Acoustic Panel Placement: Do You Need An Air Gap Behind Your Panels?

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 20 чер 2024
  • ►► Download the FREE Home Studio Treatment Framework and get everything out of your room and speakers → www.acousticsinsider.com/home...
    Should your panels sit flush against the wall, or should there be an air gap behind them?
    Some people say to hang them against the wall, others suggest the air gap.
    But does it even make any difference? And is there an optimal distance?
    The quick answer is:
    Yes, if you have the space, you can and should hang your panels with an air gap behind them, but there’s a limit.
    That’s what I want to show you in today’s video.
    Related blog post on Acoustics Insider:
    www.acousticsinsider.com/blog...
    Resources in this video:
    www.acousticmodelling.com/poro...
    Acoustics Insider - Home studio acoustic treatment techniques for audio professionals, but without all the voodoo.
    www.acousticsinsider.com/
    Acoustics Insider on Social Media:
    / acousticsinsider
    Jesco Lohan - Mixing Engineer
    jescolohan.com/

КОМЕНТАРІ • 256

  • @hannebudio267
    @hannebudio267 3 роки тому +106

    This is probably one of the best if not the best channel about room acoustics ever. Everything you need to know explained in a very simple but effective way. No need to scroll and search in hundreds of forum posts. This is gold! Keep up. Highly appreciated.

    • @oskarbuvarp6216
      @oskarbuvarp6216 Рік тому +2

      I was going to write this as a comment, but now i dont need to ^^ Im so happy and thankful Jesco Lohan.

  • @maaaquemeseyo
    @maaaquemeseyo 3 роки тому

    Amazing content as always. Thx Jesco!

  • @Truth565
    @Truth565 3 роки тому

    Thanks Jesco, for another informative video. I really appreciate you sharing this knowledge.

  • @SpencerMMusic
    @SpencerMMusic 2 роки тому

    truly incredible work you are doing here!

  • @softbreeze941
    @softbreeze941 2 роки тому

    Thank you for this channel! you are helping massively

  • @TomGranberg
    @TomGranberg 3 роки тому

    Very good and logical walk through of acoustics wave speed vs spl.

  • @J-DUB-F1
    @J-DUB-F1 3 роки тому +1

    Just discovered your channel….. This simple formula you described is priceless!. I was always told it can be a good idea to leave a small gap behind hung panels, but I never knew there was a specific formula behind getting the best results.
    Great stuff !! 😉👍

  • @jackedkerouac4414
    @jackedkerouac4414 Рік тому

    Soon after I wonder about an aspect of room treatment I get recommended a video where you cover the topic. It's invaluable what you're doing for us newbies of home studio setups. Thanks a million

  • @scott_pinzon
    @scott_pinzon 3 роки тому +6

    You have authentic depth of knowledge, and you're quite skilled at conveying complex ideas clearly. This was a real treat to watch, and the best I would ever expect to find for free. Thanks so much for sharing so generously.

  • @elbiso2004
    @elbiso2004 3 роки тому +1

    I am about to do treatment for my first studio. This information is well explained and very timely. Thank you!

  • @VilleMetsola
    @VilleMetsola 3 роки тому +1

    Great, clear explanation

  • @GrahamWilliamson1985
    @GrahamWilliamson1985 3 роки тому +1

    Absolutely amazing content as always. Learning so much from these videos. Thanks for sharing. The channel should do really well going forward 👍👌

  • @Jared-Pace
    @Jared-Pace 3 роки тому

    Always excellent and applicable information, Jesco. :)

  • @dashcammer4322
    @dashcammer4322 3 роки тому +84

    100% of spiders approve of air gaps between the panel and the wall.

    • @Harald_Reindl
      @Harald_Reindl 3 роки тому +6

      turn up the music to blow them out

    • @SyeedAli
      @SyeedAli 3 роки тому +3

      > 100% of spiders
      I hate you.

    • @michaelhametner9780
      @michaelhametner9780 Рік тому

      😂

    • @user-li7hr8so7u
      @user-li7hr8so7u Рік тому

      😆

    • @ProdbyCeeSick
      @ProdbyCeeSick 8 місяців тому

      @@Harald_Reindl😂rite or theres a few tools they make to help combat that 1 is a device called a SWIFFER DUSTER &. 2 thee most common tool for this is called a BROOM, sh!t use a dirty tee shirt. CLEAN YOUR STU!!!😂😂

  • @robparker7605
    @robparker7605 2 роки тому

    Very well explained and clear with the right balance of theory and practical application - I will be checking out your channel - Thank you !

  • @RaymanuelMuzik
    @RaymanuelMuzik 3 роки тому

    Thank you for another great one Jesco!!!

  • @powertrihy4874
    @powertrihy4874 2 роки тому

    You articulate very well 👏 fair play, thanks!

  • @beatcollectivecoop
    @beatcollectivecoop 2 роки тому

    keep it coming, best treatment advice on the tube !

  • @notaensilencio
    @notaensilencio 2 роки тому

    Jesco, thank you so much, you've opened my eyes on acoustic

  • @rusliarshad4157
    @rusliarshad4157 3 роки тому

    Excellent video. Clear and concise backed by scientific principles. You obviously know exactly what you're talking about. I'm an immediate disciple.
    Many thanks.

  • @guypelletier9637
    @guypelletier9637 3 роки тому

    Amazing, really - thank for the session on what to be thinking about before you start hanging your absorption panels..(I was just in the process of doing this) ...and thank you for the valuable set up procedure on how to hear the sweet spot for your speaker placement, I was able to understand the process and it gave me more of an insight on what I should have been focusing on - Thank you Acoustic Insider!

  • @jackharris3993
    @jackharris3993 3 роки тому +1

    What can I say but, Excellent information and presentation.

  • @leonardojul
    @leonardojul 3 роки тому +1

    Great work and well documented, I am definitely keeping your contact!

  • @JimMagary
    @JimMagary 2 роки тому

    Good video, great channel. thanks for the advice.

  • @EthanWiner
    @EthanWiner 2 роки тому

    This is great, good job Jesco!

  • @squashbeatszw
    @squashbeatszw 7 місяців тому

    Great video, great channel. Thank you.

  • @rugosotv
    @rugosotv 2 роки тому

    one of the best videos in the topic I've ever seen ... now to actually execute the ideas in my "bedroom" studio :)

  • @janstevens6986
    @janstevens6986 3 роки тому

    Thanks for your guidance! 🔈

  • @vocalead
    @vocalead 3 роки тому +5

    Super informative video, thanks for that. Does this mean that I can have air gaps for my corner bass traps instead of super chunks, and the absorption may be the same or even better?

  •  3 роки тому +1

    Great channel, subbed and checking all your other videos :)
    I have a question though, going to build new panels soon, (200mm depth cotton wool) but i'm never quite sure which density would suit my needs. Any info on that ?

  • @fingersmike
    @fingersmike 3 роки тому

    Great video, thank you for a fact based explanation!

  • @1984robert
    @1984robert 3 роки тому +19

    Great videos. Most of it actually usable for home listening rooms also. I don't want to build studio but I need to treat my listening room in order to achieve balanced and natural sounding sweet spot.

    • @Harald_Reindl
      @Harald_Reindl 3 роки тому

      @Laura Brown stop outside noise doesn't do much to your inside room acoustics itself - absorption and reflection (keep noise out) aren't the same and many stuff like Molton just *reflects* high frequencies, for bass it don't do anything at all

  • @izansengun
    @izansengun 2 роки тому

    Great info. Thanks a lot

  • @gt4viking789
    @gt4viking789 3 роки тому

    Anoyher great video Jesco, thank you 👍🏼 ATB Peter

  • @dennisgunn468
    @dennisgunn468 3 роки тому

    I am glad I saw this. I have been thinking of making a diffusor by hanging a variety of panels of dry wall of a variety of sizes at a variety of distances from the ceiling. I know there is nothing new under the sun and somebody somewhere must have thought of the same thing. I wondering if a 1 meter by 2 meter panel of drywall say 3 cm from the ceiling might not end up acting as a bit of a bass trap?

  • @svarogstudio
    @svarogstudio 3 роки тому +2

    Great explanation! I have a related question... what would be the difference in having an absorption panel close/against the wall as opposed to having them hanging on a stand closer to the listening position, and say 3 feet away from left and right wall?

  • @michaelhametner9780
    @michaelhametner9780 Рік тому

    Thanks for your awesome content! Very well explained and easy to digest even not having a lot of upfront knowledge.
    Is this (in a more moderate way) also applicable to living rooms where you listens to music and want to treat the room? I‘m thinking about the wall behind the speakers and basically building a big wooden frame with Pamela’s you find in centralized concert rooms and put absorption material behind sand possibly an airspace. In the living room I‘d not make this deepen than 10cm though as it would otherwise interfere to much with the room and it‘s usage as a living room

  • @bflippsytrance
    @bflippsytrance Рік тому

    Very interesting, so if I understand the conclusion at the end correctly, it would be beneficial to have an air gap (all be it not more than the core size), but if you have the space and resources it would still be better to just have a thicker absorption panel that would take up the same space (panel + gap). I did elevate some of my wall panels with acoustic foam on the sides of some tiles (so it has a gap to the wall inside but doesn't have open spaces on the side). But next treatment I will just get foam sheets to just have a thicker panel to elevate them. Thanks a lot! Great channel!

  • @FromLake
    @FromLake Рік тому

    Perfect video, thank you verty much

  • @elliottisherpbf
    @elliottisherpbf 3 роки тому

    You are the man! Thanks a bunch

  • @jcisme
    @jcisme 3 роки тому

    Another awesome video..

  • @fingersmike
    @fingersmike 3 роки тому +1

    Hi, thanks for your videos, they are great! A shot question I have been pondering on... Is there anything to be gained mounting two thinner panels with a gap between them an then a gap to the wall? Or maybe a the second up against the wall...

  • @simonsays9368
    @simonsays9368 Рік тому

    Thank You, Much appreciated

  • @robertroycegroome2953
    @robertroycegroome2953 3 роки тому +8

    Jesco! this answers my question from your last video. I had built panels last year that were only 4" thick and after taking your courses I learned that they should be 6". Any new panels I built would be 6" but I already invested time and money in the 4" panels, so I ran the absorber calculator and figured out that I could get slightly better response with a 1" gap. It worked perfectly and I noticed a difference. I also used this same approach to calculate the placement of freestanding temporary panels. The only door in my room is in a corner and bass tends to build up there so I placed a 6" broadband absorber during mixing sessions. I used the technique to calculate the optimal placement and air gap to the wall for the temp panel then I placed tape on the floor so I can quickly place it in the same spot. Thanks for the advice !

    • @kadiummusic
      @kadiummusic Рік тому

      If you're going to change your 4" panels for 6" panels why didn't you make a 2" gap instead of 1"? 🤔

  • @HudTronn
    @HudTronn 3 роки тому

    Very informative and educational! Just signed to your channel! :)

  • @narayanamurthy1761
    @narayanamurthy1761 2 роки тому

    Well explained

  • @andynonimuss6298
    @andynonimuss6298 8 місяців тому +1

    One more note on open-air gapping. I read a GIK mounting test using a 4" rockwool panel where one panel was tested flat on the wall and the other was tested with a 3" open-air gap. The 3" air gap did get a small boost in absorption coefficient starting from 160 Hz and down, but started to create an absorption coefficient loss starting from 630 Hz and up. So no matter what, you don't get something for nothing. It's a tradeoff. Again in this situation though, it's still better to just use a 6" panel over a 4" panel open-air gapped.

  • @maxmus9854
    @maxmus9854 2 роки тому

    Thank you, man!

  • @sdover0123
    @sdover0123 2 роки тому

    Really interesting video, thanks for the calculator! Would be keen to understand if it is possible to do similar measurements with a flat panel in a corner where the depth is then not just a fixed amount, instead deeper in the middle than the edges.

  • @cristianzarate4635
    @cristianzarate4635 2 роки тому

    Cool video, thanks, greetings from far Chile.

  • @burnrange
    @burnrange 3 роки тому +1

    I have a 10cm thick ceiling absorber preventing me from early reflection at listening spot. Does this mean I have to hang this not more than 10cm from the ceiling to avoid the non-effectiveness in the lower mids? Thank you for all this incredible wisdom you share here with us.

  • @garyshirinian
    @garyshirinian 2 роки тому

    Great video thx for sharing.
    In this case I could away with flat panel bass traps instead of triangle 🔺️by leaving space. 8 inches panel and leaving 8 inches or more I'll be able to achieve that. Bast explained thx again.

  • @derhova
    @derhova Місяць тому

    Very very useful info, and that site is a great tool. Question though, what density is ideal?

  • @MattDrums0410
    @MattDrums0410 Рік тому +1

    Another great video. I'm wondering how things would be affected by storing things in the air gap. I use my space primarily for mixing but also to record drums a lot and sometimes rehearse too, so space management is important and I have a lot of gear to store (multiple drum kits...). So I have a potentially crazy idea of putting floor to ceiling storage on the back wall (50cm deep) with various drums, stands, mics, cables etc and putting a "wall" of moveable gobos essentially in front of that. Would those panels then need to be 50cm deep themselves to have any effect? Would they even do anything to low end if there is stuff of various shapes and sizes behind them?

  • @MRC_5000
    @MRC_5000 Рік тому +2

    i have watched about 20 of your videos since saturday night and feel transformed. i have learned essential things and really appreciate your videos and advice and how well structured all of it is communicated.
    so, i am planning to get into building absorbers and bass traps (and maybe diffusors later, if i still got the need and motivation). atm i am calculating the air gap behind the panels, but i have an important questions: do i also need an air gap behind the bass traps? and if so, does the gap have to be all around the bass trap or just in the corner?
    i thought about building a standing plate for a bass trap and started wondering, if it would be neccessary to have it be a few centimeters wider all around.

  • @awolmartinez
    @awolmartinez 2 роки тому

    I just came across this video, what an excellent explanation thank you! I have 1 follow up question, so for example assuming a 2" sound absorbing panel and a 2" air gap, would a 2" thick Rockwool inside of a 4" deep frame, mounted flush to the wall, still be the same as a 2" deep panel, mounted 2" off of the wall?

  • @SuperMcgenius
    @SuperMcgenius 8 місяців тому

    Yes, good advice👍

  • @EdThorne
    @EdThorne 3 роки тому +4

    Great video, thank you. To counteract the dip in mid-range frequency absorption with a large gap, would it be prudent to put an additional layer of absorption on the wall (so effectively double layering the panels, one against the wall, one a few inches off)?

    • @tearsintherain6311
      @tearsintherain6311 2 роки тому +1

      Depends on the room really. Maybe you don’t want less mid and if so then just make the absorption thick and thin but no inbetween or add bass traps and those ugly useless foam because that pretty much only touches high frequencies

    • @tearsintherain6311
      @tearsintherain6311 2 роки тому

      Do you have an rt60 freq response of the room?

  • @AnWe79
    @AnWe79 2 роки тому

    Love the channel, been binge watching, about to build a studio in my guest house.
    Hypothetical question, just out of curiosity:
    How would a multiple panel/gap "sandwich" combination compare to single panel/gap of equal total thickness?
    Lets say we cut a panel in half by thickness, and use it with half the gap between the wall and first panel, then another equal gap between panel one and two. Would that affect absorbtion in any meaningful way?
    Taking it further, would a increasing/decreasing or shuffled thickness/gap multilayer sandwich make any perceptible difference?
    Lets say | is one unit thickness, and space is a unit gap, something like:
    room||| || | wall

  • @tyerac
    @tyerac 3 роки тому

    good explanation. Would this be true of super chunk absorbers? Should i fill the entire core with Safe N sound, or maybe just the front, to leave an equal gap of dead air behind them?

  • @edukacja2485
    @edukacja2485 3 роки тому

    Hi Jesco, can you make a video about sit-stand studio desks from an acoustician perspective? Is it even possible to use sit and stand configuration without perceiving room acoustics totally different? If the sit-stand desk can actually work, would you suggest having also sit-stand monitor stands?

  • @TonyMacaroni69_
    @TonyMacaroni69_ 9 місяців тому

    great videl man! I'm wondering what the difference would be between just placing the panel further from the wall vs kind of making the frame of the panel deeper so that you effectively create a closed air pocket. I've heard that, that's how you should actually do it, but I was never able to test and compare both versions.
    what do you think?

  • @slippyg
    @slippyg Рік тому

    Best video on the internet

  • @bluematrix5001
    @bluematrix5001 2 роки тому +1

    Hi, do you sell the plots how to make the absorbers/basstraps, basstraps/diffusers you use? thanks

  • @dsha2006
    @dsha2006 3 роки тому +1

    I heard air gap is important between window and acrylic window insert. Also I'm planning to use 2 exterior doors with space in between for our home studio.

  • @argilaga
    @argilaga 3 роки тому +2

    That was helpful, thanks!

  • @superjoseco7279
    @superjoseco7279 2 роки тому

    I am thinking in using now, silk screening mesh fabric to cover my panels. It's made of nylon, stretches very well, and allows the sound to go inside the rockwool 100% letting it do its job completely well, the way rockwool is supposed to work. It is not expensive if bought by the roll at Walmart. Using the correct opening, won't allow the tiny pieces of rockwool get out of the panel, that are really bad if you breath them. What do you think?
    .

  • @FallenStarFeatures
    @FallenStarFeatures Рік тому

    Using the Porous Absorber Calculator at the acousticmodelling link in the video, the half-wave dip in absorption you point out is much less of a problem when the calculator's Random Incidence option is checked. Does this imply that using pyramidal or triangular-ridged acoustic absorption foam is a better choice than flat-surfaced foam for deep air gaps?

  • @jpruggieri1207
    @jpruggieri1207 3 роки тому

    Just discovering this channel and it's great, thank you! Wondering about corner traps with this concept. Corner traps from the center of the panel to where the walls meet usually have a fairly large distance. Does this concept apply to corner traps as well?

    • @RaviRomana
      @RaviRomana 3 роки тому

      I have the same question as well?

  • @charleshuguley9903
    @charleshuguley9903 3 роки тому +1

    The absorber should be place as close as possible to the 1/4 wavelength position, where the amplitude is greatest and the absorption most effective. Longer wavelengths have 1/4 wavelengths farther from the wall, so the absorber must be moved farther from the wall to be effective, compared with shorter wavelengths. Please correct me if I am wrong.

  • @WaveArtsAudio
    @WaveArtsAudio 3 роки тому

    Excellent

  • @oldunclemick
    @oldunclemick 3 роки тому

    Good video and the PDF was an interesting read. My studio is visually a mess but sonically I'm delighted. Gradually I am tidying the room but the question is, how much harm will tidying the room do to the acoustics? I'm seriously considering putting up drapes to simply hide the cluttered shelves! 😀

    • @C--A
      @C--A 2 роки тому +1

      Curtains will over the shelves will absorb too much high frequencies. Would be better off just moving all the shelves to another room or a storage cupboard.

  • @mcsweet1966
    @mcsweet1966 3 роки тому

    Hello, Thanks for all those informative Videos, My Room is small. 13'L X 12'W X 8'H so working with the 38% rules my Listening sweet spot is about 5' from the front wall. I`m looking to install two 6'' D X 24''W X48''H Pad behind my monitor. But it`s getting hard to keep a equal triangle with enough stereo width in that 5' space . So Should I keep my Pad Flush to the wall to keep maximum distance between my monitor and the pad or add some space and get the Monitor closer to the Pad. Thanks

  • @dcoverzsessions
    @dcoverzsessions 3 роки тому

    hello my friend i wanted to ask you I have small room, and first I want to sound good for mixing for example and second I'm vocalist after i put a ceiling acoustic panel on the ceiling my room sound has changed to better sound, but i think a diffuser would be better, what do you think? what kind of difusor could i place on the ceiling? thank you!

  • @bandozplit
    @bandozplit 3 роки тому +2

    How would that work if the panel is put in a corner? (Meaning the air gap would be triangular). Does the same rules apply in terms of ratio?
    Keep up the good content!

  • @vishnuvijayan198
    @vishnuvijayan198 3 роки тому

    Jesco, I have noticed even with a 10 inches of porous material (in my case Rockwool density 30kg/m3 [9000 Pa.s/m2] ) and a 10 inch air gap provided, I am able to see only .5 or .4 absorption coefficient in the graph for low frequency areas. What I am asking is, will this much SAC will help to tame some serious low end and make things better? Will this SAC improves with larger surface area for the panels, especially for low frequency management?

  • @moh13666
    @moh13666 3 роки тому

    Hi..... thanks for the video ... when making panels with rockwool . how to make sure you don't have any loos fiber in the air for health problems ?

  • @makingmusiconline2309
    @makingmusiconline2309 2 роки тому

    So does this mean you want to have varying air gap depths to cover that dip in the midrange? Adding some blocks of absorber on the back in air gap, to get the best of both the airgap *and* the double depth of absorber but without the cost of having a double depth of absorber over the whole panel? Or perhaps alternating airgap and full depth panels (again to reduce the cost of absorber).

  • @drmkiwi
    @drmkiwi 2 роки тому

    Thanks for the video. Is it reasonable to substitute "home theatre" for studio with all this info and setup? I'm expecting a home theatre is at best attempting to emulate / reflect the same sort of acoustics they had when creating the audio in the studio when they produced the audio tracks. Cheers, David

  • @RecordingStudio9
    @RecordingStudio9 3 роки тому

    Great insight. Thanks.

  • @MrAzulikit
    @MrAzulikit 4 місяці тому

    Was debating between the whole back wall with all 3” Safe and Sound and pull grill cloth down over or making panels. I guess your recommendation would be to make panels. It’s a heavy bass room.

  • @mitchlibbey3671
    @mitchlibbey3671 2 роки тому +1

    Thank you! Great presentation. Question: we are getting repetitive bass sounds...day and night constantly from neighbors...! We have dual pane windows and dampers. Could bass be traveling via our plumbing? We love music...but what can we do on the entire length of one side of the house??? We live on a corner and basically have six neighbors. Echo effect probably plays a role? Any suggestions welcomed. Jim

    • @mindyrealestateagent
      @mindyrealestateagent 2 роки тому

      That’s why I’m here. It’s insane on the neighbors alll day and alll night. They never stop.

  • @the_nondrive_side
    @the_nondrive_side 2 роки тому

    Using the largest depth with a single layer over a larger area... But doubling and triple layering the centers or targeting first incidents etc could result in best results...
    I have those IKEA square shelves with the open back.. Covered and stuffed and off the wall a few inches. With stuff in them.. Books.. Guitar pedals. Batteries.. A coffee tub.. Surprisingly good compromise.

  • @nicksaya
    @nicksaya 3 роки тому

    Does the same go for when hanging panels overhead as a cloud? Distance fro panel or cloud to ceiling?

  • @mychinabean
    @mychinabean 3 роки тому +1

    Thanks for this!
    What about corner bass traps. Floor to ceiling or is a 4 footer somewhere in the middle ok?

    • @FOH3663
      @FOH3663 3 роки тому +2

      Floor to ceiling

  • @HalcyonGuitars
    @HalcyonGuitars 2 роки тому

    Question for you…I see you have slat diffuser/absorbers, how do you determine the size and positioning of the slats?

  • @n0nstrum
    @n0nstrum 3 роки тому

    Hej Jesco, do you have any experience with the AVAA active bass traps, are they any good, the price aside?

  • @mikestein8775
    @mikestein8775 3 роки тому +1

    Can you make a 6in panel with 2inch panel and 4in panel tied together in a frame? Or am I better off finding the 6in panel?

  • @budroe4057
    @budroe4057 3 роки тому +1

    Good explanation of why this occurs. But one question: would you not want less midrange absorption? Isn't the purpose to reduce LF frequency while preserving mid and high source content? I've read pros and cons to broadband absorbers for this reason. Second, thanks for the comment on distinguishing between velocity v pressure; could you do a short vid elaborating on this dynamic in application of treatment?

    • @FOH3663
      @FOH3663 3 роки тому

      The blip he demonstrated with the simulation isn't "preserving mid and high content".
      He was simply demonstrating the effects of spacing.
      To retain mid freqs and upward, you'd need slats, or Visqueen faced traps... that way the absorption is strongly weighted to the LF.

  • @FallenStarFeatures
    @FallenStarFeatures 9 місяців тому

    With a 4-inch thick slab of acoustic foam and no air gap, the Porous Absorption Calculator says absorption is down to 80% at around 400hz. If you split the foam into alternating 2-inch slabs in a checkboard pattern, you can get different air gap depths between adjacent slabs. With a 4-inch air gap, 80% absorption drops down to 300hz, but there's an unwanted dip at around 1200hz. With a 6-inch air gap, 80% absorption drops to 200hz with a dip at 900hz, but there's a secondary 100% absorption peak at 1200hz. With a checkerboard array of 2-inch slabs and an upper slab air gap of 4-inches, seems like the 900hz and 1200hz dips would be compensated by the absorption peak of the complementary slab. That would give you an octave lower 80% absorption frequency while cutting the foam thickness in half.

  • @EnragedMinority
    @EnragedMinority 2 роки тому

    Is this gap also more effective with bass traps in the corners? I've seen another video where they turn the triangle Basstraps in the other direction -> with the 90 degree angle not to the corner but to the middle of the room. In the end it looked like a square because you haven't seen the gap behind it.

  • @LeoMakes
    @LeoMakes 3 роки тому +3

    Great video as always. Question: Is there an upper limit on rockwool thickness when it comes to bass trapping? For example, let's say you have a room big enough where you can pack a full 1m (!) of rockwool against the walls. Is the bass even going to get through that much material or are you just wasting rockwool at that poing?
    Thanks as always for the great videos.

    • @TikiHorea
      @TikiHorea 3 роки тому +2

      great question, man.

    • @FOH3663
      @FOH3663 3 роки тому

      I'd simulate it in the absorption sim Jesco showed here. It's vital to enter the Rockwool characteristics in the variables.
      Or, you can split it like he suggested, ie. .5m material with .5m gap.
      Or just go for it ... put up a full 1m depth.
      Typically the thicker the velocity trap, the less dense the material requirements are.

    • @LeoMakes
      @LeoMakes 3 роки тому

      @@FOH3663 Good tip! I should have mentioned that I did this and that's what the simulator reported (after about .5m there is very little difference). The only part I couldn't figure out was the flow resistivity for Rockwool RWA-45. From what I have seen, it's right around 10k (the default value at AcousticModeling.com) but that was extrapolated data from a random acoustics forum, not an official Rockwool spec sheet. I'm not sure they've posted that information for RWA-45. Anyway thanks for your good response!

    • @FOH3663
      @FOH3663 3 роки тому +1

      @@LeoMakes
      You're welcome
      Gearslutz acoustics forum would be a solid source for greater specificity in the material density etc.

    • @Hankblue
      @Hankblue Рік тому

      @@LeoMakes You probably got it sorted by now, but it mainly depends on how low your speakers extend and how dense the material you're using is. So it could be worth it if:
      a) The insulation you're using has very low flow resistivity (1000-5000)
      b) Your speakers are producing sound in the 20-40hz range
      If the flow resistivity is high, you won't get much beyond 300-500mm thickness. If your speakers taper off at 50hz, there's no point anyway because the main absorption increase is to frequencies below that.

  • @tomphillpotts
    @tomphillpotts 2 роки тому

    I am making my own panels and can make any size and shape and thickness I want.
    I have covered all tri corners and bi corners, and near reflections and some rear wall.
    I still need to control main room modes, about 90 Hz and 120 hz, in my rectangular room.
    From your video I realize I need thicker bass traps with a gap, behind them.
    So is it better for me to make some thicker traps and leave some wall exposed to let highs and mids pass a little?
    Or should I continue and cover all walls completely?
    Should I put a thin ply layer, maybe 7mm, with holes, on the front of some traps to reflect highs and mids but still trap bass?

  • @pdxfairview
    @pdxfairview 3 роки тому

    I'm building large (4' x 8' x 6") panels to treat a large rehearsal room with 14' ceilings. Any practical mounting tips for wall-mounting larger, heavier panels with a 6" air gap? Really struggling to come up with a good way to do this. Thanks!

  • @TheNaboen
    @TheNaboen 3 роки тому

    Brilliant

  • @skatterpro
    @skatterpro 7 місяців тому +1

    I have reasons for needing the air gap other than performance - at least two of my planned absorber positions have light switches which I need access to. Using thicker panels is pretty much out of the question.
    What I don't see a lot of advice about is how to actually mount panels (in my case GIK) with an air gap. I know GIK have brackets for ceiling clouds, but I don't know if they're the best or easiest option for wall mounting.
    Any tips would be appreciated!

  • @mikets42
    @mikets42 3 роки тому

    Could you please explain why do you suggest caring about base traps while for the same money you can cover 2x (or 3x) of wall space with thinner foam for the same money? The low band of human ear directionality (phase-sensitive) is centered around 500Hz, and covering down to 300Hz (with an air gap, on -3dB) may appear to be more beneficial than going into huge room-eating expense with base traps (which you can eq electronically for a rather wide sweet spot).

  • @JulianFernandez
    @JulianFernandez 3 роки тому

    Thanks

  • @BenG64646
    @BenG64646 3 роки тому +1

    Also fellow Mitmensch mit male-pattern baldness wollt ich nur mal sagen: sieht rasiert richtig gut aus ;)

  • @vooveks
    @vooveks Рік тому

    I’ve got some GIK Acoustics panels, and they actually have around an inch of gap built in.