • @TZIMAKO.
    @TZIMAKO. 4 місяці тому +2

    Alaska is a really beautiful country (place)!!!👍

  • @nielsdaemen
    @nielsdaemen 4 місяці тому +1

    Selling Alaska was one of Russias biggest mistakes!

  • @quirinius
    @quirinius 5 місяців тому

    As far as I know, it was the Vikings who were the first Europeans to discover the America's, and not the Russians (actually a Dane).

  • @sergsilvestr1217
    @sergsilvestr1217 Місяць тому

    At that time, it was impossible for Russia to have control over Alaska and manage it. Communication lines couldn’t support saddlers. Any attempt would be waste of money.

  • @joylarson9040
    @joylarson9040 6 місяців тому +4

    The Russians were not totally barbaric to the Natives, You need to do the research. the Orthodox Church was very kind and wrote an alphabet for their language, and wrote the Bible in the language of the people, and educated the people in their own language. And the Natives were not slaves. It was only after the Americans took over that the native people were treated very badly.

  • @younousyoutoube
    @younousyoutoube 4 місяці тому +1

    Soviets must have been punching the air out of anger because of this

    • @user-ts4yf3fe9u
      @user-ts4yf3fe9u 3 місяці тому

      Considering that the Soviets shot the rightful owner of Russian, that like a house thief getting angry that he don't get the car that wasn't park in the garage because the previous owner already sell it.

  • @ticnatz
    @ticnatz 5 місяців тому +6

    Pootin wants Alaska back !!!! Good luck dude !!!

    • @043muitoa
      @043muitoa 5 місяців тому

      He have to buy it back but with today's money

    • @kenwalker687
      @kenwalker687 Місяць тому

      I have been to Alaska,. They are Americans, the Natives also, including any Russian-American descendants. and the Orthodox church. Putin can bluster all he wants.

  • @Krack2805
    @Krack2805 3 місяці тому

    lmao at all of the zig zag back and forth sea route

  • @terrywayneHamilton
    @terrywayneHamilton 5 місяців тому +1

    It is simply a geostrategic /expansion westward move by the governing body. The U.S. needed to secure all it's boarders and this deal put the U.S. on both sides of Canada thus neutralizing Canada. Mexico is likewise surrounded by the U.S. holdings in Central America and in Cuba which secure Gulf of Mexico and the important Mississippi river . When it comes to a country's security then SIZE is really important. This is known as 'Check Mate' in chess.

  • @toomtamsoumountha2793
    @toomtamsoumountha2793 8 місяців тому +1

    $7,2 mil?

  • @sym9798
    @sym9798 8 місяців тому

    I stayed the night at fort Ross in grade school

  • @chairde
    @chairde 3 місяці тому

    I was taught the Steward’s folly history.

  • @nbarealtalker
    @nbarealtalker 4 місяці тому +1

    The craziest thing about Alaska is how it was never a part of Canada.

    • @brianzybura8633
      @brianzybura8633 4 місяці тому +1

      That is because Canada did not become a country until 1867, whereas the USA became a country 91 years earlier Already Russia as a country was centuries old. So the USA and Russia were 'in the game' acquiring new territory. Russia had to sell Alaska because back in the day, Alaska was too far away to govern. Russia did damn good acquiring a huge land mass all the ways to the Bering Strait.

  • @EmilioShack1982emilioRoman
    @EmilioShack1982emilioRoman 6 місяців тому

    I'm bout to move to Alaska

  • @swoondrones
    @swoondrones 4 місяці тому +1

    Why didn't Russia know the value of Alaska to sell it?

    • @Manikanta-hh7wp
      @Manikanta-hh7wp Місяць тому

      Russia knows but Russia can't hold British attack so better option is to get some money instead of losing it after the war with british and with no money

  • @interwebtubes
    @interwebtubes 3 місяці тому

    Yeah I worked with a lady who used to live up in Alaska and I asked her about it and she quickly explained to me about the government check that she received while living in the state and what it was for
    And I’m thinking about the taxes that I paid however I was nice and warm where I was so they can keep the. Money,
    I’ll. Take the hot sunshine

  • @Karl-Benny
    @Karl-Benny 3 місяці тому

    So where is the Source of your information that the public was in Fact in favour of the Purchase

    • @kenwalker687
      @kenwalker687 Місяць тому

      This is UA-cam. Do your own research.

  • @Patrick-Inc
    @Patrick-Inc 5 місяців тому

    They needed Alaska because they didn't want Russia to be that close. Usa needed aquicker response time or to see them coming from a lot further away.
    It's for protection purposes and reactions.

    • @azulaquaza4916
      @azulaquaza4916 4 місяці тому

      USA and Russia were friends actually in the past

    • @brianzybura8633
      @brianzybura8633 4 місяці тому

      What you are saying is complete nonsense. Look, in the 1860s, the Russians help save the United States from extinction as a country. The Russians assisted the 1860s Union Army-assisting a Union Army victory. The term 'Cold War' did not arrive to this world until 1950 which was an entirely different world. I think you should watch time travel movies!

  • @bounce12
    @bounce12 5 місяців тому

    Exactly what Alberta and Newfoundland and Labrador could of looked like if the right person stepped up to help the people of these provinces

    • @adamdriver1016
      @adamdriver1016 4 місяці тому

      What, American territory?

    • @bounce12
      @bounce12 4 місяці тому

      @@adamdriver1016 Canadian

  • @joseph-sj7do
    @joseph-sj7do 5 місяців тому +1

    Did the UK / British Empire try to buy it?

  • @mirozynd4504
    @mirozynd4504 3 місяці тому

    What is sorely missing in this clip is the true historical perspective which clearly demonstrates that at the time of purchase by the USA, Alaska was worthless (its modern value depends on current technologies which weren't available at the time, in mid 19 century...it is wrong to judge the past from today's, modern perspectives of technological progress which occurred many years after the purchase.) )
    If Alaska was valuable in 1867 why would Russia have any desire to sell it ?
    Even more telling is that it was Russia which initiated the negotiations and offered to sell Alaska
    to the US, with huge reservations and opposition among Americans.
    As the clip reveals, the Russian czar was willing to take any offer over $ 5.0 million so W. Seward actually overpaid at $ 7.2 million for the purchase.
    In conclusion, William Seward was a visionary who correctly predicted the future value of Alaska a long time before it was recognized by most people at the time.
    God Bless Alaska and God Bless Seward for this fantastic gamble on the future value of Alaska !
    👏👏👏🙏😁😁😁😁😁

    • @Manikanta-hh7wp
      @Manikanta-hh7wp Місяць тому

      Russia has to sell because Russia can't hold an attack from British(Canada today) from the East

  • @tombaily29
    @tombaily29 5 місяців тому

    Knowing what we do now. It feels like we committed robbery with how valuable Alaska is.

  • @sport7553
    @sport7553 12 днів тому

    @HindsightYT if you compare usa gdp growth as a whole vs alaskas from 1867-2024 then alaskas gdp should today be about 4,7 trillions for it to have been a good purchase... so either alaskans are beeing severly exploited and that gdp is going somewhere else or it was a really bad purchase considering it's current gdp of 63 billions... alaska should currently be contributing 18% to usas current gdp for it to have been a good purchase

  • @thelloyd87
    @thelloyd87 4 місяці тому

    2:37 downside is 7 dollar Gatorade

  • @jameshudson169
    @jameshudson169 4 місяці тому

    worked out so good. we're thinking of buying greenland.

    • @kenwalker687
      @kenwalker687 Місяць тому

      Do doubt this is "tounge i check". The Danes refused and the people of Greenland would be horrified. Sorry Trump.

    • @jameshudson169
      @jameshudson169 Місяць тому

      @@kenwalker687 you think the people of alaska were horrified?

  • @jimmywillims5929
    @jimmywillims5929 3 місяці тому

    That little 7 million would be like 150 million in today’s dollar

  • @freebird7284
    @freebird7284 3 місяці тому

    they wanted 5 million and we offered 5 million, sounds like russia had a mole! great video, new sub.

  • @monkeyking-self-proclaimed7050
    @monkeyking-self-proclaimed7050 6 місяців тому +1

    Alaska here I come!

  • @Nadir-wm5dw
    @Nadir-wm5dw 3 місяці тому

    Nice story I forgot it but major and secret Zone of Aircraft and submarine and other weapons produced there plus kind of war with Japan early last century about this island or Sthg elsr
    A/W Story of history besides Wealth of the land

  • @mortophobegaming6454
    @mortophobegaming6454 5 місяців тому

    i hear a dutch voice, correct?

  • @julienb.9526
    @julienb.9526 Місяць тому

    7:43 "They were welcomed by their Russian comrades". Sounds like the USSR 200 years too early.

  • @dreamervanroom
    @dreamervanroom 5 місяців тому +1

    Did Canada try to buy it?

    • @brianzybura8633
      @brianzybura8633 4 місяці тому

      No , never. That is because Canada did not become a country until 1867. That time Canada being so small a country had no national treasury the size of the USA and Russia.

  • @railwaymechanicalengineer4587
    @railwaymechanicalengineer4587 5 місяців тому

    FOLLY OR FOLLY - THE MEANING HAS CHANGED !!!
    I think there maybe a misunderstanding of the word "Folly" !!! My Uncle lived in a "Folly". A mock Castle complete with drawbridge & even a moat. But it was built by an American who had migrated to England, around 1870, in the Victorian era (1840-1902 the reign of Queen Victoria).
    Known as a "Folly" because Castles became useless as Castles by 1380, when gunpowder first arrived from China, to Europe. But such "Follies" (and there are many in Britain), did make nice impressive homes, implying the owner was important & wealthy, & in reality often used more modern methods of construction !!!!
    So "Sewards Folly" could mean virtually the exact opposite of what it is generally thought to mean today !!!!
    Definition of "Folly" as per CURRENT Oxford English Dictionary = Quote "A lack of good sense or foolishness" Unquote !!!

  • @Kahang-
    @Kahang- 8 місяців тому +5

    Holy shot no way this guy only got 9.9k view's i thought i was watching a 2 milion subcriber's channel

  • @willylao5430
    @willylao5430 3 місяці тому

    Cities in the form of a line. Ouch!! 😂😂

  • @bobkin611
    @bobkin611 4 місяці тому +1

    Boy, I bet they regret selling Alaska now 😅 but good thing they did. A gem in the US states

    • @kenwalker687
      @kenwalker687 Місяць тому

      I read somewhere that Putin wants to take ALK back. No doubt on a technicality. Cheaper than other options.

  • @NotTheLastOne
    @NotTheLastOne 4 місяці тому

    I wonder how they counted the natives of Alaska

  • @scyus5974
    @scyus5974 5 місяців тому +1

    wait only 7.2 million for alaska? that's a motherfucking snag, maybe not for that time but jesus.

  • @brianzybura8633
    @brianzybura8633 4 місяці тому

    As I watch this I wonder where the American government back in history found that money--$7,200,000.00? Not only that but if you look at U.S. history, the Louisiana purchase was for $11,000,000.00. At the time the USA was a very small country, so where did that money come from? Decades later after the war with Mexico, The USA paid the Mexican government $15,000,000.00 for what is now , New Mexico, Arizona, Nevada, Utah, Colorado, and California. Where did that money come from? Back in that era of history, no small country had any kind of national treasury such as that. Only the British and French empires had national treasuries of that size. Likely we will never know.

  • @michellapierre9123
    @michellapierre9123 3 місяці тому

    Always tought Canada was the 1 who sold Alaska to USA…