Probably the charity part. I know that passage as Love not charity. They are not the same thing. Charity is given out of plenty. Love is given regardless of the cost.
The new prints take out what people don’t wanna hear. They even have a homosexual friendly Bible. It’s not hard to read. It’s say if you want to understand it god will help you. I know Devout Christains who can’t even read
Yep, 100%! Raised on KJ but haven't read from it in about 40 yrs, still recognized every passage! (I read from modern translations now... Not saying I haven't read the Bible in 40 yrs! 😳)
Right? I was sitting here mentally shouting “GUYS NO IT’S 1 CORINTHIANS 13 COME BACK”. 😂 The NIV and TPT versions are two of my favorite passages of scripture.
Esther Aruka it’s very different. Look up the missing verses and words in the nkjv. You can google it. You can also watch a really cool documentary new world order bible versions. They have it for free on youtube
@@NikkiBrown4theLord a. 1 john 5 : 7 as it reads in the kjv was taken from the Latin. There were some pre-kjv bibles which gave a sign of this by placing the rendering of this verse in parenthesis. b. The kjv is still copyrighted (or technically under royal prerogative) in some places. From wiki : Copyright statusEdit "The Authorized Version is in the public domain in most of the world. However, in the United Kingdom, the right to print, publish and distribute it is a Royal prerogative and the Crown licenses publishers to reproduce it under letters patent. In England, Wales and Northern Ireland the letters patent are held by the Queen's Printer, and in Scotland by the Scottish Bible Board. The office of Queen's Printer has been associated with the right to reproduce the Bible for centuries, the earliest known reference coming in 1577. In the 18th century all surviving interests in the monopoly were bought out by John Baskett. The Baskett rights descended through a number of printers and, in England, Wales and Northern Ireland, the Queen's Printer is now Cambridge University Press, who inherited the right when they took over the firm of Eyre & Spottiswoode in 1990.[166] Other royal charters of similar antiquity grant Cambridge University Press and Oxford University Press the right to produce the Authorized Version independently of the Queen's Printer. In Scotland the Authorized Version is published by Collins under licence from the Scottish Bible Board. The terms of the letters patent prohibit any other than the holders, or those authorized by the holders, from printing, publishing or importing the Authorized Version into the United Kingdom. The protection that the Authorized Version, and also the Book of Common Prayer, enjoy is the last remnant of the time when the Crown held a monopoly over all printing and publishing in the United Kingdom.[166] Almost all provisions granting copyright in perpetuity were abolished by the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988, but because the Authorized Version is protected by royal prerogative rather than copyright, it will remain protected, as specified in CDPA s171".
@@stick-itproductions.3307 I can recognize the verses but the format of the bible is different in some ways, plus I read the bible more in Spanish so the challenge is even harder :)
Definitely shouldn't get your basis of theology from worship music, instead, you should use the Bible to judge the lyrics. That being said, it seems like Passion guys dont read KJV version
I got almost all of them right?? Wow. Loved the way they read every quote LOL Super fun. Surprised they missed 1 Corinthians 13 though! They were too into the accent maybe?
@@Lhikan634, they still should have easily been able to figure out that it was 1 Corinthians 13. Yes, the KJV uses the word "charity" instead of love, but it isn't THAT different. Honestly, the only way they could have missed it is because they are/were not familiar with the passage in the first place.
@@fr33tobem3 nah, the gist is the same, and at least you should remember more or less the sequence in which love is: patient, kind, X envy, X boast, X self-seeking, and so on.
Only got 1 wrong, but I was raised in an Assembly of God where KJV was pretty much considered the ONLY translation. I like and use numerous translations in my adult life.
Why is everyone being so judgmental? Old English can be really hard to understand. It’s not necessarily that they don’t know their Bible, but they were in a relaxed, humorous environment and probably weren’t trying too hard to understand the text
Old English hadn’t been around for 400 years before the KJV was translated, dying off by 1200 AD. Then there was Middle English until 1500, when our Modern English language replaced Middle. KJV is from 1604 - 1611, or 100 years after Modern English came about. We still use Modern English 400 years later with very little change. KJV is Modern English.
Mifflin Mountain Music thank you! 🙌 I hate when people say the KJV is “old” english. It’s just sad that so called Christians don’t even know the word of God but want to teach and preach it. And on top of it they make fun of the way the KJV reads. Like what in the world? That’s the word of God, divinely inspired. It doesn’t deserve to be made fun of, but to be reverenced.
A Wife In Her Youth It is very sad. God promised to preserve his word and yet most professing Christians believe that no Bible is perfect. In English or even in Greek. It’s disrespect to God and his word.
Easily 7/7. Shakespeare wrote almost exclusively in iambic pentameter (10 syllables per line). It's easy to spot the difference when you count the syllables, haha.
Though to be fair, Shakespeare uses a lot of prose. Though those phrases were honestly pretty common. The key for me was the subject-if it talked about a specific person it was usually Shakespeare
1.) Shakespeare 2.) Bible X 3.) Bible 4.) Shakespeare 5.) Bible (& Book of Mormon) 6.) Shakespeare 7.) Shakespeare X I grew up with the Old King James version. But it was fun hearing the updated.
My first instinct with the "poor soul" one was that it sounds like Shakespeare with words like "hallow'd" and the sentence structure which kinda gives it away. But it does kinda sound like a psalm... otherwise the others were fairly easy to figure out.
Got all but the last one, and that's because it's incredibly similar to a quote from the Tempest 😂 and bonus info: the "standard" US accent or "tv accent" is closest to how people talked in Shakespeare's time, because American and British accents split off around the time of colonization and they evolved separately. Most historians/linguists believe the least change was in the US accent, though. Some Shakespearians actually believe that it's not in it's true form unless acted with an American accent. I, as unlearned as I am, tend to think that Shakespeare is most accurate when performed with the natural accents of the players
I actually thought the same in school. All those years as a kid with KJV paid off when I had to read Shakespeare. I was one of the few in class who weren't lost and confused.
I don't really read the KJV Bible. I was brought up on NI(R)V until I was 14 when we started going to a church that uses the ESV Bible and now that's all I use (and I'm 19, btw), but I still thought I could get them all right and was pretty proud of myself up until the last quote, which I missed.
@@jecolibri1803 Yup, Shakespeare! The closest Bible verse I know of is Pr 26:12, "Do you see a man wise in his own eyes? There is more hope for a fool than for him." Proverbs is more severe, it says it's worse than foolish to think oneself wise, where Shakespeare merely says it's foolish.
@@DownwardsRising Yay! ^_^ Having read the whole Bible, I remember stuff like that, but I was pretty sure scripture never worded it quite that way. And good point- the Word of truth is more poignant than Shakespeare. :-)
Having been brought up in the KJV of the Bible, i find it appaling that they didn't get 1 Corinthians 13! 😱 But thank God we shifted to NIV when I got to college. Hehe.
Cha Miranda The NIV says that Jesus fell from Heaven instead of the devil in Isaiah 14. Calls Lucifer the “Morning Star,” which is a title of Jesus in Revelation 22. NIV is satanic.
Mifflin Mountain Music, are you referring to the New NIV or the old one? Because the old one is mostly ok, it’s the new one that basically slaughters the Holy Word of God
Aaron Oram Both, from what I see. Isaiah 14:12 and Revelation 22:16. “Morning Star” is used for Lucifer in Isaiah 14, and then in Revelation 22:16 Jesus refers to himself as the morning star.
Maybe they mean what God accomplished and accomplishes in us? To be blameless? Though I can question what they were doing if they didn't know these. But there are also pastors who don't know much of details in the OT. I don't know...
I actually could recognize Shakespeare and which play, and the Bible and which book (most of them... probably because I was an English but in high school and read the Bible). But this should be a lesson as to why KJV should be updated.
Renewal Creations No reason to update the KJV, it is in Modern English. Modern English has changed very little in the 500 years it has been about. If we updated and switched from “thee,” which refers to a single person, to “you,” it would be very difficult to read since there would be no distinction between a single person and a group, as a small example.
It's not good to cause our brethren, loved by the Lord, whom He died for, to be discouraged. That is not loving as we should. I'm saying this sensing the weight of this, not just for brethren who can put songs out there for many brethren all over the world to hear and even sing along to, as an expression of their worship, but for each one of us who were commanded by our Lord to love our brethren as He has loved us. It might get difficult though for these who are leading in songs because more often than not, they are looked upon by many as they serve as encouragement through what they are doing with music. They must, as placed in a place of ladership, has greater responsibility. For more of this important role in the church, Desiring God has just a new podcast episode for ask pastor John. that could shed some light. hopefully, those who are discouraged by this (as you could see in the comments) will just be discouraged with perhaps listening to their songs or be more watchful with the songs they write (and that goes for any other band!). Hopefully, they will be encouraged to read and know their Bibles for themselves, all the more. And that goes for all of us. 😄
As an 18 year old, you would expect that I got every one of these wrong. But since I took the time to read the KJV Bible cover to cover, I got 7/7. People constantly bad mouth the KJV, and it makes me upset. The fact that Kristian referred to the KJV as the "Looney Tunes" version of the Bible shows his lack of respect for the version of the Scriptures that people gave their lives for. And, if he would take the time to get off of his phone and actually read it, he would find that it is a beautiful version of the Scriptures, one in which you have to contemplate what you have read to fully grasp Its meaning before moving on. The Bible, whatever version it may be, is the Holy-Spirit inspired Word of God, and it deserves to be revered and honored. I lost a lot of respect for Passion today.
Can't believe they didn't get 1 Corinthians 13 smh Actually most of this is pretty easy to guess even without studying much of the Bible and barely having read Shakespeare but they just passion music so whatever
Well if you want the actually inspired version, you need to learn Hebrew, Ancient Greek and Aramaic. They're all imperfect translations of the perfect Word.
0:36 Romeo and Juliet. 0:46 Proverbs? (Wrong). 1:08 Ecclesiastes 1:5, Ernest Hemingway based a novel title on that quote, and he was an atheist! 1:29 Bible, not sure where. (Wrong.) 2:04 1st Corinthians 13. 2:38 Shakespeare. 2:54 Song of Songs. 5/7, I did better than a CHRISTIAN BAND! :)
The fact that you know these answers, actually does not have much to do with the version of the BIble you use. You guys have to remember that the Word of God is constant - the meaning of the verse(s) should not change no matter what version your Bible is in. The versions are, I believe, just to adapt the Biblical VOCABULARY for the world to understand (i.e. Shakespearean english is very hard to understand for most people, so they translated it to simplified english), not to change the meaning.. When he said "Not in my Bible" for 1 Corinthians, I asked this: in which true (things are being edited out) Bible did God not originally say all of those things about love (love is what is meant by charity) in the first place? If ya'll don't know what verses say, ask the Holy Spirit!
Not sure if these people should be worship leaders... I'm not perfect but for someone who leads others in worship you'd think they know 1 Corinthians 13...
To be fair Shakespeare help write the KJV, he hid his name in Psalms 46. If you count 46 words down you will come to the word Shake, go to the bottom and skip selah and count 46 words up and you will come to the word spear. Very clever on his part. He was 46 years old at the time.
I got them all right. Also, how do you get the one about love/charity wrong? I didn't know exactly where it was, but I knew it was in Corinthians. And come on guys, I don't even read the King James Version, let alone Shakespeare.
Thing is, however, but KJV and Shakespeare had pervasive influence on English language. A better quiz would be common phrases like "Nothing new under the sun" versus "heart of gold" versus "writing on the wall" versus "the be all and end all"
Definitely got all of them. I'm an AMP person myself but it's easy to spot Shakespeare. He sounds great but his words don't touch the soul like the Bible does.
Wow. This video is so sad. Disappointing to see supposed Christians not knowing the word of God and not even being able to tell the difference between shakespearean literature and the KJV. Like do you read your bible at all? C’mon, 1 Corinthians 13. Like that was a joke. And mocking God’s word and reading it in such a condescending way like you don’t have basic English knowledge to distinguish what it’s saying or to even read it correctly. “I prefer my esv and niv.” Yeah, bible “versions” that leave out massive portions of scripture, verses and words God intended to have in the bible. Shows how vain your love for Christ is. This is quite infuriating actually.
How did they not get 1 Corinthians 13🤦♀️🤦♀️
Probably the charity part. I know that passage as Love not charity. They are not the same thing. Charity is given out of plenty. Love is given regardless of the cost.
Right! Verse is read at every wedding lol 🤦🏾♀️
Ikr
I know haha i thought they would get it haha
Charity, not love was used.
Me over here sipping on tea being raised on the king James Bible.
YamiKazeSora same
Lol! Same
For real.... Bless their hearts!!!
Same it’s the only Bible I’ve ever used or will use
The new prints take out what people don’t wanna hear. They even have a homosexual friendly Bible.
It’s not hard to read. It’s say if you want to understand it god will help you. I know Devout Christains who can’t even read
When you're raised hearing the KJV all the way through every year... This is a piece of cake.
Yup!! lol
Yep, 100%! Raised on KJ but haven't read from it in about 40 yrs, still recognized every passage! (I read from modern translations now... Not saying I haven't read the Bible in 40 yrs! 😳)
Having read KJV all my life, I found these really easy. The sentence construction is easily distinct to Shakespeare and KJV
WOW, Passion!! 1 Corinthians 13. Really?😂😂😂I'm surprised y'all didn't get that😂
1 Corinthians 13:4-8. In old language charity was the word instead of love
Ikr😂🤦♀️
Right? I was sitting here mentally shouting “GUYS NO IT’S 1 CORINTHIANS 13 COME BACK”. 😂 The NIV and TPT versions are two of my favorite passages of scripture.
I have never seen that the KJV states it as Charity🤣🤣🤣🤣-I don't take joy in reading it hey....🤣🤣🤣we thank the Lord for NIV and amplified🤣🤣🤣
i honestly think they might've been faking it to make the video more interesting, i felt these were too obvious :l
In your face Hillsong! That got me all gigggly
Got every single one, and knew that was 1 Corinthians 13! 🙌🏼🤙🏼
Same here... I've been raised on KJV
Good, someone who actually knows and reads their bible.
Same here!!! Been reading NKJV which is really not so far from KJV, yes?
Esther Aruka it’s very different. Look up the missing verses and words in the nkjv. You can google it. You can also watch a really cool documentary new world order bible versions. They have it for free on youtube
@@NikkiBrown4theLord a. 1 john 5 : 7 as it reads in the kjv was taken from the Latin. There were some pre-kjv bibles which gave a sign of this by placing the rendering of this verse in parenthesis.
b. The kjv is still copyrighted (or technically under royal prerogative) in some places.
From wiki : Copyright statusEdit
"The Authorized Version is in the public domain in most of the world. However, in the United Kingdom, the right to print, publish and distribute it is a Royal prerogative and the Crown licenses publishers to reproduce it under letters patent. In England, Wales and Northern Ireland the letters patent are held by the Queen's Printer, and in Scotland by the Scottish Bible Board. The office of Queen's Printer has been associated with the right to reproduce the Bible for centuries, the earliest known reference coming in 1577. In the 18th century all surviving interests in the monopoly were bought out by John Baskett. The Baskett rights descended through a number of printers and, in England, Wales and Northern Ireland, the Queen's Printer is now Cambridge University Press, who inherited the right when they took over the firm of Eyre & Spottiswoode in 1990.[166]
Other royal charters of similar antiquity grant Cambridge University Press and Oxford University Press the right to produce the Authorized Version independently of the Queen's Printer. In Scotland the Authorized Version is published by Collins under licence from the Scottish Bible Board. The terms of the letters patent prohibit any other than the holders, or those authorized by the holders, from printing, publishing or importing the Authorized Version into the United Kingdom. The protection that the Authorized Version, and also the Book of Common Prayer, enjoy is the last remnant of the time when the Crown held a monopoly over all printing and publishing in the United Kingdom.[166] Almost all provisions granting copyright in perpetuity were abolished by the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988, but because the Authorized Version is protected by royal prerogative rather than copyright, it will remain protected, as specified in CDPA s171".
I’m not raised on the KJV at all. I’m concerned with their biblical illiteracy.
For someone who doesn't read KJV, this was a hard challenge :(, definitely a NiV reader here
Michael Ramirez I’m so sorry
1960 all the way
You cant recognize the verses?
@@stick-itproductions.3307 I can recognize the verses but the format of the bible is different in some ways, plus I read the bible more in Spanish so the challenge is even harder :)
@Ronel Delariarte it's said textus receptus was Latin first, and then that was back-translated into Greek.
Proof you shouldn't get your theology from worship music?
Or at least find better worship music :-)
Definitely shouldn't get your basis of theology from worship music, instead, you should use the Bible to judge the lyrics. That being said, it seems like Passion guys dont read KJV version
Willemsen Val Pretty sure they use the NIV and ESV at their church.
@@jordanorjamiehowe8387 ESV is a good version. I use it time to time. Still can't believe they didn't get 1 cor 13 though! X)
Yes so true. Was pretty shocked!
2:22 "uh, that's Shakespeare."
Me: "Aaaaaargh! That's 1 Corinthians chapter thirtteeeeeeeeen!!!"
proof you need to know the bible well enough to know what it says and what it dosent!
Or proof that we no longer use Old English
Here here!!! Ehhem🧐
actually the modern english is similar to the old english enough
Whateth it sayeth and sayeth not.....eth
I actually got all of these right, and as someone who reads either the NLT or ESV, I’m kinda impressed 😂
Same
Congratulations!
I believe I did too.
I was raised on the KJV...I died a little inside when they didn't get 1 Corinthians 13.
I’m an NIV gal but I got most of these.
Me too and I got them all right
I got almost all of them right?? Wow. Loved the way they read every quote LOL Super fun. Surprised they missed 1 Corinthians 13 though! They were too into the accent maybe?
Why was I pained they didn't get 1 Corinthians 13 though 😁?
What Bibles are they reading that they did not pick up 1 Corinthians 13?
Any translation based on the Greek as opposed to the later Latin Vulgate, using the Old English, archaic, use of the word charity
@@Lhikan634, they still should have easily been able to figure out that it was 1 Corinthians 13. Yes, the KJV uses the word "charity" instead of love, but it isn't THAT different. Honestly, the only way they could have missed it is because they are/were not familiar with the passage in the first place.
Somebody mentioned "The Message" bible. That version is barely recognizable compared with KJV.
But yeah it sounds like they need to brush up on their Bible reading. 🤔 Worship singing isn't everything.
@@fr33tobem3 nah, the gist is the same, and at least you should remember more or less the sequence in which love is: patient, kind, X envy, X boast, X self-seeking, and so on.
Coming from someone raised independent baptist, this was painful because I knew these versions, and the message translation is like a children’s book
Agreed
That intro!! Kings kaleidoscope!! Love it🔥😁😁
Only got 1 wrong, but I was raised in an Assembly of God where KJV was pretty much considered the ONLY translation. I like and use numerous translations in my adult life.
Why is everyone being so judgmental? Old English can be really hard to understand. It’s not necessarily that they don’t know their Bible, but they were in a relaxed, humorous environment and probably weren’t trying too hard to understand the text
Nailed it! They were just having fun with it. 😊 And we wanted to show how similar the translation was to Shakespeare... thanks for watching, Abby!
Old English hadn’t been around for 400 years before the KJV was translated, dying off by 1200 AD.
Then there was Middle English until 1500, when our Modern English language replaced Middle.
KJV is from 1604 - 1611, or 100 years after Modern English came about.
We still use Modern English 400 years later with very little change. KJV is Modern English.
Mifflin Mountain Music thank you! 🙌 I hate when people say the KJV is “old” english. It’s just sad that so called Christians don’t even know the word of God but want to teach and preach it. And on top of it they make fun of the way the KJV reads. Like what in the world? That’s the word of God, divinely inspired. It doesn’t deserve to be made fun of, but to be reverenced.
A Wife In Her Youth
It is very sad. God promised to preserve his word and yet most professing Christians believe that no Bible is perfect. In English or even in Greek. It’s disrespect to God and his word.
Mifflin Mountain Music amen! I agree. It’s a disgrace. If they dont believe the bible they should NOT call themselves Christians
Please make Kristen Stanfield do a children’s cartoon voiceover
Felicia Moniq Kristian Stanfill* 😂😂
Easily 7/7. Shakespeare wrote almost exclusively in iambic pentameter (10 syllables per line). It's easy to spot the difference when you count the syllables, haha.
Iambic pentameter, folks.
Yeah, verse and Bible verse are two different things...cringed so hard at them not seeing the rhythm
Though to be fair, Shakespeare uses a lot of prose. Though those phrases were honestly pretty common. The key for me was the subject-if it talked about a specific person it was usually Shakespeare
Love is patient from charity is patient. I missed 1. The third one.
That accent is just beautiful 😂🤘
Did he say " take that hillsong" at the end 😂😂😂
1.) Shakespeare
2.) Bible X
3.) Bible
4.) Shakespeare
5.) Bible (& Book of Mormon)
6.) Shakespeare
7.) Shakespeare X
I grew up with the Old King James version. But it was fun hearing the updated.
My first instinct with the "poor soul" one was that it sounds like Shakespeare with words like "hallow'd" and the sentence structure which kinda gives it away. But it does kinda sound like a psalm... otherwise the others were fairly easy to figure out.
*how could they not get 1 Corinthians 13 that's my fave verse like whenever i define love*
great vid! also LOVE Alive by Kings K
"I will rise up resurrected! My past and future in Christ!"
Got all but the last one, and that's because it's incredibly similar to a quote from the Tempest 😂 and bonus info: the "standard" US accent or "tv accent" is closest to how people talked in Shakespeare's time, because American and British accents split off around the time of colonization and they evolved separately. Most historians/linguists believe the least change was in the US accent, though. Some Shakespearians actually believe that it's not in it's true form unless acted with an American accent. I, as unlearned as I am, tend to think that Shakespeare is most accurate when performed with the natural accents of the players
Did anyone hear that King's Kaleidoscope jam in the intro, though??
I long for the days when worship music writers actually know the Bible they sing about
👏👏👏
KRISTIAN IS SO GOOD AT THOSE VOICES I’M GOING TO LEGITIMATELY CRY 😂
I love how competitive these guys get 😂😂😂😂 plus the accents whatttt 😂😂😂
I got 6/7,it's always fun to play along with the bands.
All those years reading KJV as a kid paid off. Not to brag but I got all of them 😂😂
I actually thought the same in school. All those years as a kid with KJV paid off when I had to read Shakespeare. I was one of the few in class who weren't lost and confused.
@@saber-jocky3436 Same!
Same here!
I don't really read the KJV Bible. I was brought up on NI(R)V until I was 14 when we started going to a church that uses the ESV Bible and now that's all I use (and I'm 19, btw), but I still thought I could get them all right and was pretty proud of myself up until the last quote, which I missed.
Well, that's good to know!
Wow! I've never thought of that before, but it's so true! Thanks for your kind encouragement!
Wow! I've never thought of that before, but it's so true! Thanks for your kind encouragement!
Such a cool gang !!
Bible or Shakespeare: "The fool thinks himself wise, but the wise man knows himself to be a fool."
Ooh, it's very similar to a verse in 1 Co 3... but I'm gonna say Shakespeare.
@@jecolibri1803 Yup, Shakespeare! The closest Bible verse I know of is Pr 26:12, "Do you see a man wise in his own eyes? There is more hope for a fool than for him." Proverbs is more severe, it says it's worse than foolish to think oneself wise, where Shakespeare merely says it's foolish.
@@DownwardsRising Yay! ^_^ Having read the whole Bible, I remember stuff like that, but I was pretty sure scripture never worded it quite that way. And good point- the Word of truth is more poignant than Shakespeare. :-)
I am a fan of passion music but i wondered how they can't recognize famous bible verses
It's really disturbing how many Shakespeare quotes they attributed to God...
1 corinthians 13 was the easiest one to get omg!
To be fair the 1 Corinthians 13 one sounds like something from the trial scene in Merchant of Venice
"Take that hillsong" lol
Now i know what happened with Bucky after "Avengers Endgame", thank you.
Very fun, would like to see more of
I got all of them right lol. The last one was hard, but I remembered it from Song of Solomon
Having been brought up in the KJV of the Bible, i find it appaling that they didn't get 1 Corinthians 13! 😱
But thank God we shifted to NIV when I got to college. Hehe.
Cha Miranda
The NIV says that Jesus fell from Heaven instead of the devil in Isaiah 14. Calls Lucifer the “Morning Star,” which is a title of Jesus in Revelation 22.
NIV is satanic.
@@MifflinMountainMusic yes this is true.
Mifflin Mountain Music, are you referring to the New NIV or the old one? Because the old one is mostly ok, it’s the new one that basically slaughters the Holy Word of God
Aaron Oram
Both, from what I see. Isaiah 14:12 and Revelation 22:16. “Morning Star” is used for Lucifer in Isaiah 14, and then in Revelation 22:16 Jesus refers to himself as the morning star.
Mifflin Mountain Music, oh wow, I never noticed that in the niv 84. That’s a pretty rough translation. I’m a New King James perdón myself
This is sad. They don’t know their bible at all. And that last one is NOT the gospel. “STUDY to show thy selves approved workmen.”
You fail.
The last one is from song of Solomon I'm pretty sure.
The last one is songs of Solomon. Should be right after the book of proverbs.
Maybe they mean what God accomplished and accomplishes in us? To be blameless?
Though I can question what they were doing if they didn't know these. But there are also pastors who don't know much of details in the OT. I don't know...
Jonnaphril “Other people don’t know the Bible that well either” is not an excuse for anyone.
I actually could recognize Shakespeare and which play, and the Bible and which book (most of them... probably because I was an English but in high school and read the Bible). But this should be a lesson as to why KJV should be updated.
Renewal Creations
No reason to update the KJV, it is in Modern English. Modern English has changed very little in the 500 years it has been about.
If we updated and switched from “thee,” which refers to a single person, to “you,” it would be very difficult to read since there would be no distinction between a single person and a group, as a small example.
😨 I also thought 1:50 was KJV, mehn this was tricky 😅
I love how at one point they turned into Winston Churchill lol.
It's not good to cause our brethren, loved by the Lord, whom He died for, to be discouraged. That is not loving as we should. I'm saying this sensing the weight of this, not just for brethren who can put songs out there for many brethren all over the world to hear and even sing along to, as an expression of their worship, but for each one of us who were commanded by our Lord to love our brethren as He has loved us. It might get difficult though for these who are leading in songs because more often than not, they are looked upon by many as they serve as encouragement through what they are doing with music. They must, as placed in a place of ladership, has greater responsibility. For more of this important role in the church, Desiring God has just a new podcast episode for ask pastor John. that could shed some light. hopefully, those who are discouraged by this (as you could see in the comments) will just be discouraged with perhaps listening to their songs or be more watchful with the songs they write (and that goes for any other band!). Hopefully, they will be encouraged to read and know their Bibles for themselves, all the more. And that goes for all of us. 😄
Wow, you'd think they'd get the 1 Corinthians 13 one super fast, but the old-timey wording tricked them!
Hey we aussies don’t sound like that😂😂
As an 18 year old, you would expect that I got every one of these wrong. But since I took the time to read the KJV Bible cover to cover, I got 7/7. People constantly bad mouth the KJV, and it makes me upset. The fact that Kristian referred to the KJV as the "Looney Tunes" version of the Bible shows his lack of respect for the version of the Scriptures that people gave their lives for. And, if he would take the time to get off of his phone and actually read it, he would find that it is a beautiful version of the Scriptures, one in which you have to contemplate what you have read to fully grasp Its meaning before moving on. The Bible, whatever version it may be, is the Holy-Spirit inspired Word of God, and it deserves to be revered and honored. I lost a lot of respect for Passion today.
"Take that Hillsong"
lol I love it
Can't believe they didn't get 1 Corinthians 13 smh
Actually most of this is pretty easy to guess even without studying much of the Bible and barely having read Shakespeare but they just passion music so whatever
Memorised 1Cor 13 in KJV in my High School.
I am very grateful for the King James Version!
NIV -Not inspired version
Well if you want the actually inspired version, you need to learn Hebrew, Ancient Greek and Aramaic. They're all imperfect translations of the perfect Word.
Nearly Inspired Version
I love hillsong worship and passion
Honestly... these people call themselves Christians?
It was pretty sad. We all need to know Scripture better than that.
Pretty shocking that they are the ones influencing Christians with music, yet don't know much about the bible.
I got them all right except the last one
0:36 Romeo and Juliet.
0:46 Proverbs? (Wrong).
1:08 Ecclesiastes 1:5, Ernest Hemingway based a novel title on that quote, and he was an atheist!
1:29 Bible, not sure where. (Wrong.)
2:04 1st Corinthians 13.
2:38 Shakespeare.
2:54 Song of Songs.
5/7, I did better than a CHRISTIAN BAND! :)
Song ? From the intro and outro
"Alive" by Kings Kaleidoscope 🙂
The fact that you know these answers, actually does not have much to do with the version of the BIble you use. You guys have to remember that the Word of God is constant - the meaning of the verse(s) should not change no matter what version your Bible is in. The versions are, I believe, just to adapt the Biblical VOCABULARY for the world to understand (i.e. Shakespearean english is very hard to understand for most people, so they translated it to simplified english), not to change the meaning.. When he said "Not in my Bible" for 1 Corinthians, I asked this: in which true (things are being edited out) Bible did God not originally say all of those things about love (love is what is meant by charity) in the first place? If ya'll don't know what verses say, ask the Holy Spirit!
Take that Hillsong! 😂😂😂
Not sure if these people should be worship leaders... I'm not perfect but for someone who leads others in worship you'd think they know 1 Corinthians 13...
02:24 That's the passage about love... Passion music? Perhaps the 'Charity' reference threw them off, but KJV readers would have caught it, for sure.
He must be reading the wrong Bible.
I grew up with the KJV. Not the NKJV. The KJV. I love it. It is so poetic and majestic. The new versions just don't have it.
As an English Writing major from a Christian college, was cringing the whole way through this... 🤣🤣
Take that Hillsong at the end though 🤣🤣🤣
Hahahh theyre so funny! Its good to have fun from time to time as Christians!
It's quite clear that these three know more about William Shakespeare than the Holy Bible. Very sad!
To be fair Shakespeare help write the KJV, he hid his name in Psalms 46. If you count 46 words down you will come to the word Shake, go to the bottom and skip selah and count 46 words up and you will come to the word spear. Very clever on his part. He was 46 years old at the time.
Why does he sound like that guard from elder scroll 😂😂
You have violated the law....
I got them all right. Also, how do you get the one about love/charity wrong? I didn't know exactly where it was, but I knew it was in Corinthians. And come on guys, I don't even read the King James Version, let alone Shakespeare.
is the last one Song of Solomon?
Thing is, however, but KJV and Shakespeare had pervasive influence on English language. A better quiz would be common phrases like "Nothing new under the sun" versus "heart of gold" versus "writing on the wall" versus "the be all and end all"
Heck there's four clues already. It'll be fun!
02:23 reveals they have not came across 1 Corinthians 13 on a different version. Or maybe the KJV version, that is
@kingskaleidoscope for the intro💕
English Cookie Monster on the scene @1:29!!
I was raised using the kjv Bible so they were easy for me
I got all but the last one correct. KJV is the best translation.
Definitely got all of them. I'm an AMP person myself but it's easy to spot Shakespeare. He sounds great but his words don't touch the soul like the Bible does.
Sad part people use to get perfect score Easley
Ah man I got all of them except the LAST ONE.
"Bugs Bunny?" LOL
Not so funny. This shows that some so-called great worship leaders doesn't read Bible. How sad it is!
At 2:24 they are like fingers cross 😂🤞 haaa shit wen they reliaze it's from the NKJV 1st corinthians 13 not again 🤣😁😂
0:05 Is this Kings Kaleidoscope!?
Yep!
Wow. This video is so sad. Disappointing to see supposed Christians not knowing the word of God and not even being able to tell the difference between shakespearean literature and the KJV.
Like do you read your bible at all? C’mon, 1 Corinthians 13. Like that was a joke. And mocking God’s word and reading it in such a condescending way like you don’t have basic English knowledge to distinguish what it’s saying or to even read it correctly. “I prefer my esv and niv.” Yeah, bible “versions” that leave out massive portions of scripture, verses and words God intended to have in the bible. Shows how vain your love for Christ is. This is quite infuriating actually.
I can only watch since I'm only reading "Alkitab Terjemahan Baru"...
:(
I have alkitab too! But i still mainly read NIV. Its okay as long as you're reading it constantly! 💪💪
Fun game! 👍 Got all answers,🙌 though not a kjv reader(niv, nlt, esv reader) ! 😉
I’m slightly shocked they didn’t know “The Love chapter.”😳😳😳🤣🤣