XT13 Pro Special coupon code could save 5% in these links: US official【code:ArthurXT13GK】:www.geekompc.com/geekom-xt13-pro-mini-pc/ US Amazon(i9-13900H)【code:ArthurXT13GK】:www.amazon.com/dp/B0D25FBS1S?maas=maas_adg_45F383291920AADE727EE2DFD52F8B34_afap_abs&ref_=aa_maas&tag=maas
Mac's have 3 "features" Windows doesn't have: - OS is free on any device (also iPhones) for at least 5 years - Any Mac OS has plenty of software installed. - With "OpenCore Legacy Patcher" you can install Mac OS on "older" Macs
Interesting video but I was unable to mentally process it very well because the whole time my mind was trying to subsume the content under "Apple's Plan to Win", so I felt extremely empty and confused when the whole video was about Microsoft and nothing about Apple's Plan.
So what is Apple's plan? I don't really see any plan in your video. You give a nice overview about the history of Microsoft and it's failures in the past (as if Apple never had any failures). Software is more and more cloud based, and also more and more web based. Microsoft knows this and therefore heavily invested in Azure. THAT is Microsoft's main product now. They even aren't charging money for upgrades to windows anymore. Office is slowly also more and more web based and will eventually be completely replaced by web apps. These apps can run on Windows, MacOS, Linux, Android etc etc. So it is natural that windows will have a smaller marketshare. Yes one of the problems with Microsoft is that they have to support all the hardware availalbe where Apple can do exactly what they want. On the other hand, there are less and less players in the market so it will be easier for Microsoft to liaise with those players to create better standards. X86 will not be replaced fully by ARM (yet). The reason is that ARM will never be as powerfull as X86 processors because of their limited instruction set (given that X86 will continued to be develloped). ARM however is getting better and now is perfectly viable for laptops and doing day to day tasks that are not that compute intensive. Since they run much longer on a battery charge, for an office environment X86 will be dead in the near future. For specific cases X86 will however continue to be the better choice, and for that, for now at least, there will be windows x86. I think that in the future we might see solutions where ARM or RISC V will be the default for daily use, and then a much faster and bigger FPGA like chip will be programmed on the fly for specific tasks to be performed as soon as a program is loaded.
@@mRxmodule the little mini PC he talks about in the beginning, for several minutes. I smelled the sponsor spot far before he mentioned it, but what I dislike is his way he talked about it, making it sound like he just likes the PC.... And then he keeps going, and it starts to get fishy. It's probably a very decent machine but it was like watching an ad, before you know it's an ad... I'm all okay with sponsored videos... Just make it more obvious please.
NOTHING should run in Kernel Mode except the Kernel. Drivers need to run in an abstraction layer but they don’t, they use kernel extensions which have direct access to the kernel. Mac OS, Linux, and Unix all isolate the kernel and the hardware. Why does Microsoft use such an archaic way to exchange and privilege drivers when it can cause catastrophic system damage like the Crowdstrike debacle exemplified.
They actually don't, which is why ClownStrike has caused kernel panics in Linux and MacOS before. It is just that far less Linux and MacOS systems use ClownStrike bad software.
I still remember trying to install an old game with DRM in windows 10 and it just crashed with bsod, because the idiotic starforce only tried to work in windows xp and it didn't always work well, and on early versions of windows 10 it's a quick way to screw up OS and spend a few “fun hours” digging all the starforce garbage out of directories and registry. Now it is practically irrelevant, because since some version of win 10, Microsoft did think of blocking the launch of this garbage.
XP was iffy when it first came out but got way better by SP2. Windows Vista was poorly supported and hated upon release. Vista SP2 is basically Windows 7. Windows 8 had awful UI when it came out but by Windows 8.1 it was much better.
@@MrInside20 The biggest disadvantage was the lack of UAC, some viruses that used flash vulnerabilities in those years could easily get in and run as administrator, I still remember in school I was advised to create a second account with user privileges to avoid this, and it worked, especially if you visited dubious file sharing sites.
There are 1.6 billion active windows as of 2022. 8 million is less than 1 percent. Statistically, the number of affected PCs are negligble compared to its userbase. This is not to justify the issue, but rather to understand the scale of its impact among all windows users. I have 3 windows 11 pcs at home (one of them is a handheld pc), works in a multi national energy company with over 50k employees, and we were not affected by this issue
Bro tell it, this is a total non-issue. Windows is not the great OS, we all know this, but no way in holy hell will Mac become this. It is an exec PC at best and will never ever become the defacto computer for all employees.
@@joehockeyplayer8097 That's a good take. Mac's are pc's that computer illiterate business execs use to shorten the tech gap. It's the Fisher Price computer for those with a superiority complex.
Honestly, Microsoft needs to RESPECT the user again. They need to do 1 thing: 1. Opt users out of EVERYTHING by default 2. NEVER send any user data to MS, or enable features that would do so without their consent 3. Remove ALL nags, hurdles, ads, sponsored apps, etc from windows 4. Give CLEAR choices to users during setup, and then HONOR those for every update and feature moving forward. The operating systems needs to be very efficient, protect the user, and merely give the user "options" if they want, and NEVER re-ask for a feature a user had a chance to, or never opted into. People ONLY user windows because of games support, or enterprise AD. THATS IT.
A bit much to ask from a company that introduced its first default firewall with WinXP in 2000s. Further more decided that the customer was the product with Win10.
that is enough for me game and work seems good don't have to pick one or the other like you do with other os. but really i see no ads form ms they have always taken data since xp to 7 just most people didn't really care. they do it now and it some sort of live threatening privacy thing lol. which your on the internet that in itself leaves you open to all sorts of fun stuff that ms could only dream they could do lol.
They never Pass their greedy parts Windows keys are over price ( Line of number = £119 you know that worth that much over an Macbook that never ask for a key to active it is only hunt theirs people to their cheapest tool gone over price (more for Pro editon ) - just for enterprise being allowed for domain joins you got them a free macbook for using the money likey to hire more macbook so they never pay the full price just 99% of it paid and 1% theirs
@@Stormlywing yeah it makes sense that windows charges and mac doesn't for their os since it is baked in to their system when you pay it just like if you buy a windows pc but your still paying way less for a windows pc then you ever would a mac and you will get more use and a better up grade path then you get with mac.
12 днів тому+7
Buying a Mac because you're sick of MS forcing dumb, anticonsumer shit on users is like voting for Trump to get rid of corrupt politicians. Linux. Every time, always.
it's never gonna happen. windows is way too flexible compared to macos and these corporations run old software and need the flexibility to run the os on any hardware possible, virtualize it without any restrictions and still have support for every program on earth, which could never happen due to the lock in nature of macos and lack of support for backwards compatibility.
the guy is just another mac-lover and windows hater. first he says microsoft is way behind then switches his arguments to they are losing shares. isnt appl also losing shares specifically in the smartphone world? this guy is full of shit
Never say never. Intel’s dominance looked unshakable until Apple showed us what ARM-based microprocessors were capable of, including surprisingly good x86 emulation. I run Windows 11 for ARM on my MacBook in a VM when I need to run Windows software, but over the years, I’ve needed to do that less and less. Change can be a good thing.
It's not the end for Windows. MacOS is not going to power your ATM machine or your billboard or your EPOS till or your car monitoring tool or your stock picker or your car security barrier or your .............. Not now not ever. YOU can use MacOS or Linux, but those business applications will stay where they are. I'm not gloating, I'm dishing reality
^ That... This video title and introduction are pure clickbaits. Esp. the "again"? When did Apple won the first time exactly lol Seriously, I know fanboys have all the right to make videos, but coming up with BS statement like that.. WTF
What exactly gives you the illusion that Apple could never adapt to providing those services if the opportunity arose? MS won’t dominate forever, especially as corporations and the public begin to notice more and more just how unstable and inelegant they are. Apple can easily afford to develop UIs & servers for ATMs, Billboards, POS systems, etc. Once developed, all they need is to price enterprise services competitively and they would take half the market within a year. They already have the reputation of creating stable systems. Just because they chose to focus on B2C as their strategy now is no limitation imposed upon them.
@@josvah You know Rolls Royce could make budget cars for everyone, but notice that hasn't happened... coz it's not a market they care about. Apple could make inroads but there's SO many things in their DNA stopping that... like stable long-term support for ancient code, running on an insane set of hardware configurations to name a couple - the cost is high and the returns are low. And to make it worse, you now have 30+ years of coding legacy for all those applications that run on Windows written in VB6 / C++ to modern-day electron stuff. You say 'once developed' like it's nothing - you know some of these applications written over a 30 year period with millions of $'s of investment by companies that don't have infinite money like FAANG, are not just suddenly gonna start again for Macs out of some sort of righteous effort, especially when you know how indifferent and hostile Apple treats those that develop for its platform. That's why.
@@judewestburner good response, I can see both sides of the argument. I will always and forever will be an apple guy for the simple fact that I believe apple wouldnt sell out like a sh**y companie such as Microsoft would. Fot that I say Apple can do it and do it better if they wanted to.
This argument is a joke. This is a company that handicaps its products by refusing to make the base RAM in their machines (8GB) anywhere close to the competition’s standard (16GB) and to charge an exorbitant price, well beyond the cost of this upgrade, in order to include it in the product. Moreover, to disable the extra RAM (i.e., disabling 4GB in the 12GB in the M4) just to bring it down to 8G so they can charge more for the upgrade to 16GB. A company’s whose products that are marketed this way can’t possibly become the prevalent computing standard.
yet the numbers show a different story. I will never defend apple for not offering 16GB of ram as a base, but if you ever use any apple computer, especially the new ones with apple silicon, you will understand how amazing macOS is.
@@georgioszampoukis1966 macOS is amazing lol ? Sure it can do somethings better but when it comes to universal compatibility and freedom to do everything, macOS does not even comes close to the competition. Keep in mid MacOS has to support only a limited number of devices, MacOS is just more idiot proof. I can run games software from 2004 on windows and apple dropped support for all 32 bit apps way before. Many things i find annoying in MacOS, basic things that windows does better e.g. multitasking, opening switching to differrent windows etc. Heck even closing a program is a major PITA in MacOS. When it comes to gaming i don't even want apple to be anywhere near close to it, apple will destroy all freedom, modding in games, Github innovations etc literally everything and will force everything into their eco system which i never want.
@@snake2106 very strong argument to have the ability to run software from 2004, I am sure it is more crucial to people than a secure, good performing OS. It is more important than my 12 year-old MacBook Pro still receiving security updates and working flawlessly. Do you even know why windows is able to do that? Because most of the OS still runs on a 30 year old codebase. You can even find submenus that were introduced in windows 95. Also, you clearly have no experience with macOS and it is ok, but please, don’t even compare macOS to windows. I use windows for gaming, Linux for AI development (as a ML engineer) and macOS for work/everyday tasks. People defending windows are either too young or have no idea of what happens under the hood. I personally love windows for what it offers, but it is criminal to compare it with macOS and even Linux.
@@lesleyhaan116 read again itard what i said about basic tasks, backwards compatibility. You itards are not power users, just basic users who can fulfill most of their needs even on a chromebook but brag about MacOS lol.
I just purchased my first macbook after 30 years of Windows computers... yes, 30 years. I tried other os'es, linux distros, etc. for programming, daily use, etc. Mac Os on the M series... what a revelation! The speed, the ease of use, the performance, power sipping... and in the background running on native... LINUX No more forced (spying) forced ads, no forced accounts... I'm sold!! Mac has some OS quirks yes, but its a matter of adaptation... The only reason for keeping windows & flagship pc (amd) is for gaming & general GPU usage purpose. But that's it... Mac has huge potential, but the pricing policy must change, it's darn expensive...
Mac's have 3 "features" Windows doesn't have: - OS is free on any device (also iPhones) for at least 5 years - Any Mac OS has plenty of software installed. - With "OpenCore Legacy Patcher" you can install Mac OS on "older" Macs
@@theworldoffun8997 MacOS, compared to Windows, is not limited. Compared to Linux, yeah a bit. In general I think it’s the best of both worlds, or the middle ground you want to have. If Apple really gets the gaming people and the industry fully on board, Windows will die. Finally and for good.
@@TheKaosTux Windows won't die. Apple, Linux and Windows will always exist as they all have their advantages with a certain type of customer. Apple can't copy everything good about Windows without giving up some of their advantages.
As a user of both operating systems macOS is never replacing Windows simply because it will never be as open or compatible with foreign hardware as Windows is, and I don’t understand the hate Windows 11 gets, it has the best and cleanest UI since Windows 7.
@@xgui4-studios Being forced to use it? Really? I'm still using Windows 7 on a machine with an Intel Core 2 Quad (on my main computer). I turned off and disabled the update for the Windows 10 Update. I do intend to try using Windows 10 (regularly on my main computer) at some point, but I've been too busy and haven't gotten around to it. Consider that. A 17-year old CPU is still good enough for browsing the internet with a 15 year-old OS.
13:22 At this point I've forgotten why I'm watching the video because it's talking bout things I already know and not what caught my attention 🤦🏾♂🤦🏾♂🤦🏾♂
Apple user here, came from the Acer Predator (i9 + GTX1060) then when I realised i just wanted a compact laptop with good battery life I started with the 2017 air then M1 macbook pro in 2020... just this January switched to the 16" M3 Pro mbp... ...and lemme tell you this, Windows ain't going anywhere man. Also, really a 7 minute precursor ad dude?
I run Windows 10 on my HP laptop, MacOS on my MacBook Pro, Ubuntu 22.04 on my Dell server, Mint on my PC, and Windows 11 on my Dell tower. I love them all 😀
I think you’re wrong, more business software is becoming cloud based. I work for a company going that way and you can pretty much use any device you want Windows or MacOS. The days of proprietary software dependent on a specific OS is beginning to fade. Granted that evolution will probably take years.
@@jimtipton8888 Macbooks are so much more expensive to buy for business. And god how much time I spent trying to add a network printer to the Mac I had.
As an IT pro in the corporate world this is 100% correct. Macs are for the execs who want to "feel" like the are premium. For everyone else its Windows because Mac does not offer the GPO and customization we get from Windows. Case done
@@jimtipton8888 ehh but Mac would have to be competitive in price.. I don't see legacy companies switching, especially if they use MS tools such as office, Power Bi, Azure etc... Then they would also have to compete with Google as well as I'm sure they would want to offer their services.
Mac's have 3 "features" Windows doesn't have: - OS is free on any device (also iPhones) for at least 5 years - Any Mac OS has plenty of software installed. - With "OpenCore Legacy Patcher" you can install Mac OS on "older" Macs
I think that the biggest and basically only problem the Microsoft have is a perception. MS was once practical monopoly with over 90% market share. After that 75% of market share and being de facto standard for enterprise market looks like something bad. In a fact, and based on any real measure, having 75% market share is enormous business success.
Vista was good, it's just that people had potato PCs at the time so they tried running it on less than ideal hardware and it obviously went wrong. Windows 8 and ME was a total disaster
There is no need for a plan against Windows. For years now Microsoft tried to geht rid of this useless private users. But these DAUs are sticky like hell.
I hope that at least in business sector, Linux picks up the slack that Windows nor Macs can't: billboards, point of sale, oftentimes even office computers. It can be anything Windows can, without the premium cost (and user experience) of Macs.
If Mac wants to succeed then they'd have to be less greedy over RAM and SSDs. Make bsae variants with at least 16/512 and upgrades not 20 times the price of market and also allow users to easily replace parts on their computer and repair. I too got a Mac but I don't use it much because of 8/256 and that just sucks
@@mendodave What was the last straw? An expensive, capable PC built for video editing where I spent most of my time trying to get the PC to work. Switched to a 2006 Mac Pro 1.1 and it not only just worked but also rendered more than twice as fast… while being a supposedly “slower “ machine…
@@KeriRautenkranz With windows sometimes I wondered if the machine was working for me, or I was working for it. One day the requirement to run a windows only program went away when I parted ways with a particular company. I said to myself, finally I don't have to run windows anymore. So I didn't. Picked up a Mac Mini in 2012 and never went back.
linux has always been the scary os, declared as a cancer by microsoft tyemselves people got scared steam deck users use it daily, for years, they love it on smartphones, we should be using pure linux, but since it is scary, we use android the server used to store this comment uses linux, that is why google never felt the crowdstrike situation, another normal day for them linux is, but people are still scared not counting in people that do not know what a os is and when asjed to send files via mail they will send .lnk files i will let you search what a .lnk file is
lol, tell that to steam deck the entire planet runs on android, only people who can waste money on iphones do it, the rest use android, apple will never win that war, it was already lost apple laptops are not common in the planet, only perhaps on some countries, and mostly for video or image editing, profesional audio related stuff everybody else uses windows laptops desktops once steam os becomes even better will get a adption never seen before, windows is spying on you in a form that is scary, the copilot is just dangerous rigth now, ut runs slow and is easy to break windows future is so uncertain, is almost funny, but mostly scary
to me that why Apple never said gaming remember what Jobs wants to do Code games for windows to used to test drive them Make videos and edit them Office 365 Gimp is not a fair deal for 8GB ram by macbook for £1200 price
nokia and blackberry said that, remember kodak? microsoft was sure that they could dominate server market, it is dominated by linux dont count on linux is not a good idea once steam improves windows emulation for games, even more people will jump to steam os windows is in trouble
@@betag24cn it's clearly one of two things: either you have absolutely no idea what you're talking about, or you're mentally retarded. first of all, Windows has a 70% of desktop OS market share. second, linux is popular in servers not because windows is bad, but because they serve different targets, and windows still have their market share among servers also Microsoft wouldn't start azure, if they wasn't sure about that third, linux popular generally among people who "don trust corporations" or it used by big companies for working machines, because they don't have to pay for license and last, why anyone should use Steam as their OS? just WHY?
- These "MicroPC" companys need to really get on the ball, you can fit a DOPE GPU in a SteamDeck, they can jam one into a MicroPC... It blows my mind that they just leave them so "Basic"
The issue with windows is that its being recycled SO MUCH EVERY SINGLE VERSION that its becoming way too broken and all Microsoft is doing is just applying "Modern themes" onto the part they WANT the users to see, not things like device manager or control panel. All they need to do is keep the bare bone basics of the OS and slowly and PROPERLY create an ACTUALLY USABLE OS.
Vista was the last straw. After losing all my data and needing a reinstall 3x a year, I switched to Mac. Every win product is progressively worse. Mac is not perfect, but it is orders of magnitude better than windows. I used UNIX at work IBM AIX. Running Ubuntu on an old Lenovo computer it’s great. I attempted to run windows 10 on it and it was horrid. And as expected does not meet the hardware requirements for 11. 😂. Cheers! Be well folks.
I understand, but if you are going to present information to support your point, present the facts as they are. If you deliberately omit the fact that the recent Windows failure was due to an external cybersecurity company recognizing Windows as a system threat (in other words, it could have happened to MacOS), then you are just creating bias and misinformation. Final note: everyone knows that Linux is better ;)
Linux is at 4% BABYYYYYY. Nobody wants a world like the early 2000 where the only real option was Windows. At least windows xp and 7 were decent. Now all we get is bloated rubbish with AI crammed into everything.
A lot of companies weren't effected by Crowdstrike, because there's a lot of other good EDR software. Hackers already knew about supply chain attacks, Kaseya is only one of these cases, but you don't easily execute a supply chain attack. Microsoft also is in large parts to blame for the Crowdstrike crash, because it unlike macOS does not provide an unprivileged API for EDR software.
Windows 8 and vista are both good because there isn't much difference (8 is just 7 with a start menu and uwp but it's a great os and starts faster) (7 is identical to vista with minor improvements and newer running software) so vista was a really great os for the time but too much eye candy for regular pcs i could say ME really had some driver issues but i have never tried it....
MacOS taking over? In your dreams! As long as you can't use it legal and reliable on any other PC than Apple's own hardware, it won't happen. If anything, it is more likely that Linux will take over. But even that is unlikely in the foreseeable future, because most people simply use the pre-installed Windows on their machines because they don't know anything else and can't cope with anything else, and the business world, as well as most government agencies, are also largely dependent on software that runs on Windows and the officials are not willing to switch over just like that.
I don't think you really understood the kernel mode crash. MS did have features that restricted kernel level access, but could not implement these tools due to concerns about monopolism. Nothing should be using kernel level access, unless heavily audited, i.e. drivers etc. This is why since Vista most applications are restricted to user level mode, as the damage level cost is less severe. It is not as if other vendors have their own failures, only Windows is reported on more, as it's ubiquitous.
I have an M1 MacBook and love it, but I’ve just built a windows desktop, because I hate that you can’t upgrade a Mac, if Apple would let people upgrade there system I would leave Windows altogether
Microsoft stopped caring about their user experience after Windows 7, they kept creating solutions for problems that does not exist, which somehow made the original experience worse. And the worst is that Microsoft are so proud of their "solutions", they are constantly forcing the users to adapt the "solutions" by taking away their abilities to do things as they want.
microsoft got scared with android tablets and android smartphones and came with the best idea, windows 8 they had the same panic attack with win 11 time will tell what will get them scared next, we as users are scared of windows and the imposed copilot crap spying and making insecure experiences using your pc possible
@@betag24cn it looks like Microsoft was trying to copy Google and Apple. They should have backed away from trying to force people to use newer versions and put more time and effort into testing, rather than being insecure and pushing something out before it was completely tested and ready.
One of the biggest downfalls, in my opinion, is Microsoft's tendency to force features on to users instead of giving them choice. With Windows 8, they could have made the tiles optional while keeping the main operating system intact. Instead, they forced users to adapt to their new, poorly designed system. A lot of times they actually do more work to stop users from doing what they want. Even small things, like the inability to move the taskbar to the top or sides in Windows 11, or reverting to the Windows 10 start menu layout, are unnecessarily restricted. It seems they go out of their way to limit customization and user preferences. Overtime, these limitations can lead to users resenting the operating system. In contrast, Apple tends to excel at refining small details, which contributes to a more positive user experience. Although I wish they had more customization features as well. It's like their are giant tech parents telling us how we should be using our operating system in this never-ending cat and mouse game. It's completely unnecessary. Microsoft baffles me time and time again they still have one of the best operating systems out there like it or not but they're decision-making seems to be completely detached from what the users want. Seems they have become "Tone deaf".
I can imagine a world where, with better app support and more users, Chrome OS could be a real competitor. Even Samsung DEX, which is technically Linux-based, could allow users with the know-how to run any distro they want. I desire this. I want Windows to be good as well. I hope Microsoft makes the right decisions. However, I dislike that there's only one operating system that can be installed on most hardware and gets support for the majority of apps. Linux is available for most users, even if they don't realize it. But it's caught in a Catch-22. The people who install it are often tech-savvy and know what they're doing. For some of them, especially programmers, it's great. However, for creative users, it falls short due to lack of codecs and software. The general public, for whom Linux could work just fine, would have to learn how to install it and overcome their fear of it.
I think it would be better if Microsoft got away from this "linear" approach to Windows versions, like Windows 10, Windows 11, 12, 13, etc. and requiring everyone to move on to that new version. Why not introduce a separate path/thread for Windows versions, with one that includes AI and modern web technologies or one that doesn't? They already do that with different hardware, with different versions of Windows on the x86/x64 family of CPUs and ARM. It's like with Android: there's a different version of Android called Android Go for low-end hardware. Some people aren't going to want to upgrade, or have an OS that uses AI, digital assistants and/or spies on people and sends private data back to Microsoft. Privacy is becoming a big issue these days. At some point there is going to be a backlash against this stuff. People will stop putting up with it. There may eventually be a shift away from AI, digital assistants and web technology, back to native/device-specific experiences. It's not just about Microsoft, but Google as well. A lot of people want Windows to be Windows and not an Android/iOS/Mac wannabe. The Windows experience was always a native/device-specific experience, not a web/mobile experience. There are Chrome, Firefox, Safari and Android emulators for that.
This is true. I was able to get Windows Server 2022 running on an older Surface Laptop. It's been my best laptop ever. The battery is legitimately competitive with my MacBook Pro M1. And the MacBook has been slowly down dramatically when trying to use finder. The touchscreen is great on the Surface Laptop. If the larger iPad Pro ran MacOS with and optional tablet reskin when in portrait orientation I would sell all my other equipment and buy it immediately. Instead I am moving back to Windows (server) and android.
26:15 - Southwest still running Windows 3.1? Ridiculous, and it all started as a joke by some troll on X. Nobody seems to fact check these things before reporting on them. Southwest was unaffected because it does not use Crowdstrike. Pretty simple.
while that is correct, the third party had kernel access, something they should never had and kernel reacted in panic the solution was reinstal because microsoft bitlocker made impossible to enter and delete the problematic file and that had to be done in thousands if not hundreds of thousands of machines a friend told me that basically from the 500 employees on his company like 10 did not had problems, becaude they had those pcs turned off so no update happened, a automatic update forced by that microsoft partner, the rest, they had to send new pcs, and pick up the others to reinstall because, you are not suposed to have bitlocker keys stored around for 500+ machines you are right and wrong at the same time windows is as strong as a wet tissue of paper now dont suk microsoft dik.
Kids these days don't buy computers any more, only phones. Only us, old farts still buy computers, and we are dying out. And most of us either hack Windows or /and have a Linux based pc.
Sorry sir I disagree. Look at the number of laptops in use at school. They are powerful. And Apple is slowly taking over. And I am an old fart too. lol. It’s a little easier for me as I was a professional programmer.
@@thisISyouish I am evidence. 33 years old. What he is saying isn't outright true. It is happening gradually though. Running Arch Linux as my main, and Windows in a VM. So that is the current zeitgeist for someone in my age group. At least in my career and social circle. Kids will accept OS as service. Because kids don't have enough information. The vast majority will grow into these anti-consumer ecosystems.
Given Intel's issues with the 13th-generation K series processors frying themselves, I would avoid anything from Intel for the next couple of years. I like the size and form factor, but Intel has blown the entire generation due to an engineering mistake.
I just switched to Linux after fighting Windows for many years. Windows7 was the last version which I used, I updated it to W10 and I noticed how slow W10 was (no SSD back then, in 2015) so I tried to roll back, Windows refused to do it. And this while I had Windows already hang on 99% wth the update from W7 to W10. I had it with Windows and I decided to switch to Linux and only boot into Windows for playing some games. In 2020 I removed Windows and I haven't had a Windows-partition since then. I also had multiple broken systems of Windows, 1 particular bug after an update (it happened twice) and not even booting at all on other occasions. On my current laptop which shipped with Windows (my desktop is my main PC) Windows just won't be stable, it BSOD's once every hour, I put Linux on it and it seems to be rocksolid stable.
Is it the end of the beginning ? The EU is coming down hard on hardware vendors insisting that all hardware will be repairable, upgradeable and able to run at least 5 other independent operating systems...No more softarw monopolies which are holding back the growth in the economy.
My first computer was in 1990, it was an IBM clone with 8088 processor and 4 color CRT screen. No hard drive. 2 5.25" floppy drives. Had a blast playing various games. MS DOS
In my opinion MS should listen to the public, see what independent designers have been mocking up, get these ideas, but more importantly, deliver an OS WITHOUT telemetry, third-party software pre-intalled, One Drive, useless apps, animations and consuming less than 1.5GiB of RAM.
26:28 not all companies use windows... and its more likely they will use linux than develop their own proprietary system. linux is used in a lot of companies and governments , for example, at least 20 stock exchanges...
I would like to switch to a Mac because Windows has become quite annoying for me. But unfortunately, some programs that I need for my studies or for my work are not supported on MacOS. So I'm tied to an x86-capable Windows laptop, which I hope will change in the future. Also, after Windows updates, there are often problems with some programs that have kernel access, which sometimes leads to BSOD after Windows updates.
You can run windows apps in emulation through crossover or wine. [ I believe there is a free open source alternative to crossover, forgot it's name lol ]
Linux is already 90% of the way towards becoming an OS everyone can use for 90% of their tasks. If Microsoft gets too greedy, the other 10% progress will be made in a few years.
Nah... Using MacOS requires buying new hardware. Given that I think it's much more likely that a few people move to Linux instead. Most people probably won't care and stick to Windows anyways.
Microsoft forgot Steve Ballmer's "Developers, Developers, Developers" speech. It's not chance that Microsoft Windows had its best years after that speech and that company focus. As a developer you could see the change in focus, they even got rid of many of their Microsoft developer certifications and courses that are application or general programming related. The only certifications left are in web, sys admin and things they want to push like Azure. It is a complete push to the cloud. No options to learn the basics or to learn how to develop a native windows application anymore. It is no wonder their operating system is going down hill. It seems insane to me that they would push the cloud so hard given their biggest strength was having a local client OS that was so capable and had virtually complete market share control. Now we can run most things from a browser and that is a battle they lost long ago, for being a monopoly.
Well I've been a Microsoft Windows fanboy all my life. I love the fact that Windows doesn't restrict you. You can do literally anything. Apple is closed. I don't want to pay apple for my homegrown software. I want Microsoft to win this ear! I love Linux but cant place it on all systems.. all my colleagues have grown up in a windows friendly environment. It's painful. Windows is the middleground.
No. For industrial machines if it wasn't Windows, it would be Linux. Too locked down for customization and hardware are not cost effective as a terminal.
I had a Geekom A5 with an AMD Ryzen processor and 32GB of RAM. It was the worst PC I ever had. It couldn't handle having a lot of tabs or programs open, and the fan noise was so loud that my wife could hear it from the ground floor while the PC was on the first floor. Now I live in quiet peace with my Mac Mini. :) My wife on the other hand has a Beelink ser5 PC with only 16GB of RAM and that thing is quiet and works well too. And not to mention the horrible support from Geekom. Never again.
I use windows since virtually everyone else I work with uses it and they don't have the time or even interest to switch. If not for software compatibility, I would've switched long ago.
I switched to MacOS 4 years ago now. I still have a windows machine for gaming on. The only thing keeping Windows going these days are heavily entrenched corporations and gamers Now even the corporations are probably questioning their need to run Windows when most business activities are done through a browser anyway.
According to Statcounter and Statista's desktop market share data OS X dropped approx 4.5% in Q4 with a slight continued decline to just shy of 14% in July. Windows mirrors this rather neatly, rising approx 3.5% and bumping along at around 72% to date. This despite substantial upgrades to Silicon with very little gap between suggests they are not busy creating converts so much as preaching to the choir. And I mean this with no malice - this entire presentation is replete with bias. I'll leave the aggravating task of countering it to those smarter and more inclined than I am.
Microsoft needs to create a translation layer for Linux, basically a Windows core for Linux, to allow a large majority of Windows software to run fully on Linux. Sell it for around $50 as a closed source program. Either that or make a version of Windows where everything but the core is removable.
what’s this even? huge ad shoved down my throat and the detailed history of microsoft and windows. i’ll make sure to hit the avoid recommendations from this channel button
What windows NEEDS is basically a re write of windows, They should: Collecting all the underlying technology and making a new streamlined windows that isnt, win 11 on win 10 on win 7 on win xp ... but still allow apps built for older version to have the same support as now. Place all the settings in setting and have to setting modes, simple and advanced, only have one task switcher (alt + tab style) and stuff like that, everything of one category should be in one place pretty much. Focus on reducing background activities to a minimum, making everything really stable (I regularly start my laptop and the trackpad doesn't repond because windows doesn't detect the HID) Give it a new modern look, similar to windows 11 but more reliable (no graphical inconsistencies, like having 2 windows snapped between each other should not show a 2pixel row of the background, and so on). And lastly, Windows should be an operating system, not the complete experience, so a fresh install should basically have nothing installed, except for the basic like, settings (like outlined above), a text editor, a basic image & video viewer + editor (like mobile phones), file structure, calculator, web-browser (😮💨), and a really power full search that just searches the local machine, like finder for mac (it need like 4or5 letters to find the most berried stuff). For everything else they wanna give us there is the MS store that could hold all the other stuff, and give it a recomended bundels page (maybe) that has a creator bundel that instals extension for the editors, and more in that style, and they aren't pushed just there for those who need but it won't bloat other machines. As a last thing, fresh windows install on my laptop had it at ~25% utilization with horrible battery, after some basic faffing about it 2% with ~1.5% being Task Manager itself, if Macos can make a 2 core intel based macbook air feel decent (5th gen i5), windows should at least make a 4 core intel i5 8th gen feel the same, and it does at my new utilization, imagine what MS can do, 0% utilization? 😍 Thanks for reading my Windows wish list, have a great day :)
I switched from Windows to Linux. MacOS wasn't even a consideration since it only runs on Apple hardware and MacOS is clunky compared to Windows. I don't know how anybody thinks it's a good OS for productivity. I suppose like a lot of things you can get used to the jank eventually but it's otherwise off-putting.
Quality I agree. But for professional work, its gonna be the Windows PC. Not because they are better, but because they are affordable. Unless MacOS is made available to these M1 iPads, Windows will always win, regardless of the quality of Macs. I own a MacBook Pro, an iPad Air, iPad Pro and an iPhone amd Apple Watch, yet I have to have 3 windows pc standing by. Again because Apple has limitations because most of the companies around the world uses (and will continue to use) windiws.
The only reason I want a Mac is because of M series efficiency /performance per watt. If any chip manufacturer got to that level, I won't even think twice. Macs are just for Ego. there is nothing they do currently that's magical
XT13 Pro Special coupon code could save 5% in these links:
US official【code:ArthurXT13GK】:www.geekompc.com/geekom-xt13-pro-mini-pc/
US Amazon(i9-13900H)【code:ArthurXT13GK】:www.amazon.com/dp/B0D25FBS1S?maas=maas_adg_45F383291920AADE727EE2DFD52F8B34_afap_abs&ref_=aa_maas&tag=maas
Mac's have 3 "features" Windows doesn't have:
- OS is free on any device (also iPhones) for at least 5 years
- Any Mac OS has plenty of software installed.
- With "OpenCore Legacy Patcher" you can install Mac OS on "older" Macs
HUAWEIs HarmonyOS NEXT and HarmonyOS on pc Is the future😎
Interesting video but I was unable to mentally process it very well because the whole time my mind was trying to subsume the content under "Apple's Plan to Win", so I felt extremely empty and confused when the whole video was about Microsoft and nothing about Apple's Plan.
Mac is cannot take over shit
@@livestreamhuaweiin china maybe, but sanctions will forever keep it out of the western countries.
So what is Apple's plan? I don't really see any plan in your video.
You give a nice overview about the history of Microsoft and it's failures in the past (as if Apple never had any failures).
Software is more and more cloud based, and also more and more web based. Microsoft knows this and therefore heavily invested in Azure. THAT is Microsoft's main product now. They even aren't charging money for upgrades to windows anymore. Office is slowly also more and more web based and will eventually be completely replaced by web apps. These apps can run on Windows, MacOS, Linux, Android etc etc. So it is natural that windows will have a smaller marketshare.
Yes one of the problems with Microsoft is that they have to support all the hardware availalbe where Apple can do exactly what they want. On the other hand, there are less and less players in the market so it will be easier for Microsoft to liaise with those players to create better standards.
X86 will not be replaced fully by ARM (yet). The reason is that ARM will never be as powerfull as X86 processors because of their limited instruction set (given that X86 will continued to be develloped). ARM however is getting better and now is perfectly viable for laptops and doing day to day tasks that are not that compute intensive. Since they run much longer on a battery charge, for an office environment X86 will be dead in the near future.
For specific cases X86 will however continue to be the better choice, and for that, for now at least, there will be windows x86.
I think that in the future we might see solutions where ARM or RISC V will be the default for daily use, and then a much faster and bigger FPGA like chip will be programmed on the fly for specific tasks to be performed as soon as a program is loaded.
What modern software situations require the x86 instruction set?
ARM processors are more powerful than x86 🤦♂
That Geekompc sponsor spot was WAY too long, and you didn't even say it was sponsored until you stopped talking about it.
what sponsor spot? /SponsorBlock
@@mRxmodule but still someone has to set the sponsors manually before they get blocked automatically
@@mRxmodule the little mini PC he talks about in the beginning, for several minutes. I smelled the sponsor spot far before he mentioned it, but what I dislike is his way he talked about it, making it sound like he just likes the PC.... And then he keeps going, and it starts to get fishy.
It's probably a very decent machine but it was like watching an ad, before you know it's an ad...
I'm all okay with sponsored videos... Just make it more obvious please.
This is unwatchable on so many lvls.
First the guy is clueless. And then the list goes on.
Right? Dude literally knows nothing 😂
NOTHING should run in Kernel Mode except the Kernel. Drivers need to run in an abstraction layer but they don’t, they use kernel extensions which have direct access to the kernel. Mac OS, Linux, and Unix all isolate the kernel and the hardware. Why does Microsoft use such an archaic way to exchange and privilege drivers when it can cause catastrophic system damage like the Crowdstrike debacle exemplified.
Exactly
This honestly has the monolithic vs microkernel energy
They actually don't, which is why ClownStrike has caused kernel panics in Linux and MacOS before. It is just that far less Linux and MacOS systems use ClownStrike bad software.
I still remember trying to install an old game with DRM in windows 10 and it just crashed with bsod,
because the idiotic starforce only tried to work in windows xp and it didn't always work well, and on early versions of windows 10 it's a quick way to screw up OS and spend a few “fun hours” digging all the starforce garbage out of directories and registry.
Now it is practically irrelevant, because since some version of win 10, Microsoft did think of blocking the launch of this garbage.
And I think with valorant in the future it will be the same when you do anti-cheat or DRM at the kernel level,
it doesn't lead to anything good.
Windows xp and windows 7 are the best versions Microsoft had every made
Didn’t like XP much. But Windows 7 is by far the absolute best version of Windows of all time.
@@MrSamPhoenix agreed.
XP was iffy when it first came out but got way better by SP2. Windows Vista was poorly supported and hated upon release. Vista SP2 is basically Windows 7. Windows 8 had awful UI when it came out but by Windows 8.1 it was much better.
@@MrInside20 The biggest disadvantage was the lack of UAC, some viruses that used flash vulnerabilities in those years could easily get in and run as administrator, I still remember in school I was advised to create a second account with user privileges to avoid this, and it worked, especially if you visited dubious file sharing sites.
windows xp was buggy on release, i prefer 98
There are 1.6 billion active windows as of 2022. 8 million is less than 1 percent. Statistically, the number of affected PCs are negligble compared to its userbase. This is not to justify the issue, but rather to understand the scale of its impact among all windows users. I have 3 windows 11 pcs at home (one of them is a handheld pc), works in a multi national energy company with over 50k employees, and we were not affected by this issue
Bro tell it, this is a total non-issue. Windows is not the great OS, we all know this, but no way in holy hell will Mac become this. It is an exec PC at best and will never ever become the defacto computer for all employees.
@@joehockeyplayer8097 absolutely 👍🏻
@@joehockeyplayer8097 That's a good take. Mac's are pc's that computer illiterate business execs use to shorten the tech gap. It's the Fisher Price computer for those with a superiority complex.
"Self-made" his mom got him the IBM contract!
Honestly, Microsoft needs to RESPECT the user again.
They need to do 1 thing:
1. Opt users out of EVERYTHING by default
2. NEVER send any user data to MS, or enable features that would do so without their consent
3. Remove ALL nags, hurdles, ads, sponsored apps, etc from windows
4. Give CLEAR choices to users during setup, and then HONOR those for every update and feature moving forward.
The operating systems needs to be very efficient, protect the user, and merely give the user "options" if they want, and NEVER re-ask for a feature a user had a chance to, or never opted into.
People ONLY user windows because of games support, or enterprise AD.
THATS IT.
A bit much to ask from a company that introduced its first default firewall with WinXP in 2000s. Further more decided that the customer was the product with Win10.
Also they need to stop dumbing things down
that is enough for me game and work seems good don't have to pick one or the other like you do with other os. but really i see no ads form ms they have always taken data since xp to 7 just most people didn't really care. they do it now and it some sort of live threatening privacy thing lol. which your on the internet that in itself leaves you open to all sorts of fun stuff that ms could only dream they could do lol.
They never Pass their greedy parts
Windows keys are over price
( Line of number = £119 you know that worth that much over an Macbook that never ask for a key to active it
is only hunt theirs people to their cheapest tool gone over price
(more for Pro editon ) - just for enterprise being allowed for domain joins
you got them a free macbook for using the money likey to hire more macbook so they never pay the full price just 99% of it paid and 1% theirs
@@Stormlywing yeah it makes sense that windows charges and mac doesn't for their os since it is baked in to their system when you pay it just like if you buy a windows pc but your still paying way less for a windows pc then you ever would a mac and you will get more use and a better up grade path then you get with mac.
Buying a Mac because you're sick of MS forcing dumb, anticonsumer shit on users is like voting for Trump to get rid of corrupt politicians.
Linux. Every time, always.
sure good story linux is in the same boat as macos accept macos actually has market share as a desktop where linux doesn't.
it's never gonna happen. windows is way too flexible compared to macos and these corporations run old software and need the flexibility to run the os on any hardware possible, virtualize it without any restrictions and still have support for every program on earth, which could never happen due to the lock in nature of macos and lack of support for backwards compatibility.
the guy is just another mac-lover and windows hater. first he says microsoft is way behind then switches his arguments to they are losing shares. isnt appl also losing shares specifically in the smartphone world? this guy is full of shit
@@Pappizzle apple mac's pretty little boxes, lacking substance,
Never say never. Intel’s dominance looked unshakable until Apple showed us what ARM-based microprocessors were capable of, including surprisingly good x86 emulation. I run Windows 11 for ARM on my MacBook in a VM when I need to run Windows software, but over the years, I’ve needed to do that less and less. Change can be a good thing.
It's not the end for Windows. MacOS is not going to power your ATM machine or your billboard or your EPOS till or your car monitoring tool or your stock picker or your car security barrier or your ..............
Not now not ever.
YOU can use MacOS or Linux, but those business applications will stay where they are. I'm not gloating, I'm dishing reality
The current hardware won't switch, but new ones will run Linux.
^ That... This video title and introduction are pure clickbaits. Esp. the "again"? When did Apple won the first time exactly lol
Seriously, I know fanboys have all the right to make videos, but coming up with BS statement like that.. WTF
What exactly gives you the illusion that Apple could never adapt to providing those services if the opportunity arose? MS won’t dominate forever, especially as corporations and the public begin to notice more and more just how unstable and inelegant they are. Apple can easily afford to develop UIs & servers for ATMs, Billboards, POS systems, etc. Once developed, all they need is to price enterprise services competitively and they would take half the market within a year. They already have the reputation of creating stable systems. Just because they chose to focus on B2C as their strategy now is no limitation imposed upon them.
@@josvah You know Rolls Royce could make budget cars for everyone, but notice that hasn't happened... coz it's not a market they care about. Apple could make inroads but there's SO many things in their DNA stopping that... like stable long-term support for ancient code, running on an insane set of hardware configurations to name a couple - the cost is high and the returns are low. And to make it worse, you now have 30+ years of coding legacy for all those applications that run on Windows written in VB6 / C++ to modern-day electron stuff.
You say 'once developed' like it's nothing - you know some of these applications written over a 30 year period with millions of $'s of investment by companies that don't have infinite money like FAANG, are not just suddenly gonna start again for Macs out of some sort of righteous effort, especially when you know how indifferent and hostile Apple treats those that develop for its platform.
That's why.
@@judewestburner good response, I can see both sides of the argument. I will always and forever will be an apple guy for the simple fact that I believe apple wouldnt sell out like a sh**y companie such as Microsoft would. Fot that I say Apple can do it and do it better if they wanted to.
Microsoft. The IBM of the 2020s.
Microsoft (Windows) need to join forces with Apple to bring back native BootCamp on M-Series (Arm based SoCs)
This argument is a joke. This is a company that handicaps its products by refusing to make the base RAM in their machines (8GB) anywhere close to the competition’s standard (16GB) and to charge an exorbitant price, well beyond the cost of this upgrade, in order to include it in the product. Moreover, to disable the extra RAM (i.e., disabling 4GB in the 12GB in the M4) just to bring it down to 8G so they can charge more for the upgrade to 16GB. A company’s whose products that are marketed this way can’t possibly become the prevalent computing standard.
yet the numbers show a different story. I will never defend apple for not offering 16GB of ram as a base, but if you ever use any apple computer, especially the new ones with apple silicon, you will understand how amazing macOS is.
@@georgioszampoukis1966 macOS is amazing lol ? Sure it can do somethings better but when it comes to universal compatibility and freedom to do everything, macOS does not even comes close to the competition. Keep in mid MacOS has to support only a limited number of devices, MacOS is just more idiot proof. I can run games software from 2004 on windows and apple dropped support for all 32 bit apps way before. Many things i find annoying in MacOS, basic things that windows does better e.g. multitasking, opening switching to differrent windows etc. Heck even closing a program is a major PITA in MacOS. When it comes to gaming i don't even want apple to be anywhere near close to it, apple will destroy all freedom, modding in games, Github innovations etc literally everything and will force everything into their eco system which i never want.
@@snake2106
95% of your comment is about gaming everybody knows the Macs are not good at gaming
@@snake2106 very strong argument to have the ability to run software from 2004, I am sure it is more crucial to people than a secure, good performing OS. It is more important than my 12 year-old MacBook Pro still receiving security updates and working flawlessly. Do you even know why windows is able to do that? Because most of the OS still runs on a 30 year old codebase. You can even find submenus that were introduced in windows 95. Also, you clearly have no experience with macOS and it is ok, but please, don’t even compare macOS to windows. I use windows for gaming, Linux for AI development (as a ML engineer) and macOS for work/everyday tasks. People defending windows are either too young or have no idea of what happens under the hood. I personally love windows for what it offers, but it is criminal to compare it with macOS and even Linux.
@@lesleyhaan116 read again itard what i said about basic tasks, backwards compatibility. You itards are not power users, just basic users who can fulfill most of their needs even on a chromebook but brag about MacOS lol.
Yall acting like crowdstrike crash was ms fault. All fair game to apple but damn yall really need to learn how to read.
if they did, they probably won't bother to call apple support when they keep forgetting their password lol
He can't even pronounce DOS, why should anyone in the IT field take him seriously?
So a security flaw in Windows is not Microsofts fault? Nefarious or innocent mistake, vulnerabilities are vulnerabilities. MS deserves equal blame.
it was their fault, their kernel is as strong as sand
the level of quality shown by microsoft and partners, disastrous
@@betag24cn 💯
I just purchased my first macbook after 30 years of Windows computers... yes, 30 years. I tried other os'es, linux distros, etc. for programming, daily use, etc.
Mac Os on the M series... what a revelation! The speed, the ease of use, the performance, power sipping... and in the background running on native... LINUX
No more forced (spying) forced ads, no forced accounts... I'm sold!! Mac has some OS quirks yes, but its a matter of adaptation...
The only reason for keeping windows & flagship pc (amd) is for gaming & general GPU usage purpose. But that's it... Mac has huge potential, but the pricing policy must change, it's darn expensive...
Mac's have 3 "features" Windows doesn't have:
- OS is free on any device (also iPhones) for at least 5 years
- Any Mac OS has plenty of software installed.
- With "OpenCore Legacy Patcher" you can install Mac OS on "older" Macs
Idk, Mac feels limited. I want to have tiling window management on my desktop
MacOS is not based on Linux my friend. It’s based on BSD.
@@theworldoffun8997 MacOS, compared to Windows, is not limited. Compared to Linux, yeah a bit.
In general I think it’s the best of both worlds, or the middle ground you want to have. If Apple really gets the gaming people and the industry fully on board, Windows will die. Finally and for good.
@@TheKaosTux Windows won't die. Apple, Linux and Windows will always exist as they all have their advantages with a certain type of customer. Apple can't copy everything good about Windows without giving up some of their advantages.
I switched to linux 2 years ago, not looking back. Mac is not an option for me as it is a closed system and not well suited for programming
:)
:))))))))))
To be honest, more people should be switching to Linux instead of macOS. Both Windows and macOS have a lot of (proprietary) flaws.
MacOS: Less freedom, also less bull$hit. Windows OS: More freedom, more bull$hit.
yes but…same amount of bullshit
I only use my Windows PC for gaming now. Everything else is on MacOS and iOS.
Started dabbling with linux when I had the misfortune of installing Windows Vista. Been using it as a daily driver since Windows 10.
W10 was the last Windows I used. In 2017 I made the switch to Linux, after a W10 update borked my HP Sleekbook.
As a user of both operating systems macOS is never replacing Windows simply because it will never be as open or compatible with foreign hardware as Windows is, and I don’t understand the hate Windows 11 gets, it has the best and cleanest UI since Windows 7.
Agree but windows 11 is trash compared to windows 10 bht i am forced to use it anyway so i cant do anhthing about it
@@xgui4-studios Being forced to use it? Really? I'm still using Windows 7 on a machine with an Intel Core 2 Quad (on my main computer). I turned off and disabled the update for the Windows 10 Update. I do intend to try using Windows 10 (regularly on my main computer) at some point, but I've been too busy and haven't gotten around to it.
Consider that. A 17-year old CPU is still good enough for browsing the internet with a 15 year-old OS.
13:22 At this point I've forgotten why I'm watching the video because it's talking bout things I already know and not what caught my attention 🤦🏾♂🤦🏾♂🤦🏾♂
Commercial break at 3:47 regular programming resumes at 6:54
Mac is growing healthily, but so is Linux, it has tripled in the same ten years.
i wish that linux wins. YEAH OPEN SOURCE YEAAAAAH!!!!!!
Apple user here, came from the Acer Predator (i9 + GTX1060) then when I realised i just wanted a compact laptop with good battery life I started with the 2017 air then M1 macbook pro in 2020... just this January switched to the 16" M3 Pro mbp...
...and lemme tell you this, Windows ain't going anywhere man.
Also, really a 7 minute precursor ad dude?
Are you saying Mac os is out performing windows?
I run Windows 10 on my HP laptop, MacOS on my MacBook Pro, Ubuntu 22.04 on my Dell server, Mint on my PC, and Windows 11 on my Dell tower. I love them all 😀
Windows will always be in the corp environment. You can’t replace it.
I think you’re wrong, more business software is becoming cloud based. I work for a company going that way and you can pretty much use any device you want Windows or MacOS. The days of proprietary software dependent on a specific OS is beginning to fade. Granted that evolution will probably take years.
@@jimtipton8888Companies require specific software that might be exclusive to windows so the main machine will always be of windows
@@jimtipton8888 Macbooks are so much more expensive to buy for business. And god how much time I spent trying to add a network printer to the Mac I had.
As an IT pro in the corporate world this is 100% correct. Macs are for the execs who want to "feel" like the are premium. For everyone else its Windows because Mac does not offer the GPO and customization we get from Windows. Case done
@@jimtipton8888 ehh but Mac would have to be competitive in price.. I don't see legacy companies switching, especially if they use MS tools such as office, Power Bi, Azure etc... Then they would also have to compete with Google as well as I'm sure they would want to offer their services.
I switched from Windows to MacOS years ago and never looked back.
Responsive?
Mac's have 3 "features" Windows doesn't have:
- OS is free on any device (also iPhones) for at least 5 years
- Any Mac OS has plenty of software installed.
- With "OpenCore Legacy Patcher" you can install Mac OS on "older" Macs
Why not switch to Linux
@@aleksimoose He says mac,so mac it is bro
MacOS useless
I think that the biggest and basically only problem the Microsoft have is a perception. MS was once practical monopoly with over 90% market share. After that 75% of market share and being de facto standard for enterprise market looks like something bad. In a fact, and based on any real measure, having 75% market share is enormous business success.
Luckily I switched to Linux for a year before this happened
Its been nearly 10 years since Microsoft introduced „Settings“ in Win 10 and now 10 years the Control Center and the Settings app coexist
the plan was remove it, it is taking longer than expected 😂
what do you mean by Control Center? Are you talking about the Control Panel?
@@tomsmith6513 I mean the Controll Panel from back to Win 7
@@tomsmith6513 yes, they are talking about control panel.
You forgot Windows Vista. Not sure which is worse between Win Vista and Win 8.
what about Windows millennium ???
Vista was good, it's just that people had potato PCs at the time so they tried running it on less than ideal hardware and it obviously went wrong. Windows 8 and ME was a total disaster
bro windows 8 was good, people are just whining about the start screen but 8.1 fixes that and it's basically better windows 10
@@Napoleon_e2 True, also nobody says that Windows 8/8.1 was wonderfully optimized, it was smoth and rock solid.
I never had issues with Windows Vista. It’s just that 7 improved on it vastly.
Southwest Airlines is looking pretty smart holding onto an older OS version
What's in everyone's pocket? Windows is already enterprise-only.
There is no need for a plan against Windows.
For years now Microsoft tried to geht rid of this useless private users. But these DAUs are sticky like hell.
I hope that at least in business sector, Linux picks up the slack that Windows nor Macs can't: billboards, point of sale, oftentimes even office computers. It can be anything Windows can, without the premium cost (and user experience) of Macs.
If Mac wants to succeed then they'd have to be less greedy over RAM and SSDs. Make bsae variants with at least 16/512 and upgrades not 20 times the price of market and also allow users to easily replace parts on their computer and repair. I too got a Mac but I don't use it much because of 8/256 and that just sucks
Coulda just bought a used Mac honestly, MacBook pro from 2012 does most things pretty well, and it starts at about 100
Windows 8 is when I noped out and switched to Mac.
windows 8 was actually good, and 8.1 was just better windows 10, i seriously don't know why people are whining about the start screen
Windows Vista did it for me...
@@KeriRautenkranz What was the final straw for you?
@@mendodave What was the last straw? An expensive, capable PC built for video editing where I spent most of my time trying to get the PC to work. Switched to a 2006 Mac Pro 1.1 and it not only just worked but also rendered more than twice as fast… while being a supposedly “slower “ machine…
@@KeriRautenkranz With windows sometimes I wondered if the machine was working for me, or I was working for it. One day the requirement to run a windows only program went away when I parted ways with a particular company. I said to myself, finally I don't have to run windows anymore. So I didn't. Picked up a Mac Mini in 2012 and never went back.
If Linux 'd be a thing, we wouldn't even have this discussion.
linux has always been the scary os, declared as a cancer by microsoft tyemselves
people got scared
steam deck users use it daily, for years, they love it
on smartphones, we should be using pure linux, but since it is scary, we use android
the server used to store this comment uses linux, that is why google never felt the crowdstrike situation, another normal day for them
linux is, but people are still scared
not counting in people that do not know what a os is and when asjed to send files via mail they will send .lnk files
i will let you search what a .lnk file is
AI-features are not tied to Windows for ARM, they merely require an NPU which Intel an AMD processors have adopted too now.
Windows for desktop and gaming, Apple for laptops and phones.
Ubuntu for low-end PC's.
lol, tell that to steam deck
the entire planet runs on android, only people who can waste money on iphones do it, the rest use android, apple will never win that war, it was already lost
apple laptops are not common in the planet, only perhaps on some countries, and mostly for video or image editing, profesional audio related stuff
everybody else uses windows laptops
desktops once steam os becomes even better will get a adption never seen before, windows is spying on you in a form that is scary, the copilot is just dangerous rigth now, ut runs slow and is easy to break
windows future is so uncertain, is almost funny, but mostly scary
to me that why Apple never said gaming
remember what Jobs wants to do
Code games for windows to used to test drive them
Make videos and edit them
Office 365
Gimp
is not a fair deal for 8GB ram by macbook for £1200 price
I cant believe someone can have such a bad take ..windows isnt going anywhere.
nokia and blackberry said that, remember kodak?
microsoft was sure that they could dominate server market, it is dominated by linux
dont count on linux is not a good idea
once steam improves windows emulation for games, even more people will jump to steam os
windows is in trouble
@@betag24cn it's clearly one of two things: either you have absolutely no idea what you're talking about, or you're mentally retarded.
first of all, Windows has a 70% of desktop OS market share.
second, linux is popular in servers not because windows is bad, but because they serve different targets, and windows still have their market share among servers also Microsoft wouldn't start azure, if they wasn't sure about that
third, linux popular generally among people who "don trust corporations" or it used by big companies for working machines, because they don't have to pay for license
and last, why anyone should use Steam as their OS? just WHY?
You think Windows 8 was the worst.. clearly you forgot all about Windows Vista.
I have been so far behind windows 🪟since windows 8 and since 2015 I have switched over to MacOS 💻
Windows 3.1 from 1992 is still used in a commerical environment????? WOW!!!!!
- These "MicroPC" companys need to really get on the ball, you can fit a DOPE GPU in a SteamDeck, they can jam one into a MicroPC... It blows my mind that they just leave them so "Basic"
The issue with windows is that its being recycled SO MUCH EVERY SINGLE VERSION that its becoming way too broken and all Microsoft is doing is just applying "Modern themes" onto the part they WANT the users to see, not things like device manager or control panel. All they need to do is keep the bare bone basics of the OS and slowly and PROPERLY create an ACTUALLY USABLE OS.
If they could, they would shuffle the keys around on your keyboard between each update. To optimize typing speed ...
Vista was the last straw. After losing all my data and needing a reinstall 3x a year, I switched to Mac. Every win product is progressively worse. Mac is not perfect, but it is orders of magnitude better than windows. I used UNIX at work IBM AIX. Running Ubuntu on an old Lenovo computer it’s great. I attempted to run windows 10 on it and it was horrid. And as expected does not meet the hardware requirements for 11. 😂. Cheers! Be well folks.
we need to pay attention to linux more, its the real threat to windows
I understand, but if you are going to present information to support your point, present the facts as they are. If you deliberately omit the fact that the recent Windows failure was due to an external cybersecurity company recognizing Windows as a system threat (in other words, it could have happened to MacOS), then you are just creating bias and misinformation. Final note: everyone knows that Linux is better ;)
fr
Linux is at 4% BABYYYYYY. Nobody wants a world like the early 2000 where the only real option was Windows. At least windows xp and 7 were decent. Now all we get is bloated rubbish with AI crammed into everything.
A lot of companies weren't effected by Crowdstrike, because there's a lot of other good EDR software. Hackers already knew about supply chain attacks, Kaseya is only one of these cases, but you don't easily execute a supply chain attack.
Microsoft also is in large parts to blame for the Crowdstrike crash, because it unlike macOS does not provide an unprivileged API for EDR software.
You failed to mention some important historical facts, like the worst OS's ever in history: Windows Me and Windows Vista.
Vista with Service Pack 2 was quite good, but 7 is my personal favorite. Everything after it, was crap.
I missed windows me wtf is that
Windows 8 and vista are both good because there isn't much difference (8 is just 7 with a start menu and uwp but it's a great os and starts faster) (7 is identical to vista with minor improvements and newer running software) so vista was a really great os for the time but too much eye candy for regular pcs
i could say ME really had some driver issues but i have never tried it....
I don't think this teenybopper had been born when Windows Me came out.
THE YEAR OF THE LINUX DESKTOP!!!!!!!!!!!!!! (gawd i wish)
MacOS taking over? In your dreams! As long as you can't use it legal and reliable on any other PC than Apple's own hardware, it won't happen. If anything, it is more likely that Linux will take over. But even that is unlikely in the foreseeable future, because most people simply use the pre-installed Windows on their machines because they don't know anything else and can't cope with anything else, and the business world, as well as most government agencies, are also largely dependent on software that runs on Windows and the officials are not willing to switch over just like that.
22:17-23:13
What song is playing in the background? I tried to search it for countless times and I've failed to find one.
I don't think you really understood the kernel mode crash. MS did have features that restricted kernel level access, but could not implement these tools due to concerns about monopolism. Nothing should be using kernel level access, unless heavily audited, i.e. drivers etc. This is why since Vista most applications are restricted to user level mode, as the damage level cost is less severe. It is not as if other vendors have their own failures, only Windows is reported on more, as it's ubiquitous.
I have an M1 MacBook and love it, but I’ve just built a windows desktop, because I hate that you can’t upgrade a Mac, if Apple would let people upgrade there system I would leave Windows altogether
Microsoft stopped caring about their user experience after Windows 7, they kept creating solutions for problems that does not exist, which somehow made the original experience worse. And the worst is that Microsoft are so proud of their "solutions", they are constantly forcing the users to adapt the "solutions" by taking away their abilities to do things as they want.
microsoft got scared with android tablets and android smartphones and came with the best idea, windows 8
they had the same panic attack with win 11
time will tell what will get them scared next, we as users are scared of windows and the imposed copilot crap spying and making insecure experiences using your pc possible
@@betag24cn it looks like Microsoft was trying to copy Google and Apple. They should have backed away from trying to force people to use newer versions and put more time and effort into testing, rather than being insecure and pushing something out before it was completely tested and ready.
@@tomsmith6513 it is hard to believe, but they are insecure, no other explanation for win 8
win 11 feels like insecurity struck them again
One of the biggest downfalls, in my opinion, is Microsoft's tendency to force features on to users instead of giving them choice. With Windows 8, they could have made the tiles optional while keeping the main operating system intact. Instead, they forced users to adapt to their new, poorly designed system. A lot of times they actually do more work to stop users from doing what they want.
Even small things, like the inability to move the taskbar to the top or sides in Windows 11, or reverting to the Windows 10 start menu layout, are unnecessarily restricted. It seems they go out of their way to limit customization and user preferences. Overtime, these limitations can lead to users resenting the operating system. In contrast, Apple tends to excel at refining small details, which contributes to a more positive user experience. Although I wish they had more customization features as well.
It's like their are giant tech parents telling us how we should be using our operating system in this never-ending cat and mouse game. It's completely unnecessary. Microsoft baffles me time and time again they still have one of the best operating systems out there like it or not but they're decision-making seems to be completely detached from what the users want. Seems they have become "Tone deaf".
I can imagine a world where, with better app support and more users, Chrome OS could be a real competitor. Even Samsung DEX, which is technically Linux-based, could allow users with the know-how to run any distro they want. I desire this. I want Windows to be good as well. I hope Microsoft makes the right decisions. However, I dislike that there's only one operating system that can be installed on most hardware and gets support for the majority of apps.
Linux is available for most users, even if they don't realize it. But it's caught in a Catch-22. The people who install it are often tech-savvy and know what they're doing. For some of them, especially programmers, it's great. However, for creative users, it falls short due to lack of codecs and software. The general public, for whom Linux could work just fine, would have to learn how to install it and overcome their fear of it.
I think it would be better if Microsoft got away from this "linear" approach to Windows versions, like Windows 10, Windows 11, 12, 13, etc. and requiring everyone to move on to that new version.
Why not introduce a separate path/thread for Windows versions, with one that includes AI and modern web technologies or one that doesn't? They already do that with different hardware, with different versions of Windows on the x86/x64 family of CPUs and ARM. It's like with Android: there's a different version of Android called Android Go for low-end hardware.
Some people aren't going to want to upgrade, or have an OS that uses AI, digital assistants and/or spies on people and sends private data back to Microsoft.
Privacy is becoming a big issue these days. At some point there is going to be a backlash against this stuff. People will stop putting up with it. There may eventually be a shift away from AI, digital assistants and web technology, back to native/device-specific experiences.
It's not just about Microsoft, but Google as well.
A lot of people want Windows to be Windows and not an Android/iOS/Mac wannabe. The Windows experience was always a native/device-specific experience, not a web/mobile experience. There are Chrome, Firefox, Safari and Android emulators for that.
@@tomsmith6513 Very well said.
The only way for Apple get a chance to dominate Windows is when they put MacOS on their M1-M4 iPads. Otherwise, its not gonna happen.
what makes you think Apple wants to dominate Windows?
90% of the world still couldn't afford it if they did so but ok
that’s… what a mac is for
though granted, there needs to be more to ipadOS than just the typical app icons, lots of wasted potential imo
@@dm8579 money?
This is true. I was able to get Windows Server 2022 running on an older Surface Laptop. It's been my best laptop ever. The battery is legitimately competitive with my MacBook Pro M1. And the MacBook has been slowly down dramatically when trying to use finder.
The touchscreen is great on the Surface Laptop. If the larger iPad Pro ran MacOS with and optional tablet reskin when in portrait orientation I would sell all my other equipment and buy it immediately. Instead I am moving back to Windows (server) and android.
26:15 - Southwest still running Windows 3.1? Ridiculous, and it all started as a joke by some troll on X. Nobody seems to fact check these things before reporting on them. Southwest was unaffected because it does not use Crowdstrike. Pretty simple.
This is incorrect....
A third party update caused the issue.
while that is correct, the third party had kernel access, something they should never had and kernel reacted in panic
the solution was reinstal because microsoft bitlocker made impossible to enter and delete the problematic file and that had to be done in thousands if not hundreds of thousands of machines
a friend told me that basically from the 500 employees on his company like 10 did not had problems, becaude they had those pcs turned off so no update happened, a automatic update forced by that microsoft partner, the rest, they had to send new pcs, and pick up the others to reinstall because, you are not suposed to have bitlocker keys stored around for 500+ machines
you are right and wrong at the same time
windows is as strong as a wet tissue of paper now
dont suk microsoft dik.
I switched from Macs to PCs 20 years ago and never looked back
Kids these days don't buy computers any more, only phones. Only us, old farts still buy computers, and we are dying out. And most of us either hack Windows or /and have a Linux based pc.
Any evidence?
I think you forgot that video games on PC exist
Sorry sir I disagree. Look at the number of laptops in use at school. They are powerful. And Apple is slowly taking over. And I am an old fart too. lol. It’s a little easier for me as I was a professional programmer.
I've never seen anyone develop stuff for phones on a phone.
@@thisISyouish I am evidence. 33 years old. What he is saying isn't outright true. It is happening gradually though. Running Arch Linux as my main, and Windows in a VM. So that is the current zeitgeist for someone in my age group. At least in my career and social circle. Kids will accept OS as service. Because kids don't have enough information. The vast majority will grow into these anti-consumer ecosystems.
XP was not only the best Windows, but also the best OS, imo. Everything about it was just so satisfying.
Given Intel's issues with the 13th-generation K series processors frying themselves, I would avoid anything from Intel for the next couple of years. I like the size and form factor, but Intel has blown the entire generation due to an engineering mistake.
I just switched to Linux after fighting Windows for many years. Windows7 was the last version which I used, I updated it to W10 and I noticed how slow W10 was (no SSD back then, in 2015) so I tried to roll back, Windows refused to do it. And this while I had Windows already hang on 99% wth the update from W7 to W10. I had it with Windows and I decided to switch to Linux and only boot into Windows for playing some games. In 2020 I removed Windows and I haven't had a Windows-partition since then. I also had multiple broken systems of Windows, 1 particular bug after an update (it happened twice) and not even booting at all on other occasions. On my current laptop which shipped with Windows (my desktop is my main PC) Windows just won't be stable, it BSOD's once every hour, I put Linux on it and it seems to be rocksolid stable.
Is it the end of the beginning ? The EU is coming down hard on hardware vendors insisting that all hardware will be repairable, upgradeable and able to run at least 5 other independent operating systems...No more softarw monopolies which are holding back the growth in the economy.
My first computer was in 1990, it was an IBM clone with 8088 processor and 4 color CRT screen. No hard drive. 2 5.25" floppy drives. Had a blast playing various games. MS DOS
I'll stck with Windows and Linux. Not paying the Apple tax for a new machine
In my opinion MS should listen to the public, see what independent designers have been mocking up, get these ideas, but more importantly, deliver an OS WITHOUT telemetry, third-party software pre-intalled, One Drive, useless apps, animations and consuming less than 1.5GiB of RAM.
26:28 not all companies use windows...
and its more likely they will use linux than develop their own proprietary system.
linux is used in a lot of companies and governments , for example, at least 20 stock exchanges...
I would like to switch to a Mac because Windows has become quite annoying for me. But unfortunately, some programs that I need for my studies or for my work are not supported on MacOS. So I'm tied to an x86-capable Windows laptop, which I hope will change in the future. Also, after Windows updates, there are often problems with some programs that have kernel access, which sometimes leads to BSOD after Windows updates.
You can always install a virtual machine.
You can run windows apps in emulation through crossover or wine. [ I believe there is a free open source alternative to crossover, forgot it's name lol ]
Anyways would it utilize all of macs power instead of being sluggish?
I am curious to know which programs you need for your work and studies that are not supported on a Mac.
You definitely were born in the Windows 7 era my son :)
I use macOS, Windows, and Linux; while none is inherently superior, they all coexist harmoniously and winodws not going anywhere alleast not yet.
Linux is already 90% of the way towards becoming an OS everyone can use for 90% of their tasks.
If Microsoft gets too greedy, the other 10% progress will be made in a few years.
Nah... Using MacOS requires buying new hardware. Given that I think it's much more likely that a few people move to Linux instead. Most people probably won't care and stick to Windows anyways.
Switch to Linux & support open source developers.
I have already switched to Linux and I will look no other way.
Yep I moved to Linux and most businesses must move to it
Ubuntu or Mac is business move.
Microsoft forgot Steve Ballmer's "Developers, Developers, Developers" speech. It's not chance that Microsoft Windows had its best years after that speech and that company focus.
As a developer you could see the change in focus, they even got rid of many of their Microsoft developer certifications and courses that are application or general programming related.
The only certifications left are in web, sys admin and things they want to push like Azure. It is a complete push to the cloud. No options to learn the basics or to learn how to develop a native windows application anymore. It is no wonder their operating system is going down hill.
It seems insane to me that they would push the cloud so hard given their biggest strength was having a local client OS that was so capable and had virtually complete market share control. Now we can run most things from a browser and that is a battle they lost long ago, for being a monopoly.
Well I've been a Microsoft Windows fanboy all my life. I love the fact that Windows doesn't restrict you. You can do literally anything. Apple is closed. I don't want to pay apple for my homegrown software. I want Microsoft to win this ear! I love Linux but cant place it on all systems.. all my colleagues have grown up in a windows friendly environment. It's painful. Windows is the middleground.
I would rather use Linux than using Mac OS
No. For industrial machines if it wasn't Windows, it would be Linux.
Too locked down for customization and hardware are not cost effective as a terminal.
I had a Geekom A5 with an AMD Ryzen processor and 32GB of RAM. It was the worst PC I ever had. It couldn't handle having a lot of tabs or programs open, and the fan noise was so loud that my wife could hear it from the ground floor while the PC was on the first floor. Now I live in quiet peace with my Mac Mini. :)
My wife on the other hand has a Beelink ser5 PC with only 16GB of RAM and that thing is quiet and works well too.
And not to mention the horrible support from Geekom. Never again.
I'd rather use Linux than live in a walled garden
@@RomanAvdeevX are you using linux?
@@theworstredstoner0950 Yes, I daily drive Linux
@@RomanAvdeevX yeah i would to but every time i use i see why windows is better lol.
@@userunknown1030 Why is that? Photoshop and Microsoft Office I assume?
I use windows since virtually everyone else I work with uses it and they don't have the time or even interest to switch. If not for software compatibility, I would've switched long ago.
Everything from Micro$oft has always been trash. If you didn't realize that, you weren't looking hard enough at the alternatives.
Two USB ports isn't enough. You need two USB-A black ports just for the keyboard and mouse.
Disinformation right from the start, what a loser
what do you expect from a channel recomending you apple os? 😂
@@betag24cn yeah You are kinda right, but maybe the macOS is good, I don't know. but iOS is not for me
I switched to MacOS 4 years ago now.
I still have a windows machine for gaming on.
The only thing keeping Windows going these days are heavily entrenched corporations and gamers
Now even the corporations are probably questioning their need to run Windows when most business activities are done through a browser anyway.
I have a sense that the moment Satya became the ceo, the downfall started.
According to Statcounter and Statista's desktop market share data OS X dropped approx 4.5% in Q4 with a slight continued decline to just shy of 14% in July. Windows mirrors this rather neatly, rising approx 3.5% and bumping along at around 72% to date. This despite substantial upgrades to Silicon with very little gap between suggests they are not busy creating converts so much as preaching to the choir. And I mean this with no malice - this entire presentation is replete with bias. I'll leave the aggravating task of countering it to those smarter and more inclined than I am.
Microsoft needs to create a translation layer for Linux, basically a Windows core for Linux, to allow a large majority of Windows software to run fully on Linux. Sell it for around $50 as a closed source program. Either that or make a version of Windows where everything but the core is removable.
what’s this even? huge ad shoved down my throat and the detailed history of microsoft and windows. i’ll make sure to hit the avoid recommendations from this channel button
What windows NEEDS is basically a re write of windows, They should:
Collecting all the underlying technology and making a new streamlined windows that isnt, win 11 on win 10 on win 7 on win xp ... but still allow apps built for older version to have the same support as now.
Place all the settings in setting and have to setting modes, simple and advanced, only have one task switcher (alt + tab style) and stuff like that, everything of one category should be in one place pretty much.
Focus on reducing background activities to a minimum, making everything really stable (I regularly start my laptop and the trackpad doesn't repond because windows doesn't detect the HID)
Give it a new modern look, similar to windows 11 but more reliable (no graphical inconsistencies, like having 2 windows snapped between each other should not show a 2pixel row of the background, and so on).
And lastly, Windows should be an operating system, not the complete experience, so a fresh install should basically have nothing installed, except for the basic like, settings (like outlined above), a text editor, a basic image & video viewer + editor (like mobile phones), file structure, calculator, web-browser (😮💨), and a really power full search that just searches the local machine, like finder for mac (it need like 4or5 letters to find the most berried stuff).
For everything else they wanna give us there is the MS store that could hold all the other stuff, and give it a recomended bundels page (maybe) that has a creator bundel that instals extension for the editors, and more in that style, and they aren't pushed just there for those who need but it won't bloat other machines.
As a last thing, fresh windows install on my laptop had it at ~25% utilization with horrible battery, after some basic faffing about it 2% with ~1.5% being Task Manager itself, if Macos can make a 2 core intel based macbook air feel decent (5th gen i5), windows should at least make a 4 core intel i5 8th gen feel the same, and it does at my new utilization, imagine what MS can do, 0% utilization? 😍
Thanks for reading my Windows wish list, have a great day :)
I switched from Windows to Linux. MacOS wasn't even a consideration since it only runs on Apple hardware and MacOS is clunky compared to Windows. I don't know how anybody thinks it's a good OS for productivity. I suppose like a lot of things you can get used to the jank eventually but it's otherwise off-putting.
Quality is simple that’s what Mac is when you use it professionally you won’t want to use windows again
Quality I agree. But for professional work, its gonna be the Windows PC. Not because they are better, but because they are affordable. Unless MacOS is made available to these M1 iPads, Windows will always win, regardless of the quality of Macs. I own a MacBook Pro, an iPad Air, iPad Pro and an iPhone amd Apple Watch, yet I have to have 3 windows pc standing by. Again because Apple has limitations because most of the companies around the world uses (and will continue to use) windiws.
The only reason I want a Mac is because of M series efficiency /performance per watt. If any chip manufacturer got to that level, I won't even think twice. Macs are just for Ego. there is nothing they do currently that's magical
When you get a mac, you pay more for less
@@dmadking3817 the new ryzen AI chips are fairly close-ish
not on the same level ofc, but yea they pack quite a punch tbh
@@theworstredstoner0950 You save money and time with a Mac; less crashes, no hardware incompatibilities and less flakey software.