Looking for books & other references mentioned in this video? Check out the video description for all the links! Want early access to videos & exclusive perks? Join our channel membership today: ua-cam.com/channels/s_tLP3AiwYKwdUHpltJPuA.htmljoin Question for you: What’s your biggest takeaway from this video? Let us know in the comments! ⬇
Thanks Janne for your presentation. Basically she talked about user interface principle, basic UX techniques like persona, card sorting, design patterns, progressive disclosure and prototyping. even this talk is 6 years old it still matter to create great digital products.
She's amazing. The way she takes on the questions is just flawless. I love how she's so open minded and ready to answer every question with a great answer.
4E2010XD I've had the chance to listen to quite a few people that have a PhD and that is not the case. Those skills do not come in a package with a PhD. I liked her personality and I complimented her. Let's leave it at that.
It's a great opportunity to listen to JJJ. I do appreciate the information, slides, the talk that exactly match with the body language. Fantastic. Wishing you Good Luck
Thank you for such an eye opening video. You have my head spinning with design improvements and things I can do to make the design of projects much better in the future. I feel like I've been given the skills to make the future designs as best as they could possibly be, so thank you again.
Great presentation. Some really good points here; Always have a point of Exit for the user, otherwise they will mash the back button. Useful error messages in user's language. Get the user to have faith in the system, tell them when something goes right.
Excellent presentation. Some really useful practices and reasoning. I really like some of the old school design techniques to engage non it stakeholders more in the design
Greetings from Brasil. Thnx for the posting...and for the great great great talk (yeah 3 greats there). Im trying to learn asap all about usability that i can manage to learn and use in a project that is comeing like a bullet train. And you're helping us a LOT already. Liked and subscribed.
I did not know about this "card-sorting" methodology that you mentioned. Just one thing that I noticed strictly from UX perspective, it would be much better if you provide the slides you are using. If that is not available due to copyright issues, there should be another way. It was hard to "recall" (as you mentioned in your slides) what was on the slides while you are talking about them! Anyway, great work. I learend a lot. Thank you from Korea!
Loved the precentation.. helped me a lot! Thanks a lot Janne! Have a question for you... You talked about paper prototyping but isn't it a bit time consuming when it comes to editing something? With tools like Axure RP, arent digital prototypes a little more efficient,"client friendly" and ecological :) ?
I wonder how to apply this in creating a large app, e.g. an ERP, that will contain lots of personas across different departments w/ different expectations and requirements.
Nice presentation and excellent collection of techniques on different aspects of UI design. But poor camera work - never focused on the screen even when the screenshots were getting discussed. Also would have helped if Janne had repeated the questions before answering since the audience was not audible.
Guys (incl. those who up-voted), learn to google :-) - I found a link to the slides here: gotocon.com/aarhus-2012/presentation/%27%27But%20how?%27%27%20-%20Methods%20and%20techniques%20to%20making%20a%20good%20user%20interface The PDF (slides): gotocon.com/dl/goto-aar-2012/slides/JanneJulJensen_ButHowMethodsAndTechniquesToMakingAGoodUserInterface.pdf
The issue I have here is that UX works at different scales not just at the micro but at the macro and if you get it wrong it can destroy a product even before a line of code is written. So while this presenter is of very high caliber (I've seen many of her other talks and presentations) most UX architects/designers aren't. The issue is how does an employer gauge the qualify of a candidate (what are the telltale signs)?
I´m an industrial designer with a huge interest in the UI/UX design. Can you tell me where can I start with this?, I wanna make a masters or specialization on this area, but I wanna know where I begin since there´s so much content. I´ve made some websites and apps prototypes but I don´t really know how to code. Amazing talk btw, it was really well presented, very precise and to the point. Understanding your user is always key in any design process.
Giancarlo Hernandez Uni indeed, especially if you want to maximize changes being hired by a big company. However, if you have great design skills (now already or after learning it and a lot of practice) and you're good at self study and following online courses then you could find really good UI/UX design courses and communities online.
+Stuart Kaufman GOTO Conferences are neither globally sponsored nor globally endorsed by Google. Sometimes Google is one of many sponsors at GOTO Conferences. "GOTO" stands for the goto; code sample used in various programming languages.
+GOTO Conferences Thank you for the response. Very interesting and good info. I thought I considered myself fairly knowledgable in programming languages available but have never heard of GOTO. I also thought it may be Google endorsed or sponsored due to the color bar at the top edge of the videos.
+Stuart Kaufman the colors stand for the different GOTO Conferences. See gotocon.com for reference. And goto; is used in e.g. Pearl, but feel free to look for yourself: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Goto
The slides violate some of the explained principles, such as "minimize memory load" (too many bullet points, all shown at once) and "thrive for consistency" (varying font sizes and spacing). It really helps if you go as far as using single words and icons / pictures only, so that you don't understand the presentation just by looking at the slides. The slides should require the speaker to explain the actual content, the slides visually support the spoken word only. But I admit that it takes a lot of effort to get this right, it actually doubled my preparation time (because you usally want like traditionally slides for the users to read later, plus the slides with little text exclusively for the talk).
Thank you very much for sharing this on the internet. Though this is 3 years back, the points are valid to date. However rather than using the paper cuts for form emulation etc perhaps using a prototyping software is faster.
the way she handle the question and answer session can make her win Miss Universe title.. honestly, very clever girl and somehow remind me of Nightwish vocalist, both from Scandinavia/Nordic countries, the only difference is this one is have blonde hair :P
Hahahahahhaha I kept getting distracted because of her impressive resemblance to Tarja Turunen. I'd be in love if Janne turned out to be able to sing and like symphonic metal xD
The theory of UX design processes is all well. But as we all know, it doesn't fly with time frames. Normal response is: "we don't have time to wait for these wireframes, we need visual results NOW!" You can battle for UX/IA and efficiency all you want, when the person with stars and stripes says GO! - well, then you just need to pull up some hifi solutions from your pocket. Wish it wasn't so but it is. In my years of doing this I've gotten the chance to follow the correct pathways with design iterations perhaps under 10% of the times. And trust me, I fight. It's always out rated by time and money and the stakeholders never see the final end advantage in slowing down. You can show them movies, examples, talk psychology or point to best practice it doesn't work. "We want it NOW"! is the norm. They demand hifi visuals and they rarely see the advantage of prototyping sadly enough. And they don't respond any better when they are told what to think. It's just life.
***** I'm afraid UX has become just a fashionable word, I've worked at pretty large companies that SAY they value UX processes but someone is always getting pushed into the "deliver now" trap. It never fails. I've been working with interface design for a very long time, even before web, it's not become any better. I do both front-end graphics and lofi wireframing, but sadly it's become more of a side dish than anything else. My dep. never budget UX services and we are talking high tech large industries here. It's all about delivering before breakfast, no beta, no lofi processes, no IA/UX. The word is NOW. Sometimes we just need to accept how the coffee is. Good to see that you are able to find proper work within the UX discipline.
ventende I'm really curious about where you're running into this -- the blanket statements you're making about UX as a discipline being no better now than it was 20 years ago are way off-base. I work in the tech corridor of the US West Coast and there's been a dramatic improvement around companies of all sizes understanding the importance of UX in the last decade. Of course, there's still a long way to go, but progress has been pretty swift in recent years.
Jason Pace I've been working with these issues at the two biggest companies in my country, in addition this I've also experienced how it is from the consultancy side of things. Meaning how much force each company put on issues like UX and general design iterations. I did my MA degree in interface design and UX so Im a true advocate for UX approaches, personas, LOFI wireframes, etc etc. However, after so many years in this business I havent rarely seen a single executive actually give those processes any weight, cause as mentioned time is short and the short way to the goal is choice number one. Results, fast and NOW! If your sitting in that war zone responsibly for the launch of an electronic web interface solution then you better deliver NOW and not come dragging with some lo-fi wireframes and all that we designers tend to think is of utmost importance. The stakeholders won't have the time, and later on they blame YOU the designer for not providing them with lofi and highfi prorotypes. From a personal point of view I hope ALL companies world learn to value my knowledge about GUI design, UX, IA and validity etc. But sorry to say the really don care too much - cause they don't see the connection between putting in 3 months of pre-defned design iteration and plan the scope. The end is "we know what we want so were gonna launch this SERVICE NOW!
Interesting. When I partner with consultancies it's with companies like Frog Design www.frogdesign.com/ that exist solely to help companies understand the importance of integrating quality UX methodologies into their product development cycles. While I also see execs and decision makers still not placing a high value on UX initially, it's become much easier to convince them to spend the time and $$ investing in quality UX in recent years than it was before.
UX is been always in any part of our life, from cigarette lighter to electric heater. To create good product , it does not matter if is web application or every day domestic product. It need to be easy to use, be clean - not confuse it purpose. Honesty, todays' websites looks very similar, look cool, give you good impression, but sometimes you not know how to find core information on it.
There was a lot of good points made in this video however it seemed as if she was working on the presumption that a single developer or designer or domain expert; each only specialized in technology, design or that particular domain, it really seemed as if she neglected the fact that all individuals being the developer, designer and domain expert, to some degree actually shared experience and in some ways actually specialized in multiple domains of expertise... say for example a developer that is an expert in the domain of design. - Instead of forcing individuals to only be able to play the role of specializing in a particular area within each group, rather allow all members of the group to contribute in all areas of the group and if certain members of the group have anything to say against an idea, allow the idea to be logically broken down into whether it can and or should be implemented in the first place. And even if its shot down, allow it to be put in a separate list of possible ideas, maybe other groups will be wanting the idea to be implemented.
If I had a nickel for every developer who thought he/she was also a brilliant UX designer, but who was actually the worst UX designer imaginable, I'd be a billionaire. Domain expertise, and domain authority, is important.
Great presentation but no one can convince me that Microsoft's ribbons are all great - some aspects, yes, but some are terrible. The Styles part of the Home ribbon is appalling. Look at all the real estate taken up by styles that are never used. They might have tested 1.3 billion people but the whole basis of how the functions in Word are presented to the user is bad in the first place. People do not use styles naturally. Instead of Styles why not have a menu, for example, Beautify and Structure - perhaps this will get more attention. People need to make the association between Styles and Table of Contents and they need to understand that using Styles will make it so much easier to structure their document. This is not at all evident from simply using Word as it is. There needs to be a way that the using naturally uses Styles and they should be much simpler for most users with complex styling for advanced users and specialised documents.
When Don Norman coined the term, he was working at Apple and they used the term to mean everything _around_ the application itself: how to buy, unpack, install, read manual, get support, uninstall. etc.
Aspect-based UI design helps to "us" in production to keep efforts low, while addressing all UI issues such as information restatement or cross-cutting concerns see aspectfaces.com or a video here ua-cam.com/video/aTLoxlfKOjY/v-deo.html
Looking for books & other references mentioned in this video?
Check out the video description for all the links!
Want early access to videos & exclusive perks?
Join our channel membership today: ua-cam.com/channels/s_tLP3AiwYKwdUHpltJPuA.htmljoin
Question for you: What’s your biggest takeaway from this video? Let us know in the comments! ⬇
Thanks Janne for your presentation. Basically she talked about user interface principle, basic UX techniques like persona, card sorting, design patterns, progressive disclosure and prototyping. even this talk is 6 years old it still matter to create great digital products.
User experience is all about catering the design of a product or service to fit the needs of users. Thank you Janne Jul Jensen
She's amazing. The way she takes on the questions is just flawless. I love how she's so open minded and ready to answer every question with a great answer.
I agree.. sadle she is just as sharp at home ;)
+Lucent Lux That should be normal as a PhD xD
+Michael Jul Jensen savage!
4E2010XD I've had the chance to listen to quite a few people that have a PhD and that is not the case. Those skills do not come in a package with a PhD.
I liked her personality and I complimented her. Let's leave it at that.
It's a great opportunity to listen to JJJ. I do appreciate the information, slides, the talk that exactly match with the body language. Fantastic. Wishing you Good Luck
This briefing is so good. It is articulated with a KISS (Keep it Simple Stupid)...Thank you!
Thank you for such an eye opening video. You have my head spinning with design improvements and things I can do to make the design of projects much better in the future. I feel like I've been given the skills to make the future designs as best as they could possibly be, so thank you again.
Great presentation. Some really good points here; Always have a point of Exit for the user, otherwise they will mash the back button. Useful error messages in user's language. Get the user to have faith in the system, tell them when something goes right.
Thankyou for this Janne, a great description of the overall process for great UI.
this is excellent, a great resource for any developer
Microsoft should watch this...
I'm studying the nielsens's heuristics and your talk help me A LOT, thanks!
This talk really hit home for me. Well presented.
Very informative- thank you. I watched this and came away with a lot of knowledge as a new UX designer.
That' a really good video about usability. These are things that all developers should always think about.
A wonderful and very useful presentation of the ux roadmap. Great job Janne!!
this is such a brilliant thing to listen to whilst working.
"the back button fucks things up..." quote of the day! I like this presentation; very common sense and yet insightful.
Excellent presentation. Some really useful practices and reasoning. I really like some of the old school design techniques to engage non it stakeholders more in the design
Thankyou for this Janne, good information about user experience process for great UI...
This presentation did really give me knowledge about UX, Merci Madame !
Very well presented. Thanks for sharing the details. The UI should be user focused. This presentation will help developers in understanding this.
Learnt and reinforced alot of primers for UX design.
Great presentation. You make it easy to follow.
Shared on Google+ ....excellent discourse on User Interface Techniques Ms. Jensen.
Janne did a great job with this presentation in terms of being prepared. It made Greg Doench and I think of Presentation Patterns when we saw it.
Gr8 advice Janne, your approach is very applicable to not only sw products but hw as well... :)
I enjoyed your teaching. it is very encouraging to practice in my class. Thank you.
Thanks Janne Jul Jensen (@jjjtrifork) for the lecture, we're watching it as a reminder between two #UI courses at Tampere University.@UniTampere
This was great! Learned and realized a lot of things.
Exellent presentation, very helpful on a project I was assigned to.
Greetings from Brasil.
Thnx for the posting...and for the great great great talk (yeah 3 greats there).
Im trying to learn asap all about usability that i can manage to learn and use in a project that is comeing like a bullet train.
And you're helping us a LOT already.
Liked and subscribed.
Very nice presentation.
Thank u!... I use your video as a "quick training" on UI/UX and it really helped me in an interview job. :D
Beautiful... I love your presentation but the first two points were simple. But I not sure if you meant Jargon.
Really love this one!
Awesome presentation.
Very good lecture/presentation... learned a lot. And yes, she was fit :)
Wonderful presentation. Thank you very much.
UA-cam developers should watch this. If I hit a thumbs up or down, I wanna see the number change. Smh. I miss the good ole pre-google days.
Thank you for all the good info, I am anxious to try the paper method,,
I luv hearing tech talk from a beautiful woman! Well done : ]
Excellent lecture!
Could you please recommend some resources about UX that you are familiar with? Thanks.
Great tutorial...thanks it definitely helped me out alot
Its a great Keynote Janne is a good speaker !!! :)
I did not know about this "card-sorting" methodology that you mentioned.
Just one thing that I noticed strictly from UX perspective, it would be much better if you provide the slides you are using.
If that is not available due to copyright issues, there should be another way. It was hard to "recall" (as you mentioned in your slides) what was on the slides while you are talking about them!
Anyway, great work. I learend a lot. Thank you from Korea!
Maybe it is also ok, that the people who Pay alot to be there, get the full show ;)
Great talk. Thanks for sharing.
Such a useful talk. Much thanks!
Is there a link to Sldeshare, so that we can view the presentation clearly
Loved the precentation.. helped me a lot! Thanks a lot Janne! Have a question for you...
You talked about paper prototyping but isn't it a bit time consuming when it comes to editing something? With tools like Axure RP, arent digital prototypes a little more efficient,"client friendly" and ecological :) ?
Super cool talk! Thank you!
I wonder how to apply this in creating a large app, e.g. an ERP, that will contain lots of personas across different departments w/ different expectations and requirements.
Questions are not audible. Session is awesome..!
Great video on UI design techniques :)
Excelent Janne Jul Jensen!!!
Mame ,Please give the example using the graphics presentation. Over all is good. It is understandable
Thank You
Great video. What is this cost-effective something something book ?
***** thank so much for your reply, i was looking for something like that since long time ago. I will definitely check it out coming weeks.
Can you please tell me, what parts of this process do you actually use in real projects?
***** Thank you
***** Hi Janne, I was wondering what was the name of the book title you mention about convincing management to spend money on a site?
***** Thanks Janne! This was a great presentation btw.
Great presentation! Keep up the good work! ;)
What's the book that you were referring to at 46:05? Thanks, *****!
***** Thank you!
***** Thank you!
Great tutorial. Thanks
Nice presentation and excellent collection of techniques on different aspects of UI design. But poor camera work - never focused on the screen even when the screenshots were getting discussed. Also would have helped if Janne had repeated the questions before answering since the audience was not audible.
can you share the slides on slideshare if its possible?
Guys (incl. those who up-voted), learn to google :-) - I found a link to the slides here:
gotocon.com/aarhus-2012/presentation/%27%27But%20how?%27%27%20-%20Methods%20and%20techniques%20to%20making%20a%20good%20user%20interface
The PDF (slides): gotocon.com/dl/goto-aar-2012/slides/JanneJulJensen_ButHowMethodsAndTechniquesToMakingAGoodUserInterface.pdf
Thanx alot appreciate it
easily understood :) very nice
great video. thanks.
The issue I have here is that UX works at different scales not just at the micro but at the macro and if you get it wrong it can destroy a product even before a line of code is written. So while this presenter is of very high caliber (I've seen many of her other talks and presentations) most UX architects/designers aren't. The issue is how does an employer gauge the qualify of a candidate (what are the telltale signs)?
So helpful! Thanks
Thanks for sharing!
I´m an industrial designer with a huge interest in the UI/UX design. Can you tell me where can I start with this?, I wanna make a masters or specialization on this area, but I wanna know where I begin since there´s so much content. I´ve made some websites and apps prototypes but I don´t really know how to code.
Amazing talk btw, it was really well presented, very precise and to the point.
Understanding your user is always key in any design process.
Giancarlo Hernandez Uni indeed, especially if you want to maximize changes being hired by a big company.
However, if you have great design skills (now already or after learning it and a lot of practice) and you're good at self study and following online courses then
you could find really good UI/UX design courses and communities online.
+Janne Jul Jensen can you recommend me good interaction design graduate program? preferably in the US but other countries are also interesting too.
thank you for your recommendation! I'll look into that :)
thanks a lot for sharing your knowledge :)
3:44 "the back button uhhh fucks things up" Did she really say that? haha
:o
he he ,,,
hi m interested in UI/UX and want to start my carrier with it, can you help in how can I start with it. ?
Well said points to keep noted ever
Are "GOTO Conferences" Google sponsored or endorsed? What does GOTO stand for?
+Stuart Kaufman GOTO Conferences are neither globally sponsored nor globally endorsed by Google. Sometimes Google is one of many sponsors at GOTO Conferences.
"GOTO" stands for the goto; code sample used in various programming languages.
+GOTO Conferences Thank you for the response. Very interesting and good info. I thought I considered myself fairly knowledgable in programming languages available but have never heard of GOTO. I also thought it may be Google endorsed or sponsored due to the color bar at the top edge of the videos.
+Stuart Kaufman the colors stand for the different GOTO Conferences. See gotocon.com for reference. And goto; is used in e.g. Pearl, but feel free to look for yourself: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Goto
The slides violate some of the explained principles, such as "minimize memory load" (too many bullet points, all shown at once) and "thrive for consistency" (varying font sizes and spacing). It really helps if you go as far as using single words and icons / pictures only, so that you don't understand the presentation just by looking at the slides. The slides should require the speaker to explain the actual content, the slides visually support the spoken word only. But I admit that it takes a lot of effort to get this right, it actually doubled my preparation time (because you usally want like traditionally slides for the users to read later, plus the slides with little text exclusively for the talk).
*****
Thanks for that!
a presentation is not an ui
Calm down there, PowerPoint police.
Fantastic!
Whats the book she was looking for? @ 45:50
It would be great to get the name of this book.
Ill ask her..
Thank you very much for sharing this on the internet. Though this is 3 years back, the points are valid to date. However rather than using the paper cuts for form emulation etc perhaps using a prototyping software is faster.
where I can find more her talks?
+Janne Jul Jensen already found them but thanks so much Janne :)
the way she handle the question and answer session can make her win Miss Universe title.. honestly, very clever girl and somehow remind me of Nightwish vocalist, both from Scandinavia/Nordic countries, the only difference is this one is have blonde hair :P
Hahahahahhaha I kept getting distracted because of her impressive resemblance to Tarja Turunen. I'd be in love if Janne turned out to be able to sing and like symphonic metal xD
The theory of UX design processes is all well. But as we all know, it doesn't fly with time frames. Normal response is: "we don't have time to wait for these wireframes, we need visual results NOW!" You can battle for UX/IA and efficiency all you want, when the person with stars and stripes says GO! - well, then you just need to pull up some hifi solutions from your pocket. Wish it wasn't so but it is. In my years of doing this I've gotten the chance to follow the correct pathways with design iterations perhaps under 10% of the times. And trust me, I fight. It's always out rated by time and money and the stakeholders never see the final end advantage in slowing down. You can show them movies, examples, talk psychology or point to best practice it doesn't work. "We want it NOW"! is the norm. They demand hifi visuals and they rarely see the advantage of prototyping sadly enough. And they don't respond any better when they are told what to think. It's just life.
***** I'm afraid UX has become just a fashionable word, I've worked at pretty large companies that SAY they value UX processes but someone is always getting pushed into the "deliver now" trap. It never fails. I've been working with interface design for a very long time, even before web, it's not become any better. I do both front-end graphics and lofi wireframing, but sadly it's become more of a side dish than anything else. My dep. never budget UX services and we are talking high tech large industries here. It's all about delivering before breakfast, no beta, no lofi processes, no IA/UX. The word is NOW. Sometimes we just need to accept how the coffee is. Good to see that you are able to find proper work within the UX discipline.
*****
I want to pursue a UX designer career but I'm not sure what route I need to take. Do you have any suggestions?
ventende I'm really curious about where you're running into this -- the blanket statements you're making about UX as a discipline being no better now than it was 20 years ago are way off-base. I work in the tech corridor of the US West Coast and there's been a dramatic improvement around companies of all sizes understanding the importance of UX in the last decade. Of course, there's still a long way to go, but progress has been pretty swift in recent years.
Jason Pace I've been working with these issues at the two biggest companies in my country, in addition this I've also experienced how it is from the consultancy side of things. Meaning how much force each company put on issues like UX and general design iterations. I did my MA degree in interface design and UX so Im a true advocate for UX approaches, personas, LOFI wireframes, etc etc. However, after so many years in this business I havent rarely seen a single executive actually give those processes any weight, cause as mentioned time is short and the short way to the goal is choice number one. Results, fast and NOW! If your sitting in that war zone responsibly for the launch of an electronic web interface solution then you better deliver NOW and not come dragging with some lo-fi wireframes and all that we designers tend to think is of utmost importance. The stakeholders won't have the time, and later on they blame YOU the designer for not providing them with lofi and highfi prorotypes.
From a personal point of view I hope ALL companies world learn to value my knowledge about GUI design, UX, IA and validity etc. But sorry to say the really don care too much - cause they don't see the connection between putting in 3 months of pre-defned design iteration and plan the scope. The end is "we know what we want so were gonna launch this SERVICE NOW!
Interesting. When I partner with consultancies it's with companies like Frog Design www.frogdesign.com/ that exist solely to help companies understand the importance of integrating quality UX methodologies into their product development cycles. While I also see execs and decision makers still not placing a high value on UX initially, it's become much easier to convince them to spend the time and $$ investing in quality UX in recent years than it was before.
Very informative :D
slides: gotocon.com/dl/goto-aar-2012/slides/JanneJulJensen_ButHowMethodsAndTechniquesToMakingAGoodUserInterface.pdf
It's trivial but I would say recognition instead of recall during the presentation but English isn't my 2nd or 3rd language :)
I am abit surprised aswell :) - Mr. Klum.
Could be a designer can UX designer?
Is she the blonde Tarja Turunen ?
+UncleSaat Hehe, 7 more have a similar feeling.
I was also thinking that
UX is been always in any part of our life, from cigarette lighter to electric heater. To create good product , it does not matter if is web application or every day domestic product. It need to be easy to use, be clean - not confuse it purpose. Honesty, todays' websites looks very similar, look cool, give you good impression, but sometimes you not know how to find core information on it.
Impressive :)
VERY GOOD PRESENTATION
THANK YOU :)
Within the first 4 minutes did she curse?
haha did sound like the f word didn't it,,,
Sure did...lol
Cody Mavrick I think she did haha
"there's a reason there are so many websites where the back button f**ks things up" HA!
Ah....yes, yes that's it..
34:06 Progressive Disclosure
No wix i don't need a website
There was a lot of good points made in this video however it seemed as if she was working on the presumption that a single developer or designer or domain expert; each only specialized in technology, design or that particular domain, it really seemed as if she neglected the fact that all individuals being the developer, designer and domain expert, to some degree actually shared experience and in some ways actually specialized in multiple domains of expertise... say for example a developer that is an expert in the domain of design. - Instead of forcing individuals to only be able to play the role of specializing in a particular area within each group, rather allow all members of the group to contribute in all areas of the group and if certain members of the group have anything to say against an idea, allow the idea to be logically broken down into whether it can and or should be implemented in the first place. And even if its shot down, allow it to be put in a separate list of possible ideas, maybe other groups will be wanting the idea to be implemented.
If I had a nickel for every developer who thought he/she was also a brilliant UX designer, but who was actually the worst UX designer imaginable, I'd be a billionaire. Domain expertise, and domain authority, is important.
interesting
who can tell me what is her accent ? Australian or another?
Danish
Haha Australian? Have you actually heard Australian accent before?
Great presentation but no one can convince me that Microsoft's ribbons are all great - some aspects, yes, but some are terrible. The Styles part of the Home ribbon is appalling. Look at all the real estate taken up by styles that are never used. They might have tested 1.3 billion people but the whole basis of how the functions in Word are presented to the user is bad in the first place. People do not use styles naturally. Instead of Styles why not have a menu, for example, Beautify and Structure - perhaps this will get more attention. People need to make the association between Styles and Table of Contents and they need to understand that using Styles will make it so much easier to structure their document. This is not at all evident from simply using Word as it is. There needs to be a way that the using naturally uses Styles and they should be much simpler for most users with complex styling for advanced users and specialised documents.
The title and the way you discuss the topic is confusing. UI is not UX, A user interface is part or a user's experience.
When Don Norman coined the term, he was working at Apple and they used the term to mean everything _around_ the application itself: how to buy, unpack, install, read manual, get support, uninstall. etc.
She could be making a lot more in some other profession.
I like Danish
Aspect-based UI design helps to "us" in production to keep efforts low, while addressing all UI issues such as information restatement or cross-cutting concerns see aspectfaces.com or a video here
ua-cam.com/video/aTLoxlfKOjY/v-deo.html
Super(Y)
Heidi Klum is a software engineer, who knew?!