Hmm makes you wonder. What if an away team was in this situation and had someone purposely throw something on the floor so they could get extra free throws or the ball back lol
Only thing that was never confirmed before the tech...Who threw the object. It’s assumed it was the home team. This could now be an issue of visiting fans trying to get a “technical” on home teams if games are close - in my opinion. BTW - the end of game foul was a good call by the ref. Great positioning and coverage.
Had an imbecile ref do that to us, said he heard a curse word from behind our bench at a 150 team tournament where ANYONE could be watching even if they weren't a fan of that team. Thought to myself the same thing I can go sit behind the visitor team and swear loudly. I used to ref football, had the referee overturn one of my calls "an interception" by a team winning by a big score, said he wanted to give the losing team another chance. After the game I chased him to his truck like a coward he jumped in and took off before i could put my hands on him.
@@billwalters4338 As justified as you may have been, sheriff’s deputies would not have agreed with you. Better to send the game tape to the assignor and end the ref’s career.
If the fan didn't throw something on the court the game would have gone to overtime due to Miss St missing the other 2 free throws. Don't throw things onto the court people, it could cost your team the game..
He missed the final free throw shot on purpose. If you take away the tech foul shot, he would not have tried to miss the second shot on purpose after missing the first.
I agree with the foul call definetly a block. the techincal ehhhhhhhhh how do you know who throw it. you're assuming it was the home team. Also it really didn;t affect the play at all.
Could have been opposing team fan, but 1) came from home team section....those folks would have been pointing culprit out. (Their silence says volumes. 2) doubt appoint team would have “planted” someone thinking this situation would arise, and 3) it has been my experience that college kids would be bright enough to think of it! LOL! 😂.......looks like the only call that could be made!
First call was right, but I feel like the second call was wrong. I can understand voiding the initial shot even though the item hit the floor after the shot was attempted, but it feels like the game was decided not by the players. I will say that the video lacks context if a warning was already issued, but I assume not since it would likely have been included then.
Under the NCAA-M rule set it is pretty much an automatic call in that situation to call the T. So the officials had no choice but to call the T despite the time remaining on the clock
@@SgvSth disagree. Rules like these prevent fans from tossing stuff onto the floor and getting penalized for it. Without these rules these actions would happen more often.
@@Minecraftmaster44 Knowing these rules however for fans if your team is down and or its tied he missed his first free throw what would it stop a die hard fan from throwing something on the floor to give his team another chance....In that fact not much one can do unless point out the person who did it. Shouldn't be a T call on the home team.
there is by rule the phrase of having direct knowledge on something I hope that official and the crew had direct knowledge as to which team that fan was for.. to properly penalize!
Refs had direct knowledge of a fan throwing an object onto the court. Which team the fan may have been rooting for is irrelevant. The technical for fan interference is assessed on the home team.
If it was a technical foul, why were the lanes filled for second shot? Also, why was he not awarded the second of his two shot foul? Is college different in that area than high school? (Just wondering)
Pretty much all technical fouls at the NCAA level are enforced at the "point of interruption." That means that you shoot the free throws for the technical foul and then you go back to the place you were at the time of the technical foul. And that is both Class A and Class B technical fouls in almost every case. The only time we clear the lane in the NCAA is a Dead Ball Contact Technical where you give the ball to the team that was contacted. Otherwise, this is like every other technical foul at the NCAA level.
The shooting foul yes, the fan throwing object no because it was after the shot, didn’t hit anyone and didn’t affect the missed shot. No harm no foul. The fan should’ve been found, and banned from attending games again.
Shooting foul: 100% correct. A fan throwing something onto the floor, I honestly don’t even know. I want to have more of an argument about what the refs did and did not do right, but I don’t even know where to begin with that.
I agree. I think it was an overreaction by the refs. The commentator said that the tech foul was called to send a message to the fans to stop throwing things onto the court. The refs could have sent the the message by making an announcement that if it happened again, it would be a tech foul. If it happens a second time, then call the tech foul. The first shot was missed before the object landed on the court.
This is such a stupid foul! Like there is zero chance you are 100% sure which fan that is! There are fans for both teams at games this big! Like you legit cannot have a rule that impacts the actual game when you have no clue who to assess it to
Tough gig. . .the rule goes against the house? Hardly a visitor fan in that situation would do that! I don't like both benches trying to heat up a tense situation!
The foul call was absolutely correct but……The fan technical was a load of horseshit. How in the hell can the refs possibly know that it was an opposing team fan who threw the object? Anyone could have done that even a fan of the team shooting the free throws in hopes his team would benefit from a stupid ref throwing a T. Ridiculous especially since the object had NO impact whatsoever on the free thrower. Dumbest call I’ve ever seen.
I missed something here: The shooter hits the free throw despite the object coming on the court; a “T” is called, then that free throw is shot, THEN the other free throw for the original foul is shot? I thought that you first shoot the free throws for the foul, THEN you shoot any technical free throws?
I think it's pretty funny that throwing a stuffed animal got a technical foul, but it's not the best one I've ever seen. That honor goes to a school band playing three blind mice.
Another situation were referee think fans are there to see them the foul was tixtic and technical was for something thar was throw after the ball left the player hands come on that should have been a warning
Just because Georgia is home does not mean there are no Miss fans there. This is a stupid rule. I would go to every away game and in that situation I would throw my Barney doll on the court and het my guy and extra free throw. Then at the end of the season, I would confess and get them to change the rule or my friend will do it next year.
There were as there always are numerous technical fouls that weren't called. Rule book is clear. Any attempt to "influence the officials decision" is a technical foul.
This is so stupid, I’m no Georgia fan but they cannot control if a fan throws something on the court technicals and flagrants should only be given to a team if they did something that they can control
@@johnguedel7119 That was my point in my reply to @gelarjor - In all likelihood, you do not...so given that, who gets a tech and why? Not safe to assume it was a jilted fan. Probably was...but not a certainty. Impossible to say whether he would have made that second free throw had the tech not happened...game easily could have gone to OT. Still either team's game.
I guess I would sort of understand the frustration if the foul was a close-ish call but that was a very blatant foul.. He hadn't even released the ball yet and he was run into by the defender, you can't sweep someone's legs like that and not have it be a foul. It was a stupid decision by Georgia to do that, just feels like inexperience.
Great foul call. Official was in perfect position, and made a courageous--but absolutely correct--call.
I don't know, it looks like the picker push the defensive player into the shooter, but that was just from the two angles we saw.
Missed the illegal screen on miss st
Hmm makes you wonder. What if an away team was in this situation and had someone purposely throw something on the floor so they could get extra free throws or the ball back lol
Joe Bob woah😳
My question exactly
Only an idiot would throw something onto the court.
I was thinking the same thing. Who threw it ?
yoooo for real!!!!!!!!!!!!! that would be cheating
Looks like they got it right. Good job fellas.
This time; and for the Georgia fan, you can't throw your stuff bulldog on the court.
Only thing that was never confirmed before the tech...Who threw the object. It’s assumed it was the home team. This could now be an issue of visiting fans trying to get a “technical” on home teams if games are close - in my opinion. BTW - the end of game foul was a good call by the ref. Great positioning and coverage.
Doesn't matter according to current rules. Rightly or wrongly, the technical will be called on the home team.
I agree good call on foul and I agree with the assesment of techincal foul
Had an imbecile ref do that to us, said he heard a curse word from behind our bench at a 150 team tournament where ANYONE could be watching even if they weren't a fan of that team. Thought to myself the same thing I can go sit behind the visitor team and swear loudly. I used to ref football, had the referee overturn one of my calls "an interception" by a team winning by a big score, said he wanted to give the losing team another chance. After the game I chased him to his truck like a coward he jumped in and took off before i could put my hands on him.
@@billwalters4338 As justified as you may have been, sheriff’s deputies would not have agreed with you. Better to send the game tape to the assignor and end the ref’s career.
@@vitesse_arnhem Did that
Looks right to me!!! Hope you all are doing well and staying safe!!!
Fans should never be given techs. They are NOT part of the game!
The fans didn't get the tech, the home team did.
Correct all the way around. Unfortunate situation though
tom Crean with the intercom 💀💀💀
I couldn't hear what the Georgia coach said on the PA mic. Does anyone know?
If the fan didn't throw something on the court the game would have gone to overtime due to Miss St missing the other 2 free throws. Don't throw things onto the court people, it could cost your team the game..
He missed the final free throw shot on purpose. If you take away the tech foul shot, he would not have tried to miss the second shot on purpose after missing the first.
Did you watch the video at all? Wow. Just wow.
This was stupid...punishing a team for something a "fan" did....very dumb
Agreed. And it didn't affect the shot at all.
I need to get some new glasses, it looked like the defender hit the ball.
Yes, he did. However, he hits his body with his hip while airborne and shooting. This is a foul.
Correct call! Otherwise, fans will do it again on the next game.
I agree with the foul call definetly a block. the techincal ehhhhhhhhh how do you know who throw it. you're assuming it was the home team. Also it really didn;t affect the play at all.
help me understand why he only gets 1 technical foul shot?
That is the penalty assessed for that type of infraction, per the rules.
Could have been opposing team fan, but 1) came from home team section....those folks would have been pointing culprit out. (Their silence says volumes. 2) doubt appoint team would have “planted” someone thinking this situation would arise, and 3) it has been my experience that college kids would be bright enough to think of it! LOL! 😂.......looks like the only call that could be made!
First call was right, but I feel like the second call was wrong. I can understand voiding the initial shot even though the item hit the floor after the shot was attempted, but it feels like the game was decided not by the players. I will say that the video lacks context if a warning was already issued, but I assume not since it would likely have been included then.
Under the NCAA-M rule set it is pretty much an automatic call in that situation to call the T. So the officials had no choice but to call the T despite the time remaining on the clock
I guess I misunderstood the rule then. I do wish that things could have been decided just by on court actions.
@@SgvSth disagree. Rules like these prevent fans from tossing stuff onto the floor and getting penalized for it. Without these rules these actions would happen more often.
@@Minecraftmaster44 Knowing these rules however for fans if your team is down and or its tied he missed his first free throw what would it stop a die hard fan from throwing something on the floor to give his team another chance....In that fact not much one can do unless point out the person who did it. Shouldn't be a T call on the home team.
@@jasonspalding1253: Doesn't matter who throws it according to current rules. Rightly or wrongly, the technical will be called on the home team.
there is by rule the phrase of having direct knowledge on something I hope that official and the crew had direct knowledge as to which team that fan was for.. to properly penalize!
Refs had direct knowledge of a fan throwing an object onto the court. Which team the fan may have been rooting for is irrelevant. The technical for fan interference is assessed on the home team.
You don’t live in Cleveland you live in Cincinnati
If it was a technical foul, why were the lanes filled for second shot? Also, why was he not awarded the second of his two shot foul? Is college different in that area than high school? (Just wondering)
Pretty much all technical fouls at the NCAA level are enforced at the "point of interruption." That means that you shoot the free throws for the technical foul and then you go back to the place you were at the time of the technical foul. And that is both Class A and Class B technical fouls in almost every case. The only time we clear the lane in the NCAA is a Dead Ball Contact Technical where you give the ball to the team that was contacted. Otherwise, this is like every other technical foul at the NCAA level.
How can you know it was a Georgia fan that threw the stuff animal
The shooting foul yes, the fan throwing object no because it was after the shot, didn’t hit anyone and didn’t affect the missed shot. No harm no foul. The fan should’ve been found, and banned from attending games again.
Shooting foul: 100% correct. A fan throwing something onto the floor, I honestly don’t even know. I want to have more of an argument about what the refs did and did not do right, but I don’t even know where to begin with that.
So basically i should go to an awsy game, throw stuff. Eject and ban fan...no technical warranted, has nothing to do with players/coaches
Happened well after the shot was off did see it until after he missed... No way to tell who threw it. Bad call...
I agree. I think it was an overreaction by the refs. The commentator said that the tech foul was called to send a message to the fans to stop throwing things onto the court. The refs could have sent the the message by making an announcement that if it happened again, it would be a tech foul. If it happens a second time, then call the tech foul. The first shot was missed before the object landed on the court.
This is such a stupid foul! Like there is zero chance you are 100% sure which fan that is! There are fans for both teams at games this big! Like you legit cannot have a rule that impacts the actual game when you have no clue who to assess it to
Tough gig. . .the rule goes against the house? Hardly a visitor fan in that situation would do that! I don't like both benches trying to heat up a tense situation!
The foul call was absolutely correct but……The fan technical was a load of horseshit. How in the hell can the refs possibly know that it was an opposing team fan who threw the object? Anyone could have done that even a fan of the team shooting the free throws in hopes his team would benefit from a stupid ref throwing a T. Ridiculous especially since the object had NO impact whatsoever on the free thrower. Dumbest call I’ve ever seen.
I missed something here: The shooter hits the free throw despite the object coming on the court; a “T” is called, then that free throw is shot, THEN the other free throw for the original foul is shot? I thought that you first shoot the free throws for the foul, THEN you shoot any technical free throws?
The reason the technical free throw attempt came next is because if the 2nd FT attempt is missed it is a live ball.
Did they catch the idiot that threw it and ban them for the rest of the season?
I think it's pretty funny that throwing a stuffed animal got a technical foul, but it's not the best one I've ever seen. That honor goes to a school band playing three blind mice.
Another situation were referee think fans are there to see them the foul was tixtic and technical was for something thar was throw after the ball left the player hands come on that should have been a warning
Good call on the foul as he got the player down low. Also, in the rules it’s an automatic T if a fan throws something on the court during a free throw
intentional misses like that arent allowed I thought
U have to know who threw it ,if you don't you can't call a technical for it. Only option is to clear the gym if more objects come out!
That came from behind the visitors bench
Are you high?
Just because Georgia is home does not mean there are no Miss fans there. This is a stupid rule. I would go to every away game and in that situation I would throw my Barney doll on the court and het my guy and extra free throw. Then at the end of the season, I would confess and get them to change the rule or my friend will do it next year.
The black announcer is absolutely clueless on what is happening.
Keep in mind, NFHS rules are different in this situation.
So wait if my team is missing a free throw I can throw something on the court and get the team I'm for another chance at making the basket 🤔
There were as there always are numerous technical fouls that weren't called. Rule book is clear. Any attempt to "influence the officials decision" is a technical foul.
the object throwing by the fan definitely cost Georgia the game
That was the right call. UGA fans are just trashy.
This is so stupid, I’m no Georgia fan but they cannot control if a fan throws something on the court technicals and flagrants should only be given to a team if they did something that they can control
And who is to say a Mississippi St Han didn’t do it?
@@johnguedel7119 That was my point in my reply to @gelarjor - In all likelihood, you do not...so given that, who gets a tech and why? Not safe to assume it was a jilted fan. Probably was...but not a certainty. Impossible to say whether he would have made that second free throw had the tech not happened...game easily could have gone to OT. Still either team's game.
.5 left at the line. Shot gone, no interference, warning to crowd was enough
I guess I would sort of understand the frustration if the foul was a close-ish call but that was a very blatant foul.. He hadn't even released the ball yet and he was run into by the defender, you can't sweep someone's legs like that and not have it be a foul. It was a stupid decision by Georgia to do that, just feels like inexperience.