Many inaccuracies in this video. The Saturn IB didn't look like a Saturn V. There's missing the Deltas, Atlas V, Titan II, Juno, Thor, Buran, Vostok, Voskhod, Sputnik, Soyuz capsule, Apollo capsule, Gemini capsule, Mercury capsule, etc. The Atlas V is shown as the Delta Heavy with a white painted core instead of an orange painted core and the Atlas V anyway doesn't have orange painted solid rocket boosters and it doesn't have two large side boosters, Space Shuttles didn't have black painted SRBs, the SLS doesn't have white painted core stages, the Mercury-Redstone and Mercury-Atlas didn't have white painted capsules nor did the Atlas have white painted boosters (they were chrome and turned white from ice before the launch shook the ice off), the N1 rocket didn't have orange painted stages, etc.
Indeed this is flawed. What caught my eye on viewing was the measurement for the shuttle being the orbiter itself, not the entire stack and saturn Ib looking like a miniaturized saturn V.
@@Totallyprogolferкакие ракеты? О чем ты? Илон африканец сделал? Или немец до его, до последнего летали на наших союзах, есть у их! Можете только купить или переманить учёных!
As an aerospace nerd, this video physically hurt to watch. What happened to the Redstone? Why is the Atlas all white, instead of chrome? What happened to the Space Shuttle, and why is Atlantis the only one here? Where are the Buran, Angara, Juno series, Vanguard, Titan series, Ariane series, Thor series, R-7 series, Delta series, and the rest of the Indian SLV series, as well as all the Korean rockets? Why is the Saturn 1B just a squished down Saturn V? What happened to the original Atlas rockets instead of the Atlas 5 Heavy, which never even existed? (And why does it look like that?) Tf is the 'Neytron', and why does it have a huge bulge on the side? Why does the GSLV MLK-3 (now called the LVM-3) have a red interstage, and why are the PSLV's SRBs red? Why is there only one Long March model? Why have the Proton-M and not the Proton-K? Why would you use the F9 Block 5, but not the FH Block 5? Why is the Ares-1 here, but not the Ares V? Why is the Space Launch System titled Artemis 1, which is just the name of the first mission? And why is it white? Why is the New Glenn bigger than the SLS if they're, supposedly, the same height? Where's the rest of the SLS models? Why is the N-1 orange? Why not include the Skylab configuration of the Saturn V? If you have the Grasshopper, why not the Starhopper? If we want to include concepts in this video such as the Ares series and Atlas V Heavy, what about the Sea Dragon, Saturn C-8/Nova and Convair Nexus, which are probably the top three most well-known rocket concepts? I want to go on an even longer rant about some of these, but I doubt the UA-cam comment character limit would even let me finish some of the things I have to say!
Hello i really like your comment because i wasn't sure of the accuracy of this video. I'm new to this topic and would like to know more about it. What sources would you recommend ? Thank you in advance
@@romanvercier3556 Hey, thanks for asking! I really like people like Everyday Astronaut and NASASpaceflight, since they both do a lot of coverage on space news in real life. Another person I really like is Matt Lowne, since he makes a combination of his own things and real rockets. I also do a lot of my own research since I like to animate rockets.
@@bruceli9094 First of all, the size and colours are wrong in practically 30% of the shown vehicles, if not more. Secondly, this information is easily availible online, so not doing it correctly in even 1% of the shown rockets is a mistake, that shouldn't be forgiven.
@@TalentedTwin Wat's the boundry between a rocket and a spaceship? Dragon does have 16 thrusters and can propell itself forward. It has also kind of shape that other rockets have, but is is morbidly obese. In other words, a typical American space 'vehicle'
@@ТакисПроестакис, от Протона-М Россия как раз отказалась. У России сейчас появился более мощный Ангара-А5 с полезной нагрузкой до 37 тонн. Falkon-9 отдыхает. Ангара это как конструктор из которого можно собрать нужную по мощности ракету. Она способна заменить все ракеты. Самая лёгкая Ангара-А1.2 до 3 тонн полезной нагрузки.
The UR-700, UR-900 and R-56 didn’t fly. And Energia-Buran only flew once; with Polyus one more time, so it’s not really that groundbreaking. However, the video portrays most rockets absolutely falsely.
BRO THAT THUMBNAIL just send me rolling on the floor. What in the universe? The space shuttle ranked 3rd, you showed the SATURN V with the german flag? and down there?
@@Noobie_ZACOThe KSLV-1 'NARO' used a Russian RD-151 rocket as the 1st stage propellant. The KSLV-2 'NURI' was developed by its own technology regardless of the Russian rocket. However, it is true that the cooperation of Russian engineers was a valuable foundation in the early days of Korea's space rocket research.
Great idea, less-than-stellar execution. Should compare apples to appels so, first pass, show increasing sizes of actual vehicles without the booster(s), then another pass of the "full stacks". And with each, include the year first launched or used. Keep trying.
I don't care how cool that music sounds. The fact is that all of these countries need to come together and as one human to another respect each other maybe that way we can actually design a ship that can really help us achieve what obviously humanity needs.
это труба... тут информация только для основы. но источники известны... самое интересное как эти источники будут выкручиваться... ахаааа.... изучай т и
@@Вячеслав-н5ю Да да, а ещё американцы не были на Луне, Гагарин в космосе, и Земля вообще круглая. Дереволаз редкостный. Не важно сколько раз он летал, важно что полет был осуществлен и удачно, а причина дальнейшего окончания эксплуатации политическая и экономическая, к самому факту этой рабочей схемы космических полетов не имеющая. Твоя моя понимай, валенок?
@@ДмитрийРокин-ф7б )))) Просто не полный списочек получается! Энергия 80 -100 тонн полезной нагрузки на орбиту закидывала! А ЭНЕРГИя ВУЛКАН 200 Тон ! Не кто еще в мире не выводил за раз 200 тонн полезной нагрузки на околоземную орбиту! А список можно дополнять и дополнять! Сверх тяжёлые ракеты Енисей-5 . Амур-5 Каскад-7кв . Дон.
So many inaccuracies. A lot of the models are wrong. Atlas heavy never existed. Some models have the wrong numbers, like STS was 56,1m tall, not 37,2m. (37,2m is the shuttle orbiter's length) I like the video quality, but please be more accurate. I usually don't downvote a video, but here I have to. Sorry.
@@oliwierkwiatkowski8817 Буран в книге рекордов Гиннесса до сих пор находится. А то, что он летал один раз, не отменяет достижение этой технологической планки. Один раз Буран летал по экономическим соображениям - это сильно дороже, чем ракеты Союз и Протон, и реальных целей для Бурана не было, а вот за ракету Энергия обидно - хорошая ракета получилась.
@@oliwierkwiatkowski8817 и кстати, Энергия-Буран крупнее, чем Space-shuttle: Планеры почти одинаковые, но Бурану нужна более крупная ракета, потому что космодром Байконур дальше от экватора, чем американский космодром.
@@ИльяПашинцев-к4в I never said it’s smaller, just that it didn’t have a big impact on space exploration as it only flew once without a meaningful payload. Polyus didn’t reach orbit at all.
ну россия до сих пор пользуется плодами более развитой ( ушедшей ) страны под названием ссср ) современная россия новых ракет не создавала ) все деньги пустили на робота фёдора )
@@p1caso82 Россия правоприемница СССР, если вы так не считаете то кто по вашему расплатился со всеми долгами Союза? Кто в международном праве является страной приемницей? На ком лежала вся бюрократическая, дипломатическая и правовая работа после развала СССР для закрепления правовых статусов бывших республик? Да и вообще, относительно вашего комментария: вы так пишите как будто весь мир каждый год изобретает что-то абсолютно новое, а не опирается на прошлые наработки. По вашей логике тогда выходит что все страны у которых есть космическая программа пользуются плодами более развитой цивилизации, т.е. СССР, ведь вам известно чьими расчётами до сих пор пользуются для вывода космических кораблей в космос? И на чьих расчётах в принципе строятся и летают ракеты?
Artemis is the name of the program or project. The rocket used is the Space Launch System (SLS) block 1. Artemis' sister is Apollo and she used the Saturn 1B and 5.
@@ApolloKid1961 ive seen it directly called the artimis, maybe boeing wanted to make it look like more of their project by calling the rocket after the program.
El cohete que dice Artemisa 1 no se llama así ese cohete se llama SLS o Sistema de Lanzamiento Espacial (Space Launch System) Artemisa es el programa espacial para retornar a la luna como en los años 60 y 70s con el cohete Saturno V y el programa espacial Apollo. Saludos
Many inaccuracies in this video. The Saturn IB didn't look like a Saturn V. There's missing the Deltas, Atlas V, Titan II, Juno, Thor, Buran, Vostok, Voskhod, Sputnik, Soyuz capsule, Apollo capsule, Gemini capsule, Mercury capsule, etc. The Atlas V is shown as the Delta Heavy with a white painted core instead of an orange painted core and the Atlas V anyway doesn't have orange painted solid rocket boosters and it doesn't have two large side boosters, Space Shuttles didn't have black painted SRBs, the SLS doesn't have white painted core stages, the Mercury-Redstone and Mercury-Atlas didn't have white painted capsules nor did the Atlas have white painted boosters (they were chrome and turned white from ice before the launch shook the ice off), the N1 rocket didn't have orange painted stages, etc.
Btw, Proton-M is russian, Proton-K was soviet
When you are shocked by the quality of the work done by Indians, they have achieved their goals.
@@siroyiryuuwe have bigger rockets in the US buddy
Indeed this is flawed. What caught my eye on viewing was the measurement for the shuttle being the orbiter itself, not the entire stack and saturn Ib looking like a miniaturized saturn V.
@@Totallyprogolferкакие ракеты? О чем ты? Илон африканец сделал? Или немец до его, до последнего летали на наших союзах, есть у их! Можете только купить или переманить учёных!
Genuinely didn't know it was possible to make this many inaccuracies in less than 3.5 minutes...
As an aerospace nerd, this video physically hurt to watch.
What happened to the Redstone? Why is the Atlas all white, instead of chrome? What happened to the Space Shuttle, and why is Atlantis the only one here? Where are the Buran, Angara, Juno series, Vanguard, Titan series, Ariane series, Thor series, R-7 series, Delta series, and the rest of the Indian SLV series, as well as all the Korean rockets? Why is the Saturn 1B just a squished down Saturn V? What happened to the original Atlas rockets instead of the Atlas 5 Heavy, which never even existed? (And why does it look like that?) Tf is the 'Neytron', and why does it have a huge bulge on the side? Why does the GSLV MLK-3 (now called the LVM-3) have a red interstage, and why are the PSLV's SRBs red? Why is there only one Long March model? Why have the Proton-M and not the Proton-K? Why would you use the F9 Block 5, but not the FH Block 5? Why is the Ares-1 here, but not the Ares V? Why is the Space Launch System titled Artemis 1, which is just the name of the first mission? And why is it white? Why is the New Glenn bigger than the SLS if they're, supposedly, the same height? Where's the rest of the SLS models? Why is the N-1 orange? Why not include the Skylab configuration of the Saturn V? If you have the Grasshopper, why not the Starhopper? If we want to include concepts in this video such as the Ares series and Atlas V Heavy, what about the Sea Dragon, Saturn C-8/Nova and Convair Nexus, which are probably the top three most well-known rocket concepts?
I want to go on an even longer rant about some of these, but I doubt the UA-cam comment character limit would even let me finish some of the things I have to say!
I know I cringed so hard watching all the inaccuracies of this video.
Hello i really like your comment because i wasn't sure of the accuracy of this video. I'm new to this topic and would like to know more about it. What sources would you recommend ?
Thank you in advance
@@romanvercier3556 Hey, thanks for asking!
I really like people like Everyday Astronaut and NASASpaceflight, since they both do a lot of coverage on space news in real life. Another person I really like is Matt Lowne, since he makes a combination of his own things and real rockets. I also do a lot of my own research since I like to animate rockets.
one thing also... theres no V2
This video is pain. Ares 1 is too fat on the upper stage.
Thumbnail tactics worked!
I'm Indian
Yeah, same here, but it was Chinese 😐
@@papaariss It was not a clickbait , it was from future. We will build rockets like that one as well .
I'm Swedish and it worked for me too.
Yeah, they know. They know that Indians online are always looking for validation from foreigners, it's kind of a slave mentality.
@@petterbirgersson4489what is the current situation of safety in Sweden . I heard it's the crime capital of Europe
We need to shoot a rocket into space that looks like the statue of liberty.
compared to US and USSR, others’ rockets are like toys
BECUASE this comparison is extremely flawed and doesn’t portray the rockets correctly.
@@oliwierkwiatkowski8817it may not be accurate but lets appreciate that the competition between US and Russia has propelled the space mission.
@@oliwierkwiatkowski8817 the size is 99% accurate. Good enough.
@@bruceli9094 First of all, the size and colours are wrong in practically 30% of the shown vehicles, if not more. Secondly, this information is easily availible online, so not doing it correctly in even 1% of the shown rockets is a mistake, that shouldn't be forgiven.
The Russian N1 never took off. So Russia is just amongst Europe India Japan.
The Explorer 1 representation is only showing the stage 4 configuration. At launch, this sat atop a juno booster, which was 21 meters tall.
The Dragon 2 is not a rocket as well so maybe whoever created this video is showing both spacecraft and rockets, with mostly rockets of course.
@@TalentedTwin Wat's the boundry between a rocket and a spaceship? Dragon does have 16 thrusters and can propell itself forward. It has also kind of shape that other rockets have, but is is morbidly obese. In other words, a typical American space 'vehicle'
@@gert-janbonnema Spacecraft are payloads (satellites, capsules, etc) that were launched into orbit by a rocket.
Loved the music with the video!
Chinese old rocket 20 years ago with a Japanese flag😂😢what a “great” video😅
Never let bro cook again 😤💥🗣️🗣️
Hey, crediting me for the use of my grasshopper 3d model would have been great!
File a report on UA-cam.
Starship is an absolute gigant
Ajoyib kanal ekan 🗽
Click-baited by that Swedish flag 🤣 was like.. we don’t have any crewed vessels..
compared to the rest of the rockets Starship is a behemoth in every metric its an absolute work of art in the making.
Протон, Ангара, Энергия с Бураном?
протон показали
Это их борьба такая...
Битвы выигрывают не солдаты и генералы, а учителя истории. А ещё авторы роликов на Ютубе...
@@vyacheslavyevseyev5235 Обыкновенная пропаганда...
@@ТакисПроестакис, от Протона-М Россия как раз отказалась. У России сейчас появился более мощный Ангара-А5 с полезной нагрузкой до 37 тонн. Falkon-9 отдыхает. Ангара это как конструктор из которого можно собрать нужную по мощности ракету. Она способна заменить все ракеты. Самая лёгкая Ангара-А1.2 до 3 тонн полезной нагрузки.
VERY VERY more rockets))
You're extraordinarily talented, this is beyond belief.
thanks for the amazing animation
Amazing!.. cool graphics 👍🚀
Забыли ракеты Энергия - Буран, УР-700 и УР-900 и Р-56
Не забыли, а не показали для того что бы зрители забыли.
The UR-700, UR-900 and R-56 didn’t fly.
And Energia-Buran only flew once; with Polyus one more time, so it’s not really that groundbreaking.
However, the video portrays most rockets absolutely falsely.
Limited data collection 😂.I made a 3D video too. It is about missile
Energia -Buran 👌🏻
@@oliwierkwiatkowski8817finally someone that knows what there talking about. I died laughing at the “Atlas V heavy” lmfao
Legendary German V2 is missing...
Yeah it’s 😂
and V1
@martinbucher4941 its not a space rocket ,it's cruise
V1 TOO
@@kaiserwhence2468 they are space rockets but not used for this purpose
That N-1 rocket is something
Bro where is the saturn V rocket 😢?
Где Энергия-Протон, Ангара?
😅
It would be great if you could find the mass at lift off for each rocket too
Bro casually fooled us by having indian flag on another rocket
Не люблю цензуру. Этот канал исключён из списка моих рекомендаций. А раньше и смотрел и подписан был. :(
then you should remove screwyoutube, which does the most censoring anywhere
Видел как американский батут приземлился?😂
Fantastic Great video 🪐
*LOVE YOU INDIA* 🙏✌😎🇮🇳
Why?
I'm traumatised by the amount of inaccuracies.
BRO THAT THUMBNAIL just send me rolling on the floor. What in the universe? The space shuttle ranked 3rd, you showed the SATURN V with the german flag? and down there?
Korea : NURI - 47.2 m
It's a shame that NURI, one of the most recently developed rockets, is missing from the video....😢
I agree
It was a Russian rocket, wasn't it?
@@Noobie_ZACOThe KSLV-1 'NARO' used a Russian RD-151 rocket as the 1st stage propellant. The KSLV-2 'NURI' was developed by its own technology regardless of the Russian rocket. However, it is true that the cooperation of Russian engineers was a valuable foundation in the early days of Korea's space rocket research.
Gravity the best 🗿
That one after the dragon trying to tempt me into relapsing...😂
new idea:
animation vs computing/programming
Great idea, less-than-stellar execution. Should compare apples to appels so, first pass, show increasing sizes of actual vehicles without the booster(s), then another pass of the "full stacks". And with each, include the year first launched or used. Keep trying.
Could you build a rocket 🚀
Starship V3 is proposed to be 150m.
America space renaissance ftw. You all know it. Look at all the companies vying vs PRC.
Explorer 1 was a satellite, not a rocket. It was launched by a Juno I rocket, which was 21.2 meters tall.
I don't care how cool that music sounds. The fact is that all of these countries need to come together and as one human to another respect each other maybe that way we can actually design a ship that can really help us achieve what obviously humanity needs.
It is very good that all countries build space missiles instead of war missiles. If they build space missiles, they will progress
I love my india 🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳
Kon ho tum har jagah tapak padti ho tumse me bada pareshan hu 🤦♂️🤦♂️🫵
@@2k_20😂😂
You guys need to clean your rivers and stop polluting
Why?
😂😂😂
Привет всем 🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺
❤大家好🇨🇳
Hola a todos
Hola a todos
Garbage russian junk
And they caught it with chopsticks. Insane.
Россия намеренно игнорируется и искажаются факты. А где Российская ракета "Ангара"???
Да и "Буран" с *Энергией" заслуживает показа.
это труба... тут информация только для основы. но источники известны... самое интересное как эти источники будут выкручиваться... ахаааа.... изучай т и
Н-1 показали а энергию с бураном нет, зато амеров кучу ракет которые не летали показали!
Yeah this video is full of mistakes
Российского НЕТУУ, есть советское.
А где энергия-буран
Он практически не летал
@@Вячеслав-н5ю Да да, а ещё американцы не были на Луне, Гагарин в космосе, и Земля вообще круглая. Дереволаз редкостный. Не важно сколько раз он летал, важно что полет был осуществлен и удачно, а причина дальнейшего окончания эксплуатации политическая и экономическая, к самому факту этой рабочей схемы космических полетов не имеющая. Твоя моя понимай, валенок?
Where are years of production or first flight?
Энергия ! Ангара ?
Ага, вы им еще скажите что русские их десять лет на МКС на своих ракетах возили...
@@ДмитрийРокин-ф7б )))) Просто не полный списочек получается! Энергия 80 -100 тонн полезной нагрузки на орбиту закидывала! А ЭНЕРГИя ВУЛКАН 200 Тон ! Не кто еще в мире не выводил за раз 200 тонн полезной нагрузки на околоземную орбиту! А список можно дополнять и дополнять! Сверх тяжёлые ракеты Енисей-5 . Амур-5 Каскад-7кв . Дон.
@@alekseysa3887 Энергия-Вулкан ни когда не летала клоун и в металле не была
@@musicfans5304 ГУГЛ В ПОМОЩЬ
Вам удалось меня удивить ракетой Soyuz FG. Я с детства интересуюсь космической тематикой, но никогда о такой ракете не слышал.
Meteor 2H ❤️🥰🇵🇱
А где же Ангара? 2 запуска было...
Ангара? Она утонула)
@@kirillperov3843 у дурачка-русофоба подгорело.
@@kirillperov3843 Утонул ты, дереволаз, в море своей желчи и беспомощности)
Remember the swedish spaceplane in the thumbnail? I remember
So many inaccuracies. A lot of the models are wrong. Atlas heavy never existed. Some models have the wrong numbers, like STS was 56,1m tall, not 37,2m. (37,2m is the shuttle orbiter's length)
I like the video quality, but please be more accurate. I usually don't downvote a video, but here I have to. Sorry.
Por que no mostraron cohetes de Rusia, china y Corea del Norte????
Был Китай и СССР.
Потому-то за это можно получить бан!
Ракеты - Энергия. Ангара.
А где Энергия-Буран?
Energia-Buran only flew once and while it’s a shame it’s missing, it’s not a major rocket.
@@oliwierkwiatkowski8817 Буран в книге рекордов Гиннесса до сих пор находится. А то, что он летал один раз, не отменяет достижение этой технологической планки. Один раз Буран летал по экономическим соображениям - это сильно дороже, чем ракеты Союз и Протон, и реальных целей для Бурана не было, а вот за ракету Энергия обидно - хорошая ракета получилась.
@@oliwierkwiatkowski8817 и кстати, Энергия-Буран крупнее, чем Space-shuttle:
Планеры почти одинаковые, но Бурану нужна более крупная ракета, потому что космодром Байконур дальше от экватора, чем американский космодром.
@@ИльяПашинцев-к4в I never said it’s smaller, just that it didn’t have a big impact on space exploration as it only flew once without a meaningful payload.
Polyus didn’t reach orbit at all.
@@oliwierkwiatkowski8817 Полюс не вышел на орбиту из-за ошибки в самом спутнике Полюс, ракета Энергия отработала штатно.
The Atlas V Heavy never flew; it was only a concept.
Thumbnail is misleading because India is not in second place. 🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳
Insane that spacex is like 10 years ahead of everyone else
Starship💪
0:05 Poland CAN into space 🤣🤣🤣
USA 💪
with Russian engines
@@the_jestro only us rocket with russian engines is atlas-5, and that rocket is being phased out, they are not selling new launches, so no.
А Россия намеренно игнорируется. Будто и нет ее. Хотя мы космическая держава
Какая интересно высота у нынешних российских ракет?
ну россия до сих пор пользуется плодами более развитой ( ушедшей ) страны под названием ссср ) современная россия новых ракет не создавала ) все деньги пустили на робота фёдора )
@@p1caso82 Россия правоприемница СССР, если вы так не считаете то кто по вашему расплатился со всеми долгами Союза? Кто в международном праве является страной приемницей? На ком лежала вся бюрократическая, дипломатическая и правовая работа после развала СССР для закрепления правовых статусов бывших республик?
Да и вообще, относительно вашего комментария: вы так пишите как будто весь мир каждый год изобретает что-то абсолютно новое, а не опирается на прошлые наработки. По вашей логике тогда выходит что все страны у которых есть космическая программа пользуются плодами более развитой цивилизации, т.е. СССР, ведь вам известно чьими расчётами до сих пор пользуются для вывода космических кораблей в космос? И на чьих расчётах в принципе строятся и летают ракеты?
Да мир еще с тем что мы при союзе создали, справится не может.
Советские только вижу
I love usa
Would have been cool to see the year under each one.
what the fuck is the thumbnail lmaoo
Great video. You should show extended Superheavy, and australian solid fuel sounding rockets as well.
Next Video Military world ranking
Even spaceX Falcon 9 proton type Grasshopper is bigger than other operational Rocket.
😊😊😊❤😊❤😊❤😊❤😊❤😊❤😊❤😊😊❤ very good video
Шаттл и Буран с Энергией должны стоял рядом 💪💪💪
What the hell with Saturn 1b 😅, it mustn't look like Saturn 5.
Good video!
Is no one gonna mention the first rocket.
Is LITERALLY the probe itself?!?
Grasshopper was a lot bigger than I imagined.
Better to add what each rocket has achieved up to now :)
India🇮🇳
Oh yeah, the world renown Swedish space program LUL
1:21 Neytron my beloved
so cool theres a proton, electron rocket and soon a neutron rocket
EUA: " GOSTO ASSIM AMOSTRADIN "
What software is used to make this?
Where is the Sky Tree (Japan 634m)
that's a building
So much stuff you got wrong in this lol.
ikr...😅😅
Товарищу Киму только не показываете, а то он впасть не будет 🤣
"Kslv 2 nuri has left the game"
Unless you are going to spiral out so you can see the starter rockets in the middle, this kind of defeats the purpose
One ❤
So... Dragon from capsule is now a rocket? Didn't know that
It has rocket motors for emergency escape.
9.5 Denmark With Luncher Sistem 95 Count
statue of liberty is a rocket 😱😱😱😱
Just the elevator hahaa
Watkin's Tower. Tour Eiffel
Советские технологии до сих пор актуальны! А что было бы, если б Союз не развалили? Мы на Марсе яблоки собирали.
Falcón heavy is my favirote rocket
Ez igen!
Ah yes.
**ARTEMIS 1**, the best rocket ever
Artemis is the name of the program or project. The rocket used is the Space Launch System (SLS) block 1.
Artemis' sister is Apollo and she used the Saturn 1B and 5.
@@ApolloKid1961 this is what i mean. It is NOT a rocket but a program and the rocket should be SLS
@@ApolloKid1961 ive seen it directly called the artimis, maybe boeing wanted to make it look like more of their project by calling the rocket after the program.
❤❤❤❤🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺😊
Ooh Elon it's so big !
А где Российский "Ангара"?
Whats about the Miura from spain? 🇪🇦
I am from India 🇮🇳 Abdul Kalaam is salaam 🙏 Jay Hind 🚩
Bruh. 😑😑
El cohete que dice Artemisa 1 no se llama así ese cohete se llama SLS o Sistema de Lanzamiento Espacial (Space Launch System) Artemisa es el programa espacial para retornar a la luna como en los años 60 y 70s con el cohete Saturno V y el programa espacial Apollo.
Saludos