This clip was taken from the lecture titled: 'So, Who's Right?' which is available on the hikmah website. Don't forget to subscribe and share with others!
A lot of keyboard warriors on this comment section lol. A lot of people pointing at who wrong and who right. The question is how many of us got up for fajr salah? How many of us pray 5 times a day. How many people look after their neighbours?How many of us look after our parents in their old age? I think we should stop pointing at who wrong and who right and concentrate on ourselves.
@@Muwahid999 circumcisions, apostasy death pentalty for leaving islam peacefully, stoning adultress, forcing religon, forcing marriage, rape, following scholars blindly, following hadiths blindly when it clearly contradicts Quran, and so on,
@@billybonecollector7276no you can't? amateurs and ingenuine people overestimate themselves and truly competent people and those who are genuine underestimate their abilities, that's how the world works, not just humility in Islam. If a guy EVER claims he is humble or something like that, it's an instant sign that he definitely isn't. As for the Sheikh, he probably meant it not in ultimate terms but rather that he is kind and loving given the context he is talking in.
Brother Hassan Ali, I'm Alhamdulillah a Barelvi, Hanafi Sunni! But, I really enjoyed the comedy side of your speech, thoroughly enjoyable! I pray that Allah Subhaana Wata Aala gives you the best of both worlds and rid you of all ailments and problems that may be coming your way and May Allah Almighty keeps your faith safe and secure, and that Allah Subhaana Wata Aala keeps you successful in Here and in The Hereafter. Aameen Ya Rabbul Aalameen!
He doesn't discuss the main difference between sunni ( barelvi ) and deobandi . The blasphemous statement their elders made about the prophet peace be upon him and their belief that it is possible to for Allah to lie . Lying is a defect. Allah is free from defects - this is sunni aqeeda
Masha Allah, great words. We need scholar like Shaykh Hassan in both sides for unity. Deobadies and Bralvies can both unite and can do great work. So happy to hear Shaykh's words of wisdom.
Yes they can unite on falsehood n bida do not water down the Deen the man is telling you he is a deobandi he has made a choice already he Is a sectarian may Allah guide you
The best way is for these two groups never to exist. They both have issues and no I am not coming from a salafi angle. People from both sides of this fitna go to learn from Ahl al-Sunnah of the Arab world. Yet alas, they go back still saying "I'm a deobandi" etc.
@@motelamolefe8656 where has this sheikh watered down the deen? What bidah has he practiced? Give evidence for your lies brother. Insulting scholars isn't from the sunnah. Its not from islam to insult ulema. Fear Allah bro
I'm a Deobandie and i have to admit I LOVE U BRO!!! Just for the love u have for Allah (swt) for his Rasul (saw) and for his deen!!! May Allah grant u Jannat! AMEEN
“And hold fast to the Rope of Allah, and be not divided among yourselves” Quran 3:103 "As for those who divide their religion and break up into sects, thou hast no part in them in the least: their affair is with Allah: He will in the end tell them the truth of all that they did." Quran 6:159
i`m a bareilli. and you know what? i love this brother and i love you diobandy brothers when u talk like this. may allah guide us all. and shaykh hasan ali keep up the good work,may allah seal your place in paradise. YOU ARE A GOOD IMAM
*Dear People,* *All of you please do not have false allegations on Bareilvis* *First try and understand the Aqeedah from our Imams. The opinion never differ from the time of Sahaba till Imam Ahmed Raza Khan RA* Three Basic Believes of Bareilvis that most of the Deobandies do not Understand are 1⃣. PROPHET MUHAMMAD SWS WAS NOOR IN REALITY AND CAME TO THIS WORLD AS A BASHAR. AND IT IS KUFR TO SAY THAT PROPHET MUHAMMAD SWS IS NOT BASHAR. *EXPLANATION* IF IT IS SHIRK TO CALL ANYONE NOOR OTHER THAN ALLAH THEN WHAT ARE MALAAYIKA? NOOR OF MUHAMMAD SWS IS FROM NOOR OF ALLAH FOR SURE. THIS DOESN'T MEAN THAT A PART OF ALLAH WAS DETACHED OR CUT OR SEPARATED. THIS REQUIRES AWAKENING OF HEART TO UNDERSTAND, IN QURAN ALLAH SAYS THAT ALLAH BLEW FROM HIS ROOH IN ADAM THIS DOESNT MEAN PART OF ALLAH'S ROOH CAME IN ADAM. IMAM AHMED RAZA KHAN RA EXPLAINS THAT FROM THE FIRE OF BIG LOGS OF WOOD WHEN CANDEL IS TAKEN CLOSER IT GETS LIT. WHICH MEANS THE FIRE OF THE LOGS DIDNT GET REDUCED COZ A CANDLE WAS LIT BY ITS FIRE. BUT THE CANDLE LIGHT IS FROM THE FIRE THAT HELPED THE CANDLE TO BE LIT. THIS IS JUST AN EXAMPLE. 2⃣. ILMUL GHAIB OF RASOOL ALLAH SWS. NONE OF THE BAREILVIS SAY PROPHET MUHAMMAD SWS IS AALIMUL GHAIB. *EXPLANATION* FIRST WE ALL KNOW THAT THERE IS NOTHING HIDDEN FROM ALLAH SO TO CALL ALLAH AALIMUL GHAIB FROM THIS PERSPECTIVE IS WRONG. WHAT IS HIDDEN FROM THE CREATION IS GHAIB SO ALLAH CATEGORISES ILM INTO 2. 1 SHAHDA WHICH CREATIONS KNOW AND 2 GHAIB THAT IS HIDDEN FROM CREATIONS. BUT TO ALLAH ITS JUST ILM. LIKE WISE WHAT ALLAH REVEALED TO MUHAMMAD SWS FROM THE GHAIB IS NOT ILMUL GHAIB TO RASOOL ALLAH SWS ANY MORE. BUT FROM GHAIB THOSE THINGS WHICH RASOOL ALLAH SWS DIDNT REVEAL TO US IS STILL ILMUL GHAIB FOR US. SO WHEN WE SAY RASOOL ALLAH SWS HAS ILMUL GHAIB IT MEANS NOT FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF ALLAH BUT US. WHEN WE COMPARE ILM OF ALLAH AND HIS RASOOL SWS AND OTHERS IT GOES LIKE THIS: THE ENTIRE ILM OF ALL THE CREATIONS INCLUDING PROPHETS AND MALAYIKA AND ALL CREATIONS IS LIKE A DROP OF WATER IN FRONT OF THE OCEAN OF ILM OF RASOOL ALLAH SWS. *AND THE TOTAL ILM OF RASOOL ALLAH SWS IN FRONT OF ALLAH'S ILM IS NOT EVEN A DROP OF WATER IN FRONT OF THE OCEAN OF ILM OF ALLAH.* 3⃣. Hazir and Nazir: We Bareilvis do not say RASOOL Allah sws is not physically present everywhere. Nor we believe that Rasool Allah sws is aware of everything happening everywhere and every second. But we believe If Rasool Allah wants to know anything He can know by Allah Subhanahutala. Physically Rasool Allah sws is in his grave Alone and spritually Rooh e muhammad is in every living being. This topic needs lengthy explanation and everything is by Izn of Allah and by Allah. Not by self. Try to contact our Learned Imam's for clarifications before misquoting or before labeling us with false allegations. I am sure few of the things i mentioned may not be clear yet. But we have enough proofs from quran and hadees to prove our aqeedah.
On the subject of desires, I notice that when I pointed out (on your video entitled ‘The Impermissibilty Of Having Organized Debates) that your misleading claim that “EVERYONE who got misguided got misguided because they began to debate” was an exaggeration, you refused to post my comment. But when I pandered to your ego and commented (under a different name as a ruse to test your sincerity for the truth) “Thank you Brother. This is amazing. Very informative.” - you posted it within one hour!
Salaam bro, I also advise all the Gosia brothers to listen to the Tablighi brothers too and you will see that we are all trying to do the same thing. May Allah swt unite the ummah. Ameen
Subhanallah, ul Aziz,.. I added comment just with the starting of tour lafz,. I was literally fed ,and used to make dua just, to gain the true ilm. People arose into fight and conflict. This video is a relief ,one
I have daman of Aalahazrat And Aalahazrat greatest scholar of Islam he against shirk and bidat They showed us the same belief that ranged from ummat k Akabreen to the sahaba e keram rizwanallaho majmaeen
On the subject of desires, I noted that when I pointed out (on MusliVlogGuy’s video entitled ‘The Impermissibilty Of Having Organized Debates) that his misleading claim that “EVERYONE who got misguided got misguided because they began to debate” was an exaggeration, he refused to post my comment. But when I pandered to his ego & commented (under a different name as a ruse to test his sincerity for the truth) “Thank you Brother. This is amazing. Very informative.” - he posted it within one hour!
I go to a local Pakistani mosque which I have been going since moved to this place 16years ago. And this is a Brelvi/Sufi mosque but all are welcome, and many types pray too, it's all friendly. I am neither Brelvi or Sufi nor deonand. I am a Muslim, I follow Quran and Sunnah, which is the most important to try practice as best. May Allah guide us. Ameen.
Is'nt ,The religion (Islam) easy?..Ofcourse.But seeing these division and issues one thinks this is very complex and tough. .....Also this makes the Enemies Happy....Can't we forget these division?...Can we follow no other script rather than Quran and Sahih hadiths?...Can't we unite together under the banner 'Ummathi Muhammed rasoolullah'?please....That would be nice and peaceful..
Islam came to unite and not to divide. My urge is that for sake of ALLAH, please pray for our Muslim brothers and sisters in need all over the world. AMEEN.
Especially for the younger generation... We will lose them with all this in- fighting. We need to teach people to b accepting n tolerant. Thank you brother.
I am a Barelvi and I watch "Madani Channel" a lot. They have never said that Prophet Muhammad صلی اللہ علیہ وسلم has the knowledge of unseen just like Allah. We believe that he has knowledge of unseen as much Allah has given to him and the knowledge of unseen that Prophet Muhammad صلی اللہ علیہ وسلم has is like as a piece of sand in the whole desert if it is compared to the knowledge of Allah. And Allah has his own knowledge and Muhammad's صلی اللہ علیہ وسلم knowledge is granted by Allah. I I think as much you go to the main and known Ulama kiraam, you will find very little differences. But when you go to the local molvi, there you will find a lot of differences.
Alhamdullilah I to agree!! Also Barelvi moulanas and literature never says those who do NOT celebrate Milad-un-Nabi are miss-guided or Kafir or anything which unfortunately some Barelvis and Deobandis claim. Love for Allah and Muhammad Salallahu-Alaihu-wa-sallam is left to a persons heart.
Naudubilla! If a brother is doing a bid'ah and you allow him to continue to do it? As a responsible muslim it is your duty to guide the brother. You can't compromise by saying let him be attached with the deen with bid'ah. The Messenger of Allaah (sallallaahu alaihi wasallam) said: "Every innovation is misguidance and going astray" Reported by Abu Daawood (no. 4607), at-Tirmidhee (no. 2676) and it is saheeh. Ibn Hajr authenticated it Takhreej Ahaadeeth Ibn ul-Haajib (1/137).
Suheeb Ahmed Hadhrat Umar Radhiallah u anhu when he saw Trawih prayer he said "Nimal Bidatu haza (What a beutiful bidaat is it.)". Some time bidaat is Haram but some time it becomes a necessity. Like decorating mosques. Using loudspeakers, constructing Darul uloom, Darse-Nizami, Printing press and so on. Haram is when it is replacing the Sunnah and harming the religion and necessary is when it is supporting the religion.
Julia Nestler Hadhrat Umar radiallahnahu did not invent the tarawahi by himself. Our beloved Prophet (peace be upon him) led the tarawahi prayers for couple of days and stopped it. Why did he stop? I will let you figure that out. Why did Hadrat Umar RA called it a good bidah? I let you figure that out. I have give you enough clues already. Using loudspeakers or any modern means that can help umma to spread the message of Islam is permissible. Using it for entertainment is not advised. What I am saying is if you find a brother who is going against the principles (listening to any songs, music, wrong guidance), then guide him. Listening to a sermon in a masajid on a speak is permissible, listening to Qur'an in mobile is permissible. Watching movies and dance is NOT. Hope I clarified.
***** 1st understand what is bid'ah. You cannot add anything new to Islam nor you can take anything out of it. And Islam was completely established when our Prophet was alive and Allah himself mentions in glorious Qur'an. Any source where you can expand your knowledge and help Islam prosper and help you grow in a halal way it is permissible. You introduce any new inventions in Islam which was not established by the Prophet (peace be upon him) and not followed by the Sahaba it is not permissible. Who goes to hell and heaven is only decided by Allah Subhanahu Ta'ala. You or me cannot decide on that. And last but not the least. You have to ponder and reflect on Qur'an not just read. May Allah guide us all. Ameen!
***** Brother in Islam. Islam cannot be understood without Sunnah. For e.g., How may rakas one should pray in 5 times prayer is not mentioned in Qur'an. Like wise ruku, sajood, qiyaam, takbeer... all are the teaching of Prophet (peace be upon him). And the Prophet (pbuh) never said anything by his own but what was revealed to him from Allah Subhanahu Ta'aala. A Muslim is incomplete with Sunnah (sayings, doings, practice) of the Prophet ONLY. There is so much what the Prophet(pbuh) thought us which is not there in Qur'an but conveyed us through our Prophet! Qur'an and Sunnah makes a Muslim a Muslim. Else he is misguided. May Allah guide us all. ***** Jazakum Allahu Khairun brother. Baarakallahu Feeq! May Allah increase your knowledge. Ameen!
I do not know what all these sects are; Deobandi, Brelvis, Salafis, Shi'ites etc. All I know is that you must follow the teachings of the Qur'an and the Sunnah of the prophet (s.a.w). That requirement is more than enough for a muslim. You do not need to go to these weird extents where you start performing inhumane activities such as spazzing out on the floor and whacking yourself to death. Our prophet (s.a.w) is the most perfect and the greatest creation of Allah. He had the most beautiful, amazing character and personality.we should follow his basic way of life as an example to ours. Would our holy prophet (s.a.w) do such thing or even advise you to do such? My respected brothers and sisters, please take this information into consideration. i pray only to Allah (s.w.t) to help us muslims to stop creating segregation within the muslim ummah by fighting amongst each other and instead learn to have love for one another, to bring the Muslim ummah together as one. so we can stand together as one on the day of reckoning. Laa ilaa ha illallah hu muhammad ur rasoolullah ameen
Everyone except the Qur'anists know that you have to follow the Sunnah of the Rasul (PBUH) and Everyone within the scope of Sunni Islam (Ahl us-Sunnah wa'l-Jama`ah ) tries to do just that. The only issue comes when certain groups or people try to claim the following of the Sunnah for themselves alone. Aside from them, there are various Schools of Jurispudence and Schools of Thought and Schools of Methodology. There's a lot of ambiguity in several questions within the the sources of the Sunnah do it's only natural for it to be so much differences of opinions. That said, one can't claim to follow the Sunnah perfectly follow the Sunnah alone, especially if they forget to consider how vaste the religion of Islam is. Even within all the hadiths that we know are Sahih you'll find differences. Keep that in mind. Just stay away from those who love division and/or fitnah. Try to follow the Sunnah but try to be with the Jama`ah.
Also one more thing. Rastafari culture has nothing to do with Islam and it all comes from a religion raiden with shirk and superstition. They worship the late Ethiopian Emperor Haile Selassie thinking that he is the Jesus (PBUH) re-incarnated (wa iyadhu billah) and because of this it is not wise for us to emulate them in style or behaviour.
The scholars of the Standing Committee for Issuing Fatwas were asked: There is a certain group in Pakistan that is called the Bareilawis or the Nawaari group, named after their current leader who is known as Nawaari. I asked you for the shar‘i ruling concerning them and their beliefs, and praying behind them, so that this may bring peace of mind to many people who do not know the truth about them. And once again, I would like to ask you about some of their myths and widespread beliefs: 1. The belief that the Messenger (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) is alive 2. The belief that the Messenger (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) is present and can see what is happening, especially immediately after Jumu‘ah prayer. 3. The belief that the Messenger (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) will definitely intercede for them. 4. They believe in the awliya’ (“saints”) and the occupants of graves, and they pray at their graves and ask them to meet their needs. 5. They build domes over graves and put lights in them. 6. They are known to say “Ya Rasool, Ya Muhammad (O Messenger, O Muhammad) (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him). 7. They get angry with the one who says Ameen out loud and raises his hands when praying, and they regard him as a Wahhaabi. 8. They find it very strange when the siwaak is used at the time of prayer. 9. They kiss their fingers during wudoo’, at the time of the adhaan, and after prayer. 10. Their imam always recites the verse “Allah sends His Salat (Graces, Honours, Blessings, Mercy, etc.) on the Prophet (Muhammad ) and also His angels too (ask Allah to bless and forgive him)” [al-Ahzaab 33:56] after prayer, then all the worshippers send blessings upon the Prophet in unison and loudly. 11. They gather in circles after Jumu‘ah prayer, standing, reciting and reciting poetry in praise of the Prophet (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) loudly. 12. After completing the recitation of the Holy Qur’an in Taraweeh prayer in Ramadan, they make a great deal of food and distribute it in the forecourt of the mosque, as well as sweets. 13. They build mosques and adorn them elaborately, and they write over the mihraab “Ya Muhammad (O Muhammad)”. 14. They regard themselves as followers of the Sunnah and correct ‘aqeedah (belief), and think that others are in the wrong. What is the shar‘i ruling on praying behind them? They replied: It is not permissible to pray behind one who is like this, and if one who knows that the belief of the imam is like that prays behind him, his prayer is invalid, because most of the things listed are characteristics of kufr (disbelief) and bid‘ah (innovation) that are contrary to the Tawheed (affirmation of the Oneness of Allah) with which Allah sent His Messengers and which He revealed in His Books. It is contrary to the clear meaning of the Qur’an, such as the verses in which Allah, may He be exalted, says (interpretation of the meaning): “Verily, you (O Muhammad ) will die and verily, they (too) will die” [az-Zumar 39:30] and “And the mosques are for Allah (Alone), so invoke not anyone along with Allah” [al-Jinn 72:18]. The innovations that they do should be denounced in a gentle way; if they accept it then praise be to Allah. If they do not accept it, then shun them and pray in the mosques of Ahl as-Sunnah. We have a good example in the Close Friend (Khaleel) of the Most Merciful, as Allah tells us he said (interpretation of the meaning): “And I shall turn away from you and from those whom you invoke besides Allah. And I shall call on my Lord; and I hope that I shall not be unblest in my invocation to my Lord” [Maryam 19:48]. End quote from Fataawa al-Lajnah ad-Daa’imah, 2/396-398
without the scholars you shall be misguided. the scholars are from he salaf. Its ironic that they tell you not to follow hanafi shafi madhabs etc but want you to blindly follow salafism loool hypocrites.
al-Imam ibn Hajar al-Asqalani, quoted by Imam Jalaluddin al-Suyuti explicitly said that (despite not being practiced in the first three hundred years of Islam) if one takes care not to do things which contravene the sharia (such as free mixing and the like), then it is absolutely permissible to celebrate the mawlid. Anyone is free to say otherwise, but the issue was examined in details by these giants, when the issue was first discussed, and this is their ruling. Finito.
@Gaalkacyo Pirate actually that's not quite the point. But ok, let's look at it from that point of view: - ibn hajar, muhaddith, and author of many books on hadith including fath al-bari says permissible and; - gaalkacyo pirate says impermissible Hmm. Who should I listen to?
@Gaalkacyo Pirate so firstly you say not to listen to you, that you are nobody, then you quote a hadith and expect me to listen to you? Do you think ibn hajar was unaware of this hadith? He was referred to "amir al-Mumineen" in ulum al-hadith. You, an unqualified nobody, are deriving a ruling from the hadith. This is laughable really. Any pirate can quote hadith and give a judgement. I will stick to the established scholars fatawa over pirate fatawa any day. Again my choice is do I listen to a great muhaddith or a pirate? I'll take ibn hajar thanks.
@@tazboy1934 we dont reject any other scholars after the Sahaba, we have scholars like shaykh albani, Shaikh bin baz, shaykh ibn uthaymeen, shaykh othman al khamees etc.
I used to like this sheikh when I was new to the deen and trying to escape jahiliyyah! He is responsible if he misguides the people! It is vital that we identify the people of bidah! One side of my family are Barelwi, the other Deobandi. Barelwi has elements of shirk which can remove a person from the Deen, whilst Deobandi has elements of Bidah! Guide the people! Don't tell them what they want to hear, tell the them haq, the truth! Salaam!
Yes thats true ,the truth is the truth whether u like it or not ,thats not my problem ,if u dont like the truth then its ur problem. I can tell u one thing though ,the barelvis and the deobandis are one ,the differences they have are minute ,and often they have different opinions and both of them opinions are wrong...
he is typical najdi making accusation without proof, if they are a new sect rpove we follow other than the books of ahlus sunnah wal jammah! he has hidden in the Aticq
I'm not trying to be rude but Add to dictionary and Add to dictionary are not really sect. they both follow the Hannafi fique. they are institutions. its like if you go to university and graduate and you called a certain name. theey both have some bad literature and they both accept it. Also the starter of the school of disband has said to have a family tree which goes back to umar ra.
Wait so ur a deobandi yh wy do your imams say that taking pictures is haram and then same guys are on tv now and if you don't believe me it's on the official website for deobandies and btw to claim something is haram it has to be proven in hadith or Quran u guys claim everything to be haram and biddah just like the mowlid and there is no evidence to prove it's haram
Shaikh Asrar Rashid is the man you need. He’s working on this like you. Both of you together and Abu Aaliyah with Abdur-Rahman Yusaf can sort this out. We need it badly. Jzkl
Deobandis are FAR more better in terms of aqeedah, whereas the Brelvis are just 2-bit Hindus, khalas. The Deobandis were initially formed to resist Hindu culture in the subcontinent whereas the Brelvi just reinforce that, yet they don't know it. This is coming from a unbiased perspective. You need to look at the mehfils, jaloos, milad's to know that these Brelvi gatherings have similarities with the Sikh and Hindu religion, which is not surprising as Barelvism started in a North Indian city (Uttar Pradesh). We should follow the Quran and Sunnah and get away from these subcontinental versions of Islam.
I agree with you akhi. I myself follow the manhaj of the salaf. But deobandis are much closer to the haqq than the barelwi, some of whom may even be kuffar due to shirk. Allahu alam
Mashalla, May Allah bless you for your words, these people are clear on path of bidah and leading to kuffr and shirk. Deoband reject all this yet are true Ahle Sunnah wal jammah
Qur'an states: وَمَا أَرْسَلْنَا مِن رَّسُولٍ إِلَّا لِيُطَاعَ بِإِذْنِ اللَّهِ ۚ وَلَوْ أَنَّهُمْ إِذ ظَّلَمُوا أَنفُسَهُمْ جَاءُوكَ فَاسْتَغْفَرُوا اللَّهَوَاسْتَغْفَرَ لَهُمُ الرَّسُولُ لَوَجَدُوا اللَّهَ تَوَّابًا رَّحِيمًا Translation: We sent not the Messenger, but to be obeyed, in accordance with the will of Allah. If they had only, when they were unjust to themselves, come to the Messenger and asked Allah's forgiveness, and the Messenger had (also) asked forgiveness for them, they would have found Allah indeed Oft-returning, Most Merciful.(Al-Qur'an, Surah an-Nisa, 4:64) This is a direct Divine order to seek intercession of Prophet Muhammad (Peace be upon him) and this verse is Mutlaq (not restricted to any time). None of the classical commentators of Qur'an said that it only applied to the Physical Hayat (life) of Prophet (Peace be upon him) as falsely asserted by people of Bidah (Salafis/Wahabis/Ghayr Muqalideen/Quranites/Najdis/Khawarij/Takfiri etc...). Before citing many commentaries of Qur'an we would like to present a logical rhetoric question and then provide an answer: Question: When Allah is most Qarib (close) then why does He not say: Ask me in your houses and I will answer you? Why does He put the condition of going to Prophet (Peace be upon him)? Answer: If the deniers of Tawassul understand this point then In shaa' Allah this article shall be a source of guidance to them and their generations to come. This verse proves from the Nass (categorical proof) of Qur'an that Tawassul in sight of Allah is an approach which He likes & prescribes. Please remember that we as Ahlus Sunnah consider both the ways to be right i.e. a) Asking Allah without an intermediary. b) And also asking Allah through an intermediary.
@@dinoverdunya1741 yes All your the Hadith which your scholars considered Sahih contained shirk, Ma Sha Allah. Ibn Kathir As Subki Imam Nawawi Ibn Hajr Al Haythami Al Ghazali Al Bayhaqi Al Iraqi Ibn Fauraq List is never ending They all authenticated shirk according to your stupid mindset.
*Dear People,* *All of you please do not have false allegations on Bareilvis* *First try and understand the Aqeedah from our Imams. The opinion never differ from the time of Sahaba till Imam Ahmed Raza Khan RA* Three Basic Believes of Bareilvis that most of the Deobandies do not Understand are 1⃣. PROPHET MUHAMMAD SWS WAS NOOR IN REALITY AND CAME TO THIS WORLD AS A BASHAR. AND IT IS KUFR TO SAY THAT PROPHET MUHAMMAD SWS IS NOT BASHAR. *EXPLANATION* IF IT IS SHIRK TO CALL ANYONE NOOR OTHER THAN ALLAH THEN WHAT ARE MALAAYIKA? NOOR OF MUHAMMAD SWS IS FROM NOOR OF ALLAH FOR SURE. THIS DOESN'T MEAN THAT A PART OF ALLAH WAS DETACHED OR CUT OR SEPARATED. THIS REQUIRES AWAKENING OF HEART TO UNDERSTAND, IN QURAN ALLAH SAYS THAT ALLAH BLEW FROM HIS ROOH IN ADAM THIS DOESNT MEAN PART OF ALLAH'S ROOH CAME IN ADAM. IMAM AHMED RAZA KHAN RA EXPLAINS THAT FROM THE FIRE OF BIG LOGS OF WOOD WHEN CANDEL IS TAKEN CLOSER IT GETS LIT. WHICH MEANS THE FIRE OF THE LOGS DIDNT GET REDUCED COZ A CANDLE WAS LIT BY ITS FIRE. BUT THE CANDLE LIGHT IS FROM THE FIRE THAT HELPED THE CANDLE TO BE LIT. THIS IS JUST AN EXAMPLE. 2⃣. ILMUL GHAIB OF RASOOL ALLAH SWS. NONE OF THE BAREILVIS SAY PROPHET MUHAMMAD SWS IS AALIMUL GHAIB. *EXPLANATION* FIRST WE ALL KNOW THAT THERE IS NOTHING HIDDEN FROM ALLAH SO TO CALL ALLAH AALIMUL GHAIB FROM THIS PERSPECTIVE IS WRONG. WHAT IS HIDDEN FROM THE CREATION IS GHAIB SO ALLAH CATEGORISES ILM INTO 2. 1 SHAHDA WHICH CREATIONS KNOW AND 2 GHAIB THAT IS HIDDEN FROM CREATIONS. BUT TO ALLAH ITS JUST ILM. LIKE WISE WHAT ALLAH REVEALED TO MUHAMMAD SWS FROM THE GHAIB IS NOT ILMUL GHAIB TO RASOOL ALLAH SWS ANY MORE. BUT FROM GHAIB THOSE THINGS WHICH RASOOL ALLAH SWS DIDNT REVEAL TO US IS STILL ILMUL GHAIB FOR US. SO WHEN WE SAY RASOOL ALLAH SWS HAS ILMUL GHAIB IT MEANS NOT FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF ALLAH BUT US. WHEN WE COMPARE ILM OF ALLAH AND HIS RASOOL SWS AND OTHERS IT GOES LIKE THIS: THE ENTIRE ILM OF ALL THE CREATIONS INCLUDING PROPHETS AND MALAYIKA AND ALL CREATIONS IS LIKE A DROP OF WATER IN FRONT OF THE OCEAN OF ILM OF RASOOL ALLAH SWS. *AND THE TOTAL ILM OF RASOOL ALLAH SWS IN FRONT OF ALLAH'S ILM IS NOT EVEN A DROP OF WATER IN FRONT OF THE OCEAN OF ILM OF ALLAH.* 3⃣. Hazir and Nazir: We Bareilvis do not say RASOOL Allah sws is not physically present everywhere. Nor we believe that Rasool Allah sws is aware of everything happening everywhere and every second. But we believe If Rasool Allah wants to know anything He can know by Allah Subhanahutala. Physically Rasool Allah sws is in his grave Alone and spritually Rooh e muhammad is in every living being. This topic needs lengthy explanation and everything is by Izn of Allah and by Allah. Not by self. Try to contact our Learned Imam's for clarifications before misquoting or before labeling us with false allegations. I am sure few of the things i mentioned may not be clear yet. But we have enough proofs from quran and hadees to prove our aqeedah.
barelvi say allah came in form of rasoolullah Astagfirullah and deobandi are just as silly because deobandi believe imam hussein is alive performing hajj Astagfirullah
+ALI Azar Deobandi story-He says, “I (me the narrator) said your female servant narrates from the female Saint that once my nephew came to Hajj and the ship was almost destroyed. In such a helpless state he saw in his dream that Haajee (Imdaadullah) Saahib from one side and Hafiz Jeauw from the other side were shouldering the ship out of trouble. In the morning we found the ship had reached its destination safely after journeying for two days. He said “How did I know?” If the real helper was Allaah and how astonishing it would be if this were true. He relieves the problems of other himself by appearing in the cloak of others and it this gets attributed to me and you.” (Shamaa’im Imdaadiyyah pg.100---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Reas the last line. ALLAH APPEARING IN THE CLOAK OF OTHERS.(naouz billah)
Shaykh Ibn ‘Uthaymeen (may Allah have mercy on him) was asked: What is the ruling on praying behind an imam from the Bareilawi sect, who believes that the Prophet (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) is alive and present and can see us? He replied: If they believe that, then they have gone against ijmaa‘ (consensus of the ummah), and if they seek his help, then that is shirk, so it is not permissible to pray behind them. End quote. Thamaraat at-Tadween, p. 8
Mr M.A you know an imam said Prophet is alive...........but you know what everyone know he is in barzakhi life.......don't believe just in one imam I know many barelvis who believe right but imams of other sect misinterpret just like sheikh said
I'm a Hanfi Barelvi Muslim Alhmdulillah.. Devobandis are gumrah by their sheikh nanotvi, thanvi, Gangoi.. Thanvi compare the knowledge of seen of Rasool'Allah(pbuh) to mad people, to child, to chamar Maaz'Allah, Gangoi writes in his book that Allah can speak Lie Maaz'Allah Nanotvi didn't say anything about Mirza Ahmad Qadyani.. And he tells many things about last prophet issues The Mujaddid of 14th century Imam e Ahle Sunnat who's also known as A'ala Hazrat who's name is Imam Ahmad Raza Khan Barelvi (R.A) and 11 scholars of Hijza(sudia Arab) gave fatwa of Kufr
Ask yourself, "deobandi", "berelwi", are these names the prophet alayhi salaam spoke of? Are these names the sahaba and the tabi3een used to describe the actions of the prophet alayhi salaam or was it something they even knew? This is all fabricated and innovated and added to our religion which was already complete. Fear Allah, be sincere and don't blindly follow your parent's/elders/local masjid's corrupt belief system. Go back to the Qur'an and sunnah and question the stupid beliefs mentioned in this video.
Yeah Quran and Sunnah , you talk like it's so easy ! Do you know what you are talking about ? It's that Quran and Sunnah which scholars spend years and years on , and yet they don't complete. You are trying to imply that we open Quran and Sahih Bukhari by ourselves and don't need Imams ? Pls re consider .Ulama of Deobandis don't call themselves that . They are Ahul Sunnah Wal jamah . It's just a name that has been given people . They are not a sect. Majority follow the hanafi madhab and Alhamdulillah are free from Bidah and innovation . They do Dawah and Tabligh for the sake of Allah and try to follow Sunnah practically . There is no takfir , calling others kafir here . We need Imams for learning Quran and Sunnah .Pls get that clear. Also we cannot go fatwa shopping and choosing whatever we feel like . If it's Hanafi stick tot that, if Hanbali then stick to only that . That is our Deen . And all of them are on the right path since they only differ in Masail and not Aqeedah and Iman.They are not sects.
Who will teach you Quran and sunnah? What is the certification my brother....how can you say the person teaching you is qualified to teach you... grow up brother, learn your history. The main 4 schools have not gained followers blindly... they are the source of learning as they teach and derive rulings from Quran and sunnah and Ijma of Sahaba...Tabiheen.... forget and stop being google mufti ... follow Madhab.... certainly you can ask questions and find clarification if you wish so... read the biographies of 4 schools teachers .. Insha Allah you will find your answers
He starts, "theres only three problems", what!!!! Even if there was one disrespectful thing said about The Prophet (sallAllahu alihi wa sallam) it is enough for muslims to break ties with such people. Just imagine someone used foul language at this guys mother... I guarantee he wouldnt say "aah theres only one small issue between us!!" but here all of sudden he has to become soft Shame on these masked deobandis!!!!!! wal i'yaadhu biLLah min sharrihim
@@go10965videos they all oppose the authentic teaching of what Allah revealed in one way or another, following the scholars of their sects interpretations based upon many weak hadith or false rational, exactly the same way as the jews and christians fell into misguidance breaking away from the authentic message into multiple heretic fractions
maulana barelvis say that Prophet has knowledge of unseen Whatever Allah has given to him.. but deobandis say that we can't use word knowledge of unseen to the prophet becoz it may be partial or may be any thing Allah has given to him
Both of them are two sides of the same coin, the difference is mawlid and each side had their own set of scholars. Both of them are sufis ash'aris, deviated from the straight path.
@@MK-wf1eg What contemporary scholars ??? I won't use anyone in the past 1000 years. You prove your Ashari/Maturidi/Sufi Aqeedah from the Salaf and I will do the same In'sha Allah.
The Sunnis and Shias have many things and beliefs in common. Not all Shias hold corrupt beliefs. Read our History and also examine our sources which both are agreed upon by Sunnis and Shias. However, it is the Deobandi school who were Sunnis going back 200 years who then were influenced by Wahabi ideology propagated from Saudi Arabia. That was the biggest problem. Otherwise Waseela and many topics regarding the Prophet sallahu alaihi was aalihi wasalam were accepted in light of evidence from the primary sources such as the Quran and Sunnah.
This guy is a ghair muqalid imam ahmad Raza khan research was same as the previous mujadids and he was declared as ala Hazrat in front of 100 allama arab
Ibn 'Umar reported that a person asked Allaah's Messenger (sallAllaahu alayhi wa sallam) as he was sitting on the pulpit about the eating of the lizard, whereupon he said: I neither eat it, nor do I prohibit it.
This is a true problem with some barelvis mullahs. They have incorrect aqeedah, they have misunderstood waseela and for some reason dispise the Salafis but are quite close with the rafidas. Even though the rafidas are enemies of many sahaba!
Since YOU equated the Deobandis & Barelvis with Urine & Feces then it's safe for us to EQUATE THE SALAFIYYAH WITH MANI (sperm), HAIDH (menses) AND NIFAAS (blood discharged after childbirth) making you AND your ilk of ghair-muqalideen of the HADATHE AKBAR category, so with that being said we NOW know WHO's the MOST impure, debased, & adulterated out of the 3
***** Ibn Khairudeen It is not right to slander Muslims with such abusive language according to the teachings of the Quran. The Quran teaches us Tawheed and to have good manners. I myself reject barelvis since some of their writings have incorrect Aqeedah and some have misused the concept of waseela. But there needs to be academic discussion on this.
Moyna Khan why isn't it not enough to just follow what our pious predecessors (salaf-as-saliheen) were upon? Imam Malik said, "The last generations of this Ummah can only be reformed by that which reformed its first generations. What was not part of the religion then cannot become part of the religion now". This statement cannot be anymore true. The Prophet (saw) warned us about innovations and told us to stick to his Sunnah and the Sunnah of his companions diligently. This will be the saved group. DO NOT be fooled by large numbers. Know the Aqeedah of the people you follow before commiting yourself to their sect. Deobandis and barelvis are known to have questionable aspects in their school of thought pertaining to shirk and kufr. The saved group in reality has no name nor is it a new group. The Prophet (saw) did not give this particularly sect a name. So in all surety, we can only follow what the Prophet (saw) and his companions instructed us to follow and anything more or less is misguidance. (The Prophet (saw) was made from noor? He got sick, he bled, he ate, and he died, may peace be upon him. He was a normal person but he was indeed elevated higher than any creation past, present or future, and will always be. He forbade people, after his death, to exaggerate things about him.)
Moyna Khan Following the pious predecessors is a must to keep Islam strong. If everyone just followed their own beliefs where would Islam be? In a hadith, Abdullah ibn Mas’ud reported: The Prophet, sallahu alayhi wasallam, said, “The best people are those of my generation (Sahabah), then those who come after them (Tabi'een), then those who come after them (Tabi' at-tabieen). Then, there will come people after them whose testimony precedes their oaths and their oaths precede their testimony.” If want to follow the best of the best then look no further than the companions and those who followed them, and those who followed them. IT IS NOT MY OPINION. I am giving the evidence and you are still denying the truth. Isn't this just ignorance? Why are you out casting a group of people based on a small extremist minority? Do you understand the whole concept of the salaf? If you don't then you have no right to make any remarks. You misguide yourself and misguide others. You quoted the hadith on shirk and materialism. Could you provide the full hadith and where one can find it? But going from your statement, this DOES NOT PERMIT someone to commit blatant shirk on any level, major or minor, as it clearly states in the Qur'an. Again, why are you basing your claims on a small group of people to an entire country or middle-eastern region? What have you got against Arabs? They don't all have the same mindset. What has competition got to do with shirk? Explain what you mean. Do you even know the concept of shirk? From your comments after quoting the hadith, you seem to have trouble grasping what shirk is. I don't want to make assumptions but a reality we face today is that people seem to follow their sheikhs, muftis, maulanas, maulvis, imaams, etc BLINDLY and the fact that their culture comes along with it. You feel that you will be an outcast by rejecting the beliefs of the land you come from. By going with this, one is commiting shirk because you are preferring your teachers and your country without question over the truth, as in Allah and His Messenger (saw). ---------------------------------------------------------------- Tell me where is says directly that the Prophet (saw) was/is noor from the Qur'an and authentic sunnah. Your own belief is WORTHLES if it isn't backed up by evidence from the Qur'an and Sunnah. The Quran states: “Say (O Muhammad): I am only a man like you. It has been revealed to me that your Ilaah (God) is One Ilaah (God i.e. Allaah)” [al-Kahf 18:110] What you are doing is overstepping what the Qur'an says. This is also blatant shirk as well. It is not permissible to describe him (saw) as being noor (light) or as casting no shadow, or to say that he was created from light. Rather this is a kind of exaggeration which like I said the Prophet (saw) forbade when he said: “Do not exaggerate about me as was exaggerated about ‘Eesa (Jesus) ibn Maryam. Say: the slave of Allaah and His Messenger.” Narrated by al-Bukhaari, 6830. Another point is what then makes you different from the Christians who exaggerate about Eesa (Jesus) (alayhis salaam) when you describe the Prophet (saw) like you do? The Barelvis sect cannot be the saved sect if they think like this. It is the angels who are created from light. The Prophet (saw) said: “The angels were created from light, and Iblees (Shaytan) was created from smokeless fire, and Adam (peace be upon him) was created from what has been described to you.” Narrated by Muslim, 2996. However, there is a hadith that claims that he (saw) was first made from light - “The first thing that Allaah created was the light of your Prophet, O Jaabir” - but this is fabricated as in "someone made it up", and one cannot take his religion from fabricated narrations, or someone lying about the Prophet (saw) who said "Telling lies about me is not like telling lies about anyone else. Whoever tells lies about me deliberately, let him take his place in Hell.” Narrated by al-Bukhaari, 1229. Think about it carefully. If you actually think that the Prophet (saw) was made from noor or from the noor of Allah then you are going against the Qur'an and the Prophet (saw) himself, thus committing major shirk. The correct way of thinking in the sense that he (saw) brought the Revelation by which whoever Allah wills of His creation is guided. It's the LIGHT OF THE MESSAGE, not the Prophet (saw) himself. The Qur'an states: And thus We have sent to you (O Muhammad) Roohan (an Inspiration, and a Mercy) of Our Command. You knew not what is the Book, nor what is Faith? But We have made it (this Qur’aan) a LIGHT wherewith We guide whosoever of Our slaves We will. And verily, you (O Muhammad) are indeed guiding (mankind) to the Straight Path (i.e., Allaah’s religion of Islamic monotheism), --- [al-Shura 42:51-52]
Moyna Khan give me evidence for your Aqeedah. All you keep going on about is that we just follow what feel. That is completely false. What is protecting you from Shaytan? What makes you think that we can worship Allah in anyway we feel like? How does that make you any different from Hindus, Christians, mushriks? Islam is not a religion where you just choose what you feel is right and wrong, and follow what you want to follow. The person with weak Aqeedah in this discussion is the one who can't back up what he is claiming. I have given you evidence so you need to provide evidence for your beliefs.
Moyna Khan if you cannot explain to me or anybody your beliefs with evidence then why should anybody want to follow your particular way of Islam? It is not an exaggeration that we must go back to what the Prophet (saw) and his companions were upon. This will return the honour of Islam. Contemplate this. Abu Salamah, and Abu Huraira narrated: “The Prophet (saw) said: “My Ummah will face what bani Israel faced step by step, even if one of them approached his mother publicly (sexually) there will be one of my Ummah will approach his mother. The people of Israel divide into divided into 72 sects, my Ummah will divide into 73 sects, all of them are in the hellfire, and one of them is in paradise.” We asked “which one is saved?” the Prophet (saw) said: “the one that is on what Me and my companions are on today.”” [Sunan ibn Majah 3981, Kitab Al Fitan] The Prophet sallallaahu ‘alayhi wa sallam also said: “The Day of Judgment will not come until my Nation closely imitates the nations before them.” It was asked: “Like the Persians and Romans, Messenger of Allaah?” He sallallaahu ‘alayhi wa sallam replied: “Who are the nations (I could mean) except those?” (Bukhaari). This Ummah will face the same things the Bani Israel and nations before us faced. Then look at the last part. Only one group will be saved. That which he (saw) and his companions were upon. All these narrations are SAHEEH (authentic) as in the Prophet (saw) actually said them.
Discussions happen in Hinduism and Buddhism too..... But we don't kill each other.... We don't wage religious wars.... Muslims pl note...if humanity has to survive, then Islam and Christianity have to be discarded .
The important thing here is what Imam Ahmed Raza Khan believed in ........ he is the founder of the so called barelvi sect , so what others believe or Not does not matter. The Barelvi literature would be identified by there founder.
The problem here is people are resulting to mud slinging based on what they have been told. How many people have actually read the original mother books of the Barelvis and Deobandis. The real differences between the two are based on Aqeedah, Issues such as Noori Bashar, Hazar Nazar, Alimul Gayb, Mukhtar e Qul and differences over references found in both their books.
![So, Who's Right?: Q&A - Shaykh Hasan Ali [HD]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/Z6CD6zpUF_Y/mqdefault.jpg)
![So, Who's Right?: Q&A - Shaykh Hasan Ali [HD]](/img/tr.png)
A lot of keyboard warriors on this comment section lol.
A lot of people pointing at who wrong and who right. The question is how many of us got up for fajr salah? How many of us pray 5 times a day. How many people look after their neighbours?How many of us look after our parents in their old age? I think we should stop pointing at who wrong and who right and concentrate on ourselves.
+Aasim Oxford pls google the wahabi radicals deviant death cult
and how many practice circumcions which is against islam?
@@hamzayounis4085 what is against Islam??
@@Muwahid999 circumcisions, apostasy death pentalty for leaving islam peacefully, stoning adultress, forcing religon, forcing marriage, rape, following scholars blindly, following hadiths blindly when it clearly contradicts Quran, and so on,
Aqeedah comes first. Deobandis and barelwis have corrupt aqeedah.
Appreciate this Sheikh's discussion. He sound very wise and open minded about the realities of life and faith.
"I praise Allah he gave ME a good heart". SubhanAllah.
Azarul Ahmed not very humble.
@@harunyahyadotorg that is humble
When you know your are sincere you can say that.
@@billybonecollector7276no you can't? amateurs and ingenuine people overestimate themselves and truly competent people and those who are genuine underestimate their abilities, that's how the world works, not just humility in Islam.
If a guy EVER claims he is humble or something like that, it's an instant sign that he definitely isn't.
As for the Sheikh, he probably meant it not in ultimate terms but rather that he is kind and loving given the context he is talking in.
Brother Hassan Ali, I'm Alhamdulillah a Barelvi, Hanafi Sunni!
But, I really enjoyed the comedy side of your speech, thoroughly enjoyable!
I pray that Allah Subhaana Wata Aala gives you the best of both worlds and rid you of all ailments and problems that may be coming your way and May Allah Almighty keeps your faith safe and secure, and that Allah Subhaana Wata Aala keeps you successful in Here and in The Hereafter.
Aameen Ya Rabbul Aalameen!
ua-cam.com/video/Cr-Fwg7dOMw/v-deo.html
a history of thanvi
I thought it was disrespectful to Jamaican people.
He doesn't discuss the main difference between sunni ( barelvi ) and deobandi . The blasphemous statement their elders made about the prophet peace be upon him and their belief that it is possible to for Allah to lie . Lying is a defect. Allah is free from defects - this is sunni aqeeda
@@fifafreebies8941 but not all deobandis believe in this , majority of deobandis dont even study their moulanas
@@blacksheep6174 true most deobandi laymen don't know but the scholars do and defend these beliefs
Masha Allah, great words. We need scholar like Shaykh Hassan in both sides for unity. Deobadies and Bralvies can both unite and can do great work. So happy to hear Shaykh's words of wisdom.
Ooh
Yes they can unite on falsehood n bida do not water down the Deen the man is telling you he is a deobandi he has made a choice already he Is a sectarian may Allah guide you
The best way is for these two groups never to exist. They both have issues and no I am not coming from a salafi angle. People from both sides of this fitna go to learn from Ahl al-Sunnah of the Arab world. Yet alas, they go back still saying "I'm a deobandi" etc.
@@motelamolefe8656 where has this sheikh watered down the deen? What bidah has he practiced? Give evidence for your lies brother. Insulting scholars isn't from the sunnah. Its not from islam to insult ulema. Fear Allah bro
@@imrans2784 the sheikh clearly says he is deobandi and the question is were the sahabah even familiar with deobandi or were they deobandi?
I'm a Deobandie and i have to admit I LOVE U BRO!!! Just for the love u have for Allah (swt) for his Rasul (saw) and for his deen!!! May Allah grant u Jannat! AMEEN
I reject calling myself deobandie or barelvi . . Its like a veil . ...just call yourself ahlys sunnah wal jamaah and follow a rightly guided peer....
Masha'Allah. May Allah swt accept this great Shaykh and increase him in knowledge and as for those who are hating don't be jealous. Fools.
“And hold fast to the Rope of Allah, and be not divided among yourselves” Quran 3:103
"As for those who divide their religion and break up into sects, thou hast no part in them in the least: their affair is with Allah: He will in the end tell them the truth of all that they did." Quran 6:159
the rope of Allah is with awliyah and ahlul bayt
@@tazboy1934 such a dumb comment , the rope is the Quran and the Sunnah
@@tazboy1934 the rope of Allah is Qur'an
i`m a bareilli. and you know what? i love this brother and i love you diobandy brothers when u talk like this. may allah guide us all. and shaykh hasan ali keep up the good work,may allah seal your place in paradise. YOU ARE A GOOD IMAM
I am only a Muslim who follows Quran & Hadith and Sunnah of Rasool Allah & sunnah of Rightly Guided Caliphs.
your are only liar wahabi you follow devil and saudi who buy poor wahabi women for sex work in their homes form where you born hrami wahabi
you do need an imam to teach you. you cant learn it by your self.
u r wahabi devil and ur dp is also a devil photo
By Allah, this man who you are calling Wahhabi has better 'adab than you people. Stop the sectarian nonsense and practice the Sunnah from hearts.
Lol
This opened my mind, thank you shaykh !
*Dear People,*
*All of you please do not have false allegations on Bareilvis*
*First try and understand the Aqeedah from our Imams. The opinion never differ from the time of Sahaba till Imam Ahmed Raza Khan RA*
Three Basic Believes of Bareilvis that most of the Deobandies do not Understand are
1⃣. PROPHET MUHAMMAD SWS WAS NOOR IN REALITY AND CAME TO THIS WORLD AS A BASHAR. AND IT IS KUFR TO SAY THAT PROPHET MUHAMMAD SWS IS NOT BASHAR.
*EXPLANATION*
IF IT IS SHIRK TO CALL ANYONE NOOR OTHER THAN ALLAH THEN WHAT ARE MALAAYIKA? NOOR OF MUHAMMAD SWS IS FROM NOOR OF ALLAH FOR SURE. THIS DOESN'T MEAN THAT A PART OF ALLAH WAS DETACHED OR CUT OR SEPARATED. THIS REQUIRES AWAKENING OF HEART TO UNDERSTAND, IN QURAN ALLAH SAYS THAT ALLAH BLEW FROM HIS ROOH IN ADAM THIS DOESNT MEAN PART OF ALLAH'S ROOH CAME IN ADAM. IMAM AHMED RAZA KHAN RA EXPLAINS THAT FROM THE FIRE OF BIG LOGS OF WOOD WHEN CANDEL IS TAKEN CLOSER IT GETS LIT. WHICH MEANS THE FIRE OF THE LOGS DIDNT GET REDUCED COZ A CANDLE WAS LIT BY ITS FIRE. BUT THE CANDLE LIGHT IS FROM THE FIRE THAT HELPED THE CANDLE TO BE LIT. THIS IS JUST AN EXAMPLE.
2⃣. ILMUL GHAIB OF RASOOL ALLAH SWS. NONE OF THE BAREILVIS SAY PROPHET MUHAMMAD SWS IS AALIMUL GHAIB.
*EXPLANATION*
FIRST WE ALL KNOW THAT THERE IS NOTHING HIDDEN FROM ALLAH SO TO CALL ALLAH AALIMUL GHAIB FROM THIS PERSPECTIVE IS WRONG. WHAT IS HIDDEN FROM THE CREATION IS GHAIB SO ALLAH CATEGORISES ILM INTO 2. 1 SHAHDA WHICH CREATIONS KNOW AND 2 GHAIB THAT IS HIDDEN FROM CREATIONS. BUT TO ALLAH ITS JUST ILM. LIKE WISE WHAT ALLAH REVEALED TO MUHAMMAD SWS FROM THE GHAIB IS NOT ILMUL GHAIB TO RASOOL ALLAH SWS ANY MORE. BUT FROM GHAIB THOSE THINGS WHICH RASOOL ALLAH SWS DIDNT REVEAL TO US IS STILL ILMUL GHAIB FOR US. SO WHEN WE SAY RASOOL ALLAH SWS HAS ILMUL GHAIB IT MEANS NOT FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF ALLAH BUT US. WHEN WE COMPARE ILM OF ALLAH AND HIS RASOOL SWS AND OTHERS IT GOES LIKE THIS: THE ENTIRE ILM OF ALL THE CREATIONS INCLUDING PROPHETS AND MALAYIKA AND ALL CREATIONS IS LIKE A DROP OF WATER IN FRONT OF THE OCEAN OF ILM OF RASOOL ALLAH SWS. *AND THE TOTAL ILM OF RASOOL ALLAH SWS IN FRONT OF ALLAH'S ILM IS NOT EVEN A DROP OF WATER IN FRONT OF THE OCEAN OF ILM OF ALLAH.*
3⃣. Hazir and Nazir: We Bareilvis do not say RASOOL Allah sws is not physically present everywhere. Nor we believe that Rasool Allah sws is aware of everything happening everywhere and every second. But we believe If Rasool Allah wants to know anything He can know by Allah Subhanahutala. Physically Rasool Allah sws is in his grave Alone and spritually Rooh e muhammad is in every living being. This topic needs lengthy explanation and everything is by Izn of Allah and by Allah. Not by self.
Try to contact our Learned Imam's for clarifications before misquoting or before labeling us with false allegations.
I am sure few of the things i mentioned may not be clear yet. But we have enough proofs from quran and hadees to prove our aqeedah.
i love this person..and all his speeches beautifull
I agree... Deen is part of our lives.... As Muslims we need to focus on our similarities or we will b lost.
No, we unite only upon Haqq, not bid’ah and Shirk.
This guy has the potential to be a saviour for the Ahlus Sunnah Wal Jama ah
On the subject of desires, I notice that when I pointed out (on your video entitled ‘The Impermissibilty Of Having Organized Debates) that your misleading claim that “EVERYONE who got misguided got misguided because they began to debate” was an exaggeration, you refused to post my comment. But when I pandered to your ego and commented (under a different name as a ruse to test your sincerity for the truth) “Thank you Brother. This is amazing. Very informative.” - you posted it within one hour!
Ummah have need of such scholars in order to resolve the issues between different schools of thought
mashallah amazing lecture and very well said. amazing! simply wonderful.
ua-cam.com/video/Cr-Fwg7dOMw/v-deo.html
a history of thanvi
Salaam bro, I also advise all the Gosia brothers to listen to the Tablighi brothers too and you will see that we are all trying to do the same thing. May Allah swt unite the ummah. Ameen
Ameen
Tablegh jamat are sunni...shud say sunni that do tableegh
ua-cam.com/video/Cr-Fwg7dOMw/v-deo.html
a history of thanvi
Open and wide-hearted.. I sense ideas of dialecticism . need more nowadays. ✌🙏🏼
Alhamdulillah we need scholars like him
LOOL where did the Jamaican accent come from LOOL.mashaAllah nice talk
If you lived where he lives. Youd understand how much influence jamaicans have on asians
i am a Salafi ya sheikh and I love you for the sake of Allah
you are not a salafee. you are an ikhwaanee
brother does it hurt to call yourself muslim??
ok I am a muslim who follows the Salafi manhaj and love the sheikh for the sake of Allah :)
taimur74 you follow the ikhwaanee manhaj, not the salafee manhaj
sure boss . whatever you say :)
Subhanallah, ul Aziz,..
I added comment just with the starting of tour lafz,.
I was literally fed ,and used to make dua just, to gain the true ilm.
People arose into fight and conflict.
This video is a relief ,one
Amazing efforts towards for the united and verse of Al Imran
I have daman of Aalahazrat And Aalahazrat greatest scholar of Islam he against shirk and bidat
They showed us the same belief that ranged from ummat k Akabreen to the sahaba e keram rizwanallaho majmaeen
Unity is vital especially when this religion is getting targeted more and more
On the subject of desires, I noted that when I pointed out (on MusliVlogGuy’s video entitled ‘The Impermissibilty Of Having Organized Debates) that his misleading claim that “EVERYONE who got misguided got misguided because they began to debate” was an exaggeration, he refused to post my comment. But when I pandered to his ego & commented (under a different name as a ruse to test his sincerity for the truth) “Thank you Brother. This is amazing. Very informative.” - he posted it within one hour!
Thank you Moulana, keep up the good work.
I go to a local Pakistani mosque which I have been going since moved to this place 16years ago. And this is a Brelvi/Sufi mosque but all are welcome, and many types pray too, it's all friendly. I am neither Brelvi or Sufi nor deonand. I am a Muslim, I follow Quran and Sunnah, which is the most important to try practice as best.
May Allah guide us. Ameen.
Is'nt ,The religion (Islam) easy?..Ofcourse.But seeing these division and issues one thinks this is very complex and tough. .....Also this makes the Enemies Happy....Can't we forget these division?...Can we follow no other script rather than Quran and Sahih hadiths?...Can't we unite together under the banner 'Ummathi Muhammed rasoolullah'?please....That would be nice and peaceful..
Things aren't as simple as they seem. I have a thorough reply to a user by the name of Rasta Man. Please read through what I wrote
beautiful speech!!! may allah bless you shaykh
Islam came to unite and not to divide. My urge is that for sake of ALLAH, please pray for our Muslim brothers and sisters in need all over the world. AMEEN.
Hi Sheik,
I am sorry to say that yes lost of great Sahabas did celebrate the birth of Prophet, may be you might check non deobandi's books.
it is permissable..u cancelebrate or u can also not celebrate
i am sunni hanafi barelvi alhamdulillah
Subhanallah
This is amazing - mashallah
Especially for the younger generation... We will lose them with all this in- fighting. We need to teach people to b accepting n tolerant. Thank you brother.
I am a Barelvi and I watch "Madani Channel" a lot. They have never said that Prophet Muhammad صلی اللہ علیہ وسلم has the knowledge of unseen just like Allah. We believe that he has knowledge of unseen as much Allah has given to him and the knowledge of unseen that Prophet Muhammad صلی اللہ علیہ وسلم has is like as a piece of sand in the whole desert if it is compared to the knowledge of Allah. And Allah has his own knowledge and Muhammad's صلی اللہ علیہ وسلم knowledge is granted by Allah. I I think as much you go to the main and known Ulama kiraam, you will find very little differences. But when you go to the local molvi, there you will find a lot of differences.
Do you know of any reliable Barelvi sources in english ? Thank you
@@noorkhadim844 bahar e shariat is an great work of aqaid and fiqh can be downloaded in pdf on google
@@noorkhadim844uh huh😊
Alhamdullilah I to agree!! Also Barelvi moulanas and literature never says those who do NOT celebrate Milad-un-Nabi are miss-guided or Kafir or anything which unfortunately some Barelvis and Deobandis claim. Love for Allah and Muhammad Salallahu-Alaihu-wa-sallam is left to a persons heart.
Shaykh hassan Ali have you started this forum ? I'd like to promote it in the Midlands inshaAllah
oh man!! mashallah!! love his talk!!!
Naudubilla! If a brother is doing a bid'ah and you allow him to continue to do it? As a responsible muslim it is your duty to guide the brother. You can't compromise by saying let him be attached with the deen with bid'ah. The Messenger of Allaah (sallallaahu alaihi wasallam) said: "Every innovation is misguidance and going astray" Reported by Abu Daawood (no. 4607), at-Tirmidhee (no. 2676) and it is saheeh. Ibn Hajr authenticated it Takhreej Ahaadeeth Ibn ul-Haajib (1/137).
Suheeb Ahmed Hadhrat Umar Radhiallah u anhu when he saw Trawih prayer he said "Nimal Bidatu haza (What a beutiful bidaat is it.)". Some time bidaat is Haram but some time it becomes a necessity. Like decorating mosques. Using loudspeakers, constructing Darul uloom, Darse-Nizami, Printing press and so on. Haram is when it is replacing the Sunnah and harming the religion and necessary is when it is supporting the religion.
Julia Nestler Hadhrat Umar radiallahnahu did not invent the tarawahi by himself. Our beloved Prophet (peace be upon him) led the tarawahi prayers for couple of days and stopped it. Why did he stop? I will let you figure that out. Why did Hadrat Umar RA called it a good bidah? I let you figure that out. I have give you enough clues already. Using loudspeakers or any modern means that can help umma to spread the message of Islam is permissible. Using it for entertainment is not advised.
What I am saying is if you find a brother who is going against the principles (listening to any songs, music, wrong guidance), then guide him. Listening to a sermon in a masajid on a speak is permissible, listening to Qur'an in mobile is permissible. Watching movies and dance is NOT. Hope I clarified.
***** 1st understand what is bid'ah. You cannot add anything new to Islam nor you can take anything out of it. And Islam was completely established when our Prophet was alive and Allah himself mentions in glorious Qur'an.
Any source where you can expand your knowledge and help Islam prosper and help you grow in a halal way it is permissible. You introduce any new inventions in Islam which was not established by the Prophet (peace be upon him) and not followed by the Sahaba it is not permissible.
Who goes to hell and heaven is only decided by Allah Subhanahu Ta'ala. You or me cannot decide on that.
And last but not the least. You have to ponder and reflect on Qur'an not just read.
May Allah guide us all. Ameen!
All the imams of school of thoughts had the same opinion. May Allah be pleased with all of them.
***** Brother in Islam. Islam cannot be understood without Sunnah. For e.g., How may rakas one should pray in 5 times prayer is not mentioned in Qur'an. Like wise ruku, sajood, qiyaam, takbeer... all are the teaching of Prophet (peace be upon him). And the Prophet (pbuh) never said anything by his own but what was revealed to him from Allah Subhanahu Ta'aala. A Muslim is incomplete with Sunnah (sayings, doings, practice) of the Prophet ONLY. There is so much what the Prophet(pbuh) thought us which is not there in Qur'an but conveyed us through our Prophet! Qur'an and Sunnah makes a Muslim a Muslim. Else he is misguided. May Allah guide us all.
***** Jazakum Allahu Khairun brother. Baarakallahu Feeq! May Allah increase your knowledge. Ameen!
I do not know what all these sects are; Deobandi, Brelvis, Salafis, Shi'ites etc. All I know is that you must follow the teachings of the Qur'an and the Sunnah of the prophet (s.a.w). That requirement is more than enough for a muslim. You do not need to go to these weird extents where you start performing inhumane activities such as spazzing out on the floor and whacking yourself to death. Our prophet (s.a.w) is the most perfect and the greatest creation of Allah. He had the most beautiful, amazing character and personality.we should follow his basic way of life as an example to ours. Would our holy prophet (s.a.w) do such thing or even advise you to do such?
My respected brothers and sisters, please take this information into consideration. i pray only to Allah (s.w.t) to help us muslims to stop creating segregation within the muslim ummah by fighting amongst each other and instead learn to have love for one another, to bring the Muslim ummah together as one. so we can stand together as one on the day of reckoning. Laa ilaa ha illallah hu muhammad ur rasoolullah ameen
Rasta Mouse who does that on the floor 😳
Everyone except the Qur'anists know that you have to follow the Sunnah of the Rasul (PBUH) and Everyone within the scope of Sunni Islam (Ahl us-Sunnah wa'l-Jama`ah ) tries to do just that. The only issue comes when certain groups or people try to claim the following of the Sunnah for themselves alone. Aside from them, there are various Schools of Jurispudence and Schools of Thought and Schools of Methodology. There's a lot of ambiguity in several questions within the the sources of the Sunnah do it's only natural for it to be so much differences of opinions. That said, one can't claim to follow the Sunnah perfectly follow the Sunnah alone, especially if they forget to consider how vaste the religion of Islam is. Even within all the hadiths that we know are Sahih you'll find differences. Keep that in mind. Just stay away from those who love division and/or fitnah. Try to follow the Sunnah but try to be with the Jama`ah.
Also one more thing. Rastafari culture has nothing to do with Islam and it all comes from a religion raiden with shirk and superstition. They worship the late Ethiopian Emperor Haile Selassie thinking that he is the Jesus (PBUH) re-incarnated (wa iyadhu billah) and because of this it is not wise for us to emulate them in style or behaviour.
Nice speech. Mashallah....love scholar talking about unity rather than blaming each other.
Mashallah Allah has blessed him with wisdom
I Am Alhamdulillah Sunni Hanafi Barelvi..💪💪💪💪
ua-cam.com/video/Cr-Fwg7dOMw/v-deo.html
a history of thanvi
The scholars of the Standing Committee for Issuing Fatwas were asked:
There is a certain group in Pakistan that is called the Bareilawis or the Nawaari group, named after their current leader who is known as Nawaari. I asked you for the shar‘i ruling concerning them and their beliefs, and praying behind them, so that this may bring peace of mind to many people who do not know the truth about them. And once again, I would like to ask you about some of their myths and widespread beliefs:
1. The belief that the Messenger (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) is alive
2. The belief that the Messenger (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) is present and can see what is happening, especially immediately after Jumu‘ah prayer.
3. The belief that the Messenger (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) will definitely intercede for them.
4. They believe in the awliya’ (“saints”) and the occupants of graves, and they pray at their graves and ask them to meet their needs.
5. They build domes over graves and put lights in them.
6. They are known to say “Ya Rasool, Ya Muhammad (O Messenger, O Muhammad) (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him).
7. They get angry with the one who says Ameen out loud and raises his hands when praying, and they regard him as a Wahhaabi.
8. They find it very strange when the siwaak is used at the time of prayer.
9. They kiss their fingers during wudoo’, at the time of the adhaan, and after prayer.
10. Their imam always recites the verse “Allah sends His Salat (Graces, Honours, Blessings, Mercy, etc.) on the Prophet (Muhammad ) and also His angels too (ask Allah to bless and forgive him)” [al-Ahzaab 33:56] after prayer, then all the worshippers send blessings upon the Prophet in unison and loudly.
11. They gather in circles after Jumu‘ah prayer, standing, reciting and reciting poetry in praise of the Prophet (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) loudly.
12. After completing the recitation of the Holy Qur’an in Taraweeh prayer in Ramadan, they make a great deal of food and distribute it in the forecourt of the mosque, as well as sweets.
13. They build mosques and adorn them elaborately, and they write over the mihraab “Ya Muhammad (O Muhammad)”.
14. They regard themselves as followers of the Sunnah and correct ‘aqeedah (belief), and think that others are in the wrong.
What is the shar‘i ruling on praying behind them?
They replied:
It is not permissible to pray behind one who is like this, and if one who knows that the belief of the imam is like that prays behind him, his prayer is invalid, because most of the things listed are characteristics of kufr (disbelief) and bid‘ah (innovation) that are contrary to the Tawheed (affirmation of the Oneness of Allah) with which Allah sent His Messengers and which He revealed in His Books. It is contrary to the clear meaning of the Qur’an, such as the verses in which Allah, may He be exalted, says (interpretation of the meaning): “Verily, you (O Muhammad ) will die and verily, they (too) will die” [az-Zumar 39:30] and “And the mosques are for Allah (Alone), so invoke not anyone along with Allah” [al-Jinn 72:18]. The innovations that they do should be denounced in a gentle way; if they accept it then praise be to Allah. If they do not accept it, then shun them and pray in the mosques of Ahl as-Sunnah. We have a good example in the Close Friend (Khaleel) of the Most Merciful, as Allah tells us he said (interpretation of the meaning): “And I shall turn away from you and from those whom you invoke besides Allah. And I shall call on my Lord; and I hope that I shall not be unblest in my invocation to my Lord” [Maryam 19:48].
End quote from Fataawa al-Lajnah ad-Daa’imah, 2/396-398
The way of taking is stupendous 👍
Love this guy!!
without the scholars you shall be misguided. the scholars are from he salaf. Its ironic that they tell you not to follow hanafi shafi madhabs etc but want you to blindly follow salafism loool hypocrites.
al-Imam ibn Hajar al-Asqalani, quoted by Imam Jalaluddin al-Suyuti explicitly said that (despite not being practiced in the first three hundred years of Islam) if one takes care not to do things which contravene the sharia (such as free mixing and the like), then it is absolutely permissible to celebrate the mawlid. Anyone is free to say otherwise, but the issue was examined in details by these giants, when the issue was first discussed, and this is their ruling. Finito.
@Gaalkacyo Pirate your reply demonstrates your lack of understanding of my original post
@Gaalkacyo Pirate thank you for your clarification. It merely shows that you did indeed miss my whole point. You did not understand it at all.
@Gaalkacyo Pirate bro the only thing that has become clear to me from this exchange is that you did not understand my original point
@Gaalkacyo Pirate actually that's not quite the point. But ok, let's look at it from that point of view:
- ibn hajar, muhaddith, and author of many books on hadith including fath al-bari says permissible
and;
- gaalkacyo pirate says impermissible
Hmm. Who should I listen to?
@Gaalkacyo Pirate so firstly you say not to listen to you, that you are nobody, then you quote a hadith and expect me to listen to you? Do you think ibn hajar was unaware of this hadith? He was referred to "amir al-Mumineen" in ulum al-hadith. You, an unqualified nobody, are deriving a ruling from the hadith. This is laughable really. Any pirate can quote hadith and give a judgement. I will stick to the established scholars fatawa over pirate fatawa any day. Again my choice is do I listen to a great muhaddith or a pirate? I'll take ibn hajar thanks.
Wow such a short and beautiful story brother. :)
Come to India, I am from Bangalore and almost every Barelvi masjid is taken by Deobandi.. Wallahi !!
Good.
I am Sunni Alhamdulilla
This Shaykh and Shaykh Asrar Rashid should have a civil debate. Maturity is not easy to find like this.
simply awsum.
Alhamdolillah in this time of fitna I have Daman of Ala Hazrat.
We must leave all biddat and and we should follow the islam that salaf us saliheen taught us
Great brother
Subhanallah
@@Muwahid999 u cant reject the rest of the scholars and the ummah after the salaf ..
@@tazboy1934 we dont reject any other scholars after the Sahaba, we have scholars like shaykh albani, Shaikh bin baz, shaykh ibn uthaymeen, shaykh othman al khamees etc.
I used to like this sheikh when I was new to the deen and trying to escape jahiliyyah! He is responsible if he misguides the people! It is vital that we identify the people of bidah! One side of my family are Barelwi, the other Deobandi. Barelwi has elements of shirk which can remove a person from the Deen, whilst Deobandi has elements of Bidah! Guide the people! Don't tell them what they want to hear, tell the them haq, the truth! Salaam!
Yes thats true ,the truth is the truth whether u like it or not ,thats not my problem ,if u dont like the truth then its ur problem. I can tell u one thing though ,the barelvis and the deobandis are one ,the differences they have are minute ,and often they have different opinions and both of them opinions are wrong...
Really nice!
Ya imaan may Allah bless u. We need to unite the ummah for his pleasure.
deobandis and barelwi are both sects ...stick to Islam as taught by the prophet Muhammed peace be upon him. ...
peace
+Aticq Rahman pls google the wahabi radical
it's not a sect but a sunni school, established in one location to keep ppl on the sunnah and not Britishers
he is typical najdi making accusation without proof, if they are a new sect rpove we follow other than the books of ahlus sunnah wal jammah! he has hidden in the Aticq
I'm not trying to be rude but Add to dictionary and Add to dictionary are not really sect. they both follow the Hannafi fique. they are institutions. its like if you go to university and graduate and you called a certain name. theey both have some bad literature and they both accept it. Also the starter of the school of disband has said to have a family tree which goes back to umar ra.
That’s what I fear too
may Allah guide him to Tawheed and proper aqeedah. May Allah give him resentment towards bidah.
Wait so ur a deobandi yh wy do your imams say that taking pictures is haram and then same guys are on tv now and if you don't believe me it's on the official website for deobandies and btw to claim something is haram it has to be proven in hadith or Quran u guys claim everything to be haram and biddah just like the mowlid and there is no evidence to prove it's haram
Shaikh Asrar Rashid is the man you need. He’s working on this like you. Both of you together and Abu Aaliyah with Abdur-Rahman Yusaf can sort this out. We need it badly. Jzkl
Masha Allah.
Deobandis are FAR more better in terms of aqeedah, whereas the Brelvis are just 2-bit Hindus, khalas. The Deobandis were initially formed to resist Hindu culture in the subcontinent whereas the Brelvi just reinforce that, yet they don't know it. This is coming from a unbiased perspective.
You need to look at the mehfils, jaloos, milad's to know that these Brelvi gatherings have similarities with the Sikh and Hindu religion, which is not surprising as Barelvism started in a North Indian city (Uttar Pradesh).
We should follow the Quran and Sunnah and get away from these subcontinental versions of Islam.
I agree with you akhi. I myself follow the manhaj of the salaf. But deobandis are much closer to the haqq than the barelwi, some of whom may even be kuffar due to shirk. Allahu alam
wahabism/deobandism is close to hinduism thats why whabis amd deobandis were against the making of pakistan. they were with hindus.
Deobandars are Jehovah's witnesses
Mashalla, May Allah bless you for your words, these people are clear on path of bidah and leading to kuffr and shirk. Deoband reject all this yet are true Ahle Sunnah wal jammah
My identity is Muslim my deen is Islam!
Qur'an states:
وَمَا أَرْسَلْنَا مِن رَّسُولٍ إِلَّا لِيُطَاعَ بِإِذْنِ اللَّهِ ۚ وَلَوْ أَنَّهُمْ إِذ ظَّلَمُوا أَنفُسَهُمْ جَاءُوكَ فَاسْتَغْفَرُوا اللَّهَوَاسْتَغْفَرَ لَهُمُ الرَّسُولُ لَوَجَدُوا اللَّهَ تَوَّابًا رَّحِيمًا
Translation: We sent not the Messenger, but to be obeyed, in accordance with the will of Allah. If they had only, when they were unjust to themselves, come to the Messenger and asked Allah's forgiveness, and the Messenger had (also) asked forgiveness for them, they would have found Allah indeed Oft-returning, Most Merciful.(Al-Qur'an, Surah an-Nisa, 4:64)
This is a direct Divine order to seek intercession of Prophet Muhammad (Peace be upon him) and this verse is Mutlaq (not restricted to any time). None of the classical commentators of Qur'an said that it only applied to the Physical Hayat (life) of Prophet (Peace be upon him) as falsely asserted by people of Bidah (Salafis/Wahabis/Ghayr Muqalideen/Quranites/Najdis/Khawarij/Takfiri etc...). Before citing many commentaries of Qur'an we would like to present a logical rhetoric question and then provide an answer:
Question: When Allah is most Qarib (close) then why does He not say: Ask me in your houses and I will answer you? Why does He put the condition of going to Prophet (Peace be upon him)?
Answer: If the deniers of Tawassul understand this point then In shaa' Allah this article shall be a source of guidance to them and their generations to come. This verse proves from the Nass (categorical proof) of Qur'an that Tawassul in sight of Allah is an approach which He likes & prescribes. Please remember that we as Ahlus Sunnah consider both the ways to be right i.e.
a) Asking Allah without an intermediary.
b) And also asking Allah through an intermediary.
Asking Allah through Mohammad SAWW is right but asking Allah through other babas is not right its shirk
@@TabishKhan-sc9oj that would be a matter of fiqh, shirk would not be in question but it could be classified as haraam depending on the view
This Shirk ! Clear cut. ALLĀH azzawajal says those in the grave can’t hear you. It’s really that simple. May ALLĀH guide you
@@dinoverdunya1741 yes All your the Hadith which your scholars considered Sahih contained shirk, Ma Sha Allah.
Ibn Kathir
As Subki
Imam Nawawi
Ibn Hajr
Al Haythami
Al Ghazali
Al Bayhaqi
Al Iraqi
Ibn Fauraq
List is never ending
They all authenticated shirk according to your stupid mindset.
I like this brother. Very objective
REALLLY GOOD MASHALLAH makes me have a complete different view in deobandies and berelwis jazakallah ffore you adivice
*Dear People,*
*All of you please do not have false allegations on Bareilvis*
*First try and understand the Aqeedah from our Imams. The opinion never differ from the time of Sahaba till Imam Ahmed Raza Khan RA*
Three Basic Believes of Bareilvis that most of the Deobandies do not Understand are
1⃣. PROPHET MUHAMMAD SWS WAS NOOR IN REALITY AND CAME TO THIS WORLD AS A BASHAR. AND IT IS KUFR TO SAY THAT PROPHET MUHAMMAD SWS IS NOT BASHAR.
*EXPLANATION*
IF IT IS SHIRK TO CALL ANYONE NOOR OTHER THAN ALLAH THEN WHAT ARE MALAAYIKA? NOOR OF MUHAMMAD SWS IS FROM NOOR OF ALLAH FOR SURE. THIS DOESN'T MEAN THAT A PART OF ALLAH WAS DETACHED OR CUT OR SEPARATED. THIS REQUIRES AWAKENING OF HEART TO UNDERSTAND, IN QURAN ALLAH SAYS THAT ALLAH BLEW FROM HIS ROOH IN ADAM THIS DOESNT MEAN PART OF ALLAH'S ROOH CAME IN ADAM. IMAM AHMED RAZA KHAN RA EXPLAINS THAT FROM THE FIRE OF BIG LOGS OF WOOD WHEN CANDEL IS TAKEN CLOSER IT GETS LIT. WHICH MEANS THE FIRE OF THE LOGS DIDNT GET REDUCED COZ A CANDLE WAS LIT BY ITS FIRE. BUT THE CANDLE LIGHT IS FROM THE FIRE THAT HELPED THE CANDLE TO BE LIT. THIS IS JUST AN EXAMPLE.
2⃣. ILMUL GHAIB OF RASOOL ALLAH SWS. NONE OF THE BAREILVIS SAY PROPHET MUHAMMAD SWS IS AALIMUL GHAIB.
*EXPLANATION*
FIRST WE ALL KNOW THAT THERE IS NOTHING HIDDEN FROM ALLAH SO TO CALL ALLAH AALIMUL GHAIB FROM THIS PERSPECTIVE IS WRONG. WHAT IS HIDDEN FROM THE CREATION IS GHAIB SO ALLAH CATEGORISES ILM INTO 2. 1 SHAHDA WHICH CREATIONS KNOW AND 2 GHAIB THAT IS HIDDEN FROM CREATIONS. BUT TO ALLAH ITS JUST ILM. LIKE WISE WHAT ALLAH REVEALED TO MUHAMMAD SWS FROM THE GHAIB IS NOT ILMUL GHAIB TO RASOOL ALLAH SWS ANY MORE. BUT FROM GHAIB THOSE THINGS WHICH RASOOL ALLAH SWS DIDNT REVEAL TO US IS STILL ILMUL GHAIB FOR US. SO WHEN WE SAY RASOOL ALLAH SWS HAS ILMUL GHAIB IT MEANS NOT FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF ALLAH BUT US. WHEN WE COMPARE ILM OF ALLAH AND HIS RASOOL SWS AND OTHERS IT GOES LIKE THIS: THE ENTIRE ILM OF ALL THE CREATIONS INCLUDING PROPHETS AND MALAYIKA AND ALL CREATIONS IS LIKE A DROP OF WATER IN FRONT OF THE OCEAN OF ILM OF RASOOL ALLAH SWS. *AND THE TOTAL ILM OF RASOOL ALLAH SWS IN FRONT OF ALLAH'S ILM IS NOT EVEN A DROP OF WATER IN FRONT OF THE OCEAN OF ILM OF ALLAH.*
3⃣. Hazir and Nazir: We Bareilvis do not say RASOOL Allah sws is not physically present everywhere. Nor we believe that Rasool Allah sws is aware of everything happening everywhere and every second. But we believe If Rasool Allah wants to know anything He can know by Allah Subhanahutala. Physically Rasool Allah sws is in his grave Alone and spritually Rooh e muhammad is in every living being. This topic needs lengthy explanation and everything is by Izn of Allah and by Allah. Not by self.
Try to contact our Learned Imam's for clarifications before misquoting or before labeling us with false allegations.
I am sure few of the things i mentioned may not be clear yet. But we have enough proofs from quran and hadees to prove our aqeedah.
You are Telling Lies No Any Bralvi on the Earth how say this Nabi Kareem S A W W Khown Ilam e Gaibe same Like Allah
barelvi say allah came in form of rasoolullah Astagfirullah
and deobandi are just as silly because deobandi believe imam hussein is alive performing hajj Astagfirullah
You are A lair
ALI Azar
Why do you think, Qureshi is lying?
+ALI Azar
Deobandi story-He says, “I (me the narrator) said your female servant narrates from the female Saint that once my nephew came to Hajj and the ship was almost destroyed. In such a helpless state he saw in his dream
that Haajee (Imdaadullah) Saahib from one side and Hafiz Jeauw from the other
side were shouldering the ship out of trouble. In the morning we found the
ship had reached its destination safely after journeying for two days. He said
“How did I know?” If the real helper was Allaah and how astonishing it would be if this were true. He relieves the problems of other himself by appearing in
the cloak of others and it this gets attributed to me and you.” (Shamaa’im
Imdaadiyyah pg.100---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Reas the last line. ALLAH APPEARING IN THE CLOAK OF OTHERS.(naouz billah)
sanaulla sharief this of course is the Barelvi belief not the Deobandi
Shaykh Ibn ‘Uthaymeen (may Allah have mercy on him) was asked: What is the ruling on praying behind an imam from the Bareilawi sect, who believes that the Prophet (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) is alive and present and can see us?
He replied: If they believe that, then they have gone against ijmaa‘ (consensus of the ummah), and if they seek his help, then that is shirk, so it is not permissible to pray behind them. End quote.
Thamaraat at-Tadween, p. 8
Muhammad Ali yeh alot of my friends are in that situation. May Allah make it easy for you brothers
Mr M.A wobblers aren't Muslim
Mr M.A you know an imam said Prophet is alive...........but you know what everyone know he is in barzakhi life.......don't believe just in one imam I know many barelvis who believe right but imams of other sect misinterpret just like sheikh said
I'm a Hanfi Barelvi Muslim Alhmdulillah..
Devobandis are gumrah by their sheikh nanotvi, thanvi, Gangoi..
Thanvi compare the knowledge of seen of Rasool'Allah(pbuh) to mad people, to child, to chamar Maaz'Allah,
Gangoi writes in his book that Allah can speak Lie Maaz'Allah
Nanotvi didn't say anything about Mirza Ahmad Qadyani.. And he tells many things about last prophet issues
The Mujaddid of 14th century Imam e Ahle Sunnat who's also known as A'ala Hazrat who's name is Imam Ahmad Raza Khan Barelvi (R.A) and 11 scholars of Hijza(sudia Arab) gave fatwa of Kufr
Ibn uthayman al lunatic 😂😂 his opinions are worthless may Allah deal with him ameen
Jazakallah Khair..Good explanation..
Quick question what is the views of the brelvi on intercession (prophet, saints, live or dead etc) ?
its mustahab albeit with certain conditions.
Salaam dewband are real suni Muslims because they follow quran and sunnah and sahaba .brother hasan ali is right and true Muslim
Even the Ahlul Hadith are true Muslims as they follow Quran and Sunnah
@@ParvezKhan-py5ys but salafi got some big prob
"I have a good heart" is problematic for any "Shaykh" to say let alone a layman.
May God help us all
What he meant by that is just beyond your understanding
Wa aleykum as Salaam waRahmatullahi waBarakaatuh ,
you'll never get a deo who says 'napaak hoe jai' [uve become impure], even if they get 2 obsessed. most brillos are mubtadi, even tho not hardcore
Many bareilly comment on youtube keep accusing other of gustakhi...
Ask yourself, "deobandi", "berelwi", are these names the prophet alayhi salaam spoke of? Are these names the sahaba and the tabi3een used to describe the actions of the prophet alayhi salaam or was it something they even knew? This is all fabricated and innovated and added to our religion which was already complete. Fear Allah, be sincere and don't blindly follow your parent's/elders/local masjid's corrupt belief system. Go back to the Qur'an and sunnah and question the stupid beliefs mentioned in this video.
hmohammed33
Quran and hadees is INTERNATIONALDeoabnadi, Brelvei,are LOCAL
your right. but they are not sect. they are institution. they both follow the hanafi fique.
hmohammed33 the beliefs mentioned in the video are in the sunna
Yeah Quran and Sunnah , you talk like it's so easy ! Do you know what you are talking about ? It's that Quran and Sunnah which scholars spend years and years on , and yet they don't complete. You are trying to imply that we open Quran and Sahih Bukhari by ourselves and don't need Imams ? Pls re consider .Ulama of Deobandis don't call themselves that . They are Ahul Sunnah Wal jamah . It's just a name that has been given people . They are not a sect. Majority follow the hanafi madhab and Alhamdulillah are free from Bidah and innovation . They do Dawah and Tabligh for the sake of Allah and try to follow Sunnah practically . There is no takfir , calling others kafir here . We need Imams for learning Quran and Sunnah .Pls get that clear. Also we cannot go fatwa shopping and choosing whatever we feel like . If it's Hanafi stick tot that, if Hanbali then stick to only that . That is our Deen . And all of them are on the right path since they only differ in Masail and not Aqeedah and Iman.They are not sects.
Who will teach you Quran and sunnah? What is the certification my brother....how can you say the person teaching you is qualified to teach you... grow up brother, learn your history. The main 4 schools have not gained followers blindly... they are the source of learning as they teach and derive rulings from Quran and sunnah and Ijma of Sahaba...Tabiheen.... forget and stop being google mufti ... follow Madhab.... certainly you can ask questions and find clarification if you wish so... read the biographies of 4 schools teachers .. Insha Allah you will find your answers
He starts, "theres only three problems", what!!!! Even if there was one disrespectful thing said about The Prophet (sallAllahu alihi wa sallam) it is enough for muslims to break ties with such people.
Just imagine someone used foul language at this guys mother... I guarantee he wouldnt say "aah theres only one small issue between us!!" but here all of sudden he has to become soft
Shame on these masked deobandis!!!!!! wal i'yaadhu biLLah min sharrihim
Fuck off jew
I listened to this first 8 years ago.
Damn
me too how have you beliefs changed since then ? i came to the realisation all these sects are upon falsehood
@@josefineforsberg5807 how so?
@@go10965videos they all oppose the authentic teaching of what Allah revealed in one way or another, following the scholars of their sects interpretations based upon many weak hadith or false rational, exactly the same way as the jews and christians fell into misguidance breaking away from the authentic message into multiple heretic fractions
JOSEFINE FORSBERG how did you come to the conclusion that they interpret Hadiths in a false manner
@@go10965videos research, i take it you believe they are rightly guided ?
maulana barelvis say that Prophet has knowledge of unseen Whatever Allah has given to him..
but deobandis say that we can't use word knowledge of unseen to the prophet becoz it may be partial or may be any thing Allah has given to him
Both of them are two sides of the same coin, the difference is mawlid and each side had their own set of scholars.
Both of them are sufis ash'aris, deviated from the straight path.
I was going to say that but you have already wrote it. Well said.
Wahhabism is not Islam, salafi aqidah is not athari, you understand Quran with your nafs and you insult Allah and rasulullah
Jahil insaan. I am Brelwi. I am not Ashari. Educate yourself.
@Saqib Raheel Who is making Takfeer now ??? Hypocrites will be exposed.
@@MK-wf1eg What contemporary scholars ??? I won't use anyone in the past 1000 years. You prove your Ashari/Maturidi/Sufi Aqeedah from the Salaf and I will do the same In'sha Allah.
Alhamdulillah We Brailvis can prove our belief from Deobandi books but Deobandis will never be able to prove their belief from any book.
PAK Media News your both innovators.
Both deoband & barelvy r just contestor each other they need more masjids. Barelvy don't bother biddha and deoband r naasbi mostly
may allah guide us to the right path the path of the way of quran and sunnah the understanding of the salaf
The Sunnis and Shias have many things and beliefs in common. Not all Shias hold corrupt beliefs. Read our History and also examine our sources which both are agreed upon by Sunnis and Shias. However, it is the Deobandi school who were Sunnis going back 200 years who then were influenced by Wahabi ideology propagated from Saudi Arabia. That was the biggest problem. Otherwise Waseela and many topics regarding the Prophet sallahu alaihi was aalihi wasalam were accepted in light of evidence from the primary sources such as the Quran and Sunnah.
This guy is a ghair muqalid imam ahmad Raza khan research was same as the previous mujadids and he was declared as ala Hazrat in front of 100 allama arab
osman usy Shaykh Hasan Ali is hanafi.
Hahaha stop joking Bro.
Deobandis and Barelvis are both Sufis who believe in Wahdatul Wujud, hold jahmi views and practice acts of shirk and biddah.
Ibn 'Umar reported that a person asked Allaah's Messenger (sallAllaahu alayhi wa sallam) as he was sitting on the pulpit about the eating of the lizard, whereupon he said: I neither eat it, nor do I prohibit it.
Salam alaikum, this brother is awesome, and I'm not even Deobandi/Barlevi/Hanafi
thanks to Allah I am not Wahibi, najdi, kharji
mashallah and you should include deobandi
mubtadi
Berlevi Ally with Shi'a rafidah
This is a true problem with some barelvis mullahs. They have incorrect aqeedah, they have misunderstood waseela and for some reason dispise the Salafis but are quite close with the rafidas.
Even though the rafidas are enemies of many sahaba!
Syed Shamiun so does saudi, they ally with iran against isis
true
That's not even remotely true
Oh Allah grant the ummah unity oh Turner of Hearts
I am Muslim and Muslim only Alhamdulillah not part of any sect just part of the Ummah.
Rise of Pakistan is Rise of Islam!
Alhamdulillah
deobandī vs. brelwī ?
like saying urine vs. feces
Since YOU equated the Deobandis & Barelvis with Urine & Feces then it's safe for us to EQUATE THE SALAFIYYAH WITH MANI (sperm), HAIDH (menses) AND NIFAAS (blood discharged after childbirth) making you AND your ilk of ghair-muqalideen of the HADATHE AKBAR category, so with that being said we NOW know WHO's the MOST impure, debased, & adulterated out of the 3
*****
Ibn Khairudeen It is not right to slander Muslims with such abusive language according to the teachings of the Quran.
The Quran teaches us Tawheed and to have good manners.
I myself reject barelvis since some of their writings have incorrect Aqeedah and some have misused the concept of waseela. But there needs to be academic discussion on this.
The salafi manhaj is nothing but the truth (:
Moyna Khan why isn't it not enough to just follow what our pious predecessors (salaf-as-saliheen) were upon?
Imam Malik said, "The last generations of this Ummah can only be reformed by that which reformed its first generations. What was not part of the religion then cannot become part of the religion now".
This statement cannot be anymore true. The Prophet (saw) warned us about innovations and told us to stick to his Sunnah and the Sunnah of his companions diligently. This will be the saved group.
DO NOT be fooled by large numbers. Know the Aqeedah of the people you follow before commiting yourself to their sect. Deobandis and barelvis are known to have questionable aspects in their school of thought pertaining to shirk and kufr.
The saved group in reality has no name nor is it a new group. The Prophet (saw) did not give this particularly sect a name. So in all surety, we can only follow what the Prophet (saw) and his companions instructed us to follow and anything more or less is misguidance.
(The Prophet (saw) was made from noor? He got sick, he bled, he ate, and he died, may peace be upon him. He was a normal person but he was indeed elevated higher than any creation past, present or future, and will always be. He forbade people, after his death, to exaggerate things about him.)
Moyna Khan
Following the pious predecessors is a must to keep Islam strong. If everyone just followed their own beliefs where would Islam be? In a hadith, Abdullah ibn Mas’ud reported: The Prophet, sallahu alayhi wasallam, said, “The best people are those of my generation (Sahabah), then those who come after them (Tabi'een), then those who come after them (Tabi' at-tabieen). Then, there will come people after them whose testimony precedes their oaths and their oaths precede their testimony.” If want to follow the best of the best then look no further than the companions and those who followed them, and those who followed them. IT IS NOT MY OPINION. I am giving the evidence and you are still denying the truth. Isn't this just ignorance?
Why are you out casting a group of people based on a small extremist minority? Do you understand the whole concept of the salaf? If you don't then you have no right to make any remarks. You misguide yourself and misguide others.
You quoted the hadith on shirk and materialism. Could you provide the full hadith and where one can find it? But going from your statement, this DOES NOT PERMIT someone to commit blatant shirk on any level, major or minor, as it clearly states in the Qur'an. Again, why are you basing your claims on a small group of people to an entire country or middle-eastern region? What have you got against Arabs? They don't all have the same mindset. What has competition got to do with shirk? Explain what you mean. Do you even know the concept of shirk? From your comments after quoting the hadith, you seem to have trouble grasping what shirk is.
I don't want to make assumptions but a reality we face today is that people seem to follow their sheikhs, muftis, maulanas, maulvis, imaams, etc BLINDLY and the fact that their culture comes along with it. You feel that you will be an outcast by rejecting the beliefs of the land you come from. By going with this, one is commiting shirk because you are preferring your teachers and your country without question over the truth, as in Allah and His Messenger (saw).
----------------------------------------------------------------
Tell me where is says directly that the Prophet (saw) was/is noor from the Qur'an and authentic sunnah. Your own belief is WORTHLES if it isn't backed up by evidence from the Qur'an and Sunnah. The Quran states: “Say (O Muhammad): I am only a man like you. It has been revealed to me that your Ilaah (God) is One Ilaah (God i.e. Allaah)”
[al-Kahf 18:110]
What you are doing is overstepping what the Qur'an says. This is also blatant shirk as well. It is not permissible to describe him (saw) as being noor (light) or as casting no shadow, or to say that he was created from light. Rather this is a kind of exaggeration which like I said the Prophet (saw) forbade when he said: “Do not exaggerate about me as was exaggerated about ‘Eesa (Jesus) ibn Maryam. Say: the slave of Allaah and His Messenger.” Narrated by al-Bukhaari, 6830. Another point is what then makes you different from the Christians who exaggerate about Eesa (Jesus) (alayhis salaam) when you describe the Prophet (saw) like you do? The Barelvis sect cannot be the saved sect if they think like this.
It is the angels who are created from light. The Prophet (saw) said: “The angels were created from light, and Iblees (Shaytan) was created from smokeless fire, and Adam (peace be upon him) was created from what has been described to you.” Narrated by Muslim, 2996. However, there is a hadith that claims that he (saw) was first made from light - “The first thing that Allaah created was the light of your Prophet, O Jaabir” - but this is fabricated as in "someone made it up", and one cannot take his religion from fabricated narrations, or someone lying about the Prophet (saw) who said "Telling lies about me is not like telling lies about anyone else. Whoever tells lies about me deliberately, let him take his place in Hell.” Narrated by al-Bukhaari, 1229.
Think about it carefully. If you actually think that the Prophet (saw) was made from noor or from the noor of Allah then you are going against the Qur'an and the Prophet (saw) himself, thus committing major shirk. The correct way of thinking in the sense that he (saw) brought the Revelation by which whoever Allah wills of His creation is guided. It's the LIGHT OF THE MESSAGE, not the Prophet (saw) himself. The Qur'an states: And thus We have sent to you (O Muhammad) Roohan (an Inspiration, and a Mercy) of Our Command. You knew not what is the Book, nor what is Faith? But We have made it (this Qur’aan) a LIGHT wherewith We guide whosoever of Our slaves We will. And verily, you (O Muhammad) are indeed guiding (mankind) to the Straight Path (i.e., Allaah’s religion of Islamic monotheism), --- [al-Shura 42:51-52]
Moyna Khan give me evidence for your Aqeedah. All you keep going on about is that we just follow what feel. That is completely false. What is protecting you from Shaytan? What makes you think that we can worship Allah in anyway we feel like? How does that make you any different from Hindus, Christians, mushriks?
Islam is not a religion where you just choose what you feel is right and wrong, and follow what you want to follow.
The person with weak Aqeedah in this discussion is the one who can't back up what he is claiming. I have given you evidence so you need to provide evidence for your beliefs.
Moyna Khan if you cannot explain to me or anybody your beliefs with evidence then why should anybody want to follow your particular way of Islam?
It is not an exaggeration that we must go back to what the Prophet (saw) and his companions were upon. This will return the honour of Islam.
Contemplate this.
Abu Salamah, and Abu Huraira narrated:
“The Prophet (saw) said: “My Ummah will face what bani Israel faced step by step, even if one of them approached his mother publicly (sexually) there will be one of my Ummah will approach his mother. The people of Israel divide into divided into 72 sects, my Ummah will divide into 73 sects, all of them are in the hellfire, and one of them is in paradise.” We asked “which one is saved?” the Prophet (saw) said: “the one that is on what Me and my companions are on today.”” [Sunan ibn Majah 3981, Kitab Al Fitan]
The Prophet sallallaahu ‘alayhi wa sallam also said: “The Day of Judgment will not come until my Nation closely imitates the nations before them.” It was asked: “Like the Persians and Romans, Messenger of Allaah?” He sallallaahu ‘alayhi wa sallam replied: “Who are the nations (I could mean) except those?” (Bukhaari).
This Ummah will face the same things the Bani Israel and nations before us faced.
Then look at the last part. Only one group will be saved. That which he (saw) and his companions were upon.
All these narrations are SAHEEH (authentic) as in the Prophet (saw) actually said them.
Moyna Khan
"A servant of your master"
That is shirk.
We are not servants of the Prophet (saw).
The muslims are the servant of Allah, Subhana wa ta'ala
Discussions happen in Hinduism and Buddhism too..... But we don't kill each other.... We don't wage religious wars.... Muslims pl note...if humanity has to survive, then Islam and Christianity have to be discarded .
The important thing here is what Imam Ahmed Raza Khan believed in ........ he is the founder of the so called barelvi sect , so what others believe or Not does not matter. The Barelvi literature would be identified by there founder.
The problem here is people are resulting to mud slinging based on what they have been told. How many people have actually read the original mother books of the Barelvis and Deobandis. The real differences between the two are based on Aqeedah, Issues such as Noori Bashar, Hazar Nazar, Alimul Gayb, Mukhtar e Qul and differences over references found in both their books.
Follow Quran and sunnah.. So you can get salvation, this is what Quran says, instead of arguing little things.
Deobandi and Brelvis are names of people who come from the city Deoband & Brelv, which is in India.
Could Shaykha Hassan Ali discuss about Concept of Biddat in Deobandi and Brelvi Madhab, and Kyfriya Aayat of prominent scholars of Deobandis?
Please come to south africa and speak about this