Absolutely YES I want to hear more of your AI stories !! This weekend I will get my husband to help me download ChatGPT or perhaps Co-Pilot and play a little
I think that the result was amazing and a little scary. Not the subject matter, but the fact that it could so blend ideas that were input with such amplified results. We may expect to be reading material in the future if not already that has more AI input than we could ever guess. I am curious, though, if I were to input your exact same material, would I get identical results to match yours, or would the storyline be different? I use CHATGPT occasionally to ask simple questions about things, and the results have been astounding. Almost to the point of being the definitive answer to my question.
@@douglasreynolds7903 I have a different story with nearly identical prompts. There are subtle differences but it is very much a like. Do it enough times and I bet a pattern would emerge.
Excellent video. As I told you & Allen, I use Chat for recipes, travel, etc. I use it much like Google with a personal assistant aspect that gives me an encouraging word when I need it as I am trying to reach my goals. AI has a certain specific way of writing that is very telling to a reader, editor, publisher. There are programs available that can detect patterns, punctuation, etc. My writing is fueled by my thoughts, emotions, feelings, and words. No outside Intelligence can ever create that. Full stop. The artistic harm it can do to artists, writers, and creatives is extremely damaging to careers and jobs. Most publishers, Indie and otherwise, have you sign documents stating that AI was never used for the writing, editing, etc. of the work being submitted - and that goodness for that!
I find this very interesting but not sure if I like this at all? I understand there’s some advantages but how can I trust writers now on this? How do I know if I’m reading from an author or a AI? This is going to spread like wildfire and it started from one person who brought it up ?😮 crazy how this is going to continue to happen. I have a writer friend that quit his job due to AI writing books and now he is a truck driver? I’m still working on understanding this stuff. My question is how do I even trust new writers to write their own books now ? Yes, they sign a waiver but there’s always a way to change things up and cheat the system? I’m sticking to my old classics now lol 😂 Great video Greg . I’m going to be much more careful now that I know what is out there .
Hi there! Your UA-cam channel is one of my favorites, and I always enjoy watching your videos. They're incredibly informative and have helped me learn a lot. However, I've noticed a few things that could be tweaked in your recent uploads. Looking forward to seeing more great content from you.
LOL Greg you are getting good with the teaser angle 😎 Interesting experiment and results with ChatGPT. Amazing how much AI is learning and adapting from humans. Authors may have reasons to be concerned 🤔😳
Lacks dramatic drive; still, though, pretty scary, not only good at aggregating the data, but at least giving the illusion it knows how to organize it. Good at set-up/background (b/c it's just intelligently copying from other sources), but actual scene building, with convincing internal motivation, outside those parameters, not so much. Fun to play with, though.
I stand by my first comment; it can't write a story but it can fake it. I did an experiment on my channel where I had it make a tbr list for Optimus Prime and Megatron (good v evil Transformers). It was hilarious. So, yes, do more!
Fascinating video, especially considering a horror i just read centred on the use of AI/CGI/algorithms within the film/tv industry. I think the more AI we see the better/more natural it will feel, but more homoginised it will be as it pulls from the most poular ideas and gwts more sources. Still some major ethical questions on the horizon though, and it replacing/replicating human creativity fortunately feels far away
There is a lot of tell, not much show in the AI story. Good writers have nothing to worry about, but bad writers maybe should… I would like to see the second video.
Might put Patterson out of work but I think most authors are safe. Again, it was the human that provided all the interesting ideas; the AI just plugged in passable prose. It didn't add any new wrinkles or interesting ideas.
Absolutely YES I want to hear more of your AI stories !! This weekend I will get my husband to help me download ChatGPT or perhaps Co-Pilot and play a little
I think that the result was amazing and a little scary. Not the subject matter, but the fact that it could so blend ideas that were input with such amplified results. We may expect to be reading material in the future if not already that has more AI input than we could ever guess. I am curious, though, if I were to input your exact same material, would I get identical results to match yours, or would the storyline be different? I use CHATGPT occasionally to ask simple questions about things, and the results have been astounding. Almost to the point of being the definitive answer to my question.
@@douglasreynolds7903 I have a different story with nearly identical prompts. There are subtle differences but it is very much a like. Do it enough times and I bet a pattern would emerge.
Excellent video.
As I told you & Allen, I use Chat for recipes, travel, etc. I use it much like Google with a personal assistant aspect that gives me an encouraging word when I need it as I am trying to reach my goals.
AI has a certain specific way of writing that is very telling to a reader, editor, publisher. There are programs available that can detect patterns, punctuation, etc.
My writing is fueled by my thoughts, emotions, feelings, and words. No outside Intelligence can ever create that. Full stop.
The artistic harm it can do to artists, writers, and creatives is extremely damaging to careers and jobs.
Most publishers, Indie and otherwise, have you sign documents stating that AI was never used for the writing, editing, etc. of the work being submitted - and that goodness for that!
@@M-J It’s no where near able to replace a good author but it can put out interesting interpretations of story ideas.
I find this very interesting but not sure if I like this at all? I understand there’s some advantages but how can I trust writers now on this? How do I know if I’m reading from an author or a AI? This is going to spread like wildfire and it started from one person who brought it up ?😮 crazy how this is going to continue to happen. I have a writer friend that quit his job due to AI writing books and now he is a truck driver? I’m still working on understanding this stuff. My question is how do I even trust new writers to write their own books now ? Yes, they sign a waiver but there’s always a way to change things up and cheat the system? I’m sticking to my old classics now lol 😂 Great video Greg . I’m going to be much more careful now that I know what is out there .
Hi there! Your UA-cam channel is one of my favorites, and I always enjoy watching your videos. They're incredibly informative and have helped me learn a lot. However, I've noticed a few things that could be tweaked in your recent uploads. Looking forward to seeing more great content from you.
Seems legit
LOL Greg you are getting good with the teaser angle 😎 Interesting experiment and results with ChatGPT. Amazing how much AI is learning and adapting from humans. Authors may have reasons to be concerned 🤔😳
Eventually readers will presented with a Turning type test. Read two stories: decide which was written by AI.
@@anotherbibliophilereads those results would be very interesting.
That was an _epic_ show, yeo weeks ago, w MJ, wasnt it? Great ideas here 🎉
🤗
@@M-J It be a record hard to beat.
@@anotherbibliophilereads 4 next time! 🤗
Honestly, it’s not bad! I am actually a little bit intrigued 😅
@@MyMessyBookshelf I see about putting out another story.
Ok this is a little unnerving. The second one wasn’t bad either but it is so strange to think about ai coming up with an ending as well. 😮
Lacks dramatic drive; still, though, pretty scary, not only good at aggregating the data, but at least giving the illusion it knows how to organize it. Good at set-up/background (b/c it's just intelligently copying from other sources), but actual scene building, with convincing internal motivation, outside those parameters, not so much. Fun to play with, though.
@@unstopitable AI is definitely surface level only, but it is sometimes creepily on target.
@@anotherbibliophilereads You hit the nail on the head: surface.
I stand by my first comment; it can't write a story but it can fake it. I did an experiment on my channel where I had it make a tbr list for Optimus Prime and Megatron (good v evil Transformers). It was hilarious. So, yes, do more!
@@noteworthyfiction today it can only fake it, but in 20 years, it might be able to make it.
@@anotherbibliophilereads supposedly, it only needs until about 2027, but we'll see.
Fascinating video, especially considering a horror i just read centred on the use of AI/CGI/algorithms within the film/tv industry. I think the more AI we see the better/more natural it will feel, but more homoginised it will be as it pulls from the most poular ideas and gwts more sources. Still some major ethical questions on the horizon though, and it replacing/replicating human creativity fortunately feels far away
There is a lot of tell, not much show in the AI story. Good writers have nothing to worry about, but bad writers maybe should…
I would like to see the second video.
@@bouquinsbooks Thanks Elisabeth. I’m finding it fascinating what AI does.
I'm going to watch the entire video, but my guess right now at 0:01 is no, but it can fake it really well.
Oh, now.... I did write a rather long comment on your video. But I think I've pressed a wrong button somewhere. Did you get it in your reactions box?
I don't see anything. I checked the "held for review" too.
Might put Patterson out of work but I think most authors are safe. Again, it was the human that provided all the interesting ideas; the AI just plugged in passable prose. It didn't add any new wrinkles or interesting ideas.
AI isn’t creative yet. Just following algorithms.