For all of the great advancements that Space X, ULA, and other companies are coming out with, I still love watching and hearing the raw power of the SRBs and RS25 engines. Yes, they may not be the most modern but even today they are still amazing for the amount of power they generate.
I've always been impressed by the way SRBs burn outwards from a central tunnel through the solid fuel, which keeps the heat away from the containing shell until the last possible moment. Clever!
this isn't true, the explanations in this video is sort of wrong. The grains do burn from the center out, but they also do from each end of the grains. This keeps a relativly constant burning area, thus pretty much constant thrust. It also implies that the interior of the casing is exposed to hot gases from the beginning, that's why it has thorough heat insulation and a good number of seals
This is by far your best work to date. Not only did you incorporate real world footage seamlessly with a 3D model, you also showed the violent jet of flame that resides within the booster during firing. I am in awe, good sir!
He showed an artist’s rendition of the flame inside. It’s unlikely that the flame is anywhere near that shade of orange, the fuel is powdered aluminum and oxidizer and it burns white hot just as you see at the nozzle. It doesn’t suddenly get hotter as it exits because it’s already being fully oxidized inside the rocket
They have a hollow core, with a shape that keeps the surface area that is burning about the same through its burn time. For example, if it was just a hollow tube, as it burns it would get a larger and larger area as the size of the hollow cylinder gets larger. But if you have a cross or star shaped hollow, it stays far more constant. Most modern solid rockets have more complex forms, but you get the idea.
Some simpler ones do burn like a cigarette. That keeps a constant area and therefore constant thrust. One of the major downsides of doing that though is that the centre of mass moves a lot. And if you make it hollow and shape the grain correctly then you can control the thrust profile and the centre of mass. I think it can also be useful for reducing the effect of inconsistencies in the fuel.
Kind of. It doesn't show the form of the propellant grain inside, but it does show the idea of the grain burning away toward the walls of the casing as it goes (notice that the smoke and fire inside is further from the walls at the start of the video than at the end where it's almost touching.) Also, the atmosphere inside is much more homogeneous than the animation shows with big fluffy clouds, which illustrate the motion well visually. It also gets the ignition at the forward end, and a wave of ignition travelling toward the aft end right. I used to test solid rocket motors, so I got an "inside look" that most people don't. :)
Close to being accurate. The top half of the top segment, (where the pyro ignitor is,) has an 11 point star shaped bore, to one, aid in rapid ignition of all fuel grains by quickly producing pressurized hot gas due to the 11 point star bore’s higher surface area, two, to provide more thrust at liftoff than an all cylindrical, or truncated cone, bore would, and three, to burn away quickly leaving a void in the top of the top SRB segment that reduces chamber pressure slightly, and thus thrust, to aid with safe Max-Q transition. Basically an SRB version of throttling, like the RS-25 main engines are done, before Max-Q. The thrust curve looks kind of like a mountain. It rises very quickly, almost straight up and down, to about 2.8 million lbf, it slows building for a short time, topping at around 3.2 million lbf, it starts tailing off some down after 50 seconds to around 2.3 mil lbf, roughly 2/3’s the original thrust, that builds a bit back up to a second peak at 2.55 mil lbf, that then tails off gradually to 1.6 mil lbf, until approaching fuel exhaustion, where it drops downward quickly, and chamber pressure dropout automatically activates the SRB Sep system. This shows a representation of that upper, 11 point star bore, but doesn’t show it burn away quickly, leaving the thrust reducing void. Also the bore gasses would be much brighter, but for an animated demonstration this is just fine. 11 point star issue aside, cool demonstration. For those interested, the SRB propellant is APCP, Ammonium Perchlorate Composite Propellant. It consists of 69.6% (by weight) Ammonium perchlorate (oxidizer,) 16% atomized aluminum powder (primary fuel,) 0.4% black iron oxide (burn rate catalyst, and an opacifier that makes the fuel opaque to infrared heat radiation, that would otherwise overheat the fuel yet to be burned, and cause an explosion,) 12.04% PBAN polybutadiene acrylonitrile (composite binder and secondary fuel,) and finally 1.96% epoxy curing agent.
Sir, the flow field is animation: That's NOT an accurate representation. You don't see the grains and local velocity changes as you advance down the bore. As a way to convey a concept it might be useful but technically incorrect. Me: Ballistician 1982 through 2020 including ICBMs and SLBM to motors that you can hold in your hands. Erosive burning is a propellant burn in response to gas flow - you have know velocity to characterize it. Combustion stability invokes several flow phenomena including vortex shedding. Cavity acoustics also play a part.
Francis Davis I’m aware this is an animated representation, and as I said, it wasn’t accurate. I know they weren’t showing the finer details. Truth be told, this is like an elementary school animation, than a technical one. One person asked how they opened the side of the booster like that? I thought, are ya kidding? I joked and said it’s done with force fields... Anyway, I was just talking about a couple of the things they weren’t showing, is all. As far as the work you did, I bet that was a fascinating, and enjoyable, career. I’m envious. I bet you could tell some interesting stories...
Your animation makes it easy to see that even the SRB gets lighter during launch. As the fuel material is burned away that thing is getting MUCH lighter, making everything accelerate even faster. Wow thank you.
They used an adjustable window, made of corundum and quartz, and protected that with a force field, to allow viewing of the inside of,,,, sorry, can’t keep a straight face,,,, just kidding!! The view inside is CGI, because the bore gasses would be bright as hell if somehow it had been a real look inside, but the exhaust plume is definitely real. Looks odd blasting a hillside instead of streaking a path up into the sky...
Your monkey god didn't create non believe in the almighty that created haven and earth not what U made by your own hands I always wonder ppl call them self scientists and warship what they them self created
Why do people always wants an identity, this is internet a place where people can be whatever they want. He just choose to be that guy that makes awesome rocketry visuals and it doesn't matter if it is and alien because all it is important is the content.
@@calimio6 I was thinkin alien... but you said it. My father ran telemetry in the firing room during Apollo and Skylab and I had a suggestion or two for this genre genius.
Early. Keep up with the high quality visuals. also do you plan on expanding into the aircraft sectors? Will be awesome to see some 3d renders for the X-planes series
@@leosenpai8246 Take look at some reputable science/engineering website. I am not here to explain things. I just point out that this is not an accurate representation of reality. That's the problem these days. People have become lazy and believe everything that is on the Internet...
Check out the youtube channel "smarter every day". His day job is rocket engineer. Or...lt was. He is back in school for his PHD, but still makes videos. The potato gun video with see-through walls will show you how the explosion/ignition actually happens.
Flat earth logic: NASA is doing all these, spending billions of dollars on experiments and CGI to trick them into believing that earth is an oblate spheroid.
This wasn’t made by nasa so you were tricked in believing it was and your being tricked by following flat earth ….there the ones telling you lies not nasa lol
As a solid propellant ballistician I'll tell you this graphic is meaningless. The propellant grains (as in the case of this booster, Titan IV, Ariane 5) evolve gas locally and as that mass is added moving down the port velocity increases. At the head end of the motor gas velocity is zero; stagnation pressure and static pressure is equal. For most of the grain incompressible flow (Bernoulli) is sufficient for the core velocity; compressibility only arises in the latter portion of manner motors and into the nozzle. Combustion stability is a boundary layer effect and the turbulence shown in this picture would not be so dynamic. This is not a CFD simulation but a "pretty" animation. It may convey a concept but it is a poor match for real behavior. ROCSTAR (originally from the University of Illinois, Urbana) was the only code that I know that could give you the properly flow field. Because you don't see the grain represented is why you know it's a graphic interpretation
Well, you sound like you’re great fun at a parties... lol. Peace. Great tech details but I think this was more about pretty CGI than any attempt at simulation.
what is meaningless is your dissertation. This video was meant to provide an entry level representation of the internal workings of an SRB for the layperson. At that it succeeded.
@@akrogames erm... It's the burn process that is completely inaccurate. Any idiot knows that the burn is in the inside, which is why you were able to point it out so quickly. However, nothing about this accurately depicts how a SBR actually burns.
It is how it works. The SRB is a tube with the solid fuel around it. The fuel burns from the inside out with the resulting pressure exiting through the nozzle. When the fuel runs out, the engine shuts down. Duh...
@@arrow-flight But that is literally not how they are built to work, the fuel burns from bottom to top moving up the length of the chamber, not from the inside out. Just watch any other video that is actually about how SRB's work, rather than watching a video that's of a visualisation project. Education over beautification.
@@bluesifer8238 It doesn't. Think of the SRB as a tube with the propellant evenly distributed to the inner wall but not enough to close the tube. The gap in the middle of this propellant is ignited by a pyrotechnic charge which burns evenly throughout the tube and allows the thrust to exit from the bottom. This also enables a significantly larger amount of propellant to be burning at any one time. If they went from the bottom to the top, as you believe, the amount of propellant being used would not be enough to lift the orbiter.
Excellent computer video composite modelling to the real event. Like you replaced a section of the walls and plasticized propellant with a magic forcefield
I never seen anything like this! I grew up around rockets all my life untill I was 17 and went off to war. My father was a designer for AeroJet General in Sacramento (Rancho Cordova) CA and his brother was a chemist for McDonnell Douglas also in the same location he helped to develop the solid rocker fuel in the 60's and 70's. You always could tell they were testing a Saturn motor because we were less than 7 miles from the test stand and in those days there was nothing much more than a lot of nothing between us. I can not count the number of broken windows we had. There was always Cordova Glass in the area replacing glass. Any no one had to pay for it. Guess you could call it a company benefit. Great job on the video, I only wish I could have seen it all the way to the end without them closing the clam doors back up. I would like to have known how much longer the combustion went of after the fuel "ran out"
As a refinement, it would explain the ignition better if you showed the operation of the flame thrower at the top of the booster that sprays flame down the core of the propellant and then, I assume, stops once the main burn is established. Therefore there would be no flame at the reduced diameter top section.
On model rockets sized C and D you can drill a small hole thru the center of the propellant but not out the top. It will give it more initial thrust but cut duration down. Just dont go to far or it will burn thru the to and stage before it completely burns out.
The way you're able to blend the CG and real footage is amazing!!
The real footage and cgi is SEEMLESS
IKR. It's utterly obscene how seamless it is! Even in 4K!
yeah kudos to the animator
Thx for clarification lol was wondering
Then I have a bridge to sell you
*seamless
For all of the great advancements that Space X, ULA, and other companies are coming out with, I still love watching and hearing the raw power of the SRBs and RS25 engines. Yes, they may not be the most modern but even today they are still amazing for the amount of power they generate.
I’m with you. The RS25s are my favorite engine. They just looked great and I love how they look when they fire up.
@@FerociousPancake888Best exhaust plume too!
I've always been impressed by the way SRBs burn outwards from a central tunnel through the solid fuel, which keeps the heat away from the containing shell until the last possible moment. Clever!
@Girl On A Quest Boom
this isn't true, the explanations in this video is sort of wrong. The grains do burn from the center out, but they also do from each end of the grains. This keeps a relativly constant burning area, thus pretty much constant thrust. It also implies that the interior of the casing is exposed to hot gases from the beginning, that's why it has thorough heat insulation and a good number of seals
This is by far your best work to date. Not only did you incorporate real world footage seamlessly with a 3D model, you also showed the violent jet of flame that resides within the booster during firing. I am in awe, good sir!
He showed an artist’s rendition of the flame inside. It’s unlikely that the flame is anywhere near that shade of orange, the fuel is powdered aluminum and oxidizer and it burns white hot just as you see at the nozzle. It doesn’t suddenly get hotter as it exits because it’s already being fully oxidized inside the rocket
@@outerrealm I bet you're fun at parties.
Never knew how solid boosters worked on the inside. I always thought they worked like fireworks, it ignites from the bottom to the top.
Due to being hollow there is more surface area to burn. This means more thrust and shorter burn time for the same mass
They have a hollow core, with a shape that keeps the surface area that is burning about the same through its burn time. For example, if it was just a hollow tube, as it burns it would get a larger and larger area as the size of the hollow cylinder gets larger. But if you have a cross or star shaped hollow, it stays far more constant. Most modern solid rockets have more complex forms, but you get the idea.
Some simpler ones do burn like a cigarette. That keeps a constant area and therefore constant thrust.
One of the major downsides of doing that though is that the centre of mass moves a lot.
And if you make it hollow and shape the grain correctly then you can control the thrust profile and the centre of mass. I think it can also be useful for reducing the effect of inconsistencies in the fuel.
me too. i guess i learned something new today. time for a pat on the back. thanks to the people that replied with the explanation.
The problem with solid rocket boosters is it cant be shutdown
Scott Manley release a video about solid rocket booster at the same day as Hazegrayart?
*PERFECT*
My mom will still put hand in that and will be like: okay, still ain't ready for cooking,
😂😂
Yeah ! I do the same ! :-D
*EWW NOSE FACE but that is a funny joke shailk XDDDD*
Mom: still cold xd
I don't even understand why you bring ur mom here
Say Fred: did you remember to check the O rings?
There's also a very good cgi video that demonstrates challenger sbr accident
They'll have the last laugh knowing they achived more than you will your entire life
@@IOwnThisHandle You know they started out the same as everyone, don't count the chickens before they hatch applies here
@@evanyang1969 do you have a link for that, Netflix documentary has reinvigorated my interest....
@@godlikemike666 ua-cam.com/video/01CfiyP0_7A/v-deo.html
So that's what the inside looks like 😯
Cool
Kind of. It doesn't show the form of the propellant grain inside, but it does show the idea of the grain burning away toward the walls of the casing as it goes (notice that the smoke and fire inside is further from the walls at the start of the video than at the end where it's almost touching.)
Also, the atmosphere inside is much more homogeneous than the animation shows with big fluffy clouds, which illustrate the motion well visually.
It also gets the ignition at the forward end, and a wave of ignition travelling toward the aft end right.
I used to test solid rocket motors, so I got an "inside look" that most people don't. :)
@@saundby You're very right ... I commented on this and no one appreciated that ...
One week before test, Mother rabbit: "This looks like a nice place to raise a family."
Very well done, Haze. The CGI is amazing.
wait its cgi????!!!!
Close to being accurate. The top half of the top segment, (where the pyro ignitor is,) has an 11 point star shaped bore, to one, aid in rapid ignition of all fuel grains by quickly producing pressurized hot gas due to the 11 point star bore’s higher surface area, two, to provide more thrust at liftoff than an all cylindrical, or truncated cone, bore would, and three, to burn away quickly leaving a void in the top of the top SRB segment that reduces chamber pressure slightly, and thus thrust, to aid with safe Max-Q transition. Basically an SRB version of throttling, like the RS-25 main engines are done, before Max-Q. The thrust curve looks kind of like a mountain. It rises very quickly, almost straight up and down, to about 2.8 million lbf, it slows building for a short time, topping at around 3.2 million lbf, it starts tailing off some down after 50 seconds to around 2.3 mil lbf, roughly 2/3’s the original thrust, that builds a bit back up to a second peak at 2.55 mil lbf, that then tails off gradually to 1.6 mil lbf, until approaching fuel exhaustion, where it drops downward quickly, and chamber pressure dropout automatically activates the SRB Sep system. This shows a representation of that upper, 11 point star bore, but doesn’t show it burn away quickly, leaving the thrust reducing void. Also the bore gasses would be much brighter, but for an animated demonstration this is just fine. 11 point star issue aside, cool demonstration.
For those interested, the SRB propellant is APCP, Ammonium Perchlorate Composite Propellant. It consists of 69.6% (by weight) Ammonium perchlorate (oxidizer,) 16% atomized aluminum powder (primary fuel,) 0.4% black iron oxide (burn rate catalyst, and an opacifier that makes the fuel opaque to infrared heat radiation, that would otherwise overheat the fuel yet to be burned, and cause an explosion,) 12.04% PBAN polybutadiene acrylonitrile (composite binder and secondary fuel,) and finally 1.96% epoxy curing agent.
Thanks for details!
Sir, the flow field is animation: That's NOT an accurate representation. You don't see the grains and local velocity changes as you advance down the bore. As a way to convey a concept it might be useful but technically incorrect. Me: Ballistician 1982 through 2020 including ICBMs and SLBM to motors that you can hold in your hands. Erosive burning is a propellant burn in response to gas flow - you have know velocity to characterize it. Combustion stability invokes several flow phenomena including vortex shedding. Cavity acoustics also play a part.
Francis Davis I’m aware this is an animated representation, and as I said, it wasn’t accurate. I know they weren’t showing the finer details. Truth be told, this is like an elementary school animation, than a technical one. One person asked how they opened the side of the booster like that? I thought, are ya kidding? I joked and said it’s done with force fields... Anyway, I was just talking about a couple of the things they weren’t showing, is all. As far as the work you did, I bet that was a fascinating, and enjoyable, career. I’m envious. I bet you could tell some interesting stories...
Yeah, I was hoping for a more clear throttle bucket demonstration.
Your animation makes it easy to see that even the SRB gets lighter during launch. As the fuel material is burned away that thing is getting MUCH lighter, making everything accelerate even faster. Wow thank you.
Less air as it goes higher helps also.
Some of this is real right? Like it isnt all CG? otherwise that smoke plume is amazing
Correct, he edited the main body of the booster, not the exhaust.
Fun fact - the fuel core is a five point star inverted. Like the circle star emblem of the Air Force, where everything 'not a star' is the fuel.
If I'm not mistaken it's a composite, 3D render on top of tracked real footage. Pretty well done too.
They used an adjustable window, made of corundum and quartz, and protected that with a force field, to allow viewing of the inside of,,,, sorry, can’t keep a straight face,,,, just kidding!! The view inside is CGI, because the bore gasses would be bright as hell if somehow it had been a real look inside, but the exhaust plume is definitely real. Looks odd blasting a hillside instead of streaking a path up into the sky...
@@FredtheDorfDorfman1985 From what I've heard of, SRB with vibraniumshells do allow you to look inside. But thats only what I read, might be wrong.
Keep up the good work. Loving these internal visuals.
This editing is magic at this point!
Super universe challenge: Stand at the exhaust region of the rocket booster.
Cool way to die
Yes please do it on ur own🙏😊😉...we are eagerly waitin to see whats goin to happen after that......well maybe ur punk ass cools down ....🤣🤣🤣
@Gray Johnson look brother I'm from rural area of India . And we all rural people use toilets . Come and see .
@Gray Johnson 1500 years ago your forefathers used toilets at that Time ?
Your monkey god didn't create non believe in the almighty that created haven and earth not what U made by your own hands I always wonder ppl call them self scientists and warship what they them self created
We need to know the identity of the man behind the curtain. This Wizard deserves the credit.
Why do people always wants an identity, this is internet a place where people can be whatever they want. He just choose to be that guy that makes awesome rocketry visuals and it doesn't matter if it is and alien because all it is important is the content.
@@calimio6 I was thinkin alien... but you said it. My father ran telemetry in the firing room during Apollo and Skylab and I had a suggestion or two for this genre genius.
Your motion tracking is completely flawless
Wow!! Thats pretty cool!
this is easily the most underrated channel
A suggestion: do the fate of the jettisoned Saturn 5 stages. Nobody ever had images of those, much less videos of them crashing or reentering.
They either splashed down into the atlantic ocean or into either leo or a heliocentric orbit
Also: ua-cam.com/video/-oILApXqPMI/v-deo.html
Why does this man not have 10m subscribers?
because we are a bunch of people worldwide watching rocket technology or astronautics
They didn’t test the engine. They just wanted to turn earth to prevent night from coming
No that was an anti meteorite maneuver!
They were lighting up the barbecue grill
Always wondered how the Earth rotates, You learn something new every Day : )
Great job !...
Bravo to the responsible of the animation...
:-)
From Brussels, with Love...
Perfectly timed with Scott Manley’s video
Very cool! Loved the cutaway view of the internals!
Early. Keep up with the high quality visuals.
also do you plan on expanding into the aircraft sectors? Will be awesome to see some 3d renders for the X-planes series
Mustard has great visuals for planes (and other stuff), not X-planes tho, as far as I remember.
Zucc:Nice job team
My respect for SRB has moved upto next level.
my laptop when I turn it on 0:07
When I click chrome 0:12
Imagine if (like me) you would configure Chrome to launch on system start *and* restore the previous session.
Lmao
That is not laptop that is lapoven
Very cool blend of actual and CGI
It is all about controlling the back pressure. Engineering is awesome 🤘
I give up. I can't tell what's real or CGI on this channel anymore. Awesome job.
Brilliant! But also a little weird when the casing closed up at the end!
1 word? Beautiful.
What am I even looking at?
It looks like mastery over hell.
Nice CG bro
Me : *eat deadly spicy*
Me in bathroom:
Do you fire horizontally ? 😅
😂😂😂
Another satisfying video
I don't think that's an accurate representation of what's going on inside a solid fuel booster.
You are 100% correct my friend.
Then can you explain what's really going on inside the srb
@@leosenpai8246 Take look at some reputable science/engineering website.
I am not here to explain things. I just point out that this is not an accurate representation of reality.
That's the problem these days. People have become lazy and believe everything that is on the Internet...
Check out the youtube channel "smarter every day". His day job is rocket engineer. Or...lt was. He is back in school for his PHD, but still makes videos. The potato gun video with see-through walls will show you how the explosion/ignition actually happens.
@@fgm1197 In *real* science you quote your source.
Editing is pretty good
NASA to EPA " Nothing to see here..."
Awesome animation of the grain burn back!
I would like to cook a sausage on a very long stick.
I wouldn't eat it afterwards.
Your renderings are always amazing. Very informative!
What if it gets launched horizontally and finally leaves the earth tangentially
Only if Donald Trump is re-elected
@@aminr.3775 don't worry ur wish full fill soon.....
All rockets leave earth tangentially
@@IntelTVthey leave radially
Just brilliant!! Well done and thank you!!
Flat earth logic: NASA is doing all these, spending billions of dollars on experiments and CGI to trick them into believing that earth is an oblate spheroid.
Shouldn't you be watching top gear or something!
This wasn’t made by nasa so you were tricked in believing it was and your being tricked by following flat earth ….there the ones telling you lies not nasa lol
Awesome CG! The lighting gave it away and the fire. But still❤️😍
All we need are videos games at that resolution and detail with fully destructible environments, running at 60 FPS!
This is exactly what my S19 bitcoin miner looks like when I overclock it by 1%.
Pretty cool anamation.
As a solid propellant ballistician I'll tell you this graphic is meaningless. The propellant grains (as in the case of this booster, Titan IV, Ariane 5) evolve gas locally and as that mass is added moving down the port velocity increases. At the head end of the motor gas velocity is zero; stagnation pressure and static pressure is equal. For most of the grain incompressible flow (Bernoulli) is sufficient for the core velocity; compressibility only arises in the latter portion of manner motors and into the nozzle. Combustion stability is a boundary layer effect and the turbulence shown in this picture would not be so dynamic. This is not a CFD simulation but a "pretty" animation. It may convey a concept but it is a poor match for real behavior. ROCSTAR (originally from the University of Illinois, Urbana) was the only code that I know that could give you the properly flow field. Because you don't see the grain represented is why you know it's a graphic interpretation
which one is better
nasa's rocket or space x
well, space x is funded by nasa back then
Thank you, that video made no sense, solid rocket boosters don't burn like that inside the boosters
Well, you sound like you’re great fun at a parties... lol. Peace. Great tech details but I think this was more about pretty CGI than any attempt at simulation.
Of ye guna do it, do it right, I'd say
what is meaningless is your dissertation. This video was meant to provide an entry level representation of the internal workings of an SRB for the layperson. At that it succeeded.
Thank you...❤
when you eat taco bell :
Or a great way to flash cook a chicken.
This machine i.e. SRB gives instant feedback, no warming up to get started!
A completly unrealistic, inaccurate and made up image of what actually happens during a solid fuel burn
Yes it burns from the inside first, this video is ridiculous.
Completely ridiculous... The fire is inside. Gosh
@@akrogames erm... It's the burn process that is completely inaccurate. Any idiot knows that the burn is in the inside, which is why you were able to point it out so quickly. However, nothing about this accurately depicts how a SBR actually burns.
@@RCAFTailWind you are true, nut in this video there are not the flame front nor the combustion chamber, so it's not real
@@8971felix can you make a more realistic cgi please. Thanks
Nice vfx editing
Retired physics professor , Not an accurate representation of the actual combustion process!
Sir, On UA-cam... watch
"Spin of indivisible particle"
That's quite clever....well done!
That is NOT how it works. How can you burn solid rocket fuel THROUGH solid rocket fuel?
Duh
Yep but this is 2020 and idiots can't be educated.
It is how it works. The SRB is a tube with the solid fuel around it. The fuel burns from the inside out with the resulting pressure exiting through the nozzle. When the fuel runs out, the engine shuts down. Duh...
@@arrow-flight But that is literally not how they are built to work, the fuel burns from bottom to top moving up the length of the chamber, not from the inside out.
Just watch any other video that is actually about how SRB's work, rather than watching a video that's of a visualisation project.
Education over beautification.
@@bluesifer8238 It doesn't. Think of the SRB as a tube with the propellant evenly distributed to the inner wall but not enough to close the tube. The gap in the middle of this propellant is ignited by a pyrotechnic charge which burns evenly throughout the tube and allows the thrust to exit from the bottom. This also enables a significantly larger amount of propellant to be burning at any one time. If they went from the bottom to the top, as you believe, the amount of propellant being used would not be enough to lift the orbiter.
@@arrow-flight Honestly just stop arguing and educate yourself a little.
science.ksc.nasa.gov/shuttle/technology/sts-newsref/srb.html
Awesome video!!!
🤔🤔🤔
Plot twist : this is actually a demonstration of the strength of the structure and foundation which hold the rocket in place.
Hallo Greta und Luisa das sieht super aus.
The burning effect reminded me of the burning in The Falling Sand flash game
This video should actually get used by NASA to teach things to students ^^
The videos of Hazegrayart I press the button liked before watching it, because I know it is always something fantastic.
That was freaking awesome, more please!
And a great way to stay in shape
Excellent computer video composite modelling to the real event. Like you replaced a section of the walls and plasticized propellant with a magic forcefield
Best CGI I've ever seen 😘
Real
ua-cam.com/video/wbuv01dKEog/v-deo.html
your the best animator hazegrayart
Everyone gangsta until the bolts loosen.
Thanks bro I know now what's happening inside
Strong energy!
very cool
Keep the great work up mate! Wish you were around when I was in hs 30 years ago
Amazing what transparent aluminum can be used for and only be one inch thick!
"Hello computer "...
Hazegrayart: uploaded video about SRB
@Scott Manley : let's upload video about SRB
They should have put together a collab! 😂
I never seen anything like this! I grew up around rockets all my life untill I was 17 and went off to war. My father was a designer for AeroJet General in Sacramento (Rancho Cordova) CA and his brother was a chemist for McDonnell Douglas also in the same location he helped to develop the solid rocker fuel in the 60's and 70's. You always could tell they were testing a Saturn motor because we were less than 7 miles from the test stand and in those days there was nothing much more than a lot of nothing between us. I can not count the number of broken windows we had.
There was always Cordova Glass in the area replacing glass. Any no one had to pay for it. Guess you could call it a company benefit.
Great job on the video, I only wish I could have seen it all the way to the end without them closing the clam doors back up. I would like to have known how much longer the combustion went of after the fuel "ran out"
I thought you could only be deployed at 18?
Oh nice big cutting torchs.
Nice animtion
Animation
i see you are changing earth direction
.
Wow 😳 what a thrust!!!
As a refinement, it would explain the ignition better if you showed the operation of the flame thrower at the top of the booster that sprays flame down the core of the propellant and then, I assume, stops once the main burn is established. Therefore there would be no flame at the reduced diameter top section.
Wow really Kool thank you so much love rocket
Notice how the ground was smoking 50 feet to the left away from the blast...really cool....
Nice CGI there. Well done.
NASA should’ve nicknamed them “ The Big Bang”
Nice graphics
The earth is now rotating faster after this test.
I didn't realise it burnt all the way through at the same time. I thought it started at the bottom
Awesome video.
On model rockets sized C and D you can drill a small hole thru the center of the propellant but not out the top. It will give it more initial thrust but cut duration down. Just dont go to far or it will burn thru the to and stage before it completely burns out.
takes even more force to hold it down
The whole bootster looks like an exhaust pipe!!
I'm truly amazed that there's a mountain left
Brilliant I can't imagine
Interesting and creative